Questions to Ministers

14 November 2016 - NW2217

Grootboom, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

(1). Whether a certain person (details furnished) of the Nelson Mandela Museum in Qunu spent the accrued interest on the R15 million that was allocated for capital works at the specified museum, which has remained unspent and awaiting procurement approval for three years; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) Whether he has taken any consequence management action against the specified person; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

No person of the Nelson Mandela Museum in Qunu spent the accrued interest on the R15 million that was allocated for capital works at the specified museum.

The museum requested approval from The Department of Arts and Culture (DAC) to utilize the accrued interest of R2 470 757.86 for relocation and installation of the CCTV cameras in Bhunga building.

The breakdown of the R2 470 757.86 is as follows:

Rental of storage for artefacts R 414 458.86

Transportation of artefacts R 337 350.60

Relocation from Qunu to Bhunga R 218 948.40

Installation of CCTV cameras R1 500 000.00

Total R2 470 757.86

(2). No consequence management action was taken because the DAC granted the museum approval to utilize the interest accrued for the relocation and installation of the CCTV cameras in Bhunga building.

14 November 2016 - NW2254

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(a) How many fixed establishment positions were there for the (i) Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A), (ii) Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B), (iii) Detectives: General Crimes (Group C) and (iv) Detectives: Service Centre in each police station in each province (aa) in the 2015-16 financial year and (bb) since 1 April 2016, (b) how many of the specified positions were (i) filled and (ii) vacant in each case and (c) on which salary scale is each of the positions?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) The question requires a reply to address all the 1 142 police stations. This will be volumes of pages and is therefore responded by providing the provincial totals. The tables below provide a summarised exposé of the different questions and must be read with the previous reply to question 2163 which dealt with the total fixed establishment of police stations. The development and maintenance of the fixed establishment of the South African Police Service (SAPS) is informed and guided by Regulation 20 and 27 of the SAPS Employment Regulations, 2008 and is influenced by two primary variables:

- The approved organisational and post structures for police stations and clusters; and,

- the availability of funds in terms of the current budget and Medium Term Expenditure Framework.

The source that was used is the SAPS Fixed Establishment allocations for 2015/2016. The fixed establishment positions for police stations in each province in the 2015/2016 financial year and a summary of categories crimes investigated by the respective groups (attached as per annexure A) are tabulated as follows:

Year	Function	Eastern Cape	Free State	Gauteng	KwaZulu-Natal	Limpopo	Mpumalanga	North West	Northern Cape	Western Cape
(aa) + (bb) 2015-16	(i)	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	255	133	1328	513	112	149	104	42	473
	(ii)	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	310	153	1231	490	134	113	141	52	546
	(iii)	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	371	223	1625	616	193	179	134	121	769
	(iv)	Detective Service Centre	659	193	960	600	163	311	178	76	591

(1)(b) The number of filled and vacant positions for detective service at police stations in each province including the salary scales thereof since 1 April 2016 is tabulated below:

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Free State Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	4	24	29	56	20
		Filled	3	13	53	7	21
		Vacant	-1	-11	+24	-49	+1
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	3	13	34	67	36
		Filled	3	11	42	6	34
		Vacant	0	-2	+8	-61	-2
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	4	27	46	85	61
		Filled	4	33	74	38	155
		Vacant	0	+6	+28	-47	+94
	Detective Service Centre	FE	4	31	48	90	17
		Filled	3	28	46	20	82
		Vacant	-1	-3	-2	-70	+65
	Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
	North West Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	18	20	31	35
			Filled	0	12	38	12	33
			Vacant	0	-6	18	-19	-2
		Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	20	23	45	53
			Filled	0	17	41	27	45
			Vacant	0	-3	18	-18	-8
		Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	18	16	47	53
			Filled	0	16	51	27	68
			Vacant	0	-2	35	-20	15
		Detective Service Centre	FE	5	21	31	50	69
			Filled	4	28	51	24	69
			Vacant	-1	7	20	-26	0

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Mpumalanga Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	6	36	46	61
		Filled	0	4	35	24	51
		Vacant	0	-2	-1	-22	-10
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	6	27	37	43
		Filled	1	7	21	32	51
		Vacant	+1	-1	-6	-5	+8
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	6	38	58	77
		Filled	0	5	41	43	108
		Vacant	0	-1	+3	-15	+31
	Detective Service Centre	FE	5	26	41	58	178
		Filled	1	13	40	36	134
		Vacant	-4	-13	-1	-22	-44

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Eastern Cape Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	10	43	56	69	103
		Filled	9	31	90	25	58
		Vacant	-1	-12	40	-44	-45
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	10	42	64	79	139
		Filled	10	32	90	37	74
		Vacant	0	-10	26	-42	-65
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	10	47	80	92	171
		Filled	10	33	143	57	273
		Vacant	0	-14	63	-35	102
	Detective Service Centre	FE	10	41	130	174	302
		Filled	8	29	71	63	152
		Vacant	-2	-11	59	-111	150

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Gauteng Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	81	245	264	732
		Filled	6	50	305	176	375
		Vacant	6	-31	60	-88	-357
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	76	235	257	657
		Filled	2	52	214	155	441
		Vacant	2	-24	-21	-102	-216
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	92	305	357	864
		Filled	8	90	349	278	874
		Vacant	8	-2	44	-79	10
	Detective Service Centre	FE	46	103	158	187	459
		Filled	11	79	245	184	642
		Vacant	-35	-24	87	-3	183

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Limpopo Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	1	8	30	35	38
		Filled	1	29	75	16	48
		Vacant	0	-21	-45	19	-10
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	1	8	32	41	52
		Filled	1	13	56	15	39
		Vacant	0	-5	-24	26	13
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	1	11	42	58	81
		Filled	1	21	67	19	110
		Vacant	0	-10	-25	39	-29
	Detective Service Centre	FE	5	25	51	38	42
		Filled	8	22	42	9	36
		Vacant	-3	3	9	29	6

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Northern Cape Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	2	9	11	12	11
		Filled	2	9	19	13	8
		Vacant	0	0	-7	-1	3
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	2	10	12	14	18
		Filled	2	10	6	17	13
		Vacant	0	0	6	-3	6
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	2	11	24	34	53
		Filled	2	11	25	19	36
		Vacant	0	0	-1	15	17
	Detective Service Centre	FE	2	9	25	23	21
		Filled	2	8	20	18	30
		Vacant	0	1	5	5	-9

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
KwaZulu-Natal Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	29	108	150	226
		Filled	0	34	147	86	172
		Vacant	0	5	39	-64	-54
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	33	100	143	214
		Filled	0	34	134	77	211
		Vacant	0	1	34	-66	-3
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	33	118	175	289
		Filled	0	38	152	104	368
		Vacant	0	5	34	-71	79
	Detective Service Centre	FE	18	66	152	186	177
		Filled	14	60	149	70	236
		Vacant	-4	-6	-3	-116	59

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Western Cape Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	19	22	94	133	223
		Filled	14	16	100	128	122
		Vacant	-5	-6	6	-5	-101
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	19	22	97	158	268
		Filled	11	14	69	149	153
		Vacant	-8	-8	-28	-9	-115
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	19	31	138	219	380
		Filled	14	27	144	217	381
		Vacant	-5	-4	6	-2	1
	Detective Service Centre	FE	19	32	88	164	306
		Filled	16	24	70	96	149
		Vacant	-3	-8	-18	-68	-157

14 November 2016 - NW2365

Steyn, Ms A to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(a) How many boreholes did each municipality (i) drill, (ii) repair and/or (iii) upgrade since 1 October 2015, (b) what is the exact GPS location of each of the specified boreholes, (c) what were the costs of (i) drilling per meter and/or (ii) refurbishment in each case and (d) was water found at each of the boreholes?

Source
Link

Reply:

The information requested by the Hon Member is not readily available within the department. However, the Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent (MISA), is busy collating the information and will submit as soon as it’s complete.

14 November 2016 - NW2350

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(a) What are the names of each implementing agent of each community work programme being run by each relevant municipality, (b) on what date was each of the specified implementing agents appointed, (c) what amount (i) has been paid to each of the implementing agents to date and (ii) will be paid to each of the implementing agents for the remainder of the duration of each agreement, (d) what are the key deliverables specified in each of the specified agreements, (e) how many job opportunities (i) did each of the implementing agents create to date and (ii) is each of the implementing agents expected to create for the remainder of the duration of each agreement and (f) on what dates will each of the agreements expire?

Source
Link

Reply:

9A0 The following are the names of the Implementing Agents running the programme in the municipalities: (1) Border Rural Committee (2) Dhladhla Foundation (3) Insika Foundation (4)LIMA Rural Development (5) Seboka Training and Support (6) Seriti Institute (7) Siyakholwa Development (8) Thabiso/3L Development, and (9) Thembalethu Development

Kindly refer to the response to question “e” wherein it is specified as to which Implementing Agent is facilitating the implementation of the programme in each municipality.

(b) All current Implementing Agents were appointed with effect from 01 April 2014.

(c) The amount that (i) has been paid to each of the Implementing Agent to date and (ii) will be paid to each of the Implementing Agent for the remainder of the duration of each agreement are tabled below.

Implementing Agents are paid per order or contract for each province, therefore it is important that we reflect the amounts paid against each order (in a specified province) as at 30 September 2016.

PROVINCE	ORDER NUMBER	IMPLEMENTING AGENT	PAID	TO BE PAID
EASTERN CAPE	AG350815	BORDER RURAL COMMITTEE	R 16,836,7065	R 6,303,961.35
		BORDER RURAL COMMITTEE Total	R 16,836,7065	R 6,303,961.35
EASTERN CAPE	AG350823	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 31,219,895.33	R 8,717,112.65
FREE STATE	AG350825	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 14,316,004.63	R 5,571,810.22
GAUTENG	AG350820	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 16,543,503.66	R 4,876,495.28
KWAZULU NATAL	AG350819	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 18,524,356.45	R 6,488,991.18
LIMPOPO	AG350811	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 25,006,566.66	R 7,579,313.70
MPUMALANGA	AG350822	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 17,022,519.88	R 5,808,942.98
NORTH WEST	AG350824	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 19,708,628.85	R 6,569,217.33
NORTHERN CAPE	AG350826	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 7,563,482.22	R 2,856,865.95
WESTERN CAPE	AG350821	DHLADHLA FOUNDATION	R 27,297,767.68	R 6,765,920.86
		DHLADHLA FOUNDATION Total	R 177,202,725.35	R 55,234,670.15
GAUTENG	AG350806	INSIKA FOUNDATION	R 10,150,940.44	R 3,194,491.48
KWAZULU NATAL	AG350805	INSIKA FOUNDATION	R 20,262,4648	R 8,004,541.29
		INSIKA FOUNDATION Total	R 30,413,404.52	R 11,199,032.77
FREE STATE	AG350814	LIMA RURAL DEVELOPMENT	R 13,139,786.91	R 3,612,423.12
		LIMA RURAL DEVELOPMENT Total	R 13,139,786.91	R 3,612,423.12
FREE STATE	AG350801	SEBOKA TRAINING & SUPPORT	R 10,788,957.51	R 6,760,953.81
MPUMALANGA	AG350803	SEBOKA TRAINING & SUPPORT	R 11,641,758.20	R 4,169,341.92
		SEBOKA TRAINING & SUPPORT Total	R 22,430,715.71	R 10,930,295.73
FREE STATE	AG350807	SERITI INSTITUTE	R 12,631,144.31	R 6,124,120.11
GAUTENG	AG350818	SERITI INSTITUTE	R 8,812,110.29	R 5,062,889.71
KWAZULU NATAL	AG350804	SERITI INSTITUTE	R 17,628,805.28	R 8,227,248.36
LIMPOPO	AG350808	SERITI INSTITUTE	R 20,166,774.54	R 8,576,313.69
MPUMALANGA	AG350809	SERITI INSTITUTE	R 16,087,148.96	R 7,144,282.59
NORTH WEST	AG350810	SERITI INSTITUTE	R 17,020,774.93	R 10,753,744.30
		SERITI INSTITUTE Total	R 92,346,758.31	R 45,888,598.76
EASTERN CAPE	AG350802	SIYAKHOLWA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION	R 13,870,347.89	R 4,749,210.21
		SIYAKHOLWA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION Total	R 13,870,347.89	R 4,749,210.21
NORTHERN CAPE	AG350816	THABISO NGO /3L DEVELOPMENT	R 10,502,917.11	R 3,707,290.89
		THABISO NGO /3L DEVELOPMENT	R 10,502,917.11	R 3,707,290.89
EASTERN CAPE	AG350812	THEMBALETHU DEVELOPMENT	R 20,597,918.99	R 8,007,995.71
GAUTENG	AG350813	THEMBALETHU DEVELOPMENT	R 8,232,740.65	R 3,261,654.73
NORTHERN CAPE	AG350817	THEMBALETHU DEVELOPMENT	R 10,133,948.16	R 3,972,336.74
		THEMBALETHU DEVELOPMENT Total	R 38,964,607.80	R 15,241,987.18
		Grand Total	R 415,707,969.64	R 156,867,470.18

(d) The following are the key deliverables as per the Service Level Agreement entered into between the individual Implementing Agent and the DCoG.

