Questions and Replies

Reply:

(a) Yes, the recommendations by the Public Protector were implemented.

(b) The complainant was re-enlisted in the South African Police Service on 1 June 2016. The services of an independent assessor have been secured to make a determination on compensation which was set down for 22 November 2016. A written apology on behalf of the South African Police Service was also provided to the complainant. The office of the Public Protector was informed of progress in this regard.

Reply:

(1) As you might have heard Honourable Member, I have asked the Health Ombudsperson to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter. However, as immediate steps to avoid further deaths, I sent teams out visit the NGOs where deaths have occurred, and even others that were new, to assess the safety of the patients that are still alive, in order to take appropriate steps to ensure their safety.

(2) I am currently awaiting the outcome of the investigation by the Health Ombudsperson in order to determine what further interventions are required and should be taken regarding this matter.

END.

Reply:

(1)(a) The Ermelo Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently receiving 12-16 Ml/day and is designed to handle 10 Ml/day. Overall, the infrastructure of the plant is in a bad condition and this has compromised the sewage treatment process to the extent that substandard effluent is being discharged.

(b) The Green Drop System, which the Department utilizes to monitor compliance levels of wastewater treatment works in the country, shows that the level of compliance for the plant from 01 January 2016 to September 2016 is zero for micro, physical and chemical parameters specific for wastewater effluent.

(2) The effluent from the plant does not comply with the general standard. The Department had meetings with the municipality, inspections were conducted and correspondence was also sent to the municipality. Due to the lack of response from the municipality, a task team (comprising DWS, the Departments of Human Settlements, Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Economic Development, Environment and Tourism as well as the District and Local Municipalities) was then established to address the concerns related to the plant. See Tables 1 and 2 below:

Table 1: Correspondence with the Municipality prior to establishment of the task team

DWS Action	Issues raised	Type of communication	Municipality response
Issued communication due to poor water quality discharging into the stream	sewage pollution water use authorisation application	Letter dated 23 November 2009	None
Site inspection conducted on 14 July 2010	sewage pollution	Section 19 letter dated 19 July 2010	None
Site inspection conducted on 11 Nov 2011	sewage pollution at Pet Dam	Meeting held with the municipality immediately after the inspection	The problem was resolved same day
Site inspection conducted on 14 June 2012	sewage spillages and poor effluent quality reporting of pollution incidents incomplete discharge charges forms water use authorisation application Poor attendance of stakeholder forum meetings	Meeting with municipality on 06 August 2012	Raised their challenges

Table 2: Correspondences with the Municipality after establishment of the task team

DWS Action	Issues raised	Type of communication	Municipality response
Issued communication based on the meeting held on 06 August 2012	sewage pollution establishment of the Task Team	Letter dated 14 August 2012	None
Follow up	reminder to respond	Letter dated 11 October 2012	Submitted insufficient action plan on 14 November 2012
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 26 September 2012 at Govan Mbeki Municipality	No feedback, the Municipality sent another person without information
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 14 November 2012 at Lekwa Municipality	Attended
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 06 February 2013 at Dr Pixley ka Seme Municipality	Did not attend
Issued a communication	Non-attendance of Task Team meeting	Letter dated 22 February 2013	None
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 12 June 2013 at Gert Sibande District Municipality	Did not attend
Issued a communication	Action plan	Letter dated 22 August 2013	None
Assessment of WWTW on 29 October 2013 and 13 March 2014	Non-compliance letter	Letter dated 24 March 2014	None

The Department allocated R 44 275 029 million to refurbish the Ermelo Waste Water Treatment Plant in Mpumalanga. The project commenced in November 2015 and is scheduled for completion in January 2017.

---00O00---

Reply:

(a) Total number of section 33(3) matters opened by IPID

Year	Reported cases
2012/13	127
2013/14	65
2014/15	60
2015/16	41
Total	293

Refer to annexure A for more details

(b) Total number that resulted guilty in convictions per year

Year	Departmental	Criminal
2012/13	3	0
2013/14	7	0
2014/15	11	0
2015/16	11	0
Total	32	0

Refer to annexure B for more details

(c) Total number of sanctions per year

Year	Verbal warning	Written Warning
2012/13	1	2
2013/14	2	5
2014/15	0	11
2015/16	3	8
Total	6	26

Refer to annexure B for more details

Annexure A: Intake

2012-2013
Province	Station	Case Number	Short Description	Circumstances	CAS No
Free State	Hoopstad	2012040213	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	05/03/2012
Mpumalanga	Kanyamazane	2012040333	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Botshabelo	2012050448	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Selosesha	2012060159	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	68/06/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Ekuvukeni	2012060191	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Inanda	2012060194	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Msinga	2012060196	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Mbazwana	2012060197	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Melmoth	2012060200	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Emanguzi	2012060201	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Pongola	2012060206	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Parkroad	2012060307	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	546/06/2012
Free State	Bultfontein	2012060310	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	37/06/2012
Gauteng	Soshanguve	2012060318	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	OB: 880/06/2012
Free State	Villiers	2012060322	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Villiers 31/06/2012
Free State	Bethlehem	2012060323	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Bethlehem 195/06/2012
Free State	Phuthadithjaba	2012060324	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Phutha's 148/06/2012
Free State	Luckhoff	2012060325	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	25/06/2012
Free State	Phuthadithjaba	2012060326	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Phutha's 149/06/2012
Free State	Harrismith	2012060328	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Harrismith 150/06/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Chatsworth	2012060334	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Chatsworth CAS: 396/06/2012
Free State	Kagisanong	2012060335	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	KAGISANONG CAS 176/06/2012
Free State	Welkom	2012060342	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	296/06/2012
Free State	Batho	2012060359	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Batho CAS 100/06/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012060454	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 131/06/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012060457	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 132/06/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012060459	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 133/06/2012
Free State	Soutpan	2012060472	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Soutpan CAS 15/06/2012
Mpumalanga	Masoyi	2012060482	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Vrede	2012060495	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Vrede 73/06/2012
Free State	Memel	2012060502	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Memel 39/06/2012
Eastern Cape	Whittlesea	2012060596	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	328/06/2012
Free State	Boithuso	2012060649	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	270/06/2012
Free State	Kroonstad	2012060650	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	206/06/2012
Western Cape	Mbekwani	2012070068	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	ElsiesRiver	2012070077	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	616/06/2012
Western Cape	Mfuleni	2012070101	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Kopanong	2012070171	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	44/07/2012
Free State	Bronville	2012070172	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	14/07/2012
Free State	Zastron	2012070175	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	48/07/2012
Free State	Kopanong	2012070176	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	45/07/2012
Free State	Edenburg	2012070177	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	11/07/2012
Free State	Kopanong	2012070178	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	40/07/2012
Free State	Bloemspruit	2012070179	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	99/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Storms River	2012070211	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	08/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Alexandria	2012070222	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	28/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Alexandria	2012070223	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	27/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Fort Beaufort	2012070225	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	41/07/2012
Limpopo	Nebo	2012070230	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	166/06/2012
Limpopo	Tubatse	2012070235	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	232/06/2012
Eastern Cape	Ngqeleni	2012070314	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	80/07/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012070397	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 51/07/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012070401	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 52/07/2012
Western Cape	Nyanga	2012070441	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	458/07/2012
Free State	Tweespruit	2012070450	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	17/06/2012
Western Cape	Paarl	2012070462	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Mbekweni CAS 141/07/2012
Western Cape	CapeTown	2012070547	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	1691/04/2012
Free State	Clocolan	2012070643	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	82/07/2012
Limpopo	Levubu	2012070667	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Gauteng	Katlehong	2012080101	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	425/07/2012
Free State	Namahadi	2012080194	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Namahadi 28/08/2012
Gauteng	Silverton	2012080260	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	179/08/2012
Free State	Heidedal	2012080293	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	95/08/2012
Mpumalanga	Kwaggafontein	2012080312	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	68/08/20012
Gauteng	Lenasia	2012080347	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	237/08/2012
Western Cape	George	2012080389	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	871/07/2012
Free State	Bethlehem	2012080435	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	14/08/2012
Western Cape	BeaufortWest	2012080550	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	341/08/2012
Mpumalanga	Acornhoek	2012080621	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Mpumalanga	Siyabuswa	2012080829	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	451/08/2012
Western Cape	Brackenfell	2012090154	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Northern Cape	Jan Kempdorp	2012090164	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	261/08/2012
Northern Cape	Jan Kempdorp	2012090229	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	262/019/2012
Limpopo	Mahwelereng	2012090244	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	94/09/2012
Mpumalanga	Belfast	2012090359	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Limpopo	Lebowakgomo	2012090553	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	282/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090572	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	57/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090576	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	46/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090577	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	59/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090578	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	60/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090579	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	55/09/2012
Mpumalanga	Barberton	2012090581	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	239/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090587	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	53/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090588	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	61/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090589	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	62/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090629	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	56/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090633	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	54/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090635	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	58/09/2012
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2012090638	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	67/09/2012
Northern Cape	Witdraai	2012090644	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	45/09/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Maphumulo	2012100014	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Maphumulo CAS 130/09/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Tongaat	2012100042	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tongaat CAS157/09/2012
Western Cape	Wynberg	2012100237	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Wynberg CAS 92/10/2012
Western Cape	Saldanha	2012100241	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Saldanha CAS 50/10/2012
Mpumalanga	Piet Ritief	2012100356	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Gauteng	Mamelodi West	2012100503	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	345/10/2012
Western Cape	Swellendam	2012100517	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Steenberg	2012100519	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Touwsrivier	2012100556	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Touwsrivier CAS 114/102/2012
Western Cape	Worcester	2012100558	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Worcester 343/10/2012
Western Cape	Kirstenhof	2012100562	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Kirstenhof 242/10/2012
Western Cape	PlettenbergBay	2012100610	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Mfuleni	2012100719	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	514/10/2012
Western Cape	Mfuleni	2012100722	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	517/10/2012
Western Cape	MitchellsPlain	2012100724	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	1586/10/2012
Limpopo	Mankweng	2012110012	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	282/10/2012
Mpumalanga	Kwamhlanga	2012110155	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	96/11/2012
Mpumalanga	Vosman	2012110180	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	109/11/2012
Western Cape	Riversdal	2012110196	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Gauteng	Muldersdrif	2012110527	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	137/11/2012
Gauteng	Midrand	2012110690	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	916/11/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Msinga	2012110693	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	101/11/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Ezibayeni	2012110713	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Ezibayeni Cas 34/11/2012
Gauteng	Sunnyside	2012110738	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Sunnyside Cas 947/11/2012
Free State	Bayswater	2012120034	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	13/12/2012
Eastern Cape	Middelburg	2012120049	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	329/11/2012
Eastern Cape	Dimbaza	2012120222	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	63/11/2012
Western Cape	Wynberg	2012120256	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	301/10/2012
Western Cape	Goodwood	2012120257	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	335/10/2012
Western Cape	Strand	2012120357	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	335/12/2012
Limpopo	Levubu	2013020015	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	158/01/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Mooi River	2013020272	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	31/02/2013
Eastern Cape	Ngangelizwe	2013020302	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Kwanokuthula	2013030495	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Plessislaer	2013030635	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Plessislaer
Eastern Cape	Flagsaff	2013010093	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Flagstaff CAS 04/01/2012
Eastern Cape	Tsolo	2013010629	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	93/01/2013

