Questions and Replies
09 October 2017 - NW1582
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
In view of her appointment of a certain person namely Mr Thamsanqa Msomi to the Board of Denel, (a) did she know of the specified person, (b) who introduced the person to her, (c) who recommended the appointment of the person to the board of the specified institution and (d) what criteria did she use to appoint the person to the specified board?
Reply:
a) I did not know of the specified person.
b) Please refer to the answer (a) above. The person was identified through the Board appointment process specified in (d).
c) Please refer to the answer (a) above. The person was recommended/nominated by Mr Bayanda Qiniselani Mzoneli.
d) The Board appointment process is as follows:
(i) An advertisement is issued inviting nominations of suitable persons for appointment to the Boards of the SOC within the DPE portfolio. In this instance, the advertisement went out in October 2014.
- Suitable candidates are decided on the basis of qualifications and expertise, skills, experience and business acumen.
- A nomination form must be filled in with personal information, qualifications, skills, experience, and the sector of interested indicated.
- All people that have responded are put on a database maintained by the Department. The database is consulted whenever a vacancy arises on any of the DPE SOC Boards. The list is updated every two years through a call for nominations, in the media.
(ii) The advertisement is followed by evaluation of the candidates against the criteria of qualifications, skills and experience specified and a long list is determined to determine the people who qualify for consideration.
(iii) The short list is then presented to the Minister for her consideration and approval. In this regard, the list can be revised depending on the Minister’s satisfaction with list provided.
(iv) Finally, the proposed short list of candidates approved by the Minister is presented to Cabinet for approval.
Remarks: |
Reply: Approved / Not Approved |
|||
Mr Mogokare Richard Seleke |
Ms Lynne Brown, MP |
|||
Director-General |
Minister of Public Enterprises |
|||
Date: |
Date: |
09 October 2017 - NW2805
Grootboom, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture”
1. What is the total number of libraries in Mpumalanga that do not have qualified librarians; 2. whether his department advertised these positions; if not, why not; if so, (a) which positions were advertised, (b) in which publications were the vacancies advertised, (c) on what dates were the vacancies advertised and (d) what number of applications were received as a response to the specified advertisements? NW3112E
Reply:
As I have indicated in my response to question No: 1077 of 15 May 2017, that:
“Schedule 5A of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act No 108 of 1996, which stipulates that libraries, other than national libraries, are an exclusive provincial legislative competence”. The status quo is still the same.
09 October 2017 - NW1823
Moteka, Mr PG to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether she has found that it is common practice for the subcommittees of the boards within entities reporting to her to make final decisions on tenders; if so, which entities have board subcommittees that make final decisions on tenders?
Reply:
In terms of the governance framework, particularly the Significance and Materiality Framework which cascades into each Company’s Delegation of Authority Framework, qualitative and quantitative thresholds are set and may be delegated to a Committee by the main Board.
ALEXKOR SOC LIMITED
The Alexkor Board is responsible for final decisions on tenders, as recommended by the Tender committee for Tenders above R 10 million.
DENEL SOC LIMITED
The Sub Committees of the Denel SOC Ltd Board do not make final decisions on tenders.
ESKOM SOC LTD
Yes, the Eskom Board Tender Committee (BTC) makes final decisions on tenders.
Eskom BTC assists Board in discharging their duties regarding procurement. This authority is delegated to the Eskom Board Tender Committee (BTC) by Eskom Board, in terms of the Eskom Delegation of Authority Policy as well as the mandate as contained in the Terms of Reference of the Committee approved by the Board.
SAFCOL SOC LIMITED
The South African Forestry Company SOC Limited has as at date of this response not had any Board Subcommittee carrying this responsibility.
SAX SOC LIMITED
The Procurement Committee/ Board Sub-Committee recommends all tender submissions to the Board for final approval.
TRANSNET SOC LTD
There are delegated authorities relating to limits that can be approved at various levels.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mogokare Richard Seleke Lynne Brown, MP
Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises
Date: Date:
09 October 2017 - NW2562
Kwankwa, Mr NL to ask the President of the Republic
(1) What is the position of the Government of South Africa with regard to the resolutions taken at the 28th African Union (AU) Summit held in January 2017 to (a) re-admit Morocco to the AU, although this was in violation of the Constitutive Act of the AU and (b) adopt the Kagame Report on AU Reform without it having been discussed by member states prior to the specified summit; (2) whether the Government supported the adoption of the Kagame Report; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW2822E
Reply:
The Government of South Africa accepts the outcome of the Summit on the admission of Morocco to promote unity and coherence within the Continent. Member states expressed strong views that by virtue of acceding to the Constitutive Act, Morocco should abide by all provisions of the Act and immediately resolve its relations with the Western Sahara to ensure territorial integrity between the two nations. South Africa also supports the Summit’s decision that the African Union should prioritise the resolution of the impasse between the two countries to change the status quo, failing which the principles on which the African Union was constituted, as articulated in the Constitutive Act, would be undermined. We fully support the right of the people of Western Sahara to self-determination.
South Africa supports the adoption of the Kagame Report as its general thrust seeks to strengthen the African Union (AU) and improve its functioning and effectiveness. South Africa will continue to safeguard the values of the AU Constitutive Act, and in this regard will continue to engage in AU discussions on the implementation of the report in a sustainable manner.
09 October 2017 - NW2552
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the President of the Republic
(1) Whether radical economic transformation is the Government’s official economic policy; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so; (2) whether, with reference to his advocacy of the radical economic transformation policy as well as his role in leading the country into the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa economic partnership, he has at any stage found his life to be under threat as a result of poisoning attempts; if so, (a) who conspired to poison him, (b) did he commission any investigations in this regard and (c) what are the further relevant details?
Reply:
Radical economic transformation is government policy. The policy of our government is informed by the policy of the governing party, the African National Congress (ANC). The ANC at its National Conference in Mangaung in December 2012, declared that we had begun a second decisive phase of our long transition from Colonialism of a Special Type to a National Democratic Society, and that this second phase would be characterised by more radical policies and decisive action to effect socio-economic change and continued democratic transformation.
When I was inaugurated as President of the Republic for the second time on 24 May 2014, I began to give effect to the resolution in my inauguration address, when outlining the focus of the fifth democratic administration for the years 2014-2019. I said: “Today marks the beginning of the second phase of our transition from apartheid to a national democratic society. This second phase will involve the implementation of radical socio-economic transformation policies and programmes over the next five years”. The speech is attached for the Honourable Member’s perusal.
The ANC January 8 statement this year further outlined the governing party’s focus on radical socio-economic transformation, and also specifically radical economic transformation with a focus on the economy.
Radical socio-economic transformation was declared a priority for 2017/18 for government in the 2017 State of the Nation Address (SONA). In the SONA government sets out a Policy Framework and an Action Plan within which we will prioritise the allocation of resources and actions for a particular year. We defined radical economic transformation referring to fundamental change in the structure, systems, institutions and patterns of ownership, management and control of the economy in favour of all South Africans, especially the poor, the majority of whom are African and female.
We are already busy with the implementation of many aspects of the policy through our Nine Point Plan, ensuring that work done in the priority sectors that we have targeted for attention in order to reignite growth, include the meaningful participation of black people who were excluded in the past.
These sectors include mining, manufacturing, agriculture, energy, tourism, ICT, water and sanitation, industrialisation and others. We are working hard to enhance the compacts between business, labour and government as one part of effective transformation. Together we need to broaden the ownership, management and control of the economy so that we build a more sustainable future, with an economy in which the majority plays a meaningful role and in which they benefit, as it must happen in any country. The current situation where the income of white households remains at least six times higher than that of black households as per the last Census cannot be left unchallenged and must be corrected by all of us, especially business, government and labour working together.
I am not aware of a conspiracy to poison me because of the decision of South Africa to join BRICS or because of the radical economic transformation policy of government.
09 October 2017 - NW2844
Maimane, Mr MA to ask the President of the Republic
Whether he intends to heed the call for 16 August to be declared a commemorative day to be observed annually, in honour of those workers who lost their lives on 16 August 2012 in Marikana; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The death of more than 40 mineworkers in Marikana in August 2012 is a tragedy that should never be allowed to happen again in our country.
We should remember those who lost their lives by improving the living conditions of the people in Marikana.
On 26 August 2012, I appointed a Commission of Inquiry to investigate matters of public, national and international concern arising out of the tragic incidents at the Lonmin Mine in Marikana. In total 44 people lost their lives and many others were injured. Government is busy implementing the findings of the report.
I established an Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC), which is convened by the Minister in the Presidency for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. The IMC comprises of the Departments of Human Settlements, Mineral Resources, Social Development, Police, Justice and Correctional Services, and Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs in order to manage the efforts to address the short and medium term challenges in the relevant areas.
The Inter-Ministerial Committee on the Revitalisation of Distressed Mining Communities, through its work, leadership and intervention, has achieved commendable results, which include:
- Approximately 522 housing units that have been completed to date;
- Planning for Phase 2 of the housing development in Marikana Extension 5 is already underway and measures 144 hectares in extent, owned by Lonmin. The site has capacity to cater for 5 000 housing units. Lonmin has commenced with the pre-feasibility study for this development;
- Lonmin completed the conversion of all their hostels, namely 776 family units and 1 908 single apartments by December 2014, as per the Mining charter requirements
- Lonmin has also submitted a new second Social and Labour Plan for the period 2014 until 2018. It undertook to build 4 000 infill apartments which are not meant to replace homeownership but to provide decent accommodation for employees.
- Phase 1 at the Karee Housing Estate has been completed, comprising 100 family units and 225 bachelor units. The next phase is in progress and should be finalised by the end 2017 comprising another 120 single units and 48 family units.
- The Revitalisation of Distressed Mining Communities has been mainstreamed into the Government Programme of Action.
Government continues to engage business, labour and communities to seek sustainable solutions that resolve the concerns of mine workers and distressed mining communities and transform the mining sector to broaden the benefits of our country’s rich mineral wealth.
The Revised Mining Charter also seeks to address some of the medium to long-term challenges through the provision that mining license-holders should, as part of Broad-based Economic Empowerment, provide 8% free carry to the mining communities in their area of operations.
Government encourages all society to commemorate tragedies such as the one of Marikana in every manner possible.
Furthermore, government remains on track with regard to implementing the recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry which was led by retired Judge Ian Farlam.
We appeal to all social partners to use the lessons from the Marikana tragedy to honour the memory of the victims through practical measures to improve the living and working conditions of mining communities, which is the most effective way to honour them.
09 October 2017 - NW2592
Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to her?
