Questions and Replies

Filter by year

07 October 2015 - NW3383

Profile picture: Matsepe, Mr CD

Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether each water board in the country has an essential service agreement in place; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of each such agreement?

Reply:

Amatola Water

Amatola Water does not have an existing agreement of essential services as this matter is currently being discussed at the Amanzi Bargaining Council in an attempt to have a standardised approach amongst all the Water Boards.

Bloem Water

Bloem Water has an Essential Services Agreement as negotiated with labour, facilitated by the Council for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). The agreement specifies categories of employment designated as essential services such as treatment, security, pipeline teams and artisans. The Amanzi Bargaining Council is currently attending to an Essential Services framework as a guideline for adoption by respective water boards having identified their designated job categories.

Lepelle Northern Water

Lepelle Northern Water (LNW) does not have an Essential Service Agreement. This is due to the fact that organised Labour within LNW is refusing to engage on the same in order to sign one. Organised labour’s reason for refusal is that the agreement is divisive. In case of threatened industrial action we rely on clause 1 (d) of government gazette no 18276, vol 387 dated 12 September 1997 read together with chapter iv of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 as amended.

Magalies Water

Magalies Water does not have an essential services agreement. A draft agreement is in place for all Water Boards at Amanzi Bargaining Council to be discussed at the next council meeting to be held on 17 September 2015.

Mhlathuze Water

Mhlathuze Water (MW) does not have an essential service agreement in place yet. An application was made to declare MW as essential service. After extensive investigation by the Essential Services Committee where presentations were made by MW and NEHAWU, MW was formally declared an essential service on 22 June 2015. The Essential Services Committee undertook to provide an essential service agreement to MW which is still awaited. Since Mhlathuze Water has been declared an essential service, all employees within Mhlathuze Water are deemed essential employees up until the minimum service level agreement is concluded.

Overberg Water

Overberg Water does not have an existing agreement of essential services in place. Engagements are currently planned with the Trade Unions, being the South African Municipal Workers Union and Independent Municipal and Allied Trade Union to establish an Essential Services Agreement.

Rand Water

Rand Water, by the nature of its mandate in terms of the Water Services Act, 108 of 1997, performs an essential service in supplying and distributing potable water in its area of supply. As far back as 2004, Rand Water and its Trade Unions at the time, being the South African Municipal Workers Union and the Rand Water Staff Association, established an Essential Services task team to investigate and determine which services are essential. The Rand Water Minimum Services Agreement was signed by all relevant parties on 30 September 2004. In terms of Section 70 of the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (as amended, the Rand Water Minimum Service Agreement was ratified by the Essential Services Committee of the CCMA in 12 January 2005.

In essence the agreement:

    1. Indicates that parties commit to provision of essential services of providing water during any industrial action.
    2. Defines Essential Service/s, Key Posts and Maintenance Service.
    3. Has two annexures of specified positions that are required during strike action.
    4. Directs parties to meet and consult on key posts.

However should there be, deviation or non-compliance to the agreement, Rand Water reserves its right to engage replacement staff.

Amanzi Bargaining Council, to which all water utilities belong, is in the process of developing an industry / sector wide “Minimum Services Agreement”.

Sedibeng Water

Sedibeng Water has a Minimum Service Agreement in place. The agreement provides for minimum services to be provided upon labour engaging on any strike action.

The agreement lists teams that are attached to Water Purification, Maintenance and Distribution functions of the organisation. The agreement ensures that water and sanitation services continue un-interrupted during the strike action.

Umgeni Water

Umgeni Water does not have a signed Minimum Service agreement, it still in a draft format which have been discussed with NEHAWU. We (The Department) are busy engaging NEHAWU to finalise the agreement.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3419

Profile picture: More, Ms E

More, Ms E to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether her department meets the Government’s 2% employment equity target for the employment of persons with disabilities that was set in 2005; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

Currently, my Department is not meeting the set targets of 2% for the employment of people with disabilities.

However my Department has in 2012, established an Employment Equity (EE) Forum which developed and an approved EE Plan to address issues of gender and disability.

Since the inception of the forum in 2012 there has been a slow but significant movement in the appointment of people with disabilties from 0.28% in April 2011 to 0.76% as at April 2014. Currently, the percentatge of people with disabilities as at July 2015 is 0.78%. (see below movement of appointment PWDs)

My Department plans to target vacant funded posts when advertising for people with disabilities in the future to reach the target of 2% or more, and also work closely with the Directorate Gender and Mainstreaming to address isues of gender and disabilities.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3352

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What are the reasons for the non-supply of piped water to the Divaal area situated in Ward 2 of the Indaka Local Municipality and within the uThukela District Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal, which has been without piped water for six months; (2) whether her department has made alternative arrangements to supply water to the community; if not, why not; (3) whether her department (a) has taken or (b) will take action in order to reinstate piped water supplies to the specified area; if not, why not; if so, (i) what action has been taken and (ii) when will the supply of piped water be restored to the specified area?

Reply:

  1. The Uthukela District Municipality (DM) is the Water Services Authority responsible for providing water services in the Indaka Local Municipality (LM). The area is supplied through the Ekukeveni Water Scheme and the Oliphantskop Dam is the raw water source.

The Divaal area has not been without piped water supply for any extended period. The entire Indaka area has an interrupted water supply i.e. the water supply is not available on a continuous basis due to a shortage of water. The water demand exceeds the available water supply because the Ekuvukeni Water Scheme was designed for a particular area and water demand, however more areas were brought onto and supplied from this water scheme, exceeding the scheme’s design capacity.

The different areas of Indaka LM receive piped water on a rotational basis with each area receiving water supply on different days of the week. Some areas, receive water more than once a week depending on location in the area. This is influenced by the proximity to the water treatment works and the layout of the water scheme. The Divaal area is at the end of the water scheme and receives water once a week on Thursdays.

(2) When an area is not receiving water through the water scheme, the Uthukela DM provides water tankers to fill static water tanks and individual containers so residents have access to water.

(3)(a) The Uthukela DM has identified and is implementing a range of measures to ensure continuous piped water supply in the area.

(3)(b)(i)As part of the drought intervention programme, which is managed by my Department, the UThukela DM is allocated R3 million to implement a borehole programme to improve water availability in the district. Contractors are currently on site conducting investigation of sites to start drilling boreholes. The Uthukela DM has made a further application for R3.5 million under the Municipal Water Infrastructure Grant to extend the borehole programme in this area.

(3)(b)(ii)The long term sustainable solution depends on the rollout of the Driefontein Complex Regional Bulk Scheme, a Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant funded project with various phases to ultimately supply water to the region from the Spioenkop Dam.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3353

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What are the reasons for not supplying piped water to the Mazizini area situated in Ward 6 of the Okhahlamba Local Municipality and within the uThukela District Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal, which has been without piped water for six months; (2) whether her department has made alternative arrangements to supply water to the community; if not, why not; (3) whether her department (a) has taken or (b) will take action in order to reinstate piped water supplies to the specified area; if not, why not; if so, (i) what action has been taken and (ii) when will the supply of piped water be restored to the specified area?

Reply:

  1. The Mazizini area collectively comprises of two communities, the Newstand and Obonjaneni communities.

The Obonjaneni community currently has no interruptions in water supply and receives piped water from a reservoir which is fed from the KwaMfalazi River. The water is chlorinated at the reservoir.

The Newstand community in Ward 6 is normally supplied by a reservoir which is fed from the Zwelitsha Water Treatment Works (WTW). However, the Zwelitsha WTW currently does not have sufficient capacity to meet the demands of both the Zwelitsha and the Newstand areas.

The Uthukela District Municipality (DM) has therefore opted to supply the affected Newstand Community with water through a production borehole. The water from the production borehole was being pumped into the existing reservoirs which then supplied the community through the existing reticulation network. However, due to the drought currently being experienced in the Kwazulu-Natal Province, the groundwater levels have dropped substantially and there has been very little water in the borehole to pump. This resulted in the pump running dry which caused damage to the pump and the subsequent collapse of the pipe work within the borehole thus leaving the community without piped water supply for the past 6 months. This production borehole will therefore need to be replaced.

(2) The area currently has two (2) functional hand pump boreholes which are supplying approximately 900 community members with water as a temporary measure. These boreholes do not meet the full needs of the community and the Uthukela DM will be deploying water tankers to the area to fill up the reservoirs twice on a weekly schedule.

(3)(a) Yes, my Department has taken steps to reinstate piped water supplies to the area.

(3)(b)(i) As an interim measure the UThukela DM has appointed a service provider to investigate the availability of groundwater in the area and drill additional production boreholes for supply to the affected community.

(3)(b)(ii) This work is planned to commence within September 2015. The Zwelitsha WTW requires an upgrade in order to meet the required demands of both the Zwelitsha and Newstand areas. There is a planned upgrade by the Uthukela DM to increase the Zwelitsha WTW capacity scheduled to start in December 2015.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3360

Profile picture: McLoughlin, Mr AR

McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

In light of the fact that her department is mandated to discharge the Constitutional obligation of providing access to water to every citizen in the country, (a) what (i) joint discussion process has been established with the Department of Human Settlements and the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, to ensure that no duplication or overlap of functionality in the carrying out of her department’s stated mandate occurs between these departments, (ii) separate actions are being taken by her department in carrying out its stated mandate, (iii) monitoring procedure is in place, to establish whether or not there is a duplicity of actions between departments, (iv) resolution mechanism exists in instances where two or more departments are found to be carrying out the same actions to ensure that optimal use is made of the available funds and (v) good reason exists for the continuation of this right that is shared by the specified departments and (b) why should the right of water provision not be located within one dedicated department?

Reply:

(a)(i) A joint discussion has already taken place between the Department of Water and Sanitation together with COGTA, the Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent (MISA), the office of the Presidency’s M&E unit and National Treasury, and a Project Management Office (PMO) has been established to co-ordinate and integrate all water services activities related to sustainable Water Services delivery in the 27 Priority DMs. The Department of Human Settlements is part of this initiative. The PMO will ensure that there is no duplication with regards to the water and sanitation service delivery and will ensure that funding alignment between different Departments and funding sources takes place.

(a)(ii) No separate actions are being undertaken by the Department. As stated above all water services actions are being coordinated through the PMO.

