Questions and Replies

Filter by year

24 November 2017 - NW3151

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether, in view of the important role that the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer (OCPO) plays in the Government’s procurement processes, including ensuring value for money, combating corruption and ensuring integrity in the Government’s procurement processes and systems and notwithstanding the general concern that he and / or the Treasury intends to change the mandate of the OCPO to the detriment of good, clean and corrupt-free governance, he and/or the Treasury does intend to amend the mandate of the OCPO; if so, (a) what aspects of the mandate does he intend to amend and (b) for what reasons?

Reply:

a) The National Treasury is not aware of any intention to amend the mandate of the OCPO.

b) Not applicable

24 November 2017 - NW3041

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What is the total number of trust funds that have been registered since 1 January 2003, (b) how many of those trust funds are compliant to the black economic empowerment provisions and (c) what are their details?

Reply:

The registration of trusts falls under the Department of Justice and is done by the relevant Masters of the High Court in each of the court’s divisions.

24 November 2017 - NW2986

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Have any members of the (a) SA Airways (SAA) (i) board of directors and/or (ii) management and/or (b) National Treasury met with any persons associated with the Public Investment Corporation and/or the Government Employees Pension Fund on matters relating to SAA during the six months ending on 30 September 2017; if so, what are the details of each meeting in terms of the (aa) dates of meetings, (bb) venues where meetings took place, (cc) purpose, agenda and outcomes or agreements of each meeting, (dd) copies of all documents presented at the meetings and (ee) details of persons present at the meetings including but not limited to, full names and who or what entity each person was representing. (2) whether he will furnish Mr R A Lees with copies of the minutes of each meeting; if not, why not; if so, by what date?

Reply:

(1)(a)(i)(ii) Yes, members of the South African Airways (SAA) board of directors and management did have meetings with the management of the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) on matters relating to the SAA during the six months period ending on 30 September 2017.

(aa) (bb)(cc)(dd)(ee)

Various meetings between the PIC and SAA were held. The two key meetings were the following:

  • On 23 June 2017, a meeting between the senior management teams of PIC and SAA took place at the SAA Offices in Ekhuruleni. The PIC’s Executive Head for Listed Investments, Mr Fidelis Madavo, led the PIC’s delegation. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the way forward for the PIC to conduct a detailed Due Diligence on SAA. The due diligence included risk analysis, financial analysis, ESG analysis as well as legal analysis. The following employees of the PIC were also present at the meeting:
    • Mr Paul Magula – Executive Head: Risk Management
    • Mr Ernest Nesane – Executive Head: Legal Services
    • Ms Rubeena Solomon – General Manager: Investment Support
    • Mr Leon Smit – General Manager: Fixed Income
    • Mr Lloyd Mahara – Portfolio Manager: Credit Analysis: Listed Investments
    • Mr Deon Botha – Head: Corporate Affairs
    • Ms Matseko Taukobong – ESG Manager: Listed Investments
    • Mr Kagiso Motepe – ESG Analyst: Listed Investments
    • Mr Sylvester Sebico – ESG Analyst: Listed Investments
    • Mr Wellington Masekesa – Executive Assistant to the CEO
    • Ms Sasa Fako – Legal Advisor
    • Mr Sindiso Ngqameni – Legal Graduate
    • Mr Tshifango Ndadza – Senior Market Risk Analyst.
  • On 25 July 2017, a meeting took place at the PIC Offices in Pretoria. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a 5-7 year funding plan to the amount of R6 billion for SAA. The following people were in attendance:
    • Dr Daniel Matjila – CEO of PIC
    • Ms Matshepo More – CFO of PIC
    • Mr Fidelis Madavo – Executive Head of Listed Equities of PIC
    • Mr Leon Smit – General Manager: Fixed Income of PIC
    • Mr Lloyd Mahara – Portfolio Manager: Credit Analysis of PIC
    • Mr Deon Botha – Head: Corporate Affairs of PIC
    • Ms Dudu Myeni – Former Chairperson of SAA
    • Mr Musa Zwane – Former Acting CEO of SAA
    • Ms Phumeza Nhantsi – CFO of SAA

2. In line with its standard practices and procedures, the PIC and SAA entered into a non-disclosure agreement and therefore the minutes of these meetings cannot be made available. However, it can be mentioned that following the due diligence process, the transaction was submitted to the Portfolio Management Committee, the Investment Committee and the PIC Board. The transaction was not approved.

24 November 2017 - NW2911

Profile picture: Kwankwa, Mr NL

Kwankwa, Mr NL to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether, pursuant to his statement that any recommendation about the possibility of extending or broadening the mandate of the SA Reserve Bank (SARB) should be brought to his attention in line with his mandate as the Minister of Finance and in light of the need to ensure better alignment of monetary and fiscal policy in the country as a strategy to unlock job-creating growth, the Government has considered the (a) need to broaden the mandate of the SARB to ensure that it also has a socio-economic development objective and (b) possibility of introducing a 1 percentage point tolerance interval over and above the upper band of the 3-6% inflation target in order to mitigate against central bank overreaction in times of sluggish growth or when the economy is in recession?

Reply:

a) No, there is no need to review the Constitution on the mandate of the SARB.

Sections 223-225 of the Constitution outline the primary object of the SARB, which is “to protect the value of the currency in the interest of balanced and sustainable economic growth in the Republic". Section 224 (2) requires regular consultation between the Bank and the Minister of Finance.

The current Constitution and legislation governing the SARB is therefore very broad, and does not constrain Government from adopting (and legislating) appropriate policies to facilitate inclusive growth and job-creation, achieve the objectives of the NDP, and reduce inequality and deliver basic services to all those residing in SA.

Whilst the debate on the role of the central bank is vibrant, both in South Africa and other countries, it is important that those calling for reviews provide the necessary research and motivation for proposing such reviews, including their understanding of the role of both fiscal and monetary policy, and what specific problems they are seeking to solve. The SARB’s monetary policy mandate cannot be separated from Government’s fiscal policy mandate and performance. Any attempt to amend these constitutional provisions without due regard for this relationship will generate unnecessary uncertainty, and impact negatively on growth and jobs.

b) The existing monetary policy framework, through flexible inflation targeting, allows for temporary deviations of inflation from the target in the event of shocks over which monetary policy has no impact. A specific tolerance level around the target would therefore not be necessary. An explicit tolerance indicator may potentially risk de-anchoring inflation expectations, and thereby constrain the SARB’s ability to respond flexibly to an inflation shock.

17 November 2017 - NW2411

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What are the full details of each current liability of (i) the SA Airways (SAA) and (ii) each of its subsidiaries as at 31 July 2017 and (b)(i) what is the detailed breakdown of all amounts owed to the creditors by (aa) the SAA and (bb) each of its subsidiaries that were only paid in part as at 31 July 2017 and (ii) by what date will the partially-paid amounts be paid in full in each case?

Reply:

SAA is not in a position to make the details requested available, as they are confidential and involve third parties.

10 November 2017 - NW3195

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

Has he found that South Africa can afford nuclear energy?

Reply:

National Treasury conducted preliminary analysis on the costs and economic impact of a nuclear build on the fiscus and the economy in 2015. This was based on the 2013 pre-feasibility study undertaken by the Department of Energy to procure and build 9.6GW of nuclear generated energy, as per the 2010 Integrated Resource Plan.

With limited information available in the pre-feasibility study, the analysis show that a 9.6GW nuclear programme would have significant implications for national income, South Africa’s total debt burden, international financial position, the balance of payments, for taxpayers and electricity consumers who will bear the full costs of the programme.

The deteriorating fiscal position and increasing fiscal risks, as outlined in the Medium Term Budget Policy Statement makes it harder to finance and/or guarantee a programme of this nature. An accurate assessment of the affordability of the nuclear new build programme needs to be based on a full socio economic cost benefit analysis, which shows the price path, affordability to households, implications for inflation and national income.

10 November 2017 - NW2962

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)(a) What total amount of additional revenue will be raised by the SA Revenue Service (SARS) following its amendments to the allowable deductions from taxes for persons with disabilities and (b) why did SARS (i) make the determination on the specified amendment, (ii) not phase the changes out and (iii) apply the specified amendments retroactively; (2) whether SARS has conducted any studies and/or investigations to determine what the financial and economic consequences of the specified amendments will be on taxpaying (a) persons with disabilities and (b) the dependants of the specified persons; if not, in each case, why not; if so, how (i) will the specified (aa) persons and (bb) dependants be affected and (ii) were these outcomes determined?

Reply:

1. It is not clear which amendments the honourable member is referring to, so it is assumed that reference is being made to the list of qualifying disability expenses that SARS is currently in the process of updating. The changes in the list are not about raising additional revenue. The changes are being made to ensure that the list of expenses prescribed by SARS is as comprehensive as possible and that the expenses are in line with the paragraph (c) of the definition of “qualifying medical expense” in section 6B(1). This will ensure that the list does not create inequity as far as persons who do not have a physical impairment or disability are concerned. (e.g. If a person with a disability purchases a vehicle because a person is using a wheelchair, it will unfair to allow such an expense instead of only allowing modifications to the vehicle to allow the wheelchair easy access in and out of the vehicle). The prescribed expenses must, as far as possible, only include expenses without which a person with physical impairment or disability will not be able to perform activities of daily living. (e.g. If a person cannot walk, the wheelchair is an aid that assists that person to be able to move from point A to point B. Without this wheelchair, the person cannot do this activity of daily living on his or her own and will always require assistance from other people to do so.) The amendments are, therefore being made to ensure that the list is line with the requirements of the legislation; which are based on practice in other leading democracies, such as Canada. It is understood that SARS’ understanding of the requirements of the legislation has been unsuccessfully challenged by “at least” one taxpayer in the Tax Board. SARS will monitor the outcome of any appeal to inform its future decision making. The amendments will only come in on the effective date of the updated list going forward and are not made with retrospective effect.

2. Since the list is only being amended to ensure that it is as comprehensive as possible, while ensuring that the expenses listed are in full compliance with the legislation, SARS has not conducted any studies and/or investigations to determine what the financial and economic consequences of the changes to the list are to persons with disabilities and their dependants. National Treasury would determine the financial and economic consequences of substantial changes in legislative policy, such as the change from a deduction to a tax credit system for these expenses. 

10 November 2017 - NW2830

Profile picture: Vos, Mr J

Vos, Mr J to ask the Minister of Finance

What is the total amount of value-added tax that the SA Revenue Service received from the sales of (a) domestic airline tickets and (b) international airline tickets for each airline (i) in each of the past three financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017?

Reply:

The SARS systems do not differentiate the various transactions that are subject to VAT in a manner which will allow SARS to identify the VAT transactions for airline tickets separately. It should be noted further that International Airline tickets are charged VAT at 0% as they are exported services.

SARS is therefore unable to provide the data as requested.

09 November 2017 - NW2988

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

With reference to his reply to question 2736 on 19 September 2017, (a) why is the amount of R3 649 961 241,00 in development loans extended to the rest of Africa quoted in the specified reply for the 2016-17 financial year not equal to the amount reflected under the Development Bank of Southern Africa’s 2016-17 Annual Financial Statement under the same category and (b) what are the full details of the deviations in the amounts in terms of (i) amounts lent, (ii) sectors lent to, (iii) names of the clients and (iv) names of each country that the client is from for each deviation?

Reply:

The questionnaire was specific to 2016/17 hence the 3.6bn, the amount in the annual report is the total exposure.

The DBSA disbursed the total amount of R3.7 billion during the 2016/17 financial year to the rest of African continent (excluding South Africa). The total disbursement amount was made out of loan disbursements of R3.6 billion and equity investments of R69.9 million. Refer to section 1 (Disbursements to the rest of Africa for the year ended 31 March 2017) overleaf for the detail breakdown of the disbursements. The analysis also includes the current year numbers for the period ending 31 August 2017.

Section 2 (Development loans exposure to the Rest of Africa as at 31 March 2017) details the DBSA’s exposure to the rest of Africa (excluding South Africa) amounts to R17.6 billion for the year ended 31 March 2017. The analysis also includes the current year numbers for the period ending 31 August 2017.

Section 1: Disbursements to the rest of Africa for the year ended 31 March 2017

 

A. Loan disbursements

     
       

  Country

2016-2017

YTD August 2017

Sector

Angola

 

155 119 582

 

Angola Ministry of Finance

-

155 119 582

Transportation

 

 

 

 

Ghana

1 576 372 369

343 879 518

 

Cenpower Generation Company Limited

24 732 369

60 647 143

Energy

Karpower International

1 551 640 000

 

Energy

Ghana Airports Company Limited

 

283 232 374

Transportation

Kenya

220 562 054

45 381 516

 

Kenya Pipeline Company Limited

220 562 054

45 381 516

Commercial - Transportation

Madagascar

 

99 725 954

 

Ravinala Airports, S.A.

