Questions and Replies
07 June 2021 - NW581
Spies, Ms ERJ to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
In light of the fact that her department’s annual statement reflected that an amount of R372,4 million was spent on consultants for the 2019-20 financial year, what (a) is the name of each individual consultant, (b) total amount was spent on each consultant and (c) is the specific service that was provided and/or rendered by each consultant?
Reply:
It should be noted that the above expenditures marked A, B, and C were incurred using the services of the suppliers and NPOs appointed through Community Work Programme.
SUPPIER |
SERVICES RENDERED |
AMOUNT |
SEKELA XABISO |
AUDIT SERVICES |
R5 019 449,89 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
AUDIT COMMITTEE SERVICES |
R962 101,00 |
THEMBALETHU |
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY SERVICES |
R8 613,50 |
TOP MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS |
COMMUNICATION SERVICES |
R199 594,40 |
PRICEWATER COOPERS |
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R408 405,88 |
INSIKA |
SAFTEY AND HEALTH SERVICES |
R41 800,00 |
SAYM |
ORGANISATIONAL ADVISORY SERVICES |
R129 277,06 |
VARIOUS IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES (CWP) |
RESEARCH & ADVISORY SERVICES |
|
ALEXANDER FORBES |
RESEARCH & ADVISORY SERVICES |
R16 319,40 |
SAQA |
VERIFICATION OF QUALIFICATIONS |
R641 414,73 |
MAGAGSON BUSINESS ENTERPRISE |
TRANSLATION & TRANSCRIPT SERVICES |
R644 257,98 |
ISILUMKO STAFFING |
RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
R2 123 291,63 |
ADVERT & RESPONSE HANDLING HCM |
RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
R221 005,13 |
FEMPOWER PERSONNEL |
RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
R16 701 942,96 |
OBVIOUS CHOICE |
RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
R728 206,45 |
ULTIMATE RECRUITMENT |
RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
R209 656,70 |
GIJIMA HOLDINGS |
RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
R24 351,00 |
VARIOUS IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES (CWP) |
RECRUITMENT SERVICES |
(B) R7 401 633,17 |
PALMER DEVELOPMENT GROUP |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R748 991,50 |
KIJAMI DEVELOPMENT CC |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R1 613 586,40 |
RESILIENCE GLOBALE |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R199 507,80 |
21ST CENTURY PAY SOLUTIONS |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R106 375,00 |
BONAKUDE CONSULTING |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R7 647 703,69 |
KAGISO TRUST |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R9 214 315,20 |
DBSA |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R14 585 171,24 |
NKONKE TRADING |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R11 010 020,00 |
BIGEN AFRICA |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R9 939 051,27 |
DATAWORLD |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R7 898 684,21 |
DUCHARME |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
R3 146 100,00 |
UBAC |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT FEES |
R10 800 000,00 |
VARIOUS IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES (CWP) |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT FEES |
( C ) R243 280 602,79 |
TOTAL
|
372 365 731,25 |
07 June 2021 - NW1444
Nodada, Mr BB to ask the Minister of Basic Education to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What (a) are the criteria of the allocation schools to quintiles across the Republic and in each province and (b) percentage of schools (i) should be in each quintile in each province and (ii) are in fact allocated to each quintile in each province?
Reply:
What (a) are the criteria of the allocation schools to quintiles across the Republic and in each province and (b) percentage of schools (i) should be in each quintile in each province and (ii) are in fact allocated in each quintile in each province.
(a) The National Norms and Standards for School Funding (NNSSF) prescribes that the Provincial Education Departments (PEDs), when determining the relative poverty of a school and consequently in which quintile a school is placed, should base their decisions on the relative poverty of the community around the school, using national census data; and taking into account indicators, such as income; dependency ratio (or unemployment rate); and level of education of the community (or literacy rate). Schools may dispute the correctness of the poverty score assigned through representation to the provincial Head of Department.
The cut-off line between quintiles within a province is guided by the national poverty distribution table as provided in the school funding policy (Paragraph 111 of the NNSSF). This poverty distribution table basically determines the percentage of learners within a province which should be in the different quintiles.
(b)(i) Each year, the Minister of Basic Education publishes a national poverty distribution table, which also indicates the breakdown of the 60% of learners that would not pay school fees. Guided by that table, provinces are required to submit their list of schools that would be no-fee paying schools for the following year. The Minister also annually publishes the no-fee paying schools lists. The following Gazetted ‘national poverty distribution table’ or ‘poverty table’ should be used by provinces in determining how the target table (Paragraph 109 of the NNSSF) finds expression in each province. For example, Eastern Cape must consider the national quintile 1 target to be applicable to as many schools on the resource targeting list as it takes to cover 27.3% of learners, starting from the poorest school.
National Poverty Distribution Table |
||||||
Quintiles |
||||||
% |
1 poorest |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
EC |
27.3 |
24.7 |
19.6 |
17 |
11.4 |
100% |
FS |
20.5 |
20.9 |
22.4 |
20.8 |
15.4 |
100% |
GP |
14.1 |
14.7 |
17.9 |
21.9 |
31.4 |
100% |
KZN |
22.1 |
23.2 |
20.2 |
18.7 |
15.8 |
100% |
LP |
28.2 |
24.6 |
24.2 |
14.9 |
8 |
100% |
MP |
23.1 |
24.1 |
21.5 |
17.7 |
13.5 |
100% |
NC |
21.5 |
19.3 |
20.7 |
21.4 |
17.1 |
100% |
NW |
25.6 |
22.3 |
20.8 |
17.6 |
13.7 |
100% |
WC |
8.6 |
13.3 |
18.4 |
28 |
31.7 |
100% |
SA |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
100% |
(b)(ii) Percentage of learners that are in fact allocated in each quintile in each province:
Actual percentage of learners accommodated in each quintile in 2021 |
||||||
Quintiles |
||||||
% |
1 poorest |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
EC |
33,11% |
20,00% |
44,90% |
1,00% |
1,00% |
100% |
FS |
28,61% |
22,75% |
28,88% |
9,58% |
10,17% |
100% |
GP |
14,83% |
15,32% |
18,21% |
21,09% |
30,55% |
100% |
KZN |
22,47% |
26,40% |
32,72% |
10,11% |
8,31% |
100% |
LP |
34,82% |
39,44% |
21,35% |
1,43% |
2,96% |
100% |
MP |
45,22% |
37,61% |
9,67% |
3,90% |
3,60% |
100% |
NC |
23,33% |
23,58% |
25,18% |
16,30% |
11,62% |
100% |
NW |
28,77% |
19,92% |
40,04% |
10,53% |
0,75% |
100% |
WC |
9,85% |
13,69% |
17,80% |
27,21% |
31,45% |
100% |
SA |
25,96% |
24,47% |
27,13% |
11,24% |
11,16% |
100% |
All PEDs accomodate more learners in no-fee schools than have been provided for by the policy. In 2021, approximately 87% of all schools have been declared as no-fee paying schools, accommodating approximately 83% of all learners nationally.
07 June 2021 - NW1066
Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Basic Education to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What is the current status of the Incremental Introduction of African Languages initiative in public schools and (b) how does her department intend to ensure that everyone’s right to receive education in the official languages and/or languages of their choice in public schools are realised?
Reply:
(a) The Incremental Introduction of African Languages (IIAL) continues to target schools that did not offer a previously marginalised official African language (2 584) and is currently being implemented in 2 144 (83%) schools. There is thus a shortfall of 440 schools. The IIAL strategy has been implemented in Grades 1-3, and it was supposed to move to Grade 4 in 2021. However, its implementation has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic; and the Department of Basic Education's (DBE) primary focus has been and continues to be on fundamentals, which is the Home Language and the First Additional Language levels (reading and writing). It is worth noting that there are schools that are already implementing the IIAL strategy up to Grade 7, as evidenced through the 2021 Annual Performance Plan monitoring report.
(b) All the language related legislation, policies, programmes and strategies that are developed, adopted and used by the DBE advocate for learners to primarily learn through their home languages. Section 29(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that "everyone has the right to receive education in the official language or languages of their choice in public educational institutions where that education is reasonably practicable." This Bill of Rights is further echoed by the National Education Policy Act (1996), the South African Schools Act (1996), and the Language in Education Policy (1997). The National Development Plan is also very explicit and recommends that learners' Home Language be used as a language of learning and teaching for longer.
The National Curriculum Statement Grades R-12 supports mother tongue education, particularly in the Foundation Phase where learners learn the critical foundational skills of reading, writing and counting. Consequently, African languages are mainly used as languages of learning and teaching in the Foundation Phase.
The DBE developed the Language Framework document, which aims to support the utilisation of African languages as languages of learning and teaching in the early grades and beyond.
Provinces continue to support and extend the use of mother tongue education. The Eastern Cape, forexample, initiated the Mother Tongue-Based Bilingual Education, wherein 2 024 schools are using IsiXhosa and Sesotho for learning and teaching beyond the Foundation Phase. Learners in these schools are taught Mathematics, Natural Science and Technology in their Home Languages of IsiXhosa and Sesotho. The 2020 Grade 12 learners, for the first time in the history of the NCS, had access to preliminary examination question papers in their Home Languages (IsiXhosa and Sesotho).
07 June 2021 - NW1446
Nodada, Mr BB to ask the Minister of Basic Education to ask the Minister of Basic Education
With regard to the fact that the annual School Realities report is normally published not more than three months into the next year, (a) what is the reason that the School Realities report for 2020 has not been published on her department’s website, (b) on what date will it be available and (c) what is the reason for the delay?
Reply:
(a) The design of the School Realities report has not yet been completed. However, the School Realities data has been approved by the Accounting Officer in October 2020 and is available from the Department.
(b) The School Realities report will be published by the end of June 2021 on the Department's website.
(c) School closures in 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent suspension of normal programming in the Basic Education Sector, led to the delay.
07 June 2021 - NW1366
Thembekwayo, Dr S to ask the Minister of Basic Education to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What (a) engagements has she had with the parents and staff of the Theresa park Primary School in Pretoria, to find out what the relevant details were about the issues that led the parents to eject the principal from the specified school and (b) kind of assistance has her department given to the principal to deal with the trauma of her violent eviction from the school?
Reply:
This matter falls within the competence of Gauteng Department of Education (GDE); and as such I had to consult with MEC Lesufi.
(a) I am informed that MEC Lesufi visited the Principal, Ms Mabaso, at her home on 14 May 2021; and on the same evening, held a meeting with the School Governing Body (SGB) members and the SMT of Laerskool Theresapark. In this meeting, the SGB members (old and new) made submissions on the issue of the Principal. An independent investigation has since been instituted into the allegations of financial mismanagement, and the reported resignation of staff at the school.
(b) On 17 May 2021, the GDE Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) unit visited the Principal, Ms Mabaso at her home to provide support. She was advised to do self-referral and was provided with contact details.
07 June 2021 - NW1463
King, Ms C to ask the Minister of Higher Education, Science and Innovation
What (a) total number of returning students at (i) universities and (ii) technical and vocational education and training colleges did not receive National Student Financial Aid Scheme funding during the 2021 academic year and (b) were the reasons for non- funding?
Reply:
a) (i) 93 532 TVET college students
b) (ii) 52 992 University students
Un-funding Reason |
TVET Colleges |
Universities |
The academic pathway that is not funded as per the DHET guidelines for TVET colleges |
5 376 |
|
Highest qualification level already achieved |
|
22 014 |
N+ exceeded |
140 |
22 649 |
Student failed |
88 016 |
8 326 |
Student funded by other bursary |
|
3 |
Total |
93 532 |
52 992 |
07 June 2021 - NW1365
Thembekwayo, Dr S to ask the Minister of Basic Education to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What (a) processes were followed in the appointment of a certain person (name and details furnished) in the Gauteng Department of Education and (b) are the reasons that the candidate recommended by the panel was not appointed for the specified position?
Reply:
(a) and (b) The question asked falls within the Executive Authority of the Member of Executive Council (MEC) for Education in Gauteng Province, not the Minister of Basic Education.
07 June 2021 - NW1120
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Transport
What are the details of exemptions granted by the SA Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) to the SA Airways (SAA) in order to enable the SAA flights to and from Brussels to transport COVID-19 vaccines on or about 24 February 2021; (2) whether, given the exemptions for these flights granted by the SACAA, it is not a conflict of interest for the SACAA to investigate the Alpha Floor incident that occurred during the SAA flights to or from Brussels on or about 24 February 2021, as it may constitute SACAA investigating itself; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of action taken or to be taken to ensure that the investigation of the SAA Alpha Floor incident is independently investigated and reported; (3) what are the details of the person(s) and/or institution(s) that are investigating the SACAA aircraft that crashed near George in the Western Cape on 23 January 2020?
Reply:
South African Airways (SAA) wanted to conduct a flight and one of the regulatory provisions required to conduct this flight is the consideration to regain recency of the nominated pilots. Due to the fact that SAA’s Aviation Training Organization (ATO) has not been operational since 27 March 2020, the cessation of all SAA operations as of October 2020, and other factors the airline pilots needed to comply with the South African Civil Aviation Regulations (SACAR) in respect of training and recency before undertaking the planned flight.