(a)(iii) A monitoring programme is being established to ensure that, once a pipeline of projects has been determined, they are implemented and run effectively. My Department has identified eleven key intervention activities that will be monitored to ensure the implementation of sustainable water and sanitation service delivery. They are:

  1. Demographics;
  2. Service Levels;
  3. Socio-Economics;
  4. Water Services Infrastructure;
  5. Operational and Maintenance;
  6. Associated Services;
  7. Water Resources;
  8. Conservation & Demand Management;
  9. Financial;
  10. Institutional Arrangements; and
  11. Social & Customer Service Requirements.

A 5-year implementation plan will be developed and implementation thereof will be monitored at community and project level. The plan will be developed through a consultancy process at municipal level with relevant role-players and funding initiatives. The plan will be signed off by Council to ensure that no duplication takes place.

(a)(iv) Requesting Honourable member to note that, there are no two Departments which execute identical actions. Each Department finds its mandate in the Constitution, followed by the legislation administered by the respective Department, therefore the need for such a resolution mechanism has not arisen. My Department's mandate is highlighted in Section 3 of the National Water Act, 1998 (Act No. 36 of 1998):

Public trusteeship of nation's water resources

3. (1) As the public trustee of the nation's water resources the National Government, acting through the Minister, must ensure that water is protected, used, developed, conserved, managed and controlled in a sustainable and equitable manner, for the benefit of all persons and in accordance with its constitutional mandate. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Minister is ultimately responsible to ensure that water is allocated equitably and used beneficially in the public interest, while promoting environmental values. (3) The National Government, acting through the Minister, has the power to regulate the use, flow and control of all water in the Republic.”

(a)(v) Falls away.

(b) Falls away.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3538

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether any parts of Botshabelo Section K and Mangaung still use the bucket system; if so, (a) how many and (b) when is her department planning to completely eradicate the use of the bucket system in the specified areas?

Reply:

(a) Botshabelo has a total of 757 Buckets of which 155 are located in Section K. Buckets are scattered throughout the settlement and mostly on informal stands. Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality has a total of 1 347 Bucket toilets to be eradicated.

(b) My Department does not fund Metropolitan Municipalities for sanitation programmes since such municipalities receive the Urban Settlement Development Grant (USDG) from the Department of Human Settlements to attend to issues related to the Built Environment which include the provision of municipal services, roads, human settlements etc.

(c) My Department will monitor the programme by the Metro to eradicate all VIP and Bucket Toilets over the next four years.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3370

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)When will the construction of the pipeline from Bloemhof to Schweizer-Reneke in the North West (a) start and (b) be completed; (2) (a) what will be the length of the pipeline and (b) how many mega litres of water will be transported per day, (c) what is the cost of the pipeline and (d) how will it be funded; (3) whether the total cost of the project is already funded; if not, (a) why not and (b) how will it be funded; if so, what are the different (i) amounts and (ii) sources of funding; (4) whether she received an approval from the SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) regarding the construction of the pipeline over their property; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (5) whether there exists an alternative plan for the pipeline if Sanral does not approve the planned construction on its land; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1)(a) The construction of the pipeline will commence in March 2016.

(1)(b) The construction of the pipeline will be completed end of September 2016.

(2)(a) The length will be a 72 km and 350 mm diameter pipeline

(2)(b) 6.5 mega litres per day.

(2)(c) The total cost of the pipeline is R 72 million.

(2)(d) It will be funded by my Department through the Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant (RBIG).

(3) Yes, the total cost of the project which is R403 million is already budgeted through RBIG in MTEF period

(3)(a) Falls away.

(3)(b) Falls away.

(3)(b)(i) Falls away.

(3)(b)(ii) Falls away.

(4) Yes, the SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) granted approval for servitude.

(5) Falls away.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3372

Profile picture: Van Dyk, Ms V

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Whether her department will intervene to address the malfunctioning waste water treatment works in Humansdorp in the Kouga Local Municipality in the Eastern Cape; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether her department is aware of the disastrous conditions in Vergenoeg due to the spillages from the plant; if so, what plan has she put in place to address the specified matter; (3) whether the specified plant was given a Green Drop score in the last reporting cycle; if not, why not; if so, what was the score; (4) whether her department has taken any action against the specified municipality in terms of any legislation; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

  1. No, my Department has not intervened on this matter yet. The Kouga Local Municipality (LM) is the Water Services Authority, Water Services Provider and owner of infrastructure and is responsible for undertaking the necessary upgrades. The Kouga LM has secured funding through the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform to upgrade the Kwa Nomzamo Waste Water treatment Works (WWTW). My Department will therefore not intervene until the Kouga LM has shown that they are unable to perform their functions.

My Department has reacted as regulator and catchment manager as follows:

  • A non-compliance letter, dated 25 June 2015, was sent to Kouga LM addressing both the KwaNomzamo WWTW and the Koraal Pump Station. The Kouga LM responded with a reply dated 13 July 2015 (Refer to attached letter).
  • A meeting was held on 24 July 2015 between the officials from my Department and the Kouga LM technical manager to get clarity and progress on this and other matters.

 

2. Yes my Department is aware of the impact the failing WWTW is having on the environment and local communities; hence the actions taken.

The Kouga LM, in their response letter of 13 July 2015, has confirmed a partnership with the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform in 2013 to upgrade the WWTW; and on 3 June 2014 appointed a PSP to develop upgrade plans. On 4 March 2015 the Technical Report on the Refurbishment and Upgrading of the KwaNomzamo WWTW was received and is progressing to the tendering stage.

Regarding access control and fencing of the works, the Kouga Council approved a budget of R 2,0m to fence the said works. This project was approved by a full Council and a contractor has already been appointed in August 2015.

The Kouga LM is also working with local industries to ensure pre-treatment to reduce the organic and hydraulic load on the KwaNomzamo WWTW.

3. The plant assessment was done during the last green drop assessment in 2013 and the plant received a score of 57.44%. This score placed the WWTW in the category ‘50% – 80% - Fair performance, ample room for improvement’.

4. Yes, My Department has intervened from legal perspective as follows:

  • A non-compliance letter, dated 25 June 2015, was sent to Kouga LM addressing both the KwaNomzamo WWTW and the Koraal Pump Station.
  • Following their attached response dated 13 July 2015, a meeting was held on 24 July 2015 between the officials from my Department and the Kouga LM technical manager to get clarity and progress on this and other matters.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3376

Profile picture: Balindlela, Ms ZB

Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)In terms of the latest information available to her department, (a) how many waste water treatment works are currently overflowing into nearby water bodies or areas, (b) where are they situated and (c) what is the severity of each spill; (2) what system does her department utilise in order to (a) detect and (b) rapidly respond to sewage spillage and/or overflow from waste water treatment works?

Reply:

(1) The latest information with regard to spillages that have been reported is taken from those received from April 2015 to date. The number of cases reported to my Department are 19 and the cases are captured to include all the 9 provinces. Refer to Annexure A.

(2)(a) My Department through the various provincial offices undertake planned audits for the Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTWs) against their water use license, and also attend to queries received from consumers and those reported through the media as a means to attend to spillages resulting from the WWTWs, pumpstation and manholes.

(2)(b) In areas where spillages are as a result of manholes or pumpstation and municipalities have challenges to address the spillages, the rapid response unit is despatched to the affected municipality. However, Water Service Authorities (WSAs) are able to address spillages in-house if it’s detected early. In cases of a overflow from a WWTWs, nature of overflow dictates intervention and assistance needed. As a result the nature of the overflow will determine if the matter can be addressed rapidly or if it will require the plant to be upgraded to address the overflow.

In areas where it is as a result of overloading due to capacity constraint, such plants are prioritised through various support programmes of my Department for allocation of funds (Regional Bulk Infrastructure, Municipal Infrastructure Grand and Accelerated Community infrastructure programme) to upgrade the plants or in other cases refurbishment to ensure the plant operates efficiently with functional equipments that will be able to handle loading coming into the plant. The overflow as a result of design capacity constraint may not necessarily be addressed rapidly due to the fact that the upgrades are often multi year projects which take longer to construct before the overloading is completely addressed.

---00O00---

Annexure A

Region

Sector

Investigations & Inspections Reported

Investigations & Inspections Investigated or Inspected

Water User License Yes

Water User License No

Non-compliance Letters

Pre-directives

Severity of each case

Eastern Cape

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

11

11

0

11

0

7

Each cases reported were severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment hence pre-directives were issued.

Free State

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

1

2

0

0

3

0

Each cases reported were severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment

Gauteng

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

2

2

0

2

0

0

Cases reported were regarded to be severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment

Limpopo

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

1

1

0

1

0

0

Each cases reported were severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment

Mpumalanga

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

1

2

0

1

0

1

Each cases reported were severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment

North West

Government [National/Prov]

0

2

0

0

0

1

Each cases reported were severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment

North West

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

2

1

0

2

0

0

Each cases reported were severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment

Western Cape

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

1

2

0

2

0

0

Each cases reported were severe based on the fact that spillages reported has potential to pollute the environment

National

Local Government [WSA/WSP]

19

23

0

21

3

10

Cases reported not only for wastewater treatment works however also includes manholes that are close to streams and rivers. This has been taken with great urgency and prompted investigations that led to issuing of directives and put those affected WSAs under regulatory surveillance by the department.

07 October 2015 - NW3486

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)With reference to her reply to question 2727 on 31 August 2015 regarding the building demolition cost of R6 282 853, (a) which buildings were demolished, (b) what was the reason for demolishing each of the specified buildings, (c) when was each specified building demolished and (d) what is the name of the company that demolished each of the specified buildings; (2) (a) what is meant by land matters, (b) what are the relevant details of the breakdown of the R11 815 024 that was spent on the specified land matters and (c) who were the recipients of each specified amount; (3) whether her department has taken any steps to date to dredge the Hazelmere Dam of the silt build-up in an effort to restore the storage capacity of the specified dam in anticipation of rainfall; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1)(a) The following buildings were demolished:

  • Boys' hostel
  • dining hall and Dormitories
  • Green house
  • Fruit room
  • Garage and carport
  • Music room
  • Outside rooms
  • Prayer room
  • Guard house
  • Store room
  • Workshop and storerooms
  • 2x dwellings
  • Garage and rooms.

Other activities under this contract included:

  • Protection of existing graves
  • Construction of a memorial monument
  • Termination and the moving of underground services; sewer, water and electricity
  • Construction of new sewer septic tanks and laying of sewer pipe lines
  • Decommissioning and demolishing of existing sewer septic tanks and
  • Upgrading of the existing alternative access road

(1)(b) The buildings were affected by the raising of the dam wall and were within the dam boundary line.

(1)(c) The buildings were demolished during the contract period, start date 02 February to end date November 2013.