2013-2014
Province	PoliceStation	CaseNumber	IncidentCodeShortDesc	IncidentSubCodeShortDesc	CaseNumber
Gauteng	Moroka	2013040087	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	27/04/2013
Gauteng	Kempton Park	2013040326	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	414/042013
Gauteng	Protea Glen	2013040332	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Protea Glen Cas 257/04/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Empangeni	2013050053	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	488/04/2013
North West	Brits	2013050089	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	53/05/2013
Gauteng	Kagiso	2013050120	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	128/05/2013
Northern Cape	Kimberley	2013050177	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	404/04/2013
Western Cape	Piketberg	2013050307	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	140/05/2013
Northern Cape	De Aar	2013050313	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	66/12/2012
Northern Cape	De Aar	2013050326	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Northern Cape	De Aar	2013050337	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Northern Cape	DeAar	2013050339	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Eastern Cape	Balfour	2013060157	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	4/06/2013
Western Cape	Somerset-Wes	2013060198	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Strand CAS 224/06/2013
Eastern Cape	Port Alfred	2013060453	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Standerton	2013070143	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Graskop	2013070187	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	NULL	2013070251	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Barberton	2013070252	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Kwazulu Natal	Kwamakutha	2013070277	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	kwa-makthua
Free State	Ladybrand	2013070306	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	163/07/2013
Mpumalanga	Bethal	2013070373	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Eastern Cape	Humewood	2013070384	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	639/05/2013
Mpumalanga	Schoemansdal	2013080034	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	Kagiso	2013080064	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	96/08/2013
Gauteng	Bramley	2013080198	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	79/08/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Pietermaritzburg	2013080557	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Plessislaer 703/08/2013
Gauteng	Sunnyside	2013090002	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sunnyside Cas 1072/08/2013
Mpumalanga	Leslie	2013090163	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	18/01/2013
Northern Cape	Bathlaros	2013090257	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	26/09/2013
Gauteng	Diepsloot	2013090266	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	182/09/2013
Gauteng	Moroka	2013090304	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	37108/2013
Gauteng	Katlehong	2013090328	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2013090614	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	491/09/2013
Mpumalanga	Siyabuswa	2013100098	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Masoyi	2013100100	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	Akasia	2013100155	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Akasia Cas /10/2013
Free State	Harrismith	2013100173	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Kriel	2013100175	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	Mamelodi	2013100241	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Mamelodi Cas /10/2013
Eastern Cape	Mlungisi	2013100274	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Mlungisi Cas 66/10/2013
Mpumalanga	Vosman	2013100344	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Kwamhlanga	2013100450	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Free State	Parkweg	2013100462	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	1383/10/2013
Gauteng	Loate	2013100467	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	482/10/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Margate	2013100544	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	705/03/2007
Mpumalanga	Nelspruit	2013100549	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2013110021	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Lydenburg	2013110024	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Acornhoek	2013110281	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Eastern Cape	EastLondon	2013110503	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Kwazulu Natal	Highflats	2013120143	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Highflats cas 29/12/2013
Gauteng	Olivenhoutbosch	2013120145	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Northern Cape	Springbok	2013120448	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	150/12/2013
Mpumalanga	Tonga	2014010406	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Tonga
Mpumalanga	Secunda	2014010427	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Secunda
Mpumalanga	Skukuza	2014010585	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Bethal	2014010586	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	MamelodiEast	2014020229	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Mamelodi East Cas 000/02/2014
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014020256	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014020261	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Carolina	2014020309	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Kriel	2014020521	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Limpopo	Polokwane	2014020559	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	772/02/2014
Mpumalanga	Ogies	2014030396	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
2014-2015
Province	PoliceStation	CaseControlNumber	CaseNumber	Section	IncidentCode
Mpumalanga	Witbank	2014040119		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Dimbaza	2014040167		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Actonville	2014040229	07 /03/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Verulam	2014040256	192 /04/2013	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Vulindlela	2014040309	44 /04/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Ntabethemba	2014040313	18 /10/2013	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Elsburg	2014040416	188 /04/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Zastron	2014040453	218 /04/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Estcourt	2014050076	16 /05/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Bhekithemba	2014050168		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Mangaung	2014060092	87 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Heidedal	2014060093	22 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Hazyview	2014060110		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Roodepoort	2014060121	164 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Upington	2014060194	114 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060197	48 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060200	68 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060203	69 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060205	71 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060215	72 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Mondeor	2014060228	103 /06/ 201	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Tonga	2014060326		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Swartkops	2014070148	168 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Masoyi	2014070237		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014070240		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014070244		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Nelspruit	2014080150		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Nelspruit	2014080151		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Tsomo	2014080549		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Zwelitsha	2014090291		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Mthatha	2014090311	185 /9 /014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Keimoes	2014090440	129 /9 /2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Hartebeeskop	2014090449		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Tonga	2014090450		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Dalasile	2014100256		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Vrede	2014100464	0092/10/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Nqamakwe	2014100484		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	Kraaifontein	2014100582	1946/10/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Namahadi	2014110676	0117/11/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Maokeng	2014120041	293 /11/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Queenstown	2014120277	35 /12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Bushbuckridge	2014120300		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	KingWilliamsTown	2014120387		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	JaneFurse	2014120396	0148/11/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Burgersfort	2014120402	130 /12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Burgersfort	2014120419	131 /12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Bell	2015010155	13 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Grahamstown	2015010275	113 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Ngqamakwe	2015010324	95 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Nqamakwe	2015010341	94 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	JaneFurse	2015010497	109 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Hazyview	2015020076		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Dullstroom	2015020164		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Mdantsane	2015020389	197 /02/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Parkweg	2015030078	117 /03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Tweeling	2015030084	0014/03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Ficksburg	2015030296	172 /03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Balfour	2015030329		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Embalenhle	2015030342		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Kagisanong	2015030496	0439/03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
2015-2016
Province	PoliceStation	CaseControlNumber	CAS Number	Class	IncidentCode
Free State	HobHouse	2015040009	0032/03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Kagisanong	2015040119	530 /03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	Kwanokhuthula	2015040133	0777/12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Embalenhle	2015040162		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Wepener	2015050121	17 /05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Verkeerdevlei	2015050180	12 /5 /015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Edenville	2015050228	31 /05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Parkweg	2015050318	1065/05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Hibberdene	2015060029	0296/05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	Athlone	2015060076		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	TableView	2015060098		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2015060215		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Arlington	2015060375	0017/06/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Hluhluwe	2015070042	0006/07/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Acornhoek	2015070248		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Temba	2015080028	1074/07/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Kagisho	2015080277	94 /08/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Ekurhuleni Metro Police	2015080509	707 /08/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Douglasdale	2015080510	881 /08/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Makwane	2015090073	0006/09/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Dennilton	2015090111	0183/10/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Lindley	2015090458	0045/09/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Bethlehem	2015090471	409 /9 /015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Eshowe	2015090613	395 /09/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Lamontville	2015100199	15 /10/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Elliot	2015100218		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2015110339	42 /11/ 201	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2015110340	43 /11/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2015110359	44 /11/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Sakhile	2015120043		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Siyabuswa	2015120049		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Sakhile	2015120052		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Tzaneen	2015120390	0367/12/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	KingWilliamsTown	2016010065	06 /01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Maake	2016010254	0126/01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Alexandra	2016010272	360 /01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Bothaville	2016010299	0130/01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Viljoenskroon	2016020119	0008/02/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
North West	Mogwase	2016020444		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
North West	Bethanie	2016020445		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	CatoManor	2016020448		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29

Annexure B: Convictions

Details of disciplinary convictions 2012/13
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012060254 NC	Norvalspont	Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act	Written warning
2	2012090154 WC	Brackenfell	Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act	Verbal warning
3	2012100241 WC	Saldanha	Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act	Written warning

Details of disciplinary convictions 2013/14
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012070450 FS	Tweespruit	Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
2	2012060159 FS	Selosesha	Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
3	2012060310 FS	Bultfontein	Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
4	2012090581 MP	Barberton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
5	2012060505 MP	Nelspruit	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
6	2012040333 MP	Kanyamazane	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
7	2013020013 EC	Willowmore	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warnings

Details of disciplinary convictions 2014/15
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012060482 MP	Masoyi	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
2	2013070252 MP	Barberton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
3	2013100098 MP	Siyabuswa	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
4	2013090614 MP	Ermelo	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
5	2013070373 MP	Bethal	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
6	2014010586 MP	Bethal	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
7	2014040119 MP	Witbank	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
8	2014080151 MP	Mamethlake	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
9	2013070306 FS	Ladybrand	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
10	2012090553 LP	Lebowakgomo	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written Warning
11	2013080034 MP	Schoemansdal	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning

Details of disciplinary convictions 2015/16
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012070177 FS	Edenburg	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
2	2015040009 FS	Hobhouse	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
3	2015050180 FS	Verkeerdevlei	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
4	2015050228 FS	Edenville	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
5	2015060076 WC	Athlone	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
6	2015080277 NC	Kagisho	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written Warning
7	2015010497 LP	Jane Furse	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
8	2015090111 LP	Dennilton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
9	2014020256 MP	Ermelo	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written Warning
10	2015020076 MP	Hazyview	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
11	2014080150 MP	Barberton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning

Reply:

1. (a) (i) The total budget as per the Grant Allocation was as follows

FINANCIAL YEARS	MUNICIPAL GRANT	PROVINCIAL GRANT	MUNICIPAL DISASTER RECOVERY GRANT
2013/14	R346 500 000	R188 000 000	R11 300 000
2014/15	R363 600 000	R197 000 000	R8 600 000
2015/16	R374 000 000	R204 000 000	R124 000 000

(ii) Yes, no amounts were directly made available by the department since April 2016

(b) (i) Amount requested by each province in the specified financial years and (ii) paid outs.

Note: The amount stated in these tables reflects funding transferred from the Disaster Grants to affected sectors and municipalities. The post disaster recovery funds for sectors are facilitated by the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, directly transferred from National Treasury within the Contingency Reserve to relevant sectors.

PROVINCE	Type of disaster	2013/14
		Requested	Paid out
Easter Cape	Floods	R1 348 397 495	R111 350 000
Free State		0	0
Gauteng		0	0
KwaZulu-Natal	Floods	R309 265 636	R34 162 030
Limpopo	Floods	R737 035 841	R87 925 200
Mpumalanga		0	0
Northern Cape	Drought	R360 000 000	R50 000 000
North West	Drought	R3 000 804 000	R43 630 000
Western Cape	Floods	R266 589 672	R55 617 000

PROVINCE	Type of disaster	2014/15
		Requested	Paid out
Eastern Cape	Floods	R579 180 687	R 8 610 800
Free State	Fires	R50 000 000	R15 791 000
Gauteng	Floods	R701 200 770	R14 878 446
KwaZulu-Natal	Drought, Floods and Fires	R181 563 069	R89 083 000
Limpopo	Floods	R213 450 000	R14 884 000
Mpumalanga	Floods	R535 600 000	R97 170 000
Northern Cape		0	0
North West	Earth Quake	R163 500 131	R148 508 00
Western Cape	Floods	R1 074 746 408	R82 796 000

NB: It is important to note that national and provincial sector departments, including municipalities agreed to reprioritise internal funding that is anticipated and estimated savings within their equitable shares and conditional grants to address the drought situation to ensure non-duplication of financial resources. The Disaster Grants were to be utilised once provinces have fully spent the reprioritised funding. Again, the funding allocated for floods are the funds that were allocated in 2014/15, within the Medium Term Expenditure Framework to repair the damages as a result of the 2013 floods disasters.

PROVINCE		2015/16
		Requested	Paid out
Easter Cape	Drought	R385 732 991	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.
Free State	Drought	R102 442 000	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.
Gauteng	Floods for 2013	R35 588 184	R 35 588 184
KwaZulu-Natal	Floods for 2013/14	R87 096 000
	Drought	R487 884 098	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.
Limpopo	Floods for 2013/14	R20 836 000
	Drought	R51 000 000	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.
Mpumalanga	Floods for 2013/14	R30 000 000
	Drought	R162 500 000	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.
Northern Cape	Drought	R163 281 173 (per month)	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.
North West	Drought	R3 461 545 284	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.
Western Cape	Floods 2013/14	R86 919 000
	Drought	R105 000 000	No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above.

2. No outstanding amounts are to be paid out to the provinces.

Reply:

(a) No internal forensic reports

(b) External forensic reports – 2

(i) Pertaining to the Department of Science and Technology (aa) Forensic investigation into the Nkowankowa Demonstration Centre. (bb) Forensic investigation into various allegations regarding irregularities pertaining to the Nkowankowa Demonstration Centre, which was a Department of Science and Technology led community project. The period under investigation was from 01 December 2013 to 31August2015. (cc) The forensic investigation was concluded on 22 June 2016

Find here: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2309entity.pdf

 

 

 

 

Reply:

(a) The National Department of Transport has not conducted feasibility studies on Vuwani Airport in Limpopo.

(b) The Limpopo Department of Transport has conducted a pre-feasibility study for the Vuwani/P.R. Mphephu Airport during 2010. The study was part of the Limpopo Airlift Strategy, with the purpose of providing direction and guidance for the development of aviation in the province. Five generic strategies were identified in determining the status of each of the airports considered at the time, as follows:

1. Grounded: Nothing should be done as there is no, or very little potential, now or in the future, for aviation development.

2. Delayed: The development of aviation will only take place in the long term and is awaiting other matters to be put in place.

3. Boarding: There is some market potential, which should be left to the market to action and develop.

4. Take-off: There is good market potential which would be picked up by the market with minimum intervention.

5. Catapulted Take-off: There is market potential, but the development of aviation will only take place with significant intervention from government.

