Questions and Replies
29 November 2016 - NW2481
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)Whether (a) the Chief Executive Officer, (b) each executive and (c) each board member of the Media Advertising Information and Communication Technologies Sector Education and Training Authority (MICT SETA) submitted reports for each international trip they undertook (i) in the 2015 calendar year and (ii) since 1 January 2016; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, on what date; (2) whether he will make the specified reports available to Ms J Edwards; if not, why not; if so, by what date; (3) whether any staff members of the MICT SETA were formally appointed to act in the positions of the persons who travelled internationally; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are (a) the names of each staff member who was appointed in an acting position in the specified period and (b) further relevant details in this regard?
Reply:
1. (a) - (c) There were no international trips undertaken by the Chief Executive Officer, executive or board members in the 2015 calendar year and to date.
2. Not applicable.
3. Not Applicable.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 2481 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
29 November 2016 - NW2541
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) Whether she has been informed, that despite the numerous written demands by the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) to the SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC), there has been a lack of response by the SABC to submit proof that it has complied with the Constitutional Court judgment regarding the ban of airing violent protest, as submitted in a briefing by ICASA at a meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Communications on 1 November 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, why has the SABC not submitted the proof to ICASA as requested; (2) Is she monitoring the SABC to ensure that it complies with the specified Constitutional Court judgment; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
- The SABC has fully complied with the ICASA ruling. The SABC is now broadcasting news bulletins that covers all violent protests.
- Yes, the Minister watches news and no complaints were received.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
29 November 2016 - NW2536
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) What was the (a) basic salary, (b) fringe benefits and (c) fixed bonuses agreed upon in respect of Mr Hlaudi Motsoeneng’s appointments to the positions of (i) Acting Chief Operating Officer and (ii) Chief Operating Officer of the SA Broadcasting Corporation; (2) whether any agreements for performance bonuses were included in the remuneration packages of the specified person in each case; if not, why not; if so, (a) were any performance bonuses paid out to the person and (b) what criteria were used to measure the person’s performance in each case; (3) (a) with what (i) percentage and (ii) actual amount did the person’s remuneration package increase since his appointment, (b) who signed off the specified increases and (c) on what basis were the increases awarded?
Reply:
- Mr Moetsoeneng’s income for the period 18 November 2011 when he started acting as COO has been fully disclosed in the Audited Annual Reports of the SABC for 2011/2012, 2012/2013, 2013/2014, 2014/2015 and 2015/2016. There were no fixed bonuses agreed upon in both positions. However, he was one of the employees who have received ex- gratia amounts during the 2014/2015 financial year. With regards to other fringe benefits, these are aligned to his condition of service which is in line with the internal policies of the SABC.
- The SABC has not paid performance bonuses to staff as there is no Performance Management System in place.
- Since Mr Motsoeneng has been appointed as COO, the only increases that were awarded were aligned to the annual wage increases as approved by the delegated authority.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
29 November 2016 - NW1756
Dudley, Ms C to ask the Minister of Basic Education
Whether her department has adopted or intends to adopt a policy or programme of comprehensive sexuality education in schools; if so, what are the relevant details regarding the implementation thereof?
Reply:
Yes, in line with the implementation of the Department of Basic Education’s (DBE) Integrated Strategy on HIV, STIs and TB, 2012-2016, the DBE reviewed the 1999 National Policy on HIV/AIDS, for Learners and Educators in Public Schools, and Students and Educators in Further Education and Training Institutions and developed a new DBE National Policy on HIV, STIs and TB that aims to provide comprehensive sexuality education programme in schools. In addition, the Policy also seeks to create access to Sexual and Reproductive Health services to learners.
Sexuality education is implemented through Life Orientation as a subject in the curriculum, other programmes include HIV and AIDS Life Skills Education Programme and Peer Education Programme which support and strengthen the content of Life Orientation; as well as, Keeping Girls in School Programme - targeting mainly girls, and the Integrated School Health Programme which is conducted in partnership with the Departments of Health, Social Development, development partners and non-governmental organisations. In addition, the DBE is working with UNESCO to explore the online educator training on comprehensive sexuality education. Training is currently implemented in the Eastern Cape province and will be rolled out to other provinces in subsequent years.
29 November 2016 - NW2480
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)Whether (a) the Chief Executive Officer, (b) each executive and (c) each board member of the Local Government Sector Education and Training Authority (LGSETA) submitted reports for each international trip they undertook (i) in the 2015 calendar year and (ii) since 1 January 2016; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, on what date; (2) whether he will make the specified reports available to Ms J Edwards; if not, why not; if so, by what date; (3) whether any staff members of the LGSETA were formally appointed to act in the positions of the persons who travelled internationally; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are (a) the names of each staff member who was appointed in an acting position in the specified period and (b) further relevant details in this regard?
Reply:
1. (a) - (c) There were no international trips undertaken by the Chief Executive Officer, executive or board members in the 2015 calendar year and to date.
2. Not applicable.
3. Not Applicable.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 2480 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
29 November 2016 - NW2470
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
Whether (a) the Chief Executive Officer, (b) each executive and (c) each board member of the Construction Education and Training Authority (CETA) submitted reports for each international trip they undertook (i) in the 2015 calendar year and (ii) since 1 January 2016; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, on what date; (2) whether he will make the specified reports available to Mr M Bagraim; if not, why not; if so, by what date; (3) whether any staff members of the CETA were formally appointed to act in the positions of the persons who travelled internationally; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are (a) the names of each staff member who was appointed in an acting position in the specified period and (b) further relevant details in this regard?
Reply:
1. (a) - (c) There were no international trips undertaken by the Chief Executive Officer, executive or board members in the 2015 calendar year and to date.
2. Not applicable.
3. Not Applicable.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 2470 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
29 November 2016 - NW2466
Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
How many international trips were undertaken by (i) the Chief Executive Officer, (ii) each executive and (iii) each board member of the Services Sector Education and Training Authority (aa) in the 2015 calendar year and (bb) since 1 January 2016 and (b) what was the (i) cost, (ii) purpose and (iii) detailed itinerary of each specified trip?
Reply:
(a)-(bb) There were no international trips undertaken by the Chief Executive Officer, executive or board members in the 2015 calendar year and to date.
(b) (i)-(iii) Not applicable
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 2466 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
29 November 2016 - NW2485
Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)Whether (a) the Chief Executive Officer, (b) each executive and (c) each board member of the Safety and Security Sector Education and Training Authority (SASSETA) submitted reports for each international trip they undertook (i) in the 2015 calendar year and (ii) since 1 January 2016; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, on what date; (2) whether he will make the specified reports available to Mr S Esau; if not, why not; if so, by what date; (3) whether any staff members of the SASSETA were formally appointed to act in the positions of the persons who travelled internationally; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are (a) the names of each staff member who was appointed in an acting position in the specified period and (b) further relevant details in this regard?
Reply:
1. (a) - (c) There were no international trips undertaken by the Chief Executive Officer, executive or board members in the 2015 calendar year and to date.
2. Not applicable.
3. Not Applicable.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 2485 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
29 November 2016 - NW2535
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications
Whether the (a) chief executive officers, (b) chief operating officers, (c) group executives and/or (d) board members of any of the entities that report to her have (i) met with any representative member and/or close associate of the Gupta family and/or (ii) attended any meetings with the specified persons at the specified family’s estate in Saxonwold, Johannesburg, or anywhere else since she took office; if so, in each specified case, (aa) what are the names of the persons who were present at each meeting, (bb) where did each meeting take place, (cc) what was the purpose of the meeting and (dd) on what date did the meeting take place?
Reply:
The work from all government entities including those reporting to the Ministry of Communications, requires engagement with various stakeholders in the public and private sector. This is in line with the nature of work undertaken.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
29 November 2016 - NW2426
Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether she has taken any steps to secure investment in green independent power production in the country after Eskom’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Brian Molefe, refused to sign a purchasing agreement with the independent power producers; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW2808E
Reply:
The Department of Energy (DoE) takes the lead in the domestic IPP strategy including the sourcing and contracting component of these arrangements. This strategy is driven by the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) which is the country’s plan for electricity. The IRP is currently in review and will provide appropriate guidance on technology, scale and timing of the electricity requirements for the country with the objective of meeting energy security and diversifying the energy mix.
The key assumptions in the IRP need to be updated to provide a robust plan. In the last month, Eskom presented its Interim Results which shows that year on year demand for electricity only grew 1.2%. In fact demand for electricity has been fairly flat for the last decade.
The current capacity being added on the grid is based on the IRP 2010 which projected higher demand for electricity based on the economy growing close to 6%. This means that we are currently adding on capacity to the grid at rate higher than what is required. The biggest risk with having too much capacity is what happens to the plants that will potentially become stranded. While Eskom can push for a more aggressive export strategy to mitigate this, it comes with its own limitations including Transmission capacity. The challenge then becomes that Eskom would still need to collect the same level of revenue to cover the incurred costs. This is particularly critical at a time where Eskom balance sheet is highly indebted due to the build cycle. So with low volumes, the price of electricity will have to rise to sustain the required level of revenue, meaning consumers will have to pay more for electricity. These Eskom assets belong to the South African public, I have a responsibility to safeguard these and ensure that South African derive maximum value. The current trajectory will potentially be detrimental to consumers and it is critical that the IRP is concluded so we can have plan that offers maximum protection for consumers
ADVISORY NOTE TO THE MINISTER:
DEAR Minister,
Eskom has written to yourself, ministers finance and energy as signatories to the Government Support Framework Agreement (GFSA). Even though some of the arguments raised can be seen as survivalist, there are some valid arguments raised that warrant the attention of the government as a shareholder and policy maker. Specifically the fact that there is no new demand for electricity in South Africa, and therefore the addition of new power is likely to result in the shutdown of Eskom plants to create space for renewables resulting in lower revenue. The challenge is that in the cycle of build where Eskom is, the balance sheet is highly indebted and Eskom requires the correct revenue to be able to pay its debt obligation and in the absence of demand prices will have to rise to sustain the revenue level resulting in negative impact on consumers. Alternatively Eskom could write off the assets and have the National Treasury honor its debt obligations linked to those assets (which, at 60% debt the fiscus can barely afford which means more taxes to raise the cash). So an evolutionary approach is required in the addition of new capacity to ensure maximum protection for consumers.
