Questions and Replies
13 March 2017 - NW282
Shinn, Ms MR to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
(1) (a) Which company was appointed to provide physical security services to his department in terms of bid DTPS/01/2016/17A, (b) on what date was the specified appointment made and (c) what is the (i) duration and (ii) cost of the contract; (2) (a) what are the material terms of the successful bid, (b) how many firms submitted bids and (c) what bid evaluation and adjudication process was followed to determine the winning bidder; (3) what were the specific grounds for not awarding the tender to a certain company (name furnished)?
Reply:
I have been advised by the Department follows:-
(1) (a) The Department appointed Fidelity Security Group (Pty) Ltd.
(b) The service provider was appointed on 28 October 2016.The contract started on 1 December 2016.
(c) (i)The duration of the contract is two years.
(ii)The contract cost is R11 817 326.44 (VAT inclusive)
(2) (a) The material terms of the successful bid was that the service provider met all the requirement of the department regarding evaluation criteria stipulated in the bid documentation. The following were material terms for the successful bidder:
- Experience in providing physical security services,
- Proof of registration with Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA),
- Financial capability and
- Detailed Project Execution Plan.
(b) On the closing date, 70 bids were received by the Department.
(c) Normal government Supply Chain Management (SCM) bid evaluation and adjudication processes were followed.
(3) Imvula Quality Protection (Africa) (Pty) Ltd did not score the highest in the bid evaluation and adjudication processes.
13 March 2017 - NW262
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
(1) Whether a certain person (name furnished) was an employee of the State Information Technology Agency (SITA); if so, in what capacity was the specified person employed; (2) Whether SITA awarded the specified person to study at the Columbia University in New York, the United States of America; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (a) was the amount of the specified bursary and (b) were the terms and conditions applicable to the bursary in terms of the (i) duration of study, (ii) terms of grant and (iii) repayment period?
Reply:
I have been informed by SITA as follows:
1. Ms. Unathi Mtya was employed by SITA as the Head of Internal Information Technology division and has since resigned on 31 July 2016.
2. SITA did not receive an application for a bursary nor award a bursary to Ms. Unathi Mtya to study at the Columbia University in New York.
a) Not applicable
b) (i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
(iii) Not applicable
13 March 2017 - NW18
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Rural Development and LandReform
Whether any state-owned land was transferred to the Amathombeni Traditional Authority in the Thembisile Hani Local Municipality in Mpumalanga; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
No; The Department of Rural Development and Land Reform and the Commission on Restitution and Land Rights have no record of any land transferred to the said Authority.
13 March 2017 - NW270
Schmidt, Adv H to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
(1) Whether mining permits have been issued for mining activities on the (a) Wintersveld 417 KS, (b) Jagdlust 418 KS and (c) Zeekoeigat 421 KS farms located next to the R37 road between Burgersfort and Polokwane in Limpopo; if not, in each case, is he aware of the illegal mining activities taking place on each of the specified farms; if so, (i) to whom were mining rights issued and (ii) for which minerals respectively; (2) what steps will he take in line with the court order handed down by the Gauteng High Court in case 46483/206 to ensure that (a) he and (b) his department act in accordance with the responsibilities of the State being the custodian of all mineral resources on behalf of the people of South Africa to prevent illegal mining on the specified farms?
Reply:
1. (a)(b)(c)All mining permits (processing of dumps) that were issued over these properties have lapsed, however, two mining rights have been granted and issued respectively.
(i)(ii) Samancor Chrome – granted for Chrome
Lebowa Platinum Mines (Bokoni Platinum Mines) – Issued for All minerals on different reef/seam
2. The Department is working with law enforcement agencies and have also opened cases at the local police station. According to the latest developments, a lot of machineries were confiscated / impounded on site. The Department will continue to work with law enforcement agencies hoping that the perpetrators will be successfully prosecuted. The Department has served notices to most perpetrators as part of administrative enforcement but furthermore opened cases as part of criminal enforcement.
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
13 March 2017 - NW256
Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
(a) What is the detailed breakdown of South African Post Offices (SAPO) currently operational in each province? (b) Whether each specified post office is situated in (i) an urban or (ii) rural area and (c) How many of the specified post offices are equipped to issue motor vehicle licenses?
Reply:
I have been informed by SAPO as follows:
(a)
Province |
Branch |
Mobile |
RPOA |
Grand Total |
Eastern Cape |
182 |
2 |
123 |
307 |
Free State |
118 |
1 |
16 |
135 |
Gauteng |
332 |
9 |
341 |
|
KwaZulu Natal |
240 |
2 |
68 |
310 |
Limpopo |
136 |
2 |
123 |
261 |
Mpumalanga |
116 |
1 |
100 |
217 |
Northern Cape |
1 |
1 |
||
North West |
127 |
1 |
87 |
215 |
Northern Cape |
63 |
67 |
130 |
|
Western Cape |
173 |
112 |
285 |
|
Grand Total |
1 488 |
9 |
705 |
2 202 |
(b)
Province |
Branch Mines |
Rural |
Urban |
Branch Total |
Mobile Rural |
Mobile Total |
RPOA Rural |
Urban |
RPOA Total |
Grand Total |
Eastern Cape |
131 |
51 |
182 |
2 |
2 |
123 |
123 |
307 |
||
Free State |
20 |
98 |
118 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
8 |
16 |
135 |
|
Gauteng |
4 |
328 |
332 |
2 |
7 |
9 |
341 |
|||
KwaZulu Natal |
103 |
137 |
240 |
2 |
2 |
52 |
16 |
68 |
310 |
|
Limpopo |
92 |
44 |
136 |
2 |
2 |
123 |
123 |
261 |
||
Mpumalanga |
52 |
64 |
116 |
1 |
1 |
91 |
9 |
100 |
217 |
|
Northern Cape |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||||||
North West |
1 |
60 |
66 |
127 |
1 |
1 |
87 |
87 |
215 |
|
Northern Cape |
38 |
25 |
63 |
53 |
14 |
67 |
130 |
|||
WesternCape |
25 |
148 |
173 |
94 |
18 |
112 |
285 |
|||
Grand Total |
1 |
525 |
962 |
1 488 |
9 |
9 |
633 |
72 |
705 |
2 202 |
(c)
Province |
Sum of MVL systems Installed |
Eastern Cape |
113 |
Free State |
18 |
Gauteng |
235 |
KwaZulu Natal |
37 |
Limpopo |
52 |
Mpumalanga |
9 |
North West |
9 |
Grand Total |
473 |
13 March 2017 - NW347
Walters, Mr TC to ask the THE MINISTER OF ARTS AND CULTURE
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) him and (ii) his deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016? REPLY: (i) Minister (bb) As follows: (a)BMW (Pretoria) (b)5 SERIES (c)R740 299.99 (d)23 August 2016 (aaa)None. (bbb)None. (ii) Deputy Minister (aaa)As follows: Pretoria Cape Town (a) Mercedes Benz BMW (b) ML400 X5 (c) R962 793.20 R887 168.34 (d) 15 July 2014 31 July 2014 (bbb)None. (bb)None.
Reply:
(i) Minister
(bb) As follows:
(a) BMW (Pretoria)
(b) 5 SERIES
(c) R740 299.99
(d) 23 August 2016
(aaa) None.
(bbb) None.
(ii) Deputy Minister
(aaa) As follows:
Pretoria |
Cape Town |
|
(a) |
Mercedes Benz |
BMW |
(b) |
ML400 |
X5 |
(c) |
R962 793.20 |
R887 168.34 |
(d) |
15 July 2014 |
31 July 2014 |
(bbb) None.
(bb) None.
13 March 2017 - NW63
McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Health
(1)What were the reasons for shutting down the 24-hour clinic operating in Roshnee, Ward 21, in the Emfuleni Local Municipality; (2) will the specified clinic be reopened; if not, why not; if so, (a) by what date will the clinic be reopened and (b) what facilities will be offered at the clinic when it is reopened?
Reply:
(1) Roshnee clinic is a municipality clinic under the jurisdiction of the then Vereeniging/Kopanong municipality which was amalgamated to form Emfuleni Municipality in the year 2000.
The clinic had four consulting rooms and rendered municipal health services which were provided 8 hours a day, five days a week excluding weekends. The clinic has never operated for 24 hours. The reasons for the closure of the clinic in 2004 were the low utilisation rate as the clinic headcount was less than 400 per month.
The resolution to close an underutilized health facility was adopted to improve the efficient utilisation of available resources as patients were redirected to Rustervaal clinic which was a 1 kilometer away from Roshnee. The decision was taken with the consultation of the community of Roshnee.
(2) No, there are currently no plans to reopen the Roshnee clinic as the services that were rendered by Roshnee clinic are rendered at Rustervaal clinic through a comprehensive integrated Primary Health Care Package. The infrastructure at Rustervaal clinic was upgraded and staffing levels increased over the years to accommodate the PHC Package of Services and the current headcount of 3450 patients per month. When Roshnee clinic was closed down it was handed back to the community and utilized as a center for children with disabilities. The center in its current state is designed to suit the needs of children with disabilities and no longer suitable or compliant for utilisation as a health facility.
END.
13 March 2017 - NW183
Schmidt, Adv H to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
(1) How many mining companies do not have sufficient resources for rehabilitation activities? (2) What steps are being taken to ensure that mining companies comply with the statutory requirements for rehabilitation activities? (3) What steps will his department take against mining companies that do not comply with the law?
Reply:
1. 130
2. The Department issues Pre-compliance Notice in terms of section 31 of NEMA following review of report and outcome of the compliance inspections
3. The Department will issue compliance Notice as part of administrative enforcement. However, if non-compliance persist, criminal enforcement will be persued.
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
13 March 2017 - NW146
James, Dr WG to ask the Minister of Health
How many (a) directors-general, (b) deputy directors-general, (c) chief directors and (d) directors were employed in each provincial department of health of (i) Mpumalanga, (ii) North West, (iii) Northern Cape and (iv) Western Cape at the end of each of the past 10 financial years?
Reply:
The attached table reflects the information as obtained from the Provinces.
ANNEXURE 1
END.
13 March 2017 - NW370
Ross, Mr DC to ask the Minister of Science and Technology
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) her and (ii) her deputy in the (aaa) 2014 – 15 and (bbb) 2015 – 16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016.