The Vuwani/P.R Mphephu Airport fell within the third category. The Limpopo Department of Transport decided to wait a few years so that further analysis could be done on the Vuwani/P.R Mphephu Airport as well as the other public airports within the province. Such analysis will consider developments that are taking place at, amongst others, Lephalale, Musina and its SEZ status, and the Tubatse area.

The Limpopo Department of Transport is currently collaborating with the Department of Public Enterprises in determining if some of these airports can be re-commissioned and the extent of improvements that are required to enable re-commissioning.  The Limpopo Aviation Technical Stream has been established and various meetings have already been held. The Province is currently developing the Terms of References for the viability assessment, which should be conducted no later than the 2017/2018 financial year. This will provide an indication if P.R. Mphephu Airport will be viable and the costs associated with its re-commissioning, should the indication be positive. Other options will be explored depending on the outcome of the viability study.

(b) (i) N/A

     (ii) The airport is an asset of the Limpopo Department of Public Works, Roads and Infrastructure, although the buildings are utilised by the Limpopo Department of Transport. The Limpopo Department of Transport has not allocated any maintenance budget pending the outcome of the viability study.

Reply:

The following response is based on the information received from Gauteng Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs:

1. Ms Ashley Rutherford was nominated as a councillor from July 2014 up until 31 May 2015 to fill a vacancy following the resignation of a councillor.

2. Not applicable, councillors are nominated from the applicable party list to be elected in the vacancy.

3. Not applicable, councillors are nominated from the applicable party list to be elected in the vacancy.

Reply:

(1)(a) The following information is captured by the Immigration Officer for persons entering the Republic:

- Flight / vessel / transport number

- Biographic details including surname, first names, date of birth, etc.

- Occupation

- Purpose of visit

- Visa details (whenever applicable)

(1)(b) The following information is captured by the Immigration Officer for persons leaving the Republic:

- Flight / vessel / transport number

- Biographic details including surname, first names, date of birth, etc.

- Visa details (if confirmation is required on departure)

(2) 2 777 931

Reply:

The response below was provided by the municipality:

(1) (a),(b) & (c) No criminal, civil or disciplinary charges have been laid against any person and/or organisation involved in the Siyenza Group toilets tender project in the Amathole District Municipality. The investigations by the Public Protector and the National Treasury are currently underway. The outcome of the investigations will determine if there are grounds for such actions.

(i) Not applicable

(ii) Not applicable

(2) No amounts have been recovered from the specified company and/or any of the specified persons and/or organisations involved in the Siyenza Group toilets tender project. The outcome of the investigations will determine if there are grounds for such actions.

(i) Not applicable

(ii) Not applicable

(3) (a) & (b) There is no rectification programme currently being undertaken by Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent (MISA). However, MISA in partnership with the Department of Water and Sanitation will be supporting the implementation of the programme by Amatola Water Board. The Amatola Water Board has been appointed by the Department of Water and Sanitation as an implementing agent for the completion of the project. Further, the Amatola Water Board has developed and costed the implementation plan for the completion of the project. The proposed commencement date of the project is January 2017.

Reply:

The DAC has been faced with requests to assist in situations where some of artists passed on. These requests normally come from bereaved families. However, it should be noted that, in the absence of formal policy in this regard, it became important to:

a)  Appreciate the historical fact that many South African artists experienced the worst isolation and marginalisation of their works during apartheid. Despite these challenges artists continued to share South African talent and culture with the world.

b) Most of these artists are currently in the late 60s and beyond. Therefore they can no longer do work as they reached their peak during very difficult moments of the country. A lot of the works remain legendary and continues to shape the arts and cultural landscape of the country.

In relation to the above, the DAC has responded to requests related to the passing on of various legends. The financial assistance is subject to the availability of funds. Amongst them are the following:

1.The late Mr Ben Nomoyi who was in the film industry  in the early 1970s. He was able to produce works that ensured entry into the Guinness book of records. An achievement that was never recognised for many years.

2. The late Pat Matshikiza who was a jazz artist was also assisted.

3. The late Mr David Masondo, one of the pioneers of Mbaqanga music which is unique to our country and resonated to broader society.

4. The late Mduduzi 'Mandoza' Tshabalala, one of the Kwaito stars that emerged on the eve of the democratic dispensation. His music connected with society at large and deepened the social cohesion at the much need time when the country was going through a very difficult transition. Therefore he remains symbols of social cohesion.

5. Ms Pinise Saul who died recently in London her family as well was assisted with the preparation of the funeral.

The artists were assisted to the tune of R95 000 individually. It’s only 'Mandoza’ who is the youngest amongst them but the DAC strongly considered the role of his music to unite the country.

Accordingly, the focus has been on the legends of our country and who are elderly. A process is underway to determine a comprehensive criterion because sustainability of such help is in doubt. The Ministry has setup a structure of legends, which focuses on preserving the works of these legends for generations to come. It is believed that this endeavour will find innovative ways of ensuring that some of these welfare concerns may be mitigated. Currently, many of our legends are involved in various programmes, especially the master classes to share their skills with the youth.

Reply:

1. Provincial heads of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) were appointed for the first time by the Minister of Police in accordance with section 17CA(6) of the South African Police Services Act 68 of 1995 (“SAPS Act”) in 2016. There are no former provincial heads that were appointed in terms of section 17CA(6) before the appointments were made in 2016.

2. The Minister of Finance, Mr P J Gordhan is a member of the Cabinet. It follows that the appointments and remuneration of the provincial heads of the DPCI were presented before the Cabinet for concurrence. Cabinet Memorandum, which included the remuneration scale of the provincial heads was distributed to all Cabinet Ministers and no objection was received from the Minister of Finance on the remuneration scales. The Cabinet (with the Minister of Finance included) concurred with the appointments and the remuneration scales of the provincial heads.

It must be noted that the South African Police Services Act 68 of 1995 (SAPS Act), as amended, does not prescribe how concurrence should be obtained and there is no provision in the Act that requires concurrence of the Minister of Finance to be writing in each case.

Reply:

(1)(a) The Ermelo Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently receiving 12-16 Ml/day and is designed to handle 10 Ml/day. Overall, the infrastructure of the plant is in a bad condition and this has compromised the sewage treatment process to the extent that substandard effluent is being discharged.

(b) The Green Drop System, which the Department utilizes to monitor compliance levels of wastewater treatment works in the country, shows that the level of compliance for the plant from 01 January 2016 to September 2016 is zero for micro, physical and chemical parameters specific for wastewater effluent.

(2) The effluent from the plant does not comply with the general standard. The Department had meetings with the municipality, inspections were conducted and correspondence was also sent to the municipality. Due to the lack of response from the municipality, a task team (comprising DWS, the Departments of Human Settlements, Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Economic Development, Environment and Tourism as well as the District and Local Municipalities) was then established to address the concerns related to the plant. See Tables 1 and 2 below:

Table 1: Correspondence with the Municipality prior to establishment of the task team

DWS Action	Issues raised	Type of communication	Municipality response
Issued communication due to poor water quality discharging into the stream	sewage pollution water use authorisation application	Letter dated 23 November 2009	None
Site inspection conducted on 14 July 2010	sewage pollution	Section 19 letter dated 19 July 2010	None
Site inspection conducted on 11 Nov 2011	sewage pollution at Pet Dam	Meeting held with the municipality immediately after the inspection	The problem was resolved same day
Site inspection conducted on 14 June 2012	sewage spillages and poor effluent quality reporting of pollution incidents incomplete discharge charges forms water use authorisation application Poor attendance of stakeholder forum meetings	Meeting with municipality on 06 August 2012	Raised their challenges

Table 2: Correspondences with the Municipality after establishment of the task team

DWS Action	Issues raised	Type of communication	Municipality response
Issued communication based on the meeting held on 06 August 2012	sewage pollution establishment of the Task Team	Letter dated 14 August 2012	None
Follow up	reminder to respond	Letter dated 11 October 2012	Submitted insufficient action plan on 14 November 2012
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 26 September 2012 at Govan Mbeki Municipality	No feedback, the Municipality sent another person without information
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 14 November 2012 at Lekwa Municipality	Attended
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 06 February 2013 at Dr Pixley ka Seme Municipality	Did not attend
Issued a communication	Non-attendance of Task Team meeting	Letter dated 22 February 2013	None
Task Team	Actions from minutes	Meeting on 12 June 2013 at Gert Sibande District Municipality	Did not attend
Issued a communication	Action plan	Letter dated 22 August 2013	None
Assessment of WWTW on 29 October 2013 and 13 March 2014	Non-compliance letter	Letter dated 24 March 2014	None

The Department allocated R 44 275 029 million to refurbish the Ermelo Waste Water Treatment Plant in Mpumalanga. The project commenced in November 2015 and is scheduled for completion in January 2017.

---00O00---

Reply:

1. The department of small business development was proclaimed in July 2014 and currently does not have this information. Since this is a critical sector of the economy the department has prioritized the development of an Integrated Strategy and Implementation Plan on Township and Rural Enterprise Development. Amongst other things this strategy will assist with the following:

• A detailed analysis of the existing strategies and frameworks on township and rural enterprise development
• A detailed analysis of the programmes that are being implemented by different government departments and agencies on township and rural enterprise development
• Design of most appropriate programmes or other support interventions to ensure the optimal development of small enteprises and co-operatives in townships and rural areas

The department is confident that this study which is going to be done in 2016/17 financial year in partnership with the departments that fall under the Economic Sectors, Employment and Infrastructure Development (ESEID) Cluster will address some of the questions that have been asked in this question.

2. 

(a) Noting that there are insufficient and nonstandardised measurements of what consists the totality of a township economy relative to a regional, provincial, national and global economies, it is not yet possible to rank the performance and responsiveness of townships’ economies.

(b) Consequently, save for a framework that defines the nature and structure of township economies as well as the data sources for measuring it, thus far, reliable methods by means of which the monetary value of the goods and services produced within townships have not been isolated and represented during any specific time.

Reply:

(1) (a) (b) (i) (ii) The workforce analysis for the Akasia Police Station is depicted in the link below:

https://pmg.org.za/files/RNW2548Table.docx

The following posts were identified as critical vacancies:

1 x Sub Section Commander: Human Resource Management (Salary level 8).

1 x Principal Personnel Officer (Salary level 7).

The proposed promotion posts were requested from the South African Police Service (SAPS) Head Office as critical funded posts in terms of the allocated posts to the province.

During the 2016/2017 financial year, the Gauteng Province received an allocation of

1 320 entry-level Police Act employees. This allocation was scientifically distributed and approved by the Provincial Commissioner, to all 142 stations within Gauteng, by utilising the following criteria:

• A gap analysis was conducted, taking into consideration all Visible Policing and Detective Service members on salary levels 1-7, comparing the actual allocation with the Fixed Establishment.
• The allocation of 1 320 entry level Police Act employees was distributed equally amongst all stations taking into consideration the shortages on levels 1-7 for Visible Policing and Detective members.
• After the distribution, all stations with shortages were staffed equally at 78,15% on levels 1-7 (Visible Policing and Detectives).

The Gauteng Province receives an entry-level allocation every financial year, but unfortunately this allocation does not meet the human resource demands of the various business units in the province. Cluster Commanders are therefore advised to ensure the equal distribution of Human Resources within the cluster, taking into consideration the fixed establishment.

The Gauteng Province is currently busy with a project in terms of which police stations with a surplus of members within the Visible Policing environment have been instructed to identify and redeploy members to their Detective Service environment, where there is a general shortage of personnel. Furthermore, Police Stations are also instructed to redeploy experienced Visible Policing members to the Detective Service environment when they receive their new entry-level allocation.

The management of the Akasia Police Station redeployed two members from Visible Policing to the Detective Service.

2. No, SAPS is not aware of the need for a new police station in Ward 4 of the specified metropolitan municipality. To date no request was received for the possible establishment of an additional service point in the Akasia policing area.

(3)(a)(b)(i)(ii) The Akasia Police Station is a leased facility. The need for an alternative police station was included in the Provincial User Asset Management Plan (UAMP) for the 2017/2018 financial year. The Divisional Commissioner: Supply Chain Management has been requested to source adequate alternative accommodation for a new police station.

Reply:

No, the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development has not been informed of instances where cases before children’s courts could not proceed due to the social worker’s failure to comply with Regulation 56 of Regulation R261 of 1 April 2010 of the Children’s Act, Act 38 of 2005, as amended. It will therefore be appreciated if the details of these cases could be released to the Department to investigate this matter within the parameters of the Department’s mandate.

