Questions and Replies

Filter by year

27 November 2017 - NW2946

Profile picture: Wilson, Ms ER

Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Police

(1)(a) What number of persons were identified by the SA Police Services (SAPS) as having been victims of human trafficking (i) leaving the country and (ii) brought into the country in each province in each of the past five financial years, (b) what is the country of origin of each victim and (c) in which country was each victim rescued; (2) (a) whether the SAPS apprehended a suspect in each case and (b) what is the current status of each case?

Reply:

(1)(a)(i) The number of persons that were identified by the South African Police Service (SAPS), as having been victims of human trafficking and who were leaving the country, is as follows:

Province

2012/2013

2013/2014

2014/2015

2015/2016

2016/2017

Total

Eastern Cape

0

0

0

0

0

0

Free State

0

0

0

0

0

0

Gauteng

3

3

2

1

0

9

KwaZulu-Natal

0

0

0

0

0

0

Limpopo

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mpumalanga

0

1

0

0

0

1

North West

0

0

0

0

0

0

Northern Cape

0

0

0

0

0

0

Western Cape

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

3

4

2

1

0

10

(1)(a)(ii) The number of persons that were identified by the SAPS, as having been victims of human trafficking and who were brought into the country, is as follows:

Province

2012/2013

2013/2014

2014/2015

2015/2016

2016/2017

Total

Eastern Cape

0

0

0

0

0

0

Free State

0

0

0

0

1

1

Gauteng

0

0

0

12

12

24

KwaZulu-Natal

0

0

0

0

65

65

Limpopo

0

53

72

32

13

170

Mpumalanga

5

2

0

0

0

7

North West

0

0

0

4

64

68

Northern Cape

0

0

0

0

0

0

Western Cape

2

1

2

0

0

5

Total

7

56

74

48

155

340

(1)(b)(c) and (2)(a)(b) An annexure is attached and contains the following information:

(1)(b) The country of origin of each victim.

(1)(c) The country where the victims were rescued.

(2)(a) Suspects apprehended.

(2)(b) The current status of each case.

27 November 2017 - NW3260

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)With reference to the reported alienation of the MIG-21 fighter aircraft from the SA Air Force (SAAF) Museum at the Zwartkop Airforce Base, which the President of the Republic, Mr J G Zuma, allegedly gave as a present to the new Angolan President, what are the details of the (a) processes and procedures that need to be followed when the SAAF wants to dispose of an aircraft preserved by the SAAF Museum which is on the SAAF asset register and (b) public participation processes in this regard; (2) were any of the alienation and public participation processes followed; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the details from the processes that were followed; (3) (a) why was the aircraft allegedly given as a present to the new Angolan President, (b) what benefits will be received by the country and the SAAF Museum at the Zwartkop Airforce Base specifically, (c) what was the costs of (i) disposing and (ii) transporting the aircraft to Angola and (d)(i) how will the loss of this aircraft impact on the tourists and visitors to the SAAF Museum and (ii) how will this loss be made up in the future?

Reply:

1 and 2:

The Aircraft was not donated but returned back to the Angolans, this is evident in the history of the Aircraft.

All legal requirements were met since all necessary documentation including the necessary authority for the movement of Arms across the boarders was acquired from the Arms Control Board as regulated.

27 November 2017 - NW3689

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

According to the findings of the Auditor-General of South Africa for the 2015-16 financial year which were reported during the 2016-17 financial year, (a) why were goods and services with a transaction value of more than R500 000 procured through an unfair competitive bidding process in contravention of the National Treasury Regulation 16A.3.2(a) and (b) what consequence management was applied in this instance?

Reply:

Question 1a.

What were goods and services with a transaction value of more than R500 000 procured through an unfair competitive bidding process in contravention of the National Treasury Regulations 16A3.2 (a) and (b):

Response

The goods and services related to this audit finding is the Through Life Capability Management (TLCM) Implementation Project.

Question 1(b)

What consequence management was applied in this instance?

Although the decisions were taken by a project team and bidding committee level, the process advisors should have underscored the ambiguity of section 5 of the SCM Practice Note No 3 of 2003, to inform consultation with National Treasury prior to award. In this regard Director Matériel Governance, Risk and Compliance was held responsible for this irregular expenditure and was given a letter of admonishment because there was no display of malicious intent or intentional deviation from the process.

27 November 2017 - NW3213

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

Whether, with reference to his involvement and conduct on the N1 highway with members of the SA Police Service (details furnished) during the arrest of 10 men who were allegedly suspects in the killings that took place in the Marikana settlement in Phillipi, Cape Town, (a) (i) he has found that the deceased whose coffin was violated and searched during the operation was a suspect in the matter, (ii) it was proper for him to post photos of the arrested suspects on social media before they had appeared in court and (iii) he regrets the specified incident and the role he played therein and (b) he intends to make amends with those whose human and constitutional rights were violated; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(a)(i) The Minister of Police visited a scene on the N1 highway, at the Huguenot tunnel, where eight suspects were apprehended. He asked for their names and destination and urged them to cooperate with the South African Police Service’s (SAPS) investigation. The Minister did not attend any scene where a coffin was searched or present.

(a)(ii) Not applicable.

(a)(iii) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

27 November 2017 - NW3205

Profile picture: Groenewald, Dr PJ

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Police

(1)What progress has been made with case number CAS 440/5/17 at the Brixton Police Station; (2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

(1) A case of fraud is being investigated. The Investigating Officer made contact with the person who completed the 3M(a), Preamble to Statement and the 3M(b), A1 Statement, as attached in the case docket, which provide information on the complainant. This person promised to identify someone who will assist the Investigating Officer. To date, this information has not been brought forward.

The A1 statement was submitted by an advocate, who is currently in the United States of America (USA) and the statement was not made under oath. The Investigating Officer also visited the church, which is the object of the dispute, to conduct further investigation.

The Investigating Officer will again approach the abovementioned person, to assist him in the investigation of the case.

(2) No, a statement will not be made on the matter.

27 November 2017 - NW3688

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

According to the findings of the Auditor-General of South Africa for the 2015-16 financial year which were reported during the 2016-17 financial year, (a) why were certain contracts extended or modified without the approval of a properly delegated official as stipulated by National Treasury Instruction Note 32 and (b) what consequence management was applied in this instance?

Reply:

Question 1a.

Why were certain contracts extended or modified without the approval of a properly delegated official as stipulated by National treasury Instruction Note 32

Response

In terms of Paragraph 3.3 of the National Treasury Practice Note 5 of 2009/2010 for SITA procurements of goods and services the procurement officer obtained a letter from SITA giving the DOD permission to continue to procure on its own as one of the options. SITA response was deemed sufficient proof that SITA as an organ of the Minister of DPSA is officially delegated to approve such authority. Taking into account the aforementioned, an additional approval was not obtained from the Minister of DPSA nor any other official from DPSA.

Question 1b.

What consequence management was applied in this instance?

Based on the process that was followed and that SITA gave the DOD the option to procure using the DOD procurement process, no DOD member was held liable for the irregular expenditure.

27 November 2017 - NW2717

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)(a) What is her department’s budget for VIP flights in the 2017-18 financial year and (b) what amount did her department spend on VIP flights (i) in the (aa) 2015-16 and (bb) 2016-17 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017; (2) (a) what is the total number of VIP flights that her department undertook since 1 April 2017 and (b) what was the cost of each flight?

Reply:

Fin Year

Budget for VVIP Charter flights

Expenditure for VVIP Charter flights

2017/18

R 24 992 229.00

R 18 430 452.26

2016/17

R 26 880 267.00

R 61 078 365.26

     

2015/16

R 22 875 721.00

R 17 775 033.11

 

R 74 748 217.00

R 97 283 850.63

   

2. (a) what is the total number of VIP flights that her department undertook since 1 April 2017 and (b) what was the cost of each flight? NW 3024

REPLY

VVIP flights for 2017/18

   

Number of Charter flights

Cost per Charter flight

1

R 616 744.00

2

R 1 142 665.14

3

R 908 000.00

4

R 433 516.00

5

R 4 681 500.00

6

R 6 680 000.00

7

R 697 253.70

8

R 755 000.01

9

R 510 000.01

10

R 557 500.00

27 November 2017 - NW3257

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

Whether, with regard to the dilapidated situation of 35 Squadron at Ysterplaat, the 35 Squadron will be scaled down or closed down by 2020; if not, (a) what are the plans and timelines to replace the 80 year old C-47TP aircraft and (b) how will this impact on the ability and capacity of the reserve force squadron stationed at Ysterplaat and their services to the protection of our sovereignty, our ocean borders and our ocean economy; if so, (i) how will this impact on the 600 staff members and their families, (ii) how will this impact on the ability and obligation of the SA Air Force to do ocean patrols, sea search and rescue missions and (iii) how will this impact on the existing international treaties and obligations to patrol and protect southern sea islands?

Reply:

(a) internal discussions around the plans for the acquisition of a suitable maritime aircraft is currently taking place within the SANDF.

(b) The Reserve Force Squadron and 35 Squadron roles do differ.

(i) There are no plans to close down 35 Squadron as yet.

(ii& iii) The SAAF is an integral part of the SANDF Maritime Security from an Air Power point of view addressing the full spectrum of the SANDF mandate and obligations.

27 November 2017 - NW2928

Profile picture: Groenewald, Dr PJ

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)(a) What is the total number of weapons of each kind and caliber and (b) how much ammunition in the SA National Defence Force (i) during the period (aa) 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 and (bb) 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 and (ii) since 1 April 2017 have been (aa) stolen and (bb) lost; (2) whether any (a) prosecutions have been instituted in respect of the specified cases and (b) disciplinary steps have been taken; if not, why not; if so, (i) against how many persons steps were taken, (ii) for what violation and (iii) what were the steps in each case; (3) whether she will issue a statement on the matter?

Reply:

2928 (1) (a) (i) (aa) - 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 - Pistols

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

Z88

9mm

N/A

3

Star

9mm

1

N/A

2928 (1) (a) (i) (aa) - 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 - Revolvers

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

Gun Stone

.38 (private weapon)

N/A

1

2928 (1) (a) (i) (aa) - 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 - Rifles

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

R4

5.6mm

N/A

11

2928 (1) (a) (i) (bb) - 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 - Pistols

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

Uzzi

9mm

N/A

3

FN

40/70mm

N/A

2

CZ 88

9mm

1

N/A

Star

9mm

1

N/A

Z88

9mm

6

3

Pencil Flares

Pencil Flares

N/A

253

2928 (1) (a) (i) (bb) - 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 - Rifles

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

R4

5.65

5

N/A

2928 (1) (a) (ii) 1 April 2017 to 30 September 2017 - Pistols

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

Beretta PX4 Storm

9mm

1 (recovered

after negligent loss)

N/A

Glock

9mm

1

N/A

2928 (1) (a) (ii) 1 April 2017 to 30 September 2017 - Rifles

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

R4

5.65mm

N/A

8

R5

5.65mm

N/A

2

2928 (1) (b) (ii) (aa) - 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 - Ammunition

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

Armscor

40/70mm

N/A

16 rounds

Unknown

19mm

10 rounds

N/A

2928 (1) (b) (ii) - 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 - Ammunition

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

Unknown

5.65mm

N/A

13625 rounds

Exercise Hand grenade’s

Exercise Hand grenade’s

N/A

2 x grenade’s

LMG

7.62MM

N/A

1311 rounds

2928 (1) (b) (ii) - 1 April 2017 to 30 September 2017 - Ammunition

Manufacture

Calibre

Number Lost

Number Stolen

a

b

c

d

Unknown

5.65mm

N/A

59 rounds

Unknown

9mm

N/A

15

2928 (2) (a) (b) (i) (ii) (iii)

Prosecution (Not prosecuted why not)

2928 (2) (a)

Disciplinary Action

(No disciplinary action

why not)

2928 (2) (b)

Action taken against how many members

2928 (2) (b)

(i)

Crime

2928 (2)

(b)

(ii)

Steps Taken

2928 (2)

(b)

(iii)

a

b

c

d

e

Military Prosecution

(1x 9mm pistol) pending

for trial

N/A

1 x SANDF member

Theft of Fire-Arm

Trial Pending

Military Prosecution

(6x R 4 rifles) pending

for trial

N/A

4 x SANDF members

Theft of Fire-Arm

Trial Pending

Civilian Court prosecution

(2 x R 4 rifles) pending

for trial

N/A

2 x SANDF members

Theft of Fire-Arm

Trial Pending

Civilian Court prosecution (3 x Uzzi’s and 2 x FN) Found guilty and received a suspended sentence

N/A

2 x Civilians

Theft of Fire-Arm

Trail finalised

Military Prosecution

(1x 9mm pistol) pending

for trial

N/A

1 x

SANDF member

Negligent

Loss of

Fire-arm

Trial Pending

Referred for decision to

Military Prosecution for decision to prosecute (1 x 9mm)

N/A

1 x SANDF member

Theft of Fire-Arm

Decision from State Prosecutor pending

Referred for decision to

Military Prosecution for decision to prosecute (2 x R4)

N/A

2 x SANDF member

Theft of Fire-Arm

Decision from State Prosecutor pending

Case under investigation (1 x

Z88)

N/A

1 x SANDF member (suspect)

under investigation

Theft of Fire-Arm

Investigation

pending

Case under investigation (7 x

R4)

N/A

11 x SANDF members (suspects)

under investigation

Theft of Fire-Arm

Investigation

pending

Case under investigation (1311

x 7.62 rounds)

N/A

1 x SANDF members (suspect)

under investigation

Theft of Fire-Arm

Investigation

pending

Military Trial pending Case

under investigation (1

x Glock)

N/A

3 x SANDF members charged

under investigation

Theft of Fire-Arm

Trial

pending

Case referred to trial, case under investigation (1 x R5)

N/A

1 x member charged

Theft of Fire-Arm

Trial

pending

3. No

27 November 2017 - NW3536

Profile picture: De Freitas, Mr MS

De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)(a) On what date will his department and the entities that report to him review their work and relationship with a certain company (KPMG), (b) how will the specified reviews take place, (c) who will be responsible for the reviews in each case, (d) what time lines, time frames and milestones have been set in this regard, (e) how far back will the reviews go and (f) what are the terms of reference and scope in each case; (2) what steps will his department and the entities reporting to him take in each case where the reviews uncover any irregular activity or action?

Reply:

Department

(1)(a) The Department has not used the KPMG services in the recent part.

(b) Not applicable

(c)(d)(e)(f) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

(1)(a) ACSA confirms that it has conducted and completed a review of its relationship with KPMG in light of market developments

(b) Contracts awarded and scope of work for each were identified and reviewed.

(c) Business unit management (users) and Finance were responsible for the reviews.

(d) The reviews have been completed.

(f) Review focused on determining the nature of work contracted for - ACSA confirms that KPMG are on a non-statutory panel and that KPMG are not used to undertake assurance work.

2. No irregular activity or action identified.

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

(1)(a) KPMG is currently managing ATNS’s fraud hotline. Their role is limited to logging of calls only. The responsibility to investigate calls as logged is mandated to the ATNS Internal Audit department. ATNS reviews the relationship with its service providers annually or as and when contracts are due for renewal.

(b) N/A

(c) N/A

(d) N/A

(e) N/A

(2) N/A

Cross-Border Road Transport Agency

The Cross-Border Road Transport does not have any work relationship with KPMG. Therefore, (1) Not applicable;

(2) not applicable.

Road Accident Fund

(1) (a) The Road Accident Fund (RAF) finalised an internal review into the work of KPMG and did not identify any quality concerns, but the Board intends to meet with KPMG on 23 November 2017 to discuss the parties’ continued relationship in light of the reputational risk that exists for the RAF, questions (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) are not applicable since no further reviews are planned, at this time;

(2) the internal review and standard supply chain management contract review processes performed by the RAF did not uncover any irregular activity or action on the part of KPMG, but should any such irregular activity or action come to light in future the RAF’s actions will be informed by the nature of the particular irregular activity or action; the specific contractual agreements in place; and, the law as it pertains to the particular irregular activity or action.

Road Traffic Infringement Agency

(1) (a) The review is scheduled for 22 December 2017

(b) The review will be in the form of an assessment of the deliverables, validity and quality thereof, in relation to the specifications for managing the anti-Fraud and Corruption Hotline.

(c) Legal and Risk Management units in the Agency

(d) 3 months from start to completion

(e) With effect from December 2015 when they were appointed.

(f) Review the terms of the contract for manning the anti-Fraud and Corruption Hotline.

(2) Termination of the contract

Road Traffic Management Corporation

The RTMC has no continuous relationship with KPMG

South African National Roads Agency Limited

(1)&(2) SANRAL’s contractual relationship with KPMG ended on 31 October 2017. KPMG provided tax advisory services to SANRAL from 1 May 2015. The assignments were mostly driven by SARS queries on compliance issues for VAT purposes. The submissions were reviewed by SANRAL and SARS. No further reviews will be conducted.

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

The South African Civil Aviation Authority does not do any work with KPMG.

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)

1. (a) Prasa has no contract with KMPG

(b) Not applicable

(c) Not applicable

(d) Not applicable

(e) Not applicable

(f) Not applicable

Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)

1. (a) The RSR does not have any current contract or work performed for the past three years by KPMG

(b) Not applicable

(c) Not applicable

(d) Not applicable

(e) Not applicable

(f) Not applicable

2. Not applicable

Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)

  1. (a) The Ports Regulator currently does not have a business/contractual relationship with KPMG and has not transacted with KPMG in the past, therefore there’s no need to review any working relationship. (b) N/A, (c) N/A, (d) N/A, (e) N/A and (f) N/A.
  2. N/A

South Africa Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

(1) The South African Maritime Authority (SAMSA) does not have (nor has it had in the last five years) any business relationship with KPMG.

(2) Given the recent negative publicity around KMPG, it is highly unlikely that SAMSA will be engaging the services of KPMG, not unless all matters pertaining to the negative publicity have been clarified by National Treasury.

27 November 2017 - NW3091

Profile picture: Bara, Mr M R

Bara, Mr M R to ask the Minister of Police

(1) (a) How many SA Police Service (SAPS) members that formed part of the Cato Manor Serious and Violent Crime Unit were suspended as a result of alleged death squad operations that were carried out by the unit (details furnished) (b) of these how many (i) passed away whilst on suspension, (ii) retired whilst on suspension, (iii) are still on suspension and (iv) have had their suspension lifted and (c) in each case what are the relevant details including the (i) full names, (ii) rank and (iii) date of suspension; (2) (a) how many of the members are currently facing disciplinary action and (b) what are the status of these actions?

Reply:

(1)(a) There were 24 members, who formed part of the Cato Manor Serious and Violent Crime Unit.

(1)(b)(i) One member passed away whilst on suspension.

(1)(b)(ii)) Eight members retired whilst on suspension.

(1)(b)(iii) Fifteen members are still on suspension.

(1)(b)(iv) No members have had their suspensions lifted.

(1)(c)(i)(ii)(iii)

No

Rank

Initials and Surname

Date of suspension

Service Termination

 

Major General

JL Booysen

 

2017-02-28 (early retirement)

 

Lt Colonel

JM Olivier

2012-11-09

2017-01-31 (retirement)

 

Captain

SJ Smith

2012-11-09

 
 

Captain

A Lockem

2012-11-09

2016-05-31 (resigned)

 

Captain

N Crouse

2012-11-09

 
 

Lieutenant

M Panday

2012-11-09

 
 

Lieutenant

MW Thabethe

2012-11-09

2016-06-30 (resigned)

 

Warrant Officer

R Naidoo

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

B Zondi

2012-11-09

2015-12-31 (purchasing discharge)

 

Warrant Officer

TE Mdlalose

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

EA Nel

2012-11-09

2016-05-31 (purchasing discharge)

 

Warrant Officer

ME Nkabane

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

A Pillay

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

J Marten

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

CJ Smith

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

PW George

2012-11-09

2017-06-30 (early retirement)

 

Warrant Officer

P Makhanya

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

A Ghaness

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

G Padayachee

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

AFJ Staltz

2012-11-09

 
 

Warrant Officer

PJ Mostert

2012-11-09

2016-07-31 (early retirement)

 

Sergeant

RC Lee

2012-11-09

 
 

Sergeant

TM Mkhwanazi

2012-11-09

 
 

Captain

N Eva

2012-11-09

(deceased)

(2)(a) A total of 15 members, are currently facing disciplinary action.

 

(2)(b) The members are still on suspension.

27 November 2017 - NW2929

Profile picture: Groenewald, Dr PJ

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1) Whether her department gave permission for the removal of a MiG-21 jet fighter from the Air Force Museum and donating it to Angola; if so, (a) what is the reason for that, (b) whether all legal requirements were met and (c) whether the SA Heritage Resources Agency (i) was consulted regarding the donation and (ii) gave its consent; (2) whether she will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

(1) Yes the Department gave permission for the removal of a Mig-21 jet fighter from the Air Force Museum. The aircraft was not donated but returned back to its original owners since it belongs to the Angolans.

(a) The Aircraft was not donated but returned back to the Angolans, this is evident in the history of the Aircraft.

(b) Yes all legal requirements were met since all necessary documentation including necessary authority for the movement of Arms across the boarders was acquired from the Arms Control Board as regulated.

(c) There was no need to contact the SA Heritage Resource Agency for equipment that does not belong to the country since the aircraft belongs to the Angolans and was just returned back to its original owners.

BRIEF HISTORY OF THE AIRCRAFT

On 14 December 1989 a Mig-21 Bis Fishbed serial number C340 of the Angolan Air Force flown by Lieutenant Domingos José de Almeida Vinez took off from the airfield at Lubango on a routine ferry flight from Lubango to the airfield at Menogue. The aircraft climbed to altitude on a general heading of 90 degrees magnetic.

On a number of occasions, the aircraft entered clouds and upon regaining visual contact with the ground, the Pilot was no longer able to orientate himself as to his position. After a while he elected to divert to Cuito Cuanavale. Continuing on his present course, the aircraft began giving the pilot a low fuel warning at which time, he elected to attempt an emergency landing.

After preparing the aircraft for the forced landing, he selected an open field and executed a near perfect “normal” landing near Otjiwarongo in South West Africa (Namibia) and the aircraft sustained only minor damage. The Mig-21 bis was then taken by the South African government and is presently at the SAAF Museum.

The Apartheid South Africa cannot claim any historical war significance to this Air Craft for the following reason: (1) The Air Craft was not captured during the border War between South Africa and Angola, as this was during the UN resolution 435 of Namibia which was adopted on 01 April 1989, with called for the withdrawal of South African forces from Namibia, the cease fire agreement and the establishment of the UN supervised elections, i.e. United Nations Transitional Assistance Group (UNTAG).

27 November 2017 - NW3566

Profile picture: Kalyan, Ms SV

Kalyan, Ms SV to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(a) What is the total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her for more than (aa) 30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days and (b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?

Reply:

DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY VETERANS

DMV strives to pay suppliers within 30 days. There was no recorded outstanding payment to SMMEs as at 31 October 2017. However, for well established companies, there is still a challenge with processing some of the invoices due to the following challenges at DMV:

  • DMV is not yet using LOGIS (Logical Information System)
  • Lack of a computerized system leads to lack of proper tracking system
  • For travel related invoices, approvers are often out office leading to delays in the approval of invoices for payment (linked to manual approval processes).
  • Lack of capacity to manage the volume of invoices related to Travel

As per the tablelink  below (DMV UNPAID INVOICES AS AT 31 OCTOBER 2017), challenging accounts are Vodacom, Travel with Flair and SITA. The challenge is historical backlog, however, the Department is working hard to resolve these.

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW3566DMV_UNPAID.pdf

Furthermore, as at 30 September 2017, DMV account with other Government Departments had an outstanding balance of R60.5m mainly related provisioning of healthcare Support by SAHMS (R50.5m) as well as the provisioning of Housing by Human Settlement (R10m). see link below

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW3566DMV_ACCOUNT.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE

1. The response for the Department of Defence is as follow:

 (i) The number of verified and legitimate invoices that are currently (Report date: 8 Nov 2017) in possession and that remain unpaid within the Department of Defence are:

Ser

Category

Nr of Invoices

Rand Value

(aa)

More than 30 Days

30

R1,344,559

(bb)

60 Days

0

R0

(cc)

90 Days

5

R14,683

(dd)

120 Days

11

R17,531

 

TOTAL NR OF INVOICES

46

R1,376,773

The main reasons for these invoices not paid relates to the invoices being received late and then the processes to verify the correctness forces the invoices into the category of more than 30 days. Invoices in the categories of 90 to 120 days mostly relates to invoices where the verification process to confirm legitimacy takes longer due to disputes and geographical location of some units. It remains critical that all controls are continuously exercised to ensure that only verified legitimate invoices are paid.

MILITARY OMBUD

The Office of the Military Ombud has one (1) invoice under Item 20, Serial Number 20018925 (Food & Drinks: Office and Meetings) valued at R15,667.80 that has not been paid for more than sixty (60) days.

27 November 2017 - NW3388

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

What is the current status of the laboratory and radiological departments at 1 Military Hospital?

Reply:

Both the laboratory and radiological departments at 1 Military Hospital are operational. The optimal functioning of the departments are, however, compromised by redundant technology and equipment as a result of the SAMHS financial constraints.

