Questions and Replies

Filter by year

07 June 2016 - NW1639

Profile picture: Hunsinger, Dr CH

Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport

With reference to her department’s Fourth Quarter Performance Report 2015-16 presented to the Portfolio Committee on Transport on 17 May 2016, what are the reasons for underspending on the (a)(i) Moloto Development Corridor, (ii) National Railway Safety Regulator Amendment Bill [B 32B-2008] and (iii) National Rail Safety Strategy project budget line items under Programme 3 and (b)(i) establishment of the Appeals Committee and (ii) amendment of the Civil Aviation Act, Act 13 of 2009 budget line items under Programme 5?

Reply:

(a) (i) The Department completed the feasibility study on the Moloto Development Corridor in September 2014. PRASA submitted the Treasury Approval 1 (TA1) application to National Treasury at the end of October 2014. National Treasury only responded in December 2016. The allocated budget provided for an Option Analysis to be undertaken on the establishment of an appropriate structure to manage and oversee the implementation of the Moloto Rail Development Corridor. As a result of the protracted response by National Treasury and the fact that it was not supportive of the Moloto Rail Development Corridor, the Department did not occur expenditure.

(ii) The reasons underspending on the National Railway Safety Amendment Bill was due to delays in the procurement processes in securing a suitable service provider with the appropriate technical expertise to assist the Department. The service provider was appointed in October 2016.

(iii) The reasons for underspending on the National Railway Safety Strategy is a result of scarce skill related to railway safety expertise within the transport sector. A Request for Proposal was advertised in July (Bid Number DOT/04/2015/RT), however, by closing date, the Department did not received any bids. The tender was re-advertise and a service provider was appointed in January 2016.

(b) (i) The Appeals Committee is operational since 2010. An amount of R 1,45 million was provided for the remuneration of Committee Members. Committee Members are remunerated in terms of Section 123(1) of the Civil Aviation Act, 2009 and in line with the Minister of Finance’s approved Service Benefit Packages for Office Bearers. The need for the Committee to meet is guided by the number and complexity of appeals lodged by Appellants against decisions taken by the Director of Civil Aviation of the South African Civil Aviation Authority. Thirty seven (37) meetings were held in 2015/16 where eight (8) appeals were considered. The allocated amount for this project has been reduced to R 0, 803 million in the 2016/17 financial year.

(ii) Provision has been made in the 2015/16 financial year for and amount of R 1,0 million for the appointment of a specialised legal service provider to draft the Civil Aviation Amendment Bill. There was an urgent need to amend the Civil Aviation Act, 2009, to ensure compliance with international standards and practices set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). A decision, in line with Government’s Cost Saving Initiatives, has been taken to draft the amendments internally by officials in the Department. This has resulted in the under-expenditure as reported under Programme 5.

07 June 2016 - NW1643

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Transport

On what legal grounds is the SA National Roads Agency Ltd (SANRAL) of the opinion that all metrology instruments of the Gauteng e-tolling system comply fully with the requirements of the Legal Metrology Act, Act 9 of 2014 and the Trade Metrology Act, Act 77 of 1973, despite the fact that the Chief Executive Officer of the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications has indicated that SANRAL is not in compliance?

Reply:

As the honourable member is aware, the GFIP e-toll system basically uses camera images and dedicated short range communications equipment. In the case of the camera equipment installed on the GFIP system, this equipment complies with the technical requirements of SANS 1795, Part 5 on data capturing and recording devices for road traffic law enforcement.

With regard to the legislation referred to, there are currently no technical regulations published under the Legal Metrology Act which e-tolling must comply with. In the absence of specific technical regulations, this matter is being handled by the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications (NRCS) in terms of Section 22(2)(c) of the Legal Metrology Act, 9 of 2014.

The CEO of the NRCS is required to set requirements and conditions for use of the equipment in terms of Section 22(2) (c) of the Legal Metrology Act. The NRCS and SANRAL are addressing these requirements which will apply as an interim measure until technical regulations are published under the legislation. The Legal Metrology Act allows for interim measures to be used.

Additional information for the Minister:

The CEO of the NRCS also clarified this position in a letter to the Freedom Front Plus and this letter was made available to the public sometime last year. Unfortunately the contents of the letter are being mis-interpreted to cause confusion. The Legal Metrology Act allows for interim measures to be used.

In its letter of 4 March 2016 to the Freedom Front Plus, the NRCS clarifies the above and states the following:

" As there are currently no technical regulations which set out the specific requirements that the measuring instruments are to meet, compliance or non-compliance could not be established by the NATIONAL Regulator and hence there is no criminal prosecution taken against SANRAL at this stage. However, should non-compliance issues arise or be detected once interim measures are in place, enforcement measures will be applied as [provided for in the Legal Metrology Act."

07 June 2016 - NW1543

Profile picture: Figlan, Mr AM

Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

(a) What amount did (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her spend on advertising in the 2015-16 financial year and (b) how much has (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her budgeted for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) In 2015-16 financial year:

(i) The department has spent R2 621 268,44

(ii) iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority R 103 920,00

(iii) South African National Botanical Institute R 919 216,00

(iv) South African National Parks R6 552 099,12

(v) South African Weather Service R 604 241,60

(b) In the 2016-17 financial year:

(i) The department has budgeted for R 1 000 000,00

(ii) iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority R 116 000,00

(iii) South African National Botanical Institute R 1 086 396,00

(iv) South African National Parks R10 397 441,09

(v) South African Weather Service R 630 000,00

---ooOoo---

07 June 2016 - NW1401

Profile picture: Rabotapi, Mr MW

Rabotapi, Mr MW to ask the Minister in the Presidency

Whether (a) his department and (b) all entities reporting to him are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

The NYDA is running the following programs:

  • Business Support Services – Voucher Programme
  • Market Linkages
  • Mentorship
  • Grant Programme
  • Entrepreneurship Development Programme
  • Cooperative Governance Training
  • Business Registration Service

R50, 3m is allocated for all the Economic Development Programmes.

The Department of Planning Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) does not run dedicated development programmes but it does encourage SMMEs to register on its supplier database and endeavours to utilise these companies where possible when procuring goods and services.

Statistics South Africa does not run any development programme for small business.  However, it gathers data and collates such data into statistical information that would certainly be of use to small business.  A dedicated survey for the self-employed is periodically conducted to inform what takes place in the informal sector.

07 June 2016 - NW1134

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Social Development

With reference to the latest available statistics, (a) how many state-run drug rehabilitation centres are there, (b) where are the specified centres located, (c) how many persons can each specified centre accommodate and (d) how many patients are currently in state-run drug rehabilitation centres?

Reply:

(a) There are currently nine (9) state run treatment centers in the country. The location; capacity and current number of service users in these treatment centers is as follows:

 

Name of treatment centre

(b)

Location

(c)

Capacity

(d)

Current number of service users

Dr Fabian and Florence Ribeiro

Zonderwater Correctional Centre, Cullinan, Gauteng

300

136 (113 adults and 23 children)

Swartfontein

White River, Mpumalanga

75

52 (adults)

Newland Park

Newlands West, KZN

100

36 (26 adults and 10 children)

Madadeni

Madadeni, KZN

80

24 adults)

Khanyani

Newcastle, KZN

24

8 (children)

Witrand

Potchefstroom, North West

18

11(9 adults and 2 children)

De Novo

Kraaifontein, Western Cape

90

86 (70 adult males and 16 children)

Kensington

Maitland, Western Cape

40

40 (adults)

Ernest Malgas

New Brighton, Eastern Cape

38

21 (children)

07 June 2016 - NW1253

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2984 on 22 September 2015, he has received the requested information yet; if not, why not; if so, by when will this information be communicated?

Reply:

The information was provided by uMshwathi Local Municipality and approved by Minister P Gordhan):

  (1) Yes, it was owned by the former Development Services Board (DSB) in 1994 – 1995.

    (a) It was transferred to Air Health Committee, then the Health Committee became Cool Air TLC in 1996 – 2000. In December 2000, the Cool Air TLC was amalgamated into uMshwathi Municipality.

   (b) There were four areas that were controlled by Development Services Board-Dalton, Cool Air, Wartburg and New Hanover, that were converted into Health Committees and the assets from DSB were handed over to these Health Committees.

  (2) The arrangements for Cool Air Secondary School is for them to book the hall in advance at no cost to the school.

 

07 June 2016 - NW1433

Profile picture: Krumbock, Mr GR

Krumbock, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether the detective division at the Kempton Park Police Station in Gauteng received any new vehicles in the 2015-16 financial year; if so, how many did they receive; (2) (a) what is the total number of vehicles the specified detective division currently has, (b) how many are in working order and (c) on what date were the vehicles that have broken down sent to the mechanical workshop; (3) (a) how many detectives are there currently at the specified police station, (b) how many of the specified detectives have (i) attended and (ii) passed the detective course and (c) how many dockets is each detective currently investigating; (4) when will the detectives at the specified police station receive additional vehicles in order to ensure the specified police station complies with the national ratio of number of detectives to vehicles?

Reply:

(1) Yes, Kempton Park Detective Service received two (2) vehicles during the 2015/2016 financial year.

(2) (a) Kempton Park Detective Service currently have 25 vehicles.

(b) 25 vehicles are in working order.

(c) Not applicable.

(3) (a) There are 67 detectives currently at Kempton Park Detective Service.

(b) (i) 42 detectives attended a detective course.

(ii) 42 passed the detective course.

(c) Each Investigating Officer has an average of 200 dockets.

(4) The allocation of vehicles for the 2016/2017 financial year has not been finalised yet.

07 June 2016 - NW1508

Profile picture: Bagraim, Mr M

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

(1) Whether her department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether her department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

1. (a and b)

The Department of Environmental Affairs was never approached by any political party for funding in the following financial years since 1 April 2016:

  1. 2013-2014,
  2. 2014-2015, and
  3. 2015-2016.

(2) (a and b)

No funding was provided by the Department of Environmental Affairs to any political party for the following financial years since 1 April 2016:

  1. 2013-2014,
  2. 2014-2015, and
  3. 2015-2016.

Appropriated funds are meant for the execution of activities related to the mandate of the Department.

---ooOoo---

07 June 2016 - NW1302

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Social Development

What progress has been made to date with each of the specific recommendations made by the SA Human Rights Commission report (details furnished) of October 2013, into the Child Protection Register?

Reply:

Progress made to date with each of the specific recommendations made by the SA Human Rights Commission report (details furnished) of October 2013, into the Child Protection Register, is as follows:

1. Recommendation 11.1: The DSD is required to put in place urgent measures accurately and fully populated with available information. This recommendation is made on the basis that the DSD has demonstrated a capacity to increase the capturing of data on Part B of the CPR by more than 1000% since the date of the Commission’s initial request in September 2012.to this end, the Commission therefore requests that:

11.1.1: The updated CPR is submitted to it within the next 4 months for the period commencing 2012 to date.” Pg. 45

1.1. Progress

  • Two progress reports on updated CPR were submitted in 2014 and 2015 respectively. The third report is still being prepared for submission. The Register has now been updated to a record of 904 names on persons found unsuitable to work with children.
  • DSD has continued to hold bi-lateral meetings with Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DoJ&CD) where implementation issues are discussed. Meetings have been held with court officials and Chief magistrates to inform them about their obligations regarding the Register.
  • The efforts of obtaining information on persons found unsuitable to work with children from forums such as the South African Social Services Professional Council (SACE) has not been successful. DSD has written to SACE requesting compliance with Section 120 (1) (c) of the Children’s Act, Act (No. 38 of 2005).

2. Recommendation 11.2:

“The DSD is required to conduct an urgent and comprehensive audit of challenges and needs across relevant business units to inform its needs, within the next 3(three) months. A report of the audit is to be provided to the Commission on completion thereof.’’ Pg 45

2.1. Progress

The department has conducted an internal audit on the implementation of the register). The report covers the period from 01 June 2013 to 31 July 2014. A key finding is lack of adequate capacity for the effective implementation of the Register. The report made recommendations that must be implemented during the 2015/16 financial year. The department has, thereafter, successfully secured R6, 5million to capacitate the CPR unit. The grant is for a period of three years for the appointment of staff and purchase equipment. Contract staff have been appointed as follows:

  • 10 Data capturers
  • 8 Registry clerks
  • 6 social workers
  • 1 Administration officer

Data capturers and registry clerks have assumed their duties on the 16/02/2016. The administration officer was absorbed when her previous contract expired. Social workers were only interviewed on 23/02/2016 and Human Resource is currently awaiting the security clearance from the National Intelligence Agency.