SAA therefore applied for an exemption from the following provisions of the South African Civil Aviation Technical Standards as they relate to the crew training and recency:
1.1 SA CATs 121.03.2 2. (1)(a)(c) (d) and (g) - relating to approval of an external training facility.
1.2 SA CATS 121.03.1 point 3 (5) (v) to (viii) & (7) (ii) (cc) & (dd) - relating to external instructor qualification to conduct training for SAA pilots.
1.3 SA CATS 121.03.3 10.1- relating to pilots regaining recency.
1.4. SA CATS 121.03.3 3 This pertains to recurrent training:
The exemption was granted in respect of four pilots only.
In relation to the provisions of the exemptions: The SACAA is vested with the power to monitor and oversee safety and security in civil aviation. These powers are prescribed in legislation, being the Civil Aviation Act, 2009 (Act No. 13 of 2009). This Act gives powers to the Director of Civil Aviation to consider and, where good cause is shown and after being satisfied that the safety has been properly mitigated, grant an exemption to any person or body from compliance with the provisions of the regulations and associated technical standards.
(2) In terms of Section 37 of the Civil Aviation Act, the SACAA has a duty to investigate any occurrence, which does not fall under the definition of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 13. This is an international standard practice by all National Aviation Regulators.
The primary distinction in this provision is that there was no damage to the aircraft, property nor injury to personnel.
The South African Civil Aviation Regulations (SACAR) state that:
Functions of Civil Aviation Authority
73. (1) The Civil Aviation Authority has the function of conducting the safety and security oversight of civil aviation in the Republic by—
(2) In addition to the functions referred to in subsection (1) the Civil Aviation Authority has the following functions:
(m) to investigate aircraft accidents and aircraft incidents that the Aviation Safety Investigation Board has determined not to investigate in terms of Chapter 4 and for purposes of regulatory compliance with this Act;
A conflict of interest cannot be confirmed before the cause of the incident is determined. The SACAA investigation extends beyond the Alpha Floor incident and encompasses the lack of timely reporting of the incident to the SACAA as required by the Civil Aviation Regulations.
(3) The Minister of Transport appointed an independent investigating authority for the ZS-CAR accident. The Ethiopian Civil Aviation Accident Prevention and Investigation Bureau was duly appointed.
04 June 2021 - NW1303
Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Health
(1)What total number of children were born in the Republic (a) in the period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 (b) in each year in the specified period; (2) what total number of children were born in each province (a) in the period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 (b) in each year in the specified period?
Reply:
1. (a) The total number of children born in the Republic in the period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 was 9, 609, 814.
(b) The total number of children born in the Republic in each year in the period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 was as follows:
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
947,912 |
962,705 |
957,798 |
961,036 |
926,723 |
891,482 |
924,898 |
970,698 |
1,010,853 |
1,055,709 |
Source: DHIS
2. (a) The total number of children born in each province in the period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 was as follows:
Province |
Year 2011 to 2020 |
Eastern Cape Province |
1,124,581 |
Free State Province |
471,875 |
Gauteng Province |
2,178,280 |
KwaZulu-Natal Province |
1,964,786 |
Limpopo Province |
1,283,147 |
Mpumalanga Province |
795,754 |
Northern Cape Province |
220,051 |
North West Province |
592,056 |
Western Cape Province |
979,284 |
Total |
9,609,814 |
Source: DHIS
b) The total number of children born in each province in the period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 was as follows:
Province |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
EC |
119,7 |
121,606 |
118,302 |
120,048 |
113,52 |
103,988 |
101,902 |
106,139 |
108,034 |
111,342 |
FS |
48,55 |
49,439 |
47,377 |
46,432 |
44,992 |
41,625 |
45,769 |
48,394 |
49,598 |
49,699 |
GP |
207,963 |
211,389 |
212,873 |
211,247 |
209,181 |
206,18 |
218,149 |
224,414 |
231,927 |
244,957 |
KZN |
195,541 |
196,27 |
194,074 |
193,032 |
182,634 |
177,795 |
184,828 |
202,388 |
218,535 |
219,689 |
LIMP |
129,695 |
129,807 |
129,952 |
130,059 |
122,813 |
119,09 |
121,728 |
125,612 |
131,004 |
143,387 |
MPU |
75,891 |
78,53 |
78,146 |
79,472 |
75,654 |
72,928 |
77,239 |
81,482 |
83,698 |
92,714 |
NC |
21,473 |
22,643 |
22,24 |
22,973 |
22,318 |
20,549 |
20,918 |
22,079 |
22,313 |
22,545 |
NW |
59,004 |
59,695 |
58,999 |
58,304 |
57,55 |
56,309 |
57,362 |
59,8 |
61,591 |
63,442 |
WC |
90,095 |
93,326 |
95,835 |
99,469 |
98,061 |
93,018 |
97,003 |
100,39 |
104,153 |
107,934 |
Total |
947,912 |
962,705 |
957,798 |
961,036 |
926,723 |
891,482 |
924,898 |
970,698 |
1010,853 |
1055,709 |
Source: DHIS
END.
04 June 2021 - NW1396
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Tourism
(a) How are (i) service providers and (ii) suppliers who default in the services that they render to her department dealt with, (b) what number of service providers and suppliers have defaulted in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021, (c) what are the reasons for the default in rendering the services, (d) what steps are taken to reduce the default incidences and (e) what financial losses have been incurred in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021?
Reply:
Note: This response should be read in conjunction with the response to Question no: 1398.
Breach of contract is when either of the parties did not comply with any or all the terms of conditions. Thus a notice of breach of contract is issued when the supplier defaulted on the terms and conditions. Breach of contract is a pre -requirement for the contractor to be declared as a defaulter (Non-compliance of contract) (PFMA Regulation 16A.9.2 and Treasury Guidelines – (Government Procurement – General conditions of Contract – Annexure A)
a) How are (i) service providers and (ii) suppliers who default in the services that they render to the department dealt with.
If steps as per reply to Question No: 1398 are not successful, the following action are taken:
- Termination of contracts with penalties i.e. partial payment for services delivered
- Notice of Breach of Contract
- Black listing of defaulters on the departments database as well as the data base of National Treasury
- Case referred to SAPS for investigation and possible prosecution
- Contract with provider can be suspended
b) What number of service providers and suppliers have defaulted in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021
The Honourable member is referred to the letter and report submitted to the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Tourism on 3 February 2021 by the Minister and subsequently distributed to members of the committee.
c) What are the reasons for the default in rendering the services
- Non adherence to the terms and conditions of the contract by the service provider with regards to project reporting, fraudulent transactions, non compliance etc.
- Non performance
- Non reporting and refusing to comply with terms of the contract
- Collusion in obtaining the tender
d) What steps are taken to reduce the default incidences
As per reply to Question No 1398
e) What financial losses have been incurred in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021
Financial Year |
Financial losses incurred |
Since 1 April 2021 |
Information will only be audited in 2022/23 financial year. |
2020-2021 |
Information in process to be audited. |
2019-2020 |
Information can be obtained from that tabled Annual Performance Report of 2019/20 as tabled on 22 October 2020 ( ATC no 151 – 2020) |
2018-2019 |
Information can be obtained from the tabled Annual Performance Report of 2018/19 as tabled on 1 October 2019 (ATC no 72 -2019) |
04 June 2021 - NW1392
Ndlozi, Dr MQ to ask the Minister of Employment and Labour
With reference to his reply to question 1039 on 17 May 2021, what total number of the 71,7% of youth who remains unemployed for more than a year, reaches the age of 35 without ever gaining employment?
Reply:
According to data from Statsa (Q4 2020), the table below indicates the number of people that remain unemployed, ranging from less than 3 months to more than five years.
Unemployed youth (15-24 years) by duration of unemployment |
|||||
|
Less than Matric |
Matric |
Other Tertiary |
Graduates |
Total |
Less than 3 months |
47,558 |
30,998 |
11,213 |
5,406 |
95,175 |
3 months to less than 6 months |
27,752 |
21,612 |
2,983 |
211 |
52,559 |
6 months to less than 9 months |
30,041 |
29,459 |
5,290 |
998 |
65,787 |
9 months to less than 1 year |
34,422 |
79,550 |
18,946 |
2,643 |
135,560 |
1 year to less than 3 years |
200,574 |
278,745 |
35,182 |
0 |
514,501 |
3 years to 5 years |
128,614 |
116,697 |
6,094 |
1,347 |
252,753 |
More than 5 years |
106,805 |
79,162 |
10,718 |
1,666 |
198,351 |
Don't know |
0 |
0 |
1,969 |
0 |
39,929 |
Total |
581,440 |
647,680 |
93,157 |
12,632 |
1,334,909 |
Source: Statistics South Africa, Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 4 2020
04 June 2021 - NW1257
Luthuli, Mr BN to ask the Minister if Sport, Arts and Culture
(1)(a) What amount has been spent in preparation for the 2021 Tokyo Olympics and (b) how is the budget in the 2020-21 financial year different from previous budgets given the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy of the Republic; (2) Whether he, in collaboration with relevant associations involved in the 2021 Tokyo Olympics, has made contingent measures in the event where the Olympics are either postponed or cancelled; if not, why not; if so, what (a) amount is the expected loss in revenue and (b) are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1)(a). The South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee indicated that subsequent to the postponement of the Games, funds were only spent on PR and Media in relation to the Marketing of the Games e.g. 100 days to Olympic Games. The amount spent is R349, 351, 17.
Funding amounting to $60.000 has also been provided to participating National Federations that have a potential to qualify for the Games and these funds were an allocation from ANOCA in relation to athlete’s preparation. It must be noted that the procured sponsorship such as Mr Price Sport has taken care of some costs within the projected budget such as Team SA Clothing and others as SASCOC continue to procure more sponsorships. Noting measures put in place by the IOC/ IPC, Tokyo 2020 and the Japan Government towards ensuring safe Games, SASCOC has an obligation to appoint a Covid-19 Liaison Officer in the lead up to the games as per the guidelines from the Playbook. Costs have been spent in this regard.
(b). SASCOC further indicated that there has been no impact on the operational budget of the organization. However, from a games delivery perspective, particularly for Tokyo, the budget is different as follows:-
- Additional provisions need to be made to comply with all Covid-19 protocols prescribed by the IOC/IPC. These include staggered arrival of athletes to the Village, extended camps due to quarantine requirements and the appointment of a Covid-19 Liaison Officer in the lead up to the games
- Cost of flights may increase due to the shortest possible lay over being a priority rather than cost effectiveness.
- Flights may be more costly than previously with some airlines not yet flying and therefore there is very little pricing competition.
- There will be limited interaction and stay by the athletes as they will arrive just before their event and leave immediately after. The cost of maintaining the athletes at the games will therefore be reduced.
- There has been savings on competition tickets and NOC guest’s costs due to no foreign spectators being allowed entry into Tokyo
(2). SASCOC indicated that the organization follows the directive from the IOC and IPC. The IOC and IPC are not considering a cancelation nor have they addressed contingencies for a cancellation. The Games are going ahead, albeit managed and staged differently in light of Covid-19.
(a)(b). should the games be cancelled there would be no loses as no payments have as yet been made towards the team delivery to the games. It will be a huge loss for all the sponsors and mainly the clothing ones as they commenced with design and producing clothing for Team South Africa
04 June 2021 - NW1292
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)With reference to the aircraft of the SA Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) that crashed near George on 23 January 2020, what are details of all airfield approach aids that have been decommissioned due to the expiry of the relevant calibrations; (2) whether any airfield approach aids that have been decommissioned due to the expiry of the relevant calibrations will be re-commissioned; if not, why not; if so, (a) on what date in each case and (b) what are the further relevant details; (3) what are the amounts of bonuses that have been paid to each senior manager of the SACAA in each of the past five financial years?
Reply:
(1) None of the Navigational Aids has been decommissioned as a result of the SACAA aircraft crash of 23 January 2020. Only Bhisho and Mafikeng were decommissioned by the owners of the facilities approximately 10 years back.
(2) N/A (a) N/A (b) N/A.
(3) Set out below is the bonuses paid to senior managers in the past five years.
Notes
- The 2018/19 numbers include the Performance and Retention bonuses. Retention bonuses are paid after 3 years of uninterrupted service in line with the retention policy for Executives who are on fixed term contracts.
- Performance bonuses for 2020/2021 were not paid due to the outbreak of COVID-19 and its financial impact on the SACAA.
04 June 2021 - NW1340
Lotriet, Prof A to ask the Minister if Sport, Arts and Culture
(a) Who were the auditors of the SA Sports Trust for each financial year since its inception, (b)(i) what amount of COVID-19 funds did the SA Sports Trust receive and (ii) how was it spent and (c) what are the reasons that the 2019-20 Annual Report has not been uploaded onto the SA Sport Trust website?