27 November 2017 - NW2930

Profile picture: Groenewald, Dr PJ

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Dr P J Groenewald (FF Plus) ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1) With reference to her reply to question 2365 on 28 September 2017, (a) at what bases did each incident of theft and burglary take place and (b) what items were stolen at each specified base in each case; (2) whether she will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

 

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE & MILITARY VETERANS

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

QUESTION FOR WRITTEN REPLY

2930. Dr P J Groenewald (FF Plus) ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans:

(1) With reference to her reply to question 2365 on 28 September 2017, (a) at what bases did each incident of theft and burglary take place and (b) what items were stolen at each specified base in each case;

(2) whether she will make a statement on the matter? NW3247E

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - January 2016 (15 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

SAS Saldanha

Water Pump

1

NB Simon’s Town

Water Pump

1

Naval Mess Pta

TV

2

DOD HQ

2 x Memory Stick,

Laptop

2

AFB Waterkloof

4 x computers,

Laptops

1

AFB Waterkloof(1 ASU)

Liquor

1

SAMHS HQ

Batteries and Tyres

1

AFB Makhado

Underground Water Pump

1

7 SAI Bn

Rations

1

4 SAI Bn

Rations

1

Regt De La Rey

Truck Batteries

2

AFB Bloemspruit

Rations,

Computer

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - February 2016 (7 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Simonsberg

38. Revolver Gun

1

NB Simon’s Town TPT

Fuel

1

Langebaanweg Mil Base

Contract workers stealing State Property

1

SAS Saldanha

Laptop

1

Shamrock Mess

Rations

1

ASB Kimberley

Diesel

1

ASB Polokwane

Fuel

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - March 2016 (21 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

AFB Swartkop

Cell phone

2

MDW 142 SQN

Cables,

Cables

1

Medical Depot Karee Base

Compressor

1

4 SAI Bn

24 x corrugated irons

3

Mil Base Potchefstroom

Light Poles and Cables, Fuel of SAMIL, Fuel

1

2 SAI Bn

Fuel

1

EMR HQ

Tool Box

2

ASB Kimberley FASC

2 x Cashier short of cash

1

8 SAI

Cash

1

ASB Durban

Rations

1

Mil Base Wynberg

Tool Box

1

NB Simon’s Town Upperdido T/Park

Multimeter

1

SAS Saldanha

Copper Wire

1

AFB Langebaanweg

Camera,

Micro wave

1

Mil Equestrian Club House Langebaanweg

Copper pipes

1

SA War College

Laptop

1

Infantry School

Bicycle

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - April 2016 (13 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Mil Base Wynberg

Notes of evaluation

1

NB Simon’s Town West Yard

Petrol

1

NB Simon’s Town Lower North Battery Centre

Tools

1

ASB BFN De Brug Magazine

Mil vehicle radio

2

NB Durban

Copper Pipes,

7 x Tastic rice

1

NB Durban Jnr NCO Dining Hall

Rations

1

6 SAI Bn

Rations

1

J Tac HQ North West

Rations

2

DHQ

Cartridges,

Computers

1

SAMHS Depot

Ammunition

1

NB Simon’s Town Warfare School

Monitor Screen

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - May 2016 (14 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

AFB Snake Valley

Petrol

1

DHQ

3 x Laptops

1

AFB Waterkloof

Computer

1

NB Simon’s Town Mrs Building

2 x Batteries and power cables

1

SAS Saldanha TPT

Laptop

1

3 Mil Hospital Mess

Rations

1

1 Parachute Bn

Camo Uniform and 2 x Hand Grenades

2

School of Armour Tempe

7 x 12 Volts Batteries

2 x 12 volts Batteries

1

Pongola OPSl Base

Rations

1

5 SAI Bn

2 x Radios

2

ASB Potchefstroom

Lawnmowers,

Solar Batteries

1

4 Art Regt LWT,

48 x Samil and Ratels Batteries

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - June 2016 (16 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

2 Mil Hospital

CPAP Machine

1

44 Para Regt

Z88 Pistol

1

JHB Military Police

2 x State Laptops

1

ASB Kimberley FASC

Money

1

DHQ

Cartridges

1

AFB Swartkop

2 x Km Data Cables

1

ASB KZN Combined Mess

Rations

1

AFB Waterkloof Ladies Mess

Rations

1

NSD Wingfield Main Store

200 x Copper Bolts

1

5 SAI Bn

1 x Box of R4 rounds

1

6 SAI Bn

Rations

1

AFB Waterkoof SWKP

Copper Cables

1

SA Infantry School

Laptop

1

AFB Overberg

Empty R5 and 9mm Cartridges (5 x 20Lt buckets

1

8 Med Bn

Chigo Air Condition Parts

1

NB Durban Combined Club Bar

Money box with R15 312.00

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - July 2016 (16 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Mil Police School

2 x Firearm Pistols

1

Army College

Computer equipment

1

JSB Garrison TT

12 x State Toners

1

68 Air School Combined Mess

Rations

1

Swartwater Ops Base

Diesel

1

ASB JHB

Rations

1

93 AMMU Camp

Electrical items

1

3 SAI Bn

Cables

1

ASB Bloemfontein

Alcohol

1

AFB Durban 15 SQN

Wight bags

1

5 SAI BN

Rations

1

ASB Port Elizabeth

Laptop

1

6 SAI BN

Rations

1

NB Simons Town

Cash

2

SAS Saldanha

Water Pump, Equipment

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - August 2016 (9 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

44 Para Bn

Tools

1

SAHMS AMHU BFN 93 AMMU Depot Kimberley

Trauma Kit

2

93 AMMU Depot Kimberley

Fencing Wire,

Vehicle batteries

1

SA Army CTC

Diesel

1

ASB Polokwane

Fuel

1

SAAF HQ

Laptop

1

5 SAI Bn

Circuit Breaker

1

6 SAI Bn

R4 Rifle

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - September 2016 (11 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

68 Air School

Starter Generator for Air Craft

3

AFB Waterkloof

Rations,

Parts of Tractor

2

SAS Saldanha

Club Files, Rations

1

Signal Unit Tempe

3 x Laptops

1

44 Para Regt

Rations

1

AFS Port Elizabeth

Pad Lights

1

C-Club Tempe

Rations

1

Camden Ermelo

3 x R4 Rifles

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - October 2016 (8 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

SAMHS Trg

Typek Boxes

1

Fontana Mil Base

Poles

1

MDW 501 Sqd

Tools

1

AFB Waterkloof

Copper cables

1

ASB BFN

Water Taps

1

1 Para Bn

1 x Samsung TV

1

Infantry School

Batteries

1

4 Arty Regt

Plastic Water Reservoir , 2 x Bonet5 Shox

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - November 2016 (23 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

DOD Log School

Tablet

1

4 Special Forces Regt

2 GB Ram

1

ASB Tempe C-Club

Rations

1

ASB Potchefstroom

Copper Pipes

1

5 Special Forces Regt

Ammunition

1

DHQ

17 x Cartridges

1

Mobile Deployment Wing Transito

Laptop

1

Swartkop West Museum

Tools, DB Box

1

ASB JHB Technical Store

2 x Batteries

1

NB Simon’s Town Middle North Battery Canon

Rations

1

AFB Wynberg Disposal Section

4 x Dixon Power Aircraft batteries

2

De Brug Training Area Shooting Range

4 x Bogey Tank wheels,

R4 Rifle cartridges

1

1 Tank Regt

R4 Rifle Cartridge

1

Defence Prov Office EC

1 x GPS

1

PAG Combat Centre Eastern Cape

Battery

1

AFS Port Elizabeth

Tools

1

10 AA Regt

Rations

1

General Piet Joubert Shooting Range

Corrugated Iron sheets, Y-Skudards Feru pools

1

MDW

Electrical cables

1

Gen De Wet Shooting range

Empty R4 Rifle Cartridge

1

1 SAI Bn

Empty Cartridge

1

35 Wakey St Orangesig BFN

Possession of empty LMG Cartridge

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - December 2016 (18 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

AFB Ysterplaat 2 ASU Lecture Room

Computer, keyboard

2

9 SAI Bn

Rations

1

North West Signal Unit Store

Gardening Tools

1

ASB Kimberley

Rations

4

ASB Tempe

R4 empty cartridges, Computer

1

J TAC HQ Eastern Cape

Hardrive

2

14 SAI Bn

Rations

1

SA Army College

Army tent

2

AFB Waterkloof

Computer Screen, Computer Set

1

AFB Waterkloof ECC Office

Computer

1

AFB Waterkloof Ladies Mess

Rations

1

AFB Waterkloof 5 ASU

Laptop

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - January 2017 (15 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

ASB Potchefstroom 17 Maintenance Unit

Computer

1

ASB Potchefstroom

2 x 25L Diesel

1

Mil Police Bloemfontein

Canvas

2

Tempe Mil Base Gate

Rations

1

NB Simon’s Town Silvermine

Communication Cables, Antennas

1

Tempe Mil Base CHA Centre

Computer Equipment

1

80 NB Durban

Microwave

1

AFB Swartkop 17 SQN

TV

1

AFB Waterkloof NCO's Mess

Rations

1

TRG Command Casteel Park

6 x Computer Equipment

1

Thaba Tshwane Res Area

Cables, switches

1

JSB Garrison SSS

R4 Rifles, Calibers

1

JSB Wonderboom LWT

7 x Batteries

1

Army HQ

Laptop, Tablet

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - February 2017 (15 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Mil Base Wynberg

Rations

2

DOD MOB Centre

Electric Cables,

Weed eater

1

1 SSB Tempe

Inner part of computer

1

18 DSU SAAF Durban

34 x Matrasses

2

6 SAI Bn

Rations

1

14 SAI Bn Troops Mess

Rations

1

ASB Potchefstroom

Battery Cables

1

ASB JHB TPT Hanger

6 x Truck batteries

1

DOD Log Support Formation

S&T Money

1

AFB Waterkloof NCO's Mess Lounge

TV, Towels

1

7 Maintenance Unit

Hardive

1

NSD Wingfield

Copper

1

SAS Saldanha

100m Silver Diamond Wire, 10 x poles

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - March 2017 (18 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

2

ASB Potchefstroom

Geyser Cable, 100m Cable

1

SA Army CTC Fuel Balk Point

Fuel

1

Ladybrand OPS Base

Rations

1

ASB Port Elizabeth

Rations

1

Wingfield,

Rations

1

Castle of Good Hope

Flood Lights

1

7 Maintenance Unit

Laptop

2

AFB Hoedspruit

Fuel

1

7 SAI Bn

Cell phone

1

43 Brigade Stores

Batteries

1

21 SQN AFB Waterkloof

Computer Equipment

1

AFB Swartkop

Power Cables

1

501 SQN MDW

TV

1

Zonstraal OPSl Base

Dosing Unit Machine

1

J TAC North West

Goodwill Bags

1

7 SAI Bn

12 x Volts Batteries Sedan

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - April 2017 (8 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Defence Inspector Division, Wynberg

3m Copper cables

1

AFB Bredasdorp

Drain unblock aged

1

AFS Durban

Rations

1

Gopane OPS Base

Hand radio

1

Potchefstroom MP Office

Firearm

1

SAMHS HQ

Uniform voucher

1

AFB Hoedspruit

Speakers of Mil vehicle

1

A-Mess

Doors, Copper Pipes, Tools

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - May 2017 (16 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

8 Med Bn

8 x Batteries

1

AFB Hoedspruit

Laptop

1

3 Parachute Bn

2 x SAMIL Batteries

1

ASB Tempe SSSC

Diesel

1

1 SAI Bn

Accommodation Money

1

ASB Kroonstad

Rations

1

ASB Polokwane Res Areas

Copper Wire

1

DOD HQ

20 x Cartridges

2

4 SAI BN

1 x Truck Battery, 2 x 24 Volt Truck Batteries

1

ASB Tempe C-Club Mess

Rations

1

4 SFR Regt Langebaan

Painting

1

SAS Saldanha

Cables

1

NB Simon’s Town

Fuel

1

SAS Umzimkulu SHED

2 x Bellows Part of engine

1

NB Simon’s Town Simonsberg Diving School

Twin Gas Cylinders

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - June 2017 (12 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

J OPS HQ

8 x 20 L Diesel

1

Fontana Mil Base Murray Hill

Batteries

2

DHQ

Computer Set, Laptop

1

121 SAI Bn

Fuel

1

44 Para Regt

4 x Samil Batteries

1

Army HQ

Computer Set

2

AFB Hoedspruit

Money R1300.00 must pay back at member,

Chainsaw

1

AFB Ysterplaat

Projector

1

NB Simon’s Town Hugo Bierman Gallery

Rations

1

NB Simon’s Town SANAD Redhill

Pistol

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Theft of State Property - July 2017 (19 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

9 SAI Bn

Diesel

1

ASB Western Cape

Rations

1

NB Simons town Guard Post Antenna Farm

Rifles

1

ASB Tempe Combined Mess

Rations

1

44 Para Regt

Welding Machine

2

DBN Naval Base

Microwave, Water Pump

1

ASB Durban Bluff

Mil vehicle Speakers

1

Log Div HQ

Laptop

1

Mil Sport Club TT

Electric Ballistic Boxes

1

Gerbera Officers Mess

S/Cell phone

2

Mobile deployment Wing

Laptop,

Tools

3

DHQ

Computer Equipment, Laptop, Laptops

1

AFB Swartkop West

Copper Wire

1

Tempe Golf Club Store

Batteries

1

1 SAI Bn

Oil Heater

BREAK-INS

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - January 2016 (8 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

SAFI Wynberg Base

Liquor

1

ASB Wynberg

Air Ventilation

1

SAS Saldanha

Water Pipes

2

Mil Base Wynberg

Tyres ,

Computers and Electronic equipment

1

NB Simon’s Town

Toaster

1

SANDF Bowling Club

Lawnmower

1

Waterkloof MDW SQN

Cables

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - February 2016 (9 Cases)

2365 (1) (a) (aa) Number of Cases

2365 (1) (a) (bb) Military Base

2365 (2) What was stolen

1

AFB Ysterplaat

Inspection Panel

2

Mil Base Wynberg

Power Machines,

Tools

1

ASB Western Cape

Recycled Battery

2

SAS Saldanha

Generator Battery,

10 x Boxes of Safety Boots

1

ASB Potchefstroom

Electric Appliance

2

SAHMS College

Projector,

10 x Laptops

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - March 2016 (10 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

SAHMS Castle Park

Laptops

1

DOD MOB Centre

Laptop

1

SA Army Band

Musical instruments

1

Protection Force HQ

Opened office door nothing stolen

1

Mil Base Wynberg Workshop

Tools

1

Mil Base Wynberg

Compressor

1

NB Simon’s Town

Computer Monitor

2

SAS Saldanha

Speakers,

Tools

1

SAAF College

Tupperware and clothes

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - April 2016 (5 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Mil Base Wynberg

Crockery

1

ASB Potchefstroom Store

Tools

1

ASB JHB Mess

Rations

1

Mil School of Justice TT

Computers

1

ASB Nelspruit

Tyres

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - May 2016 (3 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

SAMHS Training Formation

Laptop

1

Air Force College

Door broken items stolen

1

West Coast Equestrian Centre

10 x jumping poles

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - June 2016 (14 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

3

SAS Saldanha Sewerage Farm Mil Area

Microwave, Copper Pipes, Taps, Pluming,

Kettle

1

AFB Durban Workshop

2 x Batteries

2

TT Sport Complex

4 x Batteries of lawnmowers, Cables, Welding Machine, Spades and Forks

1

AFB Waterkloof Asset Management Office

7 x PC, 1 x Projector, 1 x Dicta Phone, 1 x IBM Pad, Flat Screen and ADSL Router

1

SAS Saldanha Officer Mess VIP Rooms

32 JVC Flat Screen

1

SAS Saldanha Officer Mess Bar

Alcohol

1

ASB Potchefstroom Signal Unit

Edge Cutter and Garden Shears

1

SAS Saldanha MTR 3 School

CD Player

1

SAS Saldanha Bowls Club Storage

Lawnmower, chairs, Tables, Wheelbarrow, ElectricCables

1

ASB Potchefstroom

Tools

1

Log Formation

Alcohol, HI-FI System

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - July 2016 (6 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

2

Thaba Tswane Sports Club

Tools,

Battery

1

AFB Swartkop Mess Bar

Cash, Liquor

1

ASB Potchefstroom Signal Unit

1 x wooden door

1

NB Simon’s Town Boat Shed West Yard

Yamaha Engine

1

NB Simons town Klaawer Shooting range

Equipment for Shooting Range

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - August 2016 (9 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

ASB Western Cape Youngsfield TMSC Section

2 x Batteries

1

Mil Academy at SAFI

Liquor

1

SAS Saldanha MTR 1 TRG HQ

House breaking nothing stolen

1

SAS Saldanha Clothing Stores

Computer, Rakes, Toilet Paper

1

SAS Saldanha TPT Depot

Batteries, Toolbox

1

SAMHS Depot

House breaking nothing stolen

1

NW Signal Unit

3 x Batteries, 2 x Sets of Computers, Car Radios

1

SAMHS HQ Corporate Communication Store Room

Computers

1

AFB Hoedspruit WO Mess

252 x pencil flare cartridges

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - September 2016 (6 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

DOD Archive Store

Computer

1

ASB Western Cape TMSC Hanger

Prop Shafts

1

NB Simons town SAFI Shop

Drill, Jigsaw, Staple Gun

2

SAS Saldanha

Sound system,

Electric cables Fan White Zink

1

44 Para Regt

1 x TV

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - October 2016 (6 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

2

Works Training School

2 x TV, 2 x DSTV Decoder, Remotes

1

Infantry Formation

Items Deq CAS 03/10/16

1

SAMHS TSU

Batteries

1

ASB Garrison

Electrical Socket

1

1 Mil Hospital

Cash, TV, Sound System

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - November 2016 (12 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

AFB Ysterplaat

Copper Wires

1

NB Simon’s Town Naval Band HQ

Cleaning Material

1

SAS Saldanha Cinema Hall

Amplifier, Steel shelves, Wooden tables

1

Mil Academy

Cutlery

1

DOD Archive Unit

Computers, Copper Cables

1

ASB Durban

4 x Truck Batteries

1

Herberg Crèche Eagle Class Thaba Tshwane

Camouflage trousers

1

Swartkop West

Computers

1

ASB Eastern Cape Store

2 x Cylinders

1

Army Support Base

Generator, Gas bottle, Bicycle

1

SAS Saldanha Mil Police Store

Bicycles

1

Legsato Thaba Tshwane

DOD Computer Set, Laptop

2365 (1) (b) Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - December 2016 (5 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

9 SAI Bn Army Barber Shop

Hair cutting machine

1

AFB Bloemspruit Sickbay

Computer CPU, keyboard

2

Die Herberg Crèche Thaba Tshwane

Music System, CD Player

1

TT Sport Club

Computer

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - January 2017 (11 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

S MPR HQ Store

Copper

1

S MPR HQ

Aluminium Steel Pipes

3

North West Signal Unit Store

Generators, Garden Tools

1

ASB Potchefstroom NCO Bar Mess

TV Plasma

1

93 Ammo Depot

Pipes, Toilet seats

1

AFB Bloemspruit Mess

Rations

1

14 SAI Bn Hospitality

Rations

1

Die Herberg Crèche

20m Extension Lead

1

43 Artillery Regt Thaba Tshwane

Laptop

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - February 2017 (9 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Mil Base Wynberg Hospitality Office

Mercer Flat screen

1

Regional Office Western Cape Wynberg

Petrol Trimmer, Blower, Vacuum

1

Mil Base Wynberg Aquatic Centre

Grinder, Cutter 2 x Extensions

1

Mil Base Wynberg Ration Store

Rations

1

NB Simon’s Town OBD Building Duty Room

Computer Equipment

1

ASB JHB Disposal Store

Shoes

1

Mil Base Wynberg AMHU Ration Store

Rations

1

ASB Potchefstroom SAAIC Motorcycle Training Office

Bar Fridge, Cell phone Charger, CD Player

1

ASB JHB Welding Hanger LWT

Grinding machine, Welding Machine

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - March 2017 (5 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

1 TIR Regt

4 x Computer Equipment

1

2 Mil Hospital X-Ray Dept

Basins, Pipes

1

ASB Wynberg WO/NCO Mess Mshengu Village

Freezer door damaged nothing was stolen

1

Personnel School Bar Thaba Tshwane

Cash, TV

1

Irene DOD Archive

Computers

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - April 2017 (7 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Defence Inspector Division Wynberg

Laptop, Fire Extinguisher

1

Media Centre SAS Wingfield

Computer equipment, Microwave

1

AMHU Ration Store Mil Base Wynberg

Rations

1

AFB Durban Gally Salisbury Island

Rations

1

Lohatla Mil Police

Exhibits Cash R3 000.00

1

SAMHS School

51 x Laptops

1

JSB Wonderboom Finance Office

Try to open the safe but failed

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - May 2017 (4 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

JSB Wonderboom WO Officers Club Bar

Alcohol, Cigarettes, Sweets

1

Mil Base Wynberg Colenzo WO's and NCO's Bar

Alcohol

1

Mil Base Wynberg Mshengu Village Bar

Nothing was stolen

1

ASB Wynberg

Copper Wires

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - June 2017 (9 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

1 RNT Unit Pta

2 x Weed eaters, Lawnmowers

1

Thaba Tshwane Mil Police

Plasma TV, Cigarettes, Liquor

1

10 AD EP Flying Store

18 x Leatherman Multitool Knives,70 x Victoria Knox Knives

1

SAHMS AMU Western Cape

Rations

1

ASB Wynberg PTSR Maintenance Store

1 x Cricket bag with equipment

1

AFB Swartkop

Garden Tools

1

AFB Swartkop Museum Hanger 06

Tools

1

School of Engineering

Rations

1

ASB Wynberg PTSR Maintenance Store

4 x 80L Petrol, Green Gazebo, 1 x Dixon Battery size 628

Parliamentary Question 2930 - Burglary Business Premises (Break-ins) - July 2017 (6 Cases)

2930

Number of Cases

2930(1) (a) Military Base

2930 (1) (b) What was stolen

1

Mil Base Wynberg Facility Section

Petrol Knives

1

ASB Kroonstad

Rations

1

Infantry Information

4 x Set of computers

1

SAAF College

Nothing stolen

1

Mildentia Thaba Tshwane

Chainsaw

1

Sandhurst Thaba Tshwane

Hammer, 2 x Grinders

2. No

27 November 2017 - NW2460

Profile picture: Moteka, Mr PG

Moteka, Mr PG to ask the Minister of Sport and Recreation

What amount of the department's budget in terms of (a) monetary value and (b) as a percentage of the department's budget is spent in (i) townships and (ii) in areas that used to be within the former Bantustans?

Reply:

The Department of Sport and Recreation South Africa spends its allocated budget against line items such as Compensation of Employees, Goods and Services, Transfers to Provinces and Federations, as well as Capital Expenditure.

The Department’s budget is prepared in line with the common budget template that is applicable to all departments. This template does not provide for the divisions that the Honourable Member is seeking. It will however be of interest to the Honourable Member to note that almost 50% of the departmental budget is a grant that is transferred to provinces. In this regard 40% of this budget is allocated to School Sport and 20% to Club Development. Of these allocations, 50% of it has to be spent in the rural areas.

27 November 2017 - NW2631

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

Was the flight that (a) arrived at Waterkloof Air Force Base from Harare on or about 16 August 2017 and (b) departed from Waterkloof Air Force Base to Harare on or about 20 August 2017 granted an RSA05 clearance; if so (a) who approved the clearance and (b) on what basis was the clearance done?

Reply:

(1) (a) Yes

(b) Yes

(2) (a) The RSA05 clearance was issued by Lt Col T.D. Pretorius (Authority Officer Air Force Command Post)

(b) It was done on approval received from Defence Intelligence (who responded to a letter/request from DIRCO stating that this was a diplomatic mission in terms of the State Visits Policy of DIRCO). This approval was signed by Brigadier General M.E. Gcasa on behalf of/as directed by Lieutenant General J.M. Nyembe (Chief Defence Intelligence).

27 November 2017 - NW3687

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(a) What plans does her department have to further decentralise procurement and provide units with self-accounting status, (b) how will financial scrutiny be ensured should this happen, (c) what will become of the Area Support Bases, (d) will level 4 procurement sections be reviewed and aligned with SA Police Service and decentralised procurement of other government departments?

Reply:

Question 1a.

What Plans does her department have to further decentralise procurement and provide units with self-accounting status:

Response

There are no further plans to further decentralise procurement. Procurement delegations have been devolved to the lowest level (Level 4) in the Department.

Question 1b.

How will financial scrutiny be ensured should this happen?

Response

Financial scrutiny is administered by the finance functionaries (budget managers). Each unit that has a procurement delegation processes their requirements through their duly established financial control committees. Payment is executed at financial management division, any invoices that are inconsistent with the delegation are not processed until the matter has been resolved.

Question 1c.

What will become of the Area Support Bases?

Response

Area Support Bases are part of the procurement delegation regime.

Question 1d.

Will level 4 procurement sections be reviewed and aligned with SA Police Service and decentralised procurement of other government department?

Response

The current DOD procurement delegation regime is in line with reigning legislated procurement prescripts, there is no intent to align it to SAPS or any other department’s procurement delegation regime.

27 November 2017 - NW2718

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(a) What is the total amount that her department spent on VIP flights for (i) the President and (ii) other dignitaries attending the 9th BRICS Summit held in China from 31 August to 4 September 2017 and (b) from which (i) programme and (ii) sub-programme of her department’s budget were these costs paid in each case?

Reply:

The cost for the charter services to BRICS Summit in China is R 6 680 000.00. Funds for this requirement were out of VVI Unit budget for charter flights.

27 November 2017 - NW3757

Profile picture: Mhlongo, Mr P

Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)Whether (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her procured services from a certain company (name furnished); if so, (i) what services were procured in each case and (ii) what is the total amount that was paid to the specified company in each case; (2) whether the specified company provided services related to international travel to (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her; if so, (i) what is the name of each person who travelled, (ii) what was the travel route and (iii) what is the total amount that was paid for each person?