The human and financial capacity acquired will enable the department to focus on consultations with the courts and fora to ensure that the Register is properly updated to prevent unsuitable persons from working with children.

3. Recommendation 11.6:

In light of the pending review of the Act, the Commission recommends that the DSD as the leading department in this regard, consult on possible reforms to the Act with a view to increasing practical efficiencies, accuracy and accessibility. In this regard section 120(4) of the Act could be considered for reform directed at reducing the administrative burden currently being experienced by the Courts by allowing Courts to deem a person unsuitable to work with children upon the relevant conviction in criminal proceedings:

(4) In criminal proceedings a person must be found (DEEMED) unsuitable to work with children-

(a) On conviction of murder, attempted murder, rape, indecent assault or assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm with regard to a child;

The recommended amendment may address the need for a second and separate administrative finding of unsuitability from having to be made, allowing the names of persons so convicted to be added to the CPR without the requirement of an unsuitability finding”. Pg.45

3.1. Progress:

The status of progress with the Amendment Bill tabled in Parliament.

The draft Bill was submitted to the SPCHD Technical Working Group on 17 February 2015 and to the SPCHD Cabinet Committee on 24 February 2015 and both Committees granted approval for its introduction to Parliament. It was then introduced to the National Assembly and is currently before the Portfolio Committee on Social Development as the Children’s Amendment Bill 13 of 2015.

Among other things, the Bill seeks to amend section 120 of the Children’s Act to provide that persons convicted of certain offences against children be automatically deemed unsuitable to work with children.

The Portfolio Committee conducted public hearings, and held several briefing meeting with relevant stakeholders. The process is at an advanced stage and the Bill is awaiting adoption by the Committee. Thereafter, it will be passed in the National Assembly and be referred to the National Council of Provinces for consideration by the Select Committee on Social Services.

4. The Commission further requested additional information to form part of the progress report as outlined below:

4.1. Status and copy of the draft policy document on the possible merger of the CPR and National Register for Sex Offenders

The portfolio committee on Social Development and Justice mandated the departments of Social Development (DSD) and Justice and Constitutional Development (DoJ&CD) to look into the possibility of merging the two registers for the purpose of addressing the perceived duplication and related costs, and thereafter provide the following:

  • report on the possible options that are available to address the duplication between the National Child Protection Register and the National Register for Sex Offenders;
  • make recommendations; and
  • obtain policy guidance from the Minister of Social Development and the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services.

The registers were established under different legislative mandates which require the respective departments to establish and maintain them. The legislative mandates are as follows:

  • NCPR: Children’s Act (No. 38 of 2005).
  • NRSO: Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act (No. 32 of 2007).

The CPR provides for the protection of all children against all forms of abuse which include the physical, sexual, emotional and deliberate neglect (as stipulated in terms of Part A of the Register) and to ensure that offenders are prevented from working with these children (as stipulated in terms of Part B of the Register). The offenders are not limited to a criminal procedure, but include civil proceedings conducted in family courts including children’s courts. The Act further provide for Forums such as SACE to make findings of unsuitability on such offenders following disciplinary proceedings. The CPR, therefore, provides a wider scope of protection for all children irrespective of the type of offence committed and the nature of disability of that child.

The NRSO on the other hand, is a register on offenders convicted of sexual offences against children and persons with mental disabilities of all ages.

To comply with the portfolio committee mandate, therefore, both DSD and DoJ&CD have completed a report which is currently receiving the attention of respective Ministers. The report has identified three options for purposes of supporting amendment of legislation in order to merge the NCPR and the NRSO into one single Register.

4.2. Progress in respect of improvements to the information technology supporting the CPR programme

The information technology is currently redeveloping the electronic systems to integrate them on a single platform. The system is also being redeveloped to link with other systems within the Integrated Justice System (IJS) which include DoJ&CD, South African Police Service, Home Affairs, Correctional Services and National Prosecuting Authority which are vital for the electronic integration of information to the CPR.

6. CONCLUSION

DSD will continue to update the Commission regarding the implementation of the CPR in terms of the recommendations as stipulated in the Commission’s report.

07 June 2016 - NW1131

Profile picture: Gqada, Ms T

Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

How many officers are currently employed by each of the metropolitan police department?

Reply:

(1) The following response is based on the information provided by eThekwini, Cape Town Metropolitan municipalities and Gauteng Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs. Mangaung and Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan municipalities indicated that they do not have a Metropolitan Police departments. Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality has Security and Traffic Services which has about 600 employees. Buffalo City did not meet the deadline for submission of responses. However, the municipality has been requested to respond accordingly. The information will be delivered to the honourable member as soon as it is received.

(2) The number of officers are currently employed by each of the metropolitan police departments are provided below:

Metropolitan Municipality

Number of officers are currently employed each of the metropolitan police department

eThekwini

1866 officers

Cape Town

557 officers

Ekurhuleni

1375 officers

Johannesburg

3017 officers

Tshwane

3815 officers

Mangaung

No applicable

Nelson Mandela Bay

No applicable

by

07 June 2016 - NW1553

Profile picture: Kopane, Ms SP

Kopane, Ms SP to ask the Minister in the Presidency

(a) What amount did (i) the Office of The Presidency and (ii) each entity reporting to him spend on advertising in the 2015-16 financial year and (b) how much has (i) the Office of The Presidency and (ii) each entity reporting to him budgeted for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year? [

Reply:

The Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) spent R1 598 million from a budget of R3 670 million. Statistics South Africa spent 6. 870 million from a budget of 5. 281 million.

07 June 2016 - NW1363

Profile picture: Mahlangu, Mr JL

Mahlangu, Mr JL to ask the MR J L MAHLANGU (ANC) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF ARTS AND CULTURE:

(1) Whether he is aware (a) of the existence of a provincial heritage site, Canteen Kopje, in the Northern Cape, which is of archeological and heritage significance and is facing imminent destruction, (b) that research at the specified site began in the mid-20th century and has been on-going since 1997 (c) that various excavations in a number of locations at the site have revealed tools dating back 2,3 million years to the three phases of the Acheulean hand axe, Middle and Later Stone Age occupations, a Tswana/!Kora occupation relating closely to local communities and the remains of historic activities, (d) that a mining permit was issued in 2014 and the SA Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) successfully acquired a Cease Works Order which was lifted in March 2016 after which work by a diamond mining company commenced on 16 March 2016, (e) that the current mining programme will, conservatively estimated, destroy up to 40% of the heritage site, (f) that the fenced-off area includes the excavation areas of the University of the Witwatersrand and of Toronto and the area developed for tourism, (g) that no heritage impact assessment or archaeological impact assessment was conducted and the mining company does not have a heritage permit, which is in contravention of the National Heritage Resources Act, Act 25 of 1999, (h) that there is a conservation management plan for the site and (i) that our country has a constitutional, legal and moral obligation and responsibility to preserve and protect the heritage resources and resources with archaeological significance; if so, what steps does he intend to take to ensure the protection and preservation of the specified heritage resources; (2) in view of the lapses in adhering to the specified Act, what steps will SAHRA take to ensure that the specified heritage is preserved; (3) are there any other site(s) in the country facing a similar threat; if so, can he give the assurance that his department will support the heritage resources and protect them against the threat posed by mining and others?

Reply:

1.Yes, (a) I am aware of a heritage site called Canteen Kopje, a declared Provincial Heritage Site, located on Portion 9 of West Commonage 687, in the Barkley West District of the Northern Cape.

(b) The site was first declared as a National Monument on 29 January 1948 in terms of section 8 of the Natural and Historical Monuments, Relics and Antiquities Act, 1934. Under the current heritage act, the site enjoys protection at a provincial level.

(c) Although it is true that the significance of site was well known during the mid-20th century, local and international interest in the site waned during the second half of the 20th century. The site has been the focus of renewed research interest from the 1990s partly fuelled by significant steps forward in scientific methods, which allows for greater understanding of the formation of the site. Although the scientific work focuses on the behaviour of our earliest human ancestors, the site also contains important information about extant communities and the history and legacy of diamond mining in South Africa. Although the date of this occurrence is not known recent research by SAHRA indicates that Canteen Kopje may be the oldest known archaeological occurrence in South Africa.

(d) The Department of Mineral Resources issued a mining permit to Ms Jacky M. Wesi for Portion 5 of West Commonage, Barkley West in October 2014. Furthermore, a cease works order was issued to prevent the unnecessary destruction of significant heritage resources without the required mitigatory measures in place to prevent the undocumented destruction of such resources.

(e) The information provided to the heritage authorities and SAHRA, in particular, did not indicate that up to forty percent of the site would be mined,

(f) and specifically excluding the areas of current research by the Universities of Witwatersrand and Toronto. Similarly, according to the information provided the mining would have occurred outside the boundaries of the declared Provincial Heritage Site.

(g) This permit was issued without prior consultation with the appropriate heritage authorities. The heritage significance of the site and the provisions of the NHRA were communicated to relevant stakeholders.

(h) Yes I am aware of a Conservation Management plan for the site.

(i) Section 8 of the National Heritage Resources Act (Act 25 of 1999) promotes a three-tier system of Heritage Resources Management, in which national functions are the responsibility of the South African Heritage Resources Agency; provincial functions are the responsibility of the provincial heritage authority, and local level functions are the responsibility of local authorities.

2. A recent final court interdict granted by the Kimberley High Court has prevented any further mining on the declared site of Canteen Kopje. Although it is currently protected as a Provincial Heritage Site, SAHRA has initiated an administrative process to re-examine the grading of the site to possible Grade 1 status

3. To ensure that heritage resources are afforded the protection that it deserves it is important that the provisions of the NHRA are fully implemented. This means ensuring the provincial heritage authorities and local authorities are capacitated and adequately resourced. Currently, there are only three fully functioning provincial authorities ensuring compliance with the provisions of the NHRA. This means that the potential exists for the unwanted destruction of significant heritage resources.

07 June 2016 - NW1239

Profile picture: Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP

Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

(1)(a) What are the (i) circumstances and (ii) time lines that led to the Public Service Commission (PSC) head office currently being based in temporary office accommodation, (b) what is the term of the lease for the current offices and (c) when is the PSC expected to move into more suitable office accommodation; (2) (a) what was the once-off cost to relocate the PSC to its current temporary office accommodation, including the costs (i)(aa) to move office furniture, (bb) to install computer networks and (cc) to refurbish office space, (ii) of estate agents and (iii) any other relevant expenditure in this regard, (b) what is the total current monthly cost of the rental of the temporary office accommodation, including all levies and costs related to parking bays and (c) how does this expenditure compare to the monthly rental of the PSC’s previous office accommodation; (3) what would the monthly costs have been if the PSC moved to the office accommodation identified by the Department of Public Works?

Reply:

The Public Service Commission (PSC) is an independent Constitutional body, and its budget is appropriated via the Minister of Public Service and Administration.

1(a)(i) The Public Service Commission, forwarded a request to the Department of Public Works (DPW) on 29 October 2010 for the extension of the lease agreement for a period of five (5) years as the building (Commission House in Arcadia, Pretoria) was still suitable and met the requirements of the PSC. The PSC experienced challenges with the renewal process.

Seeing that there were delays with the renewal of the lease as well as the fact that the PSC had reached the optimal occupancy of the building, the PSC requested the DPW to procure alternative office accommodation in July 2012.

In order to allow the DPW to commence with the procurement process of the alternative accommodation, the PSC agreed that the lease agreement be renewed for a further period of eighteen (18) months to ensure that PSC relocates into the new alternative office building on 1 April 2014.

A building was identified as suitable alternative accommodation for the PSC and a lease agreement was signed. However, during tenant installation process there were concerns raised by the PSC e.g. additional costs to be borne by the PSC relating to tenant installation. This resulted in the process being suspended by the DPW. Due to the dispute, the PSC did not take occupation of the building.

The PSC forwarded another request to DPW in June 2015, after receiving notice to vacate Commission House, to commence with the sourcing alternative accommodation.

1(a) (ii) The PSC requested DPW on 1 June 2015 to re-advertise the bid as the PSC was notified of the refurbishment of the building (Commission House) taking into account that the building was supposed to be already vacant then (the PSC was supposed to have vacated the building in 2014).

