Questions and Replies
06 July 2015 - NW2240
Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Police
Whether (a) his department and (b) any entities reporting to him has paid out the remainder of any employee's contract before the contractually stipulated date of termination of the contract since the 2008-09 financial year up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if so, (i) what amount has (aa) his department and (bb) entities reporting to him spent on each such payout, (ii) to whom were these payouts made and (iii) what were the reasons for the early termination of the contracts in each specified case?
Reply:
Kindly find below mentioned answers to the abovementioned question. There were no such terminations for the years 2008-2009 and 2012-2013.
2009-2010 FINANCIAL YEAR
|
PERSAL NO |
RANK |
SURNAME & INITIALS |
RETIREMENT DATE |
AMOUNT |
REASON FOR TERMINATION |
|
0400019-6 |
Major General |
Jones JA |
2009-04-30 |
R 1 054 268.21 |
Section 35 |
|
0472624-3 |
Major General |
Mphego NM |
2009-09-30 |
R 1 165 822.26 |
Section 35 |
2010-2011 FINANCIAL YEAR
|
PERSAL NO |
RANK |
SURNAME & INITIALS |
RETIREMENT DATE |
AMOUNT |
REASON FOR TERMINATION |
|
0058432-1 |
Major General |
Terblanche OS |
2010-08-31 |
R 1 804 775.28 |
Section 35 |
|
0160983-1 |
Lieutenant General |
Naidoo P |
2010-08-31 |
R 4 462 679.40 |
Section 35 |
|
0483197-7 |
Lieutenant General |
Hlela HM |
2010-08-31 |
R 2 008 538.48 |
Section 35 |
|
0062764-0 |
Major General |
Fryer MJ |
2010-09-30 |
R 1 686 082.36 |
Section 35 |
|
0616380-7 |
Brigadier |
Mokoena TD |
2010-09-30 |
R 042 003.71 |
Section 35 |
|
0173416-4 |
Major General |
Mbambo DM |
2010-10-31 |
R 1 423 127.31 |
Section 35 |
|
0435245-9 |
Major General |
Pienaar LJ |
2010-10-31 |
R 1 213 169.85 |
Section 35 |
|
0473766-1 |
Major General |
Van Der Westhuizen CC |
2010-10-31 |
R 1 364 556.79 |
Section 35 |
|
0535587-7 |
Lieutenant General |
Mtimkulu LTMP |
2010-11-30 |
R 1 077 881.65 |
Section 35 |
|
0066660-2 |
Major General |
Roos A |
2010-12-31 |
R 1 572 791.53 |
Section 35 |
|
0055403-1 |
Major General |
Els WJ |
2011-01-31 |
R 1 706 716.69 |
Section 35 |
|
0062694-5 |
Colonel |
Bester LJ |
2011-01-31 |
R1 114 572.90 |
Section 35 |
|
0170499-1 |
Major General |
Mokwena RJ |
2011-01-31 |
R 1 522 507.82 |
Section 35 |
|
0429640-1 |
Lieutenant General |
Pruis LCA |
2011-01-31 |
R 2 194 100.02 |
Section 35 |
|
0401284-4 |
Major General |
Meyer M |
2011-02-28 |
R 1 488 136.93 |
Section 35 |
|
0417501-8 |
Brigadier |
Taylor RJ |
2011-02-28 |
R 1 439 484.09 |
Section 35 |
2011-2012 FINANCIAL YEAR
|
PERSAL NO |
RANK |
SURNAME & INITIALS |
RETIREMENT DATE |
AMOUNT |
REASON FOR TERMINATION |
|
609287-0 |
Major General |
Mabasa KW |
2011-09-30 |
R 1 831 974.99 |
Section 35 |
2011-2012 FINANCIAL YEAR
|
PERSAL NO |
RANK |
SURNAME & INITIALS |
RETIREMENT DATE |
AMOUNT |
REASON FOR TERMINATION |
|
0605774-8 |
Lieutenant General |
Lebeya SG |
2014-05-31 |
R 865 295.10 |
Section 189 (Labour Relations Act) |
|
0608018-9 |
Lieutenant General |
Mofomme AL |
2014-05-31 |
R 1 064 595.73 |
Section 189 (Labour Relations Act) |
2014-2015 FINANCIAL YEAR
|
PERSAL NO |
RANK |
SURNAME & INITIALS |
RETIREMENT DATE |
AMOUNT |
REASON FOR TERMINATION |
|
0479543-1 |
Lieutenant General |
Dramat A |
2015-03-31 |
R 3 109 029.80 |
Section 35 |
06 July 2015 - NW2386
Kohler-Barnard, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police
(1)What are the relevant details of all expenditure that was found to have been (a) irregular and (b) wasteful in his department (i) in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) from 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; (2) in respect of each such finding of (a) irregular and (b) wasteful expenditure, (i) what (aa) is the description thereof, (bb) is the value thereof and (cc) action has been taken against the persons accountable for such expenditure and (ii)(aa) what amount of such expenditure has been recovered and (bb) from whom has it been recovered?
Reply:
(1)(a)(i) and (ii) and (2)(a)(i)(aa), (bb), (cc) and (ii)(aa) and (bb).
The following details are applicable in respect of expenditure found to be irregular expenditure in the 2014/2015 financial year:
|
Details of irregular expenditure |
Cases |
Actions taken |
Amount recovered from employees |
2014/2015 |
|
Catering |
1 |
Verbal warning |
R 0.00 |
R 17 370.00 |
|
Food & Beverages |
1 |
Written warning |
R 0.00 |
R 25 229.58 |
|
Furniture |
1 |
Written warning |
R 0.00 |
R 9 102.00 |
|
Repairs |
1 |
Verbal warning |
R 0.00 |
R 24 453.00 |
|
Security Services |
1 |
Verbal warning |
R 0.00 |
R 7 085.00 |
|
Storage Fees |
1 |
Verbal warning |
R 0.00 |
R 3 657.50 |
|
Total |
6 |
R 0.00 |
R 86 897.08 |
For the period 1 April 2015 to date no irregular expenditure was found to be irregular of nature.
(1)(b)(i) and (ii) and (2)(b)(i)(aa), (bb), (cc) and (ii)(aa) and (bb).
The following details are relevant to amounts found to be fruitless and wasteful expenditure in the 2014/2015 financial year:
|
Details of fruitless and wasteful expenditure |
Cases |
Actions taken |
Amount recovered from employees |
2014/2015 |
|
Penalties on License Fees |
42 |
Liability investigation conducted to determine recoverability |
R 1 822.80 |
R 72 357.25 |
|
Accommodation |
8 |
Liability investigation conducted to determine recoverability |
R 46 631.00 |
|
|
Air/Bus Tickets |
5 |
Liability investigation conducted to determine recoverability |
R 1 765.50 |
|
|
Non attending of courses |
4 |
Liability investigation conducted to determine recoverability |
R 590.00 |
R 2 474.00 |
|
Incorrect Payment |
1 |
Liability investigation conducted to determine recoverability |
R 14 443.71 |
|
|
Penalty Municipal Account |
1 |
Liability investigation conducted to determine recoverability |
R 2 000.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications |
1 |
Liability investigation conducted to determine recoverability |
R 1 122.30 |
|
|
Total |
62 |
R 2 412.80 |
R 140 793.76 |
For the period 1 April 2015 to date no expenditure was found to be fruitless and wasteful expenditure.
In respect of fruitless and wasteful expenditure, the outcome of a liability investigation being conducted to determine recoverability can result in the following:
- Investigation still pending (no resolution);
- Treasury Regulation 12.7.3 resolution (claim against official must be waived in those instances where state cover is not forfeited);
- Liability cannot be determined; and
- Liability determination to recover expenditure.
If the category of irregular expenditure is considered, it reflects the incurrence of expenditures by members countrywide mainly where procurement prescripts were not technically complied with. The Department did however receive the goods or services. In each such incident reported, a due process of investigation, determination of responsibility and consideration of disciplinary steps are considered. Preventative control measures such as procurement authority, segregation of duties, and registration/rotation of suppliers regarding quotations, exception reporting and certification, limit irregular and fruitless expenditures. The formal process of assessment as indicated is via the Supply Chain Management (BAC) mechanism.
It should be noted that 2014/15 figures are still being audited by the Auditor-General as part of the year-end audit process, and could change.
06 July 2015 - NW2451
Ollis, Mr IM to ask the Minister of Police
(1)With regard to case CAS02/10/2011 lodged with the SA Police Service in Rosebank, Johannesburg, (a) was the case indeed opened, (b) which investigating officer has been assigned to the case, (c) have any investigations been carried out at the premises of the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac) in Jellicoe Avenue, Rosebank, and (d) have any suspects been (i) identified or (ii) arrested; (2) (a)(i) which items have been reported as allegedly having been stolen, (ii) in whose possession were the specified items at the time of the alleged theft and (b) have any of these items been recovered; (3) are investigations in the specified case ongoing or has the case been closed; (4) are any other cases involving (a) Nedlac or (b) its premises currently under investigation; if so, in each case, (i) on what date was each of the specified cases opened, (ii) what is the relevant case number and (iii) what was the outcome of the investigations in respect of each specified case? NW2819E
Reply:
(1)(a) Yes
(1)(b) Sergeant Nkosi
(1)(c) Yes
(1)(d)(i) No
(1)(d)(ii) No
(2)(a)(i) Laptop, cellular phone and two Kruger Rands valued R60 000.
(2)(a)(ii) In the office of lawful owner, N. H. Mkhuize.
(2)(b) No
(3) Case is closed.
(4) No, there are no other cases currently investigated.
06 July 2015 - NW2479
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
(1)What are the reasons for the Edenvale Police Station’s refusal to raid a known drug den (details furnished); (2) whether he will give an instruction for such a raid to take place; if not, why not; if so, when?
Reply:
- The house is occupied by different tenants from different counties and has been reported to EMPD that they can raid the place for overcrowding. It was raided for drugs by SAPS but nothing was found.
(2) The address has been given to EMPD for overcrowding. A joint operation between SAPS and EMPD has been arranged for execution.
06 July 2015 - NW2481
McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Police
(1)With regard to his reply to question 2293 on 18 June 2015, where did he get the information that Democratic Alliance (DA) members were wearing DA branded name tags; (2) whether there are any reasons and/or provisions why an open public meeting, where press are reporting, cannot be recorded; if so, what are the reasons and/or provisions; (3) why did the chairperson inform the community police forum meeting that the Member of the Executive Council had given an instruction to postpone the meeting when it was in fact Mr D Sibuyi who had given the advice that the meeting be postponed; (4) will any action be taken in this regard?
Reply:
(1) From CPF Chairperson Linda McKenzie.
(2) CPF chairperson Linda McKenzie observed a hidden video camera recorder hidden in the shoe box and asked Mr Allan Fourie why the camera is hidden in the box and his reply was that it is used to record and video. She then asked him if he had obtained permission from the executive and he replied that permission was not needed.
(3) CPF chairperson conveyed the message from the MEC office to the community at the CPF meeting.
(4) No action will be taken.