Questions and Replies

Reply:

(i) Minister

The vehicles purchased are as follows:

(a) Make	(b) Model	(c) Price	(d) Date of purchase	(aaa) FY 2014/2015	(bbb) FY 2015/2016	(bb)FY Since 1 April 2016/2017	Place
Lexus	LEXUS ES HYBRID ES 300H EX C21E	514 649.74	2014/09/26	Yes	N/A	N/A	CPT
Lexus	ES350 EX 36Z	464 819.04	2016/04/20	N/A	N/A	Yes	PTA

(ii) Deputy Minister

(a) Make	(b) Model	(c) Price	(d) Date of purchase	(aaa) FY 2014/2015	(bbb) FY 2015/2016	(bb)FY Since 1 April 2016/2017	Place
Audi	AUDI A8 4H20BA TDI Q TIP	881 629.99	2014/06/05	Yes	N/A	N/A	CPT
Lexus	LEXUS 460 16 G	808 279.00	2016/09/14	N/A	N/A	YES	PTA

Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved

Mr. Mogokare Richard Seleke Ms. Lynne Brown, MP

Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises

Date: Date:

Reply:

No services were procured and no payments were made to (a) Mr Mzwanele Manyi, (b) the Progressive Professionals Forum, (c) the Decolonisation Fund.

d(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)

Over the past 3 years, a transfer payment of R7 million was paid to the Black Business Council as appropriated. The objective of the transfer payment was to strengthen and promote advocacy and the roll-out of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Amendment Act 46 of 2013 and in particular, the Black Industrialist Programme.

Reply:

1. (a) Since 1 January 2010, the Department through the Road Traffic Management Agency, responsible for piloting the AARTO Act, issued in total 26 089 730 fines in the City of Tshwane and City of Johannesburg. The break down of this figures are as on the table below:

(i) AARTO payment figures:

Financial Year	AARTO Revenue Collected
2010/11	R 53 506 570.02
2011/12	R 86 553 514.98
2012/13	R 143 185,321.00
2013/14	R 274 398 904.99
2014/15	R 306 993 704.98
2015/16	R 555 459 029.99

(ii) Percentages regarding AARTO traffic infringements in relation to the fines issued:

Financial Year	Number of AARTO Infringements/Offences	% of AARTO Infringements/Offences
2010/11	1 478 265	5.67%
2011/12	1 707 052	6.54%
2012/13	3 474 353	13.32%
2013/14	6 797 128	26.05%
2014/15	6 120 436	23.46%
2015/16	6 512 496	24.96%
Total	26 089 730	100%

2. The honourable member should remember that road and traffic are exclusive Schedule 5A provincial function while municipal roads, traffic and parking are exclusive schedule 5B Municipal function and in contrast, road and traffic is a concurrent function with the National Department of Transport playing largely a facilitating and regulatory role.

It is on this basis that the Department is unable to provide information on (2), however this information can be sources directly from the Municipalities.

3. Please see above (2)

4. Please see above (2)

Reply:

There are no poultry projects which were closed in Limpopo province since January 2016 to date.

However there are fourteen (14) poultry projects that closed prior to January 2016 due to amongst others:

1. The distance between the poultry house and the abattoirs which must be less than 100km. Extensive travel to abattoirs leads to weight loss and mortality.
2. The Lebowakgomo abattoir which has not been operational for some time. This has impacted on poultry farmers especially from the Sekhukhune area.
3. The closure of Mikes Chicken abattoir in Polokwane.

Reply:

(1) My Department’s Main Account is not experiencing financial difficulties. However, the Water Trading Entity (WTE) is experiencing temporary cash flow problems due to non-payment of Municipalities and Water Boards. However, the WTE is in a very strong financial position as Assets exceed Liabilities by R72 billion.

During the 2016/17 budget preparation it was clear that, should the debt not be recovered this would negatively impact on the bank balance. This recovery from Municipalities and Water Boards has not happened and the overdraft has been steadily increasing since the start of the financial year.

The WTE is working closely with National Treasury (NT) and NT has sent out letters to Municipalities not paying their debt warning them that they are contravening Section 65(2)(e) of the MFMA and that they should urgently rectify the non-payment of their debt.

(2) My Department’s Main Account has been allocated a budget of R15.5 billion for the 2016/17 financial year, of which R13.6 billion has been spent by 27 February 2017, leaving an available balance of R1.9 billion up to 31 March 2017. The R1.9 billion will be used to pay for salaries (R238 million), direct transfers to Municipalities scheduled for the 8 and 9 March 2017 (R712 million) as well as goods and services and capital expenditures in the normal course of business amounting to R958 million. This is in line with my Department’s planned cash projections, and signals a slight underspending of R99 million anticipated by the end of the financial year from Compensation of Employees.

The Department’s bank account with National Treasury (SARB) is currently at a positive balance of R558 million, and there is still a balance of R1.1 billion which has not been requested from the National Treasury and is due for payment to the Department in the month of March 2017.

The WTE’s current bank balances as at 22 February 2017 are as follows:

 

Reserve Bank	(R 2 989 564 608.84)
ABSA	R 24 872536.05
Standard Bank	R 1 735 342.16
First National Bank	R 420 719.30
SAPO	R 96 644.15
Total	(R 2,962,439,367.18)

Reply:

(i) Minister of Finance	(a) Make	(b) Model	(c) Price	(d) Date
(aa)
(aaa) 2014/15	None	None	None	None
(bbb) 2015/16	None	None	None	None
(bb) April 2016 - current	None	None	None	None
(ii) Deputy Minister of Finance
(aa)
(aaa) 2014/15	Mercedes Benz	E200	R661 387.01	27-01-2015
(aaa) 2014/15	Mercedes Benz	E200	R661 387.01	27-01-2015
(bbb) 2015/16	None	None	None	None
(bb) April 2016 - current	None	None	None	None

Reply:

The Department of Women procured an official vehicle for the Minister as follows:

	(i)(aa)(aaa)	(ii)(aa)(aaa)	(i)(aa)(bbb) and (ii)(aa)(bbb) and (bb)
(a)	BMW	N/A	No official vehicle was procured during the 2015/ 16 FY and since 1 April 2016
(b)	GT 550	N/A
(c)	R926 007.61	N/A
(d)	06-Feb-15	N/A

________________________

Approved by the Minister on

Date………………………..

Reply:

 

(a)(i) The records of My Department only indicate that we have received a Water Use License Application from Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) for Somkhele Anthracite Mine. The Water Use License was issued on 4 August 2014 for Section 21 (b), (c), (g), (i) and (j) water uses of the National Water Act, 1998 (Act No. 36 of 1998). The authorization for abstraction was issued on 10 September 2010.

(a)(ii) Anthracite Colliery has not submitted a Water Use License Application to my Department.

(b) The volume abstracted is 750 000 cubic metres of water per annum for Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) for Somkhele Anthracite Mine.

(c) Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) for Somkhele Anthracite Mine abstracts water from the UMfolozi River.

 

Reply:

The case was argued on the 13 December 2016 and the reason for the removal of the case from the urgent court roll is that the court found that the matter was not urgent and advised that it could be placed in the ordinary motion court roll.

Reply:

1. Yes.

(a) The South African Human Rights found in the matter between the Democratic Alliance on behalf of the Residents of Witbank (eMalahleni) under file reference number MP/2011/0134 that the Municipality violated the rights of the residents to have access to sufficient water, largely as a result of lack of maintenance plan for its infrastructure, and consequently their rights to dignity. The Municipality appealed the Commission`s findings and the appeal was dismissed in September 2015.

(b) The findings of the Commission were that the Municipality had failed to provide the residents with access to sufficient water in violation of the provisions of section 27 of the Constitution. The Commission continues to receive complaints of violation of the rights of communities to have access to sufficient water against the Municipality.

2. (a) Following the impression by the Commission on the essence of “Meaningful Engagement” between the Municipality and the communities, the Municiplaity held a mass meeting with the community in eMalahleni on 29 July 2015.

(b) On 09 November 2015, the Municipality sent its Comprehensive Maintenance Plan to the Commission.

(c) The Commission also engaged the Municipality through, inter alia, a meeting between its Former Chairperson: Advocate Luarence Mushwana, Provincial Manager: Eric Mokonyama and the Municipal Manager: Mr Theo van Vuuren on 20 June 2016, with a view to obtain the Municipality`s implementation plan aimed at resolving water supply challenges faced by communities in eMalahleni (e.g. Masakhane, Sizanane, Phola villages)

(d) Following further engagement, 7 February 2017 and 15 February 2017 the Municipality advised the Commission in writing about steps it is taking address the challenges, namely that:

1. Through its Integrated Development Plan coupled with ongoing discussions with Glencore Mine on water augmentation, it is engaging all affected communities with a view to address within available resources its water supply capacity challenges by end of June 2017.
2. Related sanitations challenged are currently addressed through a pit- latrine (long-drops) and VIP system which the Municipality is implementing; and
3. It may, in the long-term have to relocate the Masakhane settlement to Dhuva and Siyanqoba locations so as to create space for development.

The Commission also raised challenges presented by the overflow of sewer at Louise Street in Del Judor Extension 4 due to the blockage of the line as well as the manhole overflow at Mandela Street which has been flowing into the tributary of Klein Olifant`s. an investigation by the Municipality revealed that the blockage was caused by foreign objects and that the line needs to be replaced. The line has been blocked and the Municipality has allocated R10 Million to rehabilitate the spillage and resolve the problem. A written and costed rehabilitation plan has been presented to the Commission.

The Commission is monitoring the implantation plan of the Municipality aimed at resolving the abovementioned issues.

Reply:

(1) There are currently 2 licences granting abstraction from the Hluhluwe River GWS (SMP 154) that have been registered.

(2) Refer to table below.

Owner of licences	Date issued	Period for licence	Volume of water
UMkhanyakude DM	2007/05/14	expiry date 2047/05/13	2,806,000m3 annually
Bousaam (Pty) Ltd, licence	2001/10/24	expiry date 2021/10/23	300,000m3

 

Reply:

 

1. (a) (i)(aa) None, since this is a land development programme targeting State

owned farms, PLAS farms and Communal land.

(bb) Falls Away

(ii) 689 hectares have been allocated to beneficiaries from Gorah (14), Krugerpost (221), Mantusini (373), Westwood (18), Kwa-Mashabalane (41) and Libhaba CPA (22)

(b) 689 Beneficiaries have received Gorah (14), Krugerpost (221), Mantusini (373), Westwood (18), Kwa-Mashabalane (41) and Libhaba CPA (22)

2. The budget allocation over the MTEF is as follows:

Year	2016/2017	2017/2018	2018/2019	2019/2020	TOTAL
Budget Allocation	R 100 000 000	R 247 808 000	R 619 497 000	R 698 973 000	R 1 566 278 000

 

3. There are 689 beneficiaries currently involved in a programme

4. (a) and (b)

Province	District	Farm Name	Year
Eastern Cape	OR Tambo	Mantusini	July 2016
Eastern Cape	Sarah Baartsman	Gorah	July 2015
Eastern Cape	Sarah Baartsman	Krugerspost	August 2016
KwaZulu Natal	Umgungundlovu	Westwood	July 2016
Mpumalanga	Mkhondo	Kwa-Mashabalane	March 2016
Mpumalanga	Mkhondo	Libhaba CPA	March 2016

Reply:

(1) Yes,

(2) No; the pipeline to the livestock farming will not be closed, because it will be against the requirements of Animals Protection Act 71 of 1962, Sec (1) (c) & (e).

(2) (a) Not Applicable

(b) Not applicable

(3) (a) No, the pumping system is still new as it was installed in May 2016, at this stage the pumping system is well functioning so there is no need for repair.

(b) Yes, the Department of Public works conducted assessment on boreholes, out of seven (07), four (04) were re-drilled. The water from boreholes was tested and found to be in good condition for consumption.

(c) No, there was no existing pipeline which requires repair at this stage.

(d) No, the life span of plumbing at Barberton Farm is still in good condition.

(4) No,

(a)(b) city of Mbombela has started to dig a trench which will be connecting boreholes to the reservoir.

Reply:

 

(a) Mamone Ward 20 and 21 in Makhuduthamaga has not had water since January 2017 and not since August 2016 as it is indicated above. This is due to two boreholes that are not functioning. The two boreholes are not functional due to operations and maintenance issues. In one of the boreholes, pipes have collapsed and are submerged and need to be fished and replaced. In another borehole, a submersible pump motor was burnt during drought as the water flow yields were low. The third borehole that is functional is not yielding enough flow and, as a result, not everyone is able to get water.

(b) The Sekhukhune District Municipality (SDM), being the Water Services Authority (WSA); has engaged in a procurement process to replace of equipment for the refurbishment of the two boreholes which are expected to be functional by end of March 2017.