29 November 2016 - NW2593
Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)Whether she issued any directives to the Acting Chief Executive Officer of the National Education Evaluation and Development Unit (NEEDU) after a meeting with the specified person in August 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the full details of the directives; (2) whether she raised any concerns with the specified person regarding the manner in which the NEEDU handled certain issues in the past; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the full details of her concerns; (3) whether she suggested that the NEEDU must be brought closer to her department; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, on what statutory grounds did she rely in this regard to safeguard the mandate of NEEDU to remain independent of the civil service responsible for the administration of schools; (4) on what grounds was the decision taken to shelve the National Education Evaluation and Development Unit Bill that was gazetted for public comment on 23 December 2011?
Reply:
1. The meeting between the Minister and the NEEDU management took place in July 2016. There was no meeting with the Minister in August 2016. The meeting was to brief the Minister on the work of the Unit in the first five-year cycle of systemic evaluations (2012-2016), and, second, to present the plan for the Unit in the second five-year cycle (2017-2021).
After the briefing, the Minister asked the NEEDU to conduct deeper investigations on the areas that continue to cause concern in the system. The Minister’s request or ‘directive,’ is in line with section 6 (1) (h) in the NEEDU Bill and section 7(1) in the Regulations for the Establishment of the OSCBE, another NEEDU founding document.
2. The Minister raised concerns on how findings made by NEEDU find their way into the Department quickly enough for remediation to take place.
3. In the July meeting between the Minister and the NEEDU management, the Minister encouraged a “close” working relationship between the Ministry and NEEDU. This relationship is envisaged in all NEEDU founding documents. To safeguard the independence of the OSCBE, the Business Case and Business Plan for the Establishment of the OSCBE provides as follows:
“Two factors must be present in the structure of OSCBE: independence from the Department of Basic Education (DBE) and the requirements to report to the Minister of Basic Education on the activities and outcomes of its work. These two factors are not in contention with each other, as the need for independence is related more to location, internal processes and a perceived separateness from the DBE whereas the need to report to the Minister is quite clear in terms of hierarchical accountability.”
4. The NEEDU Bill was shelved following advice by the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) to establish NEEDU, not as a statutory body, but as an independent government component called the Office of Standards and Compliance.
28 November 2016 - NW2204
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
(a) How many (i) charges have been laid with the SA Police Service and (ii) complaints have been lodged with the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) against the National Head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, Lt Gen B M Ntlemeza, from 1 January 2012 to date, (b) what was the nature of each (i) charge and/or (ii) complaint and (c) what are the full relevant details of the final outcome in each case?
Reply:
According to information currently at our disposal IPID is investigating four (4) matters against Gen BM Ntlemeza from 1 January 2012 up to date.
A case of defeating the Ends of Justice and corruption was opened against Gen. Ntlemeza by Lt Ramahlaha. A case was opened at Silverton police station with the following CAS 500/05/2016 and the matter is with SPP for decision.
A case of perjury against Gen. Ntlemeza was opened by Gen. JW Booysen. A case was opened at Sandton police station with the following CAS 943/10/2016 and the matter is still under investigation by IPID.
A case of Fraud, Uttering and Corruption against Gen. Ntlemeza was opened by Lt Ramahlaha. A case was opened at Polokwane with the following CAS 478/09/2015 and the matter was declined by DPP.
A case of Fraud, Crimen Injuria and Defamation of character against Gen. Ntlemeza was opened by Gen. JW Booysen. A case was opened at Durban Central police station with the following Cas 617/09/2015 and the matter is still under investigation.
28 November 2016 - NW2549
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police
What amount has been allocated by the SA Police Service for the construction of (a) permanent and (b) satellite police stations in Gauteng for the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
The accurate figures will soon be forwarded to you in due course as they are still in the process of verification.
28 November 2016 - NW2522
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
What amount have all (a)(i) civil and (ii) criminal litigation and (b) internal disciplinary proceedings instituted against Mr Anwa Dramat, Mr Shadrack Sibiya, Mr Robert McBride and Mr Johan Booysen cost his department; 2) what amount has his department been ordered by the courts to pay for cost orders in each of the specified cases for (a)(i) civil and (ii) criminal litigation and (b) internal disciplinary proceedings instituted against each of the specified persons as at the latest specified date for which information is available?
Reply:
1. (a)(i) and (b) In respect of civil matters and internal disciplinary proceedings pertaining to Mr Anwa Dramat, Mr Shadrack Sibiya, Mr Robert McBride, the Office of the State Attorney was not involved in these matters, excluding for the matter of Mr Johan Booysen. The details are explained below:
Johan Wessels Booysen / NDPP and Others: Case No. 8247/2015 – Durban High Court. In this matter an amount of R9 623.94 was expended on counsel and correspondent attorney fees.
(ii) All the criminal cases mentioned above were handled by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) prosecutors, and there were no specific costs related to criminal litigation in all these cases
2. (a)(i)(ii) and (b) According to the records at the State Attorney, there are no matters specifying that the State Attorney was an attorney of record, with a cost order being granted in these matters.
28 November 2016 - NW2266
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
With reference to his reply to question 1966 on 6 October 2016, what was the (a) total number of section 33(3) court convictions obtained for cases opened against the South African Police Service members for being in contravention of section 29(2) of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate Act, Act 1 of 2011, as amended, since the specified Act came into effect and (b) sentences handed down in each of the specified cases?
Reply:
(a) As a result of NPA declining to prosecute these matters, there were no convictions.
(b) Engagement with the National Director of Public Prosecution in this regard is underway.
28 November 2016 - NW2267
Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police
What is the (a) procedure followed after the Independent Police Investigative Directorate opens a criminal case with the National Prosecuting Authority in the course of its investigations and (b) relevant (i) South African Police Service Regulation(s), (ii) standard operating procedure(s) and/or (iii) National Instruction(s) governing the specified process?
Reply:
(a) When the criminal investigation has being completed and recommendations are made, IPID hands over the file to NPA for decision in terms of section 7(4) of the IPID act.
(b) (i) & (ii) For departmental recommendations IPID hands over the file to SAPS after completion for disciplinary procedures in terms of section 7(6) & 7(7) of the IPID act and SAPS implements disciplinary steps based on the new SAPS discipline regulation 5(3) which came to effect on the 1st November 2016.
28 November 2016 - NW2545
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
Whether the SA Police Service implemented all the remedial action ordered by the Public Protector in her report, entitled A Fair Chance to Serve dated 30 March 2015, concerning the complaint by a certain person (name furnished); if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will the remedial action be implemented; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(a) Yes, the recommendations by the Public Protector were implemented.
(b) The complainant was re-enlisted in the South African Police Service on 1 June 2016. The services of an independent assessor have been secured to make a determination on compensation which was set down for 22 November 2016. A written apology on behalf of the South African Police Service was also provided to the complainant. The office of the Public Protector was informed of progress in this regard.
28 November 2016 - NW2357
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
Which company was appointed by the Air Traffic Navigation Services to assist with the establishment of the Programme Management Office in the 2014-15 financial year, (b) what criteria were used to appoint the specified company, (c) what budget was allocated to the specified company and (d) what were the (i) key performance indicators, (ii) deliverables and (iii) deadlines?
Reply:
a) Project Centric, a subsidiary of Project-Link Holdings and a project management specialist company, was appointed on 13 June 2014 to conduct a Project Management Assessment and Design assignment for ATNS.
b) The normal ATNS Procurement Policies as per the PFMA and PPFA Guidelines were used in the appointment of the service provider. A request for quotation was issued on 8 April 2014 and closed on 16 April 2014 to eleven (11) service providers. The bids were evaluated against the criteria of administrative compliance, functional evaluation, price and BEE.
c) Project Centric was recommended as the successful company for appointment to the relevant line Executive at ATNS, at a total cost of R355, 737.00 including VAT. A budget of R450, 000.00 had been allocated for this exercise.
d) The service provider was broadly mandated to conduct a feasibility study for the deployment of a strong matrix Project Management Office (PMO). The specific brief to the successful service provider was to conduct an independent assessment of the current PMO (at the time) and design of a strong matrix PMO assisting with the following:
(i) and (ii)
-
- Conducting project management processes readiness assessment;
- Conducting a feasibility study and a business case for a strong matrix PMO;
- Developing a detailed design of a strong matrix PMO and a business case;
- Developing a change management plan and strategy;
- Developing a communications strategy and plan; and
- Developing a training plan.
(ii) The project commenced in August, 2014 and was completed at the end of November, 2014. Throughout the project life cycle regular feedback sessions were held with all project stakeholders to ensure a consultative process for the design of the PMO. Project status reports were distributed to all stakeholders including the EXCO. On 6 February 2015 the final Report, PMO Assessment and Design Project, as well as a request to obtain approval to implement recommendations as per the Report were tabled at the EXCO.
28 November 2016 - NW2616
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
What (a) is the current status of the investigation into CAS 199/06/2016 opened at the Khayelitsha Police Station, (b) are the offences contained in the docket, (c) is the (i) rank and (ii) name of the investigating officer and (d) are the full details of all feedback given to the family in terms of the (aa) content of, (bb) dates on which and (cc) the means through which the feedback was given?
Reply:
(a) The case docket, Khayelitsha CAS 199/06/2016 is still under investigation. The cell phone records have been requested from the service provider to be analysed. This will assist in identifying and tracing the suspects.
(b) The offence is house robbery.
(c)(i) & (ii) The details of the investigating officer cannot be disclosed to allow the investigation to be conducted without fear or favour.
(d)(aa) The complainant has been provided with feedback relating to the case number, the particulars of the investigating officer as well as the status of the investigation.
(d)(bb) Feedback was provided to the complainant on 2016-06-07 and 2016-06-29.
(d)(cc) Feedback was provided to the complainant by means of cell phone communication.
28 November 2016 - NW1966
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
(a) What is the total number of section 33(3) cases that were opened against SA Police Service members for being in contravention of section 29(2) of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate Act, Act 1 of 2011, as amended, since the specified Act came into effect, (b) what is the total number that resulted in guilty convictions and (c) what were the sanctions in each of the specified cases case?