(b) The term of the lease for the current offices is for a period of 24 months, with an exit clause after 18 months.

(c) The PSC has requested DPW to source permanent accommodation. The process will be completed by no later than January 2017.

2(a) The PSC paid R1.2 million once off costs towards the relocation to temporary accommodation (Absa Towers) for IT network infrastructure.

2(i)(aa) The PSC did not incur costs to move furniture. The Department of Public Works absorbed 50% of the relocation costs and the current landlord paid 50%.

2(i)(bb) The PSC paid R1.2 million for IT network infrastructure costs.

2(i)(cc) The PSC did not incur costs for refurbishing office space. The costs were covered by the tenant installation allowance paid by the landlord.

2(ii) The PSC did not pay estate agents fees.

2(iii) There is no other expenditure that was incurred.

2(b) The total current monthly cost of the rental of the temporary office accommodation is R1 407 312.79 for 8907 square metres.

2(c) The rental for the previous office accommodation was R523 087.00 per month for 6533.75 square metres. The rental for previous accommodation was not market related as ever since the PSC took occupation of the building in 1997, the ownership of the building changed 4 times without the annual rental escalation affected. The current monthly rental expenditure is high compare to the previous monthly expenditure on office accommodation.

(3) The monthly costs would have been lower if the PSC would have moved to the office accommodation identified by the Department of Public Works

The monthly rental for the office accommodation identified by the DPW would have been R 1 361 352.36 for 8907 square metres including parking.

07 June 2016 - NW1548

Profile picture: James, Ms LV

James, Ms LV to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

(a) What amount did (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her spend on advertising in the 2015-16 financial year and (b) how much has (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her budgeted for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) (i) The national department of Human Settlement spent R 2,941,920.20 for advertising in the 2015-16 financial year.

Entities spend on advertising in the 2015-16 financial year

(a)(ii) 1. The EAAB spent R1, 172,583.00.

2. The HDA spent R1, 200, 209.39.

3. The NURCHA spent R178, 478.07.

4. The SHRA spent R189, 017.65.

5. The NHBRC spent R7,700,000.00.

6. The NHFC spent R433 975.00.

7. The RHLF spent R197, 280.29.

8. The CSOS spent R225, 000.00.

(b) (i) The department has budgeted for R1, 5 million in the 2016-17 financial year.

(b)(ii) Entities

1. The EAAB budgeted for R135,367.00 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

2. The HDA budgeted for R1, 311, 886.60 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

3. The NURCHA budgeted for R 400 000.00 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

4. The SHRA budgeted for R1, 6 000.00 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

5. The NHBRC budgeted for R30, 000, 000.00 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

6. The NHFC budgeted for R500 00.00 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

7. The RHLF budgeted for R210 000.00 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

8. The CSOS budgeted for R0.00 for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year.

07 June 2016 - NW1381

Profile picture: Mackenzie, Mr C

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

Whether any plans have been put in place to formally house the residents of the Kya Sands informal settlement in Johannesburg in Gauteng; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the relevant details of such plans, (b) how many beneficiaries have been identified and (c) by when will such plans be put in place?

Reply:

(a) Yes, plans have been put in place to formally house the residents of the Kya Sands Informal Settlement. Due to the dense nature of the informal settlement, there is not enough land surrounding the area to formalise the project in situ. As a result, it was proposed that the project be developed in conjunction with the Lion Park Project further north, near the Lanseria Airport. The concept envisaged was that the Nietgedacht Property on which the Lion Park Project would be located would be formalized first due to the fact that the density is lower and it is envisaged that some of the residents of Kya Sands will then be relocated to the Lion Park Project. The remaining Kya Sands informal settlements residents would be formalized in situ. It should be noted that because of the high housing demand, both projects would be developed as high density housing and as such incremental formalization is not possible.

(b) A total of 13 000 beneficiaries have been identified and the scope of the project was increased to include all the informal settlements on Malibongwe Drive, between Kya Sands and Lanseria. 8 000 beneficiaries will be accommodated at the Lion Park development and 5 000 beneficiaries will be accommodated at the Kya Sands site. Beneficiaries from Lanseria/Freeway, Lanseria/Lion Park, Lanseria/Selina Park, Sands/iNanda Holding 57, Houtkoppen, Plot 5 Riverbed and Malatje informal settlements will be accommodated at the two developments.

(c) The planning process is currently underway and indications are that the development will commence during 2019/2020 financial year.

07 June 2016 - NW536

Profile picture: Lovemore, Ms AT

Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

With reference to the ministerial speech delivered on the occasion of the debate on the Budget Vote of his department on 13 May 2015, and specifically to the creation of a pool of labour relations specialists and a team of legal experts from the Department of Justice and Correctional Services to deal with the backlog of disciplinary cases following Cabinet’s approval, what are the full details of (a) the pool of labour relations and legal experts formed after Cabinet’s decision, (b) the backlog of disciplinary cases with which they were intended to deal and (c) the progress made to date in addressing the specified backlog?

Reply:

On 09 September 2014 Cabinet approved the establishment of an internal pool of legal experts and labour relations specialists to deal with the backlog cases of precautionary suspensions in the public service. The DPSA has established a pool of panellists to deal with the backlog of precautionary suspension cases in the public service.

(a) The pool comprises 298 expert investigators, departmental representatives and presiding officers to ensure that the value chain is expedited in an optimal manner. Departments and provinces request assistance on their backlog cases from the DPSA.

(b) According the national and provincial statistical report of September 2014 to 31 March 2016 the total number of the backlog of precautionary suspension cases for national departments and provinces referred to DPSA is 687. The total breakdown consist of 291 cases for the provinces and 396 for the national departments.

(c) The progress made since the inception of the project is the resolution of 384 precautionary backlog cases. The total breakdown of the resolved cases consist of 57 for provinces and 327 for national departments. The percentage for the resolved cases is 56%. Members of the pool are allocated cases on a rotational basis so as to achieve an even spread of cases amongst panellists.

07 June 2016 - NW1272

Profile picture: Jooste, Ms K

Jooste, Ms K to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1)What factors were taken into consideration when the 1 April 2016 increase in social grant pay-outs by her department were calculated; (2) whether she has found that the specified increase of social grant pay-outs will allow the grant recipients to meet their minimum nutritional requirements based on food price inflations; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

1. Social grant increases are determined in consultation with the National Treasury and the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA). The amount of money available for the individual grant increases is subject to government’s expenditure ceiling and is guided by the appropriation made for grants by Parliament. For this financial year a budget increase of 8.2% was allocated for grant increases. This increase needs to provide for both demographic and economic factors. All these factors have a considerable influence in determining annual grant increases. However, these increases are constrained by the available budget.

2. All grants, with the exception of the Child Support Grant (CSG) are above the country’s basic food poverty line as determined by Statistics, South Africa. They are also above the highest Upper Bound Poverty line (of R753 per month in 2014). Hence these beneficiaries should have enough to buy adequate food as well as additional non-food items.

07 June 2016 - NW1135

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Social Development

With reference to the latest available statistics, (a) how many (i) nonprofit and privately run (aa) drug and (bb) alcohol rehabilitation facilities are there in the country and (b) how many persons can each specified facility accomodate?

Reply:

(a)

    (i) There are currently 73 nonprofit / privately run alcohol and drug rehabilitation facilities

(b) For capacity of each centre, see attached annexure

07 June 2016 - NW1502

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Ms B S Masango (DA) to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

(1) Whether his department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether his department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(1) The DAC has not been approached by any political party for funding in the 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and to date in the 2016/17 financial years;

(2) The DAC has not provided any form of funding to any political party in the 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and to date in the 2016/17 financial years.

07 June 2016 - NW1273

Profile picture: Jooste, Ms K

Jooste, Ms K to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1)Whether her department commissioned any studies into the (a) social and (b) financial impact of the universalisation of the (i) older persons and (ii) child support grants; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) which institution(s) conducted the specified studies, (bb) when were such studies completed and (cc) is the research findings publicly available; (2) what are the key factors contributing to the development of a policy on the universalisation of the (a) older persons and (b) child support grants respectively?

Reply:

a) (i) Yes, the universalization proposals are rooted in the Taylor Committee recommendations of 2002. The Department of Social Development has also conducted studies on the social and financial impact of the universalisation of both the older Persons Grant (OPG) as well as the Child Support Grant (CSG) entitled “An exploration of the causes of poverty in old age in South Africa” and “The Feasibility study on the universal provision of the Child Support Grant (CSG) in South Africa”

(b) The Discussion Paper with policy options was developed. The Paper also highlights financial implications for each option.

(aa) The OPG study was conducted in-house by the Department, whilst the CSG study was conducted by the Economic Policy Research Institute (EPRI) for the Department.

(bb) The CSG study was concluded in 2011 and the OPG study in 2014.

(cc) The OPG research report is available for various stakeholders. The CSG research report however is currently not available for public reading as the Department is currently working on another study related to the CSG Universalisation.

2. (a) (b) Essentially, the key factors contributing to the development of a policy on the universalisation stems from the need to ensure that all excluded eligible poor people are captured and receive social grants through an easier administration process that results from Universalisation. The CSG and OPG are poverty alleviation measures targeting the largest number of poor beneficiaries in comparison to all other grants, these grants have enabled the country to achieve progress in addressing the needs of children and older persons in the household with no or low income.

However, the promise of basic care for the poorest older persons and children still faces challenges; many are excluded due to various reasons including not having the correct documentation. While the Department has taken many steps to improve coverage to reach these poor beneficiaries in the past five years, evidence suggests that under-coverage will be effectively reduced by eliminating the means test and enabling all children and older persons to access the grants with minimum of bureaucratic requirements. Furthermore, universal provisions will enable many poor children that are excluded from the programme to realise the important developmental impacts that the CSG currently delivers to millions of others. The Department believes that universal provisions of these grants will build national solidarity and reflect a common understanding that South Africans are committed to providing income support to older persons and provide children with the opportunity to develop their full capabilities.

07 June 2016 - NW1470

Profile picture: Lovemore, Ms AT

Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

(1)Whether, with reference to Commitment 8 contained in the 3rd South African Open Government Partnership Country Action Plan, 2016 to 2018, an inter-departmental committee responsible for developing, implementing and reporting on the country’s implementation and/or action plan has been put in place; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether the development of the country’s implementation and/or action plan has commenced; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1) Yes. On 26 October 2015, Cabinet approved the establishment of the inter-departmental committee on beneficial ownership. The committee was set up at the inaugural meeting of the committee held on 27 February 2016. It is constituted by the following institutions and government departments convened by the Department of Public Service and Administration:

 (a) National Treasury (NT);

 (b) Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC);

(c) Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA);

(d) South African Revenue Service (SARS):

(e) South African Police Service (SAPS):

(f) National Prosecuting Authority (NPA);

(g) Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (Doi & CD);

(h) Department of Trade and Industry (DTI);

(i) Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC);

(j) Department of Social Development (DSD);

(k) Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO);

(l) State Security Agency (SSA);

(m) National Intelligence Coordinating Committee (NICOC);

(n) South African Reserve Bank (SARB);

(o) Financial Services Board (FSB);

(p) Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE);

(q) Estate Agency Affairs Board (EAAB);

(r) Law Society of South Africa (LSSA);

(s) National Gambling Board (NGB); and

(t) Independent Regulatory Board of Auditors (IRBA)

(2) Yes. Development of the country’s implementation and/or action plan has commenced, the committee is currently finalising the draft action plan. The draft action plan is derived from the G20 High Level Principles endorsed by Cabinet in October 2015, which sets-out the required actions to be undertaken by the Government of the Republic of South Africa.

07 June 2016 - NW396

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)Whether R 800 million was moved from the SA National Defence Force’s (SANDF) budget to pay Deloitte to do an audit of SANDF’s battle preparedness; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what were the (i) motivation and (ii) objectives of the specified audit, (b) why does the SANDF not have the capacity to perform the specified audit itself, (c) why was Deloitte contracted to perform the specified audit, (d) when did (i) she and (ii) her department approve the specified audit and (e) what procurement processes were followed before appointing the specified company; (2) whether there are any higher priorities for spending the funds instead of the specified audit, especially in the face of constant complaints that not enough funding is provided to among other things South Africa’s contribution to peacekeeping forces in Africa; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details for prioritising the specified audit?

