Questions and Replies
23 November 2017 - NW3657
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Whether any problems occurred with the Sicas S7 software at the simulation test facility in Northriding; if so, (a) what are the details of the problems and (b) how will the problems impact on the progress of the software; (2) whether the entire Germiston station with all its fringe stations have been tested; if not, why not?
Reply:
1 There were some small problems experienced with the software during testing but all this have since been addressed. No problems are currently being experienced with the Sicas S7.
The Sicas S7 core software was tested and validated by the Independent Safety Assessor in the Northriding Test Facility
2. The Germiston station is yet to be tested; it is scheduled to be commissioned between June and August 2020 in line with the project timelines.
23 November 2017 - NW3593
McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What is the total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him for more than (aa) 30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days and (b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?
Reply:
Department
(a)(i) (aa) Nil
(bb) Nil
(cc) Nil
(dd) Nil
(b)(i) (aa) Nil
(bb) Nil
(cc) Nil
(dd) Nil
Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)
Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA) monitors accounts payable aging at ACSA’S Exco and Financial Risk Management Committee {FRMC} (subcommittee of the EXCO).
Extracted from the September 2017 FRMC Report (Executive Summary):
Other detail:
Supplier Name |
Current (ZAR) |
30 days (ZAR) |
31 – 60 days (ZAR) |
SIZWE AFRICA IT GROUP (PTY) LTD |
9476201,59 |
- |
- |
KARL FREDERICK KRAMER T/A DURBAN COMPRESSORS |
6188376,00 |
- |
- |
PULENG TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD |
4025764,08 |
- |
- |
SUPERCARE SERVICES GROUP (PTY) LTD |
1667932,08 |
- |
- |
TIPP FOCUS HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD |
- |
35388,38 |
1398553,52 |
ADB SAFEGATE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
474008,46 |
- |
567555,62 |
OTIS (PTY) LTD |
3549,71 |
- |
1004684,28 |
BOSASA SECURITY (PTY) LTD |
991980,77 |
-1179,26 |
- |
AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR CC |
665921,34 |
- |
317387,40 |
BMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS CC |
- |
955019,04 |
- |
KUDLAKWELANGA TRADING CC |
943200,00 |
- |
- |
RUWACON (PTY) LTD |
917543,14 |
- |
- |
AMERICAN EXPRESS CARDS - CLUB CORPORATE TRAVEL |
- |
552527,50 |
353621,12 |
BIRDLIFE SOUTH AFRICA |
741000,00 |
- |
- |
SANDTON CONVENTON CENTRE |
357117,00 |
285693,60 |
- |
ORICOL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED |
633905,89 |
- |
- |
POSTWINK SALES CC |
610185,00 |
- |
- |
ULWEMBU LA SE KASI HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD |
9183,22 |
20406,00 |
496290,55 |
EXPONANT (PTY) LTD |
- |
212603,16 |
302326,86 |
RAKOMA AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED |
500745,00 |
- |
5867,00 |
RED ALERT TSS (PTY) LTD |
215857,44 |
- |
203358,89 |
GAU FLORA NURSERY CC |
409643,43 |
- |
- |
MULTICHOICE AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
- |
233104,86 |
161225,00 |
SAFETY AND ALLIED PRODUCTS CC |
- |
- |
385092,00 |
GEORGE MUNICIPALITY |
335181,15 |
- |
- |
TECHNIQUE ENGINEERING SERVICES (PTY) LTD |
325088,35 |
- |
- |
SFI GROUP (PTY) LTD |
324351,66 |
- |
- |
CASNAN CIVILS CC |
271120,50 |
- |
- |
MINERP HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
269238,82 |
CLUB CORPORATE TRAVEL (PTY) LTD |
12655,04 |
- |
250501,38 |
MUNICIPALITY |
195531,47 |
- |
64050,00 |
TSEBO OUTSOURCING GROUP (PTY) LTD T/A TSEBO CLEANING SOLUTIONS |
121227,32 |
121227,32 |
- |
IKANDO (PTY) LTD t/a iTMASTER |
232795,49 |
- |
- |
WASTE PLAN (PTY) LTD |
231855,45 |
- |
- |
FTI CONSULTING SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
225439,56 |
- |
- |
UK RENOVATORS CC |
118445,01 |
106254,10 |
- |
DAWID KRUIPER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
222355,55 |
- |
- |
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD |
211160,70 |
- |
8755,20 |
CONTINUITYSA (PTY) LTD |
215335,17 |
- |
- |
PARNIS AIRPORT SERVICES A DIV. OF PARNIS |
21492,82 |
- |
187683,89 |
MIKELEC ELECTRICAL CC |
200215,19 |
- |
- |
LS NAIDOO T/A GOODWILL PLUMBING AND CIVILS |
- |
- |
191308,49 |
AFRIMAGE PHOTOGRAPHY t/a ALBERT FRONEMAN CONSULTING |
- |
- |
181289,64 |
AIR TRAFFIC & NAVIGATION SERVICES COMPANY LTD T/A ATNS |
177671,37 |
- |
- |
ENGEN PETROLEUM LTD |
172706,26 |
- |
- |
CAPE TOWN PARTNERSHIP NPC |
- |
- |
171000,00 |
UPLIFT QUALITY SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
164905,56 |
OMEGA COMMUNICATIONS (PTY) LTD |
26014,80 |
132599,78 |
- |
AMPCOR KHANYISA CC |
122853,59 |
- |
32667,92 |
GADGET GIRLS CC |
- |
- |
150532,44 |
TOURVEST DESTINATION MANAGEMENT A DIVISION OF TOURVEST HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD |
150392,99 |
- |
- |
ACTS OF RANDOM KINDNESS SOUTH AFRICA NPC T/A ARK SA |
- |
- |
150000,00 |
ROSENBAUER SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
122177,69 |
ZGS SOLUTIONS SERVICES (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
120000,00 |
SERVEST (PTY) LTD |
115676,22 |
- |
- |
ODEX ONLINE CC |
37273,05 |
- |
70996,28 |
JN PLUMBING CC t/a COMET PLUMBING |
103512,00 |
- |
- |
GARY RACHBUCH ATTORNEYS |
- |
- |
96898,88 |
DOWN LOW CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECTS |
96550,00 |
- |
- |
BARLOWORLD SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD T/A BARLOWORLD EQUIPMENT |
91109,71 |
- |
- |
PROTOCOR TWENTY TWO CC T/A AUTOMATION SPECIFICATION |
- |
- |
89837,93 |
BOWMAN GILFILLAN INC |
- |
- |
89143,22 |
ASPIRE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
85500,00 |
MAJUGO TRADING (PTY) LTD |
85500,00 |
- |
- |
BEUMER GROUP SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
81815,52 |
SOLID WEDGE SYSTEMS CC |
69820,67 |
- |
- |
LOURENS ROADMARKING CC |
66558,67 |
- |
- |
PLAN B CONSULTING CC |
- |
56528,72 |
- |
SUPERFECTA TRADING 106 CC T/A KZN TOP BUSINESS |
- |
- |
52624,00 |
BORDER KEI CHAMBER OF BUSINESS |
- |
51720,00 |
- |
E W TOOLS AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES |
- |
- |
51015,00 |
KELLY GROUP (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
49498,02 |
UNAKHO FIRE AND EMERGENCY TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
49200,00 |
DURBANVILLE PEST CONTROL CC T/A ENVIRO-SAFE |
46899,60 |
- |
- |
SOUTH AFRICAN PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION T/A SAPOA |
- |
- |
46603,20 |
HAMILTON HYDRAULIC SERVICES CC |
46155,18 |
- |
- |
ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA |
45600,00 |
- |
- |
WAZISONDA INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD t/a SAUSAGE SALOON PROTEA GLEN |
44689,14 |
- |
- |
DISTINCTIVE CHOICE 1272 CC T/A TURNMET |
- |
- |
43465,54 |
MANAGED INTEGRITY EVALUATION (PTY) LTD T/A MIE |
- |
- |
42750,00 |
MELEX GOLF CARS (PTY) LTD |
42021,25 |
- |
- |
AVIATION TRAINING ACADEMY |
- |
19702,62 |
21147,00 |
MOTLA CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LTD |
40286,38 |
- |
- |
THE HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICE CC T/A THE HUMAN RESOURCE CC |
- |
- |
39900,00 |
35 PHINDZANI TRADING (PTY) LTD |
1824,00 |
- |
36000,00 |
EUROPCAR. |
29703,80 |
- |
4369,19 |
NDENZA OA (SWD) (PTY) LTD T/A CANOA EASTERN CAPE (PTY) LTD |
7700,00 |
25036,13 |
- |
TD MOTHEBE TRADING T/A MOTHEBE SHUTTLE SERVICES |
- |
13650,00 |
18050,00 |
BIDDULPHS REMOVALS & STORAGE (PTY) LTD |
27861,60 |
- |
- |
PREMIER ATTRACTION 219 CC T/A ICON CIVILS & BUILDING |
- |
- |
27558,36 |
ANCER (PTY) LTD |
27025,00 |
- |
- |
ACTIVE MECHANICAL SERVICES GROUP CC T/A AMS GROUP |
26710,20 |
- |
- |
FORMFUNC STUDIO (PTY) LTD |
26239,95 |
- |
- |
CARPE DIEM CIVILS CC |
25972,40 |
- |
- |
CITY OF CAPE TOWN - RCS LEVIES |
25692,00 |
- |
- |
RAPID SPILL RESPONSE CC |
- |
- |
25362,06 |
NDODANA CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LTD |
25080,00 |
- |
- |
THE H AND H SECURITY TRUST T/A HARTWIG & HENDERSON SECURITY TRUST |
- |
24612,12 |
- |
YELLOW DOT OFFICE DEPOT (PTY) LTD |
- |
24461,65 |
- |
INSTITUTE OF PEOPLE MANAGEMENT T/A IPM |
12040,00 |
- |
12040,00 |
SIZISA UKHANYO TRADING 1067 |
23930,88 |
- |
- |
SCHINDLER LIFTS (SA) (PTY) LTD |
22160,92 |
- |
- |
THE PRIORY FOR SOUTH AFRICA OF THE ORDER OF ST JOHN T/A ST JOHN AMBULANCE |
- |
- |
21950,00 |
MULTIMINDS 186 CC T/A COOLING SOLUTIONS |
21934,51 |
- |
- |
BAPHATHE TRADING T/A ARWYP AIRPORT CLINIC |
- |
- |
20960,00 |
SIYAYA CORPORATION (PTY) LTD T/A SIYAYA TYRES |
20508,60 |
- |
- |
USIZO TECHNICAL SERVICES CC |
19899,38 |
- |
- |
GLOBAL PROSPECTUS TRAINING (PTY) LTD |
19357,20 |
- |
- |
HANAU ELECTRIC (PTY) LTD T/A TELE TRONIC |
- |
- |
17850,53 |
CARGO LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
17580,00 |
PA STATIONERS UPT (PTY) LTD |
17341,63 |
- |
- |
JABATHA PAPER AND STATIONERY CC |
15938,49 |
1206,80 |
- |
BARLOWORLD SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD T/A AVIS RENT A CAR |
16756,86 |
- |
- |
LEGADIMA PERSONNEL |
- |
- |
16279,20 |
BULKMATECH ENGINEERING (PTY) LTD |
- |
12038,40 |
3938,70 |
HEALTH INSITE SA (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
15931,50 |
MAINLINE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS CC |
- |
15789,00 |
- |
MELCO ELEVATOR SA (PTY) LTD |
15576,74 |
- |
- |
CREST PARKING & ACCESS CONTROL CC |
- |
- |
15530,22 |
SAACOSH (PTY) LTD |
15162,00 |
- |
- |
SEEDITE AND BOGOSI TRADE AND ENTERPRISE CC |
- |
15142,50 |
- |
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA T/A ECSA |
- |
3072,00 |
11845,40 |
SOUTH AFRICAN WEATHER SERVICE |
14857,28 |
- |
- |
KAMO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES |
- |
- |
14136,00 |
IMAGE EXCELLENCE PERFORMANCE CONSULTANTS GROUP (PTY) LTD T/A IE GROUP |
- |
- |
13651,50 |
MAINBRANCH INVESTMENTS 39 (PTY) LTD T/A SOARING FALCON SPUR |
2749,00 |
3974,10 |
6907,35 |
GET EDUCATED CC T/A GETSMARTER |
- |
- |
12900,00 |
WJ AUST CC T/A MICROTEQ |
12774,28 |
- |
- |
SAGE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD t/a SAGE HR AND PAYROLL A DIV OF SAGE SOUTH AFRICA |
- |
12654,00 |
- |
RENTOKIL INITIAL (PTY) LTD |
12451,89 |
- |
- |
ALGOA OFFICE AUTOMATION (PTY) LTD t/a NASHUA EASTERN CAPE |
12315,22 |
- |
- |
TOP MEDIA AND COMMUNNICATIONS (PTY) LTD |
- |
11400,00 |
- |
THE GATEWAY HOTEL UMHLANGA (PTY) LTD |
- |
11375,00 |
- |
COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE OF SOUTH AFRICA |
6477,00 |
4860,00 |
- |
DURBAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY |
- |
- |
11039,76 |
DARK FIBRE AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
10624,80 |
KINGDOM CUISINE (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
10609,22 |
APPLECART PROPERTIES 42 CC t/a SAFFRON KITCHEN |
- |
6963,12 |
3465,60 |
MINOLCO (PTY) LTD T/A KONICA MINOLTA SA |
10026,84 |
- |
- |
GARAGE CARDS - CORPORATE |
9435,04 |
- |
- |
CENTA FIRE (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
9405,00 |
SOUTHERN AFRICAN MUSIC RIGHTS ORGANISATION T/A SAMRO LIMITED |
9346,30 |
- |
- |
THINK360 KZN (PTY) LTD |
9006,00 |
- |
- |
SOUTH AFRICAN COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTRES |
8949,00 |
- |
- |
FOODWEAR CC |
8744,94 |
- |
- |
ILEMBE CONSORTIUM |
- |
- |
8735,08 |
PARAMOUNT BODY WORKS CC |
8265,00 |
- |
- |
INSTITUTION OF FIRE ENGINEERS SA |
7930,00 |
- |
- |
THE INSTITUTE OF RISK MANAGEMENT SOUTH AFRICA |
7780,50 |
- |
- |
SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY |
5985,00 |
1785,00 |
- |
INNOVATIVE SPECIALIZED PRODUCTIONS CC |
7560,00 |
- |
- |
VOLTEX (PTY) LTD T/A LITECOR |
7536,06 |
- |
- |
GILBARCO AFS (PTY) LTD |
7469,85 |
- |
- |
ENVIROSERV WASTE MANAGEMENT (PTY) LTD |
7318,80 |
- |
- |
RICOH SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
6882,88 |
- |
- |
FIHRST MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PTY) LTD (HR) |
6770,23 |
- |
- |
MR FIX IT |
6612,00 |
- |
- |
VODACOM SERVICE PROVIDER COMPANY (PTY) LTD |
- |
6534,90 |
- |
RODE AND ASSOCIATES (PTY) LTD |
- |
6498,00 |
- |
TERRA FIRMA SOLUTIONS |
6298,50 |
- |
- |
MASON COMPLETE OFFICE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD |
6260,43 |
- |
- |
COASTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES |
- |
- |
6238,67 |
WCA WORKERS COMPENSATION ASSISTANCE |
6228,30 |
- |
- |
BUMBALI (PTY) LTD t/a BUMBALI CONSULTING |
- |
- |
5700,00 |
CENTA FIREQUIP CC T/A FIREQUIP |
- |
- |
5643,00 |
AFFIRMATIVE PORTFOLIOS (CC) |
5640,05 |
- |
- |
MASSTORES (PTY) LTD T/A MAKRO SA |
- |
- |
5564,00 |
ALL ABOUT FOOD CC |
- |
- |
5270,91 |
BIDVEST SERVICES (PTY) LTD t/a BIDVEST STEINER - UPINGTON |
- |
- |
5198,40 |
COMPUTERSHARE PROPRIETARY LIMITED |
5130,00 |
- |
- |
SACHAR MOBILE PRETORIA |
- |
- |
4960,82 |
SIGMA LIFTS AND ESCALATORS (PTY) LTD |
4939,12 |
- |
- |
STEINER HYGIENE (PTY) LTD |
4673,09 |
- |
- |
COMMERCE EDGE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD |
4503,00 |
- |
- |
OMEGA HR SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
4286,40 |
ALERT STATIONERS CC |
4204,55 |
- |
- |
BASFOUR 2730 (PTY) LTD T/A NASHUA MANGAUNG |
3946,91 |
- |
- |
AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES CISKEI PTY LTD |
- |
- |
3663,96 |
SOUTH AFRICAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION LTD |
3626,52 |
- |
- |
THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SECRETARIES AND ADMINISTRATORS T/A ICSA |
- |
- |
3503,00 |
BLOEMFONTEIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY (BCCI) |
- |
- |
3450,00 |
FINTECH (PTY) LTD T/A CREDIFON POSTAGE A DIVISION OF FINTECH |
3360,00 |
- |
- |
BIG FIVE DUTY FREE (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
3315,34 |
XYZ CATERING (PTY) LTD t/a BRUCE CATERING |
- |
- |
3269,56 |
THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING T/A SAICE |
- |
- |
3103,00 |
PABALELO SECURITY SERVICES AND PROJECTS |
- |
- |
3078,00 |
METROFILE (PTY) LTD |
677,98 |
1088,47 |
1244,54 |
CSIR |
2940,52 |
- |
- |
KEYBASE TRAINING SOLUTIONS CC |
- |
- |
2821,50 |
CHUBB INTEGRATED SYSTEMS |
- |
- |
2793,00 |
CJ HATTINGH AND SONS CC T/A PMR AFRICA |
- |
- |
2600,02 |
PETTY CASH |
2586,00 |
- |
- |
JOHN KNIGHT CATERING (PTY) LTD t/a KNIGHTS CATERING |
- |
- |
2114,70 |
SOUTH AFRICAN POST OFFICE LTD |
1800,00 |
- |
- |
ALTRA MEDICAL PRODUCTIONS CC |
1394,22 |
- |
- |
DALROD OFFICE SUPPLIES (PTY) LTD |
1258,67 |
- |
- |
AVUSA RETAIL LTD T/A VAN SCHAIK BOOKSTORE |
- |
- |
1106,19 |
JRS SALES AND CONSULTING CC |
1077,32 |
- |
- |
NOSA (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
990,00 |
UPINGTON TREKKERS |
- |
- |
984,86 |
SIZWE PAINTS (PTY) LTD |
793,61 |
- |
- |
BIDVEST PAPERPLUS (PTY) LTD t/a LITHOTECH |
771,19 |
- |
- |
NELSON MANDELA BAY TOURISM |
- |
- |
720,00 |
PARK AVENUE STATIONERS CC |
679,38 |
- |
- |
VUZA MEDICAL (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
651,50 |
TRANSFORM EL TRUST T/A TRANSFORM ELECTRICAL WHOLESALERS EL |
- |
- |
603,29 |
MERCHANT WEST (PTY) LTD |
573,77 |
- |
- |
JAFF AND COMPANY (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
501,60 |
SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS T/A SAICA |
- |
- |
500,00 |
SOUTH AFRICAN REWARD ASSOCIATION T/A SARA |
- |
- |
500,00 |
WALKERS MIDAS |
- |
- |
169,25 |
HUGE CONNECT (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
158,46 |
HORSEHOE MOTEL |
149,00 |
- |
- |
HALSTED AND COMPANY (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
141,02 |
MUNASI CIVIL CONTRACTORS CC BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
- |
- |
49,25 |
VAN WYK G H MR - CORP STAFF |
- |
- |
0,30 |
MASSTORES (PTY) LTD T/A MASSDISCOUNTERS, GAME, DION, DION WIRED |
- |
- |
0,01 |
RGL TRADING (PTY) LTD T/A ITEC EAST CAPE |
- |
- |
0,01 |
GVK SIYA ZAMA BUILDING CONTRACTORS (EP) PTY LTD |
- |
- |
-0,01 |
BIDVEST WALTONS - A DIVISION OF BIDVEST OFFICE (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
-814,13 |
AQUA TRANSPORT AND PLANT HIRE (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
-2394,00 |
RESHEBILE AVIATION & PROTECTION SERVICES (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
-3707,28 |
AH HUMAN CAPITAL t/a EXECUTIVES ONLINE JOHANNESBURG NORTH |
- |
- |
-19698,42 |
GOLD CARDS - CORPORATE |
- |
- |
-28814,57 |
Total |
34392826,86 |
2983737,01 |
8566653,48 |
Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)
STATUS OF SUPPLIER INVOICES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2017
No. |
Supplier Name |
Amount outstanding 30 Days |
Amount outstanding 60 Days |
Amount outstanding 90 Days |
Amount outstanding 120 Days + |
Reason for non-payment/Envisaged date of payment |
1 |
GARTNER SOUTH AFRICA |
834,071.12 |
- |
- |
666,743.82 |
Paid End October |
2 |
MAYA INNOVATE (PTY) LTD |
388,340.32 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
3 |
NEOTEL BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES PTY LTD |
52,998.03 |
53,572.36 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
4 |
G4S SECURE SOLUTION (SA) (PTY)LTD |
82,496.56 |
- |
38,549.10 |
- |
Paid End October |
5 |
