Questions to Ministers

19 June 2017 - NW1028

Robinson, Ms D to ask the Minister of Communications

(a) What is the progress on the implementation of the recommendations with regard to the report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the SA Broadcasting Corporation Inquiry, that (i) the Board reviews the SABC’s human resource policies to ensure that they comply with labour legislation and regulations, (ii) the Interim Board, in light of past experience, should start the process of appointing a new Company Secretary (details furnished), (iii) all SABC employees who failed to enter into performance management contracts, should do so within 60 days from date of adoption of this report by the National Assembly and that new appointees should do so before they receive their first salary payment, (iv) all other vacant executive positions be properly advertised and filled with suitably qualified people, and that human resource management-related policies, procedures and practices are adhered to during the appointment process, (v) the Interim/new Board must start the process of filling the top three executive positions of Group Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer and Chief Financial Officer with suitably qualified and experienced professionals who are able to develop and put in place systems that will support the Board in its efforts to stabilise and regularise the administration and governance of the SABC, (vi) the Interim Board should evaluate the feasibility of the business case for entering into agreements with rival broadcasters (details furnished) so as to ensure that the public broadcaster does not cross-subsidise its competitors, (vii) the Interim Board, or, if necessary, the new board should urgently engage the Auditor-General to address all its findings relating to irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure, as well as to initiate disciplinary steps against any officials as required by section 51(1)(e)(iii) of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, who made and permitted irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure and (viii) the Interim Board should institute an independent forensic investigation into questionable and irregularly-awarded contracts referred to in this report or any other matter which it deems necessary and (b) has the Interim Board set any deadline in accordance with the recommendations of the report?

Source
Link

Reply:

Progress Report on the Implementation of the Recommendations of the Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the SABC Board Inquiry has been presented to the Parliament Portfolio Committee on Communications on Tuesday, 13 June 2017.

19 June 2017 - NW1322

Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education

Whether the sub-committee monitoring the policy on learner pregnancy has been established; if not, why not; if so, has any report been submitted by this sub-committee?

Source
Link

Reply:

The sub-committee monitoring the Draft Policy on the Prevention and Management of Learner Pregnancy has not yet been established. The Policy does make provision for the establishment of the sub-committee, however, only after it has been finalised and approved. Recommendations from the current consultations held with key stakeholders on the policy advocate for a multi-sectoral sub-committee that would include Department of Health, Department of Social Development and various developmental agencies. The DBE will mobilise for the said organisations to be represented on the sub-committee as the consultations continue with them.

19 June 2017 - NW1033

Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Basic Education

Source
Link

Reply:

Table 1: Number learners who fell pregnant, by district ad grade, in 2014

Province	District	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8	Grade 9	Grade 10	Grade 11	Grade 12	other	Grand Total
EC	BUTTERWORTH						1	1	1	3	5		11
	COFIMVABA						1						1
	CRADOCK							5	7	11	6		29
	DUTYWA						3		1		3		7
	EAST LONDON							6	5	9	6		26
	FORT BEAUFORT									1	1		2
	GRAAFF-REINET					1			1	2	1		5
	GRAHAMSTOWN									7	4		11
	KING WILLIAMS TOWN								1	4	4		9
	LADY FRERE						1	1	3	4	6		15
	LIBODE						2	3	2	1	8		16
	LUSIKISIKI					3	7	6	8	8	5		37
	MALUTI					3		2	2	1	5		13
	MBIZANA				4	3	18	26	38	57	40		186
	MT FLETCHER						2	4	1	5	1		13
	MT FRERE						1		1	5	4		11
	MTHATHA							2	2	1	1		6
	NGCOBO						1						1
	PORT ELIZABETH				1	2	1	2	6	14	9		35
	QUEENSTOWN						1	1		4	5		11
	QUMBU					3	1	6	6	6	7		29
	STERKSPRUIT							1	14	16	8		39
	UITENHAGE					1	2	1		5	5		14
	Total				5	16	42	67	99	164	134		527
FS	FEZILE DABI				1		5	11	16	21	15		69
	LEJWLEPUTSWA				2	4	9	11	28	30	50	4	138
	MOTHEO				2	2	7	20	47	37	69	5	189
	THABO MOFUTSANYANA		1		7	1	3	38	75	63	98	3	289
	XHARIEP						3	15	16	16	30		80
	Total		1		12	7	27	95	182	167	262	12	765
GT	EKURHULENI NORTH				1	7	16	61	108	121	110	20	444
	EKURHULENI SOUTH			1	3	8	19	71	190	203	165	1	661
	GAUTENG EAST				2	5	12	56	141	122	80		418
	GAUTENG NORTH						10	14	40	36	49		149
	GAUTENG WEST			1		9	16	50	115	81	64		336
	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL					6	12	33	103	108	86		348
	JOHANNESBURG EAST			1	2	5	10	18	70	92	59	5	262
	JOHANNESBURG NORTH				1	2	12	29	91	76	72	5	288
	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH				1	1	8	23	59	92	75		259
	JOHANNESBURG WEST					1	8	29	73	70	53		234
	SEDIBENG EAST					1	4	34	44	21	29		133
	SEDIBENG WEST				2	10	17	45	107	84	77		342
	TSHWANE NORTH					6	11	58	139	120	87		421
	TSHWANE SOUTH				2	6	31	82	122	112	96	1	452
	TSHWANE WEST			1	2	4	15	36	139	148	102	23	470
	Total			4	16	71	201	639	1 541	1 486	1 204	55	5 217
KZN	AMAJUBA						5	8	28	25	18		84
	ILEMBE				6	1	10	24	78	98	75		292
	PINETOWN					2	12	34	76	67	64		255
	SISONKE				1	2	3	4	7	12	16		45
	UGU			1	1	3	21	55	106	119	124		430
	UMGUNGUNDLOVU					2	5	28	46	57	70	2	210
	UMKHANYAKUDE			1	4	7	38	69	136	161	152		568
	UMLAZI				3	2	8	27	70	113	121	4	348
	UMZINYATHI	2	2	4	2	3	9	13	32	41	40		148
	UTHUKELA					2	5	8	16	18	20		69
	UTHUNGULU				1	9	19	45	77	88	105	2	346
	ZULULAND	5	5	6	9	16	11	23	59	53	57		244
	Total	7	7	12	27	49	146	338	731	852	862	8	3 039
LP	LEBOWAKGOMO						2	6	24	22	25		79
	MOGALAKWENA						2	4	6	6	4		22
	MOPANI				2		5	17	20	20	20	2	86
	POLOKWANE		1		2	1	8	22	41	28	29		132
	RIBA CROSS							1	2	4			7
	SEKHUKHUNE						1	4	11	11	5		32
	TSHIPISE SAGOLE						7	5	4	3	2		21
	TZANEEN						4	8	9	8	11		40
	VHEMBE				1	4	7	34	68	49	47		210
	WATERBERG				1	1	1	4	12	10	5		34
	Total		1		6	6	37	105	197	161	148	2	663
MP	BOHLABELA	1	0	66	80	107	25	50	98	89	60		576
	EHLANZENI			6	12	26	238	298	402	363	289	1	1 635
	GERT SIBANDE	2	8	10	11	12	49	71	122	102	155		542
	NKANGALA		1	1	2	24	45	71	101	116	89	7	457
	Total	3	9	83	105	169	357	490	723	670	593	8	3 210
NC	FRANCES BAARD			2	6	4	16	43	63	67	49		250
	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWA				1	21	20	40	123	101	49		355
	NAMAKWA				1	4	3	13	14	16	19		70
	PIXLEY KA SEME	1		1	3	10	30	56	179	94	70		444
	Total	1		3	11	39	69	152	379	278	187		1 119
NW	GREATER TAUNG								1	3			4
	KAGISANO MOLOPO		1		1	2	3	7	4	2			20
	KGETLENG RIVER							1		1			2
	LETLHABILE								4	4	1		9
	LICHTENBURG							1	10	2	3		16
	MADIBENG					5			1	4	3	93	106
	MAFIKENG					1							1
	MATLOSANA						194	265	141	63	26	2	691
	MORETELE								4	4	3		11
	MOSES KOTANE WEST									2	1		3
	POTCHEFSTROOM					1	2	3	14	7	6		33
	REKOPANTSWE								2	3			5
	RUSTENBURG					1	3	4	15	11	16		50
	TALEDI						1	1					2
	Total		1		1	10	203	282	196	106	59	95	953
WC	CAPE WINELANDS			2	8	11	26	83	121	122	126		499
	EDEN AND CENTRAL KAROO			2	1	9	20	56	92	111	119		410
	METRO CENTRAL					3	14	60	64	82	92		315
	METRO EAST				2	3	13	70	88	92	109		377
	METRO NORTH				1	7	45	92	131	136	124		536
	METRO SOUTH				6	9	24	70	90	78	100		377
	OVERBERG				3		10	27	34	41	40		155
	WEST COAST			1	4	7	14	40	51	47	30	1	195
	Total			5	25	49	166	498	671	709	740	1	2 864
National	11	19	107	208	416	1 248	2 666	4 719	4 593	4 189	181	18 357

Source 1: 2014 Annual School Survey

Note 2: The ASS question on learner pregnancy asks the school principal for: “the number of learners (That they are aware of) who got pregnant the previous academic year”.

Note 3: The data, as received from the provinces, are preliminary and must be treated with caution, since it has not been published in this format.

