Questions and Replies

Filter by year

08 September 2015 - NW2620

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)Whether the (a) Director: Promotion of Access to Information, (b) Deputy Director: Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point, (c) Deputy Director: Promotion of Access to Information Policy and Support, (d) Assistant Director: Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point, (e) Assistant Director: Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point, (f) Chief Administration Clerk: Promotion of Access to Information Policy and Support and (g) Chief Administration Clerk: Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point have been appointed; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) in respect of each specified position, (a) what is the (i) name and (ii) qualifications of the person who was appointed and (b) how many persons were (i) shortlisted and (ii) interviewed for each position?

Reply:

The information requested is depicted in the Table:

SN

Post

Advertisement Closing Date

Number of Members Shortlisted

Number of Members Interviewed

Comments

 

a

b

c

d

e

1

Director Promotion of Access to Information

11 July 2014

9

9 invited or interviews

5 Interviews held on 8 July 2015

4 Interviews to be held on 14 August 2015

2

Deputy Direction Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point

19 June 2014

10

8 Interviewed

2 Declined

1 Did not attend

Awaiting vetting status to appoint recommended candidate.

3

Deputy Direction Promotion of Access to Information Policy and Support

19 June 2014

8

6 Interviewed

1 Declined

1 Did not attend

Awaiting vetting status to appoint recommended candidate.

4

Assistant Director Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point

19 June 2014

13

9 Interviewed

4 Declined

Awaiting vetting status to appoint recommended candidate.

5

Assistant Director Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point

19 June 2014

4

3 Interviewed

1 Did not attend

Awaiting vetting status to appoint recommended candidate.

6

Chief Administration Clerk Promotion of Access to Information Nodal Point

19 June 2014

5

4 Interviewed

1 Declined

Awaiting vetting status to appoint recommended candidate.

7

Chief Administration Clerk Promotion of Access to Information Policy and Support

19 June 2014

5

3 Interviewed

2 Declined

Mr F. Davhana was appointed and assumed duty on 6 July 2015. Mr Davhana has a BCom in Business Management meeting the criteria for the advertised post which required a Diploma/Certificate/NQF Level 4/5 (Supply Chain Management and Financial Management).

08 September 2015 - NW3068

Profile picture: Redelinghuys, Mr MH

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training

(a) How does (i) his department and (ii) entities reporting to him define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) his department and (bbb) the entities reporting to him?

Reply:

(a) and (b) At the time of compilation, eighteen out of the twenty-six entities have responded to the question.

Name

(ii) How do you define red tape?

a) What specific interventions/systems that have been applied to identify red tape

(b) What specific interventions / systems that have been implemented to reduce red tape

  1. Department of Higher Education and Training

The Department does not have its own definition of red tape. Using the conventional use of the word “red tape”, it is understood to be unnecessary delays caused by a lack or non-existence of delegations of authority to lower levels and/or too many officials having to be in the decision-making processes of an organisation.

  • I have approved the Delegations of Authority to the Director-General in respect to the Public Service Act and Public Service Regulations, and the Director-General has further delegated some of the functions to other performer levels. Further to this, the College Councils of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) and Community Education and Training (CET) colleges are empowered by the Continuing Education and Training Act to make certain decisions and consult, and report to the Minister on decisions made where necessary. This is to ensure that decisions are made at lower levels to ensure that there is efficient and effective management as well as governance of institutions.
  • Service standards in certain operational areas and a service delivery charter have been developed to assist in monitoring delays in the operations of the department. The standard operating procedures have been developed in certain operational areas, aimed at ensuring that the decision-making processes are clear and applied consistently across the Department within set timeframes.
  1. Banking Sector Education and Training Authority (BANKSETA)

Red tape is understood to be the regulations and/or rules that are considered unnecessary that hinders and delays work done as decision-making process is rather lengthy and negatively impacting stakeholders depending on the outcome and decisions of processes.

  • The frequency of Board meetings in a year
  • Through previous experiences or lessons learned over the years.
  • Customer Satisfaction Surveys and Stakeholder Forums and Sub-Committees’ feedback.
  • Assessment of time taken for standard applications to be processed.
  • BANKSETA has a flat organisational structure with its Heads of Departments given a mandate to make decisions that allow the daily running of the business. This means that it is not in all instances where the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has to make decisions. In the event where the CEO is out of the country, the acting CEO has the delegated rights and responsibilities of the CEO to action decisions needed.
  • The Accounting Authority has also delegated some responsibilities and provided the CEO with the mandate to make certain decisions to aid the business to proceed with operations without waiting for the Board sitting.
  • In the event where urgent decisions need to be made which falls outside the delegation to the CEO; urgent meetings/teleconference can be arranged to allow the Accounting Authority opportunity to consider what is put forth and make a decision. The other option is having round robin decision by the Accounting Authority.
  1. Culture, Arts, Tourism, Hospitality and Sport Sector Education and Training Authority (CATHSSETA)

Defined as administrative (i.e. rules, procedures, procedures and processes) and regulatory hurdles, to achieving the original purpose, that affect or impose unnecessary delays, inaction, costs that exceed their benefits, productivity, and/or delivery (Including competitiveness).

  • We track and monitor the intended application of the regulatory requirements (i.e. Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), Treasury Regulations, Skills Development Act, etc.) to address non-compliance.
  • There are now relevant registers (i.e. Supply Chain Management, Asset Management, Financial Management, etc.) in place that assists in identifying red tape.
  • Appointed leadership that is committed to continuous improvements and rooting out corruption.
  • Trained staff as part of capacitating them and improving their skills so that they provide excellent service to all our stakeholders.
  • Refocused management to effectively manage performance, processes, systems, people and finances.
  • Improved supply chain management practices in order to address irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditures.
  • Set tools and monitoring mechanisms in order to track payment of suppliers within the 30 days period from receipt date of invoice.
  1. Chemical Industries Education and Training Authority (CHIETA)

The bureaucracy that results in delays in service delivery.

  • Continuous development and review of organisation’s operational framework.
  • Monthly dashboard analysis of divisional targets and achievements.
  • Monitoring of turnaround times of key performance indicators of executives and managers and implanting strategies to address deviations.
  • Line managers have been empowered to make decisions within the broad spectrum of the organisation’s operational strategy and are fully involved in strategic and business planning.
  • Monitoring, evaluation and tracking of performance against targets and continuous review and development of strategy to optimise return.
  • Business process reengineering to ensure maximum efficiency, effectiveness and economy for core business processes.
  • Replacement of manual processes with increasingly automated systems.
  • Enforcing a culture of delivery, client orientation and focus maximising return of investment.
  1. Council on Higher Education (CHE)

CHE does not have its own definition of red tape.

Not applicable

Not applicable

  1. Financial and Accounting Services Sector Education and Training Authority (FASSET)

Non-essential procedures, forms, reporting and regulations where cost heavily outweighs benefit and stands in the way of skills development.

  • Management meetings are held fortnightly to discuss issues relating to efficient and effective delivery of the SETA.
  • The SETA also interacts regularly with DHET and provides input to various matters of engagement.
  • An Enterprise-wide risk management system is in place to ensure optimal management of all risks associated with the performance of functions and delivery of services to support governance responsibilities.
  • Robust Quality Management System is also in place.
  • Furthermore, the staff at the SETA understands and delivers on reporting requirements.
  1. Fibre Processing and Manufacturing Sector Education and Training Authority (FP&M SETA)

The process undertaken to facilitate decision making without making the processes too onerous and time consuming in order to ensure efficiency and enhancing service delivery.

The SETA developed and adopted a new business model, which resulted in the review and enhancement of business processes.

  • A more flattened organisational structure was developed and implemented to fast-track service delivery and decision making.
  • The SETA has adopted a more direct reporting line and structure.
  • The delegation of authority was reviewed by the Executive Authority to broaden and provide increased capacity for the CEO.
  • The roles and responsibilities of Board Committee Structures have been streamlined for effectiveness and efficiency.
  1. Food and Beverages Manufacturing Sector Education and Training Authority (FOODBEV SETA)

Red tape refers to excessive regulation or rigid conformity to formal rules that are considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinders or prevents action or decision-making.

None

None

  1. Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority (HWSETA)

A tedious process of decision making which has an adverse effect on the beneficiaries of the service being rendered.

  • The stakeholder sessions of the Board.
  • Delivery model of the HWSETA.
  • Innovation sessions with all stakeholders.
  • Service Delivery Charter.
  • Revision of the delegation of authority.
  • Decentralisation and devolution of powers.
  1. Insurance Sector Education and Training Authority (INSETA)

Unnecessary and invalid / irrelevant requirements.

Process mapping and stakeholder feedback.

Bi-annual updates to processes and guidelines.

  1. Manufacturing, Engineering and Related Services Sector Education and Training Authority (MERSETA)

MERSETA does not have its own definition of red tape.

Not applicable

Not applicable

  1. Mining Qualifications Authority (MQA)

Lengthy policies that hinder progress of activities that need to be carried out.

Engagement in tender processes as

it takes too long to finalise a tender, ±60 days is a long process including 21 days of advertisement.

Improved policies, that are more enabling, are being investigated.

  1. National Skills Fund (NSF)

The NSF does not have a formal definition for red tape.

The NSF implemented Project Siyaphambili aimed at improving the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the entity. This included a current state assessment of the NSF to identify inefficiencies throughout the organisation, taking into consideration various reviews conducted on the skills levy system and NSF specifically.

The NSF will improve efficiencies in the organisation through the implementation of enabling technology (ERP system, document management system, monitoring technology, etc.) and through delegations of authority to a more efficient restructured organisation. Turn-around times will be monitored throughout all processes.

  1. National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS)

NSFAS does not have its own definition of red tape.

Not applicable

Not applicable

  1. Public Service Sector Education and Training Authority (PSETA)

Red tape is bottlenecks/ bureaucratic procedures that take long to achieve/ approve matters for implementation in the organisation, which inhibits performance.

No specific intervention or system has been applied to identify red tape.

  • Clearly defined workflows.
  • Standard Operating Procedures that outline roles and responsibilities, and turnaround times.
  • Delegations of Authority Framework.
  • Regular management meetings to review performance and to fast track decision-making.
  1. Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO)

Needlessly time-consuming procedures.

QCTO regularly monitors their procedures to identity areas of red tape, by reviewing the number of days allocated to process applications or requests received from stakeholders and by continually monitoring the chain of command in the processing of requests to improve turnaround time.

Systems and processes are continuously assessed to reduce red tape. Moreover, processes are governed by policies and procedures which stipulate turnaround times for processes. These timeframes are also part of the QCTO’s key performance indicators against which the organisation is audited.

  1. South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA)

Unnecessary steps or procedures in our processes that client’s need to follow to access our services.

  • SAQA’s systems are reviewed constantly in line with our established client service standards.
  • SAQA has a customer care helpline/helpdesk that records any customer complaints. These complaints are reviewed and the effects on the turnaround times are scrutinised so that SAQA can ensure continuous improvements in terms of its service delivery.

SAQA ensures that all unnecessary steps are eliminated from the processes.

  1. Safety and Security Sector Education and Training Authority (SASSETA)

Excessive rules and/or regulations which are redundant and prevent action taking place or decision-making.

Delegations of authority are in place, which are aligned to National Treasury prescripts and promote governance per PFMA requirements. Since the body is under administration, the delegations of authority are under review.