OPTICAL FIBRE TRENDS |
39,152.10 |
89,397.66 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
6 |
NGUBANE AND COMPANY JOHANNESBURG INCORPOR |
156,682.26 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
7 |
MINKATEKO GENERAL MAINTENANCE |
61,919.56 |
48,431.31 |
- |
13,440.00 |
Paid End October |
8 |
GA ENVIRONMENT (PTY) LTD |
89,889.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
9 |
MADIBA MOTSAI MASITENYANE AND GITHIRI ATT |
28,215.00 |
32,917.50 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
10 |
MOCCS (PTY) LTD |
16,512.84 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
11 |
OMNIVISION |
15,331.81 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
12 |
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY |
10,967.59 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
13 |
METROFILE PTY LTD |
21,804.13 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
14 |
HENRY WILLIAMS PLANTSCAPE |
4,836.94 |
4,836.94 |
4,836.94 |
- |
Paid End October |
15 |
KPMG SERVICES(PROPRIETATY)LIMITED |
5,735.34 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
16 |
LOAD MASS CRANE SERVICES |
5,304.42 |
- |
- |
- |
Awaiting credit note |
17 |
NTEBU PELE PROJECTS AND CONTRACTORS CC |
4,332.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
18 |
KEVCOR EQUIPMENT DIVISION |
2,872.80 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
19 |
H20 PURIFIES CC |
1,020.00 |
1,020.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
20 |
THALES(FLIGHTCRAFT AVIATION)) |
1,559,973.86 |
2,941,673.67 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
21 |
SA POST OFFICE LTD |
4,821.75 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
22 |
S A CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (LICENCES) |
982,213.98 |
2,940.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
23 |
RED ALERT JOHANNESBURG |
187,024.38 |
13,054.05 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
24 |
RAPDL CONSTRUCTION |
21,489.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
25 |
ROCKETSEED SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD |
64,877.40 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
26 |
PTES CONSULTING AND RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
21,090.00 |
105,108.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
27 |
SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING |
123,472.83 |
3,126.00 |
- |
4,466.03 |
Paid End October |
28 |
TWOFOLDS CONSULTING |
76,810.01 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
29 |
TEMBO'S CATERING |
4,770.00 |
- |
25,890.00 |
19,973.00 |
Await approval, incumbrance |
30 |
THE INSTITUTE OF RISK MANAGEMENT SOUTH AF |
31,122.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
31 |
SOLID GREEN CONSULTING CC |
31,017.12 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
32 |
RENTOKIL PTY LTD C.T |
17,729.84 |
- |
- |
5,016.26 |
Awaiting statement, requested |
33 |
THE BUSINESS ZONE 25 |
20,770.82 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
34 |
PUBLIC DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD |
14,411.41 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
35 |
PUREAU FRESHWATER |
9,623.88 |
- |
- |
- |
Approval related problem, to review contracts |
36 |
STOREX PTY LTD |
11,970.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
37 |
SABC TV LICENCES |
11,363.27 |
- |
- |
- |
Account under query, payment by 15 Nov |
38 |
WESTERN OCEAN INVESTMENTS 112 CC |
9,975.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
39 |
WATER FROM AIR |
3,003.90 |
- |
- |
- |
Await confirmation of banking details |
40 |
WALTONS STATIONERY CO |
1,574.98 |
1,723.01 |
- |
- |
Await credit note |
41 |
TS PROMOTIONS |
4,155.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
42 |
WP DE JONGH ELELECTRICAL |
1,368.00 |
- |
- |
2,394.00 |
Paid End October |
43 |
SAFETY MATE |
2,430.87 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
44 |
TUINROETE AGR |
1,538.45 |
- |
65.52 |
- |
Statement requested |
45 |
WLZ COMMUNICATION T/A HYMAX BORDER |
792.30 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
46 |
SANDOLL CONSULTANTS PTY LTD |
342.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
47 |
DAWN WING |
34,951.15 |
2,425.58 |
981.64 |
37,470.78 |
Delay in approval of invoices |
48 |
FIDELITY SPRINGBOK SECURIT(JHB) |
37,018.03 |
- |
36,516.12 |
- |
Paid End October |
49 |
FIDELITY SUPERCARE CLEANING(CT) |
8,117.94 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
50 |
BROLL PROPERTY GROUP |
12,347.12 |
- |
13,634.81 |
11,917.88 |
Account under investigation |
51 |
BATTERY CABIN |
23,700.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
52 |
DR BRATHWAITE & PARTNERS |
722.40 |
10,827.56 |
4,441.90 |
3,890.15 |
Paid End October |
53 |
BIDVEST MANAGED SOLUTIONS (Pty) lTD. |
6,369.02 |
- |
6,369.02 |
- |
Paid End October |
54 |
BIDDULPHS REMOVALS |
18,183.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
55 |
DR PETRO LEHMAN |
13,690.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
56 |
DIESEL ELECTRIC SERVICES PTY LTD |
11,235.27 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
57 |
BASIC COOLING |
4,383.30 |
- |
6,156.00 |
- |
Paid End October |
58 |
DR AS NIEMANN & ASSOCIATES |
6,562.55 |
2,887.79 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
59 |
CHUBB ELECTRONIC SECURITY PE |
1,991.60 |
- |
- |
3,272.63 |
Queries being attended to |
60 |
ADVENTURE INDUSTRIAL CLEANING |
7,210.50 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
61 |
ADT FIRE SECURITY |
1,378.43 |
- |
1,378.43 |
2,756.86 |
Paid End October |
62 |
DR BOSMAN & VENOTE |
770.00 |
2,639.39 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
63 |
DR BOSMAN;BRINK & GROENEVELD |
761.16 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
64 |
BYTES PEOPLE SOLUTIONS |
45.60 |
- |
- |
- |
Queries being attended to |
65 |
AIRPORTS COMPANY SOUTH AFRICA (CT) |
1,851.19 |
1,851.19 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
66 |
IMITIZA FARM FORT GREY (ESKOM) |
5,745.52 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
67 |
KINGDOM STATIONERY & COMPUTERS |
33,857.21 |
17,020.66 |
27,582.99 |
- |
Paid End October |
68 |
LINK FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS CC |
1,760.16 |
557.46 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
69 |
METROFILE(PTY)LTD |
4,172.29 |
- |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
70 |
NAREN MISTRY ARCHITECHS CC T/A THE CREATI |
- |
413,414.96 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
71 |
ICAS SOUTHERN AFRICA |
- |
22,116.00 |
16,986.00 |
- |
Paid End October |
72 |
KLOPPERS CAW |
- |
11,394.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
73 |
OMEGA PRINT & OFFICE SUPPLIES |
- |
13,205.76 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
74 |
IDTEK SOLUTIONS |
- |
8,898.68 |
- |
- |
Queries being attended to |
75 |
VOX TELECOMMUNICATIONS (PTY)LTD |
- |
619,233.59 |
- |
2,470,524.71 |
Paid End October |
76 |
SALISPACE |
- |
89,141.16 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
77 |
TAP PROPERTIES (PTY) LTD |
- |
56,700.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
78 |
TRANSCEND CORPORATE ADVISORS(PTY) LTD |
- |
48,639.70 |
- |
- |
Await supplier statement |
79 |
PICKFORDS |
- |
4,770.90 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
80 |
SMITH GARB & ASSOCIATES CC |
- |
35,129.10 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
81 |
THUSANANG GAST |
- |
16,840.99 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
82 |
STUTTAFORD VAN LINERS BLOEMFONTEIN |
- |
14,521.91 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
83 |
RENTOKIL PTY LTD PE |
- |
4,561.15 |
- |
- |
Await supplier statement |
84 |
RED ALERT CLEANING BLOEMFONTEIN |
- |
2,537.37 |
- |
7,555.65 |
Paid End October |
85 |
UNDERWRAPS CATERERS CC |
- |
3,819.00 |
- |
- |
Queries & late approval |
86 |
SIZABANTU PLUMBING CONTRACTORS CC |
- |
661.20 |
- |
7,331.65 |
Queries & late approval |
87 |
STUTTAFORD VAN LINES-CAPE TOWN |
- |
5,808.30 |
- |
- |
Late approval of invoice |
88 |
UNISA |
- |
13,168.75 |
5,445.00 |
6,617.50 |
Queries being attended to |
89 |
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH |
- |
2,515.00 |
- |
- |
Queries being attended to |
90 |
S A COUNCIL FOR PROF & TECH SURVEYS |
- |
1,730.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
91 |
RED ALERT ALARMS |
- |
332.60 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
92 |
DAC SYSTEMS(PTY) LTD |
- |
37,973.84 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
93 |
COFFEE UNPLUGGED CC |
- |
1,658.70 |
11,286.00 |
18,667.50 |
Paid End October |
94 |
DR K A INGHAM |
- |
11,400.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
95 |
DATACENTRIX PTY LTD |
- |
7,182.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
96 |
CHUBB ELECTRONIC SECURITY BL |
- |
639.00 |
- |
4,930.74 |
Queries being attended to |
97 |
DISCOVERY HEALTHMediacal Aid) |
- |
1,038.00 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
98 |
AASA |
- |
183,382.30 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
99 |
KOUGA MUNICIPALITY(HUMANSDORP) |
- |
3,188.04 |
- |
- |
Paid End October |
100 |
MAUREEN'S CATERING CC |
- |
10,000.00 |
- |
- |
Queries being attended to |
101 |
HEIN SCHRODER AND ASSOCIATES |
- |
- |
34,200.00 |
- |
Paid End October |
102 |
ISOLVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
13,680.00 |
- |
Paid End October |
103 |
VODAC |
- |
- |
10.00 |
- |
Paid End October |
104 |
SENNHEISER ELECTRONIC SA (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
56,458.50 |
- |
Queries being attended to |
105 |
TSHIAMO CHEMISTRY PTY LTD |
- |
- |
18,194.40 |
- |
Queries being attended to |
106 |
VAN SCHALK BOOKSTORE |
- |
- |
128.00 |
13,242.62 |
Queries being attended to |
107 |
SA BOARD FORPEOPLE PRACTICE |
- |
- |
855.00 |
- |
Queries being attended to |
108 |
CHUBB INTERGRATED SYSTEMS |
- |
- |
17,688.11 |
35,376.22 |
Paid End October |
109 |
ESKOM PHILIPSTOWN |
- |
- |
688.26 |
- |
Paid End October |
110 |
GDS TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
344,712.00 |
- |
Paid End October |
111 |
MINKATEKO GENERAL MAINTENANCE |
- |
- |
35,317.20 |
5,597.40 |
Paid End October |
112 |
MULTI WASTE |
- |
- |
3,429.92 |
- |
Paid End October |
113 |
LEXISNEXIS BUTTERWORTHS |
- |
- |
- |
51,605.10 |
Queries being attended to |
114 |
OPTRON (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
- |
13,942.20 |
Paid End October |
115 |
MAMABOLO PHAJANE ATTORNEYS |
- |
- |
- |
7,974.85 |
Paid End October |
116 |
ORACLE |
- |
- |
- |
6,561.56 |
Investigating possible duplication |
117 |
LABOURNET CENTRAL (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
- |
5,529.00 |
Paid End October |
118 |
GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS |
- |
- |
- |
4,000.00 |
Paid End October |
119 |
GANGA PLUMBERS CC |
- |
- |
- |
513.00 |
Paid End October |
120 |
HLATSHWAYO DU PLESSIS VAN DER MERWE |
- |
- |
- |
1,829.70 |
Await credit note |
121 |
UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND |
- |
- |
- |
20,584.00 |
Queries being attended to |
122 |
SIGMA LIFTS & ESCALATORS (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
- |
9,708.87 |
Paid End October |
123 |
SOUTH AFRICAN GEOMATICS INSTITUTE |
- |
- |
- |
943.50 |
Paid End October |
124 |
PICTO BUSBY |
- |
- |
- |
598.62 |
Supplier statement requested |
125 |
EXORDIA (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS) |
- |
- |
- |
526,643.15 |
Paid End October |
126 |
ALLEGRO CENTRAL VACUUM SYSTEMS |
- |
- |
- |
8,753.70 |
Paid End October |
127 |
CARGO LEARNING ACADEMY(PTY)LTD |
- |
- |
- |
3,520.00 |
Paid End October |
128 |
ALEXKOR LTD |
- |
- |
- |
3,442.66 |
Queries being attended to |
129 |
COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN AFRICA |
- |
- |
- |
2,808.01 |
Await credit note |
130 |
DRS DIETRICH;VOIGT & PARTNERS |
- |
- |
- |
485.16 |
Paid End October |
131 |
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES |
- |
- |
- |
158.13 |
Await credit note |
132 |
ACTION TRAINING ACADEMY |
- |
- |
- |
30,287.52 |
Queries being attended to |
133 |
ACTION TRAINING ACADEMY DBN |
- |
- |
- |
3,740.00 |
Queries being attended to |
134 |
GIJIMA AST HOLDING (PTY) LTD |
- |
- |
- |
16,190.28 |
Queries being attended to |
REPORT TOTAL |
5,279,037.31 |
4,981,612.13 |
725,480.86 |
4,061,004.41 |
South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)
- (i) Not applicable; (ii) and (b): The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) endeavours to comply with section 38(1)(f) of the Public Finance Management Act, Treasury Regulation 8.2.3 and National Treasury SCM Instruction No 5 of 2016/17 to settle all contractual obligations as well as all valid and approved invoices within a period of 30 days, or as prescribed or agreed.
Debt is settled within 30 days of a valid and approved invoice being presented to the SACAA’s Finance Department and if all the required supporting documents are submitted. An invoice is regarded as a valid invoice only after it has been approved by the business unit receiving the service / product, to certify that goods/services offered were received in order and were of the correct quality and quantity. Invoices that have not been approved and paid within 30 days are as a result of queries between the SACAA and the supplier that must be resolved first. Payments are done weekly by the SACAA’s Finance Department and a creditor’s age analysis is prepared and reviewed monthly. The following invoices are currently recorded as unpaid for more than 30 days:
- (ii) CBRTA’
The Cross Border Road Transport Agency pays its debt timeously, at an average of 14 days per creditor. There are however, isolated instances where service providers are not paid within 30 days of receipt of invoices for a variety of reasons, for instance, where the service has not been satisfactory and warrants engagement with the Agency, or where errors have been picked up from the supplier invoices or where the price charged is not in line with what was contracted or quoted.
- (ii) The Agency has eighteen (18) suppliers that remained unpaid for more than 30 days as at the end of October 2017. See table below for more information.
(aa) 30 days but below 60 days |
|
|
|
|
Eight (8) suppliers |
Two (2) suppliers |
Three (3) suppliers |
Five (5) suppliers |
|
Atlantis Corporate Travel |
|
R29,047.30 |
||
Duma Travel |
R117,407.90 |
|||
Flight Centre SA (Pty) Ltd |
R58,810.18 |
|||
Government Printing Works |
R749.99 |
|||
IT Squared |
R12,494.00 |
|||
Savage, Jooste & Adams |
R351,351.30 |
|||
Shred-IT |
R1,812.60 |
|||
Supreme Travel (Pty) Ltd |
R42,072.22 |
|||
Fidelity Cash Solutions (Pty) Ltd |
R4,213.04 |
|||
Sage VIP |
R1,359.45 |
|||
Fidelity Cash Solutions (Pty) Ltd |
R4,304.24 |
|||
SBV Services (Pty) Ltd |
R3,287.20 |
|||
Harvey World Travel – Waterkloof |
R40,170.33 |
|||
Chubb Security SA (Pty) Ltd |
R3,157.80 |
|||
Khayalami Security cc |
R41,952.00 |
|||
Magna BC |
R63,270.00 |
|||
Mdluli Sharp Office Automation |
R17,978.78 |
|||
Orange Fox Security Systems |
R3,921.09 |
- (ii) RAF’
|
(aa) 30 days is |
(bb) 60 days is |
(cc) 90 days is |
(dd) 120 days is |
2712, |
264, |
185, |
149, |
|
and (b) the total amount outstanding in each case is |
R35,046,966.09, |
R4,130,891.05 |
R2,497,459, and |
R2,339,787.99. |
- (ii) RTIA’
(a) (ii) Road Traffic Infringement Agency has
(aa) 30 days = 1
(bb) 60 days =1
(cc) 90 days = 1
(dd) 120 days = 1
(b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?
(aa) 30 days = R63 428.22
(bb) 60 days = R21 204.00
(cc) 90 days = R21 204.00
(dd) 120 days = R24 million
Notes:
120 days category - The R24 million outstanding relates to the SAPO balance that was in dispute since 2015-16 financial year relating to AARTO notices served.
30 - 90 days category – TheR105 836.22 relates to the services that were undertaken prior to the service level agreement being concluded. The services were undertaken based on the issued order to the supplier.
- (ii) RTMC’
Supplier Name |
30 Days |
60 Days |
90 Days |
120 Days |
Total |
ICAS |
|
63 140,80 |
178 351,10 |
248 083,32 |
489 575,22 |
Mafuyeka Attorneys |
164 640,00 |
|
|
|
164 640,00 |
Media24 |
19 152,00 |
|
|
|
19 152,00 |
Nishlan Moodley (all invoices) |
157 316,58 |
|
|
|
157 316,58 |
Partners in Travel |
4 963,56 |
|
|
|
4 963,56 |
Sail Rights Commercialization |
965 675,08 |
|
|
|
965 675,08 |
(b) |
1 311 747,22 |
63 140,80 |
178 351,10 |
248 083,32 |
1 801 322,44 |
Number of invoices |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
- (ii) SANRAL
Days outstanding |
|
Amount (R) |
(aa) 30 – 60 days |
29 |
6 601 603 |
(bb) 60 – 90 days |
8 |
190 499 |
(cc) 90 – 120 days |
4 |
137 473 788 * |
(dd) 120 |
0 |
|
|
41 |
144 265 890 |
*An amount of R137 126 716 is unpaid due to the vendor not submitting the required documentation for vendor registration.
The remainder of the outstanding invoices are at invoice verification stage with outstanding documentation from suppliers. Engagements continue with suppliers to meet all criteria for invoice processing and payment.