 

Reply:

1. Mr Letsoalo secondment was done in terms of section 15(3) of the Public Service Act. The matter of the remuneration of the secondment allowance is a matter that is being dealt with within PRASA.

a. See background information above

b. See background information above

2. PRASA is investigating the matter

a.  See the background information above

Reply:

In terms of section 25. (1) of THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED AND NATIONAL ROADS ACT, the Agency of the Department of Transport, is given the power to perform, all strategic planning with regard to the South African national roads system, as well as the planning, design, construction, operation, management, control, maintenance and rehabilitation of national roads for the Republic. The road referred to by the honourable Mr KP Robertson is not part of the national road network and no budgets was allocated for road because it is part of the Mpumalanga Provincial Road Network.

(1) Falls away

(2) Falls away

(3) Falls away

Additional information for the Minister

However, the question was referred to the province and the following below is their reply:

Can you please provide me with the budget allocations for the E514 over the past five financial years?

The road in question is Provincial road D514 with a total length of 12.6 km, from the R536 between Hazyview and Sabie at the Western end, and road D1035 at Kiepersol at the Eastern end.

It is known that the road is in poor condition, as indicated by the diagram below. Annual assessments are done on all Provincial paved roads as part of the DPWRT’s Road Asset Management System (RAMS).

One of the important metrics that are derived from these assessments is the Visual Condition Index (VCI), which is an overall indicator of the road condition on a percentage scale of 0 – 100%.

The VCI on road D514 varies roughly between 30 and 40, which classifies the road as in “Poor” condition according to the applicable TMH 9 technical manual. (See Annexure 1 for clear graph)

The DPWRT budget for routine road maintenance is allocated to each of the 21 Cost Centres in the Province, broken down into 15 routine maintenance activities like patching, drainage, grass cutting, etc. Thus, the budget is prepared per activity and there is no specific budget allocation for each road separately.

The budget for preventive maintenance (reseal) and capital works like rehabilitation are allocated per road (or project). However, no project has been budgeted for or implemented on D514 during the past five financial years.

In addition, please provide me with the budget spent on E514 over the past five financial years.

The expenditure for each Cost Centre is kept for each of the 15 routine maintenance activities across all roads in the specific area of responsibility. As a result, the expenditure is not kept by individual road and thus cannot be provided for road D514.

No capital projects have been implemented on D514 over the last 5 financial years.

Have there been any unspent budgets and were these sent back to Treasury? If not, how was the budget spent?

No, there has not been any unspent budgets in relation to D514. The DPWRT has utilized 100% of its budget for the past 5 financial years.

Please indicate the last time any department has worked on the E514 project. Could we be provided with an annexure?

Various routine maintenance activities were performed on D514 during the past financial year. Due to the number of potholes, patching is obviously very important. The previous last time patching has been done on road D514 was on 23 January 2017.

A maintenance team is scheduled to do further patching during the week of 27 February, depending on weather conditions.

ANNEXURE

Reply:

A.  There are 775 Organs of State (OoS) registered on the CSD as at 2017-02-24.

CSD Utilisation by Organs of State
	OoS using CSD (aa)	OoS not using CSD (bb)
i. National	40	1
ii. Provincial	115	8
iii. State-owned entities	236	73
iv. Municipalities	239	14
v. Municipal entities	16	4
vi. Other	24	5
Total	670	105

B.  Annexure A is hereby attached with the name of Organs of State in each case.

Reply:

In addition to routine meetings (Early Child Development, conditional grant frameworks, guideline for NPO payments, Budget 2017), the National Treasury has met with SASSA and Department of Social Development (DSD) multiple times on the issue of social grant payments upon expiry of the current contract. Two meetings were held between senior management of SASSA, DSD, National Treasury and South African Reserve Bank. Numerous meetings were held of the technical task team established to consider options for payment of social grants, consider pros and cons of different options and provide expert advice on procurement, public finance, financial sector policy and banking to SASSA.

I have also had brief discussions with the Minister of Social Development, telephonically or in person, to discuss the payment of grants.

Reply:

The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) is the regulatory authority responsible for the administration of the Exchange Control Regulations (“the Regulations”), as promulgated in terms of section 9 of the Currency and Exchanges Act (Act No 9 of 1933). The SARB has provided the following response to my department in response to this question, based on the publication of Notice and Order of Forfeiture in Government Gazette number 40526 of 2016-12-30 (as attached) in terms of Exchange Control Regulation 22B.

1. (a) and (b) The Financial Surveillance Department of SARB (FinSurv) issued an order on 29 May 2015, in terms of the provisions of Exchange Control Regulations 22A and 22C, prohibiting the withdrawal of all funds standing to the credit of an entity styled Homix (Pty) Limited (“Homix”) in an account held with Mercantile Bank Limited. At the relevant time, Homix had made an application to Mercantile Bank for the transfer of foreign currency to Morningstar International Trade Limited in Hong Kong, ostensibly for the purposes of paying for previously imported goods. The balance in the account amounted to R14 472 075 at the time in question. The relevant order was issued on suspicion that Homix had contravened the Exchange Control Regulations in that it had presented false documentation to Mercantile Bank in support of, inter alia, these pending foreign exchange transactions.

2. An investigation was conducted by FinSurv and finalised during December 2016, the findings of which included that Homix had unlawfully transferred foreign currency from the republic on numerous occasions. Pursuant to the findings of this investigation, the matter was reported to the South African Police Service (Wierdabrug CAS 548/12/2016) for further steps deemed necessary from a criminal prosecution point of view. The above-mentioned amount of R14 472 075,00, together with all interest earned thereon, was, furthermore, declared forfeit to the State in terms of Exchange Control Regulation 22B and the relevant Notice and Order of Forfeiture published in Government Gazette number 40526 of 2016-12-30.

 

Reply:

1. A complaint was received by the Presidential Hotline on 20 November 2016 relating to Performance Management at theSouth African Weather Service (SAWS) specifically relating to the 2014/15 performance assessment period. The allegations included the following:

a) Unlawful powers of the Executive Committee to change moderated performance scores;

b) Unilateral correction of scores

c) Implementation of performance-based salary increases.

The allegations were referred to the Board of SAWS for further investigation on 28 January 2016.

OMA Chartered Accountants Incorporated (OMA) was appointed to conduct an investigation into allegations made by the complainant. No Board members were involved in the appointment of OMA. The recommendations in the OMA report have been implemented.

2. A senior manager of SAWS brought allegations to the Board, on the matter of the guarantee for the radars. A preliminary analysis has revealed no irregularity. Further investigation is underway.

 

Reply:

 

The following information was submitted by the South African Revenue Service (SARS):

The process of return submission covers the aspect of submitting a return and as such declaring the liability of the taxpayer for a specific period/ year. The submission and declaration does not however automatically entitle the taxpayer to a refund. The return is therefore lodged and not the refund. The assessment result might be an amount due to SARS and not to the taxpayer.  