Reply:
Refer to table below:
No. |
Name of Entity |
(a) Opening for the board positions |
(b) Closing for board positions |
1. |
Amatola Water |
The Board of Amatola Water was appointed in February 2016. |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2020. |
2. |
Bloem Water |
The Board of Bloem Water was appointed in April 2014. |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2018. |
3. |
Lepelle Northern Water |
The Board of Lepelle Northern Water was appointed in April 2016 |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2020. |
4. |
Magalies Water |
The Board of Magalies Water was appointed in April 2014. |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2018. |
5. |
Mhlathuze Water |
The term of office of the Board was terminated in April 2017. The acting Chief Executive was appointed as the Accounting Authority in terms of Section 49(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) as amended. |
The process for the appointment of a new Board has commenced. |
6. |
Overberg Water |
The term of office of the Board was terminated in June 2017. The acting Chief Executive was appointed as the Accounting Authority in terms of Section 49(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) as amended. |
Process for the appointment of a new Board has commenced. |
7. |
Rand Water |
The Board was appointed in April 2014. |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2018. |
8. |
Sedibeng Water |
The Board was appointed in April 2017. |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2021. |
9. |
Umgeni Water |
The term of office of the Board was terminated in June 2017. The acting Chief Executive was appointed as the Accounting Authority in terms of Section 49(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) as amended. |
The process for the appointment of a new Board has commenced. |
10. |
Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA) |
The Board of the TCTA was appointed in December 2015. |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2018. |
11. |
Water Research Commission (WRC) |
The Board of the WRC was appointed in 2016. |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2020 |
12. |
Inkomati-Usuthu CMA |
The Board of Inkomati-Usuthu CMA was appointed in 2014 |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2018 |
13. |
Breede-Gouritz CMA |
The Interim Board of Breede-Gouritz CMA was appointed in 2014 |
The term of office of the Board expires in 2018 |
---00O00---
09 October 2017 - NW2161
Marais, Mr EJ to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Given the qualified audit opinion of R 2996 million in irregular expenditure shown on page 22 of Eskom’s 2016/17 annual financial statements, (a) what is the itemised cost breakdown of this irregular expenditure with supplier names for each item, (b) how was the R2996 million expenditure processed without supporting documentation given that the systems do not allow it, (c) what disciplinary measures have been instituted against individuals implicated in this irregular expenditure and (d) what measures is Eskom implementing to prevent this from reoccurring? TO:Mogokare Richard Seleke DIRECTOR-GENERAL FROM :Justin De Allende RE:PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION NO 2161 DATE:4 August 2017 ================================================================ To provide the Minister with a response to Parliamentary Question Number 2161 COVER MEMO AND THE PACKAGING OF PQ BY: Department of Public Enterprises ………………………………. Acting Deputy Director-General Date: COMMENTS: ……………………………………….. ………………………………… Mogokare Richard Seleke Director-General Date: APPROVED/DECLINED/COMMENTS ………………………………………….. ………………………………………….. …………………………………………. DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC ENTERPRISES REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY QUESTION FOR WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NO.:PQ 2161 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 4 August 2017 Mr E J Marais (DA) to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises: Given the qualified audit opinion of R 2996 million in irregular expenditure shown on page 22 of Eskom’s 2016/17 annual financial statements, (a) what is the itemised cost breakdown of this irregular expenditure with supplier names for each item, (b) how was the R2996 million expenditure processed without supporting documentation given that the systems do not allow it, (c) what disciplinary measures have been instituted against individuals implicated in this irregular expenditure and (d) what measures is Eskom implementing to prevent this from reoccurring? REPLY: (a) Eskom has provided this detail in the Annual Financial Statements issued for the year ended 31 March 2017. Please refer to Note 52 on page 113. (b) Please refer to the attached note for details of the irregular expenditure. (c) A recovery plan has been developed, which includes instituting disciplinary measures and is in the process of execution. (d) Eskom has developed an improvement plan with the aim of addressing PFMA compliance. Please refer to Directors report on Page 13 to 14 of the Annual Financial Statements issued for the year ended 31 March 2017. Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved Mr. Mogokare Richard SelekeMs. Lynne Brown, MP Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises Date:Date: Annexure to PQ 2162 (B) 52.Information required by the Public Finance Management Act Any losses due to criminal conduct or irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure that individually (or collectively where items are closely related) exceed R25 million must be reported in terms of the significance and materiality framework agreed with the shareholder. 52.1Irregular expenditure Group and company Note 2017 Rm 2016 Rm Balance at beginning of the year 348 418 Current year expenditure 4 043 106 Amounts condoned (1 084) (146) Amounts not recoverable (not condoned) (311) (30) Balance at end of the year 2 996 348 Age analysis 2 996 348 Current year 2 992 38 Prior years 4 310 Comprising – 310 B2B engineering tools expenditure incurred without PFMA approval(a) Balance at beginning of the year 310 310 Amounts not recoverable (not condoned) (310) – Purchase of land without investment committee approval(b) – – Balance at beginning of the year – 108 Amounts condoned – (108) Breach of PPPFA: monetary thresholds – incorrect tender process applied(c) 92 11 Balance at beginning of the year 11 – Current year expenditure 95 41 Amounts condoned (13) – Amounts not recoverable (not condoned) (1) (30) Breach of the NEMA(d) – 7 Balance at beginning of the year 7 – 7 – Current year expenditure – Amounts condoned (7) Use of labour broker – internal processes not followed(e) – 10 Balance at beginning of the year 10 – Current year expenditure – 10 Amounts condoned (10) – Professional services contract – internal processes not followed – – Current year expenditure – 36 Amounts condoned – (36) Tender processes not adhered to – commitments made before approval(f) 56 1 Balance at beginning of the year 1 – Current year expenditure 549 3 Amounts condoned (494) (2) Procurement of services – incorrect classification as an emergency(g) 8 4 Balance at beginning of the year 4 – 4 Current year expenditure 4 Quality management – tender process not followed and insufficient delegation of authority 1 560 – Current year expenditure(h) Breach of PPPFA – tax clearance certificates(i ) 987 – Current year expenditure 1 453 – Amounts condoned (466) – Non-compliance with CIDB regulations( j) 8 – Current year expenditure 97 – Amounts condoned (89) – Breach of PFMA – use of sole source 96 – – 5 Current year expenditure(k) Breach of PFMA – tender processes not adhered to Current year expenditure(l) 189 Various other instances – Balance at beginning of the year 5 – 5 – Current year expenditure – Amounts condoned (5) Irregular expenditure (continued) B2B engineering tools expenditure incurred without PFMA approval The matter regarding the expenditure incurred on the B2B Engineering Tools project of R310 million before PFMA approval was reported in 2015. The expenditure was subsequently derecognised by the board in accordance with the National Treasury Guideline issued on 19 April 2016. Purchase of land without investment committee approval The matter regarding the purchase of land without investment committee approval was reported in 2015. The irregular expenditure incurred has been condoned by the relevant authority and has therefore been removed from the register of irregular expenditure. Breach of PPPFA: monetary thresholds – incorrect tender process applied Irregular expenditure of R95 million was incurred in breach of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA) as follows: the PPPFA requires that monetary thresholds to determine the appropriate point-scoring criteria applicable to specific transactions be considered inclusive of VAT. Eskom erroneously applied the thresholds exclusive of VAT. Certain procurement was therefore done using the incorrect point-scoring criteria and resulted in a breach of PPPFA. Irregular expenditure incurred on affected transactions amounted to R95 million (2016: R11 million) of which R13 million was condoned in 2017, including R11 million reported in 2016. An amount of R92 million was awaiting condonation at 31 March 2017. Eskom is ensuring that regular reviews are conducted and that buyers are made aware and retrained on the supply chain management procedure Eskom’s exemption from the PPPFA expired on 7 December 2012. Eskom paid R0.4 million (2016: R30 million) during the year on contracts that were entered into between 8 December 2012 and 31 March 2013 that were inconsistent with the requirements of the PPPFA. These contracts were not recalled or corrected at the time and Eskom continued to meet its obligations in terms of these contracts. All the affected transactions took place in the normal course of business and were subject to Eskom’s approved procurement policy in force at the time Breach of NEMA Eskom unlawfully commenced with construction activities for a 132 kV power line in the Eastern Cape Province along a route that was not authorised by the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA). An amount of R7 million was incurred on the portion of the line constructed in contravention of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA). Eskom rectified the breach and received the required authorisation from DEA on 2 September 2016. Eskom paid a penalty of R1 million imposed by DEA. Disciplinary action was concluded against three employees involved. Use of labour broker – internal processes not followed Eskom processes were not followed for the procurement of certain goods and services through a labour broker. The senior managers concerned were disciplined and the labour broker instructed to discontinue sundry payments. The expenditure was condoned and no further action is required. Tender processes not adhered to – commitments made before approval Irregular expenditure of R549 million comprising 245 incidents was incurred as a result of non-adherence to internal procurement processes and employees contravening the Eskom Delegation of Authority. Incidents totalling R56 million are awaiting condonation. Procurement of services – incorrect classification as an emergency Services procured to the value of R4 million (2016: R4 million) were incorrectly classified as an emergency in the procurement process. This matter will be submitted for condonation in 2018. Quality management – tender process not followed and insufficient delegation of authority Irregular expenditure estimated at R1 560 million was incurred because of the placement of contracts without proper delegation of authority or without following established processes during the 2008-2015 financial years. Multi-disciplinary investigations were conducted into indications of mismanagement and allegations of irregularities in the quality management department. Possible fruitless and wasteful expenditure of R886 million regarding this matter was reported in 2016. A further investigation was recently finalised by an independent external company with the following outcome: identification of irregular expenditure of R1 560 million because of the placement of contracts without proper delegation of authority or without following established processes during the 2008-2015 financial years with the bulk of the payments made on these contracts occurring in the 2013 and 2014 financial years estimated fruitless and wasteful expenditure of R510 million compared to the original estimate of R886 million reported in 2016. Refer to 52.2(a) losses due to criminal conduct of R2 million. Refer to 52.3(b) Actions taken to date include the following: two employees have been dismissed (one is a senior manager) a criminal case was opened with the South African Police Service to investigate possible fraudulent transactions civil action against Eskom by one of the main suppliers is being defended a fidelity claim has been lodged in terms of a commercial crime insurance policy with a cover limit of R3 billion for losses arising from fraudulent or dishonest acts committed by employees. This claim will be concluded once the legal matters have been finalised Further disciplinary, civil and/or criminal action as appropriate will be considered against other parties involved, including action to recover losses. The following contract management process improvements have been implemented: improvement in the monitoring of performance by the SHEQ panel service providers with regular inspections and enforcement of consequence management for poor or ineffective delivery effective segregation of duties reconciliation of task orders to scope, budget, timesheets, invoices and payments, with approval of timesheets by project managers on site limiting of long-term task orders and close monitoring of performance to ensure resources are not idle nor unproductive training of employees on effective electronic documentation management Breach of PPPFA – tax clearance certificates PPPFA regulations require that tenders may only be awarded to a person whose tax matters have been declared to be in order by SARS. SARS only issues such a confirmation to a person registered as a taxpayer. Three contracts with an award value of R340 million were reported as being under investigation in 2016. A further R126 million was incurred on these contracts during the year. They were confirmed as irregular in 2017 since no SARS declaration was found to be obtained at the time of award and were condoned during the year. There were 59 contracts that were similarly affected during 2017. Irregular expenditure of R987 million was incurred on these contracts during the year and is awaiting condonation. Non-compliance with CIDB regulations Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) regulations specify the different levels of grading that contractors must have based on the value of the contracts to be awarded (not a requirement for World Bank-funded contracts). Expenditure of R89 million was identified and condoned during the year on two foreign contracts awarded in terms of World Bank funding where the grading level was not in line with CIDB regulations. A further R8 million was incurred on a contract for which tender invitations were not advertised on the CIDB website as per the CIDB Regulation 24. Breach of PFMA – use of sole source There were three incidents of irregular expenditure totalling R96 million where the use of sole sources could not be adequately justified. Breach of PFMA – tender processes not adhered to There were 11 incidents of irregular expenditure totalling R189 million where approved supply chain management processes were not adhered to. Irregular expenditure under investigation There are numerous additional instances of procurement that are subject to investigation, namely: tender processes not adhered to including breaches of delegation of authority incorrect PPPFA points thresholds applied non-compliance with CIDB regulations lack of supporting documentation including tax clearance certificates award made to a company on a sole source basis which might not comply with the criteria of sole source and contract amount determined on a contingency fee basis non-declaration of conflicts of interest by employees and tenderers giving rise to a risk of undue influence contract information not reflected correctly in the reporting system These matters are being investigated and will be disclosed in a subsequent period should they prove to be irregular. Relevant authority for condonations Condonations are currently approved by the relevant internal governance committee unless it is specifically required to be approved by National Treasury. Eskom is awaiting clarification from National Treasury on whether a relevant government department responsible for a particular piece of legislation must approve condonation of a breach relating to that legislation. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure Incidents of fruitless and wasteful expenditure above the materiality threshold There was one (2016: one) major incident of fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred by the group during the year that exceeded the materiality threshold of R25 million. This matter is carried forward from 2016. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred by the quality management department An investigation by an independent external party confirmed fruitless and wasteful expenditure estimated at R510 million compared to the original estimate of R886 million reported in the previous financial year. Refer to 52.1(h). Incidents of fruitless and wasteful expenditure below the materiality threshold Total fruitless and wasteful expenditure which individually or collectively (where items are closely related) were below the materiality threshold was R37 million (2016: R93 million) comprising 210 (2016: 655) incidents of which 10 incidents accounted for R22 million. Management continues to institute preventive and corrective measures, including disciplinary action, as considered appropriate. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure under investigation There are currently 84 incidents of alleged fruitless and wasteful expenditure under investigation, of which none is expected to exceed the materiality threshold of R25 million. The nature and extent of potential losses incurred cannot be reasonably ascertained at this stage. It is important to note that these are allegations and many of these occurrences may not qualify as fruitless and wasteful expenditure upon conclusion of the investigations. Criminal conduct Theft of conductors, cabling and related equipment Losses due to conductor theft, cabling and related equipment totalled R70 million (2016: R85 million), involving 5 734 incidents (2016: 5 161 incidents). Actions to combat these losses are managed by the Eskom Network Equipment Crime Committee in collaboration with other affected state-owned companies and the South African Police Services. The combined effort resulted in 235 (2016: 229) arrests and R5 million (2016: R5 million) worth of stolen material was recovered. Fraud Eskom concluded 15 (2016: 14) investigations into fraud during the reporting period involving R24 million (2016: R33 million), including a R2 million loss due to criminal conduct on the quality management matter. Refer to note 52.1(h). The existing internal control measures in the affected areas as well as similar areas have been reviewed and enhanced. Disciplinary, criminal as well as civil proceedings have been instituted against those involved. Non-technical revenue losses Non-technical losses are estimated at R1.3 billion (2016: R1.2 billion). These arise mainly from meter tampering and bypasses, illegal connections to the electricity network and illegal vending of electricity. Interventions to reduce non-technical energy losses: implementation of technologies in the form of smart/split meters with protective enclosures to prevent access to the meter disconnection of illegal connections, meter tampers and imposition of penalties (tamper fines) estimation and recovery of revenue for historic unaccounted energy where tampered metering installations are encountered revision of supply group codes on prepaid meters to prevent the use of illegal prepaid vouchers investigations and prosecution of criminals perpetrating electricity theft through the sale of illegal prepaid vouchers, illegal electrification and meter tampering services customer education, social mobilisation and partnership campaigns to drive behaviour change
Reply:
(a)
Eskom has provided this detail in the Annual Financial Statements issued for the year ended 31 March 2017. Please refer to Note 52 on page 113.