(1)(d) All buildings were demolished by NCG Oosthuizen Investment CC.

(2)(a) All issues related to acquisition of land by my Department.

(2)(b) A review of the cost revealed the changed total as shown in the Table below:

RECIPIENTS

DETAIL BREAKDOWN
EXPENDITURE ON LAND MATTERS
(excl. VAT)

   

Valuator - Turnover Trading 243

R 1 232 758

Land Surveyor - Button & O’Connor INC

R 96 802

Expropriation of properties:

 

Oakford Priory Investments (PTY)

R 10 523 000

Roman Catholic Mission

R 92 447

TOTAL EXPENDITURE

R 11 945 007

(3) My Department did not commence any dredging at Hazelmere as yet. This would be a process to be considered once a dam basin management analyses indicates this to be an economic viable operations option. Continued silt survey records indicated sections of the basin to be prone to sedimentation but this is to be mitigated by the raising of the dam wall.

My Department is in the process of developing dam basin management protocols that will guide on siltation prevention operations as well as dredging where determined as viable.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3590

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What amount will (a) her department and/or (b) the Department of Mineral Resources contribute to the (i) construction and (ii) operational costs of the proposed acid mine water desalination plants, (c) how will her department raise the specified funds for the specified plants and (d) will there be any consequences for programmes within her department which might suffer cuts; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether she has any plans in place to involve the private sector in the construction and implementation of the proposed project; if not, why not in each case; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) what is the projected (a) commencement and (b) completion date of the construction of the specified plants?

Reply:

(1)(a)&(b) For the current financial year, there is no fiscal-derived funding allocated by either my Department or the Department of Mineral Resources for the construction and operation of the proposed acid mine drainage (AMD) desalination plants (long-term solution) project.

(1)(c) The Vaal River System (VRS) Reconciliation Strategy has identified AMD reclamation and beneficial use thereof as one of the key pillars for ensuring water security in the VRS. Since reclaimed AMD will augment the yield of the System and benefits all water users reliant on the VRS, it is proposed that a portion of the AMD desalination cost is recovered through the VRS Raw Water Tariff, which is levied on all water users. The balance of cost is proposed for recovery through an “environmental levy” that may be invoked in the mining sector. This dual cost-recovery mechanism ensures equity by invoking both the “user pays” and “polluter pays” principles. Any funding deficit that may result is likely to be addressed through future fiscal allocations. Having considered the foregoing funding and cost-recovery proposal, my Department was given the approval of the National Treasury to fund the AMD long-term solution project off-budget using the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP) borrowing programme (loan facility) and recover cost through the VRS Raw Water Tariff. Supplementation of the cost recovery through the proposed environmental levy is under development.

(1)(d) Irrespective of the funding model that will apply for the proposed desalination of AMD, that model will not jeopardize funding allocations to other programmes.

(2) Any potential role of the private sector in construction and/ or implementation of the proposed project will be in accordance with Government’s policy on public sector procurement for the acquisition of goods and services.

(3) It is projected that construction will commence in 2018 and would last for a minimum of 2 years. Operations are thus likely to be effective from the 2020-2021 financial year.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3410

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises

Whether, since her reply to question 483 on 4 May 2015 and question 3010 on 1 September 2015, in the light of the poverty of the pensioners of the Transport Pension Fund and the Transnet Second Defined Benefit Fund, she will consider to expeditiously finalise the adjustment of the 2% rule for the specified pensioners and to urgently investigate the financial status of the specified pension funds in order to give these pensioners an inflation-linked increase at the beginning of 2016 that will be higher than the maximum increase of 2%; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether she will consider submitting an application for National Treasury to make a direct payment to these pensioners in order to bring financial relief; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether, in the light of the financial situation of the pensioners, she will consider implementing on an annual basis the parliamentary finding on 1 November 2010 (details furnished) and recommendation regarding a financial injection, further bonuses and inflation-linked increases; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details??

Reply:

  1. As per the response provided to PQ 483, along with the Minister of Finance, I am currently considering the proposal to adjust the pension fund rules to amend the 2% rule and will provide a response in due course.
  2. The rules of the fund stipulate that only when the fund is unable to meet its financial obligations, will there be a requirement for Transnet to inject money into the fund. Should Transnet not be in a position to inject the required funds in order for the Pension fund to meet its financial obligations, then the state will be required to inject funds directly into the fund. At this stage, the fund is able to meet its financial obligations and accordingly there is no legal obligation in terms of the Legal Succession to the South African Transport Services Act of 1989, for either Transnet and/or the State to make a direct payment to the Pension Funds.
  3. Transnet has complied with the recommendations of the Portfolio Committee in as far as the payment of bonuses to the pensioners are concerned. Since 2010, Transnet has to date paid over R2.2 billion in ad hoc bonuses to the pensioners belonging to the TPF and TSDBF. With regard to the recommendation relating to financial injection and inflation-linked increases, please refer to paragraphs 1 and 2 of this response.

 

07 October 2015 - NW3589

Profile picture: Mazzone, Ms NW

Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises

With reference to the Eskom’s coal-fired power stations and the fact that a number of the specified power stations will be decommissioned in the near future, does Eskom have plans in place to convert the specified coal-fired power stations into natural gas power stations; if not, why not; if so, (a) which power stations will be converted, (b) when will each of the specified power station be converted, (c) where will the natural gas be sourced from and (d) what is the projected cost of the specified conversions?

Reply:

The first coal-fired Power Station to be decommissioned will be Camden Power Station, anticipated to take place in 2020. Eskom has already commenced with a study to look at various options for the current coal fired Power Station fleet. There are currently no firm plans to convert from coal-fired to natural gas. Gas options will depend on the technical feasibility, availability of gas and environmental considerations.

(a) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) Not applicable.

(d) Not applicable.

07 October 2015 - NW3386

Profile picture: Moteka, Mr PG

Moteka, Mr PG to ask the Minister of Sport and Recreation

(1)​(a)(i) What total amount did his department spend on his travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) how many trips did he undertake between Cape Town and Gauteng in the specified financial year and (b) what total amount did his department spend on (i) hotel and (ii) residential or other accommodation for him in (aa) Cape Town and (bb) Pretoria in the 2014-15 financial year; (2)(a)(i) what total amount did his department spend on the Deputy Minister’s travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) how many trips between Gauteng and Cape Town did the Deputy Minister undertake in the specified financial year and (b) what total amount did his department spend on (i) hotel and (ii) residential or other accommodation for the Deputy Minister in (aa) Cape Town and (bb) Pretoria in the 2014-15 financial year?NW3890E

Reply:

The Department requires additional time to respond to this question as the details required needs sufficient time to collate. The Department of Sport and Recreation has a very small finance Directorate and will not be able to respond to this question within the period allocated to reply to questions.

07 October 2015 - NW3162

Profile picture: Balindlela, Ms ZB

Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)On what date was the most recent biomonitoring report compiled for (a) Mvoti River, (b) Slang River, (c) Tugela River, (d) Mooi River, (e) Mhlatuze River, (f) Hluhluwe River and (g) Nkomati River; (2) what was the water quality of each specified river as reflected in the report; (3) on what date was the sample for each specified river taken; (4) what was the geographical location where each of the samples were taken?

Reply:

(1) The bio-monitoring reports are compiled on a quarterly basis and are adapted to coincide with the different seasons. The latest available reports are therefore, for the period between April – June 2015.With regards to the Nkomati River, the August 2015 report was finalised.

(2) Refer to the table below for the response on the water quality of each river:

Name of the River

South African Scoring System (SASS) Scores

Average Score Per Taxa (ASPT)

Class

  1. Mvoti River

99

5.5

Fair

 

25

3.13

Poor

  1. Slang River

170

6.54

Good/Natural

  1. Tugela River

69

6.23

Good

 

Too deep to sample- in flood

N/A

  1. Mooi River

120

6.32

Good

  1. Mhlathuze River

118

6.21

Good

  1. Hluhluwe River

No sampling done – the river had stopped flowing, broken to several pools of water.

N/A

  1. Nkomati River

The river is largely fair with 3 monitoring sites showing poor quality and 5 monitoring sites out of 31 monitoring sites showing pristine to good quality water and it is moderately impacted

Please note that in some cases low flows (due to drought) have affected the water quality or ecological state of the rivers.

(3) Refer to the table below for the response on the date of sampling for each river:

Name of the River

Date of Sampling

  1. Mvoti River

3-Jun-2015

 

15-Jun-2015

  1. Slang River

30-May-2015

  1. Tugela River

1-Jun-2015

 

15-Jun-2015

  1. Mooi River

10-Jun-2015

  1. Mhlathuze River

25-May-2015

  1. Hluhluwe River

28-May-2015 (No sampling possible)

  1. Nkomati River

July/August 2014 (dry season) and February/March 2015 (wet season)

(4) Refer to the table below for the response on the geographical location of the rivers:

Name of the River

Coordinates

 

Latitude (S)

Longitude (E)

  1. Mvoti River

-29.159860

30.628690

 

-29.370004

31.304341

  1. Slang River

-27.420670

30.296810

  1. Tugela River

-28.756331

30.150376

 

-29.172622

31.391921

  1. Mooi River

-29.380814

39.660522

  1. Mhlathuze River

-28.746950

31.747450

  1. Hluhluwe River

-28.138560

32.019950

 

The geographical location where samples were taken for Nkomati River are as follows:

Vlakfontein 418 JT, Waterval 424 JT, Ndubazi Ranch 413 JT, Winkelhaak 723 JT, Tjakadstad 730 JT, Hooggenoeg 162 IT, Laaggenoeg 158IT, Nooitgezien 3 IU, Fig Tree 503 JU, Lebombo 186 JU.

---00O00---

 

07 October 2015 - NW3375

Profile picture: Balindlela, Ms ZB

Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

With reference to her media statement on 24 February 2015 on security of water supply (details furnished), (a) at what stage of development is the master plan for water resource infrastructure and (b) what is the estimated date of its completion?

Reply:

(a) The development of a Master Plan for water resource infrastructure is currently in the information gathering stage entailing aspects such as condition assessment of existing infrastructure and updating of the asset management plan.

It should be noted that the Second Edition of the National Water Resource Strategy that was published in 2013 already indicates key information on new water resource infrastructure projects that are currently under development and this shall form part of the master plan.