Reply:
a) The auditors of The Sports Trust since its inception until end financial year 2018 was KPMG. From 2019 to date SizweNtsalubaGobodo-Grant Thornton Inc. has been the auditors as appointed.
b) {i} Covid-19 funds received R10,281,000.00
{ii} The spend has been as per the directive of DSAC to pay the beneficiaries as selected by DSAC through the Department’s governance processes.
c) Delays with the audit completion of the 2019-20 Annual Report was partially due to Covid-19 and the sudden death of the late Financial Consultant, Mr. Lawrence Van Heerden in September, which impacted on their auditioning cycle. The Sports Trust was required to secure a replacement to manage and lead the audit process together with the Executive Director and the Finance, Audit and Risk Committee. The audit was completed in March 2021 and presented to the Board for approval. Thereafter the finalization process of the Annual Report was completed and then circulated to the Finance, Audit and Risk Committee for review, and then final review by the Board. The Annual Report is earmarked for Website upload by 31st May 2021.
04 June 2021 - NW1504
van der Merwe, Ms LL to ask the Minister of Social Development
Whether her department has been informed of the questions surrounding the qualifications of the newly-appointed North West Social Development Head of Department; if not, why not; if so, (a) has her department verified the qualifications, (b) how was the specified appointment made and (c) was due process followed during the appointment process?
Reply:
No, this matter falls under the purview of the Premier who is the Executing Authority responsible for the appointment at this level in the Province.
a) Qualifications of candidates are verified by the South African Qualifications Authority and I am advised by the Province that this was done as part of the recruitment process.
b) The appointment was made by the Premier following concurrence received from the Minister of Public Service and Administration.
c) The prescribed recruitment and selection processes for the appointment of the Head of Department was followed, as advised by the Provincial Department of Social Development.
In terms of the Public Service Act, 1994 and the 2016 Public Service Regulations the authority for the appointment of Heads of Department (HODs) at the provincial sphere of government rests with the relevant Premiers. In the case of the North West Provincial Administration, which is under section 100 of the Constitution, 1996 administration, the Premier, Prof. Job Mokgoro agreed in terms a protocol governing the Section 100 (1) (b) intervention in the Office of the Premier, that all of his administrative decisions will be subject to concurrence by the Minister for the Public Service and Administration (MPSA), before approval. This includes decisions to appoint HODs. Under normal circumstances, these decisions are not subject to consultation with Ministers at the national sphere of government, or Cabinet, as the case would be for the appointment for HODs at the national sphere of Government.
04 June 2021 - NW1435
Bryant, Mr D W to ask the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
(1) In view of a certain undertaking by the SA National Parks that the Table Mountain National Park (TMNP) would soon establish a Mission Area Command, Control and Communications Centre for the execution of Sustainable Asset Protection, Safety and Security in TMNP in accordance with the 2020 Area Integrity Management Plan, which has been planned for two years with no tangible results yet, on what date will the Joint Operations Centre be (a) completed and (b) operational; (2) whether she will furnish Mr D W Bryant with the project plan for fundraising, planning, planning approvals, specification compilation, commercial tender process, tender evaluation, implementation and/or construction and final commissioning of the planned Joint Operations Centre; (3)(a) what is the budget breakdown for the (i) new Joint Operations Centre and (ii) associated security improvements for TMNP and (b) how will the Joint Operations Centre be complemented by adequate resources on the ground; (4) does SANParks intend to recruit additional rangers to prevent and react to crime; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details; (5) what are the details of the various security solutions such as cameras, drones, helicopters, tactical response units, canine unit and rangers?
Reply:
(1) The plan to establish a command centre for Table Mountain National Park originated in 2019.. The command centre was officially established on 1 October 2020 and it is located at Newlands fire base in Cape Town. Although the Command Centre is still in the process of establishment, specifically with regards to the specialized technical infrastructure and specialized training of staff, it is already partially operational and in use by SANParks and other key security cluster stakeholders. Once completed the capacitated Command Centre will be resourced with capabilities to take action based on the intelligence it collects.
The implementation plan for the Command Centre will be divided into Phases. Phase 1 has been implemented effective from 1 April 2021 and Phase 2 implemented from 1 June 2021.
Despite the fact that the Command Centre was not fully functional during the December 2020 festive season, a successful special operation, which included aerial observation support, was conducted. A similar operation was conducted during the April 2021 festive season, with similar positive effects.
(b) The Command Centre will be complimented with a special taskforce/response team which is anticipated to be operational by November 2021. The Command Centre control room is already 60 percent functional and manned by SANParks officials.
(2) Operational plans from the security cluster are not normally placed in the public domain.
(3) SANParks wishes to clarify that a Command Centre is established, not a Joint Operations Centre.
(a)(i) Approximately R500 000 has been set aside for Operational Expenditure while an amount of R1.5 million has been budgeted for Capital Expenditure under Phase 1. To date an amount of R24,899.15 has been spent on operations and R76,569.85 has been spent on capital related expenditure.
(ii) The Command Centre aims to integrate the Ranger staff with the special taskforce/response team as well as external role players in the security cluster, namely SAPS, Metro Police, City Law Enforcement and others. This integrated approach will streamline and facilitate a more focussed response to area integrity.
b) The Command centre will be complemented by external resources such as SAPS, Metro Police, Environmental monitors and other relevant City Law Enforcement officials. It will ensure those whose primary responsibility is law enforcement also focus on safety of user in the Table Mountain National Park.
(4) The Table Mountain National Park has a total of 112 Rangers, 14 Environmental Monitors and 59 Tourism Monitors. The command centre is manned by a dedicated team who come from a Conservation and Tourism background and thus have the knowledge and experience to ensure effective and efficient deployment.
Twenty of these staff members will be trained to operate as a tactical response team, to respond to any sea, mountain and other incidents reported through the Command Centre.
(5) At this stage, SANParks is testing appropriate technologies. The organisation will select those technologies which are most feasible and deliver the intended outcomes. SANParks will also pursue partnerships, where appropriate, to further enhance safety and security and share technology, such as the existing partnership with the Table Mountain Arial Cable Company.
Helicopters will also be deployed from time to time on joint planned operations, especially during festive seasons as was done during the December 2020 festive season.
A Canine Unit for the Table Mountain National Park will be in place by August 2021.
Regards
MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
DATE: 4/6/2021
04 June 2021 - NW1281
Graham-Maré, Ms SJ to ask the Minister of Health
(1)With respect to the commitment of Government to address the scourge of gender-based violence, what (a) number of Thuthuzela Centres are located in each province, (b) number of hospitals do not have rape kits in each province and (c) are the reasons that the specified hospitals do not have rape kits; (2) whether there is a prescribed number of rape kits required in each hospital; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what number is prescribed; (3) whether hospital staff in emergency wards are trained in processing a rape victim; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether hospitals are precluded from processing a rape victim if that person has not given a statement at a police station first; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
First and foremost, on the matter of handling of alleged rape cases, it must be borne in mind that the process of investigating the alleged rape must follow a specific and prescribed chain of evidence to ensure that medico-legally there is no compromise to the quality of evidence collected, thus protecting the victim when the evidence is before a court of law. Bearing this in mind, the response to this question is as follows:
(a) The total number of Thuthuzela care centres (TCCs) in the country is 55.
Eastern Cape: 9
Free State: 4
Gauteng: 7
KwaZulu Natal: 8
Limpopo: 7
Mpumalanga: 5
Northern Cape: 4
North West: 5
Western Cape: 6
a) Hospitals are not obligated to have rape kits as the Department of Health is not involved in the procurement and delivery of rape kits as procurement and delivery is the responsibility of the South African Police Service (SAPS). The SAPS brings these kits along to the Thuthuzela Care Centres (TCCs) as and when there is a sexual assault reported. Therefore the issue of keeping rape kits at health facilities only emanates where there is a discussion between the health facility and the SAPS station responsible.
b) Not applicable based on the response in 1(b).
2. There is no prescribed number of rape kits required in each hospital. The provision of rape kits is a competency of the SAPS. However as Department of Health we take Gender based violence very seriously and it is our duty to ensure that these rape kits are available at all times to execute evidence collection at our health facilities.
We are therefore working closely together with SAPS to ensure that rape kits are always available. These kits are then delivered to the health facilities by the SAPS, for collection of evidence by health professionals, during physical examination of the survivors of sexual violence. The evidence collected by health professional using these rape kits, is then taken by SAPS to the Police Forensic Laboratory for DNA analysis.
(3) Yes, hospital staff in emergency wards is trained in processing a rape victim.
The Department of health provides service at all hospitals to manage and process survivors of rape. This is done through:
- qualified clinical forensic nurses and doctors
- Ten (10) to more days training using the manual developed by the South African Medical Research Council, the content of which is highlighted below. if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;
Health professionals provide the following services to survivors of rape:
- physical examination,
- Collection of forensic evidence using J88 form. Medico-legal evidence comprises both documentation on the examination done and DNA evidence collected during the examination.
- in children, laboratory evidence of particular sexually transmitted infections can also be used as evidence.
- reporting child abuse, neglect and exploitation to Department of Social Development and SAPS where necessary.
- registration of women and children seen for sexual assaults at health facilities
- providing HIV testing and counselling, which includes providing post exposure prophylaxis
- provision of Prophylaxis (PEP) medication to survivors of rape; which should be available 24 hours a day and patients should be prioritised irrespective of the nature of physical injuries among others.
- provision of ccomfort packs for rape victims;
- referral of women and children to Department of Social Development in the instance their safety is at risk to ensure that they are provided a safe environment such as shelters.
- referral to Psychiatrists and Psychologist to manage emotional and psychological trauma.
(4) No, hospitals are not precluded from processing a rape survivor if that person has not given a statement at a police station first. Survivors of rape have a choice of which authority they wish to access first. We however have noted that majority of rape survivors access the health facility first before they report the matter to a police station and are not dismissed at all.
END.
04 June 2021 - NW1473
Sharif, Ms NK to ask the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
(1) Whether her department has concluded any work exchange and/or employment agreements with any entity of the Republic of Cuba from the 2010-11 financial year up to the 2020-21 financial year; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (a) total number of Cuban nationals (i) have been employed in each of the specified financial years and/or (ii) are due to be employed in the 2021-23 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework period, (b) are the details of the work that each of the specified Cuban nationals was and/or will be employed to perform, (c) are the details of the specific skills sets that each of the specified Cuban nationals possessed and/or will possess that South African nationals did or will not possess and (d) are the details of the total cost of employing each of the specified Cuban nationals in each case; (2) whether her department took any steps to ensure that the specific skills set of the specified Cuban nationals were and/or will not be available in the Republic amongst South African citizens; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of the (a) steps taken and (b) outcomes of the steps taken in this regard?
Reply:
1. No, the department does not have any agreement with any agency of the Republic of Cuba in regards to exchange programmes.
(a) (i) Not applicable.
(ii) Not applicable.
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable.
© Not applicable.
2. Not applicable.
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable.
Regards
MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
DATE: 4/6/2021
04 June 2021 - NW1553
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Tourism
(a) What is the planned final deadline for the finalisation of the Tourism Recovery Plan, (b) what are the (i) timelines, (ii) time frames and (iii) deadlines for the finalisation of the plan, (c) how was the plan drawn up, (d) who was consulted, (e) what data was (i) obtained and (ii) used and (f) what are the budget allocations for each line item?
Reply:
(a) & (b) (i) – (iii) Finalisation of the Tourism Recovery Plan.
The Tourism Sector Recovery Plan was approved by Cabinet on 21 April 2021 and is a three-year recovery plan for the tourism sector ending in March 2024.
(c) How was the plan drawn up.
The Tourism Sector Recovery Plan was drafted in consultation with the entire tourism sector including private and public sector.
(d) Who was consulted.
Every South African was provided an opportunity to provide inputs into the Plan noting that the Plan was published for Public Comment in August 2020. This was in addition to focused and targeted meetings and webinars with both public and private stakeholders within the tourism sector value chain.
(e) What data was (i) obtained and (ii) used.
To properly baseline the pandemic’s impact a modified dynamic input-output table was used to model the effect of exogenous changes in tourism spending on final demand, This analysis approximated COVID-19 impact on tourism at a subsector level and enabled estimation of income and employment levels based on proposed interventions and stimuli. The model used existing data sources, amongst others, the Tourism Satellite Account and the Domestic and International Tourism Surveys. The model also drawed on survey data gathered during the development of the Tourism Sector Recovery Plan.
(f) What are the budget allocations for each line item.
Noting the fiscal contrains within Government and mitigating against the risk of not receiving any additional funding for the implementation of the Plan the Annual Performance Plans, for both the Department of Tourism and South African Tourism, focus on the implimentation of the priorities identified in the Tourism Sector Recovery Plan.
04 June 2021 - NW1270
Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister if Sport, Arts and Culture
1(a).What was the initial budget allocation for the (i) building, (ii) infrastructure projects and (iii) work of his department that are still incomplete as a result of problems with the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure and (b) what amount has been spent on each project; (2). whether it was necessary to increase the budget for the specified projects; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) by what amount and (b) what were the reasons for the increase in each (3). whether there was any fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred by his department on (a) overcharged and (b) substandard work; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) where and (ii) at what cost; (4). what (a) amount was lost due to fraud and loss in his (i) department and (ii) each entity reporting to him and (b) steps were taken? NW1462E
Reply:
On Sarah Baartman Centre of Remembrance
1(a). The initial budget for the project was R164 386 247.29 and thus far R 221 338 422.72 has been spent since April 2014.
