Questions and Replies

Reply:

(a) Mr Frans Matlala

(b) 01 July 2015

 

 

MR N MUNZHELELE

[ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

Reply:

The following Tables reflect the situation in this regard:

(a) The Department of Health

Newspaper	2012/13	2013/14	2014/15
Sowetan	R564,376.17	R153,029.57	R256,159.31
Daily Sun	R245,149.33	R230,794.39	R175,800.71

(b) Entities

Neither the Council for Medical Schemes, the Office of Health Standards Compliance, nor the South African Medical Research Council spent on advertising in either of the newspapers in questions during the stated period.

The National Health Laboratory Service spent on advertising as follows:

Newspaper	2012-13	2013-14	2014-15
Sowetan	R226,896.48	Nil	Nil
Daily Sun	Nil	Nil	Nil

END.

Reply:

1. None of the entities reporting to the Minister of Health provided any type of sponsorship.
2. None of the entities reporting to the Minister of Health intends to enter into any type of sponsorship deal or contract in the 2015 and 2016 financial years and the reasons provided are as follows:

• The National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) - due to the current financial situation; and
• The South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC); the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) and the Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC) – do not provide any sponsorship deals or contracts.

END.

Reply:

1. (a) 1 623;

(b) No nurse is ever registered with the HPCSA;

(c) I do not understand what “other medical practitioners” means.

2. (a) 6 729;

(b) 61;

3.  (a) 22;

(b) There is no remedy available for practitioners who have failed the examination three times.

4. There is currently no list of accredited qualifications obtained outside South Africa.

5. Since registration is a pre-requisite for practising the profession of medicine in South Africa, applicants will not be able to work as medical practitioners until such time as they are appropriately registered with the Medical and Dental Board.

END.

Reply:

1. (a) 60% of patients on bedaquiline are in South Africa, i.e 361 patients in South Africa out of a total of 600 worldwide.

(b) A tender to procure Linezolid is being prepared. Linezolid is available off code in the meantime.

2.  (i) and (ii) For year 1 (1st April 2015 to 31 March 2016) we are prioritising XDR-TB, pre-XDR-TB and MRD-TB with hearing impairment, renal impairment and those to be operated.

Because the main focus will be on XDR-TB, we have started rolling out at our 12 facilities responsible for treating XDR-TB which are:

• Jose Pearson and Fort Grey Hospitals (Eastern Cape);
• Dr J S Moroka (Free State);
• Sizwe Hospital (Gauteng);
• King Dinuzulu Complex Hospital (KZN);
• FH Odendaal (Limpopo);
• Witbank TB Hospital (Mpumalanga);
• Dr Harry Surtie and West End (Northern Cape);
• Tshepong Hospital (North West);
• Brooklyn Chest and Khayelitsha (Western Cape)

The 12 facilities treat all XDR-TB patients in the country.

• Jose Pearson, Fort Grey, King Dinuzulu, Sizwe and Brooklyn Chest Hospitals treat 50% to 60% of all MDR-TB in the country.

• So we believe that there will be a good coverage to years 1, 2 and 3;

• Mines and prisons will follow after 2 to 3 years.

3. A costed plan to make the drugs available has been developed and budgeted for in the HIV Conditional Grant. The drugs will be made available to 3 000 patients in year 1 (1st April 2015 to 31 March 2016), and then gradually increase to 6 000 at the end of year 3.

END.

Reply:

 

1. When Labour inspectors find that an employee does not have a valid work permit, the matter will be reported to Home Affairs who has jurisdiction over such matters.
2. The Department of Labour does not have a legal mandate or powers to remove such employees from the workplace but will refer the matter to Home Affairs to take further action.

Reply:

1. (a) (b) In June 2011, the Department established a compliance and enforcement structure in the Mineral Regulation. In 2013 funding was made available and accordingly utilised to enhance environment authorisation capacity.

(2) (a) (b) National Treasury has allocated funding sufficient to fund 22 positions, which are currently in the process of being filled.

(3)(a) 34 personnel have been appointed and designated.

(b) 28 persons have been successfully trained as Environmental Mineral Resource Inspectors whilst 6 had been previously trained. A further 60 persons will undergo training during this financial year.

(c) See (a) above

(4) The mining sector information will be provided to the Department of Environmental Affairs for inclusion into their relevant report.

Approved/not approved

Adv N.A. Ramatlhodi

Minister of Mineral Resources

Date Submitted:-………………/………………/2015

Reply:

I have been advised by the Department and Entities as follows:-

DEPARTMENT:

1. Yes

The table below provides a full response to the questions asked by the Honourable Member:-

(ii) Name	Contract Period	Contract terminated	(iii) Termination reason	Contract period paid out	(i)(aa) Amount
S D L Dhlomo	13 July 2009 to 13 January 2011	31 May 2010	The Post of Deputy Director: Subsistence and Travel was not approved on the organisational structure. The appointment was made irregularly. The employee’s contract was terminated accordingly. The employee then took the department to arbitration.	1 June 2010 to 13 January 2011	Salary: R 249 192-70

South African Post Office (SAPO)

(b) Yes,

It is not a practice of the SAPO to pay the remaining value of the contract in cases where Executives leave the organisation before the expiry date of the employment contract. The Executives in the table below were only paid the arbitration awards agreed to, between the employees, their legal representatives, and the company. However, these payments are not linked to the contracted term of employment

See arbitration figures paid since the 2008/9 financial year to current within the SAPO Group.

 

(ii) Name	Job Title	(iii) Reason for Termination	(i)(bb) Settlement Amount	Settlement Date
JP WENTZEL	COO (2 A)	Resignation (Arbitration settlement)	548,058.25	10/07/2011
RM NESHUNZHI	GM (3)	End of Contract (Arbitration settlement - (Contract paid until 31 May 2012)	532,493.50	11/30/2011
MM LEFOKA	GCEO (1)	Resignation (Arbitration settlement)	1,466,810.00	01/24/2012
MS DIAZ	GE (2 B)	Resignation (Disciplinary hearing - Deed of settlement signed) Arbitration settlement	370,217.25	11/28/2013
ME LANCASTER	GE (2 A)	Retrenchment severance package (Voluntary Retrenchment Agreement)	1,698,977.00	12/3/2013
BS BULUNGA	COMPANY SECRETARY (3)	Dismissal (Settlement at CCMA)	404,615.93	26/3/2014

ZADNA

(b) No

ZaDNA has not had an employee’s contract terminated before its stipulated termination.

SENTECH

(b) Yes,

The table below provides a full response to the questions asked by the Honourable Member:-

(ii) Name of Employee	Position	Period	(i)(bb) Amount Spend	(iii) Reason for Settlement	Process
Mr. Cassim Mohammed Siddique	Chief Financial Officer	2010	R 360 000.00	Dismissed	CCMA Award settlement
Mosala Mojaki Frederick	Head: Employee Relations	2010	R 257 393.00	Dismissed	Employee lawyer based on the ongoing case with little evidence
Steenkamp Carin	Portfolio Manager: Special Projects	2010	R 515 824.47	Retrenched	Retrenchment
Ramokhufi Rachel Neo	Executive: Strategy and Co-ordination	2010	R 250 698.34	Ongoing disciplinary hearing	Employee lawyer based on the ongoing case with little evidence
Email [email protected]	Chief Financial Officer	2012	R 142 482.84	Claimed Constructive - Dismissed	CCMA Award settlement
Nevhutalu Tendani Gaylord	Head: Financial Accounting	2012	R 62 000	Dismissed	CCMA Award settlement
Emerich Rian	General Manager: Marketing and Sales	2012	R 83 503.27	Dismissed	CCMA Award settlement

NEMISA

(b) Yes,

The table below provides a full response to the questions asked by the Honourable Member:-

(ii) To whom were payments Made	Period	(i)(bb) Amount Spend	(iii) Reason for Settlement
Chief Operations Officer	2013-2014	R 779 055.00	Mutual Separation Agreement

BROADBAND INFRACO

(b) Yes,

From 2008-09 up to date, Broadband Infraco had no early terminations of contracts which involved paying out the remainder of an employee’s fixed term contract. However, Broadband Infraco did terminate the employment contract of three (3) employees due to disciplinary processes and after an assessment that it would cost the Company far less to have conclude a mutual separation agreement with each of the employees instead of pursuing long protracted legal proceedings and committing company resources and labour in pursuit of the legal cases against the employees. Refer to the table below:

(ii) Name of employee	Position	Period	(i)(bb) Amount Spend	(iii)Reason for Settlement	Process
Suren Maharaj	Chief Financial Officer	March 2011	R 395 916.50	The Board decided to part ways with the CFO after he was issued with a final written warning for dereliction of duties	Employee had been issued with a Final written warning
S Mapatagane	SHEQ Manager	June 2011	R 123 527.34	The settlement was paid out due to legal costs that were increasing and lawyers for the Company advised on paying the settlement to minimise litigation costs	Employee had been subjected to a disciplinary hearing
Ray Hamilton	Chief Sales & Marketing Officer	August 2014	R 400 000	Paid a negotiated settlement for four (4) months for mutual separation with R Hamilton.	Disciplinary Process- he exceeded his delegation of authority

USAASA

(b) Yes,

The table below provides a full response to the questions asked by the Honourable Member:-

(ii) To whom were payments Made	Salary Level	Salary per annum	(i)(bb) Amount Paid	(iii)Reason	Date of Exit
Senior Manager: Human Resources	13	R 540 429	R 135 107	Mutual agreement	31 May 2008
Chief Executive Officer	15	R 1 099 824	R 458 260	Mutual Agreement	31 May 2010
Chief Executive Officer	15	R 1 120 935	R 499 292	Mutual Agreement	30 March 2012
Senior Manager: USAF	13	R 782 883	R 547 000	CCMA Settlement Agreement	30 September 2015
Board Administrator	10	R 405 390	R 99 534	Mutual Agreement	31 December 2014
Payroll Administrator	9	R 296 100	R 74 025	CCMA Settlement Agreement	20 April 2015

SITA

(b) Yes

The table below provides a full response to the questions asked by the Honourable Member:-

(ii) Name	Designation	(i)(bb) Gross Pay Out	Date paid	(iii) Reason for Termination
Blake Mosley-Lefatola	Chief Executive Officer	R 1 439 606.45	May 2013	Early termination of contract (Board Decision)
Nontobeko Ntsinde	Chief Executive Officer	R 574 991.00	June 2013	Unfair termination of contract (Labour Court Decision)
Thandi Zide	SITA Company Secretary	R 550 000.00	August 2013	Unfair Dismissal (CCMA Decision)
Khumbuzo Ntshevheni	Chief Operating Officer	R 1 899 000.00	June 2014	Early termination of contract (Referred to Labour Court and resulted in a Settlement Agreement)
Tshidi Gumbi	Head of Department: Human Resource	R 265 898.52	May 2015	Unfair Dismissal (Referred to CCMA and resulted in a Settlement Agreement)

Reply:

(a) The department is in the process of development a Township and Rural Economic Development Strategy that will be aimed at supporting informal businesses, SMMEs, Co-operatives, youth, gender, people with disabilities, and rural enterprises. The support will range from the provision of financial and non-financial support to the creation of an enabling legislative and regulatory environment.