It is important to note that submissions by taxpayers, where the amount reflects as being due to the taxpayer, do not result in automatic refunds but rather may be credit assessments which may undergo risk evaluation by SARS, prior to being determined to result in a refund.

In general the refund process is subject to certain compliance interventions and follows a standardised process in line with legislation.

These steps include but are not limited to:

• A declaration by a taxpayer is subjected to an automated risk mitigation system

• A declaration is reviewed where risks are identified or refunds are released where no risk is identified.
• Where risk is identified, a generic request for information from clients in support of their declaration is sent to the taxpayer. These requests are made in writing to the taxpayer’s E-filing account or registered address.
• Evaluation by SARS of the data in support of the declaration is conducted, and requests for further specific supporting documentation is sent to the taxpayer where deemed necessary by the auditor. This second request is made telephonically and followed up by a written request sent to the E-filing account or other registered details
• If required an adjustment is made to the assessment

    

As indicated above, all reviews are conducted based on the risk identified by the system and all procedures and legislation is adhered to at all times in dealing with identified cases. The TAA, chapter 5, Sec 40, differentiates between an Audit and Verification. Once again, the compliance interventions determine whether a case will be Verified or Audited. Sec 42 of the TAA requires that a taxpayer be kept informed of progress with an Audit. The same obligations do not exist in the case of Verification.

(a)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(aaa)(bbb)(b)      

Based on data that is readily available the following statistics can be provided.

It should be noted that the statistics includes all refunds as a result of current or prior tax year’s returns received. These may also include multiple returns where multiple years were outstanding.

Personal Income Tax (PIT): Refunds processed during these two performance periods that includes refunds paid out for both current and previous tax years

FY 2015/2016	Cumulative Number of Refunds	Cumulative % of Volume	Cumulative Refund Value (R)	Cumulative % of Value
Within 1 day	2 078 529	93.55%	17 636 156 292	89.51%
Within 2 day	2 080 018	93.62%	17 648 106 895	89.57%
Within 3 day	2 081 400	93.68%	17 660 046 629	89.64%
Within 4 day	2 082 565	93.73%	17 671 685 820	89.69%
Within 5 day	2 083 563	93.78%	17 682 211 625	89.75%
Within 10 day	2 093 691	94.23%	17 791 309 571	90.30%
Within 21 day	2 098 039	94.43%	17 834 333 227	90.52%
Within 30 day	2 105 910	94.78%	17 917 459 188	90.94%
Within 60 day	2 131 416	95.93%	18 226 010 663	92.51%
Within 90 day	2 158 953	97.17%	18 588 300 391	94.35%
More than 90 days	2 221 795	100.00%	19 702 139 151	100.00%
Grand Total	2 221 795	100%	19 702 139 151	100%
FY 2014/2015	Cumulative Number of Refunds	Cumulative % of Volume	Cumulative Refund Value (R)	Cumulative % of Value
Within 1 day	2 228 408	92.62%	17 475 039 484	89.19%
Within 2 day	2 231 094	92.73%	17 497 695 274	89.30%
Within 3 day	2 233 430	92.83%	17 517 603 195	89.40%
Within 4 day	2 235 407	92.91%	17 534 051 997	89.49%
Within 5 day	2 237 478	93.00%	17 551 802 975	89.58%
Within 10 day	2 245 757	93.34%	17 629 562 736	89.97%
Within 21 day	2 259 968	93.93%	17 771 765 155	90.70%
Within 30 day	2 269 100	94.31%	17 865 671 786	91.18%
Within 60 day	2 317 618	96.33%	18 342 690 800	93.61%
Within 90 day	2 348 282	97.61%	18 661 029 254	95.24%
More than 90 days	2 405 902	100.00%	19 594 118 415	100.00%
Grand Total	2 405 902	100%	19 594 118 415	100%

Corporate Income Tax (CIT): Refunds processed during these two performance periods that includes refunds paid out for both current and previous tax years

FY 2015/2016	Cumulative Number of Refunds	Cumulative % of Volume	Cumulative Refund Value (R)	Cumulative % of Value
Within 1 day	29 011	73.14%	1 926 857 827	56.18%
Within 2 day	29 084	73.32%	1 941 310 905	56.60%
Within 3 day	29 134	73.45%	1 944 784 101	56.70%
Within 4 day	29 189	73.59%	1 948 683 819	56.82%
Within 5 day	29 239	73.71%	1 952 820 096	56.94%
Within 10 day	29 437	74.21%	1 975 891 033	57.61%
Within 21 day	29 880	75.33%	2 120 522 535	61.83%
Within 30 day	30 190	76.11%	2 168 459 999	63.23%
Within 60 day	31 362	79.07%	2 368 672 630	69.06%
Within 90 day	32 708	82.46%	2 526 549 638	73.67%
More than 90 days	39 666	100.00%	3 429 659 974	100.00%
Grand Total	39 666	100%	3 429 659 974	100%
FY 2014/2015	Cumulative Number of Refunds	Cumulative % of Volume	Cumulative Refund Value (R)	Cumulative % of Value
Within 1 day	31 258	74.11%	1 740 028 825	51.67%
Within 2 day	31 327	74.28%	1 744 623 695	51.81%
Within 3 day	31 382	74.41%	1 753 376 243	52.07%
Within 4 day	31 432	74.53%	1 758 537 723	52.22%
Within 5 day	31 482	74.65%	1 762 717 215	52.35%
Within 10 day	31 684	75.13%	1 780 635 814	52.88%
Within 21 day	32 041	75.97%	1 843 791 302	54.75%
Within 30 day	32 370	76.75%	1 894 872 625	56.27%
Within 60 day	33 393	79.18%	2 054 283 521	61.01%
Within 90 day	34 614	82.07%	2 225 138 970	66.08%
More than 90 days	42 175	100.00%	3 367 388 343	100.00%
Grand Total	42 175	100%	3 367 388 343	100%

Value Added Tax (VAT): Refunds processed during these two performance periods that includes refunds paid out for both current and previous tax years

FY 2015/2016	Cumulative Number of Refunds	Cumulative % of Volume	Cumulative Refund Value (R)	Cumulative % of Value
Paid within 2 days	240 268	67.71%	20 543 123 568	16.14%
Paid within 21 days	282 753	79.69%	77 882 420 639	61.19%
Paid within 30 days	304 595	85.84%	95 477 947 992	75.02%
Paid within 60 days	337 605	95.15%	116 017 076 739	91.15%
Paid in more than 60 days	354 828	100.00%	127 276 361 477	100.00%
Grand Total	354 828	100%	127 276 361 477	100%
FY 2014/2015	Cumulative Number of Refunds	Cumulative % of Volume	Cumulative Refund Value (R)	Cumulative % of Value
Paid within 2 days	249 313	67.51%	24 522 511 615	19.61%
Paid within 21 days	322 604	87.35%	96 674 033 289	77.31%
Paid within 30 days	338 011	91.52%	107 434 615 456	85.91%
Paid within 60 days	357 374	96.77%	118 940 253 003	95.11%
Paid in more than 60 days	369 315	100.00%	125 052 605 017	100.00%
Grand Total	369 315	100%	125 052 605 017	100%

Reply:

This information is provided by SARS:

A) We confirm that the certain company (details furnished) did not report this specific incident to Customs.

B) This question must be directed to the State Security Agency.

Reply:

The Office of the Chief Procurement Officer (OCPO) has not reviewed any of these contracts. A letter dated 01 March 2017 was issued to Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality requesting for documents in order to review the bidding process.

Reply:

Kindly refer to the presentation provided to the Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation on 03 March 2017 by the Department of Water and Sanitation for details of supplier invoices and the reasons for non-payment.

Reply:

During the 2014-15 financial year, a BMW 535i sedan was procured for the use of the Minister. The vehicle was procured on 30 January 2015 for the purchase price of R750 122.76. No other vehicles were procured for the Minister or his deputy subsequent to 30 January 2015.

 

Reply:

1. (a) The following facilities are available for contact visits:

• St Albans Remand Detention Facility: accommodates 20 people at a time
• St Albans Medium B Correctional Centre: accommodates 40 people at a time
• St Albans Maximum Correctional Centre: accommodates 40 people at a time

(b) Correctional Services Order 3, Chapter V (3)(f)(i)(cc) stipulates that all visits are non-contact visits, but attempts should be made to allow contact visits for offenders in privilege group A. Offenders in privilege group A may however not lay claim to contact visits, as security considerations, the behaviour and adaptation of the offender remain the primary factors to be considered. The same apply to remand detainees.

 

2. (a) Each Centre has a clinic to attend to the sick inmates. There is also a 24 hour manned hospital for critically ill inmates.

(b) (i) One permanently appointed doctor.

(ii) There are thirty (30) registered nurses.

(aa) All are full–time employees

(bb) The facilities have two part–time doctors.

3. (a) Each housing unit has ablution block for inmates to shower and wash their clothes. The centres have hair clippers that are issued in each unit and

a dedicated room where inmates go and have their hair trimmed.

(b) Correctional Services Order 3, Chapter V, Sub Section (3)(f)(i)(cc) stipulates that “Head of Prisons must ensure that a qualified barber or

prisoner with appropriate experience is appointed to cut prisoners’ hair”.

Reply:

St Albans Prison comprises of the following sections mentioned on the table below:

• St Albans Maximum
• St Albans Remand Detention
• St Albans Medium B

ST ALBANS MAXIMUM
DATE/ YEAR	1(a) NUMBER OF ASSAULTS REPORTED	(b)(i)(ii) NUMBER OF CASES INVESTIGATES AND OUTCOME OF THE INVESTIGATIONS
2014	35 Cases reported	32 x cases were not opened by victims therefore they were finalised 3 x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised
2015	43 cases reported	36x cases were not opened by victims therefore they were finalised 3x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 4 x cases opened with SAPS but offender did not want to open a case – Finalised
2016	11 cases reported	9 x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 1 x case - offender did not want to open a case- Finalised 1 x case opened with SAPS - Pending
2017 AS OF 31 JANUARY	1 case reported	1 x case opened with SAPS in 2017 – Pending
ST ALBANS REMAND DETENTION
2014	14 cases reported	2x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 5 x cases opened with SAPS – Pending 6 x cases reported but detainees did not open the case
2015	35 cases reported	4 x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 1 x case opened with SAPS – Pending 30 x reported but not opened by detainees therefore finalised
2016	11 cases reported	7 x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 3 x cases opened with SAPS - Pending 1 x case not opened by the Detainee
ST ALBANS MEDIUM B
2014	34 cases reported	8 x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 8 x cases opened with SAPS – Pending 1 x case withdrawn by the Prosecutor – Finalised 17 x cases not opened by offenders
2015	35 cases reported	11 x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 4 x cases opened with SAPS – Pending 20 x cases not opened by offenders therefore finalised
2016	10 cases reported	3 x cases opened with SAPS – Finalised 7 x cases not opened by offenders therefore finalised
2017	1 case reported	1 x case opened with SAPS - Pending

Reply:

1. The information is in the table below:

SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC NATIONALS
YEAR	APPLIED FOR ASYLUM	GRANTED REFUGEE STATUS	(c) DENIED REFUGEE STATUS
2007	0	0	0
2008	1	Information not available	Information not available
2009	0	0	0
2010	0	0	0
2011	0	0	0
2012	5	2	0
2013	11	6	3
2014	40	11	Information not available
2015	27	3	7
2016	20	12	12

2. No

Reply:

In addition to routine meetings (Early Child Development, conditional grant frameworks, guideline for NPO payments, Budget 2017), the National Treasury has met with SASSA and Department of Social Development (DSD) multiple times on the issue of social grant payments upon expiry of the current contract. Two meetings were held between senior management of SASSA, DSD, National Treasury and South African Reserve Bank. Numerous meetings were held of the technical task team established to consider options for payment of social grants, consider pros and cons of different options and provide expert advice on procurement, public finance, financial sector policy and banking to SASSA.

I have also had brief discussions with the Minister of Social Development, telephonically or in person, to discuss the payment of grants.

Reply:

(a) The communities within the Harry Gwala District Municipality (HGDM) and uMkhanyakude DM (UKDM) have been without water for over two years due to two factors, i.e. severe drought impact which has plagued most parts of the KwaZulu-Natal including some of Harry Gwala and uMkhanyakude areas and secondly it has been due to infrastructure limitations in some areas.

(b) The department provides funding to uMkhanyakude and Harry Gwala District Municipalities in order to try to resolve the water challenges faced by the districts and my department will continue to support the municipalities to ensure that the communities have access to good quality clean water.

Refer to the table below for allocations for UMkhanyakude DM (UKDM):

Grant	2015/16	2016/17	2017/18	2018-19
RBIG	R313 Million	R110Million	R119 Million	None
MWIG	R54 Million	None	None	None
WSIG	None	R70 Million	R50 Million	R65 million

Refer to the table below for allocations for Harry Gwala DM (HGDM):

Grant	2015/16	2016/17	2017/18	2018-19
RBIG	R14 Million	R48 Million	R90 Million	R100 Million
MWIG	R43.5 Million	None	None	None
WSIG	None	R86 Million	R98 Million	R108 million

 

Reply:

No funds have been specifically allocated for nuclear power procurement in the 2017 Budget.