Reply:

Question 1.

a.(i) According to the Department of Defence's records, the Department has not concluded any audit contract with Deloitte to the value of R800 million. However, Deloitte was contracted to perform a Through Life Capability Management (TLCM) study over four years at a cost of R230 million. This requirement is a resultant of phase 1 of the TLCM Project conducted during 2013/14 in the Chief of Logistics environment. The results of TLCM phase 1 reflected that the DOD is not on par

with international standards in terms of TLCM best practice. The DOD/Armscor Acquisition, Technology Development processes and the objectives of the RESTRICTED 2 National Defence Industry Council (NDIC) were not part of the C Log study, a requirement therefore existed to align the above mentioned aspects with both international TLCM standards as well as the Defence Review 2015.

Question 2.

The TLCM project is a high priority exercise since it will ultimately contribute to a cost effective SANDF and is not at the cost of other current priorities

07 June 2016 - NW1467

Profile picture: Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP

Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister in the Presidency

With reference to his reply to question 1161 on 9 May 2016, how many learners were registered as at 6 March 2016 to rewrite their National Senior Certificate examinations in October and November 2016 at each of the 31 sites where the National Youth Development Agency is offering the specified learners the opportunity to rewrite the specified exams?

Reply:

The closing date for learner registration was on 30 March 2016, all learners completed and signed the DOBE Examination Registration Form. The forms have been submitted to the relevant Department of Basic Education examinations offices based in provinces. The Department is working on ensuring that all learners are captured. It will issue the Preliminary Schedules in August/September 2016 to confirm that all learners are registered and their subjects are captured correctly.

07 June 2016 - NW1252

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2735 on 25 August 2015, he has received the requested information yet; if not, why not; if so, by when will this information be communicated?

Reply:

The response below is based on information received from the Ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality (as approved by Minister P Gordhan on 3rd Sep 2015)

 (a) The municipality allocated a total amount of R156 million for Zone Plans, i.e. block sum allocations to each ward, in the 2014-15 budget.

(b) (i) The funds allocated to each ward are utilized for the implementation of small projects that are identified by Councilors in consultation with ward residents. (ii) Wards benefiting have been reduced to 78 wards that have less developed municipal infrastructure and the budget allocation for each ward varies depending on the project identified. The 25 wards that were excluded are highly developed and have all the necessary municipal services.

(c) The quested information still needs to be discussed first at Council level as it relates to the 2014/15 financial year’s budget, which ended on 31 July 2015.

07 June 2016 - NW1526

Profile picture: Brauteseth, Mr TJ

Brauteseth, Mr TJ to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1)Whether her department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether her department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(1)&(2) No.

07 June 2016 - NW1242

Profile picture: Lovemore, Ms AT

Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

With reference to the report produced by the Public Service Commission, entitled Assessment of the Implementation of Policy Framework on the Appointment of Ministerial Staff in National and Provincial Departments, dated May 2014, what are the details of the action taken to date to address each of the 14 recommendations at the end of the specified report?

Reply:

The details of the action taken to date to address each of the 14 Recommendations are attached herewith below as Annexure A. These details were compiled by the Public Service Commission, after consultation with the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA), which is the custodian of the Ministerial Handbook and all Human Resource Management (HRM) prescripts in the Public Service. Furthermore, the National School of Government (NSG) was also consulted.

These details illustrate that the Department of Public Service and Administration has made significant progress towards implementation of the Recommendations made by the Public Service Commission. The National School of Government has made noticeable preparatory work to roll-out implementation of the executive development programme, and plans are also under way to develop other targeted training programmes.

ANNEXURE A: Progress n implementation of each of the 14 Recommendations made in the Report - Assessment of the Implementation of Policy Framework on the Appointment of Ministerial Staff in National and Provincial Departments

No.

RECOMMENDATION FROM PSC

PROGRESS REPORT

1

The DPSA should develop a focused policy framework that will regulate the employment practices of persons who provide support and serve in EAs' offices

Amended Public Service Regulations and other prescripts regulate the employment practices of persons appointed in the offices of Executive Authorities. It covers the recruitment process, nature of appointment, allowance payable, termination of services and other employment conditions. According to the

2

All SMS levels in Ministries irrespective of the method of recruitment (headhunting or advertising) must be subjected to proper selection processes (i.e. interviews and competency assessment) and for any identified competency gap, a developmental plan must be put in place to address the gap. This plan must be developed in consultation with the person concerned and be managed by the Director-General or Head of Department.

According to the Public Service Regulations, all members of the SMS appointed in offices of EAs are supposed to be subjected to proper recruitment and selections processes and the performance management and development system for SMS. In addition, the Directive on Compulsory Capacity Development, Mandatory Training Days and Minimum Entry Requirements for SMS, which came into effect on 01 April 2015, also applies to all SMS members in the offices of EAs. SMS members should meet the minimum qualification and experience requirements prior to appointment.

The challenge is that there are still many incidences of non-compliance with prescripts, as such, the DPSA has undertaken to conduct targeted support for departments during the 2016/17 financial year.

3.

The Director-General or Head of Department has to provide "primary advisory" support to the EA due to the resources (e.g. research experts, etc.) he/she manages in the department, an administrative reporting line to the Director-General or Head of Department must be enforced for the Chief of Staff.

According to the DPSA, this is the current practice as Chiefs of Staff report to their respective Heads of Department on all administrative matters.

4

Compulsory induction, orientation/training on the functions performed in Ministries, the relationship between the Ministry and the department, the protocols of being a sessional employee and the benefits thereof and how to support the Minister with political responsibilities should be conducted with staff working in the EAs' offices, either at departmental level or coordinated by the National School of Government (NSG) or the DPSA. The current and/or previous competent and experienced Chief of Staff should be part of the training team and assist in this regard.

It is expected that the orientation of staff working in Ministries would be conducted by respective departments. The extent of implementation for such orientation programmes has not been validated.

The generic orientation course for staff in Ministries has not been developed yet. Its development has been prioritised by the NSG. Consultations with relevant stakeholders are expected to commence during the 2016/17 financial year.

5

There should be a dedicated course for Chiefs of Staff and a forum to share experiences and to professionalise this strategic role. There should be a way of career-pathing for experienced Chiefs of Staff.

The course for Chiefs of Staff has not been developed yet. Its development has been prioritised by the NSG. Consultations with relevant stakeholders are expected to commence during the 2016/17 financial year.

6

A Legislation based Compliance Framework for

Ministries should be developed by the DPSA.

Government has adopted the Management Performance Assessment Tool (MPAT) to track and report on compliance to relevant legislation by departments.

7

The DPSA should review the organisational structures of Ministries according to the size and responsibility of the Ministry.

The DPSA has developed a revised generic organisational structure for Offices of EAs and Deputy Ministers as part of the process of amending the Ministerial Handbook.

The concern is that the revised Ministerial Handbook has not been approved by Cabinet, as such, the generic organisational structures are not implemented.

It is therefore important for the Minister for Public Service and Administration to fast-track the approval of the revised Ministerial Handbook.

8

Uniform job profiles and descriptions should be enforced for Chiefs of Staff across the Public Service. Key competencies and minimum qualifications for the position of Chief of Staff must be well-defined. This will help to guide the selection and appointment process and Ministers must be informed of and adhere to this guide. Uniform job profiles should be developed for the rest of the staff in EAs' offices.

The DPSA has developed, as part of the generic organisational structures, clearly defined purpose and functions per post in the offices of EAs.

However, the extent of implementation of the uniform job description remains questionable due to the non-approval of the revised Ministerial Handbook.

With respect to SMS positions in ministerial Office, the DPSA through the Directive on Compulsory Capacity Development, Mandatory Training days and Minimum entry requirements for SMS has set the minimum qualification and experience requirement for appointment in the office of the EA at an SMS level.

The challenge is that there are still many incidences of non-compliance with prescripts and compliance with the Directive has not been assessed.

9

80% of the positions in Ministries should be permanent and be part of organograms of departments.

The DPSA proposed uniform organisational structures for Ministerial Offices does recommend that a percentage of posts in the Offices of EAs should be permanent. These are all the administrative positions, which turn to be in the majority

Implementation of this will be assessed once the revised Ministerial Handbook has been approved and is being implemented by departments.

10

An orientation and support programme for Cabinet Ministers/Premiers/Members of Executive Council (MECs) and Directors-General/Heads of Department should be developed and it must be compulsory for new EAs and DGs/HoDs to attend at the beginning of every term of government and when a need arises due to reshuffling. There must be a separate session for EAs and DGs first and thereafter a joint session. Also the advisors need to have an orientation programme.

At the start of each term of administration, the Presidency organizes anorientation programme for Executive Authorities (EAs) and the DPSA is invited to make presentations on the Roles and Responsibilities of the EA in relation to the Public Service Act and Regulations, and also presents on the Ministerial Handbook. However, there is no targeted training provided after reshuffling.

     

11

There should be a probation period for staff appointed in Ministries and that period should take into consideration the nature of Ministries and the limited time available to follow the probation period regulations that are cumbersome to release a person who is not performing or fitting in the culture of the Ministry.

In terms of the Public Service Regulations, all appointments, longer than 12 months, are subject to a probationary period. This requirement includes appointments in Ministries

However, there are instances of non¬compliance — the magnitude of which has not been established. Hence implementation of the revised Ministerial Handbook will also serve as an instrument to address such incidences.

12

The DPSA should continue to give guidance and assistance in the development and implementation of turnaround strategies and restructuring processes.

The DPSA continues to play this role, based on requests received from departments.

It must however be stated that Executive Authorities have the power to decide on their turnaround strategies and organisational structures. All what the DPSA can do is to provide guidance.

13

The DPSA should develop a database of employees with working experience in Ministries who could not be absorbed by departments for purposes of redeployment.

All permanently employed employees are accommodated in the relevant department upon exit of the EA.

There is no provision within the Public Service to absorb employees employed in Ministries linked to the term of office of EAs. Where employees who are linked to the EAs term of office are transferred to or absorbed by the department, this practice will considered to be irregular and should as such be corrected in line with the applicable prescripts.

14

The DPSA should enforce the developed benchmark job descriptions and evaluations for posts in EAs' offices to ensure consistency throughout the Public Service.

In developing the draft generic organisational structures for Ministries, all posts were job evaluated with clearly defined job purpose and functions

Once approved, implementation of these job descriptions, alongside the revised generic organizational structures will ensure consistency.

07 June 2016 - NW1019

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and TraditionalAffairs

1. In each case where a municipality has been threatened with having the supply of electricity cut off by Eskom, was a payment agreement entered into with Eskom in order to avert such a cut-off; if not, (a) why not and (b) what steps is his department taking to resolve the situation in each case; if so, in each case, when was each such an agreement reached and signed, (2) is the payment schedule (a) affordable and (b) reducing the specified municipalities' debt owed to Eskom; (3) has the specified municipalities complied with the terms of their respective agreements; if not, why not; (4) what is the current status of the inter-ministerial negotiations to resolve the impasse between municipalities and Eskom regarding (a) the billing period and (b) the interest charged by Eskom?.

Reply:

1 (a) (b). Yes, a process of entering into payment agreements between each of the affected municipalities is in its final stages. The Department of Co-operative Governance ((DCoG) in collaboration with Department of Public Enterprise (OPE), SALGA, Provincial COGTA's and Treasury conducted work sessions with the affected municipalities and Eskom. A detailed affordability analysis was conducted for each municipality taking into account its unique circumstances, the root causes for non-payment as well as other municipal commitments. This work resulted in new payment arrangements being drafted for Eskom's consideration. On approval by Eskom, these agreements will be formalised with municipalities by means of council resolutions. Eskom aims to have all the agreements in place with municipalities by end of May 2016.

2. (a). Yes, since the draft payment agreements were based on the affordability analysis; they will be affordable to municipalities.

(b) The debt will be reduced because one of the conditions of the agreements is that municipalities pay their current debt over and above the agreement amount to service outstanding debt. .

3. Eskom is still engaging and finalising discussions with the municipalities on agreed payment terms and to date there is no municipality that has finalised and signed the payment agreement with Eskom. Compliance will only be monitored once agreements are reached between Eskom and the municipalities.

4. During the inter-ministerial negotiations; Eskom made a commitment to consider waving the interest for municipalities who adhere to their payment terms and to consider reviewing the payment period. However; the response received from Eskom in that regard is as follows:
"Considering the Eskom financial situation and in line with the PFMA and MFMA requirements as well as the Supply Agreements held with our customers, Eskom has decided to continue to apply the 15 days payment period as well as charging Prime plus 5% on overdue amounts."