Currently, the Small Enterprise Finance Agency (sefa) works closely with the Small Enterprise Development Agency (seda) in relation to government’s small business incubation programme called the Seda Technology Programme (STP). Seda is the custodian of the government’s incubation programme and provides incubating businesses with non-financial and affordable rental space. Sefa in turn, provides financial support in the form of working capital, asset financing and revolving loan facilities to qualify businesses in these incubation centres.

(b) Sefa, administers a property portfolio comprising a mixture of commercial and industrial properties in the provinces of Gauteng, North-West, Free State, Eastern Cape and the Western Cape. These are old properties that were inherited from the Small Business Development Corporation (SBDC), now known as Business Partners, and are located in townships and peri-urban areas and provide affordable industrial premises to manufacturing enterprises. As at 31 March 2015, sefa provided support to 958 entrepreneurs through its property portfolio. These are old properties which were

(c) The department, together with the Departments of Arts and Culture, Economic Development and Tourism, Sports and Culture, provincial investment promotion agencies and the South African Bureau of Standards work together to promote artisanal businesses using township creativity and talent. The National Craft and Design Coordinating Body (NCDCB), in which all the stakeholders mentioned are represented, monitors the implementation of the craft and design programmes at national and provincial level. The NCDCB also serves as a platform through which government departments and the provincial agencies coordinate the information on the craft and design programmes.

Reply:

(i)(a) and (i)(b)

(ii)(a) and (ii)(b)

In terms of the data provided below, the number enrolled to study and the number registered to write the Mathematics NSC examination for the 2015 academic year are the same.

PROVINCE

Province	Total Enrolled	Maths Enrolled	% Maths
EASTERN CAPE	92 059	41 265	44.8
FREE STATE	35 246	11 847	33.6
GAUTENG	112 192	37 920	33.8
KWAZULU-NATAL	172 796	90 219	52.2
LIMPOPO	103 276	41 851	40.5
MPUMALANGA	56 133	21 059	37.5
NORTH WEST	33 844	10 867	32.1
NORTHERN CAPE	12 852	3 384	26.3
WESTERN CAPE	56 331	17 195	30.5
NATIONAL	674 729	275 607	40.8

DISTRICT

PROVINCE	DISTRICT	TOTAL ENROLLED	MATHS ENROLLED	% MATHS
EASTERN CAPE	BUTTERWORTH	4 614	2 559	55.5
EASTERN CAPE	COFIMVABA	2 069	1 529	73.9
EASTERN CAPE	CRADOCK	1 032	185	17.9
EASTERN CAPE	DUTYWA	5 819	3 536	60.8
EASTERN CAPE	EAST LONDON	7 779	2 693	34.6
EASTERN CAPE	FORT BEAUFORT	2 178	521	23.9
EASTERN CAPE	GRAAFF-REINET	985	133	13.5
EASTERN CAPE	GRAHAMSTOWN	1 222	301	24.6
EASTERN CAPE	KING WILLIAMS TOWN	6 005	1 506	25.1
EASTERN CAPE	LADY FRERE	2 044	961	47.0
EASTERN CAPE	LIBODE	7 696	3 954	51.4
EASTERN CAPE	LUSIKISIKI	5 342	2 735	51.2
EASTERN CAPE	MALUTI	2 622	1 563	59.6
EASTERN CAPE	MBIZANA	4 499	2 384	53.0
EASTERN CAPE	MT FLETCHER	2 365	1 006	42.5
EASTERN CAPE	MT FRERE	3 246	1 716	52.9
EASTERN CAPE	MTHATHA	6 933	4 964	71.6
EASTERN CAPE	NGCOBO	2 871	1 597	55.6
EASTERN CAPE	PORT ELIZABETH	9 775	2 911	29.8
EASTERN CAPE	QUEENSTOWN	3 325	1 056	31.8
EASTERN CAPE	QUMBU	3 088	1 708	55.3
EASTERN CAPE	STERKSPRUIT	3 015	901	29.9
EASTERN CAPE	UITENHAGE	3 535	846	23.9
FREE STATE	FEZILE DABI	5 527	1 684	30.5
FREE STATE	LEJWELEPUTSWA	7 516	2 370	31.5
FREE STATE	MOTHEO	11 738	3 922	33.4
FREE STATE	THABO MOFUTSANYANA	9 044	3 586	39.7
FREE STATE	XHARIEP	1 421	285	20.1
GAUTENG	EKURHULENI NORTH	10 096	3 769	37.3
GAUTENG	EKURHULENI SOUTH	11 744	3 666	31.2
GAUTENG	GAUTENG EAST	8 144	1 982	24.3
GAUTENG	GAUTENG NORTH	2 173	651	30.0
GAUTENG	GAUTENG WEST	7 388	2 063	27.9
GAUTENG	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL	9 578	2 800	29.2
GAUTENG	JOHANNESBURG EAST	8 067	3 224	40.0
GAUTENG	JOHANNESBURG NORTH	7 580	2 812	37.1
GAUTENG	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH	6 733	2 262	33.6
GAUTENG	JOHANNESBURG WEST	5 295	1 448	27.3
GAUTENG	SEDIBENG EAST	2 987	1 020	34.1
GAUTENG	SEDIBENG WEST	6 187	1 953	31.6
GAUTENG	TSHWANE NORTH	7 034	2 444	34.7
GAUTENG	TSHWANE SOUTH	11 340	5 177	45.7
GAUTENG	TSHWANE WEST	7 846	2 649	33.8
KWAZULU-NATAL	AMAJUBA	9 727	4 400	45.2
KWAZULU-NATAL	ILEMBE	9 521	5 240	55.0
KWAZULU-NATAL	PINETOWN	21 180	8 274	39.1
KWAZULU-NATAL	SISONKE	7 104	2 944	41.4
KWAZULU-NATAL	UGU	12 189	5 736	47.1
KWAZULU-NATAL	UMGUNGUNDLOVU	15 257	6 620	43.4
KWAZULU-NATAL	UMKHANYAKUDE	14 792	7 167	48.5
KWAZULU-NATAL	UMLAZI	23 204	12 022	51.8
KWAZULU-NATAL	UMZINYATHI	10 506	6 728	64.0
KWAZULU-NATAL	UTHUKELA	11 512	6 404	55.6
KWAZULU-NATAL	UTHUNGULU	20 163	12 758	63.3
KWAZULU-NATAL	ZULULAND	17 641	11 926	67.6
LIMPOPO	CAPRICORN	25 262	11 403	45.1
LIMPOPO	GREATER SEKHUKHUNE	21 945	9 417	42.9
LIMPOPO	MOPANI	19 483	5 828	29.9
LIMPOPO	VHEMBE	26 822	11 404	42.5
LIMPOPO	WATERBERG	9 764	3 799	38.9
MPUMALANGA	BOHLABELA DISTRICT	11 562	4 624	40.0
MPUMALANGA	EHLANZENI DISTRICT	16 546	5 846	35.3
MPUMALANGA	GERT SIBANDE DISTRIC	14 020	5 394	38.5
MPUMALANGA	NKANGALA DISTRICT	14 005	5 195	37.1
NORTH WEST	BOJANALA PLATINUM DI	12 638	4 168	33.0
NORTH WEST	DR. K. KAUNDA DISTRI	6 615	2 216	33.5
NORTH WEST	DR. R.S. MOMPATI DIS	5 870	1 534	26.1
NORTH WEST	NGAKA M. MOLEMA DIST	8 721	2 949	33.8
NORTHERN CAPE	FRANCES BAARD	4 764	1 370	28.8
NORTHERN CAPE	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWE	2 721	934	34.3
NORTHERN CAPE	NAMAQUA	1 051	227	21.6
NORTHERN CAPE	PIXLEY KA SEME	1 757	331	18.8
NORTHERN CAPE	Z F MGCAWU	2 559	522	20.4
WESTERN CAPE	CAPE WINELANDS EDUCA	8 313	2 104	25.3
WESTERN CAPE	EDEN & CENTRAL KAROO	6 199	1 219	19.7
WESTERN CAPE	METRO CENTRAL EDUCAT	9 332	3 789	40.6
WESTERN CAPE	METRO EAST EDUCATION	8 622	2 500	29.0
WESTERN CAPE	METRO NORTH EDUCATIO	10 538	3 685	35.0
WESTERN CAPE	METRO SOUTH EDUCATIO	9035	2 975	32.9
WESTERN CAPE	OVERBERG EDUCATION D	1919	376	19.6
WESTERN CAPE	WEST COAST EDUCATION	2373	547	23.1

The source is (Data as from the Examination Computer System as at 14 July 2015.)
Note:

The data presented is preliminary data extracted from the examination data base. The DBE is currently verifying the data. Final data will be available in August. 

(iii) The number of Grade 12 learners targeted to be studying Mathematics in the (aa) 2015, (bb) 2016, (cc) 2020 and (dd) 2030 academic years, are as follows:

PROVINCES	2015	2016	2020	2030
EC	39992	41992	51041	62219
FS	10616	11147	13549	16516
GP	40691	42726	51933	63306
KZN	80503	84529	102745	125246
LP	39203	41163	50034	60991
MP	21389	22458	27298	33276
NW	12024	12625	15346	18706
NC	3461	3634	4417	5384
WC	18385	19305	23465	28603
TOTAL	266264	279579	339828	414247

Reply:

1. The department intends to review the National Small Business Act, 1996 (Act No. 102 of 1996), read with the National Small Business Amendment Act, 2003 (Act No. 26 of 2003). The reasons to introduce an amending legislation are to provide for the alignment of the Act to the mandate of the department, to provide a framework for business growth,
investment and the facilitation of small business development and promotion.

The areas to be reviewed are as follows:

1. The definitions of small businesses,
2. The schedule or sectoral classifications,
3. Provision for the informal economy,
4. Provision for the roles of the Small Enterprise Development Agency (Seda) and the Small Enterprise Finance Agency (sefa),
5. To institutionalise the coordination of a periodical national survey for SMMEs, and
6. The role and composition of the Small Business Advisory Council.

2. The department has not concluded any transversal agreements with other departments since the last reply. This is partly due to the complexity of requirements and conditions which must be met and be favourable to all parties. As a result, consultations take longer and require a detailed execution plan with specific deliverables and timelines.

The department, however, intends to conclude and sign a transversal agreement with the National Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) and Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) by the end of 2015 in which the parties have mutually agreed to collaborate on training and development of co-operatives and SMMEs. The overall aim of this collaboration is to develop and enhance the capacity base of these small businesses to enable them to access procurement opportunities within PRASA. The department will be responsible for the building capacity of the suppliers with regards to technical and business management training whilst DHET, through the relevant Skills Education and Training Authorities (Setas), will provide technical training to co-operatives and SMMEs.

The department also intends to conclude transversal agreements with the following institutions in the near future:

1. Department of Human Settlements: to focus on procurement opportunities for small businesses and co-operatives in the development of industrial or commercial parks in the Western Cape.
2. Department of Public Enterprises: to develop and prioritise support and increase opportunities for emerging small businesses and designated groups through diverse small business support programmes.
3. Massmart: partnership with Massmart is focused on the Supplier Development Programme to improve local procurement linkages for Cooperatives and SMMEs. The programme will focus on three main areas: manufacturing, fresh produce and services to suppliers.
4. SAB Miller: the focus is on procurement opportunities to improve local linkages for Cooperatives and SMMEs. The programme will focus on three main areas: Maize, Barley and Wheat production.
5. The Swiss Confederation, represented by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO): the overall goal of the pilot project is to establish a web-based centralized system where Business Development Service Providers (BDSP) register after a quality check, and will be assessed by their clients based on the performance of the service delivered. This will allow for the identification of the skills gap of services providers.

Reply:

The Department is not reviewing the Electronic Communications Amendment Act, Act 1 of 2014, as amendment Acts are normally not reviewed.

Reply:

1. (a) Minister is seriously concerned about the poor state of the Gauteng’s township industrial park and although has not engaged with the Premier of Gauteng regarding the matter, the Small Enterprise Finance Agency (Sefa), which reports to the Department of Small Business Development, is handling the matters of Gauteng’s township industrial parks.

(b) So far Sefa has reported that it will engage with the Office of the Premier of Gauteng through the Gauteng Enterprise Propeller (GEP) in order to understand the Gauteng Province’s plans for property revitilisation. Sefa is in the process of conducting visits to the industrial parks to determine the extent of neglect and disrepair on these industrial parks: this includes assessing the physical state of these properties in order to perform all the necessary repairs and maintenance to these properties in the coming months.

 

2. Sefa has done investigations to the validity of these claims, and has so far obtained some information on the matter dating back to 1999. During the 2014/15 financial year, Sefa held discussions with the Tenants Association on the terms and conditions of transfer of ownership of these properties. Sefa is now in a process to meet individual Tenants Associations to discuss the framework for the transfer of ownership of these properties to tenants who qualify under the initial framework for transfer.

Reply:

EDD, Competition Commission, Competition Tribunal and ITAC did not spend any amount on advertising in the Sowetan and The Daily Sun for the 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 financial years.

IDC

(aa) 2012-13: IDC did not spend on advertising in the Sowetan and The Daily Sun during this period.

(bb) 2013-14 : Sowetan - Total spent was R 514 601.10

Daily Sun - Total spent was R 674 568.00

(cc) 2014-2015: Sowetan - Total spent was R 59 580.00

Daily Sun - IDC did not spend on advertising during this period

-END-

Reply:

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

With reference to the SA Civil Aviation Authority, (a)(i)(ii)(aa),(bb),(cc)

• The number of examinations written for the 2012-2013 financial year, including Air Law and Procedures was 23686.
• The number of examinations written for the April 2013 to December 2014, including Air Law and Procedures was 21773.
• The number of examinations written for the period January 2014 to 31 March 2015, which included Air Law and Procedures was 24186.
• The SACAA introduced a new examination system in January 2014, and as such monthly statistics for the specified period could not be automatically generated. The legacy system did not have the capabilities for such reporting.

(b) It is not possible to generate the average percentage per assessment or paper by using the current reporting template. However, in all cases, a print-out is provided to the examinee on completion of the examination, which indicates in what aspect of the syllabus a deficiency was encountered.

(c) The examination fees are published in the Civil Aviation Regulations 2011, Part 187, Regulation 187.01.9 (e)(ii) which is R260 per online examination and Regulation 187.01.9 (e)(iii) which is R370 per hand written examination.

(d) The SACAA makes use of reputable examination system, known as “Question Mark Perception” (QMP). The QMP provides for a learning syllabus (which is published and known to the examinee through the Appendices contained in the South African Civil Aviation Technical Standards of 2011, Document SA-CATS 61) that forms the foundation of a database of questions to be populated. Four detractors (answers) are provided in the database for each question and the student is then provided with four answers, from which the correct one must be chosen.

The QMP, through its pre-set assessment criteria, generates an examination paper for each examinee when they enter into the examination system. No two examination papers are the same. Each examination paper uses the same pre-set assessment criteria in the system to examine competency across the entire set syllabus.

Examinees are required to select the correct answer from the four answers provided for each question. On completion of the exam, the examinee requests the system to assess and the system then immediately provides the assessment mark.

(e) (i), (ii) and (iii) No investigation was conducted during the 2012-2013 financial year. No investigation was conducted during the 2013-2014 financial year. Only one (1) investigation was conducted during the 2014-2015 financial year. The investigation was initiated as the result of a complaint received from a member of the public and a holder of an expired Airline Transport Pilot’s Licence, who alleged that the questions used in the Air Law and Procedures examination were inappropriate, irrelevant and designed in such a way that no person can get the right answers. The complainant was of the view that such amounted to “fraud and that the SACAA was fleecing the public by continuously collecting examination fees whilst they knew that no person could pass such examinations”.

(f)(g) and (h) The investigation was conducted by the SACAA’s Internal Forensic Unit, with the assistance of an independent aviation expert. Among others, the investigation probed the examination admission process and procedures, question formulation, suitability, appropriateness and relevance.  The investigation also focused on determining the suitability, appropriateness and relevance of examination questions. The investigation revealed and concluded that whilst there was slight room for future improvement on the processes and procedures of admitting candidates into the examination room; the Air Law and Procedures examination questions were suitable, appropriate and relevant to the establishment of the candidate’s theoretical knowledge and competency. The investigation, therefore, found no evidence to support the allegations levelled against the SACAA.

Reply:

THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

QUESTION FOR WRITTEN REPLY

 

The National Export Advisory Council (NEAC) will facilitate access to targeted international markets by prioritising the resources and supporting the exporters to enter foreign markets and service continental infrastructure projects. NEAC will facilitate the eradication of trade barriers in the targeted markets (as informed by the Export Diversification Strategy) whilst dealing with the developmental issues as defined by the “four gear concept” of the International Trade Center, which places emphasis on the developmental impacts of the export sector and its synchronicity with the national development goals

The NEAC structure will provide direction, co-ordination and oversight in order to enhance the trade and business environment and improving the competitiveness of companies and sectors. The NEAC approach is modelled on ITC’s Four Functional Gear Concept of Competitiveness and Development which informs the draft Integrated National Export Strategy (INES). The four gears comprise 1) Border-in or supply-side issues dealing with capacity development, capacity diversification, skills and entrepreneurship development; 2) Border or business environment dealing with infrastructure, trade facilitation and cost of doing business; 3) Border-out or demand-side issues dealing with market access, in-market support and strategic export promotion; and the developmental issues such as export-related employment, transformation efforts and regional development. The three competitiveness gears of should reinforce other each, whilst powering the 4) developmental gear resulting in a combined competitiveness-development focus for the country. The NEAC structure will deal with all four gears in unlocking regulatory or institutional bottlenecks in order to improve competitiveness and drive exports.

Question

(2) (a) who are the members that serve on the specified council and (b) how were they chosen;

Response

(2) (a) NEAC will comprise the Ministries involved directly or indirectly in the export development and export promotion regulatory and policy framework, State Owned Enterprises, 5 Proxies of Export formations (including Export councils, Export clubs, Joint Action Groups, Industry associations, Chamber of Commerce) Business Unity South Africa, Black Business Council, Provincial Investment and Promotion Agencies etc.

(2) (b) The aforementioned members are recommended on their respective roles in advancing the national export agenda contributing to the realization of the National Development Plan and New Growth Path imperatives.

Question

(3) what remuneration will each council member receive;

Response

(3) The remuneration package of the council member are not determined as yet as we are awaiting the finalisation of the Regulatory Impact Assessment for the establishment of the National Export Development and Promotion Bill, the outcome thereof will inform the modality of NEAC.

The Bill which is being explored will provide for the establishment of structure/s with the functions to represent and promote the interests of the export community and to advise national, provincial and local spheres of government on policy imperatives in order to advance the national export agenda.

Question

(4) what costs will be incurred by the specified council to do its work;

Response

The costs have not been determined for the aforementioned reason (Awaiting the outcome of the National Export Development and Promotion Bill that will inform the modality of NEAC and the needs of the potential beneficiaries).

Question

(5) has (a) a business plan and (b) key objectives been developed for the specified council; if so, what are the relevant details in each case? NW2956E

Response

(5) (a) A business plan will be compiled upon the conclusion of the Regulatory Impact Assessment for the establishment of the National Export Development and Promotion Bill. It will be important to consider the proposed structure within a national responsive institutional framework in order to address the current fragmentation and the on-going strengthening of NEAC’s capacity.

(b) The key objectives of the council will be developed upon the conclusion of the Regulatory Impact Assessment for the establishment of the National Export Development and Promotion Bill.

Reply:

1.(a)(i) Country	1. (a) (ii) City	1. (b) Cost (Rand)	1. (c) Reason(s) for the trip	2. Benefit
Brazil (21-25 September 2014)	Rio de Janeiro & Sao Paulo	R 111 957.74	Opening of South African Tourism’s (SAT) office in Brazil. To preside over the Ubuntu Awards and the South African stand at the Associacao Basiliera de Agencias de Viagens (ABAV) Travel Tradeshow To interact with the Brazilian Outbound Tour Operators (Travel Trade) and visit WHS To sign a Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in the Field of Tourism.	Brazil features in the Top 20 source markets for inbound tourists to South Africa (SA). In addition, in 2013, Brazil was the second largest source market for tourists from the Americas to SA and number one in Latin America. In 2013, SA welcomed 82 802 Brazilian tourists, which was a 5.6% increase from the 2012 statistics (78 376) with a total foreign direct spend of R893 million. Therefore, the opening of the South African Tourism (SA Tourism) Office in Brazil is a direct response to the increasing importance of the Brazilian market to the growth of the SA tourism sector. In 2013, a total of 9.1 million Brazilians travelled abroad, recording a 12% increase from the previous year, with SA capturing 1% of these tourists. [NB: The motivation is based on 2013 statistics because the SA Tourism office was opened in 2014] In addition, the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on Cooperation in the Field of Tourism with Brazil was a response to the growing importance of Brazil as a source market. It is the first such agreement with a South American country. The signing of this MoU also means that SA has now entered into bilateral tourism MOUs with all BRICS countries and is in a position to share best practices on Responsible Tourism with Brazil, for example. Brazil was the first country in the world to develop standards for Responsible Tourism, followed by SA in 2011. One of the key learning areas will revolve around the strategies and/or incentives Brazil put in place to encourage tourism companies to incorporate Responsible Tourism practices in their businesses. The Minister had an opportunity to interact with both SA and Brazilian trade during the visit. The Minister gave opening remarks at the South African Airways (SAA) convened buyer-seller workshop on the side-lines of the ABAV Travel Tradeshow, where there were 39 SA exhibitors and 32 Brazilian buyers. The Minister also participated at the first Ubuntu Awards in Brazil where Brazilian tour operators, travel agents and media organisations that have worked in the spirit of partnership with SA to effectively market the destination were recognised. These efforts increased SA’s visibility in the Brazilian market and assured the travel trade that the SA Government acknowledges their role in growing SA’s market share. All these events took place during the “Meet South Africa Week” where other SA entities such as SAA, Trade and Investment KwaZulu-Natal (TIKZN), SA Tourism, SA inbound tour operators, and SA Consulate-General in Sao Paolo participated. On 24 September 2015, the Minister hosted Brazilian journalists at a media breakfast.
Uzbekistan (29 - 30 September 2014 Turkey 1-3 October 2014 Samarkand )	Turkey & Samarkand	R 197 919.41	To attend the 99th Session of the World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) Executive Council (Exco) and 5th meeting of the Working Group on Official Development Assistance (ODA).	South Africa serves on the Executive Committee of the UNWTO until 2017. Together with the General Assembly, Exco is a mandatory session. The UNWTO is a United Nations agency charged with global governance of the tourism sector and responsible/sustainable development of the tourism economy, including ethics. It is also among the key centres of knowledge development and exchange for the tourism sector globally. South Africa contributes to the governance of the global tourism sector and the UNWTO Secretariat through serving in the Exco. South Africa is the Chair of the UNWTO Working Group on ODA. The objectives of the working group are to assist the UNWTO to seek full ODA eligibility for multilateral ODA and explore ways of mobilising extra-budgetary resources for tourism development in ODA-eligible developing countries. During South Africa’s term as Chair, the working group engaged with prominent members of the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and developed a Tourism for Development Facility (TDF) which is a mechanism of mobilising extra-budgetary resources. The Minister used the opportunity to meet with tour operators and to strengthen relations in Turkey en-route to Samarkand. Turkey is a developing source market for tourist arrivals to SA.
United Kingdom & Netherlands (03-06 November 2014)	London & Amsterdam	R119 506.01	To attend the World Travel Market (WTM) including meetings with key stakeholders (trade partners and industry associations) and media engagements. To deliver the Keynote address at the Ubuntu Awards. To participate as a Panel Member of the World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) & WTM Ministers’ Summit with the Theme: The legacy imperative of mega events. To attend the World Responsible Tourism Awards.	The key event during this visit was the SA Tourism stand at the World Travel Market – showcasing South Africa together with some of its products to countries around the world. The Travel Market was also used to meet with Tourism counterparts around the world to strengthen relations. The Minister presented the SA Tourism Ubuntu awards to South Africa’s travel and trade partners who have excelled in selling the destination to travellers from the United Kingdom (UK). The UK is one of South Africa’s top overseas source markets for tourist arrivals.
Namibia (23 to 24 February 2015)	Windhoek	R 7 489.39	The Minister met with his counterpart, Mr Herunga: Minister of Environment and Tourism during the 5th International Symposium and Annual Conference of the Partners of the Global Partnership for Sustainable Tourism.	The Symposium and the Annual Conference of the Partners presented South Africa with the opportunity to advance its responsible tourism programme through networks, partnerships, knowledge exchange and potential project support. South Africa’s participation at this international event is important in that it positions the country as a leader in responsible tourism practices in the region, on the continent and globally. Ministers also took the opportunity to exchange lessons learnt on how to strengthen community-based tourism.
Germany & Italy (2-5 March 2015 Berlin 6-7 March 2015 Italy )	Berlin & Milan	R 162 201.85	To attend the Internationale Tourismus-Börse (ITB) Berlin, Germany and to visit the South African Tourism (SA Tourism) office in Milan, Italy.	ITB is a leading business platform for global tourism. SA Tourism has been participating at ITB for a number of years. The SA Tourism stand accommodates products from South Africa. ITB 2015, for the first time in its history, hosted a Minister’s Roundtable with the theme: Opportunities and Risks of mega sporting events for Tourism. Minister participated as a panel member at this platform. The latter provided South Africa with the opportunity to share our tourism experiences stemming from hosting events like the 2010 FIFA World Cup. The Minister had the opportunity to get a deeper understanding of the opportunities and challenges for Germany as a key source market for tourist arrivals to South Africa. The event also provided a good opportunity for the Minister to engage with the German Media as well as with media from other countries. This was Minister’s first visit to the SA Tourism’s office in Italy. This provided an opportunity for Minister to meet the staff and to get a deeper understanding of the opportunities and challenges to position South Africa as a preferred tourist destination for Italian residents. Minister also had the opportunity to meet with key tour operators that sell South and Southern Africa to Italian residents.
Russia & United Arab Emirates (16-20 March 2015)	Moscow	R 167 843.67	To attend the Moscow International Tourism Trade Fair (MITT) and to participate in the South African Trade and Media engagement session in Moscow, Russia. The Minister’s visit to the Russian Federation was a result of discussions following a meeting with the Ambassador of the Russian Federation, H.E Mikhail Petrakov. The meeting was convened at the request of the Russian Ambassador and the focus of the meeting was on the issues relating to tourism cooperation between South Africa (SA) and the Russian Federation. During the meeting the Russian Ambassador extended an invitation, on behalf of the Russian Minister.	MITT created a unique opportunity for the department to use the visit to Russia to gain a deeper understanding of the Russian trade and the tourism market, and to share the department’s future plans for the Russian market with the SA mission officials in charge of tourism portfolio. Russia has been identified as a priority market and a source of future tourism growth for SA. The eThekwini Declaration of 2013 raised tourism as an area BRICS should explore. Brazil as incoming Chair in 2013 proposed a MoU on which South Africa provided comments. South Africa explored opportunities to get the BRICS tourism Ministers to meet and formalise tourism cooperation within the BRICS forum. The main reason is to optimise travel and tourism flow and also to advance the African tourism agenda within BRICS. In view of Russia becoming the Chair of BRICS, the Minister used this opportunity to raise tourism issues with the Russian Deputy Minister responsible for tourism.
(15-16 March 2015)	Dubai	The cost included in the Russia trip (connection)	To promote South Africa as a tourism destination in advance of the outgoing holiday season in the UAE; To establish contact between the governments of South Africa and the UAE to promote tourism cooperation between the two countries; To engage the main role players in the tourism industry in the UAE to promote South Africa as a suitable tourism destination.	The Ministerial mission comprised of meetings with travel agencies and tour operators; major airlines representatives that have a wide reach within the Middle East region; as well as a meeting with Sheikh Sultan bin Tahnoon Al Nahyan, Chairman of the Abu Dhabi Tourism and Culture Authority. The aim of the meetings was to understand their product needs and support required for them to sell South Africa as a tourism destination. The engagements allowed the Minister to better understand the market and also address issues relating to promoting South Africa as a tourism destination. The trip has resulted in a familiarisation trip to South Africa by a group of tour operators from the UAE in June 2015 as well as the participation of tour operators from the UAE at Indaba 2015 as buyers of South African products.
United States of America (USA) & Spain (13-14 April 2015)	New York	R174 618.16	To officiate at the 6th Ubuntu Awards which is an annual event that is hosted by South African Tourism.	The Ubuntu awards honours South African Tourism’s outstanding trade partners in business and leisure travel. South African Tourism invited the Minister to deliver a keynote address at the event. The Minister also interacted with trade on emerging challenges including the issue of Ebola virus which negatively affected travel decisions in the US markets.
(15-16 April 2015)	Madrid	The cost is included in the USA trip. (connection)	To address the World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) 15th Global Summit.	The WTTC Global Summit is established as a key annual event in the Travel and Tourism calendar and is the global leaders’ forum for travel and tourism. The theme was ‘Disruption and Reinvention in the tourism sector’. The Minister was invited to deliver a speech on South Africa. Through discussions held during the summit, it was concluded that the tourism industry has the constant ability to re-invent itself as world events pose new challenges and opportunities to the sector. The sector was encouraged to embrace the power of people for its future successes. These people includes tourism consumers, world’s citizens, governments, entrepreneurs of tomorrow and people employed within the sector. The Minister’s participation in the WTTC promotes public private partnership. South Africa (both government and industry) benefits from the developments, deliberations and thematic issues emanating from the WTTC summit. South Africa also benefits from the research and knowledge that is generated by the WTTC to get deeper understanding of the opportunities and challenges in key source markets.
Seychelles (24-26 April 2015)	Victoria	R 54 173.04	To attend the International Carnival of Victoria.	The Minister of Tourism in Seychelles has with South Africa’s support, initiated discussion for the establishment of a chapter for Tourism within the African Union Secretariat. The visit provided the opportunity for an informal bilateral between the two Ministers. Participating in the Carnival assisted South Africa in developing a regional tourism footprint and to showcase our culture. The Carnival also added to a better understanding of other African countries in terms of culture and heritage. Relationship-building in the region and continent is crucial for the growth of our continent. There are also three countries which are members of BRICs, namely, Brazil, India and China who are already participating in the carnival. This will further strengthen the partnership in the tourism space. The marketing of our country through the media coverage will be profound in showcasing our attractions in Africa, Europe, South America and Asia.
United Arab Emirates (UAE) (4-5 May 2015)	Dubai	R 67 303.35	To attend the 2015 UNWTO Arabian Travel Market Ministerial Forum on Intra Arab Tourism and to establish contact between the governments of South Africa and the Middle East region. To engage the main role players in the tourism sector in the Middle East to promote South Africa as a suitable tourism destination. To attend the signing of a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) between South African Tourism and Emirates airlines to promote South Africa as a tourist destination.	The ATM is the largest travel trade exhibition in the Middle East and eight South African companies participated in the exhibition. The South African stand was officially opened by the Minister and an opportunity was provided to engage the tourism trade from the region as well as various media that were present for the opening. This enabled the tourism trade to better understand South Africa’s value proposition as a tourism destination. The Minister also met with a number of his counterparts from the Middle East as well as Mr Taleb Rifai, Secretary-General of the UNWTO and Mr David Scowsill, President and CEO, World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) during the Ministerial Forum. This assisted in establishing relations with Ministers counterparts in the Middle East region.
Croatia (27-29 May 2015)	Rovinj	R 111 831.38	To attend the 100th Session of the UNWTO Exco and 6th meeting of Working Group on ODA.	As a member of the Executive Council (Exco) of the UNWTO for the period 2014-2017, South Africa continues to contribute to the governance of the global tourism sector and the UNWTO Secretariat. South Africa benefits from the research and knowledge that is generated by the UNWTO on various issues such as trends, thematic issues, etc. South Africa is the Chair of the UNWTO Working Group on Official Development Assistance (ODA). With South Africa as chair, the working group contributed to the historic 100th session of the Exco by developing a Tourism for Development Facility which is a mechanism to be used by UNWTO for mobilising extra-budgetary resources for tourism development in ODA-eligible developing countries. The Exco endorsed the Tourism for Development Facility. The working group has achieved its objectives and will cease to exist in September 2015.
Zimbabwe (18 June 2015)	Harare	R 27 549.34	The Minister was invited by his Zimbabwean counterpart to be a panellist and guest speaker at the Ministerial Roundtable Discussions during the Sanganai World Tourism Expo organised by the Ministry of Tourism and Hospitality of the Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe in collaboration with the University of Zimbabwe. The roundtable discussions aimed at addressing issues impacting negatively on tourism growth and development in the region such as poverty, Ebola, lack of air connectivity and visa.	The Minister’s participation in these events is in line with strengthening regional integration. Minister also participated in roundtable discussions on issues pertaining to unlocking regional tourism growth potential The participation by the Minister in events like the Sanganai Tourism Expo opened opportunities for Ministers to address issues for the development of tourism in the region and to share best practises. Zimbabwe is currently the Chair of the SADC Tourism Ministers as well as the Commission for Africa under the UNWTO.

Reply:

a) i) The National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications (NRCS) ensures that all new vehicle models and certain safety critical replacement components that fall within the domain of its compulsory specifications and specific provisions of the National Road Traffic Act (Act 93 of 1996), comply with all relevant requirements before they are offered for sale in South Africa. The NRCS is mandated to ensure new manufactured and imported regulated products are in compliance with the set requirements. In addition to this initial approval, market surveillance activities ensure that manufacturers and importers that offer products for sale, continually comply with the requirements, after initial approval has been granted. Product samples are inspected during the approval process. During its market surveillance activities, the NRCS may sample products to confirm compliance.

a) ii) The NRCS is not responsible for roadworthiness of vehicles and components in use during the life cycle of the product. This obligation resides with the National Department of Transport and the National Road Traffic Act.

a.a (and b i, ii and iii):

In the 2012-13 period 5867 products were approved as they met with the requirements of the relevant compulsory specifications. Test reports from accredited laboratories independent of the NRCS, confirmed the compliance of these products. In addition, 4326 market surveillance activities confirmed compliance of products to the relevant compulsory specifications. There were no instances of non-compliance confirmed in 20 samples where non- compliance was suspected. Samples of trucks, tow-bars, brake friction material, replacement glass and lights were verified against the requirements of the compulsory specifications at the time of approval and during market surveillance. Test conditions are specified in the relevant standard referred to in the compulsory specification for a particular product.

a.b and b i; ii and iii):

In the 2013-14 period 5800 products were approved as they met with the requirements of the relevant compulsory specifications. Test reports from accredited laboratories independent of the NRCS, confirmed the compliance of these products. In addition, 4054 market surveillance activities confirmed compliance of products to the relevant compulsory specifications. There were 9 non-compliant products confirmed in sample testing where non-compliance was suspected. Relevant sanctions were imposed on these clients. Samples of tow-bars, brake friction material, replacement glass and lights were verified against the requirements of the compulsory specifications at the time of approval and during market surveillance. Test conditions are specified in the relevant standard referred to in the compulsory specification for a particular product.

a.c and b I; ii and iii):

In the 2014-15 period 3602 products were approved as they met with the requirements of the relevant compulsory specifications. Test reports from accredited laboratories independent of the NRCS, confirmed the compliance of these products. In addition, 4511 market surveillance activities confirmed compliance of products to the relevant compulsory specifications. There were no instances of non-compliance confirmed in 19 samples tested where non- compliance was suspected. Samples of trucks, tow-bars, brake friction material, replacement glass and lights were verified against the requirements of the compulsory specifications at the time of approval and during market surveillance. Test conditions are specified in the relevant standard referred to in the compulsory specification for a particular product.

In terms of the NRCS Act: Act No 5 of 2008, the sanctioning process is an internal mechanism used by the Regulator to prevent the entry of non-compliant products into the market. However, such information specific to the company/client cannot legally be made public.

Reply:

(a) The Accident and Incident Investigation Division investigates all major crashes that occur on the roads. Major crashes are defined as: (i) crashes where five or more people died, (ii) crashes where there are four or more vehicles involved with a fatality, (iii) crashes involving transportation of hazardous substances and there is a fatality and (iv) any crash that the Corporation may deem necessary to investigate.

1. In 2012 -13 there were 107 major crashes investigated
2. In 2013 – 14 there were 122 major crashes investigated
3. In 2014 – 15 there were 109 major crashes investigated

(b) (i) Investigations were initiated as soon as a crashes occurred and (ii) concluded on average after three months.

(c) (i) In 2012-13, 99 cases were referred to the SAPS for prosecution.

(ii) In 2013-14, 118 cases were referred to the SAPS for prosecution.

(iii) In 2014-15, 71 cases were referred to the SAPS for prosecution.

 

Reply:

This question has already been replied to and the Integrated Community Registration Outreach Programme (ICROP) concept document was sent for the Honourable Member’s attention on 16 July 2015.