(2)(a).Yes it was necessary for the Department to increase the initial budget based on offers received which were higher than initial budget estimates, and (a) the total amount of R182 418 492.80 was approved as the initial contract amount, and this amount also increased over time increased due to delays, hence expenditure to date is at R 221 338 422.72
(b) Reasons for escalation of the project amount include approval of Variation Orders for treatment of Asphalt, borehole and pump in response to drought conditions in the area of Hankey, where project is implemented. Additionally, other increases include Professional Fees due to Extensions of Time, Contract Price Adjustment Provision (CPAP) and Preliminaries and General (P&G) costs, and approvals of these items were between April 2019 and December 2020 to the total amount of R 35 958 918.
3. Regarding Fruitless and Wasteful expenditure
(a) The Department of Sport, Arts and Culture did not pay any invoices to the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure until it was assured that the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure did not incur any fruitless and wasteful expenditure. The Department of Sport, Arts and Culture expressly requested the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure to provide the Department with a signed letter from the Acting Director-General indicating that it did not pay the current contractor for work already undertaken by the first contractor. This particular matter was raised because the current contractor was doing remedial work on the construction work undertaken by the first contractor. The letter from the Acting Director-General of the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure indicating that it did not pay the second contractor for work originally done by the first contractor was received in December 2020.
(b) There has been a payment made by DPWI to the first contractor, whom part of his work was discovered as defective and needed to remedy by the current contractor and this claim is part of the dispute that is under mediation process. DSAC has sought assurance, through a letter, from DPWI that no claims will be paid through its budget allocation for the remedial work done by the second contractor, as payments for the defective work done by first contractor and his retention were already made by DPWI, and DSAC cannot pay double for the same service. No substandard work has been paid under the second contractor, but since project is behind schedule, there may be a possibility of penalties, which may be settled, in the final account.
(4)(a) No amount reported to have been lost due to fraud and loss in the SBCR project.
On National Archives (HVAC Project)
(1)(a). The initial budget allocated for this infrastructure project R 92 853 000 and (b). the total amount spent to date is R 106 564 132.
(2)(a). It was necessary to increase the initial budget allocation with additional R 91 518 673 to the total of R184 371 673 which became the actual initial contract amount. (b) The increase of the amount was a result of an increase of scope. The initial scope for phase1 of the project was only the fire suppression system and HVAC, but during advertisement of a tender, DPWI consolidated phase both 1 and phase 2 of the project. The scope of the added phase 2 included Mobile shelving in the 49 strong rooms; Mobile Archival Facilities and undercover control system.
(3)(a). No fruitless and wasteful expenditure has been declared so far, including due to overcharges and/or (b) substandard work.
(4)(a). There is no amount reported lost due to fraud and loss (i) in the department, (ii) but only with PACOFS as one of the department’s entity
(b) The following steps were taken
- In 2015, the Department placed a moratorium on the implementation of the infrastructure projects after discovering the maladministration of the Infrastructure budget.
- In 2016, the Department then requested National Treasury to conduct forensic investigation into the entity’s infrastructure programme, and National Treasury appointed Nkonki Inc. to conduct phase 1 forensic investigation.
- The cost of the investigation was carried by the Office of National Treasury, under the budget of the Specialised Audit Services.
- The recommendations of the forensic outcome were implemented by PACOFS council.
- The CEO and the CFO were dismissed, and there was a settlement with the service providers which were implicated.
- The settlement agreement was drafted by the State Attorney and was made an Order of the court in March 2018.
- In 2019, the National Treasury instituted phase 2 forensic investigation, which is still underway.
04 June 2021 - NW1434
Bryant, Mr D W to ask the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
(1) What was the capital expenditure on the Table Mountain National Park’s (TMNP) Hoerikwaggo Trail which was meant to be the TMNP flagship overnight trail intended to stimulate tourism and create much-needed jobs; (2) whether there has been any consequence management for the TMNP management who have allowed the Hoerikwaggo Trail to fall into disrepair; if not, why not; if so, (3) whether the issue of falling into disrepair of the Hoerikwaggo Trail has been raised as fruitless and wasteful expenditure in terms of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) what has happened to the skills upliftment programme associated with the specified trail; (5) whether the affected individuals and/or employees have been offered alternative opportunities at the Hoerikwaggo Trail; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) The capital expenditure for the Table Mountain National Park’s (TMNP) Hoerikwaggo trail was approximately R15 million.
(2) No consequence management needed to be implemented because the trail is still functional and no staff member acted negligently. As a result, SANParks did not incur any fruitless or wasteful expenditure. Currently, there are two tented camps which are not operational: the Silvermine Tented Camp was destroyed in the devastating 2015 fires and the Orangekloof tented camp was closed due to persistent crime incidents and security challenges in the area. SANParks will establish a feasible commercial opportunity at the Silvermine camp. The Orangekloof tented camp is harder to secure as it is situated in close proximity to human settlements and is easily accessible through various non-controlled access points as Table Mountain is an open access national park.
(3) The trail is still functional, and the organisation derives value from the use of the trail for Tourism purposes. Guests still book into the Wash houses, Overseers Cottage, Slangkop and Smitwinkel tented camps for overnight stays and to hike sections of the trail. Therefore, the amount spent on the trail does not qualify to be declared fruitless and wasteful expenditure in terms of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (No. 1 of 1999).
(4) The skills development of employees is an ongoing exercise and staff have been trained on various courses or skills as part of the program outputs.
(5) Employees who had been employed at the tented camps that were closed down were redeployed in other areas of the Park and are all still employed at TMNP. Therefore, there were no job losses as a result of the closure of the two camps.
Regards
MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
DATE:4/6/2021
04 June 2021 - NW1335
Krumbock, Mr GR to ask the Minister if Sport, Arts and Culture
With regard to his reply to question 328 on 19 March 2021, what (a) total number of (i) board members and (ii) guests will the SA Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee be taking to Tokyo Olympics, (b) are the names and positions in each case and (c) will the total cost be to send each specified board member and guest, including (i) flight costs, (ii) accommodation costs and (iii) any other specified costs?
Reply:
The South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee indicated that;
a) (i) Apart from the President, who leads and represents the our National Olympic and Paralympic Committee (SASCOC), no other board member will be taken to the Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics.
(ii) No guests will be taken to the Tokyo Olympic.
(b) Mr Barry Hendricks as President of SASCOC
(c) (i) (ii) (iii) SASCOC did not specify costs for sending the President to the Olympics and Paralympics
04 June 2021 - NW1269
Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister if Sport, Arts and Culture
(a). Which building and/or infrastructure projects and work of his9a) department are still incomplete as a result of problems with the department of public works and infrastructure, (b) on what date (i) did each project commence and (ii) was each project supposed to be completed and (c) what are the problems that were experienced?
Reply:
(a). The incomplete projects implemented through DPWI include both the Sarah Bartmann Centre of Remembrance (SBCR) and the installation of Heating Ventilation and Air- Conditioning (HVAC) at the National Archive Building.
On SBCR (Sarah Bartman Centre of Remembrance)
(i) Site was handed over to the contractor to commenced on 14 April 2014.
(ii) Project was supposed to be completed on 14 October 2016.
(a). The first contractor experienced cash flow problems early in the project. The quality of work was, on many occasions, not up to standard and therefore works had to be redone which caused delays in the construction programme.
Three strikes occurred in July, September and October 2014.These strikes related to Hankey workers requesting to be subcontracted to the project.
Unfortunately, many of the SMME’s and workers who wanted to be subcontracted did not have paperwork in place, did not want to submit quotations for the work; as well as a misunderstanding between the salaries paid to workers on building vs civil works.
In early 2015, the contractor applied for a revision of the practical date of completion. Strikes were experienced in 2017 due to the fact that the workers had not been paid their August and a portion of their September 2017 salaries. After assigning of the contract to the second contractor, work progressed. However, delays in the approval of Extension of Time applications and other Variations by DPWI contributed to further delays under a new contractor. A dispute also arose between DPWI and assigned contractor over defective work, which the latter remedied, because that defective work was only discovered after a site was handed over.
Additionally, the dispute also includes overpayment to the first contractor, and these are now being recovered or subtracted from the current contractor claims. The due date for completion has moved every year since 2014.
On HVAC project
(i) Site was handed over to the contractor to commence on the 16 January 2013.
(ii) Project was supposed to have been completed on the 17 July 2014.
a) The delays experienced were as a result of:
- Cash flow problems experienced by the contractor and this delayed progress on the project, and in 2019, main contractor decided to assign the contract to a sub-contractor subject to approval by DPWI. Unfortunately, this approval from DPWI is still outstanding since 2019, and this delay have implication on the validity of the contract, and related transaction that have to be processed. This includes payment of outstanding invoices, as such transactions must have contractual basis.
- The last Extension of Time approved was in Mach 2018, and this is also another matter that has a negative bearing to payment of some invoices, and affects cash flow and seamless implementation of the project
- The sub-contractor appointed to provide shelving was liquidated, and this led to significant delays in delivery and installation shelving facilities required for archiving. The new main contractor could not find a suitable replacement sub-contractor in the country and resorted to importation of the shelves from China.
- No budget for handling/removal of material that require specialized services.
These materials are not removed in some storerooms because approved budget was spent in full and approval of additional budget is subject to finalization of the assignment.
04 June 2021 - NW1245
Hlengwa, Mr M to ask the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition
Whether his department has taken any formal steps to secure international co-operation on access to patents and technology for the Republic on the production of COVID-19 vaccines; if not, why not; if so, what (a) are the relevant details, (b) inroads have been made and (c) are the challenges?
Reply:
Yes, the Department has taken formal steps to secure international cooperation on access to patents and technology for the Republic on the production of Covid-19 vaccines. In October 2020 South Africa and India tabled a proposal at the WTO calling for a temporary waiver of intellectual property rights of certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. Work has been done with both DIRCO and with the Department of Science and Innovation. President Ramaphosa has engaged with Heads of State to take forward the proposal for the Waiver.
Equitable vaccine rollout across the world is urgent, necessary and in the interest of people across the world. Reportedly about 75% of the vaccines administered were done in just 10 countries and many countries have not yet received a single dose.
On Wednesday, 14 April 2021, on behalf of the SA Government, I addressed the World Trade Organisation (WTO) on the importance of vaccine equity in the face of the most severe health and economic crisis of our generation. The discussion, which included the trade ministers of India, the European Union and United States, as well the heads of the WTO (Dr Okonjo-Iweala) and World Health Organisation (Dr Adhanom) provided a platform for South Africa to lay out its argument for temporary waiver of key areas of the WTO agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).
We pointed out that the world faces a dramatic supply-constraint. At current levels of vaccine production, it may take the world a number of years to bring the virus under control. The gap in availability of supplies will give time for the virus to spread, and to mutate into more deadly or contagious strains. Vaccine nationalism, the race to purchase vaccines by those who can afford them and vaccine hoarding are not a solution to the global supply-constraint. They are pernicious examples of beggar-thy-neighbour policies.
We made the case for stepping up production on-scale. This means using all available capacity and repurposing capacity where this can be done safely and by adhering to necessary standards.
The constraints to scaling up production include technical challenges, inadequate investment to repurpose existing production facilities and the current intellectual property rights regime.
In this context, we called for a ‘Covid New Deal’ to significantly and rapidly increase supply of vaccines and related medical goods and promote more equitable access to such essential goods.
Until the pandemic is brought under control, support for the Waiver will continue to grow.
Voluntary arrangements as provided for in the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement in many cases are simply contract production on a ‘fill and finish’ basis that do not address backward integration and distribution rights; whilst compulsory licensing procedures are onerous and cumbersome.
Negotiations with suppliers are hampered by information and bargaining asymmetries that can result in inequitable outcomes and untenable conditions attached to their procurement.
TRIPS flexibilities were simply not designed to meet the scale of the challenge we now confront.
Based on this, we proposed that the Covid package or New Deal be pursued on parallel and mutually reinforcing tracks, done pragmatically and covering five areas.
First, to scale-up production, in partnership with pharmaceutical companies, that can cover investment and funding to enhance supply capacity in different and additional parts of the world. This necessitates effective transfer of technology, sharing of know-how, backward integration of the raw materials and distribution rights. It must unlock productive capacity not just fill and finish.
Second, a timebound and targeted TRIPS waiver covering only essential diagnostics, vaccines, therapeutics and supplies.
Third, protocols covering transparency of contracts and price stability undertakings.
Fourth, commitment to avoid resort to vaccine nationalism; and
Finally, a TRIPS provision dealing specifically with future pandemics, that provides automatic rights of use and obviates the need for special arrangements and waivers.
