Questions and Replies

Filter by year

11 April 2016 - NW306

Profile picture: Ross, Mr DC

Ross, Mr DC to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(1)(a) How often does each metropolitan municipality collect household waste and (b) is it collected on a fixed schedule; if not, why not; (2) whether there were any disruptions of service or late removal of waste as a result of a failure by any municipality since 1 January 2015; if so, (a) what were the causes and (b) how has this been addressed?

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the Department. The Department thus made a request to Metropolitan Municipalities to provide the relevant information. Information was received from the following Metropolitan Municipalities:

ETHEKWINI METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

  1. (a) Once a week

           (b) Yes

      2. None

BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

  1. (a) Once a week

          (b) Yes

   2. Yes, there were disruptions of services in BCMM Solid Waste Department

      (a) Disruptions were caused by frequent breakdowns of Refuse Compactor Trucks and labour unrests;

     (b) The Department of Solid Waste usually addresses the labour issues that arise with the assistance of Corporate Services.

CITY OF TSHWANE

  1. (a) Once a week

          (b) Yes

2. The collection trucks were mostly on schedule but there may have been 1 or 2 days where some areas experienced delays.

    (a) The delays would typically be due to a break-down of a vehicle or a workers strike.

     (b) The collection continues into the following day or days so that there are no backlogs when the following week starts.

MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

  1. (a) Once a week

        (b) Yes

2. Yes, there were disruptions and late removal of waste since 1 January 2015.

     (a) There is often a shortage of vehicles due to vehicles breaking down.

     (b) The municipality utilises a pool of SMMEs who have been appointed to render emergency door to door waste collection as and when necessary.

NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

  1. The NMBM is collecting refuse from 99.98% of households within the urban edge, excluding informal areas on privately owned erven not earmarked for Human Settlements development. Almost one third of the households waste is collected bi-weekly and the remaining two-thirds are collected weekly. The NMBM is in the process of converting all bi-weekly refuse collection to a weekly service by June 2016.

2.   Yes, there were instances of late removal of waste since 1 January 2015.

     (a) The capacity to render efficient Waste Collection Services is often hampered by breakdowns in refuse trucks due to ageing fleet and turnaround time on repairs and maintenance. This leads to refuse being collected later than usual, in certain communities. Nonetheless, the refuse is collected on the same day of refuse collection schedule even if it is late during the day.

     (b) The NMBM has embarked on a process of recapitalisation of old fleet. New refuse trucks have been purchased and other trucks are scheduled to be purchased in the next financial year. In the meantime, the NMBM is hiring externally through the existing Municipal contract in order to supplement its service delivery demands.

 

11 April 2016 - NW810

Profile picture: Malatsi, Mr MS

Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

(1) What is the (a) total amount in Rands that Telkom SOC Ltd paid to a certain person (name furnished) to promote its fibre broadcast technology and (b) duration of the contract closed between Telkom and the specified person in this regard; (2) whether any South African athletes were considered to promote Telkom’s fibre broadcast technology in the specified campaign; if not, why not; if so, why did Telkom not choose a South African athlete for the specified campaign; (3) (a) which company, including the (i) name and (ii) business address of the company and (iii) details of the (aa) chief executive officer, (bb) managing director and (cc) account manager, was awarded the tenders for (aaa) print, (bbb) radio and (ccc) digital marketing of the specified campaign and (b) what is the total amount paid by Telkom to the specified company in each case? NW929E

Reply:

Telkom has provided me with the following response:-

(1)- (3) Telkom as a listed company must comply with the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) rules.

In terms of the JSE rules, information that is of financial nature has to be disclosed to all shareholders at once during an open period (reporting period). The company is currently in a closed period.

Furthermore, the information required, requires Telkom to reveal information which is of a commercial nature. The information therefore cannot be shared as it is competitive sensitive.

 

11 April 2016 - NW687

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

(a) What plans are in place to expand  (i) the exposure and (ii) work of the Child Online Protection programme at schools during the Medium Term Expenditure Framework and across and  (b) in  which provinces is this going to take place; (2) what (a) training workshops and/or (b) training support is being given to educators in all (i) government and (ii) private schools to (aa) alert them to the dangers of online child abuse and (bb) how they can mitigate against this?

Reply:

(1)(a) The DTPS will increase the number of schools per province from one (1) to two (2) as reflected in quarterly targets in the 2016/17 Business Plan. The Child Online Protection Programme also includes the e-Parenting Programme and in this regard the DTPS intends to develop an interactive e-platform for parents and an e-guide for parents to capacitate them to cope with issues of exposure of the children to harmful content online.

(1)(b) The Child Online Protection Programme will be implemented in all nine provinces and in two towns in each province. The e-Parenting Interactive Sessions will be held in all provinces except the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal as these provinces were covered in the 2015/2016 financial year.

(2)(a)(i)The DTPS will be hosting School based Awareness Workshops in eighteen (18) schools with grade 9 to 11 learners, at least two hundred and fifty (250) learners per school, and their respective teachers, at least six (6) teachers per school. The content of the workshops includes the following topics: Dangers of being Online, Safety Tips for being Online, Cyberbulling and Sexting, Identity Theft and the impact of creating a negative or positive digital footprint for the individual and the country.

(2)(a)(ii) No training workshops are planned to be implemented in private schools.

(2)(b)(i) The learners and teachers are given content and information in terms of web based resources that may be accessed in order to assist them to mitigate against the online abuse of children.

(2)(b)(ii) No training support is planned to be given to educators in private schools.

11 April 2016 - NW575

Profile picture: Topham , Mr B

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 4103 on 8 December 2015, the information has been received from the Tlokwe City Local Municipality; if so, when will this information be made available as requested?

Reply:

According to the information provided by Tlokwe City Local Municipality:

1. Amounts of Capital budget spent on refurbishment of infrastructure:

(a) 2013/2014 – R27 722 428.12

(b) 2014/2015 R63 549 878.94

2. Details of the refurbishment projects as well as the amount spent on each project are as per the table hereafter.

Tlokwe City Local Municipality Capital budget spent on refurbishment of infrastructure

2013 - 2014

PROJECT

BUDGET

SPENT

 

 

     

 

WATER

     

 

 

Refurbish sand filters at the water treatment works

1,000,000.00

231,192.00

Multi year project

 

Refurbished mechanical equipment at the Water Treatment Works

500,000.00

482,475.92

EMERGENCY MAINTAINANCE

 

 

1,500,000.00

713,667.92

 

SANITATION

     

 

 

Refurbished mechanical equipment at the Sewer Treatment Works

1,000,000.00

836,512.94

EMERGENCY MAINTAINANCE

 

Upgrade the Chris Hani Pump Station

5,000,000.00

119,118.60

 

 

1260 m main outfall sewer to be upgraded - Ikageng Proper

6,996,396.00

7,722,848.76

Multi year project

 

 

12,996,396.00

8,678,480.30

 

ELECTRICITY

     

 

 

Upgrade protection and switchgear in 5 main substations

7,872,000.00

7,070,734.50

 

 

Upgrade Electrical Network in Bailliepark

3,000,000.00

1,739,820.48

Multi year project

 

 

10,872,000.00

8,810,554.98

 

 

     

 

ROADS

     

 

 

1 000m² roads to be resealed in the Tlokwe Municipality jurisdiction

14,130,578.00

9,519,724.92

Multi year project

 

 

14,130,578.00

9,519,724.92

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

GRAND TOTAL

39,498,974.00

27,722,428.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 - 2015

PROJECT

BUDGET

SPENT

 

 

     

 

WATER

     

 

 

Refurbish sand filters at the water treatment works

2,768,808.00

3,088,291.10

Multi year project

 

Purchase and refurbish pumps, gearboxes and motors at the treatment plants

1,005,355.00

220,966.70

EMERGENCY MAINTAINANCE

 

2.2km of 450 rising main to be upgraded from WTW to Ventersdorp Road Reservoir.

5,000,000.00

4,020,628.16

Multi year project

 

Replacement of 90kw motors for pumps

160,964.58

160,964.58

 

 

Replacement of 55kw motors for pumps

111,094.14

111,094.14

 

 

To re-sleeve Water pumping line of 450mm steel with 170m underneath the runway at airport and 950m in Ikageng Road

4,895,687.00

5,581,084.27

 

 

Replacement of water & sewer lines in the following streets: Otto, Cronje , Mael, Mooivalleipark,Water Sisulu, MC Roode & James Morake Ave

5,331,660.00

3,807,836.50

Multi year project

 

To reline water pipes to the Promosa Reservoir

2,963,737.00

3,189,379.14

 

 

Replacement of motors and pumps at the Vyfhoek Res Pump station

831,858.00

831,858.00

 

 

To replace telemetry system at all water reservoirs

1,800,000.00

1,800,000.00

 

 

 

24,869,163.72

22,812,102.59

 

 

     

 

SANITATION

     

 

 

Purchase and refurbish pumps, gearboxes and motors at the treatment plants

1,005,355.00

220,966.70

EMERGENCY MAINTAINANCE

 

Replacement of water & sewer lines in the following streets: Otto, Cronje , Mael, Mooivalleipark,Water Sisulu, MC Roode & James Morake Ave

5,331,660.00

3,807,836.50

Multi year project

 

 

6,337,015.00

4,028,803.20

 

 

     

 

ELECTRICITY

     

 

 

Upgrade 66KV protection and 11Kv switch gear in main substations

28,848,084.00

19,386,695.18

Multi year project

 

Upgrade the electricity network in the Bult area

2,000,000.00

1,999,791.14

 

 

Upgrading and maintain SCADA system in electrical substation

5,000,000.00

4,438,293.65

 

 

 

35,848,084.00

25,824,779.97

 

 

     

 

ROADS

     

 

 

1500m² roads resealed

15,000,000.00

9,697,463.11

Multi year project

 

Widen Chief Luthili Drive between Govan Mbeki and Walter Sisulu Avenue

4,020,000.00

1,186,730.07

Multi year project

 

 

19,020,000.00

10,884,193.18

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

GRANT TOTAL

86,074,262.72

63,549,878.94

 

3. No part of this amount was used to pay salaries to municipal employees.

11 April 2016 - NW510

Profile picture: Van Dyk, Ms V

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

(1) (a) Which areas in each province have no cellphone reception and (b) which cellphone company has the biggest signal distribution in South Africa; (2) (a) how does the delay in the roll-out of broadband affect the cellphone spectrum and (b) are cellphone companies dependent on the analogue spectrum made available through the roll-out of broadband; (3) whether any plans have been put in place to ensure that the Kamiesberg and Richtersveld areas in Namaqualand in the Northern Cape, which currently have no cellphone reception, receive adequate cellphone reception signals so that the communities can also be connected; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the relevant details and (b) by when will the specified areas receive adequate cellphone reception signals?

Reply:

I have been advised by ICASA and the Department as follows:

(1)(a) ICASA does not have this information. We rely on map data provided by the operators as we do not have the resources to independently verify coverage of operators on a nationwide scale, although we can verify coverage in a specified location through measurement.

(b) The Authority has information regarding which operator has the largest coverage by the type of technology. However, this information has been submitted on a confidential basis therefore the Authority would have to request for permission to disclose it.

(2)(a)The roll-out of broadband does not affect the cell phone spectrum. Spectrum is an enabler for broadband roll out. It should however be noted the release of digital dividend spectrum after the migration from analogue to digital broadcasting will be critical in ensuring broadband rural deployments.

(b) Cell phone operators are dependent on spectrum to roll out broadband but not solely on analogue spectrum currently being held by broadcasters. The analogue spectrum will not be made available through the roll-out of broadband. It will be made available through digital switchover, a process of migrating analogue TV broadcasting to digital transmission, and analogue switch off, a process to complete switch-off of analogue TV services and freeing-up of spectrum. Thus, this spectrum would be available for broadband roll-out.

(3)(a) Both Kamiesberg and Richtersveld areas in Namaqualand in the Northern Cape were not monitored for the availability of Coverage. The Authority relies on the on coverage complaints it receives from the people in the area to conduct such monitoring.

(b) The areas of Namaqualand will be covered in the 2016/2017 financial year. It should be noted that Operators are not obligated to provide coverage in all areas as long as their total coverage remains within their licence conditions.

 

 

11 April 2016 - NW797

Profile picture: Cardo, Dr MJ

Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development

What progress has been made in assessing the application that was submitted to the International Trade Administration Commission (ITAC) of South Africa in December 2015 for a grain tariff review?

Reply:

Maize:

Grain SA submitted an application for an increase in the dollar based reference price for maize in December 2015. ITAC engaged with stakeholders and solicited comments from 25 interested parties. ITAC staff is now evaluating the application. The preliminary submission will be submitted to the Commissioners of ITAC during the Commission meeting of May 2016 for consideration.

Wheat:

Wheat tariffs are determined by a variable tariff formula based on US dollars. At the request of producers, when the conditions were met for an upward tariff trigger, ITAC applied the formula and tariff increases were accordingly applied. This resulted in an increase of customs duties on wheat from 91.12c/kg to 122.43c/kg and wheaten flour from 136.68c/kg to 183.65c/kg.

However, in light of the drought, the current exchange rate and the impact on food prices, government has requested a review of the variable import duty formula to ensure that consumer needs are properly taken into account.

-END-

11 April 2016 - NW631

Profile picture: Dlamini, Mr MM

Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Public Works:

(1) Whether, since his reply to oral question 471 on 9 September 2015, he has received any requests from any departments regarding further upgrades at the Nkandla residence of the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether he has worked on a costing exercise to ascertain how much the further security upgrades needed at the Nkandla residence of the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, will cost the taxpayer; if not, when he will know for sure how much will still have to be spent

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works

(1) Since, my reply to question number 471 for oral reply on 09 September 2015 the Department of Public Works has not received any requests from any Government departments regarding further security upgrades at the President’s private residence in Nkandla.

(2) The Department has not worked on a costing exercise, as the request for the security upgrades has not been received. An estimation or calculation of costs will only be done pursuant to a security assessment and the identification of requirements for the installation of security measures by the relevant departments in the security cluster.

