Questions and Replies

Reply:

 

1. The National Education Infrastructure Management System (NEIMS) database indicates the assessment history of the schools as follows:

• An assessment was conducted on 08 April 2006, 20 September 2006 and 08 April 2014;
• The last assessment was conducted in July 2018, as part of the capacity audits determination for feeder zones.
• It must be noted that visual assessments were also conducted by the school and during the school readiness visits that occur on a quarterly basis.

2. Yes, the inspections have taken place in line with the education sector prescripts.

3. There are various prescripts for inspections in the education sector. These inspections vary and they include but are not limited to the following:

• School-Readiness Quarterly Assessments;
• Emergency Maintenance queries and complaints (inspections are done by works inspectors to ascertain the level of damage and the cost implication thereof);
• Assessments done by professional service providers, once schools have been identified to undergo major capital rehabilitation to define the scope and extent of the works;
• As part of the school capacity audits, assessments were done to look at the high level of infrastructure;
• Research Assessments done by education stakeholders (e.g.) Equal Education and Section 27;
• Visual inspections are done by principals of schools;
• Provincial Legislature oversight committees conducting monitoring assessments; and
• Condition assessments done by Department of Basic Education and the custodian Department (GDID) to update the NEIMS database.

4. All claims against the Department will be processed in accordance with Section 60 of the South African Schools Act, 84 of 1996, in line with the liability.

Reply:

(a)(i)&(b)The Department of Small Business Development (DSBD)

(a)(i) The DSBD did not advertise any tenders for the 2018/2019 and therefore no briefing sessions were held

(b) The Department did not have any briefing session and it must be noted that briefing session can no longer be made compulsory but rather suppliers would be encouraged to attend the briefing session.

(a)(ii)&(b) The Small Enterprise Development Agency (Seda)

No	Tender Number	Description	Compulsory / Non-compulsory
1.	RFP/T 01-2018/19	Invitation to tender for provision of Security Services at Seda National Office for eighteen (18) months period.	Compulsory
2.	RFP/T 06-2018/19	Invitation to tender for Rental Office Space for Seda’s JTG Northern Cape Branch Office in Kuruman for a period of three (3) and five (5) years	Compulsory
3.	RFP/T 08-2018/19	Appointment of a Service Provider to provide an Internal Audit Services on a co-sourced basis for a period of three (3) years	Compulsory

(a)(ii)&(b) The Small Enterprise Finance Agency (sefa)

No	Tender Number	Description	Compulsory / Non-compulsory
1.	Sefa: 19/DSBD/2018	Appointment of Service Provider to conduct the 2018 Annual Review on SMME and Co-operatives in South Africa (DSBD)	Non-compulsory
2.	Sefa: 11/FIN/2017	Appointment of Service Provider for Construction Work to reinstate the 1st floor shops and roof refurbishing at the Victoria Street Market located at 151/155 Bertha Mkhize Road, Durban, KZN	Compulsory
3.	Sefa: 17/FIN/2017	Appointment of a Service Provider for Public Sector Invoice Discounting	Compulsory

Reply:

a) Readiness in terms of budget

The plan will be operationalised starting 2019 with a preparatory phase, followed by three roll out phases focusing on the provision of gadgets with pre-loaded content including, but not limited to, the Department of Basic Education (DBE) Workbooks. The three phases target firstly learners in multi-grade and rural farm schools secondly learners in quintile 1 to 3 schools, and lastly learners in quintile 4 and 5 schools. The source of funds for the rolling out of tablets to all schools will utilise money previously allocated to the following:

1. Printing of Workbooks and textbooks since workbooks and textbooks are being digitised and will be pre-loaded into gadgets. Currently the workbooks are printed for a single use. Through converting the books to a downloadable, interactive electronic format, the longevity of the books would be increased as they could be used multiple times. In addition, loading workbooks onto electronic gadgets would have the added benefit of decreasing the dating and marking workload for teachers (as this could be done electronically) and minor edits could be made to the electronic versions without having to reprint and distribute, which would be much more cost effective than re-printing and distributing the books annually.
2. Grant money (e.g Operation Phakisa, Maths Science and Technology (MST) School Funding and other grants) will also be used for this purpose.
3. Money will also be drawn from the Provincial Education Equitable share funding to fund the plan.
4. The Private Sector will also be approached to beef up any short fall.

b) Readiness in terms of teacher training.

The DBE is on a trajectory towards the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) and recognises that it is crucial to onboard key stakeholders like teacher unions, and to provide effective change management, training and support, not only to teachers but also for subject advisors and curriculum developers. Since 2005 province wide programmes on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) integration training for both teachers and subject advisors have been running. Training is classified into three levels: Basic Skills, Intermediate Skills and Advanced Skills. In some provinces such as Gauteng where there has been a rollout of SMART boards in the classroom, subject advisors and coordinators were trained on the use of interactive boards and tablets. In October 2016 the Directorate Curriculum Innovation and e-Learning had already developed three online platforms to train teachers on the use of technology to deliver the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) curriculum. The three platforms are:

1. The DBE MOODLE PLATFORM available at : https://dbemoodle.dedicated.co.za, the platform is a Learning Management System (LMS) (paperless) to deliver lessons with daily content and self marking learner classroom activities that are CAPS compliant. Hence saving time and hard work for teachers. The platform is for classroom utalisation with a teachers laptop and learner gadget to run an LMS.

2. DBE Cloud available at: http://www.dbecloud.org.za/lms/dbe/, the platform aggregate content and make it available online for parents, learners, teachers, subject advisors, subject coordinators and subject specialists.

3. Thutong Portal available at: http://www.thutong.doe.gov.za/, the platform is an online learning space managed by subject specialists at the DBE.

Training of teachers, subject advisers, subject coordinators and subject specialists at the DBE is ongoing, utilising the three platforms to integrate ICTs into teaching and learning. These trainings are coordinated and guided by the Professional Development Framework for Digital Learning which was approved by Council of Education ministers (CEM) in September 2017.

c) Readiness in terms of provision of security at school.

There is readiness in terms of security at school, conceptualised based on the categories as indicated below:

Computer Labs

Schools have to comply to very stringent security measures before a computer lab can be installed in that school. This will include among others the visibility of the lab to the surrounding community so that the community can report on matters that may put the security of the lab at risk. This go hand in hand with allowing communities to co-own these labs with schools so that communities can also benefit in using these labs. The specifications also include that the labs must be in the first floor to avoid roof entry, they must have safe iron doors and there should be only small horizontal windows with strong burglar bars to prevent entry. Other security measures include a dedicated alarm system, strict management protocols by schools regarding access to the lab and keys control.

Classroom tablets / cellphones

Suppliers of Classroom tablets/cellphones are required to adhere to strict supply specifications in terms of security of these gadgets. These include that these gadgets must be a trolley that is secured and can be locked while in the classroom. The trolley should have wheels to ensure that after use the gadgets can be transported from the classroom for safe keeping in the school safe made of brick and with an iron door. There should be a strict protocol approved by district and provinces from the school regarding the issuing and collection of these gadgets after lessons.

Take home gadgets

In other provinces such as Gauteng learners and teachers are allowed to take these gadgets home to keep them secured. In the next gadget delivery to teachers and learners, the DBE plans to design gadgets that are community unfriendly and only friendly for educational use only, without compromising the quality of the gadget.

Reply:

a) The average processing time for the consideration and approval of firearm competency certificates is 90 working days.

b) On 11 March 2019, a total of 6 190 competency applications had exceeded the target of 90 working days.

c) The reasons for the backlog, range from outstanding illicit reports from the Criminal Record Centre and system challenges, such as the slowness of the system.

 

 

Reply to question 616 recommended/

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date: !!" ” ' '

Reply to question 616 approved

Reply:

A total of four vehicles were procured for the office of the Ministry of Police during the 2017/2018 financial year:

(a)(b)(c) and (d) The details are as follows:

Number of vehicles	a) Make	b) Model	c) Total price	d) Date
4	BMW	30d	R3 528 025,00	2018-03-20

(i) and (ii) The four vehicles, as reflected in the table above, were purchased for the current Minister of Police and the current Deputy Minister of Police.

(aa)(aaa) In 2016/2017, no vehicles were purchased for the Minister or the Deputy Minister of Police.

(aa)(bbb) In 2017/2018, four vehicles were purchased, as reflected in the table above.

(bb) Since 1 April 2018, no vehicles were purchased for the Minister or the Deputy Minister of Police.

 

 

 

Reply to question 710 recommended/

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Reply to question 710 approved/ pp o ed

MINISTE OF POLICE BH CELE, MP

Date: .

Reply:

The abovementioned case is belng investigated by the Pretoria Serious Commercial Crime Unit. Certain warning statements and witness statements are being sought by the investigating officer.

 

 

Reply to question 584 recommended/

CO

LE (SOEG)

GENERAL NER: TH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Reply to question 584 appro\/9d

Reply:

(1)(a) On 6 March 2019, the case was taken to the Senior Public Prosecutor (SPP) for a decision.

(1)(b) In the interest of the case being investigated without fear or favour, the particulars of the investigating officer cannot be divulged.

(2) On 15 July 2014, the suspect was arrested and the case was taken to court for the first appearance. On 28 August 2014, the court requested that the complainant and the accused was to appear for mediation, as it was a common assault case. The complainant refused, stating that he wanted to be compensated.

On 7 November 2014, the matter was withdrawn by the SPP. The case was closed and filed. The complainant was informed and was dissatisfied with the SPP's decision.

On 22 July 2015, the docket was reopened on request of the complainant. On 21 October 2015, the complainant met with the Station Commander and the Detective Branch Commander, after which the case was closed.

On 2 December 2015, the case was reopened. On 3 February 2016, the complainant met with the SPP, where the complainant informed the SPP that

there was a witness to the assault, thereby resulting in a witness statement being taken. The case docket was taken to the SPP for a decision. The case was withdrawn again and filed at the police station.

On 26 July 2018, the case was reopened and sent to the Independent Police Investigative Directorate {lPlD), as the complainant was still dissatisfied. The docket was then sent to the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) and a decision was made to issue a summons against the accused. On 28 November 2018, the case was before the court and remanded to 13 December 2018. On 13 December 2018, the case was again remanded to 21

January 2019.

On 30 January 2019, the accused passed away. The death certificate was obtained and the docket is currently with the SPP, at the Germiston Magistrate’s Court, for a decision.

 

 

Reply to question 570 recommended d

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date: /§]g -t3- 2 f

Reply to question 570 appro\lead

MINISTE F POLICE BH CELE, M

Reply:

The South African below.