Reply:

Editorial Note: This Question and Reply, including the accompanying annexure, was published in 2015. In January 2024, we received information that the annexure contained an error regarding Dr More Chakane. Dr Chakane was not dismissed by the CETA due to misconduct, but rather his employment was terminated by mutual agreement between the parties. Accordingly, the annexure has been redacted to remove reference to Dr Chakane.

 

 

1. Department of Higher Education and Training:

Financial Year	(i) Amount paid on early termination	(ii) Name of employee	(iii) Reasons for early termination
2010/11	R711 187.43	Ms R Munusamy	Settlement agreement
2012/13	R685 200.00	Mr PS Mvelase	Unresolvable working practices

1. At the time of compilation, eighteen of the twenty-six entities indicated that they did not pay out the remainder of any employee's contract before the contractually stipulated date of termination, since the 2008/09 financial year up to the latest specified date. The information received from the eight entities is attached as Annexure A. The Department is following up on the outstanding information from one entity.

Compiler/Contact persons:

Ext:

DIRECTOR – GENERAL

STATUS:

DATE:

REPLY TO QUESTION 2249 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED

Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP

MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING

STATUS:

DATE:

Reply:

1. The graph below depicts the monthly cash receipts since the announcement of the new dispensation.

1. The graph below depicts the monthly cash flow comparison for the 12 months prior to the announcement of the new dispensation.

Reply:

SASSA has been in consultation with SAPS Crime Intelligence and VIP Protection Services on this matter since 2013.

Reply:

(a) In line with Section 24 (1) of the Road Traffic Management Corporation, Act No 20 of 1999 the RTMC is funded from:

• monies prescribed, subject to section 48(1)(b) which must include transaction fees charged by the Corporation for the sale of services; -  transaction fees for vehicle licenses
• penalties and fines payable to the RTMC as an issuing authority in terms of Section 32 of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998);-
• infringement fees issued by NTP (interest on invested cash balances); and
• monies appropriated by Parliament - grant from the Department of Transport.

(b) what (i) processes, (ii) procedures and (iii) mechanisms are in place to ensure the integrity of the specified funding model

The legislative framework governing RTMC and the Treasury Regulations are in place to ensure integrity of the funding model.

(c) The financial sustainability assessment that was conducted in house amongst others proved that the financial dependency of RTMC on Government funding is not sustainable. Developing a sustainable funding model warrants scientific and intellectual proneness and specialty of a particular type in ensuring long term sustainability.

Reply:

The Portfolio Committee on Labour was briefed by the Department of Labour through the Director General where the Department of Labour presented its plan and programmes to turn the Fund around. Also SCOPA was briefed on the same work plan approximately in the Month of June 2015. At this stage there are no intentions to privatise the medical aid portion.

Reply:

(a) The Department of Basic Education’s 1000 Libraries campaign started at the beginning of the current financial year.

(b) The campaign targets 1000 schools in 2019 and there will be at least 1000 additional libraries every year until 2019.

(c) The total cost of the campaign has not been determined yet.

(d) Because it is starting phase, softer criteria were used for 2015. The criteria that were used for the selection of the schools are as follows:

• There must be an existing structure;
• The structure must have minimal resources;
• The structure must be located within a functioning-school environment; and

However, the aim is to reach all schools which have no libraries.

(e) A total of 1 000 schools have been identified across the nine provinces.

(f) (i)Normal procurement procedures will be used and, in addition, donations will be received.

(ii)The Department of Basic Education is partnering with the ETDP SETA to place assistant school librarians in the identified schools. Staffing is going to be a major challenge.

Reply:

1 (a) 38 individual responses and 1 (one) group submitted proposals in this regard.

S Pillay

2. Mr T Botha: Administrator: Life Sciences Member List

3. M Tekere: Geography teacher

4. Ms L Kroll: Brainline

5. P Esterhuysen, HOD Wykeham College

6. Ms L Rodwell: Holy Rosary School

7. N Simamane: Geography teacher

8. Mr KB Mbatha: Dwaleni High School

9. Ms M Mokoka: Limpopo Education Dept

10. Mr A Nxele: Eastern Cape Education Dept

11.Mehmoodbhge

12.Ms U Pillay: Geography teacher

13 CT: Ndwandwe

14. VT Miya: Amaphisi High School

15. Ms I Grimsell: St Dominic’s College

16. Ms E Haffajee: Maritzburg Muslim School for Girls

17. V Govender: Mountview Secondary School

18. Mr Provost: Pinelands High School

19. P Oosthuysen: Holy Rosary School

20. J Lucas: Holy Rosary School

21. B Blampied: Lady of Fatima Dominican Convent School

22. JC Steimann: John Vorster Technical School

23.  Ms S Wiese: GED

24. K Clover: Cedar House School

25. T du Plessis: Milnerton High School

26. A Davey: St Patrick’s College

27. M Smith: St Andrew’s College

28. Mr G Keats, Moderator for Geography

29. Mr B Hughes: Bridge House School

30. Ms J Brown Beaulieue: College:

31. Mr DA Collins: Teacher

32. Dr A Crowe: Lecturer at UCT

33. HL Janse van Rensburg: False Bay High School

34. Ms N Masurei: Pinelands High School

35. Ms M Blignaut: St Catherine’s

36. Ms S Webber: DSG School

37. Mr C Nowlan: Weston Agricultural College 38. Ms Anne Oberholzer: Independent Examinations Board 39. A group of Geography teachers in the Limpopo Province, comprising of 131 individuals.

1(b) Responses to the Government Gazette were as follows:

31 respondents are not in favour of the proposal, especially the coupling of Mathematics with Economics (2 respondents), Geography (24 respondents) and Life Sciences (7 respondents). Seven (7) respondents are in favour of coupling of Mathematics, Accounting and Physical Sciences; one (1) is in favour of coupling Mathematics with Physical Sciences only. One (1) respondent was in favour of the proposal of coupling Mathematics with all the listed subjects.

2. Not yet.

(a) The Minister is still considering the proposals and hence no decision has been taken yet.

(b) The proposals have been taken to relevant structures such as Heads of Education Committee for discussions and will then be considered by the Council of Education Ministers (CEM).

(i) No decision has been taken.

(ii) No decision has been taken yet.

(iii) (aa) The Minister will, after consultation with the Council of Education Ministers, pronounce the decision.

(bb) The amendments will be implemented in the month of January following the year of approval.

Reply:

The dataset for 2015 is not available yet for both LURITS and Annual School Survey.

• The Annual School Survey dataset will be available in February 2016.
• All learners and educators will be uploaded on LURITS by 30 September 2015.

Reply:

1(a) The Department of Basic Education does not have a budget to provide schools with sport resources. The schools budget for sport through funding from Norms and Standards or sponsorship from private companies. The Department of Sport and Recreation, however, has allocated 40% of the total allocation of the Mass Participation and Sport development grant to school sport. Each province has 10% to purchase equipment for disadvantaged schools identified through participation in school leagues. The 5% is allocated to purchase attire for disadvantaged schools that are registered for the school sport programme and participating in school leagues. The information of the schools and their location resides with Provincial Departments of Sport and Recreation.

2. The schools that are provided with equipment are monitored and supported by the Department of Sport and Recreation, as well as officials from the Department of Basic Education at District level. The officials ensure the participation of the supported schools in school league programme and the specific codes of sport. The report with the analysis is currently being drafted by the Department of Sport and Recreation.

Reply:

 

(a) R22.2 million

(b) The amount of R22.2 million was spent on the following:

• 2014 Build-up process costs (transportation, accommodation, adjudication training, provincial ceremonies,
• The 15th Annual NTA event: Transportation, Printing and Distribution costs, accommodation, prizes, audio-visual, catering and related event costs.
• Corporate gifts for the national event;
• Sign language interpreters for the national event;
• Television production for the national event; and
• Advocacy for the national event and travel agency and professional conference organiser fees.

(c) Over-expenditure amounted to R6 488 396,57

(d) The overspending on this programme is due to the fact that the NTAs expenditure was higher than the available funds for the period under review. The NTA has been earmarked as a critical instrument for the acknowledgement and advocacy attached to the strategic priority to support the professionalisation of teachers at all levels, across the curriculum, and focuses on the inclusion of all learners and teachers within the sector. The 15th Annual NTA was utilised to elevate and celebrate all teachers across the country that serve South Africa.

(e) The R6 488 396.57 over-expenditure was approved by the Acting Director-General of the Department of Basic Education after all due procedures for approval had been followed in order to ensure that the objectives of the NTA were met.

Reply:

The Department of Labour and entities are governed by laid down procedures, policies and legislations in managing employer and employee relations. Further more, monies paid out for any reason are reflecting in Annual Reports which Honourable member has access to.

Reply:

The monitoring and evaluation component of the Department is currently at a level of a Sub-directorate, and consists of a Deputy Director and an Assistant Director. A process currently is underway with DPSA to review the organisational structure.

Reply:

I am not aware to these assertions.

I intend writing to the MEC responsible for Local Government in Gauteng, in terms of Section 106(4)(b) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act No.32 of 2000), requesting him to commission and investigation into the matter.

I will await the outcome of the investigation to determine whether or not there are findings that will enable me to provide a response to this question.

Reply:

(a) The SAPS and SANDF are not holders of Broadcasting Licences.

 

MR N MUNZHELELE

[ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

Reply:

The Honourable Member should note that the Department of Energy is responsible for administering the petrol and diesel prices, and also for determining the basic fuel price (BFP). The Minister of Finance is only responsible for setting the levies and any taxes on petrol and diesel. However, to make it easy for the Honourable Member, I will draw from the website of the Department of Energy (http://www.energy.gov.za/files/petroleum_frame.html) to assist in providing a comprehensive response to the question. The starting point in arriving at the domestic wholesale retail selling price of petrol diesel in South Africa is the calculation of the basic fuel price (BFP), and I will draw on the website of the Department of Energy in response to questions 1(a) and (b) (i) (and (iv)), and then provide my own response to the questions on the tax and levies on petrol and diesel.