Reply:
(i) In the period under review the following vehicles were purchased for use by the Minister of Science of Science and Technology:
(aaa) 2014 – 15 Financial year for Pretoria Office:
- Audi Q7 3.0 TDI 180 kw Q TIP;
- 2015
- R697,733.58 and
- 23 July 2015 (invoice date)
(bbb) 2015 – 16 financial year for Cape Town Office:
- Audi Q7 3.0 TDI quarto;
- 2016
- R798,020.53 and
- 29 March 2016 (invoice date)
(bb) Since 1 April 2016
- No cars were purchased.
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
(ii) In the period under review , no vehicles were purchased for use by the Deputy Minister of Science and Technology.
13 March 2017 - NW261
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
(1) Has the Kidds Beach postal agency in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality in the Eastern Cape been closed down; if so, (a) when was the specified agency closed down, (b) why was it closed down and (c) what alternatives have been arranged to meet the postal requirements of those residing in specified areas (details furnished); (2) Whether any amounts are outstanding and payable to the specified agency; if so, (a) what amount is outstanding and payable to the agency and (b) what is the detailed (i) breakdown and (ii) age analysis of the specified amount
Reply:
I have been informed by SAPO as follows:
1. (a) The Kidds Beach Postal Agency is not yet closed down. It is scheduled to close at the end of April 2017.
(b) The Agency has terminated the agreement with SAPO for personal reasons.
(c) As of May 2017, residents of Kidds Beach and surrounding areas will conduct their postal business at Greenfields Post Office, which is just 25 km away. Private boxes will remain at the Agency building and clients will continue to receive mail from their boxes. The company is still pursuing alternative measures with prospective agents to provide services in the area.
2. (a) The transaction viable amounts for December 2016 and January 2017 are outstanding but have been captured in the system for February 2017 payments. The capturing of these payments is dependent on the date of submission of claims by the Agent.
(b) In terms of the agreement with the current agent, the Post Office cannot divulge any confidential information to any third party without the agent’s express consent.
13 March 2017 - NW06
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Health
(1) Can he indicate, with regard to the high risks of spreading infectious diseases (details furnished), medical checks are carried out on all healthcare professionals upon (a)(i) entry and (ii) exit of hospitals and (b) routinely; if not, why not in each case; if so, what are the relevant details of the frequency of such checks; (2) whether sufficient N95 masks are allocated to hospitals and health professionals; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) The Department of Health undertakes annual assessments of health care professionals against possible infections, generally, through occupational health units located within health facilities. Recently, the Department has decided to put together an additional policy, to look at TB specifically. While the policy is still being developed, with reviews being undertaken by all relevant stakeholders including associations of health professional workers and legal units, it has already been determined that medical checks for TB will be undertaken more frequently. The policy will be implemented once it has been approved by the National Health Council (NHC);
(2) The Department of Health provides N95 masks to all health care professionals and surgical masks for the use of patients. These are however used more consistently in high risk (for infection) areas of health facilities. These masks are provided on the basis of a tender that has been awarded to a service provider, following negotiations for lowering of the masks' prices
END.
13 March 2017 - NW241
Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) Whether Eskom owns any coalmines; if so, (a) which mine(s) and (b) who mines them; (2) whether the specified mines are on Eskom’s balance sheet; if so, what is the value of each mine?
Reply:
1. This question is answered below in two parts, i.e. what Eskom owns directly and
what Eskom owns indirectly. Eskom directly owns one mine, called Kilbarchan Colliery.
Eskom indirectly owns some equity in the cost plus mines as a result of ownership of a portion of the mine assets through the cost plus coal supply agreements (CSA) signed. Mining houses have the statutory right to mine the coal, and the statutory obligation to rehabilitate. Eskom, through the CSA has the financial obligation to pay for these costs. The reserves dedicated to Eskom, can only be sold to Eskom.
In a case where the mining house intends to transfer its rights and obligations Eskom would have to provide consent.It should be noted that the CSAs do not include BEE ownership requirements as the last cost plus agreement was signed prior to Eskom’s current BEE Policy.
(1)(a)(b) Table 1 below presents Eskom’s Cost Plus CSAs. The Colliery column (a) provides the names of the mines and the Mining House (b) column provides the information on who is mining the mine.
Table 1Eskom's current Cost Plus CSAs
Colliery (a) |
Mining House (b) |
B-BBEE Status |
Start of CSA |
Current End of CSA |
Power Station |
Investment made by Eskom, from inception to date |
Annual Contractual Volumes (ktons) |
|
1 |
Kriel |
Anglo |
LME 8 |
Dec 1979 |
Dec 2019 |
Kriel |
R2.4 bn |
8 500 |
2 |
New Denmark[1] |
Anglo |
LME 8 |
Sept 1989 |
Sept 2029 |
Tutuka |
R3.2 bn |
10 000 per CSA 4 500 Assumed |
3 |
New Vaal |
Anglo |
LME 8 |
June 1989 |
June 2029 |
Lethabo |
R1.6 bn |
17 800 |
4 |
Matla |
Exxaro |
BO LME 4 |
July 1983 |
July 2023 |
Matla |
R2.2 bn |
10 066 |
5 |
Khutala |
South32 |
LME 8 |
Dec 1993 |
Dec 2033 |
Kendal |
R1.6 bn |
13 300 |
6 |
Arnot |
Closed mine |
BO LME 4 |
June 1981 |
Dec 2015 |
Arnot |
R0.8 bn |
- |
2. Kilbarchan Colliery is recorded in Eskom’s balance sheet under the subsidiary Natal Navigation Colliery. It is recorded at R1, while the associated rehabilitation liability has been fully raised in Eskom’s financial statements
On cost plus mines, these are not on Eskom’s balance sheet because the direct ownership rests with the mining houses and their balance sheets.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mr. Mogokare Richard Seleke Ms. Lynne Brown, MP
Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises
Date: Date:
-
PQ241 ↑
13 March 2017 - NW363
Terblanche, Ms JF to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) him and (ii) his deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
i. Minister Office
(aaa) 2014/15 Fin Year |
(bbb) 2015-16 Fin year |
(bb) since 1 April 2016 |
(a) N/A |
(a)N/A |
(a) Mercedes Benz E400 |
(b) N/A |
(b) N/A |
(b) 2017 model |
(c) N/A |
(c) N/A |
(c) R1,2 mil |
(d) N/A |
(d) N/A |
(d)February 2017 |
ii. Deputy Minister Office
(aaa) 2014/15 Fin Year |
(bbb) 2015-16 Fin year |
(bb) since 1 April 2016 |
(a) N/A |
(a) N/A |
(a) Porsche Cayanne GTS |
(b) N/A |
(b) N/A |
(b) 2017 model |
(c) N/A |
(c N/A |
(c) R1,3 mil |
(d) N/A |
(d) N/A |
(d) November 2016 |
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
13 March 2017 - NW1975
Boshoff, Ms SH to ask the Minister of Basic Education
(1)Whether provinces have a database and/or statistics on the number of learners with disabilities in (a) full service schools and mainstream schools and (b) schools for learners with special educational needs; (2) (a) on what date was the last audit on schools for learners with special educational needs undertaken, (b) what is the number of the specified schools in each province and (c) what number of learners are enrolled in each school and unaccounted for in each case; (3) what was the expenditure for each learner in (a) schools for learners with special educational needs and (b) full service schools in comparison to learners in mainstream schools in each province in each of the past three financial years; (4) what number of schools for learners with special educational needs have been converted into resource centres in each province in each specified financial year; (5) (a) what number of learners at each school for learners with special educational needs have been identified as erroneously placed in each specified financial year and (b) what measures and/or steps have been taken to ensure that the identified erroneously placed learners are removed and placed in a correct school and assisted in their new classes?
Reply:
(1)(a)(b)
Yes, provinces do have a database and/statistics on the number of learners with disabilities. The Department of Basic Education (DBE) together with Provincial Education Departments (PEDs) conduct three surveys that collects information on learners with disabilities annually, which are: Snap Survey and Annual Survey for Special schools (collect learner enrolment in special schools), and Annual Survey for ordinary schools (collects information on disabled learners in mainstream and full service). Each PED provide their individual databases to DBE, which, in turn, establishes a national database.
(2)(a)
The last survey on schools for learners with Special Needs was conducted on the 01 September 2016, which was the Annual Survey for Special schools.
(2)(b)(c)
Table 1 below indicates the number of special schools surveyed in 2016. It shows that there were 462 special schools in 2016 with 119 403 learners.
Table 1: Number of special schools and learners, by province, in 2016
Province |
(b) Number of Special Schools |
(c) Number of learners in Special schools |
EC |
43 |
9 463 |
FS |
21 |
5 984 |
GP |
149 |
47 769 |
KZ |
65 |
14 986 |
LP |
35 |
8 630 |
MP |
20 |
3 778 |
NC |
11 |
1 494 |
NW |
32 |
7 395 |
WC |
86 |
19 904 |
National |
462 |
119 403 |
Source: 2016 SNE SNAP Survey
(3)(a)(b)
The Department has forwarded the question to the Provincial Education Department and is awaiting the response. The response will be forwarded as soon as the Department receives it.
(4)
Table 2: Number of special schools converted into resource centres by province, in 2017/18 financial year
Prov. |
No. SSRCs |
EC |
19 |
FS |
5 |
GT |
17 |
KZN |
16 |
LP |
5 |
MP |
8 |
NC |
5 |
NW |
8 |
WC |
25 |
Total |
108 |
Source: PED’s submission
(5) (a) The information on the number of learners at each school for learners with special educational needs who have been erroneously placed in each financial year is not readily available in Provincial Education Departments (PEDs), given that the implementation to scale of the Policy on Screening, Identification, Assessment and Support (SIAS) at school level was preceded by training mainly during 2016/17 and effective implementation has only started in 2017.
(b) Measures in this regard will be put in place from 2018 onwards.
13 March 2017 - NW260
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
(1) What is the frequency of physical mail deliveries to the Serenitas Retirement Village situated at 51 General Hertzog Drive, Dan Pienaar, Bloemfontein; (2) Whether (a) he and/or (b) SAPO is aware of the dumping of three bags of mail on the pavement of the neighbouring Gracia’s Retirement Village on 9 January 2017; if so, what steps have been taken (i) against the person responsible for the dumping of the specified bags and (ii) to ensure that mail (aa) is not dumped again and (bb) is delivered reliably and regularly to the residents residing at the specified address?