 

99 725 954

Transportation

Zambia

1 803 965 113

 

 

Itezhi-Tezhi Power Corporation (ITPC) Lusaka

158 009 192

-

Energy

Maamba Collieries Limited

217 955 921

 

Energy

Zambia Electricity Supply Corporation Limited

1 428 000 000

-

Energy

Zimbabwe

49 061 705 *

-

 

*Infralink (Private) Limited

49 061 705

-

Roads And Drainage

Total Loan Disbursement

R 3 649 961 241

R 644 106 570

 

* This disbursement was a short term loan in respect of the insurance premium paid on behalf of Infralink (Private) Limited with the view of ensuring that the insurance cover on the loan does not lapse.

 

B. Equity Investments

2016-2017

YTD August 2017

Sector

       

Multi- Country

 

 

 

Africa Infrastructure Investment Fund II

8 207 547

387 774

Commercial infrastructure

Emerging Capital Partners

5 622 674

5 503 713

Commercial infrastructure

Pan African Infrastructure Development Fund

56 106 729

9 811 080

Commercial infrastructure

Total

69 936 950

15 702 567

 
       

# Total Loans and equities disbursements for year ending 31 March 2017

R 3 719 898 191

R 659 809 137

 

# As disclosed on page 8 of the 2016/17 Annual Financial Statements

Section 2: Development loans exposure to the Rest of Africa as at 31 March 2017

Country

Exposure -2016/17

Exposure as at YTD August 2017 

Sector

Angola

2 072 937 628

1 801 317 553

 

Angola Ministry of Finance

1 833 957 908

1 791 947 183

 

 

1 798 731 195

1 607 495 863

Roads And Drainage

 

35 226 713

184 451 320

Transportation

Banco de Poupanca e Credito

20 528 354

9 370 389

Commercial - Fund

Sonangol Finance Limited

218 451 366

-

Energy

Congo

1 369 557 404

1 241 702 054

 

(SNPC) SOCIÉTÉ NATIONALE DES PETROLES DU CONGO

1 369 557 404

1 241 702 054

Energy

Ghana

1 582 410 256

1 871 284 196

 

Cenpower Generation Company Limited

205 872 573

257 454 558

Energy

Ghana Airports Company Limited

671 622

289 155 048

Transportation

KARPOWER INTERNATIONAL B.V.

1 375 866 061

1 324 674 590

Energy

Kenya

304 643 104

333 044 872

 

Kenya Pipeline Company Limited

304 643 104

333 044 872

Commercial - Transportation

Lesotho

610 611 295

578 773 473

 

Lesotho Highlands Development Authority

38 799 947

40 276 042

 

 

1 045 109

889 438

Energy

 

37 754 838

39 386 604

Roads And Drainage

Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority

15 250 000

15 426 770

Water

Tsepong (Pty) Ltd

556 561 348

523 070 661

Social Infrastructure - Health

Madagascar

 

108 020 467

 

Ravinala Airports, S.A.

 

108 020 467

Transportation

Mauritius

467 714 692

471 366 657

 

Betamax Ltd

193 749 477

192 996 462

Transportation

Smile Telecoms Holdings Limited

273 965 215

278 370 194

Communications

Mozambique

510 577 955

455 137 690

 

Compania Mozambicana De Hdrocarbonetos SARS

185 362 354

148 849 304

Energy

Electricidade De Mocambique

65 691 031

44 689 974

Energy

Energia de Mocambique LDA

60 546 032

60 456 429

Energy

Mozambique Celular Limitada

76 510 856

76 947 960

Communications

Telecomunicacoes De Mozambique

122 470 525

124 196 866

Communications

Namibia

83 917 238

83 296 869

 

Namibia Power Corporation Pty Ltd

83 917 238

83 296 869

Energy

Swaziland

217 824 828

229 838 204

 

Swazi Paper Mills (Pty) Ltd (SPM)

157 354 224

166 268 460

Commercial - Manufacturing

Swaziland Electricity Board

5 143 108

5 343 238

Energy

Swaziland Government

55 327 496

58 226 505

 

 

51 316 973

54 005 842

Commercial - Agriculture

 

4 010 523

4 220 663

Water

       
       

Tanzania

113 283 353

96 919 444

 

Kilwa Energy Company Limited

604

585

Energy

Maweni Limestone Ltd

113 282 750

96 918 860

Commercial - Manufacturing

Zambia

7 124 095 838

6 851 912 015

 

ICC

12 665 839

 

Commercial - Fund

Itezhi-Tezhi Power Corporation (ITPC) Lusaka

423 491 908

421 792 793

Energy

Kariba North Bank Extension Power Corporation (KNB

956 083 955

868 900 787

Energy

Lunsemfwa Hydro Power Company Limited (LHPC)

577

-

Energy

Maamba Collieries Limited

1 278 156 993

1 278 900 215

Energy

National Road Fund Agency (NRFA) Zambia

2 769 454 093

2 577 411 770

Roads And Drainage

The David Livingstone Safari

224 408 186

220 752 901

Commercial -Tourism

Zambia Electricity Supply Corporation Limited

1 459 834 287

1 484 153 549

Energy

Zimbabwe

2 561 247 560

2 446 947 190

 

Cottco (Pty) Ltd

129 560 131

117 783 454

Commercial - Agriculture

Infralink (Private) Limited

2 431 687 429

2 329 163 736

Roads And Drainage

Multi-Country

590 966 218

491 911 631

 

Eastern and Southern African Trade and Development

590 966 218

491 911 631

Commercial - Fund

^ Total book - Rest of Africa

R 17 609 787 368

R 17 061 472 314

 

^ As disclosed on page 40 (note 13.4) of the 2016/17 Annual Financial Statements

Remarks: Reply: Approved /Not Approved

07 November 2017 - NW3286

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether he or any person in the Executive or in the National Treasury is making changes to the management, monitoring and compliance unit of the National Treasury; if so, what are the relevant details regarding the (a) reasons and (b) extent of the changes; if not, whether any changes are envisaged; if so, (2) (a) what will be the full relevant particulars of the nature of the changes and (b) by what date will the changes take effect; (3) whether he or any person in the Executive or in the National Treasury is making general changes in the National Treasury by appointing people who will amend existing authority and reporting structures and who will in any way undermine, curb or circumvent the powers of the director-general; if so, what are the relevant details of the (a) reasons and (b) extent of the changes; if not, whether any changes are envisaged; if so, (4) (a) what will be the full relevant details of the nature of the changes and (b) by what date the changes will take effect?

Reply:

The National Treasury is not aware of any of the alleged changes alluded to.

07 November 2017 - NW3376

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether a certain person (name and details furnished) accompanied him on his official travel to the United States of America in October 2017; if not, why not; if so, (a) what was the purpose, (b) what were the (i) departure and (ii) arrival dates and (c) what is the (i) total cost and (ii) detailed breakdown of such costs to the National Treasury of each trip undertaken by the specified person?

Reply:

No.

07 November 2017 - NW3232

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

With reference to each (a) forensic investigation and (b) special performance audit completed by the National Treasury (i) in the 2016-17 financial year and (ii) since 1 April 2017, what (aa) was the scope of the investigation or audit, (bb) was the title of the final report of each investigation or audit, (cc) was the date on which the investigation or audit was completed, (dd) were main findings and recommendations of each investigation or audit, and (ee) action was taken by the National Treasury in each case?

Reply:

Attached as Annexure A

30 October 2017 - NW3216

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the SA Airways (SAA) has a contract with the publisher of a certain newspaper (New Age Newspapers) for the supply of newspapers; if so, (a) what amount does the specified contract cost SAA each month, (b) on what date (i) was the contract signed and (ii) does the contract expire and (c) what are the details of price escalation clauses included in the contract?

Reply:

SAA does not have a direct contract with New Age Newspaper for the supply of newspapers. However, SAA has a month-to-month contract with Press Support, which provides for the supply of a variety of readership material including the New Age newspaper to our passengers.

(a) The contract with Press Support in respect of the New Age newspaper costs R165 690 per month excluding VAT. The New Age newspaper supply costs covers Johannesburg, Durban and Cape Town stations.

(b)(i) The contract with Press Support was signed in April 2009.

(b)(ii) This is a month-to-month contract and SAA may terminate the agreement by giving a one months’ notice with no penalties.

(c) The contract provides for general inflationary increase in March/April of every year.

30 October 2017 - NW3063

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)(a) With reference to aircraft that was ordered for the SA Airways (SAA) what total number of Airbus A330-300 wide-bodied aircraft did SAA receive from 1 September 2016 to 30 September 2017 and (b) for which routes are the specified aircraft being used; (2) whether the specified aircraft replaced any existing aircraft on the specified routes; if so, what has been done with the existing aircraft that was replaced; (3) whether the new wide-bodied aircraft are able to fly non-stop directly from South African international airports to international destinations (details furnished); if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (4) whether any additional flight and/or cabin crew were employed to service the specified aircraft; if so, (a) on what date were these employees appointed, (b) what are the recruitment processes that were followed and (c) what are the further relevant details in this regard; (5) whether the SAA leases any aircraft that are not fully utilised; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1)(a) Five (5) A330-300s.

(1)(b)These aircraft are deployed on Johannesburg-Accra/Washington, Johannesburg-Sao Paulo, Johannesburg-Dakar/Washington, and Johannesburg-Lagos routes.

(2) These aircraft replaced the two(2) A340-600s (to be returned to the lessors at the end of the lease contract in January/February 2018 and five(5) A340-300s aircraft that are more than 15 years old. SAA had heavy maintenance checks due on the existing fleet so the available flying time on the A340-300s, because of the introduction of the A330-300s, has enabled SAA to comply with the maintenance schedule as well as to adhere to the published operating schedule.

(3) Yes. The A330-300 can operate direct/non-stop flights between South Africa and Europe, South America and the African Countries. These aircraft are not an ultra-long range and can therefore not be able to fly directly to North America. North American routes are ultra-long, with more than 12 hours of non-stop flying. These routes are serviced via Accra and/or Dakar.

(4) No additional flight and/or cabin crew were employed to service the A330-300s nor was extra training required to manage the fleet change. These types have the same crew ratings as the existing fleet.

(5) SAA is not leasing any aircraft that is not fully utilised. All aircraft in the SAA fleet are fully utilised in accordance with the schedule.

30 October 2017 - NW3065

Profile picture: Topham , Mr B

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Finance

What are the full details of all sponsorships in cash or kind that the SA Airways (SAA) awarded and/or paid to any person and/or entity from 1 April 2014 to 30 September 2017, including the (a) name of each person or entity, (b) amount of each sponsorship, (c) reason for awarding each sponsorship and (d) benefits that accrued to the SAA as a result of each sponsorship?

Reply:

(1) South African Airways has not offered any cash sponsorship from 1 April 2014 to 30 September 2017. The Value-In-Kind (VIK) sponsorships offered between 1 April 2014 and 30 September 2017 are listed below:

Sponsorship Property

Right Holder

Value

Period

 

SA Olympic Teams

SASCOC

R6m per annum

2014-15

Springboks

SA Rugby

R22.5m per annum

2014-15

 

SA Olympic Teams

SASCOC

R6m per annum

2015-16

Springboks

SA Rugby

R22.5 per annun

2015-16

Miss South Africa

Sun International

R594k

2015-16

World Routes

UBM

R1.5m

2015-16

NBA Africa Games

NBA Africa

R1.3m

2015-16

International Jazz Extravaganza

Teacup Projects

R1.1m

2015-16

 

Bafana Bafana

SAFA

R10m first year

2016 - 17

SA Olympic Teams

SASCOC

R8m per annum

2016 -17

Miss South Africa

Sun International

R596k

2016 -17

 

Bafana Bafana

SAFA

R25m per annum

2017 - 2018

International Jazz Extravaganza

Teacup Projects

R1.2m

2017 - 2018

The sponsorships are offered with the purpose of deriving marketing and commercial benefits for SAA. All these sponsorships were approved in accordance with the company’s Delegation of Authority Framework (“DOA”) and have followed internal approval process.

In return for the sponsorships, SAA is afforded sponsorship rights, which include: (i) platform to promote sales on SAA; (ii) media exposure and adverting; and (iii) branding opportunities.