Considerable progress has been made to put together a broad coalition of countries in support of the Waiver proposal. Sixty-three WTO Members have co-sponsored the Waiver Proposal and another 50 have indicated their support. There is support across the developing world, and from members of the US Congress, among EU Parliamentarians and from civil society globally. The United States and New Zealand became the first developed countries to support the Waiver. However, not all European countries have as yet supported the proposal for the Waiver put forward by South Africa and India. However, it does seem that all countries are in agreement that the status quo is inadequate and that the WTO will need to find a solution to enable rapid scaling-up of production of vaccines. Discussions are now continuing and South Africa and India together with the other co-sponsors, are engaging more countries to build further support for the proposal for a Waiver.
We have a responsibility imposed by circumstances; and need to build a common approach to act with boldness to save lives.
-END-
04 June 2021 - NW1503
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
Whether the newly implemented Post-Lockdown Economic Recovery Stimulus Package clearly stipulates the trade-offs associated by the proposal to transition to cleaner energy; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, how does it differ from previous policies on climate change and cleaner energy?
Reply:
Questions relating to energy security should be addressed to the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy.
Regards
MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
DATE: 4/6/2021
04 June 2021 - NW1248
Majozi, Ms Z to ask the Minister of Health
Whether his department has a strategy in place to ensure self-reliance of the supply of the COVID-19 vaccine in future; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for increased vaccine security and therefore, self-reliance. However, the development of local vaccine manufacturing is a complex process that has high risk associated with it. To ensure the quality and consistency of vaccine manufacturing, hundreds of process steps need to be followed and there are thousands of check points for testing. The transfer of intellectual property rights as well knowledge transfer on vaccine manufacturing should be coupled with massive investment in manufacturing capacity. Currently there is an unprecedented level of support across African governments, African and Global Public Health (GPH) institutions, and the private sector, which is driven by the need for increased vaccine security and self-reliance highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
As part of the African Union we have embarked upon a project to understand the strengths to leverage and challenges that could be faced develop a framework on vaccine manufacturing on the continent including opportunities for collaboration with a range of public and private sector stakeholders. This work is ongoing and is aimed at future pandemic preparedness.
END.
04 June 2021 - NW1336
Stubbe, Mr DJ to ask the Minister if Sport, Arts and Culture
Whether, with reference to his reply to question 988 on 14 April 2021, wherein he stated that (a) a total of R 19 813 800 was spent on infrastructure during 2016, yet the 2016-17 annual report on the webpage of the SA Sports Trust states the R 129 724 372 million was spent on infrastructure and (b) for 2017 a total of R 8 860 520 was spent on infrastructure, yet the 2017-18 annual report state that R96 505 140 was spent, he will furnish Mr D J Stubbe with a clear explanation of the huge discrepancies; if not, why not, if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The Sports Trust indicated that their review has uncovered an unfortunate oversight (error) which led to the confusion. Noting that they used the same reporting template and accounting framework for the financial years in question. The indication is that the amounts as mentioned are correctly reflected in the Audited Financial Statements; the error was the incorrect reference to these line items under question but the amounts remain the same.
The discrepancies in question for the periods stated are as follows
a) For the 2016 financial period an amount of R19,813,800 was reported as Infrastructure Spend the error occurred during this period of the 2016 – 2017 annual report where the web page 18 reflected an amount of R129,724,372 for the same line item. The amount of R129, 724,372 is the total amount for Projects Spend, which comprises of the elements of Infrastructure Spend of (R19, 813,800) and the balance of the total amount is made up of Programmes, and Equipment and Kit Spend.
The Infrastructure Spend line item is incorrectly referenced with the total amount of R129, 724,372; it should be Projects Spend as reflected on Page 19 of the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income. Please refer to the second line from the bottom of the page as attached.
b) For 2017 an amount of R8,860,520 was reported as Infrastructure Spend; the error occurred during this period of 2017 – 2018 Annual Report where the web page reflected an amount of R86,171,816 for the same line item. The amount of R86, 171,816 is the total amount for Projects Spend, which comprises of the elements of Infrastructure Spend of (R8, 860,520) and the balance for the total amount compromises of the following items in the form of Programmes, and Equipment and Kit Spend.
The Infrastructure Spend line item is incorrectly referenced with this amount of R86,171,816; it and should be Projects Spend as reflected on Page 19 of the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income. Please refer to the second line from the bottom of the page as attached.
The amount of R96, 505,140 reflects the Total Income raised that comprises of the Projects Spend (R86, 171,816), Fundraising, and Operational Expenses (R9, 401,488).
In both instances the amounts mentioned under Infrastructure Spend and Project Spend are the same amounts but incorrectly referenced.
04 June 2021 - NW1274
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Employment and Labour
(1)Whether he will furnish Mr M Bagraim with a list of all transactions entered into from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 between the registered bank accounts of a certain company (name furnished) and a certain person (name and details furnished), including (a) dates and (b) amounts; if not, why not; if so, on what date; (2) whether he will furnish Mr M Bagraim with the (a) full names, (b) positions held and (c) detailed reasons for the dismissals of all persons fired from their jobs due to allegations of bribery; if not, why not; if so, on what date; (3) whether he will furnish Mr M Bagraim with the names of the three companies mentioned in the email from the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration that must be held accountable for fraud and corruption; if not, why not; if so, on what date?
Reply:
On 14 April 2021, the CCMA directed correspondence to Advance Call, the CCMA’s anonymous whistle – blower fraud hotline. The purpose of the correspondence was to request Advance Call to facilitate engagement with the whistleblower for them to furnish further details regarding the complainant, for purposes of initiating an investigation.
Advance Call attempted to contact the Whistle-blower and sent a letter via email to obtain more information, however, no response has been received by Advance Call, and consequently, neither the CCMA.
Investigation into this matter cannot take place without further information from the Whistle-blower. It is for this reason that the CCMA does not have reliable and verified information regarding the financial transactions nor has disciplinary action been taken against the alleged Commissioner.
As per the letter to the Honourable Member dated 15 April 2021 on same, once the CCMA has received trusted advice of Advance Call on developments herein and legitimate reason to launch an investigation, an investigation shall be duly initiated and a report be furnished to the Honourable Member.
04 June 2021 - NW1356
Mhlongo, Mr TW to ask the Minister of Sport Arts and Culture
(1). With regard to the unfinished stadium in the Emalahleni Local Municipality in Indwe, near Nomzamo Township, not far from Khowa formerly known as Elliot, in the Eastern Cape, (a) on what date was the tender advertised and at which newspaper, (b) which company received the tender and (c) what was the turnaround time to build the stadium; (2). whether an occupation certificate was issued; if not, why not; if so, on what date (a) was the certificate issued and (b) is it envisaged the stadium will be completed; (3). whether R11 million was budgeted for the rehabilitation of the stadium; if not, what amount was budgeted; if so, what total amount has been spent to date to rehabilitate the stadium; (4)(a). on what date will the Emalahleni Local Municipality recover the money and (b). what is the municipality’s plan to fix the stadium?
Reply:
The Municipality concern has not responded yet.
04 June 2021 - NW1398
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Tourism
(a) How are (i) service providers and (ii) suppliers who are in breach of their contracts with her department dealt with, (b) what number of service providers and suppliers have been in breach of contract in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021, (c) what are the reasons for the breach of the contracts, (d) what steps are taken to reduce the instances of breach of contract and (e) what financial losses have been incurred regarding the breach of a contract in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021?
Reply:
Note: This response should be read in conjunction with the response to Question No: 1396.
Breach of contract is when either of the parties did not comply with any or all the terms of conditions. Thus a notice of breach of contract is issued when the supplier defaulted on the terms and conditions. Breach of contract is a pre -requirement for the contractor to be declared as a defaulter (Non-compliance of contract) (PFMA Regulation 16A.9.2 and Treasury Guidelines – Government Procurement – General Conditions of Contract – Annexure A)
a) How are (i) service providers and (ii) suppliers who are in breach of their contracts with the department dealt with.
- Service Providers who are in breach of their contracts are informed immediately of such breach and remedy is usually sought from the service provider as per the signed Service Level Agreement (SLA).
- If the service provider does not cooperate in providing the required remedy, a notice of breach is then drafted to compel the service provider to rectify the breach
- Upon non-cooperation after a notice of breach , the Departments’ standard process in terms of the Agreements is to call for a meeting with the Service Provider chaired by a senior official to resolve any impasse.
- If the meeting with the Service Provider does not yield any resolution and the Department has suffered loss or rights and obligations have been undermined, the Office of the State Attroney is instructed to initiate court proceedings against the Service Provider.
b)) What number of service providers and suppliers have been in breach of contract in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021
The Honourable member is referred to the letter and report submitted to the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Tourism on 3 February 2021 by the Minister and subsequently distributed to members of the committee.
c) What are the reasons for the breach of the contracts.
- Failure to comply with the provisions contained in the signed Service Level Agreement/Contract between the Department and the Service Provider.
- Non adherence to the terms and conditions of the contract by the service Provider with regards to project reporting or fraudulent transactions and expenditure
- Collusion in obtaining the tender
d) What steps are taken to reduce the instances of breach of contract.
- Project and contract management principle are used to manage issues as they arise in order to make sure these projects are successful in the end. Issues are rectified the moment these are identified,
- Changes are implemented such as putting limits to advance payments to the service providers for EPWP contracts;
- Systems are put in place to support service providers adherence to Departmental supply chain management policies and guidelines as determine by the PFMA Act;
- Close monitoring of the service providers in order to detect potential issues before they materialise; and
- Putting management control mechanisms in place in terms of processes to be followed for approvals without and quality assurance of all evidence e.g. invoices before they get paid. The Department also pursues the following methods to deal with cases of alleged non-compliance:
- Mediation,
- Issuance of Notices of breach,
- Issuance of Letters of demand
- Recovery of funds
e) What financial losses have been incurred regarding the breach of a contract in each month in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2021
Financial Year |
Financial losses incurred |
Since 1 April 2021 |
Information will only be audited in 2022/ not audited as yet. |
2020-2021 |
Information in process to be audited |
2019-2020 |
Information can be obtained from that tabled Annual Performance Report of 2019/20 as tabled on 22 October 2020 ( ATC no 151 – 2020) |
2018-2019 |
Information can be obtained from the tabled Annual Performance Report of 2018/19 as tabled on 1 October 2019 (ATC no 72 -2019) |
04 June 2021 - NW1354
King, Ms C to ask the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture
With reference to his reply to question 2194 on October 2020, regarding the name changes in the Eastern Cape that have taken place (a) what total costs have been incurred to date for (i) advertising (ii) venues of local consultation meetings (iii) honoraria paid to Provincial Geographical names committee and (iv) honoraria to the South African Geographical names council for sittings and (b) on which dates were name change applications received for (i) King Williamstown and (ii) East London.
Reply:
(a) Costs incurred to date for:
- Advertisements on newspapers is R42 209 19
- Venues for local consultations were provided by the Buffalo City Municipality free of charge
- Honoraria paid to the Eastern Cape Provincial Geographical Names Committee is R 23 998.19
- Honoraria paid to the South African Geographical Names Council for its sitting is R147 986.00.
(b). Applications for name changes were received as follows: application for the name change of King Williamstown to Qonce was received on the 15th of October 2014 and the application for the name change of East London to Gompo was received on the 13th of October 2014.
04 June 2021 - NW1277
Ismail, Ms H to ask the Minister of Health
(1)What are the relevant details of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine trials in the Republic with regard to the (i) number of Johnson and Johnson trials that have been conducted in the Republic, (ii) relevant details and results of such trials, (iii)(aa) number of participants in each ensemble and (bb) their relevant details, outcomes and results and (iv) breakdown of the results for each trial test; 2) (a) where were the specified trials conducted and (b) what are the details of the administering bodies, hospitals and/or clinics?
Reply:
1. (i) There were three Johnson&Johnson trials conducted in South Africa, the ENSEMBLE 1 trial which was a Phase 3 single dose study, ENSEMBLE 2 which is a phase 3 two dose study (which is still ongoing), and the SISONKE study which was an open label phase 3b trial.
(ii) The SISONKE trial ended recently (on 17 May 2021) and the analysis is only just starting.
The ENSEMBLE trial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, main author GJ Sadoff: Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19. A summary of the results: “A single dose of vaccine protected against symptomatic Covid-19 and asymptomatic COVID-19 infection and was effective against severe-critical disease, including hospitalisation and death. Safety appeared to be similar to that in other phase 3 trials of Covid-19 vaccines.
(iii)-(iv) (aa) SISONKE: the trial ended on 17 May and the analysis on the data is starting now.
ENSEMBLE: a total of 44 325 participants underwent randomisation of which 43 783 received either placebo or vaccine. The per-protocol population included 39 321 participants, 19630 of which received vaccine and 19630 received placebo.
(bb) SISONKE: the trial ended on 17 May and the analysis on the data is starting now.
ENSEMBLE participants
Median age: 52 years
Gender: female 45% male 54.9% other <0.1%
Ethnicity: American Indian/Alaskan native <1%; South American 9%; Asian 3%; Black 19%; Pacific Islander <1%; White 58%; Multiracial 6%; unknown 3%.