Reply:
I have been informed by SAPO as follows:
1. Mail is delivered at the Serenitas Retirement Village every second day.
2. The so-called “dumped mail” seen at the gate of Gracia’a Retirement Village on 09 January 2017, was for delivery at the Serenitas Retirement Village. When the volume for delivery in an area is too much for the postman to carry, excess mail is prepared and placed in an excess mail bag called dump bag. The bag is then transported by vehicle to a convenient spot, in this case, Gracia’s Retirement Village, where the postman will collect and deliver further. No dumping of mail took place.
13 March 2017 - NW15
Kruger, Mr HC to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
With reference to President Jacob G Zuma’s undertaking in his State of the Nation Address delivered on 12 February 2015, that the Government will set aside 30% of appropriate categories of state procurement for purchasing from Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises (SMMEs), co-operatives, as well as township and rural enterprises, what percentage of the total procurement of (a) her department and (b) every entity reporting to her went to (i) SMMEs and (ii) co-operatives from 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available?”
Reply:
For purposes of the response, the payments to SMMEs and co-operatives cannot be separated as these are recorded together.
Information below covers the period from 01 April 2015 to 31 March 2016.
(a) The Department of Small Business Development (DSBD)
The total procurement on goods and services in respect of the 30% set aside target is as follows:
No |
Description |
LOGIS transactions |
BAS transactions |
Total |
% |
(i) and (ii) |
SMME’s and Cooperatives |
R11 715 235.01 |
10,332,498.72 |
22,047,733.73 |
69.34% |
(iii) |
Non-SMME’s |
R18 450.00 |
9,728,481.73 |
9,746,931.73 |
30.66% |
Total procurement |
11,733,685.01 |
20,060,980.45 |
31,794,665.46 |
100.00% |
In addition the R3.5 million spent on capital assets was procured through the SMME’s.
(b) Entities reporting to the DSBD
The Small Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA)
The Small Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA) total procurement on goods and services in respect of the 30% set aside target is as follows:
No |
Description |
Total |
% |
(i) and (ii) |
SMME’s and Co-operatives |
R255m |
56% |
(iii) |
Non-SMME’s |
R200m |
44% |
Total procurement |
R455m |
100% |
The Small Enterprise Finance Agency (SEFA)
The R 126,016,582 total procurement on goods and services in respect of the 30% set aside target is as follows:
No |
Description |
Total |
% |
(i) and (ii) |
SMME’s and Co- operatives |
R 88, 211,607.40 |
70% |
(iii) |
Non-SMME’s |
R 37, 804,974.60 |
30% |
Total procurement |
R 126,016,582 |
13 March 2017 - NW283
Shinn, Ms MR to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
(1) (a) What is the (i) number and (ii) the value of the shares that the Government holds as a shareholder in Telkom as at 31 January 2017, (b) how many directors is Government required to appoint to Telkom’s Board in terms of its shareholding, (c) who are the Government’s appointees to Telkom’s Board and (d) when were they appointed; (2) Are there any plans to (a) change the specified directors or (b) appoint new directors to the Telkom Board; if so, in each case, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
I have been informed by Telkom as follows:
1. (a)(i) 207 038 058 Shares
(ii) R15 244 212 210.54 as on 31 January 2017 (Government shareholdings have not changed since the previous reporting period- September 2016)
(b) Government is not required to appoint any directors to the Telkom Board.
(c) Telkom does not have any government appointees on their current Board.
(d) No appointments
(2) (a) It is the prerogative of the Board on the recommendations of the Nominations Committee subject to Shareholder approval.
(b) It is the prerogative of the Board on the recommendations of the Nominations Committee subject to Shareholder approval.
10 March 2017 - NW192
Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Tourism
(1) Whether, with reference to the National Tourism Strategy, any progress has been made in identifying municipal and other government-owned resorts and properties that are not being optimally used or under-utilised; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) What are the relevant details of the specified projects for each of the past three financial years?
Reply:
- The audit that the Department conducted in partnership with the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) provided a baseline of municipal and provincially owned tourism assets. This report was made available to all provinces for project and budget planning purposes.
- The Department of Tourism has not support any project based on the outcomes of the report as yet. However, province would in a better position to share further detailed information regarding their respective tourism assets.
10 March 2017 - NW376
Rabotapi, Mr MW to ask the Minister of Tourism
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) him and (ii) his deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016
Reply:
1. Minister
No vehicles were purchased for the Minister during 2014/15 and 2015/2016 Financial Years
2. Deputy- Minister
Year |
(a)Make |
(b)Model |
(c ) Price |
(d)Date |
|
(aa) Financial Year |
(aaa) 2014-2015 |
Audi Q7 TDI (Pretoria) Mercedes Benz (Cape Town) |
2014 2014 |
R878 701.47 R762 443.19 |
17 January 2015 19 February 2015 |
(bbb) 2015-2016 |
None |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
(bb) Since |
1 April 2016 |
None |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
10 March 2017 - NW247
Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Police
(a) What is the danger allowance rate for police and (b) when was the last time it was reviewed and increased?
Reply:
A. The Danger Allowance Dispensation was terminated in 2001 in the South African Police Service (SAPS) with the conclusion of Safety and Security Sectoral Bargaining Council (SSSBC) Agreement 4 of 2001.
Agreement 4/2001, introduced a Service Allowance,taking into consideration the unique situation of the SAPS with regard to the affordability of the danger allowance and other allowances. The Agreement was a consolidation of the Danger Allowance, Special Danger Allowance and Standby Allowance into one amount of R400,00.
B. The amount has never been reviewed since 2001, and it is currently on the agenda of the SSSBC, for review.
10 March 2017 - NW353
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Energy
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) her and (ii) her deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
(i). The Minister
No new vehicles were purchased in (aaa) 2014-15; (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
- Not applicable (
(ii). The Deputy Minister
No new vehicles were purchased in (aaa) 2014-15; (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
- Not applicable
10 March 2017 - NW277
Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform
Whether, with reference to his replies to questions 1727 and 1728 on 9 September 2016, there were any outstanding land claims for Mala Mala at the time that payments were made and land handed over to the specified beneficiaries; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the full relevant details; (2) whether any of the beneficiaries were not verified at the time that payments were made and land handed over to the beneficiaries; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, who are they collectively; (3) what is the detailed reason for the upwards valuation per hectare of the purchase price in the Mala Mala claim?
Reply:
1. With reference to question 1727, the paymentmade was for Kruger National Park not for Malamala.
With reference to question 1728, the Commission on Restitution of Land Rights (CRLR) received 24 land claims lodged by individuals/ communities against the properties belonging toSabie Sand Game Resrve. Malamala Game Reserve is within Sabie Sand Game Reserve.
The claimants have lodged claims in the area against 21 properties, consisting of 63 portions, measuring 65 000 hectares. The CRLR has by now managed to partially restore 6 properties, consisting of 9 portions, measuring 13 184 hectares, which properties used to belong to MalaMala Game Reserve.
2. In terms of the Restitution process, verification which entails compiling a list of originally dispossessed individuals and their households,was completed before the approval and handover. A Communal Property Association was set up and is called Nwandlamhari Communal Property Association.
3. The agreed (average market related) price per hectare was done after an extensive analysis of comparable sales by three valuation experts who were representing all the three parties involved in the court case; namely, the Minister through the Commission, Landowners and Claimants.
The court had also concluded that the compensation which the State will have to pay in the event of expropriation will be at least a ballpark figure of R791, 289, 492 in respect of the land and the improvement thereon. This amount did not include any amount for actual financial loss which the the landowners were likely to claim, and if considered, the eventual compensation would be in excess of R1 billion rand.
The upwards valuation per hectare of the purchase price in the MalaMala land claim was justified taking into account that valuation was first commissioned in 2007, and settlement only happened during 2012/2013 financial year. The final offer was also guided by the provisions of Section 25 of the Constitution.
10 March 2017 - NW242
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform
In light of recent revelations about his alleged corrupt involvement in pressuring his departmental officials to hand over the Bekendvlei Farm in Limpopo which was bought for R97 million, to certain persons (names and details furnished), (a) does he intend to resign in order to allow for investigation into this matter to go ahead without his interference and (b) has he done an audit of all farms handed over through the Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy and Recapitalisation and Development Programme to verify that there was no corruption in the manner in which the specified farms were handed over?
Reply:
- No, I do not intend to resign. I have referred the matter to the Office of the Public Protector for investigation as the complainant. I have also requested that a lifestyle audit be conducted on me, from 1994 when I became a public representative as Speaker of the Eastern Cape Provincial Legislature (1994 – 1999); as MEC: Housing, Local Government and Traditional Affairs (1999 – 2004); as MEC: Agriculture (2004 to 2009); and, as Minister for Rural Development and Land Reform (2009 to date).
- Yes. In the 2011/12 financial year, I requested the President to issue a Proclamation (R23 of 2012) to authorise the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) to investigate allegations of theft, fraud, corruption and maladministration in relation to the Land Reform Programme of the Department. These investigations are currently ongoing. As a result of these investigations, several farms have been seized by the Asset Forfeiture Unit; and,29 (1 Eastern Cape, 2 Free State and 26 KwaZulu Natal) of these were handed back to the Department during November 2016. Some of these matters are currently before the Courts.
As a result of the magnitude of the allegations of maladministration, financial mismanagement and/or fraud and corruption in certain PLAS and Recap farms, the then head of the SIU, Advocate Soni, requested the Department to conduct scoping exercises with a view to narrowing down forensic and related investigations for effective results. I,then, initiated several internal scoping and external forensic investigations, including Bekendvlei, into alleged irregularities in relation to the PLAS and Recap Farms. The Department is currently implementing the recommendations of the completed reports, in this regard.
10 March 2017 - NW245
Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Energy
(1) (a) What amount does Eskom pay Independent Power Producers (IPPs) compared to coal production for electricity production and (b) what is the Eskom retail price compared to the price Eskom pays to IPPs and coal; (2) (a) for how long are contracts signed with each IPP, (b) what is Eskom BBEEE policy for Independent Power Producers and (c) are all IPPs BBEEE compliant? (2) (a) for how long are contracts signed with each IPP, (b) what is Eskom BBEEE policy for Independent Power Producers and (c) are all IPPs BBEEE compliant?
