Question NW436 to the Minister of Transport

Share this page:

03 April 2019 - NW436

Profile picture: Hunsinger, Mr CH

Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport

With reference to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) matters within (a) his department and (b) the entities reporting to him, (i) what CCMA matters have been heard in each month (aa) in the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 January 2019, (ii) what number of matters were (aa) lost and (bb) won, (iii) what were the total costs involved in each case, (iv) what was spent on legal services in each month and (v) why was this necessary in each case?

Reply:

Department

(a) (i) None

(aa) None

(bb) None

(ii) (aa) None

(bb) None

(iv) Not applicable

(v) Not applicable

The (b) Cross-Border Road Transport Agency have had the cases outlined in the tables 1

The (b) Road Accident Fund have had the cases outlined in the tables 2

The (b) Road Traffic Management Corporation have had the cases outlined in the tables 3

The (b) Road Traffic Infringement Agency have had the cases outlined in the tables 4

The (b) South African National Roads Agency Limited have had the cases outlined in the tables 5

(b) The Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRTA)

TABLE: 1

2016/17 : 2 cases

(ii) Matter

(aa) lost

 

(bb) won

(iii) total costs

(iv) Amount spent on legal services

(v) Why it was this necessary

Unfair Dismissal

0

1

1, withdrawn

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

Dispute of mutual interest and of Employment Equity

   

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

2017/18 : 1 case

(ii) Matter

(aa) lost

 

(bb) won

(iii) total costs

(iv) Amount spent on legal services

(v) Why it was this necessary

Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) - Promotion

1, but the matter is under review

Not applicable

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

2018/19: 8 Cases – 1 case won – lost case Not Applicable

(ii) Matter

(aa) lost

 

(bb) won

(iii) total costs

(iv) Amount spent on legal services

(v) Why it was this necessary

Unfair Dismissal in terms of section 186 (1)(b)(ii)

Not applicable, Settlement was reached to reinstate the employee

Not applicable, settlement was reached to reinstate the employee

R154,180.50

31/01/2018 -R169.40

31/05/2018- R56.70

29/03/2018-R80,631.82

30/09/2017-R33,797.42

16/02/2018-R19,012.61

31/05/2018-R20,512.55

The cost incurred was for the legal representative during the Arbitration process

Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) - Promotion

Not applicable

Not applicable, settlement Agreement was reached, and the matter is closed

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

 

Unfair disciplinary Action

Not applicable, sanction that was in dispute expired

Not applicable, sanction that was in dispute expired

R56,350

31/10/2018 -R19, 950

19/12/2018-R36,400

It was necessary on the fact that the matter was dealt internally by legal representatives

Breach of Collective Agreement

Not applicable

Ruling in favor of the C-BRTA

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

6 [EEA] - Prohibition of unfair discrimination - Gender

Not applicable

Not applicable, parties concluded an agreement to finalise the matter internally

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

6 [EEA] - Prohibition of unfair discrimination - Gender

Not applicable

The employee did not pursue the matter further after conciliation.

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

Unfair suspension

Not applicable

The employee did not pursue the matter further after conciliation.

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

Unfair Labour Practice

The was heard during arbitration and the employee withdrawn the case.

The was heard during arbitration and the employee withdrawn the case.

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

(bb) Since 1 January 2019: 4 cases

(ii) Matter

(aa) lost

 

(bb) won

(iii) total costs

(iv) Amount spent on legal services

(v) Why it was this necessary

Unfair Dismissal

Not applicable, case is still pending

Not applicable, case is still pending

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) – Promotion

Not applicable, case is still pending

Not applicable, case is still pending

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

Unfair Labour Practice in terms of section 186 (2) (a) – Promotion.

Not applicable, case is still pending

Not applicable, case is still pending

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

Mutual interest disputes

Not applicable,

Conciliation process was heard during the month of January 2019 the matter was not resolved. Certificate to strike issued but it was interdicted

Not applicable,

Conciliation process was heard during the month of January 2019 the matter was not resolved. Certificate to strike issued but it was interdicted

R0,00

R0,00

Not applicable

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

(i)(aa)(bb) The table below is a summary of the matters heard by the CCMA in the past 3 financial years. The table includes the parties involved in the matter and the reason for the matter being set down at the CCMA.

