Reply:

1. (a)(i) The Department is currently facing 48 (those with more than one applicant counted as one) disputes.

(a)(ii) No disputes are currently being faced by the Ingonyama Trust Board (ITB) and the Office of the Valuer-General, both entities under the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

(b) These vary but include the following:

• Non-renewal of fixed-term contracts
• Performance assessments and related bonuses
• Non OSD translations
• Non-payment of leave days not taken
• Non- upgrading to higher salary levels
• Placement on pre-cautionary suspension
• Outcomes of Disciplinary Enquiries

(c) Nature of dispute. This includes:

• Unfair dismissals in terms of section 186(1) of LRA
• Unfair labour practice relating to promotion in terms of section 186(2)(a) of the LRA
• Interpretation of collective agreements
• Unfair labour practice relating to benefits in terms of section 186(2)(a) of the LRA
• Unfair labour practice relating to unfair suspension of an employee or disciplinary action short of dismissal in terms of section 186(2)(b)

(d)(i) see information relating to dates of disputes reported Annexure A.

(d)(ii) see information relating to dates of disputes resolved Annexure B.

(2) (a)( i) The Department dismissed 51 employees during the past 5 years

(a)(ii) Reasons for dismissal

8 employees dismissed for absenteeism.

1 employee dismissed for assault.

6 employees dismissed for fraud / forged signature / fraudulent medical certificate and overtime claim.

1 employee dismissed for damage to state vehicle

7 employees dismissed for abscondment

1 employee dismissed for falsification of performance assessment

1 employee dismissed for having two employment contacts

1 employee dismissed for insubordination

1 employee dismissed for irregular appointment of service provider

6 employees dismissed for irregularities in Land Reform projects

1 employee dismissed for misrepresentation of beneficiary information

3 employees dismissed for misrepresentation of disciplinary record from previous employment.

1 employee dismissed for misrepresentation of information related to service provider

1 employee dismissed for misrepresentation of criminal record on appointment

2 employees dismissed for misuse of GG vehicle / use for private purpose

3 employees dismissed for negligence and misrepresentation of information in handling Land Reform projects

1 employee dismissed for negligence with regard to payment and verification of restitution claimants

2 employees dismissed for soliciting bribe from a land reform beneficiary

1 employee dismissed for unauthorized use of GG vehicle

1 employee dismissed for unauthorized use of hired vehicle

1 employee dismissed for financial misconduct regarding e-cadastre project

1 employee dismissed for unauthorized use of Ministry letterhead.

(b)(i) no employee was paid a severance package in the past 5 years

(b)(ii) no monetary value as there were no severance packages.

Reply:

1. The farms Lukin 643 MS and Salaita 188 MT are amongst the farms that were claimed by Mr. Nthambeleni Hendrick Musekwa, on behalf of the Musekwa Community, before 31 December 1998. This claim was gazetted in 2006, long before it was known that there are coal deposits on the land under claim, and before the Government declared the area a Special Economic Zone. The intention of the Department to expropriate the farms Lukin 643 MS and Salaita 188 MT is for land restoration purposes.

2. Musekwa community.

Reply:

a) 72 000 beneficiaries participated in the programme.

b) (i) 2 400 farms.

(ii) 1 167 000 hectares.

(aa),(bb) Please refer to Annexure A.

c) 1 167 000 hectares were transferred; land acquired through the Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) programme is not leased.

Reply:

Section 179(1)(a) of the Constitution provides that the National Director of Public Prosecutions is appointed by the President, as head of the national executive. It is an executive appointment, constitutionally distinguished from those institutions whose members’ appointment involves Parliament.

Reply:

The disposal of non-core residential state land in urban areas is required when such properties do not contribute to the line function needs of government. The disposal of land is guided by national legislation, the State Land Disposal Act No. 48 of 1961, as well as provincial legislation – the Eastern Cape Land Disposal Act No. 7 of 2000.

Further, in April 2009, the Government Immovable Asset Management Act No. 19 of 2007 was promulgated to regulate uniformity in the management of state assets through its life-cycle, including a surrender plan for assets that do not meet the service delivery objectives of the State.

The properties that are advertised under SCMU5-18/19-PM002 are all vacant or dilapidated residential sites. The systematic release, through the prescribed legislative frameworks, of the State’s immovable assets that are surplus to the needs of Government and that are lying dormant in the urban areas, will promote residential development in municipal areas, as well as provide our people with security of tenure through the attainment of title deeds and also stimulate socio-economic development. The one way of addressing the latter is through the upgrading of dilapidated structures in the urban centres, and by so doing increase the revenue stream of municipalities and generally upgrade the facade of towns.

The Eastern Cape Province, through the said disposal process, aims at addressing the imbalances of the past, which contributed to the skewed land ownership patterns, with the focus on ownership transfer to the designated groups, such as black people, women, youth, military veterans and the disabled. First time home owners will be targeted as preferred bidders.

The province has committed that any site beneficially occupied or identified for strategic economic development will not be disposed.

 

Reply:

1. No.

(a),(b),(c) Falls away.

2. Falls away.

3. Falls away.

4. No.

Reply:

DAFF RESPONSE

(1)   (a) WHAT NUMBER OF LABOUR DISPUTES ARE CURRENTLY BEING FACED BY (i) HIS DEPARTMENT AND (ii) THE ENTITIES REPORTING TO HIM, (b) WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF EACH DISPUTE, (c) WHAT IS THE NATURE OF EACH DISPUTE AND (d) ON WHAT DATE WAS EACH DISPUTE (i) REPORTED AND (ii) RESOLVED;

Q(1)(a)(i): Number of current disputes face by the department	Q(1)(a)(ii): Number of current disputes face by entities of the department	Q(1)(b): cause of each dispute	Q(1)(c): nature of dispute	Q(1)(d)(i): Date of dispute referral	Q(1)(d)(ii): Date of dispute resolved
Twenty (20)	NA	Employee not shortlisted for a post she applied for.	Unfair Labour Practice (promotion)	03 November 2017	Awaiting arbitration award from General Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (GPSSBC).
		Precautionary suspension	Unfair Labour Practice (unfair suspension)	8 September 2016	Arbitration adjourned to 4 & 5 September 2018.
		Job Evaluation results	Unfair Labour Practice (promotion)	29 January 2018	Awaiting notice of setdown from GPSSBC.
		Resignation due to allegedly intolerable work environment	Unfair dismissal (constructive dismissal)	17 October 2016	Awaiting arbitration award from GPSSBC.
		Job grading	Unfair Labour Practice (promotion)	17 February 2018	Awaiting notice of setdown from GPSSBC.
		Pay progression	Unfair Labour Practice (Benefits)	7 July 2017	Awaiting notice of setdown from GPSSBC.
		Dismissal	Unfair dismissal (s186(1)	10 August 2017	Awaiting notice of setdown from GPSSBC after matter was postponed.
		Dismissal	Unfair dismissal (s186(1)	22 November 2017	Awaiting notice of setdown from GPSSBC.
		Job Evaluation (JE) results	Unfair Labour Practice (promotion)	15 December 2017	Awaiting arbitration award from GPSSBC.
		Implementation of Occupation Specific Dispensation (OSD)	Interpretation and application of collective agreement	21 July 2017	Awaiting arbitration award.
		Disciplinary sanction: suspension without pay	Unfair Labour Practice (unfair suspension)	13 November 2017	Arbitration adjourned to 11 & 12 September 2018.
		Precautionary suspension	Unfair Labour Practice (unfair suspension)	18 January 2017	Arbitration adjourned to 5, 6 & 7 September 2018.
		Leave payout	Unfair Labour Practice (Benefits)	12 February 2018	Matter withdrawn on 21 August 2018.
		Discrimination during salary upgrades	Unfair Labour Practice (promotion)	12 May 2017	Awaiting ruling on jurisdiction.
		Suspension	Unfair Labour Practice (unfair suspension)	5 November 2017	Part-heard matter. Commissioner has given the date of 17 September 2018 as the date for finalisation of the matter.
		Dismissal	Unfair Dismissal	6 February 2018	Settlement agreement entered into with the applicants. Awaiting Ministerial approval. Minister has approved the submission. Human Resources unit to facilitate the JE process.
		Conditions of employment	Unfair Labour Practice (conditions of employment)	09May 2018	Settlement agreement entered into with NEHAWU. The post is to be job evaluated.
		Victimization	Unfair Labour Practice (occupational detriment).	09 July 2018	Awaiting arbitration date
		Non-payment of pay progression	Unfair Labour Practice (Benefits)	17 June 2018	Awaiting award to be issued by the Arbitrator.
		Payment of subsidized vehicle.	Unfair Labour Practice (Benefits)	03 November 2017	Arbitration scheduled for 3 October 2018.