Reply:
(1)(a)
The average price payable under the Renewable Energy (RE) IPP Programme, covering the production coming only from the RE projects signed in 2011, ending 30 September 2016 was 218 c/kWh, whereas for the RE projects announced in 2015, the production cost averages 62 c/kWh.
Eskom aggregate cost of coal produced electricity in 2016 is s 44.1 c/kWh. Kindly note that in order to make a like for like comparison, the Eskom marginal cost of production of coal generated power (determined by Medupi and Kusile) is not known as yet, but is believed to be in excess of 100 c/kWh.
(1)(b)
The average Eskom winter tariff is 105.1 c / kWh and the summer tariff is 73.5 c / kWh. The average annual Eskom tariff is 81.4 c / kWh, and it will escalate according to the tariff increase application to be submitted to NERSA (Eskom has applied for further tariff increases in the period from 2016 onwards and it is not as yet clear where this will end). In order to compare Eskom’s production costs to the production costs under the coal IPP Programme, the two coal IPPs will sell the electricity at 80,955 c/kWh and 79,71c/kWh respectively, without any tariff increases (the only escalation will be for inflation) for the next 30 years. We expect Eskom’s aggregate tariff to increase even higher than for IPPs within the next 3 years.
(2)(a)
Renewable Energy IPP contracts have a term of 20 years.
2(b)
The B-BBEE policy as promulgated under the BBEEE Act applies to IPPs as well.
2(c)
All IPPs are BBEEE compliant.
10 March 2017 - NW163
Bozzoli, Prof B to ask the Minister of Police
Are there any investigations of corruption that are currently being undertaken by the (a) SA Police Service or (b) any other law enforcement agency at technical and vocational education and training colleges; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(a)(b) There were no cases reported to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation on corruption allegations at any of the educational institutions in question.
10 March 2017 - NW386
Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)What is the total amount of full-time equivalents students (FTE’s) who studied through the public technical and vocational education and training (TVET) Colleges during the (a) 2014, (b) 2015 and (c) 2016 academic years; (2) what was the total amount paid out to all TVET colleges by his department in each of the specified academic years as (a) contributions via the Personnel Salary System, (b) other subsidies toward staff costs, (c) contributions towards capital expenditure and (d) any other transfers in support of the operating costs of each TVET college?
Reply:
1. Relating to Ministerial approved programmes, i.e. National Certificate (Vocational) and Report 191 excluding occupational programmes, the number of students are as follows:
Financial Year |
|
|
2016/17 (Original) |
(c) 2016/17 (Revised) |
Target Headcount |
650 000 |
660 000 |
755 000 |
664 748 |
Actual Headcount |
670 455 |
664 748 |
To be confirmed |
To be confirmed |
Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTE’s) |
325 507 |
322 737 |
368 888 |
322 737 |
Funded FTE’s |
235 714 |
233 708 |
238 744 |
233 708 |
Unfunded FTE’s |
89 793 |
89 029 |
130 144 |
89 029 |
2. TVET Fiscus budget allocations:
Funding Classification |
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
R’000 |
R’000 |
R’000 |
|
|
2 540 505 |
4 943 262 |
5 168 971 |
|
1 796 776 |
Shifted to compensation of employees due to migration on 1 April 2015 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 399 051 |
1 140 945 |
1 274 848 |
Total Budget Allocation |
5 736 332 |
6 179 574 |
6 443 819 |
The total fiscus funded budget for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges for 2014/15 was R5.7 billion increasing to R6.4 billion in 2016/17. The budget caters for the salary costs and operational costs relating to the TVET Colleges. Based on the National Norms and Standards for funding TVET Colleges (NNSF-TVET), the budgets should be applied to the following economic categories:
Category |
Percentage |
Compensation of employees |
63% |
Non-personnel Non-Capital |
27% |
Capital infrastructure maintenance (repairs and maintenance) |
10% |
Total |
100% |
Compensation of Employees:
In 2014/15, subsidies towards staff costs were made to TVET colleges for salary costs of employees who were appointed and paid by the College Council as a Conditional Grant via the Provincial Education Departments. These employees were offering Ministerial approved programmes. From 1 April 2015, these employees were migrated to the Department as part of the function shift processes and the Provincial Conditional Grant was discontinued.
Capital Expenditure:
Since the last recapitalisation of TVET Colleges in 2009, no additional funding was allocated by the National Treasury to supplement capital expenditure at TVET colleges.
Transfers and Subsidies:
These funds are directly transferred to TVET colleges in three payments each year. These funds are mainly used to cater for operational costs such as water, electricity, services, learner and teaching materials, protective clothing, etc. in order to deliver effective and efficient teaching and learning.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 386 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
10 March 2017 - NW248
Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Police
(a) What is the total number of police stations or satellite police stations that were opened since 1994 to date in (i) Limpopo, (ii) North-West, (iii) Gauteng and (iv) Mpumalanga provinces, (b) how many were subsequently closed and (c) what are the reasons for closure in each case?
Reply:
(a),(i) to (iv); (b) and (c)
The table below reflects the total number of police stations or satellite police stations that were opened since 1994, to date, in (i) Limpopo, (ii) Gauteng, (iii) Mpumalanga and (iv) North West provinces, (b) and the number of police stations that were subsequently closed and the reasons for their closure:
PROVINCE |
POLICE STATION |
SATELLITE |
YEAR OPENED (since 1994 to date) |
YEAR CLOSED |
REASONS FOR CLOSURE |
Limpopo |
Muyexe |
2010 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Bandelierkop |
2010 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Mashashane |
2012 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Masemola |
2011 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Westenburg |
2012 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Muswodi |
2016 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Vhulaudzi |
2016 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Mokwakwaila |
2015 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Botlokwa |
2010 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Rakgoadi |
2015 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Matlerekeng |
2016 |
Operational |
||
Limpopo |
Sebayeng |
2013 |
Operational |
||
Gauteng |
Orange Farms |
|
1997 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Ivory Park |
|
1997 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Marabastad |
2010 |
2015 |
The Community didnot want it anymore |
Gauteng |
|
Munsieville |
1998 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Zandspruit |
2008 |
Operational |
Poor facilities |
Gauteng |
|
Welverdiend |
1998 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Kocksoord |
2001 |
1999 |
Investigation underway to re-open it |
Gauteng |
Katlehong North |
|
2012 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Zonkizizwe |
|
2002 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Midrand |
|
2005 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Temba |
|
2006 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Bekkersdal |
|
2012 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Moffatview |
|
2012 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Mamelodi East |
|
2007 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Eersterust |
|
2008 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Azaadville |
2006 |
2010 |
Closed due to Sector Policing being implemented |
Gauteng |
|
Geluksdal |
1996 |
2011 |
Closed due to the new TsakanePolice Station which is 1 km away from the Satellite |
Gauteng |
|
Zuurbekom |
2012 |
Operational |
Operational daily from 08:00 to 16:00 |
Gauteng |
Vaal Marina |
|
2012 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Tembisa South |
|
2014 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Morula Sun |
1998 |
2014 |
Insufficient personnel - Sector Policing |
Gauteng |
|
Phutanong |
1999 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Braam Fischer |
2014 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Glenharvie |
2015 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Melville |
1994 |
2005 |
Insufficient Personnel - Sector Policing |
Gauteng |
|
Zithobeni |
2002 |
2014 |
Burned down by community |
Gauteng |
Moffatview |
|
2012 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
Olievenhoutbosch |
|
2010 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Cosmo City |
2010 |
Operational |
|
Gauteng |
|
Thembelihle |
2002 |
2011 |
Personnel Shortage (Security of SAPS members) |
PROVINCE |
POLICE STATION |
SATELLITE |
YEAR OPENED (since 1994 to date) |
YEAR CLOSED |
REASONS FOR CLOSURE |
Mpumalanga |
Pienaar |
|
2004 |
Operational |
|
Mpumalanga |
Mbuzini |
|
2013 |
Operational |
|
Mpumalanga |
Phola |
|
2016 |
Operational |
|
Mpumalanga |
|
Ximhungwe |
2009 |
Operational |
|
Mpumalanga |
|
Daggakraal |
2000 |
Operational |
|
Mpumalanga |
|
Driefontein |
1998 |
Operational |
|
Mpumalanga |
Badfontein |
2003 |
Operational |
||
Mpumalanga |
|
Siyathemba |
Post 1994 |
2000 |
Burned down during public protests |
Mpumalanga |
|
Emjindini |
Post 1994 |
2015 |
Burned down during public protests |
Mpumalanga |
|
Botleng |
Post 1994 |
2010 |
Building dilapidated |
Mpumalanga |
|
Tjakastad |
Post 1994 |
2015 |
Burned down during public protests |
Mpumalanga |
|
Kwazamokuhle |
Post 1994 |
2013 |
Burned down during public protests |
Mpumalanga |
|
Msogwaba |
Post 1994 |
2004 |
New Police Station constructed (Pienaar) |
Mpumalanga |
|
Daanjie |
Post 1994 |
2004 |
New Police Station constructed (Pienaar) |
Mpumalanga |
|
Hectorspuit |
Post 1994 |
2009 |
Insufficient Workload |
Mpumalanga |
|
Lebohang |
Post 1994 |
2008 |
Burned down during public protests |
Mpumalanga |
|
Badfontein |
Post 1994 |
2014 |
Insufficient workload |
Mpumalanga |
|
Dundonald |
Post 1994 |
2015 |
New Police Station in Planning Phase |
Mpumalanga |
|
Phola |
Post 1994 |
2015 |
Upgraded to a Fully Fledged Police Station |
Mpumalanga |
|
Thuthukani |
Post 1994 |
2011 |
Burned down during public protests |
Mpumalanga |
|
Phungutsha |
Post 1994 |
2014 |
Police Station under construction |
Mpumalanga |
|
Kamhlushwa |
Post 1994 |
2014 |
Police Station under construction |
PROVINCE |
POLICE STATION |
SATELLITE |
YEAR OPENED (since 1994 to date) |
YEAR CLOSED |
REASONS FOR CLOSURE |
North West |
|
Tigane |
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Skeerpoort |
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
Hebron |
|
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
Huhudi |
|
2006 |
Operational |
Satellite upgraded to Police Station |
North West |
|
Dinokana |
1998 |
Operational |
|
North West |
Lethabong |
|
1996 |
Operational |
|
North West |
Lichtenburg |
2010 |
Operational |
|
|
North West |
|
Disaneng |
2000 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Wonderkop |
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Bapong |
2016 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Freedom Park |
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Monakato |
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Waterfall Mall |
2013 |
Operational |
|
North West |
Sun City |
|
1998 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Mabeskraal |
2004 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Kokomeng |
1998 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Zinniaville |
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
|
Braklaagte |
2010 |
Operational |
|
North West |
Bapong |
|
Being built, not opened yet |
|
|
North West |
MoekaVuma |
|
Being built, not opened yet |
|
|
North West |
Mareetsane |
|
Being built, not opened yet |
|
|
North West |
Mabeskraal |
|
Being built, not opened yet |
|
|
North West |
Dwarsberg |
|
Being built, not opened yet |
|
|
10 March 2017 - NW166
Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Police
Does the SA Police Service have a mandate to initiate lifestyle audits on citizens of the country; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what legislation is applicable in this process, (b) what requisite legislation needs to be in place before such an instruction is given, (c) which person and/or department is responsible for (i) approving the lifestyle audit and (ii) investigating the lifestyle audit and (d) what procedural steps has his department taken to implement a lifestyle audit?