TASKS	TIMELINE
a) Implement the Community Work Programme at approved sites in accordance with the Norms and Standards, and SOPs of the programme	Throughout the contract period
b) Sustain and/or expand participation levels at existing sites in order to achieve the total work-day targets and participation rates.	Throughout the contract period to 31 March 2017
c) Establish/re-establish/strengthen CWP Local Reference Committees at all sites in accordance with the procedures for the establishment and Terms of Reference for these committees involving the provinces, municipalities and all stakeholders in the process	Throughout the contract period to 31 March 17
d) Support and ensure functionality of Local Reference Committees	Throughout the contract period
e) Interface with beneficiary communities, relevant municipalities and provincial departments responsible for Local Government	Throughout the contract period
f) Provide necessary technical support to the site to ensure standardized systems for registers, baseline forms, asset registers, task management and work organization management	Throughout the contract period
g) Ensure that all participants complete the baseline registration form and that daily registers are updated	From inception of the contract, on registration of new participants.
h) Provide a financial and narrative report on CWP site implementation progress to DCoG within 10 days of the end of every month. Such reporting shall be in accordance with the prescribed reporting framework; and should include a monthly schedule of work days, beneficiary data and all information required to comply with EPWP’s web based Management Information System	10th of every month
i) Provide the information required by the EPWP’s web-based Management Information System, including work days, training days, and beneficiary data such as age, sex and disability status input such data into the prescribed format and include with the report to DCoG	10th of every month
j) Provide cumulative quarterly narrative, financial and output reports including lessons learnt	Quarterly
K) Provide cumulative annual narrative , financial and output including lessons learnt	Annually
l) Develop annual Site Business Plans in collaboration with or following consultation with Local Reference Committees, communities, municipalities and provincial departments responsible for Local Government. This would include general Site Business Plans, Procurement Plans and Training plans. These are to be updated regularly and aligned to municipal Integrated Development Plans (IDPs).	Initially within 45 days of new contracts and thereafter by 31 March of every year for the following year. All plans are to be updated monthly
m) Maintain adequate Site Records for all CWP Sites, and ensure that these records are available for inspection by the DCoG, the provincial departments responsible for Local Government (this includes original receipts at IA HQ and certified copies of invoices at site level)	Throughout the contract period
n) Ensure compliance with the Ministerial Determination on conditions of Work in the Expanded Public Works Programme, as well as other statutory requirements, such as UIF and COIDwhere applicable	Throughout the contract period
o) Keep an inventory of all stock, equipment, tools and assets per site and ensure that inventory is available for inspection by DCoG, the provincial departments responsible for Local Government, other DCoG appointees or the office of the Auditor-General.	Inventory of all stock and assets updated on a monthly basis.
p) Ensure, through the Local Reference Committees, that Useful Work is undertaken and benefits the community
q) Conduct entry and exit interviews, while keeping updated records of why participants leave and what they engage in thereafter

(e) The number of job opportunities that (i) each of the Implementing Agent did create to date and (ii) is expected to create for the remainder of the duration of each agreement are tabled below per province.

EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE

There are four Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
Chris Hani Emalahleni	Border Rural Committee	-	473	635	1,108	500
Engcobo	Border Rural Committee	1,074	1,161	1,122	3,357	1000
Great Kei	Border Rural Committee	329	563	607	1,499	500
Inkwanca	Border Rural Committee	1,056	1,167	1,142	3,365	1000
Intsika Yethu	Border Rural Committee	1,151	1,067	1,073	3,291	1000
Inxuba Yethemba	Border Rural Committee	-	490	526	1,016	500
Lukhanji	Border Rural Committee	1,108	1,139	1,090	3,337	1000
Sakhisizwe	Border Rural Committee	1,053	1,212	1,107	3,372	1000
Tsolwana	Border Rural Committee	1,055	1,100	1,013	3,168	1000
9	BRC Total	6,826	8,372	8,315	23,513	7500
Elundini	Dhladhla Foundation	1,156	1,108	1,087	3,351	1000
Gariep	Dhladhla Foundation	1,292	1,038	998	3,328	1000
Kouga	Dhladhla Foundation	-	96	353	449	500
Maletswayi	Dhladhla Foundation	-	142	486	628	500
Mbashe	Dhladhla Foundation	1,240	1,153	1,028	3,421	1000
Mnquma	Dhladhla Foundation	1,219	1,168	1,139	3,526	1000
Ndlambe	Dhladhla Foundation	449	430	463	1,342	500
Nelson Mandela Bay Metro	Dhladhla Foundation	1,242	1,514	1,973	4,729	2500
Nkonkobe	Dhladhla Foundation	1,214	1,140	1,117	3,471	1000
Nxuba	Dhladhla Foundation	1,151	1,156	1,076	3,383	1000
Nyandeni	Dhladhla Foundation	1,103	1,222	1,172	3,497	1000
Peddie	Dhladhla Foundation	1,161	1,139	1,053	3,353	1000
Perfeville	Dhladhla Foundation	1,741	1,967	1,990	5,698	2000
Port St Johns	Dhladhla Foundation	1,204	1,214	1,119	3,537	1000
Senqu	Dhladhla Foundation	2,273	2,222	2,145	6,640	2000
15	Dhladhla Foundation Total	16,445	16,709	17,199	50,353	17000
Amahlathi	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	1,836	1,905	1,784	5,525	1600
Baviaans	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	-	-	430	430	500
Blue Crane Route	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	308	515	533	1,356	500
Camdeboo	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	1,195	1,007	1,165	3,367	1000
Ikwezi	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	981	929	903	2,813	1000
Koukamma	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	-	-	450	450	750
Makana	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	1,281	1,198	1,275	3,754	1000
Sunday Rivers	Siyakholwa Development Foundation	-	369	666	1,035	500
8	Siyakholwa Total	5,601	5,923	7,206	18,730	6850
Ksd: Mthatha	Thembalethu Development	1,634	1,858	1,705	5,197	1500
Lukhanyo / Mhlontlo	Thembalethu Development	1,717	1,942	1,837	5,496	1500
Matatiele	Thembalethu Development	2,100	2,329	2,122	6,551	2000
Mthamvuna	Thembalethu Development	1,787	1,608	1,511	4,906	1500
Mzimvubu	Thembalethu Development	2,145	2,292	2,181	6,618	2000
Nquza Hill	Thembalethu Development	1,626	1,917	1,846	5,389	1500
Ntabankulu	Thembalethu Development	1,073	1,136	1,046	3,255	1000
7	Thembalethu Development Total	12,082	13,082	12,248	37,412	11000

FREE STATE PROVINCE

There are four Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
Mafube	Dhladhla Foundation	-	370	495	865	500
Mangaung	Dhladhla Foundation	1,857	2,029	1,895	5,781	2500
Metsimaholo	Dhladhla Foundation	1,000	1,060	969	3,029	1000
Moqhaka	Dhladhla Foundation	1,024	940	807	2,771	1000
Ngwathe	Dhladhla Foundation	2,089	1,948	1,999	6,036	2000
5	Dhladhla Foundation Total	5,970	6,347	6,165	18,482	7000
Dihlabeng	Lima Rural Development	-	350	473	823	500
Harrismith/ Maluti-a-Phofung	Lima Rural Development	2,832	2,963	2,703	8,498	2500
Nketoana	Lima Rural Development	-	333	442	775	500
Phumelela	Lima Rural Development	1,123	1,164	1,109	3,396	1000
Setsoto	Lima Rural Development	1,193	1,185	1,057	3,435	1000
5	Lima Rural Development Total	5,148	5,995	5,784	16,927	5500
Kopanong	Seboka Training & Support					500
Letsemeng	Seboka Training & Support	1,185	1,281	1,133	3,599	1000
Mantsopa	Seboka Training & Support	100	947	1,029	2,076	1000
Mohokare	Seboka Training & Support	1,306	1,211	1,035	3,552	1000
Wepener/Dewetsdorp	Seboka Training & Support	1,805	1,797	1,735	5,337	1600
5	Seboka Training & Support Total	4,396	5,236	4,932	14,564	5100
Masilonyana	Seriti Institute	-	239	321	560	500
Nala	Seriti Institute	995	995	951	2,941	1000
Tokologo	Seriti Institute	856	861	770	2,487	1000
Tswelopele	Seriti Institute					500
Welkom	Seriti Institute	3,343	3,283	3,067	9,693	3000
5	Seriti Institute Total	5,194	5,378	5,109	15,681	6000

GAUTENG PROVINCE

There are four Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
CoJ Region G	Dhladhla Foundation	1,160	1,282	1,115	3,557	1000
Munsieville	Dhladhla Foundation	2,798	2,934	2,926	8,658	2500
Randfontein	Dhladhla Foundation	2,304	2,411	2,273	6,988	2000
Westonaria	Dhladhla Foundation	2,683	2,627	2,324	7,634	2000
4	Dhladhla Foundation Total	8,945	9,254	8,638	26,837	7500
City of JHB Region E	Insika Foundation	1,363	1,230	1,109	3,702	1000
Merafong	Insika Foundation	2,513	2,358	2,170	7,041	2000
2	Insika Foundation Total	3,876	3,588	3,279	10,743	3000
City of JHB Region A	Seriti Institute	1,609	1,237	1,056	3,902	1000
City of JHB Region C	Seriti Institute	1,155	1,066	1,006	3,227	1000
EKURHULENI	Seriti Institute	-	-	1,019	1,019	1000
Tshwane Metro	Seriti Institute	1,743	1,670	1,663	5,076	2000
4	Seriti Institute Total	4,507	3,973	4,744	13,224	5000
CoJ REGION F	Thembalethu Development	1,192	1,391	1,056	3,639	1000
eMfuleni	Thembalethu Development	879	1,108	948	2,935	1000
Lesedi	Thembalethu Development	1,098	1,201	1,202	3,501	1000
Midvaal	Thembalethu Development	797	1,031	1,027	2,855	1000
4	Thembalethu Development Total	3,966	4,731	4,233	12,930	4000

KWAZULU NATAL PROVINCE

There are three Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
Ezingoleni	Dhladhla Foundation	1,052	1,211	1,147	3,410	1000
Greater Kokstad	Dhladhla Foundation	-	389	492	881	500
Hibiscus Coast	Dhladhla Foundation					450
Ingwe	Dhladhla Foundation	1,143	1,183	1,120	3,446	1000
Kwa Sani	Dhladhla Foundation					100
Msunduzi	Dhladhla Foundation	1,088	1,080	980	3,148	1000
Okhahlamba	Dhladhla Foundation	1,109	1,139	1,102	3,350	1000
Richmond	Dhladhla Foundation					450
Ubuhlebezwe	Dhladhla Foundation	1,043	1,046	1,067	3,156	1000
Umdoni	Dhladhla Foundation	-	326	548	874	500
Umuziwabantu	Dhladhla Foundation	1,116	1,209	1,116	3,441	1000
Umzimkhulu	Dhladhla Foundation	1,149	1,144	1,098	3,391	1000
Umzumbe	Dhladhla Foundation	1,591	1,617	1,581	4,789	1500
Vulamehlo	Dhladhla Foundation	1,095	1,158	1,085	3,338	1000
14	Dhladhla Foundation Total	10,386	11,502	11,336	33,224	11500
City of Umhlathuze	Insika Foundation					450
Dannhauser	Insika Foundation	955	1,046	1,021	3,022	1000
eDumbe	Insika Foundation	1,134	1,079	1,101	3,314	1000
eShowe	Insika Foundation	1,184	1,160	1,060	3,404	1000
Ethekwini	Insika Foundation					1000
Impendle	Insika Foundation	1,089	1,130	1,053	3,272	1000
Indaka	Insika Foundation	1,214	1,155	1,116	3,485	1000
Kwadukuza	Insika Foundation	-	284	549	833	500
Ladysmith/Emnambithi	Insika Foundation					450
Mandeni	Insika Foundation	442	551	493	1,486	1000
Maphumulo	Insika Foundation	1,014	1,053	1,080	3,147	1000
Mfolozi	Insika Foundation					450
Mkhambathini	Insika Foundation	1,072	1,100	1,074	3,246	1000
Mthonjaneni	Insika Foundation	404	638	570	1,612	500
Ndwedwe	Insika Foundation	1,207	1,115	1,060	3,382	1000
Newcastle	Insika Foundation					450
Nkandla	Insika Foundation	1,094	1,219	1,126	3,439	1100
Nongoma	Insika Foundation	1,130	1,070	1,116	3,316	1000
Ntambanana	Insika Foundation	1,115	1,132	1,084	3,331	1000
Ulundi	Insika Foundation					500
uMshwathi	Insika Foundation					450
uPhongolo	Insika Foundation	934	1,011	1,065	3,010	1000
22	Insika Foundation Total	13,988	14,743	14,568	43,299	17850
Abaqulusi	Seriti Institute	1,068	1,064	1,031	3,163	1000
Big Five False Bay	Seriti Institute					225
eMadlangeni	Seriti Institute	1,344	1,255	1,151	3,750	1000
Endumeni	Seriti Institute					450
Hlabisa	Seriti Institute					225
Imbabazane	Seriti Institute	-	-	233	233	500
Jozini	Seriti Institute	1,101	1,100	1,065	3,266	1000
Mpofana	Seriti Institute	-	-	323	323	500
Msinga	Seriti Institute	1,594	1,621	1,561	4,776	1500
Mtshezi	Seriti Institute	1,140	1,107	1,027	3,274	1000
Mtubatuba	Seriti Institute	1,201	1,164	1,110	3,475	1000
Nquthu	Seriti Institute	1,242	1,112	1,068	3,422	1000
Umhlabuyalingana	Seriti Institute	1,598	1,716	1,732	5,046	1600
uMngeni	Seriti Institute					450
Umvoti	Seriti Institute					500
15	Seriti Institute Total	10,288	10,139	10,301	30,728	11950