Reply:

  1. Yes the Department of Defence and Military Veterans, Military Ombud entered into a contract with Travel Flair.

CONTRACT DETAILS

S/N

Contract No

Contract Description

Period

End User

Progress

Estimate Paid

 

a

b

c

d

e

f

01

CPSC/B/G/454/2011

Provision of Travel Services to the ministry of Defence and Military Veterans

01 April – 31 March 2015

Ministry of Defence and Military Veterans Mr Shibambo from Office of the Minister

Extended to 31 Dec 2017

RM41

02

CPSC/B/PC/055/2014

Provision of travel services to the Military Ombudsman

01 July 2015 extended up 31 December 2017

Military Ombudsman Mr Makgari

Extended up 31 December 2017 period to 14 days

RM7

27 November 2017 - NW3115

Profile picture: Mbhele, Mr ZN

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Whether any (a) company, (b) nonprofit organisation and/or (c) individual consultant has been awarded a contract to facilitate the public consultation process for the White Paper on Safety and Security; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) what is the name of the entity or individual, (ii) what was the monetary value of the tender awarded, (iii) on what date was the tender approved and (iv) what competitive bidding process was followed to ensure compliance with proper procurement procedures and a cost-effective outcome?

Reply:

The Civilian Secretrariat for Police Service (CSPS) has not awarded any contract to any company, nonprofit organisation or individual consultant to facilitate the public consultation process for the White Paper on Saftey & Security.

A consultant has been contracted by an International Development Partner, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), to provide technical assistance to the Civilian Secretariat to draft an implementation framework and related outputs for the White Paper on Safety and Security. The focus of this consultant’s assignment is research, which is complemented by a process of engagements accross different government sectors and spheres and with relevant civil society and academic role-players active in the violence and crime prevention sector.

The GIZ support to the CSPS is being provided in the framework of the ongoing South African-German cooperation programme on violence and crime prevention, the German contribution to which is implemented on behalf of the German government by GIZ. The programme is part of the bilateral cooperation between the two countries.

  1. The consultant’s name is Ms. Melanie Lue-Dugmore
  2. The value of the contract between GIZ and the consultant is up to a maximum of R280.000. GIZ is covering the costs of professional fees, while the Civilian Secretariat is covering the travel and accommodation costs of the consultant during the performance of the assignment.  
  3. The contract period is from 18 August 2017 to 31 March 2018.
  4. The services of the consultant were procured by GIZ strictly in line with its standard procurement rules and regulations. The contract was awarded directly on the grounds of cost efficiency and highly suitable expertise based on the fact that the consultant had previously played an instrumental role in the development of the White Paper on Safety and Security as part of the team from the Consortium on Crime and Violence Prevention, which had originally been contracted by the Civilian Secretariat to assist in the drafting of the White Paper.

27 November 2017 - NW2630

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)Was an official from her department or any of the entities reporting to her present at the Waterkloof Air Force Base to receive persons entering the base for purposes of (a) disembarking aircraft Z-WPE (details furnished) and/or (b) embarking the specified aircraft (details furnished); if not, in each case, why not; if so, (i) what is the (aa) full name and (bb) professional designation of the official concerned, (ii) what are the (aa) full names and (bb) nationality of every person who disembarked at the base and (cc) when was her department notified of each person’s arrival; (2) has the specified aircraft departed from or arrived at the Waterkloof Air Force Base on any other date besides the specified dates in August 2017?

Reply:

(1) (a) Yes

(b) Yes

(i) (aa) Lt Col Hoosein Maal

(bb) Officer in Charge AFB Waterkloof Movement Control Centre

24 November 2017 - NW3659

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) How many disciplinary processes did the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors institute against auditors in the 2016-17 financial year and (b) what are the details of the (i) name of each person charged, (ii) name of the auditing firm that employed each person, (iii) disciplinary charges and (iv) outcome of the disciplinary process in each case?

Reply:

Below is the publically available information on finalised disciplinary processes for the period April 2016 to March 2017. We are unable to supply individual’s names or firm’s names, as the Board determined per section 51(5) of the APA that publication would be in general terms due to the nature of these transgressions.

1. Cases closed by Disciplinary Hearing

Case

     

First Matter

On 7 June 2016, the committee postponed the matter of Mr BN. A month prior to the hearing, the practitioner resigned from the IRBA. Although the IRBA is not precluded from continuing with a disciplinary hearing, albeit the practitioner having resigned, the committee decided not to proceed on the merits but rather to postpone the hearing sine die. However, the committee ordered that should the practitioner re-apply for re-registration with the IRBA at any stage, the case will be re-enrolled for a hearing.

 

(b) (iii) Charges

(b) (iii)

Plea

(iv)

Outcome

Second Matter

On 7 and 8 June 2016 the committee finalised the matter of Mr TM.

Charge One

Failure to comply with the Code; failure to comply with an order of the IRBA; failure to pay monies due to the IRBA and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.6; 2.13; 2.15 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded not guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Two

Failure to comply with the Code; failure to respond to correspondence from the IRBA and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.6; 2.12 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded not guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Three

Failure to comply with the Code; failure to respond, within a reasonable time, to correspondence from the IRBA; failure to comply with a requirement of the IRBA and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.6; 2.12; 2.13 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded not guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Four

Failure to comply with the Code; failure to respond, within a reasonable time, to correspondence from the IRBA; failure to comply with a requirement of the IRBA and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.6; 2.12; 2.13 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded not guilty

Guilty

 

Sanction

In respect of sanction, the committee ordered the immediate cancellation of the practitioner’s registration and removal of his name from the register.

In addition, the committee directed that a fair summary of the charges, the findings and sentence imposed, without the name of the practitioner or the name of his firm, be published in the IRBA News.

 

Charges

Plea

Outcome

Third Matter

On 9 March 2017 the committee heard the matter of Mr GS.

Charge One

Negligence and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.5; 2.6; 2.7 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Two

Negligence and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.5; 2.6; 2.7 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Three

Negligence and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.5; 2.6; 2.7 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Four

Negligence and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.5; 2.6; 2.7 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Five

Negligence and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.5; 2.6; 2.7 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Six

Negligence and bringing the profession into disrepute (rules 2.5; 2.6; 2.7 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Seven

Failure to comply with S45 of the Auditing Profession Act; failure to comply with the Code and bringing the profession into disrepute (Rules 2.1; 2.6 and 2.17 of the Rules Regarding Improper Conduct).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Sanction

The practitioner was fined a total of R300 000 in respect of all seven charges, R150 000 thereof was suspended for five years on condition that the practitioner is not found guilty of any offence relating to work done, pertaining to professional services, during the period of suspension.

The committee ordered the practitioner to contribute a sum of R150 000 towards the IRBA’s costs.

In respect of publication, the committee ordered the IRBA to publish, in IRBA News, a summary of the facts of the case, the plea and sanction, excluding the practitioner’s name and that of his firm.

 

Charges

Plea

Outcome

Fourth Matter

On 9 March 2017 the committee heard and finalised the matter of Mr JV

Charge One

Failure to comply with the Code (rule 2.1.20 of the old Disciplinary Rules).

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Two

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Three

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

 

Charge Four

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Five

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

 

Charge Six

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

 

Charge Seven

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

 

Charge Eight

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

 

Charge Nine

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

Charge Ten

Negligence (rule 2.1.5 of the old Disciplinary Rules)

Pleaded guilty

Guilty

 

 

Sanction

The practitioner was fined a total of R500 000 in respect of all 10 charges.

The committee ordered that the imposition of the fines be postponed until such time as the practitioner is reregistered with the IRBA and the payment of the fines shall be a condition for such re-registration, if and to the extent that re-registration is sought and permitted.

In respect of costs, the practitioner was ordered to contribute R50 000 towards the IRBA’s costs.

The respondent’s dire financial state of affairs, and that he was no longer practising as a registered auditor, were some of the factors taken into account during sentencing.

The committee ordered the IRBA to publish, in IRBA News, a summary of the facts of the case, the plea and sanction, excluding the name of the practitioner and that of his erstwhile firm.

2. Cases closed by Consent Order or Discharge

Discharge

Rule 3.5.1.1

Rule 3.5.1.2

Rule 3.5.1.3

Rule 3.5.1.4

Rule 3.5.1.5

16 matters

5 matters

2 matters

5 matters

2 matters

Consent order

Matter 1 – audit

Fine of R100 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 2 – audit

Fine of R100 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 3 – code

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 4 – audit

Fine of R20 000 with R10 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 5 – companies act

Fine of R100 000 with R60 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 6 – companies act

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 7 – assurance

Fine of R100 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 8 – assurance

Fine of R25 000 with R12 500 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 9 - code

Fine of R20 000 with R10 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 10 – audit

Fine of R100 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 11 – companies act

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 12 – tax act

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 13 – code

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 14 – audit

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 15 – code

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 16 – audit

Fine of R100 000, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 17 – assurance

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 18 – assurance

Fine of R60 000 with R45 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 19 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R60 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 20 – companies act

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 21 – companies act

Fine of R80 000 with R60 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 22 – audit

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 23 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 24 – audit

Fine of R100 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 25 – audit

Fine of R60 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 26 – code

Fine of R100 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 27 – audit

Fine of R50 000, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 28 - assurance

Fine of R20 000 with R10 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 29 – audit

Fine of R100 000, no costs, general publication, with full amount postponed until such time that respondent re-registers with the IRBA

Consent order

Matter 30 – audit

Fine of R200 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 31 – code

Fine of R20 000 with R10 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 32 – code

Fine of R60 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication, plus previously suspended fine of R25 000

Consent order

Matter 33 – estates act

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 34 – code

Fine of R20 000 with R10 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 35 – audit

Fine of R200 000 with R60 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 36 – code

Fine of R20 000 with R10 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 37 – code

Fine of R40 000 with R30 000 suspended for 3 years, R5 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 38 – companies act

Fine of R100 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 39 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 40 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R30 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 41 – audit

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 42 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 43 – audit

Fine of R180 000 with R80 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 44 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 45 – companies act

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 46 – companies act

Fine of R20 000 with R10 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 47 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 48 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 49 – companies act

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 50 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication plus previously suspended fine of R15 000, with full amount postponed until such time that respondent re-registers with the IRBA

Consent order

Matter 51 – audit

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication, with full amount postponed until such time that respondent re-registers with the IRBA

Consent order

Matter 52 – audit

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 53 – audit

Fine of R200 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication, with full amount postponed until such time that respondent re-registers with the IRBA

Consent order

Matter 54 – code

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 55 – audit

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 56 – code

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication, with full amount postponed until such time that respondent re-registers with the IRBA

Consent order

Matter 57 – code

Fine of R50 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 60 – code

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication, with full amount postponed until such time that respondent re-registers with the IRBA

Consent order

Matter 61 – audit

Fine of R60 000 with R30 000 suspended for 3 years, R10 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 62 – audit

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, R10 000 costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 63 – assurance

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 64 – estate agency affairs act

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 65 – assurance

Fine of R100 000 with R30 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 66 – companies act

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 67 – code

Fine of R80 000 with R30 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 68 – audit

Fine of R120 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 69 – audit

Fine of R60 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 70 – audit

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 71 – audit

Fine of R150 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 72 – audit

Fine of R150 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 73 – audit

Fine of R100 000 with R50 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 74 – audit

Fine of R100 000 with R30 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 75 – code

Fine of R50 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 76 – companies act

Fine of R40 000 with R20 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 77– audit

Fine of R50 000 with R25 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 78 – code

Fine of R80 000 with R40 000 suspended for 3 years, no costs, general publication

Consent order

Matter 79 – code

Fine of R100 000, no costs, general publication, with full amount postponed until such time that respondent re-registers with the IRBA

  

24 November 2017 - NW3616

Profile picture: Mkhaliphi, Ms HO

Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

Whether (a) her department and/or (b) any entity reporting to her own land; if so, in each case, (i) where is each plot of land located, (ii) what is the size of each specified plot and (iii) what is each plot currently being used for?

Reply:

The Department and entities responded as follows:

(a) Department of Home Affairs

The Department of Home Affairs does not own any land.

(i)-(iii) Not applicable.

(b) Government Printing Works (GPW)

The Government Printing Works (GPW) owns Erf 3265:

  1. Situated in Pretoria on the corner of Visagie and Schubart street.
  2. Size is 2552 square meters.
  3. The GPW is in the process of refurbishing this building into administration office space to be used by the GPW.

(b) Electoral Commission

The Electoral Commission does not own any land

(i)-(iii) Not applicable.

24 November 2017 - NW3266

Profile picture: Wilson, Ms ER

Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1)With reference to her replies to questions 2018 and 2019 on 9 October 2017, regarding the Mikondzo events which were managed by Azande Consulting and Vee El that were held in each province, what is the breakdown of the amounts in terms of (a) VIP transport and general transport, (b) accommodation, (c) catering, (d) venue hire, (e) equipment hire, (f) sound equipment hire, (g) management fees; (2) (a)(i) how many people were accommodated in respect of each event and (ii) what is the name of each person who was accommodated and (b) what is the name of each hotel that was booked to accommodate the specified persons?

Reply:

1. A total amount of R 80 696 163,18 was paid to Azande and Vee-El for Mikondzo events held in the 2016/17 financial year. This amount is broken down as follows:

a) VIP transport and general transport: Nothing was spent on VIP transport. An amount of R5 662 500,98 was spent on general transport

b) Accommodation: No amount was paid to Azande or Vee-El for accommodation for Mikondzo. All accommodation costs are borne directly by SASSA as it is only officials who are accommodated, in line with the prevailing policies. A total amount of R1 067 165,94 was paid for accommodation by SASSA for attendance at Mikondzo events for the 2016/17 financial year.

c) Catering: A total amount of R11 460 130,37 was paid for catering.

d) Venue hire: The costs for this item includes amounts paid for hiring of marquees, flooring, décor, chairs, tables, set-up costs and safety certificates) The total amount paid was R31 535 689,51

e) Equipment hire: No amounts were spent on equipment hire.

f) Sound equipment hire: An amount of R8 084 172,95 was paid for sound equipment hire.

g) Management fees: A total amount of R11 400 was paid for management fees.

h) Other: A total of R23 942 269,36 was paid to the contractors for other direct costs, including security services, procurement of promotional items and other services not indicated above.

2. Officials attending Mikondzo events include representatives from Head Office, Provincial Offices as well as District and Local Offices as well as officials from National and Provincial DSD. Not all of the staff need to be accommodated, as the majority are staff who normally work in the area where the Mikondzo takes place.

24 November 2017 - NW3193

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether a tender was advertised when a certain person (name furnished) was commissioned to undertake research that resulted in the production of the research report titled The Ownership of JSE Listed Companies; if so, (a) on what date was the tender advertised, (b) what is the total number of bidders who responded to the advertisement, (c) who was the (i) second best bidder, (ii) third best bidder and (iii) what was the price of each specified bidder, (d) on what date was the specified person appointed, (e) for how long was the research commissioned and (f) what is the total amount paid for the tender; (2) Whether the National Treasury has the capacity to conduct research on the ownership of the overall economy, including listed, unlisted and informal entities; if not, why not; if so, why was the research put to tender?

Reply:

1. No tender was advertised, therefore, parts (a) to (f) of the question are not applicable. Ms Thomas was contracted under the single source rules in terms of Supply Chain Management guidelines[1].

2. The National Treasury only has the capacity to undertake some aspects of such study but often for once-off projects that are not planned for, such research would take officials away from other critical work. Furthermore, it was also important to secure the services of an independent expert rather than rely on the JSE or other active stakeholders more directly involved in the ownership debate. This paper is merely the start of a research process on this matter and the National Treasury is in the process of inviting local researchers to peer review the work of Ms Thomas, as well as similar papers available on the nature of ownership of listed companies in South Africa, so as to provide a credible basis for supporting the transformation debate in South Africa.

Supply Chain Management: A guide to Accounting Officers, 2011

24 November 2017 - NW3084

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether any person at the SA Revenue Service (a) communicated with and/or (b) invited a certain person (Nyami Booi) to participate in the press conference on the controversy surrounding a certain company (KPMG) on 18 September 2017; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether he (a) was informed and/or (b) approved (i) the press conference and (ii) the presence of the specified person at the press conference; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

1. SARS issued a public statement about its intention to hold a press conference surrounding the SARS-KPMG Report matter on 18 September 2017 including informing the Chairpersons of the Portfolio Committee on Finance and SCOPA.

2. SARS approved the press conference which was open to the public.

3. A statement on the matter will not be issued.

24 November 2017 - NW2433

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether a certain person (Mr Matsobane Matlwa (CFO)) was escorted off the SA Revenue Services (SARS) premises by the security personnel following the resignation and/or termination of services; if not, why not; if so, (a) why was it necessary to have the specified person escorted off the SARS premises by security personnel, (b) what are the details of the security personnel that escorted the specified person off the SARS premises and (c) are the security personnel that escorted the specified person off the SARS premises normally assigned to ensure the personal security and well-being of the SARS Commissioner?

Reply:

Mr Matsobane was not escorted from the SARS premises following his resignation by security services.

24 November 2017 - NW2986

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Have any members of the (a) SA Airways (SAA) (i) board of directors and/or (ii) management and/or (b) National Treasury met with any persons associated with the Public Investment Corporation and/or the Government Employees Pension Fund on matters relating to SAA during the six months ending on 30 September 2017; if so, what are the details of each meeting in terms of the (aa) dates of meetings, (bb) venues where meetings took place, (cc) purpose, agenda and outcomes or agreements of each meeting, (dd) copies of all documents presented at the meetings and (ee) details of persons present at the meetings including but not limited to, full names and who or what entity each person was representing. (2) whether he will furnish Mr R A Lees with copies of the minutes of each meeting; if not, why not; if so, by what date?

Reply:

(1)(a)(i)(ii) Yes, members of the South African Airways (SAA) board of directors and management did have meetings with the management of the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) on matters relating to the SAA during the six months period ending on 30 September 2017.

(aa) (bb)(cc)(dd)(ee)

Various meetings between the PIC and SAA were held. The two key meetings were the following:

  • On 23 June 2017, a meeting between the senior management teams of PIC and SAA took place at the SAA Offices in Ekhuruleni. The PIC’s Executive Head for Listed Investments, Mr Fidelis Madavo, led the PIC’s delegation. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the way forward for the PIC to conduct a detailed Due Diligence on SAA. The due diligence included risk analysis, financial analysis, ESG analysis as well as legal analysis. The following employees of the PIC were also present at the meeting:
    • Mr Paul Magula – Executive Head: Risk Management
    • Mr Ernest Nesane – Executive Head: Legal Services
    • Ms Rubeena Solomon – General Manager: Investment Support
    • Mr Leon Smit – General Manager: Fixed Income
    • Mr Lloyd Mahara – Portfolio Manager: Credit Analysis: Listed Investments
    • Mr Deon Botha – Head: Corporate Affairs
    • Ms Matseko Taukobong – ESG Manager: Listed Investments
    • Mr Kagiso Motepe – ESG Analyst: Listed Investments
    • Mr Sylvester Sebico – ESG Analyst: Listed Investments
    • Mr Wellington Masekesa – Executive Assistant to the CEO
    • Ms Sasa Fako – Legal Advisor
    • Mr Sindiso Ngqameni – Legal Graduate
    • Mr Tshifango Ndadza – Senior Market Risk Analyst.
  • On 25 July 2017, a meeting took place at the PIC Offices in Pretoria. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a 5-7 year funding plan to the amount of R6 billion for SAA. The following people were in attendance:
    • Dr Daniel Matjila – CEO of PIC
    • Ms Matshepo More – CFO of PIC
    • Mr Fidelis Madavo – Executive Head of Listed Equities of PIC
    • Mr Leon Smit – General Manager: Fixed Income of PIC
    • Mr Lloyd Mahara – Portfolio Manager: Credit Analysis of PIC
    • Mr Deon Botha – Head: Corporate Affairs of PIC
    • Ms Dudu Myeni – Former Chairperson of SAA
    • Mr Musa Zwane – Former Acting CEO of SAA
    • Ms Phumeza Nhantsi – CFO of SAA

2. In line with its standard practices and procedures, the PIC and SAA entered into a non-disclosure agreement and therefore the minutes of these meetings cannot be made available. However, it can be mentioned that following the due diligence process, the transaction was submitted to the Portfolio Management Committee, the Investment Committee and the PIC Board. The transaction was not approved.

24 November 2017 - NW3304

Profile picture: Mkhaliphi, Ms HO

Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation

(1) Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) Whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?

Reply:

1 (a) Department of International Relations and Cooperation does not have a Chief Executive Officer

(b) The Chief Financial Officer of DIRCO also serves as the Chief Financial Officer of the ARF

2. Not applicable

UNQUOTE

24 November 2017 - NW2728

Profile picture: Brauteseth, Mr TJ

Brauteseth, Mr TJ to ask the Minister of Finance

Question: 1 (1) With regard to the contract concluded between SA Airways Technical and a certain company (Allen Aircraft Radio Corporation), (a) on what date was the tender for the specified contract first advertised, (b) what were the requirements to be met in order to tender for the contract, (c ) how many bids were received after the first advertisement? (d) which companies responded after the first advertisement? Question : 2 (a) why was the tender for the specified contract advertised on multiple occasions? (b) what are the full relevant details of each additional (i) placement date; and (ii) list of criteria that had to be met in the bidding process for the specified tender?

Reply:

Question 1

1(a) The tender for the specified contract was first advertised on 16 February 2013.

1(b) A 90/10 principle was applied in accordance with the provisions of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (“PPPFA”) regulations. The requirements to be met, i.e. the evaluation criterion were follows:

CRITICAL CTRITERIA

All bidders are required to meet the following critical criteria:

  • Sufficiently experienced;
  • Equipped;
  • Is of sufficient sound financial standing to carry out satisfactorily any contract that may be awarded pursuant to the tender;
  • Must be certified for FAA and/or EASA as repair station;
  • Must offer an access pool or exchange basis;
  • Must bid on a minimum of 95% of the main list (Airbus / Boeing or both);
  • Must bid on a minimum of 50% of the secondary list;
  • Must include a proposal for reciprocal work;
  • Must be a 24 hour 365 service;
  • Must have an Internet Based Order and Reporting System; and
  • Must meet turnaround times as specified

Price & BBBEE Evaluation Criteria:

  • PRICE - 90
  • BBBEE - 10

Below is a breakdown of areas measured under the 90 points on price.

Area to be measured under Price

Points

Repair Rate (flight hour)

35

Base kit value (%)

5

Loan Rate (Flight Hour)

2

No Fault found rate (%)

2

BER Rate(%)

2

AD’s Mandatory (Cost Thresholds)

5

AD’s Non-mandatory (Cost Thresholds)

3

Warranties

5

Reciprocal Work (Value per annum in %)

20

Soft Factors (Completeness of bid and responses)

1

Shipping Rate (Per Flight hour)

2

Handling / Exchange rate (see template)

18

Total points

100

1(c) Nine bids were received.

1(d) The following companies responded to the first tender:

  • SR Technics
  • Sabena Technics
  • AJ Walters Aviation – their bid was for Boeing only not Airbus.
  • Air France Industries
  • Israel Aerospace Industries – Boeing only fleet
  • HAECO
  • AAR and SRS aviation
  • Lufthansa Technics
  • OEM Services – Boeing only very limited Airbus

Question 2

  1. The specified tender was first advertised in February 2013 and was finally awarded in May 2016 after been advertised and retracted on only two occasions. It is important to note that in the intervening period, there were three changes in the board of directors of SAAT (the board), each with different views and strategy, which had an impact on the tender process. In the main, the reasons for multiple retractions and re-advertising were as follows:
  • In light of the cash-flow challenges and the drive to significantly reduce operational costs around 2013, SAAT resolved to review its major supplier contracts. These contracts include the Component support (specified contract), logistics and Aircraft tyre supply contracts. SAAT was considering negotiating for discounts and/or taking an integrated approach to awarding the said contracts.

Management had therefore requested the board to extend the contracts and delay the RFP process to provide an opportunity for the business to align the scope of the combined services to the Long-Term Strategy (LTTS); also to consider a number of smart solutions available within the global MRO industry.

Initially, SAAT’s objective was to pursue an integrated solution to the components Support and Logistics/shipping costs in order to not only reduce costs of the individual contracts but to also derive benefits out of scale discounts through joint procurement. In addition to which, SAAT would also pursue localisation as part of the award of the Tyre Supply contract.

  • Around April 2013, there were discussions about a possible merger between SAAT and SA Express MRO, and a possibility of Denel Aviation lagging behind. A turnaround strategy document was drafted for discussion. Because of this, an original extension on the Component support agreement was granted until the end of March 2014, the period, which the potential merger was envisaged to have been finalized.
  • Management requested the board to allow the Supply Chain Management (SCM) team to test the market so as to understand what are the normal prices on the market for component tender. SAAT has had a contract with Air France all along, as a result the only pricing the company understood was that by Air France, which was far more expensive that what was out on the market. The cost compression initiative was already applicable in this period therefore, SCM was obligated to obtain as much savings as possible from this tender to reach their target.

The request for extension was made to the board, and SCM only offered to extend the contract with Air France after they agreed to give SAAT a discount of 400 000 USD. This amount contributed towards the Cost compression

  • Furthermore the retraction was effected as a risk mitigation measure on the part of SAAT to ensure that preferred bidder is able to deliver on the contracted services.

First tender

As per responses under Question 1 above.