(b) The development of the Master Plan is estimated to be completed at the end of August 2016.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3371

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What is the status of the Wentzel Dam’s capacity to deliver water to Schweizer-Reneke in the North West; (2) whether, given the fact that five of the 16 boreholes in Schweizer-Reneke are currently dry, she has taken any measures to prevent a water crisis in the event

Reply:

  1. The Wentzel Dam’s water level has dropped to 22% effective from end August 2015. The volume of water supplied from the Schweizer-Reneke Water Treatment Plant has also dropped from 4 Ml to 2.8 Ml per day. This has resulted in water supply shortages in Schweizer-Reneke Town and Ipelegeng Township.

The most affected are high-lying areas of Ipelegeng which are getting water intermittently during the night. To address this challenge, my Department in collaboration with water services authority, the Dr. Ruth Segomotsi Mompati DM, implemented the following short term interventions:

  • The Fire and Disaster Unit from the Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati DM is on standby to supply water to the clinics and schools.
  • Two water tanker trucks are currently supplying water to the most affected areas of Ipelegeng Extension 4, 6, 8 and portion of Extension 5.
  • A total of 9X10 000 liters Jojo tanks are placed at Ipelegeng (including clinics, schools, police station) and are being filled from 06H00 until 20H00 on daily basis.

2.  My Department has allocated R5,1 million to Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati DM under the Municipal Water Infrastructure Grant (MWIG) for intervention in addressing the short term water supply issues. Already eight non-functional boreholes have been tested and the results have confirmed dewatering on the aquifers. The scope of work for this funding entails:

  • rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing boreholes;
  • sitting and drilling of new boreholes;
  • equipping of boreholes; and
  • connecting mains.

Furthermore, my Department allocated R1, 589 million to Dr. Ruth Segomotsi Mompati DM under Accelerated Community Programme (ACIP) to address Water Conservation Demand Management issues in Mamusa Local Municipality. The Dr. Ruth Segomotsi Mompati DM is in the process of getting Bid approval and the work is anticipated to commence in October 2015.

---00O00---

07 October 2015 - NW3369

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)(a) When will the new water purification plant in Bloemhof in the North West be completed and (b) what will the capacity of the plant be; (2) (a) what is the total cost of the specified plant and (b) how will it be funded; (3) whether any outstanding funding is required to complete the project; if so, (a) what amount and (b) how will it be financed; (4) who will be running the specified plant; (5) which areas will receive water from the specified plant?

Reply:

(1)(a) The new water purification plant in Bloemhof in the North West will be completed in January 2017.

(1)(b) The capacity of the plant is from 10 Mℓ/d to 25 Mℓ/d.

(2)(a) The total cost of the plant is R403 million.

(2)(b) It will be funded by my Department through Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant (RBIG).

(3) No outstanding funding is required.

(3)(a) Falls away.

(3)(b) Falls away.

(4) The plant will be operated by Sedibeng Water Board on behalf of Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Municipality.

(5) The following areas will receive water from the plant.

  • ScheizerReneke Town;
  • Ipelegeng Township;
  • Bloemhof Town; and
  • Boitumelong Township.

---00O00---

06 October 2015 - NW3465

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

Is her Department aware of the problems faced by the Oyster Bay community in the Eastern Cape as a result of sand dune encroachment on streets, public spaces and residential homes; if so, (a) what has her Department done thus far to assist the specified community, (b) what plan does her Department have going forward and (c) what is the timeline for all such assistance?

Reply:

 

THE MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REPLIES:

The Department of Environmental Affairs is aware of the problems faced by the Oyster Bay Community regarding dune encroachment onto properties and infrastructure.

a)  An application for an environmental authorisation for the proposed Slang River bank erosion stabilisation revetment, as well as management of dune sand encroachment on various ervens, including Brander Street in Oyster, Eastern Cape was submitted by Kouga Local Municipality and approved on 9 May 2015 by the competent authority being the Eastern Cape Provincial Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism.

b)  The Department of Environmental Affairs is in the process of undertaking a situational analysis report which will provide guidance on the best rehabilitation mechanism or practices.

c)  The Department has scheduled a stakeholder’s consultation meeting with all interested and affected parties during the month of October and November 2015 in order to seek short- and long-term solutions.


END

06 October 2015 - NW3458

Profile picture: Stander, Ms T

Stander, Ms T to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

(1)How many environmental impact assessments have been received by her department since 2009; (2) how many of these were (a) rejected and (b) approved; (3) of the specified approved assessments, how many (a) appeals against their approval were received and (b) of the appeals were upheld?

Reply:

 THE MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REPLIES:

(1) Since 01 January 2009 to 10 September 2015, approximately 2850 applications for Environmental Authorisation were received by the department.

(2) (a) Seven applications have been refused authorisation, and

     (b) 1651 have been granted authrorisation. The remainder may have lapsed, withdrawn or are currently being processed.

(3) Since 01 January 2009

     (a) 301 appeals against the issuance of Environmental Authorisations were lodged.

     (b) Of those 301 appeals, 20 were upheld, 29 were varied and 38 were withdrawn following settlements reached between the      parties. The rest of the appeals were dismissed.

 

END

06 October 2015 - NW3506

Profile picture: Boshoff, Ms SH

Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1)(a) How many full service schools have adapted their scholar transport vehicles to accommodate the needs of (i) disabled learners, particularly (aa) wheelchair-bound learners and (bb) visually-impaired learners in respect of each province and district and (b) what is the total number of vehicles that have been adapted for the specified purpose in each province; (2) how many (a) full service schools have boarding facilities to accommodate learners with disabilities and (b) learners are currently placed on a waiting list due to lack of accommodation in respect of each province and district; (3) how many full service schools with boarding accommodation do not have sufficient support staff to provide for the needs of learners with disabilities in respect of each province and district?

Reply:

 

(1)  (a) Full service schools do not as yet have their specific transport to transport learners and therefore there are:

             (i) no vehicles that can accommodate disabled learners, particularly

                  (aa) learners who are wheelchair users

                  (bb) learners with visual impairment in respect of each province and district.

      (b) There are no vehicles that have been adapted for the specified purpose in each province.

(2)  There are (a) 36 full service schools with boarding facilities, of which it is not certain how many are able to accommodate learners with disabilities and (b) DBE is not aware of learners who are currently placed on waiting lists due to accommodation in respect of each province and district.

(3)  The information on full service schools with boarding facilities that are without sufficient support staff is not readily available. DBE will make future plans to collect the data.


END

06 October 2015 - NW3480

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Social Development

Whether, in terms of the close protection contracts awarded by (a) the SA Social Security Agency and/or (b) her department to any other contractors beside certain companies (names furnished), any other equipment was bought beside weapons and ammunition; if so, (i) what was the nature of each specified item, (ii) what was the cost of each specified item and (iii) who authorised the purchase of each specified item?

Reply:

(a) No

(b) No

  1. Not applicable
  2. Not applicable
  3. Not applicable

06 October 2015 - NW3583

Profile picture: Mazzone, Ms NW

Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises

(1) How many contracts does Eskom have with a certain company (name and details furnished); (2) what is the (a) nature, (b) value and (c) details of each of the specified contracts; (3) have all the specified contracts followed the prescribed tender process; if not, what are the reasons for deviation from the prescribed tender process; (4) in respect of what other financial or business interests is Eskom directly and indirectly contracted with the businesses owned by a certain family?

Reply:

(1) Eskom has 1 (one) contract for the supply of coal with Tegeta Exploration and Resources.

(2) (a-c) The details of the contract are commercially sensitive as per contractual terms. The contract is for the supply of coal to Eskom.

(3) The contract followed the relevant governance process for the commodity in question.

(4) We are able to conduct a search based on companies information. The member is therefore requested to provide specific information.




END

06 October 2015 - NW3422

Profile picture: Singh, Mr N

Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

(1) Whether her Department has developed policies and mechanisms to prevent America and Europe from dumping old computers in the country under the guise of donations; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; and (2) Whether her Department has any programme in place (a) to educate the public and (b) create awareness about the risks of cancer and neurological disorders that could be caused by electronic waste?

Reply:

THE MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REPLIES:

1. The Department is the competent authority for the Basel Convention which controls the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes and their disposal. The Department ensures that the Basel Convention is complied with by implementing the control system. Developed countries are not allowed to export wastes to developing countries for disposal purposes. Information Technology Association of Canada controls the imports of second-hand goods through the Second-hand Goods Act – by providing conditions for imports of second-hand goods, including electrical and electronic goods, which then ensures that no used goods are imported into the country under the guise of donations.

​2. (a and b)

The Department provides education and awareness training to provinces and municipalities on the legislation and policies developed, which includes the Waste Act; and emphasis is always on prevention for the protection of the environment and health. The Waste Act classifies Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) as hazardous waste. Other regulations that outlines specific measures related to WEEE include the National Waste Information Regulations and Waste Classification and Management Regulations. This information is made available to the public. The Department also envisages that there will be a waste-stream specific education and awareness training programme, linked to the industry waste management plans, which is expected to be provided by the WEEE sector. The programme should provide effective communication that informs EEE consumers about the potential dangers of improper, and the potential value of proper e-Waste treatment and disposal. These campaigns will have to be of a general public nature using various media.


END

06 October 2015 - NW3482

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Social Development

With regard to weapons that were purchased by the SA Social Security Agency and her department for two certain companies (names and details furnished), (a) where is each weapon currently held and (b) what is the reason why these weapons do not appear on her department’s asset register?

Reply:

(a) (b) Not applicable

06 October 2015 - NW3481

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1)With reference to the close protection contracts entered into with two certain companies (names and details furnished), what amount did (a) the SA Social Security Agency and (b) her department spend on the purchasing of (i) weapons and (ii) ammunition for each of the specified companies; (2) (a) what was the type of each weapon that was purchased, (b) how many units of the specified weapon were bought, (c) what was the date of purchase of each weapon and (d) what is the name of the person the weapon was licensed to; (3) (a) what was the type of each stock of ammunition that was purchased, (b) how many units of the specified ammunition were bought, (c) what was the date of purchase of each stock of ammunition and (d) what is the name of the person the ammunition was licensed to; (4) who gave the authority for the purchase of each (a) weapon and (b) stock of ammunition?

Reply:

  1. None
  2. Not applicable
  3. Not applicable
  4. Not applicable

06 October 2015 - NW3610

Profile picture: Lovemore, Ms AT

Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(a) How and (b) on what legal basis has Umalusi (i) monitored the performance of, (ii) accredited and (iii) exercised control over provincial education departments since the repeal of section 22 of the General and Further Education and Training Quality Assurance Act, Act 58 of 2001 in 2008?

