Questions and Replies
04 April 2017 - NW762
Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What are the reasons that some entities reporting to her do not have their latest annual report available online via their respective websites (b) by what date will the annual reports be available online?
Reply:
Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)
The latest Integrated Report 2016 is available on the website.
Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)
- The latest Annual Report 2015 is available on the website, the reports are also achieved from 2010- 2014.
- The 2016 Annual Report will be available as soon as it is tabled in Parliament.
South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)
(a) The latest annual report of the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA), i.e. for the 2015/2016 financial year, is available online via the organisation’s website. Each year, and without fail, the SACAA ensures that its annual report is available online via its website immediately on receipt of confirmation that the annual report has been tabled in Parliament.
Cross-Border Road Transport Agency
- The Cross-Border Road Transport Agency has the latest annual report available online via the Agency’s website.
- Not applicable as the latest annual report is available online.
Road Accident Fund
(a) The Road Accident Fund has the latest annual report available online via the Agency’s website.
(b) Not applicable as the latest annual report is available online.
Road Traffic Management Corporation
- The Road Traffic Management Corporation has the latest annual report available online via the Agency’s website.
(b) Not applicable as the latest annual report is available online.
Road Traffic Infringement Agency
- The Road Traffic Infringement Agency has the latest annual report available online via the Agency’s website.
- Not applicable as the latest annual report is available online.
South African National Roads Agency Limited
(a) The South African National Roads Agency Limited has the latest annual report available online via the Agency’s website.
(b) Not applicable as the latest annual report is available online.
Ports Regulator South Africa (PRSA)
- The previous year’s annual report has not been uploaded on the Ports Regulator’s website as a result or error, however this will be uploaded as soon as possible.
- The annual report will be loaded before the end of the 2016/17 financial year.
South African Maritime Safety Authority ( SAMSA)
SAMSA publishes its Annual Performance Plan, Strategic Plans and all our Annual Reports on the SAMSA website as required.
Passenger Rail of Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
- PRASA places its annual reports on its main websites.
Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)
a) The Railway Safety Regulator’s 15/16 Annual Report is available on the entity’s website
b) N/A
04 April 2017 - NW609
Atkinson, Mr P to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
By what date will the draft funding framework for universities be made publicly available?
Reply:
The Draft Amended Policy on the Funding of Public Universities, November 2015 and the Revised Funding Framework: The Allocation of Government Grants to Public Higher Education Institutions, November 2015 were developed and submitted to me for approval to publish for public comment. Given the concerns in the system around student and university funding at the time, I made a decision that the drafts should be tabled at Cabinet before being released.
The draft documents were tabled in Cabinet on 22 November 2016. Cabinet advised that since the documents dealt with operational matters within the sector, specifically changes to the way in which the funds already within the system would be distributed to institutions, that it would not be necessary to publish them in a Gazette for public comment. Cabinet advised that the Department should consult directly and fully with the university sector on the policy and framework.
Consultation and engagements are scheduled to commence in April 2017. The full draft documents are currently being shared with the sector through Universities South Africa (USAf). Based on engagements, a final draft incorporating sector inputs will be developed and agreed upon in collaboration with USAf. The final draft will be aligned with any relevant decisions emanating from the Report of the Presidential Commission on Higher Education and Training, currently underway. The final draft documents will be submitted to the Council on Higher Education (CHE) for advice. Once the advice is received, the amended policy and revised funding framework will be submitted to me for approval and publication as the final Policy in the Government Gazette. The target date to finalise this process is the end of December 2017.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 609 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
04 April 2017 - NW610
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
Were any existing higher education programmes (a) cut or (b) reduced in order to make up the additional funding allocated to (i) student funding and (ii) other new costs in his department’s 2017-18 budget; if so, (aa) which programmes, (bb) what amount in funding was moved away from each programme and (cc) to which allocation was the funding moved?
Reply:
The Department did not (a) cut or (b) reduce any existing higher education programmes in the 2017/18 budget in order to make up the additional funding allocated to (i) student funding and (ii) other new costs in the Department.
Funding was provided through the reprioritisation of Post-School Education and Training funds within the National Skills Fund.
Further details regarding the allocation and distribution thereof will be provided during the tabling of the Department’s budget in the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces during May 2017.
COMPILER:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 610 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
04 April 2017 - NW596
Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)With reference to the report by the Ministerial Committee on the funding norms for technical vocational education and training (TVET) colleges, (a) on what date did the study on funding norms commence, (b)(i) at what stage and (ii) to what extend were TVET college principals consulted and (c) how will the findings affect the total amount allocated for the medium term budget framework at TVET colleges; (2) Whether students will in future be capped at TVET colleges in light of the lack of growth in student numbers according to the medium term budget framework; if so, what are the relevant details? (3) What plans are in place to phase in the new funding framework once it is adopted in order for colleges to budget in time for any differences in income that may occur?
Reply:
1. (a) The Ministerial Committee was established by the Minister of Higher Education and Training and published in Government Gazette No. 38053 on 3 October 2014. The Committee was inaugurated by the Minister and commenced its work on 5 March 2015. The duration of the project was initially twelve months and it was later extended until 31 March 2017.
(b) The Minister also established a Reference Group on which Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) college Principals are represented by the nominated executive members of the South African College Principals’ Organisation. The Committee has held various consultative meetings with the Reference Group.
(c) The aim of the Ministerial Review Committee is to redesign the funding distribution mechanism including the differentiation between funding requirements of rural and urban colleges. At present, it is not envisaged that the revised funding norms will bring about changes in the total amount allocated for the medium term budget framework for TVET colleges. The report from the Ministerial Review Committee is expected by 31 March 2017 after which a consultative process will be adopted before implementation.
2. Based on the funding shortfall currently experienced by the TVET system (in the region of R10 billion), the envisaged enrolment targets as set in the White Paper for Post-School Education and Training will not be achieved. The Department has therefore indicated to the TVET colleges, the maximum state funded enrolments, which therefore still permits TVET colleges to exceed these numbers if they can afford to enrol higher numbers. However, it will be based on the financial capability of the specific TVET college. The targets for the 2017/18 financial year are as follows:
- State funded enrolments: 429 638
- College funded enrolments: 235 110
- Occupational programmes (funded from other resources): 45 787
Total 710 535
3. The proposed funding framework, once approved by the Minister, will be published in a Government Gazette for public comment. This will allow all affected stakeholders to make inputs, including proposals on plans to implement the new funding framework. A readiness assessment will be conducted and TVET colleges will be consulted on the development of a national implementation plan.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 596 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
04 April 2017 - NW806
Tlhaole, Mr L S to ask the Minister of Transport
What measures does her department have in place to reduce the road carnage on the R31 road between Hotazel and Kuruman in the Northern Cape, which is as a result of a very narrow road that is used by many heavy vehicles?
Reply:
The Department has programmes in place to deal with the reduction of road carnages on R31 road. These programs are anchored around the pillars of United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety.
There is also improvement visibility of traffic police to ensure safety of all road users in this road.
We have attended to the road shoulders of the R31 to increase its capacity to cater for the heavy vehicle traffic, in particular.
The long term plans are that the additional lanes will be introduced and design life of road be improved.
04 April 2017 - NW595
Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)(a) What are the minimum requirements to qualify as (i) examiners and (ii) markers of examination papers for the (aa) National Certificate: Vocational and (bb) NATED/Report 191 examinations, (b) what is the total number of (i) examiners and (ii) markers who served in the November 2016 examinations and (c) what is the total number that has been paid to date; (2) has his department introduced any measures to determine that examiners and markers possess the minimum subject knowledge needed to ensure that correct answers, even if not covered by the official memoranda, are given the credit it deserves; if not, what plans does his department have to ensure that a minimum level of subject knowledge is required of examiners in the future; if so, what are the details; (3) whether any payments to examiners and markers of previous examination cycles are still outstanding; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
1. (a) The minimum requirements to qualify as examiners and moderators are furnished in Chapter 4, Clause 4.4 (4.4.3 (c) (i – x) of the policy on the conduct of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) examinations Government Gazette No. 22760 of 26 October 2001. On page 22 of the above-mentioned policy document, the following requirements are stated:
- A recognised three-year post matric qualification that should include the subject concerned at second- or third-year level;
- Preference should be given to serving school- and college-based educators;
- Experience as a Marker, Examiner or Moderator;
- Experience in subject committee work and/or contributions towards curriculum development;
- Motivation by the Principal or Management Forum of the college; and
- Appropriate teaching experience, including teaching experience at the appropriate level, in the subject concerned.
(b) (i) The total number of examiners appointed for the November 2016 examinations are as follows:
- NC (V): 296 examiners
- NATED/Report 191: 183 examiners
(ii) The total number of markers appointed for the November 2016 examinations are as follows:
- NC (V): 1 091 markers
- NATED/Report 191: 5 158 markers.
(c) NC(V) Examiners: 290 Examiners have been paid. The remaining 6 examiners did not submit claim forms for payment.