  • Segregation of duties to employees in the entity to allow approvals / recommendations at various committees / levels.
  • Operational plans that are linked to the mandate of the organisation are in place to ensure tasks at various levels are outlined and agreed upon. These operational plans are translated into performance assessment contracts.
  1. Services SETA

It is any unnecessary and unjustifiable processes that have the effect of making it impossible for role players to achieve required goals and therefore hinder service delivery.

An Organisational Development process has been embarked upon to analyse all processes, procedures and policies with a view to eliminating anything unnecessary and shortening anything which may be too lengthy or cumbersome, but without compromising quality and compliance.

  • The discretionary grant application system has been simplified and automated.
  • Project implementation steps are clearly articulated in the offer letters to service providers.
  • Documentation required for disbursements is clearly outlined and disbursements are based on pre-agreed deliverables outlined in contracts.
  • Stakeholders receive direct support and training on requirements so as to reduce the amount of back and forth engagement on matters.
  • A tool is being developed to enable real time reconciliation of learner attendance to facilitate timely payments of learner stipends.

 

 

Compiler/Contact persons:

Ext:

DIRECTOR – GENERAL

STATUS:

DATE:

REPLY TO QUESTION 3068 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED

Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP

MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING

STATUS:

DATE:

08 September 2015 - NW3055

Profile picture: McGluwa, Mr JJ

McGluwa, Mr JJ to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(a) How does (i) her department and (ii) entities reporting to her define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) her department and (bbb) the entities reporting to her?

Reply:

1.a, (i) (ii) Red tape refers to the hindrance caused to service delivery by bureaucratic processes within Government.

(b) (i)(II) An example of an intervention to mitigate effect of red tape is: Payment to SMMEs within 30 days as required by the Presidency and the department of Small Business Development. The DOD has a fast track process (to counter) red tape and to make sure that the SMMEs are paid within 30 days after invoicing. This is done with an understanding of the impact on the SMMEs if payments are delayed.

08 September 2015 - NW2992

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

What (a) steps has her department taken to resolve disputes between members of a certain formation (name furnished) and (b) impact have the specified disputes had on the verification of the members of the specified formation?

Reply:

(a) All formations have their constitution which does accommodate dispute resolutions amongst their members. The Department is in the moment, finalising the dispute resolution mechanisms for those who want to appeal after they have been rejected by the department to enrol in the database. Processes are already in place.

(b) Individuals are expected to present themselves to the Department for inclusion in the National Military Veterans Database and the dispute will be between the Department and the individual.

08 September 2015 - NW2340

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)(a) How (i) effective is her department’s communication and marketing strategy and (ii) is this measured objectively and (b) why have targets in respect of the specified strategy been amended from the previous year; (2) what (a) challenges have been experienced in respect of implementing the specified strategy and (b) has her department’s performance been with respect to implementing the specified strategy from 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; (3) what (a) human resources have been allocated to each provincial office for implementing the strategy, (b) systems and processes are implemented at each provincial office, (c) are the office hours of each provincial office, (d) materials and information are accessible from each provincial office and (e) are the qualifications of the staff members employed to implement the strategy; (4) whether any further training and development is being provided by her department with regard to the strategy; if so, what are the related costs; (5) (a) what are the current financial implications for each provincial office toward the implementation of the strategy, (b) why has Provincial Offices: Its Capacity and Accessibility not been listed as a key performance indicator and (c) how is the increase from R4 481 million to R8 780 million on communication being applied?

Reply:

  1. (1) (a) How (i)

The communications strategy is being rolled out and making some impact in so far as sharing information primarily through direct engagements using roadshows, stakeholder briefings with Military Veterans Associations including SANMVA the umbrella body as well as use of means such as media the website and publications. The fact that there is no national footprint and limitation of the communications structure limits capacity to reach the desired impact.

  1. Yes
  1. Targets were not amended. According to the Annual Performance Plan targets per Quarter, it is only the implementation and monitoring of the strategy.

(2)(a) The Department is currently the Department has a challenge with the organisational structure. This has limited the implementation of the Communication Strategy.

(2)(b) The Department is currently finalising its Q1 Performance review which will include amongst others, the implementation of the communication strategy. Furthermore, the Department is also running a communication campaign through GCIS. This communication campaign is focused at promoting the progress made by the Department thus far.

3.

(a) The current approved structure does not have communications staff members in provinces ,

(b) The current mode of communication with the provinces is through emails and telephones. The ICT is currently preparing for an intranet that will serve as a platform for internal communications at national and provincial level to assist in quicker relay of information to military veterans. The website capacity is also being beefed up.

(c) 07:30 – 16:30 pm are the official working hours though the officials go an extra mile and works on many occasions overtime and on weekends to cover and profile the departmental events.

(d) In the absence of physical structure of offices in provinces information is disseminated through Head Office.

(e) Not applicable

4. There is training and development planned for management and provincial coordinators to assist in the communication and marketing strategy implementation. The dates for training through a course with the School of Governance (former PALAMA) are between the 29th of July and the middle of August 2015. The current costs are R27 000

5.(a) Currently there is None.

(b) DMV is in a process of revisiting and reviewing the key performance indicators that will include that.

(c) The increase has been based on the DMV Annual Performance Plan as well as supporting key deliverables of the Department and the corporate communications programmes and activities. These include media engagements, advertorials, stakeholder engagements, use of own publications and media, branding and marketing as well as internal communications programmes. The budget is being reviewed to ensure that advertorials and other means such as social media are utilised more.

08 September 2015 - NW3045

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)With reference to a recent United Nations Office of Internal Oversight report (details furnished) on sexual offences committed by peacekeepers, which identified members of the SA National Defence Force (SANDF) as amongst major offending military forces, (a) what action has been taken in this regard and (b) what metrics have been employed to measure the success of interventions; (2) what is the number of reported sexual offences committed by members of the SANDF whilst on peacekeeping missions; (3) whether any members of the SANDF have faced disciplinary action for sexual offences committed whilst on peacekeeping missions; if so, (a) how many and (b) what was the outcome of said action in each case?

Reply:

Question 1(a). The Operations Support Legal Satellite Office (OSL) receives all incidents reported to the United Nations (UN) that involves allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct against members of the SANDF. Upon receipt the OSL deploys a team to investigate such allegations and where prima facie evidence of a commission of an offence is disclosed, the necessary disciplinary action is instituted.

Question 1(b). This OSL provides monthly feedback to the UN on all pending sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) cases. It should be noted that the recent UN report highlights the fact that South Africa is the only country to do so.

Question 2. Number of reported cases: 14. All the allegations lodged at the UN were investigated. Out of the 14 reported matters in only two cases the evidence disclosed prima facie evidence. These matters were finalised and the rest of the matters were reported closed due to no prima facie evidence.

Question 3(a). Members that faced disciplinary action: 2

Question 3(b). In both cases the members were convicted by a military court

Question 4. The submissions for assignment of Regular Force members and Reserve Force members as Senior Military Judges and Military Judges in terms of Section 14 of the Military Discipline Supplementary Measures Act, Act 16 of 1999, is with the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans for consideration.

Question 5. The number of outstanding cases within the military justice system is 1 588 cases.

08 September 2015 - NW2731

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

Why are four ministerial priorities not mentioned when comparing the 2012-16 Strategic Plan to the 2015-19 Strategic Plan?

Reply:

The Ministerial priorities that have been promulgated in the DOD Strategic Plan 2015 – 2020 are related to Milestone 1 of the SA Defence Review 2014. It is emphasised that the priorities as reflected in the Strategic Plan for the fiscal years 2011/12 – 2015/16 are embedded in the following priorities which are as follows:

Strategic Leadership.

Defence Funding Model.

Organisational Renewal.

Human Resources Renewal.

Capability Renewal

Defence Industry.

Defence Commitments.

Prior to the promulgation of these latest Ministerial priorities, an assessment was made of all previous Ministerial priorities and their implementation progress. After such an assessment a determination was made that all the priorities that were not exhaustively implemented, be incorporated under the 2015 -2020 MOD&MV high level priorities.

No Ministerial priorities were dropped, but were however incorporated under the high level Ministerial priorities. The DOD will, at its presentation of the Defence Review Implementation Plan to Parliament, make this point visible.

08 September 2015 - NW2225

Profile picture: Groenewald, Dr PJ

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)Whether, since her reply to question 249 on 18 March 2014, the Commission of Inquiry into the Dakota Air Disaster of 5 December 2012, in which the aircraft crashed into Giant’s Castle, has now been finalised; if not, why not; if so, what were the findings of the investigation; (2) whether the aircraft concerned deviated from its flight route; if so, what was the reason for this; (3) whether she will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

  1. Yes the inquiry was finalised on 28 March 2014, and the findings are as follows:
  • The Dakota Cargo crashed because it was flown at an altitude to low to provide sufficient terrain clearance and in weather that made visibility marginal.
  • The route flown also contributed to the accident as it did not ensure that the aircraft remain clear of the Drakensberg Mountains.
  • It was found that it was highly unlikely that a proper pre-flight crew briefing was held, which should have identified the flaws in the selected flight plan.
  • The aircraft was serviceable prior to the accident with no history of significant defects, and therefore did not contribute to the accident.

2. No, the Dakota aircraft did not deviate from the flight route.

3. No

08 September 2015 - NW2411

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

What amount did (a) her department and (b) each entity reporting to her spend on advertising in (i) Sowetan and (ii) Daily Sun in the (aa) 2012-13, (bb) 2013-14 and (cc) 2014-15 financial years?

Reply:

Department of Defence

(i) Sowetan

(aa) R67.921.20

(bb) R 98.280.00

(cc) R 171.536.00

(ii) Daily Sun

(aa) R 00

(bb) R 00

(cc) R 98.280.00

07 September 2015 - NW2908

Profile picture: Dlamini, Mr MM

Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Public Works:

In light of the fact that the Government continues to spend billions of rands through leases and rentals to accommodate government departments and agencies, and considering that in 2013 a total of 930 000 transactions worth more than R90 billion were scrutinised and many of which were found to be not in line with the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, (a) what is the total number of fraud cases related to leases and rentals which included officials from government departments who were investigated by either his department or the SA Police Service between 2012 and 2015 and (b) how many of the specified cases found wrongdoing on the part of departmental officials? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 2908 [NW3404E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 30 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 14 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Mr M M Dlamini (EFF) asked the Minister of Public Works: In light of the fact that the Government continues to spend billions of rands through leases and rentals to accommodate government departments and agencies, and considering that in 2013 a total of 930 000 transactions worth more than R90 billion were scrutinised and many of which were found to be not in line with the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, (a) what is the total number of fraud cases related to leases and rentals which included officials from government departments who were investigated by either his department or the SA Police Service between 2012 and 2015 and (b) how many of the specified cases found wrongdoing on the part of departmental officials? NW3404E ________________________________________________________________________ REPLY: The Minister of Public Works (a) There are six fraud cases have been concluded relating to leases / rentals, where officials have been implicated, during the period in question. (b)In five of the cases wrongdoing was found on the part of Departmental officials.

Reply:

 

(a) There are six fraud cases have been concluded relating to leases / rentals, where officials have been implicated, during the period in question.

(b) In five of the cases wrongdoing was found on the part of Departmental officials.