Ports Regulator (RS)
(a)(ii) The Ports Regulator does not have any invoices hat has remained unpaid for more than (aa)30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days. This is caused by the district finance policy of processing the invoice within 7 days after the date of receipt. The invoice are then paid filed, there are instances where the invoice may go beyond the 7 days period by those isolated instances are carefully managed to ensure that it doesn’t exceed the 30 days period
South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)
1. The total number of suppliers that remain unpaid is 596.
2.
Current |
30 Days |
60 Days |
90 Days |
|
Total Amount outstanding |
R 4 396 019,71 |
R 2 495 545,38 |
R 660 052,48 |
R 920 874,41 |
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
(a) Number of invoices unpaid –
(aa) more than 30 days - R96,149,129
(bb) more than 60 days – R85,373,156
(cc) more than 90 days – R58,998,210
(dd) more than 120 days – R880,577,150
Disparity between capital and operational expenses leaves shortfall/unpaid invoices on operational expenditure. 56% of outstanding amount is due to Transnet and 6% to municipalities.
Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)
No of days |
Number of Suppliers |
Amount |
30 Days |
31 |
677 548,37 |
60 Days* |
2 |
7 450,31 |
90 days* |
2 |
11 820,00 |
120 days** |
8 |
2 199 887,23 |
|
TOTAL |
2 896 705,91 |
* Invoices received late from suppliers
** Transactions that are currently disputed and going through a verification process or services not delivered as per specification currently being resolved
23 November 2017 - NW3553
Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What is the approved ranking system currently used by the Road Traffic Management Corporation to rank its officers and (b)(i) on what date and (ii) by whom was the specified system approved?
Reply:
a) The ranking structure of the RTMC is part of the organizational structure and it consists of the ranks of constable, inspectors, supervisors, deputy chiefs and traffic chief
b) (i) approved on the 3rd July 2014
(ii) by the RTMC board
23 November 2017 - NW3552
Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Transport
With regard to the Road Traffic Management Corporation advertisement published in 2016 for traffic officers, (a) why were some applicants appointed without drivers’ licences, (b) why were some applicants appointed as senior inspectors when the advert calls for traffic officers (c) why were other applicants with driver’s licences not accepted?
Reply:
a) None of the Traffic Officers were appointed without a driver’s licenses
b) None (Refer to (a) above)
c) Not applicable
23 November 2017 - NW3545
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Transport
Whether the contributions of the Road Traffic Management Corporation to the Government Employees Pension Fund are up to date; if not, (a) why not and (b) by which date will the contributions be up to date?
Reply:
a) Yes, the contributions to GEPF are up to date
b) Not applicable, as all contributions are up to date
c) Not applicable, as all contributions are up to date
17 November 2017 - NW3413
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)(a) What are the details of each tender issued or awarded by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him in the past three financial years, (b) what was the value of each tender, (c) who won the tender (d) the criteria were used to award the tenders and (e) what mechanisms exist to ensure that the companies that won the tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfil the requirements demanded by each tender?
Reply:
Department
PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
CONTRACT AMOUNT |
SUPPLIER |
(a)(i) |
(b) |
(c) |
To Develop, Establish, Manage the Scrapping Administration Agency (TSA). |
521 238 734.00 |
Taxi Scrapping Administration |
Advocate to draft legislation for the No-Fault Policy/Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) |
2 312 000.00 |
HJ De Waal |
Establishment of the Single Source Transport Economic Regulator through Developing Policy, Legislation and Implementation Plan |
13 036 668.00 |
DNA Economics |
Rural Accessibility/Multi Modal Deprivation Index Project |
1 509 702.00 |
VelaVke Consulting |
Provision of Legal Advisory for the Department of Transport's intervention in Limpopo |
3 200 000.00 |
Ntuli Noble |
Cleaning Services to the Department for a period of two (2) year |
4 121 985.68 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
Extend Scope of Cleaning Services to provide for additional floors allocated to DOT |
1 071 536.54 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
Extend Scope of Cleaning Services to provide for additional floors allocated to DOT |
684 438.18 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
Travel agent to provide Travel, Accommodation, Conferencing and ad-hoc Car Rental Services to the Department for a period of two (2) years |
Negotiated rates apply |
Travel with Flair |
Extension of Feasibility Study: Moloto Development Corridor |
1 034 666.00 |
SMEC |
Supply , Install and Maintain the Switchboard (PABX) and Telephone Management System for the Department of Transport's Head Office |
5 679 327.53 |
Bytes |
Formulation and Implementation of SA Road Infrastructure Policy |
4 908 125.48 |
ITS Engineering |
Marine Pollution Prevention & Response Vessel capability (Standby Tug) |
199 640 000.00 |
AMSOL |
Security Services at the Department |
4 384 093.34 |
Eldna Security Services |
Review Road based subsidized transport service |
2 843 844.00 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
Multi Modal Transport Planning and Coordination Draft Bill |
5 386 000.00 |
Modiba & Associates Inc |
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster A(Gauteng, North West & Limpopo) |
11 244 960.00 |
PH Bagale (previously Core JV) |
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster C(KZN & Mpumalanga) |
9 931 680.00 |
PH Bagale (previously Core JV) |
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster B(Northern Cape & Free State) |
22 019 199.35 |
Royal Haskoning DHV |
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster D(Eastern Cape & Western Cape) |
19 587 508.25 |
Royal Haskoning DHV |
Technical and Secretariat Services for the NTPF |
5 621 700.00 |
Delca Systems |
Travel Agent to provide Travel, Accommodation, Conferencing and ad-hoc Car Rental Services to the Department for a period of two (2) years |
|
WingsNaledi Corporate Trading (Pty) Ltd |
Development of Regional Corridor Development Strategy |
2 727 336.57 |
Arup |
Cleaning Services to the Department for a period of two (2) year |
7 658 230.46 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
CONTRACT AMOUNT |
SUPPLIER |
(a)(i) |
(b) |
(c) |
RE-APPOINTMENT :Support to Regulating Committee on Fees and Charges by ACSA and ATNS - Cost Extension |
1 314 207.00 |
PWC |
Update of the National Freight Logistics Strategy |
2 272 704.00 |
Delca Systems |
Update of the National Freight Databank |
8 941 872.72 |
Aurecon SA (Pty) Ltd |
Finalize the Draft White Paper on NADP |
2 436 164.00 |
Kaiser International (Pty) Ltd |
Review White Paper on National Transport Policy of 1996 |
5 269 365.00 |
Genesis Analytics/Aurecon SA & Webber Wentzel Consortium |
Assist in Developing a Branch-line Strategy and Pilot Program |
6 108 123.00 |
Ernst & Young Advisory Services |
NATURAL CONTINUATION: Forensic Analysis of Putco Sandfontein Contract |
4 598 226.88 |
Transport and Economics Support Services (TESS) |
Internal Audit Services for DLCA |
1 784 546.00 |
PriceWaterhouseCoopers Inc (PWC) |
Shova Kalula: Supply 2700 bicycles and helmets, vests, pumps, locks etc. |
3 996 000.00 |
Abroo Style Trading CC |
Assist Internal Audit with Audit Report Audits |
948 157.70 |
SAB&T Chartered Accountant Inc t/a Nexia SAB&T |
Natural Continuation: NATMAP 2050 Review and Update |
3 538 560.00 |
Aurecon SA (Pty) Ltd |
CLOSED BID: Finalize the Draft White Paper on NCAP |
983 424.00 |
Kaiser International (Pty) Ltd |
Freight Transport Model |
4 071 557.88 |
Kijama Development |
Determining the criteria for certifying Auditors and training requirements. |
731 300.00 |
SAATCA |
EXPANSION: Review of the National Safety Regulator Act |
798 000.00 |
Mncedisi, Ndlovu & Sedumi |
Develop a Regional Transport Market Integration Strategy |
1 866 180.00 |
Letsema Consulting & Advisory Services (Pty) Ltd |
Supply of Stationary to the Department for 2 years |
|
|
Review of the Taxi Recap Programme |
1 784 744.10 |
AM Consulting Engineers |
Shova Kalula: Supply 3450 bicycles and helmets, vests, pumps, locks etc. |
5 517 114.00 |
Foziyus Trading |
Develop an Integrated Public Transport Network plan in OR Tambo Municipal District |
1 963 650.00 |
SMEC |
Rail Economic Regulator Panel |
|
Panel |
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 1.1.1 - DEVELOP A SCOPING REPORT FOR RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL |
110 500.00 |
LTS Consulting |
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 1.1.2 - DEVELOP AN INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARKING REPORT FOR INFRASTRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL |
637 060.40 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
CONTRACT AMOUNT |
SUPPLIER |
(a)(i) |
(b) |
(c) |
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 3.1 -UNDERTAKE A REVIEW OF THE CURRENT LOCAL RAIL ENVIRONMENT ON THE LEVELS OF SERVICE |
643 846.41 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 3.2 - UNDERTAKE LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARKING IN THE RAIL ENVIRONMENT ON THE LEVELS OF SERVICE |
660 769.21 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 8.1.2 - DEVELOP A STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN AND OUTPUT REPORT FOR RAIL AND ROAD MODAL OPTIMIZATION |
630 110.80 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
Develop the White Paper on National Rail Policy and the National Rail Bill |
10 600 000.00 |
Railway Corporate Strategy (RCS) |
Lifestyle Audits of DOT Officials |
|
Panel |
Skills Audit |
981 545.47 |
LTS Consulting |
Develop a National Railway Safety Strategy |
2 730 120.00 |
Gibb (PTY) Ltd |
Feasibility Study for the Tug Boat Building Project in Preparation of a PPP |
9 033 360.00 |
J Maynard SA |
Develop a Salvage Strategy |
782 952.00 |
AUK Marine & Mining |
Feasibility Study for the Small Harbour Development in Port St Johns |
1 389 875.00 |
Urban Econ Development Economists |
Providing of Cleaning Services, Indoor & Outdoor Plants and Pest Control Services for the Department for a period of two (2) years |
9 282 329.44 |
Pheta Trading Enterprise |
Marine Pollution Prevention & Response Vessel capability (Standby Tug) |
275 880 000.00 |
AMSOL |
Supply of Stationary to the Department for 2 years |
|
Panel |
Standardization, Integration & Uniformity (SIU) of Road Sector Asset Management |
13 007 819.53 |
Nexor 312 (Pty) Ltd |
Develop an Integrated Public Transport Network plan in Thabo Mofutsenyane Municipal District |
1 315 395.91 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
Develop an Integrated Public Transport Network plan in John Taolo Gaetsewe Municipal District |
1 330 248.28 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
Road Tariff determination framework |
639 526.00 |
Genesis Analytics |
Development of the Harrismith Hub |
2 223 456.00 |
Delca Systems |
Development of the SAMSA Funding Model |
3 876 008.16 |
AUK Marine & Mining |
Security Services at the Department |
9 661 559.09 |
Maduna Protection & Cleaning Services |
Provide Training on Labelling, Packaging etc for Transport of Dangerous Goods |
830 957.40 |
Tshireletso Multi Skills & Training |
Shova Kalula: Supply bicycles and helmets, vests, pumps, locks etc |
9 967 248.00 |
Flybrothersa |
PARTICIPATION: Participate in SANRAL tender for Media buying for 6 months |
|
MediaMix360 |
PARTICIPATION: Participate in SANRAL tender for Events Management and related Services for 6 months |
|
Nitrogen |
(d) In all the above mentioned tenders awarded, bidders had to respond to set functionality criteria. The tender documents (Terms of Reference) for each tender specified the evaluation criteria for measuring functionality, as developed by a Bid Specification Committee and with cognisance to the following:
1. It should not be generic;
2. It should be determined separately for each tender;
3. It may not be so low that it jeopardise the quality of the required goods or services; and
4. It may not be so high that is unreasonable to achieve.
Functionality criteria differs from one tender to another, but can include:
- Company experience and track record;
2. Skills development;
3. Proposed methodology and approach.
The criteria will also state the points available for each criteria and, if any, each sub-criteria, as well as the minimum qualifying score needed to advance. Normally the threshold will be between 65% and 85% out of 100%;
All tenders that score the minimum qualifying score for functionality is evaluated further in terms of Price and B-BBEE in accordance with the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2016. (All the aforementioned tenders were evaluated before the implementation of the new Regulations on 1 April 2017).
(e) As detailed in Section (d) each tender had specific evaluation criteria for measuring functionality, as developed by a Bid Specification Committee. During evaluation requirements such as capacity, capability and resources are then evaluated.
Additionally, once awarded, Project Managers conclude a Contract and Project Plan in which deliverables and time frames are detailed, against which the project is managed and performance measured.
RAF
(1)(a) The Road Accident Fund (RAF), in the past three financial years awarded the following tenders after inviting competitive bids, |
(b) the value of each specified tender was, |
(c) the tender was awarded to, |
(d) the criteria used to award the aforementioned tenders is the criteria prescribed (at the time) in the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, No. 5 of 2000, more specifically: assessment of mandatory requirements as contained in the tender document; assessment of technical requirements, and, or, functional requirements as contained in the tender document (where same were specified in the tender); price; and BEE status of the service provider, in accordance with the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system based on the value of the tender, |
(e) the following due diligence mechanisms exist to ensure that the service providers that were awarded tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfill the requirements demanded of them:
|
2014-15 FY |
||||
ICT End to End Performance Assessment |
R 688,788.00 |
Elimu Technology Solutions |
||
Supply, Installation and Configuration of Servers for SAP Migration (including high speed storage device and Citrix server capacity and SAP BI servers) |
R 19,513,276.68 |
Aptronics |
||
Branding and Promotional Materials (Panel) |
R 2,000,000.00 |
Creative Harvest, Mithethe Trading, Shereno Printers
|
||
Panel of Medical Experts |
R 50,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
A Wryly Birch, Adelaide Phasha, Adri Roos, Adroit Roos, Anneke Greeff, Annelies Cramer, Anton Schepers, Ashnie Maharaj, Ben Moodie, Bernard Oosthuizen, Bongone Ngwato, Catherine Rice, Christa du Toit, Dorietta Vermooten t/a Takkie, Dr. Annalie Pauw, Dr. Gavin Fredericks, Dr. I Malepfani, Dr. Maxwell Matjane, Dr. Mudau, Dr. P N Mafuya, Dr. Sincha LB Mdaka, Dr. V P Gqokoma, EJ Prinsloo, Elana Human, Energy Plus, Esme Noble, Etienne Joubert, Fitness 4 Work, Fryer and Cornelius, G O Read, Gail Vlok, Hanien Du Preez, Hlunga Consulting, Ilse du Plessis, Ithubalethu Health and Wellness, Janine Mare Schoeman, JPV Business Solutions, K Naidoo, Karen L Dinah Plaatjie, KCN Consulting, Khazimla Occupational Health and Wellness, Kim Kaverberg, Kimbali Holdings, Leazanne Toerien, Letta Consulting, Lisha Chetty, Magdalene Mills, Mamotshabo Magoele, Marina Bosman, Medexec, Megan Sparvins, Megan Townshend, Melloney Smit, Michelle Hough, Monique Kok, Motsepe Thandiwe, N Runqu Trading, Nevashnee Panchoo, Nicolene Kotze, Nonhlanhla Similane, Peter Whitehead, Re Intergrate, Rehana Paruk, Rejoice Talifhani Ntsieni, Remotlotlo Health, Rita du Plessis, Robert Macfarlaine, S De Freitas, Salomien Pretorius, Sekwari Management, Shaida Bobat, Sharon Truter, SIMI Healthcare, SL Naidoo, SOMA Initiative, Spear, Success Moagi, Sugreen Consulting, Susan Verhoef, T Van Zyl, TC Consulting, Thandeka Consulting, TMR Nape, TNL Consulting, Tsebo Ke Thebe, Vanaja Rama, Women’s Health and Wellness, Yandisa Ngoangashe, Ye Ye Ye Human Development |
||
Panel of Internal Auditors |
R 6,000,000.00 budgeted per annum
|
Sizwe Ntsaluba, KPMG, Indyebo, Ernst & Young, PWC, Deloitte |
||
Panel of Attorneys |
R 200 000 000.00 budgeted per annum |
AK Essack, Morgan Naidoo & Co, Alet Gerber Attorneys, AV Dawson, Bate Chubb & Dickson, Bowes Loon Connellan Incorporated, Borman Duma Zitha Attorneys, Dev Maharaj & Associates, Diale Attorneys, Diale Mogashoa Attorneys, Duduzile Hlebela Incorporated, Dwarika Naidoo & Co., Excellent Mthembu Attorneys Incorporated, Fourie Fismer Incorporated, Friedman Scheckter; Gcolotela & Peter Incorporated, Govindasamy Ndzingi & Govender Incorporated, Hammann-Moosa Incorporated, Harja Patel Incorporated, Harkoo Brijlal & Reddy Incorporated, Hughes-Madondo Incorporated, Ighsaan Sadien Attorneys, Iqbal Mohamed Attorneys, Joubert Galpin & Searle Incorporated, Karsans Incorporated, Kekana Hlatshwayo Radebe Incorporated, Ketse Nonkwelo Incorporated, L Mbajwa Incorporated, Ledwaba Attorneys, Lekhu Pilson Attorneys, Lindsay Keller Attorneys, Livingston Leandy Incorporated, Mabunda Incorporated, Mac Ndhlovu Incorporated, Maduba Attorneys, Maluleke Msimang & Associates, Maponya Incorporated, Maribana Makgoka Incorporated, Marivate Attorneys, Mastross Incorporated, Matabane Incorporated, Mathipane Tsebane Attorneys, Mathobo Rambau & Sigogo Incorporated, Mayat Nurick Langa Incorporated, Mayats Attorneys, MF Jassat Dhlamini Attorneys, Mgweshe Ngqeleni Incorporated, Mkhonto & Ngwenya Incorporated, Moche Attorneys, Mohlala Attorneys, Molefe Dlepu Incorporated, Moloto Stofile Incorporated, Morare Thobejane Incorporated, Mothle Jooma Sabdia Incorporated, Mnqandi Incorporated, MT Silinda & Associates, Naidoo Maharaj Incorporated, Ngubane & Partners Incorporated, Ningiza Horner Incorporated, Noko Maimela Incorporated, Nompumelelo Radebe Incorporated, Nongogo Nuku Incorporated, Nozuko Nkusani Incorporated, Poswa Incorporated Attorneys, Potelwa & Company, Pule Incorporated, Rachoene Incorporated Attorneys, Rahman Attorneys, Rambevha Morobane Attorneys, Regan Brown Attorneys, Rehana Khan Parker & Associates, Riley Incorporated, Robert Charles Attorneys, Sangham Incorporated, Saras Sagathevan Attorneys, S.C. Mdhluli Attorneys, Shereen Meersingh & Associates, Smith Tabata Attorneys, Tasneem Moosa Incorporated, Tau Phalane Incorporated, TJ Maodi Attorneys Incorporated, TM Chauke Incorporated (Nelspruit), Tomlinson Mnguni James Attorneys, Tsebane Molaba Incorporated, Twala Attorneys, Z Abdurahman Attorneys, Z & Z Ngogodo Incorporated, Zubeda K Seedat & Co. |
||
Panel of Funeral Parlours |
R 30,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Avbob, Doves, Sopema, Mabindisa, Two Mountains, Rand Funerals, Thabelo, Last Mile, Quma, Nomatye, Sokudela, Ncedisizwe, Ngoma, Ekuphumleni, Ulwazi, Shingas, Msizi, Zothani, Multi First Class, Mcosi, Lighthouse, Wyebank, Solomons |
||
E-Recruitment |
R 4,393,048.00 |
Epi-Use Africa |
||
Standby Generator for Block C Eco Glades (re-advertised) |
R 843,683.88 |
Electrical Excellent |
||
Dry Goods |
R 2,332,036.36 |
Schick Services, Tshiamo Trading Enterprise, DBZN Trading and Projects |
||
Offsite Storage (new process) |
R 7,819,509.95 |
Metrofile |
||
Audio Visual Maintenance |
R 3,444,998.14 |
Dimension Data |
||
Enterprise Project Portfolio Management (Re- advertised) |
R 2,944,392.00 |
Accutech |
||
Citrix Licensing |
R 2,316,480.00 |
EOH Mthombo |
||
Panel of DC Experts |
R 2, 400, 000.00 budgeted per annum
|
Matshekga Labour & Consultants, Maserumule Incorporated, Masipa Incorporated, Luvuyo Dzanibe Qina, Anisa Khan Attorneys & Converyancers |
||
Learning Management System (LMS) |
R 1, 847, 789.52 |
Bytes People Solutions |
||
Panel of Assessors |
R30,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Censeo/Santam Charman Mabuza t/a Efficient Tracers, Kaygee Investigators and Security Kutullo Investigation Services, SKW Matima, Stephen Black and Muthelo Investigators, Tshidiso Trading Enterprise, Tswelopele Business Services and Projects, Gladko Consulting, Ngangelive Trading and Projects, Qhubeka Forensic Services, Rheeder Nel Assosiates, Malesa and Associates, M.I. Abdulla SB, Buthelezi Stonier, A Meyiwa Roadmate Technologies t/a Lavela Assessors, Joint Shelf 1185 CC t/a Accident Specialist, Laurence Palmer Consultants, Crawford & Company, Inkomfe Trading Enterprise, Francois Balt, GD Engelbrecht t/a Independent Analysis, MVO Consultants, Inquisitor Investigations, Versitrade |
||
2015-16 FY |
||||
ICT Security Vulnerability Service |
R 6,792,264.00 |
Ernst & Young |
||
Insurance Brokerage Services |
R 12,791,580.00 |
Marsh |
||
Interface system between SAP and RAF Biometric system |
R 2,795,799.84 |
Epi Use Africa |
||
POPI |
R 1,800,000.00 |
Performanta |
||
Printing, Scanner and Photocopying |
R 19,513,276.68 |
Altronics |
||
SAP Support Services |
R 37,462,718.95 . |
Gijima Holdings |
||
Knowledge Lake Scanning Solution and Support |
R 735, 527.81 |
Intervate Solutions |
||
SMS Notification Facility |
R 500, 000.00 |
Vodacom |
||
Courier Services |
R 551, 622.22 |
Crossroads Distribution T/A SkyNet |
||
Vulnerability Management Services |
R 6, 567, 375. 00 |
Ernst & Young |
||
IT Support to HSC, satellite and small provincial offices |
R 6, 134, 549.58 |
EOH Mthombo |
||
2016-17 FY |
||||
Research Agency Partner |
R 3,046,086.88 |
Genex Insights (Pty) Ltd |
||
Panel of Recruitment Agencies |
R 3,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Morvest Professional Services, Phaki Personnel Management Services, Moshitoa Selections, Investong Human Capital, Toro Human Capital, Versatex Trading 505 (Pty) Ltd, Dalitso Consulting (Pty) Ltd, Ntirho Business Consulting |
||
Panel of Actuaries |
R 30,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
JW Jacobson Consulting, Independent Actuaries and Consultant, NBC Holdings, Rose Wood Technologies |
||
Statutory Actuary Services |
R 5,175,000.00 |
True South Actuaries and Consultants . |
||
Procurement of McAfee licenses |
R 1,742,135.63 |
Datacentrix (Pty) Ltd |
||
Cleaning Services: All Gauteng offices and Durban office |
R 12,450,610.08 |
Monabo Hygiene Services |
||
Development of the RABSA logo branding
|
R 6,212,190.60 |
FCB Africa (Pty) Ltd |
||
Back Scanning |
R 9,041,257.50 |
Metrofile (Pty) Ltd |
||
Panel of Recruitment Agencies |
R 3,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Pinpoint One Human Resource (Pty) Ltd, Human Communications (Pty) Ltd, EOH Abantu (Pty) Ltd |
||
Provision of Cleaning Services |
R 425,005.57 |
Enzani General Trade 828 |
||
Provision of Information Tracing Services |
R 3,000,000.00 |
Crosscheck Information Bureau (Pty) Ltd |
||
NAKISA Organisational Management Tool |
R 2,795,779.84 |
EPI-USE AFRICA |
RTIA
(1)(a) Details of tender |
(b) Value |
(c) Tender awarded to |
(d) Criteria used to award tender |
(e) Mechanism |
|
|
|
|
National Treasury has developed a system (PPPFA) called Functionality or Technical Criteria to enhance the system and to ensure that the companies with the best ability are evaluated according to the Regulations. This is a safety measure built into the system to keep the companies with limited ability but with the lowest price from winning a tender. A company’s ability to execute a competitive bid is measured through its ability to perform and deliver. This ability is measured in many different ways but most of the common areas are;
|
RTMC
Response for RTMC is provided in the attached spreadsheet.