(a)(i) To date, a total of 32 members of the Senior Management Service (SMS) in the SAPS, have criminal records against their names. The Head of the SAPS does not have a criminal conviction against his name.

(a)(ii) The SAPS is not in a position to provide this information.

(b)(i)(aa) and (bb) The SAPS is not in a position to provide the information, since it contains personal information, relating to the members concerned and the disclosure will constitute an unreasonable violation of the priVacy of the members concerned.

(b)(ii) The convictions relate to the following matters:

Three members have offences related to the contravention of the “Arms and Ammunition Act and the Firearms Control Act".

A total of 19 members have offences related to the contravention of road traffic legislation.

One member has an offence related to the contravention of liquor legislation, over and above the traffic offence.

Three members have offences related to the contravention of internal security legislation.

Seven members have common law related offences, namely; fraud, public Violence, contempt of court, malicious damage to property and assault respectively.

 

Reply to question 196 recommended/

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date:

Reply to question 196 approved/

Reply:

In response to the question asked by the Honourable Member, my Department provided the following information:

2016/17:

A Mercedes Benz, C250 Avant-garde was purchased for the current Deputy Minister and its cost price was R506 060.58.

2017-2018:

A Mercedes Benz, E250 Avant-garde was purchased for the former Deputy Minister and its cost price was R771 570.99.

2018/19:

A Mercedes Benz, GLE 350 d – 2018 was purchased for the newly appointed Deputy Minister and its cost price was R 1 157 015.19.

During the past three financial years, no car was purchased for former Minister or the current Minister.

Reply:

NW880E

Province	Number of children who were killed at schools in 2018
Eastern Cape Free Sate	0   0
Gauteng	0
KwaZulu-Natal	9
Limpopo	3
Mpumalanga	3
North West	4
Northern Cape	1
Western Cape	2
Total	22

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date: §§{g -0 - g

Reply to question 757 recommended/cat o ended

MINISTER POLICE BH CELE, M

Reply:

a) A total of 2 677 security companies are registered with the Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA), with 102 943 firearms registered on the Central Firearm Register (CFR) database.

Province	Number of Security Companies	Number of Firearms
Eastern Cape	168	2 823
Free State	50	517
Gauteng KwaZulu-Natal	909 499	64 305 17 676
Limpopo	649	11 172
Mpumalanga	126	2 193
North West	93	1 607
Northern Cape	20	135
Western Cape	163	2 515
Total	2 677	102 943

(b) There are no security companies registered at a national level.

 

 

Reply to question 653 recommended/

TI L C

OLE (SOEG)

Date: ygjj .gj. gy

GENERAL H AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Reply to question 653 approved/natapprove&

MINIST OF POLICE BH CELE, MP

Date.' D

Reply:

To date, a total of 4 174 members of the South African Police Service (SAPS) haVe criminal records against their names, per national division and province, as indicated in the table below.

The SAPS is not in a position to provide the information, since it contains personal information, relating to the members concerned and the disclosure will constitute an unreasonable violation of the privacy of the members concerned.

(a) and (b)

The Directorate of Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI): A total of 17 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Legislation	51.52%
Assault	15.15%
Fraud	12.12%
Malicious Damage to Property	6.06%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	6.06%
Contravention of the South African Police Service (SAPS) Act	3.03%
Attempted murder	3.03%
Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	3.03%
Total	100.00°/«

Management Intervention: Two members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of The Firearms Control Act	50.00%
Contravention of The Arms And Ammunition Act	50.00%
Total	100.00%

Find here: Division: Operational Response Services: A total of 66 members have offences against their names.

Division: Operational Response Services: A tota1 of 66 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	63.95%
Assault	12.79%
Theft	6.98%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	2.33%
Contravention of the Arms And Ammunition Act	2.33%
Defeating the Course of Justice	2.33%
Culpable Homicide	1.16%
Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	1.16%
Contravention of the Local Authorities Act	1.16%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	1.16%
Theft (Other)	1.16%
Contravention of the Explosives Act	1.16°/
Contravention of the Act on Films And Publicatlons	1.16%
Contravention of the Diamonds Act	1.16%
Total	100.00°/«

Division: Visible Policing: A total of 69 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contraventlon of the Road Traffic Act	53.26%
Assault	16.30%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	6.52%
Theft	4.35%
Crimen lnjuria	2.17%
Fraud	2.17%
Contravention of the Magistrates Courts Act	1.09%
Contravention of the Corruption Act	1.09%
Murder	1.09%
Defeating the Course of Justice	1.09%
Contraventlon of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences And Related Matters) Amendment Act	1.09%
Contraventlon of the Flrearms Control Act	1.09%
Malicious Damage to Property	1.09%
Contravention of the Act on Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths	1.09%
OWence unknown	1.09%
Contravention of the Intimidation Act	1.09%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	1.09%
Kidnapping	1.09%
Culpable Homicide	1.09%

Division: Crime Intelligence: A total of 34 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	64.29%
Assault	11.90%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	9.52%
Malicious Damage to Property	4.76%
Extortion (Under the Common Law or Statutory Law)	2.38%
Theft	2,38%
Contravention of the Act on Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	2.38’/»
Culpable Homicide	2.38%
Total	100.00°/•

Division: Detective Service: A total of five members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	83.33%
Assault	16.67%
Total	100.00%

Division: Personnel Management: A total of five members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contraventlon of the Road Traffic Act	83.33%
Culpable Homicide	16.67%
Total	100.00%

Division: Human Resource Utilisation: One member has an offence against his/her name,

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	100.00%
Total	100.00%

Division: Human Resource Development: A total of 36 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	54.55°%
Assault	15.91%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	15.91%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	4.55%

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Sexual Offences Act	2.27%
Theft	2.27%
Contravention of the Explosives Act	2.27%
Nature Conservation	2.27%
Total	100.00°/>

Division: Finance and Administration: One member has an offence against his/her name.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Arms And Ammunition Act	100.00%
Total	100.00°/

Division: Supply Chain Management: A total of 20 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	66.67%
Crimen lnjuria	4.17%
Contravention of the Sexual Offences Act	4.17%
Culpable Homicide	4.17%
Malicious Damage to Property	4.17%
Defeating the Course of Justice	4.17%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	4.17%
Fraud	4.17%
Contravention of the Liquor Act	4.17%
Total	100.00%

Division: Protection and Security Services: A total of 78 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	45.69%
Assault	14.66%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	12.07%
Theft	6.03%
High Treason	4.31%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	2.59%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	1.72%
Contravention of the Internal Security Act	1.72%
Contempt of Gourt	1.72%
Robbery	0,86%
Contravention of the Riotous Assemblies Act	0.86%
Contravention of the Trespass Act	0.86%

 

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Demonstrations in or Near Court Buildings Prohibition Act	0.86%
Attempted Murder	0.86%
Murder	0.86%
Culpable Homicide	0.86%
Publlc Violence	0.86%
Rape	0.86%
Malicious Damage to Property	0.86%
Contravention of the Intimidation Act	0.86%
Total	100.00°/

Division: Forensic Services: A total of 14 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	50.00%
Fraud	16.67%
Culpable Homicide	16.67%
Assault	5.56%
Contravention of the Act on Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths	5.56%
Malicious Damage to Property	5.56%
Total	100.00°/«

Western Cape Province: A total of 360 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contraventlon of the Road Traffic Act	54.53%
Assault	17.94%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	7.49%
Crimen lnjuria	2.26%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	1.74°/
Malicious Oamage to Property	1.57%
Theft	1.39%
Defeating the Course of Justice	1.39%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	1.22%
Culpable Homlcide	1.22%
Contravention of the Sexual Offences Act	0.87%
Fraud	0.87%
Housebreaking	0.70%
Contravention of the Internal Security Act	0.52%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	0.52%
Indecent Assault	0.35%
Perjury	0.35%
Contravention of the Act on Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths	0.35%

 

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the General Law Amendment Act	0.35%
Rape	0.35%
Contravention of The Criminal Procedure Act	0.35%
Abuse of Dependence-produclng Substances and Rehabilitation centre	0.35%
Kidnapping	0.35%
Theft (Other)	0.35%
Contravention of the Act on Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	0.35%
Contravention of the Local Authorities Act	0.35%
Contravention of the Abortion and Sterilisation Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Corruption Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Trespass Act	0.17%
Contravention of the South African Police Service Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Liquor Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Intimidation Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Business Act	0.17%
Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Makers) Amendment Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Usury Act	0.17%
Robbery	0.17%
Breach of Peace	0.17%
Total	100.00%

Eastern Cape Province: A total of 614 members have offences against their names.

OWence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	54.20%
Assault	16.99°/
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	9.05%
Fraud	2.95%
Theft	2,59%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	1.57%
Culpable Homicide	1.57%
Defeating the Course of Justice	1.29%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	1.20%
Malicious Damage to Property	1.20°/
Crimen lnjuria	1.11%
Contravention of the South Afncan Police Service (SAPS) Act	0.83%
Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	0.46%
Contravention of the Act on Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	0.37%
Attempted Murder	0.28%
Perjury	0.28%
Abuse of Dependence-producing Substances and Rehabilitation centre	0.28%
Contravention of the Griminal Law (Sexual OWences And Related Matters) Amendment Act	0.28%
Housebreaking	0,28%
Public Violence	0.18%

7

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act	0,18%
Murder	0,18%
Contravention of the Defence Act	0.18%
Contravention of the Prevention Of Corruption Act	0.18%
Contravention of the Liquor Act	0.18%
Contravention of the Local Authorities Act	0.18%
Nature Conservation	0.18%
Bribery	0.09%
Robbery	0.09%
Contravention of the Marine Livinq Resources Act	0.09%
Theft (Other)	0.09%
Contravention of the Sexual Offences Act	0.09%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	Ooe%
Contravention of the Public Safety Act	0.09%
Contravention of the General Law Amendment Act	0.09%
Bigamy	0.09%
Extortion (Under the Common Law or Statutory Law)	0.09%
Contravention of the Sea Fishery Act	0.09%
Contravention of the Act on Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths	0.09%
Contravention of the Medicine Act	0.09%
Contraventlon of the Usury Act	0.09%
Offence Unknown	0.09%
Theft of Livestock and Related Matters	0.09%
Indecent Assault	0.09%
Abduction	0.09%
Kidnapip	0.09%
Total	100.00°/

Northern Cape Province: A total of 156 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	61.54%
Assault	16.92%
Contravention of the Arms And Ammunition Act	7.69°/»
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	2,69%
Fraud	2.69%
Defeating the Course of Justice	1.54%
Culpable Homicide	1.15%
Contravention of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act	0.77%
Crimen lnjuria	0.77%
Attempted Murder	0.38%
Malicious Damage to Property	0.38%
Contravention of the Magistrates Courts Act	0.38%

 

OWence	Percentage
Contravention of the Sexual Offences Act	0.38°/
OWence Unknown	0.38%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	0.38%
Theft	0.38%
Contravention of the Indecent or Obscene Photographic Matters Act	0.38%
_Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	0.38%
Contravention of the General Law Amendment Act	0.38%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	0.38%
Total	100.00°/«

Free State Province: A total of 417 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	46.31%
Assault	22.43%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	10.27%
Theft	2.46%
Fraud	2.17%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	2.03%
Defeating the Course of Justice	2.03%
Malicious Damaqe to Property	1.59%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	1.30%
Culpable Homicide	1.30%
Crimen lnjuria	0.87%
Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	0.72%
Contravention of the Local Authorities Act	0.58%
Attempted Murder	0.58%
Contravention of the Liquor Act	0.43%
Contravention of the Intimidation Act	0.43%
Contravention of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act	0.43%
Contravention of the General Law Amendment Act	0.43%
Theft fOther/	0.29%
Contravention of the Prevention of Corruption Act	0.29%
Contravention of the South African Police Service Act	0.29%
Contravention of the Explosives Act	0.29%
Contravention of the Social Asslstance Act	0.29%
Offence Unknown	0.29%
Public Violence	0.14%
Contravention of the Prevention of Counterfeiting Act	0.14%
Contravention of the Gambling Act	0.14%
Contravention of the Criminal Law Amendment Act	0.14%
Contravention of the Prisons Act	0.14%
Contravention of the Customs And Excise Act	0.14%
Rape	0.14°/

 

Offence	Percentage
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa	0.14%
Contravention of the National Land Transport Transition Act	0.14%
Murder	0.14%
Contravention of the Act on Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths	0.14%
Perjury	0.14%
Housebreaking	0.14%
Total	100.00°/»

KwaZulu-Natal Province: A total of 533 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	52.71%
Assault	12.02%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	6.85%
Fraud	3.36%
Theft	3.10%
Culpable Homicide	2.07%
Defeating the Course of Justice	1.68%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	1.68%
Crimen lnjuria	1.55%
Mallclous Damage to Property	1.29%
Social Assistance Act	1.29%
Contravention of the National Land Transport Act	1.03%
Contravention of the South African Police Service (SAPS) Act	1.03%
Attemtied Murder	0.78%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	0.65%
Extortion (Under the Common Law or Statutory Law)	0.65%
Contravention of the Prevention of Corruption Act	0.65%
Contravention of the Liquor Act	0.65%
Rape	0.39%
Contravention of the Crimlnal Procedure Act	0.39%
Contravention of the National Land Transport Transition Act	0.39%
Murder	0.39%
Contravention of the Aliens Act	0.39%
Breach Of Peace	0.26%
Contraventlon of the Act on Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	0.26%
Cont a entio of the I te nal Sec rit A t Contravention of the Customs and Excise Act	0.26%
	0.26%
Robbery	0.26%
Contravention of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act	0.26%
Contravention of the Trespass Act	0.26%
Theft(Other)	0.26%
Theft of Livestock and Related Matters	0.26%
Contravention of the Intimidation Act	0.26%

10

OWence	Percentage
Contravention of the Mining Rights Act	0.13%
KZN/Nature Conservation Ordinance	0.13%
Public Indecency	0.13%
Child Theft	0.13%
Bribery	0.13%
Contravention of the Nature Conservation Act	0.13%
High Treason	0.13%
Perjury	0.13%
KZN/Nature Conservation Ordinance	0.13%
Contravention of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	0.13%
Contravention of the Animals Protection Act	0.13%
Contravention of the Precious Stones Act	0.13%
Contravention of the South African Reserve Bank Act	0.13%
Contravention of the Currency Act	0.13%
Contravention of the General Law Amendment Act	0.13%
Contravention of the Kwazulu-Natal Liquor Licensing Act	0.13%
Contravention of the Prisons Act	0.13%
Abuse of Dependence-producing Substances and Rehabilitation centre	0.13%
Kidnapping	0.13%
Total	100.00°/

North West Province: A total of 260 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	56.21%
Assault	18.08%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	4.52%
Theft	3.11%
Culpable Homicide	2.26%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	1.98%
Crimen lnjuria	1.98%
Fraud	1.98%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	1,69%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	1.41%
Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	1.13%
Attempted Murder	0.85%
Defeating the Course of Justice	0.85°/»
Malicious Damage to Property	0.85%
Rape	0.28°/•
Contravention of the Prevention of Corruption Act	0.28%
Contravention of the General Law Amendment Act	0.28%
Contempt of Court	0.28%
Contravention of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act	0.28%
Abuse of Dependence-producing Substances and Rehabilitation centre	0.28%
Animal Matters Amendment	0.28%

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the South African Police Service (SAPS) Act	0.28%
Indecent Assault	0.28%
Contravention of the Precious Metals Act	0.28%
Murder	0.28%
Total	100.00%

Mpumalanga Province: A total of 240 members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	51.62%
Assault	17.70%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	7.37%
Contravention of the Firearms Gontrol Act	2.65%
Fraud	2.36%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	1.77%
Theft	1.77%
Culpable Homicide	1.77%
Defeating the Course of Justice	1.77%
Contravention of the Liquor Act	1,47%
Contravention of the Domestic Vlolence Act	1.18%
Crimen lnjuria	0.88%
Attempted Murder	0.88%
Malicious Damage to Property	0.88%
Contravention of the South African Police Service (SAPS) Act	0.59%
Perjury	0.59%
Contravention of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	0.59%
Housebreaking	0.59%
Contravention of the Sexual OWences Act	0.29%
Contravention of the Riotous Assemblies Act	0.29%
Stock Theft	0.29%
Theft of Livestock and Related Matters	0.29%
Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	0.29%
Contravention of the Gambling Act	0.29%
Murder	0.29%
Public Indecency	0.29%
Offence Unknown	0.29%
Contravention of the Public Safety Act (Regulations for KwaZulu-Natal)	0.29%
Abuse of Dependence-producing Substances and Rehabilitation Centre	0.29%
Contravention of the Contravention of the Indecent or Obscene Photographic Matters Act	0.29%
Total	100.00°/+

Limpopo Province: A total of 401 members have offences against their names.

OWence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	55.57%

12

Offence	Percentage
Assault	17.40%
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	6,42%
Theft	3.38%
Culpable Homicide	2.70%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	1.86%
Crimen lnjuria	1.52%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	1.35%
Defeating the Course of Justice	1.35%
Malicious Damage to Property	0.84%
Attempted Murder	0.68%
Contravention of the Crimlnal Procedure Act	0.68%
Fraud	0.68%
Contravention of the Prevention and Combatinq of Corrupt Activities Act	0.51%
Contravention of the South African Pollce Service (SAPS) Act	0.51%
Abuse Of Dependence-producing Substances and Rehabilitation centre	0.51%
Murder	0.51%
Rape	0.34%
Contraventlon of the General Law Amendment Act	0.34%
Contravention of the Intimidation Act	0.34%
Contravention of the Medicine Act	0.34%
Contravention of the Act on Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths	0.17%
Contravention of the Corruption Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Insurance Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Sorghum Beer Act	0,17%
Housebreaking	0.17%
Stock Theft	0.17%
Contravention of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act	0.17%
Theft (Other)	0,17%
Animal Matters Amendment	0.17%
Contravention of the Companies Act	0.17%
Contravention of the Witchcraft Suppression Act	0.17%
Perjury	0,17%
Contravention of the Act on Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	0.17%
Total	100.00°/•

Gauteng Province: A total of 824 members have offences against their names.

OWence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	49.91 %
Assault	15.61 9•
Contravention of the Arms and Ammunition Act	10.00%
Theft	3.60%
Culpable Homicide	2.28%

 

Ofience	Percentage
Fraud	2.11%
Contravention of the Firearms Control Act	1.49%
Defeating the Course of Justlce	1.40%
' Attempted Murder	1.32%
Malicious Damage to Property	1.14%
Contravention of the Liquor Act	1.14%
Crimen lnjuria	0.96%
Contravention of the Prevention of Corruption Act	0.96%
Contravention of the South African Police Service (SAPS) Act	0.96%
Contravention of the Domestic Violence Act	0.79%
Extortion (Under the Common Law or Statutory Law)	0.53%
Contravention of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act	0.44%
Contravention of the Social Assistance Act	0.44%
Murder	0.35%
Perjury	0.35%
Act on Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths	0.26%
Abuse of Dependence-producing Substances and Rehabilitation centre	0.26%
Contravention of the Intimidation Act	0.26%
Contravention of the Trespass Act	0.18%
Contravention of the Local Authorities Act	0,18%
Gontravention of the Gauteng Liquor Act	0.18%
Housebreaking	0.18%
Contravention of the Aliens Act	0.18%
Contravention of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act	0.18%
Theft(Other)	0.18%
Contravention of the Criminal Procedure Act	0.18%
Rape	O.18%
Contravention of the Hire Purchase Act Contravention of the Tear-Gas Act		0.18%
		0.09%
Robbery	0.09%
Contravention of the Animals Protection Act	0.09%
C0 a entio of the ct on D u s and D Tra c n Act Contravention of the Sexual OWences Act	0.09%
	0.09%
Offence Unknown	o o9%
Contravention of the Corruption Act	0.09%
Contravention of the Companies Act	0.09%
Contravention of the Internal Security Act	0.09%
Contravention of the General Law Amendment Act	0.09%
Contravention of the Sea Fishery Act	0.09%
Contravention of the Post Office Act	0.09%
Contempt of Court	0.09%
Kidnapping	0.09%
Contravention of the Diamonds Act	0.09%
Arson, under the Common Law or Statuto Law	0.09%
Contravention of the Public Safety Act	0.09%

'

14

Offence	Percentage
Indecent Assault	0.09%
Total	100.00°/

Office of the National Commissioner: A total of 19 members have offences against their names.

Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	45.83%
Contravention of the Ams and Ammunition Act	16.67%
Contravention of the Gauteng Liquor Act	16.67%
Theft	8.33%
Assualt	4.17%
Crimen Injuria	4.17%
Contraventlon of the Domestic Violence Act	4.17%
TOTAL	100.00%

Division: Technology Management Services: Two members have offences against their names.

