Questions to Ministers

06 December 2016 - NW2615

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

With reference to his repeated statements that he stands by the findings of his report on Nkandla on the basis that the technical findings were made by security experts, why did he not advise the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, to subject the Public Protector’s Secure in Comfort report to judicial review for alleged flawed findings; (2) whether each of the specified security experts were employees of the SA Police Service; if not, (a) at which organisation(s) was each of the experts employed and (b) what are the further relevant details in this regard; if so, (i) what are the (aa) names and (bb) ranks of each of the experts and (ii) in which (aa) divisions and/or (bb) components did each of the experts work?

Source
Link

Reply:

The mandate of the Minister of Police with regards to Nkandla upgrades was in terms of the ad hoc committee report adopted by a resolution of the National Assembly in November 2014. According to this resolution, the Minister of Police was to consider, in the light of the Public Protector’s findings, what constitutes security and non-security feature to determine the personal liability of the President if any. It was not part of the brief of the Minister of Police to advise the President, Mr J G Zuma on the legal steps that needed to be taken.
In compiling the report, information, analysis and contextualisation were solicited from, among other experts, security experts within the South African Police Service and State Security Agent. The Minister is of the view that names, ranks and divisions of the said experts are not relevant as they were representing the organisations that they work for and not acting in their personal capacities.

06 December 2016 - NW2575

Khoza, Mr NP to ask the Minister of Police

What is the status of the request for transfer of a certain person (name and details furnished) from the Duduza Police Station in Gauteng to any other police station in Limpopo, particularly in the Vhembe area?

Source
Link

Reply:

The member in question has not applied for a transfer and when engaged in this regard, he indicated that he is in the process to do so. The transfer application will receive the necessary attention when submitted.

05 December 2016 - NW2575

Khoza, Mr NP to ask the Minister of Police

What is the status of the request for transfer of a certain person (name and details furnished) from the Duduza Police Station in Gauteng to any other police station in Limpopo, particularly in the Vhembe area?

Source
Link

Reply:

The member in question has not applied for a transfer and when engaged in this regard, he indicated that he is in the process to do so. The transfer application will receive the necessary attention when submitted.

28 November 2016 - NW2204

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(a) How many (i) charges have been laid with the SA Police Service and (ii) complaints have been lodged with the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) against the National Head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, Lt Gen B M Ntlemeza, from 1 January 2012 to date, (b) what was the nature of each (i) charge and/or (ii) complaint and (c) what are the full relevant details of the final outcome in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

According to information currently at our disposal IPID is investigating four (4) matters against Gen BM Ntlemeza from 1 January 2012 up to date.

A case of defeating the Ends of Justice and corruption was opened against Gen. Ntlemeza by Lt Ramahlaha. A case was opened at Silverton police station with the following CAS 500/05/2016 and the matter is with SPP for decision.

A case of perjury against Gen. Ntlemeza was opened by Gen. JW Booysen. A case was opened at Sandton police station with the following CAS 943/10/2016 and the matter is still under investigation by IPID.

A case of Fraud, Uttering and Corruption against Gen. Ntlemeza was opened by Lt Ramahlaha. A case was opened at Polokwane with the following CAS 478/09/2015 and the matter was declined by DPP.

A case of Fraud, Crimen Injuria and Defamation of character against Gen. Ntlemeza was opened by Gen. JW Booysen. A case was opened at Durban Central police station with the following Cas 617/09/2015 and the matter is still under investigation.

28 November 2016 - NW1966

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What is the total number of section 33(3) cases that were opened against SA Police Service members for being in contravention of section 29(2) of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate Act, Act 1 of 2011, as amended, since the specified Act came into effect, (b) what is the total number that resulted in guilty convictions and (c) what were the sanctions in each of the specified cases case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) Total number of section 33(3) matters opened by IPID

Year	Reported cases
2012/13	127
2013/14	65
2014/15	60
2015/16	41
Total	293

Refer to annexure A for more details

(b) Total number that resulted guilty in convictions per year

Year	Departmental	Criminal
2012/13	3	0
2013/14	7	0
2014/15	11	0
2015/16	11	0
Total	32	0

Refer to annexure B for more details

(c) Total number of sanctions per year

Year	Verbal warning	Written Warning
2012/13	1	2
2013/14	2	5
2014/15	0	11
2015/16	3	8
Total	6	26

Refer to annexure B for more details

Annexure A: Intake

2012-2013
Province	Station	Case Number	Short Description	Circumstances	CAS No
Free State	Hoopstad	2012040213	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	05/03/2012
Mpumalanga	Kanyamazane	2012040333	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Botshabelo	2012050448	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Selosesha	2012060159	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	68/06/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Ekuvukeni	2012060191	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Inanda	2012060194	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Msinga	2012060196	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Mbazwana	2012060197	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Melmoth	2012060200	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Emanguzi	2012060201	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Pongola	2012060206	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Parkroad	2012060307	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	546/06/2012
Free State	Bultfontein	2012060310	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	37/06/2012
Gauteng	Soshanguve	2012060318	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	OB: 880/06/2012
Free State	Villiers	2012060322	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Villiers 31/06/2012
Free State	Bethlehem	2012060323	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Bethlehem 195/06/2012
Free State	Phuthadithjaba	2012060324	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Phutha's 148/06/2012
Free State	Luckhoff	2012060325	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	25/06/2012
Free State	Phuthadithjaba	2012060326	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Phutha's 149/06/2012
Free State	Harrismith	2012060328	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Harrismith 150/06/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Chatsworth	2012060334	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Chatsworth CAS: 396/06/2012
Free State	Kagisanong	2012060335	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	KAGISANONG CAS 176/06/2012
Free State	Welkom	2012060342	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	296/06/2012
Free State	Batho	2012060359	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Batho CAS 100/06/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012060454	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 131/06/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012060457	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 132/06/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012060459	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 133/06/2012
Free State	Soutpan	2012060472	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Soutpan CAS 15/06/2012
Mpumalanga	Masoyi	2012060482	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Vrede	2012060495	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Vrede 73/06/2012
Free State	Memel	2012060502	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Memel 39/06/2012
Eastern Cape	Whittlesea	2012060596	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	328/06/2012
Free State	Boithuso	2012060649	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	270/06/2012
Free State	Kroonstad	2012060650	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	206/06/2012
Western Cape	Mbekwani	2012070068	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	ElsiesRiver	2012070077	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	616/06/2012
Western Cape	Mfuleni	2012070101	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Free State	Kopanong	2012070171	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	44/07/2012
Free State	Bronville	2012070172	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	14/07/2012
Free State	Zastron	2012070175	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	48/07/2012
Free State	Kopanong	2012070176	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	45/07/2012
Free State	Edenburg	2012070177	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	11/07/2012
Free State	Kopanong	2012070178	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	40/07/2012
Free State	Bloemspruit	2012070179	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	99/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Storms River	2012070211	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	08/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Alexandria	2012070222	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	28/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Alexandria	2012070223	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	27/07/2012
Eastern Cape	Fort Beaufort	2012070225	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	41/07/2012
Limpopo	Nebo	2012070230	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	166/06/2012
Limpopo	Tubatse	2012070235	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	232/06/2012
Eastern Cape	Ngqeleni	2012070314	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	80/07/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012070397	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 51/07/2012
Free State	Tseki	2012070401	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tseki 52/07/2012
Western Cape	Nyanga	2012070441	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	458/07/2012
Free State	Tweespruit	2012070450	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	17/06/2012
Western Cape	Paarl	2012070462	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Mbekweni CAS 141/07/2012
Western Cape	CapeTown	2012070547	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	1691/04/2012
Free State	Clocolan	2012070643	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	82/07/2012
Limpopo	Levubu	2012070667	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Gauteng	Katlehong	2012080101	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	425/07/2012
Free State	Namahadi	2012080194	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Namahadi 28/08/2012
Gauteng	Silverton	2012080260	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	179/08/2012
Free State	Heidedal	2012080293	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	95/08/2012
Mpumalanga	Kwaggafontein	2012080312	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	68/08/20012
Gauteng	Lenasia	2012080347	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	237/08/2012
Western Cape	George	2012080389	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	871/07/2012
Free State	Bethlehem	2012080435	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	14/08/2012
Western Cape	BeaufortWest	2012080550	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	341/08/2012
Mpumalanga	Acornhoek	2012080621	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Mpumalanga	Siyabuswa	2012080829	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	451/08/2012
Western Cape	Brackenfell	2012090154	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Northern Cape	Jan Kempdorp	2012090164	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	261/08/2012
Northern Cape	Jan Kempdorp	2012090229	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	262/019/2012
Limpopo	Mahwelereng	2012090244	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	94/09/2012
Mpumalanga	Belfast	2012090359	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Limpopo	Lebowakgomo	2012090553	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	282/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090572	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	57/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090576	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	46/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090577	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	59/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090578	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	60/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090579	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	55/09/2012
Mpumalanga	Barberton	2012090581	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	239/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090587	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	53/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090588	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	61/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090589	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	62/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090629	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	56/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090633	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	54/09/2012
Northern Cape	Olifantshoek	2012090635	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	58/09/2012
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2012090638	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	67/09/2012
Northern Cape	Witdraai	2012090644	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	45/09/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Maphumulo	2012100014	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Maphumulo CAS 130/09/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Tongaat	2012100042	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Tongaat CAS157/09/2012
Western Cape	Wynberg	2012100237	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Wynberg CAS 92/10/2012
Western Cape	Saldanha	2012100241	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Saldanha CAS 50/10/2012
Mpumalanga	Piet Ritief	2012100356	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Gauteng	Mamelodi West	2012100503	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	345/10/2012
Western Cape	Swellendam	2012100517	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Steenberg	2012100519	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Touwsrivier	2012100556	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Touwsrivier CAS 114/102/2012
Western Cape	Worcester	2012100558	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Worcester 343/10/2012
Western Cape	Kirstenhof	2012100562	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Kirstenhof 242/10/2012
Western Cape	PlettenbergBay	2012100610	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Mfuleni	2012100719	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	514/10/2012
Western Cape	Mfuleni	2012100722	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	517/10/2012
Western Cape	MitchellsPlain	2012100724	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	1586/10/2012
Limpopo	Mankweng	2012110012	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	282/10/2012
Mpumalanga	Kwamhlanga	2012110155	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	96/11/2012
Mpumalanga	Vosman	2012110180	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	109/11/2012
Western Cape	Riversdal	2012110196	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Gauteng	Muldersdrif	2012110527	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	137/11/2012
Gauteng	Midrand	2012110690	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	916/11/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Msinga	2012110693	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	101/11/2012
Kwazulu Natal	Ezibayeni	2012110713	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Ezibayeni Cas 34/11/2012
Gauteng	Sunnyside	2012110738	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Sunnyside Cas 947/11/2012
Free State	Bayswater	2012120034	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	13/12/2012
Eastern Cape	Middelburg	2012120049	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	329/11/2012
Eastern Cape	Dimbaza	2012120222	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	63/11/2012
Western Cape	Wynberg	2012120256	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	301/10/2012
Western Cape	Goodwood	2012120257	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	335/10/2012
Western Cape	Strand	2012120357	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	335/12/2012
Limpopo	Levubu	2013020015	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	158/01/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Mooi River	2013020272	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	31/02/2013
Eastern Cape	Ngangelizwe	2013020302	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Western Cape	Kwanokuthula	2013030495	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act
Kwazulu Natal	Plessislaer	2013030635	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Plessislaer
Eastern Cape	Flagsaff	2013010093	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	Flagstaff CAS 04/01/2012
Eastern Cape	Tsolo	2013010629	Sec 33(3) Charges	Non-compliance with IPID Act	93/01/2013