(2) (a)(i) WHAT NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN DISMISSED BY HIS DEPARTMENT IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS AND (ii) FOR WHAT REASON WAS EACH EMPLOYEE DISMISSED AND (b)(i) WHAT NUMBER OF THE SPECIFIED EMPLOYEES WERE PAID SEVERANCE PACKAGES AND (ii) WHAT WAS THE MONETARY VALUE OF EACH SEVERANCE PACKAGE? 

Q2(a)(i): Number of dismissed employees in the past five years	Q2(a)(ii): reason for dismissal for each employee	Q2(b)(i): employees paid severance packages	Q2(b)(ii): monetary value of each severance package
Twenty two (22)	Employee 1: Fraud	None (0)	R0.00
	Employee 2: Fraud
	Employee 3: Absenteeism and misuse of state vehicle
	Employee 4: Gross insubordination
	Employee 5: Fraud
	Employee 6: Fraud
	Employee 7: Assault
	Employee 8: Abscondments
	Employee 9: Assault
	Employee 10: Absenteeism
	Employee 11: Absenteeism
	Employee 12: Abscondment
	Employee 13: Fraud
	Employee 14: Rhino poaching
	Employee 15: Fraud
	Employee 16: Timber theft
	Employee 17: Fraud
	Employee 18: Abscondment
	Employee 19: Rhino poaching
	Employee 20: threatening to kill supervisor and gross insubordination
	Employee 21: Absenteeism
	Employee 22: Fraud

ARC RESPONSE

1.There are only two disputes in this category that are in superior courts of law in the ARC.

a) One is in the Labour Court regarding the calculation of interest in the past dispute. The other is in the High Court as a claim for consequential damages for dismissal.

b) The cause of the labour court dispute was the result of a finding by the CCMA that the failure to renew a fixed term contract amounted to a dismissal.

2. a. (i) 36 employees were dismissed and reasons are attached to the annexure to this document.

    (ii)Reasons are attached as annexure to this document.

b. (i) The ARC has not offered any employee severance package during this period.

    (ii)The question is not applicable.

NAMC RESPONSE

1. None

2. (a)(1) 4 Employees

(ii) Misconduct

(b) (i) None

(ii) None

SAVC RESPONSE

1 (a) The SAVC does not have any current labour disputes.

2 (a) (i) The SAVC had one (1) dismissal in the past (5) years; and

(ii) The employee was dismissed for Gross Misconduct due to gross continued abuse of organisation resources / property.

(b) (i) One (1) employee was paid a separation package subsequent to a settlement agreement during a disciplinary hearing; and

(ii) The monetary value of the voluntary separation package was R107 484.00 equivalent to three month’s salary.

OBP RESPONSE

No	Cause of the dispute	Nature of dispute	Date reported	Date resolved	Outcome
1	The employee was dismissed after an internal disciplinary hearing for being AWOL.	Employee alleged unfair dismissal and lodged a dispute at the CCMA.	April 2017	On going	CCMA ruled in favour of OBP. The employee has referred the matter to the Labour Court
2	The employee was suspended for gross violation of OBP manufacturing practices.	Employee lodged 2 cases of unfair suspension with CCMA	February 2017	December 2017	The CCMA ruled in favour of OBP on both occasions
3	The employee was dismissed for gross violation of OBP manufacturing practices.	Employee lodges a case with the CCMA for access to information	August 2017	28 February 2018	The CCMA ruled in favour of OBP
4	The employee was dismissed for gross violation of OBP manufacturing practices.	Unfair dismissal lodged at CCMA	August 2017	On going	The matter is set down for 30 August 2018
5	Employee was dismissed for gross insubordination	Unfair dismissal	June 2017	December 2017	Matter settled
6	Employee was dismissed for not following quality procedures.	Unfair dismissal	February 2018	June 2018	Matter settled
7	Employee alleges unfair labour practice for equal pay for equal pay	Unfair labour dispute	February 2018	On-going	Matter set down for 26 July 2018 and will continue on 10 and 11 September 2018
8	Wage Bargaining	The Unions rejected the last offer from OBP and lodged an MMI with CCMA	July 2018	Ongoing	The matter is set down for 24 August 2018
9	Unfair dismissal	The employee refer the matter to the labour court	2015	On-going	The matter is set down for March 2019

PPECB RESPONSE

(1)  (a) The PPECB currently has one dispute that has been reffered to the CCMA.Details are depicted below:

No.	(b) Cause of Dispute	(c) Nature of Dispute	(d)(i) Date Reported	Date CCMA	Outcome	Remarks
1	Contract Employee has an expectation of permanent employment.	Section 198 of Labour Relations Act	25-May-18	12-Jun-18	Referred to arbitration.	Pending until 12 Sep-18

(2)  (a)(i) The table below depicts dismissals that occurred at the PPECB over a period of 5 years. 

(i) Employee Nr	Dismissal Date	(ii) Reason for Dismissal	(b) Severance Package
1	05/08/2013	Misrepresentation	R-nil
2	09/05/2014	Misrepresentation	R-nil
3	04/05/2015	Misrepresentation	R-nil
4	21/05/2015	Misrepresentation	R-nil
5	23/08/2016	Misrepresentation	R-nil
6	25/05/2017	Absconded and Dishonest	R-nil
7	09/06/2017	Misrepresentation	R-nil
8	31/08/2017	Inappropriate use of company property	R-nil
9	12/03/2018	Material breach of contract	R-nil

It is worth noting that majority of the cases relates to misrepresentation meaning that people were dismissed for fraudulent claims relating to timesheets.

Reply:

The speech that the President delivered in Kimberley as the Commander-in-Chief of the South African National Defence Force on the occasion of Armed Forces Day, on 21 February 2018, does not make reference to any of the assertions made in the question of the Honourable Member.

The section of the speech quoted by the Honourable Member reflects the primary mandate of the SANDF, as prescribed in the Defence Act No. 42 of 2002, Section 2(b), which states: “The primary object of the Defence Force is to defend and protect the Republic, its people and its territorial integrity”.

The President’s speech on Armed Forces Day 2018 is attached for information.

Reply:

(1) - (2) The Commission of Inquiry into State Capture is empowered to decide who should give evidence before it. If the Commission asks me to appear before it, I will gladly oblige.

Any person, including members of Cabinet and senior government employees, who may have information that would assist the Commission in its work, is encouraged to make that information available to the Commission and, if necessary, to give evidence.

 

Reply:

1. No. The current lease agreement between (names furnished) is a private document which involve third parties and therefore the Minister is not in a position to furnish such documents without the consent of the parties.

2. (a),(b) No. (name furnished) is a private company and does not report to the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform.

3. (a) Please refer to Annexure A.

(b) The Department does not have a list of members who are not receiving payment.

 

Reply:

(1) Yes, the letter from the leaders of Abahlali baseMjondolo was received by the President, in his capacity as President, on 6 June 2018.

(2) The letter was responded to on 11 July 2018, addressed to the President of Abahlali baseMjondolo, Mr S. Zikode.

Reply:

(a) - (b) The envoys were appointed to create an additional channel through which business can alert government of possible investment opportunities as well as impediments they experience in pursuing those opportunities. The envoys combined have had more than 150 engagements. These include meetings with individual companies, business chambers, business groupings and embassies.

(c) (i) The meetings referred to above have been held since the envoys were appointed, up to date.

