Questions and Replies
07 September 2015 - NW3139
Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(a) How many students over how many years have graduated from the recently de-accredited social work degree at the University of South Africa, (b) have the employers of the specified students been informed that their employees are in possession of a degree which has now been deemed inadequate by the Council for Higher Education, (c) how will the inadequacies in their training be remedied, (d) how many other social work degrees were assessed by the specified council, (e) what were the specific outcomes of each assessment and (f) what remedies were proposed in each case where inadequacies were found?
Reply:
(a) Students who graduated from the University of South Africa (UNISA) with a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) before the programme’s accreditation status was changed to ‘not accredited’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) in June 2015, are not affected by the change. Therefore, only graduates in 2015 are affected but will be allowed to register with the South African Council on Social Service Practitioners. Students who are currently enrolled in the programme will be transferred to the new programme once accredited. The University has already commenced with the recurriculation of the programme and will submit the programme to CHE for accreditation before the end of 2015. No new enrolments in the BSW will be allowed at UNISA for 2016. Once new enrolments are allowed in 2017, current students will be transferred to the new accredited programme.
(b) The primary employer of BSW graduates is the Department of Social Development (DSD). The Department, DSD and UNISA met to discuss the implications of the de-accreditation. The primary employer is therefore aware of the processes going forward, with regard to the development and offering of a new accredited BSW at UNISA.
(c) Inadequacies are remedied through recurriculation. A communication and teach-out plan for current BSW students has been developed by UNISA. Transferring current students to other programmes, until the new BSW is accredited, is considered as an option. More resources will be allocated to the Department of Social Work at the University and additional staff will be headhunted.
(d) Sixteen BSW programmes were reviewed.
(e) Seven received full accreditation, five received accreditation with conditions, one with a notice of withdrawal, whilst three were de-accredited, including UNISA’s programme.
(f) The four primary concerns were about staff competencies, the theoretical underpinning and content of the programme, programme design, and the nature and extent of practical sessions in the programme.
Compiler/Contact persons:
Ext:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
REPLY TO QUESTION 3139 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
07 September 2015 - NW2908
Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Public Works:
In light of the fact that the Government continues to spend billions of rands through leases and rentals to accommodate government departments and agencies, and considering that in 2013 a total of 930 000 transactions worth more than R90 billion were scrutinised and many of which were found to be not in line with the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, (a) what is the total number of fraud cases related to leases and rentals which included officials from government departments who were investigated by either his department or the SA Police Service between 2012 and 2015 and (b) how many of the specified cases found wrongdoing on the part of departmental officials? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 2908 [NW3404E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 30 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 14 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Mr M M Dlamini (EFF) asked the Minister of Public Works: In light of the fact that the Government continues to spend billions of rands through leases and rentals to accommodate government departments and agencies, and considering that in 2013 a total of 930 000 transactions worth more than R90 billion were scrutinised and many of which were found to be not in line with the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999, (a) what is the total number of fraud cases related to leases and rentals which included officials from government departments who were investigated by either his department or the SA Police Service between 2012 and 2015 and (b) how many of the specified cases found wrongdoing on the part of departmental officials? NW3404E ________________________________________________________________________ REPLY: The Minister of Public Works (a) There are six fraud cases have been concluded relating to leases / rentals, where officials have been implicated, during the period in question. (b)In five of the cases wrongdoing was found on the part of Departmental officials.
Reply:
(a) There are six fraud cases have been concluded relating to leases / rentals, where officials have been implicated, during the period in question.
(b) In five of the cases wrongdoing was found on the part of Departmental officials.
07 September 2015 - NW3053
Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(a) How does the Minister define Red Tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce Red Tape in your (aaa) Department and (bbb) the entities reporting to you?
Reply:
(a) Red tape is a collection or sequence of forms and procedures, oppressively complex and time-consuming, required to gain bureaucratic approval for something. In the context of the work of government, officials at junior, middle and senior management level are expected to make decisions aimed at improving service delivery. However it should be noted that officials are only able to fulfill their duties in terms of the requirements of relevant legislation. Often these decisions are complex and could lead to significant discontent amongst stakeholders at various ends of the result of such decisions. It is then currently the norm that such decisions are taken to court for review of the decision by disappointed stakeholders. In order to ensure that complex decisions would be deemed justifiable in a court of law, this requires that such decisions involve more consulting, more processes that verify adequacy, reliability and completeness of information considered, which in turn increases the time taken to reach a decision. This additional involvement in time is to ensure that when a decision is taken, it can be implemented without concern for court processes that may delay implementation.
(b) (i) and (ii), (aa) and (bb), (aaa) the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development:
Specific interventions and systems developed and implemented in the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development to improve the standards of service delivery, include the following:
- Service delivery champions have been appointed to ensure improvements in their respective areas of responsibility;
- The review of Service Delivery Models of Branches in the Department with the aim of strengthening the structures responsible for service delivery at the lowest levels;
- Decentralization of governance structures to regions with Regional Heads to strategically manage service delivery at service point level;
- Decentralization of operational functions with specific delegations and standard operating procedures and standards of performance to court managers to enable them to run the institution, procure and appoint staff;
- KHAEDU deployment of senior managers at lower performing service points with the specific mandate to unblock difficulties related to service delivery; and
- Redesign of processes and policies and deployment of Information Technology solutions to improve time in delivery of services e.g., payment of maintenance.
(b) (i) and (ii), (aa) and (bb), (bbb) Entities reporting to the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services:
Regarding the public entities, Boards and Councils reporting to the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, such as the Legal Aid Board South Africa, the Debt Collectors Council and the Special Investigation Unit, the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development has members of the department representing the Department liaising with or sitting on such Boards to assist in dealing with blockages, streamlining communication and speeding up processes.
The Council for Debt Collectors has specifically indicated that although no formal systems have been implemented to identify and reduce red tape from the Department, the Council as it reports to the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, has implemented the following measures:
- Stringent adherence to the principles as laid out in the King III Governance Report;
- Drafting and submission of an integrated annual report to Parliament even though there is no legal obligation to do so as the Council does not fall under the Public Finance Management Act; and
- Implementation of a 7 day turnover period for new registrations that is rigorously monitored.
07 September 2015 - NW2967
Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Police
(1)Whether the SA Police Service(SAPS) has policies or guidelines for enforcing legislation on sex work and suspected sex workers; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether SAPS members are trained about the specified policies or guidelines; (3) whether the specified training includes (a) apprehending suspected sex workers, (b) searching their person and (c) identifying suspected sex workers; (4) (a) how many complaints against SAPS members regarding (i) assault and/or (ii) abuse of suspected sex workers have been received in the (aa) 2012-13, (bb) 2013-14 and (cc) 2014-15 financial years and (b)(i) what were the outcomes of the specified investigations and (ii) what action has been taken against the specified SAPS members?
Reply:
- The South African Police Service does not have a specific policy or guidelines for enforcing legislation on sex work and suspected sex workers. There are however generic policies and guidelines utilized by members instead of policy and guidelines for specific offences.
Members of the South African Police Service carry out their functions and exercise their powers in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977), including the lawful arrest of sex workers. The circumstances under which any arrest may be performed and the method of arrest is set out in Standing Order (General) 341 (Arrest and the treatment of an arrested person until such person is handed over to the community service centre commander).
The Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and related matters) Amendment Act of 2007 (Act No. 32 of 2007) created an offence relating to the client of the sex worker (i.e engaging the sexual services of persons 18 years or older). National Instruction 3 of 2008 on Sexual Offences provides for the implementation of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 (Act No. 32 of 2007).
2. SAPS members receive training in the following disciplines that also apply to law enforcement in respect of sex work:
- Human Rights in Policing
- Victim Empowerment
- Dealing with Vulnerable Groups
- Apprehension of Suspects
3. The SAPS does not have specific training programmes that deal with the apprehension and searching of sex workers. The training provided is based in SAPS directives mentioned in par (1) above and applies to all individuals apprehended by the SAPS, irrespective of the alleged crime.
4. SAPS is unfortunately not able to provide the details within the given time frame as the information is not readily available and must be obtained from the provinces. A request is hereby made for an extension in order for us to provide quality and correct information as soon as it is received.
07 September 2015 - NW3148
Robinson, Ms D to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(a) How many cases of human trafficking did his department prosecute in the (i) 2010-11, (ii) 2011-12, (iii) 2012-13, (iv) 2013-14 and (v) 2014-15 financial years, (b) how many of the specified cases resulted in successful convictions and (c) (i) how many of the specified cases involved female victims and (ii) what was the nationality of the victims identified in each case?
Reply:
(a) The National Prosecuting Authority has reported the following numbers of prosecutions for human trafficking during the financial years requested:
- 2010/11: 1;
- 2011/12: 1;
- 2012/13: 3;
- 2013/14: 1; and
- 2014/15: 19.
The NPA has added that several cases are currently under investigation and in order not to jeopardise these cases that are sub judice, the NPA is unable to provide any information regarding the said matters.
(b) How many of the specified cases were convictions?
- 2010/11: 1;
- 2011/12: 1;
- 2012/13: 3;
- 2013/14: 1; and
- 2014/2015: 7 convictions.
Based on the information available at the time of this response, the NPA is only aware of two additional prosecutions on trafficking which resulted in an acquittal (both in the Western Cape. In the one matter the accused was convicted on minor charges and in the other case, the complainant refused to testify.
Progress in other matters: In eight (8) matters, the cases are partly-heard; in one case, the trial is to commence in October 2015; in one case, the trial date was set on 25 August 2015; and in two cases, bail applications will still be heard.
(c) (i) How many of the specified cases involved female victims?
Statistics regarding the gender of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable. However, based on experience, the NPA’s cases involve predominantly female victims.
(ii) What was the nationality of the victims identified in each case?
Statistics regarding the nationality of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS RECEIVED FROM THE NATIONAL PROSECUTION AUTHORITY:
(a) How many cases of human trafficking was prosecuted in the financial years as indicated:
(i) 2010 – 2011
NAME |
PROVINCE / DIVISION |
DATE |
STATUS |
S v Eloff & Another |
Free State |
2009 |
CONVICTION – Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 8 years imprisonment suspended for 5 years on conditions. |
(ii) 2011 – 2012
NAME |
PROVINCE / DIVISION |
DATE |
STATUS |
S v Dos Santos |
North Gauteng |
2011 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 (4 charges). Sentenced to life imprisonment. |
(iii) 2012 – 2013
NAME |
PROVINCE / DIVISION |
DATE |
STATUS |
S v Shembe |
Western Cape |
2012 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 23 years imprisonment. |
S v Ntonga & Bell |
Eastern Cape |
2013 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. |
S v Gwambe |
Mpumalanga |
2013 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. |
(iv) 2013 – 2014
NAME |
PROVINCE / DIVISION |
DATE |
STATUS |
S v Jezile |
Western Cape |
2014 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 and Rape section 3 of Act 32 / 2007. Sentenced to 22 years imprisonment (conviction and sentence confirmed on appeal). |
- 2014 – 2015
NAME |
PROVINCE / DIVISION |
DATE |
STATUS |
S v Allima |
KZN |
2014 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to life imprisonment. |
S v Simelane |
North Gauteng |
2014 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 and Rape section 3 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 30 years imprisonment. |
S v Mabuza |
Mpumalanga |
2014 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007 (8 charges). Sentenced to life imprisonment on all 8 charges. |
S v Wang |
Western Cape |
2014 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Postponed for sentence. |
S v Knoetze |
Eastern Cape |
2014 |
CONVICTION – Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. |
S v Uche & Others |
KZN |
2015 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Postponed for sentence. |
S v Palan & Another |
KZN |
2015 |
CONVICTION - Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes, section 71 of Act 32/2007. Sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. |
S v Rugnath |
KZN |
2014 |
Partly heard |
S v Mansaur |
KZN |
2014 |
Partly heard |
S v Matini & Another |
Eastern Cape |
2014 |
Partly heard |
S v Gudwana |
Western Cape |
2014 |
Partly heard |
S v Tiki & Others |
Western Cape |
2014 |
Partly heard |
S v Wellem & Others |
Western Cape |
2014 |
Partly heard |
S v Agasi & Others |
Western Cape |
2014 |
Partly heard |
S v Jooste |
Western Cape |
2014 |
Trial to commence in October 2015 |
S v Zweni |
KZN |
2015 |
Partly heard |
S v Chijoko & Another |
WC |
2015 |
Trial date to be set on 25/08/2015 |
S v Mbene & Another |
WC |
2015 |
For bail application on 27/8/2015 |
S v Okoye & Others |
WC |
2015 |
For bail application on 28/9/2015 |
Several cases are currently under investigation, in order not to jeopardise these cases that are sub judice, we are unable to provide any information regarding the said matters.
(b) How many of the specified cases were convictions?
See schedule as per paragraph (a) supra. Based on the information available at the time of this response, the NPA is only aware of two additional prosecutions on trafficking which resulted in an acquittal (both in the Western Cape. In the one matter the accused was convicted on minor charges and in the other case, the complainant refused to testify.
(c) (i) How many of the specified cases involved female victims?
Statistics regarding the gender of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable. However, based on experience, the NPA’s cases involve predominantly female victims.
(ii) What was the nationality of the victims identified in each case?
Statistics regarding the nationality of the victim was not captured and are therefore unavailable.
07 September 2015 - NW2917
Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police
Whether, in view of the waste of resources on security upgrades at the private residence of the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, at Nkandla, the Government has taken a decision to formulate new regulations on how to achieve optimal security benefits for the head of state and other leaders at a cost approved by Parliament and scrutinized upon its completion by given committees or an ad hoc committee, so that no waste of the type that took place at Nkandla could ever be repeated in the country; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The matter is still being looked at holistically as it deserves serious consideration; once the process is completed hopefully soon the Honorable Member will be furnished with full details.
07 September 2015 - NW2857
Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Communications:
Whether, in view of an article published in a certain newspaper (name and details furnished) that a certain person (name and details furnished) acts as a consultant to her department and in view of her reply to question 2507 on 22 July 2015, in which she stated that her department did not spend money on consultants from the date of her appointment until 22 June 2015, the specified person is contracted as a consultant to her department; if so, (a) on what date was the specified person appointed, (b) what amount has her department paid to the specified person and (c) in what capacity does the specified person act as a consultant to her department? NW3330E REPLY: MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS The response to question 2507 remains. The Department did not spend money on consultants. MR NN MUNZHELELE DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING] DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE: MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP) MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE:
Reply:
The response to question 2507 remains. The Department did not spend money on consultants.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
07 September 2015 - NW2720
Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy
(a) What are the relevant reasons for suddenly and completely aborting the Mmamabula Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) entered into between Eskom and a certain independent power producer (name furnished), which allowed for a potential electricity supply of 4 800 MW and the proposed Mmamabula Energy project as her department was responsible for procurement and (b) who were the key decision-makers responsible for aborting this project?
Reply:
The question was responded to as Parliamentary question number 2454.The resolution of these outstanding matters coincided with the need to resolve Eskom’s funding model.
.
07 September 2015 - NW2569
Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Energy
Whether, with reference to her reply to question 654 on 17 March 2015, the technical task team responsible for the investigation of allegations of irregularities at the SA Nuclear Energy Corporation has concluded its investigation; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of the investigation?
Reply:
The matter is being dealt with.
07 September 2015 - NW2993
Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Police
(1)How many members of the SA Police Service (SAPS) are made available daily for the personal protection of (a) Ministers, (b) Deputy Ministers, (c) Premiers of provinces, (d) leaders of political parties, (e) office bearers of political parties, (f) kings, (g) traditional leaders and (h) Members of Parliament; (2) how many members of the SAPS are currently made available for the personal protection of private individuals; (3) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
Reply:
(1)(a) 78
(1)(b) 76
(1)(c) 36
(1)(d) 2
(1)(e) None
(1)(f) None
(1)(g) None
(1)(h) 2
(2) None
(3) No
07 September 2015 - NW2994
Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Police
(1)Whether he is planning to establish new specialist units in the SA Police Service; if not, why not; if so, (a) when and (b) what specialist units; (2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
Reply:
- The reintroduction of specialised units in the South African Police Service is determined by organisational priorities and is being considered annually. There is no intention in the Annual Performance Plan 2015/2016 to reintroduce any additional specialised units. Existing units are continuously being capacitated to enhance their capability to render an effective and efficient service.
The moment a need for the establishment of a specialised unit is identified, the need is analysed and investigated taking existing capacities and organisational priorities into consideration in order to address a specific need.
2. No statement will be made at this moment in time.
07 September 2015 - NW3124
Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(1)Has he read the report produced by the civil society organisation, Lawyers for Human Rights, titled Queue Here for Corruption; if not, why not; if so, does he consider the findings of the specified report serious enough to warrant urgent action; (2) in light of the findings of the specified report, what steps has he taken to ensure that corruption and corrupt practices in the processing of asylum applications are eradicated?
Reply:
- Yes I have read the report titled “Queue Here for Corruption”.
- The department will be engaging with Lawyers for Human Rights on the findings and recommendations with the intention to determine the way forward on the matters raised in the report.
07 September 2015 - NW3003
Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police
Whether the SA Police Service publishes a monthly advisory or newsletter in hard copy or digital format to inform police personnel particularly about (a) any charges that any police officers were facing, (b) court trials and outcomes of trials where police officials were tried, (c) best practices from around the world, (d) meritorious achievements of police officials in South Africa and (e) findings of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate with regard to complaints laid against the police, in order to keep every police officer abreast of the specified issues and other issues in policing so as to encourage good practices and warn of the dire consequences of illegal or bad practices; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(a) The SAPS uses both digital and print formats to communicate relevant information regarding officers’ disciplinary matters. We send out information through the ‘All Users’ Email group on information picked up in the media regarding police officers being arrested, charged, convicted and sentenced for criminal actions, under the heading “Breaking News Advisory”. We also do print magazines monthly at national and provincial offices.
(b) We communicate court outcomes and not trials.
(c) No
(d) National and provincial management frequently nominates SAPS employees who have performed beyond the call of duty to ensure the safety of people and property in South Africa for awards. These nominations are forwarded to the National Monitoring Evaluation Committee which recommends that such members are rewarded financially and by means of a certificate endorsed by the National Commissioner and/or the Minister of Police. This is done on an ongoing basis. Approval of such nominations is distributed internally to all SAPS employees via e-mail and included in print publications.
(e) Not IPID information per se, but such information either results in internal disciplinary or criminal investigations. The outcomes of these investigations are disseminated as per response to (a) and (b) above.
07 September 2015 - NW3054
McGluwa, Mr JJ to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration
(a) How does (i) his department and (ii) entities reporting to him define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) his department and (bbb) the entities reporting to him?
Reply:
(a)(i)(ii)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(aaa)(bbb) The Department of Public Service and Administration and the National School of Government do not have a standard definition for red tape besides the standard dictionary meaning which generally refers to excessive regulation or rigid conformity to formal rules that are considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinder or prevent action or decision-making.
There are continuous performance monitoring reviews with specific reference to reducing lead time and improve turn-around time against the Annual Operational Plans (AOPs) and/or the Annual Performance Plans (APPs).
In keeping with the prescripts that govern effective and efficient service delivery, the following have been put in place; service delivery charter and standards, complaints handling management policy, service delivery improvement plans, amongst others, which are in addition to the processes of monitoring individual programmes and institutional performance management.
To optimise the use of ICT in order to gain some efficiency in the operations and service culture, the National School of Government is currently reviewing its service systems architecture and ICT infrastructure towards ensuring seamless delivery of education and learning programmes and courses.
CENTRE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INNOVATION (CPSI)
(a)(ii)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(bbb) According to the CPSI, red tape emerges when formal rules, regulations and procedures related to the administration of service delivery are no longer effective in achieving the goal for which they were instituted and/or the cost of compliance is not justified by the benefit that citizens receives.
The CPSI Awards Programme annually unearths a number of innovations to improve turn-around time for effective and efficient public service delivery. Recent projects include the “Vota Quota” web-based procurement system of the IEC, the CFO Helpdesk at DTI, pharmacy automation in Gauteng that significantly reduces paperwork and queues, KZN’s Digital Pen for m-Health, and the Road Accident Fund’s “RAF on the Road” initiative that simplified RAF applications and pay outs.
For a more comprehensive analysis of red tape and examples of red tape reduction, please refer to the CPSI’s Future Watch publication “From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Easing the Administrative Burden of Public Service Delivery”, available from http://www.cpsi.co.za/archived-publications/ and attached herewith).
Given the size of the CPSI and its mandate, very little red tape exists within the organisation. New internal policies and processes prioritise simplified processes and the use of electronic forms and systems rather than paper-based solutions.
An example of an internal system where red tape was reduced within the CPSI is the new online system being used for travel bookings. Using the Travel Agent’s web-based system, designated staff members are doing bookings for the organisation. The system eliminates the need to use a travel consultant to make a booking on behalf of the CPSI, provides for electronic authorisation and offers access to more and cheaper options. The CPSI is already saving significant amounts using the system.
07 September 2015 - NW2968
Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(a) Whether the Law Reform Commission Report on sex work has been finalized; and (b) on what date is the report envisaged to be published?
Reply:
(a) I wish to inform the Honourable Member that the South African Law Reform Commission (SALRC) considered sex work in its investigation into Sexual Offences: Adult Prostitution (Project 107). This investigation has now been finalized, and as required in terms of section 7(1) of the South African Law Reform Commission Act, 1973 (Act No 19 of 1973), the report has been submitted to me during July 2015 for my consideration.
(b) I am currently still considering the report and the recommendations contained therein. As soon as I finalize considering the report, further announcements will be made.
07 September 2015 - NW3151
Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(a) What cases are currently being investigated by the Special Investigating Unit and (b) which of the specified cases are before the courts?
Reply:
|
|
(a) The SIU has informed me that the following cases are currently being investigated: (1) National and all Provincial Departments of Social Development; (2) North-West Province Municipalities: (aa) Madibeng Local Municipality; (bb) Greater Taung Local Municipality; (cc) Mafikeng Local Municipality; (dd) Ventersdorp Local Municipality; (ee) Dr Kenneth Kaunda District Municipality; (ff) Matlosana Local Municipality; (gg) Maquassi Hills Local Municipality; (hh) Tlokwe Local Municipality; (ii) Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality; (jj) Ditsobotla Local Municipality; (kk) Tswaing Local Municipality; (ll) Ramotshere Moiloa Local Municipality; (mm) Ratlou Local Municipality; (nn) Moses Kotane Local Municipality; (oo) Ketlengrivier Local Municipality; (pp) Dr Ruth Mompati District Municipality; (qq) Rustenburg Local Municipality; (rr) Naledi Local Municipality; (ss) Kagisano Local Municipality; (tt) Molopo Local Municipality; (uu) Mamusa Local Municipality; (vv) Lekwa-Teemane Local Municipality; (ww) Bojanala Platinum District Municipality; and (xx) Moretele Local Municipality. (3) Department of Health: Gauteng Province; (4) South African Social Security Agency (SASSA); (5) Department of Public Works; (6) South African Police Service (SAPS); (7) Department of Public Works for the KwaZulu-Natal Province; (8) Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (TMM): Gauteng Province; (9) Ekhurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM): Gauteng Province; (10) National Department of Rural Development and Land Reform and its agents; (11) Midvaal Local Municipality: Gauteng Province; (12) Eskom Holdings Ltd; (13) Limpopo Province intervention: (aa) Provincial Treasury; (bb) Department of Health and Social Development; (cc) Department of Roads and Transport; (dd) Department of Education; (ee) Department of Public Works, Limpopo Province. (14) Department of Public Works (Security upgrade at Nkandla); (15) Department of Water Affairs (formerly the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry); (16) National Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA); (17) Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (formerly known as the Department of Land Affairs) in its national department, its provincial departments, its trading entities and their respective agencies (herein referred to as the DRDLR) and the State Information Technology Agency (PTY) Ltd (herein referred to as SITA); (18) Bushbuckridge Local Municipality: Mpumalanga Province; (19) Department of Communications; (20) USAASA (Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa); (21) KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Treasury; (22) Vhembe District Municipality; (23) Greater Tubatse Local Municipality; (24) State Information Technology Agency (Pty) Ltd (“SITA”); (25) National Department of Public Works: Prestige Directorate: Western Cape; (26) Department of Labour and the Compensation Fund; (27) National Department of Transport; (28) National Department of Public Works (Leases investigation); (29) Department of Communications; and (30) Eastern Cape Department of Education. (b) The SIU has informed me that the following civil matters are currently before court: (1) The Department of Public Works: The SIU caused summons to be issued out of the High Court at the KwaZulu-Natal local division under case number 6428/2015. The SIU (1st plaintiff) together with the Department of Public Works (2nd plaintiff) is pursuing an action for the recovery of approximately R2.3 million from the contractor as a consequence of an overcharge. The Plaintiffs are also seeking to recover the fees paid to the consultants (approximately R7 million) arising from their failure to carry out their mandate in terms of the contract concluded between the parties. The matter is currently being defended. (2) Department of Public Works (Security upgrade at Nkandla): The SIU instituted civil proceedings against Minenhle Makhanya and another in the High Court (KwaZulu-Natal Division – Pietermaritzburg) under case number 11107/14 in which the SIU is asking the court to order Mr Makhanya to pay approximately R155 million to the Department. This case is defended and on-going. (3) Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (formerly known as the Department of Land Affairs) in its national department, its provincial departments, its trading entities and their respective agencies (herein referred to as the DRDLR) and the State Information Technology Agency (PTY) Ltd (herein referred to as SITA): The SIU instituted civil proceedings against Gijima AST (Pty) Ltd and others in the High Court (Gauteng Division) under case number 88170/14 in which the SIU is asking the court to declare the tender and resulting contract unlawful and void ab initio. This case is defended and on-going. (4) Department of Communications: The Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services and the SIU instituted civil proceedings against Media Corner (Pty) Ltd and others in the High Court (Gauteng Division) under case number 66037/14 in which the Department and the SIU are asking the court to declare the tender and resulting contract unlawful and void ab initio, while also claiming approximately R12.7 million from Media Corner and asking for a type of debating of accounts in respect of the remaining approximately R32.7 million. This case is defended and on-going. (5) USAASA (Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa): The SIU instituted civil proceedings against Mr Zami Nkosi, USAASA and others in the High Court (Gauteng Division) under case number 43250/14 in which the SIU is asking the court to declare the appointment of Mr Zami Nkosi as the Chief Executive Officer of the USAASA unlawful. This case is defended and on-going. |
|
07 September 2015 - NW3050
Kohler-Barnard, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police
(1)On whose authority did Mr Solomon Makgale release a media statement that the Provincial SA Police Service Commissioners have full confidence in the National Commissioner; (2) did the National Police Commissioner sign off on the statement; (3) did the National Police Commissioner give an order that any of the nine Provincial Commissioners must sign the specified statement; if so, to which of the Provincial Commissioners did she give such an order; (4) (a) how many Provincial Commissioners did not wish to have their names attached to the document and (b) what are the relevant details in this regard?