2013-2014
Province	PoliceStation	CaseNumber	IncidentCodeShortDesc	IncidentSubCodeShortDesc	CaseNumber
Gauteng	Moroka	2013040087	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	27/04/2013
Gauteng	Kempton Park	2013040326	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	414/042013
Gauteng	Protea Glen	2013040332	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Protea Glen Cas 257/04/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Empangeni	2013050053	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	488/04/2013
North West	Brits	2013050089	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	53/05/2013
Gauteng	Kagiso	2013050120	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	128/05/2013
Northern Cape	Kimberley	2013050177	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	404/04/2013
Western Cape	Piketberg	2013050307	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	140/05/2013
Northern Cape	De Aar	2013050313	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	66/12/2012
Northern Cape	De Aar	2013050326	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Northern Cape	De Aar	2013050337	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Northern Cape	DeAar	2013050339	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Eastern Cape	Balfour	2013060157	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	4/06/2013
Western Cape	Somerset-Wes	2013060198	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Strand CAS 224/06/2013
Eastern Cape	Port Alfred	2013060453	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Standerton	2013070143	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Graskop	2013070187	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	NULL	2013070251	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Barberton	2013070252	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Kwazulu Natal	Kwamakutha	2013070277	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	kwa-makthua
Free State	Ladybrand	2013070306	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	163/07/2013
Mpumalanga	Bethal	2013070373	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Eastern Cape	Humewood	2013070384	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	639/05/2013
Mpumalanga	Schoemansdal	2013080034	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	Kagiso	2013080064	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	96/08/2013
Gauteng	Bramley	2013080198	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	79/08/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Pietermaritzburg	2013080557	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Plessislaer 703/08/2013
Gauteng	Sunnyside	2013090002	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sunnyside Cas 1072/08/2013
Mpumalanga	Leslie	2013090163	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	18/01/2013
Northern Cape	Bathlaros	2013090257	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	26/09/2013
Gauteng	Diepsloot	2013090266	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	182/09/2013
Gauteng	Moroka	2013090304	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	37108/2013
Gauteng	Katlehong	2013090328	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2013090614	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	491/09/2013
Mpumalanga	Siyabuswa	2013100098	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Masoyi	2013100100	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	Akasia	2013100155	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Akasia Cas /10/2013
Free State	Harrismith	2013100173	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Kriel	2013100175	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	Mamelodi	2013100241	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Mamelodi Cas /10/2013
Eastern Cape	Mlungisi	2013100274	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Mlungisi Cas 66/10/2013
Mpumalanga	Vosman	2013100344	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Kwamhlanga	2013100450	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Free State	Parkweg	2013100462	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	1383/10/2013
Gauteng	Loate	2013100467	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	482/10/2013
Kwazulu Natal	Margate	2013100544	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	705/03/2007
Mpumalanga	Nelspruit	2013100549	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2013110021	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Lydenburg	2013110024	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Acornhoek	2013110281	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Eastern Cape	EastLondon	2013110503	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Kwazulu Natal	Highflats	2013120143	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Highflats cas 29/12/2013
Gauteng	Olivenhoutbosch	2013120145	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Northern Cape	Springbok	2013120448	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	150/12/2013
Mpumalanga	Tonga	2014010406	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Tonga
Mpumalanga	Secunda	2014010427	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Secunda
Mpumalanga	Skukuza	2014010585	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Bethal	2014010586	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Gauteng	MamelodiEast	2014020229	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	Mamelodi East Cas 000/02/2014
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014020256	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014020261	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Carolina	2014020309	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Mpumalanga	Kriel	2014020521	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
Limpopo	Polokwane	2014020559	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges	772/02/2014
Mpumalanga	Ogies	2014030396	Sec 33(3) Charges	Sec 33(3) Charges
2014-2015
Province	PoliceStation	CaseControlNumber	CaseNumber	Section	IncidentCode
Mpumalanga	Witbank	2014040119		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Dimbaza	2014040167		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Actonville	2014040229	07 /03/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Verulam	2014040256	192 /04/2013	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Vulindlela	2014040309	44 /04/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Ntabethemba	2014040313	18 /10/2013	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Elsburg	2014040416	188 /04/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Zastron	2014040453	218 /04/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Estcourt	2014050076	16 /05/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Bhekithemba	2014050168		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Mangaung	2014060092	87 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Heidedal	2014060093	22 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Hazyview	2014060110		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Roodepoort	2014060121	164 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Upington	2014060194	114 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060197	48 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060200	68 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060203	69 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060205	71 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rosedale	2014060215	72 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Mondeor	2014060228	103 /06/ 201	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Tonga	2014060326		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Swartkops	2014070148	168 /06/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Masoyi	2014070237		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014070240		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2014070244		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Nelspruit	2014080150		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Nelspruit	2014080151		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Tsomo	2014080549		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Zwelitsha	2014090291		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Mthatha	2014090311	185 /9 /014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Keimoes	2014090440	129 /9 /2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Hartebeeskop	2014090449		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Tonga	2014090450		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Dalasile	2014100256		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Vrede	2014100464	0092/10/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Nqamakwe	2014100484		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	Kraaifontein	2014100582	1946/10/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Namahadi	2014110676	0117/11/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Maokeng	2014120041	293 /11/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Queenstown	2014120277	35 /12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Bushbuckridge	2014120300		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	KingWilliamsTown	2014120387		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	JaneFurse	2014120396	0148/11/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Burgersfort	2014120402	130 /12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Burgersfort	2014120419	131 /12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Bell	2015010155	13 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Grahamstown	2015010275	113 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Ngqamakwe	2015010324	95 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Nqamakwe	2015010341	94 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	JaneFurse	2015010497	109 /01/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Hazyview	2015020076		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Dullstroom	2015020164		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Mdantsane	2015020389	197 /02/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Parkweg	2015030078	117 /03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Tweeling	2015030084	0014/03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Ficksburg	2015030296	172 /03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Balfour	2015030329		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Embalenhle	2015030342		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Kagisanong	2015030496	0439/03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
2015-2016
Province	PoliceStation	CaseControlNumber	CAS Number	Class	IncidentCode
Free State	HobHouse	2015040009	0032/03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Kagisanong	2015040119	530 /03/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	Kwanokhuthula	2015040133	0777/12/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Embalenhle	2015040162		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Wepener	2015050121	17 /05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Verkeerdevlei	2015050180	12 /5 /015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Edenville	2015050228	31 /05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Parkweg	2015050318	1065/05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Hibberdene	2015060029	0296/05/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	Athlone	2015060076		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Western Cape	TableView	2015060098		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Ermelo	2015060215		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Arlington	2015060375	0017/06/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Hluhluwe	2015070042	0006/07/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Acornhoek	2015070248		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Temba	2015080028	1074/07/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Kagisho	2015080277	94 /08/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Ekurhuleni Metro Police	2015080509	707 /08/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Douglasdale	2015080510	881 /08/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Makwane	2015090073	0006/09/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Dennilton	2015090111	0183/10/2014	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Lindley	2015090458	0045/09/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Bethlehem	2015090471	409 /9 /015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Eshowe	2015090613	395 /09/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	Lamontville	2015100199	15 /10/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	Elliot	2015100218		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2015110339	42 /11/ 201	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2015110340	43 /11/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Northern Cape	Rietfontein	2015110359	44 /11/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Sakhile	2015120043		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Siyabuswa	2015120049		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Mpumalanga	Sakhile	2015120052		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Tzaneen	2015120390	0367/12/2015	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Eastern Cape	KingWilliamsTown	2016010065	06 /01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Limpopo	Maake	2016010254	0126/01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Gauteng	Alexandra	2016010272	360 /01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Bothaville	2016010299	0130/01/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Free State	Viljoenskroon	2016020119	0008/02/2016	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
North West	Mogwase	2016020444		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
North West	Bethanie	2016020445		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29
Kwazulu Natal	CatoManor	2016020448		33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29	33.3 – Failure to comply with section 29