(ii) Meetings were held in various locations including Johannesburg, Cape Town, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Singapore, China, Canada, Ireland, London and Poland.

(d) (i) (ii) Envoys are volunteers who are deployed to convey messages about the investment climate and to generate goodwill with investors. They are not tasked with deal-making, but with opening doors. It is up to the government to pursue the investment opportunities where appropriate, or to resolve the issues that may be blocking private sector investment.

(e) (i) (ii) To date, the total cost is at R369,644.14, which includes:

- Ticket fares: R225,397.90

- Hotel Accommodation: R57,798.69

- Delegation fee: R86,447.55

 

Reply:

(2) (a)(i) What number of employees have been dismissed by his department in the past five years: total = 1172

(a)(ii) for what reason was each employee dismissed:

Loss of state firearm	13
Murder	78
Attempted Murder	61
Rape	29
Attempted Rape	1
Reckless driving	4
Theft	191
Fraud	93
Corruption	230
Kidnapping	18
Robbery	15
Armed robbery	45
Aiding an escapee	14
Extortion	10
Assault	60
Bribery	10
House breaking	5
Failing to comply with lawful instruction	23

Sexual harassment	14
Defeating the ends of justice	97
Car hijacking	13
Absent from work without permission	71
Domestic violence	14
Racism	3
Forgery	3
Burglary	2
Dealing in Dagga	24
Unauthorised use of state property	11
Possession of stolen property	23
Total	1191
Note: 1 Member may have more than 1 sanction

2. (b)(i) what number of the specified employees were paid severance packages, and None.

     (ii) what was the monetary value of each severance package? Not applicable.

 

 

, LIEUTENANT GENERAL

ISIONAL COMMISSIONER: PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

L NTSHIEA

Date:

Agree with reply to question 2314

DEP

BC MGWENY

LIEUTENANT GENERAL COMMISSIONER: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Date: x e \

DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 17 AUGUST 2018

(INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 23-2018)

Agree with reply to question 2314

GENERAL

AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date:

Reply to question 2314 approved/

MINISTER OF POLICE BH CELE (MP)

Reply:

1. The Edenvale Police Station will receive one additional sector vehicle, by 2018-11-30.

2. The station requires the following additional vehicles: (2)(a)(i) Four vehicles are required for sector managers.

(2)(a)(ii) No additional vehicles will be allocated in this financial year.

(2)(b)(i) Two vehicles are required for other police personnel

(2)(b)(ii) No additional vehicles will be allocated in this financial year.

 

Reply to question 2791 recommended/

GENERAL H AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Reply to question 2791 approved/

MINISTER OF POLICE BH CELE, MP

Date: @

Reply:

(1) Yes, it was a Russian cargo vessel.

(2) Yes, it was found that there were containers carrying explosives and the necessary permits were in place.

(3) No, the permits were available.

(4) No, the security of the countries and the vessel will be compromised, if a public statement is made to this effect.

Reply to question 2719 recommended,

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2018-09-26

Reply to question 2719 approvecl

MINISTER OF POLICE
BH CELE, MP
Date: 01/10/2018

Reply:

(1) The Elsburg Police Station will receive three additional sector vehicles, by 2018-11-30.

(2) The station requires the following additional vehicles:

(2)(a)(i) Three vehicles are required for sector managers.

(2)(a)(ii) No additional vehicles will be allocated in this financial year.

(2)(b )(i) Three vehicles are required for other police personnel.

(2)(b )(ii) One vehicle will be received, by 2018-12-14.

 

Reply to question 2792 recommended

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SREVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date:2018-09-26

Reply to question 2792 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
BH CELE, MP
Date: 01/10/2018
 

Reply:

1. The Elsburg Police Station is currently unable to fulfil the requirement of two vehicles, per sector, due to a shortage of resources.

2. The Elsburg Police Station consists of three sectors, with two members, per sector, per shift and one vehicle. In order to fulfil the requirement of two vehicles, per sector, to patrol at all times, the following additional resources are required:

Additional Requirements
Personnel	6
Vehicles	3

 

Original signed MAJOR GENERAL I/PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER: GAUTENG NL NAPO

Date: 11 September 2018

Reply to question 2663 recommended/ d

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date: 018 0t

Reply to question 2663 approved/

MINISTER OF POLICE BH CELE, MP

Date:

1. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

36/1/4/1(201800186)

FOR WRITTEN REPLY

QUESTION 1781

DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 1 JUNE 2018 (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 19-2018)

178'l. Mrs A M Dreyer (DA) to ask the Minister of Police:

• 1. What is the current (a) actual and (b) optimal number of police officers involVed with sector policing at the Elsburg Police Station;

• 1. by what date will the specified police station receive its full complement of sector police officers?

NW1938E

REPLY:

(1)(a)(b) and (2)

Police Station	(1)(a) Actual	(1)(b) Optimal (Ideal)	(2) Date when full complement will be reached
Elsburg Sector Policing	31	23 (+8)	During the 2017/2018 financial year, no students were allocated to the police station.

Repty to question 1781 recommended/

KJ LE (SOEG) Date: , .0,- 18

GENERAL TH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Reply to question 1781 approved/not approved

MINISTER OF POLICE BH CELE, MP

Date:

Reply:

1. No additional vehicles will be allocated for sector policing, during this financial year.

2. The Bedfordview Police Station requires the following additional vehicles:

(2)(a)(i) Three vehicles are required for sector managers.

(2)(a)(ii) No additional vehicles will be allocated in this financial year.

(2)(b)(i) Three vehicles are required for other police personnel.

(2)(b)(ii) One vehicle will be receiVed, by 2018-12-14.

 

 

Reply to question 2789 recommended/id

GENERAL H AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Date: //t8 - 2 6

2

Reply to question 2789 approved/

ER OF POLICE BH CELE, M

Date:

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

FOR WRITTEN REPLY

PATE OF PUBLICATION IR INTERNAL QUE8TION PAPEg: 18 MAY 2018 (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 16-2018)

1S36. Mr C D Mataepe (DA) fo ask the Mlnlster of Pollca:

What number of (a) vehicles ara availabla for vlalble policing with specific ‹efe‹enm to eactor policing at the Be‹ffordview Police Station, (b) the epeclfled vehicles have mileage of (I) 1-100 000 kma, (li) 100 001-200 000 kms, tlll) 200 001-300 000 kms and (lv) over 300 000 kms and (c) day6 In 2017 was aach of the vehiclee out of working order7

REPLY:

NW1B78E

	Number of vehlalw numbea)	(r) daya out of . order tbr ead vehlde, In 20J7	Number of vehlcles numbers)	(o) days out of order fbr each vefilcl•, in 2017	Number of (RAPS numbers)	(c) daye out of order for aach vehJde, In 2047	Numbar of (eAP9 numbers)	(c) daye. out ef"! order for., gach . .: vehlsk, In 201.7. .
	BVG318B	1	BTY028B BTL287B	7 16	BGY310B	30	Nil	NII
			8TD60be	10

Orlgtnel aignod LIEUTENANT GEI4ERAL PROVINCIAL COMMI99IONER: GAUTEMG DB DE LANOE

Date: 22 May 2016

Reply to question 1536 recommended

’ATI L C

OUTH AFRICan›•ouce seRvlce

Date:

Reply to question 1536 approved/not approve‹I

Reply:

(1) The Edenvale SAPS is currently unable to fulfil the requirement of two vehicles per sector, due to a shortage of resources.

(2) The Edenvale Police Station has four sectors. One vehicle and two members are deployed, per sector, per shift, implying a total of 32 members. In order to fulfil the requirement of two vehicles per sector, an additional 32 members are required.
 

PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER: GAUTENG

OS DE LANGE

Date: 6 September 2018

Reply to question 2547 recommended


GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SREVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2018-09-26

Reply to question 2547 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
BH CELE, MP
Date: 01/10/2018


Please find here: Question 1787

Reply:

1. Discussion is at an advanced level with the South African Council for Educators (SACE), the Department of Social Development (DSD) and the Provincial Education Departments (PEDs) with regards to putting in place measures that will ensure that all school educators and other personnel who come into contact with children are vetted in accordance with the National Register for Sex Offenders.