Second Tender

Date of issue: 29 October 2014

Closing date: 2 December 2014

Evaluation Criteria:

SIGN-OFF SHEET – RFB AND WEIGHTING CRITERIA

PROJECT:

Aircraft Component Support II

PRODUCT:

Supply of aircraft component support service

TENDER NUMBER:

SP437/14

DATE:

28 October 2014

1. Critical Criteria

Capacity to Deliver

(Incorporating: Track Record, Experience, Service/Product Supply, Equipment, Financial Standing and previous performance of bidders)

As SAAT’s service levels and reputation as a safe transport provider is dependent upon the quality of its service, it stands to reason that quality of the GOODS/Services and products utilised to provide that service, cannot be compromised. A tender shall be evaluated in terms of their capacity to deliver.

Bidders to comment on all of the requirements below:

A bid shall not be recommended for acceptance if the CFST required to make the recommendation has any doubt, based on reasonable grounds as to whether the Bidder:

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

Is sufficiently experienced and equipped

   

Is of sufficient sound financial standing to carry out satisfactorily any contract that may be awarded pursuant to the tender

   

Must be certified for FAA and EASA as repair station

   

Must offer an access pool or exchange basis

   

Must bid on a minimum of 95% of the main list (Airbus/Boeing or both)

   

Must bid on a minimum of 50% of the secondary list

   

Must include a proposal for reciprocal work

   

Must be willing to enter into a Partnership/Joint Venture with SAAT

   

Must be a 24 hour, 365 days service

   

Further to the above, this category will be subjected to the following scrutiny:

Internet Based Order and Reporting System

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

The Bidder shall reflect the ability to report the sourcing, tracking and receiving of all components through an electronic system, that can be interfaced with any of SAAT’s Electronic Inventory Management Systems

   

AOG Help Desk

The bidder shall respond to SAAT’s request for components according to the following priorities:

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

Priority

Response Time

Dispatch Time

   

AOG

1 hour

First available flight (same day)

   

CRITICAL

3 hours

Within 24 hours

   

NORMAL/ROUTINE

12 hours

Within 72 hours

   

Component Modifications Status

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

The bidder shall supply components that are of the same modification status or better as stipulated in Appendix 1B

   

Proposals received will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria. The method used is pre-determined and is both qualitative and quantitative and in line with the PPPFA 90/10 principle.

2. FUNCTIONALITY AND PRICING TEMPLATES

The following areas will be measured in terms of Functionality Criteria:

Area to be measured under PRICE

Template

Points

Repair Rate (Flight Hour)

Pricing Template

30

Basekit Value (%)

Pricing Template

5

Loan Rate (Flight Hour)

Pricing Template

2

No Fault Found Rate (%)

Pricing Template

2

BER Rate (%)

Pricing Template

2

AD’s Mandatory (Cost Thresholds)

Pricing Template

3

AD’s Non-Mandatory (Cost Thresholds)

Pricing Template

3

Warranties

Vendor Template

5

Soft Factors (Completeness of bid and responses)

Vendor Template

1

Shipping Rate (Per Flight hour)

Pricing Template

2

Access Pool Rate (see template)

Pricing Template

15

Reciprocal Work (Value per annum in %)

Vendor Template

20

Partnership and Joint Ventures (JV’s)

Vendor Template

10

TOTAL

 

100

  1. PRICE/BEE

Please take note that Pricing and BEE would be evaluated on 90/10 PPPFA principle

Criteria

Points allocation

Points Scored

Price

90

 

BEE

10

 

TOTAL

100

 

Joint Venture BEE level will be scored at this phase.

The total value of Reciprocal Work and Partnership should amount to 30% of the value of the contract, and below are the requirements to be considered.

Reciprocal Work should amount to 10% of the value of the contract, and it will be based on the following:

Description of Services

YES/NO

COMMENT

Any component overflow from the company to SAAT (based on the Aircraft types related to in the GTA).

   

Additional work allocated to SAAT on aircraft components or components from airlines not part of the contract GTA)

   

Partnership/Joint Venture should form 20% of the value of the contract, and it should include (not limited to):

Description of Services

YES/NO

COMMENT

Line Maintenance in Africa

   

Base Maintenance from 3rd parties (C and D checks)

   

Joint Procurement strategy

   

Provide test equipment, supply drawings to build test equipment, removal of components from contract and reduction in rates ill form part of the partnership)

   

Marketing

   

Technical Training

   

Sharing and placing of MBK items at different Line Stations i.e. Mauritius, London.

   

      

Third Tender:

Date of issue: 14 July 2015

Closing date: 28 July 2015

Alternate third Tender:

Date of issue: 30 July 2015

Closing date: 10 August 2015

Evaluation Criteria

1. Critical Criteria

​1.1 Capacity to Deliver

(Incorporating: Track Record, Experience, Service/Product Supply, Equipment, Financial Standing and previous performance of bidders)

As SAAT’s service levels and reputation as a safe transport provider is dependent upon the quality of its service, it stands to reason that quality of the GOODS/Services and products utilised to provide that service, cannot be compromised. A tender shall be evaluated in terms of their capacity to deliver.

Bidders to comment on all of the requirements below:

A bid shall not be recommended for acceptance if the CFST required to make the recommendation has any doubt, based on reasonable grounds as to whether the Bidder:

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

If awarded the contract, the bidder must be able to set up, and offer services on the aircraft component immediately

   

Is sufficiently experienced and equipped

   

Is of sufficient sound financial standing to carry out satisfactorily any contract that may be awarded pursuant to the tender

   

Must be certified for FAA and EASA as repair station

   

Must offer an access pool or exchange basis

   

Must bid on a minimum of 95% of the main list (Airbus/Boeing or both)

   

Must bid on a minimum of 50% of the secondary list

   

Must include a proposal for reciprocal work if NIPP is applicable

   

Must be a 24 hour, 365 days service

   

Further to the above, this category will be subjected to the following scrutiny:

Internet Based Order and Reporting System

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

The Bidder shall reflect the ability to report the sourcing, tracking and receiving of all components through an electronic system, that can be interfaced with any of SAAT’s Electronic Inventory Management Systems

   

AOG Help Desk

The bidder shall respond to SAAT’s request for components according to the following priorities:

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

Priority

Response Time

Dispatch Time

   

AOG

1 hour

First available flight(same day)

   

CRITICAL

3 hours

Within 24 hours

   

NORMAL/ ROUTINE

12 hours

Within 72 hours

   

Component Modifications Status

 

YES/NO

COMMENT

The bidder shall supply components that are of the same or better modification status and age as stipulated in Appendix 1B

   

Proposals received will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria. The method used is pre-determined and is both qualitative and quantitative and in line with the PPPFA 90/10 principle.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Functionality and Pricing Templates

The following areas will be measured in terms of Functionality Criteria:

Area to be measured under PRICE

Template

Points

Repair Rate (Flight Hour)

Pricing Template

50

Basekit Value (%)

Pricing Template

10

Loan Rate (Flight Hour)

Pricing Template

2

No Fault Found Rate (%)

Pricing Template

2

BER Rate (%)

Pricing Template

2

AD’s Mandatory (Cost Thresholds)

Pricing Template

3

AD’s Non-Mandatory (Cost Thresholds)

Pricing Template

3

Warranties

Vendor Template

3

Access Pool Rate (see template)

Pricing Template

25

TOTAL

 

100

PRICE/BEE

Please take note that Pricing and BEE would be evaluated on 90/10 PPPFA principle

Criteria

Points allocation

Points Scored

Price

90

 

BEE

10

 

TOTAL

100

 

Fourth and Final Tender

Date of issue: 8 December 2015

Closing date: 19 January 2016

CRITICAL CRITERIA

Bidders to comment on all of the requirements below:

Compliance Requirements

COMPLY YES/NO

Is sufficiently experienced and equipped

 

Is of sufficient sound financial standing to carry out satisfactorily any contract that may be awarded pursuant to the tender

 

Must be certified for FAA and EASA as repair station

 

Must offer an access pool or exchange basis

 

No Fault Found Rate (20%)

 

BER Rate (70%)

 

AD’s Mandatory (Cost Thresholds set to $3 500.00)

 

AD’s Non-Mandatory (Cost Thresholds set to $3 500.00)

 

Warranties (Cession of warranties to reduce rates)

 

Supplier Development* - (Must be equal to 10% of the value of the contract. Bidder to include a proposal)

 

Reciprocal work* - (Must be equal to 10% of the value of the contract. Bidder to include a proposal)

 

Bidder must be willing to enter into a Partnership/Joint Venture* with SAAT equal to 10% of contract value

 

Must be a 24 hour, 365 days service

 

Further to the above, this category was subjected to the following scrutiny:

Systems Interface

COMPLY YES/NO

The Bidder shall reflect the ability to report the sourcing, tracking and receiving of all components through an electronic system, that can be interfaced with any of SAAT’s Electronic Inventory Management Systems

 

Components status

COMPLY YES/NO

The bidder shall supply components that are of the same modification status or better as stipulated in Appendix A

 

Turn-around times (TAT)

COMPLY

YES/NO

Priority

Response Time

Dispatch Time

 

AOG

1 hour

First available flight (same day)

 

CRITICAL

3 hours

Within 24 hours

 

NORMAL/ROUTINE

12 hours

Within 72 hours

 

Phase 2

PRICE AND BEE EVALUATION

Pricing Evaluation

Points

Price

90

BEE

10

TOTAL

100

Take Note: None of the bidders were awarded any BEE points, as none of the ones that tendered with BEE partners furnished SAAT with a consolidated BEE certificate.

The elements below will be evaluated under the pricing category, and points allocated as indicated below based on the quoted bid price.

Area to be measured under PRICE

Template

Points

Repair Rate (Flight Hour)

 

50

Basekit Value (%)

 

15

Loan Rate (Flight Hour)

 

5

Access Pool Rate (see template)

 

30

TOTAL

 

100

Reciprocal Work should amount to 10% of the value of the contract, and it will be based on the following:

Any component overflow from the company to SAAT (based on the Aircraft types related to in the GTA).

 

Additional work allocated to SAAT on aircraft components or components from airlines not part of the contract GTA)

 

Any maintenance services contracted to SAAT for which SAAT has got capability

 

Partnership/Joint Venture (value) should form 10% of the value of the contract, and it should include (not limited) to:

 

Line Maintenance in Africa

 

Base Maintenance from 3rd parties (C and D checks)

 

Joint Procurement strategy

 

Provide test equipment, supply drawings to build test equipment, removal of components from contract and reduction in rates ill form part of the partnership)

 

Marketing

 

Technical Training

 

Provide an inventory management system that will/can be integrated into AMOS for SAAT

 

Sharing and placing of MBK items at different Line Stations i.e. Mauritius, London.

 

   

Supplier Development (value)– must form 10% of the contract value, and it must entail the following:

 

SAAT has embarked on a supplier development program with a list of nominated suppliers being approved by the SAAT Board to promote the development of our local economy.

SAAT considers any mentorships, partnerships, skills transfers, knowledge transfers, assistance in developing a local company to become sustainable in an area that a local company currently does not have capability, SMME, job creation, training and development and/or any sustainable economic growth through revenues accumulated over the fulfilment period to be possible initiatives that are considered as supplier development. Other initiatives include research and development and/or technology transfer. As a result, bidders are requested to supply a proposal on how and what they would impart in terms of skills /training/technical information etc, to a local South African vendor.

Bidder to indicate what value they would place on each area of development, based on the above, which they would be imparting to the local vendor.

 

 

24 November 2017 - NW3041

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What is the total number of trust funds that have been registered since 1 January 2003, (b) how many of those trust funds are compliant to the black economic empowerment provisions and (c) what are their details?

Reply:

The registration of trusts falls under the Department of Justice and is done by the relevant Masters of the High Court in each of the court’s divisions.

24 November 2017 - NW3086

Profile picture: Van Der Walt, Ms D

Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Finance

With reference to the reply of the Minister of Public Service and Administration to question 2809 on 2 October 2017 and the announcement during the Budget Vote Speech on 24 February 2016 by the former Minister of Finance, Mr Pravin Gordhan, in which South Africans were informed that the Government will cut its wage bill by R25 billion over three years, (a) how does the total wage bill of the 2016-17 financial year compare to the 2015-16 financial year, (b) how does the first six months of the 2017-18 financial year compare with the first six months of the 2016-17 financial year and (c) what savings in the wage bill have been achieved due to austerity measures since this announcement for each financial year or part of it to date; (2) whether the Government is still on track in achieving its R25 billion savings on the wage bill in the specified period; if not, (a) why not and (b) what steps will he take to ensure that the targeted savings are achieved; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) what percentage of the Government’s total expenditure for the 2017-18 financial year was allocated to wages?

Reply:

1. (a) The wage bill has increased by 8.1 per cent between 2015/16 and 2016/17 financial years.

Table 1: Consolidated national, provincial and social security funds1

R million

2015/16

2016/172

Per cent increase

Compensation of employees

427 995.5

462 611.2

8.1%

1 Budget Review (2017, pp 214-215)

2 Revised estimate

(b) Wage bill information for the first six months of 2017/18 shows that the wage bill has increased by 7.4 per cent compared to the first half of 2016/17.

Table 2: Consolidated national and provincial government1

R million

2016/17

2017/18

Per cent increase

Compensation of employees:

first half

225,004.1

241,701.4

7.4%

1 IYM reports, excludes National Parliament

(c) Wage bill reductions amounting to R25 billion were effected in 2017/18 (R10 billion) and 2018/19 (R15 billion). Assessment of savings for 2017/18 will only be possible at the end of the financial year.

2. Preliminary indications based on 2017/18 first half compensation spend are that government is broadly on track to achieving targeted savings on compensation budgets. A few national and provincial departments are, however, showing signs of excess pressures on their compensation budgets. The National Treasury will continue monitoring implementation of compensation budgets during the current financial year.

3. The share of total budget for 2017/18 allocated to compensation of employees is 33.5 per cent.

Table 3: Consolidated national, provincial and social security funds1

R million

2017/18

Per cent of total budget

Compensation of employees

497 094.9

33.5%

1 Budget Review (2017, pp 214-215)

24 November 2017 - NW3001

Profile picture: King, Ms C

King, Ms C to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)What is the (a) total amount that was paid out in bonuses to employees in the National Treasury and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that was paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2016-17 financial year; (2) What is the (a) total estimated amount that will be paid out in bonuses to employees in the National Treasury and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that will be paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2017-18 financial year?

Reply:

1. (a) R10 885 524.00

(b)

Breakdown in Salary Level

2016/2017

R’ 000

 
     

3

R6,091.12

 

4

R27,781.18

 

5

R137,093.13

 

6

R43,697.67

 

7

R455,784.70

 

8

R789,116.74

 

9

R697,121.29

 

10

R767,210.21

 

11

R1,342,342.30

 

12

R2,293,830.11

 

Band A (13)

R3,169,086.49

 

Band B (14)

R1,028,229.11

 

Band C (15)

R128,139.95

 

These are the 2015/16 performance bonuses paid in the 2016/17FY

2. (a) R11 488 555.34

(b)

Breakdown in Salary Band

2017/2018

R’ 000

 
     

3

R5,963.73

 

4

R15,700.25

 

5

R170,505.99

 

6

R35,185.33

 

7

R508,233.90

 

8

R817,633.27

 

9

R900,931.86

 

10

R661,233.88

 

11

R1,508,511.88

 

12

R2,362,751.95

 

Band A (13)

R3,282,477.07

 

Band B (14)

R821,337.44

 

Band C (15)

R398,088.79

 

These are the 2016/17 performance bonuses paid in the 2017/18FY

which excludes cases that are not yet finalised

24 November 2017 - NW3465

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)How many officials and/or employees in his department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years; (2) are any of the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with the Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?

Reply:

  1. Nil
  2. Nil

24 November 2017 - NW2911

Profile picture: Kwankwa, Mr NL

Kwankwa, Mr NL to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether, pursuant to his statement that any recommendation about the possibility of extending or broadening the mandate of the SA Reserve Bank (SARB) should be brought to his attention in line with his mandate as the Minister of Finance and in light of the need to ensure better alignment of monetary and fiscal policy in the country as a strategy to unlock job-creating growth, the Government has considered the (a) need to broaden the mandate of the SARB to ensure that it also has a socio-economic development objective and (b) possibility of introducing a 1 percentage point tolerance interval over and above the upper band of the 3-6% inflation target in order to mitigate against central bank overreaction in times of sluggish growth or when the economy is in recession?

Reply:

a) No, there is no need to review the Constitution on the mandate of the SARB.

Sections 223-225 of the Constitution outline the primary object of the SARB, which is “to protect the value of the currency in the interest of balanced and sustainable economic growth in the Republic". Section 224 (2) requires regular consultation between the Bank and the Minister of Finance.

The current Constitution and legislation governing the SARB is therefore very broad, and does not constrain Government from adopting (and legislating) appropriate policies to facilitate inclusive growth and job-creation, achieve the objectives of the NDP, and reduce inequality and deliver basic services to all those residing in SA.

Whilst the debate on the role of the central bank is vibrant, both in South Africa and other countries, it is important that those calling for reviews provide the necessary research and motivation for proposing such reviews, including their understanding of the role of both fiscal and monetary policy, and what specific problems they are seeking to solve. The SARB’s monetary policy mandate cannot be separated from Government’s fiscal policy mandate and performance. Any attempt to amend these constitutional provisions without due regard for this relationship will generate unnecessary uncertainty, and impact negatively on growth and jobs.

b) The existing monetary policy framework, through flexible inflation targeting, allows for temporary deviations of inflation from the target in the event of shocks over which monetary policy has no impact. A specific tolerance level around the target would therefore not be necessary. An explicit tolerance indicator may potentially risk de-anchoring inflation expectations, and thereby constrain the SARB’s ability to respond flexibly to an inflation shock.

24 November 2017 - NW3660

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether (a) an investigation has been launched to determine who was behind the smear campaign that resulted in certain allegations against a certain person that were later found to be baseless and/or (b) any forensic investigations have been launched into any concerns of irregularities; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

a) Yes, the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) Board has launched an investigation to try and determine who was behind the smear campaign against a certain person at the PIC. Once concluded, a report will be submitted to the PIC Board.

b) With regards to the forensic audit mentioned in the Media Statement of the Minister of Finance dated 6 October 2017, the PIC Board has requested a meeting with the Minister of Finance to discuss certain matters. A date for this meeting is yet to be finalised. PIC would like to be given time to conclude these engagements.

24 November 2017 - NW3151

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether, in view of the important role that the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer (OCPO) plays in the Government’s procurement processes, including ensuring value for money, combating corruption and ensuring integrity in the Government’s procurement processes and systems and notwithstanding the general concern that he and / or the Treasury intends to change the mandate of the OCPO to the detriment of good, clean and corrupt-free governance, he and/or the Treasury does intend to amend the mandate of the OCPO; if so, (a) what aspects of the mandate does he intend to amend and (b) for what reasons?

Reply:

a) The National Treasury is not aware of any intention to amend the mandate of the OCPO.

b) Not applicable

24 November 2017 - NW3517

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

What number of foreign nationals in 2016 (a) entered South Africa on (i) visitor visas and/or (ii) holiday visas, (b) departed on or before the date on which their visas expired and (c) of each nationality (i) did not depart and (ii) applied for asylum; (2) what (a) plans does her department have in place to find the foreign nationals who did not leave the country and (b) what steps have been taken against the specified persons; (3) what (a) procedures and/or (b) programmes does her department have in place to ensure that visitors depart when their visas expire and (c) is the success rate of the specified procedures and/or programmes in each case?

Reply:

(1)(a)(i-ii) 15,256,170 (total recorded movements for traveller arrivals in 2016 on visitors and /or holiday visas.

(1)(b) 14,988,933 (total recorded movements for traveller departures in 2016 on visitors visas.

(1)(c)(i) The top five nationalities who’s movements indicate they have not yet departed the RSA are:

          1. Zimbabwe: 210,067
          2. Mozambique: 47,909
          3. Malawi: 44,818
          4. Lesotho: 36,244
          5. Nigeria: 5,509

(1)(c)(ii) The total number of asylum applications for 2016 was: 35,377

The top five nationalities that applied for asylum during 2016 are:

  1. Zimbabwe: 7,964
  2. DRC: 5,293
  3. Ethiopia: 4,754
  4. Nigeria: 3,276
  5. Bangladesh: 2 834

(2)(a) The Inspectorate Unit of the department is tasked with tracing persons who remain the country illegally. They conduct regular inspections of places of employment and other institutions. They also undertake tracing projects to locate persons who have overstayed in the country.

(2)(b) Such persons are either charged criminally or deported from South Africa.

(3)(a-b) The department does not allow such persons to apply for change of status in the country. Travellers who overstay the number of allocated days are declared undesirable for a period of 12 months or up to a maximum of a 5 year prohibition depending on the number of days overstayed in terms of s30(1)(h) of the Immigration Act. The determination of the sanction is derived from the Enhanced Movement Control System (EMCS).

In terms of the prohibition, a traveller cannot under any circumstances re-enter the country unless an appeal for upliftment of the sanction is considered and accepted by the department.

(3)(c) For the period 1 April 2016 – 31 March 2017 a total of 39,894 persons were declared undesirable. Due to the department only collating overstay data from 1 April 2016, it is not possible to provide a year-on-year trend analysis. For the period in question the most common reasons cited for overstaying are based on medical grounds or applicants awaiting temporary residence visa extensions.

24 November 2017 - NW3677

Profile picture: Cardo, Dr MJ

Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Finance

Why did the National Treasury grant full exemption from the provisions of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, to a certain company (FOSKOR) until 31 October 2019?

Reply:

The main reason is because Foskor is one of the Industrial Development Corporations’ (IDC) subsidiaries and in direct competition with private sector companies that are not required to provide reports such as Corporate Plans and Quarterly Reports. Compliance with the PFMA reporting requirements would require introduction of additional processes at a cost to companies already in financial distress.

The second reason was to afford Foskor an opportunity to compete evenly in an open market with other private companies in terms of the pace at which they could undertake certain transactions e.g. Section 54(2) of the PFMA transactions such as acquisition and disposal of assets that require approval of the executive authority; Section (7)(2) regarding opening of bank accounts after compliance with any prescribed tendering procedures and Section 7(4) providing that the National Treasury may prescribe investment policies for public entities.

It is worth mentioning that with regards to reporting requirements, IDC was requested to submit its Corporate Plan with the consolidated financial projections of the internal subsidiaries (mini-group) and any subsidiary with a total asset value above the significance level of R500 million.

With regards to the transactions they undertake, IDC was requested to ensure that the mandate and performance of their subsidiaries are aligned with government development policies i.e. the National Development Plan (NDP), New Growth Path (NGP), and Industrial Policy Action Plan (IPAP).

23 November 2017 - NW3410

Profile picture: Cassim, Mr Y

Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1)What was the budget for (a) food, (b) clothing, (c) bedding and (d) any other line items for the Don Mattera Child and Youth Care Centre in Edenvale in the (i) 2015-16, (ii) 2016-17 and (iii) 2017-18 financial years; (2) what amount was actually spent on (a) food and (b) clothing in the (i) 2015-16, (ii) 2016-17 and (iii) 2017-18 financial years

Reply:

The Department Social Development does not allocate budget for the Child and Youth Care Centre. The question was therefore referred to Gauteng Province for inputs. Inputs from the respective province are attached as Annexure A for the responses from the province.

23 November 2017 - NW3540

Profile picture: Steenkamp, Ms J

Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Transport

(a) (i) What is the total number of e-toll offices in the country and (ii) where is each office located, (b) what number of persons are employed at each office, (c) what are each person’s functions, (d) what were the monthly running costs of each office in the past three financial years, (e) what income has been generated by each office in the past three financial years and (f) how was the income generated by each office?

Reply:

a) (i) What is the total number of e-toll offices in the country

The e-toll offices are only limited to the GFIP project in Gauteng. The number of GFIP e-toll offices are as follows:

Type of e-toll Customer Service Center

Quantity

Satellite Centers

12

Permanent Kiosks

21

Temporary Kiosks

3

(ii) Where is each office located?

Permanent Kiosks [Customer Service centres]

Westgate Shopping Centre PK16

120 Ontdekkers Road, Horizon, Roodepoort

Maponya Mall PK10

Old Potchefstroom Road, Soweto / 2127 Chris Hani Road, Klipspruit Ext5, Soweto

Southgate Mall - Johannesburg PK17

Cnr Columbine Avenue & Rifle Range Road, Mondeor, Johannesburg

Cresta Mall PK03

Cnr Beyers Naudé Drive & Weltevreden Road, Cresta Ext 4, Randburg

Cedar Square PK06

Cnr Cedar & Willow Roads, Fourways, Sandton

Pepper Square PK18

Cnr North Rand RD and Oosthuizen RD Boksburg

Bonaero Centre PK04

Cnr Atlas & Geldenhuys Road, Bonaero Park, Kempton Park

Lakeside Mall PK19

Tom Jones Street, Benoni

The Glen PK02

Cnr Orpen & Letaba Streets, Oakdene, Johannesburg

Alberton City PK05

Voortrekker Street, CBD, Alberton

Trade Route Mall – Lenasia Pk15

Cnr K43 & Nirvana Roads, Lenasia, 1820

N4 Doornpoort plaza CSC01

N4 Rustenburg highway

N4 Doornpoort plaza CSC02

N4 Rustenburg highway

Kolonnade PK09

Cnr Dr. Van der Merwe & Zambezi Drive, Montana Park, Pretoria

Menlyn Park Shopping Centre PK11

Cnr Atterbury Road & Lois Ave, Menlo Park, Pretoria

Jakaranda Shopping Centre PK08

Corner of Michael Brink & Frates Rd. Rietfontein Pta

Centurion Mall PK01

Heuwel Avenue, CBD, Centurion

Mall @ Reds PK20

Cnr Hendrik Verwoed & Roohuiskraal Drives, Rooihuiskraal Ext 15, Centurion

San Ridge Square Midrand PK13

Cnr New & Lever Roads

Parkview Mall Pk21

Cnr K43 & Nirvana Roads, Lenasia, 1820

Irene Village Mall PK07

Cnr Nellmapius Ave & Van Ryneveld Roads, Irene, Pretoria, 0157

Temporary Kiosks [Customer Service centres]

The Grove Shopping Centre TK23

Cnr. Lynnwood rd & Simon Vermooten rd.