Reply:

Yes.

The Department of Health has adopted an integrated model of care whereby all service users must be consulted within the provision of health care services.

In rural areas where specialized services are not in reach of where communities live, plans are underway to contract with private providers. In areas where there are no private providers communities will be served through specialist outreach services.

END.

Reply:

I have been informed by the Department as follows:-

i.  MINISTER

 

a) MAKE	b) MODEL	c) PRICE	d) PURCHASE DATE
Audi Q7	Q7 3.0 TDI	681 841.98	2014/15 FY
Jeep	Grand Cherokee 3.6 Overland	626 661.00	2014/15 FY

(aaa) 2014-15

The vehicles bought as per the table above.

(bbb) 2015-16

No vehicles were purchased for the Minister in this financial year.

(bb) Since 1 April 2016

No vehicles were purchased for the Minister in this financial year.

ii.  DEPUTY MINISTER

a) MAKE	b) MODEL	c) PRICE	d) PURCHASE DATE
LEXUS	ES250	438 152,16	2014/15 FY
Jeep	Grand Cherokee 3.0 LTD	637 114,00	2014/15 FY

(aaa) 2014-15

The vehicles bought as per the table above.

(bbb) 2015-16

No vehicles were purchased for the Deputy Minister in this financial year.

(bb) Since 1 April 2016

No vehicles were purchased for the Deputy Minister in this financial year.

Reply:

(1) The Department of Health undertakes annual assessments of health care professionals against possible infections, generally, through occupational health units located within health facilities. Recently, the Department has decided to put together an additional policy, to look at TB specifically. While the policy is still being developed, with reviews being undertaken by all relevant stakeholders including associations of health professional workers and legal units, it has already been determined that medical checks for TB will be undertaken more frequently. The policy will be implemented once it has been approved by the National Health Council (NHC);

(2) The Department of Health provides N95 masks to all health care professionals and surgical masks for the use of patients. These are however used more consistently in high risk (for infection) areas of health facilities. These masks are provided on the basis of a tender that has been awarded to a service provider, following negotiations for lowering of the masks' prices

END.

Reply:

1.   130

2.   The Department issues Pre-compliance Notice in terms of section 31 of NEMA following review of report and outcome of the compliance inspections

3.   The Department will issue compliance Notice as part of administrative enforcement. However, if non-compliance persist, criminal enforcement will be persued.

Approved/Not Approved

Mr MJ Zwane, MP

Minister of Mineral Resources

Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017

Reply:

I have been informed by SAPO as follows:

1. (a) – (b) SAPO submitted its Request for Information (RFI) to SASSA on 10 February 2017.

2. No contracts have been entered into.

Reply:

I have been informed by SAPO as follows:

1.  (a) The Kidds Beach Postal Agency is not yet closed down. It is scheduled to close at the end of April 2017.

(b) The Agency has terminated the agreement with SAPO for personal reasons.

(c) As of May 2017, residents of Kidds Beach and surrounding areas will conduct their postal business at Greenfields Post Office, which is just 25 km away. Private boxes will remain at the Agency building and clients will continue to receive mail from their boxes. The company is still pursuing alternative measures with prospective agents to provide services in the area.

2.  (a) The transaction viable amounts for December 2016 and January 2017 are outstanding but have been captured in the system for February 2017 payments. The capturing of these payments is dependent on the date of submission of claims by the Agent.

(b) In terms of the agreement with the current agent, the Post Office cannot divulge any confidential information to any third party without the agent’s express consent.

Reply:

1.  This question is answered below in two parts, i.e. what Eskom owns directly and

what Eskom owns indirectly. Eskom directly owns one mine, called Kilbarchan Colliery.

Eskom indirectly owns some equity in the cost plus mines as a result of ownership of a portion of the mine assets through the cost plus coal supply agreements (CSA) signed. Mining houses have the statutory right to mine the coal, and the statutory obligation to rehabilitate. Eskom, through the CSA has the financial obligation to pay for these costs. The reserves dedicated to Eskom, can only be sold to Eskom.

In a case where the mining house intends to transfer its rights and obligations Eskom would have to provide consent.It should be noted that the CSAs do not include BEE ownership requirements as the last cost plus agreement was signed prior to Eskom’s current BEE Policy.

(1)(a)(b) Table 1 below presents Eskom’s Cost Plus CSAs. The Colliery column (a) provides the names of the mines and the Mining House (b) column provides the information on who is mining the mine.

Table 1Eskom's current Cost Plus CSAs

	Colliery (a)	Mining House (b)	B-BBEE Status	Start of CSA	Current End of CSA	Power Station	Investment made by Eskom, from inception to date	Annual Contractual Volumes (ktons)
1	Kriel	Anglo	LME 8	Dec 1979	Dec 2019	Kriel	R2.4 bn	8 500
2	New Denmark[1]	Anglo	LME 8	Sept 1989	Sept 2029	Tutuka	R3.2 bn	10 000 per CSA 4 500 Assumed
3	New Vaal	Anglo	LME 8	June 1989	June 2029	Lethabo	R1.6 bn	17 800
4	Matla	Exxaro	BO LME 4	July 1983	July 2023	Matla	R2.2 bn	10 066
5	Khutala	South32	LME 8	Dec 1993	Dec 2033	Kendal	R1.6 bn	13 300
6	Arnot	Closed mine	BO LME 4	June 1981	Dec 2015	Arnot	R0.8 bn	-

2.  Kilbarchan Colliery is recorded in Eskom’s balance sheet under the subsidiary Natal Navigation Colliery. It is recorded at R1, while the associated rehabilitation liability has been fully raised in Eskom’s financial statements

On cost plus mines, these are not on Eskom’s balance sheet because the direct ownership rests with the mining houses and their balance sheets.

Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved

Mr. Mogokare Richard Seleke Ms. Lynne Brown, MP

Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises

Date: Date:

1. PQ241 ↑

Reply:

(1)(a)(b)

Yes, provinces do have a database and/statistics on the number of learners with disabilities. The Department of Basic Education (DBE) together with Provincial Education Departments (PEDs) conduct three surveys that collects information on learners with disabilities annually, which are: Snap Survey and Annual Survey for Special schools (collect learner enrolment in special schools), and Annual Survey for ordinary schools (collects information on disabled learners in mainstream and full service). Each PED provide their individual databases to DBE, which, in turn, establishes a national database.

(2)(a)

The last survey on schools for learners with Special Needs was conducted on the 01 September 2016, which was the Annual Survey for Special schools.

(2)(b)(c)

Table 1 below indicates the number of special schools surveyed in 2016. It shows that there were 462 special schools in 2016 with 119 403 learners.

Table 1: Number of special schools and learners, by province, in 2016

Province	(b) Number of Special Schools	(c) Number of learners in Special schools
EC	43	9 463
FS	21	5 984
GP	149	47 769
KZ	65	14 986
LP	35	8 630
MP	20	3 778
NC	11	1 494
NW	32	7 395
WC	86	19 904
National	462	119 403

Source: 2016 SNE SNAP Survey

(3)(a)(b)

The Department has forwarded the question to the Provincial Education Department and is awaiting the response. The response will be forwarded as soon as the Department receives it.

(4)

Table 2: Number of special schools converted into resource centres by province, in 2017/18 financial year

Prov.	No. SSRCs
EC	19
FS	5
GT	17
KZN	16
LP	5
MP	8
NC	5
NW	8
WC	25
Total	108

Source: PED’s submission

(5) (a) The information on the number of learners at each school for learners with special educational needs who have been erroneously placed in each financial year is not readily available in Provincial Education Departments (PEDs), given that the implementation to scale of the Policy on Screening, Identification, Assessment and Support (SIAS) at school level was preceded by training mainly during 2016/17 and effective implementation has only started in 2017.

(b) Measures in this regard will be put in place from 2018 onwards.

Reply:

I have been informed by SAPO as follows:

1. Mail is delivered at the Serenitas Retirement Village every second day.

2. The so-called “dumped mail” seen at the gate of Gracia’a Retirement Village on 09 January 2017, was for delivery at the Serenitas Retirement Village. When the volume for delivery in an area is too much for the postman to carry, excess mail is prepared and placed in an excess mail bag called dump bag. The bag is then transported by vehicle to a convenient spot, in this case, Gracia’s Retirement Village, where the postman will collect and deliver further. No dumping of mail took place.

Reply:

I have been advised by the Department follows:-

(1) (a) The Department appointed Fidelity Security Group (Pty) Ltd.

(b) The service provider was appointed on 28 October 2016.The contract started on 1 December 2016.

(c) (i)The duration of the contract is two years.

(ii)The contract cost is R11 817 326.44 (VAT inclusive)

(2) (a) The material terms of the successful bid was that the service provider met all the requirement of the department regarding evaluation criteria stipulated in the bid documentation. The following were material terms for the successful bidder:

• Experience in providing physical security services,
• Proof of registration with Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA),
• Financial capability and
• Detailed Project Execution Plan.

(b) On the closing date, 70 bids were received by the Department.

(c) Normal government Supply Chain Management (SCM) bid evaluation and adjudication processes were followed.

(3) Imvula Quality Protection (Africa) (Pty) Ltd did not score the highest in the bid evaluation and adjudication processes.

Reply:

I have been informed by SAPO as follows:

(1) (a) During the period 1 January to date no casuals were appointed within SAPO. All casuals were converted to permanent part- time or full time employees by September 2016.

(b) Two fixed contractors were appointed since 1 January 2017. One fixed term contractor was appointed with effect from 3 January 2017 for a fixed term of 9 months within the Travel Office and another fixed term contractor was appointed with effect from 1 February 2017 for a period of 18 months to assist with the National Address roll out project.

Reply:

I have been informed by SAPO as follows:

(a)

Province	Branch	Mobile	RPOA	Grand Total
Eastern Cape	182	2	123	307
Free State	118	1	16	135
Gauteng	332		9	341
KwaZulu Natal	240	2	68	310
Limpopo	136	2	123	261
Mpumalanga	116	1	100	217
Northern Cape	1			1
North West	127	1	87	215
Northern Cape	63		67	130
Western Cape	173		112	285
Grand Total	1 488	9	705	2 202

(b)

Province	Branch Mines	Rural	Urban	Branch Total	Mobile Rural	Mobile Total	RPOA Rural	Urban	RPOA Total	Grand Total
Eastern Cape		131	51	182	2	2	123		123	307
Free State		20	98	118	1	1	8	8	16	135
Gauteng		4	328	332			2	7	9	341
KwaZulu Natal		103	137	240	2	2	52	16	68	310
Limpopo		92	44	136	2	2	123		123	261
Mpumalanga		52	64	116	1	1	91	9	100	217
Northern Cape			1	1						1
North West	1	60	66	127	1	1	87		87	215
Northern Cape		38	25	63			53	14	67	130
WesternCape		25	148	173			94	18	112	285
Grand Total	1	525	962	1 488	9	9	633	72	705	2 202

(c)

Province	Sum of MVL systems Installed
Eastern Cape	113
Free State	18
Gauteng	235
KwaZulu Natal	37
Limpopo	52
Mpumalanga	9
North West	9
Grand Total	473

 

Reply:

I have been advised by the Department as follows:-

1. Mr. Buthelezi lodged a dispute of unfair dismissal with the General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council and the arbitration is ongoing.
2. (i)The Department has taken action against Mr. Buthelezi in order to recover unauthorised expenditure incurred by the Department. The Department’s decision to recover the legal costs incurred in the labour court case between Mr Wisani Ngobeni, (a former employee of the Department) and the Department is under review.

(ii) No other legal action is being taken against current employees.

Reply:

(i) Minister

(bb) As follows:

(a) BMW (Pretoria)

(b) 5 SERIES

(c) R740 299.99

(d) 23 August 2016

(aaa) None.

(bbb) None.

(ii) Deputy Minister

(aaa) As follows:

	Pretoria	Cape Town
(a)	Mercedes Benz	BMW
(b)	ML400	X5
(c)	R962 793.20	R887 168.34
(d)	15 July 2014	31 July 2014

(bbb) None.

(bb) None.

Reply:

I have been informed by Telkom as follows:

1. (a)(i) 207 038 058 Shares

(ii) R15 244 212 210.54 as on 31 January 2017 (Government shareholdings have not changed since the previous reporting period- September 2016)

(b) Government is not required to appoint any directors to the Telkom Board.

(c) Telkom does not have any government appointees on their current Board.

(d) No appointments

(2) (a) It is the prerogative of the Board on the recommendations of the Nominations Committee subject to Shareholder approval.

(b) It is the prerogative of the Board on the recommendations of the Nominations Committee subject to Shareholder approval.