Reply:
(a) Total number of section 33(3) matters opened by IPID
Year |
Reported cases |
2012/13 |
127 |
2013/14 |
65 |
2014/15 |
60 |
2015/16 |
41 |
Total |
293 |
Refer to annexure A for more details
(b) Total number that resulted guilty in convictions per year
Year |
Departmental |
Criminal |
2012/13 |
3 |
0 |
2013/14 |
7 |
0 |
2014/15 |
11 |
0 |
2015/16 |
11 |
0 |
Total |
32 |
0 |
Refer to annexure B for more details
(c) Total number of sanctions per year
Year |
Verbal warning |
Written Warning |
2012/13 |
1 |
2 |
2013/14 |
2 |
5 |
2014/15 |
0 |
11 |
2015/16 |
3 |
8 |
Total |
6 |
26 |
Refer to annexure B for more details
Annexure A: Intake
2012-2013 |
|||||
Province |
Station |
Case Number |
Short Description |
Circumstances |
CAS No |
Free State |
Hoopstad |
2012040213 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
05/03/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Kanyamazane |
2012040333 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Free State |
Botshabelo |
2012050448 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Free State |
Selosesha |
2012060159 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
68/06/2012 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Ekuvukeni |
2012060191 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Inanda |
2012060194 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Msinga |
2012060196 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Mbazwana |
2012060197 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Melmoth |
2012060200 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Emanguzi |
2012060201 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Pongola |
2012060206 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Free State |
Parkroad |
2012060307 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
546/06/2012 |
Free State |
Bultfontein |
2012060310 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
37/06/2012 |
Gauteng |
Soshanguve |
2012060318 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
OB: 880/06/2012 |
Free State |
Villiers |
2012060322 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Villiers 31/06/2012 |
Free State |
Bethlehem |
2012060323 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Bethlehem 195/06/2012 |
Free State |
Phuthadithjaba |
2012060324 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Phutha's 148/06/2012 |
Free State |
Luckhoff |
2012060325 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
25/06/2012 |
Free State |
Phuthadithjaba |
2012060326 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Phutha's 149/06/2012 |
Free State |
Harrismith |
2012060328 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Harrismith 150/06/2012 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Chatsworth |
2012060334 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Chatsworth CAS: 396/06/2012 |
Free State |
Kagisanong |
2012060335 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
KAGISANONG CAS 176/06/2012 |
Free State |
Welkom |
2012060342 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
296/06/2012 |
Free State |
Batho |
2012060359 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Batho CAS 100/06/2012 |
Free State |
Tseki |
2012060454 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Tseki 131/06/2012 |
Free State |
Tseki |
2012060457 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Tseki 132/06/2012 |
Free State |
Tseki |
2012060459 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Tseki 133/06/2012 |
Free State |
Soutpan |
2012060472 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Soutpan CAS 15/06/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Masoyi |
2012060482 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Free State |
Vrede |
2012060495 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Vrede 73/06/2012 |
Free State |
Memel |
2012060502 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Memel 39/06/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Whittlesea |
2012060596 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
328/06/2012 |
Free State |
Boithuso |
2012060649 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
270/06/2012 |
Free State |
Kroonstad |
2012060650 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
206/06/2012 |
Western Cape |
Mbekwani |
2012070068 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Western Cape |
ElsiesRiver |
2012070077 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
616/06/2012 |
Western Cape |
Mfuleni |
2012070101 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Free State |
Kopanong |
2012070171 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
44/07/2012 |
Free State |
Bronville |
2012070172 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
14/07/2012 |
Free State |
Zastron |
2012070175 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
48/07/2012 |
Free State |
Kopanong |
2012070176 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
45/07/2012 |
Free State |
Edenburg |
2012070177 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
11/07/2012 |
Free State |
Kopanong |
2012070178 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
40/07/2012 |
Free State |
Bloemspruit |
2012070179 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
99/07/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Storms River |
2012070211 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
08/07/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Alexandria |
2012070222 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
28/07/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Alexandria |
2012070223 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
27/07/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Fort Beaufort |
2012070225 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
41/07/2012 |
Limpopo |
Nebo |
2012070230 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
166/06/2012 |
Limpopo |
Tubatse |
2012070235 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
232/06/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Ngqeleni |
2012070314 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
80/07/2012 |
Free State |
Tseki |
2012070397 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Tseki 51/07/2012 |
Free State |
Tseki |
2012070401 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Tseki 52/07/2012 |
Western Cape |
Nyanga |
2012070441 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
458/07/2012 |
Free State |
Tweespruit |
2012070450 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
17/06/2012 |
Western Cape |
Paarl |
2012070462 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Mbekweni CAS 141/07/2012 |
Western Cape |
CapeTown |
2012070547 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
1691/04/2012 |
Free State |
Clocolan |
2012070643 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
82/07/2012 |
Limpopo |
Levubu |
2012070667 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Gauteng |
Katlehong |
2012080101 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
425/07/2012 |
Free State |
Namahadi |
2012080194 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Namahadi 28/08/2012 |
Gauteng |
Silverton |
2012080260 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
179/08/2012 |
Free State |
Heidedal |
2012080293 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
95/08/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Kwaggafontein |
2012080312 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
68/08/20012 |
Gauteng |
Lenasia |
2012080347 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
237/08/2012 |
Western Cape |
George |
2012080389 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
871/07/2012 |
Free State |
Bethlehem |
2012080435 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
14/08/2012 |
Western Cape |
BeaufortWest |
2012080550 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
341/08/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Acornhoek |
2012080621 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Mpumalanga |
Siyabuswa |
2012080829 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
451/08/2012 |
Western Cape |
Brackenfell |
2012090154 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Northern Cape |
Jan Kempdorp |
2012090164 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
261/08/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Jan Kempdorp |
2012090229 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
262/019/2012 |
Limpopo |
Mahwelereng |
2012090244 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
94/09/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Belfast |
2012090359 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Limpopo |
Lebowakgomo |
2012090553 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
282/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090572 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
57/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090576 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
46/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090577 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
59/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090578 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
60/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090579 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
55/09/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Barberton |
2012090581 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
239/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090587 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
53/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090588 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
61/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090589 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
62/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090629 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
56/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090633 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
54/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Olifantshoek |
2012090635 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
58/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Rietfontein |
2012090638 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
67/09/2012 |
Northern Cape |
Witdraai |
2012090644 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
45/09/2012 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Maphumulo |
2012100014 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Maphumulo CAS 130/09/2012 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Tongaat |
2012100042 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Tongaat CAS157/09/2012 |
Western Cape |
Wynberg |
2012100237 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Wynberg CAS 92/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
Saldanha |
2012100241 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Saldanha CAS 50/10/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Piet Ritief |
2012100356 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Gauteng |
Mamelodi West |
2012100503 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
345/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
Swellendam |
2012100517 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Western Cape |
Steenberg |
2012100519 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Western Cape |
Touwsrivier |
2012100556 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Touwsrivier CAS 114/102/2012 |
Western Cape |
Worcester |
2012100558 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Worcester 343/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
Kirstenhof |
2012100562 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Kirstenhof 242/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
PlettenbergBay |
2012100610 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Western Cape |
Mfuleni |
2012100719 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
514/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
Mfuleni |
2012100722 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
517/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
MitchellsPlain |
2012100724 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
1586/10/2012 |
Limpopo |
Mankweng |
2012110012 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
282/10/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Kwamhlanga |
2012110155 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
96/11/2012 |
Mpumalanga |
Vosman |
2012110180 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
109/11/2012 |
Western Cape |
Riversdal |
2012110196 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Gauteng |
Muldersdrif |
2012110527 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
137/11/2012 |
Gauteng |
Midrand |
2012110690 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
916/11/2012 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Msinga |
2012110693 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
101/11/2012 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Ezibayeni |
2012110713 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Ezibayeni Cas 34/11/2012 |
Gauteng |
Sunnyside |
2012110738 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Sunnyside Cas 947/11/2012 |
Free State |
Bayswater |
2012120034 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
13/12/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Middelburg |
2012120049 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
329/11/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Dimbaza |
2012120222 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
63/11/2012 |
Western Cape |
Wynberg |
2012120256 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
301/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
Goodwood |
2012120257 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
335/10/2012 |
Western Cape |
Strand |
2012120357 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
335/12/2012 |
Limpopo |
Levubu |
2013020015 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
158/01/2013 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Mooi River |
2013020272 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
31/02/2013 |
Eastern Cape |
Ngangelizwe |
2013020302 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Western Cape |
Kwanokuthula |
2013030495 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Plessislaer |
2013030635 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Plessislaer |
Eastern Cape |
Flagsaff |
2013010093 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
Flagstaff CAS 04/01/2012 |
Eastern Cape |
Tsolo |
2013010629 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Non-compliance with IPID Act |
93/01/2013 |
2013-2014 |
|||||
Province |
PoliceStation |
CaseNumber |
IncidentCodeShortDesc |
IncidentSubCodeShortDesc |
CaseNumber |
Gauteng |
Moroka |
2013040087 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
27/04/2013 |
Gauteng |
Kempton Park |
2013040326 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
414/042013 |
Gauteng |
Protea Glen |
2013040332 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Protea Glen Cas 257/04/2013 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Empangeni |
2013050053 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
488/04/2013 |
North West |
Brits |
2013050089 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
53/05/2013 |
Gauteng |
Kagiso |
2013050120 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
128/05/2013 |
Northern Cape |
Kimberley |
2013050177 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
404/04/2013 |
Western Cape |
Piketberg |
2013050307 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
140/05/2013 |
Northern Cape |
De Aar |
2013050313 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
66/12/2012 |
Northern Cape |
De Aar |
2013050326 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Northern Cape |
De Aar |
2013050337 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Northern Cape |
DeAar |
2013050339 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Eastern Cape |
Balfour |
2013060157 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
4/06/2013 |
Western Cape |
Somerset-Wes |
2013060198 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Strand CAS 224/06/2013 |
Eastern Cape |
Port Alfred |
2013060453 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Standerton |
2013070143 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Graskop |
2013070187 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
NULL |
2013070251 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Barberton |
2013070252 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Kwamakutha |
2013070277 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
kwa-makthua |
Free State |
Ladybrand |
2013070306 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
163/07/2013 |
Mpumalanga |
Bethal |
2013070373 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Eastern Cape |
Humewood |
2013070384 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
639/05/2013 |
Mpumalanga |
Schoemansdal |
2013080034 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Gauteng |
Kagiso |
2013080064 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
96/08/2013 |
Gauteng |
Bramley |
2013080198 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
79/08/2013 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Pietermaritzburg |
2013080557 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Plessislaer 703/08/2013 |
Gauteng |
Sunnyside |
2013090002 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sunnyside Cas 1072/08/2013 |
Mpumalanga |
Leslie |
2013090163 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
18/01/2013 |
Northern Cape |
Bathlaros |
2013090257 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
26/09/2013 |
Gauteng |
Diepsloot |
2013090266 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
182/09/2013 |
Gauteng |
Moroka |
2013090304 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
37108/2013 |
Gauteng |
Katlehong |
2013090328 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Ermelo |
2013090614 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
491/09/2013 |
Mpumalanga |
Siyabuswa |
2013100098 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Masoyi |
2013100100 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Gauteng |
Akasia |
2013100155 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Akasia Cas /10/2013 |
Free State |
Harrismith |
2013100173 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Kriel |
2013100175 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Gauteng |
Mamelodi |
2013100241 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Mamelodi Cas /10/2013 |
Eastern Cape |
Mlungisi |
2013100274 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Mlungisi Cas 66/10/2013 |
Mpumalanga |
Vosman |
2013100344 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Kwamhlanga |
2013100450 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Free State |
Parkweg |
2013100462 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
1383/10/2013 |
Gauteng |
Loate |
2013100467 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
482/10/2013 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Margate |
2013100544 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
705/03/2007 |
Mpumalanga |
Nelspruit |
2013100549 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Ermelo |
2013110021 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Lydenburg |
2013110024 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Acornhoek |
2013110281 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Eastern Cape |
EastLondon |
2013110503 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Kwazulu Natal |
Highflats |
2013120143 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Highflats cas 29/12/2013 |
Gauteng |
Olivenhoutbosch |
2013120145 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Northern Cape |
Springbok |
2013120448 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
150/12/2013 |
Mpumalanga |
Tonga |
2014010406 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Tonga |
Mpumalanga |
Secunda |
2014010427 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Secunda |
Mpumalanga |
Skukuza |
2014010585 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Bethal |
2014010586 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Gauteng |
MamelodiEast |
2014020229 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Mamelodi East Cas 000/02/2014 |
Mpumalanga |
Ermelo |
2014020256 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Ermelo |
2014020261 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Carolina |
2014020309 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Mpumalanga |
Kriel |
2014020521 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
Limpopo |
Polokwane |
2014020559 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
772/02/2014 |
Mpumalanga |
Ogies |
2014030396 |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
Sec 33(3) Charges |
|
2014-2015 |
|||||
Province |
PoliceStation |
CaseControlNumber |
CaseNumber |
Section |
IncidentCode |
Mpumalanga |
Witbank |
2014040119 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Dimbaza |
2014040167 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Actonville |
2014040229 |
07 /03/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Verulam |
2014040256 |
192 /04/2013 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Vulindlela |
2014040309 |
44 /04/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Ntabethemba |
2014040313 |
18 /10/2013 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Elsburg |
2014040416 |
188 /04/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Zastron |
2014040453 |
218 /04/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Estcourt |
2014050076 |
16 /05/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Bhekithemba |
2014050168 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Mangaung |
2014060092 |
87 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Heidedal |
2014060093 |
22 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Hazyview |
2014060110 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Roodepoort |
2014060121 |
164 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Upington |
2014060194 |
114 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rosedale |
2014060197 |
48 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rosedale |
2014060200 |
68 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rosedale |
2014060203 |
69 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rosedale |
2014060205 |
71 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rosedale |
2014060215 |
72 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Mondeor |
2014060228 |
103 /06/ 201 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Tonga |
2014060326 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Swartkops |
2014070148 |
168 /06/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Masoyi |
2014070237 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Ermelo |
2014070240 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Ermelo |
2014070244 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Nelspruit |
2014080150 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Nelspruit |
2014080151 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Tsomo |
2014080549 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Zwelitsha |
2014090291 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Mthatha |
2014090311 |
185 /9 /014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Keimoes |
2014090440 |
129 /9 /2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Hartebeeskop |
2014090449 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Tonga |
2014090450 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Dalasile |
2014100256 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Vrede |
2014100464 |
0092/10/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Nqamakwe |
2014100484 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Western Cape |
Kraaifontein |
2014100582 |
1946/10/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Namahadi |
2014110676 |
0117/11/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Maokeng |
2014120041 |
293 /11/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Queenstown |
2014120277 |
35 /12/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Bushbuckridge |
2014120300 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
KingWilliamsTown |
2014120387 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Limpopo |
JaneFurse |
2014120396 |
0148/11/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Limpopo |
Burgersfort |
2014120402 |
130 /12/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Limpopo |
Burgersfort |
2014120419 |
131 /12/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Bell |
2015010155 |
13 /01/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Grahamstown |
2015010275 |
113 /01/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Ngqamakwe |
2015010324 |
95 /01/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Nqamakwe |
2015010341 |
94 /01/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Limpopo |
JaneFurse |
2015010497 |
109 /01/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Hazyview |
2015020076 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Dullstroom |
2015020164 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Mdantsane |
2015020389 |
197 /02/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Parkweg |
2015030078 |
117 /03/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Tweeling |
2015030084 |
0014/03/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Ficksburg |
2015030296 |
172 /03/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Balfour |
2015030329 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Embalenhle |
2015030342 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Kagisanong |
2015030496 |
0439/03/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
2015-2016 |
|||||
Province |
PoliceStation |
CaseControlNumber |
CAS Number |
Class |
IncidentCode |
Free State |
HobHouse |
2015040009 |
0032/03/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Kagisanong |
2015040119 |
530 /03/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Western Cape |
Kwanokhuthula |
2015040133 |
0777/12/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Embalenhle |
2015040162 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Wepener |
2015050121 |
17 /05/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Verkeerdevlei |
2015050180 |
12 /5 /015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Edenville |
2015050228 |
31 /05/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Parkweg |
2015050318 |
1065/05/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Hibberdene |
2015060029 |
0296/05/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Western Cape |
Athlone |
2015060076 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Western Cape |
TableView |
2015060098 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Ermelo |
2015060215 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Arlington |
2015060375 |
0017/06/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Hluhluwe |
2015070042 |
0006/07/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Acornhoek |
2015070248 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Temba |
2015080028 |
1074/07/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Kagisho |
2015080277 |
94 /08/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Ekurhuleni Metro Police |
2015080509 |
707 /08/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Douglasdale |
2015080510 |
881 /08/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Makwane |
2015090073 |
0006/09/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Limpopo |
Dennilton |
2015090111 |
0183/10/2014 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Lindley |
2015090458 |
0045/09/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Bethlehem |
2015090471 |
409 /9 /015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Eshowe |
2015090613 |
395 /09/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
Lamontville |
2015100199 |
15 /10/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
Elliot |
2015100218 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rietfontein |
2015110339 |
42 /11/ 201 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rietfontein |
2015110340 |
43 /11/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Northern Cape |
Rietfontein |
2015110359 |
44 /11/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Sakhile |
2015120043 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Siyabuswa |
2015120049 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Mpumalanga |
Sakhile |
2015120052 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Limpopo |
Tzaneen |
2015120390 |
0367/12/2015 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Eastern Cape |
KingWilliamsTown |
2016010065 |
06 /01/2016 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Limpopo |
Maake |
2016010254 |
0126/01/2016 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Gauteng |
Alexandra |
2016010272 |
360 /01/2016 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Bothaville |
2016010299 |
0130/01/2016 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Free State |
Viljoenskroon |
2016020119 |
0008/02/2016 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
North West |
Mogwase |
2016020444 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
North West |
Bethanie |
2016020445 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Kwazulu Natal |
CatoManor |
2016020448 |
|
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29 |
Annexure B: Convictions
Details of disciplinary convictions 2012/13 |
||||
No. |
CCN |
Station |
Nature of complaint |
Sentence / Sanction |
1 |
2012060254 NC |
Norvalspont |
Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act |
Written warning |
2 |
2012090154 WC |
Brackenfell |
Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act |
Verbal warning |
3 |
2012100241 WC |
Saldanha |
Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act |
Written warning |
Details of disciplinary convictions 2013/14 |
||||
No. |
CCN |
Station |
Nature of complaint |
Sentence / Sanction |
1 |
2012070450 FS |
Tweespruit |
Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
2 |
2012060159 FS |
Selosesha |
Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
3 |
2012060310 FS |
Bultfontein |
Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act |
Verbal warning |
4 |
2012090581 MP |
Barberton |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
5 |
2012060505 MP |
Nelspruit |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
6 |
2012040333 MP |
Kanyamazane |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
7 |
2013020013 EC |
Willowmore |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Verbal warnings |
Details of disciplinary convictions 2014/15 |
||||
No. |
CCN |
Station |
Nature of complaint |
Sentence / Sanction |
1 |
2012060482 MP |
Masoyi |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
2 |
2013070252 MP |
Barberton |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
3 |
2013100098 MP |
Siyabuswa |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
4 |
2013090614 MP |
Ermelo |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
5 |
2013070373 MP |
Bethal |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
6 |
2014010586 MP |
Bethal |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
7 |
2014040119 MP |
Witbank |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
8 |
2014080151 MP |
Mamethlake |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
9 |
2013070306 FS |
Ladybrand |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
10 |
2012090553 LP |
Lebowakgomo |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written Warning |
11 |
2013080034 MP |
Schoemansdal |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
Details of disciplinary convictions 2015/16 |
||||
No. |
CCN |
Station |
Nature of complaint |
Sentence / Sanction |
1 |
2012070177 FS |
Edenburg |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Verbal warning |
2 |
2015040009 FS |
Hobhouse |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Verbal warning |
3 |
2015050180 FS |
Verkeerdevlei |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
4 |
2015050228 FS |
Edenville |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
5 |
2015060076 WC |
Athlone |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Verbal warning |
6 |
2015080277 NC |
Kagisho |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written Warning |
7 |
2015010497 LP |
Jane Furse |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
8 |
2015090111 LP |
Dennilton |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
9 |
2014020256 MP |
Ermelo |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written Warning |
10 |
2015020076 MP |
Hazyview |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
11 |
2014080150 MP |
Barberton |
Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act |
Written warning |
28 November 2016 - NW2212
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What is she doing in providing evidence that can assist in the trial proceeding against a certain person (name furnished) that has been linked to a web of corruption and implicated by other rhino poachers who claimed to have worked for the poaching kingpin while the person upon confrontation by the police confirmed his intention not to stop killing rhinos?
Reply:
Please note that neither the Department of Environmental Affairs nor I can provide evidence that can assist in the trial of the person referred to in the question. However, the South African Police Service’s Directorate: Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) arrested the said person and associates on 18 December 2014 and the investigation was successfully finalised. The syndicate members were consequently brought before the Hluhluwe magistrates court after their arrest. Although bail was formally opposed by the prosecutor, the magistrate ruled in favour of the accused and they were subsequently released on R10 000,00 bail each. The matter is currently on the court roll at the Ngwelezane Regional Court. The matter has been postponed on numerous occasions due to change of legal representation on the part of the accused. We are advised that a final court date will be determined within the next month and that the investigation and prosecution team have gathered sufficient evidence and have been ready to proceed with the trial since the arrest of the syndicate members.
---ooOoo---
28 November 2016 - NW2213
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether she is instituting investigations into recent reports of illegal trade in endangered species allegedly taking place at the Faraday Muthi Market, in Selby, Johannesburg, where it is alleged that animal parts from endangered species such as leopard, lion, chimpanzee, hyena, pangolin and vulture are being traded illegally; if not, when will an investigation be instituted into the trade practices of the Johannesburg Muthi markets so as to ensure that they are legally compliant as regards trade in wildlife; if so, what are the full details of any such investigation?
Reply:
Nature conservation is a concurrent competence between national and provincial government and any investigation into illegal trade in endangered species allegedly taking place at the Faraday Muthi Market, in Selby, Johannesburg will have to be done by the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) which is the conservation authority responsible for law enforcement in the Gauteng Province.
However, due to increasing reports of the illegal activities occurring at various muthi markets, a national project has been included in the 2016/17 workplan of the Technical Committee of Minister and Members of Executive Council (MINTECH) Working Group IV, the national coordinating forum on environmental compliance and enforcement that is aimed at raising the awareness of traditional healers on the duties and obligations applicable to their activities in terms of the national biodiversity legislation.
---ooOoo---
28 November 2016 - NW2295
Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Health
Whether any (a) internal and/or (b) external forensic reports pertaining to (i) his department and/or (ii) each entity reporting to him were completed from 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic reports?
Reply:
The following table reflects the response in this regard.
(a) INTERNAL OR (b) EXTERNAL |
DEPARTMENT |
COMMENT DATE |
(aa) NAME |
(bb) SUBJECT MATTER |
(cc) DATE OF CONCLUSION |
(a) Internal Forensic Investigation |
SANAC |
Instituted in July 2011 |
Allegation against an employee |
The investigation was in response to the serious allegations of fraud levelled against the employee. |
March 2012 |
(a) Internal Forensic Investigation |
Medicine Control Council Unit |
Instituted in March 2014 |
Allegation against an employee |
The investigation was in response to the serious allegations of dishonesty levelled against the employee. |
June 2015 |
(a) Internal Forensic Investigation |
Human Resources Directorate |
Instituted in 2010 |
Fruitless and wasteful expenditure |
The investigation was in response to the serious allegations of fruitless and wasteful expenditure levelled against an employee |
June 2013 |
(a) Internal Forensic Investigation |
Johannesburg Forensic Chemistry Laboratory |
Instituted in June 2014 |
Allegations of assault against 2 employees |
The investigation was in response to the serious allegations of assault levelled against the 2 employees. |
July 2014 |
(b) External Investigation |
None |
||||
(b) External forensic investigation |
Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) |
Instituted in April 2014 |
Allegation against the Registrar |
The investigation was in response to the serious allegations levelled against the Registrar of CMS by the former provisional curator of Medshield |
April 2015 |
(a)None |
South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) |
None |
None |
None |
None |
(a)None |
Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC) |
None |
None |
None |
None |
(b)External forensic investigation |
National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) |
19 July 2013 |
SA Cosmetics |
Alleged Fraudulent Transactions |
09-Sep-13 |
(b)External forensic investigation |
11 April 2014 |
NHLS Billing |
Forensic Investigation into KZN NHLS billing system |
24-May-16 |
END.
28 November 2016 - NW2517
Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
Whether, with reference to his replies to questions (a) 2140 and (b) 2141 on 28 October 2016, any South African embassy and/or consulate in the Russian Federation issued a visa to any of the specified Russian nationals; if so, what are the relevant details in each case in terms of the (i) type, (ii) duration of stay and (iii) dates of validity of each of the specified visas?
Reply:
The Honourable Member is requested to provide me with details such as passport numbers and other additional information to enable me to validate the information on our systems and provide a response.
28 November 2016 - NW2405
Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
What (a) are the full reasons for the recent erection of stop signs on the N12 between the R28 and R558 at Zuurbekom in the Westonaria Local Municipality in Gauteng, (b) traffic impact studies were undertaken (i) to ascertain the necessity for the stop signs and (ii) since the erection of the stop signs, (c) were the results of each of the impact studies in each case and (d) were the costs involved in erecting the stop signs?
Reply:
a) The N12 West route from Naturena in Johannesburg to the Northwest Province border at Fochville has been identified as the most fatal major route in Gauteng. The intersections in the Zuurberkom area have been identified as the most hazardous locations (HAZLOCs) on the N12. The factors that contribute to the dangers at these intersections include the following:
- Excessive speed on the N12, especially since the recent rehabilitation of the road. Traffic speed monitoring has indicated that almost 40% of vehicles are travelling above the speed limit of 80km/h in this area;
- High volumes of long trucks and other slow moving traffic crossing the N12, especially in the areas adjacent to the silos;
- The area adjacent to the N12 in the Zuurberkom area that is developing, resulting in high volumes of pedestrians and cyclists crossing the N12’
- Reckless and inconsiderate drivers behaviours;
- High accident rates and fatalities in the Zuurberkom area, especially after the completion of the road rehabilitation (the number of fatalities had more than doubled from 2015 to 2016)
The installation of 4way stops at these intersections has been identified as the most appropriate measure to address these problem at these stage. In the longer term the installation of traffic signals at these intersections will be considered.
b) (i) Yes, traffic studies, investigations and inspections were undertaken by the Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport and the Gauteng Department of Community Safety in consultation with the local law enforcement agencies as part of the West Rand Rims (road accident management system)
(ii) Yes, the situation is being monitored closely and regular inspections are being carried out.
c) The study confirmed the need for the 4-way stop and indicated the need for further measures such as overhead lighting, rumble strips and continuous traffic law enforcement in this area
d) No separate record of the costs for the instillation were kept as they were installed as part of the routine maintenance activities.
28 November 2016 - NW2526
Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(1) Whether any (a) criminal, (b) civil and/or (c) disciplinary charges have been laid against any person and/or organisation involved in the Siyenza Group toilets tender scandal project in the Amathole District Municipality in the Eastern Cape; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (i) nature of the charges laid and (ii) current status of each specified case; ( 2 ) Whether any amounts have been recovered from (a) the specified company and/or (b) any of the specified persons and/or organisations involved in the specified tender scandal project; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what amount (i) has been recovered and (ii) remains outstanding in each case; (3) What is the current status of the rectification programme undertaken by (a) the Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent and/or (b) any of the specified agent’s implementing agents on the tender scandal project
Reply:
The response below was provided by the municipality:
(1) (a),(b) & (c) No criminal, civil or disciplinary charges have been laid against any person and/or organisation involved in the Siyenza Group toilets tender project in the Amathole District Municipality. The investigations by the Public Protector and the National Treasury are currently underway. The outcome of the investigations will determine if there are grounds for such actions.
(i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
(2) No amounts have been recovered from the specified company and/or any of the specified persons and/or organisations involved in the Siyenza Group toilets tender project. The outcome of the investigations will determine if there are grounds for such actions.
(i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
(3) (a) & (b) There is no rectification programme currently being undertaken by Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent (MISA). However, MISA in partnership with the Department of Water and Sanitation will be supporting the implementation of the programme by Amatola Water Board. The Amatola Water Board has been appointed by the Department of Water and Sanitation as an implementing agent for the completion of the project. Further, the Amatola Water Board has developed and costed the implementation plan for the completion of the project. The proposed commencement date of the project is January 2017.
28 November 2016 - NW2489
Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Health
(1)In view of the Esidimeni incident which resulted in unnecessary deaths within the most vulnerable sector within our society, what steps has he taken to (a) safeguard the wellbeing of the remaining former patients of the Life Healthcare Esidimeni Hospital and (b) ensure a transparent and unbiased investigation into the circumstances around the deaths of the 36 psychiatric patients; (2) what assurances can he give that there will be accountability and consequences, including criminal prosecutions, regarding the matter?
Reply:
(1) As you might have heard Honourable Member, I have asked the Health Ombudsperson to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter. However, as immediate steps to avoid further deaths, I sent teams out visit the NGOs where deaths have occurred, and even others that were new, to assess the safety of the patients that are still alive, in order to take appropriate steps to ensure their safety.
(2) I am currently awaiting the outcome of the investigation by the Health Ombudsperson in order to determine what further interventions are required and should be taken regarding this matter.
END.
28 November 2016 - NW2587
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Whether the implementation plan for the National Transport Master Plan 2050 (NATMAP) has been completed; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will the specified plan be completed; (2) whether the final NATMAP 2050 has been submitted to Cabinet for approval; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will the pla n be submitted to Cabinet; (3) whether her department will conclude all outstanding legislation relating to the NATMAP 2050 by the end of the 2016-17 financial year as indicated in her department’s 2015-16 annual performance and strategic plans; if not, (a) why not and (b) what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) The Implementation Plan for National Transport Master Plan 2050 is not complete. It is the target
for the 2016/17 financial year and anticipated to be completed by March 2017.
(2) The National Transport Master Plan 2050 has been submitted to Cabinet and got approval on the 19 October 2016.
(3) The legislation will not be completed in 2016/17 financial year as approval by Cabinet was only in October 2016.
28 November 2016 - NW2586
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
Whether the establishment of the Single Transport Economic Regulator will be reintroduced into the department’s strategic and annual performance plans; if not, why not; if so, (a) by what date and (b) what are the further relevant details?
Reply:
Yes, the Single Transport Economic Regulator project will be part of the 2017/18 and onwards of the Department’s Strategic and Annual Performance Plans. The Department plans to present a Bill (draft legislation framework) to Cabinet to solicit gazetting approval for 60 days public consultation by end of financial year of 2016/17. Thereafter, inputs from the public will be consolidated and a revised Bill will be taken back to Cabinet for approval during 2017/18 financial year. The next step will be to table the Bill in Parliament by end of 2017/18 financial year. Upon promulgation of the Bill to a legislation, the Transport Economic Regulator establishment will commence.
28 November 2016 - NW2552
Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(1)To what position has Ms Ashley Rutherford been appointed in the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality? (2) whether the position was advertised before the appointment of the specified person; if not, why not; if so, (a) on which dates and (b) in which media were advertisements placed? (3) (a) what qualifications (i) were required for the specified position and (ii) does the person possess, (b) how many other applicants applied for the position and (c) what is the total annual remuneration package for the position?
Reply:
The following response is based on the information received from Gauteng Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs:
1. Ms Ashley Rutherford was nominated as a councillor from July 2014 up until 31 May 2015 to fill a vacancy following the resignation of a councillor.
2. Not applicable, councillors are nominated from the applicable party list to be elected in the vacancy.
3. Not applicable, councillors are nominated from the applicable party list to be elected in the vacancy.
28 November 2016 - NW2543
Rabotapi, Mr MW to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture
1. Whether his department contributed any funds to the funeral of a certain person (name and details furnished) if not, what is the position regarding the contribution of funds towards the costs of an artist’s funeral; if so, (a) what is the total amount that his department contributed and (b) what are the further relevant details?
Reply:
The DAC has been faced with requests to assist in situations where some of artists passed on. These requests normally come from bereaved families. However, it should be noted that, in the absence of formal policy in this regard, it became important to:
a) Appreciate the historical fact that many South African artists experienced the worst isolation and marginalisation of their works during apartheid. Despite these challenges artists continued to share South African talent and culture with the world.
b) Most of these artists are currently in the late 60s and beyond. Therefore they can no longer do work as they reached their peak during very difficult moments of the country. A lot of the works remain legendary and continues to shape the arts and cultural landscape of the country.
In relation to the above, the DAC has responded to requests related to the passing on of various legends. The financial assistance is subject to the availability of funds. Amongst them are the following:
1.The late Mr Ben Nomoyi who was in the film industry in the early 1970s. He was able to produce works that ensured entry into the Guinness book of records. An achievement that was never recognised for many years.
2. The late Pat Matshikiza who was a jazz artist was also assisted.
3. The late Mr David Masondo, one of the pioneers of Mbaqanga music which is unique to our country and resonated to broader society.
4. The late Mduduzi 'Mandoza' Tshabalala, one of the Kwaito stars that emerged on the eve of the democratic dispensation. His music connected with society at large and deepened the social cohesion at the much need time when the country was going through a very difficult transition. Therefore he remains symbols of social cohesion.
5. Ms Pinise Saul who died recently in London her family as well was assisted with the preparation of the funeral.
The artists were assisted to the tune of R95 000 individually. It’s only 'Mandoza’ who is the youngest amongst them but the DAC strongly considered the role of his music to unite the country.
Accordingly, the focus has been on the legends of our country and who are elderly. A process is underway to determine a comprehensive criterion because sustainability of such help is in doubt. The Ministry has setup a structure of legends, which focuses on preserving the works of these legends for generations to come. It is believed that this endeavour will find innovative ways of ensuring that some of these welfare concerns may be mitigated. Currently, many of our legends are involved in various programmes, especially the master classes to share their skills with the youth.
28 November 2016 - NW2605
Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation
What are the reasons that South Africa voted against the follow-up Human Rights Council resolution calling for the appointment of an independent expert to tackle violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity?
Reply:
Quote
There has been no follow up resolution to that of the Human Rights Council on the said issue. South Africa has never voted against any resolution at the Human Rights Council or United Nations General Assembly on the thematic issue of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI).
Unquote
28 November 2016 - NW2553
Steyn, Ms A to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(1)What (a) was the total budget allocated by his department to disaster management (i) in each of the past three financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2016 and (b) amounts were (i) requested by each province in each of the specified financial years and (ii) paid out in each case; (2) whether any outstanding funds must still be paid out to the provinces; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what amount of outstanding funds must still be paid to the provinces and (b)(i) since what date has each of the specified payments been outstanding and (ii) what is the reason in each case?
Reply:
- (a) (i) The total budget as per the Grant Allocation was as follows
FINANCIAL YEARS |
MUNICIPAL GRANT |
PROVINCIAL GRANT |
MUNICIPAL DISASTER RECOVERY GRANT |
2013/14 |
R346 500 000 |
R188 000 000 |
R11 300 000 |
2014/15 |
R363 600 000 |
R197 000 000 |
R8 600 000 |
2015/16 |
R374 000 000 |
R204 000 000 |
R124 000 000 |
(ii) Yes, no amounts were directly made available by the department since April 2016
(b) (i) Amount requested by each province in the specified financial years and (ii) paid outs.
Note: The amount stated in these tables reflects funding transferred from the Disaster Grants to affected sectors and municipalities. The post disaster recovery funds for sectors are facilitated by the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, directly transferred from National Treasury within the Contingency Reserve to relevant sectors.
PROVINCE |
Type of disaster |
2013/14 |
|
Requested |
Paid out |
||
Easter Cape |
Floods |
R1 348 397 495 |
R111 350 000 |
Free State |
0 |
0 |
|
Gauteng |
0 |
0 |
|
KwaZulu-Natal |
Floods |
R309 265 636 |
R34 162 030 |
Limpopo |
Floods |
R737 035 841 |
R87 925 200 |
Mpumalanga |
0 |
0 |
|
Northern Cape |
Drought |
R360 000 000 |
R50 000 000 |
North West |
Drought |
R3 000 804 000 |
R43 630 000 |
Western Cape |
Floods |
R266 589 672 |
R55 617 000 |
PROVINCE |
Type of disaster |
2014/15 |
|
Requested |
Paid out |
||
Eastern Cape |
Floods |
R579 180 687 |
R 8 610 800 |
Free State |
Fires |
R50 000 000 |
R15 791 000 |
Gauteng |
Floods |
R701 200 770 |
R14 878 446 |
KwaZulu-Natal |
Drought, Floods and Fires |
R181 563 069 |
R89 083 000 |
Limpopo |
Floods |
R213 450 000 |
R14 884 000 |
Mpumalanga |
Floods |
R535 600 000 |
R97 170 000 |
Northern Cape |
0 |
0 |
|
North West |
Earth Quake |
R163 500 131 |
R148 508 00 |
Western Cape |
Floods |
R1 074 746 408 |
R82 796 000 |
NB: It is important to note that national and provincial sector departments, including municipalities agreed to reprioritise internal funding that is anticipated and estimated savings within their equitable shares and conditional grants to address the drought situation to ensure non-duplication of financial resources. The Disaster Grants were to be utilised once provinces have fully spent the reprioritised funding. Again, the funding allocated for floods are the funds that were allocated in 2014/15, within the Medium Term Expenditure Framework to repair the damages as a result of the 2013 floods disasters.
PROVINCE |
2015/16 |
||
Requested |
Paid out |
||
Easter Cape |
Drought |
R385 732 991 |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
Free State |
Drought |
R102 442 000 |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
Gauteng |
Floods for 2013 |
R35 588 184 |
R 35 588 184 |
KwaZulu-Natal |
Floods for 2013/14 |
R87 096 000 |
|
Drought |
R487 884 098 |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
|
Limpopo |
Floods for 2013/14 |
R20 836 000 |
|
Drought |
R51 000 000 |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
|
Mpumalanga |
Floods for 2013/14 |
R30 000 000 |
|
Drought |
R162 500 000 |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
|
Northern Cape |
Drought |
R163 281 173 (per month) |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
North West |
Drought |
R3 461 545 284 |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
Western Cape |
Floods 2013/14 |
R86 919 000 |
|
Drought |
R105 000 000 |
No disaster grants paid out until April 2016, only reprioritised funding as indicated above. |
2. No outstanding amounts are to be paid out to the provinces.
28 November 2016 - NW2309
Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Science and Technology
(1) Whether any (a) internal and/or {b) external forensic reports pertaining to (i) her department and /or (ii) each entity reporting to her were completed from 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic reports?
Reply:
(a) No internal forensic reports
(b) External forensic reports – 2
(i) Pertaining to the Department of Science and Technology (aa) Forensic investigation into the Nkowankowa Demonstration Centre. (bb) Forensic investigation into various allegations regarding irregularities pertaining to the Nkowankowa Demonstration Centre, which was a Department of Science and Technology led community project. The period under investigation was from 01 December 2013 to 31August2015. (cc) The forensic investigation was concluded on 22 June 2016
Find here: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2309entity.pdf
28 November 2016 - NW2566
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Transport
Did (a) her department and/or (b) any entity reporting to her conduct feasibility studies on Vuwani Airport in Limpopo, which is not in operation and remains a white elephant; if not, (i) why not and (ii) who is responsible for the maintenance of the specified airport?
Reply:
(a) The National Department of Transport has not conducted feasibility studies on Vuwani Airport in Limpopo.
(b) The Limpopo Department of Transport has conducted a pre-feasibility study for the Vuwani/P.R. Mphephu Airport during 2010. The study was part of the Limpopo Airlift Strategy, with the purpose of providing direction and guidance for the development of aviation in the province. Five generic strategies were identified in determining the status of each of the airports considered at the time, as follows:
1. Grounded: Nothing should be done as there is no, or very little potential, now or in the future, for aviation development.
2. Delayed: The development of aviation will only take place in the long term and is awaiting other matters to be put in place.
3. Boarding: There is some market potential, which should be left to the market to action and develop.
4. Take-off: There is good market potential which would be picked up by the market with minimum intervention.
5. Catapulted Take-off: There is market potential, but the development of aviation will only take place with significant intervention from government.
The Vuwani/P.R Mphephu Airport fell within the third category. The Limpopo Department of Transport decided to wait a few years so that further analysis could be done on the Vuwani/P.R Mphephu Airport as well as the other public airports within the province. Such analysis will consider developments that are taking place at, amongst others, Lephalale, Musina and its SEZ status, and the Tubatse area.
The Limpopo Department of Transport is currently collaborating with the Department of Public Enterprises in determining if some of these airports can be re-commissioned and the extent of improvements that are required to enable re-commissioning. The Limpopo Aviation Technical Stream has been established and various meetings have already been held. The Province is currently developing the Terms of References for the viability assessment, which should be conducted no later than the 2017/2018 financial year. This will provide an indication if P.R. Mphephu Airport will be viable and the costs associated with its re-commissioning, should the indication be positive. Other options will be explored depending on the outcome of the viability study.
(b) (i) N/A
(ii) The airport is an asset of the Limpopo Department of Public Works, Roads and Infrastructure, although the buildings are utilised by the Limpopo Department of Transport. The Limpopo Department of Transport has not allocated any maintenance budget pending the outcome of the viability study.
28 November 2016 - NW2516
Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(1)What are the relevant details of the type of information that is stored on the movement control register for persons (a) entering and (b) leaving the Republic; (2) what is the total number of persons who entered the Republic through the OR Tambo International Airport from 1 January 2016 to 1 September 2016?
Reply:
(1)(a) The following information is captured by the Immigration Officer for persons entering the Republic:
- Flight / vessel / transport number
- Biographic details including surname, first names, date of birth, etc.
- Occupation
- Purpose of visit
- Visa details (whenever applicable)
(1)(b) The following information is captured by the Immigration Officer for persons leaving the Republic:
- Flight / vessel / transport number
- Biographic details including surname, first names, date of birth, etc.
- Visa details (if confirmation is required on departure)
(2) 2 777 931
28 November 2016 - NW2193
Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
(1)What (a) is the current status of the Ermelo Waste Water Treatment Plant in Mpumalanga and (b) are the results of the water quality tests of the treated effluent in each month since 1 January 2016; (2) whether the specified plant complies with the standards for effluent discharge as regulated by her department; if not, what action has she taken to rectify the situation; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1)(a) The Ermelo Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently receiving 12-16 Ml/day and is designed to handle 10 Ml/day. Overall, the infrastructure of the plant is in a bad condition and this has compromised the sewage treatment process to the extent that substandard effluent is being discharged.
(b) The Green Drop System, which the Department utilizes to monitor compliance levels of wastewater treatment works in the country, shows that the level of compliance for the plant from 01 January 2016 to September 2016 is zero for micro, physical and chemical parameters specific for wastewater effluent.
(2) The effluent from the plant does not comply with the general standard. The Department had meetings with the municipality, inspections were conducted and correspondence was also sent to the municipality. Due to the lack of response from the municipality, a task team (comprising DWS, the Departments of Human Settlements, Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Economic Development, Environment and Tourism as well as the District and Local Municipalities) was then established to address the concerns related to the plant. See Tables 1 and 2 below:
Table 1: Correspondence with the Municipality prior to establishment of the task team
DWS Action |
Issues raised |
Type of communication |
Municipality response |
Issued communication due to poor water quality discharging into the stream |
|
Letter dated 23 November 2009 |
None |
Site inspection conducted on 14 July 2010 |
|
Section 19 letter dated 19 July 2010 |
None |
Site inspection conducted on 11 Nov 2011 |
|
Meeting held with the municipality immediately after the inspection |
The problem was resolved same day |
Site inspection conducted on 14 June 2012 |
|
Meeting with municipality on 06 August 2012 |
Raised their challenges |
Table 2: Correspondences with the Municipality after establishment of the task team
DWS Action |
Issues raised |
Type of communication |
Municipality response |
Issued communication based on the meeting held on 06 August 2012 |
|
Letter dated 14 August 2012 |
None |
Follow up |
|
Letter dated 11 October 2012 |
Submitted insufficient action plan on 14 November 2012 |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 26 September 2012 at Govan Mbeki Municipality |
No feedback, the Municipality sent another person without information |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 14 November 2012 at Lekwa Municipality |
Attended |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 06 February 2013 at Dr Pixley ka Seme Municipality |
Did not attend |
Issued a communication |
|
Letter dated 22 February 2013 |
None |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 12 June 2013 at Gert Sibande District Municipality |
Did not attend |
Issued a communication |
|
Letter dated 22 August 2013 |
None |
Assessment of WWTW on 29 October 2013 and 13 March 2014 |
|
Letter dated 24 March 2014 |
None |
The Department allocated R 44 275 029 million to refurbish the Ermelo Waste Water Treatment Plant in Mpumalanga. The project commenced in November 2015 and is scheduled for completion in January 2017.
---00O00---
25 November 2016 - NW2544
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
(1)(a) What are the names of each former provincial head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) since he assumed office, (b) on which dates was each specified person (i) appointed and (ii) replaced, (c) what was the status of each person’s employment contract at the time of their replacement and (d) on what statutory grounds did he replace the persons who were still serving within their minimum seven-year terms; (2) whether he obtained the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, Mr P J Gordhan, on the remuneration of the new provincial heads of the DPCI in accordance with section 17CA (8)(b) of the SA Police Service Act, Act 68 of 1995, as amended; if not, why not; if so, was the concurrence of the Minister of Finance obtained in writing in each case?
Reply:
1. Provincial heads of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) were appointed for the first time by the Minister of Police in accordance with section 17CA(6) of the South African Police Services Act 68 of 1995 (“SAPS Act”) in 2016. There are no former provincial heads that were appointed in terms of section 17CA(6) before the appointments were made in 2016.
2. The Minister of Finance, Mr P J Gordhan is a member of the Cabinet. It follows that the appointments and remuneration of the provincial heads of the DPCI were presented before the Cabinet for concurrence. Cabinet Memorandum, which included the remuneration scale of the provincial heads was distributed to all Cabinet Ministers and no objection was received from the Minister of Finance on the remuneration scales. The Cabinet (with the Minister of Finance included) concurred with the appointments and the remuneration scales of the provincial heads.
It must be noted that the South African Police Services Act 68 of 1995 (SAPS Act), as amended, does not prescribe how concurrence should be obtained and there is no provision in the Act that requires concurrence of the Minister of Finance to be writing in each case.
25 November 2016 - NW2398
Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
Whether any contracts have been awarded to any service provider for the (a) maintenance of and/or (b) upgrades to the (i) Mapulaneng and (ii) Matsulu Technical and Vocational Education and Training colleges in the Bushbuckridge and Mbombela Local Municipalities in Mpumalanga (aa) in the (aaa) 2013-14, (bbb) 2014-15 and (ccc) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the full relevant details of each contract awarded in each case?
Reply:
The Ehlanzeni Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) College is responsible for the Mapulaneng Campus in the Bushbuckridge Local Municipality. Since late 2013, the college has not awarded contracts to any service provider as campus upgrades and maintenance are undertaken by its skilled college staff and students as part of their practical training. The college is a technical training institution, which strives to provide theoretical and practical training for students by maintaining and upgrading its facilities to save costs and maximise the use of its allocated budget.
The college took transfer of the Matsulu Technical and Vocational Education and Training Centre during 2015. On taking occupation, it was established that the drainage pipes at the Centre were blocked and a contractor was appointed, after obtaining 3 quotations, to unblock the drainage pipes. No subsequent contracts have been awarded to service providers at this centre.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 2398 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
25 November 2016 - NW2533
Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development
What are the (a) names, (b) summaries of (i) professional qualifications and (ii) experience, (c) names of previous employers, (d) job descriptions and (e)(i) dates of hiring and (ii) length of contract of each of his advisors?
Reply:
The Department does not currently have an advisor on contract. Advisors are contracted when needed.
-END-
25 November 2016 - NW2534
Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development
Who (a) will administer the R1,25 billion socio-economic development fund created by agreement between six construction companies (names furnished) and the Presidential Infrastructure Coordinating Commission and (b) are the intended beneficiaries of the specified fund?
Reply:
(a) The Settlement Agreement provides for National Treasury to appoint an administrator.
(b) The intended beneficiaries are communities and small construction companies, with provisions for funding of training of engineers and artisans, social infrastructure, small business working capital and technical capacity within the state. Further details will be publicised in due course.
-END-
25 November 2016 - NW2193
Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
(1)What (a) is the current status of the Ermelo Waste Water Treatment Plant in Mpumalanga and (b) are the results of the water quality tests of the treated effluent in each month since 1 January 2016; (2) whether the specified plant complies with the standards for effluent discharge as regulated by her department; if not, what action has she taken to rectify the situation; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1)(a) The Ermelo Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently receiving 12-16 Ml/day and is designed to handle 10 Ml/day. Overall, the infrastructure of the plant is in a bad condition and this has compromised the sewage treatment process to the extent that substandard effluent is being discharged.
(b) The Green Drop System, which the Department utilizes to monitor compliance levels of wastewater treatment works in the country, shows that the level of compliance for the plant from 01 January 2016 to September 2016 is zero for micro, physical and chemical parameters specific for wastewater effluent.
(2) The effluent from the plant does not comply with the general standard. The Department had meetings with the municipality, inspections were conducted and correspondence was also sent to the municipality. Due to the lack of response from the municipality, a task team (comprising DWS, the Departments of Human Settlements, Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Economic Development, Environment and Tourism as well as the District and Local Municipalities) was then established to address the concerns related to the plant. See Tables 1 and 2 below:
Table 1: Correspondence with the Municipality prior to establishment of the task team
DWS Action |
Issues raised |
Type of communication |
Municipality response |
Issued communication due to poor water quality discharging into the stream |
|
Letter dated 23 November 2009 |
None |
Site inspection conducted on 14 July 2010 |
|
Section 19 letter dated 19 July 2010 |
None |
Site inspection conducted on 11 Nov 2011 |
|
Meeting held with the municipality immediately after the inspection |
The problem was resolved same day |
Site inspection conducted on 14 June 2012 |
|
Meeting with municipality on 06 August 2012 |
Raised their challenges |
Table 2: Correspondences with the Municipality after establishment of the task team
DWS Action |
Issues raised |
Type of communication |
Municipality response |
Issued communication based on the meeting held on 06 August 2012 |
|
Letter dated 14 August 2012 |
None |
Follow up |
|
Letter dated 11 October 2012 |
Submitted insufficient action plan on 14 November 2012 |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 26 September 2012 at Govan Mbeki Municipality |
No feedback, the Municipality sent another person without information |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 14 November 2012 at Lekwa Municipality |
Attended |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 06 February 2013 at Dr Pixley ka Seme Municipality |
Did not attend |
Issued a communication |
|
Letter dated 22 February 2013 |
None |
Task Team |
Actions from minutes |
Meeting on 12 June 2013 at Gert Sibande District Municipality |
Did not attend |
Issued a communication |
|
Letter dated 22 August 2013 |
None |
Assessment of WWTW on 29 October 2013 and 13 March 2014 |
|
Letter dated 24 March 2014 |
None |
The Department allocated R 44 275 029 million to refurbish the Ermelo Waste Water Treatment Plant in Mpumalanga. The project commenced in November 2015 and is scheduled for completion in January 2017.
---00O00---
25 November 2016 - NW2521
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether he has taken any action against any employee of the National Prosecuting Authority for persisting in prosecuting a certain person (name furnished) despite the fact that the State was allegedly aware that it could not prove prejudice in the specified prosecution; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
Notwithstanding the fact that there is no provision in the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) Act for the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services to take any action against prosecutors for exercising prosecutorial functions according to the Prosecution Directives and Guidelines, the following outline serves as background for the Minister in relation to this matter.
As such, there was no reason for any action to be taken against the prosecutors in the normal course of exercising their duties. Section 42 of the NPA Act further excludes liability where the prosecutorial decision was taken in good faith.
25 November 2016 - NW2307
Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Ms N W A Mazzone (DA) asked the Minister of Public Works
Whether any (a) internal and/or (b) external forensic reports pertaining to (i) his department and/or (ii) each entity reporting to him were completed from 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic reports?
Reply:
The Minister of Public Works
(a) (i) The Department of Public Works (DPW) has a dedicated internal Unit to investigate reported allegations of fraud, corruption and serious maladministration within the Department. From the 2009/10 financial year to date the Unit has received 363 cases for investigation purposes. Of the total number of cases reported, 320 cases were finalised. 32 cases are currently at various stages of investigation.
(aa) (bb) (cc)
See attached Fraud Allegation Register from 2009/10-2016/17 Financial Years of the 320 completed cases.
(b) (i) External Forensic Investigations
The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has conducted investigations in the DPW in terms of 5 Presidential proclamations – the oldest proclamation was published on 30 July 2010 and the most recent one was published on 20 July 2015. The SIU reports to the President, but they provide the DPW with findings from their investigation for the purpose of instituting corrective measures, including disciplinary action against any official where there is prima facie evidence of misconduct. Where SIU findings point to possible criminal activities, the SIU reports such evidence to the South Africa’s law enforcement agencies for further action. When the SIU finds that funds have been usurped they institute civil proceedings on behalf of the DPW to recover the lost funds. The DPW is notified of this action prior to it being taken. However, the SIU does not provide its full reports to the Department, as it reports to the State President.
DPW ENTITIES
For Agrément South Africa (ASA) No internal or external forensic reports have been completed since 01 January 2009 to date.
Council for Built Environment (CBE) |
|||
(a)(ii) |
Internal Forensic Reports |
||
(aa) |
(bb) |
(cc) |
|
2 employees that were implicated. |
Case relates to misconduct on Supply Chain procedures, Corporate Governance issues, Recruitment procedures and HR investigations. |
The dates are from July 2014 to May 2015. |
|
|
No external forensic investigations were commissioned |
||
Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) |
|||
Internal Forensic Reports |
|||
(a) (ii) |
(aa) |
(bb) |
(cc) |
15 employees that were implicated. |
Cases relate to non-compliance with procedures, bribery and theft. |
The dates are from February 2009 to September 2015 |
|
IDT
(a) (ii)
There are two different types of forensic reports that the Independent Development Trust (IDT) has dealt with during the period 01 January 2009 to 28 September 2016. The first type is a forensic report, which results from an investigation commissioned internally by IDT, but facilitated by external forensic investigators. The second type is a forensic report which is an outcome of a forensic investigation externally commissioned and whose outcome has a bearing for the IDT in one way or the other. These two types of forensic reports are listed in the table below:
LIST OF INTERNAL FORENSIC REPORTS
(a)(ii)
Internally commissioned, but externally facilitated forensic investigation reports
(aa) |
(bb) |
(cc) |
Name of investigator/s |
Alleged fraudulent claims by service provider for IDT Limpopo: Social Programme |
Fraudulent Time sheet and irregular claims |
15 April 2015 |
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) |
Alleged irregular payment to a service provider at Mpumalanga (IDT) Regional Office (MPL) |
Irregular Payments at Rob-Ferreira Hospital |
27 Sept 2012 |
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) |
Forensic Accounting investigation into Irregularities at IDT relating to wasteful expenditure |
1. Questions raised about the achievement of project deliverables and how much was paid for each of the following deliverables:
|
15 September 2016 (At the time of finalising this reply the final report had not yet been considered by the IDT Board) |
|
Procurement Irregularities at the KZN IDT relating to Mobile Classrooms |
Review the tender process followed by IDT in appointing Tedsons and JT Cabins as a service provider |
15 Sept 2016 |
National Treasury |
Procurement irregularities at the IDT relating to Destiny Group, Nkwali and Bursary |
Investigation into the procurement of services of the Destiny Group, Transfer of Mr Nkwali and Awarding of bursary to Ms Xhala |
15 Sept 2016 |
National Treasury |
Alleged Irregularities at the IDT relating to the KZN Department of Arts and Culture |
Verification of the Bid process followed in the appointment of Masakhane (Contractor) for the construction of Vulamehlo Library |
15 Sept 2016 |
National Treasury |
Alleged Irregularities in respect of Projects undertaken for the KZN: DoH |
Review procurement process for Addington Hospital maintenance and verification of the bid evaluation process followed and investigation of the circumstances that led to the clinics not being completed and determine how much was paid previously for the 3 projects |
15 Sept 2016 |
National Treasury |
LIST OF EXTERNAL FORENSIC REPORTS
IDT
(b) (ii)
Externally commissioned and facilitated investigation report/s with outcome affecting the IDT
(aa) Name of the Report |
(bb) Subject matter |
(cc) Date of conclusion |
Name of investigator |
Alleged irregularities in the procurement of service providers at Department of Correctional Services |
Prisons Fencing Project |
June 2016 |
National Treasury |
______________________________________________________________________
25 November 2016 - NW2547
Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police
(1)Is the SA Police Service aware of the activities of a certain group (name and details furnished), in the northern areas of Port Elizabeth in the Eastern Cape; if not, why not; if so, (2) have any complaints been received about alleged vigilante actions by the specified group; if so, (3) have any investigations into these complaints been initiated yet; if not, why not; if so, what are the full relevant details?
Reply:
(1) The South African Police Service (SAPS) is aware of the existence of the Malabar Patrols and their activities.
(2) No complaints have been received.
(3) No. The SAPS Crime Intelligence, Eastern Cape is aware of the activities of Malabar Patrols. The activities of the aforementioned group are being monitored to enable a rapid response by appropriate units should any incidents of intimidation be detected.
25 November 2016 - NW2105
Marais, Mr EJ to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
What amount did (a) her department and (b) each entity reporting to her spend on advertising on the (i) Africa News Network 7 channel, (ii) SA Broadcasting Corporation (aa) television channels and (bb) radio stations, (iii) national commercial radio stations and (iv) community (aa) television and (bb) radio stations (aaa) in the 2015-16 financial year and (bbb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
The Department of Small Business Development and its entities’ total spend on advertising on media is as follows:
# |
(a) Department |
(b) Entities |
|
Small Enterprise Finance Agency (sefa) |
Small Enterprise Development Agency (seda) |
||
(i) |
Africa News Network 7 (ANN7) |
ANN7 |
ANN7 |
(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
|
(ii) |
SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) |
SABC |
SABC |
(aa) |
(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(aaa & bbb) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year and since April 2016: R4 492 250. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
|||
(bb) |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R125 400. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R220 000. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R330 132. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(bbb)Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
|
(iii) |
National commercial radio stations |
National commercial radio stations |
National commercial radio stations |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R320 000. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R456 522. |
|
(bbb) Since April 2016: R189 999.24. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent |
|
(iv) (aa) |
Community television stations |
Community television stations |
Community television stations |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R28 000. |
|
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
|
(iv) (bb) |
Community radio stations |
Community radio stations |
Community radio stations |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: No amount was spent. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R157 000. |
(aaa) 2015-16 financial year: R445 289. |
|
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: R62 000. |
(bbb) Since April 2016: No amount was spent. |
Please note further that for the 2015 International Cooperatives Day, the department advertised in SAFM and Motsweding FM (both SABC radio stations). However, the budget came from the DTI.
25 November 2016 - NW2520
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether he has taken any action against any employee of the National Prosecuting Authority for persisting in prosecuting a certain person (name furnished) despite the fact that the State was allegedly aware that it could not prove prejudice in the specified prosecution; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
It must be noted that the accused application for a discharge in terms of section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act was refused. In other words the court found that the state had published a case that the accused had to answer. The National Director of Public Prosecutors (NDPP) convened a meeting where the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) South Gauteng, Advocate Andrew Chauke was requested to submit a report on various allegations relating to the prosecution of the case. At the conclusion of that meeting, it was decided that the DPP would obtain the transcript of the court proceedings for him to further address the matter with the prosecutor and his supervisor.
The DPP further reported to the NDPP that he perused the transcript of the proceedings and subsequently addressed the shortcomings of the prosecutor and pointed out to him the resultant adverse effects on the case due to him not communicating the developments in court to his supervisor.
25 November 2016 - NW2551
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police
Whether any measures are being implemented to ensure that the turnaround time for police vehicle repairs at SA Police Service garages in Gauteng is kept to a reasonable minimum so that the lack of operational vehicles does not hinder crime prevention and service delivery in the specified province; if not, why not; if so, what are the full relevant details?
Reply:
Performance benchmarks were implemented at all South African Police Service (SAPS) Garages to ensure appropriate turnaround times for SAPS vehicle repairs, thereby ensuring that adequate vehicles are available for operational deployment at all police stations/units. The following criteria are included in the performance benchmarks and are followed up on a continuous basis to address any deviations:
● The opening and closure of job cards (performance) per garage within specific time frames for the various types of services and repairs;
● The production of individual artisans and garages as well as production for all garages within the province as per the set standard; and
● The availability of vehicles per police station/unit, per province and nationally as per the set standard.
25 November 2016 - NW2494
Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Energy
What programmes or initiatives has her department put in place to educate rural and poor communities about the importance of energy efficiency?
Reply:
To educate the public about the importance of energy efficiency, the Department developed and launched the Energy Efficiency Campaign Strategy during the United Nations Convention on Climate Change’s 17th Conference of Parties (COP 17) held in Durban in 2011. In addition, on 13 March 2015, the President of South Africa launched the Presidency and Government energy savings campaign highlighting various initiatives the government will implement to promote energy savings, and these include the green building policy framework, minimum energy performance standards and labeling of energy efficiency appliances, improvement of energy efficiency, and, importantly, the installation of solar panels and solar water heaters in buildings including in residential buildings in rural and poor communities.
Furthermore, on 17 May 2016, the Minister of Energy unveiled the South African Energy Efficiency Label, and also announced measures to be implemented in buildings as part of promoting energy savings. The SA Energy Efficiency Label has been designed to provide the South African consumers, including poor and rural communities, with accurate and comparable information that enables an informed purchase decisions when buying household appliances. The advantage to consumers, especially poor and rural communities, is that they have an opportunity to play an active role both in achieving savings on electricity consumption and in making a meaningful contribution to the effort on reducing carbon emissions.
Some of the energy savings measures being implemented by the Department include the installation of smart metering and clean energy technologies in schools and government buildings, deployment of co-generation in municipal waste water treatment facilities, and the installation of energy efficient technologies related to municipal infrastructure. It should also be noted that the Ministry of Energy has been conducting outreach programmes to poor and rural communities as part of the energy savings campaign.
25 November 2016 - NW2327
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether, with reference to a certain Labour Court matter (details furnished) and the order of the Acting Labour Court Judge (name and details furnished) that his judgment be sent to the Magistrates' Commission, the National Prosecuting Authority and the Director-General of the Department of Justice and Correctional Services for investigation into the conduct of the magistrate who handled the matter at the Morekeng Periodical Court in the North West (details furnished), he can confirm that (a) the Director of Public Prosecutions will be appealing the sentence handed down by the magistrate in this matter and (b) a date has been set for the hearing of such appeal; if so, what are the full relevant details in each case?
Reply:
The appeal is set down to be heard on 14 February 2017 at the North Gauteng High Court.