Reply:
No.
A. The Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act No. 121 of 1998) provides for asset forfeiture in respect of the proceeds of crime or instrumentalities of crime. The Service may conduct investigations where a person has allegedly benefited from crime. The outcome of such investigations must be reported to the Asset Forfeiture Unit of the National Prosecuting Authority to facilitate the forfeiture of assets.
B. Section 23 of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, 2004 (Act No. 12 of 2004) provides that the National Director of Public Prosecutions (“NDPP”), may apply to a judge for an investigative direction in respect of a person who maintains a standard of living which is not proportionate to his or her past or present income or assets. If the application is authorised, the NDPP may question the suspect or any other person to produce evidence or to answer questions.
C. (i) See above.
(ii) Not applicable.
D. Not applicable.
10 March 2017 - NW12
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
What are the full relevant details of the R15 billion spent by government departments to support small, micro and medium enterprises and co-operatives in the 2015-16 financial year, as indicated by her department’s Director-General in a presentation to the SME Policy Colloquium at Esselen Park on 27 October 2016, in terms of (a) what amount each of the departments spent and (b) what kind of support each department provided in each case?”
Reply:
The table below provides the amounts as budgeted for, for the different programmes in the different department in the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) period.
Spending in terms of the budgeted allocation for the current financial year will only be available after the financial year.
The table below also provides information in terms of the kind or type of support each department will provide with regard to the budgeted amounts.
Department |
Incentives/Initiative/Public Entity |
Briefly explain Purpose/Possible Duplication within Government |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
Total MTEF |
R'000 |
R'000 |
R'000 |
R'000 |
|||
DHS (NURCHA) |
Loans to emerging contractors |
Affordable housing development |
345 000 |
360 000 |
390 000 |
1 095 000 |
DHS (NURCHA) |
Loans to emerging contractors |
Infrastructure development |
180 000 |
180 000 |
270 000 |
630 000 |
DHS (RHLF) |
Incremental loans to retail intermediaries and CBO's for housing development in rural areas |
Rural housing financing and development |
225 000 |
277 000 |
305 400 |
807 400 |
DSBD |
Black Business Supplier Development Programme |
Is a cost sharing grant offered to small black-owned enterprises to help them in improving the competitiveness and sustainability |
245 000 |
256 750 |
270 953 |
772 703 |
DSBD |
Cooperatives Incentive Scheme |
Is a cost sharing grant offered to cooperatives to help them in improving the competitiveness and sustainability |
75 000 |
78 750 |
83 318 |
237 068 |
DSBD |
Industrial Development Corporation: Craft customised Sector Programme |
Establishment of a Sector Coordinating Body, Enterprise Development Programme, Establishment of Craft Hubs, Market Access and Research and Development |
10 000 |
10 000 |
10 000 |
30 000 |
DSBD |
National Informal Business Upliftment Scheme |
To create a conductive business environment for informal businesses and provide adequate skills and infrastructure |
95 698 |
99 406 |
103 138 |
298 242 |
DSBD |
Enterprise Incubation Programme |
To provide funding for incubators that can generate revenue through the provision of services and initiatives that can be self-sustainable |
46 274 |
49 665 |
54 737 |
150 676 |
DSBD |
Small Enterprise Development Agency |
Provides non-financial support through advice, consultancy, training, and monitoring, and assisting SMMEs with technology through the technology programme. |
633 814 |
743 132 |
786 233 |
2 163 179 |
DMR |
Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa (IDC) |
Implementation of small scale mining projects |
27 434 |
28 805 |
30 476 |
86 715 |
DMR |
Marginal Mines |
This entails providing subsidies to marginal mines to pump extraneous water from underground mine openings; and researching, developing and implementing strategic solutions for mine water management. |
5 275 |
5 555 |
5 877 |
16 707 |
Tourism |
Tourism Incentive Programme |
To assist SMMEs to participate in local and international trade exhibitions, thus creating direct linkages with international tourism companies. |
188 931 |
188 002 |
198 777 |
575 710 |
DST |
Technology Innovation Agency |
To support the development and commercialisation of new products from SME through the technology station and technology platform programmes |
382 364 |
396 732 |
420 322 |
1 199 418 |
RURAL |
Rural Enterprise and Industrial Development |
The creation of an enabling institutional environment for sustainable rural development, |
390 628 |
417 478 |
449 986 |
1 258 092 |
DAFF |
Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme |
Provides post settlement support to targeted beneficiaries of land reform and redistribution |
1 565 090 |
1 678 413 |
1 769 821 |
5 013 324 |
DAFF |
Cooperatives and Rural Enterprise Development |
Facilitates and supports the development of businesses to ensure the transformation of the agriculture, forestry and fisheries products |
120 334 |
73 119 |
74 880 |
268 333 |
DAFF |
Agro-processing and Marketing |
Develops and implements support programmes to promote market access and value addition for agriculture, forestry and fisheries products |
55 921 |
63 425 |
66 662 |
186 008 |
EDD |
Small Enterprise Finance Agency |
Focuses on developing SMMEs by providing access to finance. |
213 124 |
223 780 |
236 759 |
673 663 |
Total Spending on SMMEs
|
4 804 887 |
5 130 012 |
5 527 339 |
15 462 238 |
10 March 2017 - NW438
Marais, Mr EJ to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
Whether, with reference to the costs of R41 775, 42 that were incurred by the Agricultural Sector Education and Training Authority (AgriSETA) for the rental of a vehicle on behalf of its board chairperson for the period 18 to 22 October 2016, AgriSETA incurred similar costs in support of board member’s travel and accommodation in the past three financial years; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
The Agricultural Sector Education and Training Authority (AgriSETA) did not incur similar costs in support of board members’ travel and accommodation in the past three financial years.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
MR GF QONDE
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 438 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
10 March 2017 - NW175
Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the Minister of Police
Whether CAS 61/12/2015 lodged at the Richards Bay Police Station on or around the first week of December 2015 has been forwarded to the National Prosecuting Authority for prosecution; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will the specified case be forwarded for prosecution; if so, what are the relevant details of all charges laid in the case?
Reply:
Richards Bay CAS 61/12/2015 was sent to court on 2 November 2016 for decision.
The docket was returned to the investigating officer on 14 December 2016 with follow-up directives and a submission date of on or before 24 February 2017. The charge sheet will only be drafted by the Prosecutor once a decision on the charges to be laid is finalised.
10 March 2017 - NW10
Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
(1) (a) How many (i) primary and (ii) secondary co-operatives have been funded by (aa) her department and (bb) the Department of Trade and Industry under the Co-operative Incentive Scheme since the establishment of the specified scheme and (b) what is the (i) total amount of grant money spent on the specified co-operatives by each department and (ii) detailed breakdown of the specified spending in each (aa) province and (bb) each relevant financial year to date; (2) whether any of the specified co-operatives are still operating; if not, in each case, why not; if so, in each case, what are the relevant details for each province?”
Reply:
(1)(a)(i)(aa) Primaryco-operatives have been funded by the Department of Small Business Development
CO-OPERATIVE INCENTIVE SCHEME |
|||||
DEPARTMENT |
YEAR |
NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS APPROVED |
VALUE OF APPLICATIONS APPROVED |
ESTIMATED NO OF JOB CREATED |
VALUE OF DISBURSEMENT |
Small Business Development |
2014-15 |
207 |
R 56 103 695 |
1359 |
R 64 965 564 |
Small Business Development |
2015-16 |
247 |
R 84 423 016 |
1872 |
R 75 000 000 |
Small Business Development |
2016-YTD |
172 |
R52 891 797.54 |
1115 |
R 47 214 253.97 |
Total A |
626 |
R 193 418 508.54 |
3603 |
R 187 179 817.97 |
Table 1 – CIS under DSBD
Breakdown of funded primary cooperatives under DSBD
Link for Table 2.1 below depicts DSBD CIS programme data for the 2014/15 Financial Year
Link for Table 2.2 below depicts DSBD CIS programme data for the 2015/16 Financial Year (Primary Co-operatives)
Link for Table 2.3 below depicts DSBD CIS programme data for the period April 2016 to date
(1)(a)(ii)(aa) Secondary co-operatives have been funded by the Department of Small Business Development
There was only one secondary co-operative supported, information is provided in the table below:
Table 3
TOTAL NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES 2015/16 (SECONDARY MARKETING) |
|||||
Province |
No. of Approved Projects |
Approved Amount |
% Per Province |
Total Supported |
Total |
Limpopo |
1 |
R7,648,690.00 |
100 |
1 |
R7,648,690.00 |
(1)(a)(i)(bb) Primaryco-operatives have been funded by the Department of Trade and Industry (the dti)
Table 4 below depicts thedti CIS programme data for primary co-operatives:
CO-OPERATIVE INCENTIVE SCHEME |
|||||
Department |
YEAR |
NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS APPROVED |
VALUE OF APPLICATIONS APPROVED |
ESTIMATED NO OF JOB CREATED |
VALUE OF DISBURSEMENT |
Trade and Industry |
2008/09 |
93 |
R 14 634 075 |
744 |
R 9 330 000 |
Trade and Industry |
2009/10 |
224 |
R 47 345 447 |
1792 |
R 34 523 371 |
Trade and Industry |
2010/11 |
235 |
R 55 228 903 |
1880 |
R 44 170 626 |
Trade and Industry |
2011/12 |
182 |
R 47 824 520 |
1456 |
R 52 555 674 |
Trade and Industry |
2012/13 |
314 |
R 85 323 599 |
2512 |
R 64 979 000 |
Trade and Industry |
2013/14 |
243 |
R 62 331 729 |
1944 |
R 75 479 830 |
Total (B) |
1291 |
R 312 688 273 |
10328 |
R 281 038 501 |
(1)(a)(ii)(bb) Secondary co-operatives have been funded by the Department of Trade and Industry
No secondary co-operatives were funded by the Department of Trade and Industry
Table 5: Grand Total
Department |
Number of approved projects |
Value approved |
Estimated no. of jobs supported |
Disbursements |
Small Business Development |
626 |
R 193 418 508 |
3603 |
R 187 179 818 |
Trade and Industry |
1291 |
R 312 688 273 |
10328 |
R 281 038 501 |
Grand Total |
1917 |
R 506 106 782 |
13 931 |
R 468 218 319 |
2. Specified co-operatives still operating
Not all the funded projects have been visited after implementation of the interventions. Post investment support is done on a sampling basis.