Table 2: Number learners who fell pregnant, by district ad grade, in 2015

Province	District	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6		Grade 7	Grade 8	Grade 9		Grade 10	Grade 11	Grade 12	Other	Grand Total
EC	CRADOCK												1		1
	DUTYWA										3				3
	EAST LONDON										1	2			3
	GRAAFF-REINET							1	1		1				3
	GRAHAMSTOWN						1					1	1		3
	LIBODE										2	5	9		16
	LUSIKISIKI						3	1	1		11	17	10		43
	MALUTI				1		1					1	1		4
	MBIZANA				1		1	15	14		15	29	18		93
	MT FLETCHER										1				1
	MT FRERE											1	2		3
	MTHATA							1	4		2	7			14
	NGCOBO											1			1
	PORT ELIZABETH								2		3	7	6		18
	QUEENSTOWN								2		4	4	3		13
	QUMBU								1		4	2	3		10
	STERKSPRUIT			2					1			3	1		7
	UITENHAGE							1			2	2	2		7
	Total			2	2		6	19	26		49	82	57		243
FS	FEZILE DABI							2	5		28	30	23		88
	LEJWELEPUTSWA				2		3	3	10		38	28	47		131
	MOTHEO				1		2	7	20		34	35	61		160
	THABO MOFUTSANYANA	1	1	4	1		11	13	17		65	70	73		256
	XHARIEP				2		3	4	4		13	16	17		59
	Total	1	1	4	6		19	29	56		178	179	221		694
GT	EKURHULENI NORTH						4	16	46		111	156	102		435
	EKURHULENI SOUTH				3		6	41	84		127	186	124		571
	GAUTENG EAST		1	1			9	29	50		145	148	115		498
	GAUTENG NORTH							2	17		30	28	20		97
	GAUTENG WEST				1		12	20	56		139	110	112		450
	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL			2	2		4	5	26		94	107	81		321
	JOHANNESBURG EAST						4	13	34		89	108	70		318
	JOHANNESBURG NORTH				1		3	26	51		113	103	90		387
	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH				1		1	11	30		55	89	74		261
	JOHANNESBURG WEST				1		2	9	25		30	65	37		169
	SEDIBENG EAST						1	3	9		33	51	33		130
	SEDIBENG WEST						1	21	43		98	124	94		381
	TSHWANE NORTH						4	9	41		125	123	92		394
	TSHWANE SOUTH				2		2	22	52		102	142	89	5	416
	TSHWANE WEST			1	2		3	12	46		119	149	86		418
	Total		1	4	13		56	239	610		1 410	1 689	1 219	5	5 246
KZN	AMAJUBA	0	0	0	0		2	7	27		78	113	97	0	324
	ILEMBE	0	0	0	0		1	6	15		34	52	26	0	134
	PINETOWN	0	0	0	1		4	16	42		89	121	82	0	355
	SISONKE	0	0	0	0		0	2	0		11	8	9		30
	UGU	0	0	1	0		2	17	24		71	96	90	0	301
	UMGUNGUNDLOVU	0	0	0	0		0	6	16		26	35	42	0	125
	UMKHANYAKUDE				1		3	2	5		12	17	12		52
	UMLAZI	0	0	0	0		0	8	39		84	99	129	0	359
	UMZINYATHI	0	0	0	0		1	0	4		16	17	19	0	57
	UTHUKELA	0	0	0	0		0	1	0		14	9	14	0	38
	UTHUNGULU	0	0	1	2		1	16	44		65	109	92	0	330
	ZULULAND	2	2	2	2		4	6	19		53	53	61	99	303
	Total	2	2	4	6		18	87	235		553	729	673	99	2 408
LP	CAPRICORN	0	0	0	0		1	6	37		94	62	66	0	266
	GREATER SEKHUKHUNE	0	0	0	1		1	1	7		15	15	16	1	57
	MOPANI	0	0	0	1		3	5	20		39	39	22	0	129
	POLOKWANE							0	0		0	0	0		0
	VHEMBE	0	0	0	2		1	20	80		158	95	72	0	428
	WATERBERG	0	0	0	0		3	2	4		2	5	13	0	29
	Total	0	0	0	4		9	34	148		308	216	189	1	909
MP	BOHLABELA	0	0	2	3		5	12	27		46	74	54	8	231
	EHLANZENI	2	0	3	11		23	242	281		378	307	184	15	1446
	GERT SIBANDE	0	0	0	3		11	35	45		83	87	60	0	324
	NKANGALA	2	0	1	5		133	120	136		100	93	80	99	769
	Total	4	0	6	22		172	409	489		607	561	378	122	2 770
NC														0	0
	NAMAKWA	0	0	0	0		0	1	0		4	0	1	0	6
	PIXLEY-KA-SEME	0	0	0	1		3	0	2		10	8	5	0	29
	SIYANDA				2		1	3	2		4	8	14		34
	Total	0	0	0	3		4	4	4		18	16	20	0	69
NW	BRITS	0	0	0	0		0								0
	DITSOBOTLA	0													0
	GREATER DELAREYVILLE	0	0	0	1		1	2	8		10	11	5	0	38
	GREATER TAUNG	0	0	0	0		0	7	11		14	9	4	0	45
	KAGISANO MOLOPO	0	0	0	0		0	0	1						1
	KGETLENG RIVER							1							1
	LICHTENBURG	0	0	0	0		0	0	1		2		2		5
	MADIBENG	0	0	0	2		1	0	1		0	2	1	0	7
	MAHIKENG	0	0	0	0		1	4	12		14	16	12		59
	MAQUASSI HILLS	0	0	0	0		0	0							0
	MATLOSANA	0	0	0	0		0	4	8		16	18	8	0	54
	MORETELE	0	0	0	0		0	0	4		3	5	5		17
	MOSES KOTANE EAST												1		1
	MOSES KOTANE WEST							0	0		2	0	1		3
	RUSTENBURG	0	0	0	1		0	0	2		2	7	5	0	17
	TALEDI	0	0	0	0		0	5	6		6	2	1	0	20
	TLOKWE	0	0	0	0		0	0	0		2	3	1	0	6
	Total	0	0	0	4		3	23	54		71	73	46	0	274
WC	CAPE WINELANDS				5		12	16	60		113	133	104		443
	EDEN AND CENTRAL KAR			1			6	10	53		106	128	125		429
	METRO CENTRAL			2	2		5	14	38		83	83	103		330
	METRO EAST				3		6	28	78		86	108	115		424
	METRO NORTH				2		7	52	80		107	143	118		509
	METRO SOUTH			3			3	21	60		94	139	109		429
	OVERBERG				4		3	9	40		34	22	30		142
	WEST COAST			1	2		3	15	34		45	43	42		185
	Total			7	18		45	165	443		668	799	746		2 891
National	7	4	27	78		332	1 009	2 065		3 862	4 344	3 549	227	15 504

Source 1: 2015 Annual School Survey

Note 1: The ASS question on learner pregnancy asks the school principal for: “the number of learners (That they are aware of) who got pregnant the previous academic year”.

Note 2: The data, as received from the provinces, are preliminary and must be treated with caution, since it has not been published in this format.

Table 3: Number learners who fell pregnant, by district ad grade, in 2016

Province	District	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8	Grade 9	Grade 10	Grade 11	Grade 12	Other	Total
EC	CRADOCK	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2
	DUTYWA	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1
	EAST LONDON	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	2	4	0	9
	FORT BEAUFORT	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	3
	GRAAFF-REINET	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1
	GRAHAMSTOWN	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0		1	0	2
	KING WILLIAMS TOWN	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	0	3
	LUSIKISIKI	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1
	MALUTI	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	3
	MBIZANA	0	0	0	0	0	1	4	5	18	15	0	43
	MT FLETCHER	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	1	0	4
	MT FRERE	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1
	MTHATHA	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1
	PORT ELIZABETH	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	5	0	8
	QUEENSTOWN	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		1	0	0	1
	QUMBU	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	5	5	0	14
	STERKSPRUIT	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	2
	UITENHAGE	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	3	0	2	0	7
	Total	0	0	0	1	1	5	10	20	32	37	0	106
FS	FEZILE DABI	1	0	0	0		4	3	5	3	20	0	36
	LEJWELEPUTSWA	0	0	0	1	2	7	12	19	16	23	0	80
	MOTHEO	0	0	1	2	9	3	13	32	29	28	0	117
	THABO MOFUTSANYANA	0	0	0	0	7	17	19	60	64	53	0	220
	XHARIEP	0	0	0	0	1	0	3	8	8	14	0	34
	Total	1	0	1	3	19	31	50	124	120	138	0	487
GT	EKURHULENI NORTH	0	0	1	2	3	29	54	111	104	82	0	386
	EKURHULENI SOUTH	0	0	0	1	2	29	44	90	110	112	0	388
	GAUTENG EAST	0	0	0	1	5	27	55	154	160	113	0	515
	GAUTENG NORTH	0	0	0	0	1	2	9	26	28	29	0	95
	GAUTENG WEST	0	0	0	1	7	14	29	100	114	110	0	376
	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL	0	0	0	0	1	20	31	95	100	61	0	308
	JOHANNESBURG EAST	0	0	0	0	1	7	10	48	48	56	0	170
	JOHANNESBURG NORTH	0	0	0	0	2	7	31	82	100	82	0	305
	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH	0	0	0	0	3	11	24	95	103	60	0	296
	JOHANNESBURG WEST	0	0	0	0	1	8	21	47	34	55	0	166
	SEDIBENG EAST	0	0	0	0	0	5	9	30	23	24	0	91
	SEDIBENG WEST	0	0	0	0	0	13	34	75	90	97	0	309
	TSHWANE NORTH	0	0	0	0	2	12	32	99	97	59	0	301
	TSHWANE SOUTH	0	0	0	1	1	21	54	86	123	94	0	380
	TSHWANE WEST	0	0	0	1	2	8	49	122	102	76	0	360
	Total	0	0	1	7	31	213	486	1 260	1 336	1 110	0	4 446
KZN	AMAJUBA	3	3	0	1	0	6	19	44	34	36	0	146
	HARRY GWALA	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	4	4	7	0	16
	ILEMBE	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	5	0	8
	PINETOWN	0	0	0	0	1	8	12	43	34	40	0	138
	UGU	0	0	0	0	0	1	3	9	14	11	0	38
	UMGUNGUNDLOVU	0	0	0	0	0	3	6	8	12	11	0	40
	UMKHANYAKUDE	16	14	22	18	20	4	8	20	25	24	0	171
	UMLAZI	0	0	0	0	3	6	12	28	52	62	97	260
	UMZINYATHI	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	UTHUKELA	0	0	0	0		0	1		1	3	0	5
	UTHUNGULU	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1
	ZULULAND	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0	4
	Total	19	17	22	19	24	29	63	158	178	201	97	827
LP	LEBOWAKGOMO	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	7	7	18	0	33
	MOGALAKWENA	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	2	0	4
	MOPANI	0	0	0	4	0	8	31	54	53	46	0	196
	POLOKWANE	0	0	0	0	0	3	6	27	25	25	0	86
	RIBA CROSS	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	1	0	8	0	13
	SEKHUKHUNE	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	9	8	7	0	27
	TSHIPISE-SAGOLE	0	0	0	0	0		1	3	3	7	0	14
	TZANEEN	0	0	0	0	0	4	4	9	10	8	0	35
	VHEMBE	0	0	0	5	5	19	46	110	92	77	0	354
	WATERBERG	0	0	0	0	0	1	6	20	25	14	0	66
	Total	0	0	0	9	5	35	103	241	223	212	0	828
NW	DITSOBOTLA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	2	0	5
	GREATER DELAREYVILLE	0	0	0	0	2	3	21	43	19	11	0	99
	GREATER TAUNG	0	0	0	0	0	8	12	24	17	11	0	72
	KAGISANO MOLOPO	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	6	0	1	0	8
	MADIBENG	0	0	0	0	2	0	1	0	1	0	0	4
	MAHIKENG	0	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	10	19	0	34
	MAQUASSI HILLS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	MATLOSANA	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	15	13	9	0	40
	MORETELE	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	2	2	0	0	7
	MOSES KOTANE EAST	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	3
	MOSES KOTANE WEST	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	3
	RAMOTSHERE MOILOA	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	7	6	10	0	25
	REKOPANTSWE	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	8	6	0	20
	RUSTENBURG	0	0	0	0	0	3	6	1	11	3	0	24
	TALEDI	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	1	3	0	7
	TLOKWE	0	0	0	0	0	1	4	1	0	2	0	8
	Total	0	1	0	0	5	17	56	109	91	80	0	359
WC	CAPE WINELANDS	0	0	0	3	13	22	53	73	95	121	0	380
	EDEN AND CENTRAL KAROO	0	0	0	1	11	12	39	76	77	90	0	306
	METRO CENTRAL	0	0	0	1	1	10	35	67	89	94	0	297
	METRO EAST	0	0	1		5	43	64	114	116	116	0	459
	METRO NORTH	0	0	0	2	2	40	52	71	88	100	0	355
	METRO SOUTH	0	0	1		5	24	59	64	78	90	0	321
	OVERBERG	0	1	2	5	5	25	30	31	27	17	0	143
	WEST COAST	0	0	1	3	6	11	37	30	42	38	0	168
	Total	0	1	5	15	48	187	369	526	612	666	0	2 429
NC	FRANCES BAARD	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	2	3	3	0	11
	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWE	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	2	3	2	0	10
	NAMAKWA	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	4
	SIYANDA	0	0	0	0	1	1	6	28	12	12	0	60
	SPRINGBOK	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	1	0	4
	Z.F.MGCAWU	0	0	0	0	0	3	18	15	19	13	0	68
	Total	0	0	0	0	3	6	27	50	40	31	0	157
Total	20	19	29	54	136	523	1 164	2 488	2 632	2 475	97	9 639

Source 1: 2014 Annual School Survey

Note 1: 2016 data for Mpumalanga are not yet available.

Note 2: The ASS question on learner pregnancy asks the school principal for: “the number of learners (That they are aware of) who got pregnant the previous academic year”.

Note 3: The data, as received from the provinces, are preliminary and must be treated with caution, since it has not been published in this format.

Note 4: The ASS data for Gauteng included in 2016 – is different from data provided by Gauteng – a difference of 98. The DBE is awaiting verified data from Gauteng.

19 June 2017 - NW1023

Schmidt, Adv H to ask the Minister of Communications

(1)What is the total number of media queries that the SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) received in the (a) 2016-17 financial year and (b) since 1 April 2017; (2) (a) how many of the media queries were responded to and (b)(i) how many were not responded to and (ii) why; (3) whether she has been informed that a certain person (name and details furnished) refuses to respond to media queries from certain journalists and has taken some journalists off the mailing list of the SABC?