____________________________________________________________________

11 April 2016 - NW686

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Communications

(a)What are the anticipated total costs of (i) producing and (ii) installing the 5 million subsidized Set-Top Boxes (STBs), (b) How much funding has been approved by the National Treasury in the Medium Term Expenditure Framework in this regard and (c) from which (i) departmental votes and/or (ii) other government sources will this be drawn?

Reply:

(a) The anticipated total costs of producing and installing the 5 million subsidized STBs, as appropriated, is R2.45 billion.

(b) Over the MTEF period the National Treasury has allocated R1.1 billion.

(c) The funds will be drawn from the Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services’ vote.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

11 April 2016 - NW315

Profile picture: Topham , Mr B

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

For each metropolitan municipality, how many commercial, industrial and residential building plan submissions were made in the: (a) 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years; (b) How many building plan submissions were approved by each specified municipality in the (a) 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years; (c) What is the response time to acknowledge receipt of building plans; (d) How long does it take to finalise building plan submissions?

Reply:

1. The following table represents commercial, industrial and residential building plan submissions per Metro in the 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years

Building Plans:2013-14

Metro

Commercial

Industrial

Residential

Total

City of Tshwane

94

97

12 323

12 514

Ekurhuleni

50

190

5062

5302

City of Johannesburg

104

72

11977

12153

City of Cape Town

330

7904

8234

Nelson Mandela Bay

95

86

7734

7915

Buffalo City

83

96

2461

2640

Mangaung

45

17

2283

2345

eThekwini Municipality

927

408

9618

10953

Building Plans:2014-15

Metro

Commercial

Industrial

Residential

Total

City of Tshwane

128

87

12 883

13 098

Ekurhuleni

33

241

5382

5656

City of Johannesburg

41

79

12963

13083

City of Cape Town

353

8985

9342

Nelson Mandela Bay

87

94

9530

9711

Buffalo City

84

86

2370

2540

Mangaung

35

24

2069

2108

eThekwini Municipality

1363

601

12740

14704

2. The following table represents building plans that were approved by each municipality in the (a) 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years

Municipality

YEAR

 

2013-14

2014-15

City of Tshwane

10 654

9 554

Ekurhuleni

4550

5272

City of Johannesburg

11247

11934

City of Cape Town

8407

9859

Nelson Mandela Bay

2475

3724

Buffalo City

2314

2207

Mangaung

3083

2173

eThekwini Municipality

5748

6044

3. The table below represents the time indicated by each metro on the response time to acknowledge receipt of building plans

Municipality

Response time to acknowledge receipt of Building Plans

City of Tshwane

Application is acknowledged as soon as it is received and the necessary fees are paid.

Ekurhuleni

Upon submission and payment of necessary fees.

City of Johannesburg

Upon receipt and payment of necessary fees.

City of Cape Town

Application is acknowledged as soon as it is received and necessary fees are paid.

Nelson Mandela Bay

Upon submission the application is issued with an invoice. 

Buffalo City

1 week

Mangaung

Immediately after submission and payment of the requisite building plan fees.

eThekwini Municipality

Immediately on submission and payment of the prescribed tariff where applicable.

4. The information below represents response time each municipality takes to finalise building plan submissions.

Municipality

Time taken to finalise Building Plan Submissions

City of Tshwane

Building Plans 500m² and less: 30 days

Building Plans 501m² and more: 60 days

Ekurhuleni

 

City of Johannesburg

As per the legislated time period, namely

30 days for building plans smaller that 500m² and 60 days for plans larger than 500m².

City of Cape Town

Building Plans 500m² and less: 30 days

Building Plans 501m² and more: 60 days

Nelson Mandela Bay

Eight (8) days from date of submission if application has all necessary supporting documents

Buffalo City

22 days

Mangaung

The general norm is as per the legislated time period, namely

30 days for building plans smaller that 500m² and 60 days for

plans larger than 500m².   In most cases Mangaung

Metropolitan Municipality complies.

eThekwini Municipality

In terms of timeframes expressed as a percentage the performance has been 98.1% (2013/14) and 99.9% (2014/15).

11 April 2016 - NW791

Profile picture: Redelinghuys, Mr MH

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Health

(1) How many ambulances are currently (a) operational and (b) not operational at the Odi District Hospital in Mabopane Gauteng; (2) whether there are any plans to acquire additional ambulances for use by the specified hospital; if not, why not; if so, (a) how many ambulances will be acquired and (b) what are the timeframes in this regard; (3) what are the average waiting times at the specified hospital for (a) trauma patients classified as (i) green, (ii) yellow and (iii) red, (b) out-patients referred from clinics waiting to see a doctor, and (c) out-patients for an appointment to see a doctor?

Reply:

(1) (a) and (b)

The number of ambulances indicated below serve Mabopane, Ga-rankuwa, Winterveldt and Soshanguve. These ambulances are stationed next to Odi Hospital and serve Odi and Dr George Mukhari Hospitals, all clinics, all Community Health Centres in the Northern Sub-district of Tshwane including house calls.

Type of Vehicles

Number of Allocated Vehicles

Number Operational

Number Not Operational

Ambulances

13

8

5 at workshop

Obstetrics Vehicle

2

1

1 at workshop

Response Vehicle

2

2

0

Planned Patient Transport

4

2

2 at workshop

Rescue Vehicle

1

1

0

Logistic Vehicle

1

0

1 at workshop

TOTAL

23

14

9

(2) (a) Approval has been granted for 7 ambulances to be procured in the 2016/2017 financial year, i.e. 2 Obstetrics and 5 Ambulances. The new ambulances will replace ambulances identified for disposal and to add to the existing fleet.

(b) Ambulance procurement will be completed by the second quarter of 2016/2017.

(3) The average waiting time is as follows:

(a) (i) trauma - green - 57 minutes

(ii) trauma – yellow - 18 minutes

(iii) trauma - red - 13 minutes

(b) OPD referred from clinics - 65 minutes

(c) OPD follow up - 48 minutes

CHALLENGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF WAITING TIMES

  • There is is a general population growth in the surrounding areas.
  • Odi District Hospital serves both Gauteng and North West communities and the communities are growing.
  • There are a growing number of self-referrals, hence the OPD overflows daily and this affects waiting time.
  • There is no regional or tertiary hospital between Odi and DGMA hospital, hence referral to a higher level becomes a challenge and the hospital is required to manage the many patients it cannot refer.
  • Patients are reluctant to use the nearby clinics and return to the hospital despite being referred to their respective clinic.
  • Most patients with chronic conditions come to the hospital after hours to use the Emergency Centre instead of the OPD during the day; hence the higher patient load and impact on the Emergency Centre.
  • Patients with chronic conditions who attend the Emergency Centre after hours complain about long waiting time because acutely ill or injured patients are given priority attention.
  • Turnover of clinical and nursing staff is high as they are attracted to higher level hospitals or resign due to pension and this also impacts negatively on waiting time.
  • Space in the Emergency Centres and OPD is limited due to infrastructural challenges. Consulting rooms are few so patients cannot be accommodated in comfort while waiting.

END.

11 April 2016 - NW303

Profile picture: Robertson, Mr K

Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Does each metropolitan municipality have a service level agreement with the relevant provincial department of health for the provision of clinic services; if not, why not; if so, (a) how many (i) clinics, (ii) health centres, (iii) satellite clinics, (iv) mobile clinics and (v) male health clinics are run by each metropolitan municipality, (b) what services do they offer, (c) how many new clinics have been built since 1 June 2011 and (d) what is each metropolitan municipality’s budget for health infrastructure upgrades in the 2015-16 financial year?

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the Department. The Department thus made a request to Metropolitan Municipalities to provide the relevant information. Information was received from the following Metropolitan Municipalities:

BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (BCMM)

The BCMM does not provide Primary Health Care Services, hence there is no service level agreement with the relevant provincial department of health. This function was provincialized and devolved to the Eastern Cape Province, Department of Health.

CITY OF TSHWANE (CoT)

1. A Service Level Agreement between the Gauteng Department of Health and the CoT for the provision of Primary Health Care is available and signed.

     (a) The City is rendering Primary Health Care services in 26 fixed facilities; Operating hours are from 07:30 – 16:00, Monday to Friday; 2 mobile units and 1 satellite clinic; Extended service hours are rendered on Saturdays from 08:00 to 13:00 in a selected 13 facilities to accommodate those clients that could not manage to visit the clinic during week days.

     (b) Full comprehensive PHC package is rendered in 26 facilities.

     (c) 9 Clinics were built and upgraded, namely: Lotus, Danville, Doornpoort, Gazankulu, Pretorius Park, Stanza Bopape, Olievenhoutbosch, Zithobeni and Soshanguve JJ.

     (d) The CoT allocated R43 million towards the construction and upgrade of three clinics, namely: Soshunguwe, Gazankulu and Zithobeni during the 2015-16 financial year. The projects are all in the final phase of construction and upgrading.

EKURHULENI METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

a) The Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality manages ninety one (91) Primary Health Care Services as at February 2016 as indicated in the table below.

All Community Health Centres and Medical Male Circumcision Sites are managed by the Gauteng Department of Health.

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE FACILITIES BOTH PROVINCIAL AND EKURHULENI EXCLUDING MALE MEDICAL CIRCUMCISION SITES

FACILITY TYPE

EMM

GDoH

GRAND TOTAL

Community Day Centre

 

2

2

Community Health Centre (24-Hours)

 

7

7

Clinic

78

3

81

Satellite Clinic

1

 

1

Mobile Clinic

12

2

14

Grand Total

91

14

105

b) The Primary Health Care Facilities managed by the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality render health services relevant for the type of facility as defined in the Primary Health Care Core Package of Services, namely:

Clinics: Render the basic range of Primary Health Care Services as follows:

  • Child Health Services:
  • Expanded Programme on Immunization;
  • Vitamin A supplementation;
  • Protein Energy Malnutrition Programme;
  • Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses; and
  • Growth monitoring and developmental screening.
  • Women and Maternal Health Services:
  • Reproductive Health including Family Planning;
  • Cervical cancer screening;
  • Antenatal Care Services;
  • Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV;
  • Postnatal Care Services; and
  • Counselling and referral for Termination of Pregnancy.
  • Men’s’ Reproductive Health:
  • Prostate cancer screening (Selected facilities).
  • HIV, AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections and Tuberculosis Programme:
  • Health and HIV Counselling and Testing;
  • Elimination of Mother-to-Child-Transmission of HIV;
  • Antiretroviral Therapy;
  • Post Exposure Prophylaxis;
  • Comprehensive Care, Management and Treatment of HIV Positive clients and treatment of opportunistic infections;
  • Management of Sexually Transmitted infections; and
  • Tuberculosis Control Programme.
  • Acute and Chronic Diseases Management:
  • Acute Curative Care;
  • Management of Chronic Diseases.
  • Specialised Services:
  • Primary Mental Health Services; and
  • Secondary Level Mental Health Services (Selected facilities);
  • Health Information, Education and Communication
  • Multi-sectoral HIV/AIDS Programme:
  • Door-to-Door Ward-based HIV/AIDS Education and awareness programme;
  • Stakeholder engagements including traditional health practitioners and vulnerable and marginalized groups;
  • Health awareness and screening programme; and
  • AIDS Council.

c) Twenty-one (21) new clinics, as listed in the table below, were built and they are all operational. In the current financial year (2015-16), six (6) clinics are under construction.

NEW PRIMARY HEALTH CARE FACILITIES 2011 TO DECEMBER 2015

Number

Facility Name

Year opened

Ward

Address

1

Katlehong North Clinic

2011

52

2098 Khotso street Katlehong

2

Phutanang Clinic

2011

84

7522 Kgaga street  Tsakane

3

Reedville Clinic

2011

74

Stands 604 + 605 Ottawa Street, Reedville

4

Slovo Park Clinic

2011

75

Erf 1932,1933 + 1954 Durban Drive, Slovo Park

5

Tsakane Ext 10 Clinic

2011

86

Stand 45522 & 45523, Simelane Street, Tsakane

6

Wannenburg Clinic

2011

21

C/o Pretoria and Mimosa Road, Primrose

7

Ethafeni Clinic

2012

14

43 Bennin Steet, Ethafeni Section, Ethafeni Park

8

Itireleng Clinic

2012

13

2959 Posmor & Inauguration Road, Phomolong Section, Chloorkop Ext 52, Tembisa

9

Tsakane Clinic (Ward 83)

2012

83

33334 Fingo Street, Tsakane

10

Vosloorus Poly Clinic

2012

47

New: Vosloorus ERF30, EXT1, Vosloorus

11

Alrapark Ext 3 Clinic 

2014

88

Cnr Sasstri and Molopo street Ext 3 Alra Park

12

Joy Clinic

2014

67

Erf 1343 Etwatwa West

13

Ramaphosa Clinic

2014

42

Ingwamza Street, Reiger Park Ext 5

14

Springs Clinic

2014

75

Middle Six and Plantation Road, Springs

15

Tamaho Clinic

2014

51

Erf 2141 Nhlapo Section, Cnr. Sokele and Matsose Street, Katlehong

16

White City Clinic

2014

79

Thema Road, Kwa -Thema, Springs

17

Daveyton East Clinic

2015

68

Stand No 869, Chris Hani, Ext 9 Daveyton East

18

Motsamai Clinic

2015

50

260 Motsamai Section Katlehong

19

Palmridge Clinic

2015

58

RE 41 Palmridge Road, Palmridge Community Centre, Palmridge

20

Tswelopele Clinic

2015

44

22 Lusika Street, Eastfield, Vosloorus

21

Villa Lisa Clinic

2015

43

22 Camel Street, Villa Liza

 

TOTAL

 

 

21

d) The budget for health infrastructure upgrades for 2015/16 is R96 727 171(ninety-six million, seven hundred and twenty-seven thousand, and one-hundred and seventy-one rand).

MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

There is no Service Level Agreement between the Municipal Health Services of the Mangaung Metro and the Provincial Department of Health.

NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (NMBM)

Since July 2012 the NMBM is no longer providing Primary Health Care Services following the provincialisation of these services. There is no Service Level Agreement in place since the above-mentioned date. The only clinic service rendered by the NMBM is for Occupational Health Services for Municipal employees.

11 April 2016 - NW284

Profile picture: Chewane, Dr H

Chewane, Dr H to ask the Minister of Health

(1)(a) Which provinces have frozen appointment of staff and (b) for which positions; (2) have any of the provinces frozen the appointment of doctors?