07 June 2016 - NW1603

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Transport

With reference to her reply to question 415 on 8 March 2016, (a) what is the current status of appointing the new Chief Executive Officer of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa and (b) by what date will this process be completed?

Reply:

The process to appoint the GCEO of PRASA has progressed well and is at an advantage stage

07 June 2016 - NW1468

Profile picture: Lovemore, Ms AT

Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

What are the full relevant details of the (a) meetings, (b) other activities and (c) achievements of the National Anti-Corruption Forum in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years?

Reply:

(a) No meetings have been held during the (i) 2013/2014, (ii) 2014/2015 and (iii) 2015/2016 financial years.

(b) No activities have been held during the (i) 2013/2014, (ii) 2014/2015 and (iii) 2015/2016 financial years.

(c) No National Anti-Corruption Forum (NACF) achievements have been reported on for the financial years (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16.

07 June 2016 - NW1532

Profile picture: Cassim, Mr Y

Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)Whether her department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether her department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case? NW1703E

Reply:

  1. Department was not approached by any political for funding;
  2. Falls away

07 June 2016 - NW1391

Profile picture: Van Der Walt, Ms D

Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

Whether (a) her department and (b) all entities reporting to her are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) Yes

(b) Yes, however, the participation of small business enterprises and cooperatives is advanced through public employment programmes.

(i) & (ii) The Department of Environmental Affairs provides opportunities through different programmes and entities, and is specifically responsible for the EPWP with it’s 14 different programmes through which it has provided opportunities for people through SMMEs and cooperatives.

The Programmes are listed as follow:

  • Working for Water
  • Working for Wetlands
  • Working for Ecosystems
  • Working for Forests
  • Working for Energy (Biomass)
  • Eco-Furniture Programme
  • Working on Fire
  • Working on Waste
  • Working for the Coast
  • Working for Land
  • Greening & Open Space Management
  • People & Parks
  • Wildlife Economy
  • Youth Environmental Service

All fourteen of the EP programmes are designed to secure outcomes that have high returns on investment, over and above the Full-Time Equivalent jobs and Work Opportunities. The contractors and participants are all trained, skilled and empowered to do this work.

South African National Parks (SANParks) is in part, part of the EPWP implementation, and implements a develpment programme for small contractors or businesses. It also supports additional small businesses as part of the Infrastructure Programme.

Further opportunities are being sought through the Chemical and Waste Branch on the Recycling Enterprise Support Programme (RESP).

(aa) Programmes target to support 2,369 SMMEs for 2016/17.

SANParks implements EPWP projects in all national parks, buffer zone areas and some provincial nature reserves. For the 2016/17, the projects will support 501 small contractors, including training and contractor development. As part of the Infrastructure Programme in Kruger National Park, 14 small construction contractors are mentored for civil, building and electrical works.

The iSimagaliso enterprise programme is in its 7th year. It supports 182 small businesses. Businesses receive formal training and ongoing mentoring via a virtual business hub. The small business also qualify to apply for grant funding from the programme. R6.8million has been paid on in grant funds to 88 small businesses.

(bb) The department has budgeted an estimated amount of R 1.2 billion for the 2016/17 financial year which will be procured using SMMEs.

The amount budgeted for the small contractors in the EPWP programme under SANParks is R166 million. An estimated amount of R58.8 million was budgeted for the small construction contactors in Kruger National Park.

Through the Waste Management Bureau, an approximate amount of 11 million is set aside for the Recycling Enterprise Support Programme (RESP) initiative.

For iSimangaliso, the amount that has been budgeted for this year is R1.2m.

(cc) Throught the 14 different programmes, a minimum of 1519 SMMEs, 46524 Work Opportunities and 23 467 Full Time Equivalents will be created in 2016/17, a further 140 temporary jobs will be created and supported in the Kruger construction programme.

It is also envisaged that a 150 jobs will be created through the Recycling Enterprise Support Programme.

For iSimangaliso, it is anticipated that the development programmes run by iSimangaliso will create approximately 2000 jobs in this financial year

---ooOoo---

07 June 2016 - NW1521

Profile picture: Bhanga, Mr BM

Bhanga, Mr BM to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

(1)Whether his department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether his department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(1) (a) (i)(ii)(iii) No.

(b) No.

(2) (a) (i)(ii)(iii) No.

(b) No.

07 June 2016 - NW1536

Profile picture: Steenkamp, Ms J

Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture”

1. What amount did (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him spend on advertising in the 2015-16 financial year and (b) how much has (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him budgeted for advertising in the 2015-17 financial year? (NW1707E)

Reply:

(a) The amount spend on advertising in the 2015-2016 financial year

(i) Department’s adverts

Advert on Bursaries (Non-Employees)

119,738.70

Advert: Promotional Items

854,365.00

Advert: Marketing

5,689,523.85

Advert: Recruitment

754,885.76

Advert: Tenders

390,327.24

Total spent

R7 808,840.55

 

(ii) Public Entities

I have 27 entities reporting to me, to compile this information it will take time, but as soon as it is collated I will forward the necessary information to the Honourable Member.

(b) Amount budgeted for Advertising 2016/17 financial year

(i) Department 9.2 million

07 June 2016 - NW1230

Profile picture: Mahlangu, Mr JL

Mahlangu, Mr JL to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources:

With regards to the evaluation of safety at Lily Mine in Mpumalanga South Africa, the world and the community members of Mpumalanga were shocked with the incident that occurred in Lilly Mine in Nkomazi Mpumalanga where 3 mine workers went down 80m into a sink hole. The communities across the country shared a hope and anxiety of the families and miners at Lily Mine that are distraught. In your recent media and public announcement you made the point that it will take between 6 to 8 months for the rescue team to reach the container. Up to the date “The families of Mnisi, Mazibuko and Nyerende are still in our prayers and we trust that the emotional and psychological support they are receiving will assist them to cope with the traumatic experience.

Reply:

The question is:-

  1. Whether the department was aware that the container office was actually located in such a dangerous location.

A formal investigation is underway in terms of the legal provisions and will assist in identifying the underlying causes of the accident. On completion of investigation, recommendations will be made to prevent similar accidents.

   2. Is it your expectation the mine would have known that the container is in a dangerous location.

The above-mentioned formal investigation will assist in identifying the underlying causes of the accident.

   3. Has your department conducted assessment on other mines in the country to determine that no such dangers await other mineworkers?

The mine inspections and audits are continuously being conducted with the aim of preventing harm on the mineworkers.

In a case where sub-standard condition, act or non compliance to the provisions of the Mine Health and Safety Act is observed during a mine inspection or audit, appropriate actions are immediately taken to remedy such conditions.

  4. If yes which mines? If not why not?

The mine inspections and audits are conducted at all the operating mines.

  5.  Do we have assurance that such or similar accident will not revisit the country

We endeavor to prevent mine accidents from occurring and lessons learnt from the above-mentioned investigation will be used to improve safety in the mining sector.

   6.  Does the country have requisite skills to deal with disasters of this nature?

South Africa has the requisite skills to deal with disasters at mines and our country’s Mine Rescues Services (MRS) assisted in the Chile Mine disaster in which 33 trapped mine workers were rescued successful after 69 days.

  7. If yes where is it located, and why do we find ourselves in this situation like it is at Lily Mine where it will take close to a year to reach the container where miners are trapped?

At the Mine Rescue Services of South Africa. The rescue operations have not been abandoned but options which will ensure safe rescue operations are being pursued. This is as a result of the deterioration of ground conditions at the mine.

  8. If not why don’t we have such capacity?

South Africa has the requisite skills and capacity.

  9. Who is thus responsible for the situation that we find ourselves in?

The accident investigation will assist in identifying the underlying causes of the accident.

 

 

Approved/not approved

Mr MJ Zwane, MP

Minister of Mineral Resources

Date Submitted:-………………/………………/2016

07 June 2016 - NW1082

Profile picture: Khoza, Mr NP

Khoza, Mr NP to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(a) Has any of her senior officials met with certain persons (names furnished) during the period 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015 and (b) has any of the entities reporting to her awarded any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investments, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media in the specified period; if so, what (i) are the relevant details and (ii) is the amount of each specified contract?

Reply:

Question a.

a. DOD personnel did engage with COMAIR with respect to the requirements listed in paragraph.

(b.) No senior officials were involved in this regard.

b (i.) The DOD (SA Air Force) awarded two (2) contracts to "COMAIR LTD" (V32C9) during the specific period in question for the following requirements.

• 2012: for the training of four (4) members on Flight Dispatchers Course to the value of R134 976,00.

• 2014: for CSIR skills training for SA Air Force members to the value of R28 500,00.

07 June 2016 - NW1601

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)Whether any policies have been put in place to ensure that employees from (a) her department and (b) each entity reporting to her undergo advanced driving courses; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) (a) how many employees from (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her have undergone advanced driving courses in the (aa) 2013-14, (bb) 2014-15 and (cc) 2015-16 financial years, (b) what were the costs in this regard and (c) what criteria were used to select employees to undergo the specified courses?

Reply:

Department

(1) (a) No employees within the Department underwent advanced driving courses. The Department does not have a plan for employees to attend such courses.

(1) (b)

(2) (a) (i) (aa) 2013 – 14 – None

(2) (a) (i) (bb) 2014 – 15 – None

(2) (a) (i) (cc) 2015 – 16 – None

(2) (b) Not applicable

(2) (c ) Not applicable

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

  1. (b) None of the ACSA Corporate office drivers or employees has attended advanced driving courses. ACSA intends sending all drivers for an advance driving course in the current financial year.

(2) Please refer to response provided in 1 (b) above.

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

  1. (b) As per ATNS Technical Services instructions, all ATNS Technical Support staff attend an advanced 4 X 4 drivers training course on an annual basis. This is typically a 2 day training course where participants receive both theoretical and practical training.

(2) (a) (ii) None

(aa) 2013-14: 134 Technical Staff members approximately R 108, 540-00

(bb) 2014-15: 132 Technical Staff members approximately R112, 860-00

(cc) 2015-16: 130 Technical Staff members approximately R117, 000-00

(b) For the 2015-2016 financial year the typical cost of a 2 day advanced 4 X 4 drivers training course was R900 per person.

(c) All ATNS staff members, who are required to drive to remote communications, navigation or surveillance sites as part of their routine work activities, are required to attend an advanced 4 X 4 drivers training course.

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

  1. (b) The nature of the South African Civil Aviation Authority’s (SACAA) mandate and duties undertaken by its employees does not warrant them to undergo advanced driving courses.

       2. (a) (i) N/A (ii) None (aa) None, (bb) None and (cc) None, (b) N/A (c) N/A.

South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)

(1) (b) At SANRAL all project managers that had to travel officially to construction sites underwent advance driving courses up to November 2013. This has since been stopped due to the National Treasury cost containment measures published in November 2013.

(2) (a)(ii)(aa) For SANRAL our 2 survey vehicle drivers was send on advance truck driving course (bb) None, and (cc) None,

(b) R4 050-00 per driver

(c) Required by the truck manufacturer that supplied the truck for the survey vehicle as part of the warranty agreement.

Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRTA)

1. (b) The C-BRTA does not have any policies in place to ensure that employees undergo through advanced driving courses. While the C-BRTA is aware that advanced driving courses will contribute to road safety, due to financial contraints no advanced driving training has been rolled out to employees. We however continue to work with other stakeholders in the road transport industry for collaborative partnerships with a view to promote road safety.

2. (a) (ii) (aa) 2013-14 None

(bb) 2014-15 None and (cc) None in 2015-16 financial years

(b) No costs were incurred as no advanced driving courses were offered.

(c) Not applicable as no employees were offered the advanced driving training in the 2013-14, (bb) 2014-15 and (cc) 2015-16 financial years, those that would have undergone would have done so in their personal capacity.

Road Accident Fund (RAF)

1. (b) The RAF has not put policies in place to ensure that employees undergo advanced driving courses; the RAF has however arranged for defensive driver training which included four employees);

2. (a)(ii) (aa) None

(bb) None, and (cc) Four (4)

(b) the cost related to the four employees attendance of the defensive driving course was R 4 200 (VAT inclusive), and

(c) no criteria applied specifically to the employees’ selection for enrolment for the defensive driving course

.