The Department further notes that Department of Social Development might be in a better position to respond to this matter since the responsibility to place advertisements in a local newspaper circulating in the area where the abandoned and/or orphaned child was found resides with them.

Reply:

(a) My Department has spent R37 800 269.05 in 2015/2016 and R6 840 941.20 since 1 April 2016 to date on advertising. Below is the breakdown as per request

(i) African News Network 7 channel

Item	2015/2016	1 April to date
(aa) television channels	R0.00	R0.00
(bb) radio stations	R450 000.00	R0.00

(ii) SA Broadcasting Corporation

Item	2015/2016	1 April to date
(aa) television channels	R22 528 202	R2 508 000
(bb) radio stations	R14 727 256.68	R2 499 712.20

(iii) National commercial radio stations

Item	2015/2016	1 April to date
(aa) television	R0.00	R0.00
(bb) radio station	R0.00	R1833 229

(iv) Community

Item	2015/2016	1 April to date
(aa) television	R0.00	R0.00
(bb) radio station	R94 810.37	R0.00

(b) Refer to Annexure A.

Annexure A

Below is the breakdown for entities as per request:

(b) Entities	(i)	(ii)	(aa)	(bb)	(iii)	(iv)	(aa)	(bb)	(aaa)	(bbb)
Amatola Water	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Bloem Water	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Lepelle N Water	None	SABC Limpopo Combo	Thobela FM; Phalaphala FM and Munghanalonene	R160 717,21	Capricorn FM	R68 400,00	None	R68 400,00	None	R68 400,00
Magalies Water	None	R53 530.00	None	R53 530.00	None	R9 700.00	None	R9 700.00	R63 230 00	None
Mhlathuze Water	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Overberg Water	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Rand Water	None	R 5 221 600 SABC Total	R 4 818 400 SABC TV	R 403 200 SABC Radio	R 586 515 Commercial Radio	R 161 758 Community Total	None	R 161 758 Community Radio	R 5 785 613 for 2015-16	R 184 260 since Apr 2016
Sedibeng Water	None	None	None	None	None	None	None		1 July 2016 – 30 March 2016: R523 387.80	1 April 2016 – 31 August 2016:R218 078.30
Umgeni Water	None	None	None	None	None	R135 000 (Community radio stations in July 2016)	None	None	None	R135 000 (Community radio stations in July 2016)

---00O00---

Reply:

(a) A total number of 11 699 reservists have been trained since 2009.

(b) A total number of 10 204 police reservists have been employed in permanent positions in the South African Police Service since 2009.

Reply:

(1) (a)(b)(i) No contracts and/or agreements were signed between the Department of Correctional Services and Khulisa Social Solutions at National level since the approval of the Quality Assurance Manual in 2005. Prior to the establishment of the Quality Assurance Committees as per Quality Assurance Manual, there were no formal or prescribed and or standardized methods of quality assuring service providers.

(ii) Khulisa Social Solutions has agreements with Gauteng and Western Cape regions from 2005, and they operate without an agreement at Kwazulu Natal region. The service provider has submitted applications to be quality assured at national level on the 10th of October 2016 in order to confirm if operational agreements were signed with specific management areas. The application will only be processed and considered on the 1st of December 2016 when the committee meets, as it meets quarterly.

(aa)(bb)(cc)(dd) The following table addresses questions asked:

(aa) on what date was each contract and/or agreement signed	(bb) what are the full details of the specified services that the specified organisation was expected to render in each case	(cc) where did the organisation render the services in each case	(dd) what is the total cost of each of the specified contracts and/or agreements
Gauteng Region
May - July 2005	HIV AIDS Peer Educators Training (74 offenders)	Leeuwkop Management Area	Nil
July-December 2005	Substance Abuse	Leeuwkop Management Area	Nil
September 2008	Silence the Violence Programme, HIV AIDS & Substance Abuse	Krugersdorp, Leeuwkop and Zonderwater Management Area	Nil
June-September 2014	Restorative Justice Processes Training to Psychologists, Social Workers and Spiritual Care Personnel	Boksburg M/Area	Nil
Western Cape Region
April 2009 – December 2009	Roll-out of Peer Education Support Groups, Monthly Monitoring of Peer Education Support Group, Staff training and orientation (administrative side)	Worcester Male Centre Worcester Female Centre Robertson Correctional Centre Dwarsriver Correctional Centre	Nil
Kwazulu Natal Region
No contract or agreement was signed with Khulisa. However the organization rendered programmes from 2008 to 2009	Peer education programme: My path personal development programme Drug smart peer education programme HIV/AIDS peer education programme	Durban Female Centre	Nil
No contract or agreement signed. However the organisation rendered programmes in 2009	Organization rendered programmes to Parolees and offenders which were: Sexual Offenders Programmes Problem- Solving problem Finding the employment programme	Empangeni Community Corrections Qalakabusha Correctional Centre	Nil
No contract or Agreement signed. However the organisation rendered programmes in 2008	Programmes rendered to offenders and Remand Detainees: Making Amend-Restorative Justice Programme Cycle of Crime Cross Roads	Ladysmith Correctional Centre (offenders) Bergville Correctional Centre (offenders) Dundee Correctional Centre (Remand Detainees)	Nil
No contract or Agreement signed. However the organisation rendered programmes from 2005 to 2007 The Waterval Management Area has recently entered into an agreement with Khulisa from September 2016 to September 2017	Peer education programme: My path personal development programme Drug smart peer education programme HIV/AIDS Peer education programme	Waterval Medium A Newcastle Community Corrections	Nil

Reply:

(1) The South African Police Service (SAPS) is aware of the existence of the Malabar Patrols and their activities.

(2) No complaints have been received.

(3) No. The SAPS Crime Intelligence, Eastern Cape is aware of the activities of Malabar Patrols. The activities of the aforementioned group are being monitored to enable a rapid response by appropriate units should any incidents of intimidation be detected.

Reply:

The case docket, Woodstock CAS 482/06/2016 (Theft), has not been handed over to the Malawian authorities for investigation. The alleged crime was committed between 8 June 2016 and 19 June 2016 at 29 Low Street, Observatory, Cape Town and not in Malawi. There is therefore no need for the case docket to be sent to Malawi for investigation. On 28 July 2016, the Senior Public Prosecutor at the Cape Town Magistrate’s Court declined to prosecute in this matter as there was no evidence linking the possible suspect to the perpetration of the crime.

Reply:

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h) The workforce analysis for the Putfontein Police Station is depicted below see the link:

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2550Table.pdf

The following posts were identified as critical vacancies:

1 x Sub Section Commander: Human Resource Management (Salary level 8).

1 x Principal Personnel Officer (Salary level 7).

The proposed promotion posts were requested from the South African Police Service (SAPS) Head Office as critical funded posts in terms of the allocated posts to the province.

During the 2016/2017 financial year, the Gauteng Province received an allocation of

1 320 entry-level Police Act employees. This allocation was scientifically distributed and approved by the Provincial Commissioner, to all 142 stations within Gauteng, by utilising the following criteria:

• A gap analysis was conducted, taking into consideration all Visible Policing and Detective Service members on salary levels 1-7, comparing the actual allocation with the Fixed Establishment.
• The allocation of 1 320 entry level Police Act employees was distributed equally amongst all stations taking into consideration the shortages on levels 1-7 for Visible Policing and Detective members.
• After the distribution, all stations with shortages were staffed equally at 78,15% on levels 1-7 (Visible Policing and Detectives).

The Gauteng Province receives an entry-level allocation every financial year, but unfortunately this allocation does not meet the human resource demands of the various business units in the province. Cluster Commanders are therefore advised to ensure the equal distribution of Human Resources within the cluster, taking into consideration the fixed establishment.

The Gauteng Province is currently busy with a project in terms of which police stations with a surplus of members within the Visible Policing environment have been instructed to identify and redeploy members to their Detective Service environment, where there is a general shortage of personnel. Furthermore, Police Stations are also instructed to redeploy experienced Visible Policing members to the Detective Service environment when they receive their new entry-level allocation.

The Putfontein Police Station is a leased facility. The owners have been engaged regarding the poor conditions of the Police Station as, in accordance with the lease agreement, it is their responsibility to ensure that the facility is properly maintained.

The need for an alternative Police Station was included in the Provincial User Asset Management Plan (UAMP) for the 2017/2018 financial year. The Divisional Commissioner: Supply Chain Management has been requested to source a proper alternative facility.

(i) Per the SAPS Asset Register, the Putfontein Police Station had a total of 16 vehicles on 6 November 2016. The distribution of vehicles is as follows:

COMPONENT	NUMBER OF VEHICLES	IDEAL VEHICLES AS PER EFFICIENCY INDEX SYSTEM	SURPLUS/SHORTAGE
Station Commander	1	1	0
Detective Service	6	6	0
Support Service	1	3	-2
Visible Policing	8	10	-2
Total	16	20	-4

The Putfontein Police Station has an overall shortage of four vehicles, which will be addressed by 31 March 2017.

Reply:

The Department does not currently have an advisor on contract. Advisors are contracted when needed.

-END-

Reply:

It must be noted that the accused application for a discharge in terms of section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act was refused. In other words the court found that the state had published a case that the accused had to answer. The National Director of Public Prosecutors (NDPP) convened a meeting where the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) South Gauteng, Advocate Andrew Chauke was requested to submit a report on various allegations relating to the prosecution of the case. At the conclusion of that meeting, it was decided that the DPP would obtain the transcript of the court proceedings for him to further address the matter with the prosecutor and his supervisor.

The DPP further reported to the NDPP that he perused the transcript of the proceedings and subsequently addressed the shortcomings of the prosecutor and pointed out to him the resultant adverse effects on the case due to him not communicating the developments in court to his supervisor.

Reply:

(a) The case docket, Gelvandale CAS 373/06/2016, is still under investigation by the South African Police Service (SAPS). Photographs of damage to the complainant’s vehicle must still be obtained from the complainant. Attempts are also being made to identify and trace the unknown suspects who were allegedly wearing balaclavas during the incident.

(b) The following offences are contained in the docket for Gelvandale CAS 373/06/2016.

● Armed Robbery;

● Malicious Damage to Property; and

● Assault.

(c)(i) & (ii) The details of the investigating officer cannot be disclosed to allow the investigation to be conducted without fear or favour.

(d)(i) The Investigating Officer is providing feedback to the complainant on a weekly basis.

(d)(ii) The last feedback to the complainant was provided on 11 November 2016.

Reply:

(a) The Settlement Agreement provides for National Treasury to appoint an administrator.

(b) The intended beneficiaries are communities and small construction companies, with provisions for funding of training of engineers and artisans, social infrastructure, small business working capital and technical capacity within the state. Further details will be publicised in due course.

-END-

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works

(a) (i) The Department of Public Works (DPW) has a dedicated internal Unit to investigate reported allegations of fraud, corruption and serious maladministration within the Department. From the 2009/10 financial year to date the Unit has received 363 cases for investigation purposes. Of the total number of cases reported, 320 cases were finalised. 32 cases are currently at various stages of investigation.

(aa) (bb) (cc)

See attached Fraud Allegation Register from 2009/10-2016/17 Financial Years of the 320 completed cases.

(b) (i) External Forensic Investigations

The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has conducted investigations in the DPW in terms of 5 Presidential proclamations – the oldest proclamation was published on 30 July 2010 and the most recent one was published on 20 July 2015. The SIU reports to the President, but they provide the DPW with findings from their investigation for the purpose of instituting corrective measures, including disciplinary action against any official where there is prima facie evidence of misconduct. Where SIU findings point to possible criminal activities, the SIU reports such evidence to the South Africa’s law enforcement agencies for further action. When the SIU finds that funds have been usurped they institute civil proceedings on behalf of the DPW to recover the lost funds. The DPW is notified of this action prior to it being taken. However, the SIU does not provide its full reports to the Department, as it reports to the State President.

DPW ENTITIES

For Agrément South Africa (ASA) No internal or external forensic reports have been completed since 01 January 2009 to date.