(b)
Please refer to the attached note for details of the irregular expenditure.
(c)
A recovery plan has been developed, which includes instituting disciplinary measures and is in the process of execution.
(d)
Eskom has developed an improvement plan with the aim of addressing PFMA compliance. Please refer to Directors report on Page 13 to 14 of the Annual Financial Statements issued for the year ended 31 March 2017.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mr. Mogokare Richard Seleke Ms. Lynne Brown, MP
Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises
Date: Date:
Annexure to PQ 2162 (B)
52. Information required by the Public Finance Management Act
Any losses due to criminal conduct or irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure that individually (or collectively where items are closely related) exceed R25 million must be reported in terms of the significance and materiality framework agreed with the shareholder.
52.1 Irregular expenditure
Group and company
Note |
2017 Rm |
2016 Rm |
Balance at beginning of the year |
348 |
418 |
Current year expenditure |
4 043 |
106 |
Amounts condoned |
(1 084) |
(146) |
Amounts not recoverable (not condoned) |
(311) |
(30) |
Balance at end of the year |
2 996 |
348 |
Age analysis |
2 996 |
348 |
Current year |
2 992 |
38 |
Prior years |
4 |
310 |
Comprising |
– |
310 |
B2B engineering tools expenditure incurred without PFMA approval (a) |
||
Balance at beginning of the year |
310 |
310 |
Amounts not recoverable (not condoned) |
(310) |
– |
Purchase of land without investment committee approval (b) |
– |
– |
Balance at beginning of the year |
– |
108 |
Amounts condoned |
– |
(108) |
Breach of PPPFA: monetary thresholds – incorrect tender process applied (c) |
92 |
11 |
Balance at beginning of the year |
11 |
– |
Current year expenditure |
95 |
41 |
Amounts condoned |
(13) |
– |
Amounts not recoverable (not condoned) |
(1) |
(30) |
Breach of the NEMA (d) |
– |
7 |
Balance at beginning of the year |
7 |
– 7 – |
Current year expenditure |
– |
|
Amounts condoned |
(7) |
|
Use of labour broker – internal processes not followed (e) |
– |
10 |
Balance at beginning of the year |
10 |
– |
Current year expenditure |
– |
10 |
Amounts condoned |
(10) |
– |
Professional services contract – internal processes not followed |
– |
– |
Current year expenditure |
– |
36 |
Amounts condoned |
– |
(36) |
Tender processes not adhered to – commitments made before approval (f) |
56 |
1 |
Balance at beginning of the year |
1 |
– |
Current year expenditure |
549 |
3 |
Amounts condoned |
(494) |
(2) |
Procurement of services – incorrect classification as an emergency (g) |
8 |
4 |
Balance at beginning of the year |
4 |
– 4 |
Current year expenditure |
4 |
|
Quality management – tender process not followed and insufficient delegation of authority |
1 560 |
– |
Current year expenditure (h) |
||
Breach of PPPFA – tax clearance certificates (i ) |
987 |
– |
Current year expenditure |
1 453 |
– |
Amounts condoned |
(466) |
– |
Non-compliance with CIDB regulations ( j) |
8 |
– |
Current year expenditure |
97 |
– |
Amounts condoned |
(89) |
– |
Breach of PFMA – use of sole source |
96 |
– – 5 |
Current year expenditure (k) |
||
Breach of PFMA – tender processes not adhered to |
||
Current year expenditure (l) |
189 |
|
Various other instances |
– |
|
Balance at beginning of the year |
5 |
– 5 – |
Current year expenditure |
– |
|
Amounts condoned |
(5) |
52.1 Irregular expenditure (continued)
a) B2B engineering tools expenditure incurred without PFMA approval
The matter regarding the expenditure incurred on the B2B Engineering Tools project of R310 million before PFMA approval was reported in 2015. The expenditure was subsequently derecognised by the board in accordance with the National Treasury Guideline issued on 19 April 2016.
b) Purchase of land without investment committee approval
The matter regarding the purchase of land without investment committee approval was reported in 2015. The irregular expenditure incurred has been condoned by the relevant authority and has therefore been removed from the register of irregular expenditure.
c) Breach of PPPFA: monetary thresholds – incorrect tender process applied
Irregular expenditure of R95 million was incurred in breach of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA) as follows:
-
- the PPPFA requires that monetary thresholds to determine the appropriate point-scoring criteria applicable to specific transactions be considered inclusive of VAT. Eskom erroneously applied the thresholds exclusive of VAT. Certain procurement was therefore done using the incorrect point-scoring criteria and resulted in a breach of PPPFA. Irregular expenditure incurred on affected transactions amounted to R95 million (2016: R11 million) of which R13 million was condoned in 2017, including R11 million reported in 2016. An amount of R92 million was awaiting condonation at 31 March 2017. Eskom is ensuring that regular reviews are conducted and that buyers are made aware and retrained on the supply chain management procedure
- Eskom’s exemption from the PPPFA expired on 7 December 2012. Eskom paid R0.4 million (2016: R30 million) during the year on contracts that were entered into between 8 December 2012 and 31 March 2013 that were inconsistent with the requirements of the PPPFA. These contracts were not recalled or corrected at the time and Eskom continued to meet its obligations in terms of these contracts. All the affected transactions took place in the normal course of business and were subject to Eskom’s approved procurement policy in force at the time
d) Breach of NEMA
Eskom unlawfully commenced with construction activities for a 132 kV power line in the Eastern Cape Province along a route that was not authorised by the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA). An amount of R7 million was incurred on the portion of the line constructed in contravention of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA). Eskom rectified the breach and received the required authorisation from DEA on 2 September 2016. Eskom paid a penalty of R1 million imposed by DEA. Disciplinary action was concluded against three employees involved.
e) Use of labour broker – internal processes not followed
Eskom processes were not followed for the procurement of certain goods and services through a labour broker. The senior managers concerned were disciplined and the labour broker instructed to discontinue sundry payments. The expenditure was condoned and no further action is required.
f) Tender processes not adhered to – commitments made before approval
Irregular expenditure of R549 million comprising 245 incidents was incurred as a result of non-adherence to internal procurement processes and employees contravening the Eskom Delegation of Authority. Incidents totalling R56 million are awaiting condonation.
g) Procurement of services – incorrect classification as an emergency
Services procured to the value of R4 million (2016: R4 million) were incorrectly classified as an emergency in the procurement process. This matter will be submitted for condonation in 2018.
h) Quality management – tender process not followed and insufficient delegation of authority
Irregular expenditure estimated at R1 560 million was incurred because of the placement of contracts without proper delegation of authority or without following established processes during the 2008-2015 financial years.
Multi-disciplinary investigations were conducted into indications of mismanagement and allegations of irregularities in the quality management department. Possible fruitless and wasteful expenditure of R886 million regarding this matter was reported in 2016.
A further investigation was recently finalised by an independent external company with the following outcome:
-
- identification of irregular expenditure of R1 560 million because of the placement of contracts without proper delegation of authority or without following established processes during the 2008-2015 financial years with the bulk of the payments made on these contracts occurring in the 2013 and 2014 financial years
- estimated fruitless and wasteful expenditure of R510 million compared to the original estimate of R886 million reported in 2016. Refer to 52.2(a)
- losses due to criminal conduct of R2 million. Refer to 52.3(b)
Actions taken to date include the following:
-
- two employees have been dismissed (one is a senior manager)
- a criminal case was opened with the South African Police Service to investigate possible fraudulent transactions
- civil action against Eskom by one of the main suppliers is being defended
- a fidelity claim has been lodged in terms of a commercial crime insurance policy with a cover limit of R3 billion for losses arising from fraudulent or dishonest acts committed by employees. This claim will be concluded once the legal matters have been finalised
Further disciplinary, civil and/or criminal action as appropriate will be considered against other parties involved, including action to recover losses.
