Questions and Replies

Filter by year

09 June 2016 - NW1586

Profile picture: Matsepe, Mr CD

Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What amount is owed to (i) the Magalies and (ii) Lepelle Northern water boards by each local municipality in Limpopo, (b) what amount is owed in each specified case, (c) for how many days have the debts been outstanding, (d) why has it taken so long to settle the debts, (e) when will the debts be paid in full and (f) what arrangements, if any, have been made to settle the outstanding debt?

Reply:

Refer to the table below for amount owed to Magalies Water Board:

(a)(i)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Thabazimbi Local Municipality

R28 912237

More than 3 years

The municipality is experiencing cash flow challenges.

Unknown at this stage as the municipality is under administration.

The municipality has made a commitment to make a payment of R1 million per month until National Treasury has approved the finance recovery plan.

Modimolle Local Municipality

R2 390962

0

The account is on current

31 May 2016

N/A

BelaBela Municipality

R1 620436

0

The account is on current

31 May 2016

N/A

Refer to the table below for amount owed to Lepelle Northern Water Board:

(a)(ii)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Ba-Phalaborwa Municipality

R69,6m

120 days+

Availability of funds

By 2019

The settlement agreement is in place and adhered to by the Water Services Authority (WSA)

Capricorn District Municipality (CDM Urban)

R3m

Current

N/A

N/A

 

Greater Letaba Municipality

R1m

Current

N/A

N/A

 

Greater Tzaneen Municipality

R0.78m

Current

N/A

N/A

 

GSDM (Fetakgomo Local Municipality)

R6,4m

120 days+

Availability of funds

 

Negotiations with the WSA are taking place

GSDM (Makhuduthamaga Local Municipality)

R16,1m

120 days+

Availability of funds

 

Negotiations with the WSA are taking place

Marble Hall Municipality

R1,m

120 days+

Availability of funds

 

Negotiations with the WSA are taking place

Mogalakwena Local Municipality

R5,6m

Current

N/A

N/A

 

Mopani District Municipality

R249,6m

120 days+

Availability of funds

By 2019

The settlement agreement is in place and adhered to by the WSA

Polokwane Municipality

R13,4m

Current

N/A

N/A

N/A

Lepelle Nkumpi Municipality (CDM Rural)

R2M

Current

N/A

N/A

 

Greater Tubatse Local Municipality

R20,7m

120 days+

Availability of funds

 

Negotiations with the WSA are taking place

---00O00---

09 June 2016 - NW1479

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(1)Whether any commission investigated the legitimacy of the Sukazi chieftaincy in Mpumalanga; if not, why not; if so, what is the current status of the investigation; (2) Whether a report has been generated in this regard; if not, why not; if so, has the specified report been presented to the affected parties?

Reply:

  1. The Honourable Member is requested to note that the Provincial Committee on Disputes and Claims of Traditional Leadership in Mpumalanga did conduct an investigation with respect to the claim for traditional leadership that was lodged by Mr. ME Sukazi and others. The investigation was closed following the findings by the Committee.
  2. Yes, a report was generated but was not presented to the affected parties as they did not dispute the findings of the Committee. However, a letter dated 18 February 2015 from the Office of the Premier in Mpumalanga was forwarded to Mr. ME Sukazi and others informing them of the outcome of the investigation.

09 June 2016 - NW1482

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

QUESTION 1:(a) On which dates were fire hydrants for each fire station precinct in the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality last inspected and(b) what are the further relevant details in this regard? (b) what are the further relevant details in this regard?

Reply:

(a) The hydrants are inspected daily.
(b) According to the City of Ekurhuleni, maintenance of fire hydrants within its area of jurisdiction is a Service Delivery Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) issue and there is a comprehensive programme being implemented throughout the year. In terms of this comprehensive program, a target of 50 000 hydrants must be inspected annually, and this was exceeded as depicted in the table below.

(c) The City indicated that they have appointed a Professional Service Provider (PSP) who is responsible for the maintenance and servicing of fire hydrants. The PSP has 220 fieldworkers who are responsible for the maintenance and servicing of fire hydrants within the City. The business process that the City has adopted requires a fieldworker to locate (some hydrants are underground and some above ground) the hydrant, mark with paint, service or maintain, and geo- code the location of the hydrant on a Global Positioning System (GPS). This approach requires at least five visits to each hydrant. In view of this, the City has outlined that it is difficult and cumbersome for them to indicate the date of the last visit to each hydrant as a single visit is not enough to locate, mark with paint, maintain or service and geo-code the hydrant. According to the City, work areas are divided in line with the operational fire districts, which cover more than one fire station precinct. The following numbers of hydrants have been located, marked with paint, serviced/ maintained, tested and geo-coded per Service Delivery Area:
 

Service Delivery Areas

Name of the Fire Districts

Number of Hydrants Serviced

Financial year (FY) Period

Service Delivery Area 1

• Alberton /Thokoza
• Palm Ridge
• Sonkesizwe

12 473

2013/2014

   

12 620

2014/2015

   

11 332

2015/2016

Service Delivery Area 2

• Wadeville/Katlehong
• Vosloorus

11 781

2013/2014

   

2 305

2014/2015

   

15 250

2015/2016

Service Delivery Area 3

• Boksburg Central
• Germiston Central

8 912

2013/2014

   

5 036

2014/2015

   

10 556

2015/2016

Service Delivery Area 4

• Edenvale
• Primrose
• Bedford view

10 320

2013/2014

   

5 777

2014/2015

   

16 009

2015/2016

Service Delivery Area 5

• Kempton park
• Tembisa
• Commercial
• Olifantsfontein

6 544

2013/2014

   

18 921

2014/2015

   

14 104

201512016

Service Delivery Area 6

• Leon Ferreira
• Farrarmere
• Rynfield

8 735

2013/2014

   

6 897

2014/2015

   

20 262

2015/2016

Service Delivery Area 7

• Brakpan
• Benoni
• Central Tsakane

8 292

2013/2014

   

7 058

2014/2015

   

16 516

2015/2016

Service Delivery Area 8

• Springs
• Daveyton
• Etwatwa

9 213

2013/2014

   

1 442

2014/2015

   

16 097

2015/2016

Service Delivery Area 9

• Nigel
• Duduza
• Selection Park

8 946

2013/2014

   

10 000

2014/2015

   

16 097

2015/2016

08 June 2016 - NW1513

Profile picture: Balindlela, Ms ZB

Balindlela, Ms ZB to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

(1)Whether her department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether her department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(1) No.

(2) No.

08 June 2016 - NW1545

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Health

(a) What amount did (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him spend on advertising in the 2015-16 financial year and (b) how much has (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him budgeted for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) (i) R10,633,337.38;

(ii) The table below reflects the details in this regard

ENTITY

EXPENDITURE

Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC)

R1,189,948.39

South African Medical Research Council (MRC)

R448,741.39

National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)

R1,929,655.89

Council for Medical Schemes (CMS)

R1,146,219.06

(b) (i) R14,924,000.00

(ii) The table below reflects the details in this regard.

 

ENTITY

EXPENDITURE

Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC)

R2,300,000.00

South African Medical Research Council (MRC)

R437,470.00

National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)

R2,500,000.00

Council for Medical Schemes (CMS)

R320,000

END.

08 June 2016 - NW1243

Profile picture: Lovemore, Ms AT

Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Health

(1)Whether the SA Women's Auxiliary Services Memorial Hospital in Jansenville in the Eastern Cape qualifies to have a full-time medical doctor on its staff; if not, (a) why not, (b) what level of medical expertise can the hospital employ and (c) where should the community that is served by the specified hospital access a doctor; (2) what are the terms of the contract offered to the medical doctor who is currently employed at the specified hospital; (3) whether the specified doctor has been given notice of termination of his employment; if so, why?

Reply:

1. SA Women's Auxiliary Services Memorial Hospital in Janesville in the Eastern Cape does qualify to have a full time medical doctor on its staff.

   (a) Not applicable;

   (b) The hospital qualifies for a medical officer with an MBCHB Degree and experience as a generalist.

   (c) The community that is served by the specified hospital should access a doctor at the hospital.

2. The hospital has a full- time doctor who is not on contract.

3. The doctor has not been given any notice of termination of employment.

END.

08 June 2016 - NW907

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Has he earned any additional income from businesses, in particular businesses doing work for the Government, since his appointment as Minister; if so, (a) when, (b) how much did he earn, (c) from which businesses and (d) for what work; (2) whether his (a) spouse, (b) children and (c) close family earned income from businesses, in particular businesses doing work for the Government, through his appointment as Minister; if so, in respect of each case, (i) when, (ii) how much did each earn, (iii) from which businesses and (iv) for what work

Reply:

(1) & (2) No

08 June 2016 - NW661

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether the (a) director-general and/or (b) any officials from his department attended meetings of the study groups of a certain political party (name furnished) in Parliament in the (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16 financial years; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, in each specified case, (aa) what was the purpose of the meeting, (bb) what is the (aaa) name and (bbb) designation of each official who attended, (cc) on what date did the meetings take place and (dd) which study group was attended by the specified officials; (2) whether there are any statutory grounds on which (a) the director-general and/or (b) any officials from his department are allowed to attend meetings of study groups of a certain political party in Parliament; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, on which provisions contained in the (i) Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, (ii) the Public Service Act, Act 103 of 1994 as amended, (iii) Public Service Regulations and/or (iv) Code of Conduct for Public Servants do the specified persons rely to attend the specified meetings?

Reply:

1. (a) No. And no to all subsequent sections to the question.

(b) Yes. The DDG: Tax Policy and Financial Regulations was requested by the Minister to brief the study group on certain items that were before the parliamentary committees.

    (i) Yes

    (ii) Yes

    (aa) To discuss legislation before the parliamentary committees

     (bb) (aaa) LC August and T Plaatjie

            (bbb) Ministerial Parliamentary Liaison Officers

     (cc) Upon request, usually during Parliamentary sessions.

     (dd) Finance and Appropriation study groups

2. The Code of Conduct for Public Service (Chapter 2 of the Public Service Regulations, 2001, as amended) stipulates:

(a)        An employee may not does not abuse her or his position in the public service to promote or prejudice the interest of any political party or interest group (regulation C.2.7)

(b)        An employee must refrain from party political activities in the workplace (regulation C.3.7).

However, officials of a department may and should communicate with, and consult, relevant role players on policy and legislative proposals. Relevant role players include the study group of any political party for a Parliamentary committee. Furthermore, if a Minister is invited to a study group meeting in their capacity as the Minister, i.e. as a member of the executive, they may nominate an official to represent or attend on their behalf.

On the direction of the Minister, officials have also met Members of Parliament of various political parties to provide clarity on Legislative and policy matters.

08 June 2016 - NW1341

Profile picture: Chance, Mr R

Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Small Business Development

Whether she is aware of the dispute between a certain company (name furnished) and the Small Enterprise Finance Agency (sefa) (details furnished); if not, why not; if so, what steps is she taking to investigate (a) the causes of the dispute and (b) the allegations of corruption at sefa which has impaired the company’s ability to fulfil its obligations to clients?

Reply:

Question 1:

Whether she is aware of the dispute between Razoscan (Pty) Ltd and sefa as outlined in a letter to the Minister dated 14 March 2014 from the owner of Razoscan, Ms Mendiswa Mzamane. 

Reply: sefa is not aware of the letter or its contents by the said Ms. Mzamane to Honourable Minister Zulu. However, sefa would like to highlight the dispute with Ms Mendiswa Mzamane as follows:

Purpose of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd Transaction

The transaction was to export 15 (fifteen) containers of fruit (oranges known as Valencia) to one of the largest importers of fruit in Dubai, viz Floral Fruit LLC. Purchase orders were placed with Razoscan (Pty) Ltd in US Dollars for the fruit.

Stakeholders and Background

Razoscan (Pty) Ltd approached sefa for funding in February 2015 for loan facility of R3 200 000.00 (inclusive of Initiation fee & VAT) in order export of fruit (referred to as the “exporter”).

Floral Fruit LLC: large retail entity in Dubai (referred to as “the Importer”); who imports fresh fruit from most parts of the world. Clinched a deal with Razoscan (Pty) Ltd last year (2015) for Razoscan (Pty) Ltd to supply fresh fruit.

Cosmo Fruit (Pty) Ltd: a key player in the fruit industry in the Western Cape. An importer and exporter of fresh who was approached by Razoscan (Pty) Ltd to source fresh fruit from farmers in the Western Cape.

FNB: the commercial bank appointed by Razoscan (Pty) Ltd to overlook the flow of funds and proceeds resulting from the export of fruit.

N.B: Agreements are in place for the following: importer and exporter; exporter and fruit supplier; sefa/FNB and Razoscan (Pty) Ltd.

Background

After battling for over 5 (five) months to get all the required information to put together the deal, sefa’s Investment Officer presented the deal to sefa’s credit committee in June 2015. The deal was declined after sefa had followed its normal systems and procedures in the assessment of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd’s application for funding based on the following reasons:

Poor profitability

Ms Mendiswa Mzamane, the owner of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd, showing inability to carry out the transaction and lack of adequate expertise and industry knowledge; and poor backup and no financial strength to carry out the transaction for a start-up business in the highly competitive sector.

Ms Mendiswa Mzamane, the owner of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd, appealed the “decline decision” and presented her model where she indicated how she will mitigate the risk. She was afforded two meetings where she presented her model. One meeting was held at sefa’s Centurion Head Office (attended by key sefa internal stakeholders). The other meeting was held at IDC offices where she also presented her risk mitigating factors. Key sefa stakeholders attended the meeting. FNB, who are her bankers and key players in the transaction, attended all meetings represented by Mr Richard Harvey.

Razoscan (Pty) Ltd’s application was finally approved by sefa in July 2015. By then the following key areas formed part of the deal:

  • Suppliers: the new supplier of the fresh fruit was Cosmo Fruit (Pty) Ltd – owned by Ioannis Ntinos. Ms Mendiswa Mzamane, the owner of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd had already changed suppliers three times. sefa had to conduct due diligence on all of the suppliers;
  • FNB as the commercial bank of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd had to oversee the export transaction. A Collection Agreement was signed between sefa, Razoscan (Pty) Ltd and FNB, in order to regulate the flow of the transaction and to agree on the parties respective roles and responsibilities; and
  • Fruit: at approval there was only one type of fruit to be exported namely, Valencia (oranges). The agreement with Floral Fruit was to export 15 containers but only 1 was shipped.

Approval of the Deal (see below – Approval and Disbursement of Funds)

Loan Structure

Loan Structure

Total Rand value

R2 868 000.00 (excluding fees)

 

Term

60 days

 

Grace Period

n/a

 

Grace Type

n/a

 

Interest rate

Prime 9.25 + 5.75% = 15%

 

Initiation Fee

5% of Loan (incl. VAT) = R163 476.00

Description of Business

Fresh fruit exporter to Dubai (UAE)

Approved and Disbursed Funds

Cost of 15 Fruit Containers (inclusive of cost freight/inspection/insurance, etc) R2 868000.00

sefa initiation fee @ 5% (inclusive of VAT) R 163476.00

Total Loan Value R3 031476.00

Disbursement Status

Instruction to make Disbursement of the amount of R2 868 000.00 was given by sefa at the instance of Ms Mendiswa Mzamane, the owner of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd to FNB in October 2015 to release the payment to Cosmo Fruit who would then take the funds and secure fruit from the farmers. Cosmo Fruit was thus paid an amount of R2 868 000.00 to secure the entire fruit of 15 (fifteen) containers.

Update on Export of one container and the awaited proceeds:

Only one container was shipped by Cosmo Fruit (who also assisted with the freight and loading).

The importer’s bank has not honoured the payment for the one container due to error from FNB with regard - to the payment instructions. FNB send payment instructions that did not match those agreed upon and as a result of this error the importer’s bank will not pay.

 

Ms Mendiswa Mzamane, the owner of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd, has since instructed her bank FNB to amend the instructions.

It was later discovered that Cosmo Fruit (Ioannis) has shipped the wrong fruit i.e. class 2 instead of class 1;

Ms Mendiswa Mzamane, the owner of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd, alleges that Razoscan (Pty) Ltd has a dispute with Cosmo Fruit (Pty) Ltd which is owned by Ioannis Ntinos.

Question 2:

If not, why not.

Reply: sefa and Razoscan (Pty) Ltd have entered into a legally binding loan facility agreement or an amount of R3 031 476.00 on 17 September 2015 and the whole loan facility has been to date fully disbursed in terms of the provisions of the loan facility agreement.

Question 3:

(3) If so, what steps is the Minister taking to investigate (a) the causes of the dispute and

Reply:

 (a) sefa is not aware of the specific dispute referred to in the letter dated 14 March 2014; and

(b) Razoscan (Pty) Ltd is currently in breach of the provisions of the loan facility agreement and sefa is proceeding with legal action against Razoscan (Pty) Ltd as well as against Ms. Mzamane, as the surety for the obligations of Razoscan (Pty) Ltd, arising from the loan facility agreement. Currently the legal process is underway. In conclusion, sefa’s rights shall at all material times remain reserved to protect its interest.

Question 4:

If so, what steps is the Minister taking to investigate (b) Ms Mzamane’s allegations of corruption at sefa which she claims has impaired her company’s ability to fulfil its obligations to clients?

Reply:

  • sefa is not aware of the nature of the corruption claims alleged and/or made by

Ms. Mzamane in the letter dated 14 March 2014;

    • sefa is not aware of any corruption relating to Razoscan (Pty) Ltd application for funding

and the transaction; and

  • sefa therefore has no basis to institute any investigation into the matter.

08 June 2016 - NW992

Profile picture: Topham , Mr B

Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether any person in the National Treasury requested changes to the Standing Committee on Finance’s programme for (a) Tuesday, 15 March 2016 and/or (b) Wednesday, 16 March 2016; if not, why not; if so, (i) what is the name of the person and (ii) why were the changes requested; (2) whether the person who requested the changes to the programme was authorised to do so; if not, why not; if so, what is the name of the person who authorised the request; (3) whether the request for changes to the programme was submitted to the specified committee in writing; if not, why not; if so, when?

Reply:

(1)(2)(3) The National Treasury is invited by the relevant parliamentary committee Chairperson according to their programme and only the parliamentary committee is able to decide on its programme and any possible changes. The Chairpersons and / or Committee Secretaries do consult with the relevant ministries and departments on the availability of the Minister, Deputy Minister and also the representational departmental officials before finalizing an invitation. Therefore, I suggest that this request should be directed to the identified Committee Chairperson for comment.

08 June 2016 - NW1224

Profile picture: Dudley, Ms C

Dudley, Ms C to ask the Minister of Health

What are the latest statistics on abortion in each province?

Reply:

The following table reflects the details in this regard:

PROVINCE

TOTAL

Eastern Cape

12,911

Free State

5,846

Gauteng

15,511

KwaZulu Natal

12,233

Limpopo

9,600

Mpumalanga

1,797

North West

6,744

Northern Cape

1,402

Western Cape

19,254

END.

08 June 2016 - NW1267

Profile picture: Volmink, Mr HC

Volmink, Mr HC to ask the Minister of Health

How many mental health care patients were attended to at (a) primary, (b) secondary and (c) tertiary levels of care in each province in (i)(aa) 2014 and (bb) 2015 and (ii) since 1 January 2016?

Reply:

Data for mental health care patients attended to is collected in the District Health Information System in terms of ambulatory attendees and hospital admissions - rather than primary, secondary and tertiary levels. Tables 1, 2 and 3 reflect ambulatory attendees and hospital admissions. The available data for 2016 is only up to February 2016. Data for the later months is still being collated.

(a), (b) and (c) (i) (aa)

Table 1.

Province

Attendees at ambulatory (Non inpatient) services for mental health conditions in 2014

Total number of clients admitted for mental health conditions in 2014

Eastern Cape

398950

7244

Free State

113827

2608

Gauteng

422765

4812

KwaZulu-Natal

583737

8445

Limpopo

276026

7097

Mpumalanga

3175

3286

North West

135942

3418

Northern Cape

64423

991

Western Cape

206161

13697

(a), (b) and (c) (i) (bb)

Table 2

Province

Attendees at ambulatory (Non inpatient) services for mental health conditions in 2015.

Total number of clients admitted for mental health conditions in 2015

Eastern Cape

306699

8112

Free State

49021

2199

Gauteng

254593

7314

KwaZulu-Natal

569331

9301

Limpopo

243015

7383

Mpumalanga

2142

2723

North West

81115

3360

Northern Cape

51175

1397

Western Cape

213772

16696

(a), (b) and (c) (ii)

Table 3

Province

Attendees at ambulatory (Non inpatient) services for mental health conditions in 2016 (January and February only)

Total number of clients admitted for mental health conditions in 2016 (January and February only)

Eastern Cape

42076

1579

Free State

3679

301

Gauteng

16506

1393

KwaZulu-Natal

92292

1599

Limpopo

36663

1113

Mpumalanga

306

490

North West

9211

495

Northern Cape

7439

222

Western Cape

32824

3188

END.