Centurion Lifestyle Centre TK24

Cnr Old Johannesburg and Lenchen Road in Centurion

Killarney Mall TK20

60 Riviera Road, Killarney, Johannesburg

Satellite Centres [Customer Service centres]

SC01 - Rigel

N1 North, off-ramp Rigel Avenue

SC03 - Rivonia

N1 South, off-ramp Rivonia Avenue

SC04A - BP Oasis North

The Oasis, Cnr Beyers Naudé Drive & N1 North Highway

SC04B - BP Oasis South

The Oasis, Cnr Beyers Naudé Drive & N1 South Highway

SC04C - 14th Avenue

Sentinal Avenue, off 14th Avenue, Northcliff, Randburg

SC05 - Golden Highway

N1 South, Goldern highway off ramp, Viking Filling station

SC06 - Kliprivier

N12 West, Kliprevier Off ramp, Ridgeway, Johannesburg South

SC07 - Grey

N3 South, off-ramp Grey Avenue

SC08 - Modderfontein

N3 South off-ramp, Modderfontein Road.

SC09 - Jetpark

N12 East, Jet Park, Boksburg

SC10A - Engen North

Engen Highveld One Stop, R21 North

SC10B - Engen South

Engen Highveld One Stop, R21 South

b) For Incident Management Services:

Central Operating Centre

Shift 1 - 06:00 to 18:00 & Shift 2 - 18:00 to 06:00

25

14th avenue

 

19

Golden Highway

 

14

Grey Avenue

 

17

Jet Park

 

16

Klip Rivier

 

13

Modderfontein

 

20

Route 21

 

17

Rigel Avenue

 

21

Rivonia

 

19

For Customer Services:

The e-toll contractor is compensated in terms of required service levels for customer services as specified in the contract and the managers, supervisors and agents are scheduled and deployed (7 days a week) taking into account the manning levels and 8-hours shifts. The operating hours of these service centers extends beyond normal close of business.

The number of persons currently employed to provide these services on the GFIP project are:

Employee Category

Quantity

Area Managers

7

Supervisors

84

Operators

259

A summary of the current deployment of persons is provided below:

CSC

Operating Hours and Manning levels

         
 

Weekday Trading Hours

(Monday - Thursday)

Friday Trading Hours

Saturday Trading Hours

Sunday Trading Hours

Public Holiday Trading Hours

 

Trading Hours

Manning Levels

Trading Hours

Manning Levels

Trading Hours

Manning Levels

Trading Hours

Manning Levels

Trading Hours

Manning Levels

                     

PK19 - Lakeside Mall

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

PK09 - Kolonnade

09:00 - 19:00

3

09:00 - 19:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 16:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

PK16 - Westgate

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

SC06 - Kliprivier

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

5

 

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

 

5

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

5

SC10a - R21 Engen North

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

4

 

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

 

4

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

4

PK10 - Maponya Mall

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

PK11 - Menlyn Park

09:00 - 19:00

3

09.00 - 21:00

3

09:00 - 19:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

SC01 - Rigel

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

6

 

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

 

6

PK07 - Irene Village Mall

09:00 - 19:00

3

09:00 - 20:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

PK14 - Pepper Square

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

PK02 - The Glen

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 16:00

3

09:00 - 16:00

3

SC08 - Modderfontein

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

6

 

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

 

6

PK05 - Alberton City

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

PK03 - Cresta Mall

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 19:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

SC07 - Grey Avenue

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

6

 

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

 

6

PK08 - Jakaranda

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

SC03 - Rivonia

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

08:00 - 17:00

6

 

6

 

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

17:00 - 22:00

3

 

6

SC10b - R21 Engen South

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

4

 

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

 

4

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

4

PK01 - Centurion Mall

09:00 - 19:00

3

09:00 - 20:00

3

08:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

TK24 - Centurion Lifestyle

09:00 - 18:00

2

09:00 - 18:00

2

08:30 - 15:00

2

09:00 - 13:00

2

09:00 - 13:00

2

PK15 - Trade Route Mall

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

TK30 - Parkview

09:00 - 19:00

2

09:00 - 20:00

2

09:00 - 19:00

2

09:00 - 17:00

2

09:00 - 19:00

2

TK23 - The Grove

09:00 - 18:00

2

09:00 - 18:00

2

09:00 - 17:00

2

09:00 - 17:00

2

09:00 - 17:00

2

SC09 - Jetpark

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

5

 

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

 

5

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

5

TK09 - Mall @ Reds

09:00 - 18:00

2

09:00 - 18:00

2

08:00 - 17:00

2

09:00 - 14:00

2

09:00 - 16:00

2

Doornpoort West

10:00 - 18:00

2

10:00 - 18:00

2

10:00 - 18:00

2

10:00 - 18:00

2

10:00 - 18:00

2

PK04 - Bonaero Centre

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

PK17 - Southgate Mall

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 19:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

PK13 - San Ridge Square

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

08:30 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 13:00

3

09:00 - 14:00

3

SC04a - BP Oasis North

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

4

 

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

 

4

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

4

14th Avenue

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

5

 

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

 

5

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

5

SC04b - BP Oasis South

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

4

 

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

08:00 - 18:00

4

 

4

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

4

TK20 - Killarney Mall

09:00 - 18:00

2

09:00 - 18:00

2

09:00 - 17:00

2

09:00 - 15:00

2

09:00 - 15:00

2

Doornpoort East

07:00 - 15:00

2

07:00 - 15:00

2

07:00 - 15:00

2

07:00 - 15:00

2

07:00 - 15:00

2

SC05 - Golden Highway

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

06:00 - 08:00

3

08:00 - 17:00

5

 

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

08:00 - 18:00

5

 

5

 

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

18:00 - 22:00

3

 

5

PK06 - Cedar Square

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 18:00

3

09:00 - 17:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

09:00 - 15:00

3

c) For Incident Management Services at the SANRAL Customer Service Centers:

ORS Operations Manager

The ORS Operations Manager is responsible for the overseeing of the day to day operations. The incumbent will be responsible for the reporting of incidents, KPI’s related to operations as well as liaise with all other stakeholders within the ORS environment.

ORS Fleet Manager

The ORS Fleet Manager is responsible for the overseeing of the day to day operations. The incumbent will be responsible for the reporting of incidents, KPI’s related to operations as well as liaise with all other stakeholders within the ORS environment.

ORS Area Manager

The ORS Area Manager is responsible for the day to day Management of his/her area of work i.e. he/she has to manage the shift change, manage and report to ON ROAD incidents in the required time frames, to manage safety and additional services at the ON ROAD incident and to ensure post incident data is transferred according to SOP

ORS Q & A Training Officer

To provide a professional Training and Development service to all TETI ORS staff and ensure that the best talent with the appropriate skills is available as well as to ensure an environment and culture that supports high performance.

ORS Administrator

To provide a general administrative and logistical service for the overall efficient running of the On-Road Services. Provide a supporting role to the On-Road Services Management (Fleet and Operations) in the general day-to-day operational requirements.

H-TRU Driver

To respond to incidents as dispatched by the TMC within a required time and to remove any heavy vehicles from where it causes danger or obstruction to a ‘safer’ place on the side of the freeway

L-TRU Driver

To respond to incidents as dispatched by the TMC within a required time and to remove any light vehicles from where it causes danger or obstruction to a ‘safer’ place on the side of the freeway

IRU Driver / TSO

The TSO is responsible for the Incident Response Unit (IRU) and the crew consisting of two flagmen and a BLS medic as well as all equipment and documentation of the vehicle. To respond to incidents in the required time frame, to provide on scene safety, keep in constant communication with the TMC, cooperate and assist other services on scene, collect all relevant information on scene and complete the required documentations, supervise and oversee the IRU crew.

Basic Life Support Technician

To provide first line basic medical support to injured motorists on incident scenes and to assist the MRU/MMRU paramedic and/or another qualified medical staff on scene where required. Where there is no patients or assistance to other medical staff required to provide scene safety as a flagman.

Flagman

To provide scene safety by setting up the closure and to provide traffic control by performing flagman duties according to prescribed procedures

For Customer Services:

Area Managers

Implement, manage and monitor customer service outlet/centre operational activities to achieve performance objectives.

Management, coaching and training of customer service outlet/Centre supervisor personnel to drive quality customer service and e-toll account management services.

Supervisors

The Supervisor is responsible for the daily management of a customer service outlet to ensure availability and quality of customer services to Road Users for account registration, queries and claims and account payments against TCH / VPC e-toll accounts.

Operators

Provide availability and quality customer service to walk-in customers; providing customers with product and service information.

Perform all system related tasks:

  • Enter new customer information into system;
  • Update existing customer information;
  • Identify and escalate priority issues;
  • Manage and resolve customer complaints;
  • Register road users on CRM;
  • Handle customer complaints and queries;
  • Process cash and card transactions and
  • Assist road users to navigate the website and installing tags in road user’s vehicles.

d) What were the monthly running costs of each office in the past three financial years

The compensation for services are not made on a center by center basis, but on the collective number of shifts manned and other related costs such as municipal fees, maintenance costs and rental costs. A reconciliation of the monthly running costs will comprise unbundling of payment items. The figures below reflect the overall costs related to the customer services provided at customer service centers:

2015/2016 = R 88 694 744,98 (total for the year)

2016/2017 = R 95 227 072,15 (total for the year

2017/2018 = R 50 451 413,56 (year to date)

e) What income has been generated by each office in the past three financial years

As part of customer services provided, road users do make top-ups at these centers or pay their invoices. For the different financial years, the following collective road user payments were received at these centers:

 

Revenue (Financial year)

 

2014/2015

2015/2016

2016/2017

2017/2018

April

19 915 658

13 004 920

20 619 986

21 129 261

May

22 741 000

15 357 006

20 385 130

20 479 538

June

22 142 500

15 947 121

19 324 436

21 107 051

July

20 500 489

16 793 255

20 045 998

22 156 294

August

19 802 208

15 253 531

18 994 527

20 739 284

September

17 267 399

13 571 803

18 851 062

21 097 535

October

15 881 764

14 252 734

19 418 923

21 107 265

November

13 925 891

13 288 272

19 007 095

5 046 731

December

12 606 423

18 809 217

23 022 078

 

January

12 170 534

18 142 352

17 021 558

 

February

12 560 086

16 397 786

16 082 784

 

March

13 315 478

19 937 292

21 214 187

 

 

Total

R 202 829 431

R 190 755 287

R 233 987 766

R 152 862 959

         

f) How was the income generated by each office?

The income stated in e) above is based on the payments received from road users who made top-ups or opted to settle their accounts at an office, as opposed to any of the on-line electronic payment options available.

23 November 2017 - NW3693

Profile picture: Stander, Ms T

Stander, Ms T to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1) Whether the policy framework for Government's sanitary ware programme has been developed since her reply to question 816 on 19 June 2017; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date is it envisaged that the framework will be developed; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether the proposed retreat to focus on the formulation of the specified framework took place; if not, why not; if so, (a) on which dates did it take place, (b) who attended the retreat and (c) what (i) was the total cost of the retreat and (ii) are the details of the product and/or outcome of the retreat; (3) whether the specified framework has been presented to the National Consultation lndaba; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will it be presented to the indaba; if so, what are the relevant details? NW4124E

Reply:

(1) In reply to question 816 on 19 June 2017, the Department of Social Development wishes to acknowledge that the Sanitary Dignity policy is driven by the Minister of the Department of Women. It is the Lead Department and has coordinated the development of the draft Policy which is hereto attached. The Department of Social Development is part of the Task Team and participates in all the meetings convened as well as providing support in finalizing the policy, and will also be involved in the identification of indigent girls and women from our database for distribution purposes.

(2) A retreat was not hosted by the lead Department or Department of Social Development.

(3) The framework was presented at the National 'Consultation lndaba convened by the Department of Women. The National Department of Social Development was represented by the Gender Chief Directorate. The Sanitary Dignity Consultative lndaba was held on 13 July 2017 against the background of a draft policy that has been produced by Department of Women (DoW), with the help of a team of three seconded officials from the Department of Traditional Affairs.

There is also a National Inter-department Task Team {NTT) that was established in order to work as a task team that would see to the finalization of the process of policy formulation, led by DoW and comprised of the following national departments:

• Department of Women (DoW);

• Department of Social Development (DSD);

• Department of Small Business Development (DSBD);

• Department of Trade and Industry (DTI);

• Department of Finance (National Treasury);

• Department of Higher Education;

• Department of Basic Education; and

• Statistics South Africa.

Following the presentation of the Policy Framework at the lndaba, it was agreed that the Policy Framework should form part of the Department of Women's Annual Performance Plan, Strategic Plan and Operational Plan. Provinces will be expected to develop their own policies according to their unique environments but keeping to injunctions of the Framework Policy.

Moving forward, the policy will go to the Social Protection, Community and Human Development (SPCHD) Cluster Technical Working Group (TWG), SPCHD DG Cluster, Cabinet Committee on SPCHD and then to Cabinet. It will then be gazetted and further awareness of the policy and solicitation of comments and analysis of those comments will ensue. There will be a final SociowEconomic Impact Assessment (SEIAS) process which will include the costing exercise. It will go to Cabinet for the final decision and then a final gazetting will take place and that product can be shared with Parliament.
Find here: Draft Sanitary Dignity Policy Framework

23 November 2017 - NW3589

Profile picture: Mbabama, Ms TM

Mbabama, Ms TM to ask the Minister of State Security

(a) What is the total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him for more than (aa) 30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days and (b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?

Reply:

(a) Information relating to services providers and/or contractors of the State Security Agency (SSA) forms part of the broader operational framework of the SSA and therefore remains classified and privileged. Information about service providers and/or contractors is a matter that falls in the ambit of national security and therefore excluded from public disclosure. It should however be observed that the SSA is held accountable on such matters by the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence (JSCI).

23 November 2017 - NW3414

Profile picture: Hunsinger, Mr CH

Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)(a) What salary, remuneration or benefit increases have been granted in each salary grade to employees of (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him in each of the past three financial years, (b) what criteria were used when granting the specified increases in each grade of employee in each case and (c) who authorized the increases in each specified financial year, (2) what bonuses have been given in each grade of employee in the past three financial years, (b) what criteria were used when granting the specified bonuses in each specified financial year and who authorized the bonuses in each financial year?

Reply:

Department

REPLY

1. (a) of and (ii) each entity reporting to him, (b) what criteria were used when granting the specified increases in each grade of employee in each case and (c) who authorised the increases in each specified financial year;

(a) What salary, remuneration or benefit increases have been granted in each salary grade to employees in (i) his department in each of the past three financial years:

PAST THREE FINANCIAL YEARS

LOWER LEVEL EMPLOYEES - SALARY LEVELS 1 TO 10

MIDDEL MANAGEMENT – SALARY LEVEL 11 & 12

SMS MEMBERS – SALARY LEVEL 13 - 16

2015-04-01

7%

7%

5.5%

2016-04-01

7,6%

7,6%

Wef 2016/01/01:

Level 13: 4%

Level 14 & 15: 2,5%

Level 16: 2%

2017-04-01

7,3%

7,3%

5.5%

(b) The salary increases of employees who are employed by the State and fall within the registered scope of the Public Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC) are determined by National Treasury based on the average projected CPI and approved by the Minister for Public Service and Administration.

(c) 

Section 3 (5)(a) of the Public Service Act, 1994, as amended, (Act) prescribed that subject to the Labour Relations Act and any collective agreement, the Minister for Public Service and Administration may make determinations regarding any conditions of service of employees generally or categories of employees, including determinations regarding a salary scale for all employees or salary scales for particular categories of employees and allowances for particular categories of employees.

Furthermore, in terms of section (6) (a) of the Act, any provision of a collective agreement contemplated in subsection (4), concluded on or after the commencement of the Public Service Amendment Act, 2007, shall, in respect of conditions of service of employees appointed in terms of the Act, be deemed to be a determination made by the Minister for Public Service and Administration.

(2)

(a)

(i) A service bonus/13th cheque of 100% of an employees’ gross monthly basic salary is paid to employees on salary levels 1 to 10. In the case of MMS or SMS members (salary level 11 and above), the 13th cheque may be structured from the flexible portion of their all-inclusive remuneration package.

(ii) Performance incentives (bonus)

PAST THREE FINANCIAL YEARS

LOWER LEVEL EMPLOYEES - SALARY LEVELS 1 TO 10

MIDDEL MANAGEMENT – SALARY LEVEL 11 & 12

SMS MEMBERS – SALARY LEVEL 13 - 16

2015-04-01

     

2016-04-01

     

2017-04-01

     

b)

Service bonus/13th cheque

In terms of PSCBC Resolution 3 of 1999 “an employee shall receive a service bonus if she or he

(a) has a permanent contract or a fixed-term contract lasting at least three months, unless the contract specifies otherwise, and

(b) in the year ending on her or his bonus date, does not resign or undergo discharge due to misconduct.”

(c)

Service bonus/13th cheque

As indicated in paragraph 1 (b) and (c) above, the Minister for Public Service and Administration determines the conditions of service of employees appointed in terms of the Act.

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

1. (a) Salary increase for employees including Executives; and

Housing subsidy for only Basic salaries employees on A to C Band.

(i) Airports Company South Africa SoE

(ii) Salary Increase

Remuneration Increases

Grades

% Increase

2015 Financial Year

SOL 1 to 3 (Unionized)

8%

 

SOL 3 to 5

7.5%

 

SOL 6

6.5%

 

SOL 7 and 8

6%

2016 Financial Year

A3 to C3 (Unionized)

8.5%

 

C4 to D5

7.5%

 

E1 to E3

Executives

6.5%

   

6.5%

2017 Financial Year

A3 to C3 (Unionized)

8.1%

 

C4 to D5

7.5%

 

E1 to E3

Executives

7%

  • housing subsidy for only Basic salaries employees on A to C Band
  • 2015 Financial Year – No increase
  • 2016 Financial Year – No Increase
  • 2017 Financial Year – All housing subsidy was increase to R1,500 taxable

(b) what criteria were used when granting the specified increases in each grade of employee in each case and

2015, 2016 and 2017 increases are based on:

  • Projected inflation i.e. CPI as determined by stats SA (CPI refers to the Annual Percentage Change in the Consumer Price Index, excluding interest rates on mortgage bonds);
  • Internal equity;
  • External market movement;
  • Supporting variables such performance;
  • Company Affordability
  • Employee category:
    • Unionised employees – Wage agreement based on wage negotiations
    • Non-Unionised employees – Performance based increase.

(c) who authorised the increases in each specified financial year;

  • All increases are approved by the Airports Company South Africa Board.

(2) (a) what bonuses have been given in each grade of employee in the past three financial years,

  • For FY 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17 all bonuses are based on Company and individual performance:

Categories

ACSA Patterson Grades

Paterson Broad Band

ACSA On-target

Percentages as a % of TGP

Sliding Scale

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

CEO

CFO

COO

Top Executives

E4 – F3

F3

35% - 50%

R120 million

R154 million

R164 million

   

FL

       
   

EU

       

General Management

 

EL

       

Group Managers

E1 – E3

EL

14% - 35%

     

Senior Management

D4 - D5

DU

       

Middle Management

D1- D3

DL

       

Professionals

C4- C5

CU

       

General Employees (IBU)

A3 to C3

A to CL

8.33%

     

(b)

      • Unqualified audit report;
      • The Company must be deemed financially profitable, where financial profitability is determined by the Company’s profit/loss after tax;
      • The total Bonus Pool size is calculated based on 3% of EBITDA which is dependent on the level of predetermined objectives being met.
      • Seventy five percent (75%) achievement level of the set pre-determined objectives is set a trigger for performance bonus payments;

(c)

  • All bonuses are approved by Airports Company South Africa Board.

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

2015/16 FY

2016/17 FY

2017/18 FY

Notes

6.1%

4.6%

6.1%

The remuneration increase is CPI related for both Bargaining Unit and Non-Bargaining Unit Employees,

(b)

- Annual increases are linked to the employee’s performance score, employee’s placement in terms of their grade level of the position and years of experience.

- These principles are based on the collective salary agreements for the Bargaining Unit employees and Remuneration policy for Non-Bargaining Unit employees.

(c)

- ATNS Board

(2) (a) what bonuses have been given in each grade of employee in the past three financial years,

- Only performance related bonuses have been paid to employees within the last three financial years, which the Board approves annually.

(b)

- The criteria used is a combination of the company’s performance and individual employees level of performance throughout the year of assessment.

- The trigger for the organisation’s performance is a combination of set “qualifiers and modifiers for the bonus pool.

- The individual employee’s percentage is linked to the employee’s annual salary and grade level of the position.

(c)

- ATNS Board

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

(1)(i) N/A (1)(a)(ii) The South African Civil Aviation Authority granted the following salary increases that were applied across the entire organisation to all eligible employees in line with the organsiationa’s remuneration policy:

  • 2015/16 – 7.1%
  • 2016/17 – 7.8%
  • 2017/18 – 7.7%

(1)(b) The National Treasury Guidelines were applied across the organisation. (c) The SACAA Board approved all the salary increases.

(2)(a) Performance based bonuses were paid to all eligible employees in line with company’s Remuneration Policy. (b) Performance bonuses were based on the performance of the organisation, individual employee performance, affordability and Board approval as per the company’s remuneration policy (c) The SACAA Board approved the payment of all perfomance bonuses as per the organisation’s Remuneration Policy.

RTIA

  1. (a) (ii) All salary increases that took place for the past three financial years were in accordance with DPSA cost of living adjustments indicated in the PSCBC Multi-year resolution. See lbelow table link salary increases that took place;

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW3414Remuneration.pdf

  1. The salary increases were in line with PSCBC Resolutions for Salary Levels 1-12 were as follows:
  • Year 2015=7%
  • Year 2016=7.6
  • Year 2017=7.3%

The salary increases for SMS members, Levels 13-16 were as follows:

  • Year 2015=5.5% level 13-16
  • Year 2016=4% level 13, 2.5% level 14 and 2.0% level 16
  • Year 2017=5.5%

(c) The Minister of Public Service and Administration determined/approved the adjustments for members employed in terms of the Public Service. The adjustments are determined in terms of Section 3(5)(a) of the Public Service Act,1994, as amended read with the Public Service Regulations (Chapter 4, Part 4, Section B 1).

(2) (a) The bonuses in each grade of employee in the past three financial years are provided in the Table link below.

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW3414BONUSES.pdf

(b) The criteria for granting bonuses is provided in the Table below.

Year

Criteria

2015

Ex-gratia bonuses

2016

In line with the approved Performance Management Framework

2017

In line with the approved Performance Management Framework

(c) The bonuses were authorized by the Board of the Agency.

C-BRTA

1. (a)(ii) The annual cost of living salary adjustments for the Cross-Border Road Transport Agency in the past three years were as follows:

  • 2014/15: 7.9%
  • 2015/16: 5.9%
  • 2016/17: 8.0%

In addition to the salary adjustments, in 2015/16 financial year, a collective agreement was concluded with POPCRU to regulate working hours for Road Transport Inspectorate and payment of overtime. The overtime was paid based on the threshold from the National Treasury.

(b) The Annual Cost of Living Adjustments or salary increases are determined using the criteria of the market benchmark as well as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is a determinant of consumer inflation. The annual cost of living adjustments was based on the negotiated agreement with the Labour Union, which was applicable across the board.

(c) The Executive Committee, evaluates the rationale against the feasibility of granting the annual cost of living adjustments against the CPI of the time, which is a factor of consumer inflation; and makes recommendations to the Human Resources and Remuneration Committee, which makes further inputs and recommend to the C-BRTA Board for approval.

2.(a) The performance bonuses awarded in the C-BRTA were only for 2015/16 financial year and granted to deserving employees and in line with the Performance Management policy. The basis of the Performance Bonuses was to encourage employees of the C-BRTA to continue to perform optimally towards the achievement of the Agency’s mandate. Performance Bonuses are a sole discretion of the C-BRTA Board, which determines the feasibility of awarding such based on audited performance results and financial standing of the Agency.

(b) Each employee was assessed against the signed Performance Agreements and as per the C-BRTA Performance Management Policy approved in 2014. The bonus awards were allocated on an average of 13.81% between the ranges 3,5 -5.0 rating across the board, with the exception of Executive Management who were not part of the scheme as approved by the C-BRTA Board. The allocation was on the following basis:

The Board resolved to pay performance bonuses for the financial year 2015/16 to:

  • All eligible employees who had obtained a final performance score of 3.5 and above as provided in the Performance Management Policy.
  • Eligible employees who were in the employ of the Agency at the end of the financial year of 2015/16.

No performance bonuses were approved for financial year 2016/17 yet.

(c) It is the sole discretion of the C-BRTA Board to authorise the payment of performance bonuses as and when it is reasonably feasible and financially viable to do such based on the overall audited performance of the Agency against the set Annual Performance Plan (APP).

RAF

(1)(a)(ii) The Road Accident Fund granted the following increases in the Total Employment Cost (TEC) packages of employees:

in the 2016-17 financial year,

in the 2015-16 financial year,

in the 2014-15 financial year,

TASK grade 1 – 13 employees were awarded an 8% increase,

TASK grade 1 – 13 employees were awarded a 7,6% increase,

TASK grade 1 – 13 employees were awarded a 7,4% increase,

TASK grade 14 - 19 employees were awarded a 6,7% increase,

TASK grade 14 - 19 employees were awarded a 6,5% increase,

TASK grade 14 employees were awarded a 6,9% increase,

TASK grade 20 - 25 employees were awarded a 6,2% increase.