Link to Table 5 below depicts CIS post investment verification for the financial years 2013/14 and 2014/15
NB: There are still 165 fully paid projects that are in the process of being monitored.
It should be noted that the function of monitoring was done by the monitoring and evaluation Chief Directorate under the dti when the CIS Unit was still part of the department. Therefore, due to capacity constraints, only one hundred and eighteen projects were visited post disbursement and plans are afoot to remedy the situation into the future.
The CIS Unit and Seda are currently piloting a working relationship whereby all new applications will be received through Seda branches and as well as conducting post disbursements visits to all funded cooperatives. The CIS unit has not been able to fully perform this function after being migrated from the dti to the DSBD. Post investment support was conducted through a chief directorate unit focusing on Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E) while the CIS Unit was still at the dti. the dti was able to publish two M & E reports for financial years 2013/14 and 2014/15. Since migration no full M& E has been conducted to date.
10 March 2017 - NW378
Rabotapi, Mr MW to ask the Minister of Transport
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) her and (ii) her deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
(i) MINISTER
Inherited from Minister Ben Martins
|
YZB713GP |
BZ93DBGP |
(a) Make |
BMW |
LEXUS |
(b) Model |
X5 |
LX570 |
(c ) Price |
R 789 924.00 |
R1 084 312.37 |
(d) Date of purchase |
Apr-10 |
Aug-12 |
(ii) DEPUTY MINISTER
|
CA954053 |
BZ84KGGP |
(a) Make |
BMW |
BMW |
(b) Model |
X6 |
535i Gran Turismo |
(c ) Price |
R 790 000.00 |
R789 634.50 |
(d) Date of purchase |
Sep-12 |
Aug-12 |
(aa) (aaa) 2014-15
The vehicles mentioned in (i) and (ii) above, were used by the Principals during this period.
(aa) (bbb) 2015-16
The vehicles mentioned in (i) and (ii) above, were used by the Principals during this period.
(bb) since 1 April 2016
The vehicles mentioned in (i) and (ii) above, were used by the Principals during this period.
10 March 2017 - NW201
Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police
(a) How many raids did the SA Police Service conduct at a certain address (details furnished) (i) in 2015, (ii) in 2016 and (iii) since 1 January 2017, (b) what was confiscated in each raid and (c) how many persons were arrested in each raid?
Reply:
(a) (i)(ii)(iii) There were no raids conducted at a certain address (details furnished) in 2015, 2016 and since 1 January 2017.
(b) (c) Not Applicable
10 March 2017 - NW357
Van Dalen, Mr P to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) him and (ii) his deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
The response is tabulated below.
Member of Parliament |
|
(b) Model |
(c) Price |
(d) Date |
Financial Year |
(i) Minister |
Not applicable |
(aaa) 2014/15 |
|||
Audi |
Audi Q7 |
R680 878.04 |
29 September 2015 |
(bbb) 2015/16 |
|
Not applicable |
(bb) Since 1 April 2016 |
||||
(ii) Deputy Minister |
Not applicable |
(aaa) 2014/15 |
|||
BMW |
335GT |
R727 770.02 |
7 March 2016 |
(bbb) 2015/16 |
|
Not applicable |
(bb) Since 1 April 2016 |
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 357 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
10 March 2017 - NW429
Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Energy
What amount did Eskom pay annually for diesel from (a) long term or fixed contractors and (b) short or medium term noncontractors (i) in the (aa) 2012-13, (bb) 2013-14, (cc) 2014-15 and (dd) 2015-16 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
The Department received the question, reviewed its contents against its mandate and has determined that the most appropriate respondent should be the Department of Public Enterprises.
09 March 2017 - NO03
None to ask the None
MINISTRY: PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY QUESTION FOR ORAL REPLY DATE:8 MARCH 2017 QUESTION NO.: 3 MS R M M LESOMA (ANC) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION: Whether his department has developed a monitoring instrument to assess the (a) implementation of and (b) compliance with the Protected Disclosures Act, Act 26 of 2000?NO357E REPLY No. The Minister for Public Service and Administration is not vested with legislative authority to oversee the implementation of the Protected Disclosures Act, Act 26 of 2000 (PDA). The powers to oversee the implementation of this piece of legislation are vested with the Minister responsible for the administration of Justice. The ambit of application of this Act goes beyond the functions and powers of the Minister for Public Service and Administration. However, we have embraced the intrinsic principle of reporting emanating from PDA and have infused this as an ethical value for employees in the Public Service. In terms of the Code of Conduct, which is an integral part of the Public Service Regulations, 2016, reporting of acts of corruption, fraud, nepotism and maladministration is an ethical duty for all employees in the Public Service. END
Reply:
No. The Minister for Public Service and Administration is not vested with legislative authority to oversee the implementation of the Protected Disclosures Act, Act 26 of 2000 (PDA). The powers to oversee the implementation of this piece of legislation are vested with the Minister responsible for the administration of Justice. The ambit of application of this Act goes beyond the functions and powers of the Minister for Public Service and Administration. However, we have embraced the intrinsic principle of reporting emanating from PDA and have infused this as an ethical value for employees in the Public Service. In terms of the Code of Conduct, which is an integral part of the Public Service Regulations, 2016, reporting of acts of corruption, fraud, nepotism and maladministration is an ethical duty for all employees in the Public Service.
END
09 March 2017 - NW209
Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) What (a) are the reasons that the interdict obtained by Transnet in order to remove illegal squatters from its land in Elandsfontein has been ignored and (b) action is Transnet taking in order to get the interdict enforced; (2) has Transnet read the corrective measures given by the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police Department to correct this illegal occupation; if so, what are the corrective measures; (3) what strategy does Transnet have in place to prevent additional invasions of other land they own in the Elandsfontein area?
Reply:
(1) (a) The final interdict could not be enforced and Transnet was required to proceed with the institution of an eviction application in accordance with the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from Unlawful Occupation of Land Act (“PIE Act”).
(b) Transnet has applied for a court date and are currently waiting for same.
(2) Transnet has read the corrective measures given by the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police department; Corrective measures were for Transnet to:
- Write an email to EMM to discuss the land issues
- Obtain a court interdict
- Fence off the premises and organise their own security until the property is fenced off.
(3) Transnet has an Informal Settlements Strategy that has been approved through internal structures to deal with informal settlements that are on Transnet land including cases similar to Elandsfontein
____________________________
Siyabonga Gama
Group Chief Executive:
Transnet SOC Ltd
Date:
09 March 2017 - NW265
Van Der Walt, Ms D to ask the MINISTER OF PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION
(1) With regard to the total cost of pending cases involving employees in (a) national and (b) provincial departments, what are the amounts budgeted for such expenditure in each department in the (i) 2013-14, (ii) 2014-15, (iii) 2015-16 and (iv) 2016-17 financial years; (2) did any of the specified departments spend more than the allocated budgets during the specified periods on any case; if so, what (a) are the relevant details in each case, (b) amounts were overspent and (c) was the reason in each case?
Reply:
Budgets for pending cases, involving employees, is the responsibility of individual national and provincial Accounting Officers. The Ministry for Public Service and Administration thus does not have detailed information on such budgets.
END
09 March 2017 - NW268
Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
How many foreign nationals have died whilst in his department’s custody at (a) the Lindela Repatriation Centre and (b) any other holding area in each of the last 10 calendar years?
Reply:
(a) The requested statistics of the number of people who died whilst in custody at Lindela is as follows:-
2007 – 10
2008 - 5
2009 - 1
2010 - 3
2011 - 3
2012 - 4
2013 - 2
2014 - 6
2015 - 7
2016 – 6
All these deaths occurred after the deportees were referred by the clinic at Lindela to the Leratong hospital in Krugersdorp. Only one person actually died within the facility in 2016 shortly after arrival at the facility. The person did not show visible signs of illness.
(b) The police cells at the South African Police Services (SAPS) are utilised for the detention of suspected or confirmed illegal immigrants, pending their direct deportation to their countries of origin or transferred to the Lindela Holding Facility. The SAPS statistics for any deaths in detention are not available to the Department of Home Affairs (DHA).
Prior to the proclamation of the “Determination of Places of Detention of Illegal Foreigners pending deportation” in Government Gazette No.534 in terms of s34 (1) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 on 22 June 2015, illegal immigrants were also held in correctional facilities. The statistics of the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) for the period prior to the declaration are not available to the DHA.
09 March 2017 - NW367
Stander, Ms T to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) him and (ii) his deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
(i) Late Minister Chabane.
- Make: Volkswagen
- Model: Touareg 3.0
- Price: R 755 720.82
- Purchased date: 25 July 2014
aa) None
aaa) 2014-15 Financial Year
bbb) None
bb) None
NB: Subsequently written off due to accident.
(i) Minister Ramatlhodi.
a) Make: Ford
b) Model: Everest 3.2D LTD 4X4 6At
c) Price: 714 500.40
d) Purchased date: 18 April 2016
aa) None
aaa) None
bbb) None
bb) 2016-17 Financial Year
(ii) Deputy Minister Dlodlo.
- Make: Audi
- Model: Audi A8 3.0 TDI QuatrroTip-tronic
- Price: 750 000.00
- Purchased order date: 02 June 2016
aa) None
aaa) None
bbb) None
bb) 2016-17 Financial Year
(ii) Deputy Minister Dlodlo.