07 September 2015 - NW2917

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

Whether, in view of the waste of resources on security upgrades at the private residence of the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, at Nkandla, the Government has taken a decision to formulate new regulations on how to achieve optimal security benefits for the head of state and other leaders at a cost approved by Parliament and scrutinized upon its completion by given committees or an ad hoc committee, so that no waste of the type that took place at Nkandla could ever be repeated in the country; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

The matter is still being looked at holistically as it deserves serious consideration; once the process is completed hopefully soon the Honorable Member will be furnished with full details.

07 September 2015 - NW2720

Profile picture: Van Dalen, Mr P

Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy

(a) What are the relevant reasons for suddenly and completely aborting the Mmamabula Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) entered into between Eskom and a certain independent power producer (name furnished), which allowed for a potential electricity supply of 4 800 MW and the proposed Mmamabula Energy project as her department was responsible for procurement and (b) who were the key decision-makers responsible for aborting this project?

Reply:

The question was responded to as Parliamentary question number 2454.The resolution of these outstanding matters coincided with the need to resolve Eskom’s funding model.

.

07 September 2015 - NW2801

Profile picture: van der Merwe, Ms LL

van der Merwe, Ms LL to ask the Minister of Energy

Whether her department meets the Government’s 2% employment equity target for the employment of persons with disabilities that was set in 2005; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

Yes, the Department of Energy fully complies with the set employment target. 2.48% was reached as at 31 July 2015.

07 September 2015 - NW2993

Profile picture: Groenewald, Dr PJ

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many members of the SA Police Service (SAPS) are made available daily for the personal protection of (a) Ministers, (b) Deputy Ministers, (c) Premiers of provinces, (d) leaders of political parties, (e) office bearers of political parties, (f) kings, (g) traditional leaders and (h) Members of Parliament; (2) how many members of the SAPS are currently made available for the personal protection of private individuals; (3) whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

(1)(a) 78

(1)(b) 76

(1)(c) 36

(1)(d) 2

(1)(e) None

(1)(f) None

(1)(g) None

(1)(h) 2

(2) None

(3) No

07 September 2015 - NW2968

Profile picture: Redelinghuys, Mr MH

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

(a) Whether the Law Reform Commission Report on sex work has been finalized; and (b) on what date is the report envisaged to be published?

Reply:

 (a) I wish to inform the Honourable Member that the South African Law Reform Commission (SALRC) considered sex work in its investigation into Sexual Offences: Adult Prostitution (Project 107). This investigation has now been finalized, and as required in terms of section 7(1) of the South African Law Reform Commission Act, 1973 (Act No 19 of 1973), the report has been submitted to me during July 2015 for my consideration.

(b) I am currently still considering the report and the recommendations contained therein. As soon as I finalize considering the report, further announcements will be made.  

07 September 2015 - NW3151

Profile picture: Motau, Mr SC

Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

(a) What cases are currently being investigated by the Special Investigating Unit and (b) which of the specified cases are before the courts?

Reply:

 

(a) The SIU has informed me that the following cases are currently being investigated:

(1) National and all Provincial Departments of Social Development;

(2) North-West Province Municipalities:

(aa) Madibeng Local Municipality;

(bb) Greater Taung Local Municipality;

(cc) Mafikeng Local Municipality;

(dd) Ventersdorp Local Municipality;

(ee) Dr Kenneth Kaunda District Municipality;

(ff) Matlosana Local Municipality;

(gg) Maquassi Hills Local Municipality;

(hh) Tlokwe Local Municipality;

(ii) Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality;

(jj) Ditsobotla Local Municipality;

(kk) Tswaing Local Municipality;

(ll) Ramotshere Moiloa Local Municipality;

(mm) Ratlou Local Municipality;

(nn) Moses Kotane Local Municipality;

(oo) Ketlengrivier Local Municipality;

(pp) Dr Ruth Mompati District Municipality;

(qq) Rustenburg Local Municipality;

(rr) Naledi Local Municipality;

(ss) Kagisano Local Municipality;

(tt) Molopo Local Municipality;

(uu) Mamusa Local Municipality;

(vv) Lekwa-Teemane Local Municipality;

(ww) Bojanala Platinum District Municipality; and

(xx) Moretele Local Municipality.

(3) Department of Health: Gauteng Province;

(4) South African Social Security Agency (SASSA);

(5) Department of Public Works;

(6) South African Police Service (SAPS);

(7) Department of Public Works for the KwaZulu-Natal Province;

(8) Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (TMM): Gauteng Province;

(9) Ekhurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM): Gauteng Province;

(10) National Department of Rural Development and Land Reform and its agents;

(11) Midvaal Local Municipality: Gauteng Province;

(12) Eskom Holdings Ltd;

(13) Limpopo Province intervention:

(aa) Provincial Treasury;

(bb) Department of Health and Social Development;

(cc) Department of Roads and Transport;

(dd) Department of Education;

(ee) Department of Public Works, Limpopo Province.

(14) Department of Public Works (Security upgrade at Nkandla);

(15) Department of Water Affairs (formerly the Department of Water Affairs

and Forestry);

(16) National Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA);

(17) Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (formerly known as the Department of Land Affairs) in its national department, its provincial departments, its trading entities and their respective agencies (herein referred to as the DRDLR) and the State Information Technology Agency (PTY) Ltd (herein referred to as SITA);

(18) Bushbuckridge Local Municipality: Mpumalanga Province;

(19) Department of Communications;

(20) USAASA (Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa);

(21) KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Treasury;

(22) Vhembe District Municipality;

(23) Greater Tubatse Local Municipality;

(24) State Information Technology Agency (Pty) Ltd (“SITA”);

(25) National Department of Public Works: Prestige Directorate: Western Cape;

(26) Department of Labour and the Compensation Fund;

(27) National Department of Transport;

(28) National Department of Public Works (Leases investigation);

(29) Department of Communications; and

(30) Eastern Cape Department of Education.

(b) The SIU has informed me that the following civil matters are currently before court:

(1) The Department of Public Works: The SIU caused summons to be issued out of the High Court at the KwaZulu-Natal local division under case number 6428/2015. The SIU (1st plaintiff) together with the Department of Public Works (2nd plaintiff) is pursuing an action for the recovery of approximately R2.3 million from the contractor as a consequence of an overcharge. The Plaintiffs are also seeking to recover the fees paid to the consultants (approximately R7 million) arising from their failure to carry out their mandate in terms of the contract concluded between the parties. The matter is currently being defended.

(2) Department of Public Works (Security upgrade at Nkandla): The SIU instituted civil proceedings against Minenhle Makhanya and another in the High Court (KwaZulu-Natal Division – Pietermaritzburg) under case number 11107/14 in which the SIU is asking the court to order Mr Makhanya to pay approximately R155 million to the Department. This case is defended and on-going.

(3) Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (formerly known as the Department of Land Affairs) in its national department, its provincial departments, its trading entities and their respective agencies (herein referred to as the DRDLR) and the State Information Technology Agency (PTY) Ltd (herein referred to as SITA): The SIU instituted civil proceedings against Gijima AST (Pty) Ltd and others in the High Court (Gauteng Division) under case number 88170/14 in which the SIU is asking the court to declare the tender and resulting contract unlawful and void ab initio. This case is defended and on-going.

(4) Department of Communications: The Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services and the SIU instituted civil proceedings against Media Corner (Pty) Ltd and others in the High Court (Gauteng Division) under case number 66037/14 in which the Department and the SIU are asking the court to declare the tender and resulting contract unlawful and void ab initio, while also claiming approximately R12.7 million from Media Corner and asking for a type of debating of accounts in respect of the remaining approximately R32.7 million. This case is defended and on-going.

(5) USAASA (Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa): The SIU instituted civil proceedings against Mr Zami Nkosi, USAASA and others in the High Court (Gauteng Division) under case number 43250/14 in which the SIU is asking the court to declare the appointment of Mr Zami Nkosi as the Chief Executive Officer of the USAASA unlawful. This case is defended and on-going.

 

 

07 September 2015 - NW2942

Profile picture: Van Dalen, Mr P

Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy

Will her department release an updated version of the Integrated Resource Plan; if not, why not;if so, when?

Reply:

Yes, as soon as the policy adjustment process is completed and Cabinet approval is obtained.

07 September 2015 - NW3046

Profile picture: Mbhele, Mr ZN

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What did the Deputy Minister of Police mean by her remarks on 4 August 2015 when she said that the SA Police Service’s strategic plan must always intend to treat heinous criminals as outcasts, who must neither have place in the society nor peace in their cells and that they must be treated as cockroaches, (b) how does she reconcile her remarks with her constitutional obligation to uphold the Bill of Rights which protects the human dignity of all and guarantees the right of everyone to security of the person which includes the right not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhumane or degrading way and (c) what action will he take to reprimand her for the specified remarks?

Reply:

(a)  All Ministers and Deputy Ministers have officials who are tasked to draft speaker notes. The Deputy Minister of Police did not deliver speaker notes; but a speech, which did not entail the alleged remarks as alluded. A factual recording of the Deputy Minister of Police’s speech is available upon request.

(b)  The Deputy Minister of Police always abides by the Constitution and Laws of the democratic Republic of South Africa; and respects all international conventions and instruments that South Africa is signatory to.

(c)  There are no grounds to reprimand the Deputy Minister of Police, thus, no action will be taken against her.

07 September 2015 - NW3317

Profile picture: Carter, Ms D

Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Transport

Whether the Government and the SA National Roads Agency have any immediate plans to (a) provide overtaking strips on the many steep inclines that stretch for many kilometers on the N2 between Kokstad and Umtata, considering how slow-moving heavy vehicles on the roads slow down all other vehicles behind them to a long crawl and make impatient drivers take dangerous risks that endanger innocent motorists, (b) fence off the road boundaries, considering both the deadly toll on animals every day and the danger such accidents pose to motorists and (c) demarcate rest areas which will allow rural communities to set up refreshment stalls, provide car washes and build rondavels for accommodation; if not, why not, in each case; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(a) The N2 extends for roughly 190 km between Mthatha and Kokstad. On this section safe passing opportunities have been provided over approximately 150km, particularly between Mthatha and Mount Frere, and between Mount Ayliff and Kokstad. Between Mount Frere and the Ngcelweni river, 40km north of Mount Frere, the N2 is of an older standard but design is in progress to upgrade this section which will include the provision of passing opportunities.

(b) Fencing of the N2 reserve boundaries was upgraded during construction and thereafter maintained through routine maintenance projects. The South of Brooks Nek fencing has recently been upgraded as part of a construction project. Fencing between Qumbu and Mount Frere is being upgraded over 37km as part of a construction project. Furthermore, about 33 km of fencing will be upgraded under the future construction project in the Southern side of Qumbu.

Vandalism and theft of fencing components is an ongoing challenge, as is the control of the closure of gates. The non closure of gates results in the entry of animals into the road reserve and then being trapped in a fenced corridor. The Provincial Department of Transport have introduced rangers to patrol the roads for the purpose of controlling stray animals.

(c) The N2 is considered to be a mobility road and the location of trading facilities should be considered with caution as it introduces additional turning movements with the associated reduction of the safe operation of this high speed mobility road. Such facilities are best located on lower speed access roads which operate under lower traffic volumes and speeds. Additionally it should be noted that trading on public and national roads are controlled under legislation.

07 September 2015 - NW3048

Profile picture: Mbhele, Mr ZN

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

What are the relevant (a) standing orders, (b) national instructions and (c) standard operating procedures governing the transportation of accused persons in police custody between SA Police Service holding facilities and the courts?

Reply:

(a), (b) and (c) The transportation of persons in custody of the Service is governed by Standing Order (G) 345 which includes the transportation of accused persons who are in police custody between SA Police Service holding facilities and the courts. SO (G) 345: Transportation of persons in custody of the Service and related matters, deals with all the operational aspects applicable to the transportation and escorting of persons in custody of the Service. The Standing Order prescribes the applicable operational aspects once a person in custody must be transported, including all the relevant arrangements which must be performed in order to ensure safe and secure transportation. Standing Order (G) 345 attached for ease of reference.

07 September 2015 - NW3120

Profile picture: Figg, Mr MJ

Figg, Mr MJ to ask the Dr M J Figg (DA) asked the Minister of Public Works:

Who is eligible to use the parliamentary bus service to and from the parliamentary villages? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 3120 [NW3661E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 32 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Dr M J Figg (DA) asked the Minister of Public Works: Who is eligible to use the parliamentary bus service to and from the parliamentary villages? NW3661E ___________________________________________________________________________ REPLY: The Minister of Public Works Members of Parliament, Sessional Officials, and where appropriate, their dependents, are eligible to utilise the transport service to and from the Parliamentary Villages and Parliament. ___________________________________________________________________________

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works

Members of Parliament, Sessional Officials, and where appropriate, their dependents, are eligible to utilise the transport service to and from the Parliamentary Villages and Parliament.

___________________________________________________________________________

07 September 2015 - NW2933

Profile picture: Van Dalen, Mr P

Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy

With reference to the solar water heating contracting model mentioned in her department’s Annual Performance Plan for the first quarter of 2015-16 financial year, (a) did Cabinet approve the specified model and (b) what are the exact details of the specified model?

Reply:

(a) Yes.

(b) Cabinet approved the new model for Solar Water Heaters on 24 June 2015. An Inter-Ministerial Committee on Energy will finalise the model.

07 September 2015 - NW1532

Profile picture: Balindlela, Ms ZB

Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)With reference to her replies to question 89 and question 619 on 23 March 2015 and 24 March 2015, respectively, how does she reconcile the calculated average cost of R96 491.00 for a toilet in the Eastern Cape and the cost of R9 500.00 for installing a ventilated improved toilet in the Eastern Cape; (2) (a) what is the name of the contractor who built the 57 toilets in the Eastern Cape, (b) when (i) were the toilets completed and (ii) was payment made to the contractor, (c) for the construction of how many toilets did the contract go out on tender and (d) in which municipalities were the 57 toilets built; (3)(a) what is the name of the contractor who built the 530 toilets in the Northern Cape,(b) when (i) were the toilets completed and (ii) was payment made to the contractor, (c) for the construction of how many toilets did the contract go out on tender, (d) in which municipalities were the 530 toilets built and (e) why was the calculated average cost of building a toilet R40 943.00?

Reply:

(1) With reference to question 89 of 10 March 2015 the response was adequately provided and was addressing the average cost of installing a Ventilated Improved Pit (VIP) latrine at the cost of R9 500.00 (Nine thousand five hundred) that includes the top and underground structure, health and hygiene education, project management cost and construction costs, whereas the response to question 619 of 6 March 2015 was with regard to the Bucket Eradication Programme.

(2) The name of the contractors who built the 57 toilets in Makana Local Municipality: Eastern Cape is Tyolumnqa Civils and Andile Plant Hire. Construction was completed between November 2013 and March 2014 and payment was made to the contractor. The contract went out on tender for the construction of 737 toilets.

(3) The names of the contractors who built the 363 toilets in Sol Plaatjie Municipality: Northern Cape are Reyoko Construction and Designs and LFP Trading. Construction was completed in July 2014 and payment was made to the contractor. The contract went out on tender for the construction of 954 toilets.

The Rural Household Infrastructure Grant (RHIG) provides dry, on-site sanitation at an average cost of between R9 500 (Single pit toilet) and R11 500 (Double pit toilet) however, variations may occur from province to province and may marginally increase the cost due to location of the project and the availability of materials which at times will be imported or transported from other provinces, if adequate stock is not available from local suppliers.

With regard to Water Borne Sanitation, the cost of providing a new toilet structure in urban and peri-urban areas is between R12 000 to R15 000. This does not include the water and sewer reticulation network and other direct or indirect cost associated with the project. This programme does not provide sanitation in rural areas.

Requesting the Honorable Member to clarify on the referred calculated average cost of building a toilet at the cost of R96 491.00 and R40 943.00.

---00O00---

07 September 2015 - NW3147

Profile picture: Robinson, Ms D

Robinson, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police

(a) How many cases of human trafficking were reported to the SA Police Service in the (i) 2010-11, (ii) 2011-12, (iii) 2012-13, (iv) 2013-14 and (v) 2014-15 financial years, (b) how many of the specified cases involved (i) female and (ii) male victims in each case and (c) what was the nationality of the victims identified in each case?

Reply:

(a) How many cases of human trafficking were reported to the SA Police Service in the (i) 2010-11, (ii) 2011-12, (iii) 2012-13, (iv) 2013-14 and (v) 2014-15 financial years

 

PROVINCES

2010/2011

(i)

2011/2012

(ii)

2012/2013

(iii)

2013/2014

(iv)

2014/2015

(v)

TOTAL

KZN

05

05

01

01

00

12

WC

09

12

09

06

03

39

GP

01

01

06

06

01

15

NW

01

02

02

00

01

06

LIM

00

00

01

00

03

04

MP

01

00

01

00

01

03

FS

00

00

00

01

02

03

NC

00

00

00

02

01

03

EC

01

01

01

03

01

07

TOTALS

18

21

21

19

13

92

(b) How many of the specified cases involved (i) female and (ii) male victims in each case

PROVINCES

2010/2011

2011/2012

2012/2013

2013/2014

2014/2015

TOTAL

KZN

Case 1: 09 (f)

Case 2: 03 (f)

Case 3: 01 (f)

01 (m)

Case 4: 01 (f)

Case 5: 01 (f)

Case 1: 01 (f)

Case 2: 00

Case 3: 01 (f)

Case 4: 20 (f)

Case 5: 00

Case 1: 01 (f)

01 (m)

Case1: 02 (f)

00

40 Females

02 Males

WC

Case 1: 06 (f)

Case 2: 01 (f)

Case 3: 07 (f)

Case 4: 06 (f)

Case 5: 01 (f)

Case 6: 01 (f)

Case 7: 02 (f)

Case 8: 01(f)

Case 9: 01(f)

Case 1: 01 (f)

Case 2: 01 (f)

Case 3: 03 (f)

Case 4: 01 (f)

Case 5: 01 (f)

Case 6: 03 (f)

Case 7: 01 (f)

Case 8: 01(f)

Case 9: 01(f)

Case 10: 01 (f)

Case 11:01(f)

Case 12: 01(f)

Case 1: 01 (f)

Case 2: 01 (f)

Case 3: 01 (f)

Case 4: 01 (f)

Case 5: 10 (f)

Case 6: 01 (f)

Case 7: 01 (f)

Case 8: 01(f)

Case 9: 01(f)

Case 1: 01 (f)

Case 2: 01 (f)

Case 3: 02 (f)

Case 4: 03 (f)

Case 5: 02 (f)

Case 6: 02 (f)

Case 1: 02 (f)

Case 2: 01 (f)

Case 3: 01 (f)

75 Females

GP

Case 1: 05 (f)

Case 1: 09 (f)

Case 1: 14 (f)

Case 2: 02 (f)

Case 3: 01 (f)

Case 4: 05 (f)

Case 5: 02 (f)

Case 6: 01 (f)

Case 1: 02 (f)

Case 2: 03 (f)

Case 3: 09 (m)

Case 4: 03 (m)

Case 5: 01 (f)

Case 6: 01 (f)

Case 1:02(f)

48 Females

12 Males

NW

Case 1:01(f)

Case 1:01(f)

Case 2:01 (f)

Case 1:03(f)

Case 2:02 (f)

00

Case 1:01(f)

09 Females

00 Males

LIM

00

00

Case 1: 01 (m)

00

Case 1: 01 (m)

Case 2: 01 (f)

Case 3: 19 (f)

02 Females

01 Males

MP

Case 1: 01 (f)

01 (m)

00

Case 1: 05 (f)

00

Case 1: 01 (f)

Case 1: 01 (m)

07 Females

02 Males

FS

00

00

00

Case 1: 01(f)

Case 1: 01(f)

Case 2: 01(f)

03 Females

NC

00

00

00

Case 1: 02 (f)

Case 2: 04 (f)

Case 1:01 (f)

07 Females

00 Males

EC

Case 1: 02 (f)

Case 1: 00

Case 1: 05 (f)

Case 1: 02 (f)

Case 2: 01 (f)

Case 3: 03 (f)

Case 1:01 (f)

14 Females

TOTALS

Females: 49

Males: 2

Females: 45

Males: 00

Females: 50

Males: 1

Females: 28

Males: 12

Females: 11

Males: 1

Females: 183

Males: 16

(c) What was the nationality of the victims identified in each case

PROVINCES

2010/2011

2011/2012

2012/2013

2013/2014

2014/2015

TOTAL

KZN

Case 1: 09 SA

Case 2: 03 SA

Case 3: 02 SA

Case 4: 01 SA

Case 5: 01 SA

Case 1: 01 SA

Case 2: 00

Case 3: 01 SA

Case 4: 20 SA

Case 5: 00

Case 1: 02 SA

Case1: 02 SA

00

42 South Africans

WC

Case 1: 06 SA

Case 2: 01 SA

Case 3: 07 SA

Case 4: 06 SA

Case 5: 01 SA

Case 6: 01 Russian

Case 7: 02 Chinese

Case 8: 01 SA

Case 9: 01SA

Case 1: 01SA

Case 2: 01 SA

Case 3: 03 Chinese

Case 4: 01 SA

Case 5: 01 SA

Case 6: 03 Cameroonian

Case 7: 01 Chinese

Case 8: 01SA

Case 9: 01 SA

Case 10: 01 SA

Case 11:01 SA

Case 12: 01 SA

Case 1: 01 SA

Case 2: 01 SA

Case 3: 01 SA

Case 4: 01 SA

Case 5: 10 Cambodian

Case 6: 01 SA

Case 7: 01 SA

Case 8: 01 SA

Case 9: 01 SA

Case 1: 01 Nigerian

Case 2: 01 Nigerian

Case 3: 02 Thai

Case 4: 03 SA

Case 5: 02 Nigerian

Case 6: 02 Nigerian

Case 1: 02 Nigerian

Case 2: 01 SA

Case 3: 01 SA

50 South Africans

6 Chinese

2 Thai

8 Nigerians

1 Russian

3 Cameroonian

10 Cambodian

GP

Case 1: 05 SA

Case 1: 09 Chinese

Case 1: 14 SA

Case 2: 02 Lesotho

Case 3: 01 SA

Case 4: 02 Thai

01 Yugoslavian

01 Chinese

01 SA

Case 5: 02 Thai

Case 6: 01 SA

Case 1: 01 Chinese

01 Thai

Case 2: 03 Chinese

Case 3: 09 Bangladeshi

Case 4: 03 Pakistani

Case 5: 01 SA

Case 6: 01 SA

Case 1:02 SA

26 South Africans

14 Chinese

02 Lesotho

05 Thai

01 Yugoslavian

09 Bangladeshi

03 Pakistani

NW

Case 1: 01 SA

Case 1: 01 SA

Case 2: 01 SA

Case 1: 03 SA

Case 2: 02 Chinese

00

Case 1: 01 SA

07 South Africans

02 Chinese

LIM

00

00

Case 1: 1 Zimbabwean

00

Case 1: 01 Ethiopian Male

Case 2: 19 Ethiopians

Case 3: 53 Malawians

20 Ethiopians

53 Malawians

MP

Case 1: 01 Mozambican

01 Mozambican

00

Case 1: 05 Mozambicans girls

00

Case 1: 01 SA

Case 1: 01 SA

07 Mozambicans

02 South Africans

FS

00

00

00

Case 1: 01 SA

Case 1: 01 SA

Case 2: 01 SA

03 South Africans

NC

00

00

00

Case 1: 02 SA

Case 2: 04 SA

Case 1:01 SA

07 South Africans

EC

Case 1: 02 SA

Case 1: 00

Case 1: 05 SA

Case 1: 02 SA

Case 2: 01 SA

Case 3: 03 SA

Case 1:01 SA

14 South Africans

TOTALS

52 South Africans

02 Mozambican

02 Chinese

01 Russian

33 South Africans

13 Chinese

03 Cameroonian

35 South Africans

3 Chinese

05 Mozambicans

04 Thai

02 Lesotho

01 Yugoslavian

1 Zimbabwean

10 Cambodian

20 South Africans

4 Chinese

09 Bangladeshi

02 Thai

03 Pakistani

6 Nigerians

11 South Africans

53 Malawians

20 Ethiopians

151 South Africans

53 Malawians

20 Ethiopians

22 Chinese

10 Cambodian

09 Bangladeshi

08 Nigerians

07 Mozambicans

06 Thai

03 Pakistani

03 Cameroonian

02 Lesotho

01 Yugoslavian

01 Russian

07 September 2015 - NW3119

Profile picture: Figg, Mr MJ

Figg, Mr MJ to ask the Minister of Police

(1)With reference to the recent strike action in the Baviaans Local Municipality, why did the SA Police Service, under the supervision of two certain persons (names and details furnished), allegedly refuse to (a) protect citizens when requested to do so and (b) enforce a court order aimed at preventing strikers from damaging and illegally occupying municipal property; (2) whether he will take any action against the specified persons; if not, why not; if so, what action will he take?

Reply:

(1)(a) The South African Police Service acted promptly to protect the citizens when requested to do so. Throughout the strike action there has been continuous communication and engagement between SAPS and Municipal Manager. There has also been a continuous communication and engagement between Major General Mki, Deputy Provincial Commissioner: Operational Services from the Provincial Commissioner’s office and Mr Von Buchenroder M. (MPL, DA) and he had been kept abreast about the police actions pertaining to the strike. Consequent to these police actions, two criminal cases have been registered being Willowmore CAS 34/07/2015 Assault Common and Willowmore CAS 46/07/2015 Attempted Murder.

(1)(b) The South African Police Service did enforce the Court Order and the subsequent occupation of the Office of the Municipal Manager was through his permission on the misunderstanding that the group representing the strikers wanted to engage in negotiations in order to address the causes of the strike.

When it transpired later that this was not the intention, the Municipal Manager summoned the police who immediately removed the group. In instances where the strikers convened a gathering in contravention of the order, the police immediately broke up such gathering and criminal cases were registered.

A municipal truck that was parked at Steytlerville municipal premises was damaged during the night and the matter is still under investigation. Due to the above police actions, the following criminal cases have been registered being Steytlerville CAS 14/07/2015 Malicious Damage to Property, Willowmore CAS 47/07/2015 Intimidation and Willowmore CAS 43/07/2015 Illegal Gathering.

(2) No action is envisaged against the two officers. There is no evidence to substantiate the failure to act on their part in this situation but on the contrary criminal investigations have been instituted against the strikers and some cases have already referred to the prosecuting authority for decision.

07 September 2015 - NW3080

Profile picture: Lotriet, Prof  A

Lotriet, Prof A to ask the Minister of Science and Technology

(a) How does (i) her department and (ii) entities reporting to her define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) her department and (bbb) the entities reporting to her?”

Reply:

(a) (i) The Department of Science and Technology defines “red tape” as any process or administrative requirement that hinders the effective operation and implementation of policies, programmes that seek to deliver on the mandate of the department.

(ii) The response regarding the definition of red tape by entities is presented below:

Entities

Definition of red tape

Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf)

Process that entails some restrictive processes or hindrance that have to be followed or complied with in the performance of an activity.

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)

Rules, processes and procedures that impose unnecessary delay, and inaction or cost to the supplier(s) and/or potential beneficiaries.

Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)

Unnecessary bureaucratic practices which adds no value to desired outcomes, but are imposed on processes nonetheless.

National Research Foundation (NRF)

Additional administrative measure, over and above the established policies and procedures of the organisation that are implemented through legislated authorities.

South African National Space Agency (SANSA)

Unnecessary and cumbersome rules, regulations, requirements, processes or procedures that result in unacceptable and unnecessary delays in business processes and decision making.

Technology Innovation Agency (TIA)

Excessive regulation or rigid conformity to formal rules that is considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinders or prevents action or decision-making.

(b) Response to the specific interventions and systems that have been implemented to identify and reduce red tape is provided below:

Entities/ Department

(i) Interventions

(ii) Systems

   

(aa) Identify

(bb) Reduce

(aa) Identify

(bb) Reduce

   

(aaa) Department

(bbb) Entities

Department of Science and Technology

Establishment of an Operations Committee to address operational matters.

Review of policies and procedures every two years (or as required) as part of continuous improvement or with the introduction of new/ legislative amendments.

Document adverse effects of policy implementation to inform future reviews and amendments. Development of standard operating procedures (as applicable) to maximise efficiencies.

   

Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf)

There are no specific interventions.

   

No systems to identify red tape.

No systems to reduce red tape.

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)

There are no specific interventions.

   

Continually review processes to incorporate improvements and to align to new legislative requirements.

Developed systems and processes to maximise its efficiencies and effectiveness.

Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)

There are no specific interventions.

   

Identify these through internal consultation and by working closely with the Internal and External Auditors and then determine what is required to adhere to in order to remain compliant.

No systems to reduce red tape.

National Research Foundation (NRF)

There are no specific interventions.

   

No systems to identify red tape.

No systems to reduce red tape.

South African National Space Agency (SANSA)

There are no specific interventions.

   

Identify through service level standards or turnaround time targets that are set for key processes.

Regularly review policies, procedures and systems with a view to continually assess their effectiveness.

Technology Innovation Agency (TIA)

-Materiality framework was amended to enhance decision making and execution of decisions.

-Delegation of authority was refined.

-Revision of Investment framework policy.

-Bi-monthly Exco meetings.

-Special board meetings to expedite decisions made.

-The operational team in the Supply Chain Management Unit has been expanded to meet business’ needs quicker and more efficient.

-Employee culture survey.

-Complaints review.

-Customer satisfaction surveys.

   

Operational inefficiencies are identified through inadequate turnaround times of approval and payment of projects and expenditure. It is also identified through employee engagement surveys and customer satisfaction surveys.

Investment management system has been designed and implemented.

07 September 2015 - NW2987

Profile picture: Kohler-Barnard, Ms D

Kohler-Barnard, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether any member of the SA Police Service (SAPS) Public Order Policing Unit was transferred to the Parliamentary Protection Services; if so, in each specified case (a) what is the name of the relevant officer, (b) what (i)position and/or (ii) rank did they hold, (c)(i) whether the relevant person has resigned from the SAPS and (ii) on what day was the resignation effected and (d) what are the implications to the specified person’s pension as a result of the transfer; (2) whether any of the specified persons were called upon to remove any Members of Parliament during the State of the Nation Address on 12 February 2015; if so, (a) how many such persons now serve in the Parliamentary Protection Services and (b) what are their names?

Reply:

  1. No POP members were transferred to the Parliamentary Protection Service.

(1)(a) Not applicable.

(1)(b)(i) Not applicable.

(1)(b)(ii) Not applicable.

(1)(c)(i) Not applicable.

(1)(c)(ii) Not applicable.

(1)(d) Not applicable.

(2) No.

(2)(a) Not applicable.

(2)(b) Not applicable.

07 September 2015 - NW2860

Profile picture: Majola, Mr TR

Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Communications:

)What is her position with regard to her alleged response on a letter from a certain person (name and details furnished); (2)Did the alleged cordial relationship between the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, and a certain person (name furnished) determined how she dealt with allegations of misconduct against the specified person? NW3333E REPLY: MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS Minister does not respond to hearsay. MR NN MUNZHELELE DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING] DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE: MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP) MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE

Reply:

Minister does not respond to hearsay.

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE

07 September 2015 - NW2930

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

(1) Whether, given the fact that the investment protection agreement between South Africa and Zimbabwe does not retroactively provide for the protection of property rights of South African citizens against expropriation and/or illegal occupation before the commencement of the agreement, he will consider introducing legislation to Parliament to bring about compensation for such disadvantaged people by making the confiscation of assets of the Zimbabwean government and/or responsible ministers and/or officials in South Africa possible; if not, why not, seen against the background of the Bill of Rights contained in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and relevant international law; if so, what are the relevant details; and

Reply:

(1) I wish to inform the Honourable Member that neither the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, nor the South African Law Reform Commission, has such pending legislation or research projects, in process.

(2) As the matter relates to international property rights, which are not in the jurisdiction of the Republic of South Africa, I would recommend that the Honourable Member address such question to the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation.

07 September 2015 - NW3050

Profile picture: Kohler-Barnard, Ms D

Kohler-Barnard, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)On whose authority did Mr Solomon Makgale release a media statement that the Provincial SA Police Service Commissioners have full confidence in the National Commissioner; (2) did the National Police Commissioner sign off on the statement; (3) did the National Police Commissioner give an order that any of the nine Provincial Commissioners must sign the specified statement; if so, to which of the Provincial Commissioners did she give such an order; (4) (a) how many Provincial Commissioners did not wish to have their names attached to the document and (b) what are the relevant details in this regard?

Reply:

  1. The Board of Commissioners.
  2. No.
  3. No. The statement was signed off by all the 9 Provincial Commissioners.

(4)(a) None.

(4)(b) Not applicable.

07 September 2015 - NW3004

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training

Whether his department intends to encourage every university with a law department in the country to revert to a BA, LLB curriculum seeing that the present curtailed provisions are allegedly inadequate to the needs of the profession and are inadequately equipping new lawyers with the depth of literacy so necessary to their profession; if not, why not; if so, what efforts is his department putting in place to redress the inadequacy of literacy amongst new law graduates?

Reply:

The National Reviews’ Directorate of the Council on Higher Education (CHE) circulated the draft manual, proposal and guidelines for the review of all Bachelor of Law (LLB) programmes on 5 August 2015 for comments.

The starting point of the review is the LLB qualification standard, which has been recently developed by CHE in consultation with the Reference Group on Standards Development comprising of academic experts in the field of law education. The review is an assessment of whether or not the current LLB degree programme meets the qualification standard and complies with criteria for design, delivery, output, impact and sustainability, derived from the CHE’s Criteria for Programme Accreditation.

Furthermore, the Department has representation on the National LLB Task Team, which will upon completion of the national review process, advise me on the structure of the programme at all universities. The National LLB Task Team comprises of representatives from the South African Law Deans Association (SALDA), Society of Law Teachers of Southern Africa (SLTSA), Law Society of South Africa (LSSA), General Council of the Bar (GCB), Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, and the Department of Higher Education and Training.

 

 

Compiler/Contact persons:

Ext:

DIRECTOR – GENERAL

STATUS:

DATE:

REPLY TO QUESTION 3004 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED

Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP

MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING

STATUS:

DATE:

07 September 2015 - NW2997

Profile picture: Hlengwa, Mr M

Hlengwa, Mr M to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

How many (a) public servants have retired or resigned before the prescribed retirement age in the 2014-15 financial year and (b) have re-applied for re-employment in the Public Service sector?

Reply:

The figures provided herewith below have been extracted from PERSAL. These figures exclude the (i) department of Defence and the (ii) Security sector:

(a) Employees who retired or resigned before the prescribed retirement ages during the 2014/15 financial year

Employees who retired before their prescribed retirement ages

10 449

Resignations

39 194

Total

49 643

(b) Re - employment in the Public Service

Employees who retired before their prescribed retirement ages

92

Employees who have resigned

6 614

Total

6 706

07 September 2015 - NW3053

Profile picture: Steenhuisen, Mr JH

Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

(a) How does the Minister define Red Tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce Red Tape in your (aaa) Department and (bbb) the entities reporting to you?

Reply:

(a) Red tape is a collection or sequence of forms and procedures, oppressively complex and time-consuming, required to gain bureaucratic approval for something. In the context of the work of government, officials at junior, middle and senior management level are expected to make decisions aimed at improving service delivery. However it should be noted that officials are only able to fulfill their duties in terms of the requirements of relevant legislation. Often these decisions are complex and could lead to significant discontent amongst stakeholders at various ends of the result of such decisions. It is then currently the norm that such decisions are taken to court for review of the decision by disappointed stakeholders. In order to ensure that complex decisions would be deemed justifiable in a court of law, this requires that such decisions involve more consulting, more processes that verify adequacy, reliability and completeness of information considered, which in turn increases the time taken to reach a decision. This additional involvement in time is to ensure that when a decision is taken, it can be implemented without concern for court processes that may delay implementation.

(b) (i) and (ii), (aa) and (bb), (aaa) the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development:

Specific interventions and systems developed and implemented in the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development to improve the standards of service delivery, include the following:

  1. Service delivery champions have been appointed to ensure improvements in their respective areas of responsibility;
  2. The review of Service Delivery Models of Branches in the Department with the aim of strengthening the structures responsible for service delivery at the lowest levels;
  3. Decentralization of governance structures to regions with Regional Heads to strategically manage service delivery at service point level;
  4. Decentralization of operational functions with specific delegations and standard operating procedures and standards of performance to court managers to enable them to run the institution, procure and appoint staff;
  5. KHAEDU deployment of senior managers at lower performing service points with the specific mandate to unblock difficulties related to service delivery; and
  6. Redesign of processes and policies and deployment of Information Technology solutions to improve time in delivery of services e.g., payment of maintenance.

(b) (i) and (ii), (aa) and (bb), (bbb) Entities reporting to the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services:

Regarding the public entities, Boards and Councils reporting to the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, such as the Legal Aid Board South Africa, the Debt Collectors Council and the Special Investigation Unit, the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development has members of the department representing the Department liaising with or sitting on such Boards to assist in dealing with blockages, streamlining communication and speeding up processes.

The Council for Debt Collectors has specifically indicated that although no formal systems have been implemented to identify and reduce red tape from the Department, the Council as it reports to the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, has implemented the following measures:

  1. Stringent adherence to the principles as laid out in the King III Governance Report;
  2. Drafting and submission of an integrated annual report to Parliament even though there is no legal obligation to do so as the Council does not fall under the Public Finance Management Act; and
  3. Implementation of a 7 day turnover period for new registrations that is rigorously monitored.

07 September 2015 - NW2967

Profile picture: Redelinghuys, Mr MH

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether the SA Police Service(SAPS) has policies or guidelines for enforcing legislation on sex work and suspected sex workers; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether SAPS members are trained about the specified policies or guidelines; (3) whether the specified training includes (a) apprehending suspected sex workers, (b) searching their person and (c) identifying suspected sex workers; (4) (a) how many complaints against SAPS members regarding (i) assault and/or (ii) abuse of suspected sex workers have been received in the (aa) 2012-13, (bb) 2013-14 and (cc) 2014-15 financial years and (b)(i) what were the outcomes of the specified investigations and (ii) what action has been taken against the specified SAPS members?

Reply:

  1. The South African Police Service does not have a specific policy or guidelines for enforcing legislation on sex work and suspected sex workers. There are however generic policies and guidelines utilized by members instead of policy and guidelines for specific offences.

Members of the South African Police Service carry out their functions and exercise their powers in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977), including the lawful arrest of sex workers. The circumstances under which any arrest may be performed and the method of arrest is set out in Standing Order (General) 341 (Arrest and the treatment of an arrested person until such person is handed over to the community service centre commander).

The Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and related matters) Amendment Act of 2007 (Act No. 32 of 2007) created an offence relating to the client of the sex worker (i.e engaging the sexual services of persons 18 years or older). National Instruction 3 of 2008 on Sexual Offences provides for the implementation of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 (Act No. 32 of 2007). 

2.  SAPS members receive training in the following disciplines that also apply to law enforcement in respect of sex work:

  • Human Rights in Policing
  • Victim Empowerment
  • Dealing with Vulnerable Groups
  • Apprehension of Suspects

3.  The SAPS does not have specific training programmes that deal with the apprehension and searching of sex workers. The training provided is based in SAPS directives mentioned in par (1) above and applies to all individuals apprehended by the SAPS, irrespective of the alleged crime.

4.  SAPS is unfortunately not able to provide the details within the given time frame as the information is not readily available and must be obtained from the provinces. A request is hereby made for an extension in order for us to provide quality and correct information as soon as it is received.

07 September 2015 - NW3148

Profile picture: Robinson, Ms D

Robinson, Ms D to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

(a) How many cases of human trafficking did his department prosecute in the (i) 2010-11, (ii) 2011-12, (iii) 2012-13, (iv) 2013-14 and (v) 2014-15 financial years, (b) how many of the specified cases resulted in successful convictions and (c) (i) how many of the specified cases involved female victims and (ii) what was the nationality of the victims identified in each case?

Reply:

(a) The National Prosecuting Authority has reported the following numbers of prosecutions for human trafficking during the financial years requested:

  1. 2010/11: 1;
  2. 2011/12: 1;
  3. 2012/13: 3;
  4. 2013/14: 1; and
  5. 2014/15: 19.

The NPA has added that several cases are currently under investigation and in order not to jeopardise these cases that are sub judice, the NPA is unable to provide any information regarding the said matters.

(b) How many of the specified cases were convictions?

  1. 2010/11: 1;
  2. 2011/12: 1;
  3. 2012/13: 3;
  4. 2013/14: 1; and
  5. 2014/2015: 7 convictions.

Based on the information available at the time of this response, the NPA is only aware of two additional prosecutions on trafficking which resulted in an acquittal (both in the Western Cape. In the one matter the accused was convicted on minor charges and in the other case, the complainant refused to testify.

Progress in other matters: In eight (8) matters, the cases are partly-heard; in one case, the trial is to commence in October 2015; in one case, the trial date was set on 25 August 2015; and in two cases, bail applications will still be heard.

(c) (i) How many of the specified cases involved female victims?

Statistics regarding the gender of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable. However, based on experience, the NPA’s cases involve predominantly female victims.

(ii) What was the nationality of the victims identified in each case?

Statistics regarding the nationality of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS RECEIVED FROM THE NATIONAL PROSECUTION AUTHORITY:

(a) How many cases of human trafficking was prosecuted in the financial years as indicated:

(i) 2010 – 2011

NAME

PROVINCE / DIVISION

DATE

STATUS

S v Eloff & Another

Free State

2009

CONVICTION – Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 8 years imprisonment suspended for 5 years on conditions.

(ii) 2011 – 2012

NAME

PROVINCE / DIVISION

DATE

STATUS

S v Dos Santos

North Gauteng

2011

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 (4 charges). Sentenced to life imprisonment.

(iii) 2012 – 2013

NAME

PROVINCE / DIVISION

DATE

STATUS

S v Shembe

Western Cape

2012

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 23 years imprisonment.

S v Ntonga & Bell

Eastern Cape

2013

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.

S v Gwambe

Mpumalanga

2013

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.

(iv) 2013 – 2014

NAME

PROVINCE / DIVISION

DATE

STATUS

S v Jezile

Western Cape

2014

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 and Rape section 3 of Act 32 / 2007. Sentenced to 22 years imprisonment (conviction and sentence confirmed on appeal).

  1. 2014 – 2015

NAME

PROVINCE / DIVISION

DATE

STATUS

S v Allima

KZN

2014

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to life imprisonment.

S v Simelane

North Gauteng

2014

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 and Rape section 3 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 30 years imprisonment.

S v Mabuza

Mpumalanga

2014

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 (8 charges). Sentenced to life imprisonment on all 8 charges.

S v Wang

Western Cape

2014

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Postponed for sentence.

S v Knoetze

Eastern Cape

2014

CONVICTION – Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.

S v Uche & Others

KZN

2015

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Postponed for sentence.

S v Palan & Another

KZN

2015

CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.

S v Rugnath

KZN

2014

Partly heard

S v Mansaur

KZN

2014

Partly heard

S v Matini & Another

Eastern Cape

2014

Partly heard

S v Gudwana

Western Cape

2014

Partly heard

S v Tiki & Others

Western Cape

2014

Partly heard

S v Wellem & Others

Western Cape

2014

Partly heard

S v Agasi & Others

Western Cape

2014

Partly heard

S v Jooste

Western Cape

2014

Trial to commence in October 2015

S v Zweni

KZN

2015

Partly heard

S v Chijoko & Another

WC

2015

Trial date to be set on 25/08/2015

S v Mbene & Another

WC

2015

For bail application on 27/8/2015

S v Okoye & Others

WC

2015

For bail application on 28/9/2015

Several cases are currently under investigation, in order not to jeopardise these cases that are sub judice, we are unable to provide any information regarding the said matters.

(b) How many of the specified cases were convictions?

See schedule as per paragraph (a) supra. Based on the information available at the time of this response, the NPA is only aware of two additional prosecutions on trafficking which resulted in an acquittal (both in the Western Cape. In the one matter the accused was convicted on minor charges and in the other case, the complainant refused to testify.

(c) (i) How many of the specified cases involved female victims?

Statistics regarding the gender of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable. However, based on experience, the NPA’s cases involve predominantly female victims.

(ii) What was the nationality of the victims identified in each case?

Statistics regarding the nationality of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable.

07 September 2015 - NW2857

Profile picture: Majola, Mr TR

Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Communications:

Whether, in view of an article published in a certain newspaper (name and details furnished) that a certain person (name and details furnished) acts as a consultant to her department and in view of her reply to question 2507 on 22 July 2015, in which she stated that her department did not spend money on consultants from the date of her appointment until 22 June 2015, the specified person is contracted as a consultant to her department; if so, (a) on what date was the specified person appointed, (b) what amount has her department paid to the specified person and (c) in what capacity does the specified person act as a consultant to her department? NW3330E REPLY: MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS The response to question 2507 remains. The Department did not spend money on consultants. MR NN MUNZHELELE DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING] DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE: MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP) MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE:

Reply:

The response to question 2507 remains. The Department did not spend money on consultants.

 

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

07 September 2015 - NW2569

Profile picture: Mackay, Mr G

Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Energy

Whether, with reference to her reply to question 654 on 17 March 2015, the technical task team responsible for the investigation of allegations of irregularities at the SA Nuclear Energy Corporation has concluded its investigation; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of the investigation?

Reply:

The matter is being dealt with.

07 September 2015 - NW2994

Profile picture: Groenewald, Dr PJ

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether he is planning to establish new specialist units in the SA Police Service; if not, why not; if so, (a) when and (b) what specialist units; (2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Reply:

  1. The reintroduction of specialised units in the South African Police Service is determined by organisational priorities and is being considered annually. There is no intention in the Annual Performance Plan 2015/2016 to reintroduce any additional specialised units. Existing units are continuously being capacitated to enhance their capability to render an effective and efficient service.

The moment a need for the establishment of a specialised unit is identified, the need is analysed and investigated taking existing capacities and organisational priorities into consideration in order to address a specific need.

2.  No statement will be made at this moment in time.

07 September 2015 - NW3124

Profile picture: Hoosen, Mr MH

Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

(1)Has he read the report produced by the civil society organisation, Lawyers for Human Rights, titled Queue Here for Corruption; if not, why not; if so, does he consider the findings of the specified report serious enough to warrant urgent action; (2) in light of the findings of the specified report, what steps has he taken to ensure that corruption and corrupt practices in the processing of asylum applications are eradicated?

Reply:

  1. Yes I have read the report titled “Queue Here for Corruption”.
  2. The department will be engaging with Lawyers for Human Rights on the findings and recommendations with the intention to determine the way forward on the matters raised in the report.

07 September 2015 - NW3003

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

Whether the SA Police Service publishes a monthly advisory or newsletter in hard copy or digital format to inform police personnel particularly about (a) any charges that any police officers were facing, (b) court trials and outcomes of trials where police officials were tried, (c) best practices from around the world, (d) meritorious achievements of police officials in South Africa and (e) findings of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate with regard to complaints laid against the police, in order to keep every police officer abreast of the specified issues and other issues in policing so as to encourage good practices and warn of the dire consequences of illegal or bad practices; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(a) The SAPS uses both digital and print formats to communicate relevant information regarding officers’ disciplinary matters. We send out information through the ‘All Users’ Email group on information picked up in the media regarding police officers being arrested, charged, convicted and sentenced for criminal actions, under the heading “Breaking News Advisory”. We also do print magazines monthly at national and provincial offices.

(b) We communicate court outcomes and not trials.

(c) No

(d) National and provincial management frequently nominates SAPS employees who have performed beyond the call of duty to ensure the safety of people and property in South Africa for awards. These nominations are forwarded to the National Monitoring Evaluation Committee which recommends that such members are rewarded financially and by means of a certificate endorsed by the National Commissioner and/or the Minister of Police. This is done on an ongoing basis. Approval of such nominations is distributed internally to all SAPS employees via e-mail and included in print publications.

(e) Not IPID information per se, but such information either results in internal disciplinary or criminal investigations. The outcomes of these investigations are disseminated as per response to (a) and (b) above.

07 September 2015 - NW3054

Profile picture: McGluwa, Mr JJ

McGluwa, Mr JJ to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

(a) How does (i) his department and (ii) entities reporting to him define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) his department and (bbb) the entities reporting to him?

Reply:

(a)(i)(ii)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(aaa)(bbb) The Department of Public Service and Administration and the National School of Government do not have a standard definition for red tape besides the standard dictionary meaning which generally refers to excessive regulation or rigid conformity to formal rules that are considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinder or prevent action or decision-making.

There are continuous performance monitoring reviews with specific reference to reducing lead time and improve turn-around time against the Annual Operational Plans (AOPs) and/or the Annual Performance Plans (APPs).

In keeping with the prescripts that govern effective and efficient service delivery, the following have been put in place; service delivery charter and standards, complaints handling management policy, service delivery improvement plans, amongst others, which are in addition to the processes of monitoring individual programmes and institutional performance management.

To optimise the use of ICT in order to gain some efficiency in the operations and service culture, the National School of Government is currently reviewing its service systems architecture and ICT infrastructure towards ensuring seamless delivery of education and learning programmes and courses.

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INNOVATION (CPSI)

(a)(ii)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(bbb) According to the CPSI, red tape emerges when formal rules, regulations and procedures related to the administration of service delivery are no longer effective in achieving the goal for which they were instituted and/or the cost of compliance is not justified by the benefit that citizens receives.

The CPSI Awards Programme annually unearths a number of innovations to improve turn-around time for effective and efficient public service delivery. Recent projects include the “Vota Quota” web-based procurement system of the IEC, the CFO Helpdesk at DTI, pharmacy automation in Gauteng that significantly reduces paperwork and queues, KZN’s Digital Pen for m-Health, and the Road Accident Fund’s “RAF on the Road” initiative that simplified RAF applications and pay outs.

For a more comprehensive analysis of red tape and examples of red tape reduction, please refer to the CPSI’s Future Watch publication “From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Easing the Administrative Burden of Public Service Delivery”, available from http://www.cpsi.co.za/archived-publications/ and attached herewith).

Given the size of the CPSI and its mandate, very little red tape exists within the organisation. New internal policies and processes prioritise simplified processes and the use of electronic forms and systems rather than paper-based solutions.

An example of an internal system where red tape was reduced within the CPSI is the new online system being used for travel bookings. Using the Travel Agent’s web-based system, designated staff members are doing bookings for the organisation. The system eliminates the need to use a travel consultant to make a booking on behalf of the CPSI, provides for electronic authorisation and offers access to more and cheaper options. The CPSI is already saving significant amounts using the system.

07 September 2015 - NW3047

Profile picture: Mbhele, Mr ZN

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

How many illegal and unlicensed liquor outlets have been closed by the SA Police Service in each province in the (a) 2009-10, (b) 2010-11, (c) 2011-12, (d) 2012-13, (e) 2013-14 and (f) 2014-15 financial years?

Reply:

Illegal and unlicensed liquor outlets closed down by SAPS

Financial Year

Gauteng

Mpumalanga

Limpopo

KZN

North West

N Cape

Free State

E Cape

W Cape

 

1APRIL2009TO31MARCH2010

1258

674

2604

4932

61

260

850

1210

1607

13456

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1APRIL2010TO31MARCH2011

1700

1429

2762

6432

343

324

1190

685

4018

18883

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1APRIL2011TO31MARCH2012

8966

1281

1618

16881

1363

397

977

2554

58892

92929

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1APRIL2012TO31MARCH2013

11620

821

2431

14043

1142

527

1220

2406

39537

74547

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1APRIL2013TO31MARCH2014

16278

738

1585

22058

984

260

1045

2833

31166

76947

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1APRIL2014TO31MARCH2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As from 2011/2012 to 2014/2015 the closing down of illegal and unlicensed liquor outlets by the SAPS has been a performance indicator as per the Annual Performance Plan of the SAPS. The reported statistical information was generated from the Operational Management and Monitoring System (OPAM).

Prior to this the reported statistical information (2009/2010 to 2010/211) was generated by means of a manual of system.

The reported statistical information for the financial year 2014/2015 cannot be provided as such information has not yet been released by the Minister of Police.

07 September 2015 - NW3049

Profile picture: Kohler-Barnard, Ms D

Kohler-Barnard, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police

Whether (a) a certain person (details furnished) retains the rank of Lieutenant General, (b) what is the current salary level of the specified person, (c) from which legislation and/or regulation is the specified rank derived and (d) which other persons hold the same rank?

Reply:

(a) Yes.

(b)  The current salary level of the specified person is: SMS Grade C (salary level 15).

(c) The rank is derived from the prescripts contained in Regulation 8 of the South African Police Service Act (Act No 68 of 1995), as promulgated in Government Gazette Notice No 9252, dated 1 April 2010.

(d) A total number of 23 other Lieutenant Generals (Deputy National Commissioners/Provincial Commissioners and Divisional Commissioners) are on the establishment of the South African Police Service.

 

07 September 2015 - NW3160

Profile picture: Figlan, Mr AM

Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Home Affairs

With regard to his department’s modernisation road map which indicates that the processes of the registration of marriages, issuing of death certificates and application for citizenship will be automated by mid-2015, what measures has his department put in place in respect of (a) infrastructure and (b) policies to meet this target?

Reply:

(a-b) According to the Departmental Strategic Plan 2015–2020 the department has targeted to automate the registration of marriages, divorces, deaths and citizenship business processes by the end of the 2017/2018 financial year. Currently it has only committed to continue with automation of the ID smart card and passport system through live capture in the 2015/2016 financial year. At an appropriate time the department will make further announcement on the modernisation project.

07 September 2015 - NW3108

Profile picture: Van Damme, Ms PT

Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Public Works:

(1) Who authorised the allocation of a state house to Mr Mac Maharaj from 1 January 2010 until 30 April 2015; (2) whether his department received a request from anyone to allocate a state house to the specified person; if not, how was the decision made to allocate the house; if so, (a) who made the request, (b) when was the request made and (c) on what grounds was the request made; (3) what was the total cost, including cleaning and other services, of providing the house to the specified person for the period he occupied it; (4) whether his department has a policy with regard to awarding state houses in the Bryntirion Estate in Pretoria to (a) persons who are not Ministers or Deputy Ministers and (b) special envoys; if not, why not; if so, what is the relevant policy; (5) whether his department requested the specified person to pay rent while occupying the state house; if not, why not; if so, what amount was (a) requested and (b) paid? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 3108 [NW3649E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 32 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Ms P T van Damme (DA) asked the Minister of Public Works: (1)Who authorised the allocation of a state house to Mr Mac Maharaj from 1 January 2010 until 30 April 2015; (2)whether his department received a request from anyone to allocate a state house to the specified person; if not, how was the decision made to allocate the house; if so, (a) who made the request, (b) when was the request made and (c) on what grounds was the request made; (3)what was the total cost, including cleaning and other services, of providing the house to the specified person for the period he occupied it; (4) whether his department has a policy with regard to awarding state houses in the Bryntirion Estate in Pretoria to (a) persons who are not Ministers or Deputy Ministers and (b) special envoys; if not, why not; if so, what is the relevant policy; (5)whether his department requested the specified person to pay rent while occupying the state house; if not, why not; if so, what amount was (a) requested and (b) paid? NW3649E REPLY: The Minister of Public Works (1) We could not find any official record in the Department of Public Works of who authorized the allocation of State-owned accommodation to Mr Mac Maharaj. (2)(a), (b) and (c) See the response to (1) above. (3) Services rendered at the Bryntirion Estate are centralised and costs are not recovered from individual occupants. (4) (a) and (b) State-owned accommodation at the Bryntirion Estate is not exclusively reserved for Ministers and Deputy Ministers. The Estate has different types of accommodation including houses and flats. Government officials are accommodated at the Estate as well. Following the introduction of the Turnaround Strategy in 2012 the Department has embarked on a process of further refining the Prestige policy, which includes the allocation and occupation State-owned accommodation. (5) (a) and (b) See response to (1) above. _______________________________________________________________________

Reply:

(1) We could not find any official record in the Department of Public Works of who authorized the allocation of State-owned accommodation to Mr Mac Maharaj.

(2) (a), (b) and (c) See the response to (1) above.

(3) Services rendered at the Bryntirion Estate are centralised and costs are not recovered from individual occupants.

(4) (a) and (b) State-owned accommodation at the Bryntirion Estate is not exclusively reserved for Ministers and Deputy Ministers. The Estate has different types of accommodation including houses and flats. Government officials are accommodated at the Estate as well.

Following the introduction of the Turnaround Strategy in 2012 the Department has embarked on a process of further refining the Prestige policy, which includes the allocation and occupation State-owned accommodation.

(5) (a) and (b) See response to (1) above.

_______________________________________________________________________

07 September 2015 - NW3126

Profile picture: Davis, Mr GR

Davis, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

(1) Whether a certain person (name furnished) was found guilty and convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol in 1994 and was also found guilty and convicted of culpable homicide in 1998; if so, (a) what are the specific details of the offences that the specified person was convicted of, (b) which courts handed down such conviction and (c) what sentences were handed down; (2) Was the specified person incarcerated as a result of each specified conviction; if so, for how long in each specified case; and (3) Have any of the specified convictions been expunged by his department; if so, (a) on what date were they expunged, (b) under whose authority were they expunged, (c) in terms of what legislation were they expunged and (d) what reasons were considered when the convictions of crimes were expunged?

Reply:

(1) The Departments of Justice and Constitutional Development and of Correctional Services, are not responsible for the keeping of criminal records of previous convictions. This is a function of the South African Police Service (SAPS), in particular the Criminal Record Center of the SAPS (CRC). This question should therefore be referred to the Ministry of Police for an answer or input in this regard.

(2) The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development does not have specific information in this regard.

(3) No. (a) to (d) therefore fall away.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Please also find attached a copy of the Parliamentary Question answer No 2615 of the 7th August 2015, where-in the Honourable Member is informed that no pardon has been granted by the President to the person in question, because additional information is still being awaited.

Pardons are submitted for consideration by the President, when the person concerned, does not qualify to have his conviction expunged in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977. Applications for expungement are submitted to the Director-General of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, where a convicted person has been convicted of an offence for which he/ she did not serve a term of direct imprisonment; the conviction happened more than 10 years ago; and he or she has not been found guilty of a sexual offence against a child or a mentally disabled person, which would then mean that such person’s details will be added to the National Register of Sexual Offenders in terms of Chapter 6 of the Criminal Law Amendment (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act, 2007 (Act No 32 of 2007).

It is the responsibility of the person applying for a pardon and/or an expungement, to obtain a SAPS Clearance Certificate from the Criminal Record Centre him- or herself, to submit to the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, for consideration of the expungement, if there was no direct term of imprisonment imposed, after 10 years have passed and the person has not been convicted of a sexual offence against a child or a mentally disabled person. In the latter case, an expungement will not be granted and the only option for removal of a person’s criminal conviction/s, is to apply for a Presidential pardon.

 

07 September 2015 - NW3274

Profile picture: Mhlongo, Mr P

Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Police

(1)What (a) total amount did his department spend on air travel between Gauteng and Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the 2014-15 financial year and (b) is the total number of trips that were undertaken; (2) what is the total amount that his department spent on (a) accommodation and (b) car rental in Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the specified financial year?

Reply:

(1)(a), (b) and (2)(a) and (b)

The information requested is merely not readily available at the level of detail requested. Due to the number of transactions and various documentation to be analysed and consolidated it would be extremely time consuming and place an unreasonable burden on the resources of the Department to obtain the information requested.

07 September 2015 - NW2671

Profile picture: Mackay, Mr G

Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Energy

Will she provide a detailed report containing all the information provided by the Central Energy Fund to the National Prosecuting Authority to assist in the prosecution against Lesedi Biogas (Pty) Ltd; if not, why not; if so, when?

Reply:

The matter has been reported to the NPA under Case Number 65/3/2012.  The matter is under investigation. CEF is not in the position to avail and/or request the content of the docket, such request should be directed to the NPA accordingly and a determination by the NPA in terms of their rules shall be made as to whether or not to avail such information on pending matters.

07 September 2015 - NW2787

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Public Works:

(1) Whether, with reference to his presentation and responses on 29 July 2015 to the Ad Hoc Committee on Security Upgrades at the Private Residence of the President at Nkandla, he has, upon assuming responsibilities as the Minister of Public Works and in view of the tremendous publicity given to expenditure at Nkandla, instructed his department to do a minute and detailed examination into the expenditure on construction work at President J G Zuma’s private residence at Nkandla; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether his examination of such expenditure found that (a) each of the houses in the police barracks was costing in excess of R6 million and (b) this price was grossly inflated; if not, why not; if so, (3) has he (a) taken immediate steps to discover who was responsible for that and (b) thereupon taken appropriate legal action against the specified persons to institute charges and to recover state resources; if not, why not in each case; if so, what are the relevant details of the steps he has taken in keeping with his fiduciary and political responsibilities? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 2787 [NW3256E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 28 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 07 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Mr M G P Lekota (Cope) asked the Minister of Public Works: (1) Whether, with reference to his presentation and responses on 29 July 2015 to the Ad Hoc Committee on Security Upgrades at the Private Residence of the President at Nkandla, he has, upon assuming responsibilities as the Minister of Public Works and in view of the tremendous publicity given to expenditure at Nkandla, instructed his department to do a minute and detailed examination into the expenditure on construction work at President J G Zuma’s private residence at Nkandla; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether his examination of such expenditure found that (a) each of the houses in the police barracks was costing in excess of R6 million and (b) this price was grossly inflated; if not, why not; if so, (3) has he (a) taken immediate steps to discover who was responsible for that and (b) thereupon taken appropriate legal action against the specified persons to institute charges and to recover state resources; if not, why not in each case; if so, what are the relevant details of the steps he has taken in keeping with his fiduciary and political responsibilities? NW3256E ______________________________________________________________________ REPLY: The Minister of Public Works (1)In October 2012, as the Minister of Public Works I ordered an investigation into the conduct and management of security upgrades implemented by the Department of Public Works (DPW) at the President’s residence in Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal. The Task Team responsible for this investigation submitted their Report in January 2013 and made a number of recommendations that have a bearing on DPW. The Task Team, among other things, recommended that their report be referred to the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) for further investigation. As a result, the President issued Proclamation R59 of 2013 on 20 December 2013, to mandate the SIU to conduct an investigation into the affairs of the Department with respect to the security upgrades. (2)(a)The Task Team’s Report did not make reference to the cost of individual houses in the police barracks. However, the investigation found that that the total cost of the South African Police Service (SAPS) and Department of Defence (DOD) needs, which includes accommodation, the Clinic, Park Homes, Helipads, etc., amounted to approximately R125 000 000.00. The cost of R6 million per individual house is not the result of an official departmental cost apportionment, and the department is also not aware how this amount was arrived at. (2)(b)The finding was that the price for the mentioned items was probably inflated. (3)(a)Steps have been taken to determine who was responsible for the irregularities, including the costs. (3)(b)The officials who did not comply with Supply Chain Management (SCM) prescripts in the appointment of the contractors have been charged with misconduct and the disciplinary hearings are pending. The loss as a result of the over-design of the facilities/inflation of the price is claimed by the SIU from the architect, Mr. Minenhle Makhanya. The civil matter for the recovery is pending in the High Court.

Reply:

(1) In October 2012, as the Minister of Public Works I ordered an investigation into the conduct and management of security upgrades implemented by the Department of Public Works (DPW) at the President’s residence in Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal.

The Task Team responsible for this investigation submitted their Report in January 2013 and made a number of recommendations that have a bearing on DPW. The Task Team, among other things, recommended that their report be referred to the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) for further investigation. As a result, the President issued Proclamation R59 of 2013 on 20 December 2013, to mandate the SIU to conduct an investigation into the affairs of the Department with respect to the security upgrades.

(2)(a) The Task Team’s Report did not make reference to the cost of individual houses in the police barracks. However, the investigation found that that the total cost of the South African Police Service (SAPS) and Department of Defence (DOD) needs, which includes accommodation, the Clinic, Park Homes, Helipads, etc., amounted to approximately R125 000 000.00. The cost of R6 million per individual house is not the result of an official departmental cost apportionment, and the department is also not aware how this amount was arrived at.

(2)(b) The finding was that the price for the mentioned items was probably inflated.

(3)(a) Steps have been taken to determine who was responsible for the irregularities, including the costs.

(3)(b) The officials who did not comply with Supply Chain Management (SCM) prescripts in the appointment of the contractors have been charged with misconduct and the disciplinary hearings are pending. The loss as a result of the over-design of the facilities/inflation of the price is claimed by the SIU from the architect, Mr. Minenhle Makhanya. The civil matter for the recovery is pending in the High Court.

 

07 September 2015 - NW3139

Profile picture: Cassim, Mr Y

Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training

(a) How many students over how many years have graduated from the recently de-accredited social work degree at the University of South Africa, (b) have the employers of the specified students been informed that their employees are in possession of a degree which has now been deemed inadequate by the Council for Higher Education, (c) how will the inadequacies in their training be remedied, (d) how many other social work degrees were assessed by the specified council, (e) what were the specific outcomes of each assessment and (f) what remedies were proposed in each case where inadequacies were found?

Reply:

(a) Students who graduated from the University of South Africa (UNISA) with a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) before the programme’s accreditation status was changed to ‘not accredited’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) in June 2015, are not affected by the change. Therefore, only graduates in 2015 are affected but will be allowed to register with the South African Council on Social Service Practitioners. Students who are currently enrolled in the programme will be transferred to the new programme once accredited. The University has already commenced with the recurriculation of the programme and will submit the programme to CHE for accreditation before the end of 2015. No new enrolments in the BSW will be allowed at UNISA for 2016. Once new enrolments are allowed in 2017, current students will be transferred to the new accredited programme.

(b) The primary employer of BSW graduates is the Department of Social Development (DSD). The Department, DSD and UNISA met to discuss the implications of the de-accreditation. The primary employer is therefore aware of the processes going forward, with regard to the development and offering of a new accredited BSW at UNISA.

(c) Inadequacies are remedied through recurriculation. A communication and teach-out plan for current BSW students has been developed by UNISA. Transferring current students to other programmes, until the new BSW is accredited, is considered as an option. More resources will be allocated to the Department of Social Work at the University and additional staff will be headhunted.

(d) Sixteen BSW programmes were reviewed.

(e) Seven received full accreditation, five received accreditation with conditions, one with a notice of withdrawal, whilst three were de-accredited, including UNISA’s programme.

(f) The four primary concerns were about staff competencies, the theoretical underpinning and content of the programme, programme design, and the nature and extent of practical sessions in the programme.

 

 

Compiler/Contact persons:

Ext:

DIRECTOR – GENERAL

STATUS:

DATE:

REPLY TO QUESTION 3139 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED

Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP

MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING

STATUS:

DATE: