Questions and Replies
23 April 2018 - NW530
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
With regard to the Gillooly’s interchange in Gauteng and applications for billboard structures along roads, what is the total number of applications that (a) have been received in each month, (b)(i) were approved in each month and (ii) the reasons for approval in each case (c)(i) were rejected in each month and (ii) what are the reasons for rejection in each case (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15, (bbb) 2015-16 and (ccc) 2016-17 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2017?
Reply:
Despite the presence of various billboard structures at Gillooly’s Interchange, none of these where applied for with SANRAL nor approved by SANRAL. Please see detailed answers to questions below.
(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.
(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.
(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.
(b)(i)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(b)(ii)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.
(c)(i)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.
(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.
(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.
(c)(ii)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL
(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL
(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.
23 April 2018 - NW118
Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Health
(1)Whether, with regard to the (a) Warmbad (Bela-Bela) Hospital, (b) F H Odendaal Hospital, (c) Thabazimbi Hospital and (d) Ellisras Hospital in Limpopo, the post of chief executive officer (CEO) has been filled at each specified hospital; if not, (i) why not, (ii) since which date is the relevant hospital without a permanent CEO and (iii) by which date will the specified posts be advertised and filled;if so, what are the (aa) names, (bb) qualifications and experience and (cc) term of each CEO’s contract; (2) what are the relevant details with regard to the term, qualifications and experience of the acting CEO in each case?
Reply:
See attached.
23 April 2018 - NW218
Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
What is the (a) total number of dams in the country, (b) exact location of each dam, (c) capacity of each dam, (d) date on which each dam became operational, (e) current level of each dam and (f) name of the owner of each dam?
Reply:
THE MINISTER OF WATER AND SANITATION
(a) Table below gives a breakdown summary of total number of dams in the country as well as ownership status as per dam register published on 31 December 2017.
Ownership sector |
Total number of registered dams |
State |
854 |
Department of Water & Sanitation |
322 |
Municipalities |
333 |
Other state departments |
76 |
Water Boards |
123 |
Private sector |
4 657 |
Mines, industries, business |
335 |
Agriculture |
4 322 |
Total |
5 511 |
(b) Dam location per Province is given in the table below. A detailed location of each dam is supplemented in Columns G to O of the dam register, submitted as Annexure A.
Province |
Total number of registered dams |
North West |
92 |
Gauteng |
187 |
Limpopo |
458 |
Kwazulu-Natal |
1090 |
Eastern Cape |
789 |
Western Cape |
1572 |
Northern Cape |
130 |
Mpumalanga |
675 |
Free State |
518 |
Total |
5 511 |
(c) The table below gives a cumulative summary of dam capacities per ownership sector. From the table it can be seen that state dams store 94% of all available water resources in the country, whereas private sector store the remaining 6%.
Ownership sector |
Total capacity in (m3 x 109) |
% total capacity |
State |
31.35 |
94 |
Department of Water & Sanitation |
29.35 |
88.0 |
Municipalities |
1.0 |
3.0 |
Other state departments |
0.2 |
0.6 |
Water Boards |
0.8 |
2.4 |
Private sector |
2.06 |
6.0 |
Mines, industries, business |
0.5 |
1.5 |
Agriculture |
1.56 |
4.5 |
Total |
33.41 |
100 |
(d) Dam register is submitted as an Annexure A of this reply, for all practical purpose, the date in which the dam became operational is taken as the date of completion which is given in Column R of the dam register.
(e) Dam levels are submitted as Annexure B of the reply. It should be noted that only dam levels owned by my Department are submitted. My Department is unfortunately not in a position to furnish levels of privately owned dams.
(f) Owner's details are given in Column AD of the register
23 April 2018 - NW754
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the Amathole District Municipality in the Eastern Cape in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Amathole District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW756
Ketabahle, Ms V to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the OR Tambo District Municipality in the Eastern Cape in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for OR Tambo District Municipality for the period 2016/17 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW757
Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the Alfred Nzo District Municipality in the Eastern Cape in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Alfred Nzo District Municipality for the period 2016/17 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW1035
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
With reference to her reply to question 266 on 20 March 2018, (a) what is the name of each (i) of the 955 young persons who were incubated in the Groen Sebenza programme, (ii) person who is now employed, (iii) organisation that has employed the specified persons, and (iv) person who is still unemployed; (b) what are the reasons that they are still unemployed and (c) what actions is her Department taking to ensure employment of those who are still unemployed?
Reply:
(a) (i) (ii) (iii) and (iv) Attached find the spreadsheet as an Annexure containing the names of young persons incubated through the Groen Sebenza Programme, including those employed by different organisations and those unemployed.
(b) Some chose to further their studies while others were self-employed at the end of the programme. However, as indicated previpusly, the ongoing Tracer Study will provide the status quo in this regard.
(c) Opportunities are shared with young people as and when they arise through various platforms.
---ooOoo---
23 April 2018 - NW770
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the uMgungundlovu District Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for uMgungundlovu District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW774
Ntlangwini, Ms EN to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the uMkhanyakude District Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for uMkhanyakude District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW776
Matiase, Mr NS to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the iLembe District Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for iLembe District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW791
Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality in the Western Cape in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW792
Moteka, Mr PG to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the Cape Winelands District Municipality in the Western Cape in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Cape Winelands District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW793
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the Overberg District Municipality in the Western Cape in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Overberg District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW1022
Moteka, Mr PG to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What (a) number of (i) high schools and (ii) primary schools offer healthcare services, (b) is the (i) location and (ii) name of each specified school, (c) health services are on offer, (d) is the cost of the health services and (e) is the number of employees in each profession who provide the health services at each school?
Reply:
(a), (b) and (c) The Integrated School Health Programme (ISHP) is implemented by school health teams employed by the Department of Health (DoH) in provinces. The reach of the services and the package provided, is dependent on the availability and composition of these school health teams in each geographic area. The Department of Basic Education receives signed off collated data on the number of learners that have received services in the preceding quarter from the national Department of Health. The list of schools is not provided.
(d) and (e) The cost of the school health services as well as the number of employees are the responsibility of each respective Provincial Education Department. This information is not available at DBE.
23 April 2018 - NW751
Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
(a)What number of persons has (i) his department and (ii) the entities reporting to him trained in the past five years, (b) for what purpose was each individual trained, (c) what was the cost of the training of each individual, (d) in which position was each individual who was trained employed and (e) what was the reason that each specified individual was not employed following training?
Reply:
a) The number of persons trained over the past five years are:
|
|
14 449 |
22 920 |
b) The purpose for the training can be summarised as follows:
|
|
Personal development plan (PDP): the PDPs of employees are informed by the key result areas of the individuals’ performance agreements. The employee and supervisor identify performance gaps as well as appropriate training and development interventions to address those gaps. The purpose of these training and development intervention seek to enhance the employees’ skills and competencies. The training interventions range from managerial, administrative to technical/professional training. |
|
c) The training costs vary depending on the selected course (i.e. career path), the level of qualification (i.e. unskilled, semi-skilled, specialist) and its duration. The average cost can be summarised as follows:
|
|
R 5 603,36 |
R 12 163,49 |
d) The positions can be summarised as follows:
|
|
The training for departmental employees represents officials from the lowest to the highest level in the department. |
|
e) The reasons that each specified individual was not employed following training are:
|
|
Not applicable since the training was for departmental employees. |
For the non-permanent employees (e.g. learnerships, internships) that could not be absorbed within the various entities, the reasons include but are not limited to
|
23 April 2018 - NW545
Matiase, Mr NS to ask the Minister of Health
(a) What is the (i) name, (ii) location and (iii) patient capacity of each clinic which does not offer pharmaceutical services and (b) why?
Reply:
There is no clinic that does not offer pharmaceutical services in this country.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW706
Vos, Mr J to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) Whether her department has a sexual harassment and assault policy in place; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will her department have such a policy in place; if so, (i) how are reports investigated and (ii) what are the details of the consequence management and sanctions stipulated by the policy; (2) (a) what is the total number of incidents of sexual harassment and assault that have been reported in her department (i) in each of the past three financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017, (b) what number of cases were (i) opened and concluded, (ii) withdrawn and (iii) remain open based on the incidents and (c) what sanctions were issued for each person who was found to have been guilty?
Reply:
1. Yes, the department has a Sexual Harassment Policy in place.
a) Not Applicable
b) (i) and (ii) not applicable
2. The department did not have any incidents of sexual harassment and assault reported in each of the past three financial years, including 1 April 2017.
a) (i) and (ii) not applicable
b) (i), (ii) and (iii) not applicable
c) Not Applicable
23 April 2018 - NW925
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether he has been informed that Advocate (details furnished) continues to serve as the Interim Board Chairperson of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) after being appointed as a Judge of the High Court; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) Whether he has found that Advocate (details furnished) service on the Interim Board of Prasa constitutes a breach of the Judicial Code of Conduct?
Reply:
1. I have been advised that the Judge was appointed as the Chairperson of the Interim Board of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) in October 2017 prior to her appointment by the then President of the Republic of South Africa as a Judge of the Gauteng Division of the High Court. Her appointment as a Judge was effective from 01 January 2018 but due to her position as the Chairperson of the Interim Board of PRASA, the Judge did not assume her position as a Judge of the Gauteng Division of the High Court. She requested the Judge President of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, to request me to approach the President with a request that her appointment date be deferred to 1 April 2018. Whilst she was the Chairperson of the Interim Board of PRASA, the Judge never sat nor carried any judicial functions. I have been informed that she has subsequently resigned as Chairperson of the Interim PRASA Board with effect from 16 March 2018.
2. It is not within my purview to determine whether a conduct of a Judge constitutes a breach of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The responsibility to determine whether a Judge has committed a breach of the Code of Judicial Conduct is vested upon the Judicial Conduct Committee established in terms of section 8 of the Judicial Service Commission Act, 1994 (Act no 9 of 1994) (JSC Act). Additionally, Article 2 of that Code of Judicial Conduct is clear as it provides that ‘any wilful or gross negligent breach of the Code is a ground upon which a complaint against a Judge may be lodged in terms of section 14(4)(b) of the JSC Act’. This simply means that if any determination has to be made about the conduct of the Judge, a complaint that complies with the provisions of section 14 of the JSC Act, must first be lodged with the Judicial Conduct Committee setting out the grounds upon which the complaint is based. There is currently no complaint lodged with the Judicial Conduct Committee about Judge’s conduct.
23 April 2018 - NW968
Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development
(1)(a) What number of (i) case backlogs does the Competition Commission have and (ii) days has each case been backlogged for, (b) what was the average time line, in days, from receiving a complaint to resolving a case in (i) 2015, (ii) 2016 and (iii) 2017 and (c) how does the commission monitor the (i) settlement agreements reached and (ii) progress on each agreement; (2) have any cases been referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for prosecution; if so, what are the details of the cases
Reply:
1. (a) What number of (i) case backlogs does the Competition Commission have and (ii) days has each case been backlogged for, (b) what was the average time line, in days, from receiving a complaint to resolving a case in (i) 2015, (ii) 2016 and (iii) 2017 and (c) how does the commission monitor the (i) settlement agreements reached and (ii) progress on each agreement
The Competition Commission advises that it has a total of 64 cases on backlog in cartel matters, with the periods of backlog differing by case, with the complexity of cases largely driving the period of the backlog.
The following table provides information on the average time taken for different cartel investigations as well as enforcement/other abuse of dominance and restrictive practices, for the past three years:
Category |
Average no. of days to complete all cases |
||
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
|
Cartels |
1044 days |
684 days |
1061 days |
Enforcement Other- abuse of dominance, restrictive practices |
396 days |
329 days |
254 days |
All settlement agreements concluded between the Competition Commission (“the Commission”) and respondent firms are presented to the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) for confirmation as consent orders of the Tribunal in terms of section 49D of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”). Once so confirmed by the Tribunal, a consent order may in terms of section 64 of the Act, be served, executed and enforced as if it were an order of the High Court.
Where a settlement agreement contains an on-going commitment or undertaking by a respondent firm to pay penalties or to perform remedial action, performance is monitored by the legal and economic teams of the Commission.
(2) Have any cases been referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for prosecution; if so, what are the details of the cases?
The Commission has referred certain cases to the relevant criminal investigation agency for criminal investigation. The Commissioner advises that further details of the cases cannot be disclosed at this stage because they are subject to ongoing criminal investigation.
-END-
23 April 2018 - NW786
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the John TaoloGaetsewe District Municipality in the Northern Cape in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for John TaoloGaetsewe District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW567
Mokoena, Mr L to ask the Minister of Health
(a) What is the (i) name, (ii) location and (iii) patient capacity of each clinic that does not have administrative support and (b) what is the reason for this in each case?
Reply:
(a) All clinics have administrative support.
(b) Not applicable.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW972
Mbabama, Ms TM to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture
How much land does (a) his department and/or the entity reporting to him (i) own, (ii) have exclusive rights to and / or (iii) lease from the State to (aa) use and / or (bb) occupy? NW1065E
Reply:
(a) (i) the department does not own land
(ii) South African resources agency has ownership of the land listed below:
ITEM NO. |
PRO PERTY NAME |
LACATION |
PROPERTY EXTENT |
PROPERTY USE/INTENDED USE |
EASTERN CAPE |
||||
1 |
The Lookout |
Kirkwood District |
3 947m2 |
Memorial and Grave site |
2 |
Old Congregational Church |
Cradock |
1 753m2 |
Church used by the local community |
3 |
Mooimeisiesfontein |
Riebeeck East |
69 156 m2 |
Main building leased; Repurposing concepts in process of being determined for socio-economic benefit for the community |
4 |
Old Gaol |
Grahams town |
3 736 m2 |
SAHRA office; Portion of the property vacant for leasing |
5 |
Old Residency |
King Williams Town |
10746 m2 |
Vacant property; Best use concepts in process of being determined for State use with Dept. of Public Works |
6 |
Concentration Camp Garden of Remembrance |
Aliwal North |
5 312m² |
Memorial and Cemetery |
FREE STATE |
||||
7 |
Burger Monument |
Edenburg |
52 589m² |
Memorial |
KWAZULU NATAL |
||||
8 |
Old Fort |
Durban |
20 703m² |
Public Open Space |
9 |
Blarney Cottage |
Richmond |
2.4571ha |
Vacant; Engagements in process with the Richmond Municipality to determine best use concepts for socio-economic benefits to the community |
10 |
Birthplace of Louis Botha |
Greytown |
645m² |
Memorial |
11 |
Spioenkop Battlefield |
Bergville |
46.7127ha |
Memorial |
12 |
Elandslaagte Memorial |
Klip River District |
149m² |
Memorial |
13 |
Piet Retief Grave |
Ulundi |
4307m² |
Grave site,memorial |
LIMPOPO |
||||
14 |
Moordfift Monument |
Mokopane |
132m² |
Memorial |
15 |
Old English Fort |
Polokwane |
18323m² |
Memorial |
16 |
Verdun Ruins |
Soutpansberg |
3789m² |
Archeological site |
17 |
Mapochs Caves |
Roossenekal |
63.1100ha |
Archeological site |
MPUMALANGA |
||||
18 |
Krugerhof |
Waterval Onder |
440m² |
Museum |
NORTH WEST |
||||
19 |
Old Powder Magazine |
Potchefstroom |
70m² |
Monument |
20 |
Old Fort & Cemetery |
Potchefstroom |
3 735m² |
Memorial, Cemetery |
21 |
Site of Livingstone`s House |
Marico District |
343m² |
Ruins, natural site |
NORTHERN CAPE |
||||
22 |
Union Masonic |
Kimberely |
426m² |
Use of building by local church |
WESTERN CAPE |
||||
23 |
Granite lodge |
Cape Town CBD |
1505m² |
SAHRA Head Office |
24 |
Wouter Wessels Vault |
Green point |
331m² |
Vault |
25 |
Vlakenberg Manor |
Observatory |
1.1456ha |
Leased for portion of a hotel and restaurant |
26 |
Van Riebeeck`s Hedge |
Bishopscourt |
19 151m² |
Museum; Repurposing of property for conference facilities |
27 |
Het Posthuys Museum |
Muizenberg |
1 977m² |
Museum; Repurposing of property for conference facilities |
28 |
Welcome Cottage |
Glencairn |
2 885m² |
Repurposing for best use concept in process; Engagement with DPW for potential State use |
29 |
Hugo Family Vault |
Simons Town |
1 042m² |
Vault |
30 |
Dal Josafat Farm |
Paarl |
232.5850ha |
Buildings are leased; Repurposing of property for socio-economic benefit; Engagement with DPW for the best use concept; Engagement with local municipality for the best use concepts |
31 |
Onderdal School |
Paarl |
8 728m² |
SAHRA site office; Repurposing of property in process with DPW. |
32 |
Kleinbosch Cemetery |
Paarl |
1 065m² |
Cemetery |
33 |
Groenenberg School |
Wellington |
8 565m² |
Vacant; Repurposing concepts for community benefit in process with DPW |
34 |
Tulbagh Erf 56 |
Tulbagh |
4 479m² |
Community Vegetable garden |
35 |
Tulbagh Erf 255 |
Tulbagh |
4 746m² |
Open Garden for Community use |
36 |
Struisbaai Fisherman Cottages |
Struisbaai |
17 043m² |
Repurposing of property into holiday cottages for leasing |
The head office which housed the Department and the following entities National Film and Video Foundation (NFVF); national Heritage Council (NHC) and the Pansalb are leasing their buildings from the Private persons.
All other entities occupy government properties.
23 April 2018 - NW697
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications
Whether BrandSA conducted any studies to determine the impact of the new visa regulations on the country’s tourism; if not, why not; if so, what are the (a) relevant details and (b) findings?
Reply:
No, (a) and (b) because Brand South Africa interfaces with and relies on research conducted by the Department of Tourism and South African Tourism.
23 April 2018 - NW89
Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) (a) Why was the Northern Cape chosen for the Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) migration roll-out and (b) what is the progress in this regard;(2) what are the major challenges that her department faces with regard to the DDT roll-out in the (a) country and (b) Northern Cape; (3) what number of set-top boxes (a) have been installed and (b) must still be installed in each province; (4) how far is her department behind schedule with the DTT migration roll-out; (5) how does the Government intend to support content development for the digital space created by digital migration and the roll-out of DTT?
Reply:
1. (a) The Northern Cape hosts part of the international Square Kilometre Array (SKA), which is an international radio telescope project undertaken in collaboration with other countries including the UK and Australia. Analogue television transmissions produce high levels of interference and as such they have to be switched off and replaced with digital television transmissions via satellite.
(b) To date, all qualifying households in the core towns within a Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have been connected to the digital platform. Subsequent to the installations of devices to all households’ in the core towns of the SKA; including Carnarvon, Vanwyksvlei, Brandvlei, Williston and Vorsburg; analogue transmission services have since been switched off. However, analogue transmission services could not be switched in other areas of the SKA due to households that do not qualify for government subsidised decoders.
2. (a) The major challenges relates to the lack of resources mainly funding.
(b) Majority of the areas in the Northern Cape are covered by Satellite network and currently, there is no stock to distribute to the qualifying registered households.
3. A table below present the statistics as at 31 March 2018.
PROVINCES |
ESTIMATED INDIGENTS HOUSEHOLDS |
(a) TOTAL INSTALLATIONS |
(b) BALANCE |
Northern Cape |
111,559 |
41,687 |
69,872 |
Free State |
341,306 |
104,051 |
237,255 |
Limpopo |
562,980 |
24,686 |
538,294 |
Mpumalanga |
455,867 |
40,292 |
415,575 |
KwaZulu Natal |
860,786 |
40,399 |
820,387 |
Eastern Cape |
538,633 |
10,946 |
527,687 |
North West |
382,692 |
37,319 |
345,373 |
Western Cape |
508,888 |
0 |
508,888 |
Gauteng |
1,237,289 |
0 |
1,237,289 |
TOTALS |
5,000,000 |
299,380 |
4,700,620 |
4. The department has not met the target in terms of
(a) the migration of five million qualifying households to receive government subsidised decoders;
(b) the migration of the majority of unsubscribed citizen who rely on the retail market to acquire migration devices
5. The Department is a policy maker and does not implement programmes on the ground. The department will ensure collaboration with relevant stakeholders such as the SABC and the industry to advocate for content development to feed the channels to be made available by digital migration. In 2018/19 the Department will develop a South African Audio-Visual content strategy to support the digital migration.
23 April 2018 - NW698
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications
What are the relevant details of the campaigns that BrandSA will run in the first two quarters of the 2018-19 financial year, (b) where will the campaigns be run, (c) what number of persons will be reached and (d) what is the estimated budget in each case?
Reply:
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(i) Play Your Part programme: programme designed to promote active citizenship amongst South African’s a) Partnership with Sunday Times Generation Next which includes a conference and a media programme b) Play Your Part programme through activations, radio, online TV |
|
|
|
(ii) Constitutional awareness: designed to promote Constitutional awareness as part of Outcome 14 requirements. a) National Marketing campaign developed and executed on various media platforms (TV, radio and digital platforms) b) On the ground stakeholder engagements in Western Cape, Eastern Cape, Limpopo, Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal) |
|
|
|
(iii) Promotion of the Nation Brand on domestic and international platforms: promotion of the country and its positive attributes. a) Marketing campaign promoting the Nation Brand targeting traffic at Airports pre and during the BRICS Summit. b) Marketing campaign promoting the Nation Brand at Airports Telecommunication Union (ITU) Conference c) Media partnership support |
|
|
(iii)R 2 500 000 |
(iv) Domestic and international Research Analysis: analysis on performance of the Nation Brand produced and communicated online and through various PR driven media platforms a) SA Inc project consultation on investor experience and Perceptions with business from the EU region. b) Research engagement with BRICS c) Pan-African Nation Brand University Dialogue. |
|
5 000 000 |
iv) R3 500 000 |
(v) Stakeholder Programmes in collaboration with business, govt & civil society
|
|
Estimated Reach 5 000 000 |
|
(vi) International Reputation Management Campaign to promote country reputation |
|
|
|
vii) International Stakeholder relations engagements and Global South Africans Programme (South Africans in the diaspora) |
|
|
|
viii) International & Domestic Media: CNN, BBC, CNBC Africa, EURONEWS, Local Radio, TV, Print and Online to support projects |
North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Middle East, South Africa |
|
|
23 April 2018 - NW695
Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) Whether BrandSA conducted any studies to determine whether the persistent drought experienced in large parts of South Africa contributed in any way to a decline in the number of international tourists visiting the country; if so, what (a) are the details and (b) were the outcomes of the studies; (2) Whether BrandSA plays any role in managing the depiction of the water crisis (a) in the foreign media and/or (b) on their website; if so, (i) how many media statements relating to the drought has BrandSA released (aa) in each of the past three financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2017 and (ii) what are the details of any campaigns launched in this regard?