Reply:

Umalusi’s response to question:

(a) How and (b) on what legal basis has Umalusi:

      (i)  monitored the performance of provincial education departments since the repeal of section 22 of the General and             Further Education and Training Quality Assurance Act, 2001 (Act No. 58 of 2001, as amended in 2008)?

Umalusi’s response:

In terms of section 27 (i) of the National Qualifications Framework Act, 2008 (Act No. 67 of 2008), Umalusi, as the Quality Council, is required to develop and implement policy for quality assurance. In this regard Umalusi, for example, commenced in 2009 with the process of conducting systemic evaluation for the General Education and Training Certificate, and the National Certificate (Vocational), by monitoring the Department of Higher Education and Training and the provincial education departments. Umalusi further plans to conduct systemic evaluation for the National Senior Certificate in due course.

Umalusi monitors the conduct, administration and management of examinations of all the qualifications on its sub-framework across the provincial education departments.


      (ii) Accredited provincial education departments since the repeal of section 22 of the General and Further Education              and Training Quality Assurance Act, 2001 (Act No. 58 of 2001, as amended in 2008).


Umalusi’s response:

Umalusi has never accredited any national or provincial education department, as the national and provincial education departments are deemed accredited.

      (iii) exercised control over provincial education departments since the repeal of section 22 of the General and Further             Education and Training Quality Assurance Act, 2001 (Act No. 58 of 2001, as amended in 2008).


Umalusi’s response:

The National Qualifications Framework mandates Umalusi to:-

  • develop a sub-framework of qualifications;
  • recommend the qualifications to the South African Qualifications Authority for registration;
  • develop and implement policies for the quality assurance of those qualifications; and
  • advise the Minister on the enactment of the qualifications.

On this basis, and the fact that the Department offers and assesses the qualifications registered on Umalusi’s sub-framework, Umalusi monitors their enactment and assessment, reports their performance to the Minister, and recommends steps to rectify any deficiencies.

 


END

06 October 2015 - NW3421

Profile picture: Singh, Mr N

Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

(1)Whether, in light of the amendment of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act no. 107 of 1998) which provides for measures to deal with electronic waste as hazardous waste, all industries producing electronic waste, lighting and packaging submitted their plans on how to deal with the specified waste; if not, which producers did not submit their plans; if so, what are the relevant details; and (2) Whether she intends to take legal action against all producers who did not submit their plans as required by the specified amendment; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

THE MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REPLIES:

1) In July 2015, the Minister published a gazette which gave published notice of her intention, in terms of section 28(1) read with section 28(5) of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008 (Act No. 59 of 2008), to require the Paper and Packaging Industry, Electrical and Electronic Equipment Industry and Lighting Industry to prepare and submit their industry waste management plans. The notice invited members of the public to submit comments within thirty (30) days. Once all the comments have been considered, the Minister will then publish a
section 28(1) notice which will require the 3 sectors to submit the plans.

2) The Minister has not yet published a section 28(1) notice requiring the sectors to submit an industry waste management plan. Failure to comply with an approved plan is an offence.

 

 

END

06 October 2015 - NW3125

Profile picture: Hoosen, Mr MH

Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

With reference to his reply to question 2519 on 19 August 2015 (a) what is the estimated time frame for the specified Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) on Immigration Regulations to complete its work and (b) what authority will the IMC have to implement changes on the visa regulations?

Reply:

The Cabinet has tasked the Office of the Deputy President to deal with all Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) related matters, including the possible unintended consequences of the visa regulations. I, therefore, recommend that such matters be referred to Deputy President’s Office.


END

06 October 2015 - NW3324

Profile picture: Mkhaliphi, Ms HO

Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

(1)(a)(i) What total amount did his department spend on his travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) how many trips did he undertake between Cape Town and Gauteng in the specified financial year and (b) what total amount did his department spend on (i) hotel and (ii) residential or other accommodation for him in (aa) Cape Town and (bb) Pretoria in the 2014-15 financial year; (2) (a)(i) what total amount did his department spend on the Deputy Minister’s travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) how many trips between Gauteng and Cape Town did the Deputy Minister undertake in the specified financial year and (b) what total amount did his department spend on (i) hotel and (ii) residential or other accommodation for the Deputy Minister in (aa) Cape Town and (bb) Pretoria in the 2014-15 financial year?

Reply:

(1-2) The total amount used on travel by the department for Minister and Deputy Minister is made available on 2014/15 Annual Report tabled in Parliament in September 2015.


END

06 October 2015 - NW2704

Profile picture: Wilson, Ms ER

Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Social Development

Whether (a) she, (b) her Deputy Minister and (c) any officials in her department travelled to China in the 2014-15 financial year; if so, what was the (i) purpose of each specified visit and (ii)(aa) total cost and (bb) breakdown of such costs of each specified visit?

Reply:

Minister and Deputy Minister did not travel to China during 201-2015 financial year. However, 3 officials visited China from 28 November - 6 December 2014 and participated during the World Family Summit.

Breakdown of costs:

Flights: R 144, 109.12

Accommodation: R59, 000.00

Allowance: R 18, 300.00

Total: R 221, 409.12

Funds have been budgeted for this activity

 

06 October 2015 - NW3484

Profile picture: Kopane, Ms SP

Kopane, Ms SP to ask the Minister of Social Development

Whether, with reference to her reply to question 2478 on 30 July 2015, the SA Social Security Agency (SASSA) obtained the specified authorisation from the SA Police Service (SAPS) to provide the services which are not within SASSA’s mandate, which has been the subject of the consultation between the SAPS Crime Intelligence, VIP Protection Services and SASSA since 2013; if not, (a) why not and (b) was the authorisation sought; if so, (i) will she provide proof of such authorisation and (ii) on which date will she provide this proof?

Reply:

 

(a) Refer to PQ 115

(b) Refer PQ 115

(i) Yes

(ii) Documents attached

06 October 2015 - NW3504

Profile picture: Boshoff, Ms SH

Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1)How many learners with disabilities and barriers to learning have been turned away from mainstream and/or full service schools and referred to special needs schools in respect of each province and district as at the latest specified date for which information is available; (2) (a) how many learners with disabilities and barriers to learning are currently on waiting lists to attend (i) mainstream schools and (ii) special needs schools in each province and district and (b) what is the maximum time period that the specified learners may be placed on a waiting list in respect of (i) mainstream schools and (ii) special needs schools; (3) how many officials at (a) district offices and (b) provincial education departments are suitably qualified to determine a learner’s disability in respect of each province and district; (4) how many learners with disabilities or barriers to learning (a) drop out of school and/or (b) do not complete their schooling successfully in respect of each province and district (5) how many learners with disabilities or barriers to learning at mainstream schools (a) completed their compulsory education and (b)(i) found employment and/or (ii) progressed to further education in respect of each province and district?

Reply:

 

1. The number of learners with disabilities and/or barriers to learning that have been turned away from mainstream and/or full service schools and referred to special needs schools in respect of each province and district is not readily available in the Department of Basic Education given that the Screening, Identification, Assessment and Support (SIAS) Policy has only been promulgated in December 2014 and its rollout plan to scale is starting from 2015 through to 2018.

​2. (a) The number of learners with disabilities and barriers to learning who are currently on waiting lists:

    (i) to attend mainstream schools per province and district is not readily available given that the SIAS Policy implementation has only just commenced in 2015; however, learners currently on waiting lists

    (ii) to attend special schools per province is provided in the table below. The information is not available in disaggregations per district.

Province

Number of Children/Learners on Waiting Lists: 2014

EC

 183

FS

561

GT

155

KZN

 1111

LP

 1027

MP

725

NC

1643

NW

 There are no learners on waiting lists. All learners placed in schools awaiting appropriate placement

WC

147

Most learners identified as needing special school placement are in ordinary/full-service schools receiving support while awaiting placement. 

National total:

5552

(2)  (b) There is no maximum time period specified for learners in respect of

      (i) mainstream schools and

      (ii) special needs schools to be on the waiting lists. Instead, the Admissions Policy advocates for urgent intervention by             a Provincial Head of Department in setting up an assessment and alternative placement process to ensure that                    learners in this situation access education with immediate effect.

(3)   The number of officials at:

(a) District offices; and

(b) Provincial Education Departments that are suitably qualified to determine a learner’s disability in respect of each province and district is not readily available in the DBE as the DBE makes referrals on disabilities to local health professionals and medical practitioners employed by the Department of Health.

4.  (b) Percentage of 7- to 18-year old children with disabilities who are out of schools/educational institutions.

 

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

EC

32.4

45.0

40.0

25.0

33.8

30.8

44.1

22.8

13.1

13.9

19.8

18.0

17.5

FS

14.5

34.4

37.7

12.9

20.4

21.6

25.6

11.0

8.5

6.6

5.7

9.3

11.5

GP

25.0

17.6

11.8

9.5

13.5

20.5

13.6

14.7

10.7

8.0

15.0

3.8

7.6

KZ

45.9

41.4

65.8

29.7

29.6

32.3

36.1

14.9

17.0

10.4

7.8

11.1

10.4

LP

33.5

36.7

31.3

43.0

22.5

33.6

42.5

13.2

8.3

5.4

12.3

15.1

12.7

MP

31.0

32.6

36.3

37.7

34.4

37.6

23.8

5.8

5.6

3.2

5.2

11.5

12.4

NW

35.0

38.0

47.8

25.8

23.2

23.4

36.3

26.7

7.3

14.4

10.4

5.4

7.5

NC

37.2

30.1

25.9

23.4

24.9

31.8

36.0

34.6

11.3

4.1

4.9

14.6

1.4

WC

24.5

36.3

26.5

28.6

24.0

11.9

27.4

9.9

5.0

23.6

13.7

6.3

8.6

SA

31.8

35.1

39.2

25.5

26.4

28.3

30.6

15.0

10.3

9.2

11.1

10.5

11.2

Source: General Household Survey (GHS), 2002-2014, DBE own calculation.

 

5. The number of learners with disabilities or barriers to learning at mainstream schools who:

(a) Percentage of 15- to 24-year olds with disabilities who completed grade 9 and above.