The following contract management process improvements have been implemented:
-
- improvement in the monitoring of performance by the SHEQ panel service providers with regular inspections and enforcement of consequence management for poor or ineffective delivery
- effective segregation of duties
- reconciliation of task orders to scope, budget, timesheets, invoices and payments, with approval of timesheets by project managers on site
- limiting of long-term task orders and close monitoring of performance to ensure resources are not idle nor unproductive
- training of employees on effective electronic documentation management
i) Breach of PPPFA – tax clearance certificates
PPPFA regulations require that tenders may only be awarded to a person whose tax matters have been declared to be in order by SARS. SARS only issues such a confirmation to a person registered as a taxpayer. Three contracts with an award value of R340 million were reported as being under investigation in 2016. A further R126 million was incurred on these contracts during the year. They were confirmed as irregular in 2017 since no SARS declaration was found to be obtained at the time of award and were condoned during the year. There were 59 contracts that were similarly affected during 2017. Irregular expenditure of R987 million was incurred on these contracts during the year and is awaiting condonation.
j) Non-compliance with CIDB regulations
Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) regulations specify the different levels of grading that contractors must have based on the value of the contracts to be awarded (not a requirement for World Bank-funded contracts). Expenditure of R89 million was identified and condoned during the year on two foreign contracts awarded in terms of World Bank funding where the grading level was not in line with CIDB regulations. A further R8 million was incurred on a contract for which tender invitations were not advertised on the CIDB website as per the CIDB Regulation 24.
k) Breach of PFMA – use of sole source
There were three incidents of irregular expenditure totalling R96 million where the use of sole sources could not be adequately justified.
l) Breach of PFMA – tender processes not adhered to
There were 11 incidents of irregular expenditure totalling R189 million where approved supply chain management processes were not adhered to.
m) Irregular expenditure under investigation
There are numerous additional instances of procurement that are subject to investigation, namely:
-
- tender processes not adhered to including breaches of delegation of authority
- incorrect PPPFA points thresholds applied
- non-compliance with CIDB regulations
- lack of supporting documentation including tax clearance certificates
- award made to a company on a sole source basis which might not comply with the criteria of sole source and contract amount determined on a contingency fee basis
- non-declaration of conflicts of interest by employees and tenderers giving rise to a risk of undue influence
- contract information not reflected correctly in the reporting system
These matters are being investigated and will be disclosed in a subsequent period should they prove to be irregular.
n) Relevant authority for condonations
Condonations are currently approved by the relevant internal governance committee unless it is specifically required to be approved by National Treasury. Eskom is awaiting clarification from National Treasury on whether a relevant government department responsible for a particular piece of legislation must approve condonation of a breach relating to that legislation.
52.2 Fruitless and wasteful expenditure
a) Incidents of fruitless and wasteful expenditure above the materiality threshold
There was one (2016: one) major incident of fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred by the group during the year that exceeded the materiality threshold of R25 million. This matter is carried forward from 2016.
Fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred by the quality management department
An investigation by an independent external party confirmed fruitless and wasteful expenditure estimated at R510 million compared to the original estimate of R886 million reported in the previous financial year. Refer to 52.1(h).
b) Incidents of fruitless and wasteful expenditure below the materiality threshold
Total fruitless and wasteful expenditure which individually or collectively (where items are closely related) were below the materiality threshold was R37 million (2016: R93 million) comprising 210 (2016: 655) incidents of which 10 incidents accounted for R22 million. Management continues to institute preventive and corrective measures, including disciplinary action, as considered appropriate.
c) Fruitless and wasteful expenditure under investigation
There are currently 84 incidents of alleged fruitless and wasteful expenditure under investigation, of which none is expected to exceed the materiality threshold of R25 million. The nature and extent of potential losses incurred cannot be reasonably ascertained at this stage. It is important to note that these are allegations and many of these occurrences may not qualify as fruitless and wasteful expenditure upon conclusion of the investigations.
52.3 Criminal conduct
a) Theft of conductors, cabling and related equipment
Losses due to conductor theft, cabling and related equipment totalled R70 million (2016: R85 million), involving 5 734 incidents (2016: 5 161 incidents). Actions to combat these losses are managed by the Eskom Network Equipment Crime Committee in collaboration with other affected state-owned companies and the South African Police Services. The combined effort resulted in 235 (2016: 229) arrests and R5 million (2016: R5 million) worth of stolen material was recovered.
b) Fraud
Eskom concluded 15 (2016: 14) investigations into fraud during the reporting period involving R24 million (2016: R33 million), including a R2 million loss due to criminal conduct on the quality management matter. Refer to note 52.1(h). The existing internal control measures in the affected areas as well as similar areas have been reviewed and enhanced. Disciplinary, criminal as well as civil proceedings have been instituted against those involved.
c) Non-technical revenue losses
Non-technical losses are estimated at R1.3 billion (2016: R1.2 billion). These arise mainly from meter tampering and bypasses, illegal connections to the electricity network and illegal vending of electricity.
Interventions to reduce non-technical energy losses:
-
- implementation of technologies in the form of smart/split meters with protective enclosures to prevent access to the meter
- disconnection of illegal connections, meter tampers and imposition of penalties (tamper fines)
- estimation and recovery of revenue for historic unaccounted energy where tampered metering installations are encountered
- revision of supply group codes on prepaid meters to prevent the use of illegal prepaid vouchers
- investigations and prosecution of criminals perpetrating electricity theft through the sale of illegal prepaid vouchers, illegal electrification and meter tampering services
- customer education, social mobilisation and partnership campaigns to drive behaviour change
09 October 2017 - NW2804
Grootboom, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture
(1)(a) What was his department’s mandate regarding the completion of the Enyokeni project and (b) what financial obligations were set; (2) whether the (a) mandate and (b) financial obligations were met; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
1 (a).The Department’s mandate for 2017/18 financial year was to reprioritise the completion of the project elements such as the multipurpose cultural dome (amphitheatre). The focus was to complete the amphitheatre with its elements for it to be functional.
(b). The financial obligation set for 2017/18 financial year is R28.1 million budget for the completion of the multipurpose amphitheatre facility subject to confirmation by Bill of Quantities (BOQ). Not completing the project may lead to further wasteful and fruitless expenditure and the incomplete structure, as it becomes increasingly disused, and will reflect badly on the government of the day.
2.(a). The Department is working towards meeting and realising the mandate of what has been planned for through engaging and consulting National Treasury for advice as well as all relevant key stakeholders by holding on-going engagements on the attainment of the objective.
(b). At present the department is working on consolidating cost estimates for the outstanding project elements to be submitted to National Treasury to advise on the best option that could be considered as a way forward for this project.
09 October 2017 - NW2125
Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Social Development
(1)Whether she has been informed of any threats levelled against a certain person (name and details furnished); if so, (a) when was she informed, (b) by whom and (c) what are the relevant details related to the threats; (2) did she take any steps to ensure the provision or procurement of security services for the protection of the specified person in light of these threats; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) (a) what was the rationale informing the decision to terminate the specified person’s contract and (b) will she furnish Ms B S Masango with the record of decision informing the termination of the person’s employment contract; (4) what is the (a) total monetary value and (b) the breakdown of the value of the severance package awarded to the specified person? NW2356E
Reply:
(1) No (a) Not Applicable (b) Not Applicable (c) Not Applicable
(2) No. Refer to 1
(3) The employment contract was terminated by way of mutual agreement
09 October 2017 - NW1987
Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
How many litres of water are lost annually due to leaks in each province?
Reply:
Refer to the table below for the amount of litres of water lost annually in each province due to leaks:
Province |
Volume of water lost (Mega Litres/Annum) |
Volume of water lost (Litres/Annum) |
Western Cape |
64 788 |
64 788 000 000 |
Easter Cape |
121 589 |
121 589 000 000 |
Northern Cape |
34 534 |
34 534 000 000 |
Gauteng |
295 187 |
295 187 000 000 |
Free State |
76 793 |
76 793 000 000 |
KwaZulu Natal |
238 614 |
238 614 000 000 |
Limpopo |
124 013 |
124 013 000 000 |
Mpumalanga |
93 239 |
93 239 000 000 |
North West |
84 462 |
84 462 000 000 |
Total |
1 133 219 |
1 133 219 000 000 |
---00O00---
09 October 2017 - NW2426
Carter, Ms D to ask the President of the Republic
Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2278 on 11 November 2016, a certain family (name furnished) made monetary contributions towards the home loan of a certain person (name furnished); if not, what is his position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The issues raised in the question may form part of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry recommended by the Public Protector in her Report of “State of Capture”. As such, I cannot go into the details of the issues raised in the question.
06 October 2017 - NW2942
Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry
Why did he not attend the opening of the first provincial One Stop Shop for InvestSA in Cape Town that was opened by the President of the Republic, Mr Jacob G Zuma?
Reply:
At the time, I was undergoing a medical procedure that disfigured my face. I was advised by my medical practioner to avoid high profile public events. The President agreed that, under the circumstances, the Ministry could be represented by the Deputy Minister.
06 October 2017 - NW2367
Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
What number of cases has since 2010 between state law advisors as representatives of the State at all three levels of government and the public and contested as settlements agreed without the necessary mandate; (2) (a) what number of cases altogether has been settled in each (i) national and (ii) provincial department since 2010 and (b) what does the total for settlements amount to for each year from 1 January 2010 up to the latest specified date for which information is available?
Reply:
- I have been informed that there is only one (1) reported case since 2010 (For National and Provincial Departments).
- The Honourable Member should note that the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development has reported that: No data was collected during 2010/11 to 2014/15 financial years. The table below provides details of information captured from 2015/16 and 2016/17 financial years as well as the first quarter of the current (2017/18) financial year:
Verified data 2015/16 to 2016/17 for both National and Provincial Departments:
Year |
No. of matters settled |
Amount Claimed |
Amount Awarded |
2015/16 |
969 |
R1 330 597 548.02 |
R453 750 543.47 |
2016/17 |
787 |
R815 767 876.25 |
R347 354 310.86 |
Unverified data 2017/18 for both National and Provincial Departments:
Year |
No. of matters settled |
Amount Claimed |
Amount Awarded |
Quarter 1 |
275 |
R251 194 125 |
R112 552 023 |
06 October 2017 - NW2686
Matiase, Mr NS to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
What is the reason provided by the Master of the High Court in Cape Town for refusing to grant the Ndabeni Land Claim Trust their Letter of Authority despite being instructed to do so by the court?
Reply:
I have been advised that the Master is not in a position to appoint Trustees, and the reasons for not issuing the letters of authority are as follows:
a) The judgment and order have been taken on appeal, hence the operation and execution of the latter have been suspended; and
b) The application by the Trustees Elect in terms of Section 18 (3) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013, to allow the order to be operational and executable pending the outcome of the appeal, was dismissed by the Full Bench of the Western Cape High Court.
06 October 2017 - NW2801
Mabika, Mr M to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(1)Whether the Mbazwana Thusong Centre is officially authorised to close at 15H00 and send people away thereafter; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so; (2) whether she has found that there is staff shortage at the specified centre resulting in slow provision of services such as the collection of a document which takes the whole day?
Reply:
1. No, the office is not authorised to close at 15h00 as the Department’s offices official hours are 08h00 to 16h00 on weekdays. The Office Manager however, has discretion to decide on the queue cut off time depending on the number of clients on the day to be served. This depends on the number of clients already inside the office before closing time. This minimises the risk of clients refusing to leave the office at knock-off time and thus forcing the staff to perform unpaid overtime.
2. The office is short-staffed by one official currently and is operating with four officials. The standard norm for the staff compliment for a modernised office is a minimum of five officials. An additional post was approved for the office recently and the process of recruitment of the fifth official for the office has been completed and is awaiting approval of the appointment.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2812
Vos, Mr J to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(1)By what date will e-visas be implemented as a means to streamline tourist entry in the country; (2) (a) what are the names of the (i) countries and (ii) cities where Government has opened visa facilitation centres and (b) what are the (i) names of (aa) countries and (bb) cities where the Government plans to open visa facilitation centres in the future and (ii) timeframes in this regard?
Reply:
(1) By 30 March 2018 as a pilot phase.
(2)(a) Countries and Cities where Visa Facilitation Centers are opened as per the table below:
(i) Countries |
(ii) Cities |
1. India |
Delhi/ Mumbai/ Kolkata/ Gurgaon/ Pune/ Ahmedabad/ Goa |
2. Nigeria |
Lagos/ Abuja/ Port Harcourt |
3. China |
Beijing/ Shanghai/ Chengdu/ Guangzhou/ Wuhan/ Xi’an/ Shenyang/ Hangzhou/ Jinan |
4. Angola |
Luanda |
5. Democratic Republic of Congo |
Kinshasa/ Lubumbashi |
6. Kenya |
Nairobi |
7. Ghana |
Accra |
8. Uganda |
Kampala |
9. United Kingdom |
London/ Edinburgh/ Manchester |
10. Zimbabwe |
Harare/ Bulawayo |
11. Botswana |
Gaborone |
12. Iran |
Tehran |
13. United Arab Emirates |
Dubai |
14. Mongolia |
Ulaanbaatar |
15. Senegal |
Dakar |
16. Pakistan |
Karachi/ Lahore/ Islamabad |
17. Philippines |
Manila |
18. New Zealand |
Wellington/ Auckland |
(2)(b)(i) The information is as follows:
(aa) Countries |
(bb) Cities |
|
Cairo |
(2)(b)(ii) January 2018
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2569
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to her?”
Reply:
Small Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA) board positions
The Department issued call for nominations for members to serve on board of SEDA in the various print media from 31st July 2016 and the advert closed on 26 August 2016.
Small Enterprise Finance Agency (SEFA) board positions
Call for nominations for members to serve on board of SEFA was issued in various print media from 12th of July 2015 and the advert closed on 27 July 2015.
All board vacancies are filled, however a need for appointment of additional SEFA board members was recently identified. The Department of Small Business Development (DSBD) initiated the recruitment process of same in accordance with Cabinet approved Handbook for the appointment of persons to boards of state and state controlled institutions, section 31 (f) consulting with the parent department and (h) using departmental databases. The process is underway.
National Small Business Advisory Council
a) The call for nominations was published on 23 August 2015.
b) The closing date was 3 September 2015.
06 October 2017 - NW2888
Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?
Reply:
(a) & (b) (i) Department of Justice and Constitutional Development including National Prosecuting Authority
Breakdown |
Valuation (R’000) |
(aa) (R’000) |
(aaa) (R’000) |
(bbb) (R’000) |
(bb) (R’000) |
|
Current |
855 883 |
Zero |
855 883 |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Non-current |
445 170 |
Zero |
445 170 |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Investments:
|
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Total |
1 301 053 |
Zero |
1 301 053 |
Zero |
Zero |
A. The President Fund
Breakdown |
Valuation (R’000) |
(aa) (R’000) |
(aaa) (R’000) |
(bbb) (R’000) |
(bb) (R’000) |
|
Current |
57 551 |
Zero |
57 551 |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Non-current |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Investments:
|
476 197 523 224 350 151 57 678 |
Zero |
Zero |
476 197 523 224 350 151 57 678 |
476 197 523 224 350 151 57 678 |
|
Total |
1 464 801 |
Zero |
57 551 |
1 407 250 |
1 407 250 |
B. The Guardian Fund
Breakdown |
Valuation (R’000) |
(aa) (R’000) |
(aaa) (R’000) |
(bbb) (R’000) |
(bb) (R’000) |
|
Current |
894 430 |
Zero |
894 430 |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Non-current |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Investments:
|
5 000 668 2 424 495 4 351 694 62 524 |
Zero |
Zero |
5 000 668 2 424 495 4 351 694 62 524 |
5 000 668 2 424 495 4 351 694 62 524 |
|
Total |
12 733 811 |
Zero |
894 430 |
11 839 381 |
11 839 381 |
C. The Third Party Fund
Breakdown |
Valuation (R’000) |
(aa) (R’000) |
(aaa) (R’000) |
(bbb) (R’000) |
(bb) (R’000) |
|
Current |
805 972 |
Zero |
805 972 |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Non-current |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Investments:
|
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
Zero |
|
Total |
805 972 |
Zero |
805 972 |
Zero |
Zero |
(ii) The following entities have reported as follows:
A. Legal Aid South Africa:
(a) Breakdown of current, non-current assets and investments
(aa) and (bb) Legal Aid SA neither has listed assets nor unlisted investments
(aaa) Legal Aid SA directly holds the following assets:
Current assets |
|
1. |
Trade and other receivables |
2. |
Prepayments |
3. |
Deposits |
4. |
Inventories |
5. |
Cash and cash equivalents |
Non-current assets |
|
1. |
Land |
2. |
Buildings |
3. |
Building improvements |
4. |
Computer equipment |
5. |
Furniture and equipment |
6. |
Fittings and fixtures |
7. |
Leasehold improvements |
8. |
Motor vehicles |
9. |
Finance leased assets |
10. |
Intangible assets |
Investments held |
|
1. |
None held |
(bbb) Legal Aid SA has no assets held indirectly.
(b) Valuation of current, non-current and investments held.
Legal Aid SA directly held the following assets as at 31 March 2017:
Current assets |
Amount |
|
1. |
Trade and other receivables |
|
0 – 3 months |
R5 902 188 |
|
3 – 6 months |
R54 667 |
|
6 – 12 months |
R136 166 |
|
Beyond 12 months |
R527 790 |
|
R6 620 810 |
||
2. |
Prepayments |
|
0 – 3 months |
R1 244 889 |
|
3 – 6 months |
R21 891 440 |
|
6 – 12 months |
R495 094 |
|
Beyond 12 months |
R936 897 |
|
R24 568 320 |
||
3. |
Deposits |
|
Beyond 12 months |
R1 661 651 |
|
R1 661 651 |
||
4. |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
0 – 3 months |
R245 971 703 |
|
(cash set aside for creditors and provision for external legal practitioners who have been briefed. |
R245 971 703 |
|
5. |
Inventories |
|
0 – 3 months |
R1 664 789 |
|
R1 664 789 |
||
TOTAL |
R280 487 273 |
|
Non-current assets |
AMOUNT |
|
1. |
Land |
R3 556 000 |
2. |
Buildings |
R24 143 169 |
3. |
Building improvements |
R8 955 909 |
4. |
Computer equipment |
R58 544 938 |
5. |
Furniture and equipment |
R4 381 060 |
6. |
Fittings and fixtures |
R439 675 |
7. |
Leasehold improvements |
R10 690 249 |
8. |
Motor vehicles |
58 929 637 |
9. |
Finance leased assets |
R1 099 255 |
10. |
Intangible assets |
R5 684 942 |
TOTAL |
R176 424 834 |
Investments held |
||
1. |
None held |
B. Special Investigating Unit: see table link below:
http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/Doc1RNW2888SIU_TABLE.pdf
06 October 2017 - NW2628
Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(1)By which date will her department’s newly built offices in Bronkhorstspruit in Gauteng, which were completed in May 2017, be opened; (2) whether employees stationed at her department’s Cullinan offices received any instructions to relocate to the newly built offices in Bronkhorstspruit; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what is the status of the relocation and (b) how has the relocation affected service delivery by her department?
Reply:
(1) The new anticipated date for opening of the office in Bronkhorstspruit is 1 October 2017.
(2)(a) No. Consultation with staff took place during April 2017 upon which the affected staff were given a three (3) month period to prepare for the relocation. Not all officials at the Cullinan Local office - Medium will be affected by the move and this office will still be operating with a reduced number of staff to deal with applications of birth, marriage and death only. The Cullinan and Bronkhorspruit communities were also consulted on the intended opening of the new office in Bronkhorstspruit.
(2)(b) The relocation will not impact negatively as the Cullinan Local Office - Medium remains open and staff will be available to render service delivery, whilst the Bronkhorstspruit community will benefit with the opening of the new office.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mkuseli Apleni Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2633
Kalyan, Ms SV to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
Was notice of an RSA05 clearance for the flight that (a) arrived at Waterkloof Air Force Base from Harare on or about 16 August 2017 and (b) departed from Waterkloof Air Force Base to Harare on or about 20 August 2017 received by her department; if so (a) who approved the clearance and (b) on what basis was the clearance done?
Reply:
The Department of Home Affairs is not responsible for the clearance of any flights.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mkuseli Apleni Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2505
Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
Whether, with reference to her reply to question 1966 on 10 August 2017, her department has set targets for the country to achieve using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor’s index known as the Total Early Stage Entrepreneurial Activity rate, which measures start-up activity in a country’s ecosystem; if not, (a) why not and (b) by when will targets be set; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
No, the Department of Small Business Development (DSBD) has not set targets for the country to achieve a particular rate using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor’s (GEMS) index known as the Total Entrepreneurial Activity rate, which measures start-up activity in a country’s entrepreneurship ecosystem.
a) The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor is not the only source of data which can be used to determine early stage entrepreneurial activity. The DSBD is therefore, not only limited to this source of data as a tool to measure nor determine the entrepreneurial activity rate. The DSBD will continue to consider other relevant research available to enhance its work.
b) The DSBD is in the process commissioning a “2016 Annual Review on the status of Small Business and Cooperatives in South Africa”. The findings from this research will determine a decision whether there is a need for target setting of early stage entrepreneurial activity.
06 October 2017 - NW2709
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is currently investigating a case of alleged fraud committed by seven individuals who were arrested in Heidelberg, Gauteng, for being in possession of SA Social Security Agency cards of private individuals who were receiving social grants; if not, why not; if so, (a) on what date was the case handed to the NPA by the SA Police Services and (b) what (i) is the current status of the investigation and (ii) steps have been taken to date with regard to the investigation; (2) whether the NPA launched any disciplinary action against a certain person (name and details furnished) for allegedly defeating the ends of justice after refusing to prosecute the case of alleged fraud; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
1. The National Director of Public Prosecutions has informed me that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is not investigating this matter. The power to investigate this case resorts with the South African Police Service (SAPS), who are investigating the matter.
The SAPS investigating docket was handed to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) on 3 May 2017 after which guidance was provided to the investigating officer on aspects relating to the investigation after which the docket was returned to the SAPS. The docket has not yet been resubmitted to the NPA as the investigation is yet to be concluded.
2. The SAPS approached the Senior Public Prosecutor with concerns regarding the manner in which the matter was dealt with. The Chief Prosecutor subsequently investigated the allegations and was satisfied that the prosecutors had provided the necessary guidance and had taken the appropriate steps in the circumstances of that matter. The Chief Prosecutor advised that no further steps were warranted.
06 October 2017 - NW2675
Matiase, Mr NS to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(a) What processes and systems has his department put in place to ensure maximum public participation and commentary on the South African Law Reform Commission Report on Sexual Offences: Adult Prostitution, (b) what are the details of how public participation will take place and (c) what are the timelines for public participation and commentary on the report?
Reply:
(a) and (b) The Report on Adult Prostitution (Project 107) of the South African Law Reform Commission (the Report) was released into the public domain on 26 May 2017. The public and interested parties may consider and comment on the Report. The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development is embarking on the consultation process with internal governmental stakeholders on the legislative and non-legislative interventions due to the cross cutting impact of the recommendations. This internal process will consider the recommendations in a holistic and coordinated manner. A public participation process will be followed to facilitate debate and input from members of the public.
(c) The Department has indicated that this process of internal consultation will begin in October 2017. This process will be extensive as it must delve into all aspects of the implementation of the non-legislative recommendations. I will thereafter receive a report from the Department which will enable me to make a decision on the introduction of legislation.
06 October 2017 - NW2586
Matiase, Mr NS to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to him?
Reply:
In respect to the entities reporting to me, I have been informed as follows:
1. Legal Aid South Africa:
There are no application dates for members. The members of the Board are appointed by the Minister in terms of the Legal Aid South Africa Act, 2014 (Act No. 39 of 2014). The Board of Legal Aid South Africa is fully constituted. As a result, there are no Board vacancies currently.
2. Council for Debt Collectors:
There are no applications dates set for positions on the Council for Debt Collectors. In terms of the Debt Collectors Act, 1998 (Act No. 114 of 1998), 10 Council members are appointed by the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, of which 7 members are appointed based on nominations received from the debt collection industry, law society of South Africa, Magistrates commission and an institution representing consumer interests. The Chairperson and 2 remaining members are appointed in the Ministers discretion.
In terms of section 3(4) of Act No. 114 of 1998, a member of the Council holds office for a term, not exceeding three years, determined by the Minister at the time of the member's appointment. The section also provides that a member may be reappointed at the expiration of his or her term of office.
3. South African Law Reform Commission:
Section 3 of the South African Law Reform Act, 1973 (Act No. 19 of 1973) provides for the appointment of the Commissioners by the President and does not require the prospective Commissioners to apply for these positions.
4. Special Investigating Unit
The Special Investigating Unit does not have a Board as it is a Schedule III Public entity, with the Accounting Authority fulfilling the role of the Board.
5. Rules Board for Courts of Law
There are no applications dates set for positions of the Rules Board as the Board is accountable to the Minister in terms of the Act. The Minister appoints when there is a vacancy and/or prior to the expiry of the terms of the Board.
06 October 2017 - NW2596
Mokoena, Mr L to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to him?
Reply:
When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to him? |
|||
(a) |
(b) |
||
b)Entities |
CGS |
7 September 2016 |
21 September 2016 |
MINTEK |
21 February 2016 |
06 March 2016 |
|
SDT |
21 February 2016 |
06 March 2016 |
|
SADPMR |
21 February 2016 |
06 March 2016 |
|
MHSC |
9 September 2016 |
23 September 2016 |
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
06 October 2017 - NW2711
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
What is the total cost incurred by (a) his department and (b) the National Prosecuting Authority for each official international trip undertaken by (i) the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr Shaun Abrahams and (ii) each person who accompanied him since 16 June 2015; (2) Whether a bodyguard accompanied the specified person on the international trips; if so, (a) for how many trips, (b) why and (c) what is the total cost incurred for the bodyguard to accompany the specified person in each case?
Reply:
1. (a) The table link below provides details of the total cost incurred by the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, the amounts excludes information of the National Prosecuting Authority:
http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2711TABLE.pdf
(b) The information on the costs incurred by the National Prosecuting Authority for each official international trip undertaken by the National Director of Public Prosecutions and each person that accompanied him is attached at Annexure A.
2. Yes, the NDPP has informed me that he was accompanied by his bodyguard.
a) Three (3) trips.
b) Confidential information.
c) Please refer to Annexure A.
06 October 2017 - NW2398
Kruger, Mr HC to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
What is the status of the appointment of the Board of the National Small Business Advisory Council?”
Reply:
The National Small Business Advisory Body (The Council) is being established in terms of Section 2 of the National Small Business Amendment Act, 2003 (Act No. 26 of 2003) and the members of the Advisory Body are appointed by the Minister of Small Business Development in terms of Section 3(1) of the Act.
The Minister of Small Business Development invited nominations from the general public, small business organisations and interest groups in terms of Section 3(1) of the National Small Business Amendment Act to serve on the Advisory Body. From the nominations received, the Minister of Small Business Development is mandated to select amongst the list of nominees and appoint the members of the Small Business Advisory Body for a period of three years.
To date, the Panel approved by the Minister has finalised the process of shortlisting. All relevant documents and a shortlist of verified names by the DSBD Human Resource Directorate were submitted to the Minister for consideration of the appointment to the Council.
06 October 2017 - NW2890
Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?
Reply:
Assets held by the Department and each of the entities are disclosed on the Annual Financial Statements. Information required can therefore be obtained on the annual report tabled by the Department in September 2017 to Parliament. The annual report are the key reporting instruments for departments and its entities to report against the performance targets and budgets outlined in the strategic plans, read together with the ENE.
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
06 October 2017 - NW2865
Bucwa, Ms H to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)On what date will the investigation into the fraudulent obtaining of places in health sciences courses at various public universities be completed; (2) whether the findings of the specified investigation will be made public; if not, why not; if so, by what date?
Reply:
- The investigation is a two-pronged process, i.e. an institutional investigation and probe by law enforcement agencies. The internal process at the University of KwaZulu-Natal is expected to be completed by end of the year.
- The decision to make the internal investigation findings public rests with the Council of the university.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 2865 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
06 October 2017 - NW2121
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance
What is the (a) full financial value of (i) funds and (ii) guarantees received by SA Airways (SAA) from (aa) the National Treasury and/or (bb) any other national department from 1 January 1997 to date, (b) detailed breakdown of these allocations to each department of SAA in each year, (c) motivation for providing the funds in each case and (d) detailed breakdown of the amounts of guarantees (i) requested and (ii) granted in each case?
Reply:
a(i): A summary of funds received and repaid is reflected in the table below, as per the records in the annual financial statements:
Financial Year |
Funds Received or Paid |
Initial capitalisation R3 137 million |
|
2003/4 |
R6 089 million shareholder loan advanced |
2004/5 |
R 4 000 million shareholder convertible loan |
2005/6 |
R 1 600 million of shareholder convertible loan repaid (balance of R2 400 million remained) |
2006/7 |
R 8 450 million of above loans was capitalised |
2007/8 |
R1 564 million subordinated loan raised. Capitalised in 2009/10 |
2017/18 |
R2 208 million recapitalisation (30 June 2017) |
a(ii): A summary of the Going Concern guarantees and utilisation towards loans or other purposes as is listed in the table below:
Guarantee Awarded |
Amount |
Utilisation |
Balance |
|
R’m |
R’m |
R’m |
Subordinated Loan – Nedbank (Mar 2007) |
1 300 |
1 300 |
Nil |
Going Concern Guarantee (Sep 2009) |
1 600 |
||
(Allocated to ATL, Sep ‘16) |
541 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14) |
1 055 |
4 |
|
Going Concern Guarantee (Sep 2012) |
5 006 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Jul ’14) |
1 300 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Jul ’14) |
1 500 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14) |
1 700 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14) |
295 |
211 |
|
Going Concern Guarantee (Dec 2014) |
6 488 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Dec ’14) |
450 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Apr ‘15) |
1 500 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Jun ‘15) |
1 500 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Jun’16) Bridge |
1 000 |
2 038 |
|
Going Concern Guarantee (Sep 2016) |
4 720 |
||
General Short Term Banking Facilities (Dec’16) |
830 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Dec’16) Bridge |
1 292 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (Mar‘17) Bridge |
757 |
||
LC and Guarantee Facilities (Mar’17) |
522 |
||
ATL Credit Card Exposure (Apr’17) |
768 |
||
Working Capital Utilisation (May‘17) Bridge |
104 |
447 |
|
TOTAL |
19 114 |
16 414 |
2 700 |
06 October 2017 - NW2578
Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to her?
Reply:
The entities responded as follows:
Electoral Commission
(a-b) The Electoral Commission does not have a Board. It has a Commission whose composition is described in section 6 of the Electoral Commission Act (51 of 1996). The Commission is not the equivalent of a Board.
Government Printing Works
(a-b) The Government Printing Works does not have a Board. GPW is currently a National Government component established as such in 2009 in accordance with section 7(5)(c) of the Public Service Act, 1994 (Proclamation No. 103 of 3 June 1994) (“Public Service Act”) and listed in Part A of Schedule 3 to that Act.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mkuseli Apleni Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2885
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?
Reply:
The Department and the entities responded as follows:
(i) Department of Home Affairs
(a-b) The breakdown and valuation of current and non-current assets held by Department of Home Affairs as at 31 March 2017 are as follows:
Asset type |
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
Beyond 12 months (non- current assets) |
Total |
Staff debt |
R1 616 079.85 |
R735 604.71 |
R242 576.06 |
R10 107 125.60 |
R12 701 386.22 |
Other debtors |
R791 636.58 |
R330 558.59 |
R1 122 195.17 |
||
Recoverable expenditure (disallowance accounts) |
R3 388 15.46 |
R2 781 994.10 |
R21 002 032.44 |
R24 122 842.00 |
|
Claims recoverable |
R234 930.10 |
R173 7997 310 |
R843 334.20 |
R1 739 075 574.30 |
|
Total |
R2 981 461.99 |
R735 604.71 |
R1 741 021 880.16 |
R32 283 050.83 |
R1 777 021 997.69 |
(bb) There are no investments held by Department of Home Affairs, listed or unlisted.
(ii) Government Printing Works
(a-b) The Government Printing Works (GPW) has an asset base of R3 228 752 000.57. A detailed breakdown and valuation of current and non-current assets is listed below:
Non-current assets:
Fixed assets |
Net value |
Land |
R20 128 625.42 |
Buildings |
R25 189 570.56 |
Lease Improvements |
R80 503 178.75 |
Office furniture |
R3 453 048.73 |
Computer equipment |
R3 437 878.85 |
Machinery and equipment |
R251 817318.80 |
Vehicles |
R15.16 |
Computer software |
R12 489 488.12 |
Asset in production |
R455 345 950.10 |
Sub-total |
R852 365 074.49 |
Intangible assets |
|
Intangible software |
R23 331 123.13 |
Total |
R875 696 197.62 |
Current assets
Inventories* |
R242 936 477.69 |
Trade and other receivables |
R98 442 286.16 |
Cash and cash equivalents* |
R2 011 677 039.10 |
Total |
R2 353 055 802.95 |
*Inventories and cash and cash equivalents represent the balance as at 31 August 2017 and cannot be broken down by months.
The breakdown of trade and other receivables is as follows:
Period |
Balance |
0-3 months |
R88 155 067.26 |
Greater than 3 months |
R10,287,281.90 |
Total |
R98 442 286.16 |
(bb) The GPW does not have any investments, both listed and unlisted.
(ii) Electoral Commission
(a-b) The breakdown and valuation of current and non-current assets of the Electoral Commission as at 31 March 2017 are as follows:
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents |
R14 078 042.00 |
Trade and other receivables from exchange transactions |
R22 352 490.00 |
Inventories |
R11 911 915.00 |
Total |
R48 342 447.00 |
Non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment |
R197 705 422.00 |
Heritage assets |
R1 663 664.00 |
Intangible assets |
R94 809 947.00 |
Total |
R294 179 033.00 |
(aa-bb) The breakdown period of current assets and investments is tabulated hereunder:
Current Assets |
0 - 30 Months |
3 - 6 Months |
6 - 12 Months |
Beyond 12 Months |
Totals |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
R14 078 042 |
- |
- |
- |
R14 078 042 |
Trade and other receivables |
R21 760 156 |
R8 874 |
R105 220 |
R478 240 |
R22 352 490 |
Accrued Interest |
R36 682 |
- |
- |
- |
R36 682 |
Cash collateral provided: property rentals |
R12 634 488 |
- |
- |
- |
R12 634 488 |
Prepayments |
R7 984 858 |
- |
- |
- |
R7 984 858 |
Sundry receivables |
R1 104 128 |
R 8 874 |
R105 220 |
R478 240 |
R1 696 462 |
Inventories |
R11 911 915 |
- |
- |
- |
R11 911 915 |
Total Current Assets |
R47 750 113 |
R8 874 |
R105 220 |
R478 240 |
R48 342 447 |
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
J W Mckay Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Acting Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2726
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether she (a) received, (b) considered, (c) approved and/or (d) rejected any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
(a) No, I did not receive any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
(b) No, I did not consider any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
(c) No, I did not approve any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
(d) No, I did not reject any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
---ooOoo---
06 October 2017 - NW2368
Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(a) On which date permanent residence in the Republic was awarded to a certain person (name and details furnished), (b)(i) where and (ii) how the specified person would be able to obtain a permit and/or a copy of the permanent residence and (c)(i) on what date it will be available and (ii) which person needs to be contacted in order to collect the specified permit and/or copy from such person?
Reply:
(a) As the concerned person was born in Namibia before independence, he was a South African citizen and therefore has the rights to Permanent Residence from date of birth. In terms of SA law he can never lose his right to permanent residence.
(b)(i-ii) Should he wish to obtain a letter confirming the above, he is advised to apply for it at the local Home Affairs’ office.
(c)(i) Not applicable
(c)(ii) Not applicable
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mkuseli Apleni Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2710
Breytenbach, Adv G to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(a) What is the total number of official international trips that the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr Shaun Abrahams, undertook since 16 June 2015 and (b) what was the (i) destination, (ii) purpose, (iii) cost of flights, (iv) cost of accommodation, (v) name of each hotel where the specified person stayed and (vi) total of subsistence costs incurred in each case for (aa) the specified person and (bb) each accompanying person?
Reply:
a) The National Director of Public Prosecutions has informed me that he undertook 15 international trips since 16 June 2015.
b) The tables link below give details of the international trips undertaken by the NDPP and accompanying persons:
http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2710TABLE.pdf
06 October 2017 - NW2627
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
What are the relevant details of the measures that the Government will put in place to facilitate the African Union’s vision 2063 of establishing a continental passport for freedom of movement and trade in Africa in contrast to the more strict security measures restricting movement, as proposed by the Border Management Agency?NW2933
Reply:
The legal instruments relating to the implementation of the aspects of Vision 2063 relating to Free Movement are still being negotiated by the African Union Member States. Upon adoption by the African Union, the Member States will have to sign and, in accordance with their constitutional requirements, ratify and domesticate the legal instruments.
In the case of South Africa, if the legal instruments are ratified and domesticated, all relevant Departments and their entities or agencies will have to implement them as it would be the law in the Republic.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mkuseli Apleni Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2634
Kalyan, Ms SV to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
Whether an official from her department was present at the Waterkloof Airport to process the passports and travel documents of passengers embarking on the aircraft carrier Z-WPE (a) on its arrival on 16 August 2017 at 19:11 pm and (b) on its departure on 20 August 2017 at 01:19 am; if not, why not in each case; if so, (i) what is the (aa) full name and (bb) professional designation of the official concerned, (ii) what are the (aa) full names, (bb) passport number and (cc) nationality of every individual whose passport or travel documents were processed and (iv) when was the official notified that his presence at the airport is required?
Reply:
A. Whether an Official from department was present at Waterkloof Airport On its arrival on 16 August 2017 at 19:11 pm
Officials from the Department of Home Affairs were present during the embarking of the Aircraft carrier Z-WPE on its arrival
B. Whether an Official of the department was present during the departure of Z-WPE on 20 August 2017 at 01:19 am.
Officials from the Department of Home Affairs were also present during the departure of Z-WPE on 20 August 2017 at 01:19 am
(aa) Full name
Full names: David Dihele
Full names: Busi Nkambule
Full names: Molefe Machaba
(bb) Professional designation:
As per (aa) above, the professional designations are:
Professional Designation: Chief Immigration Officer
Professional Designation: Chief Immigration Officer
Professional Designation: Immigration Officer
(cc) The nationality of every individual whose passport or travel documents were processed
All individuals processed were Zimbabwean Nationals on arrival we processed 45+1=46 Pax and on departure it was 57+ 1 =58 Pax
(iv) When was the officials notified that his presence at the airport is required?
The Officials have been part of planning for the SADC Summit. The Office has been planning the summit from June.2017. There was a permanent deployment of immigration Officers for the duration of the summit from 11-22 August.2017.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mkuseli Apleni Prof. Hlengiwe Mkhize, MP
Director-General Minister of Home Affairs
Date: Date:
06 October 2017 - NW2731
Ross, Mr DC to ask the Minister of Finance
Whether a certain company (Jim Aviation SA) plays any role with regard to the contract concluded between SA Airways Technical and a certain company (Allen Aircraft Radio Corporation); if so, (a) what are the full details of the (i) role that the specified company is playing and (ii) value of its involvement in the specified contract and (b) who are the (i) directors and (ii) shareholders of the specified company?
Reply:
JM Aviation was, as at the time of the tender submission, and still is a BEE partner of AAR. SAA is not privy to the commercial agreement between AAR and JM Aviation and thus is not in a position to respond to the specifics around each party’s role with regard to the contract concluded between SAAT and AAR/JM Aviation. SAAT’s interactions in accordance with the contract are through a dedicated individual who is tasked with the client liaison and quarterly contract review.
a.(i) Not applicable.
a.(ii) Not applicable.
b.(i) Miss M.V. Sokhulu
Miss I.N. Louw
Mr V.A. Ndzeku
Mr J. Aires
b.(ii) Miss M.V. Sokhulu: 35%
Miss I.N. Louw: 30%
Mr V.A. Ndzeku: 20%
Mr J. Aires: 15%
05 October 2017 - NW2768
Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)With regard to her reply to question 1571 on 25 September 2014, has the construction of the Esselen Park Primary School commenced; if not, (a) why not and (b) on what date will the construction commence; if so, what is the projected date of completion; (2) whether the commencement dates of construction as stipulated in the specified reply are being moved forward for (a) New Birch Acres Primary School and (b) Clayville Primary School; if so, (i) what are the new commencement dates in each case and (ii) by what dates are both schools expected to open?
Reply:
1.
(a) No, construction has not commenced due to budgetary constraints.
(b) The current project status is at feasibility stage and the start date is estimated for 01 April 2020 and completion date is estimated for 20 April 2022.
2.
(a) The estimated start date for the construction of New Birch Acres Primary is 24/10/2017 and the project is on target to commence on the said date.
(b) Construction for Clayville Primary School is estimated to start on 15/02/2020.
(i) Commencement date for New Birch Acres has not changed and for Clayville Primary School start date is 15/02/2020.
(ii) Opening dates cannot be confirmed at this stage; however, the completion dates are estimated for 31 June 2019 for New Birch Acres and 15 May2022 for Clayville Primary School.
Project name |
Project Status |
Date: Start |
Date: Finish |
New Birch Acres Primary School |
Procurement |
24/10/2017 |
31/06/2019 |
Clayville Primary School |
Project Inception |
15/02/2020 |
15/05/2022 |
Esselenpark Primary School |
Feasibility |
01/04/2020 |
20/05/2022 |
05 October 2017 - NW2096
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Basic Education
Whether (a) her department and/or (b) any entities reporting to her are funding, including by way of discretionary funding, any institution of research and development (i) domestically and/or (ii) internationally; if so, (aa)(aaa) what are the names of the specified institutions and (bbb) what are their functions, (bb) from what date has her department or any entity reporting to hier been funding them and (cc) what amount has her department contributed towards such funding?
Reply:
Department of Basic Education
(a)(i)(ii) The Department of Basic Education does not fund any Institution of Research and Development domestically or internationally.
(aa)(aaa) Not applicable
(bbb) Not applicable
(bb) Not applicable
(cc) Not applicable
South African Council for Educators
(b)(i)(ii) The South African Council for Educators does not fund any Institution of Research and Development domestically or internationally.
(aa)(aaa) Not applicable
(bbb) Not applicable
(bb) Not applicable
(cc) Not applicable
QUESTION NA 2096
UMALUSI
(b)(i)(ii) UMALUSI does not fund any Institution of Research and Development domestically or internationally.
(aa)(aaa) Not applicable
(bbb) Not applicable
(bb) Not applicable
(cc) Not applicable
05 October 2017 - NW2514
Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(a) What number of staff members are employed in the vetting and verification unit at the SA Council of Educators (SACE) and (b) what steps is SACE taking to ensure that it has the requisite capacity for vetting and verifying the volume of applications that it receives for the listing in teachers’ roll?
Reply:
a) Eight (8) staff members have been allocated the vetting and verification responsibilities as part of the processing of registration of applications.
b) Currently the South African Council for Educators (SACE) is conducting visual verification at the office. However Council is working on a process of re-conceptualizing vetting and verification with an ultimate goal of streamlining the processes and establishing a formal institutional network that will play a more meaningful role in this area. The reconceptualisation process also includes the review of the registration criteria to include, fitness-to-practice as a new concept that will incoporate issues of vetting and verification within a broader context of professional registration. Council is persuing establishing institutional networks with e.g the South African Qualifications Authority; Department of Home Affairs and the Africa Forum of Teaching Regulatory Authorities (AFTRA) to enhance its registration process.
05 October 2017 - NW2679
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(a) What is the total number of schools that have been built in each province since 1 January 2009 and (b) what number of schools are currently being built in each province?
Reply:
Prov |
TOTAL NUMBER OF SCHOOLS COMPLETED (ASIDI AND PROVINCIAL) |
|||||||||||
2009/2010 |
2010/2011 |
2011/2012 |
2012/2013 |
2013/2014 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2016/2017 |
Delivered in 2017/18 (1st Q) |
ASIDI |
Total School Delivered |
Currently being built 2017/2018 |
|
EC |
34 |
62 |
33 |
13 |
5 |
32 |
11 |
8 |
2 |
134 |
6 |
155 |
FS |
13 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
12 |
45 |
10 |
GP |
10 |
10 |
14 |
21 |
12 |
24 |
13 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
110 |
8 |
KZN |
6 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
17 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
88 |
21 |
LP |
34 |
4 |
14 |
7 |
7 |
13 |
17 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
102 |
9 |
MP |
4 |
1 |
4 |
11 |
7 |
19 |
14 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
70 |
11 |
NC |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
7 |
NW |
3 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
39 |
6 |
WC |
6 |
9 |
19 |
5 |
4 |
14 |
23 |
19 |
2 |
22 |
123 |
6 |
TOTAL |
111 |
111 |
103 |
72 |
66 |
121 |
100 |
63 |
5 |
179 |
931 |
233 |
05 October 2017 - NW1604
Tlhaole, Mr L S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans
(a) What percentage of military veterans, employed by her department, are former Umkhonto weSizwe veterans and (b) in what positions are the former Umkhonto weSizwe veterans employed?
Reply:
The Department currently employs 206 staff members excluding interns. Of the 206 employees, 76 are non-permanent employees (NPE). Therefore the Department has 130 permanent employees on its establishment.
Of the 130, there are 24 former MK members constituting 18% of the permanent employees. They hold the following positions:
- 1 x Deputy Director General
- 2 x Chief Directors
- 4 x Directors
- 13 x Deputy Directors
- 4 x Assistant Directors
Of the 76 NPE’s, four (4) are from former MK members constituting 5% and they hold the following positions:
- 1 x Acting Director General
- 1 x Director
- 1 x Deputy Director
- 1 x Assistant Director
In total the Department has 28 employees from former MK constituting 14% of the entire Department workforce.
05 October 2017 - NW2511
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)With regard to each allegation of abuse of learners by school staff (details furnished), was the case reported to the (a) provincial education department, (b) SA Council of Educators (SACE) and/or (c) SA Police Service (SAPS); if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the details of (i) all disciplinary action taken by each (aa) provincial education department and (bb) SACE against offending teachers, (ii) CAS numbers of the cases opened at SAPS and (iii) status of the SAPS investigations in each case and (iv) the outcomes of the specified disciplinary actions, (2) has psychological support been offered to the affected learners; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
1. (a) In terms of section 3(1)(b) of the Employment of Educators Act, 76 of 1998, the Head of the Provincial Education Department is the employer of educators in the service of the Provincial Education Departments (PEDs) for all purposes of employment. For this reason, the Department of Basic Education (DBE) cannot intervene in the decisions of the PEDs regarding employer-employee relations matters because of the binding contract of employment between the two parties. It is therefore the responsibility of the employer to implement policies with regards to safety measures at schools. It is also the responsibility of the employer to enforce disciplinary code and procedures against their employees. The question therefore needs to be directed to the PED to establish the facts of these cases.
1. (b) SACE SUPPLEMENTARY RESPONSE
The following cases as per the attached list were reported to
Eastern Cape
1. EC 2 Qunu Junior Secondary School: the case was investigated on 11 October 2016 and no evidence of abuse of learners was found;
Free State
2. FS 1 Reatile Primary School: the case was investigated, disciplinary hearing was conducted, the educator was found guilty and given a sanction of a striking off, which was suspended for a period of 10 years and a fine of R10 000;
Gauteng
3. GP 2 Chief Albert Luthuli School - the matter was investigated. The parent of the learner did not co-operate with the investigation and removed the learner from the school;
4. GP 5 Teach to Pass College - The matter was investigated , a disciplinary hearing was finalised and the educator was found guilty, the report and sanction are to be tabled before the ethics committee in October 2017;
5. GP 6 Parktown Boys High School - The matter was brought to our attention. The school will be furnishing us with all the information at their disposal. The school is keeping us up to date with developments in the criminal case;
6. GP12 Krugersdorp High School- The matter was brought to our attention and was investigated. We await a report from the investigator and his findings;
Kwazulu Natal
7. KZN 6 Prince Tokoto High School- The matter was brought to our attention and was investigated. Charges have been brought against the educator. A disciplinary hearing had to be postponed as the educator has been admitted to hospital for depression. The hearing will proceed as soon as he has been discharged;
8. KZN 9 Ekucabangeni High School. The educator was investigated and he is currently still in prison and was denied bail. It is a bit difficult to conduct a disciplinary hearing at the moment;
9. KZN 11 George Campbell School of Technology.-The matter was investigated. A disciplinary hearing was conducted and the educator was found guilty and given a sanction of a striking off which was suspended for a period of 15 years and a fine of R25 000.00;
Limpopo
10. LP 1 Lemetja Secondary School- The matter was investigated, a disciplinary hearing conducted and the educator was found guilty and given a sanction of a striking off which was suspended for a period of 10 years and a fine of R10 000.00;
11. LP 3 Mphaphuli High School- The matter was brought to our attention. An investigation could not be conducted as the principal refuses to cooperate with the investigation or to speak to anyone. According to the principal, he has been instructed by the spokesperson for the Limpopo Education Department to not speak to anyone regarding the allegations. The circuit manager also refuses to cooperate and refers us to the District Manager. We are recommending to Council structures for charges to be preferred against the principal for refusal to cooperate;
Mpumalanga
12. MP2 Manyano Primary School-The matter was brought to our attention and investigated. A disciplinary hearing has commenced and is being finalised on 21 and 22 September 2017;
13. MP3 Mpakeni Primary School-The matter was brought to our attention and is being investigated;
14. MP 5 Lwaleng Primary school- The matter was brought to our attention and was investigated. There was no evidence found to substantiate the allegations. The parents and their lawyers are not cooperating with us despite our numerous requests for a meeting with them. The educator was also found not guilty by a court owing to lack of evidence;
Northern Cape
15. NC1 Laerskool Orange-Noord - The matter was brought to our attention and was investigated. A disciplinary hearing will take place on 16 and 17 November 2017;
North West
16. NW1 Poifo Primary School - The matter was brought to our attention and was investigated. A disciplinary hearing was finalised, the educator was found guilty and given a sanction of a striking off which was suspended for 10 years and a fine of R10 000.00
The rest of the reports not referred to herein did not come to our attention, we were unaware thereof and we will be following up on them in due course.
2. The question needs to be directed to the relevant employers, who are the Heads of Provincial Education Departments, for details and further responses.
05 October 2017 - NW2678
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What is the total number of learners who (a) registered for Grade 1, (b) completed Grade 9 and (c) completed Grade 12 in each province in the period 1 January 1996 up to 31 December 2016?
Reply:
(a),(b),(c)
The table link below shows the total number of Grade 1 learners registered between 1997 and 2005, the total number of learners in Grade 10 (completed Grade 9) in 2006-2014 and the total number of learners completed Grade 12 in 2008-2016, per province.
Based on the cohort of learners in Grade 1 in 1997, the table aligns the same cohort of learners in Grade 10, in 2006 and the same cohort of learners in Grade 12, in 2008.
Note:
- What should not be done though, is to divide Grade 12 passes in one year (for instance 2016) by Grade 1 enrolments twelve years previously (for instance 2004) to obtain a statistic on survival to Grade 12. One key problem with this approach is that levels of repetition in Grade 1 are high, meaning one double counts learners in the denominator.
- It must also be noted that a great number of learners also enrol in TVET colleges and that others attend AET classes after completing Grade 9 which forms part of the Higher Education and Training Sector.
- With regard to (b), Repeaters in Grade 10 were included in the statistics of number of completed Grade 9 learners.
- With regard to (c), the analysis includes only full-time Grade 12 passes in the public examination. Those figures exclude Grade 12 learners writing private examinations (in particular those of the Independent Examinations Board) and part-time learners in the public system who accumulate sufficient credits to obtain a Grade 12 pass.
Link: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2678TABLE.pdf
Source: SNAP 1997 -2016
Note 1: ?? Indicate non submission of dataset
05 October 2017 - NW2322
Tarabella - Marchesi, Ms NI to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)With reference to each province, (a) what is the deadline for schools to order textbooks from their provincial department and (b) what number of schools did not order textbooks by the deadline; (2) for each school that did not order textbooks, (a) what is the name of the school and (b) on what date was the catalogue for orders made available to the specified school; (3) what measures has each provincial department put in place to ensure that textbooks are ordered by schools that have not met the deadline?
Reply:
1. (a) In accordance with the National LTSM Sector Plan, textbooks orders have to be placed by 30 June of each year. Provinces and schools are expected to align the placement of orders to this date. The dates set by each Provincial Education Department (PED) is provided in the table below:
Province |
Deadline to order textbooks |
EC |
30 September 2016. |
FS |
30 June 2017 |
GP |
23 June 2017 |
KZN |
15 May 2017. 23 June 2017 for Section 21 (1)(c) schools |
LP |
28 April 2017 |
MP |
11 August 2017 |
NC |
30 June 2107. |
NW |
22 June 2017 |
WC |
19 June 2017 |
(b) All Section 20 schools and Section 21(1) (c) schools that opted for central procurement through their respective Provincial Education Departments
placed their orders by the deadlines as determined by their PEDs.
2. (a) (b) Please see list of schools for EC, LP and NW attached as Annexure A.
Province |
Names of school that did not order by deadline |
The date when catalogue was made available to schools |
EC |
The list of schools is attached see the link: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2322List_of_School-171005.pdf |
End of June 2017 |
FS |
All Section 20 schools ordered by the deadline |
Section 21 schools order on their own. |
GP |
All 2196 schools in the province had not placed orders by 23 June 2017. There are no schools name provided. |
Catalogues were distributed to all schools on 26 May 2017 |
KZN |
A total of 48 schools are recorded as non-compliant for school-based procurement of textbooks. There are no names provided for the schools. |
Catalogues were distributed to schools on 03 May 2017. |
LP |
The list of schools is attached see the link: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2322LP-_171005.pdf |
The catalogue has been made available on the 14 August and the LDoE will place orders with publishers on 18 August. |
MP |
None |
30 June 2017 |
NC |
All schools ordered by the deadline |
The catalogue for ordering was available from end of May 2017. |
NW |
The list of schools is attached see the link: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2322NW-171005.pdf |
Catalogues made available from the 12th of June 2017. |
WC |
Deadline 29 May to 19 June 2017 |
Not provided |
3. For Section 21 schools that did not opt for central procurement, the following measures have been put in place by provinces to ensure that textbooks are ordered by schools that have not met the deadline:
Province |
Measures put in place |
Eastern Cape |
Co-ordinators were sensitised of the challenge of schools that did not order textbooks by the deadline and they were central in the re-direction of the surplus books to schools that did not place orders. The warehouse also submitted a list of books available at the warehouse due to rejections/wrong orders, etc. and some of the schools that did not place orders benefitted from the rejections and wrong orders. Schools that did not place orders have been directed to place orders with the 2018 orders. |
Gauteng |
All 200 schools without section 21.1c function have centrally procured textbooks and stationery for the 2018 academic year. Of the total of 1864 Section 21.1c schools, 1323 have submitted proof of orders to Districts and a total of 541 schools are still outstanding. The province receives weekly procurement reports from Districts for schools with section 21.1c function. As at Friday 11 August 2017. Districts continue to follow up with the 541 outstanding schools. |
KwaZulu-Natal |
The Department has issued an instruction that it would assume the responsibility of placing textbook orders on behalf of all schools which were found not to be complying with the procurement deadlines. In these instances, Head-Office has written to District Directors to intervene and progress is updated on a weekly basis to ensure accountability for every school. The District Offices are to solicit requisitions from the non-complying schools so that orders can be placed centrally on behalf of these schools. |
Limpopo |
The LDoE had several meetings with all stakeholders to ensure delivery deadlines for the 2018 academic year are met. Service Level Agreements have been signed with publishers/stationery manufacturers and SAPO, the appointed delivery agent responsible for textbook distribution in the province. The LTSM process for the 2018 academic year was communicated in circular S70. Districts have been instructed to do a verification exercise as some schools did not require additional top up textbooks. |
Northern Cape |
All schools placed orders. Schools are afforded an opportunity until mid-August 2017 to adjust/amend their orders through District Offices. |
North West |
All outstanding schools are being assisted |
Mpumalanga |
All schools submitted their orders therefore there was no need for further measures to be in place. |
Western Cape |
The Circuit Managers have the responsibility to monitor the 144 schools to ensure that textbooks are available to learners. The oversight responsibility resides with the District Directors and Chief Director: Districts. |
The Department of Basic Education has obtained the above information as provided by provinces. The Honourable Member is advised to direct questions to provinces for further detail and outstanding information.
05 October 2017 - NW2788
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What number of schools in the country currently have asbestos roofs?
Reply:
NO |
PROVINCES |
NUMBER OF SCHOOLS ROOFED WITH ASBESTOS SHEETS |
1 |
EASTERN CAPE |
1 139 |
2 |
FREE STATE |
5 |
3 |
GAUTENG |
29 |
4 |
KWAZULU-NATAL |
918 |
5 |
LIMPOPO |
39 |
6 |
MPUMALANGA |
0 |
7 |
NORTH WEST |
10 |
8 |
NORTHERN CAPE |
30 |
9 |
WESTERN CAPE |
892 |
05 October 2017 - NW2261
Stubbe, Mr DJ to ask the Minister of Basic Education
With reference to her reply to question 1851 on 6 July 2017 in which she stated that Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has been sourced in some provinces to provide for learners in braille, (a) what is the nature of the specified ICT and (b) which schools in each province have utilised the ICT?
Reply:
(a) A survey that was conducted in 2016 in all 22 schools for visual impairment in the country provided the following information with regard the provision of ICT sourced in some provinces to provide for learners who use Braille. According to the survey, the following ICT were sourced for schools in each province to expand access to the textbooks from the National Catalogue and reading texts in refreshable braille or audio format, or for production of braille at school-level:
- Braille embossers
- Graphic braille embossers;
- Refreshable braille readers;
- Classroom equipped with CCTV and magnification camera;
- Laptops;
- Cameras with keyboards;
- Tablets loaded with textbooks from the National Catalogue;
- Digital talking book readers
(b) The schools that have procured and utilised the ICT equipment in each Province are as follows:
Name of school |
Province |
Khanyisa |
EC |
Filadelfia |
GP |
Prinshof |
GP |
Sibonile |
GP |
Open Air |
KZN |
Bosele |
LP |
Letaba |
LP |
Rivoni |
LP |
Setotolwane |
LP |
Siloe |
LP |
Tshilidzini |
LP |
Silindokuhle |
MP |
Re- Tlameleng |
NC |
Christiana |
NW |
Athlone |
WC |
Pioneer School |
WC |
05 October 2017 - NW2774
Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Basic Education
With reference to the undertaking by a certain person (name and details furnished) that the building of a school would commence in 2017 and be operational in 2019, (a) what monetary amount has been allocated to the building of the specified school, (b) on what date will (i) construction commence and (ii) the school be opened, (c) what will the capacity of the school be and (d) will it be a primary school or a high school?
Reply:
a) A budget of R 69 364 000.00 has been allocated for the construction of New Birch Acres Primary School.
b) (i) It is anticipated that construction will commence on 24/10/2017.
(ii) Anticipated opening date for the completed school is 12/01/2019.
c) The capacity of the school is 1 200 leaners.
d) A Primary School.