NATED/Report 191 Examiners: All the claims have been processed and payment is being effected.
NC(V) Markers: All markers have been paid.
NATED/Report 191 Markers: 5 238 Claims have been paid and 21 claims are still being processed because relevant documentation was outstanding and have since been submitted. The remaining 21 claims will be processed for payment by 24 March 2017. The reason for the number of claims exceeding the number of markers is because a marker is allowed to mark more than one question paper.
2. When the Department did not receive sufficient qualifying applications, it re-advertised all the positions of examiners and moderators for the 2016/17 cycle. The process of appointment is determined by the Department of Public Service and Administration. The examiners and moderators were trained on the processes and procedures of setting quality question papers and marking guidelines. The training also included the use of the four elements of item demand, i.e. content, expected responses, stimulus and task, which are used to generate high quality questions. It is this ongoing training that ensures examiners and moderators are well capacitated.
Appointed markers undergo vigorous training prior to marking. The following procedures are followed:
- Markers are required to arrive at the marking session with their own answered marking guideline.
- Each marker within the panel is required to do pre-marking of scripts for their respective subject.
- The official marking guideline is discussed under the leadership of the Internal Moderator.
- Amendments, corrections and additions to the marking guideline are made during this marking guideline discussion.
- The markers mark 3 dummy scripts to test the validity of the amended marking guideline, which requires accuracy and precision.
This rigorous training ensures that markers shortcomings are identified so that markers are allocated questions according to their strengths demonstrated during the training. In addition, the moderation of the marked scripts contributes immensely to the empowerment of markers as markers are constantly provided with feedback on the accuracy of their marking. Most of the markers appointed per examination cycle are highly experienced as they have gone through this training several times and understand what it takes to achieve reliable and valid scores in this process.
3. All examiners who rendered services and submitted correctly completed claim forms in the previous examination cycle have been paid.
All marking claims for November 2016 examination cycle have been processed for payment.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 595 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
04 April 2017 - NW599
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
Has the 2013 Policy on Professional Qualifications for Lecturers in Technical and Vocational Education and Training been implemented at colleges; if not, what plans are in place to (a) roll out and (b) enforce the implementation of this policy at TVET colleges; if so, to what extent has the policy been implemented; (2) whether his department has appointed any permanent staff members in the (a) 2014-15 and (b) 2015-16 financial years that do not meet the policy requirements; if so, why were these staff members appointed?
Reply:
1. The Policy on Professional Qualifications for Lecturers in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) provides a set of qualifications for TVET college lecturers that are aligned to the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework, to be offered by universities. Universities are in the process and being supported to develop and offer the qualifications. Once the qualifications have been developed, it must be submitted to the Department for compliance evaluation with the policy, thereafter sent to the Council on Higher Education for accreditation. Thus far, one qualification has received accreditation and the University of the Western Cape is offering the Postgraduate Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching for the first time in 2017. It should be noted that the Department only took over the employment of lecturers from 1 April 2015 from colleges. Further, the Department is engaging with the Department of Public Service and Administration to provide for occupational specific conditions of service for lecturers as they were transferred into public service posts and not into educator posts.
Furthermore, the matter of minimum qualifications for lecturers is a matter of mutual interest with Unions and due to the change of status of lecturers to public service employees, the specific bargaining chamber needs to be established through Labour Relations and Public Service legislation.
The table below shows the qualifications that are being developed by specific universities.
UNIVERSITY |
TVET PROGRAMMES |
1. Cape Peninsula University of Technology |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
2. Central University of Technology |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
3. Durban University of Technology |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
4. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
5. Tshwane University of Technology |
Bachelor of Education in Technical and Vocational Teaching and Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
6. University of Fort Hare |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
7. University of Free State |
Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching and Bachelor of Education in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
8. University of Johannesburg |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
9. University of Pretoria |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
10. University of the Western Cape |
Postgraduate Diploma in Technical and Vocational Education |
11. University of the Witwatersrand |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
12. Vaal University of Technology |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
13. Walter Sisulu University |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
14. University of KwaZulu-Natal |
Advanced Diploma in Technical and Vocational Teaching |
2. (a) The Department did not employ any lecturers in the 2014/15 financial year as they were still under the employ of colleges. Lecturers were transferred from colleges to the Department on 1 April 2015.
(b) Due to lecturers being employed in terms of the Public Service Act, there are no measures for the employment of lecturers, however priority is given in the recruitment process to ensure that qualified lecturers are employed in terms of the Policy on Professional Qualifications for Lecturers in Technical and Vocational Education and Training.
In 2014, the Department conducted a profile survey on TVET lecturer qualifications in which over 7 000 lecturers participated. Just under 7% of the lecturers were found to be unqualified as prescribed by the policy. However, College Councils employed most of these lecturers because of the scarce skills in certain subjects offered at TVET colleges. Most of these being artisan lecturers.
The Department is further in the process of conducting a detailed survey of lecturer qualifications and competencies in order to develop a comprehensive plan of lecturer development and support going forward. The survey will be completed and analysed by June 2017. It is important to point out that notwithstanding the outcome of the survey, the Department will have to secure funds to ensure that lecturers are upgraded to the minimum required level if they are not fully qualified.
It is acknowledged that colleges are not always able to recruit ideal lecturers for teaching in specific subjects and programmes. Some appointees may lack the professional qualifications but have the requisite technical or academic knowledge. In such instances, colleges are required to support lecturers to fill their professional gaps and/or competencies, in terms of the Individual Lecturer Professional Development Plans, which colleges are required to develop per lecturer, since 2016. Development and training may be undertaken either through formal part/full qualifications, or through professionally directed training. Workplace based experience, where necessary, constitutes part of such training.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR-GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 599 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
04 April 2017 - NW715
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)Whether, with regard to his reply to question 165 on 7 March 2017, any funds were paid out to universities for damages due to protests during the 2016 academic year; if not, why not; if so, what amount was paid out to each of the applicable universities; (2) how did his department determine what amount should be contributed by the Government to each university to fund the 2016 zero percent fee increase; (3) did the allocations to each university for the 2016 zero percent fee increase cover the full cost of not having an increase for that year; if not, how much was the shortfall for each university?
Reply:
1.With reference to Question 165 on 7 March 2017 and as indicated in the reply, the only amount of funding that was budgeted for public universities to cover the costs of (a) damage caused by protesting students in the (i) 2015 and (ii) 2016 academic years was an amount of R40.496 million in 2015/16 towards damages at five historically disadvantaged universities, i.e. the Universities of Fort Hare (R8 million), Zululand (R4.5 million), Western Cape (R25.858 million), Walter Sisulu (R351 287) and Limpopo (R1.786 million). Some universities have claimed or are in the process of claiming from their insurance or have used their own funds to cover the cost of damages at their institutions.
2.The agreement reached on a “no fee increase” (0%) in October 2015 between government (represented by the President, Minister of Higher Education and Training and other Cabinet Ministers), universities (represented by the Chairs of University Councils and Vice-Chancellors) and student leaders included, that the funding required to enable the decision would be shared between institutions that could afford to contribute and government. The principle of cost sharing was initially based on an agreement that there would be a 70/30 share for government and universities respectively. Each university was requested to submit the financial implications for a zero percent fee increase in 2016 to Universities South Africa (USAf), who compiled a summary of the financial implications per institution and for the sector as a whole, and submitted it to the Department of Higher Education and Training. Further discussions were held with individual Vice-Chancellors and finance executives, taking into consideration the financial positions and constraints of individual universities across the system as indicated in their audited 2014 annual financial statements, to come to a final agreement on the contribution of government and each institution towards the shortfall in the universities’ budgets created by the decision.
The final amounts agreed upon varied from a 30% university contribution to a 0% contribution. Government contributed a total of 83% of the funds required through reprioritising funds, mostly from the Post-School Education and Training (PSET) system as well as from the fiscus. Government’s contribution of R1.935 billion consisted of funding taken from the Historically Disadvantaged Institutions Development earmarked grant (R362 million), Post Graduate Scholarships (R800 million), Technical and Vocational Education and Training college expansion (R473.38 million) and reprioritised from the fiscus by National Treasury (R300 million).
3. As indicated in (2), the agreement was that the financial implication would be shared between government and universities. Government (83%) and universities (17% on average) shared the financial implication of R2.330 billion required to implement the zero percent fee increase. The details per university are set out in the link below:
https://pmg.org.za/files/RNW715Table-170404.docx
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 715 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
03 April 2017 - NW708
Kopane, Ms SP to ask the Minister of Tourism
(1)Did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017; if so, what amount was spent in each case; (2) did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the auction of the (i) souvenirs or (ii) personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if so, (aa) which items were purchased and (bb) at what cost, in each case?
Reply:
1. (a) No, the Department did not participate.
2. (a) No, the Department did not participate.