C-BRTA
Response for C-BRTA is provided in the attached spreadsheet.
SANRAL
Response for SANRAL from (a) to (c) is provided in the attached spreadsheet.
(d) SANRAL used the following criteria to award the tenders as follows:
1. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following criteria are eligible to submit tenders: (a) Registered as a Consulting Engineering Firm. (b) Meet the minimum requirements for the key persons as stated in the Scope of Works. (c) National Treasury Central Supplier Database Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered. (d) Criteria for preferential procurement Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4, and is ………….. (Note to compiler: Insert “an EME or a QSE”) Failure to satisfy the eligibility criteria is a breach of the Conditions of Tender and as such, results in instant disqualification. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.2 |
A two envelope procedure apply as follows: 1. The completed CD and electronically provided Booklet marked with the tenderer’s company name, the project number and description and marked “TECHNICAL PROPOSAL”. and The completed CD and electronically provided Booklet marked with the tenderer’s company name, the project number and description and marked “FINANCIAL PROPOSAL”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.3 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilising the following formula: A = (1 – (P – Pm) / Pm) Where: P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0 (zero). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.4 |
Up to 100 minus W1 tender evaluation points will be awarded to tenderers who submit responsive tenders and who are found to be eligible for the preference claimed. Points are based on a tenderer’s scorecard measured in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE, Act 53 of 2003) and the Regulations (2017) to the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000). Points awarded will be according to a tenderer’s B-BBEE status level of contributor and summarised in the table below:
Eligibility for preference points is subject to the following conditions:
|
2 CONSTRUCTION TENDERS
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following eligibility criteria are eligible to submit tenders as follows:
Registered with the CIDB, at close of tender, in a contractor grading designation equal to or higher than a contractor grading designation determined in accordance with the sum tendered, or a value determined in accordance with Regulation 25(1B) or 25(7A) of the Construction Industry Development Regulations, for a CE class of construction work. Tenderers whose CIDB registration expires within 21 days after close of tender, need to demonstrate that there is a reasonable chance of being registered in the appropriate grading designation, by submitting a copy of their application for CIDB registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who are not capable of being registered in the required contractor designation, within 21 days after close of tender, will not be considered. Note that in terms of the Construction Industry Development Board Act, 2000 (Act No. 38 of 2000) a registered contractor must apply for renewal of registration three months before the existing registration expires. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the sake of clarity and subject to satisfactory proof of a tenderer’s ability to perform the work specified at the tendered value, the Employer lists in the table below the margins it considers reasonable. However, in the event that the sum tendered exceeds the margins shown then such tender shall be deemed non-responsive. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint Ventures are eligible to submit tenders provided that:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The tenders are required to be registered and listed on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database. Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4, and is an EME or a QSE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.2 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilising the following formula: A=(1-(P-Pm)/Pm) Where P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.3 |
The conditions stated in clauses 5.13(a) to ((f) of the Conditions of Tender as well as the following additional clauses 5.13(g) to (k) shall be applied as objective criteria in terms of section 2(1)(f) of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 and as compelling and justifiable reasons in terms of Conditions of Tender clause 5.11:
In addition to the requirements under paragraph (b) of the Conditions of Tender, in the event that a due diligence is performed as part of the tender evaluation, the due diligence report will be used to evaluate the tenderer’s ability to perform the contract as stated in paragraph (b). |
3 ROUTINE ROAD MANTENANCE: CONSULTING ENGINEERS TENDERS
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following criteria are eligible to submit tenders:
Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered.
Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4 and is ………….. an EME or a QSE. Failure to satisfy the eligibility criteria is a breach of the Conditions of Tender and as such, results in instant disqualification. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2 |
A two envelope procedure will apply as follows: 1. The completed CD and electronically provided Booklet marked with the tenderer’s company name, the project number and description and marked “TECHNICAL PROPOSAL”. and The electronically provided Booklet and completed CD marked “FINANCIAL PROPOSAL” |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilizing the following formula: A = (1 - (P - Pm) / Pm) Where: P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration; and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer. In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0 (zero). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4 |
Up to 100 minus W1 tender evaluation points will be awarded to tenderers who submit responsive tenders and who are found to be eligible for the preference claimed. Points are based on a tenderer’s scorecard measured in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE, Act 53 of 2003) and the Regulations (2017) to the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000). Points awarded will be according to a tenderer’s B-BBEE status level of contributor and summarised in the table below:
Eligibility for preference points will be determined as follows:
|
4. ROUTINE ROAD MANTENANCE: CONSTRUCTION TENDERS
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following criteria are eligible to submit tenders: a) CIDB grading Registered with the CIDB, at close of tender in a contractor grading designation equal to or higher than a contractor grading designation determined in accordance with the sum tendered, or a value determined in accordance with Regulation 25 (1B) or 25 (7A) of the Construction Industry Development Regulations, for a CE class of construction work are eligible to have their tenders evaluated. Tenderers whose CIDB registration expires within 21 days after close of tender, need to demonstrate that there is a reasonable chance of being registered in the appropriate contractor grading designation, by submitting a copy of their application for CIDB registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who are not capable of being registered in the required contractor grading designation, within 21 days after close of tender, will not be considered. Note that in terms of the Construction Industry Development Board Act, 2000 (Act No 38 of 2000) a registered contractor must apply for renewal of registration three months before the existing registration expires.
Joint Ventures are eligible to submit tenders provided that:
b) National Treasury Central Supplier Database Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered. c) Criteria for preferential procurement Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4, and is an EME or a QSE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.2 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilizing the following formula: A = (1 - (P - Pm) / Pm) Where: P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration; and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer. In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0 (zero). |
5. NON-ENGINEERING EVALUATION TENDER CRITERIA
Each tender whether RFT or RFP will be evaluated as follows:
5.1 TENDER EVALUATION AND SELECTION
SANRAL will evaluate tenders and select the Service Provider on, inter alia, the following basis:
- The Service Provider plan to assist SANRAL to meet its goals for the provision of the required services;
- The ability of the Service Provider to meet the requirements of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act. Prospective Service Provider/s must submit their shareholding structure. Bidders are encouraged to ensure that their bids include a significant BBBEE component.
- The Service Provider’s relevant experience, qualifications and success in providing the goods and services outlined in this RFT/RFP;
- The Firm's financial proposal as outlined in the RFT/RFP including discounts, service charges, other charges and fees;
- The quality of the proposal, specifically, responsiveness to requirements and adequacy of information provided;
- The qualification and experience of the personnel/staff that will be delivering the services to SANRAL;
- The contractual terms which would govern the relationship between SANRAL and the Selected Service Provider;
- Any other factors relevant to the Service Provider's capacity and willingness to satisfy the SANRAL requirements.
5.2 Evaluation and Adjudication
The evaluation and adjudication of the Tenders will strictly be dealt with in terms of the PFMA, Treasury regulations and Supply Chain Management. An Evaluation Committee consisting of senior officials from the South African National Roads Agency SOC Limited and complying with the SANRAL’s Supply Chain Management Policy will evaluate the bid tenders. The panel will individually evaluate each of the tenders received against the criteria listed in this section. A recommendation from the Evaluation Committee will be forwarded to the Adjudication Committee of the SANRAL who in terms of SANRAL’s Supply Chain Management Policy will adjudicate and award the contract.
SANRAL reserves the right to request one or more tenderers, who have scored, according to SANRAL, the highest scores for their tenders, to enter into negotiations with SANRAL regarding the award.
5.3 Test for responsiveness
SANRAL shall determine, on opening and before detailed evaluation, whether each Tender received:
- meets the requirements of this Request for Tender;
- has been properly and fully completed and signed, and
- is responsive to the other requirements of the tender documents.
A responsive Tender is one that conforms to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Tender documents without material deviation or qualification. A material deviation or qualification is one which, in the SANRAL’s opinion, would:
- detrimentally affect the scope, quality, or performance of the works, services or supply identified in the Scope of Work;
- change the SANRAL’s or the Tenderer’s risks and responsibilities under the contract, or;
- affect the competitive position of other Tenderers presenting responsive tenders, if it were to be rectified.
SANRAL may reject a non-responsive Tender, and not allow it to be subsequently made responsive by correction or withdrawal of the non-conforming deviation or reservation, unless it can be subsequently rendered responsive by correction that does not prejudice the other Tenderers.
5.4 Weight Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation will follow the following sequence: - (wherein either two or single envelope may be applicable)
Phase One
- Determine the compliance through tender content;
- Determine compliance through the returnable schedules;
- Adjudication on functionality, scoring of each function; and
- Determine the score for each tenderer compared with the minimum score required;
Phase Two
- Price (pricing schedule); and
- BEE compliance.
5.4.1 The Preference Points System:
Points are based on a tenderer’s scorecard measured in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE, Act 53 of 2003) and the Regulations (2017) to the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000). Points awarded will be according to a tenderer’s B-BBEE status level of contributor and summarised in the table below:
Eligibility for preference points is subject to the following conditions:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The conditions stated in the Conditions of Tender shall be applied as objective criteria in terms of section 2(1)(f) of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 and as compelling and justifiable reasons in terms of Conditions of Tender:
In addition to the requirements under the Conditions of Tender, in the event that a due diligence is performed as part of the tender evaluation, the due diligence report will be used to evaluate the tenderer’s ability to perform the contract. |
(e) In addition to the requirements under the Conditions of Tender, in the event that a due diligence is performed as part of the tender evaluation, the due diligence report will be used to evaluate the tenderer’s ability to perform the contract.
Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)
- – c) Answer – please refer to the attached Annexure.
d) The ACSA organisation, as a schedule 2 has adopted the PFMA and PPPFA regulation as a means of executing its procurement administration. These regulatory prescripts are in place to ensure that the procurement process is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost effective.
Further the PPPPFA sets out the standards, including the evaluation process to be employed in the evaluation and the selection of the most suitable service provider whilst ensuring that the 5 pillars as set out in section 217A of the act are upheld. The evaluation criteria are defined by a team of subject matter experts.
e) The ACSA has employed a three-bid committee system. These independent committees are assembled to ensure that the procurement process in the evaluation, recommendation and the final award is fair, transparent, competitive, equitable and cost effective. The evaluation criteria by its nature are set to determine a match against the set requirements, thus ensuring that the award to make to a supplier has the capacity and capability to undertake the contract of a defined magnitude. This holistic capacity and capability assessment is not only focused on the technical aspects, it also has a strong focus on the financial strength, legal standing, and many other aspects that are deemed necessary on a tender by tender basis.
Further to the above, ACSA has a performance management system in place. This system ensures a continuous evaluation of the performance of the service provider through the life span of the contract.
Question (a), (b), (c).
Table 1 below illustrate details of tenders issued and awarded in the 2017/2018 financial year.
Table 2 below illustrate details of tenders issued and awarded in the 2016/2017 financial year.
Table 3 (a) below illustrate details and values of tenders issued and awarded in the 2015/2016 financial year:
Table 3 (b) below illustrate details and values of tenders issued and awarded in the 2015/2016 financial year:
Question (d) what criteria were used to award the tenders?
The ATNS SCM process provide suppliers with the opportunity to compete for business in an open and transparent manner within the confines of the law. The following evaluation stages are applied when selecting suppliers:
- Stage on
- e (1) is the evaluation of Preferential Procurement requirement to assess compliance to Transformation requirements as per the ATNS Supply Chain Management Policy. Bidders meeting the Preferential Procurement requirements will proceed to the second stage of evaluation.
- Stage two (2) is the evaluation of compliance to Technical Specification requirement. The technical evaluation scores are weighted at 100% as indicated in the tender instructions. Bidders meeting minimum qualifying set threshold for technical evaluation will proceed to third stage of evaluation.
- The final stage (3) of evaluation is evaluation in terms of the preference point system. All bidders meeting the minimum qualifying threshold will be evaluated applying the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system to adjudicate the bids. The preference point system ranks tenders on the basis of calculated scores for price and BBBEE contribution.
Question (e) what mechanisms exists to ensure that the companies that won the tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfil the requirements demanded by each tender?
ATNS, the Air Traffic and Navigation Services State Owned Company of South Africa, is a high technology organisation. ATNS encourages black company participation by a form of Joint venture agreement or consortium agreement between the OEM and South African Black Owned Companies. These are some of the requirements assessed to ensure that bidders have the capacity to deliver on the project.
Technical Resources requirements:
-
-
-
- Tenderers shall have successfully completed projects of a similar nature in at least the past 3 years and shall provide a list of such projects together with end user certificates substantiating the claims made by the Tenderer.
- Tenderers shall have dedicated resources with 5 or more years’ experience in the proposed technology. CVs of proposed resources shall be included.
- The Tenderer shall identify, describe and quantify the technical resources for design, manufacture, integration, installation and support of this project as follows:
- description of engineering organisation and resources, naming and quantifying disciplines and equipment;
- description and location of manufacturing facilities, naming products and quantifying production capacity and current demand;
- description of construction organisation, naming skills and equipment; and
- description of parts replacement and repair organisation and support facilities.