 

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

EC

21.4

8.7

19.5

24.6

35.6

35.6

22.8

20.2

60.4

48.1

25.9

52.1

21.6

FS

32.0

31.3

13.1

46.3

41.8

44.8

41.0

54.0

49.9

53.2

58.1

55.6

66.7

GP

48.8

47.2

47.1

54.0

43.3

40.7

68.2

52.9

58.8

58.8

76.1

84.6

73.2

KZ

41.9

18.8

19.1

35.8

37.5

34.3

37.7

40.8

52.4

56.2

34.8

53.4

39.8

LP

49.7

38.0

27.5

13.2

33.6

33.6

49.3

23.6

43.7

21.2

51.9

49.5

27.6

MP

36.6

43.9

27.9

50.5

39.8

35.4

35.1

60.1

44.8

43.5

54.2

46.8

55.1

NW

47.4

32.9

35.0

44.2

28.3

42.6

52.8

44.1

52.6

46.5

39.2

46.3

40.2

NC

45.9

18.5

21.7

41.9

20.2

48.8

46.1

30.0

33.9

47.1

50.1

51.7

91.1

WC

40.1

37.9

17.2

61.5

32.9

31.2

32.1

34.8

61.4

52.8

73.7

64.1

76.8

SA

39.2

30.3

26.6

39.1

36.8

36.9

43.5

40.3

54.4

49.7

50.2

57.4

51.0

(a)    Source: General Household Survey (GHS), 2002-2014, DBE own calculation.

b.  (i) found employment should be available from the Department of Labour (DoL); as well as

    (iii) progressed to further education in respect of each province and district should be available from the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET).



END

05 October 2015 - NW3491

Profile picture: Bozzoli, Prof B

Bozzoli, Prof B to ask the Prof B Bozzoli (DA) to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training

(1) Does the East Cape Midlands Technical and Vocational Education and Training College (East Cape Midlands TVET College) intend to perform a membership audit of all of the unions representing employees at the specified college; if not, why not; if so, (a) when will the audit be conducted and (b) will the results inform the manner in which collective bargaining is undertaken at the specified college; (2) a) why have approximately 66 former members of staff who received formal dismissal notices from the specified college for striking illegally, 33 of whom have serious criminal charges already laid against them, including arson, intimidation and attempted murder, been rehired by the specified college and (b) what are the terms of employment for the rehired staff members; (3) were the relevant positions advertised; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; ( 4) what is the total monetary value of the damage caused to property during the violent strike earlier in 2015?

Reply:

(1) Yes. The Eastcape Midlands Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) college in conjunction with the Department of Higher Education and Training will be conducting a union membership audit as part of an annual requirement to determine which recognised unions have organisational rights within the College.

(a) The audit will be conducted during the last quarter of the 2015 academic year.

(b) No. Collective bargaining can only take place at a central level through the General Public Service Sectorial Bargaining Council (GPSSBC), Education Labour Relations Council (ELRC) and/or Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC). It is envisaged that through the College Labour Relations Forum, many issues of rights can be discussed, which will improve and enhance employer-employee relations, as well as secure labour peace and stability.

(2) (a) The College, after seeking legal advice, realised that the dismissals could be declared null and void on procedural grounds. The College therefore agreed to a "re-hearing'', which meant the dismissals would be null and void. There is no concept of "re-hearing" in the labour relations regime and such a process would be highly contestable. The dismissals would have only been fully effective after their appeals were rejected, and even then they would have had the right to challenge the dismissals further through dispute resolution mechanisms, including the labour courts and other courts. The affected employees were not rehired but re-instated.

The inherent risks in waiting for the process to be concluded and based on the legal advice, the unprocedural actions by the College would have impacted on the normalisation of learning and teaching, as well as resources of the College. If the College was found to have acted "unprocedurally" during the hearings, the possibility existed that the employees could have returned to the College on their own terms which was something that the Department and College had to mitigate against. The re-instatement of the employees was part of a settlement agreement with the National Education, Health and Allied Workers' Union (NEHAWU).

(b) The terms and conditions of the settlement agreement are as follows:
• The employees were on leave without pay from the date of their dismissal to 6 September 2015;
• All employees who embarked on the unprotected strike will forfeit a month's salary and repay any payments made to them while they were part of the unprotecied strike. This is aligned to the principle of "no work no pay"; and
• Accept a twelve month final written warning not to engage in any misconduct activities. The final written warning indicates that if the employee is found guilty of any misconduct. it will lead to a call for their dismissal.

While there were a number of employees who faced charges related to acts of arson, intimidation and attempted murder, they remain innocent until found guilty of the charges in terms of the South African legal system. In South Africa, both criminal charges and disciplinary hearings can be undertaken in parallel. It should be noted that charges were laid/instituted by individuals and not the College. At this time, the Department and College are investigating all employees who embarked on the unprotecied strike for misconduct, which will soon be followed by disciplinary action.

(3) The positions were not advertised as there were appeal processes still to be completed. However, the College opted to appoint temporary lecturers to replace striking or dismissed lecturers in order for teaching and learning to continue.

(4) Since no single employee could be identified for causing any loss or damage, the College will be undertaking a forensic audit to accurately quantify the expenses and damage incurred or caused during the strike. According to estimated College calculations, the monetary value of expenses and damage caused to property is estimated at R4 297 180.16. The College intends exercising its right to claim these damages from NEHAWU and individuals who are found guilty after disciplinary hearings are completed. This excludes the expenses and damage caused to the vehicles and property of College personnel who were not on strike, as they have their right to claim damages reserved.

Compiler/Contact persons:

Ext:

DIRECTOR – GENERAL

STATUS:

DATE:

REPLY TO QUESTION 3491 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED

Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP

MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING

STATUS:

DATE:
 

05 October 2015 - NW3299

Profile picture: Paulsen, Mr N M

Paulsen, Mr N M to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

(1) (a) (i) What total amount did his department spend on his travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) how many trips did he undertake between Cape Town and Gauteng in the specified financial year and (b) what total amount did his department spend on (i) hotel and (ii) residential or other accommodation for him in (aa) Cape Town and (bb) Pretoria in the 2014-15 financial year; (2) (a)(i) what total amount did his department spend on the Deputy Minister’s travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) how many trips between Gauteng and Cape Town did the Deputy Minister undertake in the specified financial year and (b) what total amount did his department spend on (i) hotel and (ii) residential or other accommodation for the Deputy Minister in (aa) Cape Town and (bb) Pretoria in the 2014-15 financial year? NW3907E

Reply:

  1. (a)(i) The total amount spend on travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year for the Minister was R 268 638.82.

(a)(ii) The Minister undertook 40 trips between Gauteng and Cape Town in 2014-15 financial year.

(b)(i) The total amount spent on hotel was R 185 828.80 and (ii) residential or other accommodation for the Minister in Cape Town and Pretoria in the 2014 financial year .This information relates to prestige accommodation which will mainly be municipal charges as residential accommodation is paid by Department of Public Works Prestige Unit.

2.  (a)(i) The total amount spent by DAFF on travel costs between Gauteng and Cape Town in the 2014-15 financial year for the Deputy Minister was R122 157.85.

(a)(ii) The Deputy Minister undertook 19 trips between Gauteng and Cape Town in 2014-15 financial year.

(b)(i) The total amount spent by DAFF on hotel was R 265 416.58 and (ii) residential or other accommodation for the Deputy Minister in Cape Town and Pretoria in the 2014 financial year. This information relates to prestige accommodation which will mainly be municipal charges as residential accommodation is paid by Department of Public Works Prestige Unit.

05 October 2015 - NW3008

Profile picture: Carter, Ms D

Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether he launched any investigation to find out why only R218 billion of the R256 billion allocated by the State for use on fixed capital spending had been taken up and whether as a result thereof any money budgeted for infrastructure development had failed to materialize; if not, why not; if so, what (a) was the outcome of the investigation, (b) action was taken against those persons who failed the State in one way or the other, (c) implications arose for the State as a result thereof and (d) remedial actions were taken to correct the situation?

Reply:

The budget and outcomes cited in the question relate to 2012/13 financial year as published in the Budget Review 2013. Public sector infrastructure budgets have increased significantly over the past 10 years, from R89.8 billion in 2005/06 to R262.4 billion in 2014/15. In some instances, capital budgets have grown faster than the capacity to spend. In addition, some projects experience implementation difficulties resulting in underspending. Despite this, inflation-adjusted infrastructure spend has more than doubled over the past 5 years.

Underspending of funds implies that projects may not be delivered on time and on budget, and the expected outcomes may be delayed. In some cases additional financial resources may be needed to complete the project. National Treasury has not undertaken any specific investigation in this regard. However, it closely monitors these matters on an on-going basis. When there is underspending at any level of government, the Accounting Officer for the relevant institution is responsible for taking appropriate action to address the situation. Every Accounting Officer ultimately has to account to Parliament. National Treasury plays an active role in building capacity and ensuring that resources are deployed appropriately to drive capital spending across all three spheres of government.

In addition to this government has put in place many programmes to improve infrastructure spending. For instance:

  • The PICC is coordinating the implementation of strategic infrastructure projects.
  • A performance-based approach to the allocation of infrastructure grants to provinces has been introduced. Provinces that adhere to best practice in planning and procurement are eligible for additional allocations.
  • The provincial infrastructure skills development grant has placed 240 graduates in municipal jobs in areas such as civil and electrical engineering.
  • The Municipal Infrastructure Support Agency is working with water services authorities to eradicate backlogs and conduct maintenance in water and sanitation infrastructure.


    END

05 October 2015 - NW2952

Profile picture: Davis, Mr GR

Davis, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Communications

Whether, with reference to her reply to question 2037 on 22 December 2014, the SA Broadcasting Corporation has completed the review of its editorial policies; if not, (a) why not and (b) when is the review expected to be completed; if so, (i) on what date was the review completed, (ii) was there a public participation process, (iii) who was involved in the process and (iv) what were the outcomes of this process?

Reply:

(a) The SABC is in the process of concluding its editorial policy review, public reviews and participation were undertaken in the 2014/2015 financial year.

(b) Review completion date is 31 December 2015

      (i)  N/A

      (ii) Yes across all provinces

      (ii) SABC audiences and stakeholders

      (iv) All feedback is currently being integrated into the policy

 

 

 

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

05 October 2015 - NW3082

Profile picture: Van Dyk, Ms V

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications

(a) How does (i) her department and (ii) entities reporting to her define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) her department and (bbb) the entities reporting to her? NW3623E MINISTRY:COMMUNICATIONS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Private Bag X 745, Pretoria, 0001, Tel: +27 12 473 0164 Fax: +27 12 473 0585 URL: http://www.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY QUESTION FOR WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 3082 OF 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21 AUGUST 2015 Ms V van Dyk (DA) to ask Minister of Communications (a) How does (i) her department and (ii) entities reporting to her define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) her department and (bbb) the entities reporting to her? NW3623E REPLY: MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS Government recognises the need to review its policy and regulatory environment that continue to hinder the development, growth and competitiveness of small businesses. Government has requested all spheres to institutionalise the guidelines aimed at reducing red tape at local government level. To date, the Red Tape Reduction guidelines workshops have been conducted for 102 municipalities across the country in partnership with the Provincial Departments of Economic Development as well as District and Local municipalities, Department of Trade and Industry and Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs. MR N MUNZHELELE [ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE: MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE:

Reply:

Government recognises the need to review its policy and regulatory environment that continue to hinder the development, growth and competitiveness of small businesses. Government has requested all spheres to institutionalise the guidelines aimed at reducing red tape at local government level. To date, the Red Tape Reduction guidelines workshops have been conducted for 102 municipalities across the country in partnership with the Provincial Departments of Economic Development as well as District and Local municipalities, Department of Trade and Industry and Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs.