	Council for Built Environment (CBE)
(a)(ii)	Internal Forensic Reports
	(aa)	(bb)	(cc)
	2 employees that were implicated.	Case relates to misconduct on Supply Chain procedures, Corporate Governance issues, Recruitment procedures and HR investigations.	The dates are from July 2014 to May 2015.
(ii)	No external forensic investigations were commissioned
	Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB)
	Internal Forensic Reports
(a) (ii)	(aa)	(bb)	(cc)
	15 employees that were implicated.	Cases relate to non-compliance with procedures, bribery and theft.	The dates are from February 2009 to September 2015

IDT

(a) (ii)

There are two different types of forensic reports that the Independent Development Trust (IDT) has dealt with during the period 01 January 2009 to 28 September 2016. The first type is a forensic report, which results from an investigation commissioned internally by IDT, but facilitated by external forensic investigators. The second type is a forensic report which is an outcome of a forensic investigation externally commissioned and whose outcome has a bearing for the IDT in one way or the other. These two types of forensic reports are listed in the table below:

LIST OF INTERNAL FORENSIC REPORTS

(a)(ii)

Internally commissioned, but externally facilitated forensic investigation reports

(aa)	(bb)	(cc)	Name of investigator/s
Alleged fraudulent claims by service provider for IDT Limpopo: Social Programme	Fraudulent Time sheet and irregular claims	15 April 2015	PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
Alleged irregular payment to a service provider at Mpumalanga (IDT) Regional Office (MPL)	Irregular Payments at Rob-Ferreira Hospital	27 Sept 2012	PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
Forensic Accounting investigation into Irregularities at IDT relating to wasteful expenditure	1. Questions raised about the achievement of project deliverables and how much was paid for each of the following deliverables: Progressive Woman Movement of South Africa (PWMAS) workshop; Re Tlisa Diphetoho (RTD) initiative; The business Case Review for the Transformation initiative; The Legacy project; The CEO awards; and The involvement of Fabulous Weddings	15 September 2016 (At the time of finalising this reply the final report had not yet been considered by the IDT Board)
Procurement Irregularities at the KZN IDT relating to Mobile Classrooms	Review the tender process followed by IDT in appointing Tedsons and JT Cabins as a service provider	15 Sept 2016	National Treasury
Procurement irregularities at the IDT relating to Destiny Group, Nkwali and Bursary	Investigation into the procurement of services of the Destiny Group, Transfer of Mr Nkwali and Awarding of bursary to Ms Xhala	15 Sept 2016	National Treasury
Alleged Irregularities at the IDT relating to the KZN Department of Arts and Culture	Verification of the Bid process followed in the appointment of Masakhane (Contractor) for the construction of Vulamehlo Library	15 Sept 2016	National Treasury
Alleged Irregularities in respect of Projects undertaken for the KZN: DoH	Review procurement process for Addington Hospital maintenance and verification of the bid evaluation process followed and investigation of the circumstances that led to the clinics not being completed and determine how much was paid previously for the 3 projects	15 Sept 2016	National Treasury

LIST OF EXTERNAL FORENSIC REPORTS

IDT

(b) (ii)

Externally commissioned and facilitated investigation report/s with outcome affecting the IDT

(aa) Name of the Report	(bb) Subject matter	(cc) Date of conclusion	Name of investigator
Alleged irregularities in the procurement of service providers at Department of Correctional Services	Prisons Fencing Project	June 2016	National Treasury

______________________________________________________________________

Reply:

(1)(a)(i) The investigation into Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016 has been concluded and the case docket was handed in at the office of the Senior Public Prosecutor at the Pretoria Magistrate’s Court for decision on 14 November 2016. The decision on prosecution is awaited.

(1)(a)(ii) The investigation into Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/2016 has not yet been concluded. The suspect must still be interviewed and a warning statement obtained. Some witnesses still need to be interviewed and their statements obtained.

(1)(b) The charge in both cases is Assault Common.

(2) No suspects were arrested on any of the two cases as the Criminal Procedure Act, 1997 (Act No. 51 of 1997), does not make provision for a member of the South African Police Service to arrest a suspect on a charge of Assault Common unless the crime was committed in his/her presence.

(3)(a)(i & ii) The suspect in Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016 was interviewed on 20 October 2016 and his warning statement obtained.

The suspect in Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/2016 has not yet been interviewed. As soon as all the witness statements have been obtained, the suspect will be interviewed and the warning statement obtained. The case docket will then be forwarded to the Senior Public Prosecutor for a decision.

(3)(b)(i & ii) Three witnesses were interviewed in Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016.

Eight witnesses were interviewed in Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/2016 and all indicated that they will submit statements through their Attorneys.

(4) The investigation into Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016 has been concluded.

It is envisaged that the investigation in the case docket Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/20146 will be concluded within the next two weeks.

Reply:

The Department of Small Business Development and its entities’ total spend on advertising on media is as follows:

#	(a) Department	(b) Entities
		Small Enterprise Finance Agency (sefa)	Small Enterprise Development Agency (seda)
(i)	Africa News Network 7 (ANN7)	ANN7	ANN7
	(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent.
(ii)	SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC)	SABC	SABC
(aa)	(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: R4 492 250.
			(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.
(bb)	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R125 400.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R220 000.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R330 132.
	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(bbb)Since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.
(iii)	National commercial radio stations	National commercial radio stations	National commercial radio stations
	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R320 000.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R456 522.
	(bbb) Since April 2016: R189 999.24.	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent
(iv) (aa)	Community television stations	Community television stations	Community television stations
	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R28 000.
	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.
(iv) (bb)	Community radio stations	Community radio stations	Community radio stations
	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R157 000.	(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R445 289.
	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.	(bbb) Since April 2016: R62 000.	(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent.

Please note further that for the 2015 International Cooperatives Day, the department advertised in SAFM and Motsweding FM (both SABC radio stations). However, the budget came from the DTI.

Reply:

The appeal is set down to be heard on 14 February 2017 at the North Gauteng High Court.

Reply:

Notwithstanding the fact that there is no provision in the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) Act for the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services to take any action against prosecutors for exercising prosecutorial functions according to the Prosecution Directives and Guidelines, the following outline serves as background for the Minister in relation to this matter.

As such, there was no reason for any action to be taken against the prosecutors in the normal course of exercising their duties. Section 42 of the NPA Act further excludes liability where the prosecutorial decision was taken in good faith.

Reply:

The information that is requested by Honourable van Dalen is in the process of being considered by the Portfolio Committee on Energy of which he is a member.

Reply:

In response to the question posed by the Honourable Member, the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has informed me that:

1. The investigation on Proclamation R21 of 14 May 2010 is finalised. A final report to the President is being prepared and is anticipated to be submitted to Presidency by March 2017.

           The SIU have been working with the Asset Forfeiture Unit in attending to three (3) matters.

       2. The SIU referred evidence or alleged corruption, fraud and theft to the relevant Prosecuting Authority during 2011 and 2013 respectively in relation to the following:

        (i) The appointment of 3P Consulting (PTY) Ltd vide Johannesburg, CAS 755/09/2011; and

        (ii) The appointment of the Baoki Consortium. The matter is under investigation by the Anti-Corruption Task Team (ACTT) vide, ref 40/2013.

Further relevant details of the matters under investigation obtained from the National Prosecuting Authority are as follows:

 (a) 3P Consulting (PTY) Ltd

1. The matter is still under investigation.
2. The Forensic audit report from Gobodo is not finalised yet.
3. No person has been charged with any offence.
4. Following the completion of the investigation and the finalisation of the forensic audit report, a decision will be made regarding paragraph (iii) above.

 (b) Baoki Consortium

1. The matter is under investigation by the ACTT.
2. The Investigating Officer is tracing outstanding documentation.
3. No person has been charged with any offence.
4. Following the completion of the investigation a decision will be made regarding paragraph (iii) above.

Any other details relating to these matters may be obtained from the South African Police Service (SAPS).

Reply:

To educate the public about the importance of energy efficiency, the Department developed and launched the Energy Efficiency Campaign Strategy during the United Nations Convention on Climate Change’s 17th Conference of Parties (COP 17) held in Durban in 2011. In addition, on 13 March 2015, the President of South Africa launched the Presidency and Government energy savings campaign highlighting various initiatives the government will implement to promote energy savings, and these include the green building policy framework, minimum energy performance standards and labeling of energy efficiency appliances, improvement of energy efficiency, and, importantly, the installation of solar panels and solar water heaters in buildings including in residential buildings in rural and poor communities.

Furthermore, on 17 May 2016, the Minister of Energy unveiled the South African Energy Efficiency Label, and also announced measures to be implemented in buildings as part of promoting energy savings. The SA Energy Efficiency Label has been designed to provide the South African consumers, including poor and rural communities, with accurate and comparable information that enables an informed purchase decisions when buying household appliances. The advantage to consumers, especially poor and rural communities, is that they have an opportunity to play an active role both in achieving savings on electricity consumption and in making a meaningful contribution to the effort on reducing carbon emissions.

Some of the energy savings measures being implemented by the Department include the installation of smart metering and clean energy technologies in schools and government buildings, deployment of co-generation in municipal waste water treatment facilities, and the installation of energy efficient technologies related to municipal infrastructure. It should also be noted that the Ministry of Energy has been conducting outreach programmes to poor and rural communities as part of the energy savings campaign.

Reply:

The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has informed me that the NPA does not collate specific statistics on offence. However, the table below highlights cases that are extracted from the case administration system developed by SCCU Regional Heads.

Particulars of the Matter	Quantum/Amount Involved
1. The State v Legodi Boshielo & 2 others – Project Mobile Classrooms - Department of Education - Limpopo	R70 million
2. The State v Mogotlane and Nemavhola- Project Mankele Bridge - Department of Roads and Transport - Limpopo	R79,5 million
3. The State v Mweli and Others- Project Department of Education - North West	R16 million
4. The State v Sbu Ndebele and Others - Project Tasima - Department of Transport - Pretoria	R42.5 million
5. The State v Savoy and Others- Project Intaka- Department of Health - KZN	R70 million
6. The State v .Energy Utility Services (Pty) Lt and Others – Project Eskom – Western Cape	R65 million
7. The State v Steven Jonkers and Another- Project Bus Contractor - Department of Transport - Northern Cape	R14,5 million
8. The State v Scholtz and Others - Project Trifecta - Department of Social Development - Northern Cape	R200 million

Reply:

The Competition Tribunal does not have a post for Deputy Commissioner. A nomination for the position as Deputy Chairperson of the Competition Tribunal was approved by Cabinet on 17 November 2016 and the appointment is expected to be made shortly.

-END-

Reply:

Performance benchmarks were implemented at all South African Police Service (SAPS) Garages to ensure appropriate turnaround times for SAPS vehicle repairs, thereby ensuring that adequate vehicles are available for operational deployment at all police stations/units. The following criteria are included in the performance benchmarks and are followed up on a continuous basis to address any deviations:

● The opening and closure of job cards (performance) per garage within specific time frames for the various types of services and repairs;

● The production of individual artisans and garages as well as production for all garages within the province as per the set standard; and

● The availability of vehicles per police station/unit, per province and nationally as per the set standard.

Reply:

The Ehlanzeni Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) College is responsible for the Mapulaneng Campus in the Bushbuckridge Local Municipality. Since late 2013, the college has not awarded contracts to any service provider as campus upgrades and maintenance are undertaken by its skilled college staff and students as part of their practical training. The college is a technical training institution, which strives to provide theoretical and practical training for students by maintaining and upgrading its facilities to save costs and maximise the use of its allocated budget.

The college took transfer of the Matsulu Technical and Vocational Education and Training Centre during 2015. On taking occupation, it was established that the drainage pipes at the Centre were blocked and a contractor was appointed, after obtaining 3 quotations, to unblock the drainage pipes. No subsequent contracts have been awarded to service providers at this centre.

COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:

EXT:

DIRECTOR – GENERAL

STATUS:

DATE:

QUESTION 2398 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED

Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP

MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING

STATUS:

DATE:

Reply:

(a) The National Department of Transport has not conducted feasibility studies on Vuwani Airport in Limpopo.

(b) The Limpopo Department of Transport has conducted a pre-feasibility study for the Vuwani/P.R. Mphephu Airport during 2010. The study was part of the Limpopo Airlift Strategy, with the purpose of providing direction and guidance for the development of aviation in the province. Five generic strategies were identified in determining the status of each of the airports considered at the time, as follows:

1. Grounded: Nothing should be done as there is no, or very little potential, now or in the future, for aviation development.

2. Delayed: The development of aviation will only take place in the long term and is awaiting other matters to be put in place.

3. Boarding: There is some market potential, which should be left to the market to action and develop.

4. Take-off: There is good market potential which would be picked up by the market with minimum intervention.

5. Catapulted Take-off: There is market potential, but the development of aviation will only take place with significant intervention from government.