Souvenirs |
Personal belongings |
(i) No |
(i) No |
(aa) Not applicable |
(aa) Not applicable |
(bb) Not applicable |
(bb) Not applicable |
1. (b) No, SA Tourism did not participate.
2. (a) No, SA Tourism did not participate.
Souvenirs |
Personal belongings |
(i) No |
(i) No |
(aa) Not applicable |
(aa) Not applicable |
(bb) Not applicable |
(bb) Not applicable |
03 April 2017 - NW509
Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Energy
Whether any framework agreements were signed between Eskom and (a) her department, (b) the Department of Public Enterprises, (c) the independent power producer (IPP) office and (d) individual IPPs to procure independent power producer projects; if not, (i) why not and (ii) what are the relevant details; if so, will she provide Mr G Mackay with copies of each framework agreement?
Reply:
(a) ,(b), (c), (i)
Yes, during November 2012, the Ministers of Finance, Energy and Public Enterprises entered into a Government Support Framework Agreement (GSFA) with Eskom as the buyer of electricity produced by IPPs. The GSFA contains the framework within which the Government shall make support available to Eskom in an event it cannot meet its obligation under the Power Purchase Agreement with the IPP. The Independent Power Producers Office is represented by the Department of Energy in the agreement. Such financial assistance is regarded as financial guarantee to Eskom.
In addition, the Regulatory Framework under Nersa allows the IPP cost incurred by Eskom to be a pass through to the electricity end-user with Eskom as the conduit and with no financial implications on Eskom. Any IPP procurement is added to the list from time to time in accordance with the procurement framework outlined under Section 34 of the Electricity Regulation Act.
The following project agreements have been signed with IPPs to date as part of the IPP procurement process:
A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) that is signed between Eskom and the individual IPPs at the time of financial close. The PPA is a commercial that determines contractual obligations in terms of power delivery by the IPPs (as Seller) and payments by Eskom (as Buyer). To date, 64 IPP projects have signed Power Purchase Agreements, totaling a contractual obligation by IPPs to deliver 4 001 MW of electricity to the grid.
An Implementation Agreement (IA) is signed between the Department of Energy and the individual IPPs at financial close. The IA determines contractual obligations by the Seller in relation to socio-economic and enterprise development commitments over the life-time of the project as well as the Government support to Eskom in an event of default by Eskom.
(ii) The PPA and IA with each IPP are confidential as they contain pricing information that could be used by competitors in future IPP bidding rounds. Nonetheless, we have enclosed the GSF Agreement a prototype PPA/IA.
03 April 2017 - NW691
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(1)Did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017; if so, what amount was spent in each case; (2) did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the auction of the (i) souvenirs or (ii) personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if so, (aa) which items were purchased and (bb) at what cost, in each case?
Reply:
The question was forwarded to the Department and the entities who responded as follows:
Department of Home Affairs
(1)(a) No.
(2)(a) No.
Government Printing works
(1)(b) No.
(1)(b) No.
Electoral Commission
(1)(b) No.
(1)(b) No.
03 April 2017 - NW508
Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Energy
(1)Whether any plans are being considered for the upgrading of the Killarney Milnerton Storage Tank site; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) why was the construction of new private sector funded clean fuel storage tanks, which is currently being built by a certain company (details furnished), prioritised over the upgrade of the Killarney Milnerton Storage Tank site, that would have added a significant revenue stream to the Strategic Fuel Fund (SFF); (3) has the SFF considered the privatisation and sale of the Killarney Milnerton Storage Tank site? NW565E
Reply:
1. As per 5-year SFF Corporate Plan developed for the period commencing 01 April 2017, SFF is planning to undertake technical feasibility work in the new financial year. The objective of this technical feasibility study is to ascertain the technical requirements for re-commissioning the terminal and also the operating philosophy that will ensure that the terminal operations are within safety limits in light of the recent property developments within the vicinity of the terminal.
(2) SFF The private sector Clean Fuel Storage Tanks Project was never prioritised over the upgrade of the Milnerton Storage Tank Site.
In the second half of calendar year 2014, the oil prices started to fall and only then could a business case of refurbishing the Milnerton Terminal be justifiable hence in compliance with procurement prescripts, SFF went out on a public tender for services of a company that can carry out Integrity Tank Testing (which was to inform a Refurbishment Plan for the Milnerton Terminal) on the 9th of November 2014. From this procurement process, a service provider was selected and they partly carried out the service till its contract ran out in May 2016.
The Milnerton terminal is currently certified to handle crude oil only and the Burgan Oil terminal is certified for Clean Petroleum Products, hence it was possible for NERSA to grant the construction license for such infrastructure to be developed. These two terminals are not competing and are therefore serving two different markets i.e. Clean Products and Crude Oil. Upon the completion of the refurbishment program, SFF will generate revenues from the crude oil customer base.
In recognition of the fact that SFF can fulfill its mandate of Security of Supply for the country quicker when it is holding Clean Fuels than Crude Oil, when an opportunity arose to participate in a Clean Fuels Project, SFF did put support for the project with an intention to further its Security of Supply Mandate and we must mention that SFF has never invested any cash in this venture.
(3) The privatisation or the sale of the Milnerton terminal is not in the 5-year SFF Corporate Plan. The Corporate Plan is a 5 year strategic road map for SFF. In this Corporate Plan SFF intends to continue with the Integrity Tank Testing and eventually refurbish and re-commission the Terminal and earn revenues from it.
03 April 2017 - NW693
Grootboom, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017; if so, what amount was spent in each case; 2) did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the auction of the (i) souvenirs or (ii) personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if so, (aa) which items were purchased and (bb) at what cost, in each case?
Reply:
- Neither the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DoJ&CD) nor its entities (National Prosecuting Authority, Special Investigating Unit, the Office of the Chief Justice and Legal Aid South Africa) and the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) participated in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017.
- Neither the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DoJ&CD) and the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) nor its entities participated in the auction of the souvenirs or personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma.
03 April 2017 - NW88
Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Finance
(1)What is the current status of the Municipal Financial Recovery Service; (2) (a) how many financial recovery plans were imposed on municipalities in terms of section 139(1) of the Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, Act 56 of 2003, in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) what was the outcome of the imposed recovery plan in each case; (3) whether each municipality further defaulted on their obligations after the intervention of the Municipal Financial Recovery Service; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (4) whether any (a) disciplinary and/or (b) other action was instituted against each accounting officer in each defaulting municipality for their failure to comply with the terms of section 65(2)(e) of the specified Act; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
1. The Municipal Finance Recovery Service (MFRS) was established in 2007 as a Directorate in the National Treasury within the Office of the Accountant-General in the Chief Directorate: Municipal Financial Management Act (MFMA) Implementation as required in terms of Chapter 13 of the MFMA. The MFRS has a staff complement of 2 officials which consist of a Director and Deputy-Director, whose functions are assisted by other officials and specialist’s experts, when required.
2. The responsibility to intervene in terms of section 139(1) of MFMA lies with the Provincial Executive. During the period 2013/14 to 2015/16 the provincial executive has not invoked section 139(1) of MFMA relating to mandatory intervention as regulated in the MFMA.
However, during ongoing engagements on the implementation of chapter 13, matters relating to the effectiveness of provincial intervention were raised with Provincial Treasuries (PTs), National and Provincial Departments of Cooperative Governance (DCoG), and South African Local Government Association (SALGA). The MFRS requested provinces to approach the MFRS unit for assistance, when required.
The following municipalities were assisted in the preparation of financial recovery plans:
- 2013/14 - Mbombela local municipality and Bushbuckridge local municipality
- 2014/15 - Makana local municipality and Baphalaborwa local municipality
- 2015/16 - Tswaing local municipality, NgakaModiri Molema District municipality and Thabazimbi local municipality
The plans are holistic in nature covering, amongst others, institutional, organisational, human resources, service delivery, and financial management including restructuring of budgets, tariffs, administration, capacity and oversight by councils on its implementation. They highlight implementation aspects covering short, medium and long term challenges. Provinces are required to monitor progress and report accordingly to provincial legislatures.
3. The municipalities who were assisted with the preparation of financial recovery plans have with the assistance of the Provincial Treasuries commenced engagements with creditors to conclude realistic payment arrangements.
4. The MFMA provides the enabling legal framework for addressing financial misconduct within municipalities. The MFMA clearly defines when the accounting officer and other officials commit acts of financial misconduct. Therefore, the MFMA sets out the “triggers” for determining whether or not an accounting officer or any of the other municipal officials have committed financial misconduct.
It is important to note that the MFMA merely sets the basis for any action to be taken against municipal officials for acts of financial misconduct. The responsibility for acting against the officials, given the employer / employee relationship, vests with the respective municipal councils. The Minister of Finance has promulgated the Municipal Regulations on Financial Misconduct Procedures and Criminal Proceedings in May 2014 to assist municipal councils with executing the latter’s responsibilities. Information regarding whether or not the municipal councils of these defaulting municipalities have acted against their accounting officers or other officials is best obtained from the individual municipalities. The reforms also include disclosure in Annual Reports of actions taken. These reforms are been implemented by municipalities and are subject to the compliance audit undertaken by the Auditor-General.
03 April 2017 - NW686
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Energy
(1)Did (a) her department or (b) any entity reporting to her participate in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017; if so, what amount was spent in each case; (2) did (a) her department or (b) any entity reporting to her participate in the auction of the (i) souvenirs or (ii) personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr. Jacob G Zuma; if so, (aa) which items were purchased and (bb) at what cost, in each case?
Reply:
- (a & b) The Department of Energy and its entities did not participate in the dialogue with the President unpacking of SoNA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017;
- (a &b) The Department of Energy and its entities did not participate in the auction of (i) Souvenirs or (ii) personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr. Jacob G Zuma.
03 April 2017 - NW652
Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)With regard to the secondment of Mr Collins Letsoalo from her department to the Passenger Rail Agengy of South Africa as its acting Group Chief Executive Officer (GCEO) in 2016, (a) what were the conditions on perks, remuneration and benefits for the specified person, (b) what perks and/or remuneration by month were awarded to the specified person over and above the conditions of the secondment, (c) what were the reasons for the perks, (d) what is she and/or her department doing to recoup these perks, remuneration and benefits from the specified person; (2) (a) what plans are in place to charge any official(s) in this regard, (b) who will be charged and (c) for what reasons will the specified official(s) be charged in each instance? (3) (a) what plans are in place to replace Mr Collins Letsoalo and (b) what is the total amount budgeted for this purpose?
Reply:
1 (a) The Acting Chief Executive Officer (AGCEO), Mr Collins Letsoalo was appointed, by the Board, to the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa following his secondment by the Minister of Transport.
The Board and Mr Letsoalo entered into an agreement dated the 07 July 2016 under the following conditions:
The effective date being 01 July 2017 until further notice or until a permanent GCEO is appointed.
PRASA would pay an annualized salary rate applicable to this position – the annualized salary rate applicable to this position is currently R5, 986,140.07 (498 845 p/m) which is a cost to company package.
The AGCEO is eligible to receive all the benefits applicable to this position – the current benefits applicable to this position include:
Medical Aid (compulsory, but can opt out if covered in spouse Medical Aid scheme). – Mr Letsoalo did not exercise this option at PRASA.
Provident Fund (to be structured from package) - Mr Letsoalo did not exercise this option at PRASA.
Funeral Cover (to be structured from package) - Mr Letsoalo did not exercise this option at PRASA.
13th cheque (optional and to be structured from package) - Mr Letsoalo did not exercise this option at PRASA.
Car and VIP protection (subject to fringe benefit tax).
Car allowance (to be structured from package) Mr Letsoalo did not exercise this option at PRASA.
Performance Bonus (if declared) - No bonuses have been declared at PRASA
A company cellular phone on an unlimited package (open line) - Mr Letsoalo did not exercise this option at PRASA.
Executive cover (for all executives) Mr Letsoalo did not exercise this option at PRASA.
(b) There were no perks that were awarded to the AGCEO that were above the conditions of secondment.
(c) There were no perks that were awarded to the AGCEO that were above the conditions of secondment.
(d) There is at present no need or reason to recoup any perks, remuneration and benefit from the specified person
(2) (a) The board upon the request from the minister has initiated an investigation and once this has been concluded the outcome will be addressed accordingly.
(b) This aspect will be known once the investigation has been concluded.
(c) This aspect will be known once the investigation has been concluded.
(3) (a) The board had already advertised the Group Chief Executive Officer position and the advert closed on the 15/03/2017. The next steps are the interview process (the approach and the appointment).
(b) R5, 986,140.07 (498 845 p/m) which is a cost to company package.
03 April 2017 - NW637
Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether a certain person (details furnished) signed a declaration of interests when he was appointed to the specified position; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will the specified person sign a declaration of interests; if so, (2) Did the specified person declare the golf clubs and bag that he received as a gift from a certain person (name furnished); if so, (3) Whether any action has been taken against the specified person for accepting the gift, if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
- The DPP South Gauteng has duly signed declarations of interest annually, since his appointment to this position in 2011/12, to date.
- I am informed that, the person denies claims that he ever received any gifts, including golf clubs and bags, from Mr Brett Kebble. He states that he has never met Mr Kebble.
- In light of the response in (2) above, this question does not arise.
03 April 2017 - NW454
Bucwa, Ms H to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
Whether his department procured any services from and/or made any payments to (a) Mr Mzwanele Manyi, (b) the Progressive Professionals Forum, (c) the Decolonisation Fund and/or (d) the Black Business Council; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what (i) services were procured, (ii) was the total cost, (iii) is the detailed breakdown of such costs, (iv) was the total amount paid, (v) was the purpose of the payments and (vi) is the detailed breakdown of such payments in each case?
Reply:
The Department of Home Affairs has not procured any services from the person or entities listed as there has been no need to do so.
03 April 2017 - NW382
McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Finance
Has any investigation been conducted into the cost of administering the provisions of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, Act 38 of 2001, by the (a) Government or (b) private sector; if not, (i) why not and (ii) are there any plans to conduct such an investigation; if so, (aa) by whom, (bb) at what cost and (cc) what were the results?
Reply:
(a)(i), (a)(ii)
The Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) is responsible for the bulk of the activities related to the administration of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 2001 (FIC Act), with the support of a range of other entities such as the relevant Supervisory Bodies and the law enforcement and security agencies, as well as the South African Revenue Service. Comprehensive cost analyses of the functioning of the FIC are done annually in terms of budgeting processes. The total cost of the functioning of the FIC from the entity’s inception to the end of the 2015/2016 financial year is R1 644 786 000.00, which constitutes the major portion of the costs of the administration of the FIC Act.
Additional activities which are relevant to the administration of the FIC Act relate to the functions of supervisory bodies in overseeing compliance with the Act. A variety of entities participate with the FIC in this aspect of the administration of the FIC Act. In the majority of cases the amount of resources these entities expend on the relevant activities associated with the administration of the FIC Act are integrated into the costs of them performing their core functions as supervisory bodies. The figures relating to these amounts are not readily available to the FIC or the National Treasury which makes such an analysis impossible. A complete cost analysis of these aspects of the administration of the FIC Act, in addition to the cost of the functioning of the FIC, has therefore not been done.
(b)(i), (b)(ii)
The private sector is not involved in functions to administer the provisions of the FIC Act. However, certain sectors of financial and other institutions are required to comply with obligations pursuant to the provisions of the FIC Act. It is not known to the FIC or the National Treasury whether the private sector (or any part thereof) has investigated the cost to the sector (or part thereof) of compliance with these requirements, nor is it known whether the private sector (or any part thereof) plans to conduct such an investigation.
Various bodies have at times referred to amounts relating to the cost of compliance with the FIC Act. However, the bases for determining these amounts, whether they relate directly and exclusively to compliance with the requirements of the FIC Act (as opposed to broader fraud protection, tax regulation and other regulatory requirements) and whether they reflect costs of specific bodies or the costs across sectors of financial and other institutions, have not been shared with the FIC or the National Treasury. This makes these figures unreliable as an indicator of the cost of implementation of the FIC Act.
03 April 2017 - NW459
Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
Whether his department procured any services from and/or made any payments to (a) Mr Mzwanele Manyi, (b) the Progressive Professionals Forum, (c) the Decolonisation Fund and/or (d) the Black Business Council; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what (i) services were procured, (ii) was the total cost, (iii) is the detailed breakdown of such costs, (iv) was the total amount paid, (v) was the purpose of the payments and (vi) is the detailed breakdown of such payments in each case?
Reply:
a) No (b) No (c) No and/or (d) No; because there was no contractual obligation to pay nor services procured in both (a)-(d),
b) (i)(ii) (iii) (iv)(v) (vi) Falls away
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
03 April 2017 - NW381
McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Finance
(1)What measurable impact has been made regarding the prevention of (a) money laundering and (b) fraud in South Africa since the introduction of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, Act 38 of 2001; (2) have any studies been conducted on the impact of the specified Act; if not, (a) why not, (b) are there any plans to conduct such an impact assessment and (c) what are the reasons for the continued application of the provisions in the specified Act; if so, (i) by whom, (ii) at what cost and (iii) what were the results?
Reply:
(1) Many different public entities are responsible for implementation of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 38 of 2001 (“FIC Act”), each within their area of jurisdiction. These include the relevant Supervisory Bodies, the law enforcement and security agencies, as well as the South African Revenue Service. The impact of these entities in relation to the FIC Act are reported upon in their respective annual reports and other documents. The Financial Intelligence Centre (“FIC”) can provide an indication of the measurable impact concerning the prevention of money laundering in the period April 2011 to end of March 2016, during which period the FIC:
i) initiated and disseminated 3,908 financial intelligence products to law enforcement and other partner authorities for investigation, with an estimated value of R96.97 billion;
ii) responded to 7,753 requests for information concerning domestic and international criminal investigations in 50 different crime categories;
iii) produced 107 affidavits to support various types of judicial action by the state; and
iv) blocked R794 million worth of suspected proceeds of crime, enabling the return of the funds to rightful owners.