Offence	Percentage
Contravention of the Road Traffic Act	100.00%
Total	100.00%

Reply to question 197 recommended/

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date: ! !! ! g\- 0

Reply to question 197 approved/ d

Reply:

a) No, funds will be released to the African Institute of Arts, Culture and Heritage until the institution complies with the contractual obligations and provides fully detailed information on how the allocated funds were spent on the project, and the beneficiary further furnishes the Department with satisfactory documented proofs such as invoices and/or receipts of expenditure with additional documentation on the utilisation of funds as requested by the Department as a prerequisite to release the funds to the project. Once all the required documents and information are submitted to the Department, then the funds will be released to the AIACH.

(b) The following are the reasons for the delay in releasing the funding to the AIACH:

• The beneficiary did not submit the audited financial statements which indicates that the funds already allocated to the project have been utilised in accordance with the signed Memorandum of Agreement (MoA);

• The financial report submitted is not substantiated by proof of expenditure such as invoices, receipts, bank slips, bank statements, etc., and based on the documents submitted by AIACH, the Department is not provided with the necessary assurance that the funds transferred were used in accordance with the agreement;

• The Department further noticed that some of the items bought for the project were not part of the signed Memorandum of Agreement and even the content of the narrative report is not aligned with the financial report provided by the beneficiary; and

• The Department is not clear when and where the exhibition will take place or whether it really took place or not.

Reply:

Department

(a) (i) None

(aa) None

(bb) None

(ii) (aa) None

(bb) None

(iv) Not applicable

(v) Not applicable

The (b) Cross-Border Road Transport Agency have had the cases outlined in the tables 1

The (b) Road Accident Fund have had the cases outlined in the tables 2

The (b) Road Traffic Management Corporation have had the cases outlined in the tables 3

The (b) Road Traffic Infringement Agency have had the cases outlined in the tables 4

The (b) South African National Roads Agency Limited have had the cases outlined in the tables 5

(b) The Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRTA)

TABLE: 1

2016/17 : 2 cases

(ii) Matter	(aa) lost	(bb) won	(iii) total costs	(iv) Amount spent on legal services	(v) Why it was this necessary
Unfair Dismissal	0	1 1, withdrawn	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
Dispute of mutual interest and of Employment Equity			Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable

2017/18 : 1 case

(ii) Matter	(aa) lost	(bb) won	(iii) total costs	(iv) Amount spent on legal services	(v) Why it was this necessary
Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) - Promotion	1, but the matter is under review	Not applicable	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable

2018/19: 8 Cases – 1 case won – lost case Not Applicable

(ii) Matter	(aa) lost	(bb) won	(iii) total costs	(iv) Amount spent on legal services	(v) Why it was this necessary
Unfair Dismissal in terms of section 186 (1)(b)(ii)	Not applicable, Settlement was reached to reinstate the employee	Not applicable, settlement was reached to reinstate the employee	R154,180.50	31/01/2018 -R169.40 31/05/2018- R56.70 29/03/2018-R80,631.82 30/09/2017-R33,797.42 16/02/2018-R19,012.61 31/05/2018-R20,512.55	The cost incurred was for the legal representative during the Arbitration process
Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) - Promotion	Not applicable	Not applicable, settlement Agreement was reached, and the matter is closed	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
Unfair disciplinary Action	Not applicable, sanction that was in dispute expired	Not applicable, sanction that was in dispute expired	R56,350	31/10/2018 -R19, 950 19/12/2018-R36,400	It was necessary on the fact that the matter was dealt internally by legal representatives
Breach of Collective Agreement	Not applicable	Ruling in favor of the C-BRTA	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
6 [EEA] - Prohibition of unfair discrimination - Gender	Not applicable	Not applicable, parties concluded an agreement to finalise the matter internally	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
6 [EEA] - Prohibition of unfair discrimination - Gender	Not applicable	The employee did not pursue the matter further after conciliation.	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
Unfair suspension	Not applicable	The employee did not pursue the matter further after conciliation.	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
Unfair Labour Practice	The was heard during arbitration and the employee withdrawn the case.	The was heard during arbitration and the employee withdrawn the case.	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable

(bb) Since 1 January 2019: 4 cases

(ii) Matter	(aa) lost	(bb) won	(iii) total costs	(iv) Amount spent on legal services	(v) Why it was this necessary
Unfair Dismissal	Not applicable, case is still pending	Not applicable, case is still pending	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) – Promotion	Not applicable, case is still pending	Not applicable, case is still pending	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) – Promotion.	Not applicable, case is still pending	Not applicable, case is still pending	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable
Mutual interest disputes	Not applicable, Conciliation process was heard during the month of January 2019 the matter was not resolved. Certificate to strike issued but it was interdicted	Not applicable, Conciliation process was heard during the month of January 2019 the matter was not resolved. Certificate to strike issued but it was interdicted	R0,00	R0,00	Not applicable

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

(i)(aa)(bb) The table below is a summary of the matters heard by the CCMA in the past 3 financial years. The table includes the parties involved in the matter and the reason for the matter being set down at the CCMA.

(ii) (aa)(bb)The table below illustrates the number of matters that were either lost or won at the CCMA.

(iii) The table below illustrates the matters where legal costs were incurred for matters referred and set down at the CCMA. It should be noted that not all matters referred to the CCMA incurred legal costs.

(iv) The table below illustrates the legal costs incurred per month over the reporting period for matters at the CCMA.

(v) The table below provides the reasons why matters may have necessitated the appointment of legal assistance and the reasons below are in line with the Company Disciplinary Policy.

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) matters within ATNS in the past three financial years and since 1 January 2019, showing the status and legal services costs per matter and the reasons for such costs:

MONTHS	CCMA Matters	Status	Cost Implication	Reason 4 costs
February 2016	1	won	R452 568-00	complexity
December 2017	1	won	R85 000-00	Minimal running costs
July 2018	2	1 won and 1 reinstatement	R76 640 and R917412.75	Minimal running costs
August 2018	2	Both resigned	No costs	No costs
October 2018	2	From last report	R382 500-00	complexity
December 2018	1	settlements		complexity
February 2019	2	Case still underway	No invoice yet	complexity

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

(a) Not applicable; (b), (i), (aa), (bb); (ii), (aa), (bb); (iii); (iv); (v): The tables below provide a record and details on each of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) matters handled by the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) in the past three financial years, and since 1 January 2019.

(i), (aa): 2016/17 Financial Year
Summary of table: During the 2016/17 financial year, the SACAA dealt with ten (10) CCMA matters. Out of the ten, the SACAA won five (5), three (3) were settlement agreements; and in the case of the other two, the applicants did not proceed with the cases. There were no monthly legal fees as services are procured and used as and when necessary.
(i), (aa) Nature of dispute / matters heard during the 2016/17 financial year	(aa) Matters or cases lost / won	(iii) Total cost of the case.	(iv) Total cost spend on legal fees monthly	(v) Why was this necessary?
1st case Unfair labour practice based on promotion. 2nd case The applicant claimed unfair labour practice relating to a performance bonus. 3rd case The applicant claimed unfair dismissal.	The parties settled the matter before the CCMA hearing. The parties settled the matter before the CCMA hearing. The parties settled the matter before the CCMA hearing.	Settled as per below. Settled as per below. Settled as per below. R445 165.31 (Legal cost) R2, 700 000.00 (Settlement amount)	Not applicable.	The disputes involved a member of the SACAA Executive, relating to dismissal, contractual dispute, performance bonus, and restructuring.
Unfair dismissal dispute.	The SACAA won the case at CCMA.	No cost was incurred.	Not applicable.	Not applicable.
Non-renewal of fixed term contract.	The SACAA won the case at CCMA.	R98 196.75	Not applicable.	The matter was complex in that it involved both non-renewal of a contract as well as dishonest conduct by the employee.
1st case The union claimed unfair labour practice based on the withdrawal of a standby allowance. 2nd case The union declared a dispute relating to matters of mutual interest, i.e. wages, organisational restructuring, and normalisation of salaries.	The union did not continue with the matter at the CCMA. The CCMA issued a certificate of non-resolution, and the union did not continue with the matter any further.	No cost was incurred. No cost was incurred.	Not applicable. Not applicable.	Not applicable Not applicable.
Allegations of unfair dismissal.	The SACAA won the case at the CCMA.	R369 979.40	Not applicable.	The matter was complex as it involved the interpretation of the Civil Aviation Authority Act, 2009 (Act No 13 of 2009), and the SACAA’s Conflict of Interest Policy.
Allegations of unfair dismissal.	The SACAA won the case at the CCMA.	R88 865.28	Not applicable.	The matter was complex as it involved dismissal based on probation terms.
Allegations of unfair dismissal.	The SACAA won the case at the CCMA.	R125 650.80	Not applicable.	The matter was complex in that it involved appropriateness of the dismissal, and potential claims of unilateral change to terms and conditions of employment.
TOTAL	Ten (10)	R3 827 857.54	Not applicable.	Not applicable.

(i), (aa): 2017/18 FINANCIAL YEAR
Summary of table: During the 2017/18 financial year, the SACAA dealt with three (3) CCMA matters. Out of the three two were won and one was a settlement agreement. There were no monthly legal fees as services are procured and used as and when necessary.
(i), (aa) Nature of dispute / matters heard during the 2017/18 financial year	(aa) Matters or cases lost / won	(iii) Total cost of the case.	(iv) Total cost spend on legal fees monthly	(v) Why was this necessary?
Allegations of unfair dismissal.	The SACAA won the case at CCMA.	No cost was incurred.	Not applicable.	Not applicable.
Allegations of unfair dismissal.	The parties settled the matter before the CCMA arbitration hearing.	R181 287.00 (Legal cost) R98 015.13 (Settlement amount)	Not applicable.	It was important to avoid a protracted legal battle as the applicant has a legal background and was also employed in the SACAA’s Legal Division.
Allegations of unfair labour practice.	The SACAA won the case at CCMA.	No cost was incurred.	Not applicable.	Not applicable.
TOTAL	Three (3)	R279 302.13	Not applicable.	Not applicable.

(i), (aa): 2018/19 FINANCIAL YEAR AND SINCE 1 JANUARY 2019
Summary of table: During the 2018/19 financial year and since 01 January 2019 no CCMA matter was won or lost. There were no monthly legal fees as services are procured and used as and when necessary.
(i) Nature of dispute / matters heard during the 2018/19 financial year and since 01 January 2019	(aa) Matters or cases lost / won	(iii) Total cost of the case.	(iv) Total cost spend on legal fees monthly	(v) Why was this necessary?
Allegations of unilateral change to the terms and conditions of employment.	The CCMA issued a certificate of non-resolution, and the union did not pursue the matter any further.	No cost was incurred.	Not applicable.	Not applicable
Allegations of unfair labour practice.	The applicant withdrew the matter.	No cost was incurred.	Not applicable.	Not applicable
Allegations of constructive dismissal.	The matter is still on-going at the CCMA.	No cost was incurred.	Not applicable.	Not applicable
Application by the SACAA for the designation as an essential services entity	The matter is still on-going at the CCMA.	R616 436.91	Not applicable.	The matter involves possible limitation of employees’ right to industrial action.
TOTAL	Four (4)	R616 436.91	Not applicable.	Not applicable.