Country: Latin America 40.9%; South Africa 15%; USA 44.1%
> coexisting condition: 40.8%
Outcomes & Results: Vaccine efficacy after 28 days administration
Moderate to severe-critical COVID-19: 66.1% (95% confidence interval 55.0 – 74.8%)
Symptomatic COVID-19 of any severity: 66.5% (55.5-75.1)
No differences in vaccine efficacy were observed among subgroups (sex, race or ethnic group). Only a marginal decrease in vaccine efficacy noted in participants > 60 with comorbidities after 28 days after administration. Vaccine efficacy against hospitalisation was 100% 28 days after administration. Of the South Africa population, 95% of participants had the 501Y.V2 variant, but the vaccine efficacy remained high.
(2) (a) ENSEMBLE was conducted in South Africa, Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru) and the USA.
SISONKE was conducted in the following 17 institutions, from all 9 provinces:
EC: Frere, Livingstone, Nelson Mandela Academic, Netcare Greenacres hospitals
FS: Bongani, Fezi Ngumbentombi, Life Rosepark, Pelonomi, Universitas hospitals
GP: Ahmed Kathrada, Charlotte Maxeke, Chris Hani Baragwanath, Dr George Mukhari, Netcare Milpark, Steve Biko Academic hospitals
KZN: General Justice Gizenga Mpanza, Edendale, Madadeni, Netcare St Augustines, Prince Mshiyeni Memorial hospitals
LP: Tshilidzini, Donald Fraser, Malamulele, Mediclinic Polokwane, Netcare Pholoso, St Ritas hospitals
MP: Ermelo, Life Cosmos, Mediclinic Nelspruit, Mapulaneng, Rob Ferreira hospitals
NC: Mediclinic Upington, Robert Mangaliso Sobukwe hospitals
NW: Job Shimankana Tabane, Klerksdorp-Tshephong Tertiary, Life Peglarae, Mahikeng Provincial, Moses Kotane hospitals
WC: Groote Schuur, Tygerberg, Gatesville, George, Karl Bremer, Khayelitsha District, Paarl, Worcester hospitals.
(b) ENSEMBLE was a multi-national study funded by Janssen Research and Development and others.
Vaccines for SISONKE were secured by the Department of Health and were administered by teams of researchers and vaccinators. Research staff from the South African Medical Research Council where responsible for ensuring the cold chain and drawing up the correct amount of vaccine. Vaccinators where responsible for complete assessment checks, administering the vaccine and monitoring the participants for a few minutes after administration. END.
04 June 2021 - NW1433
Bryant, Mr D W to ask the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
Whether she will furnish Mr D W Bryant with the information relating to the latest issued and audited annual financial reports indicating the financial performance of each (a) national park, (b) regional office business unit and (c) national corporate business unit of the SA National Parks (SANParks) in terms of income, (ii) operating and capital expenditure and (iii) staffing number of staff; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
a)(b)(c)
The SANParks 2020/21 financial statements are not available because they are in the process of being audited. The only available audited information is from the 2019/20 financial year, on page 191 of the SANParks 2019/20 Annual report.
The attached Excel document (Annexure A) provides a breakdown of the Audited 2019/20 Annual Financial reports indicating financial performance of each National Park, Regional Office and National Corporate Business Unit (Head Once) in terms of:
(i) income;
(ii) operating and capital expenditure; and
(iii) the number of staff in each National Park and Regional Office is provided in the table below.
PARK NAME |
TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT |
Grand Total |
|||||
PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT |
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT |
INTERSHIP PROGRAM |
LEARNERSHIP PROGRAM |
||||
Addo Elephant National Park |
162 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
174 |
||
Agulhas National Park |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
||
Augrabies National Park |
37 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
||
Biodiversity and Special Projects |
0 |
1419 |
2 |
0 |
1421 |
||
Bontebok National Park |
17 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
21 |
||
Camdeboo National Park |
29 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
34 |
||
Cape Town Office |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
||
Golden Gate Highlands National Park |
196 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
199 |
||
Groenkloof National Park |
Head Office |
273 |
18 |
2 |
0 |
293 |
|
Karoo National Park |
45 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
48 |
||
Kgaiagadi National Park |
118 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
126 |
||
Kimberly Game Capture Office |
28 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
||
Knysna National Park |
65 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
66 |
||
Kn/sna Regional Office |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
||
Kruger National Park |
2258 |
167 |
2 |
0 |
2427 |
||
Mapungubwe National Park |
82 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
83 |
||
Marakele National Park |
60 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
62 |
||
Meerkat National Park |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
||
Mokala National Park |
48 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
||
Mountain Zebra National Park |
34 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
39 |
||
Namaqua National Park |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
||
Port Elizabeth Regional Office |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
||
Richterveld National Park |
33 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
||
Rondevlei Research Office |
19 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
21 |
||
Table Mountain National Park |
209 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
218 |
||
Tankwa Karoo National Park |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
||
Tsitsikamma National Park |
130 |
27 |
1 |
2 |
160 |
||
Up |
ington Regional Office |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
West Coast National Park |
31 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
||
Wilderness National Park |
82 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
83 |
||
Grand Total |
4057 |
1681 |
14 |
22 |
5774 |
Regards
MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
DATE:
04 June 2021 - NW1275
Ismail, Ms H to ask the Minister of Health
(a) Whether he will furnish Ms H Ismail with a full report on the Ivermectin controlled-access programme and (b) how long is it envisaged that the review programme for the applications of patients will take before Ivermectin will be allowed to be used?
Reply:
a) Ivermectin Authorisation Status 25/05/2021 |
|||||
Approved |
Rejected |
Pending |
Duplicate |
||
Tier 3: Section 22C(1)(b) - licence holder |
8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
Tier 2: Healthcare Facility Stock |
134 |
40 |
0 |
4 |
|
Tier 1: Named-patient |
112 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
|
TOTAL |
254 |
58 |
0 |
6 |
318 |
b) The use of Ivermectin in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 infections received avid interest recently due to the antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties in vitro. Available data to date, mostly from small under-powered studies, show a trend towards some benefit in the management of COVID-19. National and international bodies have reviewed the data; and have concluded that there is unclear evidence of both benefit and harm, in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19. After consideration of the impact of the second wave as well as the clinical equipoise that was presented through the various studies reviewed, SAHPRA implemented an Ivermectin Controlled Compassionate Use Programme for approved unregistered ivermectin products to be accessed via a three-tier programme for Section 22C(1)(b) permit holders, healthcare facilities, and named-patient applications. On 16 March 2021,SAHPRA registered Soolantra 10mg/g cream formulation, which contains ivermectin. Soolantra Cream is indicated for the topical treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory lesions of papulopustular rosacea in adult patients and is not for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. The registration of this product enabled the compounding of ivermectin on a prescription basis for specific patients as well as off label use of ivermectin under the section 21 Controlled Compassionate Use Programme.
END.
04 June 2021 - NW1240
Sithole, Mr KP to ask the Minister of Transport
Whether, in light of a media briefing by the Chairperson of the Road Accident Fund (RAF), Ms Thembelihle Msibi, a few weeks ago when commenting on the RAF’s financial affairs (details furnished) and given that the RAF has begun a turnaround strategy whose implementation began on 1 April 2020, he is in any position to detail the list of service providers found to have been connected to the cases, including the 102 law firms reported to the Legal Practice Council for mismanagement of their trust accounts; if not, why not; if so, what are the full, relevant details?
Reply:
Of the 102 law firms reported to the Legal Practice Council (LPC) for mismanagement of their trust accounts, only 42 firms (listed below) have as yet not repaid the duplicate payments they received from Road Accident Fund (RAF).
As part of its recovery procedures the RAF withheld further payment to law firms identified as having received duplicate payments. However, a full bench of the North Guateng High Court, Pretoria, delivered judgment on 9 April 2021, in the matter of Road Accident Fund v Legal Practice Council and Others (58145/2020) [2021] ZAGPPHC 173, ordering the suspending of certain categories of writs of execution and warrants of attachment against the RAF, and in its judgment states that it does not believe that the RAF should withhold payments from successful claimants because of a dispute between the RAF and the law firms acting for the claimants. The court indicated that the RAF must instead approach the court on a case-by-case basis.
Consequently, the RAF has brought an Application in the North Guateng High Court, Pretoria, citing the 42 legal firms; the LPC; the Sheriff, Pretoria Central; the Sheriff, Pretoria East; the Sheriff, Centurion East the Sheriff, Johannesburg Central; the Sheriff, Johannesburg North; and, ABSA Bank Ltd. The details of the 42 law firms cited in the Application are as follows:
1. Phefadu AP Attorneys with its business address at Suite 407-408, Savelkouls Building, Cnr Paul Kruger & Pretorius Street.
2. CN Phukubje Attorneys with its business address at 83 Albertina Sisulu Street Corner Von Brandis Street Bradlows Building, Works @ Market 4th Floor Offices 405-407.
3. Feke-Myeko Attorneys with its business address at 380 Bosman Street Pretoria.
4. Frans Rabie Attorneys with its business address at 110A Themba Shozi Street, Balfour, Mpumalanga, 2410.
5. Gura Tlaletsi & Partners with its business address at 38 Carrington Street Mafikeng Industrial Mafikeng, North West.
6. KG Mashigo Attorneys with its business address at 58 Marshall Street Marshall Street Marshalltown Johannesburg.
7. Lekopane Khumalo Attorneys with its business address at Office 1, Grongo’s Centre, 40 Mouton Street, Hendrina, Mpumalanga.
8. Letheba Makgato & Associates with its business address at 81 Ampthill Avenue, Suite 2, @nd Floor, Central House Building, Benoni.
9. Mahlangu SV with its business address at 507 Spuy Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.
10. Makhurupetzi Attorneys with its business address at Suite 106 and 107, First Floor, Olivetti House, Cnr Pretorius and Sophie De Bruyne Streets.
11. Makokga Sebei Inc with its business address at Tudor Chambers Office No 0240 229 Helen Joseph Street Pretoria.
12. Malange Attorneys with its business address at 28 Helen Joseph Street, Suite 107 Church Square Building, Pretoria.
13. Malose Matsaung Attorneys with its business address at 238 Paul Kruger Street, Standard Bank Chambers, Pretoria Central, Pretoria.
14. Maluleka Tlhasi Inc with its business address at 754 Stanza Bopape Street, Eastcliff, Pretoria.
15. Mammile A M Attorneys with its business address at Mammile Law Chambers, 130 Highveld Road, Kempton Park.
16. Matodzi Neluheni Attorneys with its business address at 70 Sutherland Street, Newcastle Central, Newcastle.
17. Mphahlele MR Attorneys with its business address at 17B Biccard Street, Polokwane Central, Polokwane, 0699.
18. Mpho Mashiloane Attorneys with its business address at 38 Marloth Street, Mbombela,1201/ Tarentaal Shopping Center, corner Ou Kaapschenhoop & N4 Nelspruit Office No TA 03
19. Muleya Attorneys with its business address at G06, 1064 Arcadia Street, Hatfield, Pretoria 0083.
20. Musa Baloyi Attorneys with its business address at Mageza Road, Giyani-E, Giyani 0826.
21. Mzamo Attorneys with its business address at Suite 2, 3rd Floor, West Wing Suites, 132 Fox Street, Johannesburg.
22. N.T Ntshele Attorneys with its business address at Suite 325, Bank Towers, 190 Thabo Sehume Street, Pretoria, 001.
23. Ndambakuwa Attorneys with its business address at 200 Pretorius Street, Pretoria Central, Pretoria.
24. Ndlovu Attorneys with its business address at 15A Park Street, Kempton Park Central, Kempton Park, 1620.
25. Nomvula Meyiwa Incorporated / Meyiwa Inc with its business address at 525 Mendelson Street, Cnr Garsfontein & Isie-Smuts Street, Constantia Park, Glenstantia, Pretoria.
26. Nxumalo and Radebe Inc with its business address at Stand Number 265 Elukwatini Crossing, Elukwatini-A, Elukwatini.
27. PM Mositsa Inc with its business address at Lapa Building,380 Bosman Street, Pretoria. 28. PP Milazi Attorneys with its business address at 212 Rahima Moosa Street, Johannesburg 2001.
29. Raleswinga Attorneys with its business address at 523 Stanza Bopape Street, Arcadia, Pretoria, 0007.
30. Ramaselela MC Attorneys with its business address at 100 Pretorius Street, Suite 106 Olivetti House, Pretoria.
31. S Twala Attorneys with its business address at 2nd floor, Mathomo House, 132 Fox Street, Cnr Kruis Street.
32. Shabangu & Beauchamp (Pretoria) with its business address at Shop 15, Bothongo Plaza West, Francis Baard Street, Pretoria Central, Pretoria,0001.
33. Simpsons Attorneys Incorporated with its business address at 77 Troon Road, Greenside, Randburg.
34. T A Matshanda Trust with its business address at Suite 1309 - 1310, 13th Floor, His Majesty Building Cnr Commissioner & Joubert Street, Johannesburg.
35. T Khumalo Attorneys with its business address at Office 6, 17th Floor, Marble Towers, 201 Rahima Moosa Street, Johannesburg.
36. Taute Bouwer & Cilliers Incorporated with its business address at 827 25th Avenue, Rietfontein, Pretoria.
37. TC Rampatla Incorporated with its business address at Absa Building, Suite 208, 250 Pretorius Street, Pretoria Central.
38. K Malao Attorneys with its business address at 3710 Amberfield Valley Capensis Avenue Rooihuiskraal North Ext 24 Centurion.
39. Mouton & Williams Attorneys with its business address at 263,297 Ontdekkers Road, Carenvale, Roodeport,1724.
40. Modibedi Sebele Phethoe Attorneys with its business address at 44 Rooihuiskraal Road, The Reeds Centurion.
41. HC Madike Attorneys with its business address at 13 Jan Kemp Street Pongola Kwazulu Natal and at 235 Helen Joseph Street Suite 303, 3rd Floor Burlington House, Pretoria.
42. Erasmus ELS Inc t/a Erasmus Scheepers with its business address at 172 Bronkhorst Street Nieuw Muckleneuk Pretoria.
The names of the 102 law firms reported to the Legal Practice Council (LPC) for mismanagement of their trust accounts, are as follows:
- ABRAM PHUTIANE PHEFADU
- BALOYI ATTORNEYS
- CHUEU ATTORNEYS INC
- CN PHUKUBJE ATTORNEYS
- ERASMUS ELS INC T/A ERASMUS SCHEEPE
- ERWEE ATTORNEYS (MUSINA)
- FEKE-MYEKO ATTORNEYS
- FRANS RABIE ATTORNEYS
- GUMBO & CO
- GUR TLALETSI & PARTNERS
- HANLIE BRUWER ATTORNEYS
- HLUNGWANI TG ATTORNEYS
- JACOBS AND MAKWAKWA ATTORNEYS
- JD SKHOSANA ATTORNEYS
- K MALAO INC
- KG MASHIGO ATTORNEYS
- KHOROMMBI MABULI INCORPORATION
- KOMANE ATTORNEY
- LEKOPANE KHUMALO ATTORNEYS
- LETHABO MOKOENA ATTORNEYS
- LETHEBA MAKGATO & ASSOCIATES
- LM MAILA INCORPORATED
- M RAMOGOTSWA INC ATTORNEYS
- MA MOTHAPO ATTORNEYS
- MA MPHOLOANE INC
- MADIKE HC ATTORNEYS
- MAHLANGU SV
- MAHOLOBELA INC ATTORNEYS
- MAJA MATSIMELA ATTORNEYS
- MAKAU PHEFADU & PARTNERS
- MAKHURUPETZI ATTORNEYS
- MAKOKGA SEBEI INC
- MALAN M ATTORNEYS
- MALANGE ATTORNEYS
- MALATJI ATTORNEYS
- MALATJI MOLOSH & POOE
- MALOSE MATSAUNG ATTORNEYS
- MALULEKA TLHASI INC
- MAMMILE A M ATTORNEYS
- MAMOKGALAKE CHUENE ATTORNEYS
- MANTON J J S
- MASHAPA
- MASHEGO P PROKEREURS INC
- MASWENENG ATTORNEYS
- MATHEKGA ATTORNEYS
- MATODZI NELUHENI
- MBOWENI MALULEKE INCORPORATED ATTOR
- MG MALI ATTORNEYS
- MJ MOSIKARI
- MMELA MTSWENI
- MODIBEDI SEBELE PHETOE ATTORNEYS
- MOGAU SETSHOANE
- MOHULATSI ATTORNEYS INC
- MOKGATLE LESOLE ATTORNEYS
- MOKHABUKHI ATTORNEYS
- MOLEPO INCORPORATED ATTORNEYS(PTY)
- MOLOSI
- MOUTON & WILLIAMS ATTORNEYS
- MP MNGOMEZULU INCORPORATED
- MPHAHLELE MR ATTORNEYS
- MPHO MASHILOANE
- MT MAKWELA ATTORNEYS
- MTSHWENI INC ATTORNEYS
- MTSWENI INC ATTORNEYS
- MULEYA ATTORNEYS
- MUNRO FLOWERS & VERMAAK
- MUSA BALOYI ATTORNEYS
- MZAMO ATTORNEYS
- N.T NTSHELE ATTORNEYS
- NDALA ATTORNEYS
- NDAMBAKUWA
- NDHLOVU BORNVENTURE ATTORNEYS
- NDLOVU ATTORNEYS
- NDOBELA AND LAMOLA ATTORNEYS
- NOMVULA MEYIWA INCORPORATED
- NTLOEDIBE ATTORNEYS
- NTSHANGASE SS ATTORNEYS
- NXUMALO AND RADEBE INC
- PJ FAURIE ATTORNEYS
- PM MOSITSA INC
- PN HLATSWAYO ATTORNEYS
- PP MILAZI ATTORNEYS
- RALESWINGA ATT
- RAMASELELA MC ATTORNEYS
- RATSHIVHOMBELA ATTORNEYS
- RENE FOUCHE INCORPORATED
- ROME ANTHONY IAN
- S TWALA ATTORNEYS
- SANCHEZ SKOSANA INCORPORATED
- SELAMOLELA INC
- SELOLO TLOU INCORPORATED
- SHABANGU & BEAUCHAMP (PRETORIA)
- SIMPSONS ATTORNEYS INCORPORATED
- SPRUYT INC
- T A MATSHANDA TRUST
- T KHUMALO ATTORNEYS
- TAUTE BOUWER & CILLIERS INC
- TC RAMPATLA INCORPORATED
- THINDISA ATTORNEYS
- TL KEKANA ATTORNEYS
- VAN VELDEN DUFFEY
- VAN WYK ATTORNEYS (MARSHALLTOWN)
04 June 2021 - NW1256
Nxumalo, Mr MN to ask the Minister of Employment and Labour
What strategies, financially and otherwise, is the Government implementing to ensure that companies retain workers as the country prepares to emerge from COVID-19, given the interruption brought by the COVID-19 pandemic in the employment and labour sector?
Reply:
With the outbreak of the COVID-19, There is now a sense of URGENCY to accelerate implementation of the Employment Services Act, No. 4 of 2014; the UI Amendment Act, No. 10 of 2016, specifically section 5 (d) which provides for the financing of the retention of contributors in employment and the re-entry of contributors into the labour market; the Presidential Jobs Summit Framework Agreement, 2018 with a focus on: (i) protecting jobs, (ii) informal sector support, and (iii) inclusive growth interventions. The COVID-19 pandemic coupled with the advancement in technology presents us as a country with an opportunity to place productivity at the centre of the country’s long-term competitiveness and economic activity and recovery.
The pandemic, which has devastating effects on our socio-economic systems and the labour market is also creating an important opportunity for leadership in government to create an enabling environment and partner with leaders in business and labour to take decisive and urgent action to turn things around.
Over the next ten (10) years (2021 to 2030), Productivity SA strategic objectives and plans will be focused on vigorously unlocking South Africa’s productivity and potential for sustained competitiveness and economic growth as part of our interventions to implement the Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan, particularly priority areas 2: Industrialisation and Growing the productive economy; and priority area 5: Macro-economic interventions and enablers for economic growth. During this period, our Enterprise Development and Support Programmes will be focused on supporting an Integrated Enterprise Development and Support Ecosystem (government-wide programme in collaboration and partnership with social partners) to create a coherent platform to enhance access and coordination of SMME support to preserve existing job and create productive and decent employment.
The Department has allocated over R104m to Productivity SA whereby the entity implements turn-around strategies and plans to restructure and improve the productivity and operational efficiency of companies facing distress to be sustainable, competitive and create conditions conducive for job retention and creation. Funds have been made available in this regard and for the 2020/21 financial year over R104m was allocated to Productivity SA. Part of the interventions include establishing Workplace /Future forums (committee comprising on management and workers), training and capacitating their members on productivity improvement solutions.
Productivity SA also have a productivity and Competitiveness Improvement Programme which is designed to improve the competitiveness and sustainability of enterprises, targeting small enterprises and cooperatives in the productive sectors of the economy in line with the Sector Master Plans. Overall, 2796 companies were supported through the programme in the 2020/21 financial year, which included emerging entrepreneurs and cooperatives.
There are also targeted interventions through the Workplace Challenge Programme (WPC), with 109 companies mostly in the Special Economic Zones and Industrial Parks assisted and 3 industrial clusters were established in the Forestry, Footwear and Leather, and the Creative sector.
04 June 2021 - NW1334
Krumbock, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture
Whether, with reference to his reply to question 327 on 19 March 2021, wherein he stated that the budget is being reworked based on sponsors being signed and other potential funders and that a cost per team member should be available mid-March 2021, he has now received the updated budget; if not, why not; if so, on what date is it envisaged that he will make the full budget public?
Reply:
The South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) indicated that the budget has been updated to provide for only those costs that are essential for the delivery of Team SA to the Tokyo Games. Sponsors have been signed up and more sponsors are being engaged.
Additional costs due to the Covid-19 protocols with regards to the team travel, camp and medical services as prescribed in the Play Books published by the IOC and IPC Book has been considered and factored into the budget.
The original projected budget was R45, 000.000 but with the sponsorships, funding received and revisit to adjust for only those line items that are critical for games delivery, the budget is now well under R20, 000,000.
04 June 2021 - NW1291
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)With reference to the aircraft of the SA Civil Aviation Authority that crashed near George on 23 January 2020, (a) what (i) are the details of the aircraft that must replace the crashed aircraft, (ii) amount has been budgeted for the replacement and (iii) are the details of the specifications for the replacement aircraft and (b) on what date will the replacement aircraft be put into operation; (2) what are the details of any entity that is currently carrying out the legally required calibrations of airfield approach aids at airfields and/or airports around the Republic?
Reply:
(1) (a) (i) – The details of the Aircraft that must replace the crashed aircraft are as per the tender specifications advertised on public platforms including the SACAA website on 20 November 2020. These specifications are public knowledge and can be accessed on www.caa.co.za
(a) (ii) – The amount budgeted for the replacement of the Aircraft as well as the Calibration equipment is R164 million.
(a) (iii) – The details of the specifications for the replacement aircraft are as per the tender – copy of tender specifications are attached herewith.
(b) Due to the outbreak of COVID-19 and the impact that this has had on SACAA’s financial position, the SACAA management supported by the Board took a decision to place the acquisition of the aircraft on hold for another year until the financial position of the SACAA improves.
(2) The current service provider performing the calibration work is Tamifield (Pty) Ltd. The successful service provider was disclosed as required and published on the SACAA website.
04 June 2021 - NW1458
Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy
Whether any gas-to-power projects have (a) applied for and (b) been granted generating licences by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa in the past five years; if not, why not; if so, in each case, what (i) is the name of each applicant, (ii) are the relevant details with regard to (aa) output capacity, (bb) location of the project and (cc) any other licencing requirements such as environmental approval and (c) is the current status of the project in terms of (i) financial closure, (ii) expected date of completion, (iii) offtake agreements and/or (iv) power purchase agreements?
Reply:
a) No gas to power projects were applied for in the past five years
b) No.
(i) See (a) above
(ii) See (a) above
(aa) See (a) above
(bb) See (a) above
(cc) See (a) above
c) See (a) above
(i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
(iii) Not applicable
(iv) Not applicable
04 June 2021 - NW1490
Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Whether his department has concluded any work exchange and/or employment agreements with any entity of the Republic of Cuba from the 2010-11 financial year up to the 2020-21 financial year; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (a) total number of Cuban nationals (i) have been employed in each of the specified financial years and/or (ii) are due to be employed in the 2021-23 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework period, (b) are the details of the work that each of the specified Cuban nationals was and/or will be employed to perform, (c) are the details of the specific skills sets that each of the specified Cuban nationals possessed and/or will possess that South African nationals did or will not possess and (d) are the details of the total cost of employing each of the specified Cuban nationals in each case; (2) whether his department took any steps to ensure that the specific skills set of the specified Cuban nationals were and/or will not be available in the Republic amongst South African citizens; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of the (a) steps taken and (b) outcomes of the steps taken in this regard?
Reply:
1. The Department of Transport has never concluded any work exchange and/or employment agreements with any entity of the Republic of Cuba from the 2010/11 financial year to 2020/21 financial year.
The Department has no intention/need to enter into agreement with Cuban Government for skills acquisition of any kind during the 2021-23 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework period.
2. There are no skills sets identified by the Department of Transport that can be sourced from Republic of Cuba which are not available in South Africa hence there were no steps taken in this regard.
04 June 2021 - NW1358
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Communications
Whether, with regard to the preparations of the SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) for the coverage of the upcoming 2021 local government elections, and with reference to the mandate and obligations of the SABC as the national public broadcaster to educate and inform the public, the SABC will be broadcasting any practical and specific public education content related to municipal governance, especially with reference to sections 151 to 164 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, as well as its Schedules 4 and 5; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
I have been advised by the SABC as follows:
Yes, public education has historically formed part of the SABC’s standard elections coverage mandate and will continue to do so during this current election cycle. The SABC News will drive this process from an editorial perspective as has always been the case post democracy with covering and contextualizing the elections, Constitution and functioning of municipalities.