- Make: Audi
- Model: Audi A7 Sportback3.0 TDI Tip-tronic
- Price: 735 700.00
- Purchased order date: 20 June 2016
aa) None
aaa) None
bbb) None
bb) 2016-17 Financial Year
END
09 March 2017 - NW276
Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform
(a) What is the detailed breakdown of each step followed in the processing of a land claim, from when a land claim is lodged up to the finalisation of the claim when the property is handed over or a payment is made to the beneficiary, (b) what are the minimum requirements that have to be met so that a land claim can be considered valid and (c) why are claims that do not meet the specified minimum requirements thrown out?
Reply:
1. Processes of the Commission
The restitution process is carried out in 6 steps or phases as follows:
2. Lodgement and Registration of a claim
The lodgment of land claims is the first step in the restitution process. The Commission is required to assist the claimants in the lodgement of the claims. The current deadline to lodge claims is 31 December 1998.
On 27 March 2014 the National Council of Provinces passed the Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Bill.
A claim may be lodged by (1) a person that was dispossessed, (2) the direct descendants of the person (where such person is deceased), (3) an estate, or (4) a community.
The qualification criteria for claims are that a person, direct descendant of a person, estate, or community must have:
- Been dispossessed;
- Of a right in land;
- After 19 June 1913;
- As a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices;
- Has lodged a claim before the cut-off date for lodgement of claims;
- Was not, at the time of dispossession, paid compensation or any other consideration that is just and equitable (as determined in terms of section 25 (3) of the Constitution.
- Screening and Categorisation
Once a claim is lodged it is screened to determine whether all the information required to lodge a claim was submitted, the type of the claim, the location of the claimed land, etc.
3. Research / Investigation
In terms of the current Rules Regulating Procedure in the Commission, research takes place in two phases.
The first phase involves a determination of whether a claim is not excluded by the requirements of restitution. Where a claim is not excluded, it is accepted for further investigation and details of the claim are published in the Government Gazette. Where a claim is excluded, the Commission may reject that claim if it is frivolous and vexatious. Claims that are frivolous or vexatious are claims that do not have substance, or which are patently bogus.
The second phase involves a more thorough research that determines whether the claim meets the requirements for restitution. Claims that meet the requirements will proceed to the next stage. Where it is discovered at this stage that the claim does not meet the requirements, the claim will be de-gazetted (i.e. the publication of the details of the claims will be withdrawn).
4. Negotiations
All parties to a claim (including current owner of claimed land, claimant and other right holder on the claimed land) are convened and discussions held about how a claim will be settled. This will involve provision of all information to the affected parties; and the claimant being required to indicate the form of restitution (i.e. restoration of land, alternative land, or financial compensation, or a combination of the above). Where the claimant choses financial compensation, the current owner of the claimed land ceases to become an interested party. Where the claimant has opted for the restoration of the land discussions will be held for the acquisition of the land by the State (on the basis of a valuation).
5. Settlement or Referral to Court
Where no agreement can be reached on settlement the claim is referred to the Land Claims Court. If there is an agreement, the settlement is referred to the Minister.
6. Implementation
If an award is made by the Minister (on the basis of the agreement that was reached) or Court (through an order) the award or order is implemented by the acquisition of the land and its transfer to the claimant or payment of financial compensation where the award is for payment of financial compensation. Development assistance is provided where land is awarded.
- The qualification criteria for claims are that a person, direct descendant of a person, estate, or community must have:
- Been dispossessed;
- Of a right in land;
- After 19 June 1913;
- As a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices;
- Has lodged a claim before the cut-off date for lodgement of claims;
Was not, at the time of dispossession, paid compensation or any other consideration that is just and equitable (as determined in terms of section 25 (3) of the Constitution.
7. The claim is become invalid if those not meet the requirement of the restitution act.Where a claim is excluded, the Commission may reject that claim if it is frivolous and vexatious. Claims that are frivolous or vexatious are claims that do not have substance, or which are patently bogus.
09 March 2017 - NW267
Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Home Affairs
(1)With reference to his reply to question 2649 on 5 December 2016, what specific steps are being taken to address the existing backlog of appeals received by the Refugee Appeals Board; (2) will the Refugee Appeal Authority, as proposed in the Refugees Amendment Bill [B12-2016], be better equipped to address the specified backlog; (3) (a) for how long has the specified Board been improperly constituted and (b) what impact has this had on the existing backlog of appeals?
Reply:
1. The Department of Home Affairs (DHA) has undertaken two backlog projects in 2001 and 2006 with a view of reducing the backlog. While these projects were able to resolve most outstanding claims, they were not able to prevent the re-occurrence of the backlog. The problem is complex and as a result of many interlinked causes.
To address the existing backlog of appeal hearings it is necessary to contextualize the backlog: -
- In terms of section 13 of the Refugee Act (No 130 of 1998), the Refugee Appeal Board (RAB) must consist of a Chairperson and at least two other members. In the past members of the RAB would hear matters individually for each appeal.
- As explained under question 2649 (b) in the Harerimana v Chairperson of the RAB and others the honourable Judge Dennis Davis ordered RAB to sit as a quorum of 50 percent of members plus one of the members for each appeal hearing or at least two members.
- Apart from the capacity constraints the subsequent dilemma is if only two members sit to hear an appeal and they disagree they cannot come to a decision. As a consequence, RAB was advised to sit as a quorum consisting of the three members (at this point the Chairperson and two members) which will then be properly constituted. The main rationale appears to be that sitting as a quorum of three facilitates the process of decision-making.
- As at the end of January 2017, RAB consisted of one member based in Cape Town and an acting Chairperson based in Pretoria. This chronic incapacity was as a result, of the end of contract of the previous RAB Chairperson as well as the resignation of three RAB members around the same time in middle 2016.
- The DHA has about 90 Refugee Status Determination Offices (RSDO’s) based at the five Refugee Reception Offices on average these RSDO’s may hear and determine between four and seven applications per day. If the applicant is rejected as unfounded by the RSDO, he or she has a right to appeal to the RAB within 30 days. Most applicants for asylum are rejected as “unfounded” and almost all such rejections are appealed against. This further strains the backlog.
In order to address the immediate challenges of the incapacity, the Minister of Home Affairs appointed a new Chairperson for RAB on 07 February 2017. As a matter of urgency, RAB re-started appeal hearings on 20 February 2017 on the basis that it is now properly constituted. All three current members are conducting these appeal hearings sitting as a quorum.
There is also an imminent appointment of two additional members by the Minister of Home Affairs. These two members are going through the internal interview and vetting processes. The Minister will in this regard also make the appointment after the conclusion of these internal processes. (It must be noted that there is challenges in attracting qualified legal refugee experts to a mandate with such a high backlog and low salary band). As soon as the interview and vetting process is completed, it is planned that the members be based at the Durban and Musina Refugee Reception Centres, respectively. It is also planned, that the Chairperson and another member, as may be required, will travel to these centres to hold appeal hearings as an interim measure in anticipation of the adoption of the new amendments in particular related to the quorum requirements.
According to RAB statistics there are 1287 judicial review cases that were served on RAB to date. This is another capacity constraint.
Year - |
No of cases |
2013 to 2014 |
132 |
2014 to 2015 |
230 |
2015 to 2016 |
663 |
2016 to 2017 |
262 (to date) |
The reasons for the high number of reviews are the following, firstly, the decisions taken by RAB as an individual member after the Harerimana case was decided in November 2011. At the time, the previous Chairperson of RAB failed to apply the judgement and continued with hearings as individual members in some instances. Secondly, reviews are submitted in order for RAB to provide a hearing date. These reviews are mainly to compel the extension of the asylum seekers permit and to order RAB to provide a hearing date.
In this regard, RAB has undertaken an open dialogue with legal representatives of the appellants to prioritise certain cases. These cases include legal challenges to demand a hearing date and cases where a single member in contravention of the quorum requirements took decisions. This process is ongoing and intended to reduce the number of legal proceedings against RAB. RAB also intends to approach organisations such as Lawyers for Human Rights, Wits Law Clinic, UCT Law Clinic and other interested representatives to open this dialogue. (It should be noted, that at this stage there are very few of these reviews based on the merits of the case.)
During July 2015, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and representatives of South Africa had a high-level bilateral meeting in Geneva. The parties had agreed to develop a backlog project to address the outstanding RAB appeal cases. The project has not taken off due to the incapacity constraints listed above and financial constraints on both sides. The project was to run for three years ending in 2019.
RAB is continuing the dialogue with the UNHCR under the above agreement. RAB has approached the UNHCR and reopened discussion about the backlog project and its implementation. In this regard, the UNHCR was also approached to assist RAB with the development and financing of a comprehensive case management system. This system will be central to the management of any backlog project and will streamline the management of individual cases. The system will also provide a means to undertake a proactive approach to avoid a re-occurring backlog. The discussion is ongoing but promising.
At this stage, RAB is conducting hearings on an average of five to ten cases per day dependent on the complexity of cases. It has an estimated backlog of 258 232 cases with 92 535 active and 165 697 inactive cases. The institutional incapacity in this regard is evident and multifaceted. The institutional incapacity cannot be a problem that the DHA can alleviate on its own. Therefore, we are in discussion with all interested parties. This is in its infant stage.
2. Yes, as discussed above the legislative amendments will play a key role in alleviating the current incapacity and thus assist in management of the backlog. Although the legislative changes is important there is more to be done in order to address the specified backlog and to manage the caseload proactively. For example, another key requirement in proactive management of the backlog is a case management system (discussed above). This will strengthen resource management and can pinpoint how to address institutional incapacity.
3. (a) Since May 2016, no decision was taken by RAB members due to the resignation of three members and the end of contract of the previous Chairperson. It is unclear in how many appeal hearings RAB was improperly constituted.
3. (b) The impact is not measurable at this point, however, as a result of the improperly constituted RAB hearings this has opened the RAB decisions to judicial review and these reviews are likely to be successful if submitted to a High Court. As mentioned above the total number of reviews on hand is 1287 cases. A percentage of this number is reviews based on the lack of a quorum. This percentage will have a marginal effect on the backlog, compared with the total backlog, if these matters are referred back to RAB.