Reply:

(1) (a) All provinces have introduced measures to reduce expenditure, including the freezing of non critical posts. Medical posts are not frozen.

(b) Not applicable, see (1) (a) above.

(2) No.

END.

11 April 2016 - NW239

Profile picture: Ndlozi, Dr MQ

Ndlozi, Dr MQ to ask the Minister of Communications

Whether she and/or her department has bought advertising space in The New Age in the (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 and (c) 2014-15 financial years; if so, (i) what number of times and (ii) for what amount in each specified financial year?

Reply:

a) Yes, the GCIS has placed advertising in The New Age in 2012-13, regarding (i) and (ii), insertions detailed in table below.

b) Yes, the GCIS has placed advertising in The New Age in 2013-14, regarding (i) and (ii), insertions detailed in table below.

c) Yes, the GCIS has placed advertising in The New Age in 2014-15, regarding (i) and (ii), insertions detailed in table below. In the period October 2014 – April 2015, the GCIS merged with the Department of Communications to facilitate the start-up of the Department of Communication, hence the reference to Department of Communications.

 

2012-2013

 

DEPARTMENT

CAMPAIGN NAME

INVOICE AMOUNT

GCIS

National Orders

R 450 000.00

 

Orders of Companions of OR Tambo

R 77 319.36

 

SONA

R 893 475.29

 

State Funeral

R 92 836.93

GCIS Total

 

R 1 513 631.58

 

2013/2014

 

GCIS

Mandela Memorial campaign: State Funeral

R62 928.00

 

Recruitment

R50 068.80

 

SONA

R821 128.32

GCIS Total

 

R934 125.12

 

2014/2015

 

Communications

Database Registration

R 14 945.40

 

Profiling Campaign

R 720 990.72

 

Recruitment

R 301 195.75

 

Recruitment Phase 3

R 57 078.43

 

SONA 2014

R 100 137.60

 

SONA 2015

R 101 888.64

Total Communications

 

R 1 296 236.54

 

 

MR DONALD LIPHOKO

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

11 April 2016 - NW860

Profile picture: Dlamini, Ms L

Dlamini, Ms L to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises

(1)What incentives have Eskom and her department put in place to encourage legal use of electricity and discourage electricity theft beside the threats to criminalise illegal use; (2) what (a) amount is Eskom losing in revenue as a result of electricity theft (b) is the breakdown of the amount in each province?

Reply:

(1) There are no incentives provided to encourage the legal use of electricity. Eskom makes use of the Operation Khanyisa Campaign to inform and educate customers about how to better manage electricity usage.

(2)(a) We assume all non-technical energy loss to be attributed to theft. Non-technical losses in Eskom amounted to R4.7bn for 2014/15 FY.

(b) The amount stated in (2)(a) above represents the collective loss across all provinces. Eskom estimates non-technical losses at a national level, a breakdown per province therefore not available.

11 April 2016 - NW519

Profile picture: Dudley, Ms C

Dudley, Ms C to ask the Minister of Health

(1)Whether he is aware of the health concerns expressed by a certain person (name and details furnished); (2) whether his department conducted an investigation in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1) Yes. The concerns were received and acknowledged by the Ministry of Health. A further acknowledgement and assurance of the fact that the concern is being attended to was done by the Chief Directorate: Environmental Health and Port Health Services on the 08th of February 2016 to the complainant.

(2) Yes. The Department of Health conducted an investigation. The Department of Agriculture which is responsible for conducting chemical analysis for a range of chemical residues in food products (poultry, hens, eggs, bovine, ovine, porcine, etc.) whether imported into the country or produced inland, was engaged.

Food samples were taken by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the poultry products were found to be complying to the country's legal requirements and therefore it has been released to the market.

The role of the Department of Health will be to make sure that the poultry and its products are safe for human consumption through required monitoring processes. All Food Premises handling imported poultry products will be monitored. The two departments are working very closely in sharing information about consignments received and the destination for further handling which may include resale, repackaging, processing, etc.

Poultry products are handled, packaged and sealed at the point/country of origin and certified by the local inspectorate authority. All preservatives used should be indicated on the label and only approved preservatives can be used at approved levels (in terms of the CODEX Alimentarius list). The poultry products from the USA are preserved with Acetic Acid which is vinegar and kept under controlled temperature. South Africa conducts several tests on the poultry product including testing for preservatives. Consignments are transported in a sealed temperature controlled container at -18 ̊C and the seal is broken on arrival at the cold storage in South Africa. Temperature control is monitored and can be tested on arrival to see the trend throughout the voyage; a report can be generated to give an indication if there were any temperature issues during the transportation.

Additional tests are conducted to identify if there are any micro organisms in the poultry product being imported into the country. Aerobic plate count process is used as a screening measure. Further tests are done if there is an indication that the meat product is not fresh.

The National Department of Health is of the view that the identified risk can be contained through the normal processes of Environmental Health monitoring activities done by the Department of Health, Districts and Metropolitan Municipalities. Necessary steps will be taken to address any issues arising from the monitoring process. All role players are taking all necessary steps within the South African legislative provisions to deal with all perceived risks.

END.

11 April 2016 - NW368

Profile picture: Chance, Mr R

Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Health

With reference to President Jacob G Zuma’s undertaking in his State of the Nation Address delivered on 12 February 2015, that the Government will set aside 30% of appropriate categories of state procurement for purchasing from Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises (SMMEs), co-operatives, as well as township and rural enterprises, what percentage of the total procurement of (a) his department and (b) every entity reporting to him went to (i) SMMEs and (ii) co-operatives from 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available?

Reply:

(a) (i) 60.1%

(ii) Bid documents do not make provision for suppliers to indicate whether they are SMME’s or Co-operatives. The procurement was thus done with consideration of BEE levels.

 

(b) (i) South Africa Medical Research Council (31.4%)

National Health Laboratories Services (22.5%)

Office of Standard Health Compliance (70%)

 

(ii) Bid documents do not make provision for suppliers to indicate whether they are SMME’s or Co-operatives. The procurement was thus done with consideration of BEE levels.

END.

11 April 2016 - NW780

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

What process is to be followed by (a) provinces and (b) municipalities affected by the latest round of amalgamations in terms of the revised municipal demarcations, with specific reference to (i) budgets, (ii) organograms, (iii) systems and processes and (iv) assets and equipment?

Reply:

a) The process to be followed by provinces is as outlined in Section 12 of the Municipal Structures Act, which requires the MEC for local government in a province to establish a municipality in each municipal area which the Municipal Demarcation Board demarcates, and which establishment takes effect at the commencement of the first election of the council of that municipality.

Section 14(5) of the Municipal Structures further provides that the MEC, by notice in the Provincial Gazette, may make provision for transitional measures to facilitate the disestablishment of an existing municipality and the establishment of a new municipality.

The different transition matters are discussed and processed through various transitional structures at the provincial and municipal spheres, as well as reported at the Municipal Demarcation Transition Committee which is convened by the Department of Cooperative Governance.

b) The Section 14(5) Notices also provide for the establishment of Municipal Political Change Management Committees and Municipal Technical Change Management Committees.

The Municipal Political Change Management Committees are constituted by the mayors, speakers, members of the executive or mayoral committees and traditional leaders from the affected local and district municipalities.

The Municipal Technical Change Management Committees are constituted by the municipal managers and heads of department from the affected local and district municipalities, as well as representatives from organised labour and the South African Local Government Association.

The Section 14(5) Notices deal with matters relating to budgets, organograms, systems and processes, assets and equipment, integrated development planning, communications and other institutional systems and processes.

11 April 2016 - NW304

Profile picture: Robertson, Mr K

Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(1) Whether each metropolitan municipality has a metropolitan police department; if not, why not; if so, (a) when was it established, (b) how many persons (i) in total and (ii) per category are currently part of the specified municipality’s police force and (c) how many operational (i) cars, (ii) motorbikes, (iii) bicycles and (iv) other vehicles are currently used by the metro police force in each case; (2) whether each metropolitan police department have specialised units tasked with dealing with drugs, gangs and any other safety needs; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) whether each metropolitan municipality measures the average response times of the metro police to accidents and complaints; if not, why not; if so, (a) how is this measured and (b) what is the current average response time in each case?

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the Department. The Department thus made a request to Metropolitan Municipalities to provide the relevant information. Information was received from the following Metropolitan Municipalities:

BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (BCMM)

1. The BCMM does not have a Metropolitan Police Department. BCMM is in the process of establishing a Metropolitan Police Department with its implementation date being scheduled for 2016/17.

2. Not applicable

3. Not applicable

CITY OF TSHWANE (CoT)

  1. (a) The Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD) was established on 04 April 2002. It functions independently from the South African Police, funded by and accountable to the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, as per the South African Police Service Act, 1995 and 1998, as amended (Act No. 68 of 1995 and Act No. 83 of 1998). The Act prescribes the functions of a Municipal Police Service per Section 64E, as follows:

    Traffic policing, subject to any legislation relating to road traffic (Road Policing);

    The policing of municipal by-laws and regulations which are the responsibility of the municipality in question;

    The prevention of crime.

(b)  The TMPD Staff Establishment is listed within the table below:

Designation

                                   ESTABLISHMENT

 
     
 

Approved Posts as per structure

 

Posts filled as per Migration and Placement process

Vacancies

Current warm bodies

Proposed vacancies to be filled in 2015/16

Male

Female

Operational

Admin

Occupational   level

 
           

A

C

I

W

A

C

I

W

       

Admin Officer

289

167

122

143

0

22

1

0

6

65

8

2

39

0

143

5

 

Cashier

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

 

Chief of Police

1

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

 

Chief Security Evaluator

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

 

Chief Security Officer (GR A): Internal Security

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

 

Commander

36

21

15

21

0

8

1

0

9

2

0

0

1

21

0

2

 

Constable / Sergeant

2601

1533

1068

1531

0

824

48

5

108

518

10

0

18

1531

0

5

 

Constable Gr III

 

 

 

1875

 

1032

24

0

3

812

4

0

0

1875

 

5

 

Deputy Chief of Police

5

2

3

2

3

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

2

 

Deputy Director

15

10

5

10

0

5

1

0

0

0

1

0

3

1

9

2

 

Director

13

11

2

11

0

7

1

0

2

0

0

0

1

4

7

2

 

Driver

8

2

6

2

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

5

 

Driver Messenger

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

 

Examiner

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

4

 

Executive Commitments Tracking Specialist

1

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

 

Executive Secretary

2

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

2

4

 

Executive Support Specialist

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

 

Functional Head

41

19

22

19

0

4

1

0

6

5

1

0

2

2

17

3

 

Functional Head/ Snr Superintendent

8

2

6

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

2

3

 

General Worker

22

14

8

14

0

10

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

14

6

 

Human Resource Officer

2

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

4

 

Inspector

350

230

120

230

70

97

5

1

65

57

1

0

4

230

0

4

 

Law Enforcement officer

80

73

7

73

0

42

3

0

0

28

0

0

0

73

0

5

 

Liaison Officer

7

1

6

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

4

 

License Officer

0

0

0

9

0

3

0

0

0

4

0

0

2

0

9

5

 

Librarian

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

 

Management / Strategic Support Officer

3

2

1

2

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

2

3

 

Messenger

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

6

 

Operator Radio Control

40

18

22

18

0

3

0

0

2

12

0

0

1

18

0

5

 

Personal Assistant

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

3

 

Regional Director

7

5

2

5

0

3

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

5

0

2

 

Secretary

20

3

17

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

3

4

 

Security Evaluator

8

2

6

2

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

5

 

Security Officer (GR C)

120

1

119

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

5

 

Snr Admin Officer

56

34

22

33

0

5

0

0

3

12

2

0

11

0

33

4

 

Snr Secretary

5

4

1

4

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

1

0

4

4

 

Snr Security Evaluator

4

3

1

3

0

0

1

0

2

0

0

0

0

3

0

4

 

Snr Security Officer (GR B)

18

4

14

4

0

3

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

4

0

5

 

Snr Superintendent

88

55

33

55

0

25

1

0

15

9

0

0

5

55

0

3

 

Strategic Support Specialist

1

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

4

 

Superintendent

146

87

59

87

0

34

2

0

14

32

0

0

4

87

0

3

 

Supervisor (Worker)

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

 

Support Service Officer

22

5

17

5

0

2

0

0

1

2

0

0

0

0

5

4

 

System Officer

8

5

3

5

0

0

1

0

3

1

0

0

0

0

5

4

 

Technical Officer

2

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

5

 

Waiter

3

3

0

3

0

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

3

6

 

Warden

52

27

25

27

0

22

1

0

4

0

0

0

0

27

0

5

 

Total

4095

2354

1741

4212

75

2165

91

6

245

1575

27

2

100

3941

271

   
     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4212

   
     

Sergeant

866

 

429

17

4

83

317

3

0

13

       
     

Constable

665

 

395

31

1

25

201

7

0

5

       
     

 

1531

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

(c)         The Tshwane Metro Police Fleet vehicles are listed within the table below:

Type

Total

BUS

11

CAR

187

KOMBI

72

LDV

192

MOTORBIKE

142

TRACTOR

1

TRAILER

47

TRUCK

25

TOTAL

677

2. The Tshwane Metro Police’s Special Project Team assists with drug enforcement, as per the initiative implemented by the Chief of Police since January 2015. The unit consists of seven (7) members and one Supervisor who has sixteen (16) years’ experience relevant to the enforcement of illegal substance abuse. Tshwane does not have a problem of gangs as such, but the department however works closely with the SAPS to deal with crime prevention in general.

3. (a) The current TMPD system (manually) assists with monitoring calls and call time intervals. The TMPD Nodal Point (331) dispatches complaints to the regions, after which the regions contact members via cell phones or radio to attend to complaints.

    (b) Status quo on dispatch is 00:01:39 (1 Minute and 39 seconds from receipt of a call until dispatched to operational members).

MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality does not have a Metro Police Department.

NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (NMBM)

NMBM is currently busy with the planning and physical establishment process of a Metro Police Department.

 

11 April 2016 - NW636

Profile picture: Ketabahle, Ms V

Ketabahle, Ms V to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

When is he going to implement the remedial action recommended by the Public Protector regarding the mismanagement of the SA Post Office?