TASK grade 20 - 25 employees were awarded a 6% increase.

TASK grade 15 - 25 employees were awarded a 6,4% increase.

(b) The criteria used to grant the increases comprised of external market data, projected inflation and affordability.

(c) The increases in each specified year were authorised by the RAF Board and the RAF’s Remuneration Committee.

(2)(a) The following bonuses have been given for each grade of employee in the past three financial years:

in the 2016-17 financial year,

in the 2015-16 financial year,

in the 2014-15 financial year,

in respect of TASK grade 1 – 13 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 15% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 1 – 13 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 15% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 1 – 13 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 15% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 14 – 16 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 20% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 14 – 16 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 20% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 14 – 16 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 20% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 18 – 20 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 25% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 18 – 20 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 25% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 18 – 20 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 25% of the employee’s TEC,

in respect of TASK grade 21 – 24 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 30% of the employee’s TEC, and

in respect of TASK grade 21 – 24 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 30% of the employee’s TEC, and

in respect of TASK grade 21 – 24 employees, a sum calculated based on qualifying employees’ individual performance scores, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contracts of employees, with a maximum threshold of 30% of the employee’s TEC, and

in respect of the TASK grade 25 employee, a sum calculated based on the employee’s individual performance score, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contract of the employee, with a maximum threshold of 50% of the employee’s TEC.

in respect of the TASK grade 25 employee, a sum calculated based on the employee’s individual performance score, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contract of the employee, with a maximum threshold of 50% of the employee’s TEC.

in respect of the TASK grade 25 employee, a sum calculated based on the employee’s individual performance score, as assessed in terms of the RAF’s Performance Management and Development Policy and the individual performance contract of the employee, with a maximum threshold of 50% of the employee’s TEC.

(b) The criteria used in each financial year to grant the bonuses, comprised of organisational and individual performance.

(c) The bonuses in each specified year were authorised by the RAF Board and the RAF’s Remuneration Committee.

SANRAL

Table below provides summary of annual increases during the past three financial years.

(1)(a) (ii)

SANRAL GRADE

Summary of salary increases for the past 3 financial years

 

Mar 2015

Mar 2016

Mar 2017

Grade A

12%

10%

8%

Grade B

9.9%

7%

14%

Grade C

9.9%

10%

9%

Grade D

9.9%

7%

7%

Grade EL

9.9%

7%

6.5%

Grade EU

9.95%

7%

7.5%

Grade F

9.93%

7%

9%

Grade G

6.2%

6.9%

 

1 (b) In accordance with SANRAL Policy on remuneration, each year SANRAL undertakes a salary survey exercise through an independent service provider. Salary adjustments are effective from 1 March, annually.

SANRAL will typically take into account a number of factors in determining annual adjustment to the payroll, per grade. These include:

  • Performance appraisal / individual performance
  • CPI
  • Affordability
  • Market comparisons / salary survey

The Salary Survey report contains information on the following areas:

  • National salary increase trends
  • Medical aid inflation
  • Wage settlements within Government and related sectors
  • Update of pay scales for the year going forward
  • Analysis of movement in pay scales including compa ratio and cost analysis
  • Market data for specific roles within SANRAL
  • Short-term incentive market data in the National Market and State Owned Enterprises

1 (c) Annual Payroll adjustments are approved by the SANRAL Board.

2 (a)

The South African National Roads Agency SOC Limited

       

Summary of STIS for past 3 financial years

 

GRADE

2014/2015

2015/2016

2016/2017

Grade A

R 116 449.00

R 134 867.00

R 132 432.00

Grade B

R 430 421.00

R 483 378.00

R 572 590.00

Grade C

R 2 533 803.00

R 3 398 077.00

R 4 095 971.00

Grade D

R 5 373 268.00

R 6 052 020.00

R 7 008 670.00

Grade E

R 20 571 658.00

R 24 577 091.00

R 30 692 558.00

Grade F

R 4 067 261.00

R 4 468 809.00

R 5 119 188.00

Grade G

R 1 279 953.00

R 1 320 492.00

R 1 266 705.00

TOTAL

R 34 372 813.00

R 40 434 734.00

R 48 888 114.00

2 (b) The SANRAL Short Term Incentive (STI) Policy determines the criteria for bonuses. The criteria include the Annual Performance Plan, signed with the Minister of Transport. The incentive scheme is designed around delivery of SANRAL’s strategic objectives. Actual performance is measured and assessed against specific deliverables contained in the Agreement, and a performance score will be determined. The policy also specifies the minimum criteria for eligibility, based on the SANRAL overall performance as well as individual performance.

2 (c) The STI Policy is approved by the SANRAL Board. The SANRAL performance score, derived from the Annual Performance Plan, is also approved by the Board.

RTMC

(a) For the period effective April 2015, the increases have been as follows:

(i) For the 2015 financial year, the increase was 10% and 6% for managers and non-managers respectively

(ii) For the period effective April 2016, the increase has been 9% across the board

(iii) For the period effective April 2017, the increase has been 8,5% for non-management staff and 6.3% for management

(b) For Non-management this was informed by the bargaining process with Organised Labour taking into account CPIX and other economic factors.

(c) The Board of the RTMC approved all increases post assessment of performance and signing of the labour agreement on increases.

2. (a) (i) For the year ending March 2014, there was no Performance bonus that was paid.

(ii) For the year ending March 2015, the percentage approved was 6% and 3% of Annual Total package. The 6% was for permanent employees and 3 % for employees on Contract.

(iii) For the year ending March 2016, the percentage approved was 7,5% of Annual Total package

(b) The criteria for the payment of bonuses is informed by the overall performance of the organisation, the PMDS policy as well as terms and conditions of each individual employee.

(c) The Board of the RTMC approved the payment of bonuses taking into account the performance of the organisation and the PMDS policy.

 

PRASA

a) What salary, remuneration or benefit increases have been granted in each salary grade to employees of

PRASA has awarded the following inflationary Increases for 2014 - 2017

Financial Year

Inflationary Increase for Junior Employees in the Bargaining Unit

Inflationary Increase for Management Employees

2015/16(3 year Wage Agreement)

  • 8.5% for all junior employees above R115, 000.
  • 9.5% for all junior employees less than R115, 000.
  • 6.5% for Assistant Managers and Managers.
  • 5.5% Senior Managers, General Managers and Executives.

2016/17

  • 9% for all junior employees above R125, 000.
  • 10% for all junior employees less than R125, 000
  • 6.2% for Assistant Managers and Managers.
  • 6% Senior Managers, General Managers and Executives.

2017/18

  • 8% Across the Board
  • 6% across the Board

(ii) Each entity reporting to him in each of the past three financial years,

(b) The inflationary increases are paid in accordance to the PRASA Remuneration and Benefits Policy and Government guidelines

(c) The Junior Employees in the Bargaining unit inflationary increases are negotiated with Organized Labour, recommended by Group Exco to the Group Board for ratification.

Ordinarily, the management inflationary increases are recommended by Group Human Capital Management to the Board through the Human Capital and Remuneration Committee or the Board. In the absence of the Board the ratification is sought from the Shareholder.

(2) a) PRASA has not paid any bonuses for the past 3 financial years

  • a gain share payment is made to junior employees in the Bargaining unit at PRASA Rail as per the Labour Gain share Bonus Agreement

b) i) The gain share payment for junior employees is made to Regions that have exceeded their Revenue Collection Targets.

ii) The employees are paid in accordance with the time period of their participation within the given Financial Year.

RSR

1. (a) The RSR salary adjustments over the periods are as follows (excluding regrading or individual posts):

PERIOD

JOB GRADE

COST OF LIVING INCREASE %

AVE NOTCH INCREASE %

2015

1 – 8

7.00%

0.00%

 

9 – 12

6.50%

0.76%

 

13 – 16

6.00%

4.06%

2016

A1 - C2

6.80%

0.00%

 

C3 - D1

6.30%

0.31%

 

D2 - F1

5.80%

1.31%

2017

A1 - F1

6.00%

1.50%

(b) The above increases are based on annual cost-of living adjustments which are inflation related, and were based on Salary Benchmarking and Salary surveys from the South African market to determine the suitability of its salary increases and the financial impact. The RSR’s Remuneration Philosophy and staff retention is also considered in these determination.

The increases also include individual notch progressions, based on performance in line with the RSR Performance Management Policy.

(c) The RSR Board of Directors approved the financial increases in each financial year

  1. The RSR awards annual performance bonuses to all grades of employees who qualify as per the RSR Performance Management Policy. No other bonus types are applicable.
  2. The RSR’s short term performance bonuses are awarded to staff members who have performed exceptionally and met the set minimum criteria in respect of qualification for a performance bonus, and is determined based on a rating scale of 1 – 4, whereby those who met a score of 4 and above will be awarded bonuses after performance score moderation is finalized and Board approval has been obtained.
  3. The RSR Board of Directors approved the financial increases in each financial year.

Ports Regulator of South Africa

1(a)(ii) The Ports Regulator annually grants all employees a salary increase equivalent to CPI adjustment as per the National Treasury estmates used during the MTEF budget process. The employees below senior management are entitled to all bebenfits which include: medical aid, group life and pension. These benefits are however not available to senior employees in terms of the Regulator concidions of service. This practice has been in place since 2012/13 financial year when the salary bands and benefits were approved by the Minister of Transport in concurrence with the Minister of Finance as required by the National Ports Act.

(b) The increases are implemented at the beginning of each financial year. The salary increases are done as per the National Treasury guide to Departments.

( c) The salary increases are accounted for in the annual budget of the Regulator which is then approved by the Regulator (board) concurrent with the approval of the APP and the Strategic plan. This is done before the start of the financial year so that the implementation of the APP as well as salary increases is done at the same time.

2(a) The conditions of service of the Regulator indicates that all employees below manager level get 10% of annual salary as a bonus while employees from manager to senior managers get 20% of annual salary as a bonus. This practice has been in plac since 2013/14 financial year when the performance mnagement system was developed, approved and implemented

(b) The employees each sign a performance agreement at the beginning of the financial year. The performance agreement will set out expected outputs from each employee based on the deliverables for their specific department. At the end of the financial year, each employee is then assessed against reported performance and scored in accordance with the performance framework which has a sliding scale from 5 to 1. Employees get a bonus if they perform above level 3. A final weighting is done for all KPI’s and final score given to an employee. The final score is then used to calculate the quantum of the bonus earned by the employee.

( c) The performance bonus forms part of the annual budgert that is approved by the Regulator (board). When the bonuses for all employees have been finalised, there’s a review that is performed by a committee to ensuer that there was transparency, fairness and relevance between employees performance and that of the organisation. Once the review is complete the bonuses are then forwaded to the CFO for recommendation to the CEO for final approval before making payemnts to employees. .

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

(1)(a)(ii)

Year

% Increase

 

2014

6,2%

All staff

2015

5.4%

All staff

2016

5.2%

All staff

 

(1)(b)

CPI + 1%

(1)(c)

2014 – Authorized by the Board of Directors

2015 - Authorized by the Board of Directors

2016 – Authorized by the Board of Directors

(2) (a) what bonuses have been given in each grade of employee in the past three financial years, (b) what criteria were used when granting the specified bonuses in each specified financial year and (c) who authorized the bonuses in each financial year? NW3806E

Response:

(2) (a)

Year

% Increase

 
     

2014

0%

All staff

2015

8.5%

All staff

2016

6.2%

All staff except EXCO

(2) (b)

Organisational Performance was the criteria used for granting the bonuses.

(2)(c)

2014 – Board of Directors

2015 – Board of Directors

2016 – Board of Directors

 

23 November 2017 - NW3539

Profile picture: Steenkamp, Ms J

Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Transport

(a) Which entities that report to him have missed the deadline to submit their annual reports, (b) what requests for extension have been received, (c) what were the reasons given, (d) which were granted extension, (e) why was extension granted in each case, (f) which entities were not granted extension, (g) why was extension denied in each case and (h) what is being done to ensure that in future deadlines are met?

Reply:

(a)The following Entities have missed the deadline submission of Annual reports ;

1. SANRAL

2. SAMSA

3. PRASA

(b) The Accounting Authority of the above three (3) mentioned entities wrote to the Executive Authority in terms of section 65 of the PFMA about the entities failure to submit their Annual report and reason were provided.

(c) Reasons for Extensions

SANRAL;The Finalisation of the Annual Financial Statements and the Audit Report were delayed due to a delay in processing SANRAL’s request to reword its Government Guarantee and consequently the approval from National Treasury was also late. This has resulted in a delay in the issue of the Audit Report by the Auditor General of South Africa (AG)

SAMSA; There was a delay in the finalisation of the audit by the AG.

PRASA; There was a delay in the finalisation of the Annual Financial Statements and the Audit Report due to AG seeking legal opinion on Section 49 (2)(b) of the PFMA to determine if the Acting Group Chief Executive Officer can accept the Audit report as the Accounting Authority in the absence of the board

(d) Entities that were granted extension ;

1. SANRAL

2. SAMSA

3. PRASA

(e) Reasons for Extensions

The request from the three entities were reasonable and in line with the PFMA.

(f) None

(g) Not applicable

(h) What is being done to ensure that in future deadlines are met

SANRAL; The board has undertaken that they will submit request right on time.

SAMSA: Audit Committee steering has been set which comprise of Management, Internal Audit and AG. This committee reports to the Audit Committee of the board.

PRASA; An interim board has been appointed that will ensure that all vacant executive positions will be filled as a matter of urgency and The Executive Authority will be appointing a permanent board in due course.

23 November 2017 - NW3523

Profile picture: Bagraim, Mr M

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1) How many (a) boys and (b) girls were resident at Don Mattera Child and Youth Care Centre in Edenvale in each month from September 2016

Reply:

Find here: Reply:

23 November 2017 - NW3593

Profile picture: McLoughlin, Mr AR

McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Transport

(a) What is the total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him for more than (aa) 30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days and (b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?

Reply:

Department

(a)(i) (aa) Nil

(bb) Nil

(cc) Nil

(dd) Nil

(b)(i) (aa) Nil

(bb) Nil

(cc) Nil

(dd) Nil

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA) monitors accounts payable aging at ACSA’S Exco and Financial Risk Management Committee {FRMC} (subcommittee of the EXCO).

Extracted from the September 2017 FRMC Report (Executive Summary):

Other detail:

Supplier Name  

Current

(ZAR)

30 days

(ZAR)

31 – 60 days

(ZAR)

SIZWE AFRICA IT GROUP (PTY) LTD

9476201,59

-

-

KARL FREDERICK KRAMER T/A DURBAN COMPRESSORS

6188376,00

-

-

PULENG TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD

4025764,08

-

-

SUPERCARE SERVICES GROUP (PTY) LTD

1667932,08

-

-

TIPP FOCUS HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD

-

35388,38

1398553,52

ADB SAFEGATE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

474008,46

-

567555,62

OTIS (PTY) LTD

3549,71

-

1004684,28

BOSASA SECURITY (PTY) LTD

991980,77

-1179,26

-

AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR CC

665921,34

-

317387,40

BMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS CC

-

955019,04

-

KUDLAKWELANGA TRADING CC

943200,00

-

-

RUWACON (PTY) LTD

917543,14

-

-

AMERICAN EXPRESS CARDS - CLUB CORPORATE TRAVEL

-

552527,50

353621,12

BIRDLIFE SOUTH AFRICA

741000,00

-

-

SANDTON CONVENTON CENTRE

357117,00

285693,60

-

ORICOL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED

633905,89

-

-

POSTWINK SALES CC

610185,00

-

-

ULWEMBU LA SE KASI HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD

9183,22

20406,00

496290,55

EXPONANT (PTY) LTD

-

212603,16

302326,86

RAKOMA AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED

500745,00

-

5867,00

RED ALERT TSS (PTY) LTD

215857,44

-

203358,89

GAU FLORA NURSERY CC

409643,43

-

-

MULTICHOICE AFRICA (PTY) LTD

-

233104,86

161225,00

SAFETY AND ALLIED PRODUCTS CC

-

-

385092,00

GEORGE MUNICIPALITY

335181,15

-

-

TECHNIQUE ENGINEERING SERVICES (PTY) LTD

325088,35

-

-

SFI GROUP (PTY) LTD

324351,66

-

-

CASNAN CIVILS CC

271120,50

-

-

MINERP HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD

-

-

269238,82

CLUB CORPORATE TRAVEL (PTY) LTD

12655,04

-

250501,38

MUNICIPALITY

195531,47

-

64050,00

TSEBO OUTSOURCING GROUP (PTY) LTD T/A TSEBO CLEANING SOLUTIONS

121227,32

121227,32

-

IKANDO (PTY) LTD t/a iTMASTER

232795,49

-

-

WASTE PLAN (PTY) LTD

231855,45

-

-

FTI CONSULTING SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

225439,56

-

-

UK RENOVATORS CC

118445,01

106254,10

-

DAWID KRUIPER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

222355,55

-

-

JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD

211160,70

-

8755,20

CONTINUITYSA (PTY) LTD

215335,17

-

-

PARNIS AIRPORT SERVICES A DIV. OF PARNIS

21492,82

-

187683,89

MIKELEC ELECTRICAL CC

200215,19

-

-

LS NAIDOO T/A GOODWILL PLUMBING AND CIVILS

-

-

191308,49

AFRIMAGE PHOTOGRAPHY t/a ALBERT FRONEMAN CONSULTING

-

-

181289,64

AIR TRAFFIC & NAVIGATION SERVICES COMPANY LTD T/A ATNS

177671,37

-

-

ENGEN PETROLEUM LTD

172706,26

-

-

CAPE TOWN PARTNERSHIP NPC

-

-

171000,00

UPLIFT QUALITY SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD

-

-

164905,56

OMEGA COMMUNICATIONS (PTY) LTD

26014,80

132599,78

-

AMPCOR KHANYISA CC

122853,59

-

32667,92

GADGET GIRLS CC

-

-

150532,44

TOURVEST DESTINATION MANAGEMENT A DIVISION OF TOURVEST HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD

150392,99

-

-

ACTS OF RANDOM KINDNESS SOUTH AFRICA NPC T/A ARK SA

-

-

150000,00

ROSENBAUER SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

-

-

122177,69

ZGS SOLUTIONS SERVICES (PTY) LTD

-

-

120000,00

SERVEST (PTY) LTD

115676,22

-

-

ODEX ONLINE CC

37273,05

-

70996,28

JN PLUMBING CC t/a COMET PLUMBING

103512,00

-

-

GARY RACHBUCH ATTORNEYS

-

-

96898,88

DOWN LOW CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECTS

96550,00

-

-

BARLOWORLD SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD T/A BARLOWORLD EQUIPMENT

91109,71

-

-

PROTOCOR TWENTY TWO CC T/A AUTOMATION SPECIFICATION

-

-

89837,93

BOWMAN GILFILLAN INC

-

-

89143,22

ASPIRE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD

-

-

85500,00

MAJUGO TRADING (PTY) LTD

85500,00

-

-

BEUMER GROUP SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

-

-

81815,52

SOLID WEDGE SYSTEMS CC

69820,67

-

-

LOURENS ROADMARKING CC

66558,67

-

-

PLAN B CONSULTING CC

-

56528,72

-

SUPERFECTA TRADING 106 CC T/A KZN TOP BUSINESS

-

-

52624,00

BORDER KEI CHAMBER OF BUSINESS

-

51720,00

-

E W TOOLS AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES

-

-

51015,00

KELLY GROUP (PTY) LTD

-

-

49498,02

UNAKHO FIRE AND EMERGENCY TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD

-

-

49200,00

DURBANVILLE PEST CONTROL CC T/A ENVIRO-SAFE

46899,60

-

-

SOUTH AFRICAN PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION T/A SAPOA

-

-

46603,20

HAMILTON HYDRAULIC SERVICES CC

46155,18

-

-

ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA

45600,00

-

-

WAZISONDA INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD t/a SAUSAGE SALOON PROTEA GLEN

44689,14

-

-

DISTINCTIVE CHOICE 1272 CC T/A TURNMET

-

-

43465,54

MANAGED INTEGRITY EVALUATION (PTY) LTD T/A MIE

-

-

42750,00

MELEX GOLF CARS (PTY) LTD

42021,25

-

-

AVIATION TRAINING ACADEMY

-

19702,62

21147,00

MOTLA CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LTD

40286,38

-

-

THE HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICE CC T/A THE HUMAN RESOURCE CC

-

-

39900,00

35 PHINDZANI TRADING (PTY) LTD

1824,00

-

36000,00

EUROPCAR.

29703,80

-

4369,19

NDENZA OA (SWD) (PTY) LTD T/A CANOA EASTERN CAPE (PTY) LTD

7700,00

25036,13

-

TD MOTHEBE TRADING T/A MOTHEBE SHUTTLE SERVICES

-

13650,00

18050,00

BIDDULPHS REMOVALS & STORAGE (PTY) LTD

27861,60

-

-

PREMIER ATTRACTION 219 CC T/A ICON CIVILS & BUILDING

-

-

27558,36

ANCER (PTY) LTD

27025,00

-

-

ACTIVE MECHANICAL SERVICES GROUP CC T/A AMS GROUP

26710,20

-

-

FORMFUNC STUDIO (PTY) LTD

26239,95

-

-

CARPE DIEM CIVILS CC

25972,40

-

-

CITY OF CAPE TOWN - RCS LEVIES

25692,00

-

-

RAPID SPILL RESPONSE CC

-

-

25362,06

NDODANA CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LTD

25080,00

-

-

THE H AND H SECURITY TRUST T/A HARTWIG & HENDERSON SECURITY TRUST

-

24612,12

-

YELLOW DOT OFFICE DEPOT (PTY) LTD

-

24461,65

-

INSTITUTE OF PEOPLE MANAGEMENT T/A IPM

12040,00

-

12040,00

SIZISA UKHANYO TRADING 1067

23930,88

-

-

SCHINDLER LIFTS (SA) (PTY) LTD

22160,92

-

-

THE PRIORY FOR SOUTH AFRICA OF THE ORDER OF ST JOHN T/A ST JOHN AMBULANCE

-

-

21950,00

MULTIMINDS 186 CC T/A COOLING SOLUTIONS

21934,51

-

-

BAPHATHE TRADING T/A ARWYP AIRPORT CLINIC

-

-

20960,00

SIYAYA CORPORATION (PTY) LTD T/A SIYAYA TYRES

20508,60

-

-

USIZO TECHNICAL SERVICES CC

19899,38

-

-

GLOBAL PROSPECTUS TRAINING (PTY) LTD

19357,20

-

-

HANAU ELECTRIC (PTY) LTD T/A TELE TRONIC

-

-

17850,53

CARGO LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD

-

-

17580,00

PA  STATIONERS UPT (PTY) LTD

17341,63

-

-

JABATHA PAPER AND STATIONERY CC

15938,49

1206,80

-

BARLOWORLD SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD T/A AVIS RENT A CAR

16756,86

-

-

LEGADIMA PERSONNEL

-

-

16279,20

BULKMATECH ENGINEERING (PTY) LTD

-

12038,40

3938,70

HEALTH INSITE SA (PTY) LTD

-

-

15931,50

MAINLINE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS CC

-

15789,00

-

MELCO ELEVATOR SA (PTY) LTD

15576,74

-

-

CREST PARKING & ACCESS CONTROL CC

-

-

15530,22

SAACOSH (PTY) LTD

15162,00

-

-

SEEDITE AND BOGOSI TRADE AND ENTERPRISE CC

-

15142,50

-

ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA T/A ECSA

-

3072,00

11845,40

SOUTH AFRICAN WEATHER SERVICE

14857,28

-

-

KAMO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES

-

-

14136,00

IMAGE EXCELLENCE PERFORMANCE CONSULTANTS GROUP (PTY) LTD T/A IE GROUP

-

-

13651,50

MAINBRANCH INVESTMENTS 39 (PTY) LTD T/A SOARING FALCON SPUR

2749,00

3974,10

6907,35

GET EDUCATED CC T/A GETSMARTER

-

-

12900,00

WJ AUST CC T/A MICROTEQ

12774,28

-

-

SAGE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD t/a SAGE HR AND PAYROLL A DIV OF SAGE SOUTH AFRICA

-

12654,00

-

RENTOKIL INITIAL (PTY) LTD

12451,89

-

-

ALGOA OFFICE AUTOMATION (PTY) LTD t/a NASHUA EASTERN CAPE

12315,22

-

-

TOP MEDIA AND COMMUNNICATIONS (PTY) LTD

-

11400,00

-

THE GATEWAY HOTEL UMHLANGA (PTY) LTD

-

11375,00

-

COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE OF SOUTH AFRICA

6477,00

4860,00

-

DURBAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

-

-

11039,76

DARK FIBRE AFRICA (PTY) LTD

-

-

10624,80

KINGDOM CUISINE (PTY) LTD

-

-

10609,22

APPLECART PROPERTIES 42 CC t/a SAFFRON KITCHEN

-

6963,12

3465,60

MINOLCO (PTY) LTD T/A KONICA MINOLTA SA

10026,84

-

-

GARAGE CARDS - CORPORATE

9435,04

-

-

CENTA FIRE (PTY) LTD

-

-

9405,00

SOUTHERN AFRICAN MUSIC RIGHTS ORGANISATION T/A SAMRO LIMITED

9346,30

-

-

THINK360 KZN (PTY) LTD

9006,00

-

-

SOUTH AFRICAN COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTRES

8949,00

-

-

FOODWEAR CC

8744,94

-

-

ILEMBE CONSORTIUM

-

-

8735,08

PARAMOUNT BODY WORKS CC

8265,00

-

-

INSTITUTION OF FIRE ENGINEERS SA

7930,00

-

-

THE INSTITUTE OF RISK MANAGEMENT SOUTH AFRICA

7780,50

-

-

SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

5985,00

1785,00

-

INNOVATIVE SPECIALIZED PRODUCTIONS CC

7560,00

-

-

VOLTEX (PTY) LTD T/A LITECOR

7536,06

-

-

GILBARCO AFS (PTY) LTD

7469,85

-

-

ENVIROSERV WASTE MANAGEMENT (PTY) LTD

7318,80

-

-

RICOH SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

6882,88

-

-

FIHRST MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PTY) LTD (HR)

6770,23

-

-

MR FIX IT

6612,00

-

-

VODACOM SERVICE PROVIDER COMPANY (PTY) LTD

-

6534,90

-

RODE AND ASSOCIATES (PTY) LTD

-

6498,00

-

TERRA FIRMA SOLUTIONS

6298,50

-

-

MASON COMPLETE OFFICE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD

6260,43

-

-

COASTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

-

-

6238,67

WCA WORKERS COMPENSATION ASSISTANCE

6228,30

-

-

BUMBALI (PTY) LTD t/a BUMBALI CONSULTING

-

-

5700,00

CENTA FIREQUIP CC T/A FIREQUIP

-

-

5643,00

AFFIRMATIVE PORTFOLIOS (CC)

5640,05

-

-

MASSTORES (PTY) LTD T/A MAKRO SA

-

-

5564,00

ALL ABOUT FOOD CC

-

-

5270,91

BIDVEST SERVICES (PTY) LTD t/a BIDVEST STEINER - UPINGTON

-

-

5198,40

COMPUTERSHARE PROPRIETARY LIMITED

5130,00

-

-

SACHAR MOBILE PRETORIA

-

-

4960,82

SIGMA LIFTS AND ESCALATORS (PTY) LTD

4939,12

-

-

STEINER HYGIENE (PTY) LTD

4673,09

-

-

COMMERCE EDGE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

4503,00

-

-

OMEGA HR SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD

-

-

4286,40

ALERT STATIONERS CC

4204,55

-

-

BASFOUR 2730 (PTY) LTD T/A NASHUA MANGAUNG

3946,91

-

-

AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES CISKEI PTY LTD

-

-

3663,96

SOUTH AFRICAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION LTD

3626,52

-

-

THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SECRETARIES AND ADMINISTRATORS T/A ICSA

-

-

3503,00

BLOEMFONTEIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY (BCCI)

-

-

3450,00

FINTECH (PTY) LTD T/A CREDIFON POSTAGE A DIVISION OF FINTECH

3360,00

-

-

BIG FIVE DUTY FREE (PTY) LTD

-

-

3315,34

XYZ CATERING (PTY) LTD t/a BRUCE CATERING

-

-

3269,56

THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING T/A SAICE

-

-

3103,00

PABALELO SECURITY SERVICES AND PROJECTS

-

-

3078,00

METROFILE (PTY) LTD

677,98

1088,47

1244,54

CSIR

2940,52

-

-

KEYBASE TRAINING SOLUTIONS CC

-

-

2821,50

CHUBB INTEGRATED SYSTEMS

-

-

2793,00

CJ HATTINGH AND SONS CC T/A PMR AFRICA

-

-

2600,02

PETTY CASH

2586,00

-

-

JOHN KNIGHT CATERING (PTY) LTD t/a KNIGHTS CATERING

-

-

2114,70

SOUTH AFRICAN POST OFFICE LTD

1800,00

-

-

ALTRA MEDICAL PRODUCTIONS CC

1394,22

-

-

DALROD OFFICE SUPPLIES (PTY) LTD

1258,67

-

-

AVUSA RETAIL LTD T/A VAN SCHAIK BOOKSTORE

-

-

1106,19

JRS SALES AND CONSULTING CC

1077,32

-

-

NOSA (PTY) LTD

-

-

990,00

UPINGTON TREKKERS

-

-

984,86

SIZWE PAINTS (PTY) LTD

793,61

-

-

BIDVEST PAPERPLUS (PTY) LTD t/a LITHOTECH

771,19

-

-

NELSON MANDELA BAY TOURISM

-

-

720,00

PARK AVENUE STATIONERS CC

679,38

-

-

VUZA MEDICAL (PTY) LTD

-

-

651,50

TRANSFORM EL TRUST T/A TRANSFORM ELECTRICAL WHOLESALERS EL

-

-

603,29

MERCHANT WEST (PTY) LTD

573,77

-

-

JAFF AND COMPANY (PTY) LTD

-

-

501,60

SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS T/A SAICA

-

-

500,00

SOUTH AFRICAN REWARD ASSOCIATION T/A SARA

-

-

500,00

WALKERS MIDAS

-

-

169,25

HUGE CONNECT (PTY) LTD

-

-

158,46

HORSEHOE MOTEL

149,00

-

-

HALSTED AND COMPANY (PTY) LTD

-

-

141,02

MUNASI CIVIL CONTRACTORS CC BUILDING MAINTENANCE

-

-

49,25

VAN WYK G H MR - CORP STAFF

-

-

0,30

MASSTORES (PTY) LTD T/A MASSDISCOUNTERS, GAME, DION, DION WIRED

-

-

0,01

RGL TRADING (PTY) LTD T/A ITEC EAST CAPE

-

-

0,01

GVK SIYA ZAMA BUILDING CONTRACTORS (EP) PTY LTD

-

-

-0,01

BIDVEST WALTONS - A DIVISION OF BIDVEST OFFICE (PTY) LTD

-

-

-814,13

AQUA TRANSPORT AND PLANT HIRE (PTY) LTD

-

-

-2394,00

RESHEBILE AVIATION & PROTECTION SERVICES (PTY) LTD

-

-

-3707,28

AH HUMAN CAPITAL t/a EXECUTIVES ONLINE JOHANNESBURG NORTH

-

-

-19698,42

GOLD CARDS - CORPORATE

-

-

-28814,57

Total

34392826,86

2983737,01

8566653,48

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

STATUS OF SUPPLIER INVOICES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2017

No.

Supplier Name

Amount outstanding 30 Days

Amount outstanding 60 Days

Amount outstanding 90 Days

Amount outstanding 120 Days +

Reason for non-payment/Envisaged date of payment

1

GARTNER SOUTH AFRICA

834,071.12

-

-

666,743.82

Paid End October

2

MAYA INNOVATE (PTY) LTD

388,340.32

-

-

-

Paid End October

3

NEOTEL BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES PTY LTD

52,998.03

53,572.36

-

-

Paid End October

4

G4S SECURE SOLUTION (SA) (PTY)LTD

82,496.56

-

38,549.10

-

Paid End October

5

OPTICAL FIBRE TRENDS

39,152.10

89,397.66

-

-

Paid End October

6

NGUBANE AND COMPANY JOHANNESBURG INCORPOR

156,682.26

-

-

-

Paid End October

7

MINKATEKO GENERAL MAINTENANCE

61,919.56

48,431.31

-

13,440.00

Paid End October

8

GA ENVIRONMENT (PTY) LTD

89,889.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

9

MADIBA MOTSAI MASITENYANE AND GITHIRI ATT

28,215.00

32,917.50

-

-

Paid End October

10

MOCCS (PTY) LTD

16,512.84

-

-

-

Paid End October

11

OMNIVISION

15,331.81

-

-

-

Paid End October

12

OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

10,967.59

-

-

-

Paid End October

13

METROFILE PTY LTD

21,804.13

-

-

-

Paid End October

14

HENRY WILLIAMS PLANTSCAPE

4,836.94

4,836.94

4,836.94

-

Paid End October

15

KPMG SERVICES(PROPRIETATY)LIMITED

5,735.34

-

-

-

Paid End October

16

LOAD MASS CRANE SERVICES

5,304.42

-

-

-

Awaiting credit note

17

NTEBU PELE PROJECTS AND CONTRACTORS CC

4,332.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

18

KEVCOR EQUIPMENT DIVISION

2,872.80

-

-

-

Paid End October

19

H20 PURIFIES CC

1,020.00

1,020.00

-

-

Paid End October

20

THALES(FLIGHTCRAFT AVIATION))

1,559,973.86

2,941,673.67

-

-

Paid End October

21

SA POST OFFICE LTD

4,821.75

-

-

-

Paid End October

22

S A CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (LICENCES)

982,213.98

2,940.00

-

-

Paid End October

23

RED ALERT JOHANNESBURG

187,024.38

13,054.05

-

-

Paid End October

24

RAPDL CONSTRUCTION

21,489.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

25

ROCKETSEED SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD

64,877.40

-

-

-

Paid End October

26

PTES CONSULTING AND RECRUITMENT SERVICES

21,090.00

105,108.00

-

-

Paid End October

27

SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING

123,472.83

3,126.00

-

4,466.03

Paid End October

28

TWOFOLDS CONSULTING

76,810.01

-

-

-

Paid End October

29

TEMBO'S CATERING

4,770.00

-

25,890.00

19,973.00

Await approval, incumbrance

30

THE INSTITUTE OF RISK MANAGEMENT SOUTH AF

31,122.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

31

SOLID GREEN CONSULTING CC

31,017.12

-

-

-

Paid End October

32

RENTOKIL PTY LTD C.T

17,729.84

-

-

5,016.26

Awaiting statement, requested

33

THE BUSINESS ZONE 25

20,770.82

-

-

-

Paid End October

34

PUBLIC DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD

14,411.41

-

-

-

Paid End October

35

PUREAU FRESHWATER

9,623.88

-

-

-

Approval related problem, to review contracts

36

STOREX PTY LTD

11,970.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

37

SABC TV LICENCES

11,363.27

-

-

-

Account under query, payment by 15 Nov

38

WESTERN OCEAN INVESTMENTS 112 CC

9,975.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

39

WATER FROM AIR

3,003.90

-

-

-

Await confirmation of banking details

40

WALTONS STATIONERY CO

1,574.98

1,723.01

-

-

Await credit note

41

TS PROMOTIONS

4,155.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

42

WP DE JONGH ELELECTRICAL

1,368.00

-

-

2,394.00

Paid End October

43

SAFETY MATE

2,430.87

-

-

-

Paid End October

44

TUINROETE AGR

1,538.45

-

65.52

-

Statement requested

45

WLZ COMMUNICATION T/A HYMAX BORDER

792.30

-

-

-

Paid End October

46

SANDOLL CONSULTANTS PTY LTD

342.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

47

DAWN WING

34,951.15

2,425.58

981.64

37,470.78

Delay in approval of invoices

48

FIDELITY SPRINGBOK SECURIT(JHB)

37,018.03

-

36,516.12

-

Paid End October

49

FIDELITY SUPERCARE CLEANING(CT)

8,117.94

-

-

-

Paid End October

50

BROLL PROPERTY GROUP

12,347.12

-

13,634.81

11,917.88

Account under investigation

51

BATTERY CABIN

23,700.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

52

DR BRATHWAITE & PARTNERS

722.40

10,827.56

4,441.90

3,890.15

Paid End October

53

BIDVEST MANAGED SOLUTIONS (Pty) lTD.

6,369.02

-

6,369.02

-

Paid End October

54

BIDDULPHS REMOVALS

18,183.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

55

DR PETRO LEHMAN

13,690.00

-

-

-

Paid End October

56

DIESEL ELECTRIC SERVICES PTY LTD

11,235.27

-

-

-

Paid End October

57

BASIC COOLING

4,383.30

-

6,156.00

-

Paid End October

58

DR AS NIEMANN & ASSOCIATES

6,562.55

2,887.79

-

-

Paid End October

59

CHUBB ELECTRONIC SECURITY PE

1,991.60

-

-

3,272.63

Queries being attended to

60

ADVENTURE INDUSTRIAL CLEANING

7,210.50

-

-

-

Paid End October

61

ADT FIRE SECURITY

1,378.43

-

1,378.43

2,756.86

Paid End October

62

DR BOSMAN & VENOTE

770.00

2,639.39

-

-

Paid End October

63

DR BOSMAN;BRINK & GROENEVELD

761.16

-

-

-

Paid End October

64

BYTES PEOPLE SOLUTIONS

45.60

-

-

-

Queries being attended to

65

AIRPORTS COMPANY SOUTH AFRICA (CT)

1,851.19

1,851.19

-

-

Paid End October

66

IMITIZA FARM FORT GREY (ESKOM)

5,745.52

-

-

-

Paid End October

67

KINGDOM STATIONERY & COMPUTERS

33,857.21

17,020.66

27,582.99

-

Paid End October

68

LINK FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS CC

1,760.16

557.46

-

-

Paid End October

69

METROFILE(PTY)LTD

4,172.29

-

-

-

Paid End October

70

NAREN MISTRY ARCHITECHS CC T/A THE CREATI

-

413,414.96

-

-

Paid End October

71

ICAS SOUTHERN AFRICA

-

22,116.00

16,986.00

-

Paid End October

72

KLOPPERS CAW

-

11,394.00

-

-

Paid End October

73

OMEGA PRINT & OFFICE SUPPLIES

-

13,205.76

-

-

Paid End October

74

IDTEK SOLUTIONS

-

8,898.68

-

-

Queries being attended to

75

VOX TELECOMMUNICATIONS (PTY)LTD

-

619,233.59

-

2,470,524.71

Paid End October

76

SALISPACE

-

89,141.16

-

-

Paid End October

77

TAP PROPERTIES (PTY) LTD

-

56,700.00

-

-

Paid End October

78

TRANSCEND CORPORATE ADVISORS(PTY) LTD

-

48,639.70

-

-

Await supplier statement

79

PICKFORDS

-

4,770.90

-

-

Paid End October

80

SMITH GARB & ASSOCIATES CC

-

35,129.10

-

-

Paid End October

81

THUSANANG GAST

-

16,840.99

-

-

Paid End October

82

STUTTAFORD VAN LINERS BLOEMFONTEIN

-

14,521.91

-

-

Paid End October

83

RENTOKIL PTY LTD PE

-

4,561.15

-

-

Await supplier statement

84

RED ALERT CLEANING BLOEMFONTEIN

-

2,537.37

-

7,555.65

Paid End October

85

UNDERWRAPS CATERERS CC

-

3,819.00

-

-

Queries & late approval

86

SIZABANTU PLUMBING CONTRACTORS CC

-

661.20

-

7,331.65

Queries & late approval

87

STUTTAFORD VAN LINES-CAPE TOWN

-

5,808.30

-

-

Late approval of invoice

88

UNISA

-

13,168.75

5,445.00

6,617.50

Queries being attended to

89

UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH

-

2,515.00

-

-

Queries being attended to

90

S A COUNCIL FOR PROF & TECH SURVEYS

-

1,730.00

-

-

Paid End October

91

RED ALERT ALARMS

-

332.60

-

-

Paid End October

92

DAC SYSTEMS(PTY) LTD

-

37,973.84

-

-

Paid End October

93

COFFEE UNPLUGGED CC

-

1,658.70

11,286.00

18,667.50

Paid End October

94

DR K A INGHAM

-

11,400.00

-

-

Paid End October

95

DATACENTRIX PTY LTD

-

7,182.00

-

-

Paid End October

96

CHUBB ELECTRONIC SECURITY BL

-

639.00

-

4,930.74

Queries being attended to

97

DISCOVERY HEALTHMediacal Aid)

-

1,038.00

-

-

Paid End October

98

AASA

-

183,382.30

-

-

Paid End October

99

KOUGA MUNICIPALITY(HUMANSDORP)

-

3,188.04

-

-

Paid End October

100

MAUREEN'S CATERING CC

-

10,000.00

-

-

Queries being attended to

101

HEIN SCHRODER AND ASSOCIATES

-

-

34,200.00

-

Paid End October

102

ISOLVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD

-

-

13,680.00

-

Paid End October

103

VODAC

-

-

10.00

-

Paid End October

104

SENNHEISER ELECTRONIC SA (PTY) LTD

-

-

56,458.50

-

Queries being attended to

105

TSHIAMO CHEMISTRY PTY LTD

-

-

18,194.40

-

Queries being attended to

106

VAN SCHALK BOOKSTORE

-

-

128.00

13,242.62

Queries being attended to

107

SA BOARD FORPEOPLE PRACTICE

-

-

855.00

-

Queries being attended to

108

CHUBB INTERGRATED SYSTEMS

-

-

17,688.11

35,376.22

Paid End October

109

ESKOM PHILIPSTOWN

-

-

688.26

-

Paid End October

110

GDS TECHNOLOGIES (PTY) LTD

-

-

344,712.00

-

Paid End October

111

MINKATEKO GENERAL MAINTENANCE

-

-

35,317.20

5,597.40

Paid End October

112

MULTI WASTE

-

-

3,429.92

-

Paid End October

113

LEXISNEXIS BUTTERWORTHS

-

-

-

51,605.10

Queries being attended to

114

OPTRON (PTY) LTD

-

-

-

13,942.20

Paid End October

115

MAMABOLO PHAJANE ATTORNEYS

-

-

-

7,974.85

Paid End October

116

ORACLE

-

-

-

6,561.56

Investigating possible duplication

117

LABOURNET CENTRAL (PTY) LTD

-

-

-

5,529.00

Paid End October

118

GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS

-

-

-

4,000.00

Paid End October

119

GANGA PLUMBERS CC

-

-

-

513.00

Paid End October

120

HLATSHWAYO DU PLESSIS VAN DER MERWE

-

-

-

1,829.70

Await credit note

121

UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

-

-

-

20,584.00

Queries being attended to

122

SIGMA LIFTS & ESCALATORS (PTY) LTD

-

-

-

9,708.87

Paid End October

123

SOUTH AFRICAN GEOMATICS INSTITUTE

-

-

-

943.50

Paid End October

124

PICTO BUSBY

-

-

-

598.62

Supplier statement requested

125

EXORDIA (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS)

-

-

-

526,643.15

Paid End October

126

ALLEGRO CENTRAL VACUUM SYSTEMS

-

-

-

8,753.70

Paid End October

127

CARGO LEARNING ACADEMY(PTY)LTD

-

-

-

3,520.00

Paid End October

128

ALEXKOR LTD

-

-

-

3,442.66

Queries being attended to

129

COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN AFRICA

-

-

-

2,808.01

Await credit note

130

DRS DIETRICH;VOIGT & PARTNERS

-

-

-

485.16

Paid End October

131

EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

-

-

-

158.13

Await credit note

132

ACTION TRAINING ACADEMY

-

-

-

30,287.52

Queries being attended to

133

ACTION TRAINING ACADEMY DBN

-

-

-

3,740.00

Queries being attended to

134

GIJIMA AST HOLDING (PTY) LTD

-

-

-

16,190.28

Queries being attended to

REPORT TOTAL

5,279,037.31

4,981,612.13

725,480.86

4,061,004.41

 

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

  1. (i) Not applicable; (ii) and (b): The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) endeavours to comply with section 38(1)(f) of the Public Finance Management Act, Treasury Regulation 8.2.3 and National Treasury SCM Instruction No 5 of 2016/17 to settle all contractual obligations as well as all valid and approved invoices within a period of 30 days, or as prescribed or agreed.

Debt is settled within 30 days of a valid and approved invoice being presented to the SACAA’s Finance Department and if all the required supporting documents are submitted. An invoice is regarded as a valid invoice only after it has been approved by the business unit receiving the service / product, to certify that goods/services offered were received in order and were of the correct quality and quantity. Invoices that have not been approved and paid within 30 days are as a result of queries between the SACAA and the supplier that must be resolved first. Payments are done weekly by the SACAA’s Finance Department and a creditor’s age analysis is prepared and reviewed monthly. The following invoices are currently recorded as unpaid for more than 30 days:

  1. (ii) CBRTA’

The Cross Border Road Transport Agency pays its debt timeously, at an average of 14 days per creditor. There are however, isolated instances where service providers are not paid within 30 days of receipt of invoices for a variety of reasons, for instance, where the service has not been satisfactory and warrants engagement with the Agency, or where errors have been picked up from the supplier invoices or where the price charged is not in line with what was contracted or quoted.

  1. (ii) The Agency has eighteen (18) suppliers that remained unpaid for more than 30 days as at the end of October 2017. See table below for more information.

(aa) 30 days but below 60 days

  1. 60 days but below 90 days
  1. 90 days but below 120 days
  1. 120 days and more
  1. Amount outstanding

Eight (8) suppliers

Two (2) suppliers

Three (3) suppliers

Five (5) suppliers

 

Atlantis Corporate Travel

 

R29,047.30

Duma Travel

 

R117,407.90

Flight Centre SA (Pty) Ltd

 

R58,810.18

Government Printing Works

 

R749.99

IT Squared

 

R12,494.00

Savage, Jooste & Adams

 

R351,351.30

Shred-IT

 

R1,812.60

Supreme Travel (Pty) Ltd

 

R42,072.22

 

Fidelity Cash Solutions (Pty) Ltd

 

R4,213.04

 

Sage VIP

 

R1,359.45

 

Fidelity Cash Solutions (Pty) Ltd

 

R4,304.24

 

SBV Services (Pty) Ltd

 

R3,287.20

 

Harvey World Travel – Waterkloof

 

R40,170.33

 

Chubb Security SA (Pty) Ltd

R3,157.80

 

Khayalami Security cc

R41,952.00

 

Magna BC

R63,270.00

 

Mdluli Sharp Office Automation

R17,978.78

 

Orange Fox Security Systems

R3,921.09

  1. (ii) RAF’
  1. (ii) The total number of supplier invoices that are currently loaded for payment and remain unpaid by the Road Accident Fund for more than

(aa) 30 days is

(bb) 60 days is

(cc) 90 days is

(dd) 120 days is

 

2712,

264,

185,

149,

and (b) the total amount outstanding in each case is

R35,046,966.09,

R4,130,891.05

R2,497,459, and

R2,339,787.99.

  1. (ii) RTIA’

(a) (ii) Road Traffic Infringement Agency has

(aa) 30 days = 1

(bb) 60 days =1

(cc) 90 days = 1

(dd) 120 days = 1

(b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?

(aa) 30 days = R63 428.22

(bb) 60 days = R21 204.00

(cc) 90 days = R21 204.00

(dd) 120 days = R24 million

Notes:

120 days category - The R24 million outstanding relates to the SAPO balance that was in dispute since 2015-16 financial year relating to AARTO notices served.

30 - 90 days category – TheR105 836.22 relates to the services that were undertaken prior to the service level agreement being concluded. The services were undertaken based on the issued order to the supplier.

  1. (ii) RTMC’

Supplier Name

30 Days

60 Days

90 Days

120 Days

Total

ICAS

 

63 140,80

178 351,10

248 083,32

489 575,22

Mafuyeka Attorneys

164 640,00

 

 

 

164 640,00

Media24

19 152,00

 

 

 

19 152,00

Nishlan Moodley (all invoices)

157 316,58

 

 

 

157 316,58

Partners in Travel

4 963,56

 

 

 

4 963,56

Sail Rights Commercialization

965 675,08

 

 

 

965 675,08

(b)

1 311 747,22

63 140,80

178 351,10

248 083,32

1 801 322,44

Number of invoices

5

1

1

1

8

  1. (ii) SANRAL

Days outstanding

  1. Number of invoices

Amount (R)

(aa) 30 – 60 days

29

6 601 603

(bb) 60 – 90 days

8

190 499

(cc) 90 – 120 days

4

137 473 788 *

(dd) 120

 

0

     
  1. TOTAL

41

144 265 890

*An amount of R137 126 716 is unpaid due to the vendor not submitting the required documentation for vendor registration.

The remainder of the outstanding invoices are at invoice verification stage with outstanding documentation from suppliers. Engagements continue with suppliers to meet all criteria for invoice processing and payment.

Ports Regulator (RS)

(a)(ii) The Ports Regulator does not have any invoices hat has remained unpaid for more than (aa)30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days. This is caused by the district finance policy of processing the invoice within 7 days after the date of receipt. The invoice are then paid filed, there are instances where the invoice may go beyond the 7 days period by those isolated instances are carefully managed to ensure that it doesn’t exceed the 30 days period

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

1. The total number of suppliers that remain unpaid is 596.

2.

 

Current

30 Days

60 Days

90 Days

Total Amount outstanding

R 4 396 019,71

R 2 495 545,38

R 660 052,48

R 920 874,41

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)

(a) Number of invoices unpaid –

(aa) more than 30 days - R96,149,129

(bb) more than 60 days – R85,373,156

(cc) more than 90 days – R58,998,210

(dd) more than 120 days – R880,577,150

Disparity between capital and operational expenses leaves shortfall/unpaid invoices on operational expenditure. 56% of outstanding amount is due to Transnet and 6% to municipalities.

Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)

No of days

Number of Suppliers

Amount

30 Days

31

677 548,37

60 Days*

2

7 450,31

90 days*

2

11 820,00

120 days**

8

2 199 887,23

 

TOTAL

2 896 705,91

* Invoices received late from suppliers

** Transactions that are currently disputed and going through a verification process or services not delivered as per specification currently being resolved

23 November 2017 - NW3746

Profile picture: Ntlangwini, Ms EN

Ntlangwini, Ms EN to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry

(1)Whether (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her procured services from a certain company (Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd) if so, (i) what services were procured in each case and (ii) what is the total amount that was paid to the specified company in each case; (2) whether the specified company provided services related to international travel to (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her; if so, (i) what is the name of each person who travelled, (ii) what was the travel route and (iii) what is the total amount that was paid for each person (2) whether the specified company provided services related to international travel to (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her; if so, (i) what is the name of each person who travelled, (ii) what was the travel route and (iii) what is the total amount that was paid for each person

Reply:

1. (a) (i) (ii)

Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd) provided travel related services to the department upon request. Services are remunerated according to an agreed fixed fee per transaction. The types of services procured and the transaction fee per service is indicated below.