Reply:
1. Brand South Africa did not conduct any studies.
2. (a) Brand South Africa does not play a role in managing the depiction of the water crisis in (a) foreign media and/or (b) website
(i) Not applicable
(aa) Not Applicable
(bb) Not Applicable
(ii) Not Applicable. No campaigns launched.
23 April 2018 - NW927
Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Health
Is the Nelson Mandela Children's Hospital fully operational; if not why not?
Reply:
YES, with most of its services.
In line with the phasing-in approach as agreed with all stakeholders including the National Department of Health, the following services are now operational at the Nelson Mandela Children's Hospital:
Radiology - MRI scans, CT scans, X-rays and ultrasound services
Day Ward - Day admissions for MRI and CT scan patients
Anaesthesiology Unit - General Anaesthesia for Radiology patients
NICU - Admission of Neonatal ICU patients
PICU - Admission of Paediatric ICU patients
Dialysis - Peritoneal and Haemo dialysis
Cardiology - Cardiac Diagnostics and pre-surgical work up for cardiac
surgery patients
Pharmacy - medicines and medical supplies for out-patients and inpatients
The Neonatal, Maternal and Child Health department is currently commissioning theatres and surgical services, and recruiting staff for the units. The following surgical services will be available in 2018/19: Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Paediatric Neuro Surgery, Paediatric Cardiac Surgery and Paediatric General Surgery.
END.
23 April 2018 - NW951
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether, with reference to the restaurant and visitors complex that burnt down in November 2016 in the Tsitsikamma National Park, Storms River, any steps have been taken to rebuild the facility; if not, why not; if so, (a) what steps and (b) what are the timelines?
Reply:
a) The planning for the Tsitsikamma restaurant precinct development has been completed following the fire in November 2016 and is ready to be subjected to a tender process. After the restaurant was destroyed by the fire, SANParks decided to upgrade the entire restaurant precinct to include all infrastructure.
The project scope includes the following:
- Restaurant that accommodates 250 seats
- Curio shop with offices and stores
- Information centre as first point of arrival for visitors
- Multi use Boat house
- General Amenities for visitors that includes play areas, picnic areas as well as beach showers and dressing areas
- Bulk Services (Electricity, water and sewer)
b) It is envisaged that the tender and contracting process will take six months from May 2018 to October 2018. Construction is scheduled to commence in January 2019 after the peak tourism season. The estimated construction period is 18 months due to the difficult site and visitor management requirements, with estimated completion in September 2020.
The clients are being serviced from provided marquee since 10th December 2016
---ooOoo---
23 April 2018 - NW531
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
With regard to the Gillooly’s interchange in Gauteng and the applications for billboards erected on the SA National Roads Agency SOC Ltd properties such as bridges, (a) what is the total number of (i) applications that have been supported in each month, (ii) objections that have been lodged with the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and (b) what were the reasons for (i) supporting and (ii) objecting the applications (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15, (bbb) 2015-16 and (ccc) 2016-17 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2017?
Reply:
Despite the presence of various billboards on bridges owned by SANRAL in Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality, none of these where applied for with SANRAL nor approved by SANRAL. These billboards are illegal and should be removed, but SANRAL is prevented in doing so by the dispute resolution mechanisms provided for in Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act with Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (they illegally approved these billboards) and litigation relating to similar billboards with one of the transgressors. Please see detailed answers to questions below.
a) (i)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(a) (ii)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = 2 objections lodged by SANRAL
(bbb) 2015-2016 = 13 objections lodged by SANRAL
(ccc) 2016-2017 = 22 objections lodged by SANRAL
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = 12 objections lodged by SANRAL
(b) (i)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.
(b) (ii)
(aaa) 2014-2015 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)
(bbb) 2015-2016 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)
(ccc) 2016-2017 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)
(bb) since 1 April 2017 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)
23 April 2018 - NW1023
Sonti, Ms NP to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What (a) number of (i) high schools and (ii) primary schools in each province do not offer healthcare services and (b) is the (i) location and (ii) name of each specified school?
Reply:
(a) and (b) The Intergrated School Health Programme (ISHP) is implemented by school health teams employed by the Department of Health (DoH) in provinces. The reach of the services and the package provided, is dependent on the availability and composition of these school health teams in each geographic area. The Department of Basic Education receives signed off collated data on the number of learners that have received services in the preceding quarter from the national Department of Health. The list of schools is not provided.
23 April 2018 - NW785
Mathys, Ms L to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the Nkangala District Municipality in Mpumalanga in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
The ten leading causes for admission to a health care facility in Nkangala District Municipality in 2016/17 are:
- HIV and AIDS
- TB
- Lower respiratory infections
- Hypertensive heart diseases
- Ischaemic heart diseases
- Cerebrovascular diseases
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- Diabetes
- Diarrheal diseases
- Road injuries
END.
23 April 2018 - NW784
Rawula, Mr T to ask the Minister of Health
What are the ten leading causes for admission to a healthcare facility in the GertSibande District Municipality in Mpumalanga in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
The ten leading causes for admission to a health care facility in Gert Sibande District Municipality in 2016/17 are:
- HIV and AIDS
- TB
- Lower respiratory infections
- Hypertensive heart diseases
- Cerebrovascular diseases
- Diabetes
- Diarrheal diseases
- Road injuries
- Meningitis/Encephalitis
- Nephritis/Nephrosis
END.
23 April 2018 - NW581
Nolutshungu, Ms N to ask the Minister of Transport
By what date will his department scrap the failing e-toll system that privatises public roads and which motorists are refusing to pay?
Reply:
As things stand, there are no plans to scrap the e-toll system. However there are ongoing discussions at National and Provincial governments. Once decision has been reached and finalised it will be communicated.
20 April 2018 - NW1033
Paulsen, Mr N M to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
What is the (a) size of the land that his department owns at the Fort Cox Agricultural College and (b) land used other than for the training of college students; (b) has his department leased out and/or sold parts of the land to anyone in the past 24 years; if so, (a) to whom has the land been leased and/or sold and (b) what were/are the terms of the lease/sale agreements?
Reply:
DAFF’S RESPONSE:
- Currently the land owned by Fort Cox is close to 843 ha, which is the balance of about 750 ha that were given to the community of Cwaru as settlement.
Overall land utilisation at fort Cox forms part of student training, with 41 ha of irrigable land and 60 ha of dry land together with 33 camps used for grazing of animals. However, it must be stated that there are people that have encroached on the North-West side of the land, which is related to fences not being in place, as expected.
- There is no land that has been leased nor sold to anyone for the period indicated. Thus no terms have ever been established, at all.
20 April 2018 - NW494
Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister of Energy
(a) What are the reason(s) that production at the Nuclear Energy Corporation’s facility at Pelindaba has been shut down, (b) on what date did production cease and (c) on what date is it expected to be restored; (2) (a) what has been the estimated total loss of income since the date of shutdown and (b) what percentage of the facility’s income is normally generated in foreign currency; (3) (a) what is the average monthly operating costs for the facility and (b) what will the total additional cost be to bring the facility back into production; (4) (a) who is to be held accountable for this shutdown and loss of income and (b) how will future shutdowns of this nature be prevented; (5) what actions have been undertaken to assist existing clients to find alternative sources of products normally produced at Pelindaba, particularly Technetium-99 generators for use in the field of nuclear medicine?
Reply:
The facility was temporarily shut down on 17 November 2017 as a result of non-adherence to some standard operating procedures (SOPs). Production trial runs commenced on 21 February 2018.
The estimated total revenue loss for NTP Radioisotopes (SOC) Ltd is about R250 million. 92.7% of the total revenue is generated in foreign currency. The average monthly fixed costs for NTP Radioisotopes (SOC) Ltd amount to R32 million.
The NTP Board commissioned an investigation to determine the root cause of the incident. Internal oversight for Quality Control, Quality Assurance, Nuclear Safety assurance will be strengthened throughout the organization and regular compliance and assurance exercise conducted.
20 April 2018 - NW940
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans
(1)What number of (a) poachers and (b) illegal immigrants were arrested by the SA National Defence Force (SANDF) members deployed in the Kruger National Park in each year since 1 January 2010; (2) what number of cases regarding (a) poachers and (b) illegal immigrants were referred to the SANDF by the (i) SA Police Service (SAPS) members deployed in the Kruger National Park and (ii) SA National Parks rangers at the Kruger National Park annually since 1 January 2010; (3) what number of successful prosecutions resulted from the above-mentioned arrests?
Reply:
S/No Suspects/Year Apprehended Wounded Killed Arrested Total per year
1 2010 0 0 0 0 0
2 2011 4 2 9 16 31
3 2012 8 3 7 33 51
4 2013 5 1 1 6 13
5 2014 14 4 2 19 39
6 2015 0 3 3 9 15
7 2016 0 5 2 22 29
8 2017 0 2 2 3 7
9 2018 0 0 1 2 3
TOTAL 31 20 27 110 188
(a) The above figures are concerned with only poaching suspects, (Op RHINO/Op HORIZON).
(b) Illegal immigrants apprehended are handed over to the SAPS immediately; therefore the statistics thereof are not in the SANDF domain.
Question 2: What number of cases regarding (a) poachers and illegal immigrants were referred to the SANDF by the (i) SA Police Service (SAPS) members deployed in the Kruger National Park and (ii) SA National Parks rangers at the Kruger National Park annually since 1 January 2010?
REPLY: None.
Question 3: What number of successful prosecutions resulted from the abovementioned arrests?
REPLY:
The South African Defence Force (SANDF) is deployed on the National Borders as one of the Government Departments charged with the responsibility to ensure border safeguarding and is therefore required to work in accord with the SAPS. Therefore the SANDF is obliged when poachers and/or illegal immigrants are arrested, to hand the alleged perpetrators over the SAPS immediately, as such the SANDF would not have a mandate to conduct any criminal investigation and therefore no statistical data is available within its domain.
All criminal investigations are investigated by the SAPS, whom after completion submit it to the National Prosecution Authority (NPA) for further processing.
20 April 2018 - NW980
Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
How much land does (a) her Department and (b) the entities reporting to her (i) own, (ii) have exclusive rights to and/or (iii) lease from the State to (aa) use and/or (bb) occupy?
Reply:
The Department of Environmental Affairs size of the land occupied is 3.1 hectares (ha).
(b) 1. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI)
(i) 6 397ha (for use as national botanical gardens)
(ii) 991ha (for use as part of national botanical gardens) and 85ha (for use by the National Zoological Garden)
(iii) Not applicable
(aa) 1 390 ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens) and 200 ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens).
(bb) 1 390ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens) 1 390 ha and 200 ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens).
2. South African Weather Services (SAWS)
- The South African Weather Service owns 59,29 hectares.
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
(aa) Not applicable.
(bb) Not applicable.
3. iSimangaliso Wetland Park
(i) Not applicable
(ii) 332 000ha, managed by iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority (appointed as a Management Authority in accordance with the proclamation in terms of the World Heritage Convention Act, 1999).
(iii) Not applicable
(aa) Not applicable.
(bb) Not applicable.
4. South Africa National Parks (SANParks)
(i) South African National Parks owns 3 721 192 hectares of Land.
(ii) SANParks have exclusive rights to 4 026 040ha of Land for use as National Parks/Conservation Purposes.
(iii) SANParks leases approximately 304 848ha of land.
(aa) The hectares of land mentioned above are used as National Parks for Conservation Purposes.
(bb) Not applicable
---ooOoo---
20 April 2018 - NW1031
Ketabahle, Ms V to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
With reference to his reply to question 265 on 9 March 2018, wherein he indicated that part of the responsibilities of the Amathole Forestry Company is to ensure that they use the leased land only for forestry purposes and that they cannot make alterations to the land without prior approval by his department, has he been informed that the company is undertaking massive excavations at the Zingcuka Forestry, destroying a rare indigenous forest; if not, he will institute an independent investigation to ascertain the facts and bring to book all those responsible for this destruction of the indigenous forest; if so • Was the company given any permission by his department to conduct the massive excavations; if so, what (a) are the names of the officials of his department who gave such permission and (b) what was the basis for granting such permission.
Reply:
DAFF’S RESPONSE:
- The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) is not aware of any massive excavation taking place on the leased land at Zingcuka Forest and therefore will institute an investigation to ascertain the facts. The Amathole Forestry Company (AFC) has a right to quarry on existing quarries on the leased and land for the purpose of constructing or maintaining the road network within the leased land. However, for new quarries, AFC has to submit an application and get an approval from DAFF.
- There is no permission that has been given to the Amathole Forest Company (AFC) to excavate new quarry site at Zingcuka Forests.
20 April 2018 - NW825
Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development
Whether the National Empowerment Fund (a) has officially become a subsidiary of the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) and (b) has withdrawn from the R500 million loan facility it secured from the IDC for the 2017-18 financial year; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
(a) The NEF has not yet been incorporated as a subsidiary of the IDC. Technical work has been completed and includes an assessment of the regulatory and governance requirements to ensure that all applicable regulatory framework, including the PFMA, are complied with. Following completion of a review of legislative implications, the modalities of incorporation will then be considered by Cabinet.
(b) The R500 million has not been drawn as yet, as certain conditions precedent flowing from the review and approval are still to be met, namely National Treasury approval and formalization of processes by Cabinet.
-END-
20 April 2018 - NW1034
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Whether, with reference to his reply to question 264 on 26 March 2018 and his admission that Amathole Forestry Company has been causing destruction at the Zingcuka Forest, he intends to submit a formal complaint to the Forestry Stewardship Council to alert them to the transgressions by the Amathole Forestry Company; if not, why not; if so on what date will he report the company to the Forestry Stewardship Council. 2. Whether his department deems it enough to just tell Amathole Company to stop the destruction; if not, will revoke the lease agreement with the company.
Reply:
DAFF’S RESPONSE:
1. The destruction of the Indigenous Forest occurred when a contractor appointed by Amathole Forestry Company (AFC) was felling trees and the trees fell over and destroyed the indigenous forest. The Department took the matter up with AFC and instructed the company to rehabilitate the destroyed area. AFC is currently rehabilitating the area by replanting the indigenous trees that were destroyed back into the area and will inform the Department once the rehabilitation work is complete. The Department will then conduct a site visit to verify and confirm if the rehabilitation complies with norms and standards. The matter will only be reported to the Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) if AFC fails to rehabilitate the area according to acceptable norms and standards.
2. The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries will not revoke the lease agreement with the Amathole Forestry Company as the transgression does not constitute a material breach to the lease agreement. As mentioned above, AFC has already started implementing the corrective measure by rehabilitating the affected area.
20 April 2018 - NW826
Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development
What (a) are the relevant details of the work that has been undertaken by the Industrial Development Corporation in partnership with the Public Investment Corporation to assess the economic cost of public sector corruption and (b) were the findings in this regard?
Reply:
I am not aware of any work undertaken by the Industrial Development Corporation in partnership with the Public Investment Corporation to assess the economic cost of public sector corruption. The question may be referring to work undertaken for the PICC (Presidential Infrastructure Coordinating Commission) by the IDC, on the potential economic cost of corruption, details of which were provided to the Honourable Member last year in response to Parliamentary Question 2843 published on 15 September 2017, and which is reproduced below for ease of reference.
“The information on the cost of corruption was based on an economic modeling exercise that sought to quantify the cost of the reduction in real capital spending that results from corruption and the impact on decreased spending in the SA economy on goods and services. While the full extent and thus real costs of corruption is unknown precisely because by its nature it is concealed, a calculation was done based on a scenario where corruption results in a 10% increase in costs; this increase was then modeled into the data-sets to obtain GDP and employment effects.
The purpose of the modeling exercise was to show that corruption is not a ‘victimless’ crime and that the opportunity costs of improperly and unlawfully diverting resources for private gain, comes at a significant cost to economic growth, job creation and service delivery. There is a compelling case for immediate and decisive action against corruption, based on the costs it imposes on the economy, on jobs and on the poor. The results of this modeling exercise were referred to in my speech at the 11th Annual Competition Law, Economics and Policy Conference on 31 August 2017 as well as at other public gatherings and were also shared with the Committees of the Economic Cluster, in Parliament, on 10 October 2017.
During my address to the 11th Annual Competition Law, Economics and Policy Conference on 31 August 2017, I noted the following:
Neither corruption in the public sector (with its private sector counterparties) nor collusion between large firms are victimless crimes. Corruption takes resources away from housing, jobs, social grants, education and health facilities. Collusion increases the costs of doing business, it stunts the dynamism and competitiveness that is needed and it has a negative impact on growth and jobs.
A World Bank study on competition in South Africa noted the following:
“In the case of four cartels in maize, wheat, poultry and pharmaceuticals – products which make up 15.6% of the consumption basket of the poorest 10 percent – conservative estimates indicate that around 200 000 people stood to be lifted above the poverty line by tackling cartel overcharges”.
We recently began doing work to quantify the cost of corruption in the public sector, based on just a 10% increase in the price of infrastructure projects as a result of corruption...Based on our modelling, it leads to at least R27bn foregone annually in GDP and the loss of 76 000 jobs that would otherwise have been created. So corruption is not only an ethical issue, it is also a profound issue of delivery, of growth, of services to the poor.
There are some troubling matters to address in looking at corruption and the collusion therewith by professional firms, from auditors to lawyers and others.
The culture of rampant acquisition is spreading so widely that the professional standards of integrity that is a hallmark of functioning institutions, are under enormous pressure. One of its outcomes is a fraying of the social compact that all societies need and unless we act with resolution, we will not build a society that achieves the vision of the constitution, indeed, we will betray it.
There are things we can do, practical things, while the wider battle to ensure integrity in the public and private sectors, is pursued.
One of the provisions in the Construction industry Settlement Agreement that I referred to earlier, is an Integrity Commitment that CEOs of the seven largest companies signed publicly and I want to briefly quote from it:
“ In my capacity as CEO of [name of company], I do hereby declare and affirm that:
- I will conduct business, and will do everything in my power to ensure that the company and all of its associated companies (‘the Group’) conducts business in South Africa, in accordance with sound legal and ethical practice;
- I will not be involved, and will do everything in my power to ensure that no one in the Group is involved, in any kind of bribery, corruption, collusion or unfair means of furthering our business interests;
- I will do everything in my power to instil a culture of integrity, honesty and transparency in the Group consistent with this declaration
- I will develop and actively promote codes of conduct imposing ethical and legal standards on all personnel in the Group that are aligned with international best practice for the construction industry and impose appropriate penalties on those who don’t comply; and
- I will use my best efforts, and take firm steps, in line with and pursuant to my executive management authority, to expose, confront, eradicate and prevent collusion and corruption in the construction industry and in all the construction industry’s dealings with public entities, private sector institutions and with each other.”
-END-
20 April 2018 - NW958
Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans
Whether, with reference to her reply to question 35 for oral reply on 7 March 2018, she can provide (a) a list of names of the (i) companies and (ii) individuals from whom the aircrafts were hired, (b) the details around the (i) number of times each specialised aircraft was utilised and (ii) cost to hire each aircraft and (c) the total amount paid to each company and/or individual?
Reply:
1. (a) (i) Execujet SA (Pty) Ltd
Fortune Air (Pty) Ltd
National Airways Corporation (Pty) Ltd
VOGN (Pty) Ltd
South African Airways
(ii) The SAAF procurement process of VVIP chartered aircraft does not allow for direct chartering from individuals, unless the approved tender processes were adhered to (including, but not restricted to approval from National Treasury).
(b) (i) See below-listed spreadsheet.
(ii) The cost to hire each aircraft:
(c) National Airways Corporation (Pty) Ltd: R17 409 603.65
Execujet SA (Pty) Ltd: R12 660 961.82
Fortune Air (Pty) Ltd: R 8 418 837.83
VOGN (Pty) Ltd: R 8 361 503.42
South African Airways: R 1 932 956.54
20 April 2018 - NW978
Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Economic Development
How much land does (a) his department and (b) the entities reporting to him (i) own, (ii) have exclusive rights to and/or (iii) lease from the State to (aa) use and/or (bb) occupy?
Reply:
The Economic Development Department, ITAC, Competition Commission and Competition Tribunal do not own land and currently rents office space. Attached as Annexure ‘A’ is information on land which IDC owns. The properties are part of the IDC’s overall portfolio.
-END-
20 April 2018 - NW674
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)What (a) progress has been made with each investigation into Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) contracts above R10 million and (b) amount has been recovered in each case since 31 July 2017; (2) What (a) progress has been made with each investigation into Prasa contracts below R10 million and (b) amount has been recovered in each case since 31 July 2017?
Reply:
1. (a) National Treasury has submitted a report on the outcome of their investigation into contracts above R10 million, related to the recommendations made in the Public Protector’s Report, to the Interim Board of Control of PRASA for action.
The Treasury report was scrutinised by PRASA and PRASA has responded to National Treasury indicating that some of the findings were inaccurate and needed to be reviewed. National Treasury has therefore undertaken a process to reappoint the relevant service providers to review the disputed findings. Once the service providers are appointed, a review will take place and the findings will be finalised.
(b) No amounts have been recovered.
2. (a) There are no special investigations for contracts below R10 million. These are reported in the normal course of business as identified by either management or audit (internal or external).
(b) No amounts related to special investigations for contracts below R10 million have been recovered.
20 April 2018 - NW145
Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Energy
What are the (a) details and (b) levels of service providers and/or contractors from which (i) his department and (ii) the entities reporting to him procured services in the past five financial years; (2) what (a) service was provided by each service provider and/or contractor and (b) amount was each service provider and/or contractor paid; (3) (a) what is the total number of service providers that are black-owned entities, (b) what contract was each of the black-owned entities awarded and (c) what amount was each black-owned entity paid?
Reply:
The information requested by the Honourable Member is very comprehensive and covers a multitude of services providers over a significantly long period. However, it is important to note that much of this information is contained in all the Annual Reports and Financial Statements from the Auditor General (AG) that are submitted to Parliament on an annual basis. The Auditor General captures this information in the Financial Statements under Current Payments. In this regard, the AG mentions the appropriated funds, final appropriations and Actual Expenditure.
Procurement items are always listed under Current Payments, including advertising, catering, communication, consultants, contractors, outsourced services, entertainment, travel and subsistence, etc.
20 April 2018 - NW429
Bucwa, Ms H to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)What are the criteria followed in allocating staff housing at the University of Zululand; (2) Are staff members ranked in accordance with these criteria when accommodation is offered to staff in university-owned houses; (3) (a) Where is each staff house located and (b) what is the average monthly (i) rental and (ii) related costs recovered from staff occupying each staff house since 1 April 2017; (4) What (a) costs related to staff accommodation offered by the university are paid for by the staff member concerned and (b) costs are borne by the university; (5) What total amount did the university spend on staff housing (a) in the 2016-17 financial year and (b) since 1 April 2017?
Reply:
The University of Zululand has provided the following responses to the questions posed.
- The University of Zululand has an approved housing policy. Section 4.1 of the policy categorises housing units in 3 categories being:
- Section 4.1.1 Executive Housing;
- Section 4.1.2 On-campus staff housing; and
- Section 4.1.3 Off-campus staff housing.
The Criteria on the allocation of staff housing is set out in section 5 of the policy. The university has set out 4 main purposes for housing units in section 5.1
- Section 5.1.1 Housing for executives;
- Section 5.1.2 Housing for permanent employees;
- Section 5.1.3 Temporary housing for newly appointed staff; and
- Section 5.1.4 Housing of staff on short term contracts
Category 5.1.1 deals with the allocation of staff housing for executives. The housing for other categories of employees (5.1.2, 5.1.3 and 5.1.4) is on approximate proportion of 50:25:25. This ratio can be modified from time to time based on the need.
For category 5.1.2 (permanent employees), preference is given to those on higher Peromnes (4-6). Employees under this category are given a 3-year lease which may be renewable after the end of the 3-year period.
For staff category 5.1.3 (temporary housing of newly appointed staff), units may be offered for a period of up to 6 months from their commencement date.
For category 5.1.4 (housing of staff on short term contracts), housing is offered for the duration of the contract up to a maximum of 24 months.
2. Yes, the catergories as outlined above are used when allocating staff accommodation.
3. (a) The University has staff accommodation both on and off-campus. The university submitted an incomplete list as shown in Table 1 below. This information will be submitted as soon as the university has provided updated information through the Department.
Item |
House No |
(a) Location for each staff |
Type of accommodation |
(b) (i) Average monthly rental |
Category (Exec/ On camp/ off camp) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
7 917 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
9 000 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
378 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
378 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 27 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
378 |
On-campus |
2 |
Flat No. 28 |
Mhlathuze |
Family |
10 530 |
On-campus |
3 |
Flat No. 29 |
Mhlathuze |
Family |
15 750 |
On-campus |
4 |
Flat No. 30 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
10 784 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 30 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 30 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
5 |
Flat No. 31 |
Mhlathuze |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
6 |
Flat No. 32 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 32 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
4 252 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 32 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
7 |
Flat No. 33 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
13 500 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 33 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
4 500 |
On campus |
|
Flat No. 33 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On campus |
8 |
Flat No. 34 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
12 459 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 34 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
9 829 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 34 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
9 |
Flat No. 35 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 35 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 35 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
10 |
Flat No. 36 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
936 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 36 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 36 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
11 |
Flat No. 37 |
Mhlathuze |
Family |
12 930 |
On-campus |
12 |
Flat No. 38 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 38 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 38 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
13 |
Flat No. 39 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
23 532 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 39 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
15 250 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 39 |
Mhlathuze |
Shared |
16 500 |
On-campus |
14 |
House No. 40 |
S/Residences |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
15 |
House No. 41 |
S/Residences |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
16 |
House No. 59 |
S/Residences |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
17 |
House No. 25 |
S/Residences |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
18 |
House No. 26 |
S/Residences |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
19 |
House No. 60 |
S/Residences |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
20 |
Flat No. 1 |
Thandanani |
Family |
7 000 |
On-campus |
21 |
Flat No. 2 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
7 337 |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 2 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
Flat No. 2 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
22 |
Flat No. 3 |
Thandanani |
Family |
31 906 |
On-campus |
23 |
Flat No. 4 |
Thandanani |
Family |
8 609 |
On-campus |
24 |
Flat No. 5 |
Thandanani |
Family |
17 562 |
On-campus |
25 |
Flat No. 6 |
Thandanani |
Family |
25 039 |
On-campus |
26 |
Flat No: 7 |
Thandanani |
Family |
10 941 |
On-campus |
27 |
Flat No. 8 |
Thandanani |
Family |
20 596 |
On-campus |
28 |
House No. 15 |
Thandanani |
Family |
14 000 |
On-campus |
29 |
House No. 16 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
2 815 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 16 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
5 512 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 16 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 16 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
5 284 |
On-campus |
30 |
House No. 17 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
3 215 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 17 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
6 801 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 17 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
12 500 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 17 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
12 500 |
On-campus |
31 |
House No. 18 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 18 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 18 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 18 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
32 |
House No. 19 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 19 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
12 750 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 19 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
3 508 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 19 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
15 000 |
On-campus |
33 |
House No. 20 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
7 357 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 20 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
4 237 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 20 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
16 250 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 20 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
34 |
House No. 21 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 21 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 21 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 21 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
35 |
House No. 22 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
5 000 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 22 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
7 500 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 22 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 22 |
back room |
Shared |
14 400 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 22 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
36 |
House No. 23 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
2 500 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 23 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
2 500 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 23 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 23 |
Thandanani |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
37 |
House No. 42 |
Esangweni |
Family |
9 380 |
On-campus |
38 |
House No. 43 |
Esangweni |
Family |
10 602 |
On-campus |
39 |
House No. 44 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 44 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 44 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 44 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 44 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
40 |
House No. 45 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
|
|
House No. 45 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 45 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 45 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
41 |
House No. 46 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
3 300 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 46 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
6 523 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 46 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 46 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
7 500 |
On Campus |
|
House No. 46 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
42 |
House No. 47 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 47 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 47 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
7 995 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 47 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
43 |
House No. 48 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 48 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 48 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 48 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
44 |
House No. 49 |
Esangweni |
Family |
- |
On-campus |
45 |
House No. 50 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
6 998 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 50 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 50 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 50 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
46 |
House No. 51 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 51 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 51 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 51 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
47 |
House No. 52 |
Esangweni |
Family |
14 000 |
On-campus |
48 |
House No. 53 |
Esangweni |
CSIRD |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 53 |
Esangweni |
CSIRD |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 53 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
49 |
House No. 54 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
5 634 |
On-campus |
|
House No. 54 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
|
House No. 54 |
Esangweni |
Shared |
- |
On-campus |
50 |
House No. 55 |
Esangweni |
Family |
27 657 |
On-campus |
51 |
House No. 4 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
52 |
House No. 6 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
53 |
House No. 7 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
54 |
House No. 9 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
55 |
House No. 11 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
56 |
House No. 13 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
17 565 |
Off-campus |
57 |
House No. 14 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
58 |
House No. 15 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
59 |
House No. 17 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
60 |
House No. 18 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
61 |
House No. 19 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
62 |
House No. 21 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
63 |
House No. 26 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
64 |
House No. 28 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
65 |
House No. 30 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
66 |
House No. 47 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
67 |
House No. 49 |
Anthony Cres |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
68 |
House No. 10 |
Kudu |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
69 |
House No. 54 |
Dunn Rd |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
70 |
Flat No. 1 |
Mlalazi RD |
Family |
50 376 |
Off-campus |
71 |
Flat No. 2 |
Mlalazi RD |
Family |
14 000 |
Off-campus |
72 |
Flat No. 3 |
Mlalazi RD |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
73 |
Flat No. 4 |
Mlalazi RD |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
74 |
Flat No. 5 |
Mlalazi RD |
Family |
10 000 |
Off-campus |
75 |
Flat No. 6 |
Mlalazi RD |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
76 |
House No. 3 |
Glenside |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
77 |
House No. 10 |
South Rd |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
78 |
House No. 15 |
Park Lane |
Family |
- |
Off-campus |
79 |
House No. 1 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
80 |
House No. 2 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
81 |
House No. 3 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
82 |
House No. 4 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
83 |
House No. 5 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
84 |
House No. 6 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
85 |
House No. 7 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
86 |
House No. 8 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
87 |
House No. 9 |
Zini River Estate |
Family |
As per policy |
Off-campus |
(b) (i) The rental charge is based on the market rental value. The rental is levied at a minimum value refferd to as Assessed Rental Value (ARV).
(ii) The rental recovered from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018 is R798 089.
4. (a) The staff members pays for all utilities (gas, water, electricty) as well as the general maintenance of the units.
(b) The following costs are borne by the University:
- Levies and municipality rates and taxes;
- Costs for remedial work on structural defects and general maintenance; and
- Gardening and pool services (where applicable).
5. The amount spent to date on housing is as follows:
Item |
Apr 2016 – Mar 2017 |
Apr 2017 – Dec 2017 |
|
|
|
Operating Expenditure |
7 709 298 |
6 781 513 |
Gardening and Cleaning |
43 150 |
90 747 |
Maintenance and Repairs |
7 073 558 |
5 998 329 |
Rates and Taxes |
387 369 |
505 870 |
Other |
205 221 |
186 567 |
|
|
|
Capital Expenditure |
4 138 840 |
2 657 391 |
|
|
|
Total |
11 848 138 |
9 438 904 |
20 April 2018 - NW952
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Whether, with reference to the well documented increase in elephant poaching, South Africa has signed the petition which the Presidents of Uganda, Gabon and Botswana signed, calling on the European Union to close its ivory market; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether her Department has taken any steps to close the ivory trade; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
1. No, South Africa has not signed the petition with the Presidents of Uganda, Gabon and Botswana calling on the European Union to close its ivory market as South Africa’s Constitution allows for the sustainable utilisation of the country’s natural resources - ivory is one of these natural resources. South African National Parks and some of the provincial conservation authorities have stockpiles of ivory which have been legally obtained through natural deaths and/or hunting of problem elephants. If the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) approves the international sale of ivory (through the appropriate proposals), the government can then access much needed funds which would result from such sales to be ploughed back into conservation of our natural resources.
(2) The Department of Environmental Affairs has not taken any steps to close the legal ivory trade in South Africa as the legal trade in ivory is regulated under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004) and the Threatened or Protected Species (ToPS) Regulations. Retailers in South Africa who are selling ivory must be registered as traders under ToPS to sell ivory, and a buyer needs a permit to buy and to possess the ivory. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) recommends that Parties to the Convention close domestic ivory markets that are contributing to poaching or illegal trade. There is no evidence that the legal trade in ivory in South Africa is contributing to poaching and illegal trade and, accordingly, the legal ivory trade has not been closed.
---ooOoo---
20 April 2018 - NW953
Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans
(1)(a) What were the costs of chartering SAA Airbus A300-200 with registration ZS-SXW for the visit of the President, Mr C M Ramaphosa, to Rwanda and other African countries, (b) was a cost-benefit-analysis done, (c) why was the aircraft chartered and (d) was chartering the aircraft the most cost-effective option; (2) has the SA Air Force and/or the National Treasury considered other options for the President’s flights; if not, why not; if so, what were (a) the other options and (b) the costs of the alternative options that were considered? NW1039E
Reply:
1. (a) The SAAF/SANDF did not charter an A300-200. The cost of chartering the A330-200, Registration No: ZS-SXW Waterkloof to Rwanda and back to Waterkloof was R1 725 468.09.
(b) Yes.
(c) To air transport the Principal.
(d) Yes - The transportation of our Principals is the sole responsibility of the SANDF through the SAAF,
2. (a) Yes. The transportation of our Principals is the sole responsibility of the SANDF through the SAAF.
(b) Chartering aircraft is an involved exercise and one of the main considerations is safety and security of our Principals
20 April 2018 - NW898
Dreyer, Ms AM to ask the Minister of Transport
With regard to the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) system, what (a) are the operational costs of the BRT system and (b) proportion of the costs is covered by (i) fares, (ii) grants and (iii) any other source of funding?
Reply:
a) Total operating costs for 2017/2018 Financial year (FY) are R129, 134,245.00 with a projection of R258, 518,892.00 and R372, 900,948.00 for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 financial years, respectively.
b) (i) A proportion of fares for 2017/2018 FY is R16,859,365.00 with a projection of R52,476,670.00 and R111,438138.00 for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 Financial years, respectively.
(ii) Grants allocated for 2017/2018 FY is R700,718,000.00 with a projection of R671,906,000 and R670,650,000 for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 Financial years, respectively.
(iii) Of the total operating costs, Council is funding R67, 979,972.00 for 2017/2018; with a projection of R311, 124,374.00 and R508, 413,969.00 for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 financial years, respectively.
The above costs and projections are based on the starter service which has been operational since October 2017.
20 April 2018 - NW824
Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development
What (a) amount has the Industrial Development Corporation co-invested with the China Construction Bank to finance industrial development and infrastructure projects since signing a cooperation agreement in 2015 and (b) are the relevant details of each project?
Reply:
The funding relationship between the IDC and China Construction Bank (CCB) is in the form of both co-funding and access to lines of credit. This is included in the cooperation agreement between the two institutions. In the financial year ending 31 March 2016, the IDC raised USD50 million and USD75million in the year ending 31 March 2017, through lines of credit from the China Construction Bank. These were invested in various projects funded by the IDC.
In terms of co-funding, the IDC partnered with the CCB in Nyamezela, a 100% black owned women business. The project was funded by the IDC and CCB to enable the client to deliver on an Eskom contract. The project is expected to create 44 permanent jobs.
-END-