Reply:
- The Board of Commissioners.
- No.
- No. The statement was signed off by all the 9 Provincial Commissioners.
(4)(a) None.
(4)(b) Not applicable.
07 September 2015 - NW2942
Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy
Will her department release an updated version of the Integrated Resource Plan; if not, why not;if so, when?
Reply:
Yes, as soon as the policy adjustment process is completed and Cabinet approval is obtained.
07 September 2015 - NW3046
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
(a) What did the Deputy Minister of Police mean by her remarks on 4 August 2015 when she said that the SA Police Service’s strategic plan must always intend to treat heinous criminals as outcasts, who must neither have place in the society nor peace in their cells and that they must be treated as cockroaches, (b) how does she reconcile her remarks with her constitutional obligation to uphold the Bill of Rights which protects the human dignity of all and guarantees the right of everyone to security of the person which includes the right not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhumane or degrading way and (c) what action will he take to reprimand her for the specified remarks?
Reply:
(a) All Ministers and Deputy Ministers have officials who are tasked to draft speaker notes. The Deputy Minister of Police did not deliver speaker notes; but a speech, which did not entail the alleged remarks as alluded. A factual recording of the Deputy Minister of Police’s speech is available upon request.
(b) The Deputy Minister of Police always abides by the Constitution and Laws of the democratic Republic of South Africa; and respects all international conventions and instruments that South Africa is signatory to.
(c) There are no grounds to reprimand the Deputy Minister of Police, thus, no action will be taken against her.
07 September 2015 - NW3317
Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Transport
Whether the Government and the SA National Roads Agency have any immediate plans to (a) provide overtaking strips on the many steep inclines that stretch for many kilometers on the N2 between Kokstad and Umtata, considering how slow-moving heavy vehicles on the roads slow down all other vehicles behind them to a long crawl and make impatient drivers take dangerous risks that endanger innocent motorists, (b) fence off the road boundaries, considering both the deadly toll on animals every day and the danger such accidents pose to motorists and (c) demarcate rest areas which will allow rural communities to set up refreshment stalls, provide car washes and build rondavels for accommodation; if not, why not, in each case; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
(a) The N2 extends for roughly 190 km between Mthatha and Kokstad. On this section safe passing opportunities have been provided over approximately 150km, particularly between Mthatha and Mount Frere, and between Mount Ayliff and Kokstad. Between Mount Frere and the Ngcelweni river, 40km north of Mount Frere, the N2 is of an older standard but design is in progress to upgrade this section which will include the provision of passing opportunities.
(b) Fencing of the N2 reserve boundaries was upgraded during construction and thereafter maintained through routine maintenance projects. The South of Brooks Nek fencing has recently been upgraded as part of a construction project. Fencing between Qumbu and Mount Frere is being upgraded over 37km as part of a construction project. Furthermore, about 33 km of fencing will be upgraded under the future construction project in the Southern side of Qumbu.
Vandalism and theft of fencing components is an ongoing challenge, as is the control of the closure of gates. The non closure of gates results in the entry of animals into the road reserve and then being trapped in a fenced corridor. The Provincial Department of Transport have introduced rangers to patrol the roads for the purpose of controlling stray animals.
(c) The N2 is considered to be a mobility road and the location of trading facilities should be considered with caution as it introduces additional turning movements with the associated reduction of the safe operation of this high speed mobility road. Such facilities are best located on lower speed access roads which operate under lower traffic volumes and speeds. Additionally it should be noted that trading on public and national roads are controlled under legislation.
07 September 2015 - NW3049
Kohler-Barnard, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police
Whether (a) a certain person (details furnished) retains the rank of Lieutenant General, (b) what is the current salary level of the specified person, (c) from which legislation and/or regulation is the specified rank derived and (d) which other persons hold the same rank?
Reply:
(a) Yes.
(b) The current salary level of the specified person is: SMS Grade C (salary level 15).
(c) The rank is derived from the prescripts contained in Regulation 8 of the South African Police Service Act (Act No 68 of 1995), as promulgated in Government Gazette Notice No 9252, dated 1 April 2010.
(d) A total number of 23 other Lieutenant Generals (Deputy National Commissioners/Provincial Commissioners and Divisional Commissioners) are on the establishment of the South African Police Service.
07 September 2015 - NW3048
Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Police
What are the relevant (a) standing orders, (b) national instructions and (c) standard operating procedures governing the transportation of accused persons in police custody between SA Police Service holding facilities and the courts?
Reply:
(a), (b) and (c) The transportation of persons in custody of the Service is governed by Standing Order (G) 345 which includes the transportation of accused persons who are in police custody between SA Police Service holding facilities and the courts. SO (G) 345: Transportation of persons in custody of the Service and related matters, deals with all the operational aspects applicable to the transportation and escorting of persons in custody of the Service. The Standing Order prescribes the applicable operational aspects once a person in custody must be transported, including all the relevant arrangements which must be performed in order to ensure safe and secure transportation. Standing Order (G) 345 attached for ease of reference.
07 September 2015 - NW3160
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
With regard to his department’s modernisation road map which indicates that the processes of the registration of marriages, issuing of death certificates and application for citizenship will be automated by mid-2015, what measures has his department put in place in respect of (a) infrastructure and (b) policies to meet this target?
Reply:
(a-b) According to the Departmental Strategic Plan 2015–2020 the department has targeted to automate the registration of marriages, divorces, deaths and citizenship business processes by the end of the 2017/2018 financial year. Currently it has only committed to continue with automation of the ID smart card and passport system through live capture in the 2015/2016 financial year. At an appropriate time the department will make further announcement on the modernisation project.
07 September 2015 - NW3120
Figg, Mr MJ to ask the Dr M J Figg (DA) asked the Minister of Public Works:
Who is eligible to use the parliamentary bus service to and from the parliamentary villages? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 3120 [NW3661E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 32 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Dr M J Figg (DA) asked the Minister of Public Works: Who is eligible to use the parliamentary bus service to and from the parliamentary villages? NW3661E ___________________________________________________________________________ REPLY: The Minister of Public Works Members of Parliament, Sessional Officials, and where appropriate, their dependents, are eligible to utilise the transport service to and from the Parliamentary Villages and Parliament. ___________________________________________________________________________
Reply:
The Minister of Public Works
Members of Parliament, Sessional Officials, and where appropriate, their dependents, are eligible to utilise the transport service to and from the Parliamentary Villages and Parliament.
___________________________________________________________________________
07 September 2015 - NW3108
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Public Works:
(1) Who authorised the allocation of a state house to Mr Mac Maharaj from 1 January 2010 until 30 April 2015; (2) whether his department received a request from anyone to allocate a state house to the specified person; if not, how was the decision made to allocate the house; if so, (a) who made the request, (b) when was the request made and (c) on what grounds was the request made; (3) what was the total cost, including cleaning and other services, of providing the house to the specified person for the period he occupied it; (4) whether his department has a policy with regard to awarding state houses in the Bryntirion Estate in Pretoria to (a) persons who are not Ministers or Deputy Ministers and (b) special envoys; if not, why not; if so, what is the relevant policy; (5) whether his department requested the specified person to pay rent while occupying the state house; if not, why not; if so, what amount was (a) requested and (b) paid? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 3108 [NW3649E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 32 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Ms P T van Damme (DA) asked the Minister of Public Works: (1)Who authorised the allocation of a state house to Mr Mac Maharaj from 1 January 2010 until 30 April 2015; (2)whether his department received a request from anyone to allocate a state house to the specified person; if not, how was the decision made to allocate the house; if so, (a) who made the request, (b) when was the request made and (c) on what grounds was the request made; (3)what was the total cost, including cleaning and other services, of providing the house to the specified person for the period he occupied it; (4) whether his department has a policy with regard to awarding state houses in the Bryntirion Estate in Pretoria to (a) persons who are not Ministers or Deputy Ministers and (b) special envoys; if not, why not; if so, what is the relevant policy; (5)whether his department requested the specified person to pay rent while occupying the state house; if not, why not; if so, what amount was (a) requested and (b) paid? NW3649E REPLY: The Minister of Public Works (1) We could not find any official record in the Department of Public Works of who authorized the allocation of State-owned accommodation to Mr Mac Maharaj. (2)(a), (b) and (c) See the response to (1) above. (3) Services rendered at the Bryntirion Estate are centralised and costs are not recovered from individual occupants. (4) (a) and (b) State-owned accommodation at the Bryntirion Estate is not exclusively reserved for Ministers and Deputy Ministers. The Estate has different types of accommodation including houses and flats. Government officials are accommodated at the Estate as well. Following the introduction of the Turnaround Strategy in 2012 the Department has embarked on a process of further refining the Prestige policy, which includes the allocation and occupation State-owned accommodation. (5) (a) and (b) See response to (1) above. _______________________________________________________________________
Reply:
(1) We could not find any official record in the Department of Public Works of who authorized the allocation of State-owned accommodation to Mr Mac Maharaj.
(2) (a), (b) and (c) See the response to (1) above.
(3) Services rendered at the Bryntirion Estate are centralised and costs are not recovered from individual occupants.
(4) (a) and (b) State-owned accommodation at the Bryntirion Estate is not exclusively reserved for Ministers and Deputy Ministers. The Estate has different types of accommodation including houses and flats. Government officials are accommodated at the Estate as well.
Following the introduction of the Turnaround Strategy in 2012 the Department has embarked on a process of further refining the Prestige policy, which includes the allocation and occupation State-owned accommodation.
(5) (a) and (b) See response to (1) above.
_______________________________________________________________________
07 September 2015 - NW3126
Davis, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(1) Whether a certain person (name furnished) was found guilty and convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol in 1994 and was also found guilty and convicted of culpable homicide in 1998; if so, (a) what are the specific details of the offences that the specified person was convicted of, (b) which courts handed down such conviction and (c) what sentences were handed down; (2) Was the specified person incarcerated as a result of each specified conviction; if so, for how long in each specified case; and (3) Have any of the specified convictions been expunged by his department; if so, (a) on what date were they expunged, (b) under whose authority were they expunged, (c) in terms of what legislation were they expunged and (d) what reasons were considered when the convictions of crimes were expunged?
Reply:
(1) The Departments of Justice and Constitutional Development and of Correctional Services, are not responsible for the keeping of criminal records of previous convictions. This is a function of the South African Police Service (SAPS), in particular the Criminal Record Center of the SAPS (CRC). This question should therefore be referred to the Ministry of Police for an answer or input in this regard.
(2) The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development does not have specific information in this regard.
(3) No. (a) to (d) therefore fall away.
Please also find attached a copy of the Parliamentary Question answer No 2615 of the 7th August 2015, where-in the Honourable Member is informed that no pardon has been granted by the President to the person in question, because additional information is still being awaited.
Pardons are submitted for consideration by the President, when the person concerned, does not qualify to have his conviction expunged in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977. Applications for expungement are submitted to the Director-General of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, where a convicted person has been convicted of an offence for which he/ she did not serve a term of direct imprisonment; the conviction happened more than 10 years ago; and he or she has not been found guilty of a sexual offence against a child or a mentally disabled person, which would then mean that such person’s details will be added to the National Register of Sexual Offenders in terms of Chapter 6 of the Criminal Law Amendment (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act, 2007 (Act No 32 of 2007).
It is the responsibility of the person applying for a pardon and/or an expungement, to obtain a SAPS Clearance Certificate from the Criminal Record Centre him- or herself, to submit to the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, for consideration of the expungement, if there was no direct term of imprisonment imposed, after 10 years have passed and the person has not been convicted of a sexual offence against a child or a mentally disabled person. In the latter case, an expungement will not be granted and the only option for removal of a person’s criminal conviction/s, is to apply for a Presidential pardon.
07 September 2015 - NW2933
Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Energy
With reference to the solar water heating contracting model mentioned in her department’s Annual Performance Plan for the first quarter of 2015-16 financial year, (a) did Cabinet approve the specified model and (b) what are the exact details of the specified model?
Reply:
(a) Yes.
(b) Cabinet approved the new model for Solar Water Heaters on 24 June 2015. An Inter-Ministerial Committee on Energy will finalise the model.
07 September 2015 - NW1532
Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
(1)With reference to her replies to question 89 and question 619 on 23 March 2015 and 24 March 2015, respectively, how does she reconcile the calculated average cost of R96 491.00 for a toilet in the Eastern Cape and the cost of R9 500.00 for installing a ventilated improved toilet in the Eastern Cape; (2) (a) what is the name of the contractor who built the 57 toilets in the Eastern Cape, (b) when (i) were the toilets completed and (ii) was payment made to the contractor, (c) for the construction of how many toilets did the contract go out on tender and (d) in which municipalities were the 57 toilets built; (3)(a) what is the name of the contractor who built the 530 toilets in the Northern Cape,(b) when (i) were the toilets completed and (ii) was payment made to the contractor, (c) for the construction of how many toilets did the contract go out on tender, (d) in which municipalities were the 530 toilets built and (e) why was the calculated average cost of building a toilet R40 943.00?
Reply:
(1) With reference to question 89 of 10 March 2015 the response was adequately provided and was addressing the average cost of installing a Ventilated Improved Pit (VIP) latrine at the cost of R9 500.00 (Nine thousand five hundred) that includes the top and underground structure, health and hygiene education, project management cost and construction costs, whereas the response to question 619 of 6 March 2015 was with regard to the Bucket Eradication Programme.
(2) The name of the contractors who built the 57 toilets in Makana Local Municipality: Eastern Cape is Tyolumnqa Civils and Andile Plant Hire. Construction was completed between November 2013 and March 2014 and payment was made to the contractor. The contract went out on tender for the construction of 737 toilets.
(3) The names of the contractors who built the 363 toilets in Sol Plaatjie Municipality: Northern Cape are Reyoko Construction and Designs and LFP Trading. Construction was completed in July 2014 and payment was made to the contractor. The contract went out on tender for the construction of 954 toilets.
The Rural Household Infrastructure Grant (RHIG) provides dry, on-site sanitation at an average cost of between R9 500 (Single pit toilet) and R11 500 (Double pit toilet) however, variations may occur from province to province and may marginally increase the cost due to location of the project and the availability of materials which at times will be imported or transported from other provinces, if adequate stock is not available from local suppliers.
With regard to Water Borne Sanitation, the cost of providing a new toilet structure in urban and peri-urban areas is between R12 000 to R15 000. This does not include the water and sewer reticulation network and other direct or indirect cost associated with the project. This programme does not provide sanitation in rural areas.
Requesting the Honorable Member to clarify on the referred calculated average cost of building a toilet at the cost of R96 491.00 and R40 943.00.
---00O00---
07 September 2015 - NW3274
Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Police
(1)What (a) total amount did his department spend on air travel between Gauteng and Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the 2014-15 financial year and (b) is the total number of trips that were undertaken; (2) what is the total amount that his department spent on (a) accommodation and (b) car rental in Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the specified financial year?
Reply:
(1)(a), (b) and (2)(a) and (b)
The information requested is merely not readily available at the level of detail requested. Due to the number of transactions and various documentation to be analysed and consolidated it would be extremely time consuming and place an unreasonable burden on the resources of the Department to obtain the information requested.
07 September 2015 - NW2671
Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Energy
Will she provide a detailed report containing all the information provided by the Central Energy Fund to the National Prosecuting Authority to assist in the prosecution against Lesedi Biogas (Pty) Ltd; if not, why not; if so, when?
Reply:
The matter has been reported to the NPA under Case Number 65/3/2012. The matter is under investigation. CEF is not in the position to avail and/or request the content of the docket, such request should be directed to the NPA accordingly and a determination by the NPA in terms of their rules shall be made as to whether or not to avail such information on pending matters.
07 September 2015 - NW3080
Lotriet, Prof A to ask the Minister of Science and Technology
(a) How does (i) her department and (ii) entities reporting to her define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) her department and (bbb) the entities reporting to her?”
Reply:
(a) (i) The Department of Science and Technology defines “red tape” as any process or administrative requirement that hinders the effective operation and implementation of policies, programmes that seek to deliver on the mandate of the department.
(ii) The response regarding the definition of red tape by entities is presented below:
Entities |
Definition of red tape |
Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) |
Process that entails some restrictive processes or hindrance that have to be followed or complied with in the performance of an activity. |
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) |
Rules, processes and procedures that impose unnecessary delay, and inaction or cost to the supplier(s) and/or potential beneficiaries. |
Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) |
Unnecessary bureaucratic practices which adds no value to desired outcomes, but are imposed on processes nonetheless. |
National Research Foundation (NRF) |
Additional administrative measure, over and above the established policies and procedures of the organisation that are implemented through legislated authorities. |
South African National Space Agency (SANSA) |
Unnecessary and cumbersome rules, regulations, requirements, processes or procedures that result in unacceptable and unnecessary delays in business processes and decision making. |
Technology Innovation Agency (TIA) |
Excessive regulation or rigid conformity to formal rules that is considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinders or prevents action or decision-making. |
(b) Response to the specific interventions and systems that have been implemented to identify and reduce red tape is provided below:
Entities/ Department |
(i) Interventions |
(ii) Systems |
|||
(aa) Identify |
(bb) Reduce |
(aa) Identify |
(bb) Reduce |
||
(aaa) Department |
(bbb) Entities |
||||
Department of Science and Technology |
Establishment of an Operations Committee to address operational matters. |
Review of policies and procedures every two years (or as required) as part of continuous improvement or with the introduction of new/ legislative amendments. |
Document adverse effects of policy implementation to inform future reviews and amendments. Development of standard operating procedures (as applicable) to maximise efficiencies. |
||
Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) |
There are no specific interventions. |
No systems to identify red tape. |
No systems to reduce red tape. |
||
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) |
There are no specific interventions. |
Continually review processes to incorporate improvements and to align to new legislative requirements. |
Developed systems and processes to maximise its efficiencies and effectiveness. |
||
Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) |
There are no specific interventions. |
Identify these through internal consultation and by working closely with the Internal and External Auditors and then determine what is required to adhere to in order to remain compliant. |
No systems to reduce red tape. |
||
National Research Foundation (NRF) |
There are no specific interventions. |
No systems to identify red tape. |
No systems to reduce red tape. |
||
South African National Space Agency (SANSA) |
There are no specific interventions. |
Identify through service level standards or turnaround time targets that are set for key processes. |
Regularly review policies, procedures and systems with a view to continually assess their effectiveness. |
||
Technology Innovation Agency (TIA) |
-Materiality framework was amended to enhance decision making and execution of decisions. -Delegation of authority was refined. -Revision of Investment framework policy. -Bi-monthly Exco meetings. -Special board meetings to expedite decisions made. -The operational team in the Supply Chain Management Unit has been expanded to meet business’ needs quicker and more efficient. -Employee culture survey. -Complaints review. -Customer satisfaction surveys. |
Operational inefficiencies are identified through inadequate turnaround times of approval and payment of projects and expenditure. It is also identified through employee engagement surveys and customer satisfaction surveys. |
Investment management system has been designed and implemented. |
07 September 2015 - NW2787
Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Public Works:
(1) Whether, with reference to his presentation and responses on 29 July 2015 to the Ad Hoc Committee on Security Upgrades at the Private Residence of the President at Nkandla, he has, upon assuming responsibilities as the Minister of Public Works and in view of the tremendous publicity given to expenditure at Nkandla, instructed his department to do a minute and detailed examination into the expenditure on construction work at President J G Zuma’s private residence at Nkandla; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether his examination of such expenditure found that (a) each of the houses in the police barracks was costing in excess of R6 million and (b) this price was grossly inflated; if not, why not; if so, (3) has he (a) taken immediate steps to discover who was responsible for that and (b) thereupon taken appropriate legal action against the specified persons to institute charges and to recover state resources; if not, why not in each case; if so, what are the relevant details of the steps he has taken in keeping with his fiduciary and political responsibilities? MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 2787 [NW3256E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: No. 28 of 2015 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 07 AUGUST 2015 DATE OF REPLY: 07 SEPTEMBER 2015 Mr M G P Lekota (Cope) asked the Minister of Public Works: (1) Whether, with reference to his presentation and responses on 29 July 2015 to the Ad Hoc Committee on Security Upgrades at the Private Residence of the President at Nkandla, he has, upon assuming responsibilities as the Minister of Public Works and in view of the tremendous publicity given to expenditure at Nkandla, instructed his department to do a minute and detailed examination into the expenditure on construction work at President J G Zuma’s private residence at Nkandla; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether his examination of such expenditure found that (a) each of the houses in the police barracks was costing in excess of R6 million and (b) this price was grossly inflated; if not, why not; if so, (3) has he (a) taken immediate steps to discover who was responsible for that and (b) thereupon taken appropriate legal action against the specified persons to institute charges and to recover state resources; if not, why not in each case; if so, what are the relevant details of the steps he has taken in keeping with his fiduciary and political responsibilities? NW3256E ______________________________________________________________________ REPLY: The Minister of Public Works (1)In October 2012, as the Minister of Public Works I ordered an investigation into the conduct and management of security upgrades implemented by the Department of Public Works (DPW) at the President’s residence in Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal. The Task Team responsible for this investigation submitted their Report in January 2013 and made a number of recommendations that have a bearing on DPW. The Task Team, among other things, recommended that their report be referred to the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) for further investigation. As a result, the President issued Proclamation R59 of 2013 on 20 December 2013, to mandate the SIU to conduct an investigation into the affairs of the Department with respect to the security upgrades. (2)(a)The Task Team’s Report did not make reference to the cost of individual houses in the police barracks. However, the investigation found that that the total cost of the South African Police Service (SAPS) and Department of Defence (DOD) needs, which includes accommodation, the Clinic, Park Homes, Helipads, etc., amounted to approximately R125 000 000.00. The cost of R6 million per individual house is not the result of an official departmental cost apportionment, and the department is also not aware how this amount was arrived at. (2)(b)The finding was that the price for the mentioned items was probably inflated. (3)(a)Steps have been taken to determine who was responsible for the irregularities, including the costs. (3)(b)The officials who did not comply with Supply Chain Management (SCM) prescripts in the appointment of the contractors have been charged with misconduct and the disciplinary hearings are pending. The loss as a result of the over-design of the facilities/inflation of the price is claimed by the SIU from the architect, Mr. Minenhle Makhanya. The civil matter for the recovery is pending in the High Court.
Reply:
(1) In October 2012, as the Minister of Public Works I ordered an investigation into the conduct and management of security upgrades implemented by the Department of Public Works (DPW) at the President’s residence in Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal.
The Task Team responsible for this investigation submitted their Report in January 2013 and made a number of recommendations that have a bearing on DPW. The Task Team, among other things, recommended that their report be referred to the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) for further investigation. As a result, the President issued Proclamation R59 of 2013 on 20 December 2013, to mandate the SIU to conduct an investigation into the affairs of the Department with respect to the security upgrades.
(2)(a) The Task Team’s Report did not make reference to the cost of individual houses in the police barracks. However, the investigation found that that the total cost of the South African Police Service (SAPS) and Department of Defence (DOD) needs, which includes accommodation, the Clinic, Park Homes, Helipads, etc., amounted to approximately R125 000 000.00. The cost of R6 million per individual house is not the result of an official departmental cost apportionment, and the department is also not aware how this amount was arrived at.
(2)(b) The finding was that the price for the mentioned items was probably inflated.
(3)(a) Steps have been taken to determine who was responsible for the irregularities, including the costs.
(3)(b) The officials who did not comply with Supply Chain Management (SCM) prescripts in the appointment of the contractors have been charged with misconduct and the disciplinary hearings are pending. The loss as a result of the over-design of the facilities/inflation of the price is claimed by the SIU from the architect, Mr. Minenhle Makhanya. The civil matter for the recovery is pending in the High Court.
07 September 2015 - NW2860
Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Communications:
)What is her position with regard to her alleged response on a letter from a certain person (name and details furnished); (2)Did the alleged cordial relationship between the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, and a certain person (name furnished) determined how she dealt with allegations of misconduct against the specified person? NW3333E REPLY: MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS Minister does not respond to hearsay. MR NN MUNZHELELE DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING] DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE: MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP) MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS DATE
Reply:
Minister does not respond to hearsay.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
07 September 2015 - NW2930
Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
(1) Whether, given the fact that the investment protection agreement between South Africa and Zimbabwe does not retroactively provide for the protection of property rights of South African citizens against expropriation and/or illegal occupation before the commencement of the agreement, he will consider introducing legislation to Parliament to bring about compensation for such disadvantaged people by making the confiscation of assets of the Zimbabwean government and/or responsible ministers and/or officials in South Africa possible; if not, why not, seen against the background of the Bill of Rights contained in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and relevant international law; if so, what are the relevant details; and
Reply:
(1) I wish to inform the Honourable Member that neither the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, nor the South African Law Reform Commission, has such pending legislation or research projects, in process.
(2) As the matter relates to international property rights, which are not in the jurisdiction of the Republic of South Africa, I would recommend that the Honourable Member address such question to the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation.
07 September 2015 - NW3004
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
Whether his department intends to encourage every university with a law department in the country to revert to a BA, LLB curriculum seeing that the present curtailed provisions are allegedly inadequate to the needs of the profession and are inadequately equipping new lawyers with the depth of literacy so necessary to their profession; if not, why not; if so, what efforts is his department putting in place to redress the inadequacy of literacy amongst new law graduates?
Reply:
The National Reviews’ Directorate of the Council on Higher Education (CHE) circulated the draft manual, proposal and guidelines for the review of all Bachelor of Law (LLB) programmes on 5 August 2015 for comments.
The starting point of the review is the LLB qualification standard, which has been recently developed by CHE in consultation with the Reference Group on Standards Development comprising of academic experts in the field of law education. The review is an assessment of whether or not the current LLB degree programme meets the qualification standard and complies with criteria for design, delivery, output, impact and sustainability, derived from the CHE’s Criteria for Programme Accreditation.
Furthermore, the Department has representation on the National LLB Task Team, which will upon completion of the national review process, advise me on the structure of the programme at all universities. The National LLB Task Team comprises of representatives from the South African Law Deans Association (SALDA), Society of Law Teachers of Southern Africa (SLTSA), Law Society of South Africa (LSSA), General Council of the Bar (GCB), Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, and the Department of Higher Education and Training.
Compiler/Contact persons:
Ext:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
REPLY TO QUESTION 3004 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
07 September 2015 - NW2997
Hlengwa, Mr M to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration
How many (a) public servants have retired or resigned before the prescribed retirement age in the 2014-15 financial year and (b) have re-applied for re-employment in the Public Service sector?
Reply:
The figures provided herewith below have been extracted from PERSAL. These figures exclude the (i) department of Defence and the (ii) Security sector:
(a) Employees who retired or resigned before the prescribed retirement ages during the 2014/15 financial year
Employees who retired before their prescribed retirement ages |
10 449 |
Resignations |
39 194 |
Total |
49 643 |
(b) Re - employment in the Public Service
Employees who retired before their prescribed retirement ages |
92 |
Employees who have resigned |
6 614 |
Total |
6 706 |
04 September 2015 - NW3225
Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
(1)With regard to the War on Leaks programme, (a) how many of the 3 000 persons to be trained in the 2015-16 financial year have started their training and (b) when will they start working; (2) how many of the (a) 15 000 in total and (b) 3 000 to be trained in the 2015-16 financial year will be trained as (i) water agents, (ii) artisans and (iii) plumbers; (3) (a) at which institutions will the 15 000 unemployed young people receive training and (b) what type of qualification will they receive; (4) how will the training of the 15 000 persons be financed over the next three financial years; (5) whether, beside the War on Leaks programme and the appointment of Rand Water as the implementing agent, her department has any other plans or programmes to curb the high level of water losses in the country; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1)(a) A total of 800 persons have started receiving training in July 2015 and as from September a further 2200 persons will start receiving training.
(1)(b) The trained persons will start working after completion of their 36 months / 3 years training programme .Water Agents that will be trained will complete their training after ten months and could start working thereafter.
(2)(a) Below is the breakdown of the15000 to be trained in the financial year 2015-16:
15000 |
|||
Trades and quantities |
Plumbers |
Artisans |
Water agent |
7500 |
5000 |
2500 |
(2)(b) Below is the breakdown of the 3000 to be trained in the financial year 2015-16:
3000 Phase 1 FY – 2015/16 |
|||
Trades and quantities |
Plumbers |
Artisans |
Water agent |
1500 |
1000 |
500 |
-2-
(3)(a) The unemployed young people will be trained at various EWSETA accredited training institutions, TVETS(Technical Vocational Education and Training), municipalities and water boards in the nine provinces.
(3)(b) Artisans will be trade tested Artisans at the end of the training period, Water Agents will receive a qualification that is comprised of unit standard bearing credits to enable them to build up this basic qualification into a higher qualification. Plumbers will receive formal plumber qualifications from the respective accreditation bodies.
(4) My Department will fund this project over the 5 year project period through the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF).
(5) Yes, my Department has other plans to curb the high level of water losses in the country. There are initiatives such as the following:
(a)The “No Drop” regulatory programme, which serves as a guideline for municipalities to develop strategies, plans to reduce water demand, water losses and non-revenue water.
(b) Campaigns to educate the public on the scarcity of water and also to encourage water conservation and demand management.
(c) Training programme for councilors to institutionalise water conservation and demand management within the municipalities.
(d) Municipal Self-Assessment System, which the municipalities use to conduct self-assessment in various areas including water conservation and demand management.
---00O00---
04 September 2015 - NW3142
Kopane, Ms SP to ask the Minister of Human Settlements
Has her department launched a special investigation into alleged irregularities surrounding the Masimong 4 Estate in Welkom; if not, does her department intend to launch the specified investigation; if so, (a) when was the investigation concluded, (b) what were the findings of the specified investigation, (c) what recommendations did the investigation make and (d) what actions has she taken with regard to implementing the specified recommendations?
Reply:
Yes, my Department launched an investigation into the allegations made by the residents (complainants) of Masimong 4 Estate, in Welkom.
(a) The Department received the complaint in March 2015 and concluded its preliminary investigation on 28 May 2015. The preliminary investigation (assessment) of the complaint was conducted by the Department’s Legal Advisory Services and Rental Housing Development Units. It included, amongst others, engagement with the complainants and Amohela Property Management.
(b) (i) It is important to note that the initial complaint focused on allegations of rental dispute and illegal evictions. The allegation of rental dispute was confirmed and it was found that conflicting/ different monthly rental fee structures were issued by Amohela Property Management and the Free State Department of Human Settlement.
This resulted in the complainants claiming not to know the correct and/or valid monthly rental fee structure.
(ii) The allegation of illegal eviction could not be substantiated by the complainants. However, my department discovered that the complainants were (only) threatened with evictions following their dispute with Amohela Property Management on monthly rental to be paid by the tenants/ residents, due to conflicting/ different rental structure which was presented to them.
(iii) The allegations of irregularities regarding the management of Masimong 4 Estate were referred to the department in July of 2015.
(a) The outcome of the preliminary investigation recommended that the matter be referred for forensic investigation.
(b) The matter, particularly the alleged irregularities in the management of Masimong 4 Estate, is a subject of a forensic investigation that is currently underway and conducted by the department’s Special Investigations Directorate. A detailed forensic investigation report will be submitted once the investigation is finalized.
04 September 2015 - NW3107
Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Human Settlements
(a) What progress has been made with regard to the National Upgrading Support Programme and (b) what amount has been spent to date?
Reply:
The National Upgrading Support Programme (NUSP) provides technical assistance to municipalities for the development of Municipal Upgrading Strategies and Programmes, Community Capacity Building Programmes, Livelihood Strategies and Settlement Upgrading Plans. To date 987 informal settlements have been assessed and categorised, 135 informal settlements are in process of being assessed and categorised, 334 settlement plans have been developed, 242 settlement plans are in process of being developed, 35 municipal strategies / programmes have been completed and 6 municipal strategies/programmes are in progress. An upgrading manual for human settlements practitioners have been completed, a dedicated NUSP website (www.upgrading.support.org) is operational and a monthly newsletter is being produced. An investigation on tenure options on tribal land is currently being conducted.
A budget of R70 million is allocated to the NUSP in the 2015/16 financial year. In terms of the project allocation, R12.4 million is committed to signed contracts, R29.6 million is in the process of being committed on approved projects, R10 million has been allocated for Technical Support and an amount of R5 million earmarked for implementation of the Capacity Building Programme. The total amount committed or in procurement process is R57 million. An amount of R7.7 million has been spent to date.
04 September 2015 - NW3157
Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Social Development
(1) (a) Why has the planned drug rehabilitation centre in Polokwane, Limpopo, not been opened yet and (b) what was the initial planned budget for the construction of the centre; (2) has the building development exceeded the originally proposed costs; if so, (a) by how much have the building costs exceed the original budget amount and (b) why; (3) when is it expected that the centre will be open?
Reply:
(1) (a) The centre has not yet been opened because the construction is still in progress.
(b) The initial planned budget for the construction of the centre was R96 410 237.86
(2) Yes, the building development exceeded the originally proposed costs.
(a) The building costs was exceeded by an amount of R4 157 810.84
(b) The reason of exceeding the originally proposed building costs was due to an approved variation order for the extension of time which had cost implications.
(3) It is expected that the project be completed in September 2015, and will start admitting service users from 1st of November 2015.
04 September 2015 - NW2725
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Social Development
Whether, with reference to her reply to question 1660 on 26 May 2015, the (a) tender document stated that all the beneficiaries including children and procurators must be registered and (b) figure of 9 082 251 in terms of the Request for Proposals was the number of grant recipients for the 2011 – 12 financial year; if so, in each case, why was it not clear to the SA Social Security Agency and any successful bidder that registering all grant beneficiaries as well as their care givers would be more than the 9 082 251 beneficiaries and that claiming for any additional amount would be in transgression of the contract?
Reply:
(a) The RFP was not specific on the anticipated number of beneficiaries to be enrolled. However, the costing template which was attached as an Annexure stipulated the number of 9 082 251, and it was on this basis that the bidders costed the service. During the finalization of the bid, SASSA confirmed with the service provider that there was no charge for the enrolment of 9 082 251 beneficiaries. When the contract was implemented, it was realized that enrolment of all beneficiaries, procurators and children would require more time than initially expected. The enrolment had initially been planned for all grant collecting adults (the 9 082 251 quoted) but the decision was made to include the re-registration of all children and procurators since SASSA and the service provider would have face-to-face contact with each person collecting a grant. It would have created serious hardship for social grant beneficiaries had we completed the enrolment of the 9 082 251 beneficiaries, and then still expect the same beneficiaries to return at a later date to re-register their children and procurators. The extension and the inclusion of the children and procurators at the same time that enrolment was taking place was agreed to in a management meeting held in June 2012.
It would have not made any business sense for the Agency to appoint another service provider to render this service, as this would have resulted in SASSA having disparate databases, something which the re-registration and enrolment process sought to eliminate at the first place. It should also be noted that in the original RFP, consideration had always been given to paying a separate fee for the enrolment and re-registration of beneficiaries – it was not originally expected to be included within the capped fee of R16, 50 per transaction. However, the service provider, who had budgeted to absorb the cost of bulk enrolment within the service fee quoted, indicated that, with the extension of both time and numbers, there would be a cost for the service. This cost was to cover his direct costs related to the payment of staff, overtime, transport, leasing of re-registration venues and hiring of tents in areas where there was a need to do so.
(b) Given the foregoing, the payment in question cannot be regarded as a transgression of the contract. The re-registration of all beneficiaries, children and procurators was part and parcel of the long term plan. However, the ability to implement this within the set time frame and within budget was found to exceed the practical limits which had been set, and approval was therefore given for the extension of time and resources to complete the project, with as little disruption and inconvenience to social grant beneficiaries as possible. Yes, the implementation of this exercise came at a cost but in terms of the long term benefits and safeguarding the integrity of the social grant payment system, this exercise will provide the benefits will far outweigh the initial costs, as the Agency managed to accrue savings of R3.2 billion in the 2013/14 financial year for Government.
04 September 2015 - NW2602
Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
(1)With reference to her reply to question 1756 on 26 May 2015, has the Water Tribunal started with their work; if not, why not; if so, how many cases have been resolved; (2) how many cases are outstanding (a) that the previous tribunal did not deal with and (b) in total as at the latest specified date for which information is available?
Reply:
(1) Yes, the Water Tribunal has started with their work. There are no finalized cases. However, the Water Tribunal had its first hearing on the 22 July 2015 to 24 July 2015 and the cases were not finalised and were postponed to 27 August 2015 to 28 August 2015.
(2)(a) As at August 2012 when the Water Tribunal term of office came to an end a total of 124 cases were outstanding.
(2)(b) The Department currently has a total of 313 outstanding cases.
---00O00---
04 September 2015 - NW3072
Ollis, Mr IM to ask the Minister of Social Development
(a) How does (i) her department and (ii) entities reporting to her define red tape and (b) what (i) specific interventions and/or (ii) systems have been implemented to (aa) identify and (bb) reduce red tape in (aaa) her department and (bbb) the entities reporting to her?
Reply:
The Department initiated a sector-wide service delivery improvement process. This initiative enables the Department and its entities to engage directly with beneficiaries of its services. This will allow the Department and entities to identify any regulations that hinder the effective delivery of services on the ground and come up with plans to address such.
04 September 2015 - NW3223
Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
Did National Treasury approve her department’s requested rollover of (a) R1 600 899 000 for Programme 1, 2, 4 and 5 and (b) R1 557 184 000 in respect of each economic classification from the 2014-15 to the 2015-16 financial year; if not, (i) why not and (ii) what is the implication of this decision; if so, when?
Reply:
National Treasury has not yet approved my Department’s request for rollovers of R1 600 899 000 for Programme 1, 2, 4 and 5; and R1 557 184 000 in respect of each economic classification from the 2014-15 to the 2015-16 financial year.
National Treasury will only communicate the outcome of the rollover process on or before 11 September 2015 through the approved allocation letters as per the Guidelines of 2015 Adjustment Estimates of National Expenditure.
The non-approval of the requested rollover funds will necessitate the need for my Department to reprioritise the existing allocations for 2015/16 financial year within the programmes. This will result in the rescheduling of some of the infrastructure projects earmarked for the current year.
---00O00---
04 September 2015 - NW3133
Vos, Mr J to ask the Minister in the Presidency
In light of the fact that the Tourism Satellite Account provides information at a national level, what are the plans for Statistics South Africa to assist provinces and municipalities to produce tourism statistics at a local level in order to improve (a) planning and (b) budgeting?
Reply:
The methodology for Tourism Satellite Accounts (TSA) is only developed to monitor the contribution of the tourism sector to the economy on a national level. Noting that tourism, and the management thereof, is of particular interest to policy makers and government structures on a sub-national level, the United Nation’s World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) embarked on a process to develop Tourism Economic Accounts (TEA) that will allow for similar information on a lower level of geographic disaggregation.
This will take a number of years as there is no agreed international framework or standard. The development of provincial TEA is driven by UNWTO which produced a provisional set of concepts and definitions in May 2015. This is currently open for global consultation until September 2015.
04 September 2015 - NW2823
Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
Whether the eThekwini Municipality took any steps to ensure that the water and sanitation infrastructure would be able to cope with increased demand before approval for (a) residential and (b) commercial developments on the KwaZulu-Natal North Coast was considered; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
Requesting the Honourable Member to refer the question to the Minister of Corporative Governance and Traditional Affairs who is in a better position to respond to issues relating to the eThekwini Municipality.
---00O00---
04 September 2015 - NW3159
Jooste, Ms K to ask the Minister of Social Development
(1)With reference to the alleged confirmation by the General Manager of Corporate Services in the Limpopo provincial Department of Social Development on 9 February 2015 that the training of the Masupatsela Youth Pioneers will commence in March 2015 and that pioneers will continue performing community development activities until the graining provider was appointed (details furnished), (a) which training provider has been appointed to provide the specified training and (b)(i) what are the proposed costs of the specified training and (ii) over what time period will the training take place; (2) for how long are the specified pioneers expected to undergo training; (3) what has caused the delay in commencing the training for the specified pioneer group; (4) will the specified pioneer group be absorbed into either (a) the national or (b) provincial Departments of Social Development for (i) further training or (ii) permanent employment upon completion of the proposed training?
Reply:
- (a) No training provider appointed
(b) (i) The costs are not known at this stage
(ii) Under normal circumstances, the RPL process takes 12 months, but for this group the period has not yet been determined
(2) Same as (ii)
(3) The main aim of conducting RPL is to eliminate unnecessary repetitions and duplication in the training programme. The Masupatsela Youth Pioneers have already undergone some form of training. The SAQA guidelines on RPL clearly specify that it should be embedded within broader personal development and career path. It is for this reason that the Masupatsela Youth Pioneers will undergo the RPL process first before the commencement of training.
(4) As stated earlier, the main of conducing RPL is to provide the Masupatsela Youth Pioneers with accredited training to enhance their skills and knowledge, as well as improve career development and open access to better job opportunities even outside the social sector.
04 September 2015 - NW2791
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
Whether her department has effectively stopped (a) raw and untreated sewerage and (b) agricultural, mining and industrial operation contaminants from leaking into streams and rivers during the period 1 May 2009 up to 30 June 2015, and had therefore succeeded in preserving the quality of water and thereby ensuring that the water was safe for animal and human consumption and suitable for irrigating crops for local as well as export purposes; if not, what is the extent and the reasons for the Government’s failure in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details of her department’s successes?
Reply:
(a) Raw and untreated sewerage is caused by many factors such as skills shortages in municipalities, aging and overloaded infrastructure and lack of maintenance. My Department is responding to this threat by implementing programmes such as Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant, Municipal Water Infrastructure Grant and Accelerated Community Infrastructure Programme. In addition, the Green and Blue Drops reports are compiled annually to provide an indication on the level of compliance of wastewater treatment works and whether conditions of authorisation are met. Furthermore, my Department provides the necessary support for the implementation of the recommendations in the reports. The discharge of raw or partially treated sewage into the water resource is treated as a pollution incident and my Department has enforcement measures that are taken in order to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented by the wastewater treatment owner to address and minimise the pollution.
(b) Yes, for the period in question, my Department had and continues to maintain stringent measures for the protection of water resources (and the general environment) from mining, agricultural and industrial impacts. In this regard, my Department has invoked principles of the National Water Act, 1998 (Act 36 of 1998) to ensure that mines, agriculture and industries take measures to ensure unauthorised mining, agricultural and industrial-impacted discharges are terminated or treated to a suitable standard before discharging to the environment. Furthermore, my Department has implemented mega civil projects to ensure that mine water (acid mine drainage) in Gauteng is mitigated. My Department’s ongoing regulation and enforcement measures will ensure that any current and future mining, agricultural and industrial impacts on the water resources are adequately addressed.
With regard to Agriculture, my Department has during this period embarked on continuous compliance monitoring for agricultural water use activities and annual targets are set on the Annual Business Plans; furthermore my Department through water use authorisations instructs agricultural water users to exercise good farming practices such as using strip vegetation within a 50 year flood line of the river to prevent run-off with pesticides or fertilisers from polluting the resources.
My Department also instructs water users to comply with all water use license conditions, which include conditions for the prevention of contaminants from polluting streams, rivers and groundwater, as set in the respective entitlements through audits.
---00O00---
04 September 2015 - NW1492
Walters, Mr TC to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation
(a) How many invoices from private contractors to her department currently remain unpaid for longer than 30 days and (b) in each case, what (i) are the details of the (aa) contractor and (bb) services provided and (ii) what is the (aa) date of the invoice and (bb) reason why the invoice was not paid within 30 days?
Reply:
(a) The Department currently has a total 984 invoices from private contractors that are unpaid for longer than 30 days.
(b) Refer to the attached Annexure A for a detailed list.
---00O00---
04 September 2015 - NW3117
Atkinson, Mr P to ask the Minister of Human Settlements
Whether her department has any plans to (a) upgrade houses and/or (b) provide new housing for the residents of Eikenhof informal settlement in Southern Johannesburg; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(a) The City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality does not have plans to upgrade the Eikenhof informal settlement because of the dolomitic soil conditions in the area, which makes not suitable for development.
(b) The City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality resolved in 2005 that the qualifying beneficiaries of Eikenhof informal settlement will be relocated to the Lehae project. From 2012/13 a total of 175 beneficiaries from Eikenhof have been allocated houses and subsequently relocated to Lehae. As more houses are completed, beneficiaries will be relocated to Lehae.