Annexure B: Convictions

Details of disciplinary convictions 2012/13
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012060254 NC	Norvalspont	Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act	Written warning
2	2012090154 WC	Brackenfell	Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act	Verbal warning
3	2012100241 WC	Saldanha	Contravening of Section 29 of the IPID Act	Written warning

Details of disciplinary convictions 2013/14
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012070450 FS	Tweespruit	Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
2	2012060159 FS	Selosesha	Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
3	2012060310 FS	Bultfontein	Non-compliance with Section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
4	2012090581 MP	Barberton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
5	2012060505 MP	Nelspruit	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
6	2012040333 MP	Kanyamazane	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
7	2013020013 EC	Willowmore	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warnings

Details of disciplinary convictions 2014/15
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012060482 MP	Masoyi	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
2	2013070252 MP	Barberton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
3	2013100098 MP	Siyabuswa	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
4	2013090614 MP	Ermelo	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
5	2013070373 MP	Bethal	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
6	2014010586 MP	Bethal	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
7	2014040119 MP	Witbank	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
8	2014080151 MP	Mamethlake	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
9	2013070306 FS	Ladybrand	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
10	2012090553 LP	Lebowakgomo	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written Warning
11	2013080034 MP	Schoemansdal	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning

Details of disciplinary convictions 2015/16
No.	CCN	Station	Nature of complaint	Sentence / Sanction
1	2012070177 FS	Edenburg	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
2	2015040009 FS	Hobhouse	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
3	2015050180 FS	Verkeerdevlei	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
4	2015050228 FS	Edenville	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
5	2015060076 WC	Athlone	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Verbal warning
6	2015080277 NC	Kagisho	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written Warning
7	2015010497 LP	Jane Furse	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
8	2015090111 LP	Dennilton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
9	2014020256 MP	Ermelo	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written Warning
10	2015020076 MP	Hazyview	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning
11	2014080150 MP	Barberton	Non-compliance with section 29 of IPID Act	Written warning

28 November 2016 - NW2616

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

What (a) is the current status of the investigation into CAS 199/06/2016 opened at the Khayelitsha Police Station, (b) are the offences contained in the docket, (c) is the (i) rank and (ii) name of the investigating officer and (d) are the full details of all feedback given to the family in terms of the (aa) content of, (bb) dates on which and (cc) the means through which the feedback was given?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) The case docket, Khayelitsha CAS 199/06/2016 is still under investigation. The cell phone records have been requested from the service provider to be analysed. This will assist in identifying and tracing the suspects.

(b) The offence is house robbery.

(c)(i) & (ii) The details of the investigating officer cannot be disclosed to allow the investigation to be conducted without fear or favour.

(d)(aa) The complainant has been provided with feedback relating to the case number, the particulars of the investigating officer as well as the status of the investigation.

(d)(bb) Feedback was provided to the complainant on 2016-06-07 and 2016-06-29.

(d)(cc) Feedback was provided to the complainant by means of cell phone communication.

28 November 2016 - NW2545

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Whether the SA Police Service implemented all the remedial action ordered by the Public Protector in her report, entitled A Fair Chance to Serve dated 30 March 2015, concerning the complaint by a certain person (name furnished); if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will the remedial action be implemented; if so, what are the relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) Yes, the recommendations by the Public Protector were implemented.

(b) The complainant was re-enlisted in the South African Police Service on 1 June 2016. The services of an independent assessor have been secured to make a determination on compensation which was set down for 22 November 2016. A written apology on behalf of the South African Police Service was also provided to the complainant. The office of the Public Protector was informed of progress in this regard.

28 November 2016 - NW2549

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

What amount has been allocated by the SA Police Service for the construction of (a) permanent and (b) satellite police stations in Gauteng for the 2016-17 financial year?

Source
Link

Reply:

The accurate figures will soon be forwarded to you in due course as they are still in the process of verification.

28 November 2016 - NW2267

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

What is the (a) procedure followed after the Independent Police Investigative Directorate opens a criminal case with the National Prosecuting Authority in the course of its investigations and (b) relevant (i) South African Police Service Regulation(s), (ii) standard operating procedure(s) and/or (iii) National Instruction(s) governing the specified process?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) When the criminal investigation has being completed and recommendations are made, IPID hands over the file to NPA for decision in terms of section 7(4) of the IPID act.

(b) (i) & (ii) For departmental recommendations IPID hands over the file to SAPS after completion for disciplinary procedures in terms of section 7(6) & 7(7) of the IPID act and SAPS implements disciplinary steps based on the new SAPS discipline regulation 5(3) which came to effect on the 1st November 2016.

28 November 2016 - NW2266

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

With reference to his reply to question 1966 on 6 October 2016, what was the (a) total number of section 33(3) court convictions obtained for cases opened against the South African Police Service members for being in contravention of section 29(2) of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate Act, Act 1 of 2011, as amended, since the specified Act came into effect and (b) sentences handed down in each of the specified cases?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) As a result of NPA declining to prosecute these matters, there were no convictions.

(b) Engagement with the National Director of Public Prosecution in this regard is underway.

25 November 2016 - NW2498

Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Police

How many (a) police reservists has his department trained since 2009 and (b) trained police reservists have been incorporated into permanent positions since 2009?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) A total number of 11 699 reservists have been trained since 2009.

(b) A total number of 10 204 police reservists have been employed in permanent positions in the South African Police Service since 2009.

25 November 2016 - NW2551

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

Whether any measures are being implemented to ensure that the turnaround time for police vehicle repairs at SA Police Service garages in Gauteng is kept to a reasonable minimum so that the lack of operational vehicles does not hinder crime prevention and service delivery in the specified province; if not, why not; if so, what are the full relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

Performance benchmarks were implemented at all South African Police Service (SAPS) Garages to ensure appropriate turnaround times for SAPS vehicle repairs, thereby ensuring that adequate vehicles are available for operational deployment at all police stations/units. The following criteria are included in the performance benchmarks and are followed up on a continuous basis to address any deviations:

● The opening and closure of job cards (performance) per garage within specific time frames for the various types of services and repairs;

● The production of individual artisans and garages as well as production for all garages within the province as per the set standard; and

● The availability of vehicles per police station/unit, per province and nationally as per the set standard.

25 November 2016 - NW2550

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

What steps is the SA Police Service taking to address (a) understaffing, (b) inadequate building maintenance, (c) dilapidated fencing, (d) inadequate external signage, (e) sub-standard detention cells, (f) overcrowding in offices, (g) inadequate toilet facilities, (h) inadequate lighting and (i) insufficient vehicles at the Putfontein Police Station in the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h) The workforce analysis for the Putfontein Police Station is depicted below see the link:

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2550Table.pdf

The following posts were identified as critical vacancies:

1 x Sub Section Commander: Human Resource Management (Salary level 8).

1 x Principal Personnel Officer (Salary level 7).

The proposed promotion posts were requested from the South African Police Service (SAPS) Head Office as critical funded posts in terms of the allocated posts to the province.

During the 2016/2017 financial year, the Gauteng Province received an allocation of

1 320 entry-level Police Act employees. This allocation was scientifically distributed and approved by the Provincial Commissioner, to all 142 stations within Gauteng, by utilising the following criteria:

A gap analysis was conducted, taking into consideration all Visible Policing and Detective Service members on salary levels 1-7, comparing the actual allocation with the Fixed Establishment.
The allocation of 1 320 entry level Police Act employees was distributed equally amongst all stations taking into consideration the shortages on levels 1-7 for Visible Policing and Detective members.
After the distribution, all stations with shortages were staffed equally at 78,15% on levels 1-7 (Visible Policing and Detectives).

The Gauteng Province receives an entry-level allocation every financial year, but unfortunately this allocation does not meet the human resource demands of the various business units in the province. Cluster Commanders are therefore advised to ensure the equal distribution of Human Resources within the cluster, taking into consideration the fixed establishment.

The Gauteng Province is currently busy with a project in terms of which police stations with a surplus of members within the Visible Policing environment have been instructed to identify and redeploy members to their Detective Service environment, where there is a general shortage of personnel. Furthermore, Police Stations are also instructed to redeploy experienced Visible Policing members to the Detective Service environment when they receive their new entry-level allocation.

The Putfontein Police Station is a leased facility. The owners have been engaged regarding the poor conditions of the Police Station as, in accordance with the lease agreement, it is their responsibility to ensure that the facility is properly maintained.

The need for an alternative Police Station was included in the Provincial User Asset Management Plan (UAMP) for the 2017/2018 financial year. The Divisional Commissioner: Supply Chain Management has been requested to source a proper alternative facility.

(i) Per the SAPS Asset Register, the Putfontein Police Station had a total of 16 vehicles on 6 November 2016. The distribution of vehicles is as follows:

COMPONENT	NUMBER OF VEHICLES	IDEAL VEHICLES AS PER EFFICIENCY INDEX SYSTEM	SURPLUS/SHORTAGE
Station Commander	1	1	0
Detective Service	6	6	0
Support Service	1	3	-2
Visible Policing	8	10	-2
Total	16	20	-4

The Putfontein Police Station has an overall shortage of four vehicles, which will be addressed by 31 March 2017.

25 November 2016 - NW2548

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

Whether (a) he and/or (b) the SA Police Service (SAPS) has taken any steps to address the (i) understaffing and (ii) underresourcing of the Akasia Police Station in the City of Tshwane; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether the SAPS is aware of the need for a new police station in Ward 4 of the specified metropolitan municipality; if not, why not; if so, (3) has the need for the specified new police station been investigated; if not, (a) why not and (b) will the SAPS launch an investigation in this regard; if so, (i) what were the findings and (ii) on what date will the new police station be built?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) (a) (b) (i) (ii) The workforce analysis for the Akasia Police Station is depicted in the link below:

https://pmg.org.za/files/RNW2548Table.docx

The following posts were identified as critical vacancies:

1 x Sub Section Commander: Human Resource Management (Salary level 8).