LIMPOPO PROVINCE

There are two Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
Ba-Phalaborwa	Dhladhla Foundation	1,108	1,072	1,106	3,286	1000
Bela Bela	Dhladhla Foundation	1,010	1,155	1,171	3,336	1000
Greater Giyani	Dhladhla Foundation	1,955	1,720	1,681	5,356	1700
Greater Letaba	Dhladhla Foundation	442	1,077	1,071	2,590	1100
Greater Tzaneen	Dhladhla Foundation	1,893	2,239	2,237	6,369	2100
Lephalale	Dhladhla Foundation	-	-	308	308	500
Makhado	Dhladhla Foundation	1,153	1,117	1,269	3,539	1200
Maruleng	Dhladhla Foundation	1,109	1,106	1,056	3,271	1100
Modimolle	Dhladhla Foundation	-	355	559	914	500
Mogalakwena	Dhladhla Foundation	1,096	1,398	1,308	3,802	1300
Mokgoophong	Dhladhla Foundation	-	389	525	914	500
Musina	Dhladhla Foundation	399	1,083	1,270	2,752	1000
Mutale	Dhladhla Foundation	1,181	1,104	1,147	3,432	1100
Thabazimbi	Dhladhla Foundation	-	155	245	400	500
Thulamela	Dhladhla Foundation	1,349	1,221	1,139	3,709	1000
15	Dhladhla Foundation Total	12,695	15,191	16,092	43,978	15600
Aganang	Seriti Institute	1,135	1,105	1,014	3,254	1000
Blouberg	Seriti Institute	1,226	1,100	1,192	3,518	1000
Elias Motsoaled	Seriti Institute	357	619	1,138	2,114	1100
Ephraim Mogale	Seriti Institute	1,147	1,165	1,127	3,439	1000
Fetakgomo	Seriti Institute	1,142	1,095	1,036	3,273	1200
Greater Tubatse	Seriti Institute	1,878	1,712	1,564	5,154	1500
Lepelle Nkumpi	Seriti Institute	1,204	1,101	1,126	3,431	1150
Makhuduthamaga	Seriti Institute	1,057	1,159	1,319	3,535	1200
Molemole	Seriti Institute	893	1,032	1,191	3,116	1000
Polokwane	Seriti Institute	354	623	1,068	2,045	1500
10	Seriti Institute Total	10,393	10,711	11,775	32,879	11650

MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

There are three Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
Albert Luthuli - Nhlazatshe	Dhladhla Foundation	1,096	1,184	1,132	3,412	1000
Albert Luthuli - Tjakastad	Dhladhla Foundation	1,637	1,743	1,673	5,053	1800
Dipaleseng	Dhladhla Foundation	224	1,133	1,119	2,476	1000
Govan Mbeki	Dhladhla Foundation	1,257	1,228	1,207	3,692	1000
Lekwa	Dhladhla Foundation	314	1,188	1,125	2,627	1000
Mkhondo	Dhladhla Foundation	1,642	1,774	1,733	5,149	1500
Msukaligwa	Dhladhla Foundation	1,152	1,210	1,210	3,572	1000
Pixley Ka Seme	Dhladhla Foundation	1,107	1,190	1,097	3,394	1000
Victor Khanye	Dhladhla Foundation	217	1,030	1,131	2,378	1000
9	Dhladhla Foundation Total	8,646	11,680	11,427	31,753	10300
Dr JS Moroka	Seboka Training & Support	1,293	1,198	1,097	3,588	1400
Emalahleni	Seboka Training & Support	1,189	1,338	1,133	3,660	1000
Steve Tshwete	Seboka Training & Support	1,284	1,254	1,047	3,585	1000
Thembisile Hani	Seboka Training & Support	1,051	1,229	1,226	3,506	1200
4	Seboka Training & Support Total	4,817	5,019	4,503	14,339	4600
Bushbuckridge	Seriti Institute	2,674	2,858	2,696	8,228	2900
eMakhazeni	Seriti Institute	275	540	712	1,527	1000
Mbombela	Seriti Institute	1,368	1,826	1,642	4,836	1500
Nkomazi	Seriti Institute	1,541	1,683	1,578	4,802	1900
Thabachweu	Seriti Institute	1,246	1,218	1,031	3,495	1100
Umjindi	Seriti Institute	269	729	959	1,957	1000
6	Seriti Institute Total	7,373	8,854	8,618	24,845	9400

NORTHERN CAPE

There are three Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
Emthanjeni	Dhladhla Foundation	-	1,069	1,155	2,224	1000
Kareeberg	Dhladhla Foundation	1,302	784	981	3,067	1000
Karoo Hoogland	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Renosterberg	Dhladhla Foundation	966	1,060	1,100	3,126	1000
Thembelihle	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Ubuntu	Dhladhla Foundation	1,486	1,122	1,072	3,680	1000
Umsobomvu	Dhladhla Foundation	-	231	444	675	500
7	Dhladhla Foundation Total	3,754	4,266	4,752	12,772	5500
Dikgatlong	Thabiso NGO /3L Development	1,366	1,189	1,108	3,663	1000
Ga-segonyana	Thabiso NGO /3L Development					500
Hantaam	Thabiso NGO /3L Development					500
Joe Morolong	Thabiso NGO /3L Development	1,574	1,721	1,687	4,982	1500
Khara Hais	Thabiso NGO /3L Development					500
Kheis	Thabiso NGO /3L Development					500
Magareng	Thabiso NGO /3L Development	1,471	1,246	1,035	3,752	1000
Nama Khoi	Thabiso NGO /3L Development					500
Phokwane	Thabiso NGO /3L Development	-	818	949	1,767	1000
Sol Plaatje	Thabiso NGO /3L Development	14	1,225	966	2,205	1000
Tsantsabane	Thabiso NGO /3L Development					500
11	Thabiso NGO /3L Development Total	4,425	6,199	5,745	16,369	8500
Gamagara	Thembalethu Development	659	723	979	2,361	1000
Kammiesberg	Thembalethu Development					500
Kgatelopele	Thembalethu Development	1,129	1,323	1,191	3,643	1000
Khaima	Thembalethu Development	1,252	1,199	1,299	3,750	1000
Mier	Thembalethu Development	240	302	271	813	500
Richtersveld	Thembalethu Development	1,002	905	787	2,694	1000
Riemvasmaak /Ka! Gariep	Thembalethu Development	1,254	1,360	1,315	3,929	1000
Siyancuma	Thembalethu Development	-	319	329	648	500
Siyathemba	Thembalethu Development					500
9	Thembalethu Development Total	5,536	6,131	6,171	17,838	7000

NORTH WEST PROVINCE

There are two Implementing Agents facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provided to date	Target for 2016/17
Ditsobotla	Dhladhla Foundation	-	808	997	1,805	1000
GREATER TAUNG	Dhladhla Foundation	1,647	1,730	1,596	4,973	2000
Kagisano Molopo	Dhladhla Foundation	1,035	1,179	1,051	3,265	1000
Lekwa-Teemane	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Mafikeng	Dhladhla Foundation	1,688	1,686	1,555	4,929	1500
Mamusa	Dhladhla Foundation	502	1,095	1,217	2,814	1000
Naledi FS	Dhladhla Foundation	1,098	961	1,216	3,275	1000
Ramotshere Moiloa	Dhladhla Foundation	1,099	1,018	1,087	3,204	1000
Ratlou	Dhladhla Foundation	1,008	1,175	1,009	3,192	1000
Tswaing	Dhladhla Foundation	1,220	1,151	1,158	3,529	1000
10	Dhladhla Foundation Total	9,297	10,803	10,886	30,986	11000
Kgetlengrivier	Seriti Institute	598	658	1,163	2,419	1000
Madibeng	Seriti Institute	1,196	1,244	1,316	3,756	1000
Maquassi Hills	Seriti Institute	1,161	1,322	1,278	3,761	1000
Matlosana	Seriti Institute					500
Moretele	Seriti Institute	1,294	1,234	1,248	3,776	1000
Moses Kotane	Seriti Institute	1,112	1,267	1,113	3,492	1100
Rustenberg	Seriti Institute	2,579	2,592	2,289	7,460	2000
Tlokwe	Seriti Institute					500
Ventersdorp	Seriti Institute	1,309	1,285	1,139	3,733	1000
9	Seriti Institute Total	9,249	9,602	9,546	28,397	9100

WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE

There are one Implementing Agent facilitating the implementation of the programme, the table below provides the detailed breakdown of the work opportunities provided per site (Municipality) over a period of three years.

Municipality/Site Name	Implementing Agent	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	Total provide to date	Target for 2016/17
Beaufort West	Dhladhla Foundation	668	1,105	1,238	3,011	1000
Bitou	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Breede Valley	Dhladhla Foundation	1,145	1,244	1,150	3,539	1000
Cape Agulhas	Dhladhla Foundation	-	18	214	232	500
Cape Town	Dhladhla Foundation	1,232	1,131	1,100	3,463	1100
Cederberg	Dhladhla Foundation	535	606	547	1,688	700
Drakenstein	Dhladhla Foundation	564	449	538	1,551	500
George	Dhladhla Foundation	-	-	228	228	500
Hessequa	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Kannaland	Dhladhla Foundation	690	726	889	2,305	1000
Khayelitsha	Dhladhla Foundation	978	1,159	961	3,098	1000
Knysna	Dhladhla Foundation	-	-	465	465	500
Laingsburg	Dhladhla Foundation	304	236	249	789	500
Langeberg	Dhladhla Foundation	261	252	327	840	500
Mosselbay	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Nyanga/Guguletu	Dhladhla Foundation	870	1,060	1,042	2,972	1000
Oudtshoorn	Dhladhla Foundation	540	682	816	2,038	700
Overstrand	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Prince Albert	Dhladhla Foundation	440	386	399	1,225	500
Saldanha	Dhladhla Foundation	208	390	531	1,129	500
Stellenbosch	Dhladhla Foundation					500
Swellendam	Dhladhla Foundation	350	380	301	1,031	500
Theewaterskloof	Dhladhla Foundation	1,067	1,298	1,031	3,396	1000
Witzenberg	Dhladhla Foundation	533	510	614	1,657	500
24	Dhladhla Foundation Total	10,385	11,632	12,640	34,657	16000

(f) The contracts will be expiring on 31 March 2017.

14 November 2016 - NW2286

Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

Whether any (a) internal and/or (b) external forensic reports pertaining to his department and /or each entity reporting to him were completed from 1 january 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; in not, in each case , why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic report

Source
Link

Reply:

The Honourable Member might be aware that I have 26 entities reporting to me, therefore to collate information from the entities require time. I will submit that information to the Honourable member once it is available.

14 November 2016 - NW2369

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

1. Whether the Cultural and Creative Industries Federation of South Africa (CCIFSA) submitted a copy of its constitution to him; if not, why not; if so, (a) on what date and (b) what are the further relevant details in this regards; 2. Whether CCIFSA submitted annual financial statements for the (a) 2014-15 and (b) 2015-16 financial years; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, on what date(s) were the specified financial statements submitted to him; 3. What are the (a) names; (b) qualifications and (c) contact details of each of the CCIFSA’s board members; 4. Whether his department provided any form of funding, assistance, sponsorship and/or assets to the CCIFSA since the establishment of the federation in 2014; if not, in each case,what is the position in this regard; if so in each case, (a) what was the value of the funding, assistance, sponsorships and/or assets provided to the CCIFSA, (b) for what purpose and (c) has he found that the specific purpose were met? NW2704E

Source
Link

Reply:

1. Yes, CCIFSA submitted a copy of its Memorandum of Incoparation (MoI) to the Department. (a) the copy was submitted on 18 March 2015. (b) The MoI was subsequently presented to the CCIFSA inaugural conference that was held from 23 – 24 March 2015 in Bloemfontein, which I also attended. Though the conference decided to proceed with the election of the current leadership, it resolved not to adopt the MoI but to allow the new leadership to conduct further consultations with other stakeholders especially those who did not have the opportunity to be part of the process leading to the conference. CCIFSA is in the process of finalising the revised MoI, taking into consideration the views which were

2. Yes, CCIFSA submitted annual financial statements for the (a) 2014 -15 and (b) 2015-16 financial years; (c) The 2014–15 finacial statements were presented to the Department on 15 July 2015 as part of the hand-over by the Interim Committee to the current leadership. The 2015–16 financial statement were presented to the Department on 31 August 2016.

14 November 2016 - NW2355

De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport

(a) On what date did the board members of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa pay back the money for the extra board meetings they paid themselves, as per their undertaking to the Portfolio Committee on Transport on 31 August 2016, (b)(i) what amount was paid by each of the specified board members and (ii) for which of the specified board meetings, (c) which of the board members have not paid the money back yet, (d) on what date will all the moneys owed be paid back by the board members and (e) what interest is being charged to the board members?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) On 27 October 2016, the Minister of Transport, following consideration of the PRASA Board of Control’s submission in respect of the circumstances that led to the payment made to the Board for the extra Board meetings, instructed the Board of Control to repay the money that was paid for supplementary Board meetings without prior written approval from the Executive Authority. The Minister gave the deadline of on or before 31 January 2017 for the repayment of all the money.

(b) As at 31 October 2016, the Chairman of the PRASA Board, Dr. Popo Molefe, repaid R680 000.

(c) The Board as indicated in paragraph (a) above, has been given a deadline of 31 January 2017 to repay the money.

(d) The deadline for the repayment of the money is 31 January 2017.

(e) No interest is being charged to the Board members.