Road Traffic Management Corporations (RTMC)

1. (b) The RTMC does not have a policy that compels employees to undergo advanced driving courses. However the RTMC realized the importance of such training for members of the National Traffic Police and has included such practical training as a module in the training of National Traffic Officers.

2. (aa) In 2013-14 six (6) employees

(bb) in 2014-15, 184 employees and (cc) 2015-16 None employee undertook advanced driver training.

(b) R90 222

(c) Training was provided as part of the up-skilling of National Traffic Officers.

Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA)

1. (b) The RTIA does not have a policy that compels employees to undergo advanced driving courses. However, The entity’s approved HR strategy seeks to place Road Safety at the core of organisational culture and as such driver behaviour programmes including advanced driving training will be implemented

2. (a) (aa) 2013-14 – None

(bb) 2014-15 – None , and (cc) 2015-16 – None

(b) N/A

  1. N/A

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)

1. (b) The current fleet policy is silent on driver training and advanced driving. However, the company is in the process of reviewing its fleet policy and driver training is included in as follows:-

“All drivers/officials will be evaluated at regular intervals and training will be undertaken to ensure that they comply with the legislated laws”.

2. No employee of PRASA has undergone advanced drive training.

Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)

(1). The Railway Safety Regulator (RSR) does not have a policy in place that ensures employees undergo advanced driving course. The nature of the work done does not require driving skills. The majority of our work is done within the railway environment.

(2) Not applicable. Refer to 1 above.

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

(a) There is currently no policy for advance training.

(b) None of the employees have gone through advance training courses. Advanced Driving Courses were not budgeted for in the previous financial years.

None of the employees have done advance driving courses.

Ports Regulator of South Africa

  1. (b) The Ports Regulator has not spent any funds to train and develop employees for advanced driving lessons. This is because the job requirements for all Ports Regulator employees do not require employees to utilise advanced driving skills.
  2. (a) (ii) No employee of the Ports Regulator has undergone advanced driving courses in (aa) 2013/14, (bb) 2014/15 and (cc) 2015/16. (b) not applicable, (c) not applicable

07 June 2016 - NW965

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, since his reply to oral question 123 on 15 September 2014, he has taken any action to further investigate the findings of the Pikoli report, released in March 2013, into corruption in the Integrated Public Transport Plan in the Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

The response below was provided by the municipality:

The Pikoli report was considered by Counsel (Adv Ronassen), who provided legal opinion to the effect that the report was nothing else but a precursor to a full scale investigation. In light of the above, the full scale investigation is currently being conducted by the National Treasury.

07 June 2016 - NW1130

Profile picture: Mbhele, Mr ZN

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

How many metropolitan police departments are there in South Africa, (b) what are their names and (c) how much funding was allocated to each of these metropolitan police departments (i) in the (aa) 2011-12, (bb) 2012-13 (cc) 2013-14 (dd) 2014-15 and (ee) 2015-16 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2016?

Reply:

Attached please find here: Reply
 

06 June 2016 - NW1519

Profile picture: Bergman, Mr D

Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether his department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether his department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(1) (a) (i), (ii) and (iii) and (b)

The Department of Police was not approached by any political party for any form of funding.

(1) (a) (i), (ii) and (iii) and (b)

The Department of Police did not provide any form of funding to any political party.

06 June 2016 - NW726

Profile picture: Dudley, Ms C

Dudley, Ms C to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1)Whether she is aware of the alleged irregular appointment of an unqualified educator in the position of principal at a certain school (name and details furnished) without the knowledge of the school governing body; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (2) whether she will investigate the matter; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

Since the matter is more relevant to the provincial administration, the question was forwarded to the relevant Province, the KwaZulu-Natal Education Department, for a response and to date no response has been received by the DBE.

There is no response from the KwaZulu-Natal Education Department as at 30 May 2016.

06 June 2016 - NW1380

Profile picture: Mackenzie, Mr C

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Telecommunication and Postal Services

(1)   With reference to his reply to question 983 on 21 April 2016, (a) what are the detailed reasons why the City of Johannesburg owes R25 968 523,32 to the SA Post Office for more than 120 days and (b) what steps are being taken to recover the specified outstanding amount; (2) Whether any interest is being charged on the specified outstanding amount; if not, why not; if so, what (a) amount of interest has been incurred on the specified outstanding amount to date and (b) are the further relevant details?

Reply:

SAPO has advised me as follows:

  1. (a-b) Although the amount of R25, 968, 523.32 is attributed to the City of Johannesburg technically, it is its Agency, JMPD that owes SAPO. The reason why JMDP owes SAPO for more than 120 days is due to the dispute over service level as a result of the prolonged and illegal strike that paralyzed operations.
  2. (a-b) Interest has been suppressed due to the dispute declared by JMPD.

 

06 June 2016 - NW1054

Profile picture: Boshoff, Ms SH

Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1)(a) How many (i) district and (ii) provincial officials of her department have been successfully trained in (aa) SA Sign Language, (bb) Autism, (cc) Braille, (dd) Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and (ee) Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum, (b) how many educators (i) have been trained in the specified fields and (ii) are applying their expertise for the benefit of learners with the specified disabilities and (c) what report is available in each province on the monitoring which is done through the National Strategy on Learner Attainment; (2) (a) what was the R5,7 billion which was allocated to special needs schools spent in each district and in each province; (3) was the whole amount of R5,7 billion spent; if not, why not; (4) which full service schools benefitted from the R400 million that was allocated to strengthen full service schools; (5) when does her department envisage the implementation of the safety and security programme at (a) special needs and (b) full service schools in each province?

Reply:

(1)(a)(b)(i) The number of officials and teachers trained in areas of specialisation (No disaggregation between provincial and district officials has been made available) is as indicated in the table below:

Province

(aa) SASL

(bb) Autism

(cc) Braille

(dd) ADHD

(ee) Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum

 

Officials

Teachers

Officials

Teachers

Officials

Teachers

Officials

Teachers

Officials

Teachers

EC

23

0

52

0

9

0

1

0

0

0

FS

0

46

0

40

0

27

0

0

0

0

GT

0

0

50

150

0

0

12

270

0

0

KZN

22

68

148

0

17

0

0

0

0

0

LP

0

83

0

0

0

37

0

0

0

0

MP

55

30

0

30

0

31

0

67

0

0

NC

14

0

0

0

38

0

0

0

0

0

NW

36

0

18

32 principals

20

0

0

0

0

0

WC

8

116

68

40

1

80

61

341 (&SLD)

0

0

TOTAL

198

181

336

252

85

68

74

337

0

0

Source: Reports obtained from Provincial Education Departments in April 2016

  1. (b)(ii) The 181 teachers trained in SASL and 68 in Braille are using their expertise in the implementation of the CAPS for SASL and teaching of visually impaired learners in the 22 schools respectively. No information is available on the application of teachers’ expertise in the other areas yet.

(1)(c) Monitoring reports from PEDs that are submitted through the National Strategy for Learner Attainment do not include Autism, ADHD and Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum.

(2) The provinces spent R5,658 billion (98.5%) of the adjusted budget of R5,743 billion allocated to Public Special Schools in 2014/15 as indicated in the table below. The expenditure is not disaggregated to district level:

Provincial Education Departments

         

Provinces

2014/15 Adjusted Budget

2014/15 Actual Expenditure

2014/15 Under / (over)-expenditure

   

Compensation of Employees

Goods and Services

Non-profit institution

House holds

Machinery and Equipment

Total Expenditure

 
 

R'000

R'000

R'000

R'000

R'000

R'000

R'000

R'000

Eastern Cape

538 698

438 247

9 188

64 186

2 974

10 572

525 167

13 531

Free State

383 611

329 910

20

51 570

1 301

 

382 801

810

Gauteng

1 838 788

1 477 478

14 239

298 391

7 938

198

1 798 244

40 544

KwaZulu-Natal

876 012

748 062

7 338

127 800

3 401

2 158

888 759

( 12 747)

Limpopo

379 607

327 908

948

47 654

3 304

 

379 814

( 207)

Mpumalanga

221 661

177 875

5 078

31 687

491

 

215 131

6 530

Northern Cape

93 937

84 584

332

8 036

4 698

 

97 650

( 3 713)

North West

365 632

313 687

4 766

76 633

1 533

926

397 545

( 31 913)

Western Cape

1 045 531

799 600

24 986

139 761

4 975

3 510

972 832

72 699

TOTAL

5 743 477

4 697 351

66 895

845 718

30 615

17 364

5 657 943

85 534

(3) The whole amount was not spent as there was under-expenditure mainly on OSD Conditional Grant due to delays in processing journals from Equitable Share to journals in respect of expenditure which had already been incurred in previous years for OSD for Therapists prior to the introduction of the Conditional Grant. The underspending on Goods and Services was due to cost containment measures on items such as travel and subsistence as well as catering.

(4) The table below provides information about which PEDs and of course full service schools that benefited from the R400 million that was allocated for strengthening of full service schools in 2014/15.

Province

Names of Full Service Schools that Benefited

EC

Not allocated part of R400m

FS

See Annexure A

GT

See Annexure A

KZ

Not allocated part of R400m

LP

Not allocated part of R400m

MP

See Annexure A

NC

Not allocated part of R400m

NW

See Annexure A

WC

See Annexure A

(5) The National School Safety Framework was approved by the Minister in April 2015, after which Provincial Master Trainers were trained in all nine provinces. School-based training workshops are currently being rolled out to all schools including special schools and full service schools, in provinces.  

06 June 2016 - NW1410

Profile picture: Motau, Mr SC

Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Sport and Recreation

Whether (a) his department and (b) all entities reporting to him are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

We are still gathering data and contacting entities for this information. the information is not readily available

06 June 2016 - NW1351

Profile picture: Lotriet, Prof  A

Lotriet, Prof A to ask the Minister of Communications

Whether any entities received funding from the Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) failed to comply with (a) grant funding conditions and/or (b) reporting time frames since the establishment of the MDDA in 2004; if so, what are the relevant details in each such case?

Reply:

(a) The general non-compliance issues dealt on a day to day by the Projects Team and as identified through monitoring ranges from

  • Valid Tax Clearance Certificate (common amongst the Non-Governmental Organisations that drive the Community Radio and Community Television Sectors), to
  • Late reporting due to change in leadership and other community dynamics that impact of the organisational work, and
  • Mismanagement of approved funds, through allocating funds to line items that are not in the grant funding agreement, without sourcing necessary approval from the Agency.

(b) Reporting timeframes on all MDDA funded projects since its establishment are linked to and guided by the tranches allocated to each project. Each project is expected to submit a report after spending occurs on each tranche allocated.

The following table provides details of project non-compliance since 2004.

Project Name

Additional Comments & Action

 

2004/05 Financial Year

Vukani Community Radio

Balance remaining on the contract due to under spending (balance to be written back)

Takalani Community Radio

Contract extended and 2nd tranche report is under review.

Eastern Cape Community Radio Hub (NCRF)

Balance remaining on the contract due to under spending (balance to be written back)

 

2005/06 Financial Year

Barberton CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting as a result of ongoing management changes (balance to be written back)

Newcastle CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting as a result of ongoing management changes (balance to be written back)

Thetha /Orange Farm FM

Contract expired due to lack of reporting (balance to be written back)

Mokopane CR

Balance remaining on the contract due to under spending (balance to be written back)

 

2006/07 Financial Year

Bushbuckridge CR

Contract expired. Savings from under spending. To be written back

Radio Sunny South

Contract expired due to lack of reporting as a result of ongoing management changes (balance to be written back)

Alex FM

Contract expired due to lack of reporting as a result of ongoing management changes (balance to be written back)

Alfred Nzo CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting as a result of ongoing management changes (balance to be written back)

Essentials of Newspaper Management (SPI)

To be written back

Exchange Program

To be written back

 

2007/08 Financial Year

Ekhephini CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting. To be written back

Maputaland CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting. To be written back

Tubatse CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting. To be written back

Kasie Fm/Kathorus CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting. To be written back

Makhado FM

Contract expired due to lack of reporting. To be written back

Botlokwa CR

Tax clearance issues resolved, contract extended and payment of remaining balance is in process.

Shine FM

Contract expired due to lack of reporting. To be written back

Zululand CR

Contract expired due to lack of reporting. To be written back

 

2008/09 Financial Year

Khanya College (Print)

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges.

Moletjie (Program Production)

Contract savings. To be written back.

Mohodi CR (Program Production)

Delays in reporting, contract renewed and implementation underway

Voice of Tembisa CR (Program Production)

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges. To be written back

Alfred Nzo (Program Production)

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges. To be written back

Cape Town TV, (CTV)

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges. Discussions underway to review TCC progress

Bay TV-KZN, (CTV)

Contract expired, project experienced reporting challenges. To be written back

Bush Radio

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges. To be written back

Franschoek CR

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges. To be written back

Graaf Reinet CR

Contract expired, project experienced reporting challenges. To be written back

Forte CR

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges. To be written back

Star FM

Contract expired, project experienced TCC compliance challenges. To be written back

Thabazimbi CR

Contract expired, project experienced reporting challenges. To be written back

Umgungundlovu CR Mentor

Contract expired, project experienced reporting challenges. To be written back

   

2009/10 Financial Year

Behind the Mask (Print)

Delayed reporting due to compliance challenges. The project has been written back.

Cape Flats/Maraly Honikman – Mentor (Print)

The project was written back.

Bushbuckridge CR, (Program Production)

Contract savings. To be written back

ABC Ulwazi, (Program Production)

ABC Ulwazi went into liquidation. Discussions currently underway with the liquidators to finalise the matter.

Zibonele CR (Program Production)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

TUT (Program Production)

Tax clearance issues resolved and contract has expired. Contract extension underway.

Moletjie CR (Program Production)

Contract savings. To be written back

Eden FM

Delayed reporting due to compliance .To be submitted for write back

Radio Gamkaland

Delayed reporting due to compliance .To be submitted for write back

Radio Unique

Delayed reporting due to compliance .To be submitted for write back

Lukhanji FM

Delayed reporting due to compliance .To be submitted for write back

   

2010/11 Financial Year

Proudly Manenberg (Print)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

Satyagraha (Print)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

Zenzele Community Media (Print)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

AIDC/Amandla Publishes (Print)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

Takalani CR (Program Production)

Tax clearance issues resolved, contract extended and 2nd tranche report is underway.

Radio Turf (Program Production)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

Zebediela FM (Program Production)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

Move To Music (Program Production)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back

Rhodes Music Radio (Program Production)

Delayed reporting due to compliance to be submitted for write back.

Vukani CR

Contract savings. To be submitted for write back

Cosatu Archives

Delayed reporting due to changes in the project team. To be submitted for write back

   

2012/13 Financial Year

Mmegadikgang

Compliance issues, remaining amount to be written back

Botlokwa CR

Tax clearance issues resolved and contract drafting underway

Project Number is incorrect – this is a new programme production project

Star FM

Tax clearance issues un-resolved. Project Number is incorrect – this is a new programme production project

 

2013/14 Financial Year

Greater Alex today (Print)

Contract has expired.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

06 June 2016 - NW1501

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1)Whether her department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether her department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(1)(a)(i)-(iii) No, the Department of Basic Education was never approached by any Political Party for any form of funding in the 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years.

(1)(b) No, the Department of Basic Education has not been approached by any Political Party for any form of funding since 1 April 2016.

(2)(a)(i)-(iii) No, the Department of Basic Education never provided any Political Party with any form of funding in the 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years.

(2)(b) No, the Department of Basic Education has not provided any Political Party with any form of funding since 1 April 2016 and has no position in this regard.

06 June 2016 - NW219

Profile picture: Matiase, Mr NS

Matiase, Mr NS to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

Has her department awarded any contracts to companies indirectly or directly owned by certain persons (names furnished) in the (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 and (c) 2014-15 financial years; if so, in each specified financial year, (i) how many times were such contracts awarded and (ii) for what amount?

Reply:

NO

06 June 2016 - NW1527

Profile picture: Cardo, Dr MJ

Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Sport and Recreation

(1)Whether his department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether his department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

We are still going through our records to verify the information our archives.

06 June 2016 - NW1167

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Social Development

Whether any (a) strategies and/or (b) plans have been developed by her department in collaboration with the SA Social Security Agency to take over the distribution of social grants once the contract with Net1’s subsidiary Cash Paymaster Services ends in 2017; if not, (i) why not and (ii) by what date will such (aa) strategies and/or (bb) plans be developed; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(a) and (b) Following the decision not to award to re-advertised tender in October 2015, SASSA immediately started working on developing a plan to ensure that it is ready to take over the responsibility for the management of social grant payments as from April 2017, when the current contract with Cash Paymaster Services expires.

The plans developed take into account the recommendations made by the Ministerial Committee appointed to investigate options for social grant payments which were contained in the report released in December 2014. In addition, CSIR has been working with SASSA since February 2014 to assist with the development of specific work packages related to taking over the responsibility for biometric enrolment.

The plan developed contains details of all actions required to meet the deadline, with responsibilities and target dates indicated. The implementation of the plan developed is currently underway.

(i) Not applicable

(ii) Not applicable

06 June 2016 - NW1412

Profile picture: Motau, Mr SC

Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Whether (a) his department and (b) all entities reporting to him are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

I have been advised by the Department as follows:

  1. (i) Not yet

(ii) Not yet.

  • At a programme level, the Department has, for the 2016/17 financial year, prioritized the development of an ICT SMME Strategy in line with ICT B-BBEE Sector Code. The strategy would identify programmes to support and accelerate the development of ICT SMMEs across the ICT value chain.

The Department is also finalising a Traversal Agreement with the Department of Small Business Development, intended to ensure that ICT SMMEs and Cooperatives benefit from support programmes provided by portfolio organisations under the DSBD umbrella.

  • At Supply Chain Management level, the Department ensures that all tenders include the 30% Set Aside for SMMEs, Co-Operatives, Township and Rural Enterprises as prescribed by Treasury.

REPLY: SOCs

I have been informed by the entities as follows:

b) (i) Yes for Sentech, SAPO, BBI, SITA, Nemisa and .zaDNA.

No for USAASA. It has ICT programmes as per its mandate in the ECA. To this end, USAASA has subsidized the construction and extension of electronic communications through small operators such as MENG (28 million subsidy) and Galela (30 million subsidy). Whilst these are small licensed operators compared to the likes of Vodacom, MTN and CellC, however they fall outside the definition of SMME.

(ii) Sentech – No, no programmes for Cooperatives for this financial year. Sentech will be exploring support for Women Cooperatives as a new development programmes for the next financial year.

 

SAPO – Yes. SAPO is running a Supplier and Enterprise Development Programme. The beneficiaries are Emerging Micro Enterprises, Black women owned, Youth owned, Rural women and Disabled people owned enterprises. Products and services that are used to anchor Enterprise development are postal services related. These include postal bags, speed services bags, owner driver vehicles, envelopes etc. R 34.9 million was spent on SMME’s in the past year and R76.1 million was spent on Black women owned enterprises. The Enterprise development budget is R120 million for the 2016/17 financial year and the projection is to create fifty (50) new jobs for each of the beneficiary categories.

BBI No. This is because co-operatives had not responded to the public roadshows and forums conducted by BBI as many of them are not participating in the Telecoms Infrastructure sector. Co-operatives also did not respond to tenders issued by BBI.

SITA – No. SITA does not have a specific classification for co-operatives in its development programmes.

NEMISA No. NEMISA does not have development programmes for cooperatives as they were not the targeted group

.zaDNA - No, .zaDNA does not have development programmes for cooperatives, because it was not budgeted for 2016/17 financial year.

USAASA – No, USAASA runs programmes pertaining to ICASA licensed operators as required by the ECA. Cooperatives are not a feature in the ICT industry.

aa) The relevant details per SOC are as follows:

Entity:

Response:

Sentech

Supplier Development (Institutional support & capacity to create more jobs), Enterprise Development (Support growth and expansion of existing SMMEs), SMME start up development (Business Support & Mentoring for potential entrepreneurs), Cooperatives Development (support new women cooperatives in ICT) and Grant (Small Medium Enterprises Support);

SAPO

Products and services that are used to anchor enterprise development are postal service related. Chief amongst these are red letter trays, postal bags, speed services bags, twine, owner driver vehicles and envelopes.

BBI

Conducted Supplier Forums focusing on Basadi (Black Women) and Youth in various provinces. The objective of these forums was to encourage Basadi and Youth participation in the mainstream telecommunication industry and facilitation of transfer of technical skills and the development of black women and youth. The specific initiatives was information sharing on the telecommunication industry, providing information on BBI business and opportunities available, training on business and technical skills, fostering partnerships with Basadi, Youth and large businesses, encouraging Basadi and Youth suppliers to become contributors to BBBEE by improving their own contribution levels and thereby improving BBI procurement status, providing the environment and opportunities to increase the rand value of procurement-spend towards BBBEE and increase the number of BBBEE enterprises participating in BBI’s Basadi and Youth owned companies.

SITA

Is in a process of concluding an agreement with two Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to assist in the development of SMME in specific technologies. Furthermore, SITA is in a process of appointing an economic transformation execution partner to accelerate the implementation of SMME development and other identified programmes.

NEMISA

E-Literacy for Entrepreneurs, Mobile Tech Supporting Micro Business, e-Skills Course for Entrepreneurs and using Social Media for Entrepreneurs.

.zaDNA

The Registrar Reseller Programme is aimed at the historically disadvantaged people who are interested in the domain name registry business. The programme will train the individuals and give them a chance to become Registrars.

USAASA

Not applicable.

bb) Sentech - Supplier Development (R1.2m), Enterprise Development (R200 000), SMME start up development (R170 000), Cooperatives Development (R200 000) and Grant (R2.8m);

SAPO – R120m;

BBI – R20 000;

SITA – R3m;

NEMISA – e-Literacy for Entrepreneurs (R17500), Mobile Tech Supporting Micro Business (R150 000), e-Skills Course for Entrepreneurs and using Social Media for Entrepreneurs (R71 5000);

.zaDNA – R350 000;

USAASA – not applicable.

 

cc) Sentech – 36;

SAPO – 50

BBI – 20

SITA – 50

NEMISA – already in business

.zaDNA – 20

USAASA – not applicable.

06 June 2016 - NW1052

Profile picture: Boshoff, Ms SH

Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1)For each district in each province, (a) what amount was provided for the (i) procurement of assistive devices, (ii) training of professional staff, (iii) provision of transport and (iv) purchase of learner/teacher support material for (aa) schools for learners with special educational needs and (bb) full-service schools, (b) which schools have been reconfigured into full-service schools, (c) what was the cost of the reconfiguration in each case, (d) how far are the specified schools from completion and (e) what is the nature of the resources provided to the specified schools; (2) (a) in which district in each province is each of the 137 full-service schools that have been physically upgraded for accessibility situated, (b) what was the cost of the specified upgrades and (c) when does her department envisage the completion of the outstanding 654 schools?

Reply:

(1) (a) (aa) Provincial budgets for (i) procurement of assistive devices, (ii) training of professional staff, (iii) provision of transport and (iv) purchase of LTSM to Special Needs Education Schools were as follows:

Province

Districts

(i) Assistive devices

(ii) Training of professional staff

(iii) Transport

(iv) LTSM

(e) Nature of resources

EC

District disaggregation not made available

R5,6 million

R483,000

R5,3 million

R5,586 million

30 Lap Tops, Learner Profiler, Clicker 7 & Text Help Read and Write, Tobii S32 Scan and Touch

FS

Motheo, Lejweleputswa

Thabo Mofutsanyane

Nil

Amount not provided for training of 67 officials

R5,2 million

R134 631

Grade R – 3 SASL CAPS kits

GT

All 15 districts

Not specified

R14 million

R12 375 million

50% ring fenced

Specialised LTSM

Specialised HR

Teacher training

KZN

All 12 districts

Procured from budget allocation to schools

 

Application made for 15 buses – amount not specified

R2 million

R2 million

Grade R – 3 SASL CAPS kits

Braille

LP

All 5 districts

Amount within norms and standards funding not specified

None

Amount within norms and standards funding not specified

Not specified

Not specified

MP

Bohlabela

Ehlanzeni

Gert Sibande

Nkangala

R900 000

R1,2 m

R2,1 m

R2,1 m

R450 000

R450 000

R700 000

R700 000

All 18 schools participate in scholar transport programme

R1,8 m

5 Adapted buses procured

ICT connectivity installation ramps and rails and additional physical resources like laboratories, libraries and sporting facilities.