Source
Link

Reply:

According to the SABC;

(1) Its Group communication department received approximately 144 written media queries and around 360 telephonic media queries during 2016-17 financial year, 24 written media queries and 42 telephonic media queries since 1 April 2017.

(2) The SABC strive to respond to all media queries within set timeframes, however, due to several challenges amongst others that some Journalists do not give SABC enough time to respond to queries and that some Journalists published articles before soliciting responses from the SABC, to name but a few, there are delays in responding to some queries.

(3) No, however, media list change from time to time due to the nature of business for example; with Journalists leaving their organisation

15 June 2017 - NW1440

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Whether his department has audited the use of funds given to certain municipalities from his department’s 2015-16 budget to implement free wifi hotspots; if not, why not; if so, what (a) reports have been submitted by each municipality indicating effective implementation and service delivered from this allocation and (b) are the further relevant details in this regard?

Source
Link

Reply:

I have been advised by the department as follows:

(a) During the implementation of WiFi networks by the Metros, Project offices from Metros provided the Department with weekly and Monthly progress reports. Subsequently the Department conducted physical site audits and verification on a sample of connected Wi-Fi sites as part of network performance monitoring. Around 150 live sites were audited in Tshwane, Ekurhuleni, Nelson Mandela Bay and Cape Town.

(b) City of Johannesburg and Mangaung have connected some sites but have not completed their WiFi roll out programs. The Department is constantly engaging with these Metros to ensure that all sites are connected as per the agreed plans. The process to appoint WiFi service providers for both Metros is underway.

15 June 2017 - NW425

Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

(1)What is the (a) total number of housing projects that are over the value of R250 million in each province, (b)(i) date of commencement, (ii) current status and (iii) targeted date of completion of each project and (c) name of the contractor in charge of each project as of 1 February 2017 in each case; (2) what (a) are the names of the companies which have been awarded the top ten lucrative tenders for her department’s projects, (b) is the actual value of each tender and (c) was the total number of houses or residential units that were to be built in each province in the (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16 financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

Honourable member, in accordance with the document titled, “Guide to Parliamentary Questions in the National Assembly”, which prohibits Members of Parliament, including the Executive, from divulging names of persons, bodies when asking or responding to parliamentary questions, I am unable to provide names of the companies as requested above. The document referred to states the following:

“Questions are to be framed as concisely as possible. All unnecessary adjectives, references and quotations are omitted. Names of persons, bodies and, for example, newspapers are only used in questions if the facts surrounding the case have been proven. As the mere mention of such names could be construed as publicity for or against them, it should be clear that this practice is highly undesirable. If a question will be unintelligible without mentioning such names, the Departments concerned are notified of the name (-s) and this phrase is used: ".......a certain person (name furnished)”

The information received from the provinces in response to the Honourable member’s question is provided below:

EASTERN CAPE

(1) The Province has one (1) project with the value of over R250 million and details are provided as in the Table below:

No.	Commencement Date	Current status	Targeted Date of Completion	Service contracted for	Contract Amount
		R'000			R'000
1	13 October 2015	In progress/running	13 October 2018	PE-Joe Slovo West 4000 BNG: Erection of 2 000 Top Structures	263 074 520

(2) (a) & (b) The amounts of top ten tenders awarded are outlined in the table below:

Number	(b) Value of Each Tender
	R'000
1	263 074 520
2	247 851 335
3	226 931 150
4	225 129 836
5	204 297 380
6	203 858 485
7	200 207 852
8	199 890 000
9	181 021 815
10	175 731 667

(c) (i) 13 609.

(ii) 13 768.

FREE STATE

(1) The Province has a total of two (2) projects with the value of over R250 million as illustrated in the table below.

No.	Commencement Date	Current Status	Targeted Date of Completion	Service Contracted for	Contract Amount
					R'000
1	19 June 2012	Practical Completion Reached	31 March 2016	1 700 Subsidies	284 228
2	06 March 2013	in Progress	31 December 2017	Hostel Upgrading	265 509

(2) (a) & (b) The amounts of top ten tenders awarded are outlined in the table below:

Number	(b) Value of Each Tender
	R'000
1	265 509
2	241 935
3	238 866
4	194 979
5	150 970
6	131 055
7	128 898
8	126 453
9	124 765
10	123 420

(c) (i) 12 298

(ii) 8 505

GAUTENG

(1) The Province has a total of eight (8) projects with the value of over R250 million as illustrated in the table below:

No	Date of Commencement	Current status	Targeted Date of Completion	Service Contracted for	Contract Amount
					R'000
1	01 April 2014	123 units completed	30 June 2015	Jabulani Ext, 1 Housing Development, 112 CRU and 508 housing units	240 166
2	02 July 2012	208 fully subsidised houses and 334 backyard rentals completed	31 March 2017	Servicing and Construction of 5 523 residential units,(1324 fully subsidised houses, 2 172 Backyard Rentals and 669 Flisp)-Cosmo City	253 710
3	05 September 2014	1 832 fully subsidised houses(2012/13), (2016/17)-112 fully subsidised houses	30 June 2023	Lufhereng mixed housing project-24 142 houses	1 322 769
4	01 September 2015	280 services completed and bulk link services is 30% complete	31 March 2017	Installation of 2 842 services and construction 2 842 through IRDP, construction of 205 houses through FLISP and 823 social housing-Sebokeng	607 185
5	04 August 2014	all the 2 905 stands have been completed and issued with service certificates	31 March 2016	Construction of water and sewer network for 2 905 units at Hammanskraal	260 946
6	01 April 2014	The project is 30% complete	31 March 2017	Construction of overall sewer network in Bekkersdal for 50km	317 144
7	01 April 2013	420 houses completed,74 at 90%, 200 FLISP complete, 2 008 stands complete and 900 wall plates and foundations	31 March 2021	Construction of 6 470 houses through IRDP and 6 470 FLISP-Savanna City	1 395 057
8	01 January 2016	260 RDP houses completed,834 RDP houses at 95% and 49 MV,354 RDP wall plates and foundations and 69 MV	31 December 2016	Mixed Development Project-1 232 low cost houses, 98 military veterans houses and 550 units of rental stock	416 631
9	01 June 2015	192 units at 95% completion	30 June 2018	Refurbishment of 672 hostel units and the fixing of leaks on the 3 hostel sections at KwaMasiza Hostel-Sedibeng	197 903
10	01 July 2015	811 houses and 256 Social Housing Units	31 March 2019	Fleurhof construction of 2 216 houses and servicing stands in Fleurhof Ext,2	237 850

(2) The amounts of top ten tenders awarded are outlined in the table below:

Number	(b) Value of Each Tender
	R'000
1	240 166
2	253 710
3	1 322 769
4	607 185
5	260 946
6	317 144
7	1 395 057
8	416 631
9	197 903
10	237 850

(c) (i) 25 417

(ii) 40 106

KWAZULU-NATAL

The Province has a total of ten (10) projects over the value of R250 million as illustrated in the table below:

Number	Commencement Date	Current Status	Targeted Date of Completion	Service provided for	Contract Amount
		R'000			R'000
1	06 January 2015	52 546	06 January 2022	KwaMashu, Umlazi and Klaarwater Rehabilation of 23 517 units(rectification)	2 575 077
2	19 February 2014	1793 374	01 March 2018	Edendale (Msunduzi) Rural Housing(EPHP)-25 000 units	2 543 241
3	11 March 2015	112 011	10 September 2016	KwaMashu and Umlazi Rehabilation of 9003 units	611 692
4	11 March 2015	54 682	10 September 2017	Newlands:Rectification-7 933	524 630
5	07 January 2013	354 640	31 December 2016	KwaMashu, Umlazi and Glebelands Hostel Upgrade-100	455 640
6	18 August 2015	398 548	18 September 2017	Cornubia phase 1B Housing Project-2 263	448 558
7	01 November 2016	89 705	31 March 2022	Mandeni:Inyoni slums clearance initiative-3 020	447 083
8	18 January 2016	80 595	30 September 2018	Umbumbulu:Rural Housing Project-2 850	357 969
9	25 March 2014	241 264	25 March 2017	EThekwiuni (various sites)Storm damaged-5 329	300 216
10	01 July 2016	21 378	31 July 2021	Maphumulo: Rural Housing-2 000	260 408

(2) The amounts of top ten tenders awarded are outlined in the table below:

Number	(b) Value of Each Tender
	R'000
1	611 692
2	448 558
3	180 749
4	178 724
5	166 610
6	166 344
7	153 890
8	148 347
9	141 097
10	132 042

(c) (i) 35 847

(ii) 29 951

LIMPOPO 3A below.

Number	Commencement Date	Current status	Targeted Date of Completion	Service Contracted for	Contract Amount
					R'000
1	07 December 2016	Site establishment	07 December 2018	Marapong CRU ( Lephalale)	298 000

(2) (a) The names of the Companies that have been awarded the top ten tenders are outlined as per the table below:

Number	(b) Value of Each Tender
	R'000
1	12 619 219
2	11 814 858
3	6 395 364

(c) (i) 3 082

(ii) 13 845

MPUMALANGA

(1) (a) The province does not have projects over the value of R250 Million

(b) and (c)

Number	(b) Value of the Tender
	R'000
1	173 696
2	112 784
3	59 225
4	58 590
5	55 946
6	54 333
7	34 975
8	34 742
9	29 613
10	28 400

(c) (i) 11 491

(ii) 10 661.

NORTHERN CAPE

(1) (a) None

(b) Not applicable

(c) Not applicable

(2) (a) Contractors are changed yearly

(b) Not applicable

(c) (i) 2 133

(ii) 1 337.

NORTH WEST

(2) (a) The Province has two (2) projects over the value of R250 million as illustrated in Table below:

No.	Commencement Date	Current status(units completed)	Targeted Date of Completion	Service Contracted for	Contract Amount
1	27 July 2004	in progress	10 October 2017	Meriting ext. 4 & 5:Rustenburg:building of houses-1590 units	293 299
2	10 February 2015	complete	07 January 2017	Vryburg ext. 28 (Dr Ruth Mompati Municipality) building of houses-1500 units	269 241

(a) The names of the Companies that have been awarded the top ten tenders are outlined as per the table below:

Number	(b) Value of Each Tender
	R'000
1	269 241
2	212 000
3	166 000
4	155 000
5	128 000
6	103 000
7	96 101
8	95 333
9	94 427
10	86 853

(c) (i) 11 49

(ii) 10 661.

WESTERN CAPE

The Province indicated that it does not have any projects over the value of R250 million. The highest bid awarded was R228 284 427.

(b)(i) 24 August 2016

(ii) Contractor on site

(iii) 23 August 2021

Number	(b) Value of Each Tender
	R'000
1	2 052
2	100 877
3	78 761

(c) (i) 16 678

(ii) 20 558

15 June 2017 - NW677

Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

What was the total amount in rand spent by the (a) Estate Agency Affairs Board, (b) Social Housing Regulatory Authority, (c) National Housing Builders Registration Council, (d) Housing Development Agency, (e) National Urban Reconstruction and Housing Agency, (f) Rural Housing Loan Fund, (g) Community Schemes Ombud Service and (h) her department on gifts, donations and sponsorships, including the (i) full names of the beneficiaries and (ii) reasons in each of the past three financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

Honourable member, from the onset I wish to bring to your attention the document titled, “Guide to Parliamentary Questions in the National Assembly”, which prohibits Members of Parliament, including the Executive, from divulging names of persons, bodies when asking or responding to parliamentary questions. This document states the following:

“Questions are to be framed as concisely as possible. All unnecessary adjectives, references and quotations are omitted. Names of persons, bodies and, for example, newspapers are only used in questions if the facts surrounding the case have been proven. As the mere mention of such names could be construed as publicity for or against them, it should be clear that this practice is highly undesirable. If a question will be unintelligible without mentioning such names, the Departments concerned are notified of the name (-s) and this phrase is used: ".......a certain person (name furnished)”

Accordingly, in the reply below, I will not provide names of persons or bodies for whom gifts were bought or donations/sponsorship given to.