08 June 2016 - NW1181

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Health

(1)(a) What is the target number of community health workers that are needed in each district in each province to ensure that all Ward-Based Primary Health Care Outreach teams are fully operational and (b) how many Community Health Workers are currently employed in each district in each province; (2) whether there is a shortfall between the target number and the total number of the currently employed community health workers; if so, (a) what is (i) his department and (ii) each provincial department of health doing to ensure that the target is reached and (b) when will the target be reached in each district in each province?

Reply:

(1) (a) The estimated numbers of Community Health Workers (CHWs) needed to serve 30 million poor people based on Upper Bound Poverty Line of Statistics South Africa, the number of CHWs currently deployed in all provinces and districts, the shortfall and surplus of CHWs are shown in the table below. The profiles of 52 health districts are presented.

Name of Province

No of CHW needed

No of CHW deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

Eastern Cape Province

4,494

4,506

 

12

Free State Province

1,933

1,068

865

 

Gauteng Province

4,985

6,012

 

1,027

KwaZulu-Natal Province

6,475

4,410

2,065

 

Limpopo Province

3,911

2,244

1,667

 

Mpumalanga Province

2,536

890

1,646

 

North West Province

2,185

2,496

 

311

Northern Cape Province

664

828

 

164

Western Cape Province

2,563

2,180

383

 

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

7,705

1,442

Total of all provinces

29,747

24,634

5,112

 

EASTERN CAPE

       

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

A Nzo DM

578

456

122

 

Amathole DM

677

876

 

199

Buffalo City MM

433

150

283

 

C Hani DM

589

936

 

347

Joe Gqabi DM

260

270

 

10

Nelson Mandela Bay MM

652

450

202

 

O Tambo DM

1,031

1170

 

139

Sarah Baartman DM

275

198

77

 

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

684

696

Eastern Cape Province

4,494

4,506

 

12

FREE STATE 

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

Fezile Dabi DM

333

300

33

 

Lejweleputswa DM

442

138

304

 

Mangaung MM

459

144

315

 

T Mofutsanyane DM

592

408

184

 

Xhariep DM

108

78

30

 

Free State Province

1,933

1,068

865

 

GAUTENG

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

City of Johannesburg MM

1,737

1,698

39

 

City of Tshwane MM

1,067

1,749

 

682

Ekurhuleni MM

1,365

1,123

242

 

Sedibeng DM

468

847

 

379

West Rand DM

347

595

 

248

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

281

1,308

Gauteng Province

4,985

6,012

 

1028

KWA ZULU-NATAL

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

Amajuba DM

337

198

139

 

eThekwini MM

1,772

474

1,298

 

Harry Gwala DM

343

342

1

 

iLembe DM

416

312

104

 

Ugu DM

501

378

123

 

uMgungundlovu DM

594

486

108

 

Umkhanyakude DM

478

438

40

 

Umzinyathi DM

369

420

 

51

Uthukela DM

485

402

83

 

Uthungulu DM

600

426

174

 

Zululand DM

582

534

48

 

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

2,118

51

KwaZulu-Natal Province

6,475

4,410

2,065

 

LIMPOPO

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

Capricorn DM

872

235

637

 

Mopani DM

831

935

 

104

Sekhukhune DM

831

66

765

 

Vhembe DM

977

956

21

 

Waterberg DM

399

52

347

 

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

1,771

104

Limpopo Province

3,911

2,244

1,667

 

MPUMALANGA

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

Ehlanzeni DM

1,160

309

851

 

G Sibande DM

626

360

266

 

Nkangala DM

750

221

529

 

Mpumalanga Province

2,535

890

1,646

 

NORTH WEST

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

Bojanala Platinum DM

834

798

36

 

Dr K Kaunda DM

410

534

 

124

Ngaka Modiri Molema DM

591

786

 

195

Ruth Segomotsi Mompati DM

349

378

 

29

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

36

347

North West Province

2,185

2,496

 

311

NORTHERN CAPE

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

Frances Baard DM

212

222

 

10

J T Gaetsewe DM

153

240

 

87

Namakwa DM

60

108

 

48

Pixley ka Seme DM

116

246

 

130

ZF Mgcawu DM

123

12

111

 

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

111

275

Northern Cape Province

664

828

 

164

WESTERN CAPE

District/Province

No of CHWs needed

No of CHWs Deployed

Shortfall

Surplus

City of Cape Town MM

1,622

1,100

522

 

Cape Winelands DM

381

180

201

 

Overberg DM

142

180

 

38

Eden DM

257

285

 

28

Central Karoo DM

80

105

 

25

West Coast DM

81

330

 

249

Shortfall/Surplus Total

   

723

340

Western Cape Province

2,563

2,180

383

 

(b) No province nor districts is currently employing Community Health Workers.

(2) (a) (i) and (ii) No province nor district is currently employing Community Health Workers. CHWs are deployed in the district through engagement with NGOs. In addition, the National Health Council is leading the process of developing an investment case so as to determine equity in resource allocation for each province in order to determine a model for formal engagement of Community Health Workers in public sector.

(b) The target will be reached when formal mechanisms of employment have been agreed on and implemented.

END.

08 June 2016 - NW1487

Profile picture: Mazzone, Ms NW

Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What are the detailed reasons for the suspension of a certain official of the SA Airways (name and details furnished) and (b) on what statutory grounds was the specified person suspended in May 2016?

Reply:

I have been informed by South African Airways (SAA) that:

The employee was put on a precautionary suspension, based on serious allegations of misconduct levelled against her, which remain a subject of a current pending internal investigation. Full reasons for the suspension of the employee are clearly set out in the correspondence exchanged between SAA and the employee’s duly appointed legal representatives. There is no specific statute or legislative framework that regulates the suspension and/or provides grounds for the suspension of this employee. The requirements for a valid precautionary suspension are fully enunciated in common law and, such requirements had been fully complied with and met by SAA in dealing with this particular matter. The employee has a contractual employment relationship with SAA and is subject to the Disciplinary Code like all other employees. Most importantly, the Labour Relations Act, Act No. 66 of 1995 (LRA) governs and regulates the employment relationship between the employee and SAA, and thus, should the employee be aggrieved by the decision to place her on precautionary suspension, pending an internal investigation, she is at liberty to invoke the relevant provisions of the LRA for an appropriate relief. This remains an operational matter.

08 June 2016 - NW823

Profile picture: Chance, Mr R

Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Small Business Development

(1)(a) What (i) was the cost of staging the SA Business Incubation Conference which took place in Midrand from 10 to 11 March 2016 and (ii) proportion of the specified cost did (aa) her department and/or (bb) each agency reporting to her cover and (b) what amount were the conference organisers paid to organise the specified conference; (2) whether any sponsorships were raised for the specified conference; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the names of the sponsors and (b) what amount did each specified sponsor pay in sponsorship for the specified conference? NW942E

Reply:

Cost of South African Business Incubation Conference

  1. (a) and (i) The total costs for staging the SA Business Incubation Conference was R 4 383 375 (ii) (aa) The department did not cover any costs for the conference (bb) seda contributed a total amount of R 3 479 379 to the conference ,the other agency sefa, reporting to the department did not cover any costs for the conference. (b) The conference organisers were paid R 259 850 to organise the said conference;

     2. Yes, sponsorship was raised, (a) the names of the sponsors are listed in the table below; (b) the amount paid by each sponsor is specified in the table below;

Sponsor Name

Contribution

Vodacom

R 400 000

Exhibition stands sold

R 482 000

New Generation Mindset

R 22 000

Total

R 904 000

08 June 2016 - NW932

Profile picture: Bagraim, Mr M

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Finance

Has he ever (a) met with any (i) member, (ii) employee and/or (iii) close associate of the Gupta family and/or (b) attended any meeting with the specified persons (i) at the Gupta’s Saxonwold Estate in Johannesburg or (ii) anywhere else since taking office; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, in each specified case, (aa) what are the names of the persons who were present at each meeting, (bb)(aaa) when and (bbb) where did each such meeting take place and (cc) what was the purpose of each specified meeting?

Reply:

I have not attended any meeting with the Gupta family or anyone else at their Saxonworld Estate. I have encountered one or more members of his family at public events on a few occasions, eg a cricket match. I have met one of the Gupta brothers at Mahlamba Ndlovu around 2009/10 during which a brief discussion on small business finance took place.

08 June 2016 - NW1452

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the Public Investment Corporation holds any financial interest in certain companies (name furnished) in the form of (a) equity, (b) debt or (c) any other form; if not, why not; if so, what (i) was the initial value of the financial interest, (ii) was the date of the transaction, (iii) is the current value of the financial interest, (iv) is the percentage of ownership that the financial interest represents, (v) is the agreement governing the specified transactions and (vi) are the details of the agreement governing the specified transactions?

Reply:

The following information was provided by the Public Investment Corporation (PIC).

The PIC does not hold any financial interest in certain companies (name furnished).

08 June 2016 - NW1340

Profile picture: Chance, Mr R

Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Small Business Development

(a) Who are the registered owners of each Township Industrial Park under the control of the Small Enterprise Finance Agency (sefa), (b) what steps are being taken to transfer title and ownership of the specified parks to the tenants currently occupying them and (c) when does she expect that such transfers to (i) sefa and (ii) thereafter to the tenants

Reply:

(a) The properties identified to be transferred to the tenants are located in Gauteng Province. sefa’s Board of Directors has approved a resolution to transfer the ownership of the properties to qualifying tenants. The preferred tenant representative organization, Gauteng Province Industrial Parks Association (GAPIPA) and OWIPA (Orlando West Industrial Property Association) and sefa are currently in discussion to formulate and agree on the process to be followed in transferring the ownership of the properties to the existing tenants.

The Township Industrial Parks are:

Industrial Park

Registered Owner

1.

Orlando West Industrial Park

sefa

2.

Atteridgeville Industrial Park 1

Tshwane Metro

3.

Atteridgeville Industrial Park 2

Tshwane Metro

4.

Sebokeng Industrial Park 1

Business Partners Ltd.

5

Sebokeng Industrial Park 2

Business Partners Ltd.

6.

Vuka Tsoga Industrial Park

sefa

7.

Mamelodi Industrial Park 1

Tshwane Metro

8.

Mamelodi Industrial Park 2

Tshwane Metro

(b) The transferring attorneys, Kokinis Inc. are currently in the process of transferring these properties to Khula Business Premises Ltd. (100% subsidiary of sefa), where these properties will be housed.

(c) This process is anticipated to be completed by September / October this year. Once this is done, sefa will commence with negotiations for the sale of properties to the tenants. The process of transfer of ownership to the tenants is being negotiated with GAPIPA and their respective affiliates currently.