20 October 2017 - NW2475

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

1. With reference to a certain National Treasury Transversal Contract () awarded to a certain company (), what are the details of (a) all processes followed to determine which entity was the winning bidder and (b) each other supplier that tendered for the specified contract, including the (i) names, (ii) contact details, (iii) tendered contract prices and (iv) nutritional contents of the animal feeds offered in each case; 2. Whether he has found a conflict of interest therein that the owner (name furnished) of the specified company who won the bid was also the Managing Director of the Land Bank Insurance Company at the time that the tender was awarded; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, on what legislative basis did he reach this conclusion; 3. (a) Which division of National Treasury handled the awarding of the specified tender and (b) was the Land Bank involved in any way in awarding the specified tender?

Reply:

1. (a) This was an open tender process for the supply of animal feed to the state, where potential bidders were invited to submit responses in accordance with the special and general conditions of tender. The products had to comply with specific technical specifications to be acceptable. The evaluation criteria was based on submission of mandatory documentation, compliance with technical specifications and price and B-BBEE.

(b) (i) Names of bidders – Refer to attached Bidder’s List Annexure A.

(ii) Contact details – Refer to attached Bidder’s List Annexure A.

(iii) Tendered contract prices – Refer to attached Contract Circular Annexure B.

(iv) Nutritional contents of the animal feeds offered in each case – Refer to Annexure C.

2. At the closing date and time of the bid on 27 May 2016, Mr Adam Maniki Rakgalakane was not in the employ of the Land Bank and therefore there was no conflict of interest. Procedurally the company could not be disqualified.

During the due diligence process conducted on 19 October 2016, Rakgalakane Investments cc declared that one of their directors, Mr Adam Maniki Rakgalakane, had since been appointed by the Land Bank on 10 August 2016. The company undertook to ask Mr Rakgalakane to resign without withdrawing its tender, if their company became successful in the bid process. The Bid Adjudication Committee awarded the tender on 28 October 2016. Rakgalakane Investments was one of the winning bidders.

Prior to communicating the outcome of the tender, National Treasury enquired on the status of Mr Rakgalakane and it was confirmed that a process to have him resigning was underway. Mr Rakgalakane had since resigned.

3. (a) The Office of the Chief Procurement Officer – Transversal Contracting Unit.

(b) The Land Bank was not involved in the awarding of this tender.

 

19 October 2017 - NW2560

Profile picture: Matsepe, Mr CD

Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Finance

whether a certain person () will continue to be involved in the business of (a) a certain company() and/or (b) any other business entity or trust that the specified person is currently involved in; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) on what date will the specified person start employment with SAA?

Reply:

1. Mr Vuyani Jarana will not continue to be involved in the business of (a)Vodacom) and/or (b) Mr Jarana’s involvement in any other business entity or trust that the he is currently involved in will be done in accordance with South African Airways policies and procedures regarding employees’ involvement in other business outside of SAA.

2. Mr Jarana will start employment with SAA after he has served notice at his present company (Vodacom) on a date to be agreed.

19 October 2017 - NW3028

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2691 on 19 September 2017, and notwithstanding the fact that the Pension Funds Act, Act 24 of 1956, does not provide for the Pension Funds Adjudicator to exercise jurisdiction over the Public Service Pension Fund, he will consider improving transparency and external accountability regarding the management of the Public Service Pension Fund by tabling the necessary amendments to the Act in Parliament in such a way that the Pension Funds Adjudicator will indeed have jurisdiction over the Fund; if not, (a) why not and (b) what are the full relevant details of the (i) manner in which the Public Service Pension Fund is currently managed transparently and accountably and (ii) extent to which external oversight is currently applied regarding the management of the Fund; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

The decision to be made is a policy decision, which will then be followed up with the necessary legislative amendments.

19 October 2017 - NW2939

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What is the total number of reports of irregularities that were received by the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) in terms of section 45 of the Auditing Profession Act, Act 26 of 2005, from KPMG (i) in each of the past 10 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017, (b) on what date was each report received, (c) what were the details of each report and (d) what action was taken in each case following receipt of the report by IRBA?

Reply:

(a) i)  

Financial year

Number of reportable irregularities

1 April 2007 - 31 March 2008

20

1 April 2008 - 31 March 2009

37

1 April 2009 - 31 March 2010

24

1 April 2010 - 31 March 2011

17

1 April 2011 - 31 March 2012

21

1 April 2012 - 31 March 2013

12

1 April 2013 - 31 March 2014

13

1 April 2014 - 31 March 2015

14

1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016

19

1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017

19

ii)

1 April 2017 - 30 September 2017

14

 b), c) and d)

1 April 2007 - 31 March 2008: RI files were kept manually during this period. Our electronic records were only updated with the actions taken by the IRBA on continuing matters prior to the file being destroyed in terms of the IRBA’s file destruction policy and the National Archives and Records Service Act (No. 43 of 1996).

1 April 2008 - 31 March 2011: RI files were kept manually during this period. Our electronic records were only updated with the actions taken by the IRBA on continuing matters prior to the files being archived, meaning that this information could still be retrieved if required, but that it might take some time.

IRBA Reference Number

b)

Date 1st RI report received

c)

Particulars of matters addressed in report

d)

Action(s) undertaken by the IRBA - if any. Regulators to whom RIs were onwards sent.

2008/0003

04/04/2007

Tax irregularity

The DTI, CIPRO and SARS

2008/0009

04/04/2007

Tax irregularity

The DTI, CIPRO and SARS

2008/0167

16/07/2007

Tax irregularity / Contravention of the Companies Act

The DTI, CIPRO and SARS

2008/0168

16/07/2007

Tax irregularity / Contravention of the Companies Act

The DTI, CIPRO and SARS

2008/0169

16/07/2007

Tax irregularity / Contravention of the Companies Act

The DTI, CIPRO and SARS

2008/0183

25/07/2007

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0225

17/08/2007

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0343

18/10/2007

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0391

16/11/2007

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0392

16/11/2007

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0406

26/11/2007

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0407

26/11/2007

File destroyed - information not available

No conclusion provided

2008/0419

03/12/2007

Contravention of the Attorneys Act

The Law Society of the Northern Provinces

2008/0494

05/02/2008

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0529

29/02/2008

File destroyed - information not available

RI did not exist. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0566

07/03/2008

File archived - information not readily available

Electronic record not kept of regulator(s) to which RI report was sent.

2008/0567

10/03/2008

File destroyed - information not available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2008/0569

11/03/2008

Contravention of the Companies Act

The DTI and CIPRO

2008/0570

11/03/2008

Contravention of the Companies Act

The DTI and CIPRO

2008/0772

27/03/2008

Tax irregularity / Contravention of the Companies Act

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0108

10/04/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0149

08/05/2008

File archived - information not readily available

The DTI, CIPRO, The Department of Labour and the City of Johannesburg.

2009/0291

30/06/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0292

30/06/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0307

04/07/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0392

29/07/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0393

29/07/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0394

29/07/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0495

02/09/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0533

10/09/2008

File archived - information not readily available

The DTI, CIPRO, the Department of Labour and SARS.

2009/0534

10/09/2008

File archived - information not readily available

The DTI, CIPRO, the Department of Labour and SARS.

2009/0544

12/09/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0545

12/09/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0546

12/09/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0585

22/09/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0615

03/10/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0620

06/10/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0820

06/11/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0874

03/12/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0875

03/12/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0879

09/12/2008

File archived - information not readily available

File archived - information not readily available

2009/0880

09/12/2008

File archived - information not readily available

File archived - information not readily available

2009/0905

18/12/2008

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0941

23/01/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0950

02/02/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0955

05/02/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The DTI and CIPRO

2009/0959

05/02/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0960

06/02/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0962

06/02/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/0963

06/01/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/1026

26/02/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/1038

02/03/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The DTI, CIPRO and the JSE

2009/1041

06/03/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The DTI and SARS

2009/1077

16/03/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The JSE

2009/1111

27/03/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/1112

27/03/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2009/1113

27/03/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0054

04/03/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The DTI, CIPRO and SARS

2010/0071

15/04/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0156

25/05/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0579

03/07/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0582

06/07/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI did not exist. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0583

07/07/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The JSE

2010/0680

24/06/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0712

25/08/2009

File archived - information not readily available

SARS

2010/0798

02/09/2009

File archived - information not readily available

SARS

2010/0713

25/08/2009

File archived - information not readily available

SARS, National Treasury, the Office of Company and Intellectual Property Enforcement (OCIPE) & The Department of Communications.

2010/0847

30/10/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0868

29/10/2009

File archived - information not readily available

Department of Trade and Industry - the Office of Company and Intellectual Property Enforcement (OCIPE) & SARS

2010/0905

16/11/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0909

26/11/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0910

26/11/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI did not exist. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0911

27/11/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The Financial Services Board and the Financial Intelligence Centre

2010/0912

27/11/2009

File archived - information not readily available

The Financial Services Board and the Financial Intelligence Centre

2010/0913

27/11/2009

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2010/0920

23/11/2009

File archived - information not readily available

Department of Trade and Industry - the Office of Company and Intellectual Property Enforcement (OCIPE)

2010/0927

09/12/2009

File archived - information not readily available

SARS

2010/0941

11/12/2009

File archived - information not readily available

Department of Trade and Industry - the Office of Company and Intellectual Property Enforcement (OCIPE)

2010/1001

10/02/2010

File archived - information not readily available

Department of Trade and Industry - the Office of Company and Intellectual Property Enforcement (OCIPE) and the JSE.

2010/1019

19/02/2010

File archived - information not readily available

SARS

2010/1084

15/03/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0028

23/04/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0034

28/04/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0071

07/05/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0078

12/05/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0226

20/07/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0376

05/10/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0390

14/10/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0568

17/11/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0569

15/11/2010

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0606

08/12/2010

File archived - information not readily available

Department of Trade and Industry - Office of Company and Intellectual Property Enforcement (OCIPE)

2011/0634

15/12/2010

File archived - information not readily available

SARS and the Financial Services Board

2011/0682

31/01/2011

File archived - information not readily available

SARS

2011/0721

14/02/2011

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0722

03/03/2011

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0767

03/03/2011

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0779

03/03/2011

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2011/0796

18/03/2011

File archived - information not readily available

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0058

11/05/2011

Inadequate accounting records

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0089

24/05/2011

Non-payment of PAYE, UIF and Skills Levies to SARS

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0095

25/05/2011

Contravention of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0114

30/05/2011

Entity utilized an assessed loss in contravention of the Tax Act

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0118

12/05/2011

Under-payment of PAYE to SARS

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0119

02/06/2011

Allegations of collusion and price-fixing

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0126

02/06/2011

Various contraventions of the VAT Act

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0235

18/07/2011

Non-payment of PAYE and UIF due to financial difficulties.

Department of Labour and SARS

2012_0295

05/08/2011

Entity not registered for VAT

SARS

2012_0323

08/08/2011

Illegal manufacturing of conventional arms

Directorate Conventional Arms Control

2012_0401

19/09/2011

Contravention of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0408

30/09/2011

Various contraventions of the Pension Funds Act

The Financial Intelligence Centre

2012_0409

30/09/2011

Various contraventions of the Pension Funds Act

The Financial Intelligence Centre

2012_0577

21/10/2011

Incorrect VAT claims

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0597

03/11/2011

Incorrect amount paid over to SARS for income tax

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0610

21/10/2011

Incorrect VAT claims and non-payment of PAYE

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0645

22/11/2011

Inadequate accounting records

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0784

09/03/2012

Non-disclosure of directors' interest in contracts

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0798

19/03/2012

Fringe benefit taxes not withheld from employee remuneration

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0810

23/03/2012

Bank has not appointed a Money Laundering Compliance Officer

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2012_0812

30/03/2012

Non-registration for tax

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2013_0045

11/05/2012

Non-payment of PAYE to SARS

SARS

2013_0085

05/06/2012

Non-payment of PAYE, UIF and Skills Levies due to financial difficulties, inaccuracies in terms of diesel refunds claimed and non-payment of Workman's Compensation to the Commissioner.

CIPC, Department of Labour, SARS and Department of Labour (UIF)

2013_0086

06/06/2012

Under-declaration of VAT output taxes and non-payment of PAYE.