It should be noted that fraud, as a crime category, is an instance of a predicate offence which may generate proceeds of crime and could lead to money laundering, but is not itself expressly included in the objectives of the Act.
The ability to conduct studies to measure the impact of measures introduced of the FIC Act is circumscribed by the extensive nature of the issues and the interlocking elements which, together, make up the anti-money laundering and combatting of terrorism (“AML/ CFT”) framework.
Various attempts have been made by countries and international bodies to determine the extent of money laundering in money terms, as well as the impact of the global standards introduced to prevent money laundering. None of the models used has provided a satisfactory answer.
(2)(a)(b)
Neither the FIC nor the National Treasury have conducted studies on the impact of the FIC Act, nor do the FIC or National Treasury plan to do so. It is not known to the FIC or the National Treasury whether bodies in civil society or the private sector have conducted such a study or plan to do so.
Various bodies have at times referred to amounts relating to the cost of compliance with provisions of the FIC Act. However, the bases for determining these amounts, whether they relate directly and exclusively to compliance with the requirements of the FIC Act (as opposed to broader fraud protection, tax regulation and other regulatory requirements) and whether they reflect costs of specific bodies or the costs across sectors of financial and other institutions, have not been shared with the FIC or the National Treasury. This makes these figures unreliable as an indicator of the cost of implementation of the FIC Act.
(2)(b)
South Africa is fully committed to safeguarding its financial system from being exploited for the purpose of facilitating illicit financial activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing.
It should be borne in mind that the FIC Act is one of a number of pieces of legislation that are aimed at facilitating the protection of the integrity of the financial system, on the one hand, and also the administration of the criminal justice system, on the other. It is a wide-ranging framework with different inter-locking components which cannot be seen in isolation from one another. (Other parts of the legislative framework include the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA), the Protection of Constitutional Democracy Against Terrorism and Related Acts (POCDATARA) the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act (PRECCA) and all of the legislation relating to supervision and oversight of the various industry sectors which fall within the anti-money laundering framework, including banks, financial services, casinos and gambling, property and estate agents, lawyers and accountants).
Compliance with the requirements of the FIC Act promotes both objectives mentioned above and thus contributes to making it more difficult for criminals to hide their illicit proceeds in the formal financial sector and to cut off the resources available to terrorism.
The whole framework of measures against money laundering and terrorist financing described above (including the FIC Act) is South Africa’s implementation of global standards. Without these measures the South African financial system will be exposed to exploitation for criminal purposes and South African private sector institutions will not be able to compete effectively in the global financial system. These objectives form the basis for the continued application of the provisions of the FIC Act.
03 April 2017 - NW337
Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Basic Education
With regard to the norms and standards which stipulate that there should be a maximum of 36 learners in a classroom at primary schools, on what basis is the Member of the Executive Council of Education in the Gauteng forcing schools to register up to 40 learners in a classroom?
Reply:
The Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) determines its educator post establishment in line with the norms provided for in terms of Gazette No. 1676 of 1998, published in Government Gazette No. 19627 of 18 December 1998 as amended by Gazette No. 1451 of 2002, published in Government Gazette No. 24077 of 15 November 2002. The GDE’s post establishment is also informed by ELRC Resolution 4 of 1995, which provides for learner to educator ratios of 40 and 35 for primary and secondary schools respectively.
03 April 2017 - NW14
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
(1)With reference to her reply to question 2105 on 25 November 2016, what was the (a) purpose, (b) target market of the advertising done on the SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) and (c) breakdown of the R4 492 250 spent in the 2015-16 financial year for (i) advertisement production and (ii) airing costs on (aa) SABC 1, (bb) SABC 2 and (cc) SABC 3;
Reply:
1 (a) The expenditure of R 4 492 250 which is referred to in the enquiry was for the broadcasting of a television advertisement. The expenditure was for airing costs of a Seda multi-media, advertising and Public Relations campaign which profiled and created awareness of Seda’s products and services to its customers and potential clients. The advertisement which was 30 seconds long, featured 438 times on these stations over a five week period.
(b) The advertisement was part of a marketing campaign to raise the level of awareness of Seda’s service offerings for SMME’s and cooperatives in the country.
(c) Breakdown of the R 4 492 250 expenditure per TV station:
Item |
Cost |
ETV |
R 1 659 635 |
SABC |
R 1 939 842 |
ENCA |
R 410 400 |
DSTV |
R 482 371 |
Total |
R 4 492 250 |
Breakdown of the advertising expenditure per TV station:
Item |
|
|
ETV |
R 1 117 136(This is the only production cost and was the money spent on producing the TV advert aired on SABC channels, ETV, ENCA and DSTV) |
R 1 659 635 |
SABC |
R 1 939 842 |
|
ENCA |
R 410 400 |
|
DSTV |
R 482 372 |
|
Total |
R 1 117 136 |
R 4 492 250 |
Note: The production cost of R1 117 136 was the only production cost and was the money spent on producing the TV advert.
Further breakdown of the SABC advertising and airing costs:
Item |
|
|
(aa)SABC 1 |
R1 117 136 (This is the only production cost and was the money spent on producing the TV advert aired on SABC channels, ETV, ENCA and DSTV) |
R 495 990 |
(bb)SABC 2 |
R 623 295 |
|
(cc) SABC 3 |
R 277 020 |
|
SABC NEWS |
R 543 587 |
|
TOTAL |
R 1 117 136 |
R 1 939 842 |
2. Post campaign analysis was done through measuring the impact of the campaign via the influx of calls to Seda’s national information centre. The impact of the campaign was measured through media reports provided by Seda’s media monitoring service.
The impact of the advertising campaign measured through Seda’s national information centre is reflected in the link below:
03 April 2017 - NW694
Grootboom, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Labour
(1)Did (a) her department or (b) any entity reporting to her participate in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017; if so, what amount was spent in each case; (2) did (a) her department or (b) any entity reporting to her participate in the auction of the (i) souvenirs or (ii) personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if so, (aa) which items were purchased and (bb) at what cost, in each case?
Reply:
1. No
2. No
03 April 2017 - NW667
Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
With reference to the Minister of Police’s replies to (a) question 3723 on 2 November 2015, (b) question 62 on 29 February 2016 and (c) oral question 98 on 25 May 2016, (i) what is the current status of the National Prosecuting Authority’s investigation into docket CAS 123/03/2014, opened at the Nkandla Police Station regarding eight charges of corruption against the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, in terms of the Prevention and Combatting of Corrupt Activities Act, Act 12 of 2004, for his alleged complicity in the alleged misappropriation of public funds to upgrade his personal residence at Nkandla, (ii) which unit is the specified investigation currently with, (iii) what are the names of the persons that have been questioned to date and (iv) by what date is it to be expected that the specified investigation will be finalized?
Reply:
- The matter which was investigated by SAPS is still under consideration by the National Prosecuting Authority.
- The matter is under consideration of the Priority Crimes Litigation Unit (PCLU) of the NPA.
- The names of potential witnesses and persons who have been questioned during the course and scope of this ongoing investigation cannot be disclosed.
- It is regrettably not possible to provide a definitive date on which this investigation is expected to be concluded.
03 April 2017 - NW507
Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Energy
(1)Whether she will furnish Mr. G Mackay with the full unabridged contract of the Strategic Fuel Fund’s sale of crude oil in December 2015; if not, why not; if so, by what date; (2) What (a) (i) statutory grounds and (ii) procurement regulations were relied on for the specified sale and (b) were the (i) quantities and (ii) grades of the various fuel stocks that were sold? NW564E
Reply:
(1) The agreements for the sale of crude oil entered into by SFF with the buyers contain confidentiality provisions that prohibit SFF from disclosing the contents of these agreements to third parties. The consent to disclose to third parties must first be obtained from the buyers before such disclosure can happen. The buyers have a right, in contract, to decline SFF’s request unless SFF is compelled in law to make a disclosure.
(2) (a)(i) National Energy Act 2008, s17(1) states that ‘The Minister may, in a prescribed manner, for the purpose of ensuring security of supply, direct any state-owned entity to […] maintain and manage national energy feedstocks’ and through s17(2) ‘the nominated state-owned entity must perform the functions in subsection 17(1) in accordance with the relevant published security of supply strategies’ and read with s17(3)(b)(ii) which states that ‘the strategies or policies contemplated in subsection 17(2) may contain but not be limited to the conditions under which withdrawals may be made from such strategic energy feedstocks’.
2(a)(ii) Procurement regulations apply to procurement of goods and services, the sale was governed by subsection 54(2)(d) Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 which states that ‘Before a public entity concludes an [acquisition or disposal of a significant asset], the accounting authority of the public entity must promptly and in writing inform the relevant treasury of the transaction and submit relevant particulars of the transaction to its executive authority for approval of the transaction.’