Reply:

  1. SAPO is cooperating and implementing the recommendations of both the Public Protector and the SIU Reports.
  2. The Minister through our department is monitoring that SAPO complies with the recommendations of the Reports.

11 April 2016 - NW689

Profile picture: Bhanga, Mr BM

Bhanga, Mr BM to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

(a) What are the reasons for the 94, 2% increase in consultants fees for the South Africa Connect project over the Medium Term Expenditure Framework, (b) why is most of the expenditure expected in the final year of the project, (c) what are the full details of the process by which the specified consultants services will be procured and (d) when is procurement due to start?

Reply:

I have been advised by the Department as follows:-

(a) The funds reflected under the Consultants: Business and advisory services line item are not funds that will be used to procure consultancy services. National Treasury allocated Phase 1 roll-out funding under the Economic classification (Goods and Services: Consultants: Business and advisory services) line item. These funds will be used to procure connectivity services for the facilities targeted for the Phase 1 roll-out over the MTEF period.

The increase in the allocation is due to additional funds that National Treasury allocated towards the SA Connect Phase 1 implementation.

(b) Additional funding was allocated by National Treasury in 2017/18 and 2018/19 as it was envisaged that lessons learnt from the Phase 1 pilot will allow for a ramp up of the project in the outer years. This funding is in addition to the partial funding that was allocated for the Phase 1 roll-out during the 2014 MTEF allocation period, covering the 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18 financial years.

(c) There will not be any consultants procured using the funds allocated for the roll-out.

(d) Refer to (c)

 

11 April 2016 - NW828

Profile picture: Majola, Mr TR

Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What are all the categories of leave applicable in the SA Police Service according to relevant (i) statutes, (ii) national instructions and (iii) any other human resource management policy directives and (b) what is the maximum number of days permissible in each of the specified categories of leave?

Reply:

As per attached table.

11 April 2016 - NW739

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Health

Whether the Government is pursuing a vigorous policy to detect glaucoma at an early stage so that medical help can be given before any lasting damage occurs; if not, why not; if so, what has been the situation year on year during the period 1 June 2009 to 29 February 2016?

Reply:

Yes, Government is pursuing a vigorous policy for the early detection of Glaucoma and provision of medical intervention for those who already have the condition. As part of Government’s response to the 1999 Vision 2020 Initiative of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and IAPB, guidelines for Eye Health were developed prioritising the five leading causes of blindness and visual impairment in South Africa, that is Cataract, Glaucoma, Diabetic retinopathy, Childhood blindness and Retractive errors. The following services/activities have taken place as part of a strategy to minimize the impact of eye health conditions and Glaucoma specifically:

  • A symptom-based integrated clinical management Primary Care (PC101) guideline incorporates the detection and management of Glaucoma and other eye care conditions at a Primary Health Care (PHC) level;
  • Eye Health has been integrated with all other programmes to ensure that eye health is addressed holistically and not as a vertical programme. This allows for the screening of Glaucoma on patients with conditions such as diabetes and hypertension;
  • Every year, provinces organise a Glaucoma awareness week to raise awareness about the impact of Glaucoma. During the week, screening and health education on Glaucoma is provided. Different mainstream and social media are also utilised to educate the public on Glaucoma. In 2016, Glaucoma awareness week was commemorated during the week of the 6th to the 12th March 2016; and
  • The following services are regularly provided at different facilities:
  • Primary level - screening is conducted by PHC nurses, ophthalmic nurses and optometrists. Suspected cases of Glaucoma are referred to hospitals for further assessments and management;
  • Secondary level – Ophthalmologists and Optometrists screen the eye and provide management for all Glaucoma cases that are detected. Low vision and rehabilitative services are provided to people whose vision has been irreparably damaged.
  • Government has appointed a dedicated eye health person at the National Department of Health to prioritise eye health and develop strategies to eliminate avoidable blindness and visual impairment including the early detection of Glaucoma.

No records are available on specific year on year programmes run during the period 01 June 2009 to 29 February 2016.

END.

11 April 2016 - NW861

Profile picture: Chewane, Dr H

Chewane, Dr H to ask the Minister of Health

(1)Why is the clinic at Senekal, O R Tambo Section, in the eastern Free State Province not open despite being completed two years ago; (2) what is the cost of damage to the specified property due to vandalism and loss due to stolen equipment?

Reply:

  1. The clinic at Senekal, OR Tambo Section, in the Eastern Free State province, was not completed because the contractor failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, and as such was never handed over to the provincial department of health, and as such it could not be opened.
  2. The damage, due to the vandalism of the facility, is a responsibility the contractor because it was never handed over to the provincial department of health.

END.

11 April 2016 - NW812

Profile picture: Kohler-Barnard, Ms D

Kohler-Barnard, Ms D to ask the Minister of Public Works

Why was the investigation into alleged criminal activities in the Independent Development Trust conducted by the Auditor-General of South Africa rather than the SA Police Service?

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works

The investigation into alleged irregularities at the Independent Development Trust (IDT) was not conducted by the Auditor-General of South Africa. The IDT Board of Trustees appointed Gobodo Forensic and Investigative Accounting (PTY) Ltd. (GFIA) to conduct a preliminary investigation into the allegations of irregularities in the procurement of goods and services.

A preliminary report, which was presented to the IDT Board of Trustees, revealed serious irregularities in the supply chain management processes within the IDT and further recommended that certain significant findings required further investigation.

The Board then took a proactive step and referred such an investigation to the Specialised Audit Services Unit (SAS) within the Office of the Accountant-General at the National Treasury. This Unit conducts all its investigations in collaboration with all the law enforcement agencies of Government, including the South African Police Service under the auspices of Anti-Corruption Task Team.

11 April 2016 - NW305

Profile picture: Ross, Mr DC

Ross, Mr DC to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether each metropolitan municipality offers any support to neighbourhood watch initiatives; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case? (2) whether there were any disruptions of service or late removal of waste as a result of a failure by any municipality since 1 January 2015; if so, (a) what were the causes and (b) how has this been addressed?

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the Department. The Department thus made a request to Metropolitan Municipalities to provide the relevant information. Information was received from the following Metropolitan Municipalities:

BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

The BCMM does not offer any support to neighbourhood watch initiatives other than the BCMM Law Enforcement Services and Traffic Services.

CITY OF TSHWANE

The functions of the Tshwane Metro Police include Crime Prevention, By-Laws and Road Policing. The Crime Prevention and Social Crime Prevention Units do assist neighbourhood watches as and when needed. Tshwane is divided into Regions and Regional Policing offices attend meetings at South African Police Stations whereby the community is assisted through the Community Police Forum Meetings.

MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

Not applicable

NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (NMBMM)

Metro Police not yet established. The SAPS currently provides support to neighbourhood watch initiatives.

 

08 April 2016 - NW452

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Energy

Whether her department will be ratifying the National Energy Regulator’s proposed regulations on Small-Scale Embedded Generation (SSEG); if not, why not; if so, when this will be done. 2) Whether Eskom, as a key role player in the electricity industry, unequivocally supports the implementation of the SSEG; if not, why not; if so, what (a) steps are being taken by her department to promote SSEG and (b) is the target date for achieving the relevant objectives? NW506E

Reply:

  1. No, NERSA develops rules not regulations. We are in the process of developing Licensing Regulations, which will enable NERSA to implement Small-Scale Embedded Generation (SSEG) rules that they have developed.
  2. (a) It is the responsibility of the Department to ensure organised development in the electricity industry and the development of licensing regulations is meant to facilitate government policy objectives. Incidentally, it is municipal constraints relating to the wheeling of power that pose the biggest risk to SSEG.

(b) The Regulations are still under development and are expected to be published for public comments.

08 April 2016 - NW241

Profile picture: Dlamini, Mr MM

Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Energy

Whether she and/or her department has bought advertising space in The New Age in the (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 and (c) 2014-15 financial years; if so, (i) what number of times and (ii) for what amount in each specified financial year?

Reply:

NO

(b), (c)Period:

(i) What No of Times

(ii) Amount:

 

A

April 2012 to March 2013

1

R45,131.18

 

B

April 2013 to March 2014

2

R1,038,466.70

 

C

April 2014 to March 2015

1

R305,208.41

 

Grand total R1 388 806.29

08 April 2016 - NW548

Profile picture: Cardo, Dr MJ

Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development

Whether the Industrial Development Corporation is planning to restructure its debt; if not, why not; if so, (a) why, (b) what amount and (c) how?

Reply:

The Chief Executive Officer of the IDC was quoted in a local newspaper in February 2016, as noting that the IDC needs to restructure some of the debt that it holds.

This restructuring would be on the asset, not liability side of the IDC’s balance sheet, ie money owed to the Corporation by local companies.

The purpose of the debt restructuring is to assist IDC clients and business partners that are affected by the downturn in the macro-economic environment, particularly those that are negatively impacted by the slump in commodity prices. In this regard further details will be provided in my budget vote speech, or as soon as the IDC has completed the technical work on the matter.

-END-

08 April 2016 - NW499

Profile picture: Van Dalen, Mr P

Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy

What progress has been made to date by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) to implement marginal cost-based electricity tariffs in the country? 2) Whether Nersa employs a geographically differentiated marginal cost-based cost-of-supply methodology in this regard; if not, what steps are being taken to prepare such a methodology; if so, what are the relevant details? NW553E

Reply:

  1. NERSA does not use the marginal cost based method for electricity tariffs but rather the revenue requirement method. The Electricity Regulation Act requires that NERSA allow an efficient operator to recover its cost plus a reasonable return. This method is applied fully for Eskom. In case of Municipalities, this method has just been approved for implementation. It has therefore not been applied for municipal regulation. The cost of supply studies will be performed by municipalities and submitted to NERSA for review and consideration when municipal tariff applications are considered.
  2. Please refer to (1) above.

08 April 2016 - NW567

Profile picture: Wilson, Ms ER

Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 4096 on 8 December 2015, his department has received the outstanding information from the Tlokwe Local Municipality, if so, when will the information be made available as requested?

Reply:

According to information received from Tlokwe City Local Municipality, as at Dec 2015.

(1) (a) Two (2) officials are currently on suspension.

(b) (i) (aa) Position of suspended official

(bb) Reason for suspension

(ii) Period of suspension

(iii) Total remuneration during period of suspension

Senior Librarian

Harassment and intimidation of subordinates, failure to report theft by a subordinate and gross misconduct (abuse of power).

One (1) month

(27 October 2015)

R 49 762.30

Senior Admin Officer

Disruption of normal operations of the employer, displaying rude and aggressive behaviour to fellow employees, wilful absence from performing tasks and responsibilities allocated to him.

One (1) month

(2 October 2015)

R 39 172.29

(2) No severance packages were paid to any municipal official.

08 April 2016 - NW571

Profile picture: Van Dalen, Mr P

Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 4094 on 8 December 2015, the requested information has been received from the metropolitan municipalities; if so, when will the specified information be made available?

Reply:

a) The department is only responsible for managing the local government equitable share which provides for the subsidization of the provision of basic services to poor households. In the Local Government Equitable Share formula a monthly household income equal to two old age pensioners’ grant of R2 300 per month is used to define the formula’s affordability threshold. It should be noted that the threshold is not an official poverty line or a required level to be used by municipalities in their own indigent policies. However, should municipalities choose to provide fewer households with free basic services than they are funded for through the local government equitable share, their budget documentation should clearly indicate why they have made this choice and how they have consulted with their community during the budget process.

b) With regard to the Local Government Equitable Share (LGES) formula, the basic services component of the formula provides for the subsidisation of the provision of basic services to poor households. The subsidy includes funding for the provision of free basic water (6 kiloliters per household per month), energy (50 kilowatt-hours per household per month) and sanitation and refuse (based on the service levels as defined national policy). The basic services component provides a subsidy of R313.76 per month in 2015/16 for the cost of providing basic services to each of these households. The monthly amount provided to each service is provided in the Explanatory Memorandum to the 2015 Division of Revenue Bill.

c) According to the STATSSA Non-Financial Census released in August 2015, the total nationwide number of indigent households registered with municipalities is 3 482 260. The table below captures registered indigent households per metro:

Table 1: Total Number of Indigent Households Registered in each Metropolitan Municipality

Province

Metropolitan Municipality

Indigent Households

Gauteng

City of Johannesburg

288, 209

 

Tshwane

96, 883

 

Ekurhuleni

36,526

Free State

Mangaung

20, 105

KwaZulu Natal

Ethekwini

589, 605

Eastern Cape

Buffalo City

61, 960

 

Nelson Mandela Bay

85,022

Western Cape

City of Cape Town

288, 724

Total

 

1,467,034

d) The basic services component of the local government equitable share is worth
R33.3 billion in 2015/16 financial year and accounts for 74.9 per cent of the total value of the local government equitable share.

e)

      1. The eligibility for indigent subsidy is determined via application. All households who qualify in terms of the criteria set by the municipality visit municipal offices and/ or other registration points established by the municipality to complete and lodge applications for subsidy consideration.
      2. The eligibility for indigent subsidy is not determined automatically via Property valuation. Instead, it is determined via application process as in (i) above. Property valuation is just but one of the many targeting methods that municipalities can use to target indigent households as spelt out in the national indigent Policy framework and the implementation guidelines.

08 April 2016 - NW736

Profile picture: Carter, Ms D

Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Energy

Whether the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Programme has been able to (a) contribute between 1 – 2 GW of electricity to the grid, (b) deliver on time and on budget to create confidence in the industry, (c) make a case against the argument that renewable energy will not meet base load, (d) demonstrate viability and (e) generate power for the use of any enterprise; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

a) Yes, the current installed capacity of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (REIPP) Programme is 2.48 GW and the maximum simultaneous contribution recorded is 1.59 GW.

b) Yes, the REIPP programme has been run and is delivering in a world class way comparable to the best in the world. Time expectations have been met and although there is not a “budget” in the strictest sense of the word, the energy prices for the programme have come down via the competitive tendering process, exceeding expectations. There is significant confidence in the industry, which can be seen in the large amounts of money being invested.

c) No, it was never an objective of the REIPP programme to make a case for or against the argument that renewable energy will not meet base load. The decisions around the requirements for base load or peaking energy is made in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process. At the same time it can be stated that the country’s electricity demand profile requires a large portion of base-load generation, which is generation that is predictably available throughout the day for every day of the week. Unfortunately, renewables cannot supply this base load as they are inherently extremely variable and large scale storage, to smooth out this variability, is not yet economically viable. Either nuclear or fossil (coal or gas) or hydro (unfortunately only in a limited way in South Africa) generation must provide this base load. Put differently, a large scale renewable wind programme can provide a degree of base load if geographically well diversified but will need to be supplemented with storage and other dispatchable generation technologies. Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) can provide base load if built with enough storage but the cost of this far exceeds the other base load options.

d) Yes, the REIPP programme has already demonstrated its viability. From an integrated power system point of view, the renewable energy contributed to the grid every day, significantly reducing the need for Eskom to use open cycle gas turbines and as such is preventing load shedding as well.

e) Yes, the electricity supplied from renewables is currently being used by all customers and is thus suitable and available for all. The nature of the country’s integrated power system is such that all generation, regardless of technology or origin, is effectively pooled and all customers draw from this pool. It is not impossible for any customer to determine the generator(s) sourcing its electricity.

08 April 2016 - NW345

Profile picture: Mackenzie, Mr C

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Communications

(1) Whether the website of the Government Communication and Information System was allegedly hacked by a certain group (name furnished) in February 2016; if so, in each case, (a) was any restricted area of the website accessed, (b) was any data lost and (c) have any steps been taken to correct the vulnerabilities in the website; (2) whether any other websites of (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her have been hacked over the past 12 months; if so, (i) which websites were hacked and (ii) on what dates respectively?

Reply:

(1) An unused sub-site on the Government Communication and Information System website that housed a redundant contact database was hacked exploiting an SQL injection vulnerability.

(a) No restricted area of the website was accessed. All the information on the sub-site database is public information and the log files of the content management system (CMS) of the sub-site database indicate that none of the exposed user information was used to log onto the CMS before the vulnerability was closed.

(b) No data was lost.

(c) The vulnerability was removed, all redundant accounts on the user table were locked and active accounts were reset.

(2) The Department’s website and the websites of the entities reporting to it have not been hacked over the past 12 months.

 

 

MR DONALD LIPHOKO

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM

DATE:

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE

08 April 2016 - NW430

Profile picture: Van Dyk, Ms V

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications

(1)What percentage of the advertisements of the (a) (i) national and (ii) provincial government departments, and (b) all entities reporting to the specified departments, was distributed to community media such as (aa) community radio stations, (bb) community print media, (cc) community television stations and (dd) small commercial publications during the period 1 July 2015 to 31 January 2016; (2) why, with reference to her reply to question 3806 on 21 December 2015, did the Government Communications and Information System only spend money on advertising in community radio stations, and not in all other forms of community media as detailed above, if not, why not, if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

1. During the period 1 July 2015 to 31 January 2016, GCIS placed advertisements to the value of R153 138 655.73 on behalf of its clients (national and provincial departments and entities reporting to these departments). R22 187 761.61 of this advertising expenditure was allocated to community media (community radio stations, community print media, community television stations and small commercial publications), representing 14% of the allocated budget. A detailed breakdown follows below:

(a)(i) 13% of advertising allocated by national departments as listed in the accompanying table

(ii) 12% of advertising allocated by provincial departments as listed in the accompanying table

(b) 18% of advertising allocated by all entities reporting to specified departments as listed in the accompanying table

2. Community media offers government the opportunity to direct communications messages at specific and highly localised audiences. Whilst this is adequate for tactical interventions on community print or community television, interactive campaigns requiring the targeting of multiple communities simultaneously are best suited to community radio.

The Government Communication and Information System primarily focuses on such high reach multi-site campaigns which often use interactive phone-in community radio programmes. In this advertising format, a minimum of 75 community radio stations are connected via satellite to enable a single interview to be broadcast to multiple community radio stations. In turn, listeners resident in the broadcast footprint of any of the participating community radio stations can call in to the GCIS studio and interact live with the studio guests.

This capability is not available on other forms of community media as detailed in the question.

MR D LIPHOKO

[ACTING] DIRECTOR GENERAL

GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI, MP

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

08 April 2016 - NW690

Profile picture: Redelinghuys, Mr MH

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Economic Development

Whether the Winterveld Enterprise Hub in Pretoria is currently fully operational; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether an assessment of its economic impact has been done; if not, why not; if so, (a) when was such an assessment done and (b) what were the findings?

Reply:

The Economic Development Department is not involved in this project. The Gauteng Department of Economic Development is overseeing the project.

-END-

08 April 2016 - NW806

Profile picture: Van Dyk, Ms V

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications

(a) What was the purpose of her attendance at the 2016 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland from 7 to 10 March 2016, (b) what are the (i) names and (ii) positions of the persons who accompanied her and (c) what was the (i) total cost and (ii) breakdown of the costs of the specified trip?

Reply:

(a) Minister was not invited to the World Economic Forum in Davos.

 

(b) (i) not applicable

(ii) not applicable

 

(c) (i) not applicable

(ii) not applicable

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE

08 April 2016 - NW491

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

With regard to the construction of the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality’s Bus Rapid Transit system currently operating from Kempton Park to Tembisa in Gauteng, (a) what are the reasons that there are no bus stop near the Kempton Park West suburb and (b) why have the residents of Kempton Park West not been consulted in this regard?

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the department. We will however engage the affected provincial department responsible, to solicit the relevant information from the municipality. The Honourable Member will be kept updated on the process.

08 April 2016 - NW857

Profile picture: Ndlozi, Dr MQ

Ndlozi, Dr MQ to ask the Minister of Communications

With reference to the Kurara FM and Radio Teemaneng in the Northern Cape which face the possibility of collapse due to dire financial difficulties, (a) what is her department doing to assist the specified radio stations, which, on numerous occasions, have tried to bring the matter to the attention of her department and (b)(i) what are the relevant details of the number of community radio stations in each province that her department has assisted and (ii) how was each specified station assisted in the period 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2015?

Reply:

a) Kurara FM received a total grant funding of R 1,575,946.59 from the Media Development & Diversity Agency in October 2010 which was to cover the Purchasing of a digital broadcast studio; Transmission costs; Stipends; and Operational costs. The allocated funds were to be disbursed to the station on a tranche payment basis, meaning for every tranche of the funds released, the station was or is contractually obligated to submit a comprehensive financial and narrative report accompanied by supporting documents. The station could not adequately report on the first tranche of the funds and the Agency sent an official to the station to assist with the report. As a result, the station was then able to receive its second of the four tranche payments.

Subsequently, as contractually required, the station once again could not submit a thorough report and the Agency once more visited the station to intervene and assist the station. Upon the Agency’s engagement with the project, it learnt that the station had undergone a change in management and the management, together with its board, declared that the station had no records of the funds. As such, it claimed, it could not furnish the Agency with the required report, a key prerequisite before any further funds could be disbursed to the project. In light of this impasse, the Agency has since advised the station to request that the grant be written-off and reapply for another grant with the Agency. The station is yet to respond after the last engagement with the Agency. It should be noted that the recommendation to the station from the Agency’s officials is based on the fact that the station has declared that it cannot account for and has no record whatsoever of the funds in question.

Radio Teemaneng received a total grant funding of R 954,773.62 from the Media Development & Diversity Agency in July 2011 which was to cover Equipment and Operational costs. The station has so far received two payments of the four tranches as per its contract with the Agency. While the Agency has tried to assist the station to adequately report on the latest funds it received, the contract the station has with the Agency lapsed as a result of slow reporting from the station. It also emerged that the station could not provide the Agency with a valid tax clearance certificate. As part of requirements, before any payment can be made to any entity or beneficiary, a valid tax clearance must be submitted to the Agency, and the station is yet to do so do date. As it stands, the Agency has given the station an opportunity to resolve its tax certificate issues with SARS before any further payment can be made. The process will also require that the station’s contract with the Agency be extended, provided that the station can adequately report on its previous tranche and also provide a valid tax clearance certificate.

(b)(i) A total number of 57 community radio stations have been assisted by the Media Development & Diversity Agency from the period 1st January 2012 to 31st of December 2015, as follows: Limpopo (10); North West (9); KZN (12); Eastern Cape (5); Western Cape (4); Free State (3); Mpumalanga (7); Northern Cape (3); Gauteng (4).

(ii) The stations were funded for various line items and the breakdown per province is as follows:

Limpopo Province

  1. Maruleng FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  2. Giyani Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends, Programme Production)
  3. Greater Tzaneen FM ((Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, and stipends)
  4. Sekhukhune FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  5. Botlokwa FM (Programme production)
  6. Lephalale Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  7. Mohodi FM (Programme Production and stipends)
  8. Malamulele FM (Digital broadcast studios, operational costs and stipends)
  9. Tshepo ya Sechaba Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  10. Hlanganani FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs and stipends)

North West

  1. Kgatleng FM (Digital broadcast studios, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  2. Madibogo Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  3. Mafikeng Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  4. Mmabatho FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  5. Radio Mafisa (Transmission equipment, operational cost)
  6. Village FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  7. Motsitle Community Radio(Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  8. Aganang Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, stipends and programme production)
  9. Star FM (Operational Costs, Office Equipments, Salaries and Programme production)

KwaZulu Natal

  1. ICORA (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  2. Ngquthu Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  3. Nqubeko Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  4. Umgungundlovu Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  5. KZN Capital Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  6. Inanda FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  7. Ugu Youth Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  8. Siyathuthuka Community Radio ( Transmission equipment, operational costs and stipends)
  9. Maputaland Community Radio
  10. Vibe FM ((Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs and power back- up)
  11. Radio Khwezi (Programme Production)
  12. Nongoma FM(Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)

Eastern Cape

  1. Mdantsane FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  2. Kumkani FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  3. Izwilethemba Community Christian Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  4. Isajonisi Youth Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  5. LA FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)

 

Western Cape

  1. Radio KC (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, security costs, marketing costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  2. Bush Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio and stipends)
  3. Radio Kaapsepunt (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  4. Radio Namakwaland (Programme production)

Free State

  1. Koepel Stereo (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  2. Naledi Community Radio(Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  3. Mozolo Community Radio(Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)

Mpumalanga

  1. Mash FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs and stipends)
  2. Emalahleni Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, stipends and Programme production)
  3. Bushbuckridge Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios and signage)
  4. Nkangala Community Radio(Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs and operational costs)
  5. MP East Community Radio (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  6. Nkomazi FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  7. Kanyamazane Community Radio(Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, stipends and Programme production)

Northern Cape

  1. Radio Riverside (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming, stipends and audio streaming)
  2. N FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming, stipends and audio streaming)
  3. Revival FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)

Gauteng

  1. Eldos (Digital broadcasting equipment, Transmitter, Training and Operational Costs)
  2. Hweletsa Hope FM (Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs, audio streaming and stipends)
  3. Ekasi Connexion (Power back up, Digital Broadcasting Equipment)
  4. Bagaka FM(Digital broadcast studios, transmission costs, operational costs)

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE

08 April 2016 - NW442

Profile picture: Carter, Ms D

Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation

(1)Whether her department had requested any urgent meeting with the United States (US) Embassy or with the Secretary of State, Mr John Kerry to furnish proof of the embassy fomenting insurrection with a view to achieving a regime change in South Africa; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether she will make a statement on the role of the US government through its embassy?

Reply:

1. No.

South Africa enjoys a strong cordial relationship with the US. Various channels of communication are open for both sides should they see the need to discuss any issue. The two Ministers normally do so under the auspices of Strategic Dialogue which they co-chair.

2. No.

 

UNQUOTE

08 April 2016 - NW275

Profile picture: Carter, Ms D

Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Energy

Whether her department launched any new programme or initiatives to substantially intensify the generation of solar energy to enable Eskom to stop using expensive diesel in its open-cycle turbines during daylight hours when solar radiation was available for tapping; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

Since the advent of load shedding and the creation of the war room in 2014, the DoE commissioned a study in conjunction with the CSIR to quantify the extent of the cost savings emanating from the deployment of renewable energy technology, including solar, in the place of diesel and this was estimated at R3.6bn.

The DoE made a proposal to accelerate the cheaper alternative of using solar technology to replace diesel-fired power generation. This alternative is based on the generation of solar energy using solar plants that have been procured under the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers Programme (REIPPP). The DoE further made a determination under Section 34 of the Electricity Regulation Act to procure additional solar generation capacity through an expedited procurement process given that there was evidence that this option would assist in reducing the cost of generation of diesel fired turbines, especially during peak periods.

The process for the expedited procurement of an addition 1800MW of solar power generation was concluded under the REIPPP with bid submissions closing on 11 November 2015. The commissioning of these power stations is expected within two years and it can therefore be expected that less and less diesel will be required during periods when solar power is generated.

08 April 2016 - NW365

Profile picture: Cardo, Dr MJ

Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Energy

With reference to President Jacob G Zuma’s undertaking in his State of the Nation Address delivered on 12 February 2015, that the Government will set aside 30% of appropriate categories of state procurement for purchasing from Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises (SMMEs), co-operatives, as well as township and rural enterprises, what percentage of the total procurement of (a) her department and (b) every entity reporting to her went to (i) SMMEs and (ii) co-operatives from 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available?

Reply:

a)  The Department does support SMMEs, Co-operatives, as well as Township and rural enterprises through their procurement spent.

b) The procurement spent for SOEs was mainly on SMMEs and they are detailed below as follows.

Entity

Report

NNR

15% of R51 million total Expenditure year to date on goods & services

SANEDI

R3,313770.00 being 19% of total cash and accrued operating expenses

CEF

R 3,847,260,039.37 spent on BBEE including SMME (CEF Group does not report specifically on SMMEs and Co-operatives or categories these suppliers separate from the BEE spend.

NECSA

37% of the total procurement spend (R 86 million) was spent on Qualifying Small Enterprises (QSEs= Annual revenue of less than 10 million

25% of the total procurement spend ( R 58 million ) was spent on Exempt Micro Enterprises (EME=Annual revenue of less that R 50 million )

NB: In terms of the BBBEE Act, SMME’s are now referred to as QSEs and EMEs.