MS. STELLA NDABENI-ABRAHAMS, MP
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
04 June 2021 - NW1249
Cebekhulu, Inkosi RN to ask the Minister of Health
(1)Given the reality brought to us by the COVID-19 pandemic about the importance of investing in scientific research capacity for pharmaceutical production, what strategies has the Government adopted to boost local research capacity in pharmaceuticals; (2) whether the Government intends to intervene in the pharmaceutical sector to ensure self-reliance in pharmaceuticals; if not, why not; if so, what (a) are the relevant details of the strategy and (b) is the projected timeline?
Reply:
1. The SAMRC has a variety of grant programs (both internal and through strategic partnerships) that are supporting drug discovery research and development in key health priority areas. These projects are leading to novel drug targets and candidate molecules and include plant-based medicines as well as biologicals such as vaccines and monoclonal antibodies.
The Technology Innovation Agency, with funding from the Department of Science and Innovation has established an API Cluster aimed at increasing the capacity of the country to develop the processes and manufacturing capability for the manufacture of active pharmaceutical ingredients. This cluster links innovators at the universities and science councils with industry, including development partners and pilot production facilities. This provides a mechanism to advance new drugs in development by local innovators towards testing and approval. One of the objectives is to synthesise molecules that may have efficacy against Covid to ensure continuity of supply. We are in discussions with international partners round this.
Government, through the Department of Science and Innovation, is a shareholder in The Biovac Institute, which has embarked on an ambitious journey to bring manufacture of vaccine APIs to the country. Biovac has been pursuing a backward integration strategy and has undertaken technology transfers with major pharmaceutical companies to establish the capacity for formulation, fill and finish of vaccines. It is raising funding to expand this capacity and to add a production suite for antigens/immunogens/biologicals. The same applies for Afrigen Biologics. Biovac and Afrigen are, further, developing its own vaccine candidates. Government has also been supporting the CSIR’s efforts to establish GMP manufacture of biologicals using plant production systems. The team are actively working on a concerted strategy to leverage off South Africa’s scientific investments to see if these can translate into products.
There are a number of pockets of excellence in drug discovery and vaccine development research in South Africa, situated predominantly at the universities and science councils. A key bottleneck, however, is the pilot scale manufacture of these under GMP conditions for clinical trials and later commercial manufacture at scale. This is where further investment is required to ensure that the full pharmaceutical and vaccine development value chain is in place in the country.
2. On 2 October 2020, India and South Africa proposed the TRIPS Waiver”, a proposal to suspend intellectual property protections for products and technologies needed for the fight against COVID-19, including vaccines, for the duration of the pandemic. This would involve a temporary suspension of certain rules set out in the Trips agreement, the intellectual property treaty of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The waiver proposal by India and South Africa presents an important opportunity for all governments to unite and stand up for public health, global solidarity, and equitable access through a concrete step at the international level that can provide an automatic and expedited solution to address IP and technology challenges collectively. The TRIPS Waiver proposal is now gaining support from major drug manufacturing countries.
The Department of Science and Innovation, and Trade, Industry and Competition are developing strategies for the local production of pharmaceuticals, especially the production of the active pharmaceutical ingredients.
Inter-Ministerial Committee on Covid-19 vaccines has a DPME lead Technical Working Group tasked with mobilizing local capacity to deliver the dosages required and building a long-term capability step by step using current capacity from upstream to downstream to prepare for the next pandemic. They are starting by looking at the vaccines already developed and approved and those in the pipeline to determine what they can do locally in ensuring dosages by using a fill/finish strategy and then move to how to build capabilities to enable future pandemic response.
The following are key milestones that have been achieved to date:
- Several partnerships established with current and under development Covid-19 vaccines developers (Biological E partnership; ImmunityBio; Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology of Cuba; Greenlight BioScience for technology transfer of mRNA technology; Kentucky Bio-Products; and J&J – already manufacturing locally through Aspen)
- South Africa have the following competitive advantages which can be used to build permanent State Infrastructure to enable future pandemic response
a) South Africa has experienced principal investigators who are employees of universities and Science Councils which is an advantage.
b) Bioanalytical laboratories e.g. North-West University/DSI – Preclinical Drug Development Platform facility has been developed for this purpose
c) Ethics related expertise including individuals for the data safety and management board
d) Existing capabilities locally: CAPRISA, SAMRC, AURUM, DESMOND TUTU, WITS HEALTH, AHRI, and others on the clinical research side
END.
04 June 2021 - NW1276
Ismail, Ms H to ask the Minister of Health
Whether he will furnish Ms H Ismail with the (a) full details of the person(s) and/or company that provide funding to the SA Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority and (b) breakdown of the total amounts provided by each funder?
Reply:
The (a) full details of the person(s) and/or companies that provide funding to the SA Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) and (b) breakdown of the total amounts provided by each funder are indicated in the table below:
Full details of the person(s) and/or company that provide funding to the SAHPRA |
Breakdown of the total amounts provided by each funder |
Clinton Health Access Initiative |
R 1 441 170 (Direct donation) |
Centers for Disease Control |
R 16 739 056 (Direct donation through NDOH) |
Public Health Enhancement Fund |
R 2 580 000 (Services in kind) |
Right to Care |
R 94 204 (Services in kind – Office accommodation) |
Bill and Mellinda Gates Foundation |
R 73 000 000 (Services in kind) |
National Treasury |
R60 000 000 (Conditional Grant) |
END.
04 June 2021 - NW1271
Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture
What (a) amount was spent on consultants in each entity reporting to him; and (b) plans does his department have in place to reduce its reliance on professional service providers?
Reply:
(a). The amount spent on consultants by each Entity reporting to my department are responded to on the attached spreadsheet for your further attention.
(b). The Department is encouraging public entities to utilise in-house available expertise for the services required. Where consultants are utilised, the Department encourages entities to use a cost effective means to source services in line with the National Treasury cost curtailment measures.
04 June 2021 - NW1376
Arries, Ms LH to ask the Minister of Social Development
What (a) is the current backlog of adoption services in the Republic and (b) impact does the delay in processing adoption applications have on the (i) children and (ii) prospective parents?
Reply:
a) Currently, the Department does not have backlog as we have cleared all outstanding adoption cases.
(i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
04 June 2021 - NW1423
Opperman, Ms G to ask the Minister of Social Development
What are the reasons that R666 million was not billed in the 2018-19 financial year, (b) who is not paying as her department is struggling to recover debts and only two material irregularities were found which amount to a loss of R1,9 million and (c) how far is the investigation regarding the lease agreement with the Department of Defence?
Reply:
I would like to inform the Honourable Member that neither the Department nor any of its entities has a lease agreement with the Department of Defence.
04 June 2021 - NW1441
Seitlholo, Mr IS to ask the Minister of Transport
Whether, with reference to the submissions made by his department in the meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Transport on 7 May 2021, where the Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA) and Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC) delivered their 2020-2021 Annual Performance Plans, his department is currently forging ahead with the process to amalgamate RTIA, RTMC and the Driving Licence Card Account; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) how far is the amalgamation process and (b) what are the full relevant details regarding the amalgamation process?
Reply:
The process of legislative mandate review of RTMC and RTIA, has started and National Treasury has been engaged on the issue of the DLCA and we are awaiting their response on the migration of their functions to the RTMC.
This is work in Progress, particularly the Legislative mandates pertaining to RTMC and RTIA , and this will need Parliamentary process to give ratification on the proposed amalgamation.
04 June 2021 - NW1333
Krumbock, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition
(1)(a) What are the names of all the approved service providers, including those responsible for events, catering, and marketing, for the National Lottery Board and (b) on what date was each service provider appointed. (2)what (a) payments were made to each service provider in the (i) 2016-17, (ii) 2017-18, (iii) 2018-19 and (iv) 2019-20 financial years and (b) services were rendered with regard to each payment?
Reply:
I have been furnished with a reply to the question submitted, by Ms Thabang Mampane, Commissioner of the National Lotteries Commission.
“(1)(a)(b) The panel for service providers relating to the promotion of public knowledge and awareness by, amongst others developing and implementing educational and informational measures to educate the public of the Lotteries about the lotteries and provisions pursuant to section 2(5)(a)(i) of the Lotteries Act - Operations: Brand Positioning, Grant Funding and Regulated matters. Catering for the organisation was procured in line with relevant PFMA, Treasury Regulations and National Treasury guidelines as follows:
OPERATIONAL COSTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 2(5) OF THE LOTTERIES ACT, NO 57 OF 1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016/17 Financial Year |
2017/18 Financial Year |
2018/19 Financial Year |
2019/20 Financial Year |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No panel appointed. |
|
|
(2) (a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) and (b)
OPERATIONAL COSTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 2(5) OF THE LOTTERIES ACT, NO 57 OF 1997 |
|
It is noteworthy to mention that the following suppliers provided education and awareness as it relates to Education and Awareness publication costs as per PQ466, and it is our understanding that the current PQ seeks to gather information relating to Education and Awareness workshop and conferencing costs.
- Anzomode
- Tau ya Phoka (Pty) Ltd
- Roadshow Marketing
- Chilo Group (Pty) Ltd
- Cheniwell
- Be-Sure Events Solutions (Pty) Ltd
- Blackmoon Advertising and Research (Pty) Ltd.”
-END-
04 June 2021 - NW1306
Cuthbert, Mr MJ to ask the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition
(1) On what date was the internal report into corruption in the National Lotteries Commission by Sekela Xabiso audit firm due to be completed; (2) (a) what are the reasons that the report has not yet been presented to the Portfolio Committee on Trade, Industry and Competition and (b) on what date will the report be presented to the specified committee; (3) what amount has been paid to the specified audit firm thus far; (4) whether he will furnish Mr M J Cuthbert with a detailed breakdown of the R36,5 million budgeted for the investigation in question; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (the dtic) did not appoint Sekela Xabiso to conduct an investigation. The company was appointed by the NLC and attached herewith is the response from the NLC regarding the matter. Below is the reply to the question, submitted by Ms Thabang Mampane, Commissioner of the National Lotteries Commission.
1. “The Board of the NLC initiated the investigation by offering members of the public an unrestricted platform to report any acts of wrongdoing, corruption or fraud through the appointed independent audit firm and to provide all evidence, notwithstanding those matters previously independently investigated and concluded. The investigation was expected to be concluded by end of May 2020; however, the due date fell within the period of the Level 5 hard lockdown. Thus due to COVID-19 restrictions, the inability to travel to conduct site visits and/or verification of infrastructure projects, the voluminous matters to be investigated and many other factors that led to a delay in the work of the audit firm gaining momentum the initial conclusion date was not met as anticipated.
2. The investigation process is underway and final outcomes of the investigation pending. The Board will make available the final outcomes of the investigation upon conclusion and adoption by the Board, as previously undertaken to the Portfolio Committee.
3. The total cost of the investigation to date is R9,657,867.10.
4. In responding to the question, extract of NLC’s response provided on PQ 695 bears reference.
Extract of PQ 695
The National Lotteries Commission is required to fulfil its mandate and ensure that the Commission performs its functions efficiently and effectively in compliance with the Lotteries Act and any other applicable law. The budget spend over the past three financial years to ensure that the NLC provides guidance and support to the Board whilst applying the principles of openness and transparency to advise the Minister on the efficacy of legislation pertaining to lotteries and ancillary matters, exercise its power to institute legal proceedings in order to properly discharge its functions and responsibilities and approach any court for any order the board deems appropriate for effective regulation and enforcement of the Lotteries Act is detailed below. The rapid increase of the Legal and Investigations budget over the past three years is attributed to independent investigations as a result of increased media exposure and enforcement of the Third National Lotteries Licence, pursuant to ensuring that the National Lottery and Sport Pools are conducted with all due propriety and strictly in accordance with the Constitution, the Act, all other applicable law.
The total budget allocated for Legal & Investigations Division was R36 500 000.00, being 2% of its National Lotteries Commission’s total expenditure including Grant Allocations.”
-END-
04 June 2021 - NW1243
Ngcobo, Mr S to ask the Minister of Employment and Labour
(a) What financial strategies has his department adopted to sustain employment and support productivity between now and the end of the year and (b) how does he intend to ensure that companies do not shed employees once the Republic has emerged out of COVID-19?
Reply:
(a) The Department is working on a single source funding model for Productivity SA in line with the provisions of section 12 of the Employment Services, where funding will flow from the appropriation as well as the UIF in terms of section 5 (d) of the UI Amendment Act.
(b) The Department has made provision for (i) the Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (TERS) which is the outcome of the Presidential Jobs Summit Framework Agreement to assist companies facing economic distress (financial and operational difficulties) and contemplating retrenching workers. A Joint Adjudication Committee is established, and the CCMA, UIF and Productivity SA collaborate to assist the companies as provided for in the LRA and section 7 of the Employment Services Act.
Further interventions are through Productivity SA whereby the entity implement turn-around strategies and plans to restructure and improve the productivity and operational efficiency of companies facing distress to be sustainable, competitive and create conditions conducive for job retention and creation. Funds have been made available in this regard and for the 2020/21 financial year over R104m was allocated to Productivity SA.