Reply:

1.  The Department of Environmental Affairs has put various measures in place for monitoring, regulating and enforcement in the traditional healers industry as further expanded upon below:

The Department of Environmental Affairs has promulgated the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004(Act 10 of 2004) (NEMBA), the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) regulations, as well as the Threatened and Protected Species (TOPS) regulations. In terms of Section 57(1) of NEMBA, a person may not carry out a restricted activity involving a specimen of a listed threatened or protected species without a permit issued in terms of Chapter 7 of NEMBA. Therefore, a permit would be required each time a traditional healer carry out a restricted activities. Restricted activity is defined in NEMBA, and includes, but not limited to; possession, transporting selling, buying, damaging, and cutting of a specimen of listed threatened or protected species. Carrying out of any restricted activity involving a specimen of a listed threatened or protected species without a permit is an offence which is punishable by either a fine not exceeding R10 million or an imprisonment for a period not exceeding ten years, or both such a fine and imprisonment. Monitoring of compliance and enforcement of the above legislations is conducted by Environmental Management Inspectors (EMIs)

(a). Not applicable.

(b). The Minister has, in terms of the provisions of the National Environmental Management Act of 1998 (NEMA), appointed officials within the Department of Environmental Affairs and duly designated them as Environmental Management Inspectors (EMIs). The EMIs are part of the National Environmental Management Inspectorate. The EMIs (also known as the “green scorpions”) are mandated to monitor compliance with environmental legislation and to take enforcement action in cases where non-compliance with environmental legislation has been detected. It should be noted that there are also green scorpions at the provincial environmental and conservation departments.

In 2014, the National Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Strategy (NECES) was developed for the Inspectorate. In line with the strategic objectives of the NECES, specific sectors are prioritised for compliance and enforcement activities; and during the 2016/17 financial year, the “Traditional healers”, “Muti traders” and “Muti Collectors” industry was a focus area for compliance promotion and awareness initiatives as a precursor to more targeted compliance monitoring and enforcement planned for the 2017/18 financial year.

The project thus far has focused on compliance promotion and awareness campaigns for the “Traditional Healers”, “Muti-Traders” and “Muti-Collectors” operating at the “muti-markets” in order to assist them to come into compliance with national environmental legislations, such as the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act, Act 10 of 2004, (NEMBA), with regard to buying and selling species listed on the Threatened or Protected Species List at the “muti-markets”.

On 19 January 2017, the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA), together with Gauteng Provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD), hosted the first biodiversity compliance awareness workshop in Johannesburg, Gauteng Province. The main purpose of the workshop was to bring together all traditional healers and “muti-traders” operating at the Faraday and Mai Mai markets. Further events in other provinces and additional meetings are planned for the latter part of the financial year, ahead of the more targeted compliance and enforcement work that will take place as part of this project in the 2017/18 financial year.

(2) Yes, the Environmental Management Inspectors (Green Scorpions) from the Department of Environmental Affairs and Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development have visited Faraday Muti Market situated at the Faraday Taxi Rank in Johannesburg.

(b) The reason for this particular visit was not to conduct inspections and identify endangered species yet. The purpose for the attendance at the market was to meet with the management of the Muti Markets with regard to the compliance promotion and awareness campaign being conducted by the Department. This type of campaign is critical to ensure that those working at the market are aware of the legal requirements for trade, as well as what trade is permitted. It was also to ensure that the trade that is conducted at the market is sustainable, as well as also to assist in enabling the trade at these markets to continue in line with what is legally permitted. The effectiveness and ultimate success of our monitoring and enforcement activities are strengthened if they are preceded by these types of campaigns.

(b) (i) No individuals were penalised.

(ii) No individuals were arrested.

It must be noted that there will be further compliance and enforcement work that will be carried out to ensure that there is no trade in endangered species in line with the NECES and that appropriate penalties and arrests will be made should any infractions be found.

 

Reply:

For purposes of the response, the payments to SMMEs and co-operatives cannot be separated as these are recorded together.

Information below covers the period from 01 April 2015 to 31 March 2016.

(a) The Department of Small Business Development (DSBD)

The total procurement on goods and services in respect of the 30% set aside target is as follows:

No	Description	LOGIS transactions	BAS transactions	Total	%
(i) and (ii)	SMME’s and Cooperatives	R11 715 235.01	10,332,498.72	22,047,733.73	69.34%
(iii)	Non-SMME’s	R18 450.00	9,728,481.73	9,746,931.73	30.66%
Total procurement	11,733,685.01	20,060,980.45	31,794,665.46	100.00%

 

In addition the R3.5 million spent on capital assets was procured through the SMME’s.

(b) Entities reporting to the DSBD

The Small Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA)

The Small Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA) total procurement on goods and services in respect of the 30% set aside target is as follows:

No	Description	Total	%
(i) and (ii)	SMME’s and Co-operatives	R255m	56%
(iii)	Non-SMME’s	R200m	44%
Total procurement	R455m	100%

The Small Enterprise Finance Agency (SEFA)

The R 126,016,582 total procurement on goods and services in respect of the 30% set aside target is as follows:

No	Description	Total	%
(i) and (ii)	SMME’s and Co- operatives	R 88, 211,607.40	70%
(iii)	Non-SMME’s	R 37, 804,974.60	30%
Total procurement	R 126,016,582

Reply:

(i)  In the period under review the following vehicles were purchased for use by the Minister of Science of Science and Technology:

(aaa) 2014 – 15 Financial year for Pretoria Office:

1. Audi Q7 3.0 TDI 180 kw Q TIP;
2. 2015
3. R697,733.58 and
4. 23 July 2015 (invoice date)

(bbb) 2015 – 16 financial year for Cape Town Office:

1. Audi Q7 3.0 TDI quarto;
2. 2016
3. R798,020.53 and
4. 29 March 2016 (invoice date)

(bb) Since 1 April 2016

1. No cars were purchased.
2. Not applicable
3. Not applicable
4. Not applicable

(ii)  In the period under review , no vehicles were purchased for use by the Deputy Minister of Science and Technology.

Reply:

(1) All hospitals inclusive of rural hospitals are equipped with necessary functioning and life saving equipments in emergency sections.

(2) (a) & (b) An explanation of the equipment provided at all levels of care is elaborated below in (i) - (vi) -

(i) Blood gas machines in district hospitals are available in theatres and also provided National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS), which is on site for trauma cases, and in the higher level of care from regional hospitals is available in trauma units, theatres and intensive care units;

(ii) Partograms are available in all antenatal care units in maternity as from district hospitals to the higher level of care;

(iii) Paediatric ventilators are available to all regional hospitals where paediatric services are provided and higher level of care as this forms part of specialised care. CPAPs are available in district hospitals with high care units;

(iv) Neonatal central lines are available in Neonatal Intensive Care units as from regional hospitals to the higher level of care;

(v) Hard trauma collars are available from Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and also in trauma units in all hospitals;

(vi) Anaesthetic machine with capnogram are available in all theatres in all hospitals.

END.