-
-
South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACCA)
Tender Details |
Value of contract in 2014/15 (a)(ii); & (b) |
Criteria for award of tender (d) |
Mechanisms deployed for the tender award |
|
Supplier/ Awarded to (c) |
Description (a)(i) |
2014/15 |
||
AE Soft (Pty) Ltd |
Laptop and Desktop |
R3,088,350.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
The Bid Specification Committee deploys a risk aversion strategy in the functionality during the approval of the specifications. The risk aversion include but not limited to methodology (how), experience (including references), and successes attained during the delivery, where possible site inspections (at service provider premises or were services are rendered) are also conducted. |
MTN |
Cell Phone Provider |
Usage based |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Kingdom Caterers |
Canteen & Catering Services |
R414,000.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Betts Townsend |
Re-Advertisement. Project Manager for CAA Premises |
R720,000.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Travel with Flair |
Travel Agency |
Booking based |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Empic & Synova JV |
Enterprise Business System (EBS) |
R94,091,131.20 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Metrofile (Pty) Ltd |
Document Imaging, Scanning and Retrieving Solution |
R3,927,072.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Continuity SA (Pty) Ltd |
Business Continuity Operational Disaster Site |
R5,796,848.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Business Enterprise @ University of Pretoria |
Organizational Structure Review |
R1,670,100.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Business Enterprise @ University of Pretoria |
National Aviation Transformation Strategy (NATS) |
R948,480.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
Tender Details |
Value of contract in 2015/16 (a)(ii); & (b) |
Criteria for award of tender (d) |
Mechanisms deployed for the tender award |
|
Supplier/ Awarded to (c) |
Description (a)(i) |
2015/16 |
||
Vox Telecommunications |
Least Cost Routing |
R198,242.34 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
The Bid Specification Committee deploys a risk aversion strategy in the functionality during the approval of the specifications. The risk aversion include but not limited to methodology (how), experience (including references), and successes attained during the delivery, where possible site inspections (at service provider premises or were services are rendered) are also conducted. |
Superior Pilot Services |
Cadets Pilot Training |
R3,325,699.20 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Aerodata AG |
FIU Strategy |
R 1,795,319.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
ExecuJet |
Aircraft Maintenance, Hangarage, Office Acc and FOB services |
Service based |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd |
Security (Guarding) Services |
R8,531,320.68 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Docufile Records |
Off-Site Storage |
R503,195.65 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Sisonke Printers & Signage (Pty) Ltd |
Aeronautical Information Publication |
R451,192.39 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Business Enterprise @ University of Pretoria |
National Aviation Transformation Strategy (NATS) |
R948,480.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
Tender Details |
Value of contract in 2016/17 (a)(ii);& (b) |
Criteria for award of tender (d) |
Mechanisms deployed for the tender award |
|
Supplier/ Awarded to (c) |
Description (a)(i) |
2016/17 |
||
Superior Pilot Services |
Cadet Pilot Training Service Provider |
R11, 012, 810.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
The Bid Specification Committee deploys a risk aversion strategy in the functionality during the approval of the specifications. The risk aversion include but not limited to methodology (how), experience (including references), and successes attained during the delivery, where possible site inspections (at service provider premises or were services are rendered) are also conducted. |
Servest Group (Pty) Ltd |
Cleaning, Pest Control and Hygiene Services |
R1, 408, 824.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
ACSA Cape Town |
Cape Town Lease |
R6, 237, 619.12 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Introstat (Pty) Ltd |
IT Equipment |
R4, 165, 076.79 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Sizwe IT Group |
Core Network Switch Replacement |
R537, 465.19 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Vox Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd |
Internet Solutions |
R17, 121, 910.46 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Microsoft |
Microsoft Licenses (Sole Supplier) |
R7, 461, 805.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Computer Security and Forensic Solutions (Pty) Ltd |
ICT Security |
R2, 034 444.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Deloitte & Touché |
Audits of Aviation Fuel Levies |
R938, 670.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Capitol Caterers (Pty) Ltd |
SCM Canteen Services |
R1, 529, 481.15 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
NexisLexis (Pty) Ltd |
Provision and uploading of Act, Technical Standards and Regulations on CAA intranet and website |
R1, 374, 369.75 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
Sethewo (Pty) Ltd |
Maintenance and Support of Great Plains |
R919, 296.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Century Avionics |
Supply and Installations of Flight Data Recorder |
R1, 046, 795.06 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
- ii Railway Safety Regulator
2014/15 Financial Year
No |
Services |
C |
B |
D |
HR Supports Services |
Work Dynamics |
R 1 584 600.00 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
|
Travelling Management Services |
Fly-Now |
Rate based |
||
Fleet Management Services |
Khula Fleet |
R14 857 278.15 |
||
Rail Infrastructure Risk Management Project |
Mzumbo Consulting |
R8 421 225.6 |
||
Development of 4 Rail Regulations |
Muthwa Law consulting& Bulumko Inc. |
R685 00.00 |
||
ENS Africa |
R480 000.00 |
|||
MPM Holdings |
R777 857.00 |
|||
MNC Incorporated |
R700 000.00 |
2015/16 Financial Year
No |
1 a |
1 b |
1 c |
1 d |
Development of regulations on occurrence management and board of inquiries in terms of Section 50 of the NRSR Act 16 of 2002 |
Ramphele Attorneys |
R719 000.00 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
|
Development of regulations on safety of person, including person with disabilities on board stationary or rolling stock, infrastructure or at station in terms of Section 30(d) of the NRSR Act no. 16 of 2002 as amended for the RSR |
MNS Attorneys |
R737 100,00 |
||
Development of Regulations on Construction Activities in terms of Section 31(e) of The National Railway Safety Regulator Act no. 16 of 2002 as Amended for the Railway Safety Regulator submission. |
MNS Attorneys |
R844 200.00 |
||
Provision of RSR Q Rail Management Quality System Project. |
Business Assessment Services |
R2 234 870.82 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
|
Maintain and support a managed wide area network infrastructure for a period of 36 months with an option to extend for a further 24 months. |
VOX Telecommunications |
R4 184 661.84 |
||
RSR application hosting for a period of 36 months. |
Telkom SA |
R5 049 011.69 |
||
Provision of tablets and 3G to RSR for a period of 24 months. |
Telkom SA |
R5 352 744.00 |
||
Appointment of a service provider for the development of High speed Rail Standard for the RSR. |
GIBB Engineering and Architecture |
R5 490 945.09 |
||
Provision of fully serviced accommodation for the regions. |
Full Facilities Management |
R195 912 468.00 |
2016/17 Financial Year
No |
1 a |
1 b |
1 c |
1 d |
To Conduct A Motorist And Pedestrian Level-Crossing Risk Behavior Study. |
MTO Safety |
R2 995 920.00 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
E1 The Railway Safety Regulator has established a Project Management Office to assist project managers with the tracking of deliverables by the service provider to ascertain that projects are delivered on time, at the allocated cost, within the scope agreed to and assess the performance of the bidder.
E2 The office of the CFO through scm is also responsible for supplier performance and monitoring.
E3 Another mechanism is the Internal Audit function that audits these matters on a quarterly basis.
E4 Further, the RSR established a Compliance Unit in order for completeness and compliance to be verified before payments are made to suppliers.
E5 Predetermined functionality criteria applied to ensure that the companies that won the tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfil the requirements
Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)
Year |
Tender Description |
Appointed Supplier |
BBBEE level |
Amount |
2012/13 |
Procuremnt of Internal Audit Services |
Deloitte |
2 |
R 906 000.00 |
2013/14 |
Procurement of IT Hardware |
Intergr8 |
4 |
R 111 116.84 |
Procurement of Human Resources Management |
PWC |
2 |
R 1 246 986.00 |
|
Procurement of Offsite Data Storage |
Metrofile |
5 |
R 50 400.00 |
|
Procurement of Financial Consulting Services |
KPMG |
3 |
R 277 824.00 |
|
Procurement of Multi-function Printer |
Green Dot |
3 |
R 91 147.56 |
|
2014/15 |
Procument of IT Management Services |
Teksys Computers |
4 |
R 194 119.20 |
2015/16 |
Procerment of Internal Audit Services |
A2A Kopano Incorporated |
1 |
R 824 686.50 |
2016/17 |
Procurement of IT Hardware |
IT Master |
2 |
R 389 994.51 |
Procurement of Multi - Function Printer |
Olivetti Direct Office Technologies |
3 |
R 132 924.00 |
|
Procurement of Valuation of Assets Services |
Meridian Economics |
4 |
R 1 915 086.00 |
(d) The bid for each contract specified the minimum requirements that must be met for each tender, also the bid had a minimum score of functionality that must be met before the bidder can be evaluated on price.
(e) The terms of reference for the bid specified that the bidder must demonstrate their ability to deliver the service required, this is also monitored during the contract period.
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
See attached Annexure
- Refer to the spreadsheet attached.
(d) Each tender was advertised in the newspapers and i-tender
- They were evaluated through Bid Evaluation Committees and adjudicated through Bid Adjudication Committees.
- Depending on the thresholds and is as follows:
- R 25 million and below approved by the Divisional and Subsidiary CEO’s
- R 50 Million and Below approved by the Group CFO and Group CEO
- R 50 Million and above approved by the of the Board.
- Once approved PRASA enter into negotiations with the approved service provider.
(e) On construction related works construction guarantees and Bid Bonds (from the Financial institutions) are required;
- Depending on the nature of requirements (Goods, Services and works) PRASA has incorporated probity services on the tenders that are more than R 10 million;
- All service providers that have passed the technical thresholds are subjected to security screening;
- Company experience and the CV’s of the Resources proposed form part of the mandatory requirements;
- All previous projects that have been completed will require referral letter from the clients;
- The industry certification /professional bodies IDB/IATA/ASATA/PR.Eng/SAICA/ESCA) also form part of the evaluation criteria;
- Latest Annual Financial Statements to the liquidity ratios; and
- During the project period the Supplier Assessment and Evaluation form are sent to End-user and the Service Provider to ensure that all requirement are met.
South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)
2014/2015 FINANCIAL PERIOD |
||||
Supplier Name |
Description |
80/20 or 90/10 |
Value |
SLA or Contract |
SIZWENTSALUBAGOBODO |
Internal Audit Services |
90/10 |
R 2 456 928.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
FARANANI |
SOFTWARE LICENCE FEE |
90/10 |
R 3 115 672.43 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
INTERNET SOLUTIONS |
IT SYSTEM |
90/10 |
R 12 186 107.36 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
7 |
MAINTENANCE OF SECURITY SYSTEM (CAMERAS) |
80/20 |
R 1 582 534,77 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
NASHUA MOBILE |
CELLPHONE VOICE & DATA SERVICE |
90/10 |
R 2 908 777.27 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
PMB CHANGE A LIFE |
CSI PROJECT (DUZI CANOEING PROJECT) |
90/10 |
R 1 000 000.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
BLAUPAU MANAGEMENT CONSULTINGCC |
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR MARITIME SECTOR |
90/10 |
R 1 950 000.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
CSIR |
RESEARCH SERVICE |
Inter-governmental procurement |
R 1 670 328.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
COMPUTER INITIATIVES T/A VOX |
GP UPGRADE |
90/10 |
R 1 642 985.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
2015/2016 FINANCIAL PERIOD |
||||
Supplier Name |
Description |
80/20 or 90/10 |
Value |
SLA or Contract |
MTN |
CELLPHONE VOICE & DATA SERVICE |
90/10 |
R 4 184 525,13 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
VODACOM |
CELLPHONE VOICE & DATA SERVICE |
NT Transversal Contract |
R 9 706 305,09 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
FARANANI |
SLA MAINTENANCE FEE - GO LIVE |
90/10 |
R 1 838 232.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
2016/2017 FINANCIAL PERIOD |
||||
Supplier Name |
Description |
80/20 or 90/10 |
Value |
SLA or Contract |
BYTES TECHNOLOGY GROUP SA (PTY) LTD |
PHOTOCOPIER MACHINE LEASE |
NT Transversal Contract |
R 724 230,72 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
PLAZA AQUAD |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 1 719 780.60 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
RICKETT SALES (PTY) LTD |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 4 916 879.68 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
RICKETT SALES (PTY) LTD |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 4 770 517.20 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
GROWTHPOINT |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 6 250 169.16 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
TRANSNET NATIONAL PORTS AUTHORITY |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 7 812 711.45 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
INTERPARK (SOUTH AFRICA) (PTY) LTD |
PARKING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 1 354 320.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
JHI REAL ESTATE (19 TH FLOOR) |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 27 621 270.60 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
JHI REAL ESTATE ((18 TH FLOOR) |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 14 484 130.60 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
INDWE RISK MANAGEMENT |
INSURANCE FOR SAMSA DIRECTORS |
90/10 |
R 1 729 065.10 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
SIKELA XABISA |
INTERNAL AUDIT |
90/10 |
R 3 094 789.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
17 November 2017 - NW3411
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to the Prasa signalling systems and maintenance work after the Elandsfontein train crash, (a) why has maintenance work on the signalling systems stopped in some areas in Gauteng, (b) what is being done to resume and complete this work in each area respectively and (c) what are the timelines and deadlines for each area in this regard?
Reply:
a) The maintenance of the signalling system has never stopped in some areas in Gauteng. It has intensified working hand in hand with the Rail Safety Regulator (RSR) with a dedicated joint team of inspectors from RSR and Metro-rail signalling technicians.
b) Refer to (a) above
c) Refer to (a) above
17 November 2017 - NW3299
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to him are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
1. Transport Entities CEO’s are appointed on a five (5) years fixed term contract. Some of the entities CFOs are appointed on a permanent basis and others on a five (5) years fixed term contract.
2. Department of Transport entities CEO’s and CFO’s employment status
Name of Entity |
Name of CEO |
Contract Expiry Date |
Name of CFO |
Contract Expiry Date |
|
1 |
SANRAL |
Mr Skhumbuzo Macozoma |
30 November 2021 |
Ms Inge Mulder |
Permanent |
2 |
PRASA |
Mr Lindikaya Zide |
Acting |
Ms Yvonne Page |
Acting |
3. |
ATNS |
Mr Thabani Mthiyane |
30 June 2018 |
Mr Mtome Moholola |
Acting |
4. |
SAMSA |
Mr Sobantu Tilayi |
Acting |
Mr Phumlani Myeni |
Permanent |
5. |
SACAA |
Ms Poppy Khoza |
30 Novemeber 2018 |
Mr Asruf Seedat |
30 November 2021 |
6 |
ACSA |
Mr Bongani Maseko |
30 May 2018 |
Mr Dirk Kunz (Acting) |
Acting |
7 |
Ports Regulator |
Mr Mahesh Fakir |
30 April 2019 |
Mr Thokozani Mhlongo |
31 October 2020 |
8 |
C-BRTA |
Mr Sipho Khumalo |
30 June 2021 |
Mr Nchaupe Maepa |
Acting |
9 |
Road Accident Fund |
Ms Lindelwa Jabavu |
Acting |
Mr Rodney Gounden |
31 August 2022 |
10 |
RSR |
Mr Nkululeko Poya |
31 October 2021 |
Mr Regardt Gouws |
Permanent |
11 |
RTMC |
Adv Makhosini Msibi |
31 December 2018 |
Ms Liana Moolman |
Permanent |
12 |
RTIA |
Mr Japh Chuwe |
30 September 2021 |
Ms Palesa Moalusi |
Contract 31 July 2018 |
17 November 2017 - NW3437
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)How many officials and/or employees in his department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years; (2) are any of the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with the Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?
Reply:
1. 2014/2015 – 7 employees (work outside employment in the Public Service)
2015/2016 – 4 employees (work outside employment in the Public Service)
2016/2017 – 8 employees (work outside employment in the Public Service)
2.
a) None
b) Not applicable
c) Not applicable
17 November 2017 - NW3547
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) How is the performance of the boards of entities that report to him measured, (b) what sanction takes place should the performance targets not be met, (c) how did each board of each entity that report to him perform against set targets and measurables in the past three financial years and (d) who monitors the performance of boards?
Reply:
a) At the beginning of the financial year each entiy is required to submit a Shareholders compact. The shareholders compact, documents the mandated key performance measures and indicators to be achieved by the entities as agreed by the Accounting Authority and Executive Authority. The Executive Authority monitors the extent to which the Board as a whole, achieves the objectives and specific performamce targets. Procedures have been established where all the Accounting Authorities in SOE’s reports to the Executive Authority on a quarterly basis for monitoring and evaluation purposes.
b) In instances where an entity has not met its performance targets, careful consideration must be given, taking into account the reasons provided by the entities for non-achievement. Where it is found that Board members are lacking in certain skills sets they will be recommended for skills training or equipping programmes relevant to requirements. Sanctions would only become applicable where an entity has deliberately and knowingly acted negligently with state funds or resources or where supply chain processes were overlooked. In such instances, investigations are undertaken, followed by disciplinary action(s) where applicable or necessary.
c) Boards’ performance for the past three (3) financial years has been satisfactory, with other entities performing exceptionally well.
d) Board performance is monitored by the Corporate Governance Section within the Department. In addition, Boards also undergo Board evaluations, these can be done by an independent company or alternatively Board members can evaluate each other. Board evaluations conducted by Board members evaluating each other are usually done on a confidential basis. During these evaluations Board members are required to evaluate not only the positives but the negatives of each Board member over the course of the financial period under review. The outcomes of these Board evaluation reports are submitted to the Shareholder on an annual basis.
14 November 2017 - NW3423
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What are the processes, procedures and mechanisms with regard to the issuing of small-scale and ad hoc work required to be done by the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa, (b) how is the work issued, (c) how are suppliers identified and decided upon, (d) what amount has been spent in this regard in each month in the past three financial years and (e) what was the nature of the work in each case?
Reply:
a) All small-scale work is procured through quotation process for both CAPEX and OPEX. SME’s and suppliers registered on the database are invited to submit quotations for goods or services required. During 2014 financial year up to July 2016, PRASA supplier database was used to source quotations for small-scale and ad-hoc works such as unplanned maintenance. Since July 2016, the Central Supplier Database managed by National Treasury is used to source quotations for all small –scale works.
b) Invites are sent to suppliers registered on the Central Supplier Database to renders services or provide goods for OPEX and CAPEX. The supplier information is obtained from the Central Supplier Database.
c) On rotational basis, suppliers are selected from the Central Supplier Database and invited to quote for services or goods required by the business.
d) Refer to Annexure A.
e) The nature of work relates to repairs and maintenance, office stationer, cleaning services and property relates services. Refer to Annexure A
10 November 2017 - NW3333
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Transport
What is the total number of vehicles in each gross vehicle mass category that are registered in each metropolitan municipality?
Reply:
It should be noted that vehicles are categorised on the National Traffic Information System in the following manner:
- Heavy load vehicle with a GVM exceeding 3500Kg which is equip to draw
- Heavy load vehicle with a GVM exceeding 3500Kg, not equipped to draw
- Heavy passenger motor vehicle designed to carry 12 or more persons
- Light load vehicle with a GVM 3500Kg or less
- Light passenger motor vehicle designed to carry less than 12 persons
- Motorcycle, Motor-tricycle, Motor Quadru-cycle
- Special Vehicles
- Unknown: In this instance, the GVM is known but the vehicle category is unknown. This is old data and it is usually farming equipment that is specially classified.
Annexure A Table 1 contains a summary of the above-mentioned categories per metropolitan municipality. Data as found on the NaTIS as on 30 September 2017.
Annexure A
Table1:
Vehicle Population per Category and Metropolitan Municipality as at 30 September 2017
|
|||||||||
Metropolitan Municipality |
Heavy load veh(GVM>3500Kg equip to draw) |
Heavy load veh(GVM>3500Kg, not to draw) |
Heavy passenger mv (12 or more persons) |
Light load vehicle (GVM 3500Kg or less) |
Light passenger mv(less than 12 persons) |
Motorcycle / Motortricycle / Quadrucycle |
Special Vehicle |
Unknown |
Grand Total |
Bloemfontein |
6607 |
5485 |
2906 |
50211 |
102801 |
7535 |
4870 |
685 |
181100 |
Buffalo City |
2195 |
2137 |
4098 |
40264 |
94900 |
2839 |
2645 |
281 |
149359 |
City of Cape Town |
19741 |
13899 |
19204 |
263116 |
915221 |
56544 |
15120 |
1556 |
1304401 |
Ekurhuleni |
47848 |
36604 |
24863 |
315273 |
768452 |
36745 |
24067 |
643 |
1254495 |
eThekwini |
20542 |
16413 |
22829 |
180856 |
569450 |
16763 |
9218 |
666 |
836737 |
Johannesburg |
27727 |
21557 |
39927 |
367802 |
1175211 |
50612 |
16030 |
847 |
1699713 |
Mogale City* |
5383 |
3489 |
4951 |
59097 |
118303 |
6124 |
4515 |
184 |
202046 |
Nelson Mandela Bay |
4847 |
5100 |
5088 |
69036 |
181752 |
11645 |
4537 |
856 |
282861 |
Pretoria |
21236 |
15470 |
24546 |
313808 |
763596 |
39256 |
21625 |
874 |
1200411 |
Sedibeng* |
10145 |
7250 |
7458 |
92034 |
194083 |
10097 |
8347 |
256 |
329670 |
Grand Total |
166271 |
127404 |
155870 |
1751497 |
4883769 |
238160 |
110974 |
6848 |
7440793 |
* Not officially declared as Metropolitan Municipalities but regarded as substantial.
10 November 2017 - NW3415
Dreyer, Ms AM to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What plans are in place to integrate minibus taxis into an integrated public transport system,(b) what are the time frames, time lines and milestones in this regard,(c)(i) what consultation has taken place (ii) with whom (d) what are the main features of the integration?