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2013_0098

12/06/2012

Contravention of Exchange Control Regulations (South African Reserve Bank)

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2013_0146

10/07/2012

Various irregularities identified in establishment of trust

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2013_0170

17/07/2012

Various contraventions of the VAT Act

SARS

2013_0183

24/07/2012

Entity has not registered as a credit provider

National Credit Regulator

2013_0203

07/08/2012

Breach of fiduciary responsibility by senior manager

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2013_0241

03/09/2012

Non-payment of PAYE and UIF to SARS

SARS and Department of Labour (UIF)

2013_0374

16/11/2012

Non-payment of PAYE, VAT and Capital Gains Taxes to SARS

SARS

2013_0620

20/02/2013

Non-payment of VAT to SARS and non-submission of tax returns

SARS

2013_0633

01/03/2013

Incomplete accounting records

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2014_0019

16/04/2013

Entity has not registered as a credit provider

National Credit Regulator

2014_0130

25/06/2013

Non-payment of PAYE due to financial difficulties

JSE and SARS

2014_0200

08/08/2013

Non-payment of PAYE to SARS

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2014_0206

21/08/2013

Uncertainties regarding the company's ability to continue with mining operations

CIPC and the Department of Mineral Resources

2014_0207

21/08/2013

Uncertainties regarding the company's ability to continue with mining operations

CIPC and Dep of Minerals

2014_0252

13/09/2013

Allegations of fraud regarding travel and subsistence claims, Non-payment of PAYE to SARS.

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2014_0258

23/09/2013

Non-payment of PAYE, UIF or Skills Levies

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2014_0272

07/10/2013

Entity has not registered as a credit provider

National Credit Regulator

2014_0281

15/10/2013

Non-submission of tax returns and trading whilst insolvent.

CIPC and SARS

2014_0282

15/10/2013

Non-submission of tax returns and trading whilst insolvent.

CIPC and SARS

2014_0325

11/11/2013

Non-payment of PAYE or UIF

SARS and the Department of Labour (UIF)

2014_0347

21/11/2013

Trust not registered as a taxpayer

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2014_0508

24/02/2014

Possible falsification of accounting records

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2015_0041

03/04/2014

Inadequate accounting records

The Financial Services Board

2015_0050

11/04/2014

Misappropriation of funds by director

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2015_0123

13/05/2014

PAYE not paid over to SARS and not registered for VAT

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2015_0338

11/07/2014

Non-compliance with the Technology Innovation Agency Act

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2015_0410

05/08/2014

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2015_0469

26/08/2014

Non-payment of VAT

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2015_0716

03/11/2014

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved and no tax returns have been submitted

CIPC & SARS

2015_0722

04/11/2014

Facility does not have professional negligence insurance

The Department of Health

2015_0795

25/11/2014

Entity has not registered as a credit provider

The National Credit Regulator

2015_0858

16/01/2015

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2015_0859

16/01/2015

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2015_0978

11/03/2015

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved as well as allegations of fraud

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2015_0979

11/03/2015

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved as well as allegations of fraud

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2015_0987

16/03/2015

Allegations of fraud against a former FM

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2016_0016

13/04/2015

Fraud & theft

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2016_0032

24/04/2015

Companies Act - Breach of fiduciary duties by director

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2016_0071

23/04/2015

Companies Act - Breach of fiduciary duties by director

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2016_0166

11/06/2015

Companies Act - Breach of fiduciary duties by director

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2016_0192

26/06/2015

Companies Act - Breach of fiduciary duties by director

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2016_0248

14/07/2015

Companies Act - Breach of fiduciary duties by director

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2016_0316

13/08/2015

Fraudulent breach of supply chain management policy

Department of Higher Education and Training & The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation.

2016_0376

01/09/2015

Misappropriation of trust funds

Master of the High Court

2016_0390

08/09/2015

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2016_0487

11/09/2015

Outstanding VAT, Skills Levies, UIF and PAYE.

SARS, Department of Labour & Department of Labour (UIF)

2016_0488

11/09/2015

Outstanding VAT, Skills Levies, UIF and PAYE.

SARS, Department of Labour & Department of Labour (UIF)

2016_0489

11/09/2015

Outstanding VAT, Skills Levies, UIF and PAYE.

SARS, Department of Labour & Department of Labour (UIF)

2016_0490

22/09/2015

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2016_0532

18/09/2015

Outstanding UIF and PAYE & CFO having allegedly misappropriated funds

SARS, Department of Higher Education and Training & Department of Labour (UIF)

2016_0678

14/12/2015

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2016_0693

15/12/2015

Company trading whilst insolvent

CIPC

2016_0719

08/01/2016

PAYE not paid over to SARS, financial assistance provided to related party without board approval. Terms and conditions of a loan agreement entered into with the Land Bank were not met. Terms and conditions of a grant received from the Department of Agriculture, forestry and Fisheries were not met.

CIPC, SARS, Land Bank & Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

2016_0820

01/03/2016

Financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2016_0845

07/03/2016

Contractual breach that amounted to fraud.

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0030

15/04/2016

Provisional tax returns not submitted, VAT returns not submitted & not registered for royalty taxes.

SARS & Department of Mineral Resources

2017_0032

15/04/2016

Provisional tax returns not submitted, VAT returns not submitted & not registered for royalty taxes.

SARS, JSE & Department of Mineral Resources

2017_0036

19/04/2016

PAYE not deducted

SARS

2017_0042

22/04/2016

Output VAT not declared & financial statements not prepared

CIPC & SARS

2017_0116

01/06/2016

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0149

15/06/2016

Financial Statements not audited and tax returns not submitted

CIPC & SARS

2017_0150

15/06/2016

Financial Statements not audited and tax returns not submitted

CIPC & SARS

2017_0316

04/08/2016

Financial statements not prepared

RI did not exist. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0433

23/09/2016

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

CIPC & SARS

2017_0526

03/11/2016

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0713

18/10/2016

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0733

24/11/2016

Non-submission of tax returns and not yet registered for royalty tax purposes

JSE, Department of Mineral Resources & SARS

2017_0734

24/11/2016

Non-submission of tax returns and not yet registered for royalty tax purposes

SARS & Department of Mineral Resources

2017_0758

06/12/2016

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0759

06/12/2016

Non-submission of tax return (ITR14 return)

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0760

06/12/2016

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0795

20/01/2017

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0828

20/02/2017

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2017_0829

20/02/2017

Companies Act Section 30 - financial statements not prepared and/or approved

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2018_0060

22/05/2017

HR Director not acting in good faith.

Department of Higher Education & Training

2018_0082

05/06/2017

Lack of adequate accounting records

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2018_0089

12/06/2017

Contraventions of Section 29 and 34 of the Companies Act

FIC & DPCI

2018_0101

20/06/2017

Non-declaration of fringe benefits

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2018_0161

05/07/2017

Company annual tax returns and provisional tax not submitted. Non-submission of royalty tax returns and contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act.

CIPC,SARS,JSE & Department of Mineral Resources

2018_0163

05/07/2017

Company annual tax returns and provisional tax not submitted. Non-submission of royalty tax returns and contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act.

SARS,CIPC & Department of Mineral Resources

2018_0180

13/07/2017

Suspected corruption/ fraud

RI not continuing. No further actions required by the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005.

2018_0232

08/08/2017

Contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act

CIPC & SARS

2018_0233

08/08/2017

Contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act

CIPC & SARS

2018_0234

08/08/2017

Contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act

CIPC & SARS

2018_0235

08/08/2017

Contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act

CIPC & SARS

2018_0243

14/08/2017

Non-submission of provisional tax returns, annual tax returns and VAT returns and contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act

CIPC & SARS

2018_0244

14/08/2017

Non-submission of provisional tax returns, annual tax returns and VAT returns and contravention of Section 30 of the Companies Act

CIPC & SARS

2018_0351

22/09/2017

Information not due yet

Information not due yet

19 October 2017 - NW2918

Profile picture: Gardee, Mr GA

Gardee, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Finance

Has (a) the Department of Home Affairs and / or (b) the Independent Electoral Commission requested funding to capture addresses of all registered voters; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) what amount was requested and (ii) what amount was given?

Reply:

The Independent Electoral Commission through Department of Home Affairs has submitted a funding request for the address harvesting project (to capture addresses). The request will be considered as part of the 2018 Budget deliberations (which has not yet been finalised). Allocations to departments and entities will be presented to Parliament when the Budget is tabled for consideration in February 2018.

19 October 2017 - NW2620

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)How many loans the (a) Public Service Pension Fund and (b) Public Investment Corporation has awarded to (i) individuals and (ii) legal persons, including trusts, since 1 January 2000; (2) with regard to each person and/or legal person to whom the loan has been awarded, what is the (a)(i) amount and (ii) basis of the loan, (b) what served as security for the loan, (c)(i) on which date was the loan awarded and (ii) what is the (aa) term and (bb) interest rate of the loan and (d) which amount of the loan has already been repaid in each case; (3) (a) which of the loans will in all probability never be repaid, (b) what steps will be taken in respect of each one and (c) which loans will probably be converted into shares?

Reply:

As agreed with the honourable Member, the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) attached a list of the disclosure of its unlisted investments that was submitted to the Standing Committee on Finance (SCOF) during October 2016. The PIC is in the process of updating this document to include information for the 2016/17 financial year and this will also be submitted to SCOF during November 2017, when the PIC is scheduled to appear before the Committee. A copy of this document will be submitted to the Member.

12 October 2017 - NW2909

Profile picture: Singh, Mr N

Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the investigation conducted by the investigative units of the SA Revenue Service into the tax affairs of Members of Parliament has been concluded; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the full relevant details?

Reply:

Due to the secrecy provisions contained in Section 69 of the Tax Administration Act No. 28 of 2011, The South African Revenue Service (SARS) is prohibited from disclosing any taxpayer information (including whether or not a taxpayer is subject to an investigation) to any person other than a SARS official.

SARS treats the tax affairs of all parliamentarians in exactly the same manner as all other taxpayers in accordance with the compliance model. This model is premised on three components to encourage tax compliance: Education, Service and Enforcement.

06 October 2017 - NW2121

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

What is the (a) full financial value of (i) funds and (ii) guarantees received by SA Airways (SAA) from (aa) the National Treasury and/or (bb) any other national department from 1 January 1997 to date, (b) detailed breakdown of these allocations to each department of SAA in each year, (c) motivation for providing the funds in each case and (d) detailed breakdown of the amounts of guarantees (i) requested and (ii) granted in each case?

Reply:

a(i): A summary of funds received and repaid is reflected in the table below, as per the records in the annual financial statements:

Financial Year

Funds Received or Paid

 

Initial capitalisation R3 137 million

2003/4

R6 089 million shareholder loan advanced

2004/5

R 4 000 million shareholder convertible loan

2005/6

R 1 600 million of shareholder convertible loan repaid (balance of R2 400 million remained)

2006/7

R 8 450 million of above loans was capitalised

2007/8

R1 564 million subordinated loan raised. Capitalised in 2009/10

2017/18

R2 208 million recapitalisation (30 June 2017)

a(ii): A summary of the Going Concern guarantees and utilisation towards loans or other purposes as is listed in the table below:

Guarantee Awarded

Amount

Utilisation

Balance

 

R’m

R’m

R’m

Subordinated Loan – Nedbank (Mar 2007)

1 300

1 300

Nil

Going Concern Guarantee (Sep 2009)

1 600

   

(Allocated to ATL, Sep ‘16)

 

541

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14)

 

1 055

4

       

Going Concern Guarantee (Sep 2012)

5 006

   

Working Capital Utilisation (Jul ’14)

 

1 300

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Jul ’14)

 

1 500

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14)

 

1 700

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14)

 

295

211

       

Going Concern Guarantee (Dec 2014)

6 488

   

Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14)

 

450

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Apr ‘15)

 

1 500

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Jun ‘15)

 

1 500

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Jun’16) Bridge

 

1 000

2 038

       

Going Concern Guarantee (Sep 2016)

4 720

   

General Short Term Banking Facilities (Dec’16)

 

830

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Dec’16) Bridge

 

1 292

 

Working Capital Utilisation (Mar‘17) Bridge

 

757

 

LC and Guarantee Facilities (Mar’17)

 

522

 

ATL Credit Card Exposure (Apr’17)

 

768

 

Working Capital Utilisation (May‘17) Bridge

 

104

447

       

TOTAL

19 114

16 414

2 700

06 October 2017 - NW2731

Profile picture: Ross, Mr DC

Ross, Mr DC to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether a certain company (Jim Aviation SA) plays any role with regard to the contract concluded between SA Airways Technical and a certain company (Allen Aircraft Radio Corporation); if so, (a) what are the full details of the (i) role that the specified company is playing and (ii) value of its involvement in the specified contract and (b) who are the (i) directors and (ii) shareholders of the specified company?