These discussions have culminated in a draft Protocol between the SACE, the employers of educators, the DSD and the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DoJ) on the management of educators’ conduct, accessing the registers and the reporting of offences against children to the DSD. It is envisaged that the protocol will be concluded before the end of this year.

Since conditions of employment of other personnel appointed in terms of the Public Service Act are determined by the Minister of Public Service and Administration, a request to the Minister to amend the Public Service Regulations to accommodate the requirements of the Children’s Act, 2005 and the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 may be necessary, alternatively to work together with the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) to develop a similar protocol.

2. The events leading to the finalisation of the protocol will guide the Minister on whether to issue a statement or not.

Reply:

(1) The Germiston Police Station is currently unable to fulfil the requirement of two vehicles per sector, due to a shortage of resources.

(2) The Germiston Police Station has five sectors with two members per sector and one vehicle, per sector, implying a total of 40 members. In order to fulfil the requirement of two vehicles, per sector, an additional 40 members are required.



Original signed LIEUTENANT GENERAL

PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER: GAUTENG

OS DE LANGE

Date: 6 September 2018

 

 

36/1/4/1 (201800187)

 

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

 

FOR WRITTEN REPLY

 

QUESTION 1782

 

DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 1JUNE2018!INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 19-20181

 

1782. Mrs A M Dreyer (DA) to ask the Minister of Police:

(1) What is the current (a) actual and (b) optimal number of police officers Involved with sector policing at the Germiston Police Station;

(2) by what date will the specified police station receive its full complement of sector police officers?

NW1939E

REPLY:
 

(1)(a)(b) and (2)

 

Police Station	(1)(a) Actual	(1)(b) Optimal (Ideal)	(2) Date when full complement will be reached
Germiston Sector Policing	72	51 (+21)	During the 2017/2018 financial year, seven students were allocated to the police station.

Reply to question 1782 recommended


GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIOER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SEOG)
Date: 2018-06—8

Reply to question 1782 approved/not approved


MINISTER OF PLICE?
BH CELE, MP
Date: 17/06/2018

Reply:

Department	a)(i) name of each investing company t hat invested on land	b)(i) Nature of investments.	b)(ii)) value investments.	b)(iii) length of each investment.
DST	None	None	None	None

 

Entity	a)(i) name of each investing company t hat invested on land	b)(i) Nature of investments.	b)(ii)) value investments.	b)(iii) length of each investment.
CSIR	None	None	None	None
NRF	None	None	None	None
SANSA	None	None	None	None
HSRC	None	None	None	None
TIA	None	None	None	None
ASSAF	None	None	None	None

 

Reply:

1. Currently, there are no officials suspended in the DBE

2. (a) There are no officials suspended for less than 60 days.

(b) There are no officials suspended for 60 to 90 days.

(c) There are no officials suspended for 90 to 110 days.

(d) There are no officials suspended for longer than 120 days.

3. Not applicable

Reply:

(1) (a)

DAFF

(1) (a) Total number
(i) DDGs	(ii) CDs	(i) DDGs	(ii) CDs
(aa) Acting capacity	(aa) Acting capacity	(bb) Permanent capacity	(bb) Permanent capacity
*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women
1 (12/9-20/9)	0	3	1	6	1	21	15

* Men and women

(2) (a)

ARC

(2) (a) Total number
(i) Chief Executive Officers	(ii) Directors
*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women
1	0	21	8

* Men and women

NAMC

(2) (a) Total number
(i) Chief Executive Officers	(ii) Directors
*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women
1	0	8	4

* Men and women

PPECB

(2) (a) Total number
(i) Chief Executive Officers	(ii) Directors
*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women
1	0	4	2

* Men and women

OBP

(2) (a) Total number
(i) Chief Executive Officers	(ii) Directors
*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women
1 (Acting)	0	6	3

* Men and women

MLRF – N/A as it does not have employees of its own

(2) (a) Total number
(i) Chief Executive Officers	(ii) Directors
*Total	(b) Women	*Total	(b) Women
0	0	0	0

* Men and women

Reply:

(2) (2)(a)(i) The Boksburg North Police Station will receive one additional sector vehicle by 2018-11-30.

(2)(a)(ii) The station will require the following additional vehicles: Four vehicles are required for sector managers.

(2)(b)(i) No additional vehicles will be allocated in this financial year. Six vehicles are required for other police personnel.

(2)(b)(ii) Three vehicles will be received, by 2018-12-14.

NW3083E

 

 

Reply to question 2790 recommended/

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Uate: ]g1g -09- 2 6

NATIONAL AS6Ef4BLY

FORWRWTENREPLY

DATG O§ P$@LICATION IN INTERNAL gU$§TION P/\(*fiRt !+ Y 2016 (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER ND 16-201B)

16s0. Mr M Watate (DA) to aeh tks Mtnlatar of Police:

What numbBT DI(a) vehidea are available for visible pollclng wkh speclflc refarenae to sector policing at the Bokeburg North Police Stadon, (b) the apeclfled vehiobs have mileage of (I) \-100 000 kms, (ii) 100 00't-200 000 kma, §g) 200 001-300 000 kms and (lv) over 300 000 kma and (c) days In 2017 was eaoh of the vehldas out of

NW1870E

REPLY:

Notth Toll vehlolee avallabla fDr s»‹c›r
	Number Nf vehbBs (8AP0 numbers)	(o) daya 0UtM working ord#rar eqch vehicle, In 20J7	Numberd VOWIOBB (8APS numtma)	(c) daya 0U1Of worklng oMsrb caoh vehbfe, In 2017	Number of V0 010B (SAP9 numbers)	(o) djzys OMtOf worldrig mderbr each vehk›Ie, in 2017	Number of VshlCkB (GAP8 numDee)	(o) daya 0M01 wo/Nng otderb ea:8t vahlcle, In 2017
	BTS6088	2	BSY7018 8SW236B BTCB008	95 4é 20	BSIYI839B BTJ360B BTJ060B	19 5 88	BGB487B BRP006B	30 40

Ortglnal slgned LIEUTENANT GENERAL PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER: OAUTENQ DS DE LANGE

Data: 2Z May 2018

2

Reply to question 1530 recommended/

TI L C

LE

Roply to queetlon 1530 approved

MINISTER BH CELE, £/lP

GENERAL

UTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Reply:

(1)(a)(b) Designated Police Officers (DPOs) are appointed at police stations, to conduct compliance inspections in terms of the Second-Hand Goods Act, 2009 (Act No 6 of 2009). This includes registered second-hand goods stores and scrap metal dealers. However, at most police stations, the appointed DPO is also responsible to conduct compliance inspections, in respect of the firearm and liquor environments.

As part of the compliance inspection, all records maintained by the registered second-hand goods dealer, are checked by the DPO to ensure that they are taking identity document numbers. The compliance inspection includes the verification of copies of the applicable official document, as proof of the identity of the person, who either acquired or disposed of goods, as prescribed in Sections 21(4) and (5) of the Second- Hand Goods Act. The proof of identity can be a temporary South African identity certificate, a South African identity document, a valid current passport or a valid current South African driving licence.

(2) Yes, the regulations, as required in terms of Section 41 of the Second- Hand Goods Act, for the accreditation of Second-Hand Goods Dealers

Associations was completed and promulgated on 6 September 2011, in the Government Notice, No R703. The Regulations for Dealers and Recyclers was completed and promulgated, on 3 April 2012, in the Government Notice, No R285.