(1). (i) and (iv) The website of the Department of Energy states that the basic fuel price (BFP) attempts

“to represent the realistic, market-related costs of importing a substantial portion of South Africa's liquid fuels requirements, and it is therefore deemed that such supplies are sourced from overseas refining centres capable of meeting South Africa's requirements in terms of both product quality and sustained supply considerations.

The petrol price in South Africa is therefore directly linked to the price of petrol quoted in US dollars at refined petroleum export orientated refining centres in the Mediterranean area, the Arab Gulf and Singapore. This means that the domestic prices of fuels are influenced by (a) international crude oil prices, (b) international supply and demand balances for petroleum products and (c) the Rand/US Dollar exchange rate”.

The website goes on to note that there are both international and domestic influences that are added to the BFP to arrive at the final pump prices in the different fuel pricing zones (magisterial district zones). The domestic influences include inland transport costs, wholesale margin, retail profit-margin, the slate levy, and various taxes / levies as listed below. It should be noted that diesel prices are regulated only up to the wholesale level; so the retail price of diesel is not regulated.

(ii), and (iii) Levies on fuels and taxes

The following levies and taxes that apply to liquid fuels in South Africa are provided below:

Table 1: Levy, tax and additional items on PETROL AND DIESEL

Levy	Date first imposed	Amount of levy Fiscal year 2015/16	Objective of the levy
General fuel levy	Early 1980s; Customs and Excise Act, No.91 of 1964 Introduced for the first time around April 1983	255 cent per litre on petrol and 240 cent per litre on diesel	Revenue (net of the refunds) go to the National Revenue Fund, from which they are appropriated to fund government’s general expenditure programmes, including the construction and maintenance of roads and support of public transport. Refer to the annual Budget Review for more information for any specific fiscal year. . Since the abolishment of RSC levies, about one third of the revenue is shared with metropolitan municipalities.
Customs and excise levy	1994; Customs and Excise Act, No.91 of 1964 Introduced in April 1983	4 cents per litre on petrol, diesel and biodiesel. The 4 cents per litre has been fixed since the 1990s.	Included in the Southern African Custom Union (SACU) pool and shared amongst the SACU member countries.
Road accident fund levy	Road Accident Fund Act, No.56 of 1996 Introduced in May 1997	154 cents per litre on petrol, diesel and biodiesel	Provides cover for all road users against injuries sustained or death arising from accidents involving motor vehicles.
Equalisation fund levy	Central Energy Fund Act, No. 38 of 1977; Introduced in January 1979	Zero cents per litre on both diesel and petrol since 1996	The fund was in the past primarily used to smooth out monthly fluctuations in the price of liquid fuels. This was an attempt to try and limit the impact of volatile international crude oil prices and fluctuations in the Rand / US $ exchange rate on fuel prices. This effort has not been very successful and was ceased about 5 years ago.
Demand Side Management Levy	The Central Energy Fund Act, No. 38 of 1977; Introduced in January 2006	10 cents per litre on 95 Octane petrol in inland areas	Most vehicles in the inland market do not require 95 ULP. In an effort to limit the demand for 95 ULP in the inland area to prevent "octane wastage" and to ensure sufficient supply for motorist who really need it the DSM levy was introduced.
Petroleum Pipelines Levy	The Petroleum Pipelines Levies Act, No. 28 of 2004 Introduced in March 2007	0.15 cents per litre - NERSA	To meet the general administrative and other costs for the functions performed by the Petroleum Pipelines Regulatory Authority.
Slate Levy	The Central Energy Act, No.38 of 1977 Introduced in January 2009	Fluctuates	To finance the balance in the Slate account when the Slate is in a negative balance. If the daily Basic Fuel Price (BFP) is higher than the BFP in the fuel price structure, a unit under recovery is realised otherwise there is an over recovery for the oil companies.
IP tracer dye levy	Central Energy Fund Act, No. 38 of 1977. Introduced in August 1999	0.01 cents per litre	To curtail the unlawful mixing of diesel and illuminating paraffin, an illuminating paraffin tracer dye is injected into illuminating paraffin. An illuminating paraffin tracer dye levy was introduced into the price structures of diesel to finance expenses related thereto.

The Table below indicates how the pump price for petrol, and the wholesale price for diesel, is determined for an inland province like Gauteng.

Table 2: Composition of levy, tax and additional items in Gauteng

COMPOSITION OF THE RETAIL PRICE OF PETROL AND THE WHOLESALE PRICES FOR DIESEL IN GAUTENG FOR June 2015
GAUTENG FUEL PRICES	Petrol 93 ULP	Diesel * 0.05% S
	c/l	c/l
Basic fuel price (BFP)	644.65	638.63
Wholesale margin	33.50	64.70
Service cost recoveries	30.00	30.00
Dealers margin (*)	151.10	N/A
Zone differential in Gauteng	35.30	35.30
Fuel levy	255.00	240.00
RAF levy	154.00	154.00
Customs & excise duty	4.00	4.00
IP Tracer levy	N/A	0.01
Slate levy	0	0
Petroleum Pipelines Levy	0.15	0.15
Rounding	0.3
Retail price	1 308.00
Wholesale price		1 166.79

(2) Fuel levy revenue

The money received from the fuel levy is recorded in the relevant audited financial statements every year, and included in the appropriate Budget Review, all made available to Parliament and the public. The figures below are drawn from annual Budget Reviews.

Table 3: Revenue from the General Fuel Levy and RAF

R million	General Fuel Levy (net)*	Road Accident Fund Levy
2011/12 (audited)	36 589.07	16 628.02
2012/13 (audited)	40 320.20	17 621.42
2013/14 (audited)	43 684.65	19 961.98
2014/15 (estimate)	48 466.52	22 038.71
* Net of diesel refunds
Source: Budget Review Table 4: Initial estimate of revenue collected since 1 April 2015 to 31 May 2015
2015/16#	8 602.88	4 364.56
Revenue from 1 April 2015 to May 2015
Source: Statement of the National Revenue, Expenditure and Borrowing as at 31 May 2015 issued by the DG: National Treasury

(3) No, as noted in the Budget Review and other budget documents every year, there is no money received from the fuel levy that is ring-fenced for the maintenance of roads. The building and maintenance of roads is done by departments or agencies in all three spheres of government, and is appropriated in national and provincial laws and municipal budgets. The amounts spent directly by the national government on the maintenance of roads are appropriated from the National Revenue Fund, and the budget information is provided below. A national entity like SANRAL also funds maintenance of certain roads, using budgetary funds and revenue it may collect. The actual funds spent per year on the maintenance of roads requires the Honourable Member to consider the budgets and annual reports of all organs of state involved with road funding in all three spheres of government.

It should also be noted that in 2014/15 R10.19 billion of the net revenue from the general fuel levy was allocated to the eight metropolitan municipalities as a part of a revenue sharing arrangement.

Money from the Road Accident Fund levy is ring-fenced and used by the Road Accident Fund to compensate victims of vehicle accidents for injuries sustained as a result of such accidents. The Road Accident Fund Levy is thus a form of a personal injuries insurance policy. Further information is available from its annual reports.

The tables below are from the 2015 Budget document Estimates of National Expenditure (ENE) and provide an overview of the funds allocated to the National Department of Transport.

Vote 37: National Department of Transport
Subprogramme: R million	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17
Administration	382.90	399.80	423.50
Integrated Transport Planning	81.20	84.30	89.10
Rail Transport	15 034.60	18 362.00	19 389.60
Road Transport	21 645.30	22 852.10	23 876.20
Civil Aviation	148.30	154.00	162.70
Maritime Transport	110.60	115.40	121.80
Public Transport	11 323.80	11 846.40	12 779.10
TOTAL	48 726.70	53 814.00	56 842.00

Vote 37: National Department of Transport
Subprogramme: %	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17
Administration	0.8%	0.7%	0.7%
Integrated Transport Planning	0.2%	0.2%	0.2%
Rail Transport	30.9%	34.1%	34.1%
Road Transport	44.4%	42.5%	42.0%
Civil Aviation	0.3%	0.3%	0.3%
Maritime Transport	0.2%	0.2%	0.2%
Public Transport	23.2%	22.0%	22.5%
TOTAL	100%	100%	100%

Reply:

Government has not taken any decision to establish new cities, and thus no funds have been set aside for this purpose. It should also be noted that development of cities can evolve from small towns or urban nodes that grow as a result of increased economic activities and population growth. Examples of such areas include towns such as Lephalale, which is growing rapidly due to increased economic activities and public infrastructure investments in the area. Furthermore, the location, desirability and growth of such areas are informed by municipalities’ Spatial Development Frameworks. It is, therefore, the responsibility of municipalities to approve such developments. However, as new and substantial economic hubs develop in new towns and cities, government will assist these municipalities to acquire appropriate planning and other technical capability to manage these new challenges and opportunities.

Reply:

The Department spent as per below breakdown:

HQ LABOUR	2012-2013	2013-2014	2014-2015
(i)SOWETAN	R560 159.87	R585 060.78	R271 368.72
(ii)DAILY SUN	R777 265.50	R789 273.05	R699 177.80

ENTITIES:

(b) ENTITIES REPORTING TO THE MINISTER (i) (Sowetan)	(aa) 2012-13	(bb) 2013-14	(cc) 2014-15
NEDLAC	n/a	n/a	n/a
UIF	n/a	R148,243.32	R371,229.60
CF	R291, 012.20	R624, 552.22	R66, 983.43
PSA	n/a	R76, 799.52	R254, 177.02
CCMA	n/a	n/a	n/a

(b) ENTITIES REPORTING TO THE MINISTER (ii) (Daily Sun )	(aa) 2012-13	(bb) 2013-14	(cc) 2014-15
NEDLAC	n/a	n/a	n/a
UIF	n/a	R29,930.47	n/a
CF	R174, 911.80	R298, 344.39	n/a
PSA	n/a	n/a	n/a
CCMA	n/a	n/a	*R 39, 979.80

# PSA – payment made to Times Media with adverts in Sowetan and Sunday times.

Compensation Fund – Sowetan Live – 2013/14 = R100, 000.00.