2(b)(i) 10 million barrels;
2(b)(ii) Bonny Light and Basrah blend.
03 April 2017 - NW644
Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
With respect to children who are affected by the choices their parents make by illegally immigrating to South Africa, what are the rights of children or minors whose parents have moved to South Africa illegally to join the working class, in light of the fact that the specified children are now prevented from (a) writing matric, (b) opening bank accounts and (c) contributing to the economy?
Reply:
Children of parents who are in South Africa illegally are expected to return to their home countries as a family unit either voluntarily or by deportation as per section 34(1) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. This section provides for the arrest and deportation of an illegal foreigner. The rights provided to the children would also be in line with the family unit by allowing for the right to appeal against the deportation or request the deportation to be confirmed by a warrant of a court. The detention of such a family would be at a place of safety pending their removal from South Africa.
31 March 2017 - NW627
Stubbe, Mr DJ to ask the Minister of State Security
With reference to his statement made at the press briefing by the Justice, Crime Prevention and Security Cluster on 5 March 2017, (a) what are the reasons that his department is considering taking measures to regulate social media platforms, (b) when does his department plan on implementing such measures and (d) which avenues will be used to implement these measures?
Reply:
a) We’ve maintained that information-sharing via the electronic web or cyberspace has revolutionized our world and the way in which we interact with each other. It has brought exciting opportunities in developing our economies, improving our health care, education, agricultural production, the provision of services to name but a few. These opportunities are endless. However, on the same breath, there are real threats that have manifested themselves in the same space, which if left unchecked can destabilize our use of this space and result in untold harm to individuals, corporates and governments. These include amongst others, cybercrime activities, human trafficking, defamation, child pornography and the like. The concern is to isolate and deal with those individuals who have nefarious intentions and want to use cyberspace and its platforms to propagate such.
b) The intention of sharing such a view during that media briefing referred to in the Hon Members’ question was to allow South Africans to have an honest discussion and debate on this matter. On the occasion of the processing, by Parliament this year, of the Cyber Crime and Cyber Security Bill, the public will be able to make their input heard as we all have a responsibility to secure our cyberspace and all its related platforms.
(c) As indicated in (b) above, a process involving public participation will ensue as part of developing the appropriate regulatory framework.
31 March 2017 - NW575
Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications
(1)With reference to her reply to question 143 on 28 February 2017, (a) over how many days was each specified training session offered, (b) on which dates did the training sessions take place and (c) what is the curriculum breakdown of the content of each training session; (2) (a) what were the (i) rental costs for each venue hired for each training session and (ii) final costs of each training session and (c) for how many days was each venue hired in each case; (3) (a) what is the total number of persons who attended each training session offered from each of the three radio stations and (b) where did each training session take place? NW633E
Reply:
Training conducted |
Training provider |
1(a) No of days |
1(b) Dates of training |
1(c) Breakdown of schedule |
2(a)(i) rental costs |
2(a)(ii) total costs |
2(c) training duration |
3(a) people trained |
3(b) venue training |
Content Development |
SASJA/SAASTA |
2 days |
19 - 20 February 2016 |
Science journalism training / reporting |
Held as SAASTA training venue. No cost incurred |
R184 000 |
2 days |
N/A |
N/A |
Governance
|
WITS University |
2015 academic year |
2015 academic year – phased sessions |
Advanced radio certificate and station advisory mentoring service |
Held at the WITS University. No cost incurred |
R674 300 |
2015 academic year |
5 persons per station for the 3 stations |
WITS Radio Academy and on site |
Grantee Orientation |
MDDA |
3 days |
30, 31 March and 1 April 2016 |
|
R471 345 |
R707 000 |
3 days |
N/A |
N/A |
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
31 March 2017 - NW569
Marais, Mr EJ to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)(a) How many independent schools have been identified as operating illegally in each province, (b) how many of the specified schools have been closed down since 1 January 2014, (c) what are the names of the schools and (d) how many of the schools cater for learners with disabilities; (2) (a) how many independent schools received assistance from the relevant education department in each province to get legal registration since 1 January 2014, (b) what are the names of the specified schools and (c) how many of the schools cater for learners with disabilities; (3) what is the turnaround time to register an independent school in each province; (4) which provincial education departments have (a) posted the list of names of all registered independent schools together with their registration numbers on the website of her department and (b) placed policy documents on the website that regulate the registration of independent schools?
Reply:
(1)
|
(1)(a) How many independent schools have been identified as operating illegally in each province |
(1)(b) how many of the specified schools have been closed down since 1 January 2014, |
(1)(c) what are the names of the schools |
(1)(d) how many of the schools cater for learners with disabilities |
---|---|---|---|---|
EC |
66 |
4 |
See Annexure A |
0 |
FS |
1 |
0 |
See Annexure A |
The school indicated that it was assisting learners with disabilities but the owner did not want to follow the correct procedures for school registration. |
GP |
23 |
The 23 schools were served to cease operation |
See Annexure A |
5 |
KZN |
The province has no such schools, they are not known |
1 |
See Annexure A |
0 |
LP |
9 |
0; The nine have submitted applications for registration. Site visits have been conducted for all to verify compliance to the registration requirements. The schools will soon be informed of their registration status. |
See Annexure A |
1 |
MP |
As soon as it is established that a school is operating without registration, the necessary action is taken to correct the situation. In cases where the non-compliance areas are too many, the owner/applicant is requested to seize the operation with immediate effect. Most of the time ‘illegally operating’ schools are guided and supported to become compliant. |
0 |
See Annexure A |
N/A |
NC |
4 |
0; These are all newly established. Necessary legal procedures will be followed before they are closed down. Where guidance and support is necessary, it will be rendered so that they comply with the policy prescripts |
See Annexure A |
0 |
NW |
11 |
All 11 schools mentioned in (a) were served with letters to cease operation |
See Annexure A |
0 |
WC |
31 |
11 schools were closed; 5 were registered, and some became tutor centres that tutored learners who were Home Schooled, others just disappeared |
See Annexure A |
1; Although the school has subsequently been registered |
(2)
|
2(a) how many independent schools received assistance from the relevant education department in each province to get legal registration since 1 January 2014 |
2(b) what are the names of the specified schools |
2(c) how many of the schools cater for learners with disabilities |
EC |
1 |
See Annexure B |
0 |
FS |
5 |
See Annexure B |
5; They do not have special classes for learners with disabilities however; learners experiencing learning barriers are provided with remedial lessons. |
GP |
23 |
See Annexure B |
5 |
KZN |
0 |
See Annexure B |
N/A |
LP |
21 |
See Annexure B |
2 |
MP |
10 |
See Annexure B |
Provision for disability is a requirement for registration. Sufficient proof must be given that learners with especially physical disabilities will be catered for. |
NC |
5 |
See Annexure B |
All the schools cater for learners with disabilities in an integrated manner. They are not specializing nor discriminating. |
NW |
11 |
See Annexure B |
0 |
WC |
45 |
See Annexure B |
1 |
(3)
What is the turnaround time to register an independent school in each province |
|
EC |
90 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
FS |
90 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
GP |
90 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
KZN |
90 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
LP |
9 Months |
MP |
90 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
NC |
30 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
NW |
90 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
WC |
90 days, if all requirements for registration are met |
(4)
|
(a) which provincial education departments have posted the list of names of all registered independent schools together with their registration numbers on the website of her department |
(b) which provincial education departments have placed policy documents on the website that regulate the registration of independent schools |
EC |
Yes |
Yes |
FS |
Yes |
No. The documents were available on the website but they were not uploaded when the system was updated. Follow-ups with EMIS and IT to have the addressed. |
GP |
Yes |
Yes |
KZN |
No |
Yes |
LP |
Yes |
Yes |
MP |
No |
Yes |
NC |
No |
No |
NW |
Yes |
Yes |
WC |
No. The names of all registered independent schools were published in a Provincial Extraordinary Gazette |
No. The matter will be addressed |
31 March 2017 - NW706
Kalyan, Ms SV to ask the Minister of State Security
Did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017; if so, what amount was spent in each case; (2) Did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the auction of the (i) souvenirs or (ii) personal belonging of the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if so, (aa) which items were purchased and (bb) at what cost, in each case?
Reply:
1. (a) No
(b) No
2. (a) No
(b) No
(i) No
(ii) No
(aa) No
(bb) No
31 March 2017 - NW674
Bara, Mr M R to ask the Minister of Police
(1)(a)What is the current status of the investigation into CAS 503/6/2015 opened at the KwaMashu Police Station, (b) what are the offences contained in the specified docket and (c) what is the (i) rank and (ii) name of the investigating officer; (2) whether any suspects have been arrested to date; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) whether any (a) suspects or (b) witnesses have been interviewed; if not, why not, in each case; if so, (i) on what date and (ii) what are the further relevant details in each case; (4) when is the investigation anticipated to be finalised?