 

 

Reply to question 2766 recommended

Date:

26J8 -I?- 2 6

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

Reply to question 2766 approved

Reply:

The response is in response to National Assembly Question 880. The question is attached for ANNEXURE A ease of reference. The response to NA 880 was without a response from Eastern Cape and as a result a number of follow ups were made with NA 2106 being the last. The response to NA 880 and subsequent follow-up questions is attached as ANNEXURE B

a) (i) 995 (ii) 1187

b) See attached list (ANNEXURE B)

c) Small and non-viable

d) See attached list (ANNEXURE B)

e) See attached list (ANNEXURE B)

f) See attached list (ANNEXURE B)

g) See attached list (ANNEXURE B)

ANNEXURE A

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

WRITTEN REPLY

QUESTION 880

DATE OF PUBLICATION OF INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 31/03/2017

INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 12/2017

880. Ms N I Tarabella Marchesi (DA) to ask the Minister of Basic Education:

(1) With reference to her department’s presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education on 7 March 2017, (a) how many schools are due to be (i) closed and (ii) merged with other schools in each province, (b) what is the name of each of the specified schools, (c) what is the reason in each case, (d) to which school(s) will the affected pupils be transferred, (e) what is the timeline in each case, (f) what arrangements will be made to transport the affected learners to the specified school(s) and (g) what additional resources will be allocated to such schools, including educators, infrastructure and learning and teaching support materials;

(2) did any consultation with stakeholders take place in each case; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case? NW946E

RESPONSE:

1. (a) – (e) The Department has forwarded the question to the Provincial Education Departments and is awaiting the response. The response will be forwarded as soon as the Department receives it.

(f) As part of the process of rationalisation, merging and closing of schools, learners who will need to be transported from their current schools to the host school are identified, the routes finalised and approved. These are then factored into the transport plan that is submitted to the Department of Transport for the transportation of these learners.

(g) The LTSM resources of the closed school are transferred to the host school that has been identified to accommodate the learners from both schools that are merged. Where there are shortages, additional orders are placed to ensure the requisite LTSM resources are supplied to the school.

However, it must be noted that provisioning of educators at receiving schools is in terms of the post provisioning norms, which takes into account the number of learners as one of the factors.

2. The Department has forwarded the question to the Provincial Education Departments and is awaiting the response. The response will be forwarded as soon as the Department receives it.

Reply:

1. There were two structures, namely, National Committee for Education Support Services (NCESS) and National Commission on Special Needs in Education and Training (NCSNET). Below are the members of each of the structures:

• National Committee for Education Support Services (NCESS)

Ms Hawa Bawa

Ms Cornelia Elizabeth Aucamp

Mr Arthur John Jervis Brownell

Dr Keith Cloete

Prof Priscilla Fihla

Rev Ertol Randall Gradwell

Prof Patrick Sibaya

Mrs Nozicelo Abigail Tukulu

Ms Deborah Anne van Stade

Mr Edcent Williams

• National Commission on Special Needs in Education and Training (NCSNET)

Dr Johan Hamilton

Mrs Sumboornam Moodley

Mrs Shirley Makutoane

Dr Anbanithi Muthukrishna

Mr Sigamoney Manicka Naicker

Ms Gretta Mazwi

Ms Colleen Rulten

Ms Marie Schoeman

Mr Thinyane Frank Molelle

Ms Lidia Pretorius

Prof Petrus Van Niekerk

Ms Belinda Ngoqo

• Secretariat

Ms Colleen Howell

Ms Berenice Daniels

Ms Donell Trimmel

Ms Sheila Manko

2. The registry does not retain information for longer than five years.

Reply:

(1) a) Number of A-Class Reservists on -' i) 31 May 2012: 17 939

ii) 31 May 2018: 3 002

b) Number of D-Class Reservists on

	i)	31 May 2012:	32 524
(2)	ii)   None.	31 May 2018:	4 087

(3) During 2014, a new National Instruction 3/2014: The Reserve Police Service was approved by the National Commissioner which regulates the Reservists dispensation in the South African Police Service. In terms of National Instruction 3/2014, the categories of A Reservist, B Reservist, C Reservist and D Reservist was abolished and replaced with Category 1: Functional Police and Category 2: Specialised Operational Support. As on 17 September 2018, there are 3762 Category 1 Reservists and 40 Category 2 Reservists in the South African Police Service. The process of converting the remaining A, B, C and D category Reservists to Category 1 and Category 2 are in process.

 

 

 

L TSHIEA

Date: \& ! '='9

LIEUTENANT GENERAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Reply to question 2759 recommended/

DEP

BC MGWENY

Date: \

LIEUTENANT GENERAL COMMISSIONER: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Reply to question 2759 recommended

GENERAL IS SO TH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

ROLE (SOEG

FOR WRITTEN REPLY

QUESTION 2759

DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 14 SEPTEMBER 2018 (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 30-2018)

Reply to question 2759 approved/we

OF POLICE BH CELE, P

Date: @/

Reply:

(1) (a) (b) (c) No schools have been built in the past five financial years.

(2) (a) The total number of learners with disabilities that were on waiting lists in the (i) 2016-17 and (ii) 2017-18 financial years is depicted in the table below:

Province	(i) 2016-2017	(ii) 2017-2018
EC	2 106	0
FS	257	548
GT	14 081	852
KZN	1 363	770
LP	53	0
MP	445	393
NC	300	687
NW	16	72
WC	Use a centralised waiting system (CEMIS) 0	Use a centralised waiting system (CEMIS) 0
Total	18 621	3 322

Source: Provincial Quarterly Stats

(b) Learners on the waiting list are awaiting alternative placement in other schools, and are supported in their current schools until they are placed.

Reply:

According to the South African Police service's (SAPS) records, the person, whose name and details are provided, was never arrested, on 10 August 2018, in Vanderbi]lpark. No disciplinary action is, therefore, warranted.

Reply to question 2420 recommended/not recommended


GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SREVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2018-09-05

Reply to question 2420 approved


MINISTER OF POLICE
BH CELE, MP
Date: 01/10/2018
 

Reply:

(a)(i)(ii). The DBE does not allocate funding for specific sub programmes on the provincial infrastructure programme funded through the Education Infrastructure Grant and the equitable share. Provinces are allocated funding based on approved User Asset Management Plans and PED’s allocate funding to sub programmes. On the ASIDI programme, the table below indicates the budget allocated to sanitation projects per province.

Table 1: ASIDI Expenditure on sanitation projects.

Province	2015/2016	2016/2017	2017/2018	2018/2019
EC	R62,330,603	R59,606,644	R65,180,090	R58,576,264
FS			R9,767,708
KZN	R35,381,425	R49,221,256	R23,747,468	R1,302,244
LIM	R10,361,152	R84,688,051	R251,509,822	R62,851,525
MPU	R26,972,511	R79,970,983	R1,779,464
(blank)
Grand Total	R135,045,691	R273,486,934	R351,984,552	R122,730,033

Table 2: ASIDI Allocation to sanitation in the current financial year

Row Labels	Planned Expenditure 2018/2019
EC	R803,270,651
KZN	R50,339,526
LIM	R297,844,277
Grand Total	R1,151,454,454

(b)The table below indicates the number of schools with pit latrines that are not in the current year’s project plans. This is as per the sanitation audit conducted in May/June 2018.

Table 3: Schools with pit latrines.

	Schools with pit latrines ONLY and Unacceptable sanitation	School with proper sanitation but pits not demolished
Eastern Cape	1598	323
Free State	156	42
Gauteng	0	5
KwaZulu Natal	1365	1477
Limpopo	507	853
Mpumalanga	127	278
North West	145	47
Northern Cape	0	15
Western Cape	0	0
TOTALS	3898	3040

Reply:

(a) (i) and/or (ii) (aa)

It is assumed that this question relates to the lion bone export quota allocation.

The decision on lion bone export quota arose from the 17th meeting of Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), in 2016. The initial determination of the quota was in 2017, whereby an export quota of 800 skeletons (with or without skull) was determined. The quota was subsequently implemented as such.

As part of the quota determination, the Department conducted a meeting with various stakeholders as listed below:

• Provincial conservation departments
• South Africa Breeders Association
• NGO (anti sustainable use and pro sustainable use NGOs)
• Media
• Hunting organizations
• Lion bone traders
• Lion breeders
• Private individuals

(bb) Hunting of lions is regulated in terms of the National and Provincial legislations. Due to the fact that hunting permits are issued by the Members of Executive Council (MECs) at the Provincial level (regulation of hunting occurs at the Provincial level), the Department is not actively involved in decision making of hunting activities.