Reply:
a) In terms of public transport strategy the incumbent operators (taxi and bus operators) should be the core of the integrated public transport system. Currently, the Integrated Public Transport Networks (IPTNs) are being operated by the incumbent operators as envisaged in the strategy. In most of the cities minibus taxi are feeding to the trunk or will feed to the trunk once the system is up and running.
b) The system is being rolled out in phases, as a result of that various cities are at different stages in terms of their system roll out.
c) (i) Consultation has taken place with various affected taxi associations and operators
(ii) It is mandatory for municipalities to consult all affected operators (minibus taxi and bus operators) when planning to implement the IPTNs.
d) In some corridors minibus taxi operators withdraw their operations and join the Vehicle Operating Company (VOC), whereas in certain cases minibus taxis remain in operation either as a feeder to the trunk of the public transport system or compete with the public transport system.
10 November 2017 - NW3418
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Transport
(a)(i) Which taxi associations received government grants in the past three financial years and (ii) what were the grant amounts in each case, (b) what criteria are used to decide on qualifying taxi associations, (c) what is the purpose of the grant in each case, (d)(i) what key performance areas and specific actions are the taxi associations expected to perform and (ii) how often and how do the taxi associations report to his department, (e) what disqualified a taxi association from receiving future grants and (f)(i) which grants have been denied, (ii) to which taxi associations and (iii) why in each case in the past three financial years?
Reply:
(a) Taxi Associations operate at local level and by their very own nature are self-sustainable. The Department of Transport does not provide any direct financial assistance in the form of grants to Taxi Associations and neither are we aware of any provincial or local government that provides grants to these Associations.
(b) Refer to response number (a);
(c) Refer to response number (a);
(d) Refer to response number (a);
(e) Refer to response number (a);
(f) Refer to response number (a).
10 November 2017 - NW3419
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)With reference to the payment of overtime for officers and staff members in the Road Traffic Management Corporation since 2015, (a) why has some overtime payments owed not been paid to the officials concerned and (b) when will these payments be paid; (2) will interest on these overdue payments be paid to those affected; if not, why not; if so, what amount in percentage interest will be paid; (3) will those affected be compensated in a different way; if not, why not; if so, what are the details of how they will be compensated?
Reply:
- All overtime due to officers and staff members has been paid and there is no outstanding payment.
- See (1) above
- See (1) above
10 November 2017 - NW3528
Brauteseth, Mr TJ to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)What subsidy has his department paid to the Brakpan Bus Company over the past three financial years; (2) whether he has been informed of a 2014 feasibility study into future options of the specified bus company; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, which option does his department support; (3) (a) what are the relevant details of the kind of oversight that this department has over the bus company, in view of the subsidy paid by the taxpayer; (4) (a) what (i) fraud and/or (ii) corruption has been identified in the running of the bus company and (b) why is the bus company running at a loss?
Reply:
(1) Subsidized bus services are managed and administered by Provincial Departments of Transport and subsidy is paid by Provinces through the Public Transport Operations Grant, which is a supplementary grant. The Brakpan Bus Company contract is managed by Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport and their subsidy allocation for the past three financial years is:
- 2014/15 – R11 554 076.00
- 2015/16 – R18 291 488.00
- 2016/17 – R23 293 376.00
2. Brakpan Bus Service is a municipal owned bus company and any decision about the future of the company is the prerogative of the municipality as long as it is aligned with all legislative prescripts governing public transport. The Department is conscious of the fact that Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport has appointed CSIR to conduct a due diligent exercise for all subsidized bus contracts in the Province, including Brakpan, with the aim of designing new public transport contracts in future.
3. The bus company is monitored by the Province through a Supervisory and Monitoring Firm (SMF) appointed by Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport to ensure that the operator complies with all contractual obligations.
4. a) The running and performance of the bus company is solely the obligation of the municipality as the owner.
b) Same as (a) above.
10 November 2017 - NW3538
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
Whether the next Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Road Accident Fund has been appointed; if so, (a) who has been appointed, (b) what criteria were used to appoint the new CEO, (c) (i) how many applications were received and (ii) what are the names of each candidate and (d) why were the unsuccessful applicants not successful in each case?
Reply:
The next Chief Executive Officer of the Road Accident Fund has not been appointed, and paragraph (a)(b)(c)(i)(c)(ii) are therefore not applicable
10 November 2017 - NW3546
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What steps has been taken by his department to ensure that all (i) metered taxis and (ii) e-hailed taxis are operating legally, (b) what number of the specified taxis were found to be operating illegally in the past three financial years and (c) what are the details of sanctions that were imposed on the illegal taxis?
Reply:
a) On the 19th July 2017 I met with the Minister of Police and the Acting National Commissioner and his team to discuss the state of affairs between the metered taxis and /app-based operators and to propose a more focussed enforcement strategy.
In addition, I met with the MEC for Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport and the MMC’s of the relevant metropolitan municipalities on the 24th July 2017.
Furthermore, I met with the Gauteng Metered Taxi Council, the Concerned Metered Taxi Operators and the app-based operators on the 27th July 2017 in Midrand.
I also arranged a walk-about programme on 11th September 2017 in Sandton to sensitize operators that they must abide by the prescripts of the law which requires them to have a valid operating licence and that there will be no compromise on law enforcement.
b) During the above engagements, the Gauteng Province indicated they have received 6001 applications for e-hailing services as at 15 September 2017. Only 2077 applications were approved and only 1 was rejected. The Gauteng province further indicated that 3923 applications are still pending before the Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity (GPRE).
Regarding the metered taxi service, the GPRE received 3326 applications and 1368 of those applications were approved. GPRE also rejected 1958 applications.
During the October month the Province embarked on an outreach program where a total of 1078 applications were received and 162 licences were issued after this program. However, the information changes all the time as the Province is busy processing the licences to assist those who want to comply.
c) The National Land Transport Act, 05 of 2009 creates an offence to anyone who provides a public transport service without the necessary operating licence. If found to be providing public transport services without the licence, the relevant vehicle must be impounded and a determined fine must be paid before the vehicle is released by law enforcement. The fine varies from Province to Province since this power rests with the MECs and it goes up on a second and third offence.
10 November 2017 - NW3422
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)With regard to bridges constructed by the SA National Roads Agency in the past three financial years, (a)(i) what total number has been built and (ii) where were they built in each specified financial year, (b) what were the total costs in each case and (c) to which companies were the tenders awarded in each case; (2) on what date (a) did the construction of each bridge commence and (b) was each bridge completed; (3) (a) what public participation and consultation processes took place in each case and (b) what impact did the consultations have on each project?
Reply:
1. (a) (i) 21 bridges have been built over the past 3 years by SANRAL.
(ii) Please see attached Table for relevant details on location.
(b) Please see attached Table for relevant details of the project under which bridge was built. Bridges are normally constructed as part of a road construction project, a price is tendered for the complete project and not each bridge individually.
(c) Please see attached Table for relevant details.
2. (a) Please see attached Table for relevant details on the project start and end dates. Please note that the start dates refer to date when consultant was first appointed.
(b) Please see attached Table for relevant details on year built of each bridge.
3) (a) The public participation process for each project is guided by the relevant requirements of the National Environmental Management Act and related Regulations.
(b) The impact of consultations on each project is varied and can range from no impact to complete realignment of a route been required, and these recommendations are captured in the Record of Decision issued by Department of Environmental Affairs for each project.
10 November 2017 - NW3426
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to his reply to question 2529 on 4 September 2017 pertaining to statistics from arrests during the 2016-17 festive season, (a) why does the Road Traffic Management Company (RTMC) not keep record of the data requested and (b) from what other source does the RTMC obtain this data?
Reply:
a) The recording of blood test results from Police Forensic laboratories is a mandate of SAPS. Traffic Officers only serve as complainants on the matter and the docket is processed by SAPS detectives. All 2016/17 cases are still pending.
b) The data is kept on SAPS CAS system and Department of Justice Register.
10 November 2017 - NW3428
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) How is the current tariff system of the National Ports Authority calculated and (b) how does it compare to international tariff systems and structures?
Reply:
(a) The tariffs of the NPA are calculated on the basis of a comprehensive Tariff Methodology based on the widely used internationally best practice Required Revenue approach. The current tariff decision is based on the third tariff methodology published by the Regulator having been aproved and published in March 2017 after a number of rounds of public consultation. See annexure A: Port Tariff Methodology For Tariff Years 2018/19 – 2020/21
The tariff strategy published in July 2015 sets out a transparent and rational approach to an efficient and cost reflective pricing structure. Long term tariff targets are published on an annual basis to increase transparency and stability in the sector and significant progress have been made in the rebalancing of port tariffs on a sustainable basis. The tariff strategy is fairly unique as very few port pricing systems are publicly regulated but does reflect an advanced approach to port infrastructure pricing. Please see Annexure B: Tariff Strategy for the South African Ports System 2015/16.
10 November 2017 - NW3548
Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Transport
With regard to the functions taken over from Tasima, (a) who has taken over these functions, (b) what are the functions, (c) how is it ensured that functions are properly executed, (d) what (i) are the costs since taking over these functions, (ii) additional staff have been appointed for this purpose and (iii) are their functions and (e) when were they appointed?
Reply:
a) The Road Traffic Management Corporation’s Road Traffic Information Systems (RTIS) Unit took over all functions related to the operation and managements of the NaTIS with effect from 05 April 2017.
b) The functions include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Software Development
- Business Engagement
- Business Intelligence
- NaTIS User Training
- NaTIS Infrastructure Support
- Project Office – deployment of new NaTIS sites, replacement of equipment, deployment of communication services
- NaTIS Site Support – Hardware and network support
- System Support – End-user Software Trouble shooting
- Information System Security and Governance, Risk and Compliance
- NKP Physical Security
c) The Corporation employed a compliment of technical staff with over 700 years accumulated NaTIS experience in 2015. This staff compliment has been augmented with existing support functions in Finance, Human Capital, Risk Management, etc to ensure that all functions are properly executed.
d)
(i) Costs to date
Road Traffic Information Systems costs incurred, YTD September2017 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Economic classification |
|
|
|
Amount |
Compensation of Employees |
|
|
|
R39 011 781.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goods & Services |
|
|
|
R56 878 696.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditure |
|
|
|
R 1 528 044.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total spent on eNaTIS |
|
|
R |
97 418 522.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) No additional staff have been appointed in the RTIS Unit since the takeover. Corporation continues to review its staff requirements in terms of its strategic mandate.
(iii) Not applicable, see (d)(ii) above as no new staff have been appointed.
e) Not applicable, see (d)(ii) above.
10 November 2017 - NW3555
James, Ms LV to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to a certain court case (details furnished), (a) what are the costs of the specified court case to date, (b) what are the reasons for the costs, (c) what are the relevant details of the cost orders to date and (d)(i) why is a certain company (name furnished) applying for leave to appeal the ruling and (ii) what has he found to be the reason for the specified application?
Reply:
(a) The costs are unknown at this stage as the Department is yet to receive the accounts of the Departmental Advocates from the State Attorney.
(b) The costs are for the services rendered to the Department by the Advocates.
(c) The Court ordered the Department to pay the costs of Comair and the Court Order became suspended when the Department filed the leave to appeal through the State Attorney.
(d)(i) Another Court could come to a different conclusion as the High Court may have erred in concluding that the Air Services Licensing Council has taken a decision to suspend a license of an applicant (Comair), when there was an existing interim order directing the Air Service Licensing Council not to take a decision.
(d)(ii) The Air Service Licensing Council ought to be allowed the space to make a decision on the shareholding issue to ensure clarity and finality on the matter.
10 November 2017 - NW3556
James, Ms LV to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to the provincial regulating entities and the applications for licenses, (a) what (i) are the reasons for delays in these applications, (ii) is being done to get up-to-date on applications and (iii) is the average turn-around time in processing applications, (b) how is this average turn-around time calculated, (c) what is being done to reduce turn-around times in future and (d) what mechanisms, processes and procedures have been put in place in this regard?
Reply:
a) (i) Slowness of the system, National Land Transport Information System (NLTIS), used to process applications for operating licences and failure by operators to submit required or additional information for upliftment of licences.
(ii) In the short term, officials work overtime to process as many applications as possible. The medium term solution is to redesign the NLTIS.
(iii) Approximately 90 days for the processing of applications. However, the turnaround time differs in each Province, subject to capacity constraints in each Provincial Regulatory Entity (PRE).
b) Calculated using the first-come-first-processed scheduler. Complete application will take a minimum of 5 days at phase 1: helpdesk, 35 days at registration and publication phase, 10 days for board preparations and adjudication and 10 days for board minutes and upliftment of operating licences.
c) PREs have developed standard procedure manuals. The PRE committee has delegated the over the counter transactions to officials to reduce the turnaround time.
d) The Department is in a process of redesigning the system (NLTIS).
10 November 2017 - NW3299
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to him are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
1. Transport Entities CEO’s are appointed on a five (5) years fixed term contract. Some of the entities CFOs are appointed on a permanent basis and others on a five (5) years fixed term contract.
2. Department of Transport entities CEO’s and CFO’s employment status
Name of Entity |
Name of CEO |
Contract Expiry Date |
Name of CFO |
Contract Expiry Date |
|
1 |
SANRAL |
Mr Skhumbuzo Macozoma |
30 November 2021 |
Ms Inge Mulder |
Permanent |
2 |
PRASA |
Mr Lindikaya Zide |
Acting |
Ms Yvonne Page |
Acting |
3. |
ATNS |
Mr Thabani Mthiyane |
30 June 2018 |
Mr Mtome Moholola |
Acting |
4. |
SAMSA |
Mr Sobantu Tilayi |
Acting |
Mr Phumlani Myeni |
Permanent |
5. |
SACAA |
Ms Poppy Khoza |
30 Novemeber 2018 |
Mr Asruf Seedat |
30 November 2021 |
6 |
ACSA |
Mr Bongani Maseko |
30 May 2018 |
Mr Dirk Kunz (Acting) |
Acting |
7 |
Ports Regulator |
Mr Mahesh Fakir |
30 April 2019 |
Mr Thokozani Mhlongo |
31 October 2020 |
8 |
C-BRTA |
Mr Sipho Khumalo |
30 June 2021 |
Mr Nchaupe Maepa |
Acting |
9 |
Road Accident Fund |
Ms Lindelwa Jabavu |
Acting |
Mr Rodney Gounden |
31 August 2022 |
10 |
RSR |
Mr Nkululeko Poya |
31 October 2021 |
Mr Regardt Gouws |
Permanent |
11 |
RTMC |
Adv Makhosini Msibi |
31 December 2018 |
Ms Liana Moolman |
Permanent |
12 |
RTIA |
Mr Japh Chuwe |
30 September 2021 |
Ms Palesa Moalusi |
Contract 31 July 2018 |
10 November 2017 - NW3420
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) Why have the requests for more regular meetings of the Air Services Licensing (ASL) Council not been granted or accredited to, (b) how many requests for additional ASL Council meetings have been received in the past three financial years, (c) why have none of the requests been responded to and (d) what has he found to be the legislative implications of not acceding to the requests?
Reply:
Civil Aviation Branch
(a) The Air Services Licensing Council (ASL) normally meets monthly to consider applications for licenses. In terms of section 8(1) of the Air Services Licensing Act (Act No. 115 of 1990) (hereinafter referred to as “the Áct”), it is the prerogative of the Council to hold meetings at such times and places as may from time to time be determined by the Chairperson of the Council. The Council is, therefore, not required to request approval for the scheduling of additional meetings.
(b) and (c) Meetings of the Air Services Licensing Council are planned and organized monthly over a period of twelve months. Council is mandated in terms of the Act to hold meetings at such times and places as may be determined by the Chairperson, aligned with budgeted funds. Various additional meetings were held during the past three financial years, details as follows: In the 2015/16 financial year, Council held 14 scheduled monthly- and 3 additional meetings (total of 5 additional meetings for the year); during the 2016/17 financial year, Council held 12 scheduled monthly- and 3 additional meetings and in 2017/18 (to date), Council held 7 scheduled meetings and 2 additional meetings.
(d) No legislative implications are inherent in this regard, since all meetings of the Council are conducted within the mandate of the Act.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Air Services Licensing Council is a statutory body established in terms of Section 3 of the Air Services Licensing Act (Act No. 115 of 1990). The Council is concerned with the licensing and control of the domestic air services. In addition, it is responsible for the promotion of high standards of safety and to ensure that the domestic air services are rendered within the legislative framework.
In terms of Section 7, “A member of the council shall receive, from moneys appropriated by Parliament for this purpose, such remuneration and allowances as may be determined by the Minister of Transport, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, in general or in any particular case.” Provision is made within the Branch Civil Aviation’s budget for the normal activities of the Council, which include monthly scheduled meetings as well as a nominal allocation for additional meetings to address licence applications as well as aviation industry-related meetings. Planning of additional meetings and other activities of the Council must, however, be done with due regard to the available budget as well as the cost cutting measures currently in place within the public service.
The Council conducts both scheduled and additional meetings as and when required. Various additional meetings were held during the past three financial years, details as follows:
- In the 2015/16 financial year: Council held 14 scheduled monthly- and 3 additional meetings (total of 5 additional meetings for the year);
- During the 2016/17 financial year, Council held 12 scheduled monthly- and 3 additional meetings; and
- In 2017/18 (to date), Council held 7 scheduled meetings and 2 additional meetings.
10 November 2017 - NW3424
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Transport
With regard to airline compliance reports required by the SA Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA), (a) which airlines have failed to comply in the past three financial years, (b) what reasons were given for the noncompliance in each case, (c) what were the specified airlines requested to do to rectify each noncompliance issue, (d) what steps have the airlines taken in this regard, (e) which of the airlines failed to do any rectifications, (f) what did the SACAA do in each case and (g) what are the cost implications in each case?
Reply:
South African Civil Authority (SACAA)
The airline industry in South Africa needs to comply with the Civil Aviation Regulations of South Africa. According to these regulations, each airline must be certified to operate by complying with the requirements for an Air Operator Certificate (AOC). On an annual basis each airline must renew its certificate by participating in a renewal audit. The SACAA also conducts surveillance audits to ensure that all operators (airlines) comply with the SACAA’s safety and security regulations. Airlines from foreign countries are also subjected to ramp inspections; these are surprise inspections, conducted at the airports and the purpose of these inspections are to ensure that foreign airlines comply with the regulations of South Africa to operate in this country. These requirements are known upfront by all operators from foreign States wishing to conduct civil aviation activities in South Africa.
(a) In terms of local airline operators, in the past three financial years, only South African Express failed to comply with the requirements emanating from the audit conducted into their operations which affected the renewal of their Air Operator Certificate (AOC).
In relation to Foreign Air Operators:
- Air Zimbabwe;
- Qatar Airways;
- Turkish Airlines; and
- Saudi Airlines; did not qualify with the regulatory requirements for a Foreign Operator Permit (FOP).
(b) The reasons given for the non-compliance in each case is as follows -
- South African Express failed to comply with the requirements emanating from the audit conducted into their operations that related to the effective management of their safety management system;
- Whilst the aforementioned airlines were not in possession of the required Foreign Operator Permits.
(c) South African Express was expected to address the non –compliances identified during the safety oversight inspection as per the timelines communicated by the SACAA to them and the four Foreign Operators were required to obtain the Foreign Operator Permits.
(d) Following the grounding of the airline, South African Express eventually addressed the non-compliances identified by the SACAA in terms of the regulations. Their approval was subsequently reinstated. The four Foreign Air Operators did manage to obtain their Foreign Operator’s Permits after complying fully with the SA Civil Aviation Regulations in this regard.
(e) None, all the airlines addressed their non–compliances.
(f) South Africa Express: Air Operator Certificate (OAC) was suspended and the above-mentioned foreign airlines were restricted from exercising the privileges of an approved Foreign Air Operator.
(g) The SACAA did not incur any additinal cost for these oversight activities as this forms part of our planned oversight activites. (Shoud we mot list thepenalties for the FOP non-complainces though just in case or is it too much information?)
NW3816E
10 November 2017 - NW3425
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) (i) How often are toll prices of long distance and inter-provincial toll roads revised and (ii) what criteria are used to arrive at a decision to revise the prices, (b) how many price increases have taken place in respect of each toll road in the past three financial years and (c) what are the details of the increases in each case?
Reply:
a) (i) Toll prices are revised once every year effective 1 March, or closest subsequent date, determined by the Minister’s approval of the tariffs and their publication in the gazette.
a) (ii) The average CPI during the previous 12 months (November to October) or, in the case of concessions (public private partnerships), the year on year CPI, as determined by the respective concession agreements.
b) Three price increases in the past three financial years, one per year, effective 7 March 2015, 1 March 2016 and 3 March 2017. GFIP e-tolls were not adjusted in 2015; they were adjusted in 2016 and 2017.
c) Details of the increases are as follows:
- The previous year’s unrounded tariffs were adjusted for Consumer Price Index:
- The CPI for 2015: 6.0167%
- The CPI for 2016: 4.6750%
- The CPI for 2017: 6.0417%
- The adjusted tariffs were rounded off, to the closest 20 cents, 50 cents or Rand
10 November 2017 - NW3427
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to his reply to question 2551 on 4 September 2017 pertaining to the grounding of aircraft on 18 August 2017 and 19 August 2017, (a) why was the SAA aircraft in question not in possession of a Foreign Operator’s Permit, (b) what is being done to ensure that this is not repeated and (c) what audit has been conducted to ensure that all aircraft have up-to-date Foreign Operator’s Permits in future?
Reply:
South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)
((a) Foreign Operator’s Permits (FOP) are only issued to foreign air operators by the State they wish to operate. In this case SAA needs to comply with other State’s requirements in terms of FOPs. South African air operators needs to be in possession of an Air Operator’s Certificate (AOC) in terms of the Civil Aviation Regulations, and therefore SACAA does not have a jurisdiction on the FOP issued by Foreign States. The air operator namely, SAA, will therefore be in an ideal position to respond to this question.
(b) Based on the previous response this question will be best responded to by the operator or National Treasury.
(c) The SACAA conducts scheduled and random safety oversight audits and/or inspections on foreign air operators that operate in South Africa. This audit extends to all foreign aircraft flying into and out of South Africa. It is during these inspections that we verify whether the foreign aircraft are in possession of the required permit or generally qualify with all other safety and security regulations in terms of the Civil Aviation Regulations of South Africa.
In addition, the SACAA on 2 August 2017 hosted a Round Table with all Foreign Operators to educate them on all the requirements for an FOP and how to comply with the South African regulations in this regard. NW3819E
10 November 2017 - NW3429
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What are the current arrangements regarding the shared rail infrastructure between the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) and Transnet, (b)(i) how often is the specified arrangement reviewed and (ii) how are such reviews conducted, (c)(i) what is the total length of the shared infrastructure and (ii) what is the length of the rail that has been transferred for use by (aa) Prasa and (bb) Transnet, (d) what are the current financial arrangements in this regard, (e) what amounts were (i) paid to Transnet and (ii) received from Transnet in each month in the past three financial years?
Reply:
a) METRORAIL
PRASA owns the majority of rail infrastructure in the Metropolitan areas, with some rail corridors owned by Transnet on which Metrorail is currently the main operator. Arrangements are as per original allocation of assets in 1990 when PRASA was formed, while traffic over these corridors have changed since 1990 and where PRASA has become the majority user. Metrorail is dependent on Transnet for operational performance and maintenance on these corridors owned by Transnet, as follows:
KwaZulu Natal
- Umgeni – Effingham – Duff’s Road.
- Duff’s Road – Stanger.
- Train control system of entire KZN region controlled by Transnet.
Western Cape
- Cape Town – Kraaifontein/Wellington/Worcester.
- Cape Town – Monte Vista.
Gauteng
- Vereeniging – Houtheuwel.
- Greenview – Pienaarspoort.
- Oberholozer – Miday.
- Meyerton – Vereeniging.
Eastern Cape
- Entire Port Elizabeth network.
- Entire East London network.
In coastal regions such as KZN, Western Cape and Eastern Cape infrastructure ownership and train control are regarded strategic assets for Transnet in terms of access to harbours, and in other regions ownership interest for Transnet is driven by control of freight traffic through the PRASA used network.
The current infrastructure arrangements also include 167 stations owned by Transnet and used by PRASA at a nominal lease amount, plus bulk service charges payable to municipalities and recovered from PRASA.
MAIN LINE PASSENGER SERVICES (SHOSHOLOZA MEYL)
The MLPS business has been transferred to PRASA in 2008/09 whereas MLPS is totally reliant on Transnet for track access at market related costs. The MLPS business uses Transnet infrastructure for all long distance passenger rail services and PRASA is totally dependent on Transnet for its service performance and support.
The MLPS business uses 100 Transnet stations, of which some were to be transferred and others leased to PRASA. These arrangements were not concluded and PRASA pays Transnet pro rata usage for bulk services at these stations payable to municipalities.
Usage of shared infrastructure between Transnet and PRASA is governed by various agreements (Interface, Commercial and Safety agreements).
b) (i) and (ii)
Most of the current agreements between the parties have expired, while agreements have been extended until new agreements are negotiated. PRASA and Transnet have agreed to review and rationalise the agreements, including reviewing the original asset allocation between the parties based on the principle of the main user to retain ownership. The process has not been concluded and requires policy interventions on the appropriate model for asset allocation and access charge regimes for use of each other’s assets. PRASA presented that the current market related access charges proposed by Transnet is unaffordable to PRASA. The Department of Transport has commenced with a study on the determination of fair/appropriate access charges.
(c) (i) and (ii)
- Shared infrastructure Metrorail: 400km.
- Shared infrastructure MLPS: 6 000 – 8 000km
- PRASA owned rail infrastructure: 2 200km
- Transnet owned Freight Rail Infrastructure: 22 000 (including branch lines and heavy haul lines)
(d)
Interface arrangements are governed through access and commercial lease agreements.
A Mutual use agreement governs usage and charges for shared infrastructure between Metrorail and Transnet.
An Access and Haulage agreement governs usage and charges for MLPS, while MLPS is totally reliant on Transnet for network access.
Transnet has been moving to market related rates over the past 5 years. PRASA presents that the proposed rates are unaffordable to PRASA in terms of its subsidy allocations and PRASA has therefore negotiated zero percentage increases since 2011/12 until new agreements are concluded.
(e)
At fixed 2011/12 Rates |
PRASA pays Transnet per annum R’m |
PRASA receives from Transnet per annum R’m |
Metrorail train control |
90 |
21 |
Metrorail operational support |
120 |
|
Property expenses |
50 |
10 |
MLPS haulage |
200 |
|
Shared Infrastructure |
36 |
60 |
TOTAL |
496 |
91 |
Notes:
- Transnet’s new price proposals for market related rates include increases of up to 150% on above rates paid by PRASA over the past 5 years.
- Due to the lack of funding for the MLPS business over the past 5 years, a considerable debt has been accrued by PRASA and owed to Transnet on the above access/service charges valued at R600m.
10 November 2017 - NW3500
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Has Swifambo Rail Leasing (SRL) taken back the Vossloh Espana-built locomotives; if not, (a) why not and (b) where are the locomotives currently; if so, by what date; (2) what (a) has happened to the balance of the budget, (b) alternatives are being considered upon failure of the judgement and return of locomotives to SRL and (c) is the setback in terms of loss to upgrade the services to passengers in relation to the initial refurbishment plan?
Reply:
1. No
(a) Swifambo is appealing the judgement
(b) The Locomotives are currently staged in the following depots:
Braamfontein: 6 locomotives,
Bloemfontein: 3 locomotives,
Beaufort West: 1 locomotive,
East London: 2 locomotives, and
Port Elizabeth: 1 locomotive.
2. (a) The whole matter has been put on hold pending the appeal
(b) See (a) above
(c) The availability and reliability of locomotives are the biggest challenge to ensure reliable inter-city services in the Main Line Passenger Services (MLPS) business, as well as for Metrorail operations in the Eastern Cape. The original PRASA locomotive programme intended to address this challenge. While the height of the locomotives provides some limitations on certain lines, the AFRO4000 locomotives could be deployed on corridors without over-head power structures or with power over-head power structures of correct profile.
PRASA has entered into an agreement with Transnet to purchase 7 x 7E refurbished locomotives for use in the Eastern Cape. Due to the lack of available locomotives for the MLPS business, PRASA will approaching the market for the lease of locomotives especially for the upcoming high peak season over December/January.
10 November 2017 - NW3550
Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) On what date will a new Board of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) be appointed, (b) why has a new board not been appointed, (c) how is Prasa functioning without a board, (d) how are financial documents signed off in the absence of a board?
Reply:
(a) The Interim Board of PRASA was appointed with effect from 19 October 2017.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Not applicable.
(d) All the financials will be signed off by the PRASA Board of Control.
10 November 2017 - NW3551
Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) Why did Road Traffic Management Corporation officers who have been trained since 2015 receive non-credit bearing certificates, (b) what is being done to ensure that the affected officers receive accredited training and (c) why were some officers awarded accredited courses without drivers’ licenses?
Reply:
a) Officers who were issued with non-credit bearing certificates did not fully meet the entry requirements for the Examiners of Vehicle course.
An Executive decision was taken to expose these officers to non-credit bearing up-skilling learning areas to address other critical skills which necessary to ward off the escalating carnage on the country’s roads.
b) The affected official were put on progamme by the Corporation to obtain the required driving licenses, and are scheduled to be enrolled for the credit bearing course in Examiner of Vehicle which is due to start on the 13 November 2017.
c) All officers who were enrolled for the accredited course possessed the relevant driving licenses in line with the applicable legislation
10 November 2017 - NW3554
James, Ms LV to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) Why have the outstanding overtime payments of Road Traffic Management Corporation officers and staff not been made, (b) by which date will the payments be made and (c) why have staff members been requested to take time off in lieu of overtime payment?
Reply:
a) All overtime has been paid and
b) N/A
c) The policy allows staff members to take time off in lieu of overtime
10 November 2017 - NW3412
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to the Prasa signalling systems and maintenance work thereof, (a) what are the details of the work that is still outstanding in the 2017-18 financial year in each province, (b) why have these maintenance projects not been completed, (c) what is being done to resume and complete the maintanance work in each area respectively, (d) what are the timelines and deadlines for each area in this regard, (e) what are the amounts already paid in respect of each project and (f) (i) what are the total outstanding amounts in respect of each project and (ii) when will the outstanding amounts be paid in each case?
Reply:
Capital Expansion program for Resignalling
(a)(b) (c) (d)(e)
In 2013, PRASA commenced with a 7 year rollout of the new modern signaling system to replace existing signaling interlocking, which consist mainly of obsolete mechanical and electro-mechanical systems, with electronic interlocking as the technology of the future. In the Gauteng region, Stages 1 and 2 have been integrated into one overall programme whose contract was awarded to Siemens at an investment totaling R3.8 billion (exclude inflation). In the Durban and Western Cape regions, the signalling contracts were awarded to Bombardier for R1.3 billion (exclude inflation) and Thales/Maziya for R1.8 billion (exclude inflation), respectively. The overall investment amounts to approximately R7 billion across the three regions.
The scope of work of the signaling programme across the three regions includes the construction of central control centres for trial monitoring and control. Further, the programme includes the installation of new interlocking systems to improve operational capacity, safety and flexibility.
The overall Gauteng signalling work is currently at 48.9 per cent completion against a planned target of 55.9 per cent. The lagging behind against the planned target is due to additional scope of works which include the implementation of the Automatic Train Protection system between Pienaarspoort and Pretoria station in line with the introduction of a new service. To date, 19 (of 92) stations (Midway, Lenz, Lawley, Stretford, Grasmere, Residensia, Irene, Olifantsfontein, Kaalfontein, Leralla, Tembisa, Randfontein, Robinson, Krugersdorp, Luipaardsvlei, Roodepoort, Boksburg East, Dunswart, Benoni) have already been commissioned
The Gauteng Nerve Centre (GNC) building is 100 per cent complete and already operational. The GNC currently operates Irene, Olifantsfontein, Kaalfontein, Leralla and Tembisa Corridor. The Southern line (Midway – Residensia) is next to being migrated to the GNC before the end of the current financial year. In total, eight Centralized Traffic Control Center’s (CTC’s) across Gauteng will be migrated to the GNC. The remaining mini control centres (Pretoria North, Germiston, George Goch, New Canada and Dunswart) will be migrated over a period ahead.
Project expenditure for Gauteng up to October 2017 amounts to R3 billion (including inflation adjustments).
The overall progress in Western Cape is at 68.3 percent completion, which includes design work, ordering of long lead items, pilot installations of signalling and communication, trenching and cable laying and installation of track side equipment for first two phases. The works currently underway and yet to be concluded include the construction of the Cape Metrorail Control Centre (CMCC) at Bellville and the installation of new interlocking systems at various rail lines. In addition, the works currently underway includes telecoms, power supply, OHTE and Perway adjustments across the different railway lines. Project expenditure up to October 2017 amounts to R842 million.
In KwaZulu Natal, the current works of the project includes the establishment of the Durban Central Traffic Control (CTC) at Rossborough and the installation of new interlocking systems from KwaMashu – Durban – Umlazi, Isipingo- Umbogwintini, Pinetown line and Crossmoor line. The overall Signalling work in Kwa-Zulu Natal is at 58.7 percent completion, consisting of detailed designs, track work installations, civil works, ordering of bulk material items and installation of first new point sets and signalling equipment. It is anticipated that the Pinetown line will be commissioned with a new signalling system by the fourth quarter of the current financial year. Project expenditure up to October 2017 amounts to R653 million.
Rehabilitation Program
The above renewal programme is a long term plan that will renew the system once all the projects are completed. In the interim, minor rehabilitation projects and maintenance of the existing system are taking place to ensure continuity of operations while the projects are being rolled out.
The Details of work covered during the 2017/18 financial year covers the following
- Replacement of vandalized and stolen signalling system which directly affects train services
- Constructive maintenance on worn-out signaling equipment affecting system reliability. Majority of this work is covered by a resignalling program discussed above
- Routine maintenance and minor corrective work covered under operational maintenance
The above interventions are aimed sustaining the reliability and safety of the current (old) signalling system; however there remains a backlog of maintenance and repairs. This outstanding work is caused by ongoing theft and vandalism of signalling equipment and lack of human capital to deal with obsolete equipment and constraints in the operational funding for maintenance.
These challenges are addressed through major renewal program discussed above and the capital intervention program (minor rehabilitation projects). The Gauteng signalling rehabilitation amounts to R32.5 mil, KwaZulu Natal amounts to R8mil and Western Cape amounts to R19.5mil. In total the signalling rehabilitation program amounts to R60 mil covering all three regions; the actual spending is R22mil with projects still in execution and planned to be completed by end of the financial year. The outstanding amount of R38mil will be fully utilized by end of the 2017/18 financial year with the completion of the various rehabilitation projects.
10 November 2017 - NW3421
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to the bridge over the N3 that collapsed in August 2017, (a) what was the cost of the repair, (b) on what dates were inspections of the bridge undertaken in the past three financial years, (c) what did each respective report reflect, (d) who prepared the reports respectively, (e) (i) on what date was the report on the August 2017 collapse finalised, (ii) what did the report reflect and (iii) who prepared the report and (f) what early warning systems have been put in place before any bridge collapses?
Reply:
a) The bridge has not been repaired yet.
b) A detailed inspection was done in 29 July 2016 by consulting firm Arcus Gibb according to requirements of the Committee of Transport Officials (COTO) of South Africa.
c) The inspection report reported "minor" defects with minimum "relevancy". No repairs were necessary.
d) The 29 July 2016 inspection report was done by consulting firm Arcus Gibb.
e) (i) The report was completed on 31 August 2017.
(ii) The report reflected that an 18.1 ton coil of steel came off a truck and impacted the pier above the protective barrier. The pier complied with the then TPA impact requirements when the bridge was constructed in 1978. The report also highlighted that the large impact was considered an extremely rare occurrence. The report did not deal with why the steel coil came off the truck. The report concluded that the collapse of the bridge was as a result of this impact and not any maintenance issues. All reinforcing and pre-stressing steel was not corroded and lack of maintenance did not lead to the collapse.
(iii) The bridge collapse report was compiled by the consulting firm Superstructures Consulting Engineers.
f) Although the highway is monitored with 24-hour CCTV, these systems cannot detect and warn against a bridge collapse caused by vehicle accident as experienced with this incident.
06 November 2017 - NW3430
James, Ms LV to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) Why does a certain person (Collins Letsoalo name furnished) have a security detail, (b) what is the security detail comprised of, (c) since what date has the security detail been in place, (d) what are the total costs in each case and (e) from which budget is the security being paid?
Reply:
- Mr Collins Letsoalo does not have any security detail.
- (See (a) above
- (See)(a) above
- (See) (a) above
06 November 2017 - NW3231
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Has the commissioning process with Siemens for the Gauteng Nerve Centre (GNC) rail signalling system been completed; if not, (a) why not and (b) what has been the cost of noncompletion to the GNC; if so, when; (2)is the GNC fully functional and connected in line with the intended design; if not, what are the reasons; (3) has the full staff component necessary to operate the GNC been trained; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will this happen; (4) whether the full extent of the rail network of the Passenger Rail Agency of SA (Prasa) is currently monitored from the GNC in accordance with the initial plans; if not, (a) why not and (b)(i) what measures have been put in place to extend the service to cover the full extent of the Prasa rail network and (ii) at what cost?
Reply:
1. The Gauteng Nerve Centre (GNC) building has been commissioned and was officially opened for operation in October 2015. To date, the GNC operates the Irene, Olifantsfontein, Kaalfontein, Leralla and Tembisa corridor on a new signaling system. Currently, PRASA is moving the southern line which includes Midway – Residensia Corridor into the GNC.
2. The GNC is functional and connected as stated above, in line with the intended project rollout. As more stations are equipped with the new signaling system, they will progressively be migrated to the GNC for control.
3. Yes, the GNC's traffic operators are trained in accordance with the corridor commissioning program. To date, 82 train control officers have been trained. Further, 42 engineering technicians were trained to maintain the new signaling system
4. The requirement of the GNC is to control the entire Gauteng region only, in accordance with the operational plan. It should, however, be stated that other regions such as the Western Cape and KwaZulu Natal will also be equipped with new modern control centres similar to the one in Gauteng.
06 November 2017 - NW3373
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)What is the total number of control operators, train control supervisors, CCTV operators, system supervisors, technical supervisors, maintenance technicians, CIS operators, security and supporting staff currently employed at the Gauteng Nerve Centre rail signalling system; (2) whether the (a) integrated communication module, (b) trunk radio and Global System for Mobile Communications – Railway, (c) Overhead Track Equipment monitoring system and (d) CCTV monitoring of stations system are fully operational; if not, in each case, why not?
Reply:
1. The total number of:
-
- Control operators is 158
- Train control supervisors is 106
- CCTV operators is 17
- System supervisors is20
- Technical supervisors is 48
- Maintenance technicians is 909
- CIS operators is 20
- Security is 701 (Internal PRASA Staff); and
- Supporting staff currently employed at the Gauteng Nerve Centre rail signaling system = 9 Other support staff are not sitting directly in the GNC and are not included in the nine. Negotiations are underway with labour on their migration to the GNC.
2. (a) Integrated communication module
PRASA has the following communications systems which are currently used in train communications systems and also planned to be used in future:
- Trunk radio communications: Communications between Train Driver to Train Control Officer
- GRM-R (Global System for mobile communication in Railway) will be used for communications between Train Drivers to Train Control Officer. (The system is yet to be handed over to the regions).
- OTN (Optic telecommunications network) for signalling transmissions network which is being rolled out on the re-signalling project.
- Rail Communications system which is meant for the Public Address system and which need to undergo a major repairs within Gauteng region.
- LAN LINES (fixed telephones which are used for communications by Train Control Officers and Train drivers and are recorded).
- Integrated System Access control Management Systems (ISAMS) the project is ongoing and handed over in Tshwane region.
- Email Communications systems for the end user broader communications in PRASA.
All these communications systems except trunk radio systems are transmitted by the optic fibre backbone meaning any failure to the optic fibre network it will affect communications provided no redundancy in place. The systems are also power depended for an effective communications.
(b) Trunk Radio and Global System for Mobile Communications – Railway,
- Trunk Radio : Gauteng North the system is working fully. In Gauteng South the system has just been repaired and the new hand set bought. They are being programmed and the system will be fully operational 11th November 2017
- Global System for Mobile Communications: Not in place. PRASA is in the process of commissioning GSMR
(c) Overhead Track Equipment monitoring system and
There is no overhead Track Equipment Monitoring System but there is a power supply monitoring system (Telecontrol) and is working in full giving on line real time monitoring information.
(d) CCTV monitoring of stations system;
The CCTV monitoring system is fully operational in major junction stations and centers with the exception of some of the smaller stations where they are installed but not linked to the respective control rooms for monitoring due to repeated cable theft incidents.
06 November 2017 - NW3374
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)(a) What number of the (i) 70 Vossloh Espana-built locomotives were delivered to South Africa and (ii) specified locomotives were damaged, (b) (i) when, (ii) how and (iii) at what repair cost was each locomotive damaged and (c) what amount has been paid to a certain company (details furnished) up until the last delivery of locomotives; (2) has the specified company been approached to pay back the money that was paid to it; if not, why not; if so, by what date?
Reply:
(1) (a) (i) PRASA received 13 locomotives
(ii) One locomotive was damaged
(b) (i) The damage occurred on 18 August 2015
(ii) as a result of a derailment at Modderrivier outside Kimberly
(iii) The cost of repairs are estimated at R50 million; the final figure could not be established due to the current legal proceedings.
(c) PRASA has paid R2.6 billion to the supplier of the locomotive
(2) PRASA has issued a summons against the said company for repayment of the R2.6 billion.
02 November 2017 - NW3058
Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Whether, with reference to fines being issued in terms of the National Road Traffic Act, Act 93 of 1996, and the Criminal Procedure Act, Act 51 of 1977, the specified fines and/or summonses are issued against the identity number of the alleged offender; if so, what legal grounds support this authorisation; (2) whether, in the case of business concerns, the fines and/or summonses are issued against the (a) identity number of the alleged offender or (b) registration number of the business concern; if so, what legal grounds support this authorisation; (3) whether, in the case of business concerns, the fines and/or summonses are sent to the address of the (a) invividual offender or (b) business concern; if so, what legal grounds support this authorisation; (4) whether, in the case of individuals and business concerns that have appointed a representative to receive and handle fines and/or summonses on their behalf, the fines and/or summonses are issued against the identity number of the representative; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what legal grounds support this authorisation; (5) whether, in the case of individuals and business concerns that have appointed a representative to receive and handle fines and/or summonses on their behalf, the fines and/or summonses are sent to the address of the (a) individual offender, (b) business concern or (c) representative; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what legal grounds support this authorisation?
Reply:
1. In terms of Section 73 National Road Traffic Act 93 of 1996
The Act presumes that the owner drove or parked a vehicle, where in any prosecution in terms of the common law relating to the driving of a vehicle on a public road or in terms of this Act, it is necessary to prove who was the driver of such vehicle it shall be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary that such vehicle was driven by the owner thereof.
In terms of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, Section 56 (1)
If an accused is alleged to have committed an offence and a peace officer on reasonable grounds believes that a Magistrate's Court, on convicting such accused of that offence, will not impose a fine exceeding the amount determined by the Minister from time to time by notice in the Gazette, such peace officer may, whether or not the accused is in custody, hand to the accused a written notice which shall- (a) specify the name, the residential address and the occupation or status of the accused; (b) call upon the accused to appear at a place and on a date and at a time specified in the written notice to answer a charge of having committed the offence in question; (c) contain an endorsement in terms of Section 57 that the accused may admit his guilt in respect of the offence in question and that he may pay a stipulated fine in respect thereof without appearing in court; and (d) contain a certificate under the hand of the peace officer that he has handed the original of such written notice to the accused and that he has explained to the accused the import thereof.
(2) The business concern appoints a proxy who is deemed to be the registered owner of the vehicle. Therefore, if a fine is issued irrespective of who the driver is the fine is issued against such proxy.
(3) (4) (5) Response provided in Question 2 above is also applicable to Question 3, 4 and 5.
02 November 2017 - NW3080
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Did his department attain possession and control of the eNatis system, if not, why not; if so, when; (2) has the software audit been carried out to establish the integrity of the program; if not, why not; if so, (a) by whom, (b) at what cost and (c) what are the details of the findings of the audit; (3) What was the total legal expenses for (a) his department and (b) all related entities, in the Tasima (Pty) Ltd litigation process?
Reply:
(1) The Constitutional Court on 9 November 2016, in line with the Shareholders Committee resolution to transfer the NaTIS to the Road Traffic Management Corporation (Corporation) ordered the hand-over of the system and the services to the Corporation. On 05 April 2017, subsequent to an application brought to the effect by the Corporation, the Sherriff executed the Order of Tuchten J and evicted Tasima from the premises. Thereafter the Sherriff handed possession and control of the system to the Corporation.
(2) The NaTIS is a National Key Point and as such all physical, logical and network security assessments are conducted by the SAPS NKP unit and the National Communications branch of the State Security Agency (SSA). The initial physical security assessment was completed in July 2017. The Logical and Network Security assessment is subject to confirmation from SSA and is planned for completion in this quarter. The Auditor-General (AG) also includes the NaTIS audit in its annual Information Systems Audit of the Department of Transport. As of 2017/8 the AG will include it in the audit of the Corporation.
(3) (a) The total legal expenses for the Department spent on the Tasima litigation
Financial Year |
Amount (R) |
2017/18 |
466 287 |
2016/17 |
7 443 436.24 |
2015/16 |
7 356 858.60 |
2014/15 |
131 328.00 |
2013/14 |
622 765.00 |
2012/13 |
677 202.00 |
Total to date |
16 697876.84 |
(b) The total spend on legal fees for the Corporation related to the Tasima (Pty) Ltd matter is:
Financial Year |
Amount (R) |
2017/18 |
3 858 342,63 |
2016/17 |
2 290 492,83 |
2015/16 |
16 651 202,05 |
2014/15 |
1 204 248,00 |
2013/14 |
1 463 619,63 |
Total to date |
25 467 905,14 |
31 October 2017 - NW3230
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
What is the total amount that has been spent on consulting fees related to the National Transport Master Plan since September 2008?
Reply:
The total amount that was spent on consulting fees for National Transport Master Plan was R35 923 481.23
31 October 2017 - NW3145
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) Why have three board members of Airports Company of South Africa (ACSA), who were fired by his predecessor, been reappointed onto the board of ACSA,(b) what issues and /or circumstance have changed since the firing and subsequent reappointment of the three board members and (c) why were different board members not considered to replace the specified board members?
Reply:
a) There was no record showing that the removed Board members were afforded an opportunity to make representations to the Former Minister before they could be removed as Board members.
The Minister was also informed by the Popo Molefe and others court case pertaining to PRASA where the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria ruled that Popo Molefe and others were incorrectly removed from their positions, as they were not afforded and opportunity to make representation to the former Minister on why should not be removed from the Board of PRASA. The Court thus ordered their reinstatement.
b) There are no issues or circumstances that have changed so far as the ACSA board is still quorating
c) Please refer to answer (a) above and further that there was a possibility of another court application against their removal, which would have interdicted their process of appointing new board of directors.
31 October 2017 - NW3209
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Transport
How does he justify the 72% increase in the vehicle renewal transaction fee that he has determined to be paid to the Road Traffic Management Corporation in the 2017-18 financial year in terms of Regulation 3 of the Road Traffic Management Regulations?
Reply:
The Road Traffic Management Corporation was established by the Act of Parliament, the RTMC Act 20 of 1999. At the establishment phase it was conceptualised that the Corporation will be funded in line with provisions of Section 24 (1) of the Act which provides for and prescribes the sources of funding. The Corporation is funded in the following manner:
- Monies prescribed, subject to section 48 (1)(b) which must include transaction fees charged by the Corporation for the sale of services;
- Penalties and fines payable to the Corporation as an issuing authority in terms of section 32 of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1988);
- Interest on invested cash balances and
- Monies appropriated by Parliament.
Transaction fees were introduced in terms of the RTMC Act and approved by then Finance Minister Trevor Manuel in 2007 for the operation and maintenance of NATIS. At the introduction phase the fees were introduced at R30 and they were to increase by R6 annually.
Since the initial phase the fees were only revised by R6 in 2009 as per the provisions of Section 48 of the RTMC Act. This revision brought into effect the First Amendment of the Regulations in the Government Gazette No. 930 of 23 September 2009. The significance of the regulation amendment, was that the Regulations was amended to provide that the Minister of Transport, may henceforth, increase the Transaction Fee amount annually by Notice in the Government Gazette and in the process repealed the previous 5-year fee structure.
Subsequently there were no revisions and or increases of the transactional fees due to the impasse that related to the legal battles and other administrative challenges amongst others and the transaction fees remained R36 from 2009 to 2016.
Post the challenging period articulated above the transactional fees were only increased to R42 in January 2016, the same amount it should have been in 2010.
The current increase of R30 falls far below the required thresh-hold of required increase which should have been at R96,00 as per the then approval by the Minister of Transport. Mindful of the affordability test it become prudent that the increase be R30,00 as opposed to the once off R54, 00 increases.
The design of the NATIS has remained constant over the years and the system was never upgraded and no improvements were ever made. The current environment requires a complete overhaul and upgrading of the e-Natis and we are required by the provisions of the enabling legislation that the maintenance of the system should be done in line with the Act. The Act provides that the Corporation should ensure that phase out, where appropriate, public funding and phase in private sector investment in road traffic on a competitive basis; securing, where appropriate, full cost recovery based on the user-pays principle and introduce commercial management principles to inform and guide road traffic governance and decision-making in the interest of enhanced service provision
There is an urgent need to upgrade the architecture of the NATIS to make it more supportive to the current needs of users and registering authorities. The non-implementation of the annual increase has made the Corporation to lose the revenue of R2billion and this caring government deemed it prudent not to burden the public and not applied the increase retrospectively.
31 October 2017 - NW3212
Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to remuneration packages at the Road Traffic Management Corporation, what are the reasons for the exorbitant and above-inflation increases in the packages of (a) the Chief Executive Officer, which has increased by 31,6% from R5,950,000 in 2015-16 financial year to an enormous R7,830,000 in the 2016-17 financial year, (b) executive senior management, which have increased by an average of 19,11% and (c) non-executive Board members, which increased by an average of 22,16%?
Reply:
a) The total package of the Chief Executive Officer for 2016/17 financial year is R4, 905m compared to R4 5m in the 2015/16 financial year. This resulted into a 9% increase which was applicable to all employees. Included in the total package is the basic salary of R2,781m and the other benefits inclusive of Provident Fund, Non-Pensionable Allowance, Medical and Housing of R2,124m. Performance bonus is generally what is due to employees, however the contract of employment of the CEO makes specific provision for performance bonus, which bonus is determined by the Board from time to time and the CEO was granted R2,925m post assessment of his performance and performance of the organisation. It should be noted that the package of the CEO did not increase with 31.6% but with 9%.It should be noted that there were changes on year to year non-recurring items (performance bonus)
b) The packages of the Executive Senior Management increased by 9% across the board, which includes the basic salary and other benefits inclusive of Provident Fund/Pension Fund, Non-Pensionable Allowance, Service bonus provision, Car allowance, Medical and Housing. It should be noted that included in the Other benefits is non-recurring items like Subsistence, reimbursive kilometres and Performance bonus.
c) There was no increase to the individual remuneration (retainer and meeting attendance) of non-executive Board members. It should be noted that the increase reflected when comparing the financial years relates to all non-executive Board members and meeting attendance year to year as they are not the same as a result a bottom line comparison does not give a true reflection. The following are the main reasons for year to year differences in the total amount for all totals non-executive Board members:
- two non-executive Board members (DH Ewertse and TMN Kgomo) served the full term of the financial year compared to 2015/16. The two members were appointed with effect from 1 December 2015 and served four (4) months in 2015/16, as the remaining period before the end of the financial year.
- three of the non-Executive Board Members retired in December 2016, and replaced by three new non-executive Board members appointed with effect from January 2017.
24 October 2017 - NW3081
Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to the Moloto Rail Project, have any formal contracts been entered into with China or any Chinese companies; if so, (a) what is the total value of each contract, (b) what are the details of conditions applicable to each contract, (c) who approved the deal that was entered into by PRASA in respect of the specified contract and (d) what is the scope of the involvement of China in the project, including (i) being the supplier and (ii) in the execution of the project?
Reply:
1. No contract has been entered into between the Department of Transport or PRASA and the people Republic of China or Chinese companies
a) Refer to 1 above.
b) Refer to 1 above.
c) Refer to 1 above.
d) Refer to 1 above.
20 October 2017 - NW3024
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Transport
(1) What is the (a) total amount that was paid out in bonuses to employees in his department and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that was paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2016-17 financial year; (2) what is the (a) total estimated amount that will be paid out in bonuses to employees in his department and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that will be paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2017-18 financial year?
Reply:
The response below outlines payment of performance bonuses to employees as well as a breakdown of bonuses in each salary level for the 2016/17 financial year. Furthermore, the total estimated amount to be paid in bonuses to employees for 2017/18 financial year is provided. It should be noted that a breakdown of bonuses for the 2017/18 financial year would only be possible after all employees have been assessed at the end of the performance cycle i.e. 31 March 2018.
1(a) The total amount that was paid out in bonuses to employees in the Department of Transport for the 2016/17 financial year is R8 652.15 million.
1(b) Detailed breakdown of bonus according to each salary level for 2016/17:
Salary level |
Total number of Beneficiaries |
Amount |
3 |
12 |
R 43 402.56 |
4 |
16 |
R 54 237.56 |
5 |
26 |
R 83 529.77 |
6 |
74 |
R 409 128.99 |
7 |
54 |
R 363 139.61 |
8 |
72 |
R 565 331.81 |
9 |
62 |
R 584 158.92 |
10 |
49 |
R 562 119.22 |
11 |
58 |
R 832 364.34 |
12 |
61 |
R 1 160 331.95 |
13 |
50 |
R 2 597 918.06 |
14 |
18 |
R 1 396 486.40 |
Grand Total |
551.93 |
R 8 652 149.19 |
2 (a) In line with legislation and prescripts that regulate Performance Management and Development System in the Public Service, at least 1,5% is annually budgeted for payment of performance bonuses for employees. However, the Minister has the prerogative, in special circumstances to exceed the 1,5% allocated budget.
It is based on the above background that the 2017/18 projected amount for payment of performance bonuses to the deserving employees’ amount to: R6, 750,315.00.
2 (b) The Department is currently not in a position to provide detailed breakdown of the bonus that will be paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2017-18 financial year, as this is dependent on the individual performance outcome which will only be determined at the end of the financial year (i.e. 31 May 2018).
11 October 2017 - NW3549
Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) Which directorate and/or entity is responsible for the Moloto Rail Development Corridor project, (b) what (i) are the deadlines, milestones and timeframes for this project and (ii) processes, procedures and mechanisms exist to ensure that the deadlines, milestones and mechanisms are met, (c) who is financing this project , (d) what are the (i) conditions of the funding and (ii) total monetary value of the project, (e) how will it be paid off, (f) who are the partners in this project, (g) how are they partners in each instance and (h) what are the conditions respectively?
Reply:
a) The Rail Transport Branch and PRASA as an implementing agency, is currently responsible for the Moloto Rail Development Corridor Project.
b) (i) The Moloto Rail Development Project is currently not funded. The Department submitted an application for funding to National Treasuary.
(b) (ii) Refer (b) (i)
(c) Refer to (b) (i)
(d) (i) (Refer to (b) (i)
(e) Refer to (b) (i)
(f) Refer to (b) (i)
(g)Refer to (b) (i)
(h) Refer to (b) (i)
28 September 2017 - NW2765
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) How many officials of entities reporting to him were transferred from one entity to another in the past 3 financial years, (b) (i) when did the transfers take place and (ii) why, (c) at what level were these officials, (d) how were they absorbed and integrated and (e) what are the cost implications to the entities involved?
Reply:
NAME OF THE ENTITY |
(a) HOW MANY OFFICIALS OF ENTITIES REPORTING TO HIM WERE TRANSFERRED FROM ONE ANOTHER IN THE PAST THREE YEARS |
(b) (i) WHEN DID THE TRANSFER TAKE PLACE and (ii) WHY? |
(c) AT WHAT LENVEL WERE THESE OFFICIALS |
(d) HOW WERE THEY ABSORBED AND INTEGRATED |
(e) WHAT ARE THE COST IMPLICATIONS TO THESE ENTITIES |
1. Railway Safety Regulator |
No Officials were transferred |
This question falls away |
This question falls away |
This question falls away |
This question falls away |
2. Road Traffic Management Corporation |
One hundred and ninety for (194) Officials were transferred |
b (i) March 2017 b (ii) for the primary purpose of integrating and harmonisation of Road Traffic Law Enforcement Services |
Two Officials in the Top Management, twenty Officials who are professionally qualified, ninety five Skilled Officials, fifteen Semi Skilled Officials and six Unskilled Officials. The total is one hundred and thirty eight |
The integration was expected in terms of Section 197 of the Labour Relations and tripartite agreement between RTMC, CBRTA and Recognised Labour |
R20 520 017.00 |
3. South African Civil Aviation Authority |
No Officials were Transferred |
Question falls away |
This Question falls away |
This question falls away |
This Question falls away |
4. Cross Border Roads Transport Agency |
138 officials were transferred to the Road Transport management Corporation |
b (i) the transfer took place on the 31st March 2017 with the effective date of the 1st April 2017 b (ii) The transfer occurred in order to consolidate all law enforcement functions under the Transport Portfolio |
1 official at Top management 1 official at senior management 7 officials at professional/qualified/ experienced/ specialist 123 skilled officials 6 unskilled officials |
The officials were absorbed and integrated in term of section 197 of the Labour Relations Act |
Salaries cost R68.1m Operating cost R11.3m Fixed Assets R1.2m |
5. Air Traffic Navigation Services |
No officials were transferred |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
6. Road Traffic Infringement Agency |
No officials were transferred |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
7. South African Maritime Safety Authority |
No officials were transferred |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
8. Airports company of South Africa |
No employees were transferred |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
9. Road Accident Fund |
No officials were transferred |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
10. South African National Roads Agency limited. |
One Official was transferred from DOT SANRAL |
b (i) the transfer occurred on the 1st March 2017 b (ii) the Transfer was done to fill the position of the executive PA to SANRAL Chief Executive Officer. |
The Official was at the level of an Administrative Officer |
The official was converted to SANRAL employment terms and conditions in accordance with SANRAL‘s HR Policies |
None other than the complete takeover of the salary obligations from DOT to SANRAL |
11. Ports Regulator |
There was no transfer that took place |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
12. Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa. |
There was no transfer that took place. |
These questions falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |
Question falls away |