(ii) (aa)(bb)The table below illustrates the number of matters that were either lost or won at the CCMA.

(iii) The table below illustrates the matters where legal costs were incurred for matters referred and set down at the CCMA. It should be noted that not all matters referred to the CCMA incurred legal costs.

(iv) The table below illustrates the legal costs incurred per month over the reporting period for matters at the CCMA.

(v) The table below provides the reasons why matters may have necessitated the appointment of legal assistance and the reasons below are in line with the Company Disciplinary Policy.

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) matters within ATNS in the past three financial years and since 1 January 2019, showing the status and legal services costs per matter and the reasons for such costs:

MONTHS

CCMA Matters

Status

Cost Implication

Reason 4 costs

February 2016

1

won

R452 568-00

complexity

December 2017

1

won

R85 000-00

Minimal running costs

July 2018

2

1 won and 1 reinstatement

R76 640 and R917412.75

Minimal running costs

August 2018

2

Both resigned

No costs

No costs

October 2018

2

From last report

R382 500-00

complexity

December 2018

1

settlements

 

complexity

February 2019

2

Case still underway

No invoice yet

complexity

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

(a) Not applicable; (b), (i), (aa), (bb); (ii), (aa), (bb); (iii); (iv); (v): The tables below provide a record and details on each of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) matters handled by the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) in the past three financial years, and since 1 January 2019.

(i), (aa): 2016/17 Financial Year

Summary of table: During the 2016/17 financial year, the SACAA dealt with ten (10) CCMA matters. Out of the ten, the SACAA won five (5), three (3) were settlement agreements; and in the case of the other two, the applicants did not proceed with the cases. There were no monthly legal fees as services are procured and used as and when necessary.

(i), (aa) Nature of dispute / matters heard during the 2016/17 financial year

(aa) Matters or cases lost / won

(iii) Total cost of the case.

(iv) Total cost spend on legal fees monthly

(v) Why was this necessary?

1st case

Unfair labour practice based on promotion.

2nd case

The applicant claimed unfair labour practice relating to a performance bonus.

3rd case

The applicant claimed unfair dismissal.

The parties settled the matter before the CCMA hearing.

The parties settled the matter before the CCMA hearing.

The parties settled the matter before the CCMA hearing.

Settled as per below.

Settled as per below.

Settled as per below.

R445 165.31

(Legal cost)

R2, 700 000.00 (Settlement amount)

Not applicable.

The disputes involved a member of the SACAA Executive, relating to dismissal, contractual dispute, performance bonus, and restructuring.

Unfair dismissal dispute.

The SACAA won the case at CCMA.

No cost was incurred.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Non-renewal of fixed term contract.

The SACAA won the case at CCMA.

R98 196.75

Not applicable.

The matter was complex in that it involved both non-renewal of a contract as well as dishonest conduct by the employee.

1st case

The union claimed unfair labour practice based on the withdrawal of a standby allowance.

2nd case

The union declared a dispute relating to matters of mutual interest, i.e. wages, organisational restructuring, and normalisation of salaries.

The union did not continue with the matter at the CCMA.

The CCMA issued a certificate of non-resolution, and the union did not continue with the matter any further.

No cost was incurred.

No cost was incurred.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable

Not applicable.

Allegations of unfair dismissal.

The SACAA won the case at the CCMA.

R369 979.40

Not applicable.

The matter was complex as it involved the interpretation of the Civil Aviation Authority Act, 2009 (Act No 13 of 2009), and the SACAA’s Conflict of Interest Policy.

Allegations of unfair dismissal.

The SACAA won the case at the CCMA.

R88 865.28

Not applicable.

The matter was complex as it involved dismissal based on probation terms.

Allegations of unfair dismissal.

The SACAA won the case at the CCMA.

R125 650.80

Not applicable.

The matter was complex in that it involved appropriateness of the dismissal, and potential claims of unilateral change to terms and conditions of employment.

TOTAL

Ten (10)

R3 827 857.54

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

(i), (aa): 2017/18 FINANCIAL YEAR

Summary of table: During the 2017/18 financial year, the SACAA dealt with three (3) CCMA matters. Out of the three two were won and one was a settlement agreement. There were no monthly legal fees as services are procured and used as and when necessary.

(i), (aa) Nature of dispute / matters heard during the 2017/18 financial year

(aa) Matters or cases lost / won

(iii) Total cost of the case.

(iv) Total cost spend on legal fees monthly

(v) Why was this necessary?

Allegations of unfair dismissal.

The SACAA won the case at CCMA.

No cost was incurred.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Allegations of unfair dismissal.

The parties settled the matter before the CCMA arbitration hearing.

R181 287.00

(Legal cost)

R98 015.13 (Settlement amount)

Not applicable.

It was important to avoid a protracted legal battle as the applicant has a legal background and was also employed in the SACAA’s Legal Division.

Allegations of unfair labour practice.

The SACAA won the case at CCMA.

No cost was incurred.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

TOTAL

Three (3)

R279 302.13

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

(i), (aa): 2018/19 FINANCIAL YEAR AND SINCE 1 JANUARY 2019

Summary of table: During the 2018/19 financial year and since 01 January 2019 no CCMA matter was won or lost. There were no monthly legal fees as services are procured and used as and when necessary.

(i) Nature of dispute / matters heard during the 2018/19 financial year and since 01 January 2019

(aa) Matters or cases lost / won

(iii) Total cost of the case.

(iv) Total cost spend on legal fees monthly

(v) Why was this necessary?

Allegations of unilateral change to the terms and conditions of employment.

The CCMA issued a certificate of non-resolution, and the union did not pursue the matter any further.

No cost was incurred.

Not applicable.

Not applicable

Allegations of unfair labour practice.

The applicant withdrew the matter.

No cost was incurred.

Not applicable.

Not applicable

Allegations of constructive dismissal.

The matter is still on-going at the CCMA.

No cost was incurred.

Not applicable.

Not applicable

Application by the SACAA for the designation as an essential services entity

The matter is still on-going at the CCMA.

R616 436.91

Not applicable.

The matter involves possible limitation of employees’ right to industrial action.

TOTAL

Four (4)

R616 436.91

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

(b) The Road Accident Fund (RAF)

TABLE: 2

(i)(aa) matters heard in 3 financial years,

(ii)(aa) the following number of matters were lost,

and (bb) won,

(iii) the total cost involved in each case is,

(iv) what was spent on legal services in each month,

and (v) it was necessary in each case because,

2015-16 FINANCIAL YEAR

April – November

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

December

RAF v Chilopo

0

1

R202,831.77

R 202,831.77

Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter

January

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

February

E.Mahlomotja

1

1

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

T. Mazibuko

   

R0,00

 

Internally Represented

2016-17 FINANCIAL YEAR

April

P. Zulu

0

1

R0,00

R0.00

Internally Represented

May

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

June

G. Qobeka

0

2

R194,534.61

R249,016.71

Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter

P. Keti

   

R54,482.10

 

Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter

July

P. Hlongwane

1

1

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

N. Ntongolo

   

R0.00

 

Internally Represented

August - September

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

November

D. Creighton

0

2

R96,292.16

R283,193.17

Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter

E. Moseneke

   

R186,901.01

 

Attorney appointed due to complexity of the matter

December - March

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

2017-18 FINANCIAL YEAR

March

R.J. Mazibuko

0

1

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

April

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

May

J. Sabasa

0

1

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

June - August

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

September

L. Gxanase

0

1

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

October

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

November

M. Mpupu

0

2

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

Z. Dangwana

   

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

December - March

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

2018-19 FINANCIAL YEAR

March

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

April 2018

S. Mlaza

0

1

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

May 2018

T.G. Nonjongo

1

1

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

S. Menziwa

   

R0,00

None

Internally Represented

June - February

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

M. Gcnabana

0

1

R0.00

None

Internally Represented

and (bb) since 1 January 2019 to 28 February 2019,

None

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

 

(b) The Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC)

TABLE 3

2016/17 financial year

NAME

NATURE OF THE CASE

MONTH

FINANCIAL YEAR

OUTCOME

WON / LOST

LEGAL SERVICES COST

Mngomezulu

Gross Negligence and Financial irregularities

July 2016

2016/17

Won

R104 959.80

Mathibe and Lebaka

Gross Negligence

February 2017

2016/17

Mathibe Lost

R108,000

Mabena

Assault and unruly behaviour

Dec 2016

March 2017

2016/17

Won

R82,080

Msiza

Assault

Dec 2016

January 2017

2016/17

Won

R142 000

           
           

2017/18 financial year

NAME

NATURE OF THE CASE

MONTH

FINANCIAL YEAR

OUTCOME

WON/LOST

LEGAL SERVICES COSTS

Msiza

Assault

April 2017/

July/August

2017/18

Won

R205 200

Lebatlang

Gross Negligence

August 2017

2017/18

Won

R41 040

Van der Zandt

Assault

October 2017

2017/18

Lost

R494 240

Williams & others

Alleged Unfair Labour Practice

November 2017

2017/18

Won

R7 200

Williams & Others

Alleged Unfair Labour Practice

December 2017

2017/18

Won

R82 080

Mathibe

Gross Negligence

December 2017

2017/18

Lost

R172 440

2018/19 financial year

NAME

NATURE OF THE CASE

MONTH

FINANCIAL YEAR

OUTCOME

WON / LOST

LEGAL SERVICES COSTS

Khumalo and 17 others

Alleged unfair Labour Practice

May 2018

2018/19

Pending

R62 100

Khumalo & 17 Others

Alleged Unfair Labour Practice

November 2018

2018/19

Pending

R9 800

POPCRU

Alleged Unfair Labour Practice

July 2018

2018/19

Won

R188 800

NEHAWU obo Stephinah Segalagala

Alleged Unfair Labour Practise

August 2018

2018/19

Won

R0.00

Maphiri

Unfair Dismissal

December 2018

2018/19

Won

R0.00

(bb) Matters heard at the CCMA since 1 January 2019

NAME

NATURE OF THE CASE

MONTH

FINANCIAL YEAR

OUTCOME

WON/LOST

LEGAL SERVICES COSTS

Dada

Alleged unfair dismissal

January 2019

2018/19

Pending

R151 130.75

Khumalo

Alleged Unfair Dismissal

January / February 2019

2018/19

Pending

R248 400

NEHAWU

Organisational Rights

January 2019

2018/19

Pending

R0.00

(v) Why it was necessary to spend on each case

The nature of the respective matters together with capacity constraints pre April 2018, necessitated the appointment of external service providers to provide legal services. The RTMC appointed an additional 3 senior labour relations officials in 2018, which appointments have already resulted in reduction of legal costs incurred in the 2018/19 financial year.

(b) The Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA)

TABLE 4

(b) (i) 3 were matters were heard

2016/17 Financial Year

NATURE OF CASE

MONTH

OUTCOME

LOST / WON

LEGAL COST

Why was the spending necessary

Conciliation: Disclosure of information

September 2016

Won

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Arbitration: Disclosure of Information

October2016

Won

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Conciliation/ Arbitration: Equal pay for work of equal value

September 2016

Settlement reached

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

2017/18 Financial Year

7 Matters were heard

Conciliation: Unfair labour practice

April 2017

Won

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Arbitration: Unfair labour practice

May 2017

Won

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Set down for picketing rules

by SATAWU

June 2017

matter abandoned

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Conciliation: Working Hours

by SATAWU

July 2017

matter abandoned

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Arbitration: Working hours

by SATAWU

August 2017 matter abandoned

matter abandoned

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Arbitration: Housing allowance

August 2017

Won

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Conciliation/Arbitration: Unfair labour practice ( suspension)

November 2017

Suspension withdrawn

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

2018/19 Financial Year

7 Matters were heard

Conciliation: Equal pay for equal value

February 2018

On-going

R 91 709

Not Applicable

Conciliation: Unfair labour practice

February 2018

Matter withdrawn

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Conciliation: Dismissal

May to December 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

Won

R 115 968

R 141 935

R 110 966

The one case involved a senior executive manager therefore the Agency had to employ the services of a legal representation at a cost.

Arbitration: Unfair labour practice

June 2018

On-going

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Conciliation: Discrimination based on Gender

November 2018

On-going

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Arbitration : Condonation

Nov and Dec 2018

Won

R 68 598

Not Applicable

Conciliation: Dismissal

December 2018

On-going

R 0 .00

 

Since 1 January 2019

3 Matters were heard

Conciliation: Discrimination on the grounds of Gender

January 2019

On-going

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Condonation for late referral

February 2019

On-going

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

Arbitration

March 2019

On-going

R 0 .00

Not Applicable

(b) The South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)

TABLE 5

(b) (i) 0 were matters were heard

2016/17 Financial Year

NATURE OF CASE

MONTH

OUTCOME

LOST / WON

LEGAL COST

Why was the spending necessary

-

-

-

-

-

2017/18 Financial Year

0 Matters were heard

-

-

-

-

-

2018/19 Financial Year

3 Matters were heard

CCMA Dispute: Unfair Dismissal: misconduct related to tender irregularities

July 2018

Parties reached a settlement on the matter:


R0.00

Not Applicable

LRA section 62 Demarcation dispute

August 2018

Applicant (Trade Union) withdrew the dispute:


R144, 793.65

Legal representation was required considering the nature of the dispute

Section 198A Dispute: (TES) labour broking deeming employee provision

Jan 2019

Applicant (Trade Union) withdrew the dispute: technically won


R248, 573.67

Other parties to the dispute were legally represented and for comparative ability reasons SANRAL had to procure the same services

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

(i) (aa) In the past three financial years

Year

No. of Disputes

Month

Nature of Dispute

2016

1

February

Unfair Dismissal*

 

1

May

Unfair Dismissal

 

1

November

Timing of 13th cheque payment

 

1

November

Non-renewal of employment contract

2017

1

January, August

Unfair Dismissal*

 

1

April, August

Non-renewal of employment contract****

 

1

August

Unfair Dismissal***

 

1

September, October, November

Non-renewal of employment contract**

2018

1

January

Non-renewal of employment contract**

 

1

April, June

Unfair Dismissal***

 

1

June, September

Non-renewal of employment contract****

bb) Zero (0)

ii) aa) Lost: Zero (0)

bb) Won: Seven (7)

Year

No. of Disputes

Month

Nature of Dispute

In SAMSA’s favour

2016

1

February

Unfair Dismissal*

Yes

 

1

May

Unfair Dismissal

Yes

 

1

November

Timing of 13th cheque payment

Yes

 

1

November

Non-renewal of employment contract

Yes

2017

1

January, August

Unfair Dismissal*

Yes

 

1

April, August

Non-renewal of employment contract

Settlement Agreement reached

 

1

August

Unfair Dismissal***

Yes

 

1

September, October, November

Non-renewal of employment contract**

Settlement Agreement reached

2018

1

January

Non-renewal of employment contract**

 
 

1

April, June

Unfair Dismissal***

Yes

 

1

June, September, December

Non-renewal of employment contract

Still pending.

2019

Zero

iii)

Year

No. of Disputes

Month

Nature of Dispute

In SAMSA’s favour

Cost

Legal costs

Total costs

2016

1

February

Unfair Dismissal*

Yes

Zero

Zero

Zero

 

1

May

Unfair Dismissal

Yes

Zero

   
 

1

November

Timing of 13th cheque payment

Yes

Zero

   
 

1

November

Non-renewal of employment contract

Yes

Zero

   

2017

1

January, August

Unfair Dismissal*

Yes

Zero

R514k

R1,9m

 

1

April, August

Non-renewal of employment contract

Settlement Agreement reached

R1,4m

   
 

1

August

Unfair Dismissal***

Yes

Zero

   
 

1

September, October, November

Non-renewal of employment contract**

Settlement reached in January 2018

     

2018

1

January

Non-renewal of employment contract**

Settlement Agreement reached

R261k

R735k

R996K

 

1

April, June

Unfair Dismissal***

Yes

Zero

   
 

1

June, September, December

Non-renewal of employment contract

Still pending.

     

2019

Zero

Zero

Zero

 

iv)

Year

Legal Costs

2016

None

2017

R514k

2018

R735k

b)

Year

Cost

2016

None

2017

R1,4m

2018

R261k

v) Legal costs are due to company representation at the CCMA

a) Other costs are due to settlement agreement reached at the CCMA

Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)

b) There are no(I) matters hat have been heard in the CCMA in the past (aa) Three financial years (bb) since 1 January 2019. (ii) (iii)(iv)(v) Not applicable

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA):

(i) (aa) CCMA matters heard in each month in the past three financial years are detailed in the

Annexure as attached.

(bb) CCMA matters heard since 1 January 2019 are detailed in the Annexure as attached.

(ii) (aa) No matters were lost.

(bb) Five (5) matters were won.

(iii) Please refer to Annexure.

(iv) Please refer to Annexure.

(v) Please refer to (iv).

Date

(i)

(a) & (b)

Employee no

Employee Name and Surname

Employee Subgroup

Nature of Dispute

CCMA Outcome

Legal Costs: at the CCMA

31 April 2015

20104010

Pallelo Lebaka

Executive Manager

Failing to protect the right of PRASA in executing one of the contracts that was under way.

Employee Claims were dismissed

No Legal Costs applicable

16 April 2016

20108387

Mudzungu Mudau

HCM: Intern

Unfair Termination of contract of Employment

Employee Claims were dismissed

No Legal Costs applicable

16 April 2016

20108399

Surprise Mthombeni

HCM: Intern

Unfair Termination of contract of Employment

Matter was dismissed

No Legal Costs applicable

27 July 2018

20106955

Mavhungu Mahunganei

Project Manager

Unfair conduct - promotion/demotion/probation/training/benefits

Matter was dismissed

R126,000-77.

09 January 2019

20012266

Luyanda Gantsho

General Manager

Unfair dismissal

Matter ended at the conciliation

No Legal Costs applicable

Railway Safety Regulator (RSR):

CCMA matters heard in each month in the past three financial years are:

 

(i)(aa)

Month

2016/2017

2017/2018

2018/2019

January

-

-

Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions

February

-

-

Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions

March

Misconduct dismissal

-

Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions

April

Misconduct

-

-

May

-

Misconduct dismissal.

-

   

Alleged refusal to bargain x 2

 

June

Misconduct dismissal

Misconduct dismissal

Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions x 6

 

Non-confirmation of probation

   
 

Unfair suspension

   

July

-

-

-

August

-

-

Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions x 2

September

Misconduct dismissal

Dismissal unknown.

Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotions/demotions x 2

   

Agency shop agreement

 
   

Alleged refusal to bargain x 2

 

October

-

-

-

November

-

-

-

December

Improper conduct and insubordination

-

-

 

Unfair suspension

   

CCMA matters heard since 1 January 2019 are:

 

(i)(bb)

Date

CCMA Matter

8 January 2019

Alleged failure to consult on s189

31 January 2019

S6 EEA – Prohibition of Unfair Discrimination

1 February 2019

Alleged unfair conduct related to promotion

27 February 2019

Alleged unfair dismissal

 

Alleged non-renewal of fixed-term contract x 2

6 March 2019

Alleged unfair labour practice related to promotion

8 March 2019

Alleged unfair conduct related to provision of benefits

12 March 2019

Alleged unfair dismissal

(ii) (aa) Two (2) matters are taken on review, which is currently in progress.

(bb) Six (6) matters were won.

(iii) Compensation of about R600,000 which is currently a subject of review.

(iv) In-house capacity was used and thus there is no financial implications.

(v) As internal resources were used, no costs were incurred.

Source file