It is for this reason that the Department had not had a meeting with an organisation or association specifically regarding lion hunting in the past three financial years and since 1 April 2018.

(b) Presentations were made by the Department (as the CITES Management Authority) and the Chair of CITES Scientific Authority (South African National Biodiversity Institute – SANBI). Organisations who were willing to make presentations at the consultation meeting, were also afforded an opportunity to present (such as EWT, Linda Tucker Foundation and Save the Rhino). In addition, the meeting was open for discussions, the participants were given an opportunity to voice their views.

 

(c) On 17 January 2017 there was a meeting between the National Department of Environmental Affairs, Scientific Authority and relevant Provincial Departments. On 18 January 2017 there was a consultation session between all the organisations mentioned in (a)(aa) above and the Department, including the Scientific Authority.

(d) Please refer to the attached attendance register for both the meetings.

(e) The comments raised were considered when determining the 2017 and 2018 lion bone export quota. The decision on the quota was also communicated to the public.

The meeting on 17 January 2017 agreed that government stakeholders will provide comments. The wider stakeholder meeting on 18 January agreed to provide comments to the Department by 2 February 2017 and it was agreed that the Department forward those comments to the Scientific Authority for consideration in order to establish the quota.

 

It was therefore agreed that the Department will meet with the Scientific Authority by end of February 2017 and the quota be set by the beginning of March 2017.

---ooOoo---

Reply:

a) The Department of Public Works has refurbished the official residence of the President of the Republic of South Africa, namely Mahlamba-Ndlopfu, which entails repairs to the following:

• the leaking roof, including gutters and down pipes;
• internal and external paintwork to walls, including areas where water damages were identified;
• ailing existing plumbing systems;
• faulty electrical systems, including the existing security system.

The total cost for the repairs was R7 314 514, 48. No works were registered for the in Cape Town Presidential residence.

b) The Department has conducted repairs to the existing security system, including the faulty electrical system at O.R Tambo House, the official residence of the Deputy President of the Republic. The cost of the repairs amounted to R856 000, 00. No works were registered at the Cape Town official residence of the Deputy President.

_______________________________________________________________________

Reply:

(1) Block Chain is supported by the DST through research projects and human capital development. The total funding provided is R550 000.00 with the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) spending R4 081 800.00 of their Parliamentary Grant on the application and understanding of blockchain and the wider distributed ledger technologies.

(2) Details of the research:

Between 2011 and 2017, the DST funded a human capacity development programme in Information Security. The programme funded mostly MSc and PhD candidates. Amongst the students funded were two MSc candidates who completed their studies in 2016, and their areas of research were related to the Blockchain, i.e.

(2.1) A study of the Blockchain involving its application to the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) was conducted. The study assessed how the Blockchain functions and also assessed the application of the Blockchain to other systems other than cryptocurrencies, e.g. electronic voting, smart contracts, and intellectual property rights.

(2.2) On 19-20 July 2018, the DST through the Office of Digital Advantage (ODA), hosted a workshop that looked at Blockchain beyond its application in crypto-currencies. The workshop pulled together SMEs, and other role players. The long-term aim is to stimulate innovations for socio-economic benefits of distributed ledger technologies (DL Ts) and Blockchain technology in areas such as public health, agriculture, food safety/security, energy availability, environmental management etc. The DST, ODA and the CSIR are working on a concept to further unpack this work whose funding will extend beyond the CSIR.

(3) Renewable Energy initiatives supported by the DST amounts to R167 million (2018/19) that is split amongst the following interventions:

(3.1) Solar energy and Wind energy technologies - R27 million per annum;

(3.2) Bio-energy - R14 million per annum (algae based, lignocellulose based and decision support tools - R7 million and Research Chairs - R7 million);

(3. 3) Energy storage (to support performance of alternative/renewable energy) - R 15 million per annum; and

(3.4) Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies - R96 million per annum.

(4) The above mentioned investments are made in support of broader government initiatives in support of the National Development Plan, energy security and access (Integrated Resource Plan) with the intent of diversifying South Africa's energy portfolio (Integrated Energy Plan). The different focal areas have specific strategic plans articulating the desired outcomes.

(5) Water savings initiatives supported by the DST amounts to R2 540 000.00.

This includes demonstration projects and post-graduate research.

(6) Details of the demonstrations and post-graduate research:

(6.1) The DST through the Water Research Commission conducted a study into Water Efficiency for R200 000.00. The main finding in relation to non-revenue water and broader efficiency is that it is a highly mature and well invested RDI area in SA The major challenges lie in the implementation of recommendations by government (particularly at municipalities). In our view, water reuse needs to be considered in relation to water savings as well.

(6.2) In addition the DST funded 3 post-graduate students to a total of R640 000.00 with a focus on water savings through the following projects: Economic Analysis of water recovery from flue gas: A South African Case Study, UWC; Water recovery from flue gas through membrane technology, UWC; Assessment of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse, UKZN with one student focussed on agricultural water efficiency and savings.

(6.3) Three demonstration projects were conducted with the City of Johannesburg, who offered up test sites after a call to all municipalities to a total of R1.7 million. The City of Johannesburg not only provided test sites but also their staff to be trained on the technologies. The three technology demonstrations were for:

(6.3.1) Look.See Do, which is an augmented reality tool to assist technicians in municipalities to fix machinery. This can get around waiting for specialised technicians to fly out from Europe and elsewhere to assist with maintenance. The technician can assist the municipal technician through this tool without being physically present.

(6.3.2) Aquatrip is a technology that can assist with water leaks through detecting a drop in pressure, signifying a leak, and closing the valve in the pipe. This then alerts the consumer that there is a problem and the leak can be fixed and the valve reset, much like the trip switch on an electrical distribution board.

(6.3.3) Arumloo is a low flush toilet developed on Biomimicry principles.
The shape of the arum lily was the inspiration for the design of the toilet It allows for a complete flush to occur on 1.5 - 2.0 litres of water, which is significantly better than the current 6 litre flush of the smallest cistern.

Reply:

Yes, the dolomite risk management programme in the Department of Public Works is in place. Due to a considerable amount of assets built on dolomite land, the department has established a Dolomite Risk Management Unit (DRMU), which is mandated to monitor the dolomitic conditions of these areas. The DRMU is, among others, responsible for monitoring the department’s facilities constructed on dolomite land, to classify the dolomitic status for every greenfield and brownfield project and to monitor the designs and construction of projects executed on land underlain by dolomite formations to ensure compliance with standards and specifications.

The DRMU has a full time Dolomite Specialist Consultant appointed for a period of three years, whose tasks comprise of the monitoring and investigation of reported and urgent dolomite incidences. The consultant is also responsible for surveying and conducting integrity inspections of current infrastructure (especially wet services) to ensure that deteriorated infrastructure with a high likelihood of causing subsidence and sinkholes is proactively replaced. The Department is also in a process of finalising the appointment of an emergency contractor (after the previous contract had expired in the previous financial year), who will assist in addressing emergency dolomite-related requests. In the previous financial year, a total of R2.2 million was spent on dolomite-related professional consultancy fees for monitoring, investigations, and issuing of technical specifications for the repair of already occurred and reported dolomite incidences. This represents 93% of the R2.4 million allocation for the 2017/2018 financial year. A total of R118 million was spent on preventative and remedial dolomite capital and maintenance projects. This represents 105% of the R112 million allocation for the 2017/2018 financial year.

In the current financial year, a total of R127 million has been allocated for dolomite related projects and services, which include the professional consultancy services for the specialist consultant, emergency construction services, and preventative capital projects. About R55 million of this allocation has already been spent. Most of the preventative projects are concentrated in the City of Tshwane area covering Thaba Tshwane, Centurion, Waterkloof and Swartkop. There are however, other projects implemented across the Gauteng Province, which include Lenasia (Westonaria), Katlehong (Ekurhuleni), Olifantsfontein (Ekurhuleni), Carletonville (Merafong), KwaThema (Ekurhuleni), Protea (Johannesburg) and Dobsonville (Johannesburg). In the coming financial year of 2018/2019, the department is planning on continuing to strengthen its dolomite risk management programme by, among others, strengthening the DRMU through the recruitment of suitably qualified and experienced persons to carry-out the mandate of the unit, and prioritisation of more preventative capital and maintenance projects with more focus on the Thaba Tshwane and Centurion areas.

Reply:

a) The costs for the administration of receipts/revenue are limited to the salary of the cashier, and below are the costs per financial year:

1. 2016/17 - R325 869.00
2. 2017/18 - R335 916.00

In addition to receipt/revenue management for the Department, the cashier is responsible for the following functions:

• management of the petty cash - Giving out the petty cash, reconciliation, replenishment and safe-keeping thereof;
• receiving and safekeeping cash, issuing of receipts, reconciliation and safe-keeping of the cash;
• deposit cash received into the Department’s bank account;
• capturing of sundry payments;
• updating of the Reapatela system (30 days payment monitoring system).

b) The following amounts were received per financial year:

2016/17 = R14.608 million, calculated as follows:

	R’000
Sales of goods and services other than capital assets	1 261
Interest	12 361
Sales of capital assets	70
Transactions in financial assets and liabilities	916
Departmental revenue collected	14 608

2017/18 = R10.358 million, calculated as follows:

	R’000
Sales of goods and services other than capital assets	295
Interest	8 498
Transactions in financial assets and liabilities	1 565
Departmental revenue collected	10 358

Reply:

The Department of Public Works is not leasing any properties abroad. The function of providing accommodation for Government use in foreign territories was allocated to the then Department of Foreign Affairs in 1999, today known as the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO).

It is recommended that the question be directed to DIRCO for an accurate and comprehensive response in this regard.

(a), (b), (c) and (d) Fall away.

Reply:

(a)(i) None.

(a)(ii) Refer to the table below for responses from entities.

(a)(ii)	(b)(i)	(b)(ii)	(b)(iii)
Amatola Water	None	None	None
Bloem Water	None	None	None
Lepelle Northern Water	None	None	None
Magalies Water	None	None	None
Mhlathuze Water	None	None	None
Overberg Water Investing private parties:- Transnet, Telkom, MTN and Vodacom	Transnet: Rent income for access to the servitude land of Overberg Water.	Transnet: R45 265.65 pa (annual escalation of 8%)	Transnet: Area 338 hectares – Indefinitely but based on a five-year review basis
	Telkom: Rent income for access to the servitude land of Overberg Water.	Telkom: R51 757.49 pa (annual escalation of 8%)	Telkom: Area 224 hectares – Indefinitely but based on a five-year review basis
	Vodacom: Rent income for access to the servitude land of Overberg Water.	Vodacom: R40 528.38 pa (annual escalation of 10%)	Vodacom: Area 262 hectares – Indefinitely but based on a five-year review basis
	MTN: Rent income for s to the servitude land of Overberg Water.	MTN: R40 528.38 pa (annual escalation of 12.38%)	MTN: Area 230.25 hectares - Indefinitely but based on a five year review basis
Rand Water	None	None	None
Sedibeng Water	None	None	None
Umgeni Water	Brookdale farm in Howick - Cattle Farming	R19 835.92	200.0408 hectares. 5 Years Lease duration
	Doorenhoek farm (Pietermaritzburg) - Sugarcane Farming	R18 163.11	297.4926 hectares. 10 Years Lease duration
TCTA	None	None	None
WRC	None	None	None

Reply:

(a) The first major study undertaken for this area was the Letaba River Basin Study in 1985 (DWAF,1990), which comprised the collection and analysis of all available data on water availability and use, as well as estimates of future water requirements and assessments of potential future water resource developments. This was followed by a Pre-feasibility Study (DWAF, 1994), which was completed in 1994. The focus of the Pre-feasibility Study was the complete updating of the hydrology of the Basin. The next study undertaken was a Feasibility Study of the Development and Management Options (DWAF, 1998), which was completed in 1998.

(b) The Dam Height (Above river bed) 34 m and 43.5 m (Above estimated lowest foundation).

(c) It is envisaged that a dam at the Nwamitwa site would have a storage capacity of 187 million m3 and will increase the firm yield from the river system for domestic use by 14 million m3 per annum.

(d)(i) We plan to appoint the Contractors for the roads and advanced works in March 2020 and the appointment of the Contractor for the Construction of Dam in March 2022. This is purely subject to the availability of funding and finalisation of certain land matters.

(d)(ii) The estimated project completion date is in 2026.

(e) Current Estimated cost of the project is R4 650 000 000.

(f) Total jobs to be created will be determined on finalisation of the procurement strategy on the project.

(g) The project has been delayed by five (5) years.

(h) Insufficient funding for project implementation.

Reply:

a) (i) and (b) (i), (ii) and (iii):

The Department of Public Works currently has no method of calculating or quantifying the amount of investments into its properties by private parties/tenants nor does it have a record of all the parties who have invested in State-owned properties.

This question is very much appreciated, because now I will urge that consideration be made to ensure all future letting out agreements with private parties to state, in detail, the investor details, the investment plan, as well as the proposed investment amount.

Nevertheless, the Departments’ Acquisition and Disposal Framework requires all applicants who wish to lease a State-owned property to submit a business proposal detailing the intended capital expenditure on the required property.

b) (ii) Response on the Entities reporting to the Department of Public Works:

and (b) (i), (ii) and (iii)

Name of the Entity	(a) name of each investing company that has invested on land owned by	(ii) each entity reporting to him	(b)(i) nature	(ii) value	(iii) length of each investment
Agremént South Africa	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable
Council for the Built Environment	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable		None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable
Construction Industry Development Board	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable
Independent Development Trust	The land is not leased out.	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable	None / Not applicable

Reply:

Question 1:

On 12 December 2012, the Ministerial Determination for the procurement of 2500MW of coal fired plants was published. The Ministerial Determination was issued in terms of the 2010 - 2030 IRP. In line with the Determination, the Department released the Request For Proposals to procure the coal fired plants to the market in December 2014. The process of concluding the procurement process that began in December 2014 will conclude when the 2 projects sign Power Purchase Agreements ("PPAs") with the Buyer.

(a)

(i) Following the procurement process two (2) projects were announced as preferred bidders, namely Thabametsi Power Project (Thabametsi Project); and ACWA Power Khanyisa Thermal Power Project (Khanyisa Project). The 2 projects were awarded a total of 863MW of the 2500MW Determination.

(ii) The sponsor of Thabametsi Power Project is Marubeni Group and the rest of the other shareholders may not be disclosed, as the Department under the RFP committed not to disclose such information about the project. The Sponsor of the Khanyisa Project is ACWA Power, of which the same will apply in disclosing the information in relation to the remaining shareholders as mentioned above.

(b) Government does not provide money to the lPP’s, however lPP’s are required to raise their own capital to build the power plant. In the case of the two projects, they afe expected to faise approximately R40 billion to build the power plant, which will be paid for by the consumer through the tariff, as indicated in Question 2 below.

Question 2:

On the basis of assumed demand, the IRP 2018 indicates that the consumer will pay 1 9 cents/kwh more to the projected tariff of 119 cents/kwh by 2030, which equates to an estimated cumulative amount of R23 billion.

Question 3:

The two projects were procured prior to the release of the 2018 IRP in accofdance with the 2010 IRP. It is anticipated that the two projects will start generating baseload electricity from 2023

Reply:

1. The foIIowing policing actions are takan to address incidents of violence on farm and small holdings:

• • Hot spots were identified where incidents occcur;
  • Analysis of incidents to determine the trends and modus operandi,
  • Operation to prevent crime conducted in hot spots;
  • Increase patrols in hot spots;
  • Visits to farms and small holdings;
  • Simulation exercises to test the reaction capacity to incidents specifically on farms;
• • Priority Committee meetings for Rural Safety are conducted on all levels;
  • Capacity building sessions with Rural Sataty Corodinators are conducted on all levels; and
  • Compliance inspection conducted at rural and rural/urban police stations.