(b) The Road Accident Fund (RAF)

TABLE: 2

(i)(aa) matters heard in 3 financial years,	(ii)(aa) the following number of matters were lost,	and (bb) won,	(iii) the total cost involved in each case is,	(iv) what was spent on legal services in each month,	and (v) it was necessary in each case because,
2015-16 FINANCIAL YEAR
April – November
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
December
RAF v Chilopo	0	1	R202,831.77	R 202,831.77	Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter
January
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
February
E.Mahlomotja	1	1	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
T. Mazibuko			R0,00		Internally Represented
2016-17 FINANCIAL YEAR
April
P. Zulu	0	1	R0,00	R0.00	Internally Represented
May
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
June
G. Qobeka	0	2	R194,534.61	R249,016.71	Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter
P. Keti			R54,482.10		Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter
July
P. Hlongwane	1	1	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
N. Ntongolo			R0.00		Internally Represented
August - September
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
November
D. Creighton	0	2	R96,292.16	R283,193.17	Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter
E. Moseneke			R186,901.01		Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter
December - March
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
2017-18 FINANCIAL YEAR
March
R.J. Mazibuko	0	1	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
April
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
May
J. Sabasa	0	1	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
June - August
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
September
L. Gxanase	0	1	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
October
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
November
M. Mpupu	0	2	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
Z. Dangwana			R0,00	None	Internally Represented
December - March
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
2018-19 FINANCIAL YEAR
March
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
April 2018
S. Mlaza	0	1	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
May 2018
T.G. Nonjongo	1	1	R0,00	None	Internally Represented
S. Menziwa			R0,00	None	Internally Represented
June - February
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
M. Gcnabana	0	1	R0.00	None	Internally Represented
and (bb) since 1 January 2019 to 28 February 2019,
None	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable

 

(b) The Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC)

TABLE 3

2016/17 financial year

NAME	NATURE OF THE CASE	MONTH	FINANCIAL YEAR	OUTCOME WON / LOST	LEGAL SERVICES COST
Mngomezulu	Gross Negligence and Financial irregularities	July 2016	2016/17	Won	R104 959.80
Mathibe and Lebaka	Gross Negligence	February 2017	2016/17	Mathibe Lost	R108,000
Mabena	Assault and unruly behaviour	Dec 2016 March 2017	2016/17	Won	R82,080
Msiza	Assault	Dec 2016 January 2017	2016/17	Won	R142 000

2017/18 financial year

NAME	NATURE OF THE CASE	MONTH	FINANCIAL YEAR	OUTCOME WON/LOST	LEGAL SERVICES COSTS
Msiza	Assault	April 2017/ July/August	2017/18	Won	R205 200
Lebatlang	Gross Negligence	August 2017	2017/18	Won	R41 040
Van der Zandt	Assault	October 2017	2017/18	Lost	R494 240
Williams & others	Alleged Unfair Labour Practice	November 2017	2017/18	Won	R7 200
Williams & Others	Alleged Unfair Labour Practice	December 2017	2017/18	Won	R82 080
Mathibe	Gross Negligence	December 2017	2017/18	Lost	R172 440

2018/19 financial year

NAME	NATURE OF THE CASE	MONTH	FINANCIAL YEAR	OUTCOME WON / LOST	LEGAL SERVICES COSTS
Khumalo and 17 others	Alleged unfair Labour Practice	May 2018	2018/19	Pending	R62 100
Khumalo & 17 Others	Alleged Unfair Labour Practice	November 2018	2018/19	Pending	R9 800
POPCRU	Alleged Unfair Labour Practice	July 2018	2018/19	Won	R188 800
NEHAWU obo Stephinah Segalagala	Alleged Unfair Labour Practise	August 2018	2018/19	Won	R0.00
Maphiri	Unfair Dismissal	December 2018	2018/19	Won	R0.00

(bb) Matters heard at the CCMA since 1 January 2019

NAME	NATURE OF THE CASE	MONTH	FINANCIAL YEAR	OUTCOME WON/LOST	LEGAL SERVICES COSTS
Dada	Alleged unfair dismissal	January 2019	2018/19	Pending	R151 130.75
Khumalo	Alleged Unfair Dismissal	January / February 2019	2018/19	Pending	R248 400
NEHAWU	Organisational Rights	January 2019	2018/19	Pending	R0.00
(v) Why it was necessary to spend on each case
The nature of the respective matters together with capacity constraints pre April 2018, necessitated the appointment of external service providers to provide legal services. The RTMC appointed an additional 3 senior labour relations officials in 2018, which appointments have already resulted in reduction of legal costs incurred in the 2018/19 financial year.

(b) The Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA)

TABLE 4

(b) (i) 3 were matters were heard
2016/17 Financial Year
NATURE OF CASE	MONTH	OUTCOME LOST / WON	LEGAL COST	Why was the spending necessary
Conciliation: Disclosure of information	September 2016	Won	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Arbitration: Disclosure of Information	October2016	Won	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Conciliation/ Arbitration: Equal pay for work of equal value	September 2016	Settlement reached	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
2017/18 Financial Year
7 Matters were heard
Conciliation: Unfair labour practice	April 2017	Won	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Arbitration: Unfair labour practice	May 2017	Won	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Set down for picketing rules by SATAWU	June 2017	matter abandoned	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Conciliation: Working Hours by SATAWU	July 2017	matter abandoned	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Arbitration: Working hours by SATAWU	August 2017 matter abandoned	matter abandoned	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Arbitration: Housing allowance	August 2017	Won	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Conciliation/Arbitration: Unfair labour practice ( suspension)	November 2017	Suspension withdrawn	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
2018/19 Financial Year
7 Matters were heard
Conciliation: Equal pay for equal value	February 2018	On-going	R 91 709	Not Applicable
Conciliation: Unfair labour practice	February 2018	Matter withdrawn	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Conciliation: Dismissal	May to December 2018 June 2018 July 2018 October 2018	Won	R 115 968 R 141 935 R 110 966	The one case involved a senior executive manager therefore the Agency had to employ the services of a legal representation at a cost.
Arbitration: Unfair labour practice	June 2018	On-going	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Conciliation: Discrimination based on Gender	November 2018	On-going	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Arbitration : Condonation	Nov and Dec 2018	Won	R 68 598	Not Applicable
Conciliation: Dismissal	December 2018	On-going	R 0 .00
Since 1 January 2019
3 Matters were heard
Conciliation: Discrimination on the grounds of Gender	January 2019	On-going	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Condonation for late referral	February 2019	On-going	R 0 .00	Not Applicable
Arbitration	March 2019	On-going	R 0 .00	Not Applicable

(b) The South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)

TABLE 5

(b) (i) 0 were matters were heard
2016/17 Financial Year
NATURE OF CASE	MONTH	OUTCOME LOST / WON	LEGAL COST	Why was the spending necessary
-	-	-	-	-
2017/18 Financial Year
0 Matters were heard
-	-	-	-	-
2018/19 Financial Year
3 Matters were heard
CCMA Dispute: Unfair Dismissal: misconduct related to tender irregularities	July 2018	Parties reached a settlement on the matter:	R0.00	Not Applicable
LRA section 62 Demarcation dispute	August 2018	Applicant (Trade Union) withdrew the dispute:	R144, 793.65	Legal representation was required considering the nature of the dispute
Section 198A Dispute: (TES) labour broking deeming employee provision	Jan 2019	Applicant (Trade Union) withdrew the dispute: technically won	R248, 573.67	Other parties to the dispute were legally represented and for comparative ability reasons SANRAL had to procure the same services

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

(i) (aa) In the past three financial years

Year	No. of Disputes	Month	Nature of Dispute
2016	1	February	Unfair Dismissal*
	1	May	Unfair Dismissal
	1	November	Timing of 13th cheque payment
	1	November	Non-renewal of employment contract
2017	1	January, August	Unfair Dismissal*
	1	April, August	Non-renewal of employment contract****
	1	August	Unfair Dismissal***
	1	September, October, November	Non-renewal of employment contract**
2018	1	January	Non-renewal of employment contract**
	1	April, June	Unfair Dismissal***
	1	June, September	Non-renewal of employment contract****

bb) Zero (0)

ii) aa) Lost: Zero (0)

bb) Won: Seven (7)

Year	No. of Disputes	Month	Nature of Dispute	In SAMSA’s favour
2016	1	February	Unfair Dismissal*	Yes
	1	May	Unfair Dismissal	Yes
	1	November	Timing of 13th cheque payment	Yes
	1	November	Non-renewal of employment contract	Yes
2017	1	January, August	Unfair Dismissal*	Yes
	1	April, August	Non-renewal of employment contract	Settlement Agreement reached
	1	August	Unfair Dismissal***	Yes
	1	September, October, November	Non-renewal of employment contract**	Settlement Agreement reached
2018	1	January	Non-renewal of employment contract**
	1	April, June	Unfair Dismissal***	Yes
	1	June, September, December	Non-renewal of employment contract	Still pending.
2019	Zero

iii)

Year	No. of Disputes	Month	Nature of Dispute	In SAMSA’s favour	Cost	Legal costs	Total costs
2016	1	February	Unfair Dismissal*	Yes	Zero	Zero	Zero
	1	May	Unfair Dismissal	Yes	Zero
	1	November	Timing of 13th cheque payment	Yes	Zero
	1	November	Non-renewal of employment contract	Yes	Zero
2017	1	January, August	Unfair Dismissal*	Yes	Zero	R514k	R1,9m
	1	April, August	Non-renewal of employment contract	Settlement Agreement reached	R1,4m
	1	August	Unfair Dismissal***	Yes	Zero
	1	September, October, November	Non-renewal of employment contract**	Settlement reached in January 2018
2018	1	January	Non-renewal of employment contract**	Settlement Agreement reached	R261k	R735k	R996K
	1	April, June	Unfair Dismissal***	Yes	Zero
	1	June, September, December	Non-renewal of employment contract	Still pending.
2019	Zero	Zero	Zero

iv)

Year	Legal Costs
2016	None
2017	R514k
2018	R735k

b)

Year	Cost
2016	None
2017	R1,4m
2018	R261k

v) Legal costs are due to company representation at the CCMA

a) Other costs are due to settlement agreement reached at the CCMA

Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)

b) There are no(I) matters hat have been heard in the CCMA in the past (aa) Three financial years (bb) since 1 January 2019. (ii) (iii)(iv)(v) Not applicable

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA):

(i) (aa) CCMA matters heard in each month in the past three financial years are detailed in the

Annexure as attached.