1 x Principal Personnel Officer (Salary level 7).

The proposed promotion posts were requested from the South African Police Service (SAPS) Head Office as critical funded posts in terms of the allocated posts to the province.

During the 2016/2017 financial year, the Gauteng Province received an allocation of

1 320 entry-level Police Act employees. This allocation was scientifically distributed and approved by the Provincial Commissioner, to all 142 stations within Gauteng, by utilising the following criteria:

A gap analysis was conducted, taking into consideration all Visible Policing and Detective Service members on salary levels 1-7, comparing the actual allocation with the Fixed Establishment.
The allocation of 1 320 entry level Police Act employees was distributed equally amongst all stations taking into consideration the shortages on levels 1-7 for Visible Policing and Detective members.
After the distribution, all stations with shortages were staffed equally at 78,15% on levels 1-7 (Visible Policing and Detectives).

The Gauteng Province receives an entry-level allocation every financial year, but unfortunately this allocation does not meet the human resource demands of the various business units in the province. Cluster Commanders are therefore advised to ensure the equal distribution of Human Resources within the cluster, taking into consideration the fixed establishment.

The Gauteng Province is currently busy with a project in terms of which police stations with a surplus of members within the Visible Policing environment have been instructed to identify and redeploy members to their Detective Service environment, where there is a general shortage of personnel. Furthermore, Police Stations are also instructed to redeploy experienced Visible Policing members to the Detective Service environment when they receive their new entry-level allocation.

The management of the Akasia Police Station redeployed two members from Visible Policing to the Detective Service.

2. No, SAPS is not aware of the need for a new police station in Ward 4 of the specified metropolitan municipality. To date no request was received for the possible establishment of an additional service point in the Akasia policing area.

(3)(a)(b)(i)(ii) The Akasia Police Station is a leased facility. The need for an alternative police station was included in the Provincial User Asset Management Plan (UAMP) for the 2017/2018 financial year. The Divisional Commissioner: Supply Chain Management has been requested to source adequate alternative accommodation for a new police station.

25 November 2016 - NW2547

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Is the SA Police Service aware of the activities of a certain group (name and details furnished), in the northern areas of Port Elizabeth in the Eastern Cape; if not, why not; if so, (2) have any complaints been received about alleged vigilante actions by the specified group; if so, (3) have any investigations into these complaints been initiated yet; if not, why not; if so, what are the full relevant details?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) The South African Police Service (SAPS) is aware of the existence of the Malabar Patrols and their activities.

(2) No complaints have been received.

(3) No. The SAPS Crime Intelligence, Eastern Cape is aware of the activities of Malabar Patrols. The activities of the aforementioned group are being monitored to enable a rapid response by appropriate units should any incidents of intimidation be detected.

25 November 2016 - NW2546

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

What (a) is the current status of the investigation of CAS 373/06/2016 opened at the Gelvandale Police Station in Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, (b) are the offences contained in the docket, (c) is the (i) rank and (ii) name of the investigating officers and (d)(i) feedback has been given to the complainant and (ii) were the dates on which feedback was given to the complainant?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) The case docket, Gelvandale CAS 373/06/2016, is still under investigation by the South African Police Service (SAPS). Photographs of damage to the complainant’s vehicle must still be obtained from the complainant. Attempts are also being made to identify and trace the unknown suspects who were allegedly wearing balaclavas during the incident.

(b) The following offences are contained in the docket for Gelvandale CAS 373/06/2016.

● Armed Robbery;

● Malicious Damage to Property; and

● Assault.

(c)(i) & (ii) The details of the investigating officer cannot be disclosed to allow the investigation to be conducted without fear or favour.

(d)(i) The Investigating Officer is providing feedback to the complainant on a weekly basis.

(d)(ii) The last feedback to the complainant was provided on 11 November 2016.

25 November 2016 - NW2544

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(1)(a) What are the names of each former provincial head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) since he assumed office, (b) on which dates was each specified person (i) appointed and (ii) replaced, (c) what was the status of each person’s employment contract at the time of their replacement and (d) on what statutory grounds did he replace the persons who were still serving within their minimum seven-year terms; (2) whether he obtained the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, Mr P J Gordhan, on the remuneration of the new provincial heads of the DPCI in accordance with section 17CA (8)(b) of the SA Police Service Act, Act 68 of 1995, as amended; if not, why not; if so, was the concurrence of the Minister of Finance obtained in writing in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. Provincial heads of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) were appointed for the first time by the Minister of Police in accordance with section 17CA(6) of the South African Police Services Act 68 of 1995 (“SAPS Act”) in 2016. There are no former provincial heads that were appointed in terms of section 17CA(6) before the appointments were made in 2016.

2. The Minister of Finance, Mr P J Gordhan is a member of the Cabinet. It follows that the appointments and remuneration of the provincial heads of the DPCI were presented before the Cabinet for concurrence. Cabinet Memorandum, which included the remuneration scale of the provincial heads was distributed to all Cabinet Ministers and no objection was received from the Minister of Finance on the remuneration scales. The Cabinet (with the Minister of Finance included) concurred with the appointments and the remuneration scales of the provincial heads.

It must be noted that the South African Police Services Act 68 of 1995 (SAPS Act), as amended, does not prescribe how concurrence should be obtained and there is no provision in the Act that requires concurrence of the Minister of Finance to be writing in each case.

25 November 2016 - NW2531

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(1)What (a) is the current status of the investigations into (i) CAS 1277/9/2016 and (ii) CAS 1344/9/2016 opened at the Pretoria Central Police Station and (b) are the charges contained in each docket; (2) whether any suspects have been arrested to date; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) whether any (a) suspects or (b) witnesses have been interviewed; if not, in each case, why not; if so, (i) by what date and (ii) what are the further relevant details in each case; (4) on what date will the specified investigations be finalised?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a)(i) The investigation into Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016 has been concluded and the case docket was handed in at the office of the Senior Public Prosecutor at the Pretoria Magistrate’s Court for decision on 14 November 2016. The decision on prosecution is awaited.

(1)(a)(ii) The investigation into Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/2016 has not yet been concluded. The suspect must still be interviewed and a warning statement obtained. Some witnesses still need to be interviewed and their statements obtained.

(1)(b) The charge in both cases is Assault Common.

(2) No suspects were arrested on any of the two cases as the Criminal Procedure Act, 1997 (Act No. 51 of 1997), does not make provision for a member of the South African Police Service to arrest a suspect on a charge of Assault Common unless the crime was committed in his/her presence.

(3)(a)(i & ii) The suspect in Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016 was interviewed on 20 October 2016 and his warning statement obtained.

The suspect in Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/2016 has not yet been interviewed. As soon as all the witness statements have been obtained, the suspect will be interviewed and the warning statement obtained. The case docket will then be forwarded to the Senior Public Prosecutor for a decision.

(3)(b)(i & ii) Three witnesses were interviewed in Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016.

Eight witnesses were interviewed in Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/2016 and all indicated that they will submit statements through their Attorneys.

(4) The investigation into Pretoria Central CAS 1277/09/2016 has been concluded.

It is envisaged that the investigation in the case docket Pretoria Central CAS 1344/09/20146 will be concluded within the next two weeks.

25 November 2016 - NW2415

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

Whether CAS 482/06/2016 opened at the Woodstock Police Station in Cape Town has been handed over to the Malawian authorities yet; if not, on what date will it be handed over to the specified authorities; if so, on what date was the specified docket handed over to the authorities?

Source
Link

Reply:

The case docket, Woodstock CAS 482/06/2016 (Theft), has not been handed over to the Malawian authorities for investigation. The alleged crime was committed between 8 June 2016 and 19 June 2016 at 29 Low Street, Observatory, Cape Town and not in Malawi. There is therefore no need for the case docket to be sent to Malawi for investigation. On 28 July 2016, the Senior Public Prosecutor at the Cape Town Magistrate’s Court declined to prosecute in this matter as there was no evidence linking the possible suspect to the perpetration of the crime.

15 November 2016 - NW2283

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What is the current status of the investigation of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation into allegations of fraud and corruption at the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa and (b) how many investigators have been allocated to the specified investigation?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) The matter is investigated by the Serious Economic Offences Unit within the Directorate for priority Crime Investigation (DPCI).

The investigation is ongoing and information has been requested to speed up the investigation into the matter.

(b) The unit operates in team format and the case will be handled by the entire team.

15 November 2016 - NW2264

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether he obtained the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, Mr P J Gordhan, on the remuneration of Lt. Gen. B M Ntlemeza before he was appointed as the National Head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation in accordance with section 17CA(8)(a) of the South African Police Services Act, Act 68 of 1995, as amended; if not, why not; if so, on what date did he obtain the concurrence of the Minister of Finance in writing; (2) whether he placed a notice of the remuneration scale payable to the specified person in the Government Gazette before the person was appointed to the specified position, in accordance with section 17CA(8)(a) of the specified Act; if not, why not; if so, (a) on what date was this gazetted and (b) what is the Government Gazette number; (3) whether he submitted the remuneration scale payable to the person to Parliament for approval, in accordance with section 17CA(9) of the Act; if not, why not; if so, (a) on what date and (b) in what form was the specified submission made to Parliament?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. At the time of the appointment of Gen B M Ntlemeza the current Minister of Finance, Mr P J Gordhan was not the Minister of Finance. The Then Minister of Finance, Mr N Nene was a member of the Cabinet and the appointment of Gen Ntlemeza was presented before Cabinet for concurrence. Cabinet Memorandum, which included the proposed remuneration scale of Gen Ntlemeza was distributed to all Cabinet Ministers including the Minister of Finance and no objection was received from the Ministers. Cabinet (with the Minister of Finance included) concurred with the appointment of Gen Ntlemeza on 09 September 2015 and that was before he was appointed on 10 September 2015.