Service

Transaction Fee per Service

Air travel Regional

R114.00

Air travel International

R200.00

Air travel Domestic

R114.00

Shuttle Services Domestic

R28.00

Car rental Domestic

R60.00

Accommodation Domestic

R85.00

The supplier was a paid a total amount of R529 795.00 in Transaction Fees for the period 1 April 2017 to 31 October 2017.

2. (a) (i) (ii) (iii)

Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd) assisted in providing the services below for international travel for the period 1 April 2017 to 31 October 2017. These costs are inclusive of the cost that was paid to the airlines for the respective tickets and the transaction fees paid to the travel agency.

Name of Traveller

Travel Route

Amount

Baliso Nangamsomarcus Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/JHB

14 461.29

Brits Rudolfmarthinus Mr

JHB/Zurich/Geneva/JHB

14 874.29

Bromfield Kim Ms

JHB/London/JHB

14 213.29

Busetti Claire Ms

JHB/Dubai/Beijing/JHB

38 234.29

Chokoe Nokoportia Ms

JHB/Doha/Tehran/JHB

9 003.23

Christian Jeanallison Mrs

JHB/Paris/Berlin/JHB

22 247.29

Christian Jeanallison Mrs

JHB/Dubai/Moscouw/Novosibisk/JHB

16 181.29

Christian Jeanallison Mrs

JHB/Dubai/Tehran/JHB

9 722.23

Christian Jeanallison Mrs

JHB/Singapore/Kuala Lumpur/JHB

16 111.29

Christians Gillianeleanore Ms

JHB/Atlanta/San Diego/Atlanta/JHB

26 880.23

Chuene Kgothatso Ms

JHB/Honk Kong/Tianjin/Hong Kong/JHB

33 039.29

Chuene Thebeamotsetumelo Mr

JHB/Doha/Tehran/Doha/JHB

9 003.23

Coppin Garthdennis Mr

JHB/Dubai/London/Dubai/JHB

10 804.29

Davies Robert Dr

Amsterdam/Cape Town

130 486.00

Davies Robert Dr

Cape Town/Paris/JHB

108 671.23

Davies Robert Dr

Cape Town/JHB/Zurich/London

54 023.46

Davies Robert Dr

Cape Town/London/Paris/London

97 353.23

Davies Robert Dr

JHB/Frankfurt/Brussels/Frankfurt/JHB

107 980.29

Davies Robert Dr

JHB/Frankfurt/Morrocco/Frankfurt/JHB

2 380.00

Davies Robert Dr

JHB/Hong Kong/Hangzhou/Hong Kong

73 365.29

Dikeledi Mamosa Ms

JHB/Dubai/Saint Petrusburg/Dubai/JHB

9 983.23

Dladla Thulisile Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Beijing/Honk Kong/JHB

14 236.29

Dludla Xolanikhayelihle Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Taiwan/Hong Kong/JHB

10 126.23

Evans Jonathanedward Mr

JHB/Dubai/Hamburg/Dubai/JHB

9 763.29

Evans Jonathanedward Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Dusseldorf/Munich/JHB

28 373.23

Evans Jonathanedward Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

22 429.29

Evans Jonathanedward Mr

JHB/Hong Konh/Hangzhou/Hong Kong

15 901.29

Evans Jonathanedward Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Beijing/JHB

21 754.23

Evans Jonathanedward Mr

JHB/Zurich/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

12 833.23

Fikizolo Simphiwe Mr

JHB/Dubai/Budapest/Dubai/JHB

24 228.29

Fikizolo Simphiwe Mr

JHB/Amsterdam/Chicago/Amsterdam/JHB

22 359.29

Fikizolo Simphiwe Mr

JHB/Munich/Brussels/Munich/JHB

26 271.29

Fredericks Janine Ms

JHB/Abu Dubai/Delhi/Abu Dhabi/JHB

10 375.29

Fubbs Joanmariaelouise Ms

JHB/Paris/Havana/Paris/JHB

101 911.29

Gleimius Gordonrichard Mr

JHB/Amsterdam/Paris/Amsterdam/JHB

8 956.23

Gleimius Gordonrichard Mr

JHB/Paris/Berlin/Paris/JHB

22 247.29

Gleimius Gordonrichard Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Dusseldorf/Frankfurt/JHB

15 747.29

Govender Lukekalayvanan Mr

JHB/Doha/London/Doha/JHB

10 630.29

Govender Lukekalayvanan Mr

JHB/Dubai/Moscouw/Dubai/JHB

9 921.29

Govender Lukekalayvanan Mr

JHB/Dubai/Saint Petrusburg/Dubai/JHB

9 273.23

Govender Lukekalayvanan Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Paris/Frankfurt/JHB

11 184.23

Gushu Phumza Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Toronto/Frankfurt/JHB

22 099.29

Hall Mamotseki Ms

JHB/Perth/Sydney/Perth/JHB

17 036.29

Hangula Madume Mr

JHB/Dubai/Beijing/Dubai/jHB

16 062.29

Hoff Dean Mr

Stokholm/Gothernburg

3 431.00

Hoff Dean Mr

Barcelona/Amsterdam/Doha/JHB

2 506.00

Hoff Dean Mr

Gothernburg/London

7 131.00

Hoff Dean Mr

JHB/Atlanta/Houston/Atlanta

13 509.23

Hoff Dean Mr

JHB/Abu Dahbi/JHB

10 001.29

Hoff Dean Mr

JHB/Doha/Amsterdam/Doha

17 166.29

Hoff Dean Mr

JHB/Dubai/Stokholm/Dubai

11 135.29

Hoosen Yunus Mr

JHB/Dubai/Viena/Dubai/JHB

57 431.29

Hoosen Yunus Mr

JHB/Istanbul/Brussels/Istanbul/JHB

52 428.23

Jaffer Mogamatsadick Mr

JHB/Dubai/Jakarta/Bangkok/Dubai/JHB

13 462.29

Jaffer Mogamatsadick Mr

JHB/Paris/JHB

12 306.23

Jaffer Mogamatsadick Mr

JHB/Dubai/Oslo/Dubai/JHB

8 379.23

Jaffer Mogamatsadick Mr

JHB/Dubai/Shanghai/Xiamen/Dubai/JHB

33 000.29

Jaffer Mogamatsadick Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

12 388.29

Jama Sibusiso Mr

JHB/Munich/Cologne/Munich/JHB

18 114.23

Jama Sibusiso Mr

JHB/Zurich/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

14 760.29

Jeewan Reikadevi Mrs

JHB/New York/Chicago/Miami/New York/JHB

24 856.29

Jonas Nolusindiso Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Oslo/Trondheim/Amsterdam/

23 780.29

Jonathan Janice Ms

JHB/Sao Paulo/Santiago/Chile/Sao Paulo/JHB

37 835.23

Jonathan Janiceverona Ms

JHB/Sao Paulo/JHB

23 420.23

Karg Ilse Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Geneva/Zurich/Dusseldorf/Frankfurt/JHB

27 658.29

Karg Ilse Ms

JHB/Sao Paulo/JHB

23 974.23

Kekana Jimmalome Mr

JHB/Atlanta/JHB

24 754.29

Kekane Nnonomagdeline Ms

JHB/Paris/Havanna/Amsterdam/JHB

35 081.29

Kgomommu Matome Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Dusseldorf/Munich/JHB

28 373.23

Kgomommu Matome Mr

JHB/Zurich/Berlin/Zurich/JHB

15 508.23

Khambula Sanetlouisa Mrs

JHB/London/JHB

14 388.29

Kimani Zukiswa Ms

JHB/Paris/JHB

16 306.23

Kimani Zukiswa Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Hangzhou/Hong Kong/JHB

14 341.29

Klassen Thamsanqa Mr

JHB/Zurich/JHB

12 698.23

Klassen Thamsanqamatthews Mr

JHB/Abu Dhabi/Dusseldorf/Abu Dhabi/JHB

9 805.29

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Brussels/Frankfurt/JHB

21 268.29

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Dusseldorf/Frankfurt/JHB

27 618.23

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Marrakech

33 072.29

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Beijing/Hong Kong

16 254.29

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

13 901.29

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/London/Brussels/London/JHB

20 733.23

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/London/JHB

14 566.29

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/Munich/Beijing/JHB

60 553.23

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

JHB/Zurich/Berlin/Zurich/JHB

15 258.23

Kruger Niklasinamaria Ms

Marrakech/Paris/JHB

33 231.00

Kubheka Fuziwe

JHB/Sao Paulo/Lima-Peru/Chile/Lima/JHB

36 051.23

Kubheka Fuziwe Ms

JHB/Doha/Beijing/Doha/JHB

13 955.29

Leroux Adriaan Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

40 169.29

Leroux Adriaanjacobus Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Xiamen

49 517.29

Leroux Adriaanjacobus Mr

JHB/Munich/Frankfurt/Havanna/Frankfurt/JHB

108 163.29

Letsoalo Confidence Ms

JHB/Doha/Barcelona/Amsterdam/Doha/JHB

19 672.29

Lukhele Bonganialbert Mr

JHB/Doha/Beijing/

13 121.29

Mabale Henryrichard Mr

JHB/Sao Paulo/Lima-Peru/

34 960.29

Mabitjethompson Malebo Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Chicago/JHB

70 905.29

Mabitjethompson Malebo Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Beijing/Hong Kong/JHB

45 452.29

Mabitjethompson Malebo Ms

Chicago

2 618.00

Maboane Ntshoakotsesamuel Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Dusseldorf/Frankfurt/JHB

13 785.29

Madyibi Ntombizinevelma Ms

JHB/Dubai/Beijing/Dubai/JHB

43 704.29

Mafu Michael Mr

JHB/Abu Dahbi/Geneva/Abu Dahbi/JHB

7 702.23

Mafu Michael Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Beijing/JHB

21 754.23

Magwanishe Gratitudehon

JHB/Amsterdam/Saint Petrusburg/Paris/

0.00

Magwanishe Gratitudehon

Geneva/Paris/London

102 803.23

Magwanishe Gratitudehon

JHB/Paris/Havanna/Paris/JHB

101 522.29

Magwanishe Gratitudehon

JHB/Paris/JHB

108 461.23

Magwanishe Gratitudehon

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

77 681.29

Mahlale Rirhandzu Mr

Brussels/Frankfurt/JHB

2 162.00

Mahlale Rirhandzu Mr

JHB/Dubai/Shanghai/Dubai/JHB

22 126.29

Mahlale Rirhandzu Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Oslo/Toronto/Oslo/Frankfurt/JHB

13 736.29

Mahlale Rirhandzu Mr

Shanghai/Xiamen

3 291.00

Mahlale Rirhandzu Mr

Toronto/Amsterdam/Zurich

7 882.00

Majaja Nomfuneko Ms

Viena/Zurich/JHB

7 322.00

Makhele Victor Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Brussels/Frankfurt/JHB

13 785.29

Makuni Nobuhlephumzile Ms

JHB/London/JHB

15 203.29

Makwele Makwele Mr

JHB/Dubai/Paris/Dubai/JHB

9 499.23

Malatsi Kabelokenneth Mr

JHB/Singapore/Kuala Lampur/Singapore/JHB

16 111.29

Malatsi Kabelokenneth Mr

JHB/Australia/JHB

27 206.29

Malete Jeminah Ms

JHB/Atlanta/JHB

13 509.23

Malete Jeminah Ms

JHB/Abu Dahbi/JHB

16 870.29

Malete Jeminah Ms

JHB/Dubai/Oslo/Dubai/JHB

8 379.23

Malunga Tshepiso Ms

JHB/Dubai/Beijing/Dubai/JHB

10 100.29

Manakele Spokazi Ms

JHB/Dubai/Amesterdam

6 254.29

Manci Mlungisi Mr

JHB/Dubai/Shanghai/Dubai/JHB

2 850.00

Mandiwana Makana Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Toronto/Frankfurt/JHB

22 099.29

Mandiwana Makanagerald Mr

JHB/Sydney/Melborne/Sydnay/JHB

16 018.29

Mangole Phetogosusan Mrs

JHB/New York/Chicago/Miami/JHB

24 856.29

Maphutha Jacob Mr

JHB/Zurich/JHB

14 638.23

Maruping Pontsho Ms

Cape Town/Doha/Viena/Doha/Cape Town

9 494.23

Mashabela Victor Mr

JHB/Paris/JHB

12 306.23

Mashau Yandeya Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

18 295.23

Mashau Yandheyayvonne Ms

JHB/Paris/JHB

12 352.23

Mashigo Lorrainekekeletso Ms

JHB/London/JHB

14 566.29

Mashigo Lorrainekekeletso Ms

JHB/Zurich/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

21 797.29

Mashigo Thabang Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

46 591.29

Mashiloane Lizzymapula Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

14 236.29

Masie Sewelaagness Ms

JHB/Perth/JHB

18 982.29

Masotja Evelyn Ms

JHB/Paris/Havanna/Paris/JHB

31 518.29

Mathabe Shereenmantlapane Mrs

JHB/Dubai/JHB

11 054.23

Mathate Steven Mr

JHB/Istanbul/Viena/Istanbul/JHB

23 608.29

Matlala Mokgadi Ms

JHB/Abu Dahbi/Dehli/Abu Dahbi/JHB

10 675.29

Matlawa Gladys Ms

JHB/Dubai/Budapest/Prague/Dubai/JHB

24 228.29

Matomela Nontombi Mrs

JHB/Atlanta/JHB

25 589.29

Mbanyana Phillip Mr

JHB/Paris/JHB

56 296.23

Mbhiza Ntsakophyllis Ms

JHB/Dubai/Milan/Dubai/JHB

11 095.29

Mbuyisa Virginialindiwe Mrs

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

10 462.23

Medupe Moloantoa Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Brussels/Frankfurt/JHB

26 292.29

Medupe Moloantoa Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

28 822.58

Medupe Moloantoasidwell Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

14 306.29

Mello Simon Mr

JHB/Paris/JHB

11 054.23

Mhlanga Nombulelo Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/JHB

11 318.29

Mkhize Melvin Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/JHB

12 677.29

Mlangeni Tshepo Mr

JHB/Munich/Geneva/Frankfurt/JHB

21 569.23

Mlangeni Tshepomugabe Mr

JHB/Abu Dahbi/Geneva/Abu Dahbi/JHB

9 558.29

Mlumbipeter Xolelwa Ms

JHB/London/Brussels/London/JHB

73 171.23

Mlumbipeter Xolelwafaith Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Morocco/Frankfurt/JHB

117 584.29

Mlumbipeter Xolelwafaith Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

3 400.00

Mlumbipeter Xolelwafaith Ms

JHB/Zurich/Brussels/Frankfurt/JHB

58 906.29

Mlumbipeter Xolelwafaith Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

41 788.29

Moagi Ernest Mr

JHB/Doha/London/Doha/JHB

11 084.29

Mogashoa Ephraim Mr

JHB/Munich/Geneva/Frankfurt/JHB

21 569.23

Mogashoa Ephraimkgohlo Mr

JHB/Abu Dahbi/Geneva/Abu Dahbi/JHB

9 558.29

Mogashoa Ntlaparuemmah Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/JHB

11 898.29

Mokhere Tebogo Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/JHB

17 591.60

Molefane Maoto Mr

JHB/Dubai/Shaghai/Dubai/JHB

37 774.29

Molefe Thabobernard Mr

JHB/Dubai/Milan/Dubai/JHB

11 095.29

Molepolle Seabelo Mr

JHB/Dubai/China/Dubai/JHB

11 409.23

Moloto Edwin Mr

JHB/Sao Paulo/Lima-Peru/Sao Paulo/JHB

37 299.23

Moloto Kagisobonolo Ms

JHB/Frankfort/Tunis/ Frankfort/ JHB

21 987.29

Moodley Lindachrystal Mrs

JHB/Amsterdam/Atlanta/JHB

16 311.29

Mookodi Danielmatome Mr

JHB/Dubai/Stokholm/Dubai/JHB

8 104.23

Moraloge Nthatisimary Mrs

JHB/Sao Paulo/JHB

23 800.23

Moraloge Nthatisimary Mrs

JHB/Sao Paulo/Lima/Sao Paulo/JHB

34 960.29

Mosoeu Tebello Ms

JHB/Perth/JHB

18 982.29

Mphela Delisile Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/JHB

12 418.29

Mphela Mpatibethuel

JHB/Sao Paulo/Lima/Sao Paulo/JHB

36 149.23

Mphooso Reitumetse Ms

JHB/Paris/JHB

12 306.23

Mphooso Reitumetse Ms

JHB/Munich/Brussels/Munich/JHB

38 577.52

Mqambalala Guguletu Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Havanna/Frankfurt/JHB

34 881.29

Mthethwa Nthabisengmaud Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

14 201.29

Mthethwa Nthabisengmaud Ms

JHB/New York/JHB

17 304.23

Mtimkulu Simangele Ms

JHB/Abu Dahbi/JHB

16 553.29

Mtshwane Thailitha Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

12 163.29

Munyai Gregory Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/China/Hong Kong/JHB

12 314.23

Munyai Gregory Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/China/Hong Kong/JHB

12 677.29

Munyai Gregory Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

12 656.29

Mviko Nompumelelononcedo Mrs

JHB/Zurich/Brussels/Zurich/JHB

19 824.29

Mweli Petervusi Mr

JHB/Doha/Beijing/Doha/JHB

13 955.29

Naidoo Julian Dr

JHB/Dubai/Shanghai/Dubai/JHB

43 704.29

Naidoo Valentine Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/China/Hong Kong/JHB

10 462.23

Ndhlovu Davidthemba Mr

JHB/Dubai/Shanghai/Dubai/JHB

43 704.29

Ndikandika Nangamso Ms

JHB/Paris/Havanna/Paris/JHB

45 328.29

Neethling Inze Mrs

JHB/Zurich/JHB

27 336.23

Ngwenya Justice Mr

JHB/Abu Dahbi/Dusseldorf/Abu Dahbi/JHB

10 165.29

Nkiwane Hloniphile Ms

JHB/Dubai/Beijing/Dubai/JHB

10 100.29

Nkomo Marumo Mr

JHB/New York/San Diego/New York/JHB

28 491.23

Nkuna Kissingerntsako Mr

JHB/Abu Dahbi/Geneva/Abu Dahbi/JHB

9 418.29

Nkuna Kissingerntsako Mr

JHB/Zurich/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

10 351.23

Nkuna Nyiko Mr

JHB/Sao Paulo/Lima-Peru

45 520.29

Nkuna Nyiko Mr

JHB/Singapore/Kuala Lumpur/Singapore/JHB

2 257.20

Ntola Ayanda Ms

JHB/Dubai/Beijing/Dubai/JHB

17 061.29

Ntola Ayanda Ms

JHB/Dubai/Saint Petrusburg/Dubai/JHB

9 273.23

Phihlela Lebogang Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Amsterdam/Frankfurt/JHB

18 495.29

Pieterse Pauljohannes Mr

JHB/Paris/Havanna/Amsterdam/Jhb

35 081.29

Pillay Mogamberry Mr

JHB/Paris/JHB

12 306.23

Pillay Morgenie Ms

JHB/Munich/Bonn/Munich/JHB

18 114.23

Pillay Morgenie Ms

JHB/Munich/Bonn/Munich/JHB

18 769.29

Pule Koketso Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

12 476.29

Radebe Marthabusisiwe Ms

JHB/Dubai/Tokoyo/Dubai/JHB

25 047.58

Ragaven Rashmee Ms

JHB/Dubai/Bangkok/Dubai/JHB

13 462.29

Ramabulana Desmond Mr

JHB/Paris/Havanna/Paris/JHB

31 518.29

Ramagoshi Kwena Ms

JHB/Abu Dahbi/JHB

10 001.29

Ramushu Madileke Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

13 464.29

Rantho Lillianleshasha Ms

JHB/Frankfurt/Brussels/Frankfurt/JHB

25 968.29

Rasethaba Sello Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

40 019.29

Reddiar Melanie Ms

JHB/Dubai/Stokholm/Dubai/JHB

8 104.23

Reddy Thirnavellie Ms

JHB/Dubai/Shagnhai/Dubai/JHB

8 834.23

Reinecke Lizell Ms

JHB/Zurich/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

8 660.23

Samanga Ruvimbo Ms

JHB/Perth/JHB

18 982.29

Sanni Zanele Ms

London/Luzemburg/London

3 563.00

Sardha Seema Ms

JHB/Dubai/Tehran/Dubai/JHB

9 722.23

Sardha Seema Ms

JHB/HongKong/Shaghai/Hong Kong/JHB

-15 891.29

Sardha Seema Ms

JHB/Shanghai/JHB

23 340.29

Sardha Seema Ms

JHB/Zurich/Copenhaag/Zurich/JHB

12 954.23

Sasayi Sibusiso Mr

JHB/Paris/Havanna/Paris/JHB

31 518.29

Scholtz Jodilynne Mrs

JHB/London/Atlanta/London/JHB

97 586.29

Scholtz Jodilynne Mrs

Doha/JHB

7 000.00

Scholtz Jodilynne Mrs

JHB/New York/San Dieogo/New York/JHB

125 456.23

Seleoane Miriam Ms

JHB/Zurich/Copenhaag/Zurich/JHB

8 902.23

Serwadi Lesego Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

12 163.29

Serwadi Lesego Ms

JHB/Singapore/China/Singapore/JHB

16 367.23

Setshedi Tsianetalitha Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Beijing/Hong Kong/JHB

14 201.29

Simelane Sizwelenox Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

22 429.29

Simelane Sizwelenox Mr

JHB/Zurich/Geneva/Zurich/JHB

12 833.23

Singh Kameetha Ms

JHB/Dubai/Milan/Dubai/JHB

11 095.29

Singh Reshni Ms

JHB/New York/Chicago/New York/JHB

27 530.29

Skosana Phindile Ms

JHB/Dubai/Beijing/Dubai/JHB

10 100.29

Skosana Vusumuzi Mr

JHB/Amsterdam/Paris/Geneva/Paris/JHB

34 734.23

Soldaat Jeremiahbrian Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Oslo/Brussels/Oslo/Frankfurt/JHB

24 730.29

Soldaat Jeremiahbrian Mr

JHB/Dubai/Shanghai/Xiamen/Dubai/JHB

25 417.29

Soldaat Jeremiahbrian Mr

JHB/New York/JHB

15 180.23

Steto Liso Mr

JHB/Dubai/Copenhaag/Dubai/JHB

8 274.23

Strachan Garthrichard Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Hangzhou/Hong Kong/JHB

54 075.29

Swarts Prudence Ms

JHB/Perth/JHB

18 982.29

Tau Alfred Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

12 163.29

Tau Alfred Mr

JHB/Singapore/China/Singapore/JHB

16 367.23

Tonipenxa Vuyelwa Dr

JHB/Dubai/Shaghai/Dubai/JHB

43 704.29

Tsatsi Magdelinenomvulamary Ms

JHB/Perth/JHB

18 982.29

Tyini Sandilesydney Mr

JHB/Frankfurt/Havanna/Frankfurt/JHB

34 881.29

Tyini Sandilesydney Mr

JHB/Paris/JHB

12 306.23

Vandermerwe Annaelizabeth Ms

JHB/Dubai/Copenhage/Dubai/JHB

14 347.29

Vanrenen Elizabeth Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

16 254.29

Vanrenen Elizabeth Ms

JHB/Hong Kong/Shanghai/Hong Kong/JHB

21 754.23

Vass Jocelynreinette Ms

JHB/Singapore/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

19 655.29

Zikode Siphoreginald Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/China/Hong Kong/JHB

20 665.23

Zikode Siphoreginald Mr

JHB/Dubai/Shanghai/Dubai/JHB

38 234.29

Zikode Siphoreginald Mr

JHB/Hong Kong/Xiamen/Hong Kong/JHB

46 580.29

     

Response from the Entities

Entity

1(b)

(1)(b)(i)

(1)(b)(ii)

(2)(b)

(2)(b)(i)

(2)(b)(ii)

(2)(b)(iii)

Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC)

The CIPC procured services from the company

Travel management services

+/- R15 000.00

The company did not provide international travel services

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Companies Tribunal (CT)

The CT did not procure services from the company

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Export Credit Insurance Corporation (ECIC)

The ECIC procured services from the company

Travel management services

R14 562 871.00

The company did provide international travel services

Please see attached document

Please see attached document

Please see attached document

National Consumer Commission (NCC)

The NCC did not procure services from the company

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

National Consumer Tribunal (NCT)

The NCT did not procure services from the company

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

National Credit Regulator (NCR)

The NCR did not procure services from the company

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

National Empowerment Fund (NEF)

The NEF did not procure services from the company

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

National Gambling Board (NGB)

The NGB did not procure services from the company

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

National Lotteries Commission (NLC)

The NLC procured services from the company

Travel management services

R1 848 521.00

The company did not yet provide international travel services

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

National Metrology Institute of South Africa (NMISA)

The NMISA did not procure services from the company

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

National Regulator For Compulsory Specifications (NRCS)

The NRCS procured services from the company

Travel management services

R7 459 096.00

The company did not provide international travel services

Please see attached document

Please see attached document

Please see attached document

South African Bureau of Standards (SABS)

The SABS procured services from the company

Conference and event management services

R170 217.77

The company did not provide international travel services

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

South African National Accreditation System (SANAS)

The SANAS procured services from the company

Travel management services

R6 568 655.00

The company did provide international travel services

Please see attached document

Please see attached document

Please see attached document

23 November 2017 - NW3441

Profile picture: Ndlozi, Dr MQ

Ndlozi, Dr MQ to ask the Minister of State Security

1. How many officials and/or employees in his department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years; 2. Are any of the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?

Reply:

1. Information relating to members of the State Security Agency (SSA) forms part of the broader operational framework of the SSA and therefore remains classified and privileged. Information about members is a matter that falls in the ambit of national security and therefore excluded from public disclosure. It should however be observed that the SSA is held accountable on such matters by the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence (JSCI).