NERSA

More than 40% of R60 million (NERSA’s procurement spend for 2015/16) went to service providers with a BBBEE Level 3 and above.

NRWDI

NRWDI is not yet operational; this is not applicable to the Institute.

07 April 2016 - NW285

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Did he instruct the SA Revenue Services (SARS) Commissioner to discontinue the restructuring of SARS operations; if so, what was the response from the SARS commissioner; if not, (2) is the National Treasury supportive of the restructuring of operations by SARS?

Reply:

  1. Yes, the Minister requested the SARS Commissioner to discontinue the restructuring of SARS operational restructuring to enable him to review and consult with the team on the matter.
  2. The National Treasury does not have an oversight role of SARS.

07 April 2016 - NW286

Profile picture: Matlhoko, Mr AM

Matlhoko, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(a) What is he doing about the struggling Vhembe District Municipality which appointed a Municipal Manager who was dismissed from the previous employment for gross incompetence and (b) what is his department doing to assist the municipality's deteriorating situation?

Reply:

(a) Vhembe District Municipality has been identified as one of the municipalities that is supported in terms of Back to Basics programme. Support that is currently provided by the department includes filling of vacant senior management positions, namely: (1) Municipal Manager; (2) Director: Community Services; and (3) Director: Technical services.

(b) According to the information received from the Limpopo Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance, Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs, the Vhembe District municipal council resolved that the employment of the municipal manager should not continue as she refused to sign an employment contract. The Council indicated that the terms of the employment contract which the municipal manager refused to agree with are reasonable and in the best interest of the municipality. The department is in the process of seconding an acting municipal manager as requested by the municipal council.
 

07 April 2016 - NW271

Profile picture: Groenewald, Mr HB

Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(1)What is the sum total accrued in respect of arrears service fees that are owing by (a) individuals, (b) businesses and (c) state institutions to municipalities across the country for (i) electricity and (ii) any other services as at the latest specified date for which information is available; (2) Whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

According to the report compiled by the National Treasury in terms of section 71 of the MFMA, as at September 2015, the categories of debtors set out below have arrears on electricity and other services including sewerage, refuse removal and water. The debtor amounts reflected below are exclusive of interest.

  1. (a) Individuals

Service

Arrears on service fees excluding interest (R ‘000)

  1. Electricity

R3,772,823 billion

  1. Any other services (excluding property rates)

R20,110,377 billion

(1) (b) Businesses

Service

Arrears on service fees excluding interest (R ‘000)

  1. Electricity

R5,102,455 billion

  1. Any other services (excluding property rates)

R2,983,647 billion

(1) (c) Sate Institutions

Service

Arrears service fees excluding interest (R ‘000)

  1. Electricity

602,587 million

  1. Any other services (excluding property rates)

989,179 million

2. My department, in consultation with other stakeholders, has taken various initiatives to curtail the non-payment of municipal arrear debt. These initiatives include auditing and verification of the outstanding government debt, the verification entails confirming whether invoices that are contested by government departments are correct. The team is also ensuring that municipalities have enforceable credit control policies and by-laws.

I will consider whether or not to make a statement in due course.

07 April 2016 - NW145

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(1)Whether any municipalities have been furnished with notifications by (a) Eskom and/or (b) any water board to notify them that the supply of electricity or water as the case may could be cut off due to non-payment; if so, (i) which municipalities are affected, (ii) what amount is owed to the relevant utilities by each specified municipality as at 31 December 2015 and (iii) what detailed steps are being taken to avert the crisis? (2) whether he will consider provincial and/or national intervention in the defaulting municipalities in terms of section 139(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, for a failure to meet their financial obligations; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1) (a) Eskom has issued nine public notifications of partial disconnection of electricity supply by 31 December 2015. (b) There are no municipalities that have received notices from the Waterboards due to non-payment.

(ii)The following municipalities are affected have been issued with disconnection notices by Eskom. The detailed breakdown of debt owed by each is illustrated in the table below:

PROVINCE

MUNICIPALITY

TOTAL DEBT OWED R’000 (Million)

Eastern Cape

Gariep

R56.8

 

Maletswai

R59.2

 

Nxuba

R43

 

Ikwezi

R13.9

Northern Cape

Kha-ima

R5.7

 

Dikgatlong

R23.1

 

Ubuntu

R16.8

 

Thembelihle

R22.7

 

Magareng

R17.5

(iii) Aligned to the approach taken by the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, (COGTA) Public Enterprises (DPE) and SALGA, Eskom in conjunction with the national task team is visiting affected municipalities, as well as those that were disconnected in December 2015 and January 2016. The objective is to assess the challenges faced by the municipalities and provide Eskom with the opportunity to enter into sustainable payment arrangements.

(2) I have not yet considered an intervention in the defaulting municipalities, in terms of section 139(5) of the Constitution, the power to intervene in municipalities rests with the relevant provincial executives. It is only when a provincial executive cannot or does not adequately exercise the powers or perform the functions referred to in subsection (5) that the national executive is permitted to intervene in a municipality.

07 April 2016 - NW849

Profile picture: Steenhuisen, Mr JH

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)On what date did sections (a) 51, (b) 52, (c) 53 and (d) 54 of the Financial Management of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act, Act 10 of 2009 as amended come into operation; (2) was any exemption from compliance with any of the specified sections granted by the National Treasury to the Parliament of RSA; if not, has the National Treasury satisfied itself that the Parliament of RSA is compliant with each of the specified sections in the specified Act; if so, (a) on what date was the exemption granted and (b) what were the grounds for such exemptions?

Reply:

(1) Sections 51, 52, 53 and 54 of the Financial Management Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act, 2009 (Act No. 10 of 2009), as amended (herein called “the Act”), took effect on 19 April 2009. The Act was amended by the Financial Management of Parliament Amendment Act, 2014 (Act No. 34 of 2014), which took effect on 1 April 2015. The mentioned sections of the Act were not amended by Act No. 34 of 2014.

(2) The Act does not confer authority on the National Treasury to grant exemptions from compliance with any of its provisions to Parliament. The National Treasury is not seized with the administration of the Act and ensuring compliance with its provisions. Sections 51 to 53 of the Act impose obligations on the Accounting Officer of Parliament, i.e. the Secretary to Parliament, while section 54 of the Act imposes obligations on the Executing Authority of Parliament, i.e. the presiding officers of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces, acting jointly, and also on Parliament. The oversight mechanism envisaged in section 4 of the Act is tasked with maintaining oversight of the financial management of Parliament.

 

07 April 2016 - NW302

Profile picture: Rabotapi, Mr MW

Rabotapi, Mr MW to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether each metropolitan municipality offers rate rebates to (a) the elderly, (b) disabled persons, (c) low income property owners and (d) other persons and/or organisations; if not, why not; if so, what is the (i) criteria and (ii) rebate in each specified case?

Reply:

Yes, the response with respect to each metropolitan municipality is as reflected in the tables below.

Given that the granting of rate rebates is one of the three instruments municipalities utilise in granting relief to property owners, for completeness we have included information pertaining to the granting of reductions on the market values of properties and exemptions where applicable. This is because municipalities use any combination of these three relief measures (according to their individual preference). Thus, by merely looking at only one of these three relief measures in isolation of the other two, one cannot get a full picture as to how each metropolitan municipality approaches the issue of granting relief to property owners.

The information below is sourced from municipal rates policies and other relevant municipal budget related documents which contain detailed information (such indigent policies and resolutions levying rates), and therefore this response does not provide all detailed information (e.g. with respect to criteria) as reflected in those documents because to do so would amount to duplicating information in those municipal documents which are ordinarily published in municipal websites for any interested person to obtain detailed information without the risk of these being summarised by someone else (as is the case now by the Department) in a manner which can fail to do justice to those detailed public documents.

Buffalo City

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • Be the owner of a property categorized as residential
    • Occupy the property as his/her primary residence
    • Must apply for the rebate
    • Must be in receipt of gross monthly income (excluding medical contributions) not exceeding R10,500.00 from all sources including income of spouse
    • Must be at least 60 years of age on 1 July of the financial year concerned, and If the applicant turns 60 in that financial year the rebate will be granted on a pro rata basis from the date on which the applicant turns 60

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate : Income R0 - R3000
    • 85% rebate : Income R3001 – R4500
    • 70% rebate : Income R4501 – R6000
    • 55% rebate : Income R6001 – R7500
    • 40% rebate : Income R7501 – R9000
    • 25% rebate : Income R9000 – R10500

(b) People with disability:

(i) Criteria

    • The first 4 bullets in (a) above applies
    • Disabled persons must be in receipt of a disability grant and submit proof e.g. letter from SASSA

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Same as in (a) above.

(c) Low income property owners:

(i) Criteria

    • The owner may not own any property in addition to the property in respect of which indigent support is provided
    • Property of indigent household may be inspected annually to determine validity of application or indigency
    • The property must be categorized as residential

(ii) Relief in each specified case

  • 100% rebate if the value of the property does not exceed R120, 000.

(d) Other persons and/or organisations:

1. Newly developed commercial/industrial properties

(i) Criteria

    • The property must be categorized as commercial/industrial in the valuation roll
    • The property must be developed
    • The value of the development must be R50,000,000.00 or above (this requirement does not apply to East London Industrial Development zone property owners).

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate is phased out over a period of 5 years
  • Year 1 – 50%
  • Year 2 – 40%
  • Year 3 – 30%
  • Year 4 – 20%
  • Year 5 – 10%, thereafter, full rates will be payable

2. Differential rebate

(i) Criteria

    • Areas where some or all of the services are not offered by the municipality

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Water – 22.50% rebate
    • Electricity – 15.00% rebate
    • Sewerage – 15.00% rebate
    • Refuse – 7.50% rebate
    • Constructed roads – 15.00% rebate

3. Public Benefit Organisations (PBOs)

(i) Criteria

  • Various properties owned by PBOs, for example, used exclusively as a home catering for persons with disabilities, a hospital, clinic, metal institution, frail care centre, orphanage, old age homes or any other benevolent institutions, provided that any profits from the use of such properties are used entirely for the benefit of the institution.

(ii) Relief in each case

  • May qualify for 100% rebate on application.

Exemptions

The following properties are exempted from rating:

  • Municipal owned properties non-rateable
  • Religious or places of places of public worship and special property (e.g. museums, libraries)
  • Rural communal land

Ekurhuleni

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • Owner reached the age of 60 years or more
    • Own property concerned which must be
      • residential
      • farm property used for residential purposes
      • smallholdings used for residential purposes
    • total monthly income from all sources including income of spouse of owner must not exceed an amount determined by the Council from time to time (see table below for amounts)
    • Once-off application for the duration of valuation roll
    • Not be in receipt of indigent assessment rate rebate
    • Must reside permanently on the concerned property
    • Property must consist of one dwelling only and no part thereof is sub-let

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Additional reduction of R150,000 of the market value of property
    • Additional rebate based on household income:

Average monthly earnings in respect of preceding 12 months

Rebate in percentage on assessment rates

R0.00 – R2,700.00 (2 x state pensions)

100%

R2,700.01 – R5,250.00

85%

R5,250.01 – R6,840.00

70%

R6,840.01 – R8,470.00

55%

R8,470.01 – R12,750.00

40%

 

(b) People with disability:

1. Disability grantees and/or medically boarded persons

(i) Criteria

    • Same as (a) above.

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Additional reduction of R150,000 of the market value of property
    • Additional rebate based on household income:

Average monthly earnings in respect of preceding 12 months

Rebate in percentage on assessment rates

R0.00 – R2,700.00 (2 x state pensions)

100%

R2,700.01 – R5,250.00

85%

R5,250.01 – R6,840.00

70%

R6,840.01 – R8,470.00

55%

R8,470.01 – R12,750.00

40%

(c) Low income property owners

Refer to reductions and exemptions below.

(d) Other persons and/or organisations:

1. Natural disasters

(i) Criteria

    • Property damaged by a natural disaster as defined in terms of the Disaster Management Act, 57 of 2002
    • Apply to the Council

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Council may fully or partially suspend the levying or rates

2. Sporting bodies

(i) Criteria

    • Apply to be granted a rebate
    • For purposes of amateur sport and any social activities which are connected to sport
    • Subject to existing agreements between club and Council

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 90% rebate

3. Public and private schools, universities and colleges

(i) Criteria

    • Public schools which are state funded
    • Private schools not funded in terms of South African Schools Act, 84 of 1996 and are registered as independent schools
    • Universities
    • Technical and other colleges

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate on private (independent) primary and secondary schools is in accordance with percentage after net profit:

Net profit after tax

Rebate

0.00% – 10.00%

100%

10.01% – 20.00%

90%

20.01% – 30.00%

80%

30.01% – 40.00%

70%

    • 20% rebate on private (independent) universities and colleges, registered as educational institutions not subsidized by state
    • 100% rebate on crèches registered as educational institutions

4. Vacant unimproved land

(i) Criteria

    • Dwelling units being constructed which will be used for residential purposes
    • Rebate granted for a maximum period of eighteen months from the date the approved building plan is supplied
    • Occupation certificate be supplied at the end of the eighteen months period
    • Failure to supply the occupational certificate will result in reversal of rebate already granted

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 75% rebate

Reductions

(a) The elderly, (b) people with disability, (c) low income property owners, (d) other persons and/or organisations

(i) Criteria

    • Residential property

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • The first R150, 000 of the market value of property is deducted.

Exemptions

(c) Low income property owners:

1. Indigent households

(i) Criteria

    • Own residential property
    • Apply to access the relief provided the combined household income of all occupants/ residents and/or dependents residing on the property and are over the age of 18 years, is less than two (2) state monthly pension grants.

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Exempted if property does not exceed maximum value of R150 000.

2. Child headed households

(i) Criteria

    • Headed by child and registered in terms of Council’s approved indigent policy
    • Apply to access the relief provided the combined household income of all occupants/ residents and/or dependents residing on the property and are over the age of 18 years, is less than two (2) state monthly pension grants.

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Exempted if property does not exceed maximum value of R150 000.

(d) Other persons and/or organisations

 

1. Public benefit organisation / non-governmental organization and cultural organisations

(i) Criteria

    • May be exempted from paying rates if fall within:
      • welfare and humanitarian institutions
      • animal welfare
      • cultural
    • Once-off application for the duration of valuation roll

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Exempted

eThekwini

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • Owner reached age of 60 years or more during financial year
    • Own residential property concerned or property owned solely by either spouse
    • The property being a primary residential
    • Value of property must not exceed R3 million
    • Apply for renewal of rebate annually

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • A rebate not exceeding R3, 623 or such lesser amount

(b) People with disability:

1. Disability grantees or medically boarded persons

(i) Criteria

    • Owner physically or mentally disabled
    • Own residential property concerned or property owned solely by either spouse
    • Reside in the property concerned
    • Annually apply for a rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • A rebate not exceeding R3, 623 or such lesser amount

(c) Low income property owners:

1. Child headed households

(i) Criteria

    • Property headed by a minor (person under age of 21)
    • Property owned by terminally ill parent or a child or deceased estate of the parent
    • Value of property must not exceed a value determined by Council at its annual budget
    • Minors must reside permanently on the property
    • Apply for renewal of rebate annually

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • A rebate not exceeding R3, 623 or such lesser amount

(d) other persons and/or organisations:

1. Life rights schemes and retirement villages/complexes

(i) Criteria

    • The scheme must be registered in terms of Housing Development Scheme for Retired Persons Act, 65 of 1988
    • The Scheme must be registered with and regulated by the South African Association of Homes for the Aged (SAHA)
    • Title deeds of the property must be appropriately endorsed
    • Apply for a rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 25% rebate

2. Commercial accommodation

(i) Criteria

    • Owner of property must permanently reside on the property
    • Bed and breakfast, guesthouses, and back-packers lodges must have a valid registration certificate issued by the Municipality
    • Apply for a rebate annually

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 50% rebate for bed and breakfast
    • 25% rebate for guesthouses
    • Rebate not exceeding 50% for backpacker lodges, holiday accommodation and student accommodation with up to 40 beds available
    • Rebate not exceeding 25% for backpacker lodges, holiday accommodation and student accommodation with up to 80 beds available
    • 25% rebate for property let-out for purposes of holiday accommodation for reward
    • 25% rebate for property let-out for purposes of student accommodation (learners of higher education and above)

3. Schools not for gain

(i) Criteria

    • The schools not for gain on the business and commercial category
    • Use of land or buildings, or any part thereof shall not be for the private pecuniary benefit of any individual whether as a shareholder in a company or otherwise
    • Apply for a rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 50% rebate

4. Natural and other disasters

(i) Criteria

    • Property damaged by a natural disaster as defined in terms of the Disaster Management Act, 57 of 2002
    • Property damaged by causes other than that defined by the Disaster Management Act, 57 of 2002 and such damage renders the property uninhabitable
    • Damage to property caused by arson is excluded
    • Apply for a rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 75% temporary rebate for a period of six months or a portion thereof
    • Thereafter, a further 75% temporary rebate for a period not exceeding six months

5. Economic development

(i) Criteria

    • Developments as indicated in the Incentive Policy of Council
    • Rebates shall be for defined period
    • Developer shall be under contractual obligation to complete property within a defined period
    • Apply for a rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Green field development and brown field development receive rebates:

Value of development R (Millions)

Rebate on rates payable in percentage

0 – 50

15%

51 – 150

25%

151 – 300

50%

301 and above

65%

Reductions

(a) the elderly, (b) people with disability, (c) low income property owners, (d) other persons and/or organisations

(i) Criteria

    • Residential property

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • The first R120, 000 of the market value for property exceeding R185, 000

(d) other persons and/or organisations

1. Vacant land

(i) Criteria

    • Land outside the urban development phasing line which is vacant

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Reduction of R30, 000

Exemptions

(d) other persons and/or organisations

1. Residential property with a value of up to R185,000 is exempted.

2. Public benefit organisations

(i) Criteria

    • May be exempted from paying rates if fall within:
      • welfare and humanitarian institutions
      • health care institutions
      • animal welfare
      • Schools and organisations for the mentally and physically challenged
      • cemeteries
      • heritage sites
    • Use of land or buildings, or any part thereof shall not be for the private pecuniary benefit of any individual whether as a shareholder in a company or otherwise
    • Apply for exemption

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Exempted

3. sporting bodies

(i) Criteria

    • Apply for exemption, and aapplicants must produce a tax exemption certificate issued by the South African Revenue Services (SARS) as contemplated in Part 1 of the Ninth Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1962 (Act 58 of 1962).

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rated on value of building area only
    • The building area shall exclude change rooms and store rooms necessary for the sport.

City of Cape Town

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • Occupy the property as his/her primary residence
    • Must be at least 60 years of age
    • Must apply
    • Must be in receipt of gross monthly household income not exceeding R12,000.00
    • The applicant and/or spouse and/or life partner should not be the owner of more than one property nationally

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate : Income R0 – R3500
    • 95% rebate : Income R3501 – R5000
    • 90% rebate : Income R5001 – R6000
    • 80% rebate : Income R6001 – R7000
    • 70% rebate : Income R7001 – R8000
    • 60% rebate : Income R8001 – R8500
    • 50% rebate : Income R8501 – R9000
    • 40% rebate : Income R9001 – R9500
    • 30% rebate : Income R9501 – R10000
    • 20% rebate : Income R10001 – R11000
    • 10% rebate : Income R11001 - R12000

(b) People with disability:

(i) Criteria

Same as (a) above.

(ii) Relief in each specified case

Same as (a) above.

(c) Low income property owners:

(i) Criteria

Same as (a) above.

(ii) Relief in each specified case

  • May qualify for 100% rebate.

(d) Other persons and/or organisations:

1. Agricultural properties

(i) Criteria

    • Bona fide farming properties
    • Contribute to the local economy
    • Assists in meeting the service delivery and development obligations of the city
    • Contribution to the social and economic welfare of farm workers
    • Must apply for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 80% rebate on the rate levied on residential properties

2. Nature reserves, special nature reserves and national parks

(i) Criteria

  • May apply for the rebate
    • Private property contracted into the Table Mountain National Park in terms of the Protected Areas Act
    • Private property exhibiting sensitive ecological areas/features, identified by the City’s Environmental Management Resources Department
    • Owners of properties with formal in perpetuity conservation agreements of over 10 hectares

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • May be granted a 100% rebate

3. Religious organisations

(i) Criteria

  • Property used primarily as an office of a religious organization
  • Property used as parking facilities, halls used for religious purposes
  • Accommodation for missionaries, camping sites not operated for gain and cemeteries for that religious community

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • May be granted a 100% rebate

4. Non-Profit Organisations (NPOs)/ Public Benefit Organisations (PBOs)

(i) Criteria

  • Must have a constitution which does not preclude any resident of the City from being a member
  • Must be open to the general public
  • May apply for the rebate
  • Be registered as NPOs under the Non-Profit Organisations Act or be PBO that qualify for tax exemption as contemplated by Part 1 of section 30 of the Ninth Schedule of the Income Tax Act
  • Must be organisations with limited resources
  • Health and welfare institutions
  • Educational institutions
  • National/Provincial/ Local Heritage Site /Historical Monuments
  • Charitable institutions
  • Cemeteries and crematoria
  • Cultural institutions
  • Museums, libraries, art galleries and botanical gardens
  • War veterans organisations
  • Youth development organisations
  • Animal protection
  • Sporting bodies
  • Homeless people shelters
  • Early childhood development

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • May be granted a 100% rebate

Reductions

  1. Criteria
  • Residential properties
  1. Relief in each specified case
  • Maximum reduction of up to R200,000.00 granted to every individually-valued residential property

Exemptions

  1. Criteria
  • Any private road or any other property where the market value of the property is equal to or less than R50,000.00

City of Johannesburg

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • Owner reached age of 60 years
    • Own and occupy property concerned
    • Value of property may not exceed R2, 000, 000
    • Apply to Council for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate if pensioner receives National Social Security Grant
    • 100% rebate if pensioner is age 70 years and above irrespective of income
    • 100% rebate if pensioner has gross monthly income below or equal to R7, 850
    • 50% rebate if pensioner has gross monthly income above R7, 850 but less than or equal to R13, 458

(b) People with disability:

1. Emanating from injury

(i) Criteria

    • Must have been injured on duty serving:
      • South African National Defence Force
      • South African Policy Service
      • Emergency Services
      • Johannesburg Metropolitan Police
    • Own and occupy property concerned
    • Value of property may not exceed R2, 000, 000
    • Apply to Council for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate if pensioner receives National Social Security Grant
    • 100% rebate if pensioner is age 70 years and above irrespective of income
    • 100% rebate if pensioner has gross monthly income below or equal to R7, 850 provided pensioner is at least 60 years of age
    • 50% rebate if pensioner has gross monthly income above R7, 850 but less than or equal to R13, 458 provided pensioner is at least 60 years of age

(c) Low income property owners:

1. Extended social package

(i) Criteria

    • Apply to municipality every six months
    • Own and occupy property concerned
    • Property value not exceeding R450, 000

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 70% rebate of current monthly rates when Johannesburg Poverty Index is greater than zero but not exceeding 34 points
    • 100% rebate of current monthly rates when Johannesburg Poverty Index is greater than 35 points

2. State’s Social Security Grant

(i) Criteria

    • Own and occupy residential property concerned
    • Owner is dependent on a State’s Social Security Grant in terms of Social Assistance Act, 59 of 1992
    • State’s Social Security Grant is their sole source of income

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate

3. Child headed households

(i) Criteria

    • Property occupied by a household headed by a minor
    • Value of property may not exceed R2, 000, 000
    • Property owned by terminally ill parent or a child or deceased estate of the parent
    • Terminally ill parent or their child must apply annually for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate shall be maximum of 100% of the current monthly rates

(d) other persons and/or organisations:

1. Heritage properties

(i) Criteria

    • Declared heritage site in terms of section 27 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 25 of 1999
    • Designated as protected areas in terms of section 28 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 25 of 1999
    • Designated as heritage area in terms of section 31 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 25 of 1999
    • Apply to Council for approval of rebate annually

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate shall be maximum of 20% of the current monthly rates

2. Residential sectional title

(i) Criteria

    • High density residential development including sectional title units

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 5% rebate of the currently monthly rates

3. Protection of animals

(i) Criteria

    • Property registered in the name of any institution or organization which has as its exclusive objective the protection of animals
    • Apply to Council for approval of rebate/exemption

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate shall be maximum of 100% of the current monthly rates

4. Disaster areas

(i) Criteria

    • Property situated within an area affected by a disaster within the meaning of the Disaster Management Act, 57 of 2002
    • Apply to Council for approval of rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate shall be maximum of 100% of the current monthly rates

5. Vacant land

(i) Criteria

    • Land outside the urban development boundary which is vacant
    • Rebate only available if property could not be developed due to unavailability of bulk infrastructure and/or bulk services
    • Apply to Council for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate shall be maximum of 50% of the current monthly rates

6. Housing development schemes for retired persons

(i) Criteria

    • Properties owned by juristic persons that fall under the Housing Development Schemes for Retired Persons Act, 65 of 1988 as amended
    • Owner of property shall pass on the benefits of the rates rebate to the registered holder/s of the right to occupation in the Scheme

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate shall be maximum of 50% of the current monthly rates

7. Registered social landlords

(i) Criteria

    • Properties owned by individuals or entities designated as Registered Social Landlords under the Registered landlord Policy of the City

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 40% rebate on the current monthly rates where property is zoned for commercial use and is rated accordingly

8. New building incentive

(i) Criteria

    • New building development that would take place within the identified Corridors of Freedom in line with the Growth and Development Strategy 2040
    • Development must be in line with the development requirements set out by the City
    • Proposed developments must follow all planning by-laws

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Property owner will pay a quarter of the rate as per the category of land for a period not exceeding two years during the construction
    • Property owner will pay half the rates on the first year of operation as per the category of land

9. Private sports club

(i) Criteria

    • Owned by private sports club
    • Used primarily for sporting purposes

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 40% rebate

10. Provision and/or promotion of youth development

(i) Criteria

    • Property registered in the name of any institution or organization which has as its exclusive objective the provision and/or promotion of youth development

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate

Reductions

(a) The elderly, (b) people with disability, (c) low income property owners, (d) other persons and/or organisations

(i) Criteria

    • Residential property
    • Properties used for multiple purposes, provided one or more components of the property are used for residential purpose

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • The first R200, 000 of the market value of the property.

Mangaung

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • The property must be registered in the name of the applicant
    • Must be at least 60 years of age
    • Must occupy the relevant property
    • In a case of a semi-detached house, of which a section is rented out, only rates paid for that section occupied by the owner is subject to rebates
    • If the owner due to medical reasons had to take early retirement the age requirement of 60 years will not apply
    • The property owner must apply

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • The rebate on the first R250,000.00 of the rateable value for residential properties of qualifying senior citizens will only be applicable on properties with a value that does not exceed R2 ,000,000.00

(b) People with disability:

(i) Criteria

    • Same as (a) above.
    • Must be in receipt of a disability pension from the Department of Welfare and Population Development

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • The rebate on the first R250,000.00 of the rateable value for residential properties of qualifying disabled persons will only be applicable on properties with a value that does not exceed R2 ,000,000.00

(c) Low income property owners:

(i) Criteria

    • Occupy the property as his/her primary residence and must be registered as indigents in terms of the adopted indigent policy of the municipality
    • The rebate will automatically apply and no further application is thus required

(ii) Relief in each specified case

  • May qualify for 100% rebate

(d) Other persons and/or organisations:

1. Child headed families

(i) Criteria

    • The head of the child headed family must occupy the property as his/her normal residence
    • Must not be older than 18 years of age
    • Must still be a scholar or jobless
    • Must be in receipt of a total monthly income from all sources not exceeding an amount to be determined by the municipality
    • Must apply for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • May qualify for 100% rebate

Reductions

  1. Disaster related matters
  1. Criteria
  • Partial or total destruction of a property
  • Disasters as defined in the Disaster Management Act
  • Owner must apply
  1. Relief
  • Maximum reduction of 80%
  1. Residential properties
  1. Criteria
  • No requirement for lodging an application.
  1. Relief in each specified case
  • In addition to the mandated first R15,000.00 of the market value of residential properties, and additional R55,000.00 reduction is applicable to all residential properties

Exemptions

  1. Public Benefit organisations (PBOs)
  1. Criteria
    • Property owned by public benefit organisations and used for any specified public benefit activity listed in item 1(welfare and humanitarian), item 2 (health care) and item 4 (education and development) of part 1 of the Ninth Schedule to the Income Tax Act
    • Must apply
    • PBO must attach a SARS tax exemption certificate issued by the South African Revenue Services
  1. Relief
  • May be exempted

Nelson Mandela Bay

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • Be a natural person
    • Be the owner of the property
    • Occupy the property as his/her normal residence
    • Must be at least 60 years of age on 1 July of the financial year concerned, or if the owner turns 60 during the year the rebate will be granted on a pro rata basis from the date on which the applicant turned 60
    • Submit pension statements
    • Not be a receipt of an indigent subsidy
    • Ensure that his/her accounts are not in arrears before applying for a rebate
    • Be in receipt of a total gross annual income not exceeding R118,700

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebate is based on the total annual household income
    • 85% rebate : Income between two state pensions and R54,000
    • 70% rebate : Income between R54,001 and R66,900
    • 55% rebate : Income between R66,901 and R79,800
    • 40% rebate : Income between R79,801 and R92,800
    • 25% rebate : Income between R92,801 and R105,700
    • 10% rebate : income between R105,701 and R118,700

(b) People with disability:

(i) Criteria

    • Same as (a) above.
    • Must be in receipt of a disability grant/pension and submit proof and nature of disability, and submit SASSA statements with the application.