(bb) CCMA matters heard since 1 January 2019 are detailed in the Annexure as attached.

(ii) (aa) No matters were lost.

(bb) Five (5) matters were won.

(iii) Please refer to Annexure.

(iv) Please refer to Annexure.

(v) Please refer to (iv).

Date (i) (a) & (b)	Employee no	Employee Name and Surname	Employee Subgroup	Nature of Dispute	CCMA Outcome	Legal Costs: at the CCMA
31 April 2015	20104010	Pallelo Lebaka	Executive Manager	Failing to protect the right of PRASA in executing one of the contracts that was under way.	Employee Claims were dismissed	No Legal Costs applicable
16 April 2016	20108387	Mudzungu Mudau	HCM: Intern	Unfair Termination of contract of Employment	Employee Claims were dismissed	No Legal Costs applicable
16 April 2016	20108399	Surprise Mthombeni	HCM: Intern	Unfair Termination of contract of Employment	Matter was dismissed	No Legal Costs applicable
27 July 2018	20106955	Mavhungu Mahunganei	Project Manager	Unfair conduct - promotion/demotion/probation/training/benefits	Matter was dismissed	R126,000-77.
09 January 2019	20012266	Luyanda Gantsho	General Manager	Unfair dismissal	Matter ended at the conciliation	No Legal Costs applicable

Railway Safety Regulator (RSR):

CCMA matters heard in each month in the past three financial years are:

	(i)(aa)
Month	2016/2017	2017/2018	2018/2019
January	-	-	Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions
February	-	-	Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions
March	Misconduct dismissal	-	Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions
April	Misconduct	-	-
May	-	Misconduct dismissal.	-
		Alleged refusal to bargain x 2
June	Misconduct dismissal	Misconduct dismissal	Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions x 6
	Non-confirmation of probation
	Unfair suspension
July	-	-	-
August	-	-	Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions x 2
September	Misconduct dismissal	Dismissal unknown.	Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions x 2
		Agency shop agreement
		Alleged refusal to bargain x 2
October	-	-	-
November	-	-	-
December	Improper conduct and insubordination	-	-
	Unfair suspension

CCMA matters heard since 1 January 2019 are:

	(i)(bb)
Date	CCMA Matter
8 January 2019	Alleged failure to consult on s189
31 January 2019	S6 EEA – Prohibition of Unfair Discrimination
1 February 2019	Alleged unfair conduct related to promotion
27 February 2019	Alleged unfair dismissal
	Alleged non-renewal of fixed-term contract x 2
6 March 2019	Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotion
8 March 2019	Alleged unfair conduct related to provision of benefits
12 March 2019	Alleged unfair dismissal

(ii) (aa) Two (2) matters are taken on review, which is currently in progress.

(bb) Six (6) matters were won.

(iii) Compensation of about R600,000 which is currently a subject of review.

(iv) In-house capacity was used and thus there is no financial implications.

(v) As internal resources were used, no costs were incurred.

Reply:

a) The delay in the delivery of driving licence cards was occasioned by the system upgrade on the production machine and the labour dispute lodged by the employees involved in the production of driving licence cards.

b) The production team worked overtime to address the backlog. In January 2019, there was a backlog of 250k cards, which was addressed on 8th February 2019. As at 7th March2019, there was a backlog of 194k cards which was caused by a delay in the delivery of material. This backlog will be addressed by 15 April 2019.

c) The Department (DLCA) has been working on a recovery tool to retrieve the missing images (fingerprints, photos and eye-test) in some instances where we have been able to retrieve them we proceeded to produce and dispatch the driving license card. In those instances where we have not been able to, members of the public have been requested to return to the centres to redo their applications. There are also instances where cards had to be rejected due to cancellation requests from the DLTC or bad images sent to the DLCA.

d) The DLCA opened a case of extortion and sabotage and the office of the Directorate for Priority Investigation upon their investigation issued a “nolle prosecui” citing amongst others lack evidence as the reason for withdrawal.

Reply:

The Department of Trade and Industry (the dti) has published the application for the Small Enterprise Finance Agency’s (sefa) B-BBEE facilitator status for public comment. The latest update from the (the dti) is that responses have been received from the public with no major objections and therefore the facilitator status will be granted. However, the approval to use the facilitator status will be limited to the transformation of financial intermediaries. The final approval is awaiting a go-ahead from the Minister of Trade and Industry.

The Small Enterprise Development Agency (Seda) is in consultation with the the dti regarding a BEE facilitator status and has initiated the BEE verification process. The first verification process was finalised in May 2018 which found Seda to be non-compliant as most of Seda expenditure was not considered as it was core of our business. A second verification is planned to take place in March 2019.

Reply:

There are no new vehicles parked at PRASA Head Office. There are eight (8) double cab bakkies parked in Durban and nine (9) double cab bakkies parked in Cape Town respectively. The reason for this is due to discrepancies in the fitments when the vehicles were delivered. The vehicles did not have canopies and ladder racks. The suppliers have begun with these fitments and the vehicles will be on the road by the second week of April 2019.

Reply:

a) R3 794 143,61

b) Corporate Affairs Division | Sponsorships

c) On 23rd July 2018 Airports Company South Africa (ACSA) celebrated its jubilee anniversary of 25 years. ACSA was established on the 23rd of July 1993, when the government established it as a fully-fledged Stated-Owned Company. Prior to 1993, the airports operator was a unit within the National Department of Transport.

ACSA has grown into an airports authority that manages a network of nine world class airports that South Africa can be extremely proud of. The company currently employs approximately 3000 permanent employees, contributed R9,5 Billion to the economy in financial year 2017 while supporting 14 950 jobs that resulted in R2,8 Billion of worker income in the country.

ACSA Airports have also, over the years, consistently improved their world rankings and won prestigious industry awards. Cape Town International Airport and O.R Tambo International Airport are currently ranked 21st and 32nd respectively on the Skytrax top 100 airports globally.

Based on all these achievements, the company made a resolution to host the 25th anniversary with the sole purpose of appreciating and thanking key stakeholders and partners.

The objective of the gala dinner was to recognize and acknowledge the support the company has enjoyed from key stakeholders over the quarter century. ACSA stakeholders include amongst others, all tiers and spheres of government, shareholders, regulators, airlines, bankers, investors, retailers, concessionaires, clients to name but a few.

(d) The 25th Anniversary Gala Dinner was aimed at recognizing the role played by stakeholders in the success and sustainability of Airports Company South Africa. Stakeholders are at the heart of ACSA’s 25-year journey.

As a State-owned company, Airports Company South Africa has a greater vision and mission beyond delivering profitability for its shareholders. We are mandated to advance South Africa’s national agenda of economic growth and development while delivering a sustainably profitable business. We strive to fulfil this mandate by conducting our business in an ethical manner that enables inclusive growth and creates sustainable value for all our stakeholders.

This approach further embeds our vision to be the most sought-after partner in the world for the provision of sustainable airport management solutions by 2025, as we accelerate the impact of our transformation agenda in South Africa.

It is against this backdrop that one of the key elements of ensuring Airports Company South Africa’s (ACSA) sustainability as a business is the approach to stakeholder relations management. Stakeholder relations supports the company’s vision and strategic objectives by helping build coherent partnerships that are mutually beneficial and that will maintain sustainable growth into the future.

Reply:

a) Three buildings are situated on PRASA land located at 14 Mill Street, Newlands. The buildings consist of two Metrorail operational buildings and portion of a dual use facility, which is the most prominent of the three buildings located on the property. The latter was an existing house that was upgraded as a guesthouse and office accommodation for PRASA Senior Management on business visits to Cape Town. However subsequently a decision was taken to commercialise the building and rent it out.

b) The land on which the property is located was not purchased but transferred from Transnet Ltd. to the SARCC, now PRASA, in 1990 when the Transport Services land holdings was split between the Rail Freight and Passenger entities.

c) (i) The land on which the property is located was not purchased but transferred from Transnet Ltd. to the SARCC, now PRASA, in 1990. The guesthouse / office accommodation unit was upgraded and capitalised in 2015 at an amount of R7,187,073-07.

(ii) No amount is outstanding

Reply:

a) Passenger injuries and fatalities since 1 March 2018 to date

Date	(i) Injuries	(ii) Fatalities
March 2018	0	0
April 2018	20	1
May 2018	21	0
June 2018	19	0
July 2018	10	2
August 2018	20	1
September 2018	10	0
October 2018	12	0
November 2018	8	0
December 2018	10	1
January 2019	8	0
TOTAL	138	5

b) The total amount in compensation paid out to victims:

Date	Compensation
April 2018	R6,653,051
May 2018	R8,389,731
June 2018	R5,535,938
July 2018	R9,494,982
August 2018	R8,296,502
September 2018	R6,111,562
October 2018	R7,643,447
November 2018	R23,775,493
December 2018	R6,926,698
January 2019	R4,334,350
February 2019	R13,489,686
March 2019	R2,367,332
TOTAL	R103,018,772

It should be noted that commuter injury claims are long tail in nature and takes a long period to finalise and settle to that extent claims incurred in a specific month are not settled in that month but in later months.

c) Each incident that occurs on the PRASA network is reported to the Joint Operations Centre where the incident is recorded and a protection official is called out to the scene to investigate the incident. In cases of fatalities, each incident is reported to the South African Police Service who then takes charges of the scene and hands it over to PRASA once the deceased is removed from the rail environment. Incidents are further reported to the Railway Safety Regulator daily.

d) PRASA has not reneged on its legal duty to ensure doors are closed. PRASA as an operator is committed to passenger safety and operational safety. When the driver picks up their train at the Staging Yard, he/she ensures that the doors are tested and functional. We, therefore make sure that the doors that are malfunctioning are repaired before the train leaves the Staging Yard. Passengers have a tendency of blocking the doors and cause them to malfunction. When the train is staged for the evening, the driver tests the doors and makes sure that the malfunctioning doors are reported. The driver normally fills in the T403 Document to report the malfunctioning doors. The doors are therefore repaired before the train move into the operational tunnel.

Reply:

1. The operating costs are based on a very limited kerb side pre-pilot service with 6 operational buses initially. While this would have been palatable if scaled up to aPhase 1-like 40 and then 80 buses carrying over 20 000 average weekday passenger trips within 6 months to a year, this did not happen and hence the current scale of costs and ridership is unbalanced and unviable.

Despite 2 years of DoT appeals, the city has proven incapable of correcting this. Hence a final warning has been communicated to the city project team in March 2019 and they have 6 months to rebalance costs and revenues and move to viability.

2. a) Amount: R 50 million per annum

b) June 2020

c) To increase the City’s capacity

Reply:

There are currently no driverless cars on the country’s roads. Yes, there are plans but not in the immediate due to policy and legislative amendments that would need to take place to bring about this realisation.

.

Reply:

(a)(i)(aa) None

(a)(i)(bb) None

(b), (c), (d), €, (f), (g), (h) Not applicable

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

1. R250 million was put into a six-month fixed term deposit with Nedbank from March 2016 – September 2016.
2. Six-month fixed term deposit
3. Maximize interest received
4. 7.65%
5. Chief Financial Officer
6. March 2016 to September 2016
7. 7.65%
8. Nedbank – being the transactional banker at the time

Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRTA)

(i0 (a) No investments were made by (ii) the CBRTA (aa) in the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2018, consequently questions (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are not applicable.

Road Accident Fund (RAF)

(j) (a) No investments were made by (ii) The RAF has not made any investments (in the sense of “funds under management”) (aa) in the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2018, consequently questions (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are not applicable.

Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC)

(i) (a) No investments were made by (ii) The RTMC has not made any investments (aa) in the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2018, consequently questions (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are not applicable.

Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA)

(i) (a) No investments were made by (ii) The RTIA has not made any investments (aa) in the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2018, consequently questions (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are not applicable.

South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)

(a) Please refer to the attached spreadsheet for a detailed response. (Annexure ‘A’)

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

(a) (i) Not applicable. (a) (ii) (aa) The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) has not made any investments in the past three financial years other than depositing surplus funds in call accounts with banking institutions as disclosed to National Treasury on an annual basis as per Treasury Regulations.

(aa) and (bb) As per table below – Deposits in call accounts: 

 

	2016/03/31	2017/03/31	2018/03/31	2019/02/28
SACAA Call Accounts	Balance	Balance	Balance	Balance
Investec Call account	26 816 234	28 711 924	30 687 860	32 540 602
Absa Call account	26 675 429	28 391 238	30 164 946	31 810 956
Nedbank Call account	25 811 325	27 584 337	29 438 724	31 173 458
Standard Bank Call account	109 922 727	155 916 512	206 096 735	195 026 950
Total Call Account Balances	189 225 715	240 604 011	296 388 266	290 551 966

b) the nature of each investment & (c) why each investment was made in each case: the call accounts are utilised to invest surplus funds.

c) the projected returns in each case: rates on call accounts as published by the respective banks from time to time.

d) who represented the entity when negotiating the investments: the Chief Financial Officer and the Senior Manager: Finance as per the approvals and Delegation of Authority.

e) on what date each investment was made: on a daily basis all surplus cash identified is invested in a call account.

(g) The Annual returns as per the financial statements is:

Current year to 28 February 2019 R16 983 320

Year ended 31 March 2018 R17 006 783

Year ended 31 March 2017 R14 549 007

(h) with whom investments were made in each case: Standard Bank, Investec, ABSA, and FNB.

Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)

(a)(ii) The Ports Regulator has not made any investments in the past (aa) three financial years

and since (bb) 01 April 2018.

(b)(c)(d)(f)(g)(h) Not applicable

Railway Safety Regulator (RSR):

a) The RSR invests only in the Corporation for Public Deposits (CPD) at the South African Reserve Bank. Withdrawals at CPD can be done at any time at no charge. The RSR earns interest from these investments.

(aa) The following investments were made in the past three financial years:

2015/2016 R7,105,000

2016/2017 R81,000,000

2107/2018 R144,700,000

(bb) An amount of R189,900,000 was invested since 1 April 2018.

b) The nature of each investment were short term deposits with the CPD at the South African Reserve Bank.

c) Each investment was made for the purpose of earning interest.

d) The projected returns were for interest earned at variable interest rates.

e) No negotiations took place when deposits were made to the CPD.

f) The dates on which each investment was made are as follow:

2015/2016
Date	Amount Invested
2015/11/25	5,000
2015/12/04	1,000,000
2015/12/23	1,000,000
2016/01/20	5,000,000
2016/03/30	100,000
Total	R7,105,000

2016/2017
Date	Amount Invested
2016/08/15	40,000,000
2016/10/12	7,500,000
2016/11/02	25,000,000
2016/12/28	7,500,000
2017/01/11	1,000,000
Total	R81,000,000

2017/2018
Date	Amount Invested
2017/04/21	5,000,000
2017/04/21	5,000,000
2017/04/21	5,000,000
2017/04/21	5,000,000
2017/04/21	5,000,000
2017/07/04	2,000,000
2017/07/13	4,000,000
2017/07/13	2,000,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	3,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/20	4,500,000
2017/07/21	4.500.000
2017/08/01	14,000,000
2017/10/13	3,000,000
2017/10/17	1,500,000
2017/10/18	5,000,000
2017/10/18	700,000
2018/01/15	500,000
2018/02/19	2,000,000
2018/02/23	700,000
2018/03/12	4,000,000
2018/03/15	300,000
Total	R144,700,000

2018/2019
Date	Amount Invested
2018/04/07	4,800,000
2018/04/24	20,000,000
2018/06/20	80,000,000
2018/06/21	40,000,000
2018/06/26	25,000,000
2018/06/24	4,500,000
2018/10/12	1,000,000
2018/10/19	1,500,000
2018/10/26	11,500,000
2018/11/09	1,600,000
Total	R189,900,000

g) Returns enjoyed to date are:

2015/2016 R396,953 interest earned

2016/2017 R1,061,724 interest earned

2017/2018 R2,096,959 interest earned

2018/2019 R5,473,457 interest earned from 1 April 2018 to 28 February 2019

h) The RSR invested only in the Corporation for Public Deposits (CPD) at the South African Reserve Bank

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

	(aa) in the past three financial years	(bb) Since 1 April 2018
(b) Nature of investment	Monies, for which we do not have an immediate need for, are transferred from the current bank account to a call account in order to maximise interest earned.
(c) Why was the investment made
(d) Projected Returns	Interest rates can vary from time to time, but the rates are currently: Current Account – 5.25% Call Account – 5.6%
(e) Who represented SAMSA in negotiations	There are no negotiations – these accounts were set up many years ago. Transfers to and from the Call account are authorised by the Chief Financial Officer and released by 2 bank signatories as per the Delegation of Authority.
(f) Date of Investment	Various dates as and when surplus monies are identified so that we can maximise interest earned.
(g) Return on investments received	The following interest was received in: 2016 – R401 000 2017 – R688 000 2018 – R2 534 000	From 1 April 2018 to 31 January 2019 SAMSA received interest of R2 315 000
(h) Investments made with	ABSA Bank	ABSA Bank

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

Airports Company South Africa has a Board approved Investment Policy which governs the investment of surplus funds in line with the Section 31.3.1 of the Treasury Regulation which stipulates the following “A government business enterprise listed in Schedule 2, 3B and 3D or a public entity listed in Schedule 3A or 3C authorised to invest surplus funds, must have an investment policy approved by the accounting authority”.

Please see attached Investment portfolios, addressing the following questions: (a) What investments have been made in each month by (ii) entities reporting to him (aa) in the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2018, (b) what was the nature of each investment, (d) what were the projected returns in each case, (f) on what date was each investment made, (g) what returns have been enjoyed to date in each case and (h) with whom were investments made in each case?

(e) The Company’s Treasury Department under the Finance Division is responsible for negotiating the investments of surplus cash on behalf of the company.

(b) The Company invests in various instruments such as money market funds, term deposits, income funds and call deposits which ensures that the company is able to meet its financial obligations at all times.

(c) The Treasury Department invests surplus cash in accordance with the Board approved policy to ensure that capital is preserved, adequate liquidity is maintained, and returns are optimised. The counterparty risk is managed by monitoring and diversifying the list of approved counterparties. To mitigate credit risk, the Treasury Department conducts credit risk assessment of investment counterparties whenever there is new information such as financial statements and credit rating reports. In addition, the Company invests with institutions and funds with a minimum national long-term credit rating of A- or equivalent and/or minimum national short-term credit rating of F1 or equivalent.

The Board Approved Investment Policy further stipulates the following thresholds regarding counterparties and approved financial instruments for the investment of surplus cash: counterparty limit, asset class allocation, credit rating limit, weighted average duration, assessment of investment instruments based on liquidity requirements and financial instruments and products.

Airports Company Investment portfolio as 30th June 2018

Airports Company Investment portfolio as 30th September 2018

Airports Company Investment portfolio as 31st December 2018

Airports Company South Africa Investment Portfolio as 31st March 2016

Airports Company South Africa Investment Portfolio as 31st March 2017

Airports Company South Africa Investment Portfolio as 31st March 2018

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA):

(i) PRASA invests its surplus cash in F1 rated Banks and Money Market Funds as per the PRASA Treasury Management Policy. These investments are not for trading purposes but are to preserve the time value of money as PRASA awaits spending on the execution and roll out of the PRASA programmes. The funds are spread across investment vehicles and banking institutions so as to avoid concentration risk. The PRASA investment policy consists of the following three strategies (in order of importance):

• Preservation of Capital (only investing in money market instruments;
• Maintenance of liquidity to meet funding requirements; and
• Maximise risk adjustment return in accordance to all sections of the Treasury Policy.

(aa) The following investments were made in the past three financial years:

Nedgroup Money Market Funds

2016 / 2017	2017 / 2018	2018/ 2019
R884,807,250	R947,598,412	R965,575,424

Investec Money Market Funds

Opening Market Value	2016 / 2017	2017 / 2018	2018/ 2019
R759,303,087	R1,320,123,109-55	R1,320,123,109-55	R1,560,634,085-00

Investec Money Market Funds

Opening Market Value	2016 / 2017	2017 / 2018	2018/ 2019
R759,303,087-00	R1,320,123,109-55	R1,320,123,109-55	R1,560,634,085-00

ABSA Money Market Funds

Opening Market Value	2016 / 2017	2017 / 2018	2018/ 2019
R1,107,051-285-00	R1,107,051,285-00	R1,196,976,046-54	R1,815,702,156-00

(bb) Stanlib – R500 million was deposited to PRASA’s investment in the Stanlib Money Market Fund since 1 April 2018.