The Vuwani/P.R Mphephu Airport fell within the third category. The Limpopo Department of Transport decided to wait a few years so that further analysis could be done on the Vuwani/P.R Mphephu Airport as well as the other public airports within the province. Such analysis will consider developments that are taking place at, amongst others, Lephalale, Musina and its SEZ status, and the Tubatse area.

The Limpopo Department of Transport is currently collaborating with the Department of Public Enterprises in determining if some of these airports can be re-commissioned and the extent of improvements that are required to enable re-commissioning.  The Limpopo Aviation Technical Stream has been established and various meetings have already been held. The Province is currently developing the Terms of References for the viability assessment, which should be conducted no later than the 2017/2018 financial year. This will provide an indication if P.R. Mphephu Airport will be viable and the costs associated with its re-commissioning, should the indication be positive. Other options will be explored depending on the outcome of the viability study.

(b) (i) N/A

(ii) The airport is an asset of the Limpopo Department of Public Works, Roads and Infrastructure, although the buildings are utilised by the Limpopo Department of Transport. The Limpopo Department of Transport has not allocated any maintenance budget pending the outcome of the viability study.

Reply:

Yes, the Single Transport Economic Regulator project will be part of the 2017/18 and onwards of the Department’s Strategic and Annual Performance Plans. The Department plans to present a Bill (draft legislation framework) to Cabinet to solicit gazetting approval for 60 days public consultation by end of financial year of 2016/17. Thereafter, inputs from the public will be consolidated and a revised Bill will be taken back to Cabinet for approval during 2017/18 financial year. The next step will be to table the Bill in Parliament by end of 2017/18 financial year. Upon promulgation of the Bill to a legislation, the Transport Economic Regulator establishment will commence.

Reply:

1. The appointment of the Chairperson of the Governing Body of the CCMA for a period of five years was done in error, and the matter was reported by the Department to the Portfolio Committee. The Department is aware that section 116 of the Labour Relations Act specifies a three year appointment period and steps have been taken to rectify the situation so as to bring the period of appointment in line with the Act.

2. The National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC) did nominate two candidates for the position of Chairperson of the CCMA Governing Body and requested the Minister to consider the nominees. This was done in writing by the Executive Director of NEDLAC in August 2013.

3. The mandate for the appointment of the Chairperson of the CCMA Governing Body is contained in section 116 of the Labour Relations Act. Further information relating to the functioning of the CCMA Governing Body is contained in Schedule 3 to the Labour Relations Act.

END

Reply:

(1) The Implementation Plan for National Transport Master Plan 2050 is not complete. It is the target for the 2016/17 financial year and anticipated to be completed by March 2017.

(2) The National Transport Master Plan 2050 has been submitted to Cabinet and got approval on the 19 October 2016.

(3) The legislation will not be completed in 2016/17 financial year as approval by Cabinet was only in October 2016.

Reply:

1. South Africa voted in favour of the resolution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation on Occupied Palestine on 13 October 2016, in view of South Africa’s support for the longstanding right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and the achievement of their legitimate national aspirations that include freedom, independence, justice, peace and dignity in an independent Palestinian State. South Africa is also committed to the two State solution that is an essential part of achieving peace in the entire Middle East through the establishment of a free and sovereign Palestinian State co-existing side-by-side in peace and security with the State of Israel, based on the 4 June 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.

2. This resolution has no implications regarding other religious connections to Jerusalem as a holy site in that it affirms the importance of the old city of Jerusalem and its Walls for the three monotheistic religions. It seeks to safeguard the cultural heritage of Palestine and the distinctive character of East Jerusalem, in view of the persistent, systematic destruction of this heritage through numerous activities. It calls for an immediate end to these activities and for Israel to honour its obligations under UNESCO conventions, resolutions and decisions.

UNQUOTE

Reply:

The heavy flooding that occurred in the Gauteng Province in early November 2016 did not affect operations materially and the Boksburg office is open and functioning. The damage that occurred in May 2016 in the Boksburg office was caused by a burst water hydrant outside in the street over a weekend and not stormy weather. This caused severe damage to office equipment and furniture which had to be replaced.

However, the lease for the Boksburg office is expiring on 30 April 2017. The Department requested the Department of Public Works to find alternative accommodation as the current office accommodation no longer meets the needs of the Department.

Reply:

(1) It is anticipated that the establishment of the single KwaZulu-Natal Water Board will be gazetted during the 2017/18 financial year. The establishment will be dependent on the outcome of the due diligence exercise.

(2) Yes, a selection panel will be constituted to recommend the appointment of Board Members for the single KwaZulu-Natal Water Board. The selection panel will be appointed during the 2017/18 financial year.

(3)(a) During the course of the 2017/18 financial year.

(3)(b)(i)During the course of the 2017/18 financial year.

(3)(b)(ii)During the course of the 2017/18 financial year.

---00O00---

Reply:

1. (a)The successful applicant should be in possession of a Basic Traffic Diploma, atleast 4 years work related experience in Law Enforcement. Avalid proof of registration as a Traffic Officer, No previous conviction, have a Driver’s License and should at least have an Examiner of Driver’s License or Examiner of Vehicles qualification.

(b) Post where advertised on the basis that Salary was negotiable within the C1 band as per Patterson grades and the date of appointment.

(c)Please refer answer (b) as it bears relevance to the question.

(d)why have some of the inspectors not been given ranks despite them being in the service of the NTP for more than three years;

Irrespective of the years served, all Traffic Officers are appointed as Traffic Officers at the entry level of the profession. Traffic officers are considered for progression on the basis of funded and vacant positions.

(2) The training provided to Senior Inspectors is accredited i.e. Examiners of Vehicles and Examiners of Driver’s License.

(a) Not applicable
(b) All Traffic officers receive accredited Training

 

Reply:

(a) The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) through its Property Management Division, PRASA Corporative Real Estate Solutions (CRES), oversees the cleaning of stations in five (5) regional offices located in Eastern Cape, Western Cape, KwaZulu Natal, Gauteng South and Gauteng North. The names of the cleaning service providers appointed and the station / facility name are outlined per region in Annexure A.

(b) -(c) The appointment date and contracting date of all cleaning service providers is outlined per region in Annexure A.

(d) The service providers were all appointed to ensure and maintain acceptable cleanliness levelsfor the contracted facilities (See Annexures B and C).

(e) The amount spent to date against each cleaning service provider is outlined per region in Annexure A.

(f) The performance monitoring of the cleaning service providers is done by employees of PRASA CRES.PRASA CRES Regional Managers take the ultimate responsibility of ensuring that the Property Management services are delivered at acceptable levels.

(g,h&I)Each region has a list of non- performing cleaning service providers which have led to their contracts being terminated.

South Gauteng Region

• Marble Arch,extended contract terminated on the 02nd March 2016 due non- performance
• Hughdeck Creations , contract terminatedon the 29thApril 2015 due non-performance

North Gauteng Region

• None

KZN Region:

• None

Western Cape Region

• None

ANNEXURE A

Eastern Cape Region

For the past three (3) financial years, the Station Cleaning service in the Eastern Cape region has not been outsourced. The service is currently rendered by PRASA employees.

Western Cape Region(Cleaning Companies)