NC

Three districts

R4993 per learners

Not specified

Not specified

R2,365 million

Grade R – 3 SASL CAPS kits

Hearing Aids

LCD Projectors Interactive whiteboards

Tablets

Laptops

NW

All 4 districts

R8,4 million

R2,44 million

R9 million

R1,9 million

Grade R – 3 SASL CAPS kits

Braille textbooks

WC

5 districts

R300 000 per district

R14 000 per district

R52,033 million

R63,5 million

Assistive devices for the assistive devices loan centre based at a special school resource centre in each district

Source: Information provided by provinces in April 2016

(1)(a) (bb) Provincial budgets for (i) procurement of assistive devices, (ii) training of professional staff, (iii) provision of transport and (iv) purchase of LTSM to Full-Service Schools

Province

Districts

(i) Assistive devices

(ii) Training of professional staff

(iii) Transport

(iv) LTSM

(e) Nature of Resources

EC

District disaggregation not made available

R6,3 million

Amount not made available

Amount not made available

R45,000

 

FS

none

nil

nil

nil

Nil

n/a

GT

All 15 districts

R6,95 million

Included in R14 million above

Not specified

Not specified

Specialised LTSM

Specialised HR

Teacher training

KZN

12 Districts

Budgets for 2016/17 not specified

Budgets for 2016/17 not specified

Budgets for 2016/17 not specified

Budgets for 2016/17 not specified

Counsellors and Learning Support Educators

Furniture and relevant equipment

LP

None

Nil

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

MP

All 4 districts

Not specified

See training budgets above

Not specified

No separate allocation – supplied as all ordinary schools

ICT connectivity installation ramps and rails and additional physical resources like laboratories, libraries and sporting facilities.

NC

Frances Baard

John Taolo Gaetsewe

ZF Mhcawu

Pixley-Ka-Seme

Namaqua

R400 000 above which is available on demand

Not specified – covered by district line budgets

R225280

R7414

R153058

R114420

R156793

No separate allocation – supplied as all ordinary schools

Supplied according to individual needs

NW

All 4 districts

R20 million – including infrastructure

Not specified

R2,1 million

Vehicles for therapists

No separate allocation – supplied as all ordinary schools

1 Councelling room, accesible toilets, store and strong room, ramps and paving around the building and assistive devices

WC

Cape Winelands (27)

Eden Karoo (27)

Metro Central (12)

Metro East (17)

Metro North (21)

Metro South (9)

Overberg (15)

West Coast (19)

R81 000

R81 000

R36 000

R51 000

R63 000

R27 000

R45 000

R57 000

(including LTSM and Transport)

Included in Assistive devices budget

R81 000

R81 000

R36 000

R51 000

R63 000

R27 000

R45 000

R57 000

Included in Assistive devices budget

Funding for a teaching assistant, specialised LTSM/training/ transport.

Source: Information provided by provinces in April 2016

(1)(b) Schools reconfigured as Full-Service Schools, (c) cost of reconfiguration, (d) how far from completion and (e) nature of resources:

Province

Districts

Schools reconfigured

c) Cost of reconfiguration

(d) How far from completion

EC

District disaggregation not made available

3 of 30 schools

R6,3 million

To be completed in 2016/17

FS

none

none

nil

n/a

GT

All 15 districts

* Complete list of districts and schools provided in Annexure A

19 compliant

56 in preparation

38 receiving support for LSEN

R90 000

 

KZN

12 districts

101

R2 million

95% to be completed in 2016

LP

Greater Sekhukhune

Vhembe

Mopani

Capricorn

Waterberg

Sibisi

Roossenekal

Phaphamani

Mokgalabje

Tshisahulu

Mutende

Shilume

Marumofase

Nwaxindzhele

Mariveni

Eureka

Mahlodumela

Harry Oppenheimer

St Brendan’s Secondary

Warmbaths

Albert Luthuli

Mmamakwa

Not specified

Budget and timeframes not specified

MP

All 4 districts

20 out of 140

R3,6 m

Assessment will be done in 2016/17 to develop plan for completion of remaining 120 schools

NC

Frances Baard:

ZF Mgcawu:

Pixley Ka Seme:

JT Gaetsewe:

Sol Plaatje, Harstwater

Blaauwskop, Sternham

Alpha, Lowryville

Isagontle, Deben

Not specified

No infrastructure upgrading

Ramps will be provided at two newly identified schools

NW

All 4 districts

4 schools per district (16)

R20 million

09 Full service schools projects to be completed in 2016/17 –budget is R11, 538, 000.00. Number 15 FSS to be completed in 2017/18 budget of R41, 159,000. (kindly note that infra- structure developments are multi- year projects)

WC

All 8 districts

40 schools

Infrastructure reconfiguration only on request

In 9 schools: Ramps constructed

Toilet modifications

Lift provided in Outeniqua High

Source: Information provided by provinces in April 2016

(2) Full-Service Schools that have been physically upgraded

Province

(a) Districts

Schools that have been upgraded

c) Costs of specified upgrades

Future Plans for upgrading

EC

Lusikisiki

Port Elizabeth

East London

3 (+1) completed in 2009)

R28 million

22 have been assessed for minor adjustments from 2016/17 – 2017/18

FS

Fezile Dabi, Lejweleputswa, Motheo, Thabo Mofutsanyana and Xhariep

6

Amount not provided

Information not available at this stage

GT

All 15 districts

74:

Cohort 1: 19 completed

Cohort 2: 56 capacity building and staffing

Cohort 3: 38

Cohort 1: R10 million

Cohort 2: R90000 per school

Cohort 3: Learning Support Educator in 9 schools

Processes in place with Facility Management and DID to ensure FSS receive needed infrastructural upgrades over the next 3 years.

KZN

12 Districts

26

R2 million

Completion of all schools by end of 2016

LP

Greater Sekhukhune

Vhembe

Mopani

Mokgalabje

Tshisahulu

Mariveni

Not specified

Assessment will be done in 2016/17 to develop costed roll-out plan

MP

All districts

20

Not specified

Assessment will be done in 2016/17 to develop costed roll-out plan

NC

ZF Mgcawu

Pixley Ka Seme

Sternham Primary

Alpha Primary

Not specified: Infrastructure Conditional Grant

Building of ramps and access features will commence according to Physical Planning Priority Plans

NW

All districts

20

Not specified

9 Schools in 2016/17 for R11,5 million

15 Schools in 2017/18 for R41,1 million

WC

Cape Winelands

Eden Karoo

Metro Central

Metro East

Metro North

Metro South

Wellington Primary

Outeniqua High

JD Crawford

Ned Doman

Pinelands North

Soyisile

Parow Prep

Sun Valley

Cascade

Not specified

Schools receive accessibility upgrades when other infrastructural work is done at the school. No specific budget has been allocated.

Source: Information provided by provinces in April 2016

ANNEXURE A

LIST OF FULL-SERVICE SCHOOLS IN GAUTENG

19 FULL SERVICE SCHOOLS - AUDITED AND COMPLYING WITH CRITERIA

Ekhuruleni North

LAERSKOOL KEMPTON PARK

Ekhuruleni South

EDENPARK PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ekhuruleni South

NTUTHUKO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng East

MICHAEL ZULU PRIMARY SCHOOL

Sedibeng East

LAERSKOOL JAPIE GREYLING

Sedibeng East

RATANDA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Sedibeng West

MOGOGODI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg Central

LAKEVIEW PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg East

M.C. WEILER PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg North

DIEPSLOOT COMBINED SCHOOL

Johannesburg South

ORANGE FARM PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg West

DISCOVERY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng West

TSAKANI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane North

BAXOXELE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane South

WALTER SISULU PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane South

NELLMAPIUS PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane West

LAERSKOOL BOOYSENS

Tshwane West

BACHANA MOKWENA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng North

BAWEZE PRIMARY SCHOOL

COHORT 2 and 3: SCHOOLS THAT HAVE BEEN CAPACITATED BUT NOT YET PHYSICALLY UPGRADED

Ekhuruleni North

ISIZIBA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ekhuruleni North

MASHEMONG PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ekhuruleni North

ISAAC MAKAU PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ekhuruleni North

SIPHETHU PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ekhuruleni South

DROMMEDARIS PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ekhuruleni South

ABINALA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ekhuruleni South

UMZAMO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng East

THOPODI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng East

NIGEL SECONDARY SCHOOL

Gauteng East

NTOKOZWENI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng East

DUDUZA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Sedibeng East

SITHOKOMELE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Sedibeng East

TSOELOPELE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Sedibeng West

DR NHLAPO INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

Sedibeng West

IMFUNDO MIDDLE SCHOOL

Sedibeng West

EMFULENI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Sedibeng West

EMANZINI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg Central

EBUHLENI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg Central

ENTANDWENI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg Central

ELDOCREST PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg Central

MVELEDZANDIVHO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg East

P.S. TSOSANE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg East

BONWELONG PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg East

EKUKHANYISWENI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg East

DRAKE KOKA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg North

WINNIE-NGWEKAZI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg North

COSMO CITY WEST PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg North

AB XUMA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg North

BOSMONT PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg North

WITKOPPEN PRIMARY

Johannesburg North

REKGUTLILE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg South

MADIBA PRIMARY

Johannesburg South

MID-ENNERDALE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg South

LEHAE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg West

MAYIBUYE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg West

TUMELO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg West

BRAAMFISCHERVILLE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Johannesburg West

SENYAMO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng West

MOHLAKANO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng West

ISIQALO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng West

KAMOHELO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng West

REAKGONA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane North

MOTJIBOSANE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane North

MAROKOLONG PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane North

LEFOFA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane North

PULAMADIBOGO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane South

JAKARANDA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane South

EMASANGWENE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane South

SEAPARANKWE PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane West

BOTSALO PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane West

EMA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Tshwane West

LESEDI POTLANA PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng North

SEDIBENG PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng North

VEZULWAZI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng North

ZIVUSENI PRIMARY SCHOOL

Gauteng North

MKHAMBI

SCHOOLS IDENTIFIED TO BE CONVERTED TO FULL SERVICE SCHOOL IN 2016

Ekhuruleni North

Emangweni Primary

Ekhuruleni North

Primrose Primary

Ekhuruleni North

Laerskool Verkenner

Ekhuruleni North

Klopperpark Primary

Ekhuruleni North

Laerskool Putfontein

Ekhuruleni North

Laerskool Bredell

Ekhuruleni South

Laerskool Van Dyk

Ekhuruleni South

Laerskool Elspark

Ekhuruleni South

Laerskool Goudrand

Gauteng East

Katlego Primary

Gauteng East

Laerskool Die Arend

Gauteng East

Laerskool Pam Brink

Gauteng North

Kutumela Molefi Primary

Gauteng North

Rethabile Primary

Gauteng North

Ematsheni Primary

Gauteng North

Onverwacht

Gauteng North

Laerskool Du Preez Van Wyk

Gauteng West

Kamogelo Primary

Gauteng West

Mashudu Primary

Gauteng West

Mphe- Thuto Primary

Gauteng West

Magaliesburg Secondary

Johannesburg Central

Pentarosa Primary

Johannesburg Central

Lumelang Primary

Johannesburg North

Blair Atholl

Johannesburg North

Masakhane

Johannesburg North

Ikaneng

Johannesburg North

Dumezweni

Johannesburg North

Laerskool Claremont

Johannesburg South

Lawley Primary

Johannesburg South

Mfundo Mtoti Primary

Johannesburg West

Princess Primary

Sedibeng East

Sicelo Primary

Sedibeng East

Laerskool Drie Riviere

Sedibeng West

Mnqiniswa Primary

Sedibeng West

Polokong Primary

Sedibeng West

Phehello Primary

Sedibeng West

Mthombolwazi Pr

Sedibeng West

Zitha Primary

Sedibeng West

Letsima Ilima

Sedibeng West

Sivuse Primary

Tshwane North

Laerskool Nellie Swart

Tshwane North

Doornpoort Primary

Tshwane North

Laerskool Nellie Swart

Tshwane South

Pretoria Primary

Tshwane South

Valhalla Primary

Tshwane South

Laudium Heights

Tshwane South

Phuthaditshaba Primary

Tshwane South

Laerskool Fleur

Tshwane West

Lotus Gardens Primary