Reply:
(1)(a) The investigation into the case docket, KwaMashu CAS 503/06/2015, was concluded and a court date was set for 24 April 2017, at the Ntuzuma Regional Court.
(1)(b) The charge in the case docket is Rape, in terms of Section 3 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 (Act No 32 of 2007).
(1)(c)(i)(ii) The details of the investigating officer cannot be disclosed, in order to allow the investigation to be conducted without fear or favour.
(2) Yes, one suspect was arrested.
(3)(a)(i)(ii) Yes, the suspect was interviewed on 19 November 2015 and appeared before court on 23 November 2015.
(3)(b)(i)(ii) Yes, the victim was interviewed on 29 June 2015 and 7 July 2015 and the witnesses were interviewed on 29 June 2015, 20 January 2016, 5 March 2016 and 1 April 2016.
(4) The SAPS’s investigation has been concluded and the matter is on the court roll for trial.
31 March 2017 - NW374
Tarabella - Marchesi, Ms NI to ask the Minister of State Security
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) him and (ii) his deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-2015 and (bbb) 2015-2016 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016.
Reply:
Minister of State Security:
Make |
Model |
Year Model |
Price |
Purchase date |
Financial Year |
Comments |
Mercedes Benz |
S 350 |
2015 |
R 1 317 517.47 |
17/11/2015 |
2015/2016 |
Mercedes Benz |
Deputy Minister of State Security:
Make |
Model |
Year Model |
Price |
Purchase date |
Financial Year |
Comments |
Jeep |
Grand Cherokee 3.6L |
2014 |
R626 661.00 |
12/08/2014 |
2014/2015 |
Official vehicle Gauteng |
Jeep |
Grand Cherokee LTD |
2015 |
R547 320.00 |
31/03/2015 |
2014/2015 |
Official vehicle Western Cape |
No vehicles have been procured since 1 April 2016 to date.
31 March 2017 - NW544
Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)What are the reasons that (a) the part-time teachers teaching at the National School of the Arts have not had any salary increase since 2011 and (b) salaries of the specified teachers get paid late every month; (2) on what date of each month are the part-time teachers supposed to receive their salaries?
Reply:
1. (a) The Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) is currently investigating the matter. The response will be forwarded as soon as the information is received from the GDE.
It must be noted that the payment of salaries of educators employed on a part-time basis are paid an hourly rate that is regulated in terms of the Personnel Administration Measures (GG No. 39684). The regulation determines the rate and the calculation of such rate which is adjusted annually in terms of the cost of living adjustment process.
(b) The teachers in question do not receive a regular monthly salary. They are paid on an hourly rate according to the hours they worked using the system of submitting claims. Claims are submitted at the end of the month and payment can only be made once claims have been submitted and processed. The date of payment may vary for individuals depending on the date on which they submitted their claims.
(2) The claims for salaries are processed and paid within 7(seven) days after they have been received from the claiming teacher. On average, the claims are paid within 10 working days after the end of the month.
31 March 2017 - NW563
Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What are the details of the total remuneration package received by a certain officer (details furnished) of the SA Council for Educators for the 2015-16 financial year, including the (a) basic remuneration, (b) car allowance, (c) accommodation allowance, (d) credit card allowance and (e) cellphone allowance?
Reply:
The total remuneration was structured as follows:
- Basic remuneration: R 997 331
- Car allowance: R 415 557
- Accommodation Allowance R 78 002
- Credit card allowance R NIL
- Cell phone Allowance R NIL
31 March 2017 - NW490
Davis, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Basic Education
With regard to a presentation by her department to the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education on 28 February 2017, in which mention was made of progress towards the decolonisation of the Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) curriculum, (a) what definition of decolonisation is being used by her department for this purpose, (b) why was the CAPS curriculum not decolonised when it was introduced in 2012 and (c) what will a fully decolonised curriculum look like?
Reply:
a) There is no specific definition of the “decolonisation” of the curriculum that the Department uses in its policy documents. Decolonisation of the curriculum has been defined by different scholars and different sources. For example, Justice Mavhundla, in his presentation to the Executive Dean of Law at UNISA, on the occasion of reflecting on the project of the decolonization of education in South Africa, reminded those present that “in the year 1994, we did not throw through the window the contaminated water in the form of apartheid with the bowl…. What this means is that as we progress further into the future, we need then to have a deliberate and progressive transformation infused in our jurisprudence to accord with the modern dictates of the epoch we leave in”.
South African society as a whole including the Education System has been subject to much influence by Colonial powers that ruled our country and this needs to be addressed in current and future curriculum revision processes.
(b) The decolonisation of curriculum is a process that started as early as 1999. When CAPS was developed in 2011, some elements again aimed at the decolonisation of the curriculum were introduced.
Principles that buttress Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) are benchmarked on South African and African contexts and they are benchmarked to match international standards. They include:
- Social transformation: ensuring that the educational imbalances of the past are redressed, and that equal educational opportunities are provided for all sections of our population;
- Active and critical learning: encouraging an active and critical approach to learning, rather than rote and uncritical learning of given truths;
- High knowledge and high skills: the minimum standards of knowledge and skills to be achieved at each grade are specified and sets high, achievable standards in all subjects;
- Progression: content and context of each grade shows progression from simple to complex;
- Human rights, inclusivity, environmental and social justice: infusing the principles and practices of social and environmental justice and human rights as defined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. The National Curriculum Statement Grades 10 – 12 (General) is sensitive to issues of diversity such as poverty, inequality, race, gender, language, age, disability and other factors;
- Valuing indigenous knowledge systems: acknowledging the rich history and heritage of this country as important contributors to nurturing the values contained in the Constitution; and
- Credibility, quality and efficiency: providing an education that is comparable in quality, breadth and depth to those of other countries.
Therefore, tremendous progress has been made from 2000-2016 to decolonise the school curriculum, however there is still more that needs to be addressed.
Therefore, tremendous progress has been made from 2000-2016 to decolonise the school curriculum, however there still more that needs to be addressed.
(c) A fully decolonized curriculum will entail a fully transformed curriculum policy regime, content of subjects, one that produces learners that are fully immersed in the indigenous knowledge system, and that which imbues a sense of pride to be an African armed with knowledge, skills and values that are internationally intelligible, and therefore equally equipped to be a proud citizen of the world and meet the skills challenges of the 21st century.
31 March 2017 - NW656
Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police
With regard to sections (a) 20(1), (b) 20(1A)(a) and (c) 21(1A)(b) of the Sexual Offences Act, Act 23 of 1957, as amended, how many (i) arrests have been made, (ii) cases have been opened, (iii) dockets were referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for a decision and (iv) dockets were finalised through an admission of guilt fine (aa) in each of the past five financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
(a)(b)(c)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(aa)(bb)
The information that is required is not readily available. Each case must be verified
before the information can be submitted. An extension of three weeks is hereby requested in order for us to provide quality and correct information.
Note that the Section 21(1A)(b) as mentioned in section (c) of the question does not exist, it might be a typing error and maybe should read 20(1A)(b).
31 March 2017 - NW565
Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)Did a certain officer (details furnished) of the SA Council for Educators sign a performance agreement for the (a) 2015-16 and (b) 2016-17 financial years; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) did the specified person receive a performance bonus for the 2015-16 financial year; if not, why not; if so, what was the amount received in rand? NW623E
Reply:
a) (a) Yes. A Performance Agreement was signed for the year 2015-16; and
(b) Yes. A Performance Agreement was signed for the year 2016-17.
b) His performance did not qualify him for a performance bonus.
31 March 2017 - NW679
Dreyer, Ms AM to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesQUESTION
(1) Did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the Dialogue with the President: Unpacking of the SONA 2017 on Radical Economic Transformation Implementation event hosted at the Oyster Box Hotel in Umhlanga, Durban, on 25 February 2017; if so, what amount was spent in each case; (2) did (a) his department or (b) any entity reporting to him participate in the auction of the (i) souvenirs or (ii) personal belongings of the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if so, (aa) which items were purchased and (bb) at what cost, in each case? NW738E
Reply:
Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF)
- DAFF did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
- DAFF did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
Agricultural Research Council (ARC)
- The ARC did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
- The ARC did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)
- The NAMC did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
- The NAMC did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB)
- The PPECB did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
- The PPECB did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP)
- The OBP did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
- The OBP did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
Fisheries Management
- Fisheries did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
- Fisheries did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
Ncera Farms
- The Ncera Farms did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
- The Ncera Farms did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
South African Veterinary Council (SAVC)
a. The SAVC Farms did not participate in the dialogue unpacking SONA 2017 with the President on the 25th of February 2017.
b. The SAVC Farms did not participate in the auction of souvenirs or personal belongings of the President.
31 March 2017 - NW504
Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Basic Education
Since her reply to oral question 117 on 24 August 2016, what progress has her department made in implementing each of the 16 recommendations made in the report of the Ministerial Task Team investigating allegations into the selling of posts of educators by members of teachers’ unions and departmental officials in provincial education departments?