It must be noted that the South African Police Services Act 68 of 1995 (SAPS Act), as amended, does not prescribe how concurrence should be obtained and there is no provision in the Act that requires concurrence by the Minister of Finance to be writing.

2. The Minister submitted the remuneration scale which has already been approved by the Department of Public Service to Parliament for approval. This is part of the process of publishing the said remuneration scale in the Government Gazette. Whilst it is acknowledged that the SAPS Act requires the Minister to place a notice of the remuneration scale payable to the Head of DPCI in the Government Gazette, it must be pointed out that the Act does not prescribe the time frames at which such notice must be placed in the Gazette.

3. (a) The Minister submitted the remuneration scale payable to Gen Ntlemeza to Parliament on 31 October 2016.

(b) The remuneration scale was submitted through the Speaker of the National Assemble in writing.

14 November 2016 - NW2229

Lorimer, Mr JR to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What is the total number of persons who were arrested for (i) possession of and (ii) dealing with drugs at the (aa) Langlaagte, (bb) Brixton, (cc) Sophiatown, (dd) Parkview and (ee) Linden Police Stations in Johannesburg, Gauteng, (aaa) in the past three financial years and (bbb) since 1 January 2016 and (b) what is the total number of the specified arrests which resulted in successful prosecution in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(cc)(dd)(ee)(aaa)(bbb)(b)

(aa) LANGLAAGTE
(a) ARRESTS
	(aaa)	(bbb)
	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2016-01-01 UNTIL 2016-10-21
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	158	211	114	60
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	9	7	4	5
(b) CONVICTIONS
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	81	91	54	44
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	5	4	3	4

(bb) BRIXTON
(a) ARRESTS
	(aaa)	(bbb)
	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2016-01-01 UNTIL 2016-10-21
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	328	568	299	295
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	23	23	10	9
(b) CONVICTIONS
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	299	323	121	170
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	8	20	7	4

(cc) SOPHIATOWN
(a) ARRESTS
	(aaa)	(bbb)
	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2016-01-01 UNTIL 2016-10-21
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	1104	1768	1167	555
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	19	31	41	27
(b) CONVICTIONS
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	440	592	335	325
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	7	10	11	17

(dd) PARKVIEW
(a) ARRESTS
	(aaa)	(bbb)
	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2016-01-01 UNTIL 2016-10-21
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	58	47	35	6
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	6	6	3	2
(b) CONVICTIONS
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	19	16	21	4
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	4	3	1	0

(ee) LINDEN
(a) ARRESTS
	(aaa)	(bbb)
	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2016-01-01 UNTIL 2016-10-21
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	129	109	60	64
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	16	5	1	2
(b) CONVICTIONS
(i) POSSESSION OF DRUGS	44	52	20	12
(ii) DEALING IN DRUGS	3	4	1	0

14 November 2016 - NW2254

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(a) How many fixed establishment positions were there for the (i) Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A), (ii) Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B), (iii) Detectives: General Crimes (Group C) and (iv) Detectives: Service Centre in each police station in each province (aa) in the 2015-16 financial year and (bb) since 1 April 2016, (b) how many of the specified positions were (i) filled and (ii) vacant in each case and (c) on which salary scale is each of the positions?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) The question requires a reply to address all the 1 142 police stations. This will be volumes of pages and is therefore responded by providing the provincial totals. The tables below provide a summarised exposé of the different questions and must be read with the previous reply to question 2163 which dealt with the total fixed establishment of police stations. The development and maintenance of the fixed establishment of the South African Police Service (SAPS) is informed and guided by Regulation 20 and 27 of the SAPS Employment Regulations, 2008 and is influenced by two primary variables:

- The approved organisational and post structures for police stations and clusters; and,

- the availability of funds in terms of the current budget and Medium Term Expenditure Framework.

The source that was used is the SAPS Fixed Establishment allocations for 2015/2016. The fixed establishment positions for police stations in each province in the 2015/2016 financial year and a summary of categories crimes investigated by the respective groups (attached as per annexure A) are tabulated as follows:

Year	Function	Eastern Cape	Free State	Gauteng	KwaZulu-Natal	Limpopo	Mpumalanga	North West	Northern Cape	Western Cape
(aa) + (bb) 2015-16	(i)	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	255	133	1328	513	112	149	104	42	473
	(ii)	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	310	153	1231	490	134	113	141	52	546
	(iii)	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	371	223	1625	616	193	179	134	121	769
	(iv)	Detective Service Centre	659	193	960	600	163	311	178	76	591

(1)(b) The number of filled and vacant positions for detective service at police stations in each province including the salary scales thereof since 1 April 2016 is tabulated below:

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Free State Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	4	24	29	56	20
		Filled	3	13	53	7	21
		Vacant	-1	-11	+24	-49	+1
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	3	13	34	67	36
		Filled	3	11	42	6	34
		Vacant	0	-2	+8	-61	-2
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	4	27	46	85	61
		Filled	4	33	74	38	155
		Vacant	0	+6	+28	-47	+94
	Detective Service Centre	FE	4	31	48	90	17
		Filled	3	28	46	20	82
		Vacant	-1	-3	-2	-70	+65
	Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
	North West Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	18	20	31	35
			Filled	0	12	38	12	33
			Vacant	0	-6	18	-19	-2
		Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	20	23	45	53
			Filled	0	17	41	27	45
			Vacant	0	-3	18	-18	-8
		Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	18	16	47	53
			Filled	0	16	51	27	68
			Vacant	0	-2	35	-20	15
		Detective Service Centre	FE	5	21	31	50	69
			Filled	4	28	51	24	69
			Vacant	-1	7	20	-26	0

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Mpumalanga Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	6	36	46	61
		Filled	0	4	35	24	51
		Vacant	0	-2	-1	-22	-10
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	6	27	37	43
		Filled	1	7	21	32	51
		Vacant	+1	-1	-6	-5	+8
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	6	38	58	77
		Filled	0	5	41	43	108
		Vacant	0	-1	+3	-15	+31
	Detective Service Centre	FE	5	26	41	58	178
		Filled	1	13	40	36	134
		Vacant	-4	-13	-1	-22	-44

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Eastern Cape Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	10	43	56	69	103
		Filled	9	31	90	25	58
		Vacant	-1	-12	40	-44	-45
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	10	42	64	79	139
		Filled	10	32	90	37	74
		Vacant	0	-10	26	-42	-65
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	10	47	80	92	171
		Filled	10	33	143	57	273
		Vacant	0	-14	63	-35	102
	Detective Service Centre	FE	10	41	130	174	302
		Filled	8	29	71	63	152
		Vacant	-2	-11	59	-111	150

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Gauteng Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	81	245	264	732
		Filled	6	50	305	176	375
		Vacant	6	-31	60	-88	-357
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	76	235	257	657
		Filled	2	52	214	155	441
		Vacant	2	-24	-21	-102	-216
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	92	305	357	864
		Filled	8	90	349	278	874
		Vacant	8	-2	44	-79	10
	Detective Service Centre	FE	46	103	158	187	459
		Filled	11	79	245	184	642
		Vacant	-35	-24	87	-3	183

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Limpopo Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	1	8	30	35	38
		Filled	1	29	75	16	48
		Vacant	0	-21	-45	19	-10
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	1	8	32	41	52
		Filled	1	13	56	15	39
		Vacant	0	-5	-24	26	13
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	1	11	42	58	81
		Filled	1	21	67	19	110
		Vacant	0	-10	-25	39	-29
	Detective Service Centre	FE	5	25	51	38	42
		Filled	8	22	42	9	36
		Vacant	-3	3	9	29	6

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Northern Cape Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	2	9	11	12	11
		Filled	2	9	19	13	8
		Vacant	0	0	-7	-1	3
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	2	10	12	14	18
		Filled	2	10	6	17	13
		Vacant	0	0	6	-3	6
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	2	11	24	34	53
		Filled	2	11	25	19	36
		Vacant	0	0	-1	15	17
	Detective Service Centre	FE	2	9	25	23	21
		Filled	2	8	20	18	30
		Vacant	0	1	5	5	-9

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
KwaZulu-Natal Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	0	29	108	150	226
		Filled	0	34	147	86	172
		Vacant	0	5	39	-64	-54
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	0	33	100	143	214
		Filled	0	34	134	77	211
		Vacant	0	1	34	-66	-3
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	0	33	118	175	289
		Filled	0	38	152	104	368
		Vacant	0	5	34	-71	79
	Detective Service Centre	FE	18	66	152	186	177
		Filled	14	60	149	70	236
		Vacant	-4	-6	-3	-116	59

Prov	Function	Post	Lt Col - SL10	Capt- SL 8	W/Off - SL7	Sgt- SL6	Const- SL5
Western Cape Province	Detectives: Violent Crimes (Group A)	FE	19	22	94	133	223
		Filled	14	16	100	128	122
		Vacant	-5	-6	6	-5	-101
	Detectives: Economic Crimes (Group B)	FE	19	22	97	158	268
		Filled	11	14	69	149	153
		Vacant	-8	-8	-28	-9	-115
	Detectives: General Crimes (Group C)	FE	19	31	138	219	380
		Filled	14	27	144	217	381
		Vacant	-5	-4	6	-2	1
	Detective Service Centre	FE	19	32	88	164	306
		Filled	16	24	70	96	149
		Vacant	-3	-8	-18	-68	-157

14 November 2016 - NW2265

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

With reference to his reply to question 2099 on 6 October 2016, (a) what are the details of the adverts in respect of the amount that was spent on advertising on the (i) Africa News Network 7 channel and (ii) South African Broadcasting Corporation television channels (aa) in the 2015-16 financial year and (bb) since 1 April 2016, (b) what was the purpose of each advert, (c) when did each of the specified adverts air, (d) how many times did each advert air, (e) what was the cost of each airing and (f) how long was each of the adverts?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) The details of the adverts in respect of the amount that was spent on advertising, are as follows:

(a)(i) Africa News Network 7 channel - The Minister of Police, Mr NPT Nhleko, introduced the acting National Commissioner and discussed the Farlam Commission’s recommendations; police murders and the Acting National Commissioner’s plans for the SAPS, among other things on The New Age (TNA)’s breakfast show.