Further, in the reply provided below we include purchases of flowers for staff members who are hospitalised and their bereaved families, which does not necessarily qualify to be regarded as gifts. The Department also purchases gifts when the Minister meets with foreign delegations or her counterparts.

DEPARTMENT AND ITS ENTITIES	2013/2014	2014/2015	2015/2016
Estate Agency Affairs Board	None	None	None
Social Housing Regulatory Authority	R 25 000.00	None	R61,306.00
National Home Builders Registration Council	R506 033.50	R234 582.00	R195 000.00
Housing Development Agency	R25,405.00	R26,039.00	R41,532.00
National Urban Reconstruction and Housing Agency	R31,489.07	R89,926.14	R12,056.00
Rural Housing Loan Fund	R87,500	R34,999.50	R181,642.10
Community Schemes Ombud Service	None	None	None
Department of Human Settlements	R 10 241 089.23	R 497 076.69	R 452 18.89.89

15 June 2017 - NW1442

Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

What (a) is the budget allocated to the process of researching, writing and conducting (i) socio economic impact assessments and (ii) public hearings pertaining to the (aa) Digital Development Fund Bill, (bb) ICT Economic Regulator and Tribunal Bill, (cc) Electronic Communications Amendment Bill and (dd) Electronic Communications and Transactions Amendment Bill, arising from the National Integrated ICT Policy White Paper as outlined in the 2017-20 Medium Term Expenditure Framework, (b) proportion of the projected expenditure will be spent on (i) departmental resources and (ii) external resources such as specialist consultants and (c) is the timeline drawn up to complete the drafting and submission to Cabinet of each piece of legislation?

Source
Link

Reply:

I have been advised by the department as follows:

(a) Internal human resources capacity will be utilised to research, write and conduct socio economic impact assessments. The Department will, with the assistance of the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation and Office of the Chief State Law Advisor conduct this area of work.

No public hearings will be conducted in the current financial year. The Minister will consult the public through the publication in the Gazette of the draft Bills for public comment, as required by PAJA. The estimated expenditure for publication of each Bill in the Gazette is R150, 000.00.

(b) An amount of R2, 5 million has been budgeted for the procurement of external specialist consultants for the development of Business Cases for the establishment of these new institutions in line with the Treasury Guidelines.

(c) In line with the approved Annual Performance Plan, the Department will submit the draft Bills to Cabinet to approve for public consultation in third quarter of the 2017/18 financial year.

15 June 2017 - NW1443

Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

What (a) is the budget allocated to the process of researching and writing all envisaged new legislation and amendments to existing legislation pertaining to the (i) Postal Services Amendment Bill, (ii) South African Post Office SOC Ltd Amendment Bill and (iii) Ikamva National e-Skills Institute (iNeSI) Bill, (b) proportion of the projected expenditure will be spent on (aa) departmental resources and (bb) external resources, such as specialist consultants and (c) is the timeline drawn up to complete the drafting and submission to Cabinet of each piece of legislation?

Source
Link

Reply:

I have been advised by the department as follows:

(a) There is no budget allocation for researching, writing and conducting socio economic impact assessments or public hearings, since such processes will be conducted internally with the assistance of the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation and Office of the Chief State Law Advisor.

(b) The only estimated expenditure is for the publication of each Bill in the Gazette amounting R150, 000. 00.

(c) In line with the approved Annual Performance Plan, the Department will submit the draft Bills to Cabinet for approval and for public consultation in third quarter of the 2017/18 financial year.

15 June 2017 - NW1441

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

(1) Why has the implementation of the Rapid Deployment Guidelines, inserted into the National Integrated ICT Policy White Paper, been delayed until after March 2019; (2) has a study been conducted by her department to determine (a) the impact of this delay on broadband rollout across government jurisdictions and (b) the knock-on effect of the delay on the cost to communicate and in rolling out South Africa Connect; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

I have been advised by the department as follows:

1. When the Electronic Communications Act was amended in 2014 it replaced the requirement to develop Rapid Deployment Guidelines with the requirement to develop a National Rapid Deployment Policy. As a result of this amendment, the National Rapid Deployment Policy was included in the National Integrated ICT Policy White Paper. The rationale for the replacement of the guidelines with a policy is that a large proportion of the key stakeholders that are affected by the Rapid Deployment Policy are not subject to the provisions of the Electronic Communications Act (ECA), and, consequently, their behaviour cannot be regulated through the ECA.

2.(a)-(b) The Department has not carried out any study to determine the impact of a delay in implementing the Rapid Deployment Policy as there is no delay as yet in the implementation.

15 June 2017 - NW1507

Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Whether (a) his department and (b) each entity reporting to him procured any services from and/or made any payments to (i) a certain company (name furnished) or (ii) any other public relations firms; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, what (aa) services were procured, (bb) was the total cost, (cc) is the detailed breakdown of such costs, (dd) was the total amount paid, (ee) was the purpose of the payments and (ff) is the detailed breakdown of such payments?

Source
Link

Reply:

I have been advised by the department and entities as follows:

(a) No

(b) No

14 June 2017 - NW1113

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether he has ever met with certain persons (names furnished); if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether he has ever received any (a) gifts or (b) payments from certain persons (names furnished); if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) will he make a statement on the matter?

Source
Link

Reply:

1.I have never had formal meetings with them.

2. No, I have declared all gifts I have received since my appointment as Member of Parliament and Member of the National Executive.

3. No statement will be made.

14 June 2017 - NW1383

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether, with reference to his reply to oral question 29 on 12 May 2017, Government has investigated the possibility of using the Government Employees’ Pension Fund (GEPF) through the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) as a possible public entity partner for SA Airways (SAA) as one option in Government’s review of SAA’s long term turnaround strategy; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) how will the interests of beneficiaries of the GEPF be protected from possible future losses incurred by SAA and (b) what are the further relevant details in this regard?

Source
Link

Reply:

No. Government has not investigated the possibility of using the Government Employees’ Pension Fund (GEPF) through the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) as a possible public entity partner for SA Airways (SAA) as one option in Government’s review of SAA’s long term turnaround strategy.

The Minister of Finance announced in the Budget Speech on 24 February 2016 that he, together with the Minister of Public Enterprises had “agreed to explore the possible merger of South African Airways and South African Express, under a strengthened board, with a view to engaging a potential minority equity partner, and to create a bigger and more operationally efficient airline”. The Study undertaken by Bain and Abacus in this regard has been completed and the next steps are for the National Treasury and the Department of Public Enterprises to review the options and recommendations to allow an informed decision to be taken on how to proceed.

The PIC does not hold equity investments in State Owned Companies (SOCs). However, the PIC, on behalf of its clients, does hold a substantial amount of bonds of various SOCs. A significant portion of the PIC's bond-holdings in SOCs is government guaranteed. Importantly, SOCs have never defaulted on any of the PIC's bond investments. The PIC undertakes all investment decisions in the best interest of its pensioners and clients and in line with client mandate requirements and the investment risk parameters stipulated by client mandates. The continued support of SOCs by PIC will be underpinned by these mandate requirements. Moreover, all investments are also subject to a robust due diligence process which includes a credit analysis, Environmental, Social and Governance report as well as risk and legal reports.

The aim of the PIC remains to safeguard pensions of public servants and ensure that reasonable returns are generated for contributors.

14 June 2017 - NW976

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)What is the (a) first name, (b) last name, (c) identification number, (d) designation, (e) job description, (f) date of commencement and (g) remuneration level of each person employed in the National Treasury; (2) what is the total number of persons employed in the National Treasury (a) before 31 March 2017 and (b) after 31 March 2017?

Source
Link

Reply:

1.A detailed list is attached in response to (a) – (g), for all National Treasury employees as at 8 May 2017.

2. (a) Total number of persons employed as at 31 March 2017 is 1168.

(b) Total number of persons employed as at 8 May 2017, 1164. (Annexure A attached) [confidential]

14 June 2017 - NW1517

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether any lenders imposed any conditions on the SA Airways (SAA) Board when each loan was granted to SAA in each of the past three financial years; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what (a) are the details of each condition and (b) progress has the SAA Board made to comply with the conditions in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

Lenders imposed terms and conditions on SAA as per normal Loan market standards. This practice is not unique to SAA and applies to all companies both public and private and across all markets including RSA, Europe and USA to name a few. The following terms and conditions are contained in SAA loan agreements and the Airline has complied and continues to comply with each of those conditions.

	Financial Covenants	Complied with (Y/N)	Non-Financial Covenants	Complied with (Y/N)
Project Phoenix Loans	*1. Non-payment* SAA does not pay on the due date any amount payable pursuant to a Finance Document at the place and in the currency in which it is expressed to be payable	Y	*1. Illegality / unlawfulness* It is or becomes unlawful for SAA or the Guarantor to perform any of its obligations under the Finance Documents	Y
	*2. Maintenance of insurance on assets* SAA maintains insurances with insurance companies to such an extent and against such risks as companies engaged in similar business normally insure.	Y	*2. Change of control* SAA’s reporting lines change from the current reporting line, being National Treasury and the Minister of Finance, to another party.	Y
	*3. Negative pledge* SAA shall not unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Lenders, create permit to subsist any Security over any of its assets.	Y	*3. Misrepresentation* Any representation or statement made or deemed to be made by SAA or the Guarantor in the Finance Documents or any other document delivered by or on behalf of SAA or the Guarantor under or in connection with any Finance Document is or proves to have been incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made or deemed to be made.	Y
	*4. Disposals* SAA will not enter into a single transaction or a series of transactions and whether voluntary or involuntary to sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of any asset.	Y	*4.Audit qualification* The Auditors of SAA qualify the audited annual consolidated financial statements of SAA or any of its Affiliates.	Y
	*5.Taxes* SAA will maintain its status as a statutory body established in accordance with laws of South Africa and will maintain its tax residence in South Africa and ensure that it is not resident or liable to tax in any other jurisdiction.	Y	*5. Government Guarantee* The guarantee ceases to be legal, valid, binding and enforceable or otherwise ceases to be effective.	Y
	*6. Merger* SAA shall not, unless otherwise agreed to by the Lenders in writing, enter into any joint venture, amalgamation, demerger or corporate reconstruction.	Y	*6. No breaching of laws* SAA has not breached any law or regulation which breach has or might reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.	Y
	*7. Acquisition* SAA shall not unless otherwise agreed to by the Lenders in writing, acquire or subscribe for shares or other ownership interest in or securities of any company or other person, or acquire any business, assets or incorporate any company or other person.	Y	*7. Material adverse effect* No material adverse effect has occurred.	Y
	*8. Cross default* Any financial indebtedness of SAA which is not paid due nor within any originally applicable grace period, or declared to be or otherwise becomes due and payable prior to its specified maturity as a result of an event of default, or cancelled or suspended by a creditor of SAA which as a result of an event of default.	Y	*8. Constitutional documents* SAA will ensure that no change is made to its constitutional documents without prior written consent of the Lenders where such change has or is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.	Y
		Y	*9. Sanctions* SAA and to the best of knowledge of SAA having made due and careful enquiry, its Affiliates, are not Sanctioned Entities, to the extent applicable, or have not participated in a Sanctioned Transaction or have not contravened and Sanctions or are not targeted under any Sanctions.	Y
		Y	*10. Compliance to anti-corruption laws*** SAA to the best knowledge of SAA having made due and careful enquiry, and each of its Affiliates, has conducted its businesses in compliance with Applicable Anti-Bribery Law and has instituted and maintains policies and procedures designed to promote and achieve compliance with such laws.	Y
			*11. Change of business* SAA shall procure that no substantial change is made to the general nature of the business of SAA from that carried on at the signature date.	Y
			*12. Financial year end* SAA shall not change its Accounting Reference Date.	Y
			*13. Change in Auditors* SAA may only replace its Auditors with the prior approval of the Lenders, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.	Y
			*14. Expropriation* The authority or ability of any affiliate of SAA to conduct its business is wholly or substantially curtailed by any seizure, expropriation, nationalisation, intervention, restriction or other action by or on behalf of any governmental, regulatory or other authority or other person.	Y

14 June 2017 - NW1516

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether Government imposed any conditions on the SA Airways (SAA) Board when each Government guarantee was granted to SAA in each of the past three financial years; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what (a) are the details of each condition and (b) progress has the SAA Board made to comply with the conditions in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

SAA was issued with two government guarantees in the past three financial years; R6.88 billion on 22 December 2014 to sign off and approve the 2013/14 Annual Financial Statements (AFS) and R4.72 billion on 08 September 2016 to sign off and approve the 2014/15 and 2015/16 AFS. Table 1 below highlights the conditions attached to each of these two government guarantees issued and the progress made by SAA on each condition.