Reply:

JM Aviation was, as at the time of the tender submission, and still is a BEE partner of AAR. SAA is not privy to the commercial agreement between AAR and JM Aviation and thus is not in a position to respond to the specifics around each party’s role with regard to the contract concluded between SAAT and AAR/JM Aviation. SAAT’s interactions in accordance with the contract are through a dedicated individual who is tasked with the client liaison and quarterly contract review.

a.(i) Not applicable.

a.(ii) Not applicable.

b.(i) Miss M.V. Sokhulu

       Miss I.N. Louw

       Mr V.A. Ndzeku

       Mr J. Aires

b.(ii) Miss M.V. Sokhulu: 35%

        Miss I.N. Louw: 30%

        Mr V.A. Ndzeku: 20%

        Mr J. Aires: 15%

04 October 2017 - NW2477

Profile picture: Topham , Mr B

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Finance

What (a) are the names of each (i) supplier and (ii) service provider of the SA Airways (SAA), (b) goods and services are delivered and provided to SAA in each case, (c) is the monetary value of each contract concluded with each specified (i) supplier and (ii) service provider and (d) is the date (i) on which the specified contracts were entered into and (ii) of expiry of each contract?

Reply:

See attached annexure A

04 October 2017 - NW2823

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)What is the (a) total value of contingent liabilities and (b) the detailed breakdown of each of the specified contingent liabilities according to (i) type, (ii) institution, (iii) exposure amount and/or (iv) amount drawn against the guarantee that the National Treasury has extended (aa) in each of the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2017; (2) whether the National Treasury has received requests for further guarantees; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

1. Table 1 link below shows the total value of contingent liabilities (guarantees) issued and drawn-down, as well as a breakdown according to State Owned Companies (SOCs) for 2014/15 to 2016/17 as shown in the 2017 Budget Review.

Table 1: Government guarantee portfolio

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2823TABLE-171004.pdf

2. The National Treasury is currently considering a guarantee request of R3 billion by the South African Broadcasting Corporation. The request was submitted after the broadcaster has made a determination that it would face a liquidity challenge in the current financial year. The SABC has highlighted a number of factors that have contributed to the entity’s declining revenues and increasing operating costs. These include among others, the unfavourable economic conditions and a number of policy decisions with regard to content over the broadcaster’s various platforms, which have led to the decline in the advertising revenues as major advertisers withdrew their business due to declining listenership and viewership in some of the broadcaster’s crucial platforms. In addition, the salary bill and pay-outs of dismissed staff has contributed to an increase in costs. The loss in both advertising and TV license revenue along with increased costs, have contributed significantly to the losses incurred in both the 2014/15 and 2015/16 financial years.

Where no guarantee requests have been submitted, it might be as a result of the fact that the specific SOCs’ financial matrices are such that the SOCs do not require government assistance or the SOCs are able to borrow on the strength of their own balance sheets.

Table 1: Government guarantee portfolio

04 October 2017 - NW2821

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether a certain official (a) applied for the position (Chief Procurement Officer) and / or (b) requested to be removed from the specified position; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether (a) he and / or (b) the director-general informed the specified person of the imminent removal from a certain position (details furnished) in writing; if not, why not; if so, (i) on what date was the specified person informed and (ii) what were the reasons for the specified person’s removal; (3) whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

1. (a) No, the official did not apply for the position of Chief Procurement Officer (CPO).

    (b) Yes, the official requested to be relieved of the functions of the CPO. In addition, acting capacity is temporary and can be terminated at any time.

2. (a) Yes, the official received a letter from the Minister.

(b) Yes, the Director-General also informed the official.

     (i) The official was informed on 31 August 2017.

     (ii) To relieve the official of the CPO responsibilities and rotate the acting role among other Chief Directors in the Office of the CPO.

3. A statement has already been issued regarding this matter.

 

 

04 October 2017 - NW2789

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether he has begun the process of finding a replacement for a certain person (); if not, why not?

Reply:

Yes. The Minister will make an announcement regarding this matter after the South African Airways’ Annual General Meeting.

 

04 October 2017 - NW2733

Profile picture: Topham , Mr B

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether the SA Revenue Service has plans in place to prevent the illicit trade in any category of goods and/or services; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) What is the estimated loss in tax revenue collection from the illicit trade in each category of goods and/or services? (3) What is the total estimated loss in tax revenue for the 2016/17 financial year?

Reply:

(1) Yes, SARS has plans in place to prevent the illicit trade in any category of goods and/or services as stipulated in its Strategic Plan 2016/17-2020/21.

(2) These products are in the main strictly prohibited so SARS cannot collect any revenue from them.

(3) Please refer to response 2 (two) above.

 

04 October 2017 - NW2621

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the SA Airways had the required foreign operators permits to fly (a) to and (b) from all destinations on (i) 20 August 2017 and (ii) 31 August 2017; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

Details on foreign operators permit are reflected below.

     

INTERNATIONAL

   

COUNTRY

DESTINATION

OPERATING AUTHORISATION

VALIDITY

Australia

Perth

Foreign Air Transport Air Operators Certificate

Yearly - 31 May 2018

Brazil

Sao Paulo

Authorisation from the Ministry of Defence. Appointed Local Legal representative, validated by ANAC. Approved slots. Approved Hotran (Horário de Transporte/Time of Transportation)

Ongoing

Germany

Frankfurt and Munich

Operating Permit through Seasonal Filing.

IATA Season

Hong Kong

Hong Kong

Operating Permit

Yearly Basis - 24 March 2018

U.S.A.

New York and Washington

Overflying and Landing clearance. Economic Authority from the US DOT

Overflying and Landing Clearance - IATA Season, Economic Authority –

Bi Yearly Basis

United Kingdom

London

Foreign Carrier Permit

IATA Season

AFRICA

     

COUNTRY

DESTINATION

OPERATING AUTHORISATION

VALIDITY

Angola

Luanda

Overflying and Landing clearance. Angola in the process of changing their legislation to include Foreign Operators Permits

IATA Season

Benin

Cotonou

Foreign Operators Permit (A319, A320 and B738)

Yearly Basis - 18 May 2018

Cameroon

Douala

Foreign Operators Permit Required; of which SAA has one

 

Congo

Brazzaville and Pointe Noire

Foreign Operators Permits issued to Foreign Airlines. SAA doesn't require one, as it is an eligible airline. Should they want to include an additional aircraft, letter to be written to ANAC, in order to obtain operating authorisation

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

Cote d'Ivoire

Abidjan

No Foreign Operators Permit required.

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

D.R.C.

Kinshasa

Foreign Operators Permit currently not applicable as Authorities and Airlines in process of debating actual cost. Once consensus reached, FOP will be required

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

Gabon

Libreville

Foreign Operators Permit not required. Gabon CAA intends to put a process in place. Overflying and landing clearance

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

Ghana

Accra

Overflying and Landing clearance. Foreign Air Operators Certificate - Application ongoing

Foreign Operators Permit still to be issued

Kenya

Nairobi

Foreign Operators Permit not required. Bilateral Air Services Agreement in place

Mauritius

Mauritius

Overflying and Landing clearance. New requirement for carriers to have a Foreign Operators Permit. This will be applied for when renewing our Seasonal Approval (Oct 17)

IATA Season

Mozambique

Maputo

Foreign Air Operators Licence - A319, A320, B738 and B737

IATA Season

Namibia

Windhoek

Foreign Air Operator Permit - A319, A320, B738 and B737

Yearly Basis - 30 June 2018

Nigeria

Lagos

Foreign Operators Permit not required. Overflying and landing clearance

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

Senegal

Dakar

Foreign Operators Permit. Will be commencing with the process to obtain one, in order to avoid any future problems

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

Tanzania

Dar Es Salaam

No Foreign Operators Permit required. Slot Allocation given as operating approval

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

Uganda

Entebbe

Foreign Operators Permit Required; of which SAA has one

Seasonal submission of overflying and landing clearance

Zambia

Lusaka, Livingstone and Ndola

Foreign Operators Permit

Yearly - 31 December 2017

Zimbabwe

Harare and Victoria Falls

Foreign Operators Permit on the 19 August 2017, SA025 scheduled to depart from Harare at 07h20 am was grounded by Zimbabwean Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Reason for grounding was the Foreign Operator Permit (FOP) that was not found on board of the aircraft, the incident affected Harare and Vic Falls. It should be noted that it was confirmed that, there was previously no requirement for SAA to obtain or to have in possession the required FOP.

Bi-Yearly Basis - 18 August 2019

04 October 2017 - NW2482

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)With reference to his reply to question 1923 on 17 August 2017, what were the (a) total cost and (b) detailed breakdown of such costs of the travel of a certain person to the United States of America; (2) whether the specified person accompanied him on any other official overseas travel since 1 April 2017; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, in respect of each instance of official overseas travel, what was the (a) purpose, (b)(i) departure date and (ii) inbound arrival date and (c)(i) total cost and (ii) detailed breakdown of such costs?

Reply:

(1)(a) R145 168.72

(1)(b) Air travel R131 935.43

Daily allowance R 13 233.29

(2) Yes, since 1 April 2017 a certain person has accompanied the Minister on three occasions for official travel overseas. All expenses were in line with the provisions as stipulated in the Ministerial Handbook, Chapter 6, 3.1 & 3.2.:

(2)(a)

Purpose

(2)(b)(i)

Departure date

(2)(b)(ii)

Inbound Arrival date

(2)(c)(i)

Total cost

(2)(c)(ii)

       

Detailed breakdown

Amount

BRICS conference and Central Bank Governors meeting, Shanghai

17 June 2017

19 June 2017

R204 041.36

Daily allowance

Air travel

R4 826.49

R199 214.87

African Investor Conference, London

19 June 2017

21 June 2017

R83 441.57

Air travel

R83 441.57

G20 conference, Germany

5 July 2017

9 July 2017

R80 742.86

Air travel

R80 742.86

TOTAL

 

R368 225.79

 

26 September 2017 - NW2730

Profile picture: Brauteseth, Mr TJ

Brauteseth, Mr TJ to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)With reference to the contract concluded between SA Airways Technical (SAAT) and a certain company (name furnished), why was the specified contract (a) initially awarded to Air France and (b) subsequently withdrawn; (2) whether the specified airline has taken legal action against SAAT for withdrawing the specified contract; if so, (a) why did the specified airline take legal action, (b) in which court(s) is the specified airline taking legal action, (c) what is the quantum of damages that the specified airline is claiming and (d) what amount has SAAT spent in defending this matter to date?

Reply:

1(a) There was never an initial award of the contract to Air France. The Cross Functional Sourcing Team (“CFST”) had recommended that the Board of Directors of SAAT (“the Board”) make an award to Air France, which was the third ranked bidder in terms of the evaluation process. The recommendation by the CFST was based on certain risks pertaining to bidders ranked first and second. The Board did not agree with the rationale put forward by the CFST and did not approve the award to Air France.

1(b) No withdrawal of the award ever took place.

Air France did not take legal action against SAAT for the withdrawal of a specific contract. Air France took SAAT to court to interdict SAAT from entering into a contract with a preferred bidder.

2(a) Air France made an application for an interdict to stop the award of and conclusion of the contract with a preferred bidder at the North Gauteng High Court.

2(b) North Gauteng High Court

2(c) Air France did not claim any damages from SAAT

2(d) SAAT won the case with costs and Air France was ordered to pay the SAAT’s legal costs. The legal action by Air France did therefore not cost SAAT anything.

26 September 2017 - NW2822

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

With reference to his reply to question 1533 on 3 July 2017, what is the detailed breakdown of the amount spent on the Expanded Public Works Programme by (a)(i) each national government department and (ii) each public entity reporting to each specified national department, (b)(i) each provincial government department and (ii) each public entity reporting to each specified provincial department and (c) each municipality in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

The coordination and oversight of the Expanded Public Works Programme is the mandate of the national Department of Public Works and hence they are best placed to provide the detailed information being requested.

21 September 2017 - NW2734

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by the (i) Industrial Development Corporation, (ii) Development Bank of Southern Africa and (iii) Land Bank according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?

Reply:

Land bank and DBSA responses are provided below, however, IDC does not report to the National Treasury.

LAND BANK RESPONSES:

(a) (b) (iii)

Distinction between current and non – current assets:

The Group presents the assets and liabilities in decreasing order of liquidity as it provides information that is more reliable and relevant than a current/non-current presentation because the Group does not supply goods or services within a clearly identifiable operating cycle.

Gross Loans by Maturity Value

 

Group 2017

R’000

Group 2016

R’000

Bank 2017

R’000

Bank 2016

R’000

< 3 Months

7 685 650

6 209 050

7 685 650

6 209 050

3 – 6 months

4 793 132

4 606 878

4 793 132

4 606 878

6 – 9 months

3 533 562

1 506 583

3 533 562

1 506 583

9 – 12 months

1 004 508

545 831

1 004 508

545 831

1 – 5 years

4 351 860

9 082 557

4 351 860

9 082 557

> 5 years

21 655 326

16 873 417

21 655 326

16 873 417

TOTAL

43 024 038

38 824 315

43 024 038

38 824 315

(aa) Listed Investments:

(aaa) Held directly:

Listed investment (1)

 

Group 2017

R’000

Group 2016

R’000

Bank 2017

R’000

Bank 2016

R’000

Rhodes Food Group Holdings Limited

197 000

-

197 000

-

(bbb) Held indirectly:

Assets earmarked for medical aid liabilities

Listed investments

 

Group 2017

R’000

Group 2016

R’000

Bank 2017

R’000

Bank 2016

R’000

Local equity

242 749

230 734

242 749

230 734

Local bonds

53 187

33 594

53 187

33 594

Foreign equity

49 582

63 794

49 582

63 794

TOTAL

345 518

328 122

345 518

328 122

The assets earmarked for medical aid liabilities are managed through a mandate by Coronation Asset Managers.

(bb) Unlisted investments:

(aaa) Held directly:

Unlisted investments (2)

 

Group 2017

R’000

Group 2016

R’000

Bank 2017

R’000

Bank 2016

R’000

Capespan Capital (Pty) Ltd

1 288

849

1 288

849

Acorn Agri (Pty) Ltd

75 000

-

75 000

-

TOTAL

76 288

849

76 288

849

Investments in Land Bank 100% owned subsidiaries

 

Group 2017

R’000

Group 2016

R’000

Bank 2017

R’000

Bank 2016

R’000

Land Bank Life Insurance Company (Life Insurer)

-

-

30

30

Land Bank Insurance Company (Short term Insurer)

-

-

350 000

200 000

TOTAL

-

-

350 030

200 030

(bbb) Held indirectly:

Assets earmarked for medical aid liabilities

Unlisted investments

 

Group 2017

R’000

Group 2016

R’000

Bank 2017

R’000

Bank 2016

R’000

Commodities – Local ETF

2 514

3 563

2 514

3 563

Cash – Local

11 834

25 272

11 834

25 272

TOTAL

14 348

25 835

14 348

28 835

The assets earmarked for medical aid liabilities are managed through a mandate by Coronation Asset Managers.

Investments held by subsidiaries (LBIC)

 

Group 2017

R’000

Group 2016

R’000

Equities

412 151

474 424

Commodities

35 568

33 064

Collective investment schemes

370 893

354 568

Bonds

247 763

259 810

Cash deposits and similar securities

146 564

178 045

Investment Policy

13 980

33 986

TOTAL

1 226 920

1 333 897

The above listed investments held by subsidiaries are managed through mandates by with the following Asset Managers:

  • Coronation Fund Managers Limited
  • Momentum Asset Management
  • Argon Asset Management
  • Investec Asset Management
  • Old Mutual Investment Group (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd Group

DBSA RESPONSE:

2. Equity Investment YE 2016/2017

 

Unlisted

Beyond 12 months

Direct Investments

 

Ohorongo

81 313 764

Proparco

452 956 708

The Currency Exchange Fund

578 411 113

   

Indirect Investments - Private Equity Investments

 

African Agriculture Fund (Phatisa)

176 917 010

AgrieVie (Strategy Partners)

152 856 925

African Health Fund (Aureos)

243 667 465

African Infrastructure Investment Fund

394 847 707

Convergence Partners

82 385 417

Emerging Capital Partners

615 555 323

Ethos

1

HIFSA

1 867 607 518

International Housing Solutions

190 242 204

Medu Capital

18 699 500

PAIDF

882 236 100

PAIDF 2

21 936 838

PAIP

-

Shanduka

-

Trinitas

76 847 532

Vantage Capital

136 027 906

Frandevco

-

One and only Cape Town Holdings

-

StarSat

-

Development Bank of Zambia

-

Total equity investments

5 972 509 032

20 September 2017 - NW2610

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether he approached the Commissioner of the SA Revenue Service to inquire about the tax affairs of a certain family (); if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (2) will he make public the outcomes of the specified inquiry; if not, why not?

Reply:

Chapter Six of the of the Tax administration Act regulates the confidentiality of taxpayer information. In terms of Section 69 (2) of the Tax Administration Act, a SARS official may not disclose “Taxpayer information” to any person who is not a SARS official. Although there are certain exceptions to this general prohibition none of these exceptions permit SARS to disclose detail in the course of answering the questions posed to SARS. 

The Commissioner does not discuss taxpayer information with the Minister.

20 September 2017 - NW2308

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether FlySAA is generating revenue from all lounges in airports across the country; if so, (a) what amount and (b) what is the cost of running the specified lounges in each case?

Reply:

The Lounges are facilities operated by SAA and offer selected passengers, comfort beyond that that is afforded in the airport terminal. Such comfort includes comfortable seating, quieter environment, and often better access to customer service representatives. Other offers include wireless internet access and other business services.

The Lounges mainly serve as a service offering to premium passengers, those flying business class, and to frequent fliers who are Voyager members and have achieved a prescribed voyager membership status.

During financial year 2016/17 SAA’s eight (8) Lounges generated a revenue totaling: (a) R74, 867, 946 at the operating costs of: (b) R106, 519, 595

Philosophy of an Airline Lounge:

An Airline Lounge is more of a differentiating factor than a profit/revenue making stream, for the following reasons:

  • The market is seeing increased ground services activity as operators strive to compete on quality provision. The business/first class lounge is an especially important part of the ground service experience, and one of the most critical branding elements for an airline.
  • To meet the needs of First Class, Business Class and Airlines Frequent Flyers customers, airlines seek to offer a complete airport to airport experience, not only in the air but also on the ground. Well-designed lounges provide a refuge from a very busy airport and an opportunity for airlines to demonstrate their character, qualities and service level.
  • For the airline, the quality of their lounge and lounge services are an extension of their brand and a way of enhancing customer relationships. As passengers spend more time at the airport, due to increased security, congestion and delays, the lounge experience has become a powerful differentiator in airline selection.

19 September 2017 - NW2736

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

What is the detailed breakdown of all development loans extended in the rest of Africa by the Development Bank of Southern Africa (a) in the 2016-17 financial year and (b) since 1 April 2017 in terms of the (i) amounts lent, (ii) sectors lent to, (iii) names of the clients and (iv) names of each country that the clients are from?

Reply:

  1. Country

2016-2017

YTD August

Sector

Angola

 

155 119 582

 

Angola Ministry of Finance

-

155 119 582

Transportation

       

 Ghana

1 576 372 369

343 879 518

 

 Cenpower Generation Company Limited

24 732 369

60 647 143

 Energy

 Karpower International

1 551 640 000

 

 Energy

 Ghana Airports Company Limited

 

283 232 374

Transportation

 Kenya

220 562 054

45 381 516

 

 Kenya Pipeline Company Limited

220 562 054

45 381 516

 Commercial -  Transportation

 Madagascar

 

99 725 954

 

 Ravinala Airports, S.A.

 

99 725 954

 Transportation

 Zambia

1 803 965 113

   

 Itezhi-Tezhi Power Corporation (ITPC) Lusaka

158 009 192

-

 Energy

 Maamba Collieries Limited

217 955 921

 

Energy

 Zambia Electricity Supply Corporation Limited

1 428 000 000

-

Energy

 Zimbabwe

49 061 705 *

-

 

 *Infralink (Private) Limited

49 061 705

-

 Roads And Drainage

 Total Disbursement

3 649 961 241

644 106 570

 

* This disbursement was a short term loan in respect of the insurance premium paid on behalf of Infralink (Private) Limited with the view of ensuring that the insurance cover on the loan does not lapse.

19 September 2017 - NW2698

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What is the total amount of public funds that have been paid from the National Revenue Fund to (i) political parties, (ii) independent public representatives in local government and (iii) independent election candidates from each sphere of Government (aa) in each of the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2017, (b) what are the details of the methods used to determine the (i) total allocations and (ii) allocations to each political party, independent public representatives in local government and independent election candidates, (c) on what dates were the specified allocations paid and (d) what were the funds utilised for in each case?

Reply:

a) There is no public funding paid directly from National Revenue Fund to Political Parties, Independent public representatives in local government and independent election candidates from each sphere of government. Funds are administered by the IEC and allocated for represented political parties at national and provincial legislatures.

b) The total amount appropriated from 2014/15 to 2016/17 financial years, Represented Political Parties Fund (RPPF) amounts to R383 million administered by the IEC and Parliament appropriated amounts to R1.1 billion. Political party funding through Parliament comes as a transfer made by Parliament.

Year

RPPF

Parliament

2014/15

122 096 000

352 173 000

2015/16

127 394 147

371 033 000

2016/17

134 480 800

385 478 000

2017/18

141 204 000

414 438 000

In 2017/18 financial year only RPPF and Parliament appropriated amounts to R141.2 million and R414.4 million respectively.

c) The Constitution stipulates the funding for political parties to enhance multi-party democracy and the national legislation provide for the funding of political parties participating in national and provincial legislatures on an equitable and proportional basis. The Public Funding of Represented Political Parties Act 103 of 1997 provides a broad framework for the public funding of represented political parties at national and provincial legislatures. The allocations from the Represented Political Parties Fund (RPPF) are paid to each political parties calculated as follows:

i) Allocating 90% of the total amount of funding available from the Fund during a particular financial year paid proportionally. The proportional allocation is determined by dividing the amount (90% from the total funding available during a financial year) proportionally among the participating parties in any legislative body in accordance with the number of seats awarded to each participating party in the National Assembly and the Provincial Legislatures jointly.

ii) The remaining 10% of the amount of funding available from the Fund during a particular financial year is paid equitably meaning it is divided equally among the participating parties in the provincial legislatures.

The allocations from Parliament to political parties is provided by Parliament and regulated by Section 34 of the Financial Management of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act of 2009.

d) Funds allocated are transferred quarterly to RPPF and Parliament. Further details on when allocations are made should be obtained from the relevant transferring authority.

e) RPPF funds are allocated to political parties for any purposes compatible with its functioning as a political party in a modern democracy, whereas Parliament allocations are for political party support, constituency support and also for party leadership support. Again further details on what funds are used for can be obtained from the transferring authority and or the annual report of each receiving political party.

19 September 2017 - NW2697

Profile picture: Lees, Mr RA

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) How many applications were received for the special voluntary disclosure programme that closed on 31 August 2017, (b) what is the value of each application, (c)(i) how many of the specified applications were received from each economic sector and/or person and (ii) to what value in each case, (d) how many of the specified applications have been processed to date and (e) what is the total amount of revenue that (i) has been collected from processed applications and (ii) is expected to be collected from unprocessed applications?

Reply:

a) Two thousand and two (2002) SVDP applications were received by 31 August 2017.

b) The gross value of foreign assets declared, based on the 40% inclusion, is R34 939 070 557. The values of the individual declarations range from zero Rands to 1.4 Billion Rands.

We note that some taxpayers have disclosed 100% of the value of foreign assets on the application forms as opposed to only 40%. SARS is verifying the information submitted and will only be in a position to finalise this value once all applications have been verified.

c) (i) SARS is also not in a position to confirm the number of applications by economic sector at this stage.

(ii) This will be confirmed once the verification process has been concluded.

d) Of the 2002 applications received, three hundred and five (305) applications have been processed, resulting in two hundred and eighty (280) SVDP agreements being concluded with tax liabilities totalling R 1 031 627 067.

e) (i) Of that amount, R822 381 676 has been collected to date.

(ii) As highlighted above, based on taxpayers’ own declarations, an additional amount of about R4 billion is potentially collectable, however, we are in the process of verifying the correctness of the declarations.

19 September 2017 - NW2691

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether he is prepared to place all public service pension funds, including the pension funds of state enterprises, under the jurisdiction of the Pension Funds Adjudicator in order to ensure transparent management and cheap adjudication; if not, (a) how will this decision be justified in terms of the principles of fairness and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and (b) to what extent will pension fund members enjoy protection in the absence of oversight by the Pension Funds Adjudicator; if so, what are the (i) relevant details and (ii) time lines?

Reply:

The Pension Funds Act, 24 of 1956 as it stands does not make provision for the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator to have jurisdiction over pension funds other than those registered in accordance with the Act.

14 September 2017 - NW537

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2150 on 9 November 2016 and noting the requirements of section 7(3) of the Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, Act 56 of 2003, the VBS Mutual Bank is a registered bank according to the Banks Act, Act 94 of 1990; if not, why has no action been taken against any of the specified municipalities that deposit funds with the specified bank; if so, (a) on what date was the bank registered and (b) what are the further relevant details in this regard; (2) whether any action will be taken in future to prevent further deposits by municipalities with the bank; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

1. (a) VBS Mutual Bank was established in 1982 and initially operated as the Venda Building Society in the former Venda Homeland. VBS Mutual Bank (VBS) is registered with the South African Reserve Bank and operates under banking license No. 1051 in terms of the Mutual Banks Act of 1993. The bank was granted a permanent Mutual Bank license on 11 October 2000.

(b) VBS Mutual Bank is not registered under the Banks Act of 1990 and therefore does not have a commercial banking license. It is one of three banks currently registered as mutual banks in South Africa. However, as stated in the MFMA, municipalities are free to use the banking services of any of the 17 banks licensed in terms of the Banks Act of 1990, but not with a bank operating in terms of the Mutual Banks Act of 1993.

2. VBS is allowed to accept deposit in terms of section 54(1) (a) of the Mutual Banks Act, 1993 which reads as follows, “A mutual bank may, subject to the provision of this Act and such directives as may from time to time be issued by the Registrar- a) accept deposits and grant loans, advances or other credit in the Republic.”

The National Treasury will communicate with specific municipalities, in this regard.

14 September 2017 - NW2629

Profile picture: Figlan, Mr AM

Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether any measures have been put in place in each municipality in Gauteng to ensure that they are equipped to implement the National Treasury’s new Municipal Standard Chart of Accounts (mSCOA); if not, why not in each case; if so, what (a) is the current status of implementation of the mSCOA in each case and (b) are the further relevant details?

Reply:

The National Treasury provided various types of support to municipalities for the implementation of mSCOA. The following initiatives were undertaken in preparation of the affected environment, with a specific focus on the Gauteng province:

1. After promulgation of the mSCOA Regulations, the mSCOA chart was rigorously tested and refined by piloting in selected municipalities. Gauteng pilot municipalities were Cities of Johannesburg, Tshwane and Ekurhuleni.

2. A dedicated website was established to assist municipalities in understanding, educating and implementation of mSCOA, including information such as the project summary document, chart versions, Municipal SCOA circulars, presentations, etc:

http://mfma.treasury.gov.za/RegulationsandGazettes/MunicipalRegulationsOnAStandardChartOfAccountsFinal/Pages/default.aspx

3. The mSCOA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Portal was established, an internet based database tool for logging and responding to mSCOA related queries in March 2015 and is available to all municipalities.

4. Ongoing technical guidance and support to municipalities in the form of Circulars:

  • mSCOA Circulars No. 1 to 6 provided guidance on mSCOA implementation; and
  • MFMA Circular No. 80 and its addendum set out the proposed minimum ICT and business process functionality to enable transacting against mSCOA with effect 1 July 2017.

5. All the circulars were extensively consulted and also published on the National Treasury website.

6. The Transversal Tender: Local Government Financial Management and Internal Control Systems (RT25-2016 in the Government Tender Bulletin of 4 March 2016) was issued to support all municipalities that decided to make any system change(s) and / or upgrade(s).

7. Support provided through various mSCOA National and provincial forums, including mSCOA work groups, vendor forum(s) / platforms and a National Integrated Communication Forum involving the Gauteng Provincial Treasury and Gauteng pilot municipalities. These sessions were duplicated by the Gauteng Provincial Treasury in mSCOA, CFO and other relevant provincial forums.

8. Provided training across the affected environment, which included:

  • A one-day training initiative: ‘Demystifying mSCOA’, which was attended by 118 Gauteng officials on 8 December 2014;
  • 2-day non-accredited mSCOA training sessions was rolled-out for piloting municipalities, system vendors, and provincial treasuries. Gauteng delegates participated on 5 and 6 May 2015, with concurrent metro specific sessions facilitated with the Cities of Ekurhuleni, Johannesburg and Tshwane;
  • 3-day non-accredited sessions for all non-pilot municipalities was rolled-out to ensure that all non-pilot municipalities have a clear understanding of mSCOA and impact this will have on their respective municipalities. The training was attended by 71 officials in Gauteng comprising of 39 and 29 from municipalities and provincial treasury respectively.
  • Drawing closer to phase 4 project-end, a strategic partnership was concluded resulting in the future outsourcing of all project related training (accredited and- non-accredited) through a strategic partnership with the Certified Institute of Government Finance Audit and Risk Officers (CIGFARO (previously IMFO)) in cooperation with SALGA with effect 01 December 2016.
  • Dedicated support through the placement of a mSCOA Advisor as part of mSCOA project phase 4 (01 February 2016 to 31 March 2017) for project phase 5 (01 June 2017 to 31 March 2020) to the Gauteng Provincial Treasury to support municipalities in the province.

(a) & (b) The current status of implementation in Gauteng can be summarised as follows:

 (i) All Gauteng municipalities successfully submitted both their tabled and adopted budgets in the mSCOA data string to the Local Government Database hosted by the National Treasury;

(ii) 3 of the 11 Gauteng municipalities (City of Johanesburg, Ekurhuleni and Midvaal) successfully submitted MFMA section 71 reports in the mSCOA data strings;

(iii) 5 of the 11 Gauteng municipalities (City of Johannesburg, City of Tshwane, Emfuleni, Rand West City and Sedibeng) successfully submitted their integrated development plans in the mSCOA data string format;

(iv) The recent mSCOA transaction verification assessments conducted by the National Treasury and Gauteng Provincial Treasury on whether municipalities are transacting across selected test areas refers. Verification was completed for 7 municipalities, none of the verified municipalities in Gauteng is transacting across all the 8 selected test areas. The verified municipalities are partially transacting across some test areas. Each municipality not fully transacting across the 8 areas assessed, National Treasury and Gauteng Treasury are engaging all affected municipalities individually on their project plan to reach full transacting together with concurrent hands-on-support.

14 September 2017 - NW2624

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether there were any requests for deviations from the mandatory cost containment measures announced by the National Treasury (a) in the 2016-17 financial year and (b) since 1 April 2017; if not, what is the National Treasury’s policy position with regard to requests for deviations in the specified financial year and period; if so, (i) what is the name of the department, constitutional entity and/or public entity that made a request for a deviation, (ii) when was each deviation (aa) requested and (bb) approved and/or denied, (iii) what was the nature of each specified deviation requested, (iv) what was the motivation for requesting each deviation and (v) why was the specified deviation request approved and/or denied in each case?

Reply:

(a) Yes, the received deviations by the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer are indicated in the table below.

(b) Yes, the received deviations by the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer are indicated in the table below.

(i) Name of Department

(ii) When was each deviation

(iii)The nature of each specified deviation requested

(iv) The motivation for requesting each deviation

(v) Why was the specified deviation request approved and/or denied in each case

 

(aa) Requested

(bb) Approved and/or denied

     

Department of Military Veterans

19 June 2017

Approved

Business Class travel

Require guidance on travel provisions for members of the DMV’s Appeals Board and Advisory Council that are appointed in terms of sections 9 and 19 of the Military Veterans Act 18 of 2011 and not in terms of Section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994 as was previously indicated.

  • An appeal Board and Advisory Council on Military Veterans was established to attend to the interests of military veterans. The Advisory Council is responsible to the Minister.
  • The department requested further clarity because they initially said the members of the Appeals Board and Advisory Council were appointed in terms of s12A of the Public Service Act but later realised that they were appointed in terms of the Military Veterans Act.
  • The National Travel Policy Framework (National Treasury Instruction 02 of 2017/18) and the current cost containment instruction (NT Instruction 04 of 2017/18) applies to all travellers travelling on Official Business associated with performing the Institution’s functions in terms of their mandate and strategic, operational and performance plans.
  • The definition of a Traveller “is a person travelling at the behest of the Institution on Official Business. Institutions may include, but not limited to, other categories of employees, executives, other policy beneficiaries in line with applicable employment conditions, e.g. Institution bereavement, wellness and recruitment policies; Research collaboration support such as researchers, postgraduate students, utilising shared research platforms, Non-executive members, appointed members of a Committee, appointed members of a Commission of Enquiry, persons appointed as advisors on grounds of policy considerations in terms of section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994, interview candidates and other government employees where an employer-employee relationship exists as defined in the Labour Relations Act or similar, e.g. International Labour law (in the case of employees based in foreign countries) and other applicable legislation, invited guests, care attendants to a Traveller with a disability”
  • After reviewing the Military Veterans Act with regards to the establishment of the Advisory Council and the Appeals Board, the power and duties, the appointment requirements and the composition of these governance structures, it is apparent that their functions are similar to that of persons appointed as advisors on grounds of policy considerations in terms of section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994.
  • It is for this reason that NT approved that Members of the DMV’s Advisory Council and Appeals Board be treated the same as persons appointed as advisors on grounds of policy considerations in terms of section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994 for travel provisions as set out in the two Instructions mentioned above.

The Presidency

31 March 2017

Not approved

Request to exceed the maximum allowance rate per star grading for domestic hotel accommodation

  • Special Advisors, Officials in the private office of the Presidency and Deputy Presidency, Office of the Director General, Office of the Chief Operations Officer, support staff of former principals, protocol officers, spousal support staff and presidential aides are required to travel to Cape Town and other provinces in support of principals during official engagements.
  • The Domestic Accommodation Rate Grid determines the maximum allowance rate per star grading within which an employee is allowed to be accommodated in accordance with an employee’s salary level. This poses a challenge as some of the hotel rates do not fall within the maximum allowed rates.

National Treasury does not give blanket approvals to deviate from cost containment measures.

The Presidency

29 August 2017

Under review

Request for deviation from Instruction Note No. 4 of 2017/18 for essential core staff to travel in the same class when accompanying the President and Deputy-President on commercial flights.

Arrangement of commercial air travel on occasion, including accommodating of essential core staff travelling with principals.

In efforts to minimise cost, the Presidency will on occasion arrange for commercial air travel for the President and Deputy President. On such occasions, it is critical that essential core staff traveling with the Principals be accommodated in the same class during the flights. The core staff comprises, but is not limited to, Private/Assistant Private Secretary, Presidential Aide, Medical Doctor and two Close Protectors. The National Treasury Instruction Note No. 4 of 2017/18 makes provision for business class travel for certain ranks. However, this excludes the core support staff of the Principals due to ranks not covered, irrespective of duration of travel.

Department of Labour

20 July 2017

Approved on condition that the newspapers are not procured for personal use of employees

Procurement of newspapers and magazines

The newspapers are for comprehensive monitoring of the mass media, the development of media analysis and research solutions and delivering of most appropriate interventions as a key element of the strategic management function.

Newspapers are for comprehensive monitoring of the mass media, the development of media analysis and research solutions and delivering of most appropriate interventions as this is a key element of the strategic management function.

14 September 2017 - NW2623

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)With reference to mandatory cost containment measures announced by the National Treasury, by what amount did expenditure on (a) consultants, (b) travel and subsistence, (c) catering and events, (d) entertainment, (e) advertising, (f) newspapers and advertising, (g) conference and (h) any other specified expenditure item(s) decrease in each department, constitutional institution and public entity listed in Schedules 2 and 3 of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, as amended, in the 2016-17 financial year and since 1 April 2017; (2) What is the total amount of expenditure in each of the specified categories in each of the specified financial years?

Reply:

This reply provides additional information to supplement the information provided in the reply to the above question, dated 12 September 2017. The first reply focussed mainly on the preliminary outcome for 2016/17 and the first 5 months of the 2017/18 financial year. In the tables below data is provided from 2013/14, the base year for the introduction of the cost containment measures. Data for 2017/18 has been updated with the latest spending data as at 31 August 2017. Historical data has been extracted from the financial systems of government and might differ from the published financial statements of departments, as all data has been mapped to the 2017/18 version of the chart of accounts.

1. Total expenditure by national departments on items that relate to the mandatory cost containment measures decreased in nominal terms by R2.1 billion from 2013/14 to 2016/17, an average annual decrease of 5.4 per cent. This implies a real decline of R4.5 billion (in 2016 Rands) or a real average annual percentage decrease, after taking the effect of inflation into account, of 10.5 per cent. Table 1 below provides a consolidated summary of expenditure items related to the cost containment instruction note for national government. Details by national department is provided in the attached annexure A. The table provides actual expenditure for the 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 financial years, (mapped to the 2017/18 version of the chart of accounts), as well as the preliminary outcome for 2016/17 and data for the first 5 months of 2017/18.

 

Table 1: Summary of expenditure on cost containment related items: National departments 1 see the link below: 

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2623Table1-170926.pdf   

  1. Excludes Parliament

Total expenditure by provinces on items that relate to the mandatory cost containment measures increased in nominal terms by R182.2 million from 2013/14 to 2016/17, an average annual increase of 0.6 per cent. However, this implies a real decline of R1.7 billion (in 2016 Rands) or a real average annual percentage decrease, after taking the effect of inflation into account, of 4.8 per cent. Table 2 below provides a consolidated summary of expenditure items related to the cost containment instruction note for all provinces. Details by province is provided in the attached annexure B. The table below provides actual expenditure for the 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 financial years, (mapped to the 2017/18 version of the chart of accounts), as well as the preliminary outcome for 2016/17 and data for the first 5 months of 2017/18.

As indicated in the previous response, expenditure information on these spending items is not available for constitutional institutions and public entities listed in Schedules 2 and 3 to the PFMA since these institutions utilise different entity controlled financial systems for their payments.

 

Table 2: Summary of expenditure on cost containment related items: All provinces see the link below: 

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2623Table2-170926.pdf

2. The total expenditure in relation to (a) consultants, (b) travel and subsistence (c) catering (d) entertainment (e) advertising (f) newspapers and publications (g) conferences and (h) other related expenditure for the 2016/2017 financial year amounts to R11.5 billion for national departments and R10.4 billion for provinces, as indicated in Tables 1 and 2 above. Corresponding expenditure from 1 April 2017 to 31 August 2017 amounts to R4.2 billion for national departments and R4.7 billion for provinces. Details of expenditure by national department is provided in annexure A and a summary of expenditure by province is provided in annexure B.

See the link for AnnexureA and B: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2623Annexure_-170926.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14 September 2017 - NW2595

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to the National Treasury?

Reply:

The opening and closing dates for the advertisement for vacancies for the Board positions for entities and councils reporting to the Minister of Finance was:

a) 11 June 2017

b) 23 June 2017

14 September 2017 - NW2316

Profile picture: Rabotapi, Mr MW

Rabotapi, Mr MW to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)With reference to his reply to question 1755 on 20 July 2017 with regard to the protective service officers allotted to the Commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (SARS), what is the total expenditure for this service in (a) each of the past five financial years and (b) since 1 April 2017; (2) with regard to the protective service officers allotted to the (a) spouse of the Commissioner of SARS and (b) staff members of SARS, what is the total expenditure for each service in (i) each of the past five financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017; (3) (a) on what date was the last threat and risk assessment done for (i) the Commissioner of SARS and (ii) the spouse of the Commissioner of SARS and (b) on what date is each case set to be reviewed again?

Reply:

1. (a) The number of Protective Service Officers (PSO) is determined by the Threat and Risk Assessment (TRA) which is compiled in advance by South African Police. By divulging the number protectors allotted to the Commissioner will bridge security measures currently in place.

Total expenditure is dependent on the employee grade see breakdown below:

Period: 2013/14

Minimum of grade 4B pa

Midpoint of grade 4B pa

Maximum of grade 4B pa

01 April ‘13-31 March 2014

202 608

270 144

337 668

Cell Phone

R650

Uniform Allowance

R4,765

Period: 2014/15

Minimum of grade 4B pa

Midpoint of grade 4B pa

Maximum of grade 4B pa

1 April 2014–31 March 2015

215 508

295 212

374 916

Cell phone

R650

Uniform Allowance

R5 060.43

Period: 2015/16

Minimum of grade 4B pa

Midpoint of grade 4B pa

Maximum of grade 4B pa

1April 2015–31 March 2016

228 504

313 008

397 524

Cell Phone

R500

Uniform Allowance

R 5 313.58

Period: 2016/17

Minimum of grade 4B pa

Midpoint of grade 4B pa

Maximum of grade 4B pa

1April 2016–31 March 2017

237 984

317 316

396 648

Cell Phone

R400

Uniform Allowance

R 7 226.47

b) The total expenditure for this service in (b) since 1 April 2017.

Period: 2017

Minimum of grade 4B pa

Midpoint of grade 4B pa

Maximum of grade 4B pa

1April 2016–31 March 2017

R237 984

R336 024

R396 648

Cell phone

R500

Uniform Allowance

Not yet paid

(2) With regard to protective service officers allotted to (a) the spouse of the Commissioner and (b) staff members of SARS, please refer to the response at 1(a) and (b) above.

(3) (a) The South African Revenue Service does not conduct Threat and Risk Assessments (TRA) either (i) for the Commissioner and (ii) the Commissioner’s spouse. (b) The TRA is compiled in advance by the South African Police Services; SARS is therefore unable to confirm when each case is set to be reviewed.

12 September 2017 - NW2561

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether any legal opinion was obtained before the application of the clean break principle was implemented, when a member of the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) gets divorced; if not, (a) why not and (b) how the validity of the principle was established; if so, (i) what are the relevant particulars and (ii) what did the legal opinion find regarding the (aa) constitutionality of the unilateral creation of a debt for a member and (bb) rationality of the principle; (2) how can access to a copy of the legal opinion be obtained?

Reply:

The GEPF is currently a respondent in a court application brought against it by a member on the application of the “clean break principle” where many of the issues canvassed in this question are involved. It is therefore not appropriate to answer these questions at this time.

12 September 2017 - NW2470

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)With reference to the clean break principle when a member of the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) gets divorced, (a) how many members of the fund have been affected by this since the rule was instituted, (b)(i) what is the cumulative debt of all the members to the fund and (ii) what is the interest rate at which the debt is levied and (c) how many members have already expressed objections to the principle; (2) whether the principle will be retained and whether plans exist to abolish it; if not, (a) why not and (b) what are the full reasons and particulars in this regard; if so, (i) what are the concomitant particulars and time lines, (ii) with what will the principle be replaced and (iii) what happens to the members who have already incurred debt in terms of the clean break principle?

Reply:

1. (a) It is important to understand that there is no debt in the conventional sense of the word. The GEPF provides affected divorced members with a funding mechanism to replenish their benefit after paying out the non-member spouse without adversely affecting other members of the Fund.

(b) (i) as explained in (a) above, it is not correct to consider the so-called divorce debt in the GEPF context as conventional debt that accumulates. Divorced members choose to replenish their benefits or not.

(ii) The GEPF does not keep statistics of members who object as the use of this mechanism to replenish their benefit is a member’s choice. However, the GEPF is a respondent in a court application by a member on the application of the “clean break principle.”

2 Although there are no obvious negative effects of the current application of the clean break principle, it confuses members, and the Board has already decided to discard the current application of the clean break principle in its current form. After the GEPF consulted the employer and employee representative through the Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC), the PSCBC has taken a resolution, Resolution 1 of 2017, to make the necessary changes to the GEP Law and rules. This is subject to the normal process of changing laws in the country

(i) The current mechanism for implementing the clean break principle will be replaced with a reduction of the member’s years of service commensurate with the amount paid to the non-member spouse in terms of the divorce decree.

(iii) Members who have already used the current the clean break principle mechanism to replenish their benefit will be given the option to have their years of service reduced commensurate with the amount paid to the non-member spouse in terms of the divorce decree.

2. Although there are no obvious negative effects of the current application of the clean break principle, it confuses members, and the Board has already decided to discard the current application of the clean break principle in its current form. After the GEPF consulted the employer and employee representative through the Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC), the PSCBC has taken a resolution, Resolution 1 of 2017, to make the necessary changes to the GEP Law and rules. This is subject to the normal process of changing laws in the country.

12 September 2017 - NW2624

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether there were any requests for deviations from the mandatory cost containment measures announced by the National Treasury (a) in the 2016-17 financial year and (b) since 1 April 2017; if not, what is the National Treasury’s policy position with regard to requests for deviations in the specified financial year and period; if so, (i) what is the name of the department, constitutional entity and/or public entity that made a request for a deviation, (ii) when was each deviation (aa) requested and (bb) approved and/or denied, (iii) what was the nature of each specified deviation requested, (iv) what was the motivation for requesting each deviation and (v) why was the specified deviation request approved and/or denied in each case?

Reply:

a) Yes, the received deviations by the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer are indicated in the table below.

b) Yes, the received deviations by the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer are indicated in the table below.

(i) Name of Department

(ii) When was each deviation

(iii)The nature of each specified deviation requested

(iv) The motivation for requesting each deviation

(v) Why was the specified deviation request approved and/or denied in each case

 

(aa) Requested

(bb) Approved and/or denied

     

Department of Military Veterans

19 June 2017

Approved

Business Class travel

Require guidance on travel provisions for members of the DMV’s Appeals Board and Advisory Council that are appointed in terms of sections 9 and 19 of the Military Veterans Act 18 of 2011 and not in terms of Section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994 as was previously indicated.

  • An appeal Board and Advisory Council on Military Veterans was established to attend to the interests of military veterans. The Advisory Council is responsible to the Minister.
  • The department requested further clarity because they initially said the members of the Appeals Board and Advisory Council were appointed in terms of s12A of the Public Service Act but later realised that they were appointed in terms of the Military Veterans Act.
  • The National Travel Policy Framework (National Treasury Instruction 02 of 2017/18) and the current cost containment instruction (NT Instruction 04 of 2017/18) applies to all travellers travelling on Official Business associated with performing the Institution’s functions in terms of their mandate and strategic, operational and performance plans.
  • The definition of a Traveller “is a person travelling at the behest of the Institution on Official Business. Institutions may include, but not limited to, other categories of employees, executives, other policy beneficiaries in line with applicable employment conditions, e.g. Institution bereavement, wellness and recruitment policies; Research collaboration support such as researchers, postgraduate students, utilising shared research platforms, Non-executive members, appointed members of a Committee, appointed members of a Commission of Enquiry, persons appointed as advisors on grounds of policy considerations in terms of section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994, interview candidates and other government employees where an employer-employee relationship exists as defined in the Labour Relations Act or similar, e.g. International Labour law (in the case of employees based in foreign countries) and other applicable legislation, invited guests, care attendants to a Traveller with a disability”
  • After reviewing the Military Veterans Act with regards to the establishment of the Advisory Council and the Appeals Board, the power and duties, the appointment requirements and the composition of these governance structures, it is apparent that their functions are similar to that of persons appointed as advisors on grounds of policy considerations in terms of section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994.
  • It is for this reason that NT approved that Members of the DMV’s Advisory Council and Appeals Board be treated the same as persons appointed as advisors on grounds of policy considerations in terms of section 12A of the Public Service Act of 1994 for travel provisions as set out in the two Instructions mentioned above.

The Presidency

31 March 2017

Not approved

Request to exceed the maximum allowance rate per star grading for domestic hotel accommodation

  • Special Advisors, Officials in the private office of the Presidency and Deputy Presidency, Office of the Director General, Office of the Chief Operations Officer, support staff of former principals, protocol officers, spousal support staff and presidential aides are required to travel to Cape Town and other provinces in support of principals during official engagements.
  • The Domestic Accommodation Rate Grid determines the maximum allowance rate per star grading within which an employee is allowed to be accommodated in accordance with an employee’s salary level. This poses a challenge as some of the hotel rates do not fall within the maximum allowed rates.

National Treasury does not give blanket approvals to deviate from cost containment measures.

The Presidency

29 August 2017

Under review

Request for deviation from Instruction Note No. 4 of 2017/18 for essential core staff to travel in the same class when accompanying the President and Deputy-President on commercial flights.

Arrangement of commercial air travel on occasion, including accommodating of essential core staff travelling with principals.

In efforts to minimise cost, the Presidency will on occasion arrange for commercial air travel for the President and Deputy President. On such occasions, it is critical that essential core staff traveling with the Principals be accommodated in the same class during the flights. The core staff comprises, but is not limited to, Private/Assistant Private Secretary, Presidential Aide, Medical Doctor and two Close Protectors. The National Treasury Instruction Note No. 4 of 2017/18 makes provision for business class travel for certain ranks. However, this excludes the core support staff of the Principals due to ranks not covered, irrespective of duration of travel.

Department of Labour

20 July 2017

Approved on condition that the newspapers are not procured for personal use of employees

Procurement of newspapers and magazines

The newspapers are for comprehensive monitoring of the mass media, the development of media analysis and research solutions and delivering of most appropriate interventions as a key element of the strategic management function.

Newspapers are for comprehensive monitoring of the mass media, the development of media analysis and research solutions and delivering of most appropriate interventions as this is a key element of the strategic management function.

07 September 2017 - NW2415

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1) With reference to his reply to question 1381 on 3 July 2017, since what date has a certain person (name furnished) been on suspension from the SA Revenue Service (SARS); (2) whether the specified person was escorted out of the SARS premises by security officials; if not, why not; if so, why?

Reply:

1. Mr Jonas Makwakwa was officially suspended on 15 September 2016.

2. His suspension was effected in accordance with the provisions and relevant procedures of the SARS suspension policy.