It is important to note that these properties were not designed and developed with the intention to sell to individual tenants at the time. The cost of subdivision may end up being substantial. It is for this reason that sefa is engaging with tenants representative bodies and together try and ascertain the most suitable way to transfer the properties and also ensuring that all the tenants hold equity (ownership) equivalent to the square metres and portion(s) they are occupying / renting. The recipients (tenants) of the properties will be notified of the obligations, both financially and legally, of owning a fixed commercial property.

08 June 2016 - NW1274

Profile picture: Jooste, Ms K

Jooste, Ms K to ask the Minister of Social Development

(1)What are the full details of the procedure that needs to be followed by grant recipients when they note (a) unlawful, (b) fraudulent and/or (c) immoral debit deductions made from their SA Social Security Agency accounts; (2) what steps is her department taking to communicate the specified procedure to all current grant recipients?

Reply:

1. Any beneficiary noticing any (a) unlawful; (b) fraudulent and/or (c) immoral activity on his/her social grant must immediately report this to the nearest SASSA office. At the SASSA office, the beneficiary will be requested to complete an affidavit confirming that he/she did not purchase any advanced airtime, pre-paid electricity or take out a loan. This affidavit can be commissioned by the SASSA official attending to him/her. The SASSA official will then log the dispute and submit the affidavit to Cash Paymaster Services, to facilitate the refund of the money deducted and to blacklist that social grant account for any future purchases. In terms of the approved Dispute Resolution Mechanism, all cases must be dealt with within a time frame of 10 working days.

Alternatively, any beneficiary can call the SASSA toll free number 0800 60 10 11 and register a dispute. Again, that beneficiary will be requested to submit an affidavit confirming the dispute and that he/she did indeed not purchase any financial services or commodities. On receipt of the affidavit, SASSA will submit the dispute to Cash Paymaster Services, which has 10 working days in which to resolve the dispute.

2. SASSA has conducted a training programme for identified SASA staff within all provinces as well as those manning the call centre at Head Office, to ensure that they are aware of the procedures to be followed. The approved Dispute Resolution Mechanism has been made available to all staff as well as Cash Paymaster Services. In addition, SASSA is continuing with its communication programme through both print and electronic media (radio and television) to try to ensure that all beneficiaries are aware of the processes to follow, should they become aware of any untoward activity on their social grant.

SASSA is also appealing to community leaders and NGO’s to assist in directing any social grant beneficiary who may have experienced challenges with his/her social grant payment to the nearest SASSA office.

Notwithstanding these measures which have been put in place, notice should be taken of the amendments to the Regulations to the Social Assistance Act, Act 13 of 2004 which were published on 6 May 2016. These amendments make it clear that no deductions or EFT debit transactions, apart from these authorized in terms of the Regulation 26A for funeral policies which comply with the regulations, may be effected off the SASSA card account. This is effective immediately and should halt the type of challenges beneficiaries have been experiencing. Should any beneficiary with to have access to the stop order or debit order facility, that beneficiary will be required to open a commercial bank account, and request SASSA to transfer the social grant from the SASSA card account to the commercial bank account. This will be done at no cost to the beneficiary, who is then free to manage his/her bank account as he/she sees fit.

08 June 2016 - NW1393

Profile picture: Van Damme, Ms PT

Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Health

Whether (a) his department and (b) all entities reporting to him are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) The National Department of Health does not have structured development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives, however, as part of our Supply Chain Management approach the procurement of goods and services is executed in line with the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act No 05 of 2000 and its associated Preferential Procurement Regulations of 2011, with the purpose of enhancing the participation of Historically Disadvantaged Individuals (HDIs) and the small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs) in the public sector procurement system. The basis of the current position within the department is informed by the legislative environment of public sector procurement which currently does not allow for “set asides” procurement approach.

(aa) This is not applicable to the department since no structured development programmes for (i) small businesses; and (ii) co-operatives exist within the department.

(bb) Whilst the department does not have an approved policy of dedicated spend on (i) small businesses; and (ii) co-operatives, the department budget for the procurement of goods and services for 2016-17 is R 1 453 613 000.00 of which 30% will be utilized for SMMEs' and Co-operatives where applicable.

(cc) This is not applicable to the department since no structured development programmes for (i) small businesses; and (ii) co-operatives exist within the department.

(b) None of the entities reporting to the Minister of Health are running development programs for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives as this does not fall within the legal mandate as outlined in the entities enabling legislation.

END.

08 June 2016 - NW1481

Profile picture: Redelinghuys, Mr MH

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether a certain person (name furnished) (a) was and/or (b) still is on the SA Airways no-fly list; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

The following information was provided by South African Airways (SAA).

The certain person (name furnished) (a) was not and (b) is not currently on any SAA no-fly list.

07 June 2016 - NW1135

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Social Development

With reference to the latest available statistics, (a) how many (i) nonprofit and privately run (aa) drug and (bb) alcohol rehabilitation facilities are there in the country and (b) how many persons can each specified facility accomodate?

Reply:

(a)

    (i) There are currently 73 nonprofit / privately run alcohol and drug rehabilitation facilities

(b) For capacity of each centre, see attached annexure

07 June 2016 - NW1508

Profile picture: Bagraim, Mr M

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

(1) Whether her department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether her department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

1. (a and b)

The Department of Environmental Affairs was never approached by any political party for funding in the following financial years since 1 April 2016:

  1. 2013-2014,
  2. 2014-2015, and
  3. 2015-2016.

(2) (a and b)

No funding was provided by the Department of Environmental Affairs to any political party for the following financial years since 1 April 2016:

  1. 2013-2014,
  2. 2014-2015, and
  3. 2015-2016.

Appropriated funds are meant for the execution of activities related to the mandate of the Department.

---ooOoo---

07 June 2016 - NW1131

Profile picture: Gqada, Ms T

Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

How many officers are currently employed by each of the metropolitan police department?

Reply:

(1) The following response is based on the information provided by eThekwini, Cape Town Metropolitan municipalities and Gauteng Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs. Mangaung and Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan municipalities indicated that they do not have a Metropolitan Police departments. Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality has Security and Traffic Services which has about 600 employees. Buffalo City did not meet the deadline for submission of responses. However, the municipality has been requested to respond accordingly. The information will be delivered to the honourable member as soon as it is received.

(2) The number of officers are currently employed by each of the metropolitan police departments are provided below:

Metropolitan Municipality

Number of officers are currently employed each of the metropolitan police department

eThekwini

1866 officers

Cape Town

557 officers

Ekurhuleni

1375 officers

Johannesburg

3017 officers

Tshwane

3815 officers

Mangaung

No applicable

Nelson Mandela Bay

No applicable

by

07 June 2016 - NW1363

Profile picture: Mahlangu, Mr JL

Mahlangu, Mr JL to ask the MR J L MAHLANGU (ANC) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF ARTS AND CULTURE:

(1) Whether he is aware (a) of the existence of a provincial heritage site, Canteen Kopje, in the Northern Cape, which is of archeological and heritage significance and is facing imminent destruction, (b) that research at the specified site began in the mid-20th century and has been on-going since 1997 (c) that various excavations in a number of locations at the site have revealed tools dating back 2,3 million years to the three phases of the Acheulean hand axe, Middle and Later Stone Age occupations, a Tswana/!Kora occupation relating closely to local communities and the remains of historic activities, (d) that a mining permit was issued in 2014 and the SA Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) successfully acquired a Cease Works Order which was lifted in March 2016 after which work by a diamond mining company commenced on 16 March 2016, (e) that the current mining programme will, conservatively estimated, destroy up to 40% of the heritage site, (f) that the fenced-off area includes the excavation areas of the University of the Witwatersrand and of Toronto and the area developed for tourism, (g) that no heritage impact assessment or archaeological impact assessment was conducted and the mining company does not have a heritage permit, which is in contravention of the National Heritage Resources Act, Act 25 of 1999, (h) that there is a conservation management plan for the site and (i) that our country has a constitutional, legal and moral obligation and responsibility to preserve and protect the heritage resources and resources with archaeological significance; if so, what steps does he intend to take to ensure the protection and preservation of the specified heritage resources; (2) in view of the lapses in adhering to the specified Act, what steps will SAHRA take to ensure that the specified heritage is preserved; (3) are there any other site(s) in the country facing a similar threat; if so, can he give the assurance that his department will support the heritage resources and protect them against the threat posed by mining and others?

Reply:

1.Yes, (a) I am aware of a heritage site called Canteen Kopje, a declared Provincial Heritage Site, located on Portion 9 of West Commonage 687, in the Barkley West District of the Northern Cape.

(b) The site was first declared as a National Monument on 29 January 1948 in terms of section 8 of the Natural and Historical Monuments, Relics and Antiquities Act, 1934. Under the current heritage act, the site enjoys protection at a provincial level.

(c) Although it is true that the significance of site was well known during the mid-20th century, local and international interest in the site waned during the second half of the 20th century. The site has been the focus of renewed research interest from the 1990s partly fuelled by significant steps forward in scientific methods, which allows for greater understanding of the formation of the site. Although the scientific work focuses on the behaviour of our earliest human ancestors, the site also contains important information about extant communities and the history and legacy of diamond mining in South Africa. Although the date of this occurrence is not known recent research by SAHRA indicates that Canteen Kopje may be the oldest known archaeological occurrence in South Africa.

(d) The Department of Mineral Resources issued a mining permit to Ms Jacky M. Wesi for Portion 5 of West Commonage, Barkley West in October 2014. Furthermore, a cease works order was issued to prevent the unnecessary destruction of significant heritage resources without the required mitigatory measures in place to prevent the undocumented destruction of such resources.

(e) The information provided to the heritage authorities and SAHRA, in particular, did not indicate that up to forty percent of the site would be mined,

(f) and specifically excluding the areas of current research by the Universities of Witwatersrand and Toronto. Similarly, according to the information provided the mining would have occurred outside the boundaries of the declared Provincial Heritage Site.

(g) This permit was issued without prior consultation with the appropriate heritage authorities. The heritage significance of the site and the provisions of the NHRA were communicated to relevant stakeholders.

(h) Yes I am aware of a Conservation Management plan for the site.

(i) Section 8 of the National Heritage Resources Act (Act 25 of 1999) promotes a three-tier system of Heritage Resources Management, in which national functions are the responsibility of the South African Heritage Resources Agency; provincial functions are the responsibility of the provincial heritage authority, and local level functions are the responsibility of local authorities.

2. A recent final court interdict granted by the Kimberley High Court has prevented any further mining on the declared site of Canteen Kopje. Although it is currently protected as a Provincial Heritage Site, SAHRA has initiated an administrative process to re-examine the grading of the site to possible Grade 1 status

3. To ensure that heritage resources are afforded the protection that it deserves it is important that the provisions of the NHRA are fully implemented. This means ensuring the provincial heritage authorities and local authorities are capacitated and adequately resourced. Currently, there are only three fully functioning provincial authorities ensuring compliance with the provisions of the NHRA. This means that the potential exists for the unwanted destruction of significant heritage resources.

07 June 2016 - NW1239

Profile picture: Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP

Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

(1)(a) What are the (i) circumstances and (ii) time lines that led to the Public Service Commission (PSC) head office currently being based in temporary office accommodation, (b) what is the term of the lease for the current offices and (c) when is the PSC expected to move into more suitable office accommodation; (2) (a) what was the once-off cost to relocate the PSC to its current temporary office accommodation, including the costs (i)(aa) to move office furniture, (bb) to install computer networks and (cc) to refurbish office space, (ii) of estate agents and (iii) any other relevant expenditure in this regard, (b) what is the total current monthly cost of the rental of the temporary office accommodation, including all levies and costs related to parking bays and (c) how does this expenditure compare to the monthly rental of the PSC’s previous office accommodation; (3) what would the monthly costs have been if the PSC moved to the office accommodation identified by the Department of Public Works?

Reply:

The Public Service Commission (PSC) is an independent Constitutional body, and its budget is appropriated via the Minister of Public Service and Administration.

1(a)(i) The Public Service Commission, forwarded a request to the Department of Public Works (DPW) on 29 October 2010 for the extension of the lease agreement for a period of five (5) years as the building (Commission House in Arcadia, Pretoria) was still suitable and met the requirements of the PSC. The PSC experienced challenges with the renewal process.

Seeing that there were delays with the renewal of the lease as well as the fact that the PSC had reached the optimal occupancy of the building, the PSC requested the DPW to procure alternative office accommodation in July 2012.

In order to allow the DPW to commence with the procurement process of the alternative accommodation, the PSC agreed that the lease agreement be renewed for a further period of eighteen (18) months to ensure that PSC relocates into the new alternative office building on 1 April 2014.

A building was identified as suitable alternative accommodation for the PSC and a lease agreement was signed. However, during tenant installation process there were concerns raised by the PSC e.g. additional costs to be borne by the PSC relating to tenant installation. This resulted in the process being suspended by the DPW. Due to the dispute, the PSC did not take occupation of the building.

The PSC forwarded another request to DPW in June 2015, after receiving notice to vacate Commission House, to commence with the sourcing alternative accommodation.

1(a) (ii) The PSC requested DPW on 1 June 2015 to re-advertise the bid as the PSC was notified of the refurbishment of the building (Commission House) taking into account that the building was supposed to be already vacant then (the PSC was supposed to have vacated the building in 2014).

(b) The term of the lease for the current offices is for a period of 24 months, with an exit clause after 18 months.

(c) The PSC has requested DPW to source permanent accommodation. The process will be completed by no later than January 2017.

2(a) The PSC paid R1.2 million once off costs towards the relocation to temporary accommodation (Absa Towers) for IT network infrastructure.

2(i)(aa) The PSC did not incur costs to move furniture. The Department of Public Works absorbed 50% of the relocation costs and the current landlord paid 50%.

2(i)(bb) The PSC paid R1.2 million for IT network infrastructure costs.

2(i)(cc) The PSC did not incur costs for refurbishing office space. The costs were covered by the tenant installation allowance paid by the landlord.

2(ii) The PSC did not pay estate agents fees.

2(iii) There is no other expenditure that was incurred.

2(b) The total current monthly cost of the rental of the temporary office accommodation is R1 407 312.79 for 8907 square metres.

2(c) The rental for the previous office accommodation was R523 087.00 per month for 6533.75 square metres. The rental for previous accommodation was not market related as ever since the PSC took occupation of the building in 1997, the ownership of the building changed 4 times without the annual rental escalation affected. The current monthly rental expenditure is high compare to the previous monthly expenditure on office accommodation.

(3) The monthly costs would have been lower if the PSC would have moved to the office accommodation identified by the Department of Public Works

The monthly rental for the office accommodation identified by the DPW would have been R 1 361 352.36 for 8907 square metres including parking.

07 June 2016 - NW1611

Profile picture: Cardo, Dr MJ

Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development

(a) How many officials from his department attended the 2016 World Economic Forum on Africa that was held in Kigali, Rwanda, from 11 May 2016 to 13 May 2016, as part of the South African delegation and (b) what were (i) the names of the attendees and (ii) their formal designations or positions in Government?

Reply:

One official, Dr Molefe Pule, Chief of Staff in the Ministry of Economic Development, accompanied me to Kigali, Rwanda for the World Economic Forum Africa.

-END-

07 June 2016 - NW1381

Profile picture: Mackenzie, Mr C

Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

Whether any plans have been put in place to formally house the residents of the Kya Sands informal settlement in Johannesburg in Gauteng; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the relevant details of such plans, (b) how many beneficiaries have been identified and (c) by when will such plans be put in place?

Reply:

(a) Yes, plans have been put in place to formally house the residents of the Kya Sands Informal Settlement. Due to the dense nature of the informal settlement, there is not enough land surrounding the area to formalise the project in situ. As a result, it was proposed that the project be developed in conjunction with the Lion Park Project further north, near the Lanseria Airport. The concept envisaged was that the Nietgedacht Property on which the Lion Park Project would be located would be formalized first due to the fact that the density is lower and it is envisaged that some of the residents of Kya Sands will then be relocated to the Lion Park Project. The remaining Kya Sands informal settlements residents would be formalized in situ. It should be noted that because of the high housing demand, both projects would be developed as high density housing and as such incremental formalization is not possible.

(b) A total of 13 000 beneficiaries have been identified and the scope of the project was increased to include all the informal settlements on Malibongwe Drive, between Kya Sands and Lanseria. 8 000 beneficiaries will be accommodated at the Lion Park development and 5 000 beneficiaries will be accommodated at the Kya Sands site. Beneficiaries from Lanseria/Freeway, Lanseria/Lion Park, Lanseria/Selina Park, Sands/iNanda Holding 57, Houtkoppen, Plot 5 Riverbed and Malatje informal settlements will be accommodated at the two developments.

(c) The planning process is currently underway and indications are that the development will commence during 2019/2020 financial year.

07 June 2016 - NW536

Profile picture: Lovemore, Ms AT

Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration

With reference to the ministerial speech delivered on the occasion of the debate on the Budget Vote of his department on 13 May 2015, and specifically to the creation of a pool of labour relations specialists and a team of legal experts from the Department of Justice and Correctional Services to deal with the backlog of disciplinary cases following Cabinet’s approval, what are the full details of (a) the pool of labour relations and legal experts formed after Cabinet’s decision, (b) the backlog of disciplinary cases with which they were intended to deal and (c) the progress made to date in addressing the specified backlog?

Reply:

On 09 September 2014 Cabinet approved the establishment of an internal pool of legal experts and labour relations specialists to deal with the backlog cases of precautionary suspensions in the public service. The DPSA has established a pool of panellists to deal with the backlog of precautionary suspension cases in the public service.

(a) The pool comprises 298 expert investigators, departmental representatives and presiding officers to ensure that the value chain is expedited in an optimal manner. Departments and provinces request assistance on their backlog cases from the DPSA.

(b) According the national and provincial statistical report of September 2014 to 31 March 2016 the total number of the backlog of precautionary suspension cases for national departments and provinces referred to DPSA is 687. The total breakdown consist of 291 cases for the provinces and 396 for the national departments.

(c) The progress made since the inception of the project is the resolution of 384 precautionary backlog cases. The total breakdown of the resolved cases consist of 57 for provinces and 327 for national departments. The percentage for the resolved cases is 56%. Members of the pool are allocated cases on a rotational basis so as to achieve an even spread of cases amongst panellists.

07 June 2016 - NW1433

Profile picture: Krumbock, Mr GR

Krumbock, Mr GR to ask the Minister of Police

(1)Whether the detective division at the Kempton Park Police Station in Gauteng received any new vehicles in the 2015-16 financial year; if so, how many did they receive; (2) (a) what is the total number of vehicles the specified detective division currently has, (b) how many are in working order and (c) on what date were the vehicles that have broken down sent to the mechanical workshop; (3) (a) how many detectives are there currently at the specified police station, (b) how many of the specified detectives have (i) attended and (ii) passed the detective course and (c) how many dockets is each detective currently investigating; (4) when will the detectives at the specified police station receive additional vehicles in order to ensure the specified police station complies with the national ratio of number of detectives to vehicles?

Reply:

(1) Yes, Kempton Park Detective Service received two (2) vehicles during the 2015/2016 financial year.

(2) (a) Kempton Park Detective Service currently have 25 vehicles.

(b) 25 vehicles are in working order.

(c) Not applicable.

(3) (a) There are 67 detectives currently at Kempton Park Detective Service.

(b) (i) 42 detectives attended a detective course.

(ii) 42 passed the detective course.

(c) Each Investigating Officer has an average of 200 dockets.

(4) The allocation of vehicles for the 2016/2017 financial year has not been finalised yet.

07 June 2016 - NW1543

Profile picture: Figlan, Mr AM

Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

(a) What amount did (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her spend on advertising in the 2015-16 financial year and (b) how much has (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her budgeted for advertising in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) In 2015-16 financial year:

(i) The department has spent R2 621 268,44

(ii) iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority R 103 920,00

(iii) South African National Botanical Institute R 919 216,00

(iv) South African National Parks R6 552 099,12

(v) South African Weather Service R 604 241,60

(b) In the 2016-17 financial year:

(i) The department has budgeted for R 1 000 000,00

(ii) iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority R 116 000,00

(iii) South African National Botanical Institute R 1 086 396,00

(iv) South African National Parks R10 397 441,09

(v) South African Weather Service R 630 000,00

---ooOoo---

07 June 2016 - NW978

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Minister of Social Development

(a) How many (i) non-governmental organisations and (ii) community-based organisations has the National Development Agency funded since its inception and (b) in each case, (i) how many of the specified organisations are (aa) still operational and (bb) not operational, (ii) why are the specified organisations no longer operational and (iii) what has happened to the services that they were providing?

Reply:

(a) The NDA has funded 2612 Community Based Organisations and Non-governmental organizations since inception. However, in the last five years, a total of 485 NGOs/CBOs were funded for which have hereunder provided the responses. The status of all organisations since inception cannot be confirmed as The NDA Grant making process works with funded projects for a period of 12 to 18 months. During this period our relationship with an organization is regulated by a Funding Agreement between the NDA and the CBO/NGO. At the end of the funding period, the NDA would develop an exit/sustainability plan for the organization and then the formal relations between the NDA and the organization ceases.

(b) (i) Of the 485 organisations funded in the last five years, 452 are still operating and providing services to communities. A total of 33 NGOs/CBOs are no longer operational. (ii) The reasons for their lack of operation include lack of funding since the completion of NDA funding and governance challenges, including conflict within the organisations. (iii) The activities that they were involved in have been transferred to other organisations within the area. To mitigate the challenges faced by organisations the NDA in partnership with the Department of Social Development has implemented a capacity building programme since 2013 which has trained 4244 NGOs/CBOs in all provinces, including organisations that may not have been directly funded by the NDA. The capacity building will result in sustainability for the organizations and their service delivery capacity.

07 June 2016 - NW640

Profile picture: Sonti, Ms NP

Sonti, Ms NP to ask the Minister of Social Development

(a) What amount has her department budgeted for food parcels for 2016, (b) how many of the food parcel projects are planned for the period 1 May 2016 to 31 August 2016 and (c) what steps has her department taken to dispel the notion that her department allegedly disburses food parcels as a mechanism to buy votes during election periods?

Reply:

(a) An amount of R500 000 000 has been made available for the social relief of distress programme for the 2016/17 financial year. Social relief of distress is a comprehensive programme which aims to meet the immediate material needs of citizens who experience a crisis. Food parcels are only one component of this programme. Social relief of distress may be provided in the form of food parcels, food vouchers, school uniforms, humanitarian support in times of disasters and/or cash, under certain circumstances.

(b) The social relief of distress programme is a needs driven programme, in that citizens who find themselves in such dire circumstances that they are unable to meet their or their family’s basic needs may apply for this assistance at SASSA offices and service points. In addition, where SASSA becomes aware of a disaster which has affected community members. The current drought is one such example of a natural disaster which may prompt the provision of social relief of distress.

It is therefore difficult to know in advance how many people will apply for this form of support. In terms of the Annual Performance Plan, SASSA has targeted to provide social relief of distress to 400 000 people. Of these, 160 000 are targeted for assistance in the first 2 quarters of the new financial year. However, it should be noted that these are projected numbers – the actual numbers will only be known when people come forward in response to a crisis situation. The numbers may be affected by natural disasters, which cannot be predicted, or economic circumstances in the country.

(c) Any social relief of distress is provided to South African citizens, permanent residents and refugees, who meet the criteria as set in the Social Assistance Act, Act 13 of 2004 and its Regulations. This means that every person who receives social relief of distress has gone through a screening and application process. These applications are available for audit.

The criteria which applicants must meet before they are considered for social relief of distress are that, in addition to the citizenship criteria, the applicant must have insufficient funds, and: meet one or more of the following-

Is awaiting payment of an approved grant;

The breadwinner has been assessed as being disabled for a period of less than 6 months;

The breadwinner of that household has died and application is made within 12 months of the death;

The breadwinner of that household has been admitted to a private or public institution for at least one month;

Where the refusal may cause undue hardship; or

The household has been affected by a disaster.

Social relief of distress is an on-going legislated programme which is budgeted for and implemented every year.

 

07 June 2016 - NW1253

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2984 on 22 September 2015, he has received the requested information yet; if not, why not; if so, by when will this information be communicated?

Reply:

The information was provided by uMshwathi Local Municipality and approved by Minister P Gordhan):

  (1) Yes, it was owned by the former Development Services Board (DSB) in 1994 – 1995.

    (a) It was transferred to Air Health Committee, then the Health Committee became Cool Air TLC in 1996 – 2000. In December 2000, the Cool Air TLC was amalgamated into uMshwathi Municipality.

   (b) There were four areas that were controlled by Development Services Board-Dalton, Cool Air, Wartburg and New Hanover, that were converted into Health Committees and the assets from DSB were handed over to these Health Committees.

  (2) The arrangements for Cool Air Secondary School is for them to book the hall in advance at no cost to the school.

 

07 June 2016 - NW1640

Profile picture: Hunsinger, Mr CH

Hunsinger, Mr CH to ask the Minister of Transport

(a) Why did KwaZulu-Natal request a rollover of its Provincial Road Maintenance Grant and (b) what are the further relevant details in this regard?

Reply:

(a) According to our records which are contained in the Infrastructure Reporting Model (IRM), Kwazulu Natal Province have sent their allocation for Provincial Roads Maintenance Grants (PRMG) though the department as the Transferring National Officer (TNO), have withheld the fourth tranche payment.

(b) The Department is engaging with the province together with National Treasury to rectify expenditure as reported on IRM while we are awaiting response from National Treasury for the approval of rollover funds withheld. Note that Provincial Treasuries manage rollover funds on behalf of National Treasury.

07 June 2016 - NW969

Profile picture: Horn, Mr W

Horn, Mr W to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

With reference to the Kabuso Investigative Report into the Makana Local Municipality in the Eastern Cape, (a) what action has he taken against those implicated in the report, (b) what plans does he have, if any, to recover any financial losses incurred by the guilty parties and (c) when will he table the Kabuso report, released in February 2010, in Parliament?

Reply:

The response below was provided by municipality:

(a) Following the recommendations of the Kabuso forensic report, the employment contracts of the Municipal Manager and Strategic Manager in the Office of the Mayor were terminated. Further, a committee was established consisting of councillors to address issues implicating councillors and an action plan was also submitted to Council in order to address issues implicating officials. This process is being coordinated by the Administrator.

(b) The municipality's legal representatives are engaging with those implicated with a view to recover the financial losses incurred by the municipality.

(c) I was not aware that the Kabuso report is supposed to be tabled in Parliament. The Administrator is dealing with this matter and would adhere to such a request.

07 June 2016 - NW1035

Profile picture: Redelinghuys, Mr MH

Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(1) (a) How many (i) permanent and (ii) temporary employees are currently employed by the Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD) and (b) at what (i) salary band and (ii) skill level;(2) what is the detailed breakdown of the TMPD's expenditure for (a) the remuneration of councillors, (b) debt impairments, (c) contracted services and (d) depreciation and asset impairment (i) in the (aa) 2012-13, (bb) 2013-14 and (cc) 2014-15 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2015 to the latest specified date for which information is available?

Reply:

Attached please find here: Reply
 

07 June 2016 - NW1502

Profile picture: Masango, Ms B

Masango, Ms B to ask the Ms B S Masango (DA) to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

(1) Whether his department was approached by any political party for any form of funding (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether his department provided any form of funding to any political party (a) in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

Reply:

(1) The DAC has not been approached by any political party for funding in the 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and to date in the 2016/17 financial years;

(2) The DAC has not provided any form of funding to any political party in the 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and to date in the 2016/17 financial years.

07 June 2016 - NW396

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(1)Whether R 800 million was moved from the SA National Defence Force’s (SANDF) budget to pay Deloitte to do an audit of SANDF’s battle preparedness; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what were the (i) motivation and (ii) objectives of the specified audit, (b) why does the SANDF not have the capacity to perform the specified audit itself, (c) why was Deloitte contracted to perform the specified audit, (d) when did (i) she and (ii) her department approve the specified audit and (e) what procurement processes were followed before appointing the specified company; (2) whether there are any higher priorities for spending the funds instead of the specified audit, especially in the face of constant complaints that not enough funding is provided to among other things South Africa’s contribution to peacekeeping forces in Africa; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details for prioritising the specified audit?

Reply:

Question 1.

a.(i) According to the Department of Defence's records, the Department has not concluded any audit contract with Deloitte to the value of R800 million. However, Deloitte was contracted to perform a Through Life Capability Management (TLCM) study over four years at a cost of R230 million. This requirement is a resultant of phase 1 of the TLCM Project conducted during 2013/14 in the Chief of Logistics environment. The results of TLCM phase 1 reflected that the DOD is not on par

with international standards in terms of TLCM best practice. The DOD/Armscor Acquisition, Technology Development processes and the objectives of the RESTRICTED 2 National Defence Industry Council (NDIC) were not part of the C Log study, a requirement therefore existed to align the above mentioned aspects with both international TLCM standards as well as the Defence Review 2015.

Question 2.

The TLCM project is a high priority exercise since it will ultimately contribute to a cost effective SANDF and is not at the cost of other current priorities

07 June 2016 - NW1252

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether, with reference to his reply to question 2735 on 25 August 2015, he has received the requested information yet; if not, why not; if so, by when will this information be communicated?

Reply:

The response below is based on information received from the Ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality (as approved by Minister P Gordhan on 3rd Sep 2015)

 (a) The municipality allocated a total amount of R156 million for Zone Plans, i.e. block sum allocations to each ward, in the 2014-15 budget.

(b) (i) The funds allocated to each ward are utilized for the implementation of small projects that are identified by Councilors in consultation with ward residents. (ii) Wards benefiting have been reduced to 78 wards that have less developed municipal infrastructure and the budget allocation for each ward varies depending on the project identified. The 25 wards that were excluded are highly developed and have all the necessary municipal services.

(c) The quested information still needs to be discussed first at Council level as it relates to the 2014/15 financial year’s budget, which ended on 31 July 2015.

07 June 2016 - NW298

Profile picture: Ollis, Mr IM

Ollis, Mr IM to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

Whether each metropolitan municipality has a municipal public accounts committee; if not, why not; if so, (a) is the committee chaired by a member of the opposition, (b) what is the name of the chairperson, (c) are meetings of the committee open to the public and (d) how are the specified meetings advertised?

Reply:

The responses below were received from the metropolitan municipalities:

All the Metropolitan Municipalities stated that they have a Municipal Public Accounts Committees.

The table below illustrates the responses to question (a), (b), (c) and (d) as per municipality.

Attached please find here: Table

 

07 June 2016 - NW705

Profile picture: Steenkamp, Ms J

Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

(1)How much did it cost to fund each district municipality to fulfil its mandates in the (a)(i) 2011-12, (ii) 2012-13, (iii) 2013-14 and (iv) 2014-15 municipal financial years and (b) since 1 July 2015; (2) whether, with reference to the budget speech delivered by the Minister of Finance, Mr Pravin Gordhan, on 24 February 2016, measures will be implemented to curb expenditure by each district municipality; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether any studies have been conducted to determine the viability of maintaining each district municipality whose entire income comes from the national fiscus; if not, why not; if so, what were the outcomes

Reply:

The question by the Honourable member should be directed to the National Treasury. The National Treasury manages the expenditure and the budgets of municipalities in line with the provisions in the Municipal Finance Management Act. Municipalities report budgetary matters in terms of s71 of the MFMA and are best placed to respond to matters relating to budget and expenditures of all municipalities.

07 June 2016 - NW1384

Profile picture: Kruger, Mr HC

Kruger, Mr HC to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture

Whether (a) his department and (b) all entities reporting to him are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) The Department of Arts and Culture’s Mzansi Golden Economy (MGE) programme provides opportunities for small business and co-operatives in all creative industries sectors. The MGE strategy was initiated in 2011 to create cross-sectoral strategic investment mechanisms to overcome significant challenges with regard to job creation, market and audience development, skills development and research identified through sector research processes and also consultation processes with creative industry practitioners, businesses and organisations. The core of the programme comprises 10 work streams as follows:

MGE Objectives

Work streams

Audience development

  • Cultural Events
  • Touring Venture
  • Public Art
  • Artists in Schools

Building Demand

  • Art Bank
  • Mzansi Golden Market
  • Cultural Observatory
  • Cultural Precincts

Human Capital Development

  • National Academy for the Creative Industries of South Africa (NACISA)

Under the auspices of this programme, and the National Academy for the Creative Industries South Africa (NACISA) workstream, the Department of Arts and Culture’s 6 performing arts entities run incubator programmes for arts entrepreneurs. The details per institution are outlined in the table below.

DAC Business Development Programmes

 

Question 1aa

1bb

1cc

MGE Workstream

Description

Budget 2016/17

(in ZAR)

Jobs Created

Cultural Events

The programme supports festivals, exhibitions, productions and other cultural events across the country through national and regional flagships programmes and open calls. Enterprises supported include companies, co-operatives, non-profit organisations and individuals.

162,032,000

Across all workstreams it is anticipated that 15,000 work opportunities will be created

Touring Ventures

The programme supports participation by South African artists in local and international platforms including festivals, Cultural Seasons, biennales, conferences through identified programmes and open calls. Enterprises supported include companies, co-operatives, non-profit organisations and individuals.

28,500,000

 

Public Art

The programme supports public art programmes and infrastructure across the country through flagships programmes and open calls. Enterprises supported include companies, co-operatives, non-profit organisations and individuals.

8,000,000

 

Artists in Schools

Individual artists are provided with opportunities to join teachers in the classroom to enhance the teaching and learning experience through the formal curriculum of learners in identified primary and high schools in all nine provinces.

12,000,000

 

Art Bank

The Art Bank in 2016/17 will begin commissioning and purchasing contemporary visual art works from artists and galleries across the country for exhibition and rental by government agencies and private sector stakeholders.

6,000,000

 

Mzansi Golden Market

(Sourcing Enterprise)

The MGM portal will be fully launched in 2016/17, providing all arts enterprises with opportunities to profile their organisation and work on an online portal.

1,000,000

 

Cultural Observatory

The Cultural Observatory will conduct research and impact studies across the creative industries that will inform policy and programming, and also provide the sector with insights into business and other opportunities in the sector.

16,000,000

 

Cultural Precincts

Support will be provided to the development infrastructure in cultural precincts as designated spaces for the production and consumption of the arts.

12,500,000

 

National Academy for the Creative Industries of South Africa (NACISA)

Artists and enterprises will be provided with training opportunities through identified programmes including the incubator programmes offered by the performing arts institutions as outlined in the table below.

31,569,400

 

A portion of these funds will directly benefit small business and co-operatives in the sector as these organisations are eligible for financial support in terms of the funding criteria of the DAC for the MGE programme.

Public Entity Business Development Programmes

  1. Performing arts institutions

As outlined in the Estimates of National Expenditure, through their core programming, the 6 DAC performing arts entities will

Programme

Target Number

Budget

(in ZAR)

Annual productions

205

124,031,000

Annual festivals

14

 

Skills and training development programmes

50

23,300,000

(A portion of this will be spent on skills development & training)

A portion of these funds will directly benefit small business and co-operatives in the sector.

The incubator programmes, delivered in partnership with the DAC are as follows:

ENTITY

PROGRAMME

DESCRIPTION

BUDGET 2016/17

OUTPUT PER CYCLE

Market Theatre

Community Theatre Practitioners Incubator Programme

The proposed Community Theatre Practitioners Incubator Programme will concentrate on improving the skills of community based writers, directors and actors and empower them with the necessary skills to enable them to create and produce works of high standard and of local content.

The Incubator Programme will train the next generation of the community arts leaders, arts entrepreneurs and administrators and expose them to the creative and practical sides of the industry and what is required to produce a professional theatre piece.

The Incubator Programme will provide the group leaders (usually the writers and directors) with specialised training and resources to acquire additional and enhanced skills that will enable them to improve the quality of their work and their leadership which will ultimately be of benefit to the group and the new plays they are creating.

1,600,000

10 Writers

10 Directors

+/- 80 Community Arts Practitioners Incubated

10 Plays of local content

 

DAC Incubator Photography Programme

The Market Photo Incubator intends developing an on the job based photography programme as a platform from which photographers at a relatively progressed level might enhance and refine their practice, while learning additional skills through the guidance of established practitioners, curators and administrators.

Aimed at emerging photographers, the Programme is envisaged as a transfer of skills, experience, knowledge and professional practice that might shift talented photographers into a more advanced stage.

The incubation Programme further offers an administrative directed opportunity in photography, affording the incubates skills and credentials that facilitates independent thought, ensuring high levels of competence, commitment and reliability.

1,600,000

10 Photographers Incubated.

10 annual fully developed projects that will take the form of an exhibitions and publications.

Projects engaging with the public and communities through photography.

Publications, as reflection of overall activities.

Windybrow Theatre

Emerging Theatre Practitioners Incubator Programme

Windybrow Theatre’s Emerging Theatre Practitioners Incubator Programme will engage with emerging and/or mid-level theatre practitioners – directors, designers, stage managers and actors - and offer them areas of opportunity to work one-on-one with a professional mentor over a 4 month period towards the staging of a fully developed script of their choice. This incubation process will result in the creation and staging of 5 new works of local content annually.

1,600,000

4 fully fledged theatre productions of local content per year.

4 professionally trained directors per year with the creative and business skills to develop sustainable careers in the theatre industry and contribute to production of exciting new South African work on the country’s stages.

12 fully trained designers in set, costume and lighting design per year.

4 fully trained production managers per year

4 fully trained stage managers per year.

24 fully trained actors per year (+/-6 actors per production)

The Playhouse Company

Playhouse Dance Residency Incubator Programme

The Residency Incubator programme aims to develop 8 dancers annually and these dancers will create 4 new locally inspired pieces for 4 seasons, tapping into a wide range of dance repertoire which consists of a schools programme, New Stages, South African Women’s Arts Festival and the Festive Season programme. With assistance from The Playhouse Company, the Dance Residency also receives mentorship from established arts administrators.

1,600,000

x4 seasons

x4 Productions of Local Content

x8 Dancers Incubated

 

Playhouse Actors' Studio

A core company of twelve actors is engaged as part of The Playhouse drama residency/ incubation programme. This fully-fledged annual programme provides incubation and advancement in the industry for suitably talented actors. Established performing arts professionals would contribute to the work of the residency by teaching masterclasses.

The actors will also feature in existing seasons at the Playhouse i.e New Stages, the South African Women's Arts Festival, Children's Theatre, Schools seasons as well as in the Playhouse Community Arts Mentorship Programme etc.

1,600,000

x12 Actors incubated

x4 New local Productions

Participation in 4 platforms

ArtsCape

Creative Capacities Incubator

Creative Capacities Incubator (CCI) is aimed at 15 arts organisations across performing arts disciplines towards a well-rounded programme that supports the establishment of healthy arts business practice that is sustainable, efficient and professionalised.

The potential for the existing organisations in the landscape to contribute significantly to the turning around of the status quo which is dominated by eternal volunteerism at the expense of the constitutional right of every citizen of South Africa to participate in the economy, as set out in the NDP and other such efforts by our government as aspirations towards social cohesion was identified to be and still continues to be underutilised and unexplored.

Parallel to that is the existence of such models that are somewhat successful but are driven by the privileged, accessing government funding and donor funding; etc. on behalf of the marginalised and keeping them at the level of dependent beneficiary eternally.

The project seeks to challenge this by means of capacitating to disrupt the norm significantly.

1,600,000

x80 Individuals capacitated

Min 30 content created which is either written and or performed.

x15 fully incubated Arts Marketers per cycle

x15 fully incubated technical and lighting technicians

State Theatre

Indie Spotlight Incubator Programme

Independent theatre practitioners in and around the province would be offered a venue where they could stage their productions at no cost. The State Theatre will provide available resources like décor, costume, human resource and technical skills, mentorship, and marketing – with the caveat that the productions be competent enough to be able to draw and sustain a respectable audience.

The independent producers would then go into a deal with the State Theatre, where box office returns would be split 80 or 70 % to the independent producers and 20 or 30% to the State Theatre. Such a box office split would serve as a driver for the independent producers to try and achieve a full audience capacity for their productions as this would satisfy their profit principle, and this in turn would serve to benefit the State Theatre with attracting new audiences and increasing its declining audiences.

1,600,000

x20 New production per cycle

x20 Groups with +/- 4 individuals per group incubated.

Skills transfer from State Theatre technical skills to incubates.

2 Weeks Season per organisation.

Possible recording and editing of a DVD of the production.

 

The Precinct Programme

The Precinct Incubator Programmes aims to establish talented Artists and bands within the local community. The programme will screen bands through a panel of judges and the winning band will be incubated for 3 month and with the output being a completed album.

Through the 3 months recording period, the band or artist will be mentored by industry professionals that will be strategically selected based on the genre of music that the winning band produces.

1,600,000

x4 Completed market ready Albums.

x4 New demos for artist that place in 2nd place.

+/- 10 individuals incubated and capacitated.

Opportunity created for artist to perform at State Theatre Jazz and African Nights.

PACOFS

Operation Vulindlela Incubator Programme

Over the next year, the aim is to successfully provide Resources and Practical experience to 6 local theatre productions, 12 Music Groups or individuals and employ approx. 12 facilitators to host the Workshops and Masterclasses.

The programme will provide on-hand incubation to artists that make it through the selection process in developing their projects or creating new content and PACOFS will provide tools of production and platform to showcase their content.

The incubator project will present 6 Exit productions for 12 music groups at the end of each cycle as part of the First Stages Festival. Incubates will also be afforded opportunities to participate in various other projects within the province as part of our Current Artistic Development program.

1,600,000

x6 Local Theatre Production.

Incubate 12 music groups or individual productions

Participation in various festivals organised by PACOFS

 

Total Incubators for 2015/16 FY

Total Individuals Incubated or Capacitated in 2015/16 FY

 

6 Incubators to be launched by July 2015

406

 

Total Incubators for 2016/17 FY

Total Estimate of Individuals Incubated or Capacitated in 2016/17 FY

 

6 Incubators functional in 2016/17

406

 
  1. Development Agencies

As outlined in the Estimates of National Expenditure, through their core programming, the Development Agencies will support:

Entity

Programme

Target Number

Budget

(in ZAR)

National Film & Video Foundation (NFVF)

Local content scripts developed annually

66

53,495,000

 

Local content films developed annually

38

 
 

Bursaries provided for film & video studies annually

63

 
 

Film festivals supported annually

16

 

National Arts Council

Individual artists supported annually

212

26,725,000

 

Arts programmes developed & successfully implemented annually

8

 
 

Flagship creative arts projects financially supported annually

3

 
 

Arts organisations receiving 3 year funding on an annual basis

91

 

A portion of these funds will directly benefit small business and co-operatives in the sector as these organisations are eligible for financial support in terms of the funding criteria of the NFVF and NAC.

07 June 2016 - NW1019

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and TraditionalAffairs

1. In each case where a municipality has been threatened with having the supply of electricity cut off by Eskom, was a payment agreement entered into with Eskom in order to avert such a cut-off; if not, (a) why not and (b) what steps is his department taking to resolve the situation in each case; if so, in each case, when was each such an agreement reached and signed, (2) is the payment schedule (a) affordable and (b) reducing the specified municipalities' debt owed to Eskom; (3) has the specified municipalities complied with the terms of their respective agreements; if not, why not; (4) what is the current status of the inter-ministerial negotiations to resolve the impasse between municipalities and Eskom regarding (a) the billing period and (b) the interest charged by Eskom?.

Reply:

1 (a) (b). Yes, a process of entering into payment agreements between each of the affected municipalities is in its final stages. The Department of Co-operative Governance ((DCoG) in collaboration with Department of Public Enterprise (OPE), SALGA, Provincial COGTA's and Treasury conducted work sessions with the affected municipalities and Eskom. A detailed affordability analysis was conducted for each municipality taking into account its unique circumstances, the root causes for non-payment as well as other municipal commitments. This work resulted in new payment arrangements being drafted for Eskom's consideration. On approval by Eskom, these agreements will be formalised with municipalities by means of council resolutions. Eskom aims to have all the agreements in place with municipalities by end of May 2016.

2. (a). Yes, since the draft payment agreements were based on the affordability analysis; they will be affordable to municipalities.

(b) The debt will be reduced because one of the conditions of the agreements is that municipalities pay their current debt over and above the agreement amount to service outstanding debt. .

3. Eskom is still engaging and finalising discussions with the municipalities on agreed payment terms and to date there is no municipality that has finalised and signed the payment agreement with Eskom. Compliance will only be monitored once agreements are reached between Eskom and the municipalities.

4. During the inter-ministerial negotiations; Eskom made a commitment to consider waving the interest for municipalities who adhere to their payment terms and to consider reviewing the payment period. However; the response received from Eskom in that regard is as follows:
"Considering the Eskom financial situation and in line with the PFMA and MFMA requirements as well as the Supply Agreements held with our customers, Eskom has decided to continue to apply the 15 days payment period as well as charging Prime plus 5% on overdue amounts."

07 June 2016 - NW1610

Profile picture: Cardo, Dr MJ

Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development

(1)How many written submissions were received on the proposed amendments to the Price Preference System on the Exportation of Ferrous and Non-ferrous Waste and Scrap Metals published in Government Gazette notice R.1211 on 11 December 2015; (2) whether any oral submissions have been heard by the International Trade Administration Commission (ITAC) on the proposed amendments; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what are the names of the stakeholders that were invited by ITAC to make oral submissions and (b) what was the gist of their submissions in each case?

Reply:

1.I am advised that a total number of 73 entities responded with written comments to the proposed amendments to the Price Preference System (PPS) on the Exportation of Ferrous and Non-ferrous Waste and Scrap Metals published in Government Gazette notice R.1211 on 11 December 2015.

(2) (a) Oral submissions have been heard by the Commission (ITAC) and were
made by the following entities:

  • Metal Recyclers Association (MRA).
  • Recycling Association of South Africa (RASA).
  • Non Ferrous Metal Industries Association of SA (NFMIA) and the Aluminium Federation of SA (AFSA) in a combined presentation.
  • SA Institute of Foundrymen (SAIF).

(2)(b) In the light of the fact that the process of evaluating the amendments is still underway it would not be appropriate to divulge the specific content of the oral submissions, save to say that in general, NFMIA, AFSA and SAIF were in support whereas the MRA and RASA objected to the amendments.

-END-

07 June 2016 - NW1465

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Police

(1)How many (a) foreign tourists and (b) foreigners who live in South Africa have been the (i) victims and (ii) perpetrators of crimes in each specified year in the period 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2015; (2) what was the nature of the crime where (a) offences were committed and (b) persons were victims?

Reply:

Due to the nature of the information required, an extension of time is hereby requested to enable us to provide an accurate and comprehensive response.

07 June 2016 - NW1391

Profile picture: Van Der Walt, Ms D

Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

Whether (a) her department and (b) all entities reporting to her are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

(a) Yes

(b) Yes, however, the participation of small business enterprises and cooperatives is advanced through public employment programmes.

(i) & (ii) The Department of Environmental Affairs provides opportunities through different programmes and entities, and is specifically responsible for the EPWP with it’s 14 different programmes through which it has provided opportunities for people through SMMEs and cooperatives.

The Programmes are listed as follow:

  • Working for Water
  • Working for Wetlands
  • Working for Ecosystems
  • Working for Forests
  • Working for Energy (Biomass)
  • Eco-Furniture Programme
  • Working on Fire
  • Working on Waste
  • Working for the Coast
  • Working for Land
  • Greening & Open Space Management
  • People & Parks
  • Wildlife Economy
  • Youth Environmental Service

All fourteen of the EP programmes are designed to secure outcomes that have high returns on investment, over and above the Full-Time Equivalent jobs and Work Opportunities. The contractors and participants are all trained, skilled and empowered to do this work.

South African National Parks (SANParks) is in part, part of the EPWP implementation, and implements a develpment programme for small contractors or businesses. It also supports additional small businesses as part of the Infrastructure Programme.

Further opportunities are being sought through the Chemical and Waste Branch on the Recycling Enterprise Support Programme (RESP).

(aa) Programmes target to support 2,369 SMMEs for 2016/17.

SANParks implements EPWP projects in all national parks, buffer zone areas and some provincial nature reserves. For the 2016/17, the projects will support 501 small contractors, including training and contractor development. As part of the Infrastructure Programme in Kruger National Park, 14 small construction contractors are mentored for civil, building and electrical works.

The iSimagaliso enterprise programme is in its 7th year. It supports 182 small businesses. Businesses receive formal training and ongoing mentoring via a virtual business hub. The small business also qualify to apply for grant funding from the programme. R6.8million has been paid on in grant funds to 88 small businesses.

(bb) The department has budgeted an estimated amount of R 1.2 billion for the 2016/17 financial year which will be procured using SMMEs.

The amount budgeted for the small contractors in the EPWP programme under SANParks is R166 million. An estimated amount of R58.8 million was budgeted for the small construction contactors in Kruger National Park.

Through the Waste Management Bureau, an approximate amount of 11 million is set aside for the Recycling Enterprise Support Programme (RESP) initiative.

For iSimangaliso, the amount that has been budgeted for this year is R1.2m.

(cc) Throught the 14 different programmes, a minimum of 1519 SMMEs, 46524 Work Opportunities and 23 467 Full Time Equivalents will be created in 2016/17, a further 140 temporary jobs will be created and supported in the Kruger construction programme.

It is also envisaged that a 150 jobs will be created through the Recycling Enterprise Support Programme.

For iSimangaliso, it is anticipated that the development programmes run by iSimangaliso will create approximately 2000 jobs in this financial year

---ooOoo---

07 June 2016 - NW982

Profile picture: Wilson, Ms ER

Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Social Development

(a) What research has the National Development Agency conduct as part of its mandates in the (i) 2012-12, (ii) 2012-13, (iii) 2013-14, (iv) 2014-15 and (v) 2015-16 financial years and (b) how has the specified research contributed to the improvement of the development sector in South Africa?

Reply:

(a) Research conducted:

(i) 2011/12

There were no research studies conducted during the year

(ii) 2012-13

  1. Civil Society Organization’s participation in Food security Activities in South Africa (March 2013)
  2. Civil Society Organization’s participation in Income generating Activities in South Africa (March 2013)
  3. Challenges faced by Early Childhood Development Sector in the Country (April 2012)
  4. A situational Analysis of Civil Society Organizations in the Western Cape (June 2012)

(iii) 2013-14

  1. Funding Constraints and Challenges faced by Civil Society Organizations in South Africa (June 2013)
  1. Framework for the Development of an annual state of development report (January 2014)
  1. Civil Society Organization’s participation in the MDG processes in South Africa (January 2014)
  2. State of poverty and its manifestation in the nine provinces of South Africa (March 2014)

(iv) 2014-15

  1. Community development foundation framework &capacity Development framework (March 2015)
  2. Enhancing active citizenry engagement in South Africa (March 2015)

(v) 2015-16

  1. Enhancing civil society participation in the South African Development Agenda : The role of CSOs (December 2015)
  2. South African government funding to non-profit organisations: what is the investment value? (February 2016)

(b) Research contribution

The research studies conducted by the NDA has contributed in new knowledge on how to improve programmes aimed at supporting the civil society sector, government planning and implementation of programmes for the civil society and making information available to the broader public through publications of the research in the NDA website. Some of the research has been used to inform debates and discussions with relevant organs of state for purposes of informing policy and programme planning. In addition, research reports are printed in hard copies and made available for the public in the NDA Provincial offices and NDA Advisory Centres. In addition, all NDA research reports are presented to a range of stakeholders, including civil society, government, private and international donors.

07 June 2016 - NW1082

Profile picture: Khoza, Mr NP

Khoza, Mr NP to ask the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

(a) Has any of her senior officials met with certain persons (names furnished) during the period 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015 and (b) has any of the entities reporting to her awarded any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investments, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media in the specified period; if so, what (i) are the relevant details and (ii) is the amount of each specified contract?

Reply:

Question a.

a. DOD personnel did engage with COMAIR with respect to the requirements listed in paragraph.

(b.) No senior officials were involved in this regard.

b (i.) The DOD (SA Air Force) awarded two (2) contracts to "COMAIR LTD" (V32C9) during the specific period in question for the following requirements.

• 2012: for the training of four (4) members on Flight Dispatchers Course to the value of R134 976,00.

• 2014: for CSIR skills training for SA Air Force members to the value of R28 500,00.

07 June 2016 - NW1130

Profile picture: Mbhele, Mr ZN

Mbhele, Mr ZN to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

How many metropolitan police departments are there in South Africa, (b) what are their names and (c) how much funding was allocated to each of these metropolitan police departments (i) in the (aa) 2011-12, (bb) 2012-13 (cc) 2013-14 (dd) 2014-15 and (ee) 2015-16 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2016?

Reply:

Attached please find here: Reply