14 November 2016 - NW2411

Tarabella - Marchesi, Ms NI to ask the Minister of Transport

What (a) are the full reasons why the SA National Roads Agency (SANRAL) approached the Constitutional Court regarding the tolling of the N1 and N2 highways in the Western Cape and (b) amount has SANRAL spent on legal expenses on the specified matter to date?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) At the heart of the appeal is the question of condonation of an unreasonable delay on the part of the City of Cape Town, as an organ of state and its failure to provide an explanation for its unreasonable delay in reviewing the decisions taken concerning the N1/N2 Project (the Project). There is no question that the City knew that the decisions had been taken at the time that they were taken, that SANRAL was acting in furtherance of those decisions, and that the City stood by and did nothing even though it knew of this. It offered no explanation for why it did nothing. The Project was more than a decade in the making. Monies have already been spent in implementing and carrying out certain works concerning the Project. The City, being well aware of the Project, delayed unreasonably in bringing its application – almost a decade later. The City has never disputed that it became aware of the SANRAL decisions to declare the roads as toll roads when they were published in 2008. The peremptory 180-day period referred to in section 7 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, (PAJA), (Act 3 of 2000) expired during March 2009

The N1 / N2 Winelands Project was conceived to improve the link between the Western Cape and the rest of the country, and substantial time, effort and investment had been put into its development. The Winelands Toll Road Project is a strategic infrastructure project that is necessary to sustain and develop the Western Cape economy and brings enormous economic development for the Western Cape Province. It was also earmarked to facilitate the movement of large volumes of export and import freight, business, tourism, recreational and commuter traffic which is vital to growing the South African economy.

(b) I must hastily point out to this honourable House and to the honourable member, Ms N I Tarabella Marchesi MP, that the Appeal as lodged by SANRAL is also against the costs order awarded and it would be negligent and misleading of me to mention a figure which the Appeal Court might overturn, my suggestion therefore is that we await the finalisation of the Appeal.

11 November 2016 - NW2269

Maimane, Mr MA to ask the President of the Republic

(1)With reference to section 91(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and in the light of the allegations by a certain person (name and details furnished) that private persons excercised these powers that were exclusively provided for him, what is his position regarding such allegations that the specified person was offered a cabinet position by a member of a certain family (name furnished) during meetings at their residence in October 2010 in return for the cancellation of an SA Airways route to India; (2) was he present at a certain residence (name furnished) when the offer was allegedly made to the person; (3) whether he held any meetings with the person between 1 October 2010 and 31 December 2010; if not, what is his position regarding claims to the contrary; if so, (a) how many meetings did the specified person request with him during the specified period, (b) how many requests resulted in a meeting being held and (c) what was the reason for each meeting not being held with the person as requested?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2308

Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

Whether any (a) internal and/or (b) external forensic reports pertaining to (i) his department and/or (ii) each entity reporting to him were completed from 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic reports?

Source
Link

Reply:

Whether any forensic reports for the period 1 JAN 2009 to 31 OCT 2016

(a) (i) Department: Internal Forensic Reports: 102

(b) (i) Department: External Forensic Reports: 12 as provided by Service Providers

appointed by the Department

(a) (ii) Entity: Internal Forensic Reports: 0

(b) (ii) Entity: External Forensic Reports: 0

The abovementioned figures exclude forensic investigations referred to the Special Investigating Unit by the Department. Those are work-in-progress..

(aa), (bb), (cc) Please refer to Annexure A.

11 November 2016 - NW2154

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)Whether her department will lease five specialist maritime surveillance aircraft (details furnished) from a consortium led by Atlantis Aviation as part of the obligations of the SA Air Force (SAAF), as set out in the latest Defence Review, under Project Metsi/Kiepie; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the full relevant details of (a) the tender process followed by the Armaments Corporation of South Africa (Armscor) to procure the specified aircraft, (b) the age of the aircraft in terms of (i) years flown and (ii) hours clocked to date, (c) the yearly (i) leasing and (ii) operating costs, (d) how the specified costs will be funded and (e) the date on which the aircraft will be operational in the SAAF; (2) whether she will make the tender notices published by Armscor available to Mr S J F Marais; if not, why not; if so, by what date; (3) whether a due diligence investigation was done prior to entering into an agreement with the specified consortium; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of the outcome of the specified investigation; (4) whether she intends to procure permanent specialist maritime surveillance aircraft once the lease of the specified aircraft ends; if not, why not; if so, by what date will this take place; (5) whether the procurement of the specified aircraft has any impact on the need to replace some of the SAAF stock (details furnished); if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

Questions 1-5

The SAAF has not leased aircrafts from the consortium led by Atlantis Aviation.

The SAAF was approached by Atlantis Aviation in the run-up to the AAD 2016 with the view to showcase the Donier 328.

The SAAF did not make any commitment to acquire these aircrafts after the assessment by our maritime specialists.

11 November 2016 - NW2247

Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)(a) What are the relevant details of all training provided to the Road Traffic Management Agency’s officials in the past three financial years, (b) what amount did each training course cost, (c) who conducted each training course and (d) what qualifications were offered in each case; (2) whether each specified training course was accredited; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether the requirement to be in possession of (a) normal and/or (b) specialised driving licences was waived for any of the officials to attend any of the specified courses; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. Training of the National Traffic Police (NTP) : 2016/17

(a) Training Details:

A total of 101 Officers are being trained as Examiners of Vehicles and Examiners for Driving Licences.
Duration: from 19 July to 08 December 2016
Venue: Heidelberg SA Army Gymnasium

Training Cost:

Total cost of Training as at 30 September 2016 amounted to R3,3 million

Training Provider:

Boekenhoutkloof Traffic Training College in collaboration with the RTMC Training Provisioning. Boekenhoutkloof Traffic College is an accredited training provider, accredited with the Safety and Security, Sector, Education and Training Authority (SASSETA).

Qualifications were offered:

Certificate in Examiners of Vehicles and Certificate in Examiners for Driving Licences.

Training of the National Traffic Police: 2015/16

(a) Training Details:

A total of 130 officers were trained on the following:
- Physical Fitness
- Tactical Training
- Firearm Training
- Theoretical Training (NLTA, AARTO, and Legal Subjects)
- Training as Examiners of Vehicles
Duration: from 18August to 14 December 2015
Venue: Heidelberg SA Army Gymnasium

(b) Training Cost:

Total cost of Training as at 31 March 2016 amounted to R7,9 million

(c) Training Provider:

Boekenhoutkloof Traffic Training College in collaboration with the RTMC Training Provisioning. Boekenhoutkloof Traffic College is an accredited training provider, accredited with the Safety and Security, Sector, Education and Training Authority (SASSETA).

(d) Qualifications were offered:

Certificate in Examiners of Vehicles.

Training of the National Traffic Police: 2014/15

(a) Training Details:

The training was presented to 172 members of the National Traffic Police at the TELKOM Centre of Learning in Olifantsfontein, Gauteng. The following milestones were set during the up-skilling training conducted from 25 October 2014 to 15 December 2014:

Physical Fitness
Tactical Training
Firearm Training
Theoretical Training

All of the aforementioned aspects which made up the Up-Skilling Training Programme of the NTP, were spread throughout the up-skilling training programme in the format of a Block Programme.

(b) Training Cost:

The training budget for the NTP up-skilling for 2014/15 was R20m, actual expenditure was R11m.

Training Provider:

This training was referred to as the Up-Skilling of the NTP and was conducted by George Fivaz Forensic and Risk (GFFR) Training from 25 October 2014 to 15 December 2014. GFFR conducted the training in collaboration with Lyceum College.Lyceum College is registered with the Department of Higher Education and Training as a Private Higher Education Institution.

(b) Qualifications were offered:

Lyceum College registered this programme as an internal certification programme.

2. The Training for Examiners of Vehicles and Examiner for Driving Licences are accredited programmes consisting of the following Unit Standards:

UNIT STANDARD TITLE	NUMBER	NQF LEVEL
EXAMINERS OF VEHICLES
Examine vehicles for road-worthiness	336639	Level 4
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of basic vehicle components	377200	Level 4
Examine light motor vehicles for fitness and road-worthiness	377223	Level 4
Engage in sustained oral/signed communication and evaluate spoken/signed texts	119462	Level 4
EXAMINERS FOR DRIVING LICENCES
Examine candidates for the learners drivers licence	256522	Level 3
Examine for a driving licence - Grade D	377227	Level 4

The Up-Skilling of the NTP conducted by GFFR in collaboration with Lyceum College during 2014/15 was done on the Lyceum College registered internal certification programme.
The following training done during 2015/16 has reference:
- Physical Fitness – none credit bearing as part of up-skilling of the NTP
- Tactical Training - none credit bearing as part of up-skilling of the NTP
- Firearm Training - none credit bearing as part of up-skilling of the NTP; this training is also part of the annual maintenance shoot done in terms of the Firearms Control Act, Act 60 of 2000.
- Theoretical Training (NRTA, NLTA, AARTO, and Legal Subjects) – none credit bearing as part of up-skilling of the NTP.

3. No driving licence requirements were waived for any of the above training.

The requirements as set out in the National Road Traffic Act, 1996, Act 93 of 1996 (NRTA) were met:

Grades of examiner of vehicles (EoV) and examiner for driving licences (EDL), with driving licence requirements, as per the NRTA are as follow:

(1) Examiner of vehicles:

Grade A, examiner to hold a Code EC driving licence for a manual transmission and a Code A driving licence;
Grade B, such examiner to hold a Code EB driving licence for a manual transmission and a Code A driving licence;
Grade C, such examiner to hold Code EC driving licence for a manual transmission;
Grade D, such examiner to hold a Code EB driving licence for a manual transmission.

(2) Examiner for driving licences:

Grade A, examiner to hold a Code EC driving licence for a manual transmission and a Code A driving licence;
Grade B, examiner to hold a Code EC driving licence for a manual transmission;
Grade C, examiner to hold a Code B driving licence for a manual transmission and a Code A driving licence;
Grade D, examiner to hold a Code B driving licence for a manual transmission;

11 November 2016 - NW2174

Gqada, Ms T to ask the President of the Republic

(1)Whether, in pursuance of the Constitutional Court Ruling on Nkandla, he obtained a mortgage loan from the VBS Mutual Bank in order to settle the R7,8 million ordered by the court for non-security related upgrades at his private residence at Nkandla in KwaZulu-Natal; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) on what date did he secure the specified loan from the specified bank, (b) what was the amount of the loan and (c) did he obtain the loan in his name; (2) whether he will furnish Ms T Gqada with a copy of the loan; if not, why not; if so, by what date?

Source
Link

Reply:

I raised the amount R7 814 155.00 through a home loan obtained from VBS Mutual Bank on its standard terms. VBS Mutual Bank is one of the few financial institutions which offer home loans in respect of land owned by traditional authorities.

After paying over the amount of R7 814 155 00 to the South African Reserve Bank, I as a matter of courtesy, advised the Constitutional Court that I have paid the amount as per the order of that court. I deem such notification sufficient and compliant with both the order of court and of my constitutional obligations.

11 November 2016 - NW2178

Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy

(1)Whether, with reference to the Strategic Fuel Fund’s 2015-16 annual report, the 300 000 barrels of crude oil to the value of R60 million that was lent to a service provider has been (a) paid for and (b) returned to the specified fund; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, what are the relevant details; (2) (a) when did the lending of the specified barrels of crude oil occur, (b) what is the name of the specified service provider, (c) when did she become aware of the loss of the barrels of crude oil, (d) why were the barrels of crude oil lent to the service provider in the first place and (e) why were the barrels of crude oil not returned to the fund; (3) whether her department has a policy in place to check whether a potential service provider has any political connections; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what were her department’s findings in respect of the specified service provider and (b) what are the further relevant details; (4) what internal controls are in place at the fund to prevent it incurring losses in similar types of transactions? NW2500E

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) The review of contracts ordered by the Minister will deal with this matter.

(2) The contract and its conditions are subject of a review that the Minister of Energy has instituted.

(3) No.

(4) SFF has adequate internal control processes in place that could have prevented it from incurring losses in this transaction if they had been adhered to. These controls include i) the board-approved limits of authority policy, ii) risk management policy iii) properly constituted Exco with relevant PFMA and risk management experience and supported by clear terms of reference. There is a materiality framework that provides guidance on levels of approvals for all material transactions.

11 November 2016 - NW2137

Maynier, Mr D to ask the President of the Republic

Whether, with reference to his reply to oral question 17 on 13 September 2016, he has engaged with the Minister of Mineral Resources on the controversy surrounding the statement issued by the Minister on 1 September 2016; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

I reprimanded the Minister of Mineral Resources for the statement.

11 November 2016 - NW2153

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)What is the main defence purpose of the temporary military base that has been set up on the outskirts of the residential area of Fouriesburg in the Free State; (2) whether there are any plans to (a) resettle the specified base further away from the specified residential area and/or (b) establish the base as a permanent base; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, (i) what are the relevant details, (ii) by what date will the base be moved and/or established permanently and (iii) what amount will it cost; (3) whether any complaints regarding unreasonable noise pollution originating from the base were received from residents of Fouriesburg; if not, what steps will she take to ensure that the specified residents do not experience discomfort due to the unreasonable noise pollution; if so, what steps has she taken to address the specified complaints; (4) whether any complaints regarding unreasonable noise pollution originating from the base have been lodged with the Fouriesburg Police Station; if so, (a) what are the relevant details and (b) what steps has she taken to address the specified complaints?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. Fouriesburg was identified as an Operational Base facility to accommodate Force Structure Elements (FSE’s) on a rotational basis to effect Border Control as part of the South African National Defence Force’s Border Control Strategy. Utilization of this facility for this purpose was further augmented by a Cabinet decision and Directive to continue with Border Control Operations as well as a request from the Border communities. Fouriesburg forms part of fifteen (15) Operation Base Facilities that have been identified nationally.

2. (a) and (b)

There are no plans to resettle this facility from its current location as it was used previously and closed as part of the reduction of force levels. The base will be resuscitated to a permanent military base facility for utilization for border control operations.