 

 

 

MR N MUNZHELELE

[ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

05 October 2015 - NW2072

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Communications:

Whether SA Broadcasting Corporation undertook any investigations during the period 1 January 2010 to 31 May 2015 into its administration to bring to light (a) corruption (b) futile and fruitless expenditure (c) abuse of power (d) cover up of irregularities and the violation of the constitution of RSA to serve the best interest of the public; if not (i) why not in each case and (ii) what steps does she intend to take in this regard; if so, what are the (aa) relevant details and (bb)outcomes of such investigation in each year. MINISTRY:COMMUNICATIONS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Private Bag X 745, Pretoria, 0001, Tel: +27 12 473 0164 Fax: +27 12 473 0585 URL: http://www.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY QUESTION FOR WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 2072 OF 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 29 MAY 2015 Mr W Madisha (Cope) to asked Minister of Communications: Whether SA Broadcasting Corporation undertook any investigations during the period 1 January 2010 to 31 May 2015 into its administration to bring to light (a) corruption (b) futile and fruitless expenditure (c) abuse of power (d) cover up of irregularities and the violation of the constitution of RSA to serve the best interest of the public; if not (i) why not in each case and (ii) what steps does she intend to take in this regard; if so, what are the (aa) relevant details and (bb)outcomes of such investigation in each year. REPLY: MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS SABC undertook investigations against Ms Gugu Duda former CFO Ms Nompilo Dlamini Manager: Supply chain N/A N/A N/A This was resolved MR N MUNZHELELE [ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE: MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE:

Reply:

SABC undertook investigations against

(a) Ms Gugu Duda former CFO

(b) Ms Nompilo Dlamini Manager: Supply chain

(c) N/A

(d) N/A

(i) N/A

(ii) This was resolved

 

 

 

 

MR N MUNZHELELE

[ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

02 October 2015 - NW3528

Profile picture: Matsepe, Mr CD

Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether an audit committee was in place in each (a) metropolitan municipality and (b) local municipality that received a disclaimer or adverse audit opinion for the 2013-14 financial year; if not, why not; if so, (i) what are the qualifications and relevant experience of each member of each audit committee and (ii) how many times did the specified committee meet in the specified financial year; (2) were any reports from each specified committee tabled and considered in each relevant municipal council; if not, why not?

Reply:

  1. No metropolitan municipality received a disclaimer or adverse audit opinion for the
    2013-14 financial year.

A total of 58 municipalities (names supplied in the attached spreadsheet) had either a disclaimer or adverse audit opinion, as follows:

District municipalities: 5 disclaimer opinions and 1 adverse opinion

Local municipalities: 50 disclaimer opinions and 2 adverse opinions

 

District and local municipalities fall within the oversight of Provincial Government hence not all the information needed to fully respond to this parliamentary question is held by the National Treasury. Enquiries with the respective Provincial Treasuries have revealed that they too do not keep all the information needed to dispose of this matter.

In order to respond fully and properly, the National Treasury requests a period of 6-8 weeks to further consult with the respective Provincial Treasuries and the affected municipalities to collect and analyse the outstanding information.

In the interim, based on the information available to the National Treasury, all 58 affected municipalities reported that they had audit committees in place. Data on the audit committee meetings held during 2013-14 are shown in the graph below. It should be noted that all municipalities that held less than four meetings are non-compliant with the MFMA.

 

 

2. See table below;

No.

Province

Municipality

Type

Audit opinion

Audit Committee (AC)

No of times AC met during 2013/14 FY

1

EC

OR Tambo District

District

Disclaimer

Yes

3

2

EC

Great Kei

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

3

EC

Ikwezi

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

4

EC

Inkwanca

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

5

EC

Inxuba Yethemba

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

1

6

EC

Lukhanji

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

7

EC

Makana

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

8

EC

Mbizana

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

9

EC

Mhlontlo

Local

Adverse

Yes

4

10

EC

Ndlambe

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

11

EC

Ngqushwa

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

12

EC

Ntabankulu

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

13

EC

Sundays River Valley

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

14

FS

Letsemeng

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

5

15

FS

Mafube

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

16

FS

Maluti-A-Phofung

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

17

FS

Mantsopa

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

5

18

FS

Matjhabeng

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

19

FS

Moqhaka

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

20

FS

Nala

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

1

21

FS

Ngwathe

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

1

22

FS

Phumelela

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

2

23

GP

Westonaria

Local

Adverse

Yes

4

24

KZN

Amajuba District

District

Disclaimer

Yes

3

25

KZN

Hlabisa

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

26

KZN

Jozini

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

27

LP

Mopani District

District

Adverse

Yes

5

28

LP

Vhembe District

District

Disclaimer

Yes

4

29

LP

Ba-Phalaborwa

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

6

30

LP

Ephraim Mogale

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

5

31

LP

Fetakgomo

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

6

32

LP

Thabazimbi

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

33

LP

Tubatse

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

34

MP

Emakhazeni

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

3

35

MP

Emalahleni

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

36

MP

Mkhondo

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

37

MP

Msukaligwa

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

38

MP

Thaba Chweu

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

6

39

NW

Dr Ruth S Mompati

District

Disclaimer

Yes

4

40

NW

Ngaka Modiri Molema

District

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

41

NW

Ditsobotla

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

42

NW

Greater Taung

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

43

NW

Lekwa-Teemane

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

44

NW

Mamusa

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

4

45

NW

Maquassi Hills

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

2

46

NW

Tswaing

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

47

NW

Ventersdorp

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

2

48

NC

!Kheis

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

49

NC

Dikgatlong

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

50

NC

Ga-Segonyana

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

51

NC

Kamiesberg

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

52

NC

Karoo Hoogland

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

53

NC

Kgatelopele

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

54

NC

Magareng

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

55

NC

Phokwane

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

56

NC

Renosterberg

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

57

NC

Thembelihle

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

58

NC

Tsantsabane

Local

Disclaimer

Yes

No Info

02 October 2015 - NW3349

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

What was (a) the total (i) revenue collection target, (ii) actual revenue collected and (iii) variance between the revenue target and revenue collected and (b) the breakdown of the total (i) revenue collection target, (ii) actual revenue collected and (iii) variance between the revenue target and revenue collected during the period 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available?

Reply:

(a) The National Treasury publishes detailed statement on actual tax revenue received into the National Revenue Fund on a monthly basis in the Government Gazette and on its website. This is done within 30 days after the end of each month, in terms of section 32(1) of the Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999. The latest available monthly statement is for the period ending 31 July 2015, which was published as part of on 28 August 2015 (refer to Statement of the National Revenue, Expenditure and Borrowing as 31 July 2015 published by the Director-General of the Treasury, as attached). The data for the period ending August 2015 will be published by the end of September 2015.

The information below refers to the annual tax revenue targets as published in the 2015 Budget Review, and the actual collections for the year to date for this fiscal year and the previous fiscal year. The Treasury does not publish monthly revenue targets as these can be subject to great volatility. As you are aware, the Treasury does revise the annual tax revenue targets in October every year during the Medium Budget Policy Statement, and again in the annual Budget.

(i) The total (gross) tax revenue target for the 2015/16 fiscal years is R1 081 275 million. This is R94 992 million, or 9.6 per cent, higher than the actual collections of R986 283 million for the previous fiscal year.

(ii) The actual total tax revenue collections for the period April to July 2015 (the first four months of the 2015/16 fiscal year) amounted R309 742 364 million. The actual total tax revenue collections for the period April to July 2014 (the first four months of the 2014/15 fiscal year) amounted R279 047 million.

(iii) Hence the actual total tax revenue collections during the first four months of the 2015/16 fiscal year is R29 376 million, or 10.5 per cent, higher that for the same period last year.

(b) The table attached (Statement 1 as published on 28 August 2015) provides the breakdown of the aggregate (total) data provide in (a) by tax type. The table indicates that in nominal terms corporate income tax revenue, during the first four month of the 2015/16 fiscal year, were below the actual collections during the first four months of the previous fiscal year by 1.5 per cent. This may be an indication that total corporate income tax revenue for the 2015/16 fiscal is likely to be below the target for the year. It should, however, be noted that most corporate tax revenue is collected at the end of each quarter with June and December the more important months.

02 October 2015 - NW3604

Profile picture: Motau, Mr SC

Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What cases are currently being investigated by the SA Revenue Services’ Anti-Corruption Unit and (b) which of the specified cases are currently before the courts?

Reply:

(a)(b) Internal Cases:

The requested information forms part of the ongoing investigative process.

The release of such information may prejudice the outcome of such investigations/ disciplinary proceedings.

External Cases:

Due to the taxpayer confidentiality provisions contained in Section 69 of the Tax Administration Act No. 28 of 2011, SARS is prohibited from disclosing any taxpayer information (Including whether or not a taxpayer is subject to an audit/ investigation) to any person other than a SARS official. SARS is, therefore, unfortunately not in a position to respond to the above request in relation to any tax matter.

02 October 2015 - NW3347

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)In respect of the mandatory cost containment measures specified in the National Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013-14, by what (a) amount and (b) percentage did expenditure on (i) consultants, (ii) travel and subsistence and (iii) catering and events (aa) increase and/or (bb) decrease in each specified (aaa) department, (bbb) constitutional institution and (ccc) public entity listed in Schedule 2 and 3 of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, (aaaa) in the (aaaaa) 2013-14 and (bbbbb) 2014-15 financial years and (ccccc) in the period 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; (2) What is the total amount of the specified expenditure (a) in the 2013-14 financial year and (b) during the period 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available?

Reply:

  1. Table 1 provides a summary of expenditure in relation to the amounts spent and the percentage increases or decreases related to (i) consultants, (ii) travel and subsistence and (iii) catering and events in departments. The table provides expenditure information for the 2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 financial years.