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Same as (a) above.

(c) Low income property owners

(i) Criteria

    • The household income of applicants, from all sources, shall not exceed the equivalent of two State welfare pensions
    • The applicant must be an account holder and must reside on the property in respect of which assistance is sought and must apply in person.
    • The applicant must not own more than one fixed property within the metro

(ii) Relief in each specified case

  • A full credit for property rates.

(d) Other persons and/or organisations:

1. Sporting bodies (Professional)

(i) Criteria

    • Property must be owned/leased for sporting purposes
    • May be for gain and not-for -gain
    • Profits earned must be invested in the betterment of the organization and not be for private gain
    • Must apply for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • May qualify for 40% rebate

2. Social Housing

(i) Criteria

  • Property registered in the name of an institution accredited in terms of the Social Housing Act 16 of 2008 which provides or intends to provide rental of cooperative housing options for households with a gross monthly household income less than the maximum housing subsidy
  • Accounts of the applicant must be up to date or arrangements must be made to pay outstanding balances before any rebate will be granted

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • May qualify to be rated at the same rate as public benefit organisations in terms of the Rate Ratios Regulations Between Residential and Non-Residential Properties.

Reductions

None, and for properties affected by disasters, such properties are re-valued to get the revised their market values for rating purposes.

Exemptions

  1. Sporting bodies (Amateur)
  1. Criteria
    • Property must be owned/leased for sporting purposes
    • May be for gain and not-for -gain
    • Profits earned must be invested in the betterment of the organization and not be for private gain
    • Must apply for the rebate
  1. Relief in each specified case
  • May be exempted
  1. PBOs and Not For Gain institutions or organisations
  1. Criteria
    • Must apply for the exemption
    • Properties used exclusively as hospitals, clinics, mental hospitals, orphanages, retirement villages, old age homes or any other benevolent institutions
    • Properties belonging to not-for-gain institutions (organisations) that perform charitable work
    • Land used exclusively for cemeteries and crematoriums
    • Properties owned by a declared institution in terms of the Cultural Institutions Act
    • Museums, libraries, art galleries and botanical gardens registered in the name of private persons and open to the public
    • Properties registered in the name of a trust/trusts and/or organisations as defined in the Social Aid Act
    • Properties owned/used by youth organisations for the promotion and development of the youth
    • Properties owned, or used by institutions or organisations the exclusive aim of which is to protect birds, reptiles, fish and animals not-for-gain
    • Properties registered in the name of and used primarily as a place of public worship by a religious community
  1. Relief
  • May be exempted

Tshwane

Rebates

(a) The elderly:

(i) Criteria

    • Owner reached age of 60 years or more during financial year
    • Own residential property concerned
    • Property concerned must be occupied only by the pensioner and his/her spouse, if any, and by dependents without income

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • A further maximum/total rebate of 50% (on the remaining property rates, after the applicable residential rebates have been granted) if total gross income of the pensioner and/or spouse does not exceed an amount equal to twice the annual state pension (2 x R1,410 or 2 x R1,430 if older than 75) for a financial year
    • A further maximum/total rebate of 40% (on the remaining property rates, after the applicable residential rebates have been granted) if joint income of the pensioner and/or spouse does not exceed R130, 000 for a financial year

(b) People with disability:

1. Physically or mentally disabled

(i) Criteria

    • Owner physically or mentally disabled
    • Own residential property concerned
    • Property concerned must be occupied only by the pensioner and his/her spouse, if any, and by dependents without income

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • A further maximum/total rebate of 50% subject to total gross annual social pension for a financial year, which amount may be reviewed during the City’s annual budget process
    • A further maximum/total rebate of 40% if joint income of the pensioner and/or spouse exceeds an amount equal to twice the annual state pension (2 x R1,410 or 2 x R1,430 if older than 75) for a financial year, but does not to exceed R130, 000 for a financial year

(c) Low income property owners:

1. Indigent households

(i) Criteria

  • Gross monthly income of all members of the household does not exceed the joint amount of two state old age pensions excluding child support grant and foster care grant
    • Applicant as well as any other member of the household does not own other fixed property than one in which they reside

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate

2. Owner temporarily without income: indigent criteria may be applied in terms of Indigent Policy of City of Tshwane

(i) Criteria

    • Same as indigent households above.

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate

(d) Other persons and/or organisations:

1. Grants-in-aid

(i) Criteria

    • Registered in the name of an institution or organization in terms of Non-profit Organizations Act, 71 of 1997
    • Hospitals, clinics and institutions for mentally ill person which are not operated with intention to make profit
    • Cemeteries and crematoriums which are registered in the name of private persons and which are used exclusively for burials and cremations
    • Museum, art galleries, libraries and botanical gardens which are registered in the name of private persons and which are open to public, whether admission is charged or not
    • Rateable property registered in the name of a trustee or any organization which is being maintained for the welfare of war veterans as defined in section 1 of the Social Aid Act (House of Assembly), 37 of 1989
    • Sports grounds used for the purpose of amateur sport and any social activities which are connected with the sport
    • Rateable property registered in the name of the Boy Scouts, Girl Guides, Sea Scouts, Voortrekkers or any organization which is in the opinion of the municipality similar or, any rateable property let by a municipality to any such organization
    • Rateable property registered in the name of a declared institution as defined in section 1 of the Cultural Institutions Act, 29 of 1969, or the cultural Institutions Act (House of Assembly), 66 of 1989
    • Apply to Chief Financial Officer

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 100% rebate

2. Owners of land alienated by the municipality after January 2015

(i) Criteria

    • Owners of land alienated by the municipality

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebates in terms of the Development Investment Incentive Policy of the City

3. Owners of catalytic investment properties

(i) Criteria

    • Owners of catalytic investment properies

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • Rebates in terms of the Development Investment Incentive Policy of the City

4. Independent school

(i) Criteria

    • Application does not meet the criteria for Public Benefit Organisation property as defined
    • Apply for the rebate

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • 20% rebate

Reductions

(a) the elderly, (b) people with disability, (c) low income property owners, (d) other persons and/or organisations

(i) Criteria

    • Residential property

(ii) Relief in each specified case

    • First part of value of property up to R75, 000 of the market value

Exemptions

(d) Other persons and/or organisations

1. Public Service infrastructure

2. Places of public worship

3. Protected areas

4. State trust land

Cooporate Gov Ministry letter.jpg

07 April 2016 - NW562

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether the SA Revenue Service (SARS) conducts (a) enforcement investigations and/or (b) criminal investigations; if not, why not; if so, (i) what is the (aa) name and (bb) designation of the person(s) responsible for (aaa) enforcement investigation and (bbb) criminal investigations, (ii) what is the (aa) name and (bb) number of personnel employed in each (aaa) division(s) and (bbb) department(s) responsible for (aaaa) enforcement investigations and (bbbb) criminal investigations; (2) what legal authority does the SARS have to conduct (a) enforcement investigations and (b) criminal investigations?

Reply:

The following information is provided by South African Revenue Service (SARS):

  1. (a)(b)
    Yes, the South African Revenue Service is mandated and as such do perform Enforcement and Criminal Investigations.

(i)(aa)(bb)(aaa)(bbb)

Within the current SARS structure there are Group Executives responsible for the investigative capacity. These Group Executives report directly to respective Chief Officers.

(ii)(aa)(bb)(aaa)(bbb)(aaaa)(bbbb)

There are currently 1599 Enforcement Auditors who conduct enforcement investigations, and 381 Criminal investigators. They range from junior investigators to Senior Specialist investigators.  Unfortunately we cannot provide names of these officials for their safety due to the nature of their work.

(2)(a)(b)

In terms of the SARS Act no. 34 of 1997 the South African Revenue Service is legally mandated and authorised to conduct Enforcement Investigations (investigative audits) and Criminal Investigations in pursuit of its mandate to collect all moneys due to the fiscus and to combat non-compliance and tax evasion. Moreover, the SARS Act makes the Commissioner, as chief executive officer, responsible in particular for the formation and development of an efficient administration and the effective deployment and utilisation of staff to achieve maximum operational results.

Furthermore in terms of the Tax Administration Act no. 28 of 2011 under Chapter 5, Part A and B, SARS is mandated to perform such investigations.

07 April 2016 - NW468

Profile picture: Vos, Mr J

Vos, Mr J to ask the Mr J Vos (DA) to ask the Minister of Tourism

(1) How many (a) direct and (b) indirect jobs respectively have been created in the tourism industry in (i) 2013, (ii) 2014 and (iii) 2015 respectively; (2) how much did tourism contribute to the country’s gross domestic product during (a) 2013, (b) 2014 and (c) 2015 respectively; (3) what is the detailed breakdown of international arrivals at the (a) Cape Town International, (b) O R Tambo International and (c) King Shaka International airports in (i) 2013, (ii) 2014 and (iii) 2015 respectively?

Reply:

(1) How many (a) direct and (b) indirect jobs respectively have been created in the tourism industry in (i) 2013, (ii) 2014 and (iii) 2015 respectively;

(a) Direct contribution to jobs

The latest figures available from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) are provisional figures for 2014. Estimates from the World Travel and Tourism Council were used to report on 2015.

Job Creation

  1. 2013
  1. 2014
  1. 2015 estimate

Direct Jobs

655 587

680 817

705,600

Source: 2013 and 2014: Tourism Satellite Account, StatsSA. 2015: WTTC 2015 estimates.

(b) Total contribution to employment (direct and indirect)

It should be noted that StatsSA does not measure the total contribution of tourism to employment (direct and indirect contribution). Figures and estimates from WTTC were used to report on this indicator. However, WTTC does not release figures on the indirect contribution alone, therefore figures reported below is for total contribution which includes both direct and indirect contribution.

Job Creation

  1. 2013
  1. 2014
  1. 2015 estimate

Total contribution to employment (Direct and indirect)

1 437 500

1 497 600

1 551 400

Source: WTTC

(2) how much did tourism contribute to the country’s gross domestic product during (a) 2013, (b) 2014 and (c) 2015 respectively

It should be noted that the contribution of tourism to GDP is reported for direct as well as for total contribution (direct and indirect). StatsSA only measures the direct contribution to GDP and the latest figures available are 2014 provisional figures. Therefore figures reported below for direct contribution in 2013 and 2014 were sourced from StatsSA. WTTC estimates were used to report on the direct contribution to GDP for 2015 as well as the direct and indirect contribution from 2013 to 2015.

Contribution to GDP

  1. 2013
  1. 2014
  1. 2015 estimate

Direct

R101,7 billion

R111,6 billion

R117,8 billion

Direct and indirect

R345,7 billion

R357,0 billion

R369.3 billion

Source: Source: 2013 and 2014: Tourism Satellite Account, StatsSA. 2015: WTTC 2015 estimates.

(3) International tourist arrivals

Airport

  1. 2013
  1. 2014
  1. 2015
  1. Cape Town

International Airport

461,186

524,131

557,050

  1. OR Tambo

International Airport

2,656,222

2,001,365

1,932,096

  1. King Shaka

International Airport

35,920

38,449

37,162

Source: Statistics SA

07 April 2016 - NW772

Profile picture: Atkinson, Mr P

Atkinson, Mr P to ask the Minister of Small Business Development

(1)(a) What is the current status of the plan to reduce red tape in the Moretele Local Municipality in North West, (b) what is the total number unnecessary (i) policies, (ii) by-laws and (iii) regulations that were rescinded during the process to reduce red tape in the specified municipality and (c) what total amount of administration costs will the specified intervention save businesses in the specified municipality; (2) can she list three or more examples of the red tape that was cut because of the specified intervention in the specified municipality?

Reply:

(1)(a) The current plan of the Department of Small Business Development (DSBD) regarding the Red Tape Reduction Programme is to revisit the piloted municipalities to assess progress made in relation to the following: complaints notification system, 30 payment system, building plan approval processes, business registration permits, by-laws and communication of small business information to SMMEs and Cooperatives. Specifically for Moretele Local Municipality in North West, the turnaround times for payment of small businesses have been reduced to the required 30 days period.

(b) There is no record of unnecessary (i) policies, (ii) by-laws and (iii) regulations rescinded in the specific municipality. The total number of policies, by-laws and regulations that impede the development and promotion of small businesses will only be outlined upon the conclusion of the proposed study on regulatory protocols affecting small businesses to be conducted by DSBD during the 2016/17 financial year. However, in terms of Moretele Local Municipality the by-laws are reviewed every two years.

(c) The current assessment did not consider the administration costs. But the reduction of Red Tape in each of the identified areas will lead to the reduction of costs in of turnaround times, improvement of communication on compliance will also reduce costs experienced by SMMEs.

2. Some of the examples that can be referred to regarding how the red tape has been reduced include: The establishment of the Moretele call centre to receive, capture and provide status report on general community queries.