2. Rural Safety and food security remains and will remain a priority for the South African Police Service. The status of the Implementation of the Rural Safety Strategy is an indicator in Programme 2: VisiblePolicing in the Annual Performance Plan (APP) at the South African Police Service for the current financial year (2018/2019). The progress of implementation at rural and rural/urban police stations is reported on a quarterly basis in the current APP.

A National Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (NATJOINTS) Rurat Safety Priority Committee consisting of all relevant internal and external role players to ensure that rural safety is managed in a coordinated and integrated manner is in a place for numerous yaars and is meeting quarterly. The latest meeting took place on 10 August 2018 and the recent tncidents of violence on farms and small holdings were a focus point of the meetlrig.

Priority Committees on Rural Safety is also in place on provincial, cluster and police station level to ensure that rural safety is also managed and coordinated on all levals.

3. The South African Police Service does not have a specialised rural safety unit and the reaction capacity towards all incidents is currently in place and resorts at police stations.The rapid reaction forces such as the Special Task Fore and the Tacticall Response Teams are situated in the Division: Operational Response Services and can be deployed to assist wlth violent incidents when there is a need.

 

 

ACT! Yl SJ JEPHTA

LfRUTENANT GENERAL

NAL COMMSGONER: \HMBLE POLImNG

FOR WRIT3’BN REPLY: QUM6TI0N 8204: DAYG OF PUBLICATIONIN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 17 AUGUST 2018: (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPgR NO 23-2018)

Reply to qaeatlon 2204 recommen‹8hot reco nded

sr MA6

LIEU1GNANT GENERAL TIONAL COMMISSIONER: POLICING

IgOLA

Reply to question 2204 recammen‹I/not recommended

L C

LE (8OGG)

Reply to quaatlon 2204 approved/

GENERAL AFRICAN POLICE SBRVICM

Reply:

PROVINCE	206/2017 (aa)		2017/2018 (bb)		1 April 2018 to date (ii))
	(a) Flying squad operational	(b) Number of members at the Flying Squad	(a) Flying squad operational	(b) Number of members at the Flying Squad	(a) Flying squad operational	(b) Number of members at the Flying Squad
Eastern Cape	6	39	6	201	6	174
Free State	4	191	4	194	4	188
Gauteng	7	706	7	669	7	649
Limpopo	3	129	3	124	3	127
KwaZulu-Natal	2	49	2	50	2	47
Mpumalanga	3	136	3	127	3	124
Northern Cape	1	37	1	35	1	45
North West	3	70	3	71	3	69
Western Cape	1	192	1	178	1	188
	30	1748	30	1649	30	1608

 

 

 

 

JERAt.

AFRICAN POLICE 8ERVICB

Raply to question 226 approved/notappfeygd

Reply:

1. (a)(i) 6 Deputy Director-Generals (DDG)

(ii) 21 Chief Directors (CD)

(aa) 3 Acting Chief Directors (CD)

(bb) 18 permanent Chief Directors (CD)

(b) 11 females in each case (1 DDG and 10 CD)

2.

Entity	(a)i Number of Chief Executive Officers	(a)ii Number of directors of each entity reporting to the department	(b) Number of women in each case
CSIR	01	06	04
NRF	01	06	02
SANSA	01	06	04
HSRC	01	10	06
TIA	01	05	03
Assaf	None	None	None
NACI	01	None	None

The National Advisory Council on Innovation (NACI) is not a public entity. It is a Council, which is comprised of specialists that reports to CEO as secretariat to council. Currently the Council has an Acting CEO, who was seconded from the Department.

Reply:

The draft IRP 2018 has been published for public comments. Procufement of additional capacity in line with the projections in the final IRP2O18 and in accordance with Section 34 of the Electricity Regulation Act will follow once the final IRP 2018 is approved by Cabinet.

Reply:

The Department of Science and Technology (DST) does not have any standing agreement with Mr Melusi Ntuli.

The DST is the custodian of the Grassroots Innovation Programme, which is implemented by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) on behalf of the department. Mr Ntuli was a beneficiary to the programme. He concluded a Memorandum of Agreement with the CSIR on 29 November 2016 which was terminated on 21 July 2017, at his request.

Mr Ntuli has innovated the Chargeless Electric Engine, which is meant to be an alternative to the current piston and turbine engines. It has a PSDC motor that operates as the heart of the engine. The chargeless motor engine is also intended to be used in aircrafts and helicopter propulsion.

operates as the heart of the engine. The chargeless motor engine is also intended to be used in aircrafts and helicopter propulsion.

a) The Memorandum of Agreement between the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research and Mr Ntuli was signed on 29 November 2016 and was terminated on 21 July 2017.

b) The agreement between Mr Ntuli and the CSIR was concluded to assist Mr Ntuli's innovation, the chargeless electric engine, with a technology assistance package. The Grassroots Innovation Programme assists beneficiaries with the following;

• • Product research and development with a subject matter expert at institutions of higher learning, science council and/ or technology transfer office;
  • Product design and machining support through a technology station with machining expertise;
  • Product electronic support through a technology stations with eleGtronics specific expertise;
  • Product testing with testing and certification bodies to meet/comply with standards body;
  • Intellectual Property protection of the innovation/ invention; and
  • Marketing and profiling of the innovators and their innovations.

The assistance granted to Mr Ntuli through the programme is valued at R205 096.00 and covered the payment for design and machining expertise, provision of management development support and training as well as marketing and profiling his innovation.

Reply:

1. (a) The Minister has received two letters containing allegations of maladministration and corruption against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Board from NIHSS staff, as well as a whistle-blower.

(b) The Minister has not been made aware of any case opened against the CEO or the Board.

2. The Director-General on 20 August 2018 requested the Board of NIHSS to investigate the allegations mentioned above and provide a response to the Department on how they have been addressed. The response was received on 04 September 2018 and is currently being analysed. This response covers the allegations made by the staff and a whistle-blower. The Board has requested the CEO and Human Resource unit to respond to the allegations contained within the formal letter of collective grievance.

Reply:

Over the last few years, we have engaged the Cape Town Philharmonic Orchestra and KwaZulu-Natal Philharmonic Orchestra around the issues of funding of Orchestras. Our point of departure is informed by the understanding that the resources allocated to us must be used prudently and spread fairly across the sector in the whole country.

For a few years in the past we used to fund the two Orchestras cited above. This was unfair practice.

We engaged them and inform them that this practices is unsustainable and unfair because it is only two provinces who are benefiting out of the nine.

We informed them that the Department of Arts and Culture has taken a decision to fund only a National Orchestra and the Cities in which the Orchestras are based will have to fund them.

To this extent out of their own volition, the City of Johannesburg decided to put aside an amount of 20 Million Rands (R20 Million) to fund the local Orchestra.

We call and encourage all the Cities and Provinces to fund their own Orchestras.

Of critical importance in this process is the transformation of the Orchestras to reflect the South African demographics. South Africans across the board must embrace and support them, however this support will come through when people feel the sense of ownership.

Reply:

Over the last few years, we have engaged the Cape Town Philharmonic Orchestra and KwaZulu-Natal Philharmonic Orchestra around the issues of funding of Orchestras. Our point of departure is informed by the understanding that the resources allocated to us must be used prudently and spread fairly across the sector in the whole country.

For a few years in the past we used to fund the two Orchestras cited above. This was unfair practice.

We engaged them and inform them that this practices is unsustainable and unfair because it is only two provinces who are benefiting out of the nine.

We informed them that the Department of Arts and Culture has taken a decision to fund only a National Orchestra and the Cities in which the Orchestras are based will have to fund them.

To this extent out of their own volition, the City of Johannesburg decided to put aside an amount of 20 Million Rands (R20 Million) to fund the local Orchestra.

We call and encourage all the Cities and Provinces to fund their own Orchestras.

Of critical importance in this process is the transformation of the Orchestras to reflect the South African demographics. South Africans across the board must embrace and support them, however this support will come through when people feel the sense of ownership.