Reply:
All the cases have been referred to the relevant Provincial Education Departments (PEDs) for the implementation of the recommendations of the Ministerial Task Team (MTT).
The Department has established a Special Task Team comprising of representatives from the Eastern Cape, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, North West and the Northern Cape to ensure that the recommendations are implemented and that progress reports are provided to the Minister. This team is assisted by two (2) representatives from the Department of Justice.
The progress reports from the Special Task Team will be presented at a meeting scheduled to take place in the last week of April 2017.
31 March 2017 - NW657
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
With regard to section 11 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, Act 32 of 2007, as amended, how many (a) arrests have been made, (b) arrests for prostitution have been made, (c) cases have been opened, (d) dockets were referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for a decision and (e) dockets were finalised through an admission of guilt fine for the (i) Pretoria Central and (ii) Pretoria West Police Stations in each of the past five financial years?
Reply:
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(i)(ii) The information that is required is not readily available. Each case must be verified before the information can be submitted. An extension of three weeks, is hereby requested, in order for us to provide quality and correct information.
31 March 2017 - NW636
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for the use of the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr Shaun Abrahams, since his appointment to the specified position on 18 June 2015?
Reply:
a) Make: Mercedes Benz GLE 350d SUV
b) Model: 2016
c) Price: R1 234 157.97
d) The vehicle was procured on 17 March 2016 via G Fleet as part of the RT57 Government Contract as approved by the Minister of Justice & Correctional Services on 27 January 2016.
31 March 2017 - NW478
Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
Whether he, with reference to his reply to question 1155 on 5 May 2016, (a) previously or (b) since he intervened in the sale of the Glencore mine, took similar actions to rescue mining companies and to retain jobs; if not, why did he find it expedient to intervene in this instance by virtue of his position as Minister of Mineral Resources; if so, what are the relevant details, with specific reference to (a) the companies involved, (b) his actions and (c) the outcome of the actions?
Reply:
There are several interventions that can be taken to save jobs depending on the challenges faced by the company. These interventions may include but not limited to interventions as declaration signed by the stakeholders.
Sale of assets might be considered if jobs are to be saved and two parties agrees. This intervention will always be persued if there is high probability that jobs will be saved.
I revived the Mineral and Petroleum Board (MPB) with a mandate to focus on section 52 notices
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
31 March 2017 - NW566
Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Basic Education
Was a certain person (name and details furnished) appointed to the position by the outgoing CEO; if not, by whom was the person appointed; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The Acting CEO was not appointed by the outgoing CEO. The SACE Council appointed the acting CEO.
31 March 2017 - NW489
Davis, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(a) What progress has the Ministerial Task Team which was appointed to consider the introduction of History as a compulsory subject in Grades 10, 11 and 12 made to date and (b) when is the report of the task team due to be submitted to her for consideration?
Reply:
1. The History Ministerial Task Team convened eight meetings between March and November 2016. The Task Team conducted international comparative research on India, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Nigeria, China, Tanzania, Russia & Brazil to add to the international research that was presented at the History Round-Table of 4 December 2015. Furthermore, the team made proposals to strengthen the content of History in the General Education and Training (GET) and Further Education and Training (FET) bands. This work of strengthening the content is to be consolidated in April 2017. The MTT is also planning to conduct consultative meetings in various provinces to get inputs on the strengthened History curriculum to ensure that it is representative and inclusive.
2. The final report will be released to the Minister at the end November 2017.
31 March 2017 - NW638
Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether a certain person (name and details furnished) serves on a select committee run under the auspices of the Minister of Police, Mr N P T Nhleko, and the State Security Agency; if so, (a) what amount has the specified person’s involvement in terms of (i) travel and (ii) accommodation expenses cost and (b) who bears these costs; 2) does the specified select committee meet with the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma; if so, on what basis; 3) (a) how many flights has the specified person undertaken since his appointment to the specified position, (b) how many of the flights were in business class, (c) who is responsible for the costs of these flights and (d) what amount did these flights cost; 4) (a) what amount was spent on hotel accommodation for the specified person since his appointment and (b) who is responsible for the costs of the accommodation?
Reply:
- The National Prosecuting Authority has informed me that the person was seconded to a Reference Group under the auspices of the Secretariat of the Minister of Police during the period 2014 to 2015, with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions for South Gauteng, Advocate Andrew Chauke and under former National Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr Mxolisi Nxasana. All costs were covered by the Secretariat of the Police, details of which can be obtained from the aforementioned Secretariat.
- The Reference Group did not, at any, stage meet with the Honourable President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G. Zuma.
- & (4) The required information is in the possession of the Secretariat of Police from whom same should be requested.
31 March 2017 - NW635
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether a criminal charge of rape has been placed on the court roll against a certain person (name and details furnished); if so, how has he advised the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma, to proceed in this instance?
Reply:
Neither the National Prosecuting Authority nor the South African Police Services are aware of such a complaint.
31 March 2017 - NW586
Cebekhulu, Inkosi RN to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesQUESTION
In light of the application by Monsanto South Africa (Pty) Ltd to proceed with the general release of a genetically modified multi-event maize product, MON 87460 x MON 89034 x NK603 for the entire region of South Africa, can the Minister confirm or deny that the approval of the trials was based solely on safety and efficacy reports provided by the company? (1) Whether, in light of the application by a certain company (name furnished) to proceed with the general release of a genetically modified multi-event maize product for the entire region of South Africa (details furnished), the approval of the trials was based solely on safety and efficacy reports provided by the company; if not, can he provide the list of all the independent non-industry aligned studies taken into consideration in this process; if so, why were no independent studies conducted or reviewed in this regard; (2) if the trials of both the specified company and independent studies were considered, what differentiates the outcome in South Africa from the findings made in the 39 countries where the specified products and their related herbicides are currently banned entirely; (3) whether, in view of the fact that some of our agricultural produce is exported to various countries, including the countries where the specified products and related herbicides are currently banned, he has considered the ramifications if our agricultural produce for export to these countries is affected by cross-contamination? NW644E
Reply:
No decision has been made on the application by Monsanto for general release of Genetically Modified Maize, event MON87460 x MON89034 x NK603. The application was submitted to the Registrar of the GMO Act on 28 February 2017 and a notice of the application published in three national newspaper in line with the prescribed application process. What was approved under the GMO Act is field trial for Monsanto MON87460 x MON89034 x NK603 maize. Field trials are conducted prior to submission of a general release application and the purpose of field trials is to generate safety and efficacy data. The GMO Act allows for applicants to conduct field trials within the prescripts of the Act and Monsanto conducted the field trials in the 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 planting seasons to collect the safety and efficacy data. Combined data from the two seasons of field trials now forms the basis of the application for general release.
a) and (b) In the current general release application, the safety and efficacy data is contained in the reports from the mentioned field trials. We confirm these are provided by the company in question. This information will be reviewed independently by the Advisory Committee and Executive Council in a scientifically sound manner, taking into consideration recognised risk assessment methods that are currently applied at national, regional and international level; for example, Codex Alimentarius standards.
c) The assumption is that the 39 countries referred to are part of the European Union (EU). This application has not served at EU and therefore a comparison of the outcome of the South African risk assessment cannot be compared to that of the EU. However the EU Commission has approved the individual maize events: NK603 (approved in 2015), MON89034 (approved in 2009) and MON87460 (approved in 2015) maize events for placing on the market for feed or food or for any other uses than food and feed, with the exception of cultivation.
d) South Africa has only authorised the commercialization of genetically modified maize, soybean and cotton. South Africa is a net importer of soybean and cotton. When maize is exported from South Africa, processes are in place to certify the GM status of a consignment in the instance where a country requires non-GM consignment or do not allow the entry of GM maize at all. The 39 countries have not entirely banned GMOs; they still allow imports for food/feed but not for planting
31 March 2017 - NW639
Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether (a) (Furnished details) and (b) (furnished details) resumed their duties at the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA); if so, (i) on what date did the specified persons resume their duties at the NPA and (ii) what course of action has he advised the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma, to take in each case?
Reply:
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) informed me that (the persons details furnished) are on special leave and they have not resumed their duties at the NPA. They were granted leave to appeal by the North Gauteng High Court and the President of the Republic communicated in public that he will await the conclusion of the court processes before considering whether any action is necessary. .
31 March 2017 - NW659
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
With regard to sections (a) 2, (b) 10, (c) 12, (d) 12A and (e) 19 of the Sexual Offences Act, Act 23 of 1957, as amended, how many (i) arrests have been made, (ii) arrests for prostitution have been made, (iii) cases have been opened, (iv) dockets were referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for a decision and (v) dockets were finalised through an admission of guilt fine for the Pretoria West Police Station in each of the past five financial years?
Reply:
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)
The information that is required is not readily available. Each case must be verified before the information can be submitted. An extension of three weeks, is hereby requested, in order for us to provide quality and correct information.