Legend:

Condition complied with
Condition partially complied with
Condition not complied with

Table 1: SAA Guarantee Conditions

Conditions related to the R6.88 billion guarantee issued on 22 December 2014
Within 1 month, SAA to provide a comprehensive implementation plan for the 90 Day action plan interventions outlining the milestones and timelines for delivering the targeted savings and responsible person.	SAA submitted the 90 Day Action plan implementation dashboard.
SAA together with the Government will review and stress test the financial model and refined LTTS.	SAA provided a financial model which was stress tested by government and the airline.
Within 3 months, SAA to develop proposals on the network structure, fleet strategy and structure of the airline for consideration by Government.	SAA appointed InterVistas to assist the airline in developing a new Network and Fleet Plan which was considered by government.
Within 3 months, SAA to identify areas where it intends reducing operational costs and develop implementation plans to reduce such costs	SAA identified cost compression initiatives and developed an implementation plan.
Within 3 months, SAA to strengthen its governance, internal controls and working capital management, develop an implementation plan in this regard and provide monthly progress reports to government.	SAA has indicated that it has strengthened its governance and has included a detailed summary in the 90 Day Action Plan report. No monthly progress is given in this regard.
SAA to provide weekly reports to NT on its utilisation, cash position and daily cash forecasts.	SAA provides weekly reports of its daily cash forecast and utilisation thereof.
Conditions related to the R4.72 billion guarantee issued on 08 September 2016
The primary focus of the Board must be to return the airline to financial sustainability.	This condition has been included in SAA’s 2016/17 Shareholder compact The SAA Board has finalised its five year Corporate Plan, which represents the airline’s turnaround strategy.
SAA's strategy must be strengthened and alignment with other state owned airlines ensured.	The SAA Board has reviewed and revalidated the airline’s strategy which forms part of the approved turnaround strategy and informs the 5 year Corporate Plan. The next step is aligning the strategy with other State Owned Airlines.
SAA must implement more aggressive cost cutting initiatives as recommended by the Aviation expert (Deloitte) in areas of fuel, aircraft ownership, labour, maintenance, repair and overhaul and procurement.	Initiatives identified by Deloitte have not been implemented. However, Seabury has identified additional cost compression initiatives in SAA’s 5 year Corporate Plan.
The network fleet plan must be refined based on a sound business case so that the airline takes advantage of opportunities to scale back the operations of the airline to focus only on operating routes which positively contribute to the profitability of the airline, closes routes that have been making losses for longer than one year, and ensures that the network plan is aligned with other state owned airlines.	The SAA Board has reviewed and revalidated the airline’s strategy which forms part of the approved turnaround plan strategy and informs the 5 year Corporate. The next step is for SAA to close routes that have been loss making for more than a year and aligning the network plan with other State Owned Airlines.
The airline's strategy must better differentiate the airline, enabling it to continue to compete effectively, inter alia through addressing customer value proposition.	The SAA Board has reviewed and revalidated the airline’s strategy which forms part of the approved turnaround strategy and informs the 5 year Corporate Plan. NT is in the process of assessing SAA’s turnaround strategy and 5 year Corporate Plan to determine whether the airline has addressed this condition.
The airline must work with National Treasury (NT) and the Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) in giving consideration to the possible merger of SAA with South African Express (SAX) airlines and the potential introduction of a strategic equity partner.	SAA has availed itself and its subsidiaries to work with the consultant, Bain and Company SA. SAA officials availed themselves in engaging with DPE and NT officials on a regular basis during the time that Bain and Company SA was conducting the Study.
The Board is required to appoint a permanent Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and other key executives in consultation with the Minister of Finance.	In progress. The CFO has been appointed. Candidates for the CEO position have been shortlisted. It is anticipated that after the CEO is appointed then he/she will then fill other key executive positions.
Funding must be secured to meet the airline's liquidity requirements.	SAA has secured funding for its liquidity requirements and is in the process of refinancing.
The Board is required to ensure that the AFS for both 2014/15 and 2015/16 are finalized.	SAA’s 2014/15 and 2015/16 AFS have been finalised and tabled in parliament.
SAA is required to report progress on a weekly basis to NT until such a time that the Minister of Finance determines.	NT and SAA convene weekly monitoring meetings.
SAA must share all media communication with the Minister of Finance or his designated representative prior to the issuance of media communication and only communicate on issues that require shareholder approval where approval has been obtained from the Minister of Finance to do so.	This matter is dependent on media communication by SAA. Currently, NT is not aware of any non-adherence to this condition.

Source: National Treasury

14 June 2017 - NW1112

Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

What (a) amount was spent by the National Treasury on e-government services in the 2016-17 financial year and (b) is the projected expenditure for the 2017-18 financial year?

Source
Link

Reply:

a) R21 442 522.93

b) R28 313 315.54

14 June 2017 - NW1152

Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether there are any new public entities being established; if so, (a) what will their functions be and (b) what is the total amount that will be allocated to each entity?

Source
Link

Reply:

There are various Bills proposing the establishment of public entities which are currently being considered by Parliament and Provincial Legislatures. The following public entities are currently being proposed in Bills before Parliament:

National Public Health Institute of South Africa
Waste Management Bureau
Wine Certification Authority
Border Management Authority
Financial Sector Conduct Authority
Ombud Council (Financial sector)

a) The above Bills are still under consideration before the different legislatures, the establishment of these entities and their functions are therefore proposals.

b) If the enabling legislation is enacted, the National Treasury or relevant Provincial Treasury will engage in discussions with the relevant department concerned, to assess the appropriate level of funding to be allocated to the public entity, in line with its legislated functions.

14 June 2017 - NW1219

Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether (a) the National Treasury has (i) procured any services from and/or (ii) made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation; if not, in each case, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (aa) services were procured, (bb) were the total costs, (cc) is the detailed breakdown of the costs, (dd) was the total amount paid, (ee) was the purpose of the payments and (ff) is the detailed breakdown of the payments in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

National Treasury

(a)(i) None

(a)(ii) N/A

(a)(ii)(aa) N/A

(a)(ii)(bb) N/A

(a)(ii)(cc) N/A

(a)(ii)(dd) N/A

(a)(ii)(ee) N/A

(a)(ii)(ff) N/A

ASB

The Accounting Standards Board has not procured any services or made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

CBDA

The CBDA has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

DBSA

The DBSA has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

FIC

FIC has not procured any services from or made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

FSB

FSB has not procured any services from or made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

GEPF

GEPF did not procure any services nor made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation and does not intend to procure any of their services in the future.

GPAA

The GPAA has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

IRBA

The IRBA has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

PFA

The PFA has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

LAND BANK

The Land Bank has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

FAIS OMBUD

The FAIS Ombud has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

PIC

The PIC has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

SAA

The SAA has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

SARS

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has not procured services from the Decolonisation Foundation and does not have the supplier registered on its database.

SARS procures goods and services in line with its mandate in compliance with the PFMA, National Treasury Regulations, Preferential Procurement Regulations, respective National Treasury Practice Notes and guidelines as well as internal policies and procedures. The position going forward is that SARS conducts its procurement activities in line with the provisions of Section 217 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Accordingly SARS is compelled to consider and fairly evaluate any proposal received through a duly constituted procurement process from a bona fide vendor.

SASRIA

The SASRIA has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

TAX OMBUD

The Office of the Tax Ombud has not procured any services from Decolonisation Foundation, and no payments were made to Decolonisation Foundation.

14 June 2017 - NW1531

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the Financial Intelligence Centre referred any cases to law enforcement agencies (a) in each of the past six financial years and (b) since 1 April 2017; if so, what is the total number of cases that were referred to (i) law enforcement agencies and (ii) each law enforcement agency in each of the specified financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

The Financial Intelligence Centre refers information (financial intelligence) for investigation to law enforcement (SAPS), the tax authority, security services and regulators on an ongoing basis as part of the FICs regular function as envisaged in section 40 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001, as amended.

The FIC provides statistical information about its referrals in each of its Annual Reports.

Since the commencement of the 2011/2012 financial year until 31 March 2017 the FIC referred at least 5,230 financial intelligence reports to various bodies as defined in section 40 (1) of the FIC Act for investigation.

Of the 5,230 referrals stated above, 733 were disseminated for investigation to the law enforcement authorities - i.e. the South African Police Services (SAPS), inclusive of the Directorate of Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) and the Crime Intelligence Division (CI).

Year on year statistics are tabulated below:

Year	Total referred	To law enforcement
2011/2012	761	108
2012/2013	883	200
2013/2014	883	64
2014/2015	870	61
2015/2016	511	89
2016/2017	1,322	211
2017/2018 (April, May)	49	21
Total	5,279	754

End.

14 June 2017 - NW1557

Lorimer, Mr JR to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources

(1)(a) When did his department become aware of illegal sand mining at Agate Terrace in the Eastern Cape and (b) what steps (i) have been taken and (ii) will be taken by his department to stop the illegal mining practices; (2) whether he has found that the steps taken have proven effective in combatting illegal sand mining; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) (a) how many cases of illegal sand mining has his department acted upon (i) in each of the past three financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017 and (b) what is the detailed breakdown of the number of cases in respect of each province?

Source
Link

Reply:

1.(a) The Department became aware of illegal sand mining at Agate Terrace in the Eastern Cape on 14 October 2015.

(b) (i) The area of concern was visited 6 times, on 09 December 2015, 22 and 23 November 2016, 09 February 2017, 14 February 2017 and 18 May 2017.

On 9th of December 2015, a certain Mr Zizi Gwele was found loading sand into his truck with spades, he refused to give his full contact details and was given a verbal warning and instructed to leave the site, which he did.

During the follow up inspections conducted between 22 and 23 November 2016 to 18 May 2017 no person was found mining sand in the area mentioned above.

(ii) The Department is in the process of identifying the landowners in order to ensure that access to the site is controlled. The site will be continuously monitored until such time the transgressors are found and the relevant enforcement action will be taken against them.

2. In this particular case, the steps taken have proven to be effective as Mr Zizi Gwele, who was previously found on site and given a warning, was not present or seen on site in all occasions. In addition, no any other person was found mining sand between 22 and 23 November 2016 until 18 May 2017 when we conducted follow up site visits.

3. Below is a breakdown of reported cases of illegal sand mining that the department acted upon (i) in each of the past three financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017 and (b) and the detailed breakdown of the number of illegal sand mining cases in respect of each province.

Province	2014-2015	2015-2016	2016-2017	1 April 2017 to date	Total per province
Gauteng	0	9	1	0	10
Mpumalanga	7	5	8	0	20
Eastern Cape	0	7	13	1	21
Limpopo	1	6	23	5	35
North West	0	0	0	1	1
Free State	0	0	0	2	2
Kwazulu Natal	0	26	31	6	63
Western Cape	0	0	0	0	0
Northern Cape	0	0	0	0	0
Total	8	53	76	15	152

Approved/Not Approved

Mr MJ Zwane, MP

Minister of Mineral Resources

Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017

14 June 2017 - NW1083

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the National Treasury conducted an investigation into the sale of strategic oil reserves; if not, why not; if so, on what date (a) was the investigation completed and (b) will he table the report in the National Assembly?

Source
Link

Reply:

In June 2016, the National Treasury met with various officials within the Department of Energy (DoE), the Central Energy Fund (CEF) and the Strategic Fuel Fund (SFF). This meeting was held subsequent to the National Treasury learning of the disposal of the strategic oil reserves by the SFF with a view of understanding the details of what had occurred.

Following the meeting, the SFF committed to submitting to the National Treasury all documentation relating to the disposal process. The National Treasury reviewed the documentation in order to ascertain the legality of the process followed in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) and the Central Energy Fund Act of 1977.

The National Treasury completed its review and reported its findings and recommendations to the former Minister of Energy in August 2016. No response has been received to date. The former Minister of Energy instituted an investigation into the stock disposal process, however, the findings of the investigation have not been reported to the National Treasury.

14 June 2017 - NW1518

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)With reference to the revelations made in court that the former SA Revenue Services (SARS) Group Executive of Business Intelligence (name furnished), remained employed by the (a) National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and (b) State Security Agency (SSA), while she was employed by SARS, was the Commissioner of the SARS aware that the specified person was still employed by the NIA and SSA while in the employ of SARS; if not, why not; if so, what are the full details of the reasons why SARS permitted this arrangement; (2) whether the specified person received any compensation from the NIA and SSA during her employ at SARS; if so, what are the details of all compensation received in each case; (3) what are the full details of the (a) specified person’s deployment to SARS as a spy and (b) persons the specified person spied on; (4) whether there are other SARS employees who (a) are currently or (b) ever were employed by the SSA in a covert capacity; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the full details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

1.In the period the Commissioner has been employed with SARS, there is no record of the said GE.

2.SARS is unable to respond on behalf of SSA.

3. Please refer to response one (1) above.

4. SARS employees are employed in the capacity for which they are contracted for.

14 June 2017 - NW1250

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Why were members of the Standing Committee on Finance not invited by the National Treasury to attend the 2017 World Economic Forum on Africa held in Durban between 3 and 5 May 2017; (2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Source
Link

Reply:

The Presidency is responsible for invitations to the World Economic Forum on Africa meetings and not the National Treasury. Only the Presidency has the prerogative to extend invitations. The National Treasury is delegated by the Presidency to organise logistics for the convening of the conference, however invitations do not form part of the delegated mandate.

14 June 2017 - NW1115

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What number of cases relating to the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, Act 12 of 2004, as amended, have been referred to the SA Police Service by the Financial Intelligence Centre for further investigation since the specified Act was assented to and (b) what number of the specified cases have (i) been investigated and (ii) resulted in a conviction in (aa) total and (bb) each specified financial year since 2004?

Source
Link

Reply:

The FIC refers information in its possession for investigation to law enforcement agencies pursuant to its primary objectives and functions as defined in section 3 and 4 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001, as amended, with the aim of identifying proceeds of crime, combatting money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

The FIC does not refer cases of acts of criminality for investigation. Rather in terms of Section 40 of the Act, it refers packages of transactional and other information that present indicators of suspected criminality to be investigated by the competent authorities. It is for these authorities to determine if the transactions are indeed proceeds of crime, or may be associated with an unlawful predicate offence.

The FIC has recorded the information sought from 2012 onwards and which is set out below.

(a) Between 1 April 2012 till 31 March 2017 the FIC referred 87 matters for investigation by the competent authorities for them to determine if the transactions reported are proceeds of crime or connected to an unlawful predicate offence involving acts of corruption as defined by the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, Act 12 of 2004 (PRECCA) legislation.

The FIC made the following referrals related to suspected acts of corruption and for which statistics have been kept in the financial years:

2012/2013: 9

2013/2014: 8

2014/2015: 6

2015/2016: 40

2016/2017: 24

Total: 87 referrals.

(b) The FIC does not have information available regarding which of these matters have been investigated by the competent authorities or have resulted in a conviction.

13 June 2017 - NW954

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether, since the handing down of the Constitutional Court judgment on the Nkandla matter on 31 March 2016, his department has conducted any assessment of the security upgrades required at the private residence of the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, in Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) on what date was the assessment conducted and (b) was the assessment conducted by the (i) South African Police Services and/or (ii) State Security Agency; (2) did his department hire a consultant to do the assessment; if so, (a) who was the consultant (b) what is the total amount that the consultant was paid (c) did the assessment indicate that there is a need for more security upgrades, (d) what is the estimated cost of the upgrades and (e) has the work already commenced?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) Yes, 5 December 2016.

(1)(b)(i) Yes. The assessment was conducted by the SAPS Presidential Protection Service (PPS).

(1)(b)(ii) Not applicable.

(2) No, it is the mandate of the SAPS to conduct these assessments.

(2)(a) Not applicable.

(2)(b) Not applicable.

(2)(c) No,

(2)(d) The Department of Public Works (DPW) is responsible for the implementation of proposals, as contained in the security report, in addition to the cost associated with their implementation, which would include the cost associated with the hiring of consultants.

(2)(e) No.

Original signed BRIGADIER

f/HEAD: PRESIDENTIAL PROTECTION SERVICE

NPA MATHABATHE

Date: 18 May 2017

Reply to question 954 recommended/~~not recommended~~

Original signed LIEUTENANT GENERAL

ACTING NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLIEC SERVICE

SF MASEMOLA

Date: 26 May 2017

Reply to question 954 approved/not approved

MINISTER OF POLICE

FA MBALULA, MP

Date:

13 June 2017 - NW1637

Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry

(1)Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2518 on 15 November 2016, a further socio-economic impact assessment on the proposed National Liquor Amendment Bill 2016 was conducted; if so, (a) when was this presented to Cabinet and (b) what were the main economic effects highlighted in the study; 2) Why was the socio-economic impact assessment report on the (a) final Liquor Policy and (b) proposed Bill not sent to the National Economic Development and Labour Council, causing the discussion around the proposed Bill to deadlock?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) (a) The socio-economic impact assessment (SEIAS) on the proposed National Liquor Amendment Bill, 2016 (Bill) was conducted. The Bill together with the SEIAS report will be submitted to Cabinet for introduction into Parliament.

(2) (a) The SEIAS on the final Liquor Policy was never requested for submission to NEDLAC.

(b) The SEIAS on the Bill was requested by the Business constituency, but not by the Executive Director for all NEDLAC constituencies. In order to facilitate the conclusion of the NEDLAC report, the dti sent the SEIAS report to the Executive Director for discussion at NEDLAC. A date for the meeting is still to be set.

13 June 2017 - NW1117

Davis, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Basic Education

With reference to the note of the Auditor-General in his review of the 2017-18 Annual Performance Plan of her department, that her department is presently negotiating with unions on the implementation of performance agreements of principals, (a) why is there a delay in the implementation of the performance contracts, (b) which unions are currently opposed to the implementation of performance contracts and (c) what plans does she have to resolve the impasse over the implementation of performance contracts?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) The signing of work plans is a new service condition for principals and is embedded in the Quality Management System (QMS) for school-based educators. The QMS instrument requires all principals to develop work plans with clear targets and deliverables for their respective schools. The work plan will serve as a performance agreement that will be signed by both the principal and his/her immediate supervisor (i.e. the circuit manager). The Combined Trade Union- Autonomous Teachers Union (CTU-ATU) and the Department of Basic Education (DBE) have already signed the QMS collective agreement while SADTU still has to sign the agreement.

(b) The agreement has not been signed by SADTU. SADTU will only sign if the annual salary progression based on satisfactory performance increases from 1% to 1.5%. SADTU is using the 0.5% salary progression as a bargaining tool.

(c) The Minister of Basic Education has promulgated the revised Personnel Administrative Measures (PAM), dated 12 February 2016. The revised PAM includes the job descriptions of all educators from post level 1-4 and requires that a work-plan must be signed off between the educators and their immediate supervisors. The promulgation of the revised PAM has overtaken the impasse between the SADTU and the DBE with respect to the QMS as the job descriptions and requirement to develop work-plans are now regulated as policy and must be implemented by all principals and circuit managers in Provincial Departments of Education as part of the compliance measures as regulated in PAM. The DBE has further informed HEDCOM and CEM about the need to ensure that all school principals and circuit managers are informed about this and implement this as a compliance measure. The ELRC has also conducted training of all provinces on the revised PAM so that all principals and PED officials understand the amendments. This training has further assisted to ensure that all levels in the education system are informed of the revised measures and are able to implement it as part of compliance.

13 June 2017 - NW1410

Brauteseth, Mr TJ to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

What (a) total amount has been spent by his department on legal fees (i) in the (aa) 2014-15, (bb) 2015-16 and (cc) 2016-17 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017 and (b) are the (i) details, (ii) outcomes and (iii) costs of each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a)(i),(aa),(bb),(cc),(ii),(b)(i),(ii),(iii) Due to the nature and volume of information requested, the Department will collate the information and submit to Parliament by 31 July 2017.

13 June 2017 - NW1474

Walters, Mr TC to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

By what date will the forensic report of the National Forensic Services investigation into conflict on the Nirwanda Farm in the Hex River Valley be made public; (2) What is his position regarding the recommendations contained in the specified forensic report that (a) a criminal investigation be conducted on alleged corruption between the current and former officials of his department and certain entities, (b) disciplinary action be taken against an official from his department, (c) investigations be conducted on other projects where certain entities (names furnished) have been appointed as a strategic partner, (d) a legal opinion be sought on how to regularise the Nirwanda Progressive Land Acquisition Policy Project and (e) civil claims be instituted for the recovery of funds due to his department; (3) Whether any other officials are also implicated in alleged irregularities at Nirwanda; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. The Department of Rural Development and Land Reform has referred this matter for criminal investigation by the relevant law enforcement agencies. As such, the report will not be made public yet.

2. The Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform instructed the recommendations as per the forensic report be implemented and as such:

a) Please refer to part (1) above.

b) Disciplinary action has been instituted against the implicated official who is still in the employ of the Department.

c) The Department has instituted preliminary investigations as per the recommendations of the forensic investigation report.

d) A Senior Counsel opinion is being obtained in this regard.

e) Please refer to part (2)(d) above.

3. Please refer to part (2)(b) above.

13 June 2017 - NW1398

Hill-Lewis, Mr GG to ask the MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

Are there any current impediments to the export of South African (a) meat and (b) animal related products, including eggs, to the European Union, relating to the failure by the country to renew its Approved Residue Plan; if so, what (i) are the relevant details and (ii) is being done to resolve these impediments?

Source
Link

Reply:

9a) and (b) No. There are no impediments to the export of South African meat, animal related products to the European Union (EU) relating to the failure by the country to renew its approved residue plan.

South Africa submitted the National Chemical Residue Control Programme to the EU on 11 April 2017. However, there were challenges identified during the recent audit carried out by the EU in South Africa in February 2017.

The challenges are being addressed with all relevant stakeholders and the EU is continuously being apprised of the developments. The Department is currently sourcing funding to implement a full National Chemical Residue Control Programme. Furthermore the Department and the Red Meat Industry Forum are discussing the possibility of launching a Public Private Partnership on residue monitoring. The results of the project and resultant outcomes are expected at the end of June 2017.

13 June 2017 - NW1141

Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

(a) With reference to the budget allocation, and projection as reflected in the annual performance plan which was discussed in the meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Rural Development and Land Reform on 3 May 2017, why is the intake of Mpumalanga National Rural Youth Service Corps students and budget significantly lower than the rest of the other provinces, (b) why has the budget allocation been reduced, (c) what percentage of the budget is allocated to skills development and (d) what is the monetary value of that budget percentage?

Source
Link

Reply:

a) The Mpumalanga Province did not recruit youth into National Rural Youth Service Corps Programme (NARYSEC) during the 2012 financial year. As a result the number of youth currently in the NARYSEC Programme in Mpumalanga Province is lower than other provinces. During the 2017/18 financial year the province will recruit about 300 youth.

The budget is allocated based on the number of participants/students currently in the programme, number of participants/students to be recruited during the financial year and amounts to be paid for training. The budget allocated to Mpumalanga Province was calculated on the same principles.

(b) The budget allocation for Mpumalanga Province has not been reduced but increased by 27.8% in the current financial year from R25.196 m to R32.169 m.

(c) Skills development is allocated 29.9% of the budget.

(d) The monetary value is R9.62 m.

13 June 2017 - NW1325

Stander, Ms T to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1) With reference to her reply to question 566 on 31 March 2017, (a) what salary is being paid to the Acting Chief Executive Officer; (2) has the position been advertised; if not, why not; if so, (3) has the application period closed; if so, (a) when will the interviews be conducted, (b) how many applicants (i) applied for the position and (ii) were shortlisted for the position and (c) what are the pre-requisite qualifications for the position?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. (a) An Acting allowance equivalent to the difference of her permanent salary and the minimum salary level of the CEO’s salary band is payable to the Acting CEO.

2. Yes.

(3) Yes .

(a) Not yet determined.

(b) (i) 57 applications were received.

(ii) Shortlisting still in progress.

(c) Appropriate B Degree or equivalent qualification in education; Knowledge of the education sector is a prerequisite and at least 10 years’ experience at management level; Teaching experience will be a distinct advantage.

13 June 2017 - NW978

Davis, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(a) What is the purpose of the reports titled 2016 Qualitative Input Meeting – December 2016 External Moderator Report, for each subject in the National Senior Certificate examinations for 2016 and (b) will her department make these reports available to members of the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) INTRODUCTION

Umalusi processes for approval of results is not a tail end process. It begins with the quality assurance of several processes that culminate in a final product. Below are the processes that happen prior to the final standardisation process. The external moderators are engaged in these processes and the Assessment Standards Committee engages with the input from all these processes through qualitative input reports presented prior to the standardisation process.

1. THE PURPOSE OF THE QUALITATIVE INPUT REPORT

The qualitative input (QI) report assists the Assessment Standards Committee of Council (ASC) in their decision making process around standardisation matters per subject. It provides the committee with the history of quality assurance processes on a subject starting from the moderation of question paper(s), standardisation of the marking guidelines and ending with the process of verification of marking.

1.1 MODERATION OF QUESTION PAPERS

The QI report provides information on the status of the question paper at the point of approval. It indicates whether the question paper(s) met the required standards by meeting the set criteria such as appropriate distribution of cognitive demands as set out in the Subject Assessment Guideline, adequate coverage of the subject content, technical aspects including the quality of diagrams and pictures used in the question papers etc.

1.2 STANDARDISATION OF THE MARKING GUIDELINES

This part of the QI report gives details of the discussions on the marking guidelines leading to its finalisation before marking commences. Umalusi moderators play a role of an arbiter and final judge on what should be acceptable as appropriate responses, including alternate answers, to the various questions. Upon finalisation, the marking guideline is signed-off and no further changes and/or additions can be made without the consent of the relevant Umalusi moderator.

2.3 VERIFICATION OF MARKING

The verification of marking section of the QI report intends to provide information on whether marking in the various question papers was conducted in a consistent manner and confirms adherence to the marking guideline across provinces and regions. It also provides an opinion on whether marking was of quality and done accurately by checking on the allocation of marks and additions to arrive at the total mark obtained by a candidate. Umalusi has a right to request for remarking in a subject if there is enough evidence indicating that marking was done poorly and this may have unfairly advantaged or disadvantaged candidates.

(b) Yes, Umalusi will make the qualitative reports available to the PC on Basic Education.

13 June 2017 - NW1267

Steyn, Ms A to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

(a) What was the budget allocated to the development of the Agri-park project in Springbokpan since its inception, (b) what amount of the specified budget was utilised as at 16 May 2017, (c) what specific items was the allocated budget spent on and (d) what amount of the allocated budget was spent on (i) infrastructural implements and (ii) productive capacity; (2) (a) how many hectares were planted in the specified project, (b) who are the officials responsible, (c) under which programme was each hectare planted, (d) what is the cost for each hectare planted and (e) what types of crops were planted in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) (a) R120.7 million.

(b) During the 2015/2016 and 2016/17 FY the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR) spent R93.5 million.

(c) The budget was spent on, production inputs (seeds, fertiliser, chemicals and fuel), Mechanisation inclusive of (tractors, planters, disk harrows, cultivators, boom sprayers) and a harvester, planting support and the physical infrastructure development at Springbokpan Agrihub site.

(d) (i) R 35,4 million was spent on infrastructure implements (Mechanisation and a Harvester) in the 2015/16 and 2016/17 financial years.

(ii) R 46, 6 million was spent on production capacity over the 2015/16 and 2016/17 financial years.

(2) (a) In 2015/16 financial year 5450 ha was planted and in the 2016/17 financial 3050 ha was planted.

(b) Officials from the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform worked with officials from North West Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.

(c) Rural Enterprise and Industrial Development (REID) programme.

(d) In the 2015/16 FY the cost per hectare was R 6 128.00, in the 2016/17 FY the cost per hectare was R4 332.00.

(e) The main crops planted were sunflower and maize.

13 June 2017 - NW1478

Kalyan, Ms SV to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesQUESTION

Whether (a) his department and (b) each entity reporting to him procured any services from and/or made any payments to (i) a certain company (name furnished) or (ii) any other public relations firms; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, what (aa) services were procured, (bb) was the total cost, (cc) is the detailed breakdown of such costs, (dd) was the total amount paid, (ee) was the purpose of the payments and (ff) is the detailed breakdown of such payments?

Source
Link

Reply:

DAFF

DAFF has not procured services from any public relations firm including Bell Pottinger.

PPECB

PPECB has not procured services from any public relations firm including Bell Pottinger.

OBP

OBP has not procured services from any public relations firm including Bell Pottinger.

NCERA

NCERA has not procured services from any public relations firm including Bell Pottinger.

ARC

ARC has not procured services from any public relations firm including Bell Pottinger.

NAMC

NAMC has not procured services from any public relations firm including Bell Pottinger.

MLRF

MLRF has not procured services from any public relations firm including Bell Pottinger.

13 June 2017 - NW1324

Stander, Ms T to ask the Minister of Basic Education

With reference to the article titled SACE takes education forward through ethics, upgrades, that appeared in the Western Cape edition of The New Age newspaper on 3 April 2017, how many of the 593 complaints that the SA Council of Educators reported as having received in the 2015-16 financial year were cases of (a) sexual misconduct, (b) physical assault and (c) corporal punishment?

Source
Link

Reply:

SACE RESPONSE:

a) 2015/16-sexual misconduct 84

b and c) 2015/16-physical assault and corporal punishment 280

The South African Council of Educators (SACE) does not differentiate between physical assault and corporal punishment.

13 June 2017 - NW1323

Stander, Ms T to ask the Minister of Basic Education

With reference to the article titled SACE takes education forward through ethics, upgrades, that appeared in the Western Cape edition of The New Age newspaper on 3 April 2017, what are the constraints within the division that the SA Council of Educators refers to as preventing it from doing more work?

Source
Link

Reply:

SACE RESPONSE:

One of the biggest challenges within the division is capacity constraints. The division comprises of 3 permanent prosecutors to investigate and prosecute cases throughout the country and it has a further 2 investigators on a permanent basis.

A prosecutorial function is a specialised function that requires persons with the necessary training, skill and knowledge, preferably someone with legal or labour relations training and background.

The division makes use of trained panellists to assist with investigations and to chair disciplinary hearings. Although they are trained by the SACE, most of them still require a lot of further and continuous training.

13 June 2017 - NW1343

Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Police

(a) How many (i) new police stations are being built and (ii) upgrades to existing police stations are in the process of being performed in the 2017-18 financial year, (b) where is each police station located, (c) what is the total projected amount budgeted for the project and (d) why was the location chosen in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a)(i)(b)(c) The following four police stations are under construction in the 2017/2018 financial year:

PROVINCE	(a)(i)(b) POLICE STATIONS	(a)(i)(c) TOTAL PROJECT ALLOCATION
Eastern Cape	Qhasa	R31 680 800,00
Eastern Cape	Pholile	R30 132 867,00
Limpopo	Muyexe	R20 515 558,00
North West	Mareetsane	R31 591 029,00
TOTAL		R113 920 254,00

(a)(ii)(b)(c) The following four existing police stations are being renovated in the 2017/2018 financial year:

PROVINCE	(a)(ii)(b) POLICE STATIONS	(a)(ii)(c) TOTAL PROJECT ALLOCATION
KwaZulu-Natal	Nyoni	R12 242 359,00
Limpopo	Bandelierkop	R3 483 341,00
Western Cape	Calitzdorp	R1 200 000,00
Western Cape	Leeu Gamka	R2 940 000,00
TOTAL		R19 865 700,00

(d) The location of all projects, is determined by Provincial Commissioners and confirmed by the National Management Forum. The criteria is based on factors such as crime trends, operational needs, etc.

13 June 2017 - NW1010

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

What is the detailed breakdown of the full inventory that the SA Police Service discovered during its raid conducted in Randburg’s central business district on 27 March 2017?

Source
Link

Reply:

The ammunitions that were recovered, were not recovered as a result of a raid, but as a result of a complaint which had been reported to the Randburg Police Station.

The following were recovered:

Firearms

	Firearm	Quantity
1	AK 47 Rifle	7
2	R5 Rifle	1
3	M16 Rifle	1
4	Homemade Rifle	1
5	Handgun Pistol	18
6	Handgun Revolver	12
7	Uzi	1
8	9mm pistol barrel	2

Magazines

	Firearm	Quantity
1	Rifle magazine	32
2	Pistol 9mm	10

Ammunitions

	Firearm	Quantity
1	Rifle ammunition	7 boxes + 7 rounds of ammunition
2	9mm ammunition	17 boxes + 5 rounds of ammunition
3	.38 Special ammunition	2 boxes
4	1 bag with mixed calibres of ammunition
5	7 bags containing spent cartridges

Explosives

One improvised explosive device with:

three connected mortars;
three lengths of detonation cord; and
three detonators.

One improvised explosive device with:

four connected mortars;
three lengths of detonation cord; and
four detonators.

One improvised explosive device with:

Outside cover of a bullet resistant vest (not a SAPS issue);
Cellular telephone adapted to be an electronic switch, with protruding electric wires;
Two flat squares of explosives (tiles), connected to each other;
Explosive cord;
Two detonators at each of the two ends of the cord, with one of the explosive tiles attached; and
Two detonators.

One smoke grenade of a commercial type used on boats, which is detonated when they are in distress;

Four flares, commercial type used on boats, which is detonated when they are in distress.

One military grade smoke grenade.

One military stun grenade.

Two M26 hand grenades.

One F1 hand grenade.

Five teargas canisters.

One hand radio with charger.

One bag with bullet resistant jacket outers (not SAPS issue).

13 June 2017 - NW1123

Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Basic Education

Whether, with reference to her reply to question 213 on 6 March 2017, the requested information has been received from the Council for Quality Assurance in General and Further Education and Training (Umalusi); if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date is the information expected; if so, by what date will she communicate it?

Source
Link

Reply:

With reference to question 213:

With reference to English First Additional Language Paper 3 of the 2016 National Senior Certificate (NSC) examinations, were Umalusi moderators instructed that the word count requirement in the essay question be ignored; if so, (a) why was this instruction given and (b) which official gave this instruction to the moderators?

Within a legislative framework, no official could instruct Umalusi moderators to ignore examination and curriculum policy. During the marking guideline discussion, Umalusi’s moderators serve as the ultimate authority in the standardisation of the marking guidelines. Therefore no instruction was given.

However, during the marking guideline discussion of English First Additional Language Paper 3, clarity was given in terms of the required word count. The stipulated word count is 250 to 300 words. It was emphasised that in the interest of fairness and the credibility of the marking process, there has to be a common understanding of the rubric’s requirements. The rubric for the marking of the essay in Section A of the mentioned paper makes no provision that penalties should be imposed when candidates exceed the word limit of 300 words. This was pointed out to ensure that no marking officials impose unfair penalties. The word count is therefore stipulated to guide candidates on the length of the essay.