(a)(ii) South African Broadcasting Corporation’s television channels – the Russia-Africa Anti-Drug Conference and Commemoration Day.

(a)(ii)(aa) The Russia-Africa Anti-Drug Conference.

(a)(ii)(bb) The South African Police Service (SAPS)’s National Commemoration Day.

(b) The purpose of the Russia-Africa Anti-Drug Conference advert was to publicise the conference and its intentions.

The purpose of the National Commemoration Day advert was to sensitise the public to the hosting of the National Commemoration Day in remembrance of SAPS members who had passed away in the line of duty during the 2015/2016 financial year.

(c) The Russia-Africa Anti-Drug Conference was aired on 8 and 9 March 2016.

The National Commemoration Day was aired on 29 August 2016.

(d) The Russia-Africa Anti-Drug Conference was aired for a total of 12 slots (one slot on SABC 1, five slots on SABC 2 and six slots on SABC 3).

The National Commemoration Day was aired for a total of 20 slots (seven slots on SABC 1, ten slots on SABC 2, and three slots on SABC 3).

(e) Africa News Network 7 channel, at a cost of R958 662,84.

South African Broadcasting Corporation’s television channels, the Russia-Africa Anti-Drug Conference airing cost R253 000,00 and the National Commemoration Day airing cost R786 600,00.

(f) The length of the Russia-Africa Anti-Drug Conference advert was 60 seconds.

The length of the National Commemoration Day advert was a 10-seconds news clock. This is an advert in the form of the news clock and was aired before the start of the news.

14 November 2016 - NW2303

Mhlongo, Mr TW to ask the Minister of Police

Whether any (a) internal and/or (b) external forensic reports pertaining to (i) his department and/or (ii) each entity reporting to him were completed from 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what is the (aa) name, (bb) subject matter and (cc) date of conclusion of each of the specified forensic reports?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a)(b)(i)(aa)(bb) and (cc)

The reply pertaining to the South African Police Service is contained in the table below.

Item No	and (b) Internal/External	(aa) and (bb) Name and Subject Matter	(cc) Date of conclusion
	External	Alleged irregularities relating to the maintenance and repairs of SAPS vehicles at the Johannesburg garage and Vereeniging auxiliary garage.	February 2011
	Internal	Allegation of corruption by Colonel Jwara and three other suspects – Roodepoort CAS 1303/05/2008.	22 March 2011
	Internal	Alleged irregularities relating to the maintenance and repairs of SAPS vehicles at the Bloemfontein garage.	30 April 2011
	Internal	Alleged irregularities pertaining to the procurement of 200 000 booklets to be utilised by Employee Health and Wellness Component.	17 October 2011
	Internal	Alleged procurement irregularities for installation and removal of communication and warning equipment at Supply Chain Management- Alrode New Vehicle Section.	7 December 2011
	Internal	Alleged irregularities of misappropriation of funds: North and South Sudan	14 March 2012
	Internal	Alleged non-payment of acting allowance and denial of promotion to the next level of Lt Col. B.E. Gaitsiwe-04824890: Human Resource Utilisation.	September 2012
	Internal	Alleged misappropriation of funds at Jericho Police Station.	January 2013
	Internal	Alleged misconduct: Lieutenant General TS Mpembe, Provincial Commissioner Limpopo – SAPS VEHICLE BVS471B.	June 2013
	Internal	Alleged irregularities pertaining to the procurement of tyres for state vehicles at Dundee Accounting Station.	May 2013
Item No	and (b) Internal/External	(aa) and (bb) Name and Subject Matter	(cc) Date of conclusion
	Internal	Alleged irregularities relating to maladministration of the Northern Cape Provincial Youth Crime Prevention Framework.	July 2013
	Internal	Alleged irregularities pertaining to the procurement of 22 000 laptops for Detective Service.	August 2014
	Internal	Alleged irregularities pertaining to leave gratuity and pension payments made to fictitious beneficiaries.	August 2014
	Internal	Alleged procurement irregularities of prefabricated units at Thabazimbi Training Academy.	August 2014
	External	Delays in payment of service termination benefits.	5 September 2014
	Internal	Alleged maladministration and irregularities of mismanagement of funds: Bishop Lavis Police Academy.	October 2014
	External	Alleged irregularities on increase of expenditure on civil claims	December 2015
	Internal	Alleged irregularities relating to procurement of accommodation for PUBLIC Order Policing members deployed in Kuruman.	April 2015
	Internal	Alleged tender irregularities for the supply and delivery of handgun retention cords – Division: Supply Chain Management.	14 April 2015
	Internal	Alleged procurement irregularities for the supply and delivery of new spare parts – Division: Supply Chain Management.	April 2015
Item No	and (b) Internal/External	(aa) and (bb) Name and Subject Matter	(cc) Date of conclusion
	Internal	Alleged loss of state money at Johannesburg Central Station – Finance Office.	10 February 2016
	Internal	Alleged misconduct against senior personnel officer and the existence of a possible syndicate in the Section: Service Absence and Termination.	March 2016
	Internal	Alleged irregularities pertaining to procurement of spare parts at SAPS Kimberley Garage.	3 May 2016
	Internal	Alleged unethical behaviour, maladministration and financial irregularities at Division: Human Resource Development Chatsworth Training Academy.	17 October 2016

31 October 2016 - NW2205

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Was any (a) company and/or (b) nonprofit organisation awarded a contract as part of the implementation of the We Are One Humanity Anti-Xenophobia campaign in 2015; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) what was the value of each tender awarded, (ii) when was each tender approved and (iii) were proper procurement procedures followed in each case; (2) (a) what were the (i) objectives and (ii) measurable outcomes of the specified campaign and (b) have the specified objectives been achieved?

Source
Link

Reply:

The information is still being collated as some documents were in the custody of other entities which will soon be made available to you with all the details.

31 October 2016 - NW2203

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What was the fixed establishment for the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation in the (i) 2009-10, (ii) 2010-11, (iii) 2011-12, (iv) 2012-13, (v) 2013-14, (vi) 2014-15 and (vii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) which of the specified positions were vacant in each of the specified financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

The information required is already solicited by other sections for consolidation which will be ready soon , can the member therefore afford us an opportunity to come up with an accurate product.

06 October 2016 - NW1883

Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether he is aware of the fact that the SA Police Service is referring some criminal offences directly to the courts without conducting a proper investigation and making an entry in the crime register; if not, why not; if so, (a) how many cases were referred directly to the courts countrywide in the (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16 financial years without proper investigation and (b)(i) what types of offences and (ii) how many of each specified offence were referred in such a way in each specified year; (2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) No, the Minister of Police is not aware that the South African Police Service (SAPS) is referring some criminal offences directly to court without conducting proper investigation. The SAPS is referring cases to court in which there is prima facie evidence to place cases on the court roll. In some of these cases the investigation has not yet been concluded due to outstanding evidential material that must still be obtained and filed in the case dockets.

(1)(a)(i) and (ii) See reply to paragraph (1) above.

(1)(b)(i) and (ii) See reply to paragraph (1) above.

(2) No.

06 October 2016 - NW2099

Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Police

What amount did (a) his department and (b) each entity reporting to him spend on advertising on the (i) Africa News Network 7 channel, (ii) SA Broadcasting Corporation (aa) television channels and (bb) radio stations, (iii) national commercial radio stations and (iv) community (aa) television and (bb) radio stations (aaa) in the 2015-16 financial year and (bbb) since 1 April 2016?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) The South African Police Service spent the following amounts on advertising.

(aaa) In the 2015/2016 financial year:

	Africa News Network 7	R958 662,84
(ii)(aa)	SABC Television	R744 705,00
(ii)(bb)	SABC Radio	R669 718,65
	Commercial Radio	R122 351,00
(iv)(aa)	Community Television	R0,00
(iv)(bb)	Community Radio	R627 000,00
Grand Total	R3 122 437,49
(bbb) For the period 1 April 2016 to 30 August 2016:
	Africa News Network 7	R958 662,84
(ii)(aa)	SABC Television	R912 000,00
(ii)(bb)	SABC Radio	R0,00
	Commercial Radio	R0,00
(iv)(aa)	Community Television	R0,00
(iv)(bb)	Community Radio	R0,00
Grand Total	R1 870 662,84

06 October 2016 - NW2064

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether each Head of Department (HOD) of his department signed a performance agreement since their appointment; if not, (a) what is the total number of HODs who have not signed performance agreements, (b) what is the reason in each case, (c) what action has he taken to rectify the situation and (d) what consequences will the specified HOD face for failing to sign the performance agreements; if so, (i) when was the last performance assessment of each HOD conducted and (ii) what were the results in each case; (2) whether any of the HODs who failed to sign a performance agreement received a performance bonus since their appointment; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) at what rate and (b) what criteria were used to determine the specified rate; (3) whether any of the HODs who signed a performance agreement received a performance bonus since their appointment; if so, (a) at what rate and (b) what criteria were used to determine the rate?

Source
Link

Reply:

1. The Minister of Police hereby confirms that a performance agreement was signed with the suspended National Commissioner of the South African Police Service (SAPS), General Phiyega (Head of Department)(HOD) for the 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 financial years. Due to the suspension of this HOD, a performance agreement for the 2016/2017 financial year was concluded with the Acting National Commissioner of SAPS, Lieutenant General Phahlane.

Due to the suspension of General Phiyega during October 2015, the assessment process could not be completed for the 2014/2015 financial year. As the suspension is still in place, no assessment for the 2015/2016 financial year will be initiated until the reasons for the suspension have been resolved.

2. As no formal assessment of the suspended HOD was possible, it can be confirmed that the HOD of SAPS has not received any form of performance bonus for either the 2014/2015 or 2015/2016 financial years.

3. The response to Question 2064 only relates to information at the disposal of the South African Police Service. Information relating to the Independent Police Investigative Directorate and the Civilian Secretariat for Police will have to be obtained from those departments.

06 October 2016 - NW2029

Bozzoli, Prof B to ask the Minister of Police

What formal qualifications does each of his department’s (a)(i) Chief Financial Officers and/or (ii) acting Chief Financial Officers and (b)(i) Directors-General and/or (ii) acting Directors-General possess?

Source
Link

Reply:

The formal qualifications of the department’s (a)(i) Chief Financial Officers and/or (ii) acting Chief Financial Officers and (b)(i) Directors-General and/or (ii) acting Directors-General are as follows:

(a)(i) Chief Financial Officer:

Bachelor of Commerce, 1994;

Honours Bachelor of Accounting science, 1997;

Higher Diploma in Law – International Tax Law, 2004;

Higher Diploma in Law – Tax Law, 2002; and

Qualifying Examination and Practical Training- Public Accountant’s and Auditor’s Board- 1999.

(a)(ii) Acting Chief Financial Officer:

Not Applicable – no acting incumbent.

(b)(i) Director General (Suspended)

Bachelor of Arts in Social Work – 1980;

Honours Bachelor of Arts in Social Science – 1986;

Magister Artium (Socialis Scientiae) – 1993; and

Post Graduate Diploma in Business Administration, 1997.

(b)(ii) Acting Director General

National Diploma in Police Administration – 1992; and

Bachelor of Administration (Public Administration) – 2013.

06 October 2016 - NW1947

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

How many (a) second-hand cellphone stores within the Tembisa Police Station precinct have been closed due to the owners not having a licence for second-hand goods, (b) arrests were made in this regard and (c) of the arrests resulted in convictions in the (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16 financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) No second-hand cellphone stores within the Tembisa Police Station precinct have been closed due to the owners not having a licence for second-hand goods.

(b) Not applicable.

(c)(i) Not applicable.

(c)(ii) Not applicable.

06 October 2016 - NW1946

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

How many (a) second-hand cellphone stores within the Tembisa South Police Station precinct have been closed due to the owners not having a licence for second-hand goods, (b) arrests were made in this regard and (c) of the arrests resulted in convictions in the (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16 financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) No second-hand cellphone stores within the Tembisa South Police Station precinct have been closed due to the owners not having a licence for second-hand goods.

(b) Not applicable.

(c)(i) Not applicable.

(c)(ii) Not applicable.

06 October 2016 - NW1945

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

How many (a) second-hand cellphone stores within the Kempton Park Police Station precinct have been closed due to the owners not having a licence for second-hand goods, (b) arrests were made in this regard and (c) of the arrests resulted in convictions in the (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16 financial years?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) No second-hand cellphone stores within the Kempton Park Police Station precinct have been closed due to the owners not having a licence for second-hand goods.

(b) Not applicable.

(c)(i) Not applicable.

(c)(ii) Not applicable.

06 October 2016 - NW1944

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles does the Tembisa Police Station in Gauteng have for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that are supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortfall of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive its full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) 48 Members, who are divided into seven sectors.

(2)(b) Seven vehicles per sector.

(2)(a) Four members per sector, per relief, thus a total of 112 members.

(2)(b) Two vehicles per sector, thus a total of 14.

(3)(a)(i) 64 Members.

(3)(a)(ii) Seven vehicles.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Tembisa Police Station will be issued by 31 March 2017. The province received an allocation of 1 300 posts for new entry-level enlistments during the 2017/2018 period. The identified vacancies will be filled with new entry-level enlistments.

06 October 2016 - NW1943

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles does the Tembisa South Police Station in Gauteng have for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that are supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortfall of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive its full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) The total number of visible policing officers is 24. This consists of eight members per sector thus providing two members per four shifts, per sector for three sectors. Additionally there are three sector managers.

(1)(b) There is a total number of four vehicles available for the three sectors.

(2)(a) The total number of visible policing officers should be 48. This would provide 16 members per sector which is four members per four shifts per sector for three sectors.

(2)(b) The minimum number of vehicles to be placed in a sector is two.

(3)(a)(i) There is a shortage of 24 officers.

(3)(a)(ii) Each sector should have two vehicles, thus the station has a shortage of two vehicles to have two vehicles available in each sector.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Tembisa South Police Station will be issued by 31 March 2017. The province received an allocation of 1 300 posts for new entry-level enlistments during the 2017/2018 period. The identified vacancies will be filled with these new entry-level enlistments.

06 October 2016 - NW1941

Walters, Mr TC to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles does the Boksburg North Police Station in Gauteng have for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that are supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortfall of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive its full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) Two members per sector, a total of eight members.

(1)(b) One vehicle per sector, a total of four vehicles.

(2)(a) Four members per sector, a total of 16 members.

(2)(b) Two vehicles per sector, a total of eight vehicles.

(3)(a)(i) 19 Members.

(3)(a)(ii) Five vehicles.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Boksburg North Police Station will be issued by 31 March 2017. The province received an allocation of 1 300 posts for new entry-level enlistments during the 2017/2018 period. The identified vacancies will be filled with these new entry-level enlistments.

06 October 2016 - NW1940

Walters, Mr TC to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles does the Primrose Police Station in Gauteng have for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that are supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortfall of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive its full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) Sector 1: Four members.

Sector 2: Two members.

Sector 3: Two members.

(1)(b) Sector 1: Two vehicles.

Sector 2: One vehicle.

Sector 3: One vehicle.

(2)(a) Sector 1: Four members.

Sector 2: Four members.

Sector 3: Four members.

(2)(b) Sector 1: Two vehicles.

Sector 2: Two vehicles.

Sector 3: Two vehicles.

(3)(a)(i) Three members.

(3)(a(ii) Two vehicles.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Primrose Police Station will be issued by 31 March 2017. The province received an allocation of 1 300 posts for new entry-level enlistments during the 2017/2018 period. The identified vacancies will be filled with these new entry-level enlistments.

06 October 2016 - NW1939

Walters, Mr TC to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles does the Bedfordview Police Station in Gauteng have for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that are supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortfall of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive its full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) Six members per sector which is a total of 24 members.

(1)(b) Three sector policing vehicles and one sector manager vehicle.

(2)(a) 12 Members per sector which is a total of 48 members.

(2)(b) Two vehicles per sector.

(3)(a)(i) 24 Members.

(3)(a)(ii) Three vehicles for sector policing and two vehicles for sector managers.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Bedfordview Police Station will be issued to the station by 31 March 2017. The province received an allocation of 1300 posts for new entry-level enlistments during the 2017/2018 period. The identified vacancies that exist will be filled with new entry-level enlistments.

06 October 2016 - NW1938

Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)What is the total number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that the Sebenza Police Station in Gauteng has for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that are supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortage of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles, if any, at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive its full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) 16 Members, which is four members per sector and two members per shift.

(1)(b) Two vehicles are deployed in the four sectors. (1 vehicle for sectors 1 and 2 and 1 vehicle for sectors 3 and 4)

(2)(a) 16 Members, which is four members per sector and two members per shift.

(2)(b) One vehicle per sector.

(3)(a)(i) According to the Fixed Establishment there are no personnel shortages at Sebenza Police Station.

(3)(a)(ii) According to the Efficiency Index System (EIS) there is a shortage of six vehicles at Sebenza Police Station.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Sebenza Police Station will be issued by

31 March 2017.

06 October 2016 - NW1937

Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)What is the total number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles the Edenvale Police Station in Gauteng has for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that is supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortage of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive their full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) There are 75 visible policing members who are deployed as follows:

- One section commander.

- Three sub-section commanders.

- 12 Members working in the Community Service Centre.

- Five operations commanders.

- 36 Sector team members.

- Eight members performing court duties.

- Two members performing crime prevention duties.

- Three sector managers.

- Five members doing operational support, Firearms, Liquor and Second Hand Goods (FLASH), exhibit management and general enquiries.

(1)(b) Four sectors with one vehicle per sector.

(2)(a) Four members per sector.

(2)(b) Two vehicles per sector.

(3)(a)(i) 16 Members.

(3)(a)(ii) Six vehicles.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Edenvale Police Station will be issued to the station by 31 March 2017. The province received an allocation of 1 300 posts for new entry-level enlistments during the 2017/2018 period. The identified vacancies will be filled with these new entry-level enlistments.

06 October 2016 - NW1936

Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police

(a) Why were weapons discharged three times between 24 November 2015 and 1 August 2016 at a certain address (details furnished) and (b) who was responsible for discharging of weapons in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) According to the resident at the mentioned address, no shooting took place during the said period.

(b) Not applicable.

06 October 2016 - NW1935

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

(a) Why are two unmarked police cars with certain registration numbers (details furnished) regularly visiting a certain property (details furnished), (b) how many times have the specified vehicles visited the specified property since 1 January 2016 and (c) what are the names of the SA Police Service officers who operate from the specified vehicles?

Source
Link

Reply:

(a) The mentioned vehicles do not belong to the South African Police Service.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) Not applicable.

06 October 2016 - NW1932

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether owners of firearms are required to sign forms indemnifying (a) any SA Police Service (SAPS) official, (b) the SAPS and/or (c) the Government of any (i) responsibility and/or (ii) legal action that may arise as a result of the firearm being in their possession when handing firearms over to the SAPS; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) what standard procedures has his department put in place for handing firearms over to the SAPS?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) Yes, a person who is legally entitled to possess a firearm or ammunition in terms of the Firearms Control Act, 60 of 2000 and who is the owner of the firearm or ammunition may surrender that firearm or ammunition to (a) a police official (b) of the South African Police Service by the handing over of the firearm or ammunition to (c) a police station together with the applicable licence, permit or authorisation, together with the applicable form (SAPS 522 (a) – Surrendering of Firearm Item(s)).

(1)(i)-(ii) In all instances where a firearm or ammunition is surrendered to a police station, the circumstances may be investigated to establish whether an offence has been committed with or in respect of such firearm or ammunition. A receipt must be handed over to the person from whom the firearm and ammunition is received.

(2) National Instruction 3/2002 regulates the surrendering of firearms and/or ammunition to the South African Police Service.

06 October 2016 - NW1931

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(1)(a) What is the current status of the investigation into CAS 110/8/2014 opened at the Mabopane Police Station and (b) what are the charges contained in the docket; (2) whether any suspects have been arrested to date; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) whether any (a) suspects or (b) witnesses have been interviewed; if not, why not, in each case; if so, (i) when and (ii) what are the further relevant details in each case; (4) when is the investigation anticipated to be finalised?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) The case docket Mabopane CAS 110/08/2014 is still under investigation and currently on the court roll at the Ga-Rankuwa Magistrate’s Court.

(1)(b) The charge in this case docket is Rape.

(2) Yes, a suspect was arrested on 11 August 2014. The suspect failed to appear in court on the remand date. However, he was traced in prison on 21 April 2016 and appeared in court on that day. The case against the accused was remanded to 27 September 2016 to allow the defence to obtain copies of the content of the case docket.

(3)(a) Yes, the arrested suspect was interviewed on 11 August 2014 and a warning statement was obtained from him.

(3)(b) Yes, witnesses were interviewed on 11 August 2014 and 9 September 2014 and their statements obtained.

(3)(b)(i) The suspect was interviewed on 11 August 2014.

The witnesses were interviewed on 11 August 2014 and 9 September 2014 respectively.

(3)(b)(ii) The arrested suspect’s warning statement and statements from the witnesses were obtained.

(4) The investigation is concluded and a trial date must be determined.

06 October 2016 - NW1966

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(a) What is the total number of section 33(3) cases that were opened against SA Police Service members for being in contravention of section 29(2) of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate Act, Act 1 of 2011, as amended, since the specified Act came into effect, (b) what is the total number that resulted in guilty convictions and (c) what were the sanctions in each of the specified cases case?

Source
Link

Reply:

a) IPID opened 127 cases for 2012/13 financial year, 65 cases for 2013/14, 60 cases for 2014/15 and 41 cases for 2015/16.

b) For 2012/13 IPID received 3 departmental convictions, 7 departmental convictions for 2013/14, 11 departmental convictions for 2014/15 and 11 departmental convictions for 2015/16.

c) For 2012/13 two written warning and one verbal warning were received, five written warning and two verbal warning were received for 2013/14, eleven written warning were received for 2014/15 and for 2015/16 eleven departmental convictions were received, three verbal warning were issued and eight written were also issued.

06 October 2016 - NW1942

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles does the Norkem Park Police Station in Gauteng have for each of its sectors; (2) what is the minimum number of visible policing (a) officers and (b) vehicles that are supposed to be allocated to any sector; (3) (a) what is the shortfall of visible policing (i) officers and (ii) vehicles at the specified station and (b) by which date will the specified station receive its full complement in each case?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) 24 Members, thus six members per sector. Two members are posted per shift per sector in four sectors.

(1)(b) Three vehicles for the four sectors.

(2)(a) 32 Members for the four sectors, which is eight members per sector and thus two members per shift per sector.

(2)(b) One vehicle per sector, thus 4 vehicles.

(3)(a)(i) There is a shortage of 8 members.

(3)(a)(ii) There is a shortage of 1 vehicle.

(3)(b) The new vehicles purchased for Norkem Park Police Station will be issued by 31 March 2017. The province received an allocation of 1 300 posts for new entry-level enlistments during the 2017/2018 period. The identified vacancies will be filled with new entry-level enlistments.

06 October 2016 - NW1930

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

(1)(a) What is the current status of the investigation into CAS 300/6/2016 opened at the Akasia Police Station and (b) what are the charges contained in the docket; (2) whether any suspects have been arrested to date; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) whether any (a) suspects or (b) witnesses have been interviewed; if not, why not, in each case; if so, (i) when and (ii) what are the further relevant details in each case; (4) when is the investigation anticipated to be finalised?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1)(a) The investigation into case docket, Akasia CAS 300/06/2016 has not yet been concluded. The injured victim, who is still in hospital due to injuries sustained in the motor vehicle collision, must assist with the re-construction of the collision scene.

(1)(b) The charge contained in the case docket is reckless and negligent driving of a motor vehicle.

(2) No suspects have been arrested or charged in this matter. It is normal procedure in the investigation of cases of this nature that the South African Police Service (SAPS) concludes the investigation and then refers the case docket to the Senior Public Prosecutor (SPP) for a decision on prosecution. Should the SPP decide to prosecute in the matter, a summons to appear in court is issued by the SPP which will then be served on the accused to appear in court on the pre-determined court date.

(3)(a) Yes, a possible suspect, the driver of the other motor vehicle was interviewed on 20 June 2016 and his statement obtained.

(3)(b) Yes, an independent eyewitness was interviewed on 20 June 2016 and his statement obtained.

(3)(b)(i) 20 June 2016.

(3)(b)(ii) Statements of the possible suspect and eyewitness have been obtained.

(4) The conclusion of this investigation is dependent on when the victim, who was injured in the collision, is discharged from hospital and his ability to assist with the re-construction of the collision scene.

27 September 2016 - NW1876

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(1) Has the SA Police Service (SAPS) officer who shot and injured a 17-year old learner outside Rietvale Secondary School in Ritchie, Northern Cape, on 14 June 2016 been placed on suspension pending finalisation of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) investigation; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether the specified IPID investigation has been completed yet; if not, (a) why not and (b) by when is it expected that the specified investigation will be completed; if so, (i) what were the findings, (ii) what is the recommended sanction against the specified officer and (iii) has the specified recommendation been implemented by the SAPS?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) No. The member was not suspended after all relevant facts of the incident were considered by the Northern Cape Provincial Disciplinary Committee. The facts revealed that the member fired a warning shot. The incident was thoroughly investigated and referred for a disciplinary hearing which commenced on 19 September 2016.

(2) Yes.

(2)(a) Not applicable.

(2)(b) The investigation was completed and submitted to the South African Police Service on 15 July 2016.

(2)(b)(i) The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) through its investigation found that the member committed misconduct by contravening Regulations 20(a) in that he failed to comply with, or contravened an Act, Regulation or legal obligation; 20 (e), in that, he endangered lives of others by disregarding safety rules or regulations; 20(p), in that, while on duty he conducted himself in an improper, disgraceful and unacceptable manner; and Regulation 20(z) for committing a common law or statutory offence.

(2)(b)(ii) The recommendation was that the member be charged departmentally in terms of the South African Police Service Discipline Regulations, 2006.

(2)(b)(iii) Yes, the SAPS did implement the IPID recommendation by instituting disciplinary steps and referred the matter for a hearing as indicated in paragraph (1) above.

26 September 2016 - NW1876

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

(1) Has the SA Police Service (SAPS) officer who shot and injured a 17-year old learner outside Rietvale Secondary School in Ritchie, Northern Cape, on 14 June 2016 been placed on suspension pending finalisation of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) investigation; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether the specified IPID investigation has been completed yet; if not, (a) why not and (b) by when is it expected that the specified investigation will be completed; if so, (i) what were the findings, (ii) what is the recommended sanction against the specified officer and (iii) has the specified recommendation been implemented by the SAPS?

Source
Link

Reply:

(1) On the basis of the information provided to me please accept this as an interim reply as I have dedicated somebody to give me more clarity on some of the issues I have raised with SAPS, therefore full response on part one will soon follow, however part two of the question has been responded to fully.

(2) The case was taken over from SAPS by IPID for investigation on the 17 June 2016. On 14 July 2016 the case was referred to the office of the Provincial Director of Public Prosecution and SAPS respectively with the recommendations that the member be charged both Departmental and Criminal. The Provincial SAPS decided to charge the member and the Departmental trial is set for 19 September 2016. The office of the National Director of Public Prosecution returned the case docket on 01 September 2016 for further investigation before the decision can be taken. The IPID intend to complete the outstanding investigations as directed by DPP on or before 15 September 2016. Furthermore, the IPID will not be in the position to state why the member was not suspended by SAPS. The suspension of the member is the solely the prerogative of the SAPS Management.

Questions and Replies

06 December 2016 - NW2615

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

06 December 2016 - NW2575

Khoza, Mr NP to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

05 December 2016 - NW2575

Khoza, Mr NP to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

28 November 2016 - NW2204

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

28 November 2016 - NW1966

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

28 November 2016 - NW2616

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

28 November 2016 - NW2545

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

28 November 2016 - NW2549

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

28 November 2016 - NW2267

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

28 November 2016 - NW2266

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2498

Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2551

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2550

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2548

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2547

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2546

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2544

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2531

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

25 November 2016 - NW2415

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

15 November 2016 - NW2283

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

15 November 2016 - NW2264

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2229

Lorimer, Mr JR to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2254

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2265

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

14 November 2016 - NW2303

Mhlongo, Mr TW to ask the Minister of Police

Reply:

Alleged irregularities relating to the maintenance and repairs of SAPS vehicles at the Johannesburg garage and Vereeniging auxiliary garage.

Alleged irregularities relating to the maintenance and repairs of SAPS vehicles at the Bloemfontein garage.

Alleged irregularities pertaining to the procurement of 200 000 booklets to be utilised by Employee Health and Wellness Component.

Alleged irregularities of misappropriation of funds: North and South Sudan