CLEANING COMPANY NAME	STATION NAME	CONTRACT APPOINTMENT	SPENT TO DATE
ALL PURPOSE CLEANING SERVICES CC	Heideveld and Netreg	2014, Jun 30	R1,719,845.41
	Stock Road and Philip	2014, Jun 30
	Phillip,Stockrd	2015, Sep 28
	Lavistown,Bonthehewel	2015, Sep 28
	Netreg station	2016, Mar 31
	Lentegeur,Mitchelsplain	2016, Apr 07
	Waste removal Lentegeur, Mitchelsplain	2016, Oct 27
	Lavistown, Net	2016, Oct 27
	Belhar,Unibel	2016, Oct 27
	Rosebank,Mowbrey	2016, Oct 27
	Phillip,Mandalay	2016, Oct 31
PHILLIP CLEANING SERVICE	Waste removal at Culemborg Depot	2014, Jun 11
	Cleaning & Hygiene Khayelitsha and Nonkqubela	2014, Jun 30
	Cleaning & Hygiene Bontheheuwel and Laviston	2014, Jun 30
	Cleaning bellvileShosholoza offices	2015, May 12
	Horticulture,waste removal Soetendal	2015, Sep 29	R1,660,389.18
	Horticulture,waste removal Abbotsdale,ka	2015, Sep 29
	Cleaning new ShosholozaMeyl Bellville	2015, Dec 08
	Cleaning and horticulture at Bellville S	2016, Apr 04
	Cleaning and horticulture Abbotsdale,Kal	2016, Apr 04
	Cleaning at Mutual and Woltemande	2016, Oct 27
GREYSTONE TRADING 816 CC	Cleaning contract Salt River and PDD	2013, Jun 04	R 8,242,999.85
	Depots: Cleaning of Muldersvlei	2014, Jul 14
	Depots: Cleaning of Belville	2014, Jul 14
SOUTHERN AMBITION 1110 CC	Cleaning Contract Unibell and Belhar	2013, May 28	R564,780.00
	Cleaning and horticulture Avondale	2016, Oct 27
	Cleaning and horticulture Century City,	2016, Oct 27
PEARCES CLEANING SERVICES	Waste removal Salt river, Firgrove Depot	2014, Jun 27	R51,200.00
QOSHELISA CATERING AND CLEANING SER	Cleaning of Belleville Station	2013, Apr 02	R3,280,835.00
	waste removal: Figrove,Bellville,Thornto	2015, Jan 15
	Wasteremoval at Bellville,Koelenhof Stat	2016, Jun 09
	Cleaning & horticulture Firgrove Depot	2016, Sep 15
	Cleaning & horticulture Khayelitsha,Nolu	2016, Oct 07
	Cleaning & horticulture at Kuilsriver,Bl	2016, Oct 07
SINAKO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT CC	Cleaning Contract Huguenot and Paarl	2013, May 28	186,575.40
SIMANYENE CLEANING SERVICES CC	Cleaning Contract Pentech and Sarepta	2013, May 28	R1,669,003.67
	Cleaning and Hygiene Sarepta,Pentech	2014, Jun 12
	Cleaning Beaufort-West Station	2014, Jul 23
	Cleanin,waste removal at Du TOIT N KOELE	2015, Feb 17
	Cleanin,waste removal at Huguenot n Paarl	2015, Feb 17
	Cleaning ,waste removal at Willington,Mbekweni	2015, Feb 17
YUSUF'S DISTRIBUTORS CC	Cleaning Contract Lavistown and Bonteheuwel	2013, May 28	R779,648.42
	Cleaning Contract Salt river	2013, May 28
	Cleaning contract Michell'sPlain,Lenteguer	2013, Jul 12
	Salt River	2013, Oct 29
	Kuyasa and Chris Hani	2013, Oct 29
	Mandalay, Stock Road, Phillipi and Nyanga	2013, Oct 29
	Kayelitsa, Nolungile and Nonqkubela	2013, Oct 31
ELIHLE CLEANING SERVICES CC	Waste Removal at Mutual,Pentech,Unibell	2014, Jun 12	R404,211.95
	Cleanin,waste removal at Vlottenburg,lyn	2015, Feb 17
	Waste removal at firgrove,bellville	2016, Feb 02
AMANGELE-NGELE TRADING	Waste Removal at Kuyasa,Nyanga,Chris Hani	2014, Jun 12	R174,810.00
	Waste removal at Langa,Nyanga,Chris Hani	2016, Jul 19
	Horticulture Service michells plain SRM	2016, Nov 07
MAKUZANYWE TRADING CC	clening,waste removal at Mbekweni, Wellington	2015, Oct 27	R574,482.40
	clening,waste removal at Huguenot ,Paarl	2015, Oct 27
	cleaning and horticulture Huguenot,Paarl	2016, Apr 07
WORLD FOCUS 485 CC	Cleaning and hygiene at Stellenbosch,Du	2014, Jun 12
	Cleaning and Hygiene Lyndoch,Vlotternber	2014, Jun 12
S'BHALALA CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICE-	WasteRemoval at Depots WCR	2015, Feb 10	R2,999,749.59
	Waste removal at Depots WCR	2015, Nov 16
	cleaning,orticulture at Lyndoch,Stellenb	2016, Mar 30
	cleaning,orticulture at Du toit,Koelenof	2016, Mar 30
	cleaning,horticulture at Langa station	2016, Mar 30
	cleaning,horticulture at wittebome,plums	2016, Mar 30
	Cleaning and horticulture Rondebostch,	2016, Oct 27
	Cleaning and horticulture Plumsteed,Steu	2016, Oct 27
	Cleaning and horticulture Harfield,kenil	2016, Oct 27
	Cleaning and horticulture Somerset west,	2016, Oct 27
	Cleaning and horticulture Goodwood,VAsco	2016, Oct 27
	Cleaning and horticulture Lyndoch,Vloote	2016, Oct 27
	Cleaning and horticulture Rosebank,Mowbr	2016, Nov 01
AKHOYENA TRADING CC	Waste Removal at Salt River Station	2015, Aug 12	R784,830.06
	Cleaning and horticulture Phillipi,Stock	2016, Apr 07
	Cleaning and horticulture Belhar,Unibell	2016, Apr 07
	Cleaning and horticulture Banteheuwel,La	2016, Apr 07
TWO DREAMS CONSTRUCTION cc	Waste removal Koelenhof,Firgrove,Dal	2014, Jun 27	R81,000.00
LEISURE CRUZ TRAVEL CC	Cleaning Contract Culemborg Depot	2013, May 28	R149,450.00
MATSIPANE TRADING ENTERPRISE CC	Eersteriver, Fauri, Somerset, Van Derste	2013, Apr 02	R 3,906,704.39
	Cleaning Rosebank, Rondebosch, Newlands	2013, Apr 02
SENZAKAHLE BUSINESS SERVICES	Cleaning Wittebome, PlumsteadSteurhoff	2013, Apr 02	R4,161,780.34
	Clean De Grandale, Avondale &Oorsterzee	2013, Apr 02
	/ketemand, Akasia, Monte Vista, Century	2013, Apr 02
	Cleaning Goodwood, Vasco, Elsies river,	2013, Apr 02
	Cleaning of trains at Salt river SRM	2016, Oct 03
	Cleaning of trains Salt River SRM	2016, Nov 07
TORMALINE CLEANERS	Saltriver,Wellington,Belvile,Strand,Kraa	2013, Sep 26	R587,209.45
	Paardeneiland yard	2013, Sep 26	R678,032.20
MDAX AFRIKA TRADING ENTERPRISE	Stikland, Branckenfell, Eikofontein,	2013, Apr 02
NTENTENI CONSTRUCTION &	Waste removal at BellbvilleStatiion	2014, Jun 11	R 2,602,545.54
	Cleaning & Hygiene Nolungile n Mandalay	2014, Jun 30
	Cleaning of trains at Culemborg Yard	2016, Jul 18
	Cleaning of trains at Culemborg SRM	2016, Sep 15
	Cleaning of trains Culemborg SRM	2016, Oct 31
QAMA MAINTANANCE PROJECTS CC	Cleaning Contract Beaufort West	2013, May 28	R430,277.50
	Cleanin,waste removal at Unibell,Serepta	2015, Mar 06
MAMPIES TREE FELLING&GARDENING	Cleaning contract Deip River, Heathfield	2013, Jun 13	R 561,552.67
	Cleaning and horticulture St James,Simon	2016, Apr 06
	Cleaning and horicultureMuizenberg,ST J	2016, Oct 27
LLK CONSULTANTS CC	Cleaning Contract	2013, May 28	R454,000.00
	Waste removal at Salt River and Woodstoc	2014, Jun 11
	Cleaning & Hygiene Mitchels Plain and Le	2014, Jun 30
THE BUSINESS ZONE 2631 CC	Cleaning & Hygiene Huegenot,Paarl and Da	2014, Jul 01	R1,216,132.26
	Cleaning & Hygiene Wellington,Mbekweni	2014, Jul 01
	Cleanin,waste removal at Netreg,Heidevel	2015, Feb 10
	Cleanin,waste removal at Lentegeur	2015, Feb 10
	horticulture & cleaning Parow Station B	2015, Dec 18
BAGGOTTS CLEANING SERVICE	Cleaning services for cabins	2013, Oct 31	R108,336.04
LAWLINK PROJECTS CC	Cleaning and horticulture Willington,Mbe	2016, Apr 07	R439,500.00
	Cleaning and horticulyureHuogenot,Bekwe	2016, Oct 27
WORLD FOCUS 913 CC	Cleaning Contract Stellenbosch, vlootenb	2013, May 28	R 1,211,531.00
	Cleaning Contract Muildesvlei,Koelenhof	2013, May 28
	Cleaning and Hygiene Lyndoch&Vlottenbe	2014, Jun 25
	Cleaning and Hygiene Stellenbosch,DuToi	2014, Jun 25
	Cleaning,waste removal at Abbotsdale,Kalb	2015, Feb 17
	Cleaning,waste removal at Malan,Soetendal	2015, Feb 17
	Refuse removal Ysterplaat and Esplanade	2016, Aug 10
INTERWASTE (PTY) LTD	Waste removal	2013, Dec 10	R62,945.69
QAMANI CLEANING & HORTICULTURAL	Cleaning of Tygerberg&Parrow Station	2013, Apr 02	R711,541.86
ZIBELE CLEANING SERVICES	Cleaning,waste removal woodstock,Ystepla	2015, Oct 21	R1,460,493.95
	Cleaning,waste removal Chris hani,Kuyasa	2015, Oct 21
	Cleaning,Horticulture at Goodwood,Elsies	2016, Mar 30
	Cleaning and horticulture Ndabeni,Pinelands	2016, May 04	R194,110.00
	Cleaning and horticulture Athlone, Crawford	2016, Oct 27	R209,999.95
	Cleaning and horticulture Pinelands	2016, Oct 27	R216,000.00
	Horticulture service Khayelitsha SRM	2016, Nov 07	R41,000.00
MYRIAD PROJECT MANAGEMENT	Stations: Cleaning of Langa	2014, Jul 14	R407,000.00
	Cleaning and horticultre Bellville	2016, May 03
NONKUZO TRADING CC	Cleaning and Hygiene Various Cabins WC	2014, Jun 27	R122,500.00
BANTU BUSINESS ACTION	Cleaning,waste removal VlottenburgLyndo	2015, Sep 28	R 539,650.94
	Cleaning,horticulture at Avondale,Ooster	2016, Mar 31
	Cleaning,horticulture at Kapteinsklip	2016, Mar 31
HIRE THINA GENERAL TRADING	Cleaning and horticulture Diep River,Hea	2016, Apr 07	R 476,226.00
	Cleaning and horticulture Retreat,Steenb	2016, Oct 27
INYAMEKO TRADING	Depots: Cleaning of PaardenEiland	2014, Jul 14	R2,399,104.55
	Cleaning,horticulture at Kentamade,Akasi	2016, Mar 30
	Cleaning,horticulture at 0ttery,Southfire	2016, Mar 30
	Cleaning,horticulture at Athlone, Crawford	2016, Mar 31
	Cleaning and Horticulture Langa Station	2016, Jul 26
MBASA CLEANING SERVICES	Cleaning contract Kuislriver,Blackhealth	2013, Jun 13	R 272,000.00
BHUNGANE CLEANNING & CONSTRUCTION	Waste removal Kraaifontein&Brackenfell	2014, Jun 27	R973,940.00
	Cleaning,waste removal Belhar, Unibell	2015, Sep 28
	Cleaning and horticulture Claremont,Harf	2016, Apr 07
	Cleaning and horticulture Belhar,Unibell	2016, Apr 07
	Cleaning and horticulture Mutual,Woltema	2016, Apr 07
	Cleaning and horticultreSteenberg,lakes	2016, May 03
MBAWULETHU MANUFACTURING & PROJECTS	Woodstock,obsevatory, Mowbray	2013, Sep 25	R 1,738,551.74
	Cleaning,horticultureMowbray,Woodstock,	2016, May 10
SUPERCARE SERVICES GROUP (Pty) Ltd	Cleaning and hygiene for Cape Town Stati	2014, Feb 01	R 29,248,102.36
	Cleaning of Cape Town Station	2014, Nov 19
	Waste removal at Cape Town Station	2015, Feb 25
NONDELA GEDEZA INVESTMENTS	Cleaning WC	2014, Jun 27	R2,065,062.18
LASAKA CONSTRUCTION cc	Cleaning of various stations WC	2014, Jun 13	R2,776,510.37
TOP n NOS cc	Cleaning Services Worcester station WC	2014, Oct 03	R1,745,353.50
	Cleaning Services DE AAR Station WC	2014, Oct 03
	Cleaning Services Malmesbury Station WC	2014, Oct 03
	Cleaning,HorticultureRosebank,newlands	2016, Mar 17
	Cleaning at Turn around Station	2016, Aug 01
	Cleaning of trains salt river SRM	2016, Oct 03
TAMMS CLEANING & HORTICULTURAL	Cleaning and Horticulture Maitland Prote	2015, Jan 15	R3,496,416.02
	Cleanin,waste removal at Lavistown,Bonte	2015, Feb 06
	Cleanin,waste removal at Philip,Mandalay	2015, Feb 06
	Cleanin,waste removal at Nolungile,Nokqu	2015, Feb 06
	Horticulture,waste removal khayelitsha	2015, Sep 15
	Horticulture,waste removal Mitchelsplai	2015, Sep 15
	Cleaning at Maitland protection service	2015, Oct 27
	Cleaning,horticulture at Tygerberg, Paro	2016, Mar 30
	Cleaning,horticulture at Nokqubela,Nolun	2016, Mar 30
	Cleaning horticulturetekraaifontein,Eik	2016, May 05
	Cleaning of Kraaifontein,Brackenfell	2016, Oct 07
	Cleaning and horticulture Bellville	2016, Oct 31
	Cleaning,horticulture at Strand,Somerset	2016, Mar 30
	Cleaning horticultureteEerste River,	2016, May 05
NONKUZO HOLDINGS (Pty) Ltd	cleaning horticultureteBlackeath,Melton	2016, May 05	R117,343.95
WASTEBUSTERS CC	Waste removal at Cape town station	2015, Jul 14	R201,561.61
WASTE MART Pty Ltd	Waste removal at various depots	2016, Aug 02	R15,600.00
	Waste removal emptying wheely bins CTN	2016, Sep 08	R74,885.96
GOLELA MULTI- PURPOSE Pty Ltd	Horticulture @ Belhar, Pentech SRM	2016, Nov 09	-

Western Cape Region (Cleaning Cooperatives)

CLEANING COMPANY NAME	STATION NAME	CONTRACT APPOINTMENT	SPENT TO DATE
UNAKO PRIMARY Co-operative Limited	Cooperative Nyanga Station	2015, Oct 29	R544,902.00
KHANYISA SERVICES PRIMARY	Cooperative Heideveld Station	2015, Oct 29	R548,991.90
LITHEMBA PROJECTS Co-operative	Cooperative chrishani station	2015, Oct 30	R520,600.68
LUKHANYO PRIMARYCo-operative	Cooperative Kuyasa Station	2015, Nov 26	R 758,399.68

KwaZuluNatal Region (Cleaning Companies)

CLEANING COMPANY NAME	STATION NAME	CONTRACT APPOINTMENT	SPENT TO DATE
SUPER CLEAN	DURBAN STATION	09 April 2014	R 14 323 260.24
NTABELO	BEREA STATION	20 October 2016	R 10 200 001.03
SIZIMISELE NGOMSEBENZI TRADING CC	BRIDGE CITY	21 September 2016	R 424 561.56
BAMBOO ROCK 1156 CC t/a KUSILE	BRIDGE CITY	01 June 2016	R 253 276.89
SHANELA t/a SUPER CLEAN	CLEANING OF BRIDGE CITY	01 September 2015	R297 413.456
SHANELA t/a SUPER CLEAN	CLEANING OF BRIDGE CITY	01 December 2015	R273 942.00
BIDVEST	CLEANING OF BRIDGE CITY	01 March 2016	R170 963.52

KwaZulu Natal Region (Cleaning Cooperatives)

COOPERATIVE NAME	STATION NAME	SIGNED CONTRACT	PAYMENT TOTAL
SENAMILE UZWANO	Moses Mabhida	17 December 2015	R527 059.20
FORTUNE PRIMARY Co-operation Ltd	KwaMashu	17 December 2015	R605 370.35
EYEMBOKODO MULTIPURPOSE PRIMARY Cooperative Ltd	Tembalihle	17 December 2015	R495 495.20
IYONA YETHU / IMPUMELELO	Duffs Road	17 December 2015	R652 266.07
	Effingham
	Avoca
	Red Hill
	Green Wood Park
	Clairwood
IMPILO IYAZANYWA	Duffs Road	18 December 2015	R405 686.38
	KwaMnyandu
MASAKHANE CLEANING Co-operative	Duffs Road	18 December 2015	R629 659.54
	Congella
	KwaMnyandu
COLLEAGUES Co-operative Ltd Dedicated	Avoca	18 December 2015	R619 661.57
	Red Hill
	Reunion
	Duffs Road
SIBEKITHEMBA Coop	Dalbridge	17 December 2015	R369 894.66
ZIYADUMA PRIMARY Cooperative Ltd	Umbilo	17 December 2015	R399 749.96
WAY FORWARD	Congella	17 December 2015	R635 765.12
	Clairwood
AMANDLOMZAMO	Rossburg	18 December 2015	R370 488.66
INTOKOZO	Merebank	17 December 2015	R429 687.86
THUTHUKA	Amanzimtoti	17 December 2015	R375 734.78
CEBOLETHU PRIMARY Co-operative	Isiphingo	17 December 2015	R496 073.58
OKUSHA PROMARY Cooperative	Winkelspruit	17December 2015	R396 108.16
ILANGELIHLE PRIMARY Co-op	Umlazi	18 December 2015	R472 792.46
HARD WORKESR Cleaning Co-operative Ltd	Lindokuhle	18 December 2015	R684 956.41
	Zwelethu
ZIYENZEKE- OAKLANDS Community Cooperative	Isithundu Hills	17 December 2015	R491 742.06
CIKIZISA	Thornwood	17 December 2016	R389 031.02
SIMAMA Co-operative and Multiservice	Pietermaritzburg	17 December 2015	R571 164.81
SENZAKAHLE	Ladysmith	17 December 2015	R451 578.41
Bambanani	NEWCASTLE	21 December 2015	R391 785.21

Gauteng North Region (Cleaning Companies)

CLEANING COMPANY NAME	STATION NAME	CONTRACT APPOINTMENT	SPENT TO DATE
Risk Release	Pretoria Station	01-Apr-14	R13,640,582.38
Katanga	Watloo station	01-Nov-12	R 5,260,759.89
	Silverton station
	Koedoespoort station
	Haartebeespruit station
	Irene station
	Eersterus station
	Centurion Station
	Denneboom station
Elephante	Walker Street Station	01-Nov-12	R 2,445,501.85
	Devenish station
	Mears station
	Fonteine station
	Pinedene station
	Sportspark station
	Kloofsig station
MarenaNaledi	Capital Park	01-Nov-12	R 3,559,487.10
	Gezina
	Deernes
	Villiera
	Queenswood
	Pretoria West
	Barracks
	TechnikonRaant
	Golf
	Schutte Street
	Rebecca
	Elecktro
	Peirneefsrus
African June	Belle Ombre Station	01-Jun-15	R248,800.00
Marble arch	Mabopane Station	01-Nov-12	R 4,161,348.73
Sikizani	Hercules	01-Nov-12	R 4,292,782.15
	Daspoort
	Mountain View
	Wonderboom
	Pretoria North
	Winternest
	Lynroos
Katanga	Rissik	01-Nov-12	R 537,841.68
	Loftus Versfleldpark
Landelani	Bosman Straat	Dec-13	R381,173.16
	CorDelfos
	Kalafong
Landelani Clean sweap	Belle Ombre	02-Dec-15	R 197,470.94
African June	Polokwane Station	01-Nov-15
Risk Release	Loftus	01-Mar-15	R108,326.30
	Rissik station

Gauteng North Region (Cleaning Cooperatives)

NAME OF CLEANING SERVICE PROVIDER	STATIONS APPOINTED TO CLEAN	DATE OF APPOINTMENT	TOTAL AMOUNT SPEND TO DATE
Predianet	Soshanguve	01-Dec-15	R 417,298.09
Tswelopele (Pfaranani Co-ops)	Akasiboom	01-Dec-15	R 371,187.08
Bokamoso (Brightminds Co-ops)	Kopanong	01-Dec-15	R 509,520.22
Tirisano	Saulsville	01-Dec-15	R 463,409.21
Susivusiwana	EersteFabriek	01-Dec-15	R 509,520.22
SedibasaLefa	Pienaarspoort	01-Dec-15	R 509,520.22

Gauteng South (Cleaning Companies)

NAME OF CLEANING SERVICE PROVIDER	STATIONS APPOINTED TO CLEAN	DATE OF APPOINTMENT	TOTAL AMOUNT SPEND TO DATE	Additional Work
Hugdeck Creations	Denver	01st November 2012	R 2,391,563.10
	Tooronga
	George Cogh
	Cleveland
	President
	Geldenhuis
	Driehoek
Mbita Consulting Services	Vereeniging	01st November 2012	R 44,849,771.23	R 4,316,187.68
	Alloy
	Rendam
	Kookrus
	Meyerton
	Union
	Dallas
	Wattles
	Rand Water
	Henly on Klip
	Daleside
	Kliprivirier
	Angus
	Mpilisweni
	Natalspruit
	Wadeville
	Katlehong
	Doorfontein
	Germiston West
	Germiston South
	India
	Germiston Lake
	Webber
	Parkhill
	Jeppe
	Germiston
Marble Arch Cleaning & Security Services	Braamfontein station	01st November 2012	R31,717,658.58	R3,117,461.06
	Oberholzer
	Mayfair station
	Grosvenor station
	kleingrond
	Braamfonteinmetrorail
	BraamfonteinShosholozameyl
	Anglers
	Laanglagte Station
	Industria station
	Westbury
	Newclare
	Bosmont
	Maraisburg
	Unified
	Floridah station
	Hamberg station
	Georginia
	Roodepoort
	Horizon
	Princess
	Witpoortjie
	Luipaardsvlei
	Lanwen
	Krugersdorp
	Wesrand
	Millsite
	Robinson
	Homelake
	Randfontein
	Westernaria
	Suurbekom
	New Canada station
	Crown
	Orlando
	Village Main
	Kliptown
	Tshiawelo
	central	01st November 2012
	middelvlei
	vleikop			R3,117,461.06
Marble Arch Cleaning & Security Services	welverdin
	Midway
	Nasrec		R31,717,658.58
	Westgate
	Booysens
	Faraday
	Karsene West
	Goudeon
	longdale
	Waterworks
	Benrose

Gauteng South (Cleaning Companies)

NAME OF CLEANING SERVICE PROVIDER	STATIONS APPOINTED TO CLEAN	DATE OF APPOINTMENT	TOTAL AMOUNT SPEND TO DATE
MalehoSpecialised Services	Kaalfontein	November 2015	R 281,284.80
	Oakmoor
	Olifantsfontein
Kgakilwe Trading	Limindlela	November 2015	R 306,600.00
	Birchleigh
	Kempton Park
	Leralla
	Van Riebeeck Park
	Tembisa
Sesiyaya	Isando	November 2015	R 130,371.84
	Rhodesfield
Clearpath	Oos Rand	November 2015	R 291,042.00
	Boksburg
	Boksburg Oos
	Dunswart
Mwelase	Elsburg	November 2015	R 60,175.92
3TK Brothers	Northmead	November 2015	R 315,216.00
	Van Rhyn
	New Kleinfontein
	Alliance
	Apex
	Avenue
	Benoni
	Daveyton
Onkutlwile Enterprise	Brakpan	November 2015	R 195,300.00
	Daggafontein
	New Era
	Nigel
	Pollark Park
	Roadbend
	Schapensrust
	Selpark
	Servaas
Tau li Misana	Delmore	November 2015	R 277,020.00
	Elandsfontein
	Knights
	Ravensklip
	Angelo
Swingsweftly	Kwaggastroom	November 2015	R 327,601.80
	Residensia
	Grasmere
	Midondale
	Anglers
	Lawley
	Houtheuwel
Landelanicleansweap	Lenz	November 2015	R 154,005.87
Kgakilwe	Nancefield	November 2015	R 49,500.00
Tau li Misana	Mlamlankunzi	November 2015	R 30,841.56
M-Cubed	Kroonstad	November 2015	R 240,000.00
	Kimberley

Gauteng South (Cleaning Companies)

NAME OF CLEANING SERVICE PROVIDER	STATIONS APPOINTED TO CLEAN	DATE OF APPOINTMENT	TOTAL AMOUNT SPEND TO DATE
MalehoSpecialised Services		November 2015	R 281,284.80
	Kaalfontein
	Oakmoor
	Olifantsfontein
Kgakilwe Trading	Limindlela	November 2015	R 306,600.00
	Birchleigh
	Kempton Park
	Leralla
	Van Riebeeck Park
	Tembisa
Sesiyaya	Isando	November 2015	R 130,371.84
	Rhodesfield
Clearpath	Oos Rand	November 2015	R 291,042.00
	Boksburg
	Boksburg Oos
	Dunswart
Mwelase	Elsburg	November 2015	R 60,175.92
3TK Brothers	Northmead	November 2015	R 315,216.00
	Van Rhyn
	New Kleinfontein
	Alliance
	Apex
	Avenue
	Benoni
	Daveyton
Onkutlwile Enterprise	Brakpan	November 2015	R 195,300.00
	Daggafontein
	New Era
	Nigel
	Pollark Park
	Roadbend
	Schapensrust
	Selpark
	Servaas
Tau li Misana	Delmore	November 2015	R 277,020.00
	Elandsfontein
	Knights
	Ravensklip
	Angelo
Swingsweftly	Kwaggastroom	November 2015	R 327,601.80
	Residensia
	Grasmere
	Midondale
	Anglers
	Lawley
	Houtheuwel
Landelanicleansweap	Lenz	November 2015	R 154,005.87
Kgakilwe	Nancefield	November 2015	R 49,500.00
Tau li Misana	Mlamlankunzi	November 2015	R 30,841.56
M-Cubed	Kroonstad	November 2015	R 240,000.00
	Kimberley

Gauteng South (Cleaning Companies)

STATIONS APPOINTED TO CLEAN	NAME OF CLEANING SERVICE PROVIDER	DATE OF APPOINTMENT	TOTAL AMOUNT SPEND TO DATE
Kaalfontein	Albenico Holdings	17 August 2016	R 177,691.02
Oakmoor
Olifantsfontein
Limindlela	Ndaba Group	17 August 2016	R 232,950.00
Birchleigh
Kempton Park
Leralla
Van Riebeeck Park
Tembisa
Isando	Broad Edge	17 August 2016	R 134,640.00
Rhodesfield
Oos Rand	Nhlangano JV	17 August 2016	R 230,000.00
Boksburg
Boksburg Oos
Dunswart
Elsburg
Northmead	Fumocrete	17 August 2016	R 175,000.00
Van Rhyn
New Kleinfontein
Alliance
Apex
Avenue
Benoni
Daveyton
Brakpan	ManegarMashamba	17 August 2016	R 210,000.00
Daggafontein
New Era
Nigel
Pollark Park
Roadbend
Schapensrust
Selpark
Servaas
Delmore	Ndaba Group	17 August 2016	R 162,037.04
Elandsfontein
Knights
Ravensklip
Angelo
Springs	KhumoGobatho Trading	17 August 2016	R 79,752.00

Gauteng South Region (Cleaning Cooperatives)

Name of Cooperative	Station Name	Contracted Date	Amount Paid to date
Hamisi Ga batukanaBasika	Ikwezi	November 2015	R 565,928.00
Orange Farm Cultural Initiative	Stretford	November 2015	R 396,583.00
PhambiliBomama Trading Enterprise	Merafe	November 2015	R 565,928.00
Uthando Trading	Naledi	November 2015	R 565,928.00
Galaletsang Primary Cooperative	Naledi Train Yard	November 2015	R 510,928.00
Phakane Transport &Communtiy Projects	Dube	November 2015	R 565,928.00
Masego Trading & Projects	Nhlanzane	November 2015	R 510,939.00
Ikakgeng Multipurpose Cooperative	Lindela	November 2015	R 378,805.05
Parents Power Cooperative	Stretford	November 2015	R 479,204.00
Sivuyile Cooperative	Bloemfontein	November 2015	R 357,538.50
Mantswe A kgakalaMotewana	Phomolong	November 2015	R 565,928.00
Mocheko Projects	Pilot	November 2015	R 393,552.60
Ikhamba Cleaning Services	Eatonside	November 2015	R 348,393.43
PhakamaniMzonsundu Cooperative	Kwesine	November 2015	R 388,828.00
Likhothwayo Cooperative	Phefeni	November 2015	R 510,928.00
NithandaneMakhosikazi	Mzimhlophe	November 2015	R 510,928.00