13 June 2017 - NW1528

Vos, Mr J to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

With reference to the lifting of the moratorium on recruitment for Government departments, how many posts in her department will be (a) advertised and (b) filled in each quarter in the (i) 2017-18, (ii) 2018-19 and (iii) 2019-20 financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

The figures below are based upon a projection.

Financial Year	Advertised	Filled
		Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
2017/18	782 posts in Q1 90 posts in Q2 90 posts in Q3 90 posts in Q4 Total:1052 (approximately)	220	248	247	247
2018/19 (Projected Natural Attrition)	270	0	90	90	90
2019/20 (Projected Natural Attrition)	270	0	90	90	90

13 June 2017 - NW654

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

With regard to section 11 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, Act 32 of 2007, as amended, how many (a) arrests have been made, (b) cases have been opened, (c) dockets were referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for a decision and (d) dockets were finalised through an admission of guilt fine (i) in each of the past five financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2016?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a)(b)(c)(d)(i)(ii) The information is as follows:

and (ii) Financial year	(a) Number of arrests	(b) Number of cases opened	(c) Number of dockets referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for a decision	(d) Number of dockets finalised through an admission of guilt fine
2012/2013	275	281	11	19
2013/2014	419	408	4	36
2014/2015	373	366	7	37
2015/2016	406	406	7	26
2016/2017 (1 April 2016 to 28 February 2017)	380	383	14	11

13 June 2017 - NW1376

Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Police

(1)What number of members of the SA Police Service (SAPS) are currently fully and comprehensively trained to use the software application commonly referred to as Analyst Notebook; 2) what number of (a) applications for cell phone data in terms of section 19 of the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act, Act 70 of 2002, were submitted by the SAPS to (i) the designated judge, (ii) regional magistrates and (iii) magistrates in the period 1 January 2014 to 31 March 2017 and (b) of the specified applications were (i) granted and (ii) declined in each case; (3) what number of times has the SAPS outsourced the (a) investigation or (b) analysis of cell phone data to private consultants in the specified period; (4) whether any measures have been put in place to prevent the abuse of cell phone data by (a) SAPS members and/or (b) private consultants; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) 785

(2)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(b)(i)(ii) This information is classified

(3)(a)(b) This information is classified

(4)(a)(b) This information is classified

13 June 2017 - NW1344

Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Police

Whether the SA Police Service deployed additional police officers (a) at or (b) around the Parliament of South Africa in the week preceding the 2017 State of the Nation Address, including on 9 February 2017; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, in each case, (i) what is the total number of additional officers that were deployed on each day, (ii) where were the additional officers sourced from, (iii) did the police stations, from which the additional officers were sourced during the period concerned, experience staff shortages and (iv) what is the total amount that was (aa) budgeted and (bb) actually paid on overtime for the (aaa) specified additional police officers, and (bbb) police officers assigned to cover the shifts of the specified additional police officers?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) Yes.

(a)(i) 1 February 2017 - 9 officers.

2 February 2017 - 13 officers.

3 February 2017 - 12 officers.

4 February 2017 - 14 officers.

5 February 2017 - 18 officers.

6 February 2017 - 18 officers.

7 February 2017 - 86 officers.

8 February 2017 - 89 officers.

9 February 2017 - 504 officers.

(a)(ii) The additional officers were sourced from the Division: Protection and Security Services (PSS) Head Office, PSS: Eastern Cape, PSS: Kwazulu-Natal, PSS: Northern Cape and PSS: Mpumalanga.

(a)(iii) No.

(a)(iv)(aa) R 1, 243, 964.00

(a)(iv)(bb) R 1, 018, 295.78

(aaa) Please see reply to paragraph (bb) above.

(bbb) No additional overtime was paid as the extra shift was part of the total operational plan.

(b) No personnel were deployed around the Parliament of South Africa.

13 June 2017 - NW1347

Mbabama, Ms TM to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Were the alleged death threat(s) received by a certain person (name furnished) reported to the SA Police Service; if so, for each threat reported, (a) on what date was the threat reported, (b) at what police station was the threat reported, (c) what is the CAS number for the docket(s) that was opened, (d) who is the investigating officer assigned to investigate the complaint and (e) what is the status of the investigation; (2) was a threat assessment conducted for each threat reported; if not, why not; if so, (a) on what date were the results of the threat assessment available and (b) what were the recommendations of the threat assessment results; (3) did the reported threats result in (a) a VIP security detail being awarded to the specified person and/or (b) an increase in the VIP security detail assigned to the specified person; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) to (e) The response required in terms of this question, will require the Division: Protection and Security Service (PSS), to disclose protected information regarding the life of the individual. This may put her life at risk and compromise the investigation which is in progress.

2. Yes.

(2)(a) 11 May 2009.

(2)(b) It was recommended that protection be provided to the specified person.

(3)(a) Yes.

(3)(b) Protection was based on the threat and no additional protectors were allocated.

13 June 2017 - NW1335

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Has he received disclosures of interest in terms of section 12(2) of the South African Police Service Employment Regulations of 2008 from (a) the National Commissioner, (b) the Deputy National Commissioner, (c) each of the Provincial Commissioners and (d) any person acting in any of the above positions for the (i) the 2012-13, (ii) the 2013-14, (iii) 2014-15, (iv) 2015-16 and (v) 2016-17 financial years; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

No disclosures of interest in terms of Regulation 12(2) of the South African Police Service Employment Regulations of 2008 were submitted by:

(a) the National Commissioner,

(b) the Deputy National Commissioner,

(c) each of the Provincial Commissioners and

(d) any person acting in any of the above positions,

for the following financial years:

(i) 2012-13;

(ii) 2013-14;

(iii) 2014-15;

(iv) 2015-16; and

(v) 2016-17.

The disclosure of interests of all of the above-mentioned functionaries in respect of the periods under discussion were dealt with as contemplated in Regulation 12(1) of the South African Police Service Employment Regulations, 2008 and the provisions of Regulation 12(2) of such Regulations did not apply to any of them in respect of the periods under discussion.

13 June 2017 - NW1209

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Whether members of the SA Police Service (SAPS) entered the National Assembly (NA) chamber on 09 February 2017, if so (a) how many, (b) what weapons were they armed with, (c) which units did they belong to, (d) under whose authority did they enter the NA Chamber and (e) whether clear and present danger to the life and limb of the members of the National Assembly or the National Council of Provinces had been established before SAPS members entered the NA chamber?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) No members of the South African Police Service (SAPS) entered the National Assembly (NA) chamber on 9 February 2017, because the NA does not form part of their deployment mandate.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) Not applicable.

(d) Not applicable.

(e) Not applicable.

13 June 2017 - NW1042

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What is the total number of members of the SA Police Services who are currently suspended, (b) in each case (i) on what date was each member suspended; (ii) what is the rank of each specified member; (iii) what is the total amount that has been paid to each suspended member to date including (aa) salary and (bb) other benefits and (c) what steps have been taken to finalise the matter as speedily as possible?

Source
Link

Reply:

a) The total number of the South African Police Service (SAPS) members, who are currently on suspension, is 50.

(b)(i)(ii)(iii)(aa) and (bb)

No.	(ii) Rank	Date of Suspension	(iii)(aa) and (bb) Total salary paid to date
1.	Captain	2012-09-11	R1 633 228,96
2.	Captain	2012-09-11	R1 584 518,17
3.	Captain	2012-09-11	R1 545 104,50
4.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 234 955,70
5.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R866 906,84
6.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 348 358,91
7.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 346 799,53
8.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 410 625,59
9.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 166 801,04
10.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 351 706,48
11.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 365 550,83
12.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 344 472,55
13.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 381 722,30
14.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 342 449,71
15.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 215 676,69
16.	Warrant Officer	2012-09-11	R1 146 384,56
17.	Sergeant	2012-09-11	R1 027 741,84
18.	Sergeant	2012-09-11	R1 087 664,79
19.	Security Officer	2014-12-11	R286 449,00
20.	Constable	2015-05-16	R184 462,92
21.	Sergeant	2012-08-30	R949 219,04
22.	Warrant Officer	2012-08-30	R1 214 152,98
23.	Sergeant	2012-08-30	R947 251,88
24.	Data Typist	2017-01-22	R52 723,82
25.	Constable	2017-01-18	R49 921,31
26.	Constable	2017-02-10	R39 296,08
27.	Constable	2017-02-10	R55 330,97
28.	Constable	2017-02-10	R41 020,56
29.	Captain	2016-08-03	R267 158,25
30.	Captain	2016-04-12	R384 170,20
31.	Captain	2017-01-24	R99 627,09
32.	Constable	2017-01-17	R46 275,16
33.	Captain	2016-05-20	R379 943,19
34.	Constable	2017-02-17	R35 308,91
35.	Warrant Officer	2016-08-25	R85 570,37
36.	Captain	2016-08-15	R277 905,79
37.	Captain	2016-08-15	R104 485,05
38.	Warrant Officer	2016-08-12	R64 240,39
39.	Constable	2015-12-30	R256 683,99
40.	Captain	2016-10-19	R198 231,38
41.	Constable	2015-10-30	R332 334,38
42.	Captain	2016-10-10	R206 703,06
43.	Constable	2017-02-20	R33 087,45
44.	Constable	2017-03-23	R31 367,95
45.	Constable	2017-04-03	R13 990,07
46.	Constable	2017-04-03	R13 466,74
47.	Sergeant	2017-04-07	R13 973,95
48.	Constable	2017-04-03	R13 990,07
49.	Constable	2017-04-03	R13 466,74
50.	Admin Clerk	2017-04-07	R14 586,25

(c) Disciplinary measures have been instituted against all the members who are on suspension and their disciplinary hearings are in process. Some of the members on the list have been dismissed, however, they have appealed the sanction.

13 June 2017 - NW1334

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Whether he has received disclosures of interest in terms of section 12(1) of the South African Police Service Employment Regulations of 2008 from (a) the National Commissioner, (b) the Deputy National Commissioner, (c) each of the Provincial Commissioners and (d) any person acting in any of the above positions for the (i) 2012-13, (ii) 2013-14, (iii) 2014-15, (iv) 2015-16 and (v) 2016-17 financial years; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

The disclosures of interest in terms of Regulation 12(1) of the South African Police Service (SAPS) Employment Regulations of 2008 were submitted by:

(a) the National Commissioner,

(b) the Deputy National Commissioner,

(c) the Provincial Commissioners and

(d) any person acting in any of the above positions, for the following financial years:

(i) 2012-13;

(ii) 2013-14;

(iii) 2014-15;

(iv) 2015-16; and

(v) 2016-17.

However, in respect of the 2015-16 financial year, the disclosures of interest of the National Commissioner, the Deputy National Commissioner: Corporate Service Management and the Head: Corporate Communication, who were suspended and who were not allowed access to any premises of the SAPS, were not submitted. The Public Service Commission (PSC) was informed accordingly.

The relevant details in each declaration consisted of, inter alia, the following:

Shares and other financial interests in private or public companies and other corporate entities recognised by law;
Directorships and partnerships;
Remunerative work performed outside the SAPS;
Consultancies and retainer-ships;
Sponsorships;
Gifts and hospitality from another source than a family member; and
Ownership and other interests in land and property, whether inside or outside the Republic.

Questions and Replies

19 June 2017 - NW1028

Robinson, Ms D to ask the Minister of Communications

Reply:

19 June 2017 - NW1322

Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education

Reply:

19 June 2017 - NW1033

Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Basic Education

Reply:

19 June 2017 - NW1023

Schmidt, Adv H to ask the Minister of Communications

Reply:

15 June 2017 - NW1440

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Reply:

15 June 2017 - NW425

Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

Reply:

15 June 2017 - NW677

Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

Reply:

15 June 2017 - NW1442

Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Reply:

15 June 2017 - NW1443

Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Reply:

15 June 2017 - NW1441

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Reply:

15 June 2017 - NW1507

Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1113

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1383

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW976

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1517

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1516

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1112

Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1152

Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1219

Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1531

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1557

Lorimer, Mr JR to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1083

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1518

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1250

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

14 June 2017 - NW1115

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Reply:

13 June 2017 - NW954

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

13 June 2017 - NW1637