ABSA – R550 million was added to PRASA’s investment in the ABSA Money Market Fund since 1 April 2018.

j) The nature of each investment were short term deposits with Money Market Funds (Investec Money Market Fund, ABSA Money Market Fund, Nedgroup Money Market Fund, Stanlib Money Market Fund).

k) Each investment was made for preserving the buying power of PRASA’s capital subsidies while PRASA awaits spending on the execution and roll out of the R172 billion government investment program.

l) The projected returns were for interest earned on short term banking investments and prevailing money market fund rates which fluctuate daily for the purpose of preserving the entity’s buying power when payments are due.

m) The Group Treasurer with guidance of the Chief Financial Officer represents PRASA when investments are made.

n) The dates on which each investment was made are as follow:

Nedgroup Money Market Fund 20 October 2016 R300 million

Stanlib Money Market Fund 21 October 2016 R500 million

Stanlib Money Market Fund 18 October 2019 R500 million

Investec Money Market Fund 1 December 2015 R300 million

Investec Money Market Fund 9 September 2016 R200 million

ABSA Money Market Fund 15 February 2019 R400 million

ABSA Money Market Fund 22 February 2019 R150 million

o) Returns enjoyed to date from these investments are:

Nedgroup Money Market Fund R165,243,457-33

Stanlib Money Market Fund R229,694,094-93

Investec Money Market Fund R294,600,836-98

ABSA Money Market Fund R278,679,930-00

p) PRASA made investments were made with:

• Nedgroup Money Market Fund
• Stanlib Money Market Fund
• Investec Money Market Fund
• ABSA Money Market Fund

Reply:

1.(a) The Public Transport Network Grant is a conditional grant (under the Division of Revenue Act) to selected municipalities to accelerate the implementation of Integrated Public Transport Networks.

(b) Municipalities submit an annual budget proposal and business plan in the year prior to the budgeted municipal financial year which forms the basis for approving and monitoring PTN Grant spending by the DoT.

c) The proportion of the PTN Grant allocated to capital spending can very per city project design depending on the quantity of infrastructure required and the amount of compensation of existing operators. As a rough guide, up to the present, at least 60 to 70% of the Grant has been going to capital in the larger metropolitan cities that are operating proper scale Phase 1 systems.

Please note that the premature launch of Harambee in Ekurhuleni in 2017 with just 8 buses is at such a suboptimal scale that it cannot be viewed as a pilot Phase 1 project let alone a viable bus service. The city was meant to expand to 80 buses carrying 20 000 a day in 2018 and currently is still under a quarter of this.

The DoT has met with the city in June and September 2018 and March 2019 and put them on notice that they need to scale up to a proper operation of at least 40 buses in calendar 2019 or risk DoT invoking Division of Revenue Act powers to withhold transfers.

(2) Due to a lack of capacity and lengthy delays, the DoT is just looking to have a proper Phase 1 up and running over the next 5 years that will link Tembisa, Kempton Park, OR Tambo International Airport, Boksburg and Vosloorus. We expect this to cost a total of R5 to 6 billion in capital and when mature to carry around 100 000 weekday passenger trips.

The DoT will not allow any grant spending on other phases until the city can prove that it is running Phase 1 successfully. This is likely to take 3 to 5 years. At that stage future phases will have to be redesigned and costed to scale down on infrastructure.

(3) (a,b,c) In 2016/17 the City estimates operating costs at R68m with no fare income as they were only running a test service. In 17/18, the City estimates operating costs at R143m and the DoT estimates fare income at a truly negligible R1m or less due to the very limited service which was not viable from the start. In 18/19 the City estimates operating costs at R300m including indirect operating costs and fare income at R20m.

The city has not been forthcoming regarding Council contributions, but the DoT estimates it at around R40 to R50 million per year in question.

In conclusion, the Harambee project needs to professionalize and be run viably with properly balanced costs and revenues and passengers. After appealing for this for over 2 years, the DoT has now given the city until the end of 2019/20 to completely zero base all costs and rescale all operations to be viable and balanced and not a token white elephant. There is currently no excuse open to the city for the current mess and what remains is to drastically turn things around in 2019/20 or face the consequences.

Reply:

1. The Minister has not been informed that she has been impacted in the above. The Minister is also not aware of any allegations made against her by Mr Agrizzi as indicated above with regards to the said Commission.

2. All gifts are recorded accordingly in the gifts register and submitted in line with the Executive Members’ Ethics Act 83 of 1998, none such were received from Bosasa.

Reply:

660 (1&2) (a)(i) (ii)(aa) (bb)(aaa)(aaaa) - 1 April 2016 until 31 March 2017

Weapons	Manufacture	Any other lethal objects	Action taken
	Type	Calibre	Stolen	Lost
a	b	c	e	f	g
Pistol	Star	9mm	None	One (1)	Kroonstad Legsato on 04/09/2018 awaiting trial date
Pistol	Z88	9mm	One (1)	None	Bloemfontein Court for trial on 30/04/2019
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	None	One (1)	Member was found guilty in Military Court sentence to 12 Months in Detention Barracks
Launch Grenades	Hand Grenades	40mm	Thirty Six (36)	None	Two members was found guilty and sentence for 42 years in prison
Uzi Machine Guns	Uzi Machine Guns	9mm	Four (4)	None	Two members was found guilty and sentence for 42 years in prison The person that bought the weapons was sentence to One (1) year in prison
Rifle	R 5	5.56mm	One(1)	None	Case docket still under investigation
Pistol	Z88	9mm	One(1)	None	The accused was found guilty and received a fine of R 4000.00 and 2 years imprisonment suspended for a period of 3 years.
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	One(1)	None	The member was found guilty and was fined R 5000.00.
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	None	Three (3)	On 13 August 2018 Accused No1 was found guilty for the theft of firearm and was sentence for two years. Accused No2 and 3 were found guilty on Negligent Loss of Negligent and sentence to repay the value of the firearm.
Pistol	Z88	9mm	None	One(1)	Case docket still under investigation
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	None	Four(4)	Case docket still under investigation
Pistol	Z88	9mm	None	Six (6)	Case docket at Pretoria Regional Court for decision.
Pistol	Clock	9mm	None	One(1)	The accused was found guilty and fined of R 2000.00

660 (1&2) (b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb) (aaa)(aaaa) - 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017

Ammunition	Manufacture	Any other lethal objects	Action taken
	Type	Calibre	Stolen	Lost
a	b	c	e	f	g
Small calibre ammunition	R 4	5.56mm	Two Thousand Seven Hundred (2700) Rounds	None	Still under investigation for Sec 204 Application
Small calibre ammunition	R 4	5.56mm	Thirty (30) Rounds	None	Case still under investigation
Small calibre ammunition	R 4	5.56mm	Three Thousand (3000) Rounds	None	Case trail date is 07/05/2019 at Krugersdorp Magistrate Court
Small calibre ammunition	R 4	5.56mm	One thousand one hundred and Seventy Three (1173) Rounds	None	Accused was charged and case post phoned until 04 April 2019.

660 (1&2) (a)(i) (ii)(aa) (bb)(aaa)(bbbb) - 1 April 2017 until 31 March 2018

Weapons	Manufacture	Any other lethal objects	Action taken
	Type	Calibre	Stolen	Lost
a	b	c	e	f	g
Pistol	Baretta	9mm	Three (3)	None	Pistols circulated on CAS.
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	None	One(1)	Member found guilty in Military Court and was fined R1000.00 (One Thousand Rand)
Rifle	R 5	5.56mm	None	One (1)	Case docket at Bloemfontein Legsato on 09/11/2017 awaiting trial date.
Rifles	R 4	5.56mm	Six (6)	None	On 06 August the six accused was found not guilty at Cape Town Legsato
Pistol	Sig Sauer	9mm	One(1)	None	Case docket investigation finalised handed over to Legsato Langebaan on 19 March 2019
Pistol	Star	9mm	One(1)	None	Member was found guilty and discharged from the SANDF.
Pistol	Baretta	9mm	One (1)	None	Member will appear in court on the 08 April 2019.
Pistol	Z88	9mm	One (1)	None	The firearm was recovered still under investigation the two(2) civilian members that was involved was sentence to Five(5) years imprisonment.
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	Three (3)	None	Case docket still under investigation
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	One (1)	None	Case docket still under investigation
Pistol	Clock Pistol	9mm	None	One(1)	Accused was found guilty and fined R 3000.00 (Three Thousand Rand.)
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	None	One(1)	Case docket to Court for decision.
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	One(1)	None	Docket at Court suspect send for psychological evaluation.
Rifle	R 5	5.56mm	None	One(1)	Case referred back to IO for further instructions to be executed from Prosecutor at Pretoria Regional Court
Rifle	R 5	5.56mm	None	Two(2)	Case docket still under investigation
Pistol	Z88	9mm	None	Two(2)	Case docket still under investigation
Small calibre ammunition	R 5 Rifle Ammunition	5.56mm	Hundred and Fifty Five (155) Rounds	None	Awaiting report from Welkom SAPS.
Small calibre ammunition	LMG Rifle Ammunition	7.62mm	Four (4)Rounds	None	Awaiting report from Welkom SAPS.
Small calibre ammunition	R 4 Rifle ammunition	5.56mm	Sixty (60) Rounds	None	On 06 August the six accused was found not guilty at Cape Town Legsato

660 (1&2) (a)(i) (ii)(aa) (bb)(aaa)(bbb) - 1 April 2018 to current date

Weapons	Manufacture	Any other lethal objects	Action taken
	Type	Calibre	Stolen	Lost
a	b	c	e	f	g
Pistol	Star	9mm	Two(2)	None	Case still under investigation.
Pistol	Star	9mm	One (1)	None	Case still under investigation
Pistol	Z 88	9mm	None	One(1)	Weapon was recovered no suspect case still under investigation
Rifle	R 4	5.56mm	None	Three(3)	Case still under investigation.

660 (1&2) (b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb) (aaa)(bbb) - 1 April 2018 to current date

Ammunition	Manufacture	Any other lethal objects	Action taken
	Type	Calibre	Stolen	Lost
a	b	c	e	f	g
Small calibre ammunition	Z88	9mm	Seven (7) Rounds	None	Case docket still under investigation
Small calibre ammunition	R4	5.56mm	None	Two Hundred and Ten (210) Rounds	Undetected not enough evidence found for prosecution
Small calibre ammunition	R4	5.56mm	Hundred and Twenty (120) Rounds	None	One member was found guilty Discharge from the SANDF
Small calibre ammunition	R 4	5.56mm	None	Two Hundred and Ten (210) Rounds	Case reopened against one member for further investigation