Following an assessment by the National Department of Public Works and the Local municipality it was approved that the facility be re-established. The estimated costs will be R36 million for two financial years, 2017/18 and 2018/19.

3. Complaints have been received by a section of the population of Fouriesburg. The commanders are engaging the entire community to listen to their concerns including noise pollution.

4. There is no evidence of any complaints laid at the local SAPS Police Station.

11 November 2016 - NW2268

Maimane, Mr MA to ask the President of the Republic

(1)With reference to his reply to oral question 9 on 19 June 2013, what are the details of the nature of his relationship with a certain family (name furnished); (2) (a)(i) in which capacity and (ii) on what dates in 2015 did he visit the specified family at their residence and (b) what was the reason for each visit; (3) has any member of the family ever given (a) him and/or (b) any member of his family a gift, no matter how trivial; if so, in each case, what are the details of the gift?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2274

Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the President of the Republic

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 109 on 20 September 2016, he ever visited a certain residence (details furnished) at the same time as certain persons (names furnished) visited there; if so, in each case, what was the reason for the visit?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2272

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the President of the Republic

Whether he will make a statement with regard to the allegation that a certain person (name and details furnished) was informed by a certain family (name furnished) about the specified person’s imminent appointment to the Cabinet (details furnished) before it was announced by him; if so, what is his response?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2275

Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the President of the Republic

Whether he ever visited a certain residence (details furnished) at the same time as a certain person (name furnished) visited there; if so, what was the reason for the visit?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2138

Maynier, Mr D to ask the President of the Republic

(1)Whether the statement issued by the Minister of Mineral Resources on 1 September 2016 was issued in the Minister’s personal capacity; if not, what are the relevant details; if so, why did the Minister state in a reply to written question 1892 on 22 September 2016 that he was not speaking in his personal capacity; (2) whether the specified statement reflects Cabinet’s position on the recommendations contained in the inter-ministerial committee’s report; if not, why not; if so, why did the Minister claim in a reply to written question 1892 on 22 September 2016 that four of the specified recommendations were approved by Cabinet; (3) whether any action has been taken against the specified minister for issuing the specified statement; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

I had indicated in my previous reply that the statement issued by the Minister of Mineral Resources, Mr Mosebenzi Zwane on 1 September 2016, on the work of the task team established to consider the implications of the decisions of certain banks and audit firms to close down the accounts and withdraw audit services from the company named Oakbay Investments, was issued in his personal capacity and not on behalf of the task team or Cabinet. I am not in the position to answer why the Minister Zwane in his reply on 22 September 2016 said that he was not speaking in his personal capacity. The question in this regard must be directed to the Minister.

I reprimanded the Minister for the statement.

11 November 2016 - NW2273

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the President of the Republic

Did he ever visit the estate of a certain family (name and details furnished) at the same time as certain other persons (names furnished) were present; if so, in each case, what was the reason for the visit?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2248

Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)Whether the Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC) paid for accommodation for any of its officers (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) how much did the RTMC spend on accommodation of officers in each of the specified periods, (b) why were the specified officers accommodated, (c) what accommodation was used and (d) what are the (i) names and (ii) rank of each officer whose accommodation was paid for by the RTMC in each province in each month of the specified periods; (2) whether the RTMC provides any additional entitlements to its officers when travelling; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the full relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. The nature of National Traffic Police (NTP) is to ensure that they are on the roads to execute law enforcement programmes in line with RTMC strategic deliverables. In the execution of their work NTP collaborates with provinces on different operations and programmes. As a result it is common cause that all NTP are expected to travel to all 9 provinces in line with deployment plan. This is done in consultation with the National Treasury guidelines and the RTMC Subsistence and Travel policy. Below please find the number of officers that were employed by RTMC for the years under question as well as the related accommodation costs.

	2013/2014	2014/2015	2015/2016
Senior Management	1	2	4
Assistant superintendent	35	35	35
Traffic Officers	202	191	170
Senior Inspectors	0	0	37
Total	238	228	246
Cost	R 2 084 854,61	R 8 895 417,22	R 7 299 625,79

2. No the officer are paid in line with the subsistence and travel policy of the RTMC

11 November 2016 - NW2271

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the President of the Republic

(1)What is the position with regard to allegations by a certain person (name and details furnished) that a certain person (name furnished) sought to influence the spending of the Government Communication and Information System in favour of The New Age newspaper during a meeting at their residence; (2) whether he called the specified person at any point in 2015 to assist certain brothers (names furnished); (3) whether he will make a statement regarding allegations that certain persons (details furnished) threatened the person’s job if the person did not accede to the family’s demands?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2277

Waters, Mr M to ask the President of the Republic

(1)Has he ever considered withdrawing from a Cabinet meeting due to a conflict of interest; if so, (a) which meeting(s) did he consider withdrawing from and (b) for what reason specifically in each case; (2) has he ever declared the (a) personal and (b) professional relationships of a certain person (name furnished) with members of a certain family (name furnished) to the Cabinet in order to mitigate a potential conflict of interest; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2243

De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport

(a) How many senior management service officials from her department were suspended (i) in the (aa) 2013-14, (bb) 2014-15 and (cc) 2015-16 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2016, (b) what were the reasons in each case, (c) for how long were each of the specified officials suspended and (d) what were the financial implications in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

a) How many senior management service officials from her department were suspended?

(i) (aa) 2013-14 financial year

One (01) DDG for 10 months.

(i) (bb) 2014-15 financial year

Five (05) employees

2 Deputy Directors-General (3 Months and 15 days)
1 Director (3 months and 20 days)
1 Deputy Director (3 months and 20 days)
1 Assistant Director (4 months and 10 days)

(i) (cc) 2015-16 financial year

Two (02) employees

2 Deputy-Directors: General (6 months)

(ii) Since 1 April 2016

Three (03) employees

Director General: Transport (2 months and 15 days)
2 Deputy-Directors: General (7 months)

(b) what were the reasons in each case?

The officials committed serious allegations of misconduct that warranted precautionary suspension. Precautionary suspension is always with full pay in terms of Chapter 7, clause 2(b) of the Senior Management Service Handbook and clause 7.2 of the Disciplinary Code and Procedure (Resolution 1 of 2003).

(c) for how long were each of the specified officials suspended and (d) what were the financial implications in each case?

2013/2014 FINACIAL YEAR
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES	MONTH	VALUE OF PAYMENTS
One employee	May 2013	R0
	June	R77 356.42
	July	R94 116.98
	August	R94 116.98
	September	R153 559.29
	October	R94 116.98
	November	R94 116.98
	December	R94 116.98
	January 2014	R94 116.98
	February	R94 116.98
	March	R94 116.98
TOTAL	R 983 851.55

2014/2015 FINACIAL YEAR
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES	MONTH	VALUE OF PAYMENTS
Employee 1	April 2014	R138 386.61
Sub-total	R138 386.61

Employee 2	July 2014	R118 521.91
	August 2014	R124 311.78
	September 2014	R53 130.51
TOTAL		R295 964.20

Employee 3	October 2014	R27 974.57
	November 2014	R70 907.76
	December	R70 907.76
	January	R70 907.76
	February	R23 312.74
Sub-total		R264 010.59

Employee 4	October 2014	R16 478.74
	November 2014	R41 769.04
	December 2014	R41 769.04
	January 2015	R41 769.04
	February 2015	R13 732.29
Sub-total		R155 518.15

Employee 5	October 2014	R36 545.71
	November 2014	R37 020.79
	December 2014	R37 020.79
	January 2015	R37 020.79
	February 2015	R13 741.90
Sub-total		R161 349.98
TOTAL		R1 015 229.53

	2015/2016 FINACIAL YEAR
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES	MONTH	VALUE OF PAYMENTS
Employee 1	October 2015	R95 275.94
	November 2015	R95 275.94
	December 2015	R161 562.14
	January 2016	R97 684.41
	February 2016	R97 684.41
	March 2016	R97 684.41
Sub-total		R645 167.25

Employee 2	October 2015	R101 242.52
	November 2015	R101 242.52
	December 2015	R101 242.52
	January 2016	R189 167.37
	February 2016	R103 773.67
	March 2016	R103 773.67
Sub-total		R700 442.27
TOTAL		R1 345 609.52

	2016/2017 FINACIAL YEAR
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES	MONTH	VALUE OF PAYMENTS

Employee 1	April	R97 684.41
	May	R97 684.41
	June	R97 684.41
	July	R97 684.41
	August	R97 684.41
	September	R97 684.41
	October	R97 684.41
Sub-total		R68 3790.87

Employee 2
	April	R103 773.67
	May	R103 773.67
	June	R103 773.67
	July	R103 773.67
	August	R103 773.67
	September	R103 773.67
	October	R103 773.67
Sub-total		R726 415.69

Employee 2
	May	R47 694.56
	June	R139 293.86
	July	R139 293.86
	August	R139 293.86
Sub-total		R465 576.44
TOTAL		R 1 875 783.00

11 November 2016 - NW2276

Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the President of the Republic

Whether, with reference to his previous declaration of the Waterkloof house as an asset, which is used by a certain person (name furnished), (a) a certain family (name furnished) and/or (b) a company linked to the family assisted the person (details furnished) in purchasing the house; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, why did the specified family assist the specified person?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

11 November 2016 - NW2278

Horn, Mr W to ask the President of the Republic

(1)(a) Why did he not include any values in his declarations during the period 2009 to 2016, and (b) were (i) the specified declarations made to the Cabinet secretariat in each of the respective calendar years complete and (ii) there no other declarations elsewhere; (2) in light of the fact that he previously declared a certain house used by a certain person (name and details furnished) as an asset and indicated an amount of R18 000 per month as an instalment, (a) how does he reconcile the R18 000 instalment indicated in his disclosures for the specified house with the R79 715 instalment in the mortgage bond of a certain bank (name furnished), (b) why did a certain mining company (name furnished) provide security for the specified bond and (c) why was this declaration not made in recent years?

Source
Link

Reply:

The questions asked form part of the subject matter of the Report into Allegations of improper and unethical conduct by the President and other state functionaries on matters relating to the removal and appointment of Ministers and Executives of State Owned Enterprises. It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the Report is inconclusive. After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge. I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report.

10 November 2016 - NW2258

Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

(1)What is the (a) cost and (b) standard process set by her department with regard to constructing houses for military veterans; (2) has the construction of all the houses for military veterans to date followed the same (a) standard process and (b) cost in each province; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) (a) The current costs for constructing a house for a military veteran, as per the agreed minimum norms and standards with the Department of Military Veterans, has been set at R 188 884,00. Of this amount, the Department of Human Settlements is responsible for the normal housing subsidy amount of R 110 947,00 whilst the Department of Military Veterans is responsible for the top-up amount of R78 000,00.

(b) In 2012 the Departments of Human Settlements and Military Veterans signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to guide roles, responsibilities and accountability of all the parties, in the process of providing adequate housing to military veterans. This MOU provides the framework regarding the obligations of the two Departments as well as for the Provincial Departments of Human Settlements and municipalities in the delivery of housing units for qualifying military veterans.

It includes an agreement that the Human Settlements Development Grant shall only fund the standard subsidy house cost and any residual amount required to achieve the higher specification house required by the Department of Military Veterans shall be funded by them as pointed out in paragraph (1) (a) above.

In terms of this MOU, the nine Provincial Human Settlements Departments are mandated to conclude Service Level Agreements with the Department of Military Veterans. These Service Level Agreements are to be based on the delivery targets set by the Department of Military Veterans.

(2) (a) In terms of the Memorandum of Understanding, construction of all housing units for military veterans should follow the agreed process as outlined above.

(b) Similarly, the cost break down as outlined must be complied with by all parties.

10 November 2016 - NW1888

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)With reference to his reply to oral question 163 on 7 September 2016, what are the functions and tasks to be carried out by the specified advisors appointed to assist in exploring a merger between the SA Airways and SA Express and the possible introduction of a strategic equity partner; (2) whether the specified advisors have been appointed; if not, why not; if so, what (a)(i) is the period of the contract that has been awarded and (ii) are the costs of the specified contract and (b) are the names of the advisors?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. The Request for Proposals (RFP) available on National Treasury’s website outlines the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the appointment of advisors to assist government in developing the optimal group corporate structure for the realignment of the state-owned airline assets. In terms of the TOR, the scope of activities to be performed by the advisors is as follows:

The consultants will be responsible for:

- Reviewing the corporate plans (strategic plans) of SAA and SAX;
- Assessment of the existing corporate structure proposals that have been made by the state-owned airlines and external advisors including an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages and an assessment of the extent to which they would enable the achievement of Government’s objectives;
- Reviewing other supporting documentation, e.g. financial statements and annual report, legal agreements, risk management plan, governance documentation and legislative requirements;
- Benchmarking international practice for the corporate structure of airlines;
- Developing and comprehensively assessing a range of options for realigning the state owned airlines covering each of the key elements of the corporate structure, including:
  - Establishment of a holding company structure;
  - Corporatisation of Voyager and Cargo;
  - Integration of SAA, SAX and Mango into an integrated airline group with and without Airlink;
  - Increase or decrease in the shareholding in Airlink and valuation of the current 2.95% shareholding;
  - Integration of the technical divisions of SAA, SAX and Denel;
  - Identification of non-core assets for disposal;
  - Creation of a shared services division;
  - Establishment of a separate aircraft leasing company;
  - Separately corporatising the international, regional or domestic routes;
  - Investment by strategic equity partners (SEPs) at group or subsidiary level (including identification and assessment of potential SEPs).

This should include an analysis for each option of the advantages and disadvantages and an assessment of the extent to which it will enable the achievement of Government’s objectives.

- Developing a comprehensive, holistic, overall recommendation for the optimal group corporate structure for the realignment the state-owned assets that will best achieve Government’s objectives. The recommendation must detail how each of these objectives are addressed; and
- Identification of the required policy interventions by Government to realign the state-owned airline assets;
- Developing a comprehensive plan for implementing the recommended option. The plan must clearly indicate any financial implications and potential risks with mitigation strategies.

2. The appointment of the advisors is still being finalised. Issues relating to the cost of the services in relation to the budget had to first be resolved.

10 November 2016 - NW1886

Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether the Chairperson of the SA Airways (SAA) Board is entitled to a security detail; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, how many (a) security minders are on duty to protect the incumbent at any given time and (b) hours of the day are the specified minders present with the specified person; (2) whether the specified minders are armed; if so, what firearms do they carry; (3) what were the costs of employing the specified minders for each month since the specified person’s appointment in 2012; (4) whether the specified minders travel with the specified person; if not, why not; if so, what were the total costs of (a) accommodation and (b) travel expenses incurred for the specified minders for each month since the specified person’s appointment in 2012; (5) whether the specified minders are present at any SAA Board meetings; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what are the relevant details of all SAA Board meetings that the specified minders attended and (b) was the specified minders’ presence at the specified meetings sanctioned by the SAA Board?

Source
Link

Reply:

The following information was submitted by South African Airways Board:

No member of the South African Airways Board including its Chairperson is entitled to a security detail; however the company provides general security at all its premises. No special security arrangements have been made and no minders have been appointed by SAA to protect the Chairperson. Consequently no expenditure has been incurred by the Company in this regard.

The National Treasury cannot verify this information.

10 November 2016 - NW2425

Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry

What memoranda of understanding in terms of (a) rebates and (b) incentives have been secured from (i) local governments and (ii) provinces to attract business for the revitalisation of the country’s industrial parks?

Source
Link

Reply:

the dti has allocated R281 million for this programme to date. This money is being used for critical infrastructure upgrades. There are budget constraints, and funding as well as other non-financial support mechanisms are being discussed. The first engagement was held in the form of discussions with stakeholders through a symposium held on 12-13 October 2016 at the DBSA in Midrand. Further engagements with local government and provinces are planned for early next year.

10 November 2016 - NW2302

Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources

Whether any (a) internal and/or (b) external forensic reports pertaining to (i) his department and/or (ii) each entity reporting to him were completed from 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic reports?

Source
Link

Reply:

	Department of Mineral Resources	aa)	bb)	cc)
	1	Mining permit application	Objection of mining permit application	11/10/2016
i)Dept	2	Prospecting right application	Unfair administrative procedures in processing mining right application	11/10/2016
	3	Corruption on the issuing of mining permit	Investigation into allegations of corruption on the issuing of mining permit	23/02/2016
	4	Stationery procurement	Irregular expenditure relating to procurement of stationery	15/12/2015
	5	Mining permit	Incorrectly allocated mining permit	13/10/2015
	6	Mining permit application	Irregular proof of submission of documents	13/10/2015
	7	Mining permit application	Alleged conflict of interest	13/10/2015
	8	Fraud and corruption	Fraudulent blasting certificates.	28/07/2015
	9	Mine Managers Certificate of Competency (MMCC)	Allegations of irregularities in the issuing of MMCC. Allegations pertaining to Principal inspector.	07/11/2014
	10	Corruption	Allegations of irregular appointment	10/06/2014
	11	Corruption	Abuse of GG vehicles	12/05/2014
	12	Theft	Theft and loss of cash	12/03/2014
	13	Irregular award of ICT Infrastructure	Allegations of irregular award of ICT Infrastructure	20/01/2012
		aa)	bb)	cc)
ii)Entities	Council for Geoscience	Fraud	Recruitment process (mispresentation of qualifications)	30/10/2014
		Contravention of Supply Chain Management regulations	Procurement irregularities	28/02/2014
		Contravention of Supply Chain Management Practice Note	Collusion of suppliers	18/05/2016
	South African Diamond and Precious Metal Regulator	Report on the contravention of ICT policy	Misconduct	31/12/2011
		Corruption/fraud investigation	Alleged misconduct	24/03/2014
		Disclosure of confidential information	Misconduct	28/05/2015
	Mine Health and Safety Council	N/A	N/A	N/A
	MINTEK	N/A	N/A	N/A
	South African Diamond Trader	N/A	N/A	N/A

Mr MJ Zwane, MP

Minister of Mineral Resources

Date Submitted:-………………/………………/2016

10 November 2016 - NW1698

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether the SA Reserve Bank (SARB) endorsed the appointment of a certain person (name and details furnished); if not, why not; if so, (a) what was the name of the person(s) who (i) evaluated and (ii) approved the endorsement of the specified person for the specified position and (b) on what date was the endorsement approved; (2) whether the specified person’s endorsement was recorded in any document; if not, why not; if so, what was the (a) nature of and (b) date on each such document; (3) whether the SARB took any disciplinary action against any person(s) involved in the endorsement of the specified person; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether the SARB’s decision to endorse the specified person contributed to the collapse of African Bank; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

The following information was submitted by the South African Reserve Bank:

1. The South African Reserve Bank is the entity responsible for the prudential regulation of all banks in South Africa. This regulation includes ensuring that only those that meet the ‘fit and proper’ requirement act in key management and board positions. As such the South African Reserve Bank has provided the following response to this parliamentary question:

The Banks Act, Act No 94 of 1990 (the Banks Act), read with the Regulations relating to Banks (Regulations), requires that all directors and executive officers of a bank should be fit and proper and affords the Registrar of Banks (Registrar) the power to make an assessment in this regard. The application of a certain person was received by the Registrar who duly considered the prescribed information submitted with the application and notified the relevant bank in writing that that there was no objection to the proposed appointment.

2. The Registrar’s decision in terms of section 60 of the Banks Act was conveyed in a letter dated 6 August 2002 for the appointment of the specified person as Chief Operating Officer and Executive Director of African Bank Limited. A subsequent application was received for the appointment of the specified person as Executive Director of African Bank Investments Limited (the holding company) and approved in a letter dated 22 April 2003. The specified person was later appointed as Chief Risk Officer of African Bank Limited.

3. No disciplinary action was taken by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) against any of its staff members in this matter as there was no evidence or allegations of any misconduct on the part of any staff member in this regard.

4. The causes of the failure of the previous African Bank Limited are documented in the Myburgh report which the SARB is unable to add to.

10 November 2016 - NW2353

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)With reference to page 128 of the 2015-16 annual report of the Armaments Corporation of South Africa (Armscor), (a) what are the (i) details of and (ii) justification for Armscor’s application of a 25% black equity selection criterion as a requirement for supply chain management in contravention of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, Act 5 of 2000, as amended, (b) what steps have been taken by (i) her and/or (ii) Armscor to address the R13,2 million incurred as a result of the specified policy and (c) how did the transactions established by the specified policy benefit (i) Armscor and (ii) the SA National Defence Force; (2) whether the specified transactions have been regulated yet; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. Armscor applied the 25% Black equity requirement as a selection criterion until September 2014 when the application of this criterion was discontinued. The objective of this strategic intervention was to address the dire transformational challenges facing the local defence industry.

When Armscor introduced the qualifying BEE requirement, the Preferential Procurement Policy Regulations were not applicable to Schedule 2 and 3 Public Entities. In 2011, National Treasury introduced the revised Regulations which became applicable to, inter alia, schedule 2 public entities and these entities were however granted exemption until 7 December 2012 for implementation of the Regulations. Armscor aligned its policy with the revised Regulations immediately but retained the 25% black equity ownership requirement.

Discussions were then started with the National Treasury, through which National Treasury was made aware of Armscor’ s policy of 25% black equity ownership requirement. Whilst in discussions with the National Treasury and in the process of applying for exemption subsequent to those discussions, the Auditor General declared monies spent on contracts which were subject to the 25% BEE requirement irregular expenditure.

The 13.2 million reported represents expenditure incurred during the 2015/16 financial period as a result of contracts placed during the period that the 25% black equity requirement was applied.

(2) The expenditure incurred while applying the 25% black equity criterion was condoned by National Treasury on 19 July 2016. The 25% black equity ownership requirement application resulted in some previously disadvantaged groups or persons entering the economic stream through participation in the acquisition/procurement contracts funded from the SDA, GDA and Armscor operational expenditure. To this end, this intervention has made strides in changing the ownership landscape in the South African defence industry.

Finally, the application of the 25% black equity ownership qualifying requirement has to an extent amongst others assisted in seeking to establish and retain sovereign and strategic capability for the benefit of the SANDF in local empowered entities.

10 November 2016 - NW2325

Sithole, Mr KP to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

Whether her department has conducted a study to determine the number of (a) employed and (b) unemployed hostel dwellers for the purpose of developing a housing provision strategy, if not; why not, if so; what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

In terms of the Community Residential Units (CRU) Programme, accommodation is provided to low-income households that earn a gross income of between R800 and R3 500 per month. All the funding related to this programme is allocated to the provinces and these provinces, municipalities or social housing institutions are responsible for the management of the units, including ensuring that the appropriate beneficiaries gain access to the rental units. Social facilitators can be appointed to determine the employment status of each hostel dweller in order to ensure proper unit allocation based on their affordability level. A portion of the funding provided to provinces is used for the compilation of 5 year provincial rental housing strategies which are demand and needs driven and which inform the Departments’ annual allocations.

10 November 2016 - NW2257

Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

How many title deeds were handed over by each metropolitan municipality since 1 April 2016?

Source
Link

Reply:

The Metropolitan Municipalities have reported as follows:

(a) Between 1 April and 30 June 2016 Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality handed over a total of 225 title deeds.

(b) Between 1 April and 30 June 2016 Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality handed over a total of 1 003 title deeds.

(c) Between 1 April and 30 September 2016 the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality handed over a total of 1 062 title deeds.

(d) Buffalo City, Ekurhuleni, City of Johannesburg, Tshwane and Ethekwini Metropolitan Municipalities are verifying their information and once the process has been completed, the Honourable member will be provided with the required information.

10 November 2016 - NW2352

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)With reference to the 2015-16 annual report of the Armaments Corporation of South Africa (Armscor), why did the payments to executive directors increase by 8,04% while revenue decreased by 7,6% and expenditure increased by 13.1%; (2) whether each (a) executive director and/or (b) management official of Armscor signed a performance agreement with her for the (i) 2015-16 and (ii) 2016-17 financial years; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what (aa) are the relevant details and (bb) criteria are used to determine yearly (aaa) increases and/or (bbb) bonuses to the specified officials?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) The payments to executive directors for the financial year ending 31 March 2016 included the once-off buy out of the future medical liability which were not included in the period ending 31 March 2015 and this result in the increase over and above the annual increase. This settlement of the future medical liability as negotiated with the employees and retirees of Armscor reduced the future liability for medical contributions after retirement significantly.

The biggest contributor to the decrease in the total revenue of Armscor was the decrease of the allocation to Armscor that is in accordance to the National Treasury baseline reduction. The increase in expenditure furthermore is mainly influenced by the recognition of actuarial losses on the medical liability buy-out that is a result of the settlement of the liability. If the impact thereof is excluded the operating expenditure increased with only 2.3%.

(2) All Armscor employees (including management) have an agreed Balanced Scorecard (BSC) that contains the individual’s performance criteria to be achieved. This is an annual process and it cascades down from the executive management which BSC’s are based on the goals and objectives that is contained in the Corporate Plan. Armscor only consider the payment of a performance bonus if the goals as set in the Corporate Plan are achieved (as agreed) and the funding is available. Individual performance bonuses are then based on a combination of the company achievement and the achievement of the individual’s performance criteria.

Annual increases are informed by market surveys and affordability. The increase also takes into consideration the agreement reached with Organised Labour. In this regard, the executive and senior management receive the same or lower increase percentage – as has been the case over the past few years - than members forming part of the bargaining unit as represented by Organised Labour.

10 November 2016 - NW2323

Mmemezi, Mr HM to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

What steps does she intend to take to assist the affected and deserving families whose house foundations for RDP houses were abandoned by contractors in Ikageng near Tlokwe?

Source
Link

Reply:

The North West Provincial Department of Human Settlements has advised that a contractor was appointed to complete the BNG houses in Ikageng Extension 11. To date, 36 houses have been completed by the contractor and it is expected that the remaining 24 houses will be completed by the end of November 2016.

09 November 2016 - NW1968

Maimane, Mr MA to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the VBS Mutual Bank has ever defaulted on its payment of dividends to the Public Investment Corporation; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) on what dates, (b) what was the value of each dividend pay-out defaulted on and (c) what are the further relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

The following information was submitted by the Public Investment Corporation (PIC):

The VBS Mutual Bank has never defaulted on its payment of dividends to the PIC. The decision to pay dividends rests with the board of a company after taking into account factors such as capital required for growth, capital for precautionary purposes and capital adequacy requirements as well as compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, Act 71 of 2008.

09 November 2016 - NW2150

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether any municipalities have (a) deposited funds with and/or (b) made loans to VBS Mutual Bank in the past five municipal financial years; if not, in each case, what is the position in this regard; if so, in each case, (i) which municipality (aa) deposited funds with and/or (bb) made loans to the specified bank, (ii) when was each (aa) deposit and/or (bb) loan made and (iii) what was the amount in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) According to National Treasury’s database of Section 71 reports submitted by the municipality as at 30 June 2016, investments with VBS Mutual Bank were made by the following municipalities:

(i) West Rand District Municipality

(ii) Capricorn District Municipality

(b) Municipalities do not make loans to financial institutions and /or banks as a standard practice as they are not allowed to lend money to financial institutions. There is also no municipality that has a primary bank account with VBS Mutual Bank.

(c) There are no other municipalities that have invested with VBS Mutual Bank according to the National Treasury’s database.

(d) According to National Treasury’s database of Section 71 reports submitted by the municipality as at 30 June 2016, investments with VBS Mutual Bank were made by the following municipalities:

Name of Municipality	Start Date	End Date	Amount	Balance
West Rand Municipality	24/02/2015	23/08/2015	R21 million	R0
West Rand Municipality	22/03/2016	23/09/2016	R10 million	R10 million
West Rand Municipality	30/03/2016	23/04/2016	R15 million	R0
West Rand Municipality	08/04/2016	07/06/2016	R15 million	R0
Capricorn District Municipality	01/04/2016	30/06/2016	R120 million	R0

09 November 2016 - NW2215

Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Finance

With regard to the current conjecture and speculation on the future of businesses linked to a certain family (name furnished), (a) what is the extent of exposure of the (i) Public Investment Corporation and (ii) Industrial Development Corporation to companies linked to the specified family and (b) what steps have been taken or will be taken to ensure that this exposure will not lead to potential losses?

Source
Link

Reply:

The following information was submitted by the Public Investment Corporation (PIC):

(a)(i) The PIC has no direct exposure to any business linked to the Gupta family.

(a)(ii) The Industrial Development Corporation queries should be directed to the Minister of Economic Development.

(b) Not applicable.

.

09 November 2016 - NW2192

Kopane, Ms SP to ask the Minister of Basic Education

What is the total number of (a) overaged learners who were enrolled at each (i) school for learners with special educational needs, (ii) school for the visually impaired and (iii) school for the hearing impaired in each district of each province in the (aa) 2013-14, (bb) 2014-15 and (cc) 2015-16 financial years, (b) learners who were incorrectly placed at each specified school because mainstream schools did not have space to accommodate the learners and (c) learners who were placed on waiting lists in each case in each specified financial year?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a)(i)(aa)(bb)(cc)

The detailed response on overaged learners who were enrolled at each school for learners with special educational needs in the 2013/14; 2014/15 and 2015/16 is attached as Annexure A.

(a)(ii)(aa)(bb)(cc)

The detailed response on overaged learners who were enrolled at each school for the visually impaired in the 2013/14; 2014/15 and 2015/16 is attached as Annexure A.

(a)(iii)(aa)(bb)(cc)

The detailed response on overaged learners who were enrolled at each school for the school for the hearing impaired in each district of each province in the 2013/14; 2014/15 and 2015/16 is attached as Annexure A.

(b) Response attached at Annexure B.

(c) Response attached at Annexure C.

ANNEXURE A

(a)(i)(aa)(bb)(cc)

Table 1: Number of over-aged (19 and above) learners in special schools, by district, in between 2013 and 2015

Province	District	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16
EC	EAST LONDON	128	100	82
	GRAHAMSTOWN	27	35	30
	KING WILLIAMS TOWN	202	176	166
	LUSIKISIKI	21	18	30
	MALUTI	6	16	13
	MBIZANA	124	126	120
	MT FRERE	55	120	136
	MTHATA	202	260	208
	NGCOBO	51	39	38
	PORT ELIZABETH	183	112	92
	QUEENSTOWN	0	4	0
	QUMBU	50	59	58
	STERKSPRUIT	25	34	38
	UITENHAGE	326	99	115
	Total	1 400	1 198	1 126
FS	FEZILE DABI	103	100	91
	LEJWELEPUTSWA	98	117	133
	MOTHEO	321	305	271
	THABO MOFUTSANYANA	98	81	59
	Total	620	603	554
GT	EKURHULENI NORTH	405	364	378
	EKURHULENI SOUTH	211	256	270
	GAUTENG EAST	624	522	581
	GAUTENG NORTH	47	61	41
	GAUTENG WEST	243	250	213
	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL	223	289	346
	JOHANNESBURG EAST	211	196	186
	JOHANNESBURG NORTH	264	281	314
	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH	173	237	204
	JOHANNESBURG WEST	135	158	179
	SEDIBENG EAST	94	94	91
	SEDIBENG WEST	113	202	173
	TSHWANE NORTH	60	58	14
	TSHWANE SOUTH	218	196	152
	TSHWANE WEST	330	352	328
	Total	3 351	3 516	3 470
KZ	AMAJUBA	317	385	277
	EMPANGENI	132	168	144
	ILEMBE	75	41	67
	OBONJENI	0	43	0
	OTHUKELA	105	131	136
	PINETOWN	213	196	171
	PORT SHEPSTONE	0	19	0
	SISONKE	20	37	35
	UGU	29	0	30
	UMGUNGUNDLOVU	264	257	239
	UMKHANYAKUDE	82	30	62
	UMLAZI	301	380	423
	UMZINYATHI	61	66	60
	UTHUNGULU	18	0	0
	VRYHEID	79	78	43
	Total	1 696	1 831	1 687
LP	CAPRICORN/Polokwane	876	954	777
	LEBOWAKGOMO	143	0	146
	MOGALAKWENA	4	0	8
	MOPANI	175	215	219
	SEKHUKHUNE	177	188	189
	TZANEEN	10	13	8
	VHEMBE	483	396	376
	WATERBERG	81	89	62
	Total	1 949	1 865	1 785
MP	BOHLABELA	241	253	5
	EHLANZENI	0	0	5
	GERT SIBANDE	0	0	111
	NKANGALA	0	0	94
	Total	241	253	215
NC	FRANCES BAARD	277	80	91
	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWA	0	12	21
	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWE	9	0	0
	NAMAQUA	0	0	0
	SIYANDA	0	2	2
	Total	286	94	114
NW	BRITS	0	24	0
	GREATER DELAREYVILLE	48	38	75
	GREATER TAUNG	75	69	73
	KAGISANO MOLOPO	20	23	18
	KGETLENG RIVER	23	12	11
	KLERKSDORP	0	6	0
	LETLHABILE	39	51	26
	LICHTENBURG	101	24	65
	MADIBENG	43	52	84
	MAFIKENG	85	88	0
	MAQUASSI HIILS	52	46	39
	MATLOSANA	11	3	9
	MORETELE	26	37	25
	MOSES KOTANE EAST	67	47	89
	POTCHEFSTROOM	115	76	126
	REKOPANTSWE	85	47	106
	RUSTENBURG	268	96	113
	ZEERUST	27	21	12
	Total	1 085	760	871
WC	CAPE WINELANDS	51	50	45
	EDEN AND CENTRAL KAROO	40	57	50
	METRO CENTRAL	118	142	176
	METRO EAST	161	116	92
	METRO NORTH	91	108	77
	METRO SOUTH	105	88	84
	OVERBERG	15	7	10
	WEST COAST	36	27	27
	Total	617	595	561
National		11 245	10 715	10 383

Source: 2013-15 SNAP survey for special schools

(a)(ii)(aa)(bb)(cc)

Table 2: Table 1: Number of over-aged (19 and above) learners in special schools with visually impaired, by district, in between 2013 and 2015

Province	District	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16
EC	KING WILLIAMS TOWN	0	1	2
	LUSIKISIKI	0	0
	MALUTI	0	0	2
	MBIZANA	41	38	39
	MTHATA	47	51	46
	PORT ELIZABETH	40	29	25
	STERKSPRUIT	0	0	1
	Total	128	119	115
	FEZILE DABI	1	0	0
	LEJWELEPUTSWA	1	3	2
	MOTHEO	30	27	30
FS	THABO MOFUTSANYANA	15	16	11
	Total	47	46	43
	EKURHULENI NORTH	9	2	0
	EKURHULENI SOUTH	0	0	1
	GAUTENG EAST	6	6	12
	GAUTENG WEST	6	5	4
	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL	3	2	2
	JOHANNESBURG EAST	2	3	5
	JOHANNESBURG NORTH	1	1	0
GT	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH	0	1	1
	JOHANNESBURG WEST	7	3	2
	SEDIBENG EAST	7	6	4
	TSHWANE NORTH	1	1	0
	TSHWANE SOUTH	2	1	1
	TSHWANE WEST	91	102	99
	Total	135	133	131
KZN	AMAJUBA	5	6	4
	EMPANGENI	3	0	1
	OTHUKELA	2	3	3
	PINETOWN	3	1	1
	UGU	0	0
	UMGUNGUNDLOVU	23	21	30
	UMLAZI	13	12	10
	UMZINYATHI	1	2	1
	VRYHEID	1	1	1
	Total	51	46	51
LP	CAPRICORN	84	73	46
	LEBOWAKGOMO	5	0	5
	SEKHUKHUNE	2	4	5
	VHEMBE	40	38	36
	WATERBERG	0	0	0
	Total	131	115	92
MP	GERT SIBANDE	1	1	2
	NKANGALA	2	0	0
	Total	3	1	2
	FRANCES BAARD	4	13	17
NC	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWA	0	1	0
	Total	4	14	17
	BRITS	0	1	0
	GREATER TAUNG	40	38	30
	KAGISANO MOLOPO	1	3	3
	LETLHABILE	0	0	1
	LICHTENBURG	14	1	0
NW	MADIBENG	0	4	3
	MOSES KOTANE EAST	3	0	0
	REKOPANTSWE	0	10	0
	RUSTENBURG	10	0	5
	ZEERUST	0	0	1
	Total	68	57	43
	CAPE WINELANDS	7	9	11
WC	METRO NORTH	32	30	24
	Total	39	39	35
National	606	570	529

Source: 2013-15 SNAP survey for special schools

(a)(iii)(aa)(bb)(cc)

Table 3: Table 1: Number of over-aged (19 and above) learners in special schools with hearing impaired, by district, between 2013 and 2015

Province	District	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16
EC	EAST LONDON	0	1	0
	KING WILLIAMS TOWN	108	97	88
	LUSIKISIKI	0	0	1
	MALUTI	6	16	10
	MTHATA	59	81	89
	PORT ELIZABETH	2	3	4
	STERKSPRUIT	0	1	0
	Total	175	199	192
FS	LEJWELEPUTSWA	0	0	1
	MOTHEO	40	35	27
	THABO MOFUTSANYANA	48	37	31
	Total	88	72	59
GT	EKURHULENI NORTH	6	1	2
	EKURHULENI SOUTH	6	8	7
	GAUTENG EAST	6	6	6
	GAUTENG WEST	9	4	3
	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL	1	4	4
	JOHANNESBURG EAST	38	29	31
	JOHANNESBURG NORTH	1	2	0
	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH	6	20	29
	JOHANNESBURG WEST	31	41	37
	SEDIBENG EAST	3	1	2
	TSHWANE NORTH	27	23	6
	TSHWANE SOUTH	34	34	31
	TSHWANE WEST	79	96	81
	Total	247	269	239
KZ	AMAJUBA	7	7	3
	EMPANGENI	93	104	90
	ILEMBE	4	3	3
	OTHUKELA	1	0	1
	PINETOWN	77	51	56
	PORT SHEPSTONE	0	18	0
	UGU	22	0	27
	UMGUNGUNDLOVU	16	15	17
	UMLAZI	26	15	49
	UMZINYATHI	0	2	1
	VRYHEID	3	0	0
	SISONKE	1	0	0
	Total	249	215	247
LP	CAPRICORN/POLOKWANE	185	179	171
	GREATER SEKHUKHUNE	12	15	7
	TZANEEN	4	13	4
	VHEMBE	1	5	6
	WATERBERG	2	4	6
	Total	204	216	194
MP	BOHLABELA	1	0	1
	EHLANZENI	6	0	1
	GERT SIBANDE	1	1	0
	NKANGALA	6	4	0
	Total	14	5	2
NC	FRANCES BAARD	4	17	16
	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWA	0	0	1
	Total	4	17	17
NW	GREATER TAUNG	0	2	1
	KAGISANO MOLOPO	2	0	0
	LETLHABILE	0	1	2
	LICHTENBURG	6	0	1
	MADIBENG	0	0	3
	MAFIKENG	1	0	0
	MAQUASSI HIILS	47	43	39
	MOSES KOTANE EAST	1	0	0
	POTCHEFSTROOM	0	1	0
	RUSTENBURG	17	19	19
	Total	74	66	65
WC	CAPE WINELANDS	13	15	16
	METRO CENTRAL	6	4	8
	METRO EAST	6	8	5
	METRO NORTH	0	1	1
	METRO SOUTH	27	20	33
	OVERBERG	0	1	0
	Total	52	49	63
National		1 108	1 279	1 078

Source: 2013-15 SNAP survey for special schools

Annexure B

(b) Number of learners that were incorrectly placed because mainstream schools did not have space to accommodate them

Provinces	Districts	Number of incorrectly placed learners in Special Schools (SSs)	Number of incorrectly placed learners in Special Schools (SSs) for Visual Impairment	Number of incorrectly placed learners in Special Schools (SSs) for Hearing Impairment
GP	15	All learners placed in Special Schools in Gauteng are placed in line with provincial admissions circular for learners with barriers to learning (Circular 31 of 2009)	0	0
EC	23	Nil report	Nil report	Nil report
FS	5	25	0	0
KZN	12	150	0	0
LP	1/5	5	106	0
MP	4	68	0	0
NC	1/5	0	0	0
NW	3/4	6	0	0
WC	8	0	0	0
TOTALS		98	106	0

Source: Provincial Reporting

Annexure C

c) Learners on Waiting Lists

Provinces	Districts	Number of Learners on waiting lists in Special Schools (SSs)	Number of Learners on waiting lists in Special Schools (SSs) for Visual Impairment	Number of Learners on waiting lists in Special Schools (SSs) for Hearing Impairment
		2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16
GP	15	3902	3338	1785	0	0	46	0	0	45 not all hearing impaired, school has an MID section
EC	23	-	3691	3244	Nil report	Nil report	Nil report	Nil report	Nil report	Nil report
FS	5	266	452	621	0	0	0	0	0	0
KZN	12	3091	2190	1636	110	76	37	255	183	138
LP	4/5	582	508	568	203	1	2	9	15	10
MP	4	699	1022	850	4	10	8	20	18	17
NC	1/5	119	67	87	1	101	0	1	4	1
NW	3/4	573	658	803	-	7	-	-	11	1
WC	8	-	-	-	0	0	0	0	0	0
TOTALS	63	9232	11926	9606	419	195	47	285	231	167

Source: Provincial Reporting

09 November 2016 - NW2161

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

Whether, with reference to the reply of the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs to question 1741 on 23 September 2016, he intends to introduce legislation to move the Matatiele Local Municipality back to KwaZulu-Natal from the Eastern Cape; if not, why not; if so, (a) by what date and (b) what are the further relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

I will introduce the relevant legislation in the event of Cabinet agreeing to move the Matatiele Local Municipality back to Kwazulu –Natal.

09 November 2016 - NW2182

Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education

(1)(a) What is the total number of female learners who were enrolled at each school for learners with special educational needs in each district and province in the (i) 2013, (ii) 2014, (iii) 2015 and (iv) 2016 academic years, (b) what is the total number of the specified learners who fell pregnant in each of the specified academic years and (c) what were the ages of the learners in each case; (2) whether the pregnancies of the learners were reported to the relevant (a) provincial education departments and (b) the SA Council for Educators in each case; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)

The detailed response is attached as Annexure A.

(1)(a)(iv)

The 2016 data is not yet available.

1(c)

The Department has no data on ages of learners who were pregnant.

2(a) (b)

No.

ANNEXURE A

Table 1 below shows an increase in enrolment of female learners from 41 566 in 2013 to 42 312 in 2015. Only one province, the Western Cape had a decrease in female enrolment in special schools.

Table 1: Number of female learners in Special schools, by district, between 2013 and 2015

Province	District	2013	2014	2015
EC	EAST LONDON	541	488	490
	GRAHAMSTOWN	101	101	102
	KING WILLIAMS TOWN	320	309	294
	LUSIKISIKI	29	46	52
	MALUTI	57	59	62
	MBIZANA	293	285	309
	MT FRERE	118	129	129
	MTHATA	424	444	427
	NGCOBO	87	86	90
	PORT ELIZABETH	925	939	984
	QUEENSTOWN	0	0	0
	QUMBU	90	85	87
	STERKSPRUIT	104	128	115
	UITENHAGE	360	363	373
	Total	3 449	3 462	3 514
FS	FEZILE DABI	295	299	312
	LEJWELEPUTSWA	327	318	337
	MOTHEO	1 303	1 316	1 323
	THABO MOFUTSANYANA	300	291	265
	Total	2 225	2 224	2 237
GT	EKURHULENI NORTH	1 692	1 724	1 677
	EKURHULENI SOUTH	790	823	846
	GAUTENG EAST	1 357	1 365	1 368
	GAUTENG NORTH	62	73	93
	GAUTENG WEST	736	767	981
	JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL	1 461	1 552	1 516
	JOHANNESBURG EAST	1 000	1 059	975
	JOHANNESBURG NORTH	1 455	1 546	1 651
	JOHANNESBURG SOUTH	1 210	1 215	1 200
	JOHANNESBURG WEST	926	971	939
	SEDIBENG EAST	588	586	583
	SEDIBENG WEST	428	495	471
	TSHWANE NORTH	829	865	816
	TSHWANE SOUTH	1 467	1 456	1 462
	TSHWANE WEST	975	1 004	1 055
	Total	14 976	15 501	15 633
KZ	AMAJUBA	563	611	587
	EMPANGENI/UTHUNGULU	521	586	582
	ILEMBE	122	148	168
	OBONJENI		144
	OTHUKELA	228	249	245
	PINETOWN	1 021	917	938
	PORT SHEPSTONE/UGU	312	313	317
	SISONKE	133	149	240
	UMGUNGUNDLOVU	857	712	905
	UMKHANYAKUDE	204	105	217
	UMLAZI	1 920	2 112	2 149
	UMZINYATHI	161	167	160
	VRYHEID	248	237	82
	Total	6 290	6 450	6 590
LP	CAPRICORN/Polokwane	1 116	1 407	1 091
	LEBOWAKGOMO	330		294
	MOGALAKWENA	11		14
	MOPANI	267	363	234
	SEKHUKHUNE	376	407	371
	TZANEEN	162	95	158
	VHEMBE	724	721	711
	WATERBERG	236	240	225
	Total	3 222	3 233	3 098
MP	BOHLABELA	92		113
	EHLANZENI	214	342	245
	GERT SIBANDE	411	426	420
	NKANGALA	538	502	502
	Total	1 255	1 270	1 280
NC	FRANCES BAARD	527	541	569
	JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWA	52	56	50
	NAMAQUA	0	52	62
	SIYANDA	2	9	2
	Total	581	658	683
NW	BRITS		103
	GREATER DELAREYVILLE	77	61	85
	GREATER TAUNG	126	131	150
	KAGISANO MOLOPO	36	48	47
	KGETLENG RIVER	30	26	31
	LETLHABILE	103	105	45
	LICHTENBURG	157	96	174
	MADIBENG	177	107	290
	MAFIKENG	90	225
	MAQUASSI HILLS	102	103	108
	MATLOSANA	171	199	208
	MORETELE	61	72	65
	MOSES KOTANE EAST	49	53	107
	POTCHEFSTROOM	408	404	421
	REKOPANTSWE	145	72	230
	RUSTENBURG	502	545	441
	ZEERUST	41	51	54
	Total	2 275	2 401	2 456
WC	CAPE WINELANDS	789	694	754
	EDEN AND CENTRAL KAROO	679	702	680
	METRO CENTRAL	1 640	1 203	1 618
	METRO EAST	1 702	705	1 331
	METRO NORTH	974	762	1 057
	METRO SOUTH	1 076	2 197	924
	OVERBERG	141	144	165
	WEST COAST	292	292	292
	Total	7 293	6 699	6 821
National		41 566	41 898	42 312

Source: 2013-15 Snap survey for special schools

Note: 2016 data is not yet available, it will available end of November 2016

(b)

Table 2 below indicates a drop in number of learners who fell pregnant from 423 in 2013 to 297 in 2015. KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga had a slight increase in learner pregnancy.

Table 2: Number of learners in special school who fell pregnant, between 2013 and 2015

Province	2013	2014	2015
EC	39	21	23
FS	17	11	7
GT	209	161	164
KZ	10	7	18
LP	39	12	11
MP	10	15	15
NC	4	0	0
NW	23	22	19
WC	72	63	40
National	423	312	297

Source: 2013-15 Annual Survey for special schools

Note: 2016 data is not yet available, it will available end of November 2016

09 November 2016 - NW2256

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

(a) Why does the Edenvale Home Affairs office service only 100 persons on Saturdays and (b) how many persons are turned away on average on Saturdays; (2) Whether any plans are being put in place to increase the number of persons serviced at the specified office on Saturdays; if not, why not; if so; what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a-b) It is not correct to state that Edenvale Home Affairs office services only 100 clients on Saturdays. The average statistics for the office on a Saturday is 120 for intake of applications for ID smart cards and passports only and 90 for collection of these documents ready for collection. This statistics excludes other legacy services rendered by the Department such as registration of births, deaths and marriages and related services required by clients over the weekend.

For your convenience I am attaching a copy of statistics for the previous three months (Aug – Oct 2016) marked Annexure A, B and C on services for ID smart card and passports excluding all other services.

2. The office is sufficiently capacitated over the weekend as there are 14 Front Office Clerks and 2 Supervisors on a weekend. Whilst the office is attending to all legacy and collection clients, the rate of processing clients applying for ID smart card and passport is due to clients’ particulars having to be captured on the live capture system.

09 November 2016 - NW2055

Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether each Head of Department (HOD) of the National Treasury signed a performance agreement since their appointment; if not, (a) what is the total number of HODs who have not signed performance agreements, (b) what is the reason in each case, (c) what action has he taken to rectify the situation and (d) what consequences will the specified HOD face for failing to sign the performance agreements; if so, (i) when was the last performance assessment of each HOD conducted and (ii) what were the results in each case; (2) whether any of the HODs who failed to sign a performance agreement received a performance bonus since their appointment; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) at what rate and (b) what criteria were used to determine the specified rate; (3) Whether any of the HODs who signed a performance agreement received a performance bonus since their appointment; if so, (a) at what rate and (b) what criteria were used to determine the rate?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. Yes, the Head of Department (HOD) of the National Treasury (NT) has signed a performance agreement since his appointment.

(a-d) Not applicable.

(i) The last performance assessment for the HOD of NT was conducted for the 2014/15 fiscal year; and

(ii) The results for the 2014/15 fiscal year was a B+ performance level in terms of NT’s performance management process.

2. The HOD signed performance agreements and has never received a performance bonus.

(a -b) Not applicable.

3. No, the HOD of NT has not received a performance bonus since his appointment.

(a -b) Not applicable.

09 November 2016 - NW2331

Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

(1)Whether his department has included a pending application function on its live capture software for cases where the network service is interrupted; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether he is considering to approach a different service provider than the State Information Technology Agency to ensure a more consistent provision of services in each of his department’s offices; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

No. Live Capture system does not have a pending application function, but functions on an off-line mode. If there is no WAN (Wide Area Network) service, the applications are stored at a local (office/branch) server and transmitted once the WAN connectivity is restored.
Telecommunications Network Services is a mandatory service of the State Information Technology Agency (SITA) in terms of the SITA Act and Regulations. The matter of network downtimes has been brought to the attention of the Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications and Postal Services and Portfolio Committee on Home affairs in a joint sitting. SITA has presented the plan to provide redundancy connections to the Department of Home Affairs offices and the plan is monitored by the Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications and Postal Services.

09 November 2016 - NW2297

Tarabella - Marchesi, Ms NI to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

Whether any (a) internal and/or (b) external forensic reports pertaining to (i) his department and/or (ii) each entity reporting to him were completed from 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic reports?

Source
Link

Reply:

Responses provided by the Department of Home Affairs, Electoral Commission and Government Printing Works are tabulated below:

Department of Home Affairs

	(aa) - Name	(bb) Subject Matter	(cc) Conclusion date
(a)(i)	1. Tender DHA22-2013	Allegations of the alterations of the price after closing date of the tender	30 June 2015
	2. Tender DHA07-2014	Complaint from member of the public on the awarding of a tender	24 August 2015
	3. Interest on overdue accounts	Interest charged on overdue accounts submitted by Refugee Ministries Centre for interpretation services	26 September 2016
(a)(ii)	No	N/A	N/A

According to the Electoral Commission

	(aa) - Name	(bb) Subject Matter	(cc) Conclusion date
(a)(ii)	No	N/A	N/A
(b)(ii)	1. Forensic Investigation: Electoral Commission – Riverside Office Park	The lease agreement entered into for the Electoral Commission’s national office accommodation	14 December 2013

According to the Government Printing Works

	(aa) - Name	(bb) Subject Matter	(cc) Conclusion date
(a)(ii)	1. Government Printing Works (GPW)	Unauthorised and confidential information shared with external parties relating to the physical security and guarding services tender at GPW Head and Regional Offices	30 September 2016
(b)(ii)	No	N/A	N/A

09 November 2016 - NW2284

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

(1)What is the current status of the application for the renewal of the passport of a certain person (name and details furnished); (2) (a) why was the specified person’s application for the renewal of a passport blocked, (b) why was the person flagged for investigation, (c) what were the findings against the person and (d) what steps will he take to resolve the specified matter speedily?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) There is no passport application lodged on the system. However, the client is eligible to apply.

(2)(a-b) The specified person’s application for the renewal of a passport was not blocked. Markers were set on her identity number for precautionary purposes (awaiting confirmation of naturalisation requirements/ prerequisites in accordance with Section 5(5)(a) of the South African Citizenship Act, (Act no. 88 of 1995) (“the Citizenship Act”). This process was not pursuing the specified person, as it is similarly done to all foreign nationals who had acquired permanent residency and whose naturalisation process was not yet entirely concluded.

(2)(c) The investigation concluded that the applicant complied with Section 5(5)(a) of the South African Citizenship Act, 1995 (Act no. 88 of 1995). Section 5(5)(a) of the Act stipulates that the husband/wife of the South African citizen who has been married to a South African citizen for a period of two years may apply for naturalisation as a South African citizen if he/she has been permanently resident in the Republic for a period of two years after the Permanent Residence was issued.

(2)(d) Markers have been lifted on the identity number and the specified person can lodge the application for the required document (passport).

Questions and Replies

14 November 2016 - NW2217

Grootboom, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2254

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2365

Steyn, Ms A to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2350

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2286

Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2369

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2355

De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2411

Tarabella - Marchesi, Ms NI to ask the Minister of Transport

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2269

Maimane, Mr MA to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2308

Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2154

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2247

Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Transport

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2174

Gqada, Ms T to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2178

Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2137

Maynier, Mr D to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2153

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2268

Maimane, Mr MA to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2274

Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2272

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2275

Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2138

Maynier, Mr D to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2273

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2248

Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2271

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2277

Waters, Mr M to ask the President of the Republic

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2243

De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport

Reply:

11 November 2016 - NW2276