Table 2 provides a summary of expenditure in relation to the amounts spent on (i) consultants, (ii) travel and subsistence and (iii) catering and events in departments for months of 01 April 2015 to August 2015. The aforementioned information was extracted from the National Treasury’s transversal financial management systems that are utilised by departments.

Expenditure information on consultants, travel and subsistence and catering and events is not available for constitutional institutions and public entities listed in Schedules 2 and 3 to the PFMA since these institutions utilise different entity controlled financial systems for their payments.

Table 1:

Expenditure related to consultants, travel and subsistence and catering and events for the periods 2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015



Departmental Expenditure


Actual

2012/2013


Actual
2013/2014

Increase   

Decrease  

Stagnant

Amounts
R’ billions

Amounts
R’ billions


Consultants
 


12,517,130.00


12,825,333.00


2%


Travel and Subsistence


9,612,468.00
 


9,861,580.00


3%


Catering, entertainment and venue rental
 


1,919,882.00
 


2,277,808.00


19%

 
 
 Departmental Expenditure

 

Actual
2013/2014

Preliminary Outcome
2014/2015



%

 

Amounts
R’ billions

Amounts
R’ billions


Consultants
 

 
12,825,333.00


12,461,082.00


-3%


Travel and Subsistence
 


9,861,580.00


9,290,305.00


-6%


Catering, entertainment and venue rental
 


2,277,808.00


1,202,054.00


-47%

Table 2:

Expenditure related to consultants, travel and subsistence and catering and events for the periods 1 April 2015 to 31 August 2015.




   Departmental Expenditure


Total Expenditure for
the period April to
August 2015




April 2015




May 2015




June 2015




July 2015




Aug 2015


Consultants


1,732,426,679


297,622,187


468,593,838


276,016,927

 

295,309,972


394,883,755


Travel and Subsistence


3,257,077,554


423,396,914


599,404,614


721,937,277


776,152,420


736,186,328


Catering, entertainment  and venue rental



397,756,954



38,426,149



71,388,387



84,038,985



106,305,102



97,598,331


Total


5,387,261,187


759,445,250


1,139,386,839


1,081,993,189


1,177,767,495


1,228,668,414

 

2.The total expenditure in relation to consultants, travel and subsistence and catering and events for the 2013/2014 financial year amounts to R25 billion. Corresponding expenditure from 1 April 2015 to 31 August 2015 amounts to R5.4 billion.

 

02 October 2015 - NW3428

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

In respect of the additional cost containment measures for consideration by accounting officers and accounting authorities specified in the National Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013/2014, which specified (a) departments, (b) constitutional institutions and (c) public entities listed on Schedule 2 and 3 of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, (i) acquired air tickets using corporate air miles accumulated through loyalty programmes, (ii) discontinued supplying employees with newspapers and other publications and (iii) ensured team-building functions, social functions and end-of-year functions, are not financed from the establishment budget in the (aa) 2013-14, (bb) 2014-15 and (cc) 2015-16 financial years?

Reply:

The provisions of paragraph 4 of the National Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013/3014 that relate to expenditure on the engagement of consultants, travel and subsistence, domestic hotel accommodation, hiring of vehicles, entertainment allowances and expenditure related to catering and the hosting of social events are mandatory. The areas contained in the Annexure to the Treasury Instruction are not mandatory for implementation and expenditures related thereto are not auditable.

Therefore information related to (i) the acquisition of air tickets using corporate air miles and (ii) the discontinuing of purchases related to newspapers and other publications are cost containment measures that are not mandatory and can only be obtained directly from the respective departments, constitutional institutions and public entities. The information on expenses related to (iii) team building, social functions and year end functions are specifically precluded from being financed from the budgets of departments. Information related thereto is thus not available from the National Treasury and can be obtained directly from the respective departments, constitutional institutions and public entities.

02 October 2015 - NW3441

Profile picture: Figg, Mr MJ

Figg, Mr MJ to ask the Minister of Finance

What total remuneration amount was paid to each director of the SA Airways Group in the 2014-15 financial year?

Reply:

KALAWE M R4 552 981.00

MEYER WH R3 661 080.00

KWINANA Y R753 522.15

MYENI DC R846 115.62

ROSKRUGE C R427 486.62

MPONDO B R553 089.69

MABIZELA A R285 181.10

NAITHANI R R272 480.29

LEPULE R R221 197.71

KHUMALO A R206 404.80

KUBEKA M R480 056.90

TAMBI J R200 590.92

DIXON AD R171 116.18

02 October 2015 - NW3621

Profile picture: Steyn, Ms A

Steyn, Ms A to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

How many farms have been transferred for the purposes of land reform in the Blue Crane Route Local Municipality, in the Eastern Cape, since 1994; (2) (a) who is currently on each farm and (b) what is the current status of each farm?

Reply:

 

(1) 28 farms

(2)(a),(b) Please refer to the table below.

Project

Program

(a) Lease Agreement/ Caretakership/Owner

(b) Status

Mulderskraal

PLAS

Nelani, Tozi William

Productive.

Theo Schneider (Die Vlakte)

PLAS

Ilima Farming Trust

Allegations of sub-letting submitted to Property Management Unit.

Craig Gowan 1 (Krugers Post)

PLAS - AVMP

Cookhouse Stockowners Coop

Productive, croplands to be recapitalised. In process of appointing Humansdorp Coop.

Alleengelaaten

PLAS Recap

Siyahluma Coop

Productive, to be recapitalised.

Bethaven / Kommetjieshoek

PLAS Recap

Roundtop Trading (Pty) Ltd & Farm Workers Trust

Productive, to be recapitalised, shareholding being revisited.

Brakfontein

PLAS Recap

Saleni & son

Productive, to be recapitalised

DoornRivier

PLAS Recap

JFC Investments (Pty) Ltd

Productive, fencing upgrade needed

Draaihoek

PLAS Recap

Lume Agricultural CC

Productive, to be recapitalised

Elandsdrift

PLAS Recap

Sbewu Gatyeni (Pty) Ltd

Productive, to be recapitalised

Klipfontein Voernet

PLAS Recap

ECRDA

Dormant, feed factory

Krantzkloof

PLAS Recap

A Mehlo

Productive, to be recapitalised

Lenathal

PLAS Recap

A Draghoender

Productive, to be recapitalised

Liyaaqat James Enterprise

PLAS Recap

Liyaaqat James

Productive, recapitalised

Nuwerus

PLAS Recap

River Corner

Productive, to be recapitalised

Rocky Ridge

PLAS Recap

A Draghoender

Productive, to be recapitalised

Sidwell Mantile Family

PLAS Recap

Sidwell Mantile

Productive, recapitalised

Sonder

PLAS Recap

ZA Pitani

Productive, to be recapitalised

Soutvlei (Sout Vleij)

PLAS Recap

H Gxotiwe

Productive, to be recapitalised

Weltevreden

PLAS Recap

S Miners & wife

Productive, to be recapitalised

Westondale

PLAS Recap

W'dale Farming CC (Gxotiwe, P)

Productive, to be recapitalised

Karkotskraal (Zama Ukhupila)

State Land

Yose / Mafilika / Makana / Blignaut

Productive: Divided & allocated to 4 individual stockowners.

Zama Ukuphila Trust State Com (Siyazama)

State Land

Siyazama (Kosini,Julime)

Managed as commonage by Municipality

Masizame Trust

SLAG

SLAG beneficiaries

Productive, requires better management

Pearston Commonage

COM

Blue Crane Route Municipality

Commonage, owned & managed by municipality

Som East Commonage

COM

Blue Crane Route Municipality

Commonage, owned & managed by municipality

Houghamdale North

LRAD

LRAD beneficiaries

Productive joint venture

Middleton Ostrich Development

LRAD

LRAD beneficiaries

Requires better management and to resolve internal disputes

Nelsig Township Stockfarmers

LRAD

LRAD beneficiaries

Productive, Land Bank loan to be paid

02 October 2015 - NW3427

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the National Treasury intends to expand the scope of the mandatory cost containment measures specified in the National Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013/2014; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

After more than 18 months of implementing Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013/2014, the National Treasury recognises that further savings could be realised by refining the cost containment applicable to institutions governed by the PFMA. For instance, conference expenditure has been identified as an area in which expenditure could be curtailed. Once the refined document has been through the approved processes it will replace the current one.

02 October 2015 - NW3559

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether, in respect of the (a) mandatory and (b) additional cost containment measures specified in National Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013/2014, each specified (i) department, (ii) constitutional institution and (iii) public entity listed on Schedule 2 and 3 of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, (aa) complied and/or (bb) failed to comply in the 2014-15 financial year; (2) (a) why was there a failure to comply in each specified case and (b) what steps have been taken by the National Treasury to enforce compliance in each case?

Reply:

(1) Information on whether (i) departments, (ii) constitutional institutions and (iii) public entities complied with the (a) mandatory and (b) additional cost containment measures specified in the National Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013/2014 is not available at the National Treasury.

(2) Information related to reasons on why there was (a) failure to comply with the mandatory and additional cost containment measures is not available at the National Treasury. Regarding (b), enforcement of the cost containment measures must be overseen firstly by the accounting officers of departments and constitutional institutions and by accounting authorities of public entities, secondly by the relevant arm of state and finally by the Auditor-General of South Africa to ensure compliance.

02 October 2015 - NW3429

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether there are any measures in place in his department to (a) monitor, (b) evaluate and (c) report on compliance with the cost containment measures set out in the National Treasury Instruction 01 of 2013/2014; if not, in each specified case, why not; if so, in each specified case, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

When all laws, regulations and instruction notes issued by organ of state, compliance with the cost containment measures has to be enforced and overseen (i) firstly within each department, constitutional institution and public entity, (ii) secondly, by the relevant legislative arm of the state and (iii) finally, by the Auditor-General of South Africa.

02 October 2015 - NW3518

Profile picture: Hoosen, Mr MH

Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

Has his department detected any cases of (a) fraud and/or (b) corruption in the roll-out of the new Smart ID cards; if so, (i) how many cases have been detected thus far, (ii) how did the perpetrators of the fraud and/or corruption infiltrate the Smart ID system and (iii) what measures has his department put in place to prevent the issuance of further fraudulent Smart ID cards?

Reply:

(a-b) No, the Smart ID Card remains the most highly secured form of identification ever produced with sophisticated security features that are not corruptible. No corruption cases have been detected during the roll out of Smart ID Card process.

i) None.

ii) Not applicable.

iii) The department does not issue fraudulent Smart ID Cards.