Reply:

(a)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(cc)

The Departments:

The Sowetan
2012/2013	2013/2014	2014/2015
111,444 .27	176,592.50	239,974.07
The Daily Sun
2012/2013	2013/2014	2014/2015
-	-	38,136.42

The Entities:

The South African Cities Network (SACN)

The SACN did not spend any amount on advertising in Sowetan and Daily Sun in the 2012 /13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 financial year.

South African Local Government Association (SALGA)

The Sowetan			Total
2012/2013	2013/2014	2014/2015
-	R50, 940,90	R73, 051,20	R123,992,10
The Daily Sun
2012/2013	2013/2014	2014/2015
-	-	-

Municipal Demarcation Board

The Sowetan			Total
2012/2013	2013/2014	2014/2015
R267,471,36	-	R30,834,70	R298 306,06
The Daily Sun
2012/2013	2013/2014	2014/2015
R380,933,25	R298,981,26	-	R679 851,54

Reply:

This information is not readily available. It will take some time to assemble the information.

Reply:

(1)No, as stated in my response to PQ2015/2467, I have not investigated the matter and therefore am not aware of the details pertaining the matter.

(2)I intend writing to the MEC responsible for local government in Gauteng, in terms of Section 106(4)(b) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act No.32 of 2000), requesting him to commission an investigation into the matter.

Reply:

(a) Section 62(1)(d) of the Municipal Finance Management (MFMA) provides that the Accounting Officer must take all reasonable steps to ensure that unauthorized, irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure or other losses are prevented. Furthermore section 125(2)(d) of the MFMA requires that the notes to the annual financial statements must include particulars of any material losses or any material irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure, including in the case of a municipality, any material unauthorized expenditure that occurred during the financial year and whether these are recoverable.

From the above it is clear that the legislation places the obligation to make public and disclose particulars of any irregular expenditure incurred, including taking steps to prevent such expenditure from being incurred, on the Accounting Officer. Moreover, the legal principle underpinning the MFMA is that the Accounting Officer and Council are responsible for implementation of the MFMA and to ensure appropriate corrective measures are taken.

b) The Honorable member to note that section 62 of the Municipal Systems Act sets out the process to be followed when aggrieved persons are dissatisfied with decisions taken by a municipality. The process provides for appeals to be dealt with by the municipality within its internal governance structures. There is no requirement in section 62 for decisions with regard to the outcomes of appeals to be reported to the National Treasury. Information in this regard is therefore only available at institutional level and therefore National Treasury was not made aware of the extent of the appeals.

c) With regards to supply chain management disputes or objections, regulations 49 and 50 of the Municipal Supply Chain Management Regulations provide the procedure to be followed. The regulations provide that such disputes be first investigated internally by the municipality before it escalates the matter to the provincial or national treasury. It is therefore clear that the National Treasury will not be aware of supply chain management disputes unless a municipality or the relevant treasury was unable to resolve the matter through its internal processes. The details of such information will be available at institutional level.

(2) Correspondence was received from the City Manager dated 3 September 2012. However, this only provided information of irregular expenditure relating to the request for condonement. As mentioned earlier, the detailed information on all irregular expenditure is maintained within the municipality and in this instance was not shared with National Treasury.

(3) (a) Section 32(2) of the MFMA provides that the Municipal Council must recover all irregular expenditure incurred unless the municipal council has, after an investigation by a council committee, certified the expenditure as irrecoverable and has written it off. It is therefore clear that legislatively, the municipal council is the only appropriate structure who should take action in relation to the irregular expenditure that has been incurred. Information in this regard is therefore best obtained from the municipality concerned.

(b) Section 171 of the MFMA defines when an accounting officer of a municipality commits an act of financial misconduct. To further support the implementation of this section and chapter 15 as a whole, the Municipal Regulations on Financial Misconduct Procedures and Criminal Proceedings (“Financial Misconduct Regulations”) was promulgated on 31 May 2014 which sets out processes to be followed by municipalities in dealing with allegations of financial misconduct. The regulations provide that as a start, allegations has to be dealt with by the municipal council through its internal established structures that deals with disciplinary matters. This relevant matter will therefore be referred to the Executive Mayor of this specific municipality for his further handling consistent with the provisions of the Financial Misconduct Regulations.

(4) The National Treasury will not be conducting any forensic audit at the municipality at this stage as the information at hand indicate that the Office of the Public Protector is in the process of conducting an investigation at the municipality. The National Treasury will await the outcome thereof.

Reply:

I am not aware to these assertions.

I intend writing to the MEC responsible for local government in Gauteng, in terms of Section 106(4) (b) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act No.32 of 2000), requesting him to commission an investigation into the matter.

According to Section 106 (4)(b)of the Municipal Systems Act, the MEC must table a report in the relevant provincial legislature, detailing within 90 days from the date of my request to him, to conduct the investigation. The MEC is required to simultaneously send a report to me, the Minister of Finance, and the NCOP.

I will await the outcome of the investigation to determine whether or not there are findings that enable me to provide specific responses in respect of sub-questions (a)(b)(c)(d) and (i)(ii).

Reply:

No. The law has only been in place for few months hence cannot make a realistic diagnosis of the challenges in matching suitable candidates with the requirements of the employers at this stage.

Reply:

(a) None

(b) Only South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC), which is exempted from paying an annual license fee.

 

 

 

 

MR N MUNZHELELE

[ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

Reply:

(1) The Department is not aware of any municipal managers that are prevented from performing their functions but rather municipal managers who have been suspended from work for breach of conduct.

(2) According to information furnished by provinces, the following are municipal managers that have been placed on suspension by municipalities:

Province	Municipal Manager	Municipality	Date placed on suspension	Nature of misconduct
Eastern Cape	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Ikwezi LM	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.
	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Inkwanca LM	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.
Free State	Mr PI Radebe	Mafube LM	5 January 2015	Council decision to implement consequence management due to Auditor-General audit opinion of a disclaimer over the past 5 years.
Gauteng	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil

Province	Name of municipal manager	Name of the municipality	Date of suspension	Nature of misconduct
KwaZulu-Natal	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Endumeni LM	26 March 2014	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.
	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Imbabazane LM	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.
	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Indaka LM	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.
	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Vulamehlo LM	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.
Limpopo	Mr TM Maake	Mopani DM	1 February 2015	Financial misconduct
	Mr Ntwane	Thabazimbi LM	10 December 2014	Maladministration, misappropriation of funds and non-compliance with supply chain procedures
	Mr M Mathivha	Thulamela LM	28 April 2015	Fruitless expenditure
	Ms C Mamitla	Polokwane LM	4 May 2015	Financial misconduct
	Mr MF Ramaphakela	Lepelle-Nkumpi LM	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.	Details not furnished. Province requested to obtain information.
Mpumalanga	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
North West	Mr K Rabanye	Mahikeng LM	29 November 2014	Corruption and maladministration
	Mr J Bhine	Ditsobotla LM	3 April 2013	Gross maladministration
	Mr J Makade	Ventersdorp LM	11 October 2014	Maladministration
Northern Cape	Mr TF Leeuw	Magareng LM	20 April 2015	Maladministration
	Mr M Fillis	Ubuntu LM	5 March 2015	Corruption and maladministration
Western Cape	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil

Reply:

The Department of Energy, not the National Treasury, is responsible for developing the
Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) and making determinations relating to generation capacity required to enable procurement of power from the proposed Mmamabula Energy Project.

Reply:

The information is not readily available and must be obtained from the provinces.  A request is hereby made for an extension in order for us to provide quality and correct information as soon as it is received.

Reply:

I am not aware of these assertions.

I intend writing to the MEC responsible for local government in Gauteng, in terms of Section 106(4)(b) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act No.32 of 2000), requesting him to commission an investigation into the matter.

 

Reply:

I am not aware of these assertions.

I intend writing to the MEC responsible for local government in Gauteng, in terms of Section 106(4)(b) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act No.32 of 2000), requesting him to commission an investigation into the matter.

Reply:

The Department of Human Settlements:

(a) & (b) The amount spent by the Department of Human Settlements on purchasing and installation of a generator is R1 784 859,00.

(c) The amount for operating costs (fuel) since the generator was purchased R 22 956.00.

(d) There are no maintenance costs incurred thus far.

The Entities:

(a) There are eight (8) public entities reporting to the Minister of Human Settlements, only the following three public entities have purchased generators:

• EAAB spent R391 006.40 on the 11th March 2014;
• NURCHA has spent R 288 635 in 2007; and
• NHBRC has spent R 700 000.00.

(b) Installation cost for the generators of NHBRC and NURCHA was included in the purchasing amount. EAAB has spent R 10 000.00 for installation.

(c) Spending on operational cost, including fuel:

• The HDA is responsible for the refuelling of the generator. The average cost to refuel the generator is R 4000.00, based on 4x4 hour load shedding per month;
• NURCHA has spent R 69 223.00;
• EAAB has spent R 9 763.84 from 12/05/2014 to 01/01/2015; and
• NHBRC has spent R 134 982.82 (This includes: Diesel = R 93 091.49; SMS Commander = R 10 545.00; and SDM Controller = R 31 346.33)

(d) Maintenance of generators

• EAAB has spent R 15 298.80 to maintain the generators from 23/09/2014 to 01/01/2015;
• NURCHA has spent R 13 800.00 per annum
• NHBRC has spent R 64 655.63 for the service and maintenance of the generators since 1 April 2013.