08 March 2017 - NW393
Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of State Security
In respect of his letter with reference MIN/M1/7 addressed to Mr D J Maynier concerning his reply to question 2335 on 11 November 2016 with regard to Project Spider Web, on what date was the reply to the specified question (a) submitted and (b) tabled before the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence?
Reply:
The reply in question was
(a) Submitted on the 14 November 2016 to the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence for tabling.
08 March 2017 - NW200
Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
With reference to the final report prepared by a certain person (name furnished) into the collapse of African Bank, entitled African Bank Limited: Investigation in terms of s69A of the Banks Act, 94 of 1990, which has been referred to the National Director of Public Prosecutions and his reply to question 1700 on 30 August 2016, what is the name of the prosecutor assigned to the matter; 2) whether the (a) perusal of the specified report has been finalised and/or (b) final report has been referred for further investigation; if not, in each case, why not; if so, what are the full details in each case?
Reply:
1. The matter was assigned to a Senior State Advocate within the Special Commercial Crime Unit who was tasked with the review of the report.
2. (a) Yes,
(b) The National Prosecuting Authority is currently preparing its own report based on the findings of the curator. It is this report which will indicate what the next course of action should be. It is not possible to say at this stage whether or not the matter will be referred for further investigation as that will be dependent on the recommendations to be made in the said report. The finalisation of the said report took extraordinarily long because the report of the curator is quite voluminous. However, the indications are that the report is reaching its final stages, and will be concluded within a short space of time.
08 March 2017 - NW377
Rabotapi, Mr MW to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry
What is the (a) make, (b) model, (c) price and (d) date on which each vehicle was purchased for use by (i) him and (ii) his deputy (aa) in the (aaa) 2014-15 and (bbb) 2015-16 financial years and (bb) since 1 April 2016?
Reply:
(a) (b) (c) (d) (i) (aaa) (bbb) (bb)
Minister Davies
No vehicles were purchased for Minister Davies during the 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years. New vehicles were purchased in the 2016-17 financial year due to the fact that the existing vehicles had exceeded 120 000 kilometers and were deemed to be in violation of the security regulation and transport policy for Executive Authorities.
Make |
Model |
Price |
Purchase Date |
Toyota Fortuner |
2016 |
R625 718.94 |
28 July 2016 |
Toyota Fortuner |
2016 |
R623 788.94 |
28 July 2016 |
(a) (b) (c) (d) (ii) (aa) (aaa) (bbb) (bb)
Deputy Minister Masina
No vehicles were purchased for Deputy Minister Masina for the 2014-15 financial years. The vehicles below were purchased in the 2015-16 financial year. No other vehicles were purchased after 1 April 2016.
Make |
Model |
Price |
Purchase Date |
BMW X5 |
2014 |
R966 112.14 |
27 November 2015 |
BMW X5 |
2015 |
R900 309.48 |
22 December 2015 |
07 March 2017 - NW164
Bozzoli, Prof B to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)Are external examination processes in place at the 26 South African public universities; if not, why not; if so, for each university, to which (a) programmes and (b) years of study do the specified processes apply; (2) are academics from (a) other local universities and (b) international universities used as external examiners by each of the specified universities; if not, why not; if so, (i) from which universities are they mainly drawn and (ii) in which courses are they used?
Reply:
1. Yes, there are external moderation and examination processes in place at all institutions. This is a programme accreditation prerequisite as stated by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) in accordance with its programme accreditation criteria (refer to Criteria for Programme Accreditation, CHE, 2004).
Student Evaluation and Assessment Procedures must be explicitly stated in the Student Assessment Policies and Procedures of each university in accordance with Criterion 6, which states: “External moderation of students’ learning achievements by appropriately qualified personnel. Moderators are appointed in terms of clear criteria and procedures and conduct their responsibilities in terms of clear guidelines.”
In addition, Criterion 13 (CHE, 2004: 19-20) states:
“The programme has effective assessment practices which include internal (or external) assessment, as well as internal and external moderation.” Criterion 13 explicitly states that, in order for a programme to be accredited and offered by a university. The learning achievements of students on the exit level of a qualification are externally moderated by appropriately qualified people who have been appointed according to clear criteria and procedures and who conduct their responsibilities in terms of clear guidelines. External moderation includes the following:
- External moderators are recommended by the examining academic department, are independent experts in their fields, have qualifications at least on the same level as the qualification being examined, are changed regularly, are not appointed as part of reciprocal arrangements (where possible), and are approved by and responsible to Senate/equivalent body.
- The institution provides information on the curriculum and on continuous assessment, and guidelines to assist external moderators in the completion of their reports.
- External moderators mark fully at the exit level of the programme at least 10 percent of the examination scripts for each paper written and do random checks of at least 20 percent of examination scripts for each paper.
- Completed external moderator reports are returned to the lecturer concerned and also to the programme coordinator or head of department/school. Problems are discussed with the lecturer concerned and the programme coordinator monitors the implementation of agreed improvements. External moderators approve the final marks list for the qualification concerned.
- External moderators are expected to comment on the validity of the assessment instruments, the quality of student performance and the standard of student attainment, the reliability of the marking process, and any concerns or irregularities with respect to the observation of institutional/professional regulations.”
(2) (a) Academics from South African as well as from (b) international universities are utilised as external examiners. Such external examiners and moderators must adhere to the minimum criteria for examiners as set by the CHE in its Criteria for Programme Accreditation. At least one external examiner must be utilised for the examination and moderation of dissertations and theses. Their expertise to serve as external examiners is in accordance with the criteria for programme accreditation.
(b) The actual external examiners change and evolve continuously, regardless of whether they are from South African or international institutions. The Department does not collect information on the institutions from which external examiners are drawn. Examiners are used in all exit level examinations in major fields of study in programmes at National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Levels 7 to 10. This is a quality assurance requirement.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 164 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
07 March 2017 - NW334
Jooste, Ms K to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) How are roving traffic hotspots coordinated, (b) what are the objectives of these roving hotspots, (c) (i) how many and (ii) where have these hotspots taken place in the past three financial years, (d) how are the successes or failures of these hotspots ascertained, (e) what were the successes and failures of each hotspot in each province and (f)(i) what are the lessons learnt from these hotspots and (ii) what has been implemented in each province as a result?
Reply:
Reference must be made rather to Roving road blocks and not roving traffic Hotspots. The roving road blocks are also known as Mini Road side check points as opposed to fully fleshed road blocks with all the Road Traffic Signs displayed as prescribed in the Road Block Manual.
(a) The coordination of these roving road blocks is done within the provincial coordinating structures and Law Enforcement Technical Committee (LETCOM) to optimize the use and sharing of limited resources.
(b) The objectives of operations are to reduce road crashes and make road safe; target un-roadworthy vehicles and unfit drivers such as drunk drivers; and increase visibility of officers on the road.
(c) Number of Road blocks is (i) 74 382
(ii) The Road Blocks were conducted in all provinces.
(d) These operations are informed by the Road Traffic Intelligence report and situational analysis per area.
(e)Successes and failures are determined by number of crashes in the province, and number of arrests of drunk drivers.
(f) (i) Lesson learned is that there is a need for stronger coordination of joint operationsto be guided from national level and provincewith identified critical locations to be assisted through the deployment of the National Traffic Police resources from time to time.
(ii) Each province is currently establishing coordinating structures to plan and optimize coordination.
07 March 2017 - NW240
Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)In light of the prohibitive costs of higher education, is he aware of any initiative to address the high cost of prescribed textbooks; (2) is he prepared to engage with institutions of higher learning and the publishing industry to address the specified matter; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) The Department does not prescribe specific student textbooks per subject in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges as this is not a suitable model to use in a post-school vocational learning environment.
Students in TVET colleges do not pay for their textbooks. It is a requirement that colleges must provide every student with a minimum of one textbook per subject per level until the student has passed the subject. This is funded through the Voted Funds transferred to colleges. This principle applies to all the Ministerially-funded programmes and qualifications offered in TVET colleges.
I am aware of the high cost of knowledge resources (including prescribed textbooks, academic books, journals and e-journals and databases) relating to university education. While there is no specific initiative to deal with prescribed textbooks on their own, there have been two related initiatives linked to the issue of creating efficiencies and bringing down the costs of such resources. These are:
- engagements with National Treasury and the South African Revenue Service around the issue of Value Added Tax and other taxes on knowledge resources; and
- a process for enabling national negotiations with publishers on e-resources (initially e-journals and databases) with the long-term aim of to enable the establishment of a national digital library, including e-text books.
(2) The Department has an ongoing relationship with all publishers of student textbooks, actively involved in the college market, since 2006. Regular written and oral communication takes place between the relevant branch of the Department and related publishers in the form of correspondence and meetings to address specific needs and requirements for student textbooks.
TVET colleges have access to lists and prices of textbooks available in the sector and subject committees in these institutions select textbooks based on set criteria.
Most colleges procure student textbooks directly from publishers, to reduce the knock-on cost along the distribution value chain, although booksellers sometimes play an important role to relieve the burden on colleges to procure a wide variety of student textbooks needed for a range of programmes being offered in these institutions.
No significant annual increase in prices of student textbooks happened since 2006. In some instances, the increase has been as little as R5 per textbook costing in the region of R200. In 2016, one publisher dropped their prices as a result of healthy competition amongst publishers in a relatively small market compared to the schools market.
To date colleges have not complained about the cost of textbooks. Currently, what could pose a problem is the over-enrolment of students in colleges, which may lead to cash flow challenges resulting in institutions avoiding purchasing new textbooks for all students. The Department is aware of such challenges and is currently dealing with these as urgent cases and attention is given for immediate resolution.
I am prepared to engage with universities and the publishing industry. The Department, in collaboration with the Department of Science and Technology (DST) has started this process through a focus on national site licenses for e-journals and databases which are prohibitively expensive and are not accessible to all universities and their students. Currently, universities and science councils purchase individual licenses to access electronic databases, with many not being in a position to afford the associated fees to enable an effective range of resources to support high level teaching, learning and research. Between 2014 and 2016, the Department commissioned the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) to investigate and assist with evaluating options for implementing national site licenses for access to electronic journals and databases. The investigation, which was jointly overseen by the Department and DST, has recently been concluded. The investigation suggests that the establishment of national site licenses, through a high level national negotiating team, would bring about substantial savings, while at the same time improve equity of access to e-journals and databases across the university and science sectors. A process for taking this work forward is currently being worked on.
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 240 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE: