Questions and Replies

Reply:

(1) Yes

The issues of internal disciplinary processes and/or investigations is sub judice, therefore the FPB is not in a better position to release details in relation to (a)(b) at this stage.

(c) The investigations are at an advance stage

(d) The employee has consented to pre-dismissal arbitration and application has been lodged with the CCMA.

(2) Yes, with effect from 17 March 2017 pending the outcome of the disciplinary process.

(a) The details of the employee in relation to suspension cannot be disclosed as the matter is sub judice.

(b) Yes, they were receiving salaries.

(3) (a) Yes

(b) No, as the imployee has since resigned from the FPB following an agreement of mutual separation.

(4) The FPB has reached a mutual separation agreement.

Reply:

Auditing process in relation to the total amount spent, amongst others, refer to in this parliamentary question is still under away, once the auditing process and all other process has been completed, the amount spent, will be submitted to Parliament as part of the Annual Reports, which will be tabled in Parliament.

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) It was reported to the Department that no examiners of vehicles in the Northern Cape have been convicted of issuing fraudulent certificates of road worthiness during the 2016 / 17 financial year.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

(1) Yes, since from 17 March 2017.

(2) (a)(b) the FPB conducts benchmarking studies in different jurisdictions and the work on the Online Regulation Policy was a culmination of such studies.

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

(a) The Eastern Cape Province reported that one examiner was convicted and is still practicing (Case no 217/ 1 /2016 Cradock Magistrate Court). The reason for continuation is that the Department is waiting for the response of the accused. A suspension letter was issued to him and signed by him on 08 May 2017. He was given 21 days to respond and this will end on the 02 June 2017.

(b) See above (a)

(c) See above (b)

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) The Limpopo province reported that there were no examiners convicted of issuing fraudulent certificates of road worthiness in the 2016 / 17 financial year.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

(i) There are three ongoing investigations at PRASA.

1. The investigations into the irregular and fruitless and wasteful expenditure found by the Auditor-General in the 2014/2015 annual financial statements. This was commissioned by the Board of PRASA in terms of its fiduciary duties flowing from the Public Finance Management Act and led by Werksmans Attorneys.
2. The investigations into contracts of more than R10 million concluded between 2012 and 2015 as per the remedial steps recommended by the Public Protector’s Report in August 2015 that are associated with the entities and transactions that were under investigation in (1) above. These investigations were, by agreement between PRASA, the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer of the National Treasury and the Department of Transport, led by Werksmans Attorneys.
3. The investigations into contracts of more than R10 million concluded between 2012 and 2015 as per the remedial steps recommended by the Public Protector in August 2015. These relate to entities and transactions that were not viewed as related to the entities and transaction under investigation in (1) above. These investigations are led by National Treasury and National Treasury has appointed about 20 entities with forensic investigation capacity to conduct the investigation of these transactions and entities.

(ii) There is no new investigation commissioned by the Board of PRASA.

(iii) For the Financial Years 15/16 and 16/17, R148 million was paid for the investigations, and for the 17/18 Financial Year R14 million has been budgeted.

(iv) The timeframes for the conclusion of the investigations is end of July. The Milestones are that reports are submitted to the Board as they are completed. To date the Board has instituted seven court actions and has also forwarded 41 reports to the Directorate of Priority crimes investigations for further criminal investigations and 4 internal disciplinary actions have been instituted against affected employees.

(v) Please see response under (ii).

Reply:

The Department has refurbished and equipped the West End Psychiatric Hospital state patients unit in the 2016/17 financial year.

(a) A vacated 36 bed ward at West End Hospital has been completely upgraded to make it suitable for involuntary male health patients. The male involuntary patients were transferred from the secure ward adjacent to the existing State Patient Ward. This vacated ward is also suitable for State Patients which allowed rapid transfer in early May of 21 State Patients from Kimberley Correctional Services.

(b) The ward is fully and appropriately equipped for State Patients.

END.

Reply:

a) The Department of Communications (DoC) spent R958 689.84 on a business briefing held on 26 May 2016 which was organised by the newspaper in question.

b) The entities in the DoC portfolio did not spend on promotional events organised by the newspaper in question since 1 May 2014.

Reply:

No, neither the National Department of Health nor any of the public entities reporting to the Ministry of Health procured any services from the Decolonisation Foundation.

END.

Reply:

(aa) 2014-15

ITEM	NAME	DESIGNATION	AIR	CAR HIRE	(a) TRAVEL	(b) ACCOMMODATION
(i)	MS E PETERS	MINISTER	R1 298 747.00	R 667 166.38	R1 965 913.38	R181 172.70
(ii)	MS L CHIKUNGA	DEPUTY MINISTER	No information available	R392 782.61	R392 782.61	R21 345.00
(iii)	MR I MNISI	MEDIA LIAISON OFFICER - MINISTRY	R8 706.17	R17 527.30	R26 233.47	R69 754.38
(iii)	MS N MAPHANGA	PARLIAMENTARY AND MEDIA LIAISON OFFICER - DEPUTY MINISTER	R0.00	R142 222.72	R142 222.72	NO INFO

No information – no record, company insolvent

(bb) 2015-16

ITEM	NAME	DESIGNATION	AIR	CAR HIRE	(a) TRAVEL	(b) ACCOMMODATION
(i)	MS E PETERS	MINISTER	R1 401 868.22	R883 813.53	R 2 285 681.75	R50 760.73
(ii)	MS L CHIKUNGA	DEPUTY MINISTER	R1 008 247.22	R863 496.51	R1 871 743.73	R109 187.69
(iii)	MR I MNISI	MEDIA LIAISON OFFICER - MINISTRY	R104 071.11	R30 607.13	R134 678.24	R52 744.00
(iii)	MS N MAPHANGA	PARLIAMENTARY AND MEDIA LIAISON OFFICER - DEPUTY MINISTER	R219 534.16	R154 047.35	R373 581.51	R124 636.87

(cc) 2016-17

ITEM	NAME	DESIGNATION	AIR	CAR HIRE	(a) TRAVEL	(b) ACCOMMODATION
(i)	MS E PETERS	MINISTER	R750 529.60	R1 047 281.14	R1 797 810.74	R85 616.07
(ii)	MS L CHIKUNGA	DEPUTY MINISTER	R862 245.83	R539 112.08	R1 401 357.91	R152 472.49
(iii)	MR I MNISI	MEDIA LIAISON OFFICER - MINISTRY	R93 865.84	R47 183.02	R141 048.86	R49 622.53
(iii)	MS N MAPHANGA	PARLIAMENTARY AND MEDIA LIAISON OFFICER - DEPUTY MINISTER	R195 974.90	R282 622.46	R478 597.36	R191 802.97

Reply:

(a) (i) Please refer to Annexure A.

(ii) Only 1 (one) borehole was refurbished at a cost of R 58 129.98. All other boreholes were drilled and equipped, as per annexure A.

(iii) Please refer to Annexure A.

(b) (i),(ii) Please refer to the Annexure A.

(c) (i) There were no service providers appointed for maintenance of boreholes. Boreholes were on completion handed over to the farmers (beneficiaries or communities).

(ii) No maintenance costs were incurred by the Department.

ANNEXURE A OF NA QUES 1049 OF 2017

No	Province	Local Municipality	Name	Total Cost per borehole	(a)(i) Drilling cost per metre	(a)(iii) Equipping cost per metre	(b)(i) Type of pump	(b)(ii) Type of equipment installed
1	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Bethlehem Camp 1	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
2	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Bethlehem Camp 2	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
3	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Gedachtenis	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 2 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
4	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Mahlake 305	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
5	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Mahlake 310	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
6	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mcakwini 1	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
7	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Ndombeni	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
8	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Bethangwe	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
9	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mansiya	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
10	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Manaba	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
11	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Imanzibomvu (Mbazwana)	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
12	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Kwageorge dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
13	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mabandleni dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
14	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mkhumbikazane	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
15	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Thengane dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
16	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Bomvini Dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
17	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Genuka dip	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
18	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mfanela	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
19	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mthaleni	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
20	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mthaleni 2	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
21	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Masakeni	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
22	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Masakeni 2 (Giba)	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
23	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Nqutshini	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
24	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Nqutshini 2 (Esimphondweni)	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
25	KZN	Zululand	Ntweni	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
26	KZN	Zululand	Nkweme	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
27	KZN	Zululand	Ndololwane	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
28	KZN	Zululand	Emfemfeni	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
29	KZN	Zululand	Dabhazi	R 87 246.73	R 736.60	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
30	KZN	Zululand	Dabhazi	R 87 246.73	R 736.60	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
31	KZN	Zululand	Dabhazi	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
32	KZN	Zululand	KwaMphothi	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
33	KZN	Zululand	Qanqathu Trust	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
34	KZN	Uthungulu	Thelumoyaphansi	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
35	KZN	Uthungulu	Matina	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
36	KZN	Uthungulu	Matina	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
37	KZN	Uthungulu	Siyangokuya	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
38	KZN	Uthungulu	Mpongose	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
39	KZN	Uthungulu	Dubeni Dip tank	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
40	KZN	Uthungulu	Ntshiweni Dip Tank	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
41	KZN	Uthungulu	Patane (Gcobashe)	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
42	KZN	Uthungulu	Mfanisa	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
43	KZN	Uthungulu	Ntuthunga	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
44	KZN	Uthungulu	eDayini	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
45	KZN	Uthungulu	Sabhuza	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
46	KZN	Uthungulu	Sabhuza	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
47	KZN	Uthungulu	Gegethe	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
48	KZN	Amajuba	Inkululeko Yomphakathi	R 407 185.65	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
49	KZN	Amajuba	Ndwakazane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
50	KZN	Amajuba	Vaalbank-Esidakeni	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
51	KZN	Amajuba	Vaalbank-Esidakeni	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
52	KZN	Amajuba	Slagveld	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
53	KZN	Amajuba	AMAJUBA - OSIZWENI	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
54	KZN	Amajuba	Jiyane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
55	KZN	Amajuba	Waaihoek	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
56	KZN	Amajuba	Esikhaleni	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
57	KZN	Amajuba	Reserve Farm	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
58	KZN	Amajuba	Bloodriver -Nzimane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
59	KZN	Amajuba	Bloodriver -Nzimane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
60	KZN	Amajuba	AMAJUBA BUFFALO RIVER	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
61	KZN	Amajuba	Steeling	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
62	KZN	Amajuba	Malonjane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
63	KZN	Amajuba	GROOTHOEK	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
64	KZN	Amajuba	MANCAMANE	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
65	KZN	Amajuba	WAAIHOEK FARM 2 TRUST	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
66	KZN	Amajuba	GROOTVLEI	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
67	KZN	Amajuba	BEROUW	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
68	KZN	Umzinyathi	Ward 9	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
69	KZN	Umzinyathi	Ward 7	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
70	KZN	Umzinyathi	Ward 7 Replacement	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
71	KZN	Umzinyathi	Nquthu Ward 12 Jabuvu	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
72	KZN	Umzinyathi	Jabavu - alternate	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
73	KZN	Umzinyathi	Nquthu Ward 13 Hluleni	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
74	KZN	Umzinyathi	HLAZAKAZI	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
75	KZN	Uthukela	Emnambithi piggery	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
76	KZN	Uthukela	Mdlatswele -Cornfields	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
77	KZN	Uthukela	Mkholombe -Weenen	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
78	KZN	Uthukela	Khanjana (Nhlambamsoka)	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
79	KZN	Uthukela	Rosboom ( Goodhope)	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
80	KZN	Uthukela	RIETKUIL FARM	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
81	KZN	Uthukela	KLIP PORT FARM	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
82	KZN	Uthukela	MANGQATENI	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
83	Limpopo	Greater Giyani	Thomo	R 346 225.00	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
84	Limpopo	Thulamela	Tshifudi	R 415 663.38	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
85	Limpopo	Lephalale	Kgobagodimo	R 482 582.50	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
86	Mpumalanga	Thembisile Hani	Gemsbokfontein	R 150 000.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 1 troughs on slab
87	Mpumalanga	Bushbuckridge	Welverdiend A	R 315 680.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
88	Mpumalanga	Chief Albert Luthuli	Lekkerloop (section 2)	R 58 129.98	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	4x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 8 troughs on slab
89	Mpumalanga	Thaba Cheu	Pilgrimrest	R 160 000.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	4 x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 16 troughs on slab
90	Mpumalanga	Nkomazi	Strydomblok/Dludluma	R 202 000.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
91	Mpumalanga	Nkomazi	Goba	R 189 720.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
92	North West	Moses Kotane	DRIEFONTEIN FARM-MMEKWA	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
93	North West	Moses Kotane	DRIEFONTEIN FARM-MONAGENG	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
94	North West	Mahikeng	FARM LUCYDALE-STONE	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
95	North West	Mahikeng	FARM LUCYDALE-MATSHEKA	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
96	North West	Mahikeng	SUNNYSIDE-MOJIWA	R 220 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
97	North West	Moses Kotane	VLAKFONTEIN FARM	R 220 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
98	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Mabiletsa	R 220 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
99	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm- ntshabele PJ	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
100	North West	Moses Kotane	driefontein farm -Monageng	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
101	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm-Ramokgadi	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
102	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Pitse	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
103	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Lekgotla PN	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
104	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm- Maragel BJ	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
105	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm - Matlapeng	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
106	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm Moraka	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
107	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm- Maragele TM	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
108	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Molefe ES	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
109	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Ntshabele NS	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
110	North West	Rustenburg	Palmietfontein -Mokgatle	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
111	North West	Rustenburg	Potgieters fontein-Motlhabane	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
112	North West	Rustenburg	Palmietfontein -Rammutla	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
113	North West	Mahikeng	Lucydale farm	R 220 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) According to information provided by the Free State province, no examiners were arrested or convicted in the 2016 / 17 financial year for fraudulent certification of roadworthiness.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) The North West Department of Transport reported on the following:

Four (4) Examiners had been arrested and charged.

Of the four (4), one (1) examiner resigned during the process,

One (1) examiner was found guilty by the Wolmaranstad Magistrate Court and sentence will be passed on the 9th June 2017.

Two (2) Examiners' case ongoing at the Tlhabane Magistrate Court, but are currently on bail and the hearing postponed to the 8th June 2017 - Case No. 336/02/2017

One (1) Runner and a Clerk arrested with the Examiner above, case also ongoing - Case No. 336/02/2017

The examiner who was found guilty is not currently working as an examiner.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

 

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) Gauteng Province responded by noting that that five (5) Examiners of vehicles have been de-registered as Authorized Officers for Fraud during the 2016/2017 financial year and are no longer practicing as Examiners of Vehicles in the Gauteng Province due to their registration being cancelled.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

(a) In terms of section 40 of the National Road Traffic act, 1996 (Act No. 93 of 1996) read with regulation 136 of the National Road traffic Regulations, 2000 it is the competency of the respective MEC’s responsible for transport to either suspend or cancel the registration of a testing station, if a testing station no longer complies with the requirements for registration. In terms of Regulation 137E the Inspectorate of Testing Stations shall evaluate and inspect as prescribed and make recommendations to the MEC in terms of the compliance or non-compliance of vehicle testing stations in the province. This includes but is not limited to the compliance to SANS 10216. It remains the prerogative of the respective MECs to implement the recommendations of the SABS and the reason for different applications of the recommendations is due to the fact that each MEC may choose to implement according to his or her discretion.

(b) The function of the Inspectorate of Testing Stations is currently performed by the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS). The Inspectorate can only make recommendations to the respective MEC and have no powers to enforce such recommendations. It remains the prerogative of the respective MECs to implement the recommendations of the SABS and the reason for different applications of the recommendations or not implementing at all is due to the fact that each MEC may choose to implement according to his or her discretion. All provinces have replied that the recommendations were adhered to.

(c) The Department is communicating concerns regarding noncompliance at the national forums and via provincial information sessions. This happens on a continuous basis. The Department has further included the development of the Anti-Fraud and Corruption Strategy in its Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Plan. The Department is further striving towards publishing the Minimum Requirements for Service Delivery Standard. Both these initiatives strive to address non-compliance at not only testing stations but also Driving Licence Testing Centres and Registering Authorities. All of the mentioned initiatives involves publication in the Gazette and impact studies. The replies to (d), (e) and (f) are dependent on the relevant MECs of each province and are depicted under the applicable provincial heading below.

Eastern Cape:

(d) (i) Upon recommendations by the SABS, Eastern Cape issues a TS4 notice to the contravening vehicle test station in terms of Regulation 136 (1) and (2) NRTA, Act 93 of 1996, and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000, requiring the said VTS to report to the MEC in writing within 14 days from the date of the notification, the reason for such failure to comply and details of the measures taken to rectify and prevent such failure. Standards are applied to in terms of the National Road Traffic Act 93/1996

(ii) (iii) The Province follows up with the VTS after the 14 days, and with the SABS to determine if the recommendations have been implemented and findings cleared. If the findings are not cleared, and of a nature that warrants suspension or cancellation, Eastern Cape then issues a TS5 notice to the contravening VTS notifying of the suspension or cancellation of the registration of such VTS, in terms of Regulation 136 NRTA, Act 93 of 1996, and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000.

No SABS findings were ignored. All recommendations by the Vehicle Testing Centre were rectified and sent back to SABS.

EC Inspectorate Section is doing a follow up to those recommendations by SABS and most were rectified.

The contravening VTS then has the right to appeal to the Minister of Transport within 21 days of receipt of the notice as per Section 51A NRTA, Act 93 of 1996. If an appeal is lodged with the Minister of Transport within the 21 days, and the Province is notified of such, then the Province waits for the decision of the Minister before implementing the suspension or cancellation.

(e) Inspectorate after the visit SABS should immediately forward copy or Email to the Provincial Inspectorate

(f) Eastern Cape Vehicle Fitness Section

Free State:

(d)The Province has started during the 2014-2015 Financial Year to upgrade and calibrate all the vehicle testing equipment at vehicle testing stations in the province.

(i) (ii)The Province reported that 17 stations were upgraded (i.e. Bloemfontein, Trompsburg, Bethlehem, Harrismith, Parys, Heilbron, Sasolburg, Kroonstad, Welkom, Virginia, Wesselsbron, Marquard, Ladybrand, Ficksburg, Odendaalrus, Thaba-Nchu, and Windburg Testing Stations) by the end of the 2016/17 financial year.

(iii) The province endeavors to continue upgrades in the 2017/18 financial year and will further calibrate the equipment of five more stations i.e. Botshabelo, Phuthaditjhaba, Bultfontein, Viljoenskroon and Petrusburg.

(e) The Inspectorate for Vehicle Testing Stations will follow up on the progress reported by the province.

(f) Provincial Monitoring Unit

Gauteng Province:

(d) (i) Upon recommendations by the SABS, Gauteng issues a TS4 notice to the contravening vehicle test station in terms of Regulation 136 (1) and (2) NRTA, Act 93 of 1996, and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000, requiring the said VTS to report to the MEC in writing within 14 days from the date of the notification, the reason for such failure to comply and details of the measures taken to rectify and prevent such failure.

(ii) The Province follows up with the VTS after the 14 days, and with the SABS to determine if the recommendations have been implemented and findings cleared. If the findings are not cleared, and of a nature that warrants suspension or cancellation, Gauteng then issues a TS5 notice to the contravening VTS notifying of the suspension or cancellation of the registration of such VTS, in terms of Regulation 136 NRTA, Act 93 of 1996, and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000. The contravening VTS then has the right to appeal to the Minister of Transport within 21 days of receipt of the notice as per Section 51A NRTA, Act 93 of 1996. If an appeal is lodged with the Minister of Transport within the 21 days, and the Province is notified of such, then the Province implements the decision to suspend or cancel the VTS in question on approval by the Minister

(iii) Addressed in (ii) above

(e)Addressed in (d) above

(f) Gauteng: Vehicle Fitness Section

KwaZulu-Natal:

The KwaZulu-Natal Province abides by the prescripts of SANS 10216. The Inspectorate of testing stations, SABS conducts yearly inspections at KwaZulu-Natal Vehicle Testing Stations and provides recommendations in respect of the findings in terms of SANS codes 10216 and deviations are addressed accordingly.

KZN does adhere to the recommendations made by the SABS. Upon receipt of TS4, TS5 recommendations from SABS, notices of intention to cancel or suspend or suspension/cancellation notices, signed by the HOD, are forwarded to the vehicle testing stations. Responses are followed up.

(c) Notices are sent to the vehicle testing stations, responses are dealt with, and SABS is consulted with regarding the responses.

(d) What are the:

(i) The recommendation is received from SABS. The notice is prepared for the HOD’s signature. On receipt of the signed notice, the notice is hand delivered and from the date of delivery, the testing station is given 14 days to respond.

(ii) The KwaZulu-Natal Department of Transport issued twelve (12) TS4 notices on recommendation from SABS, and 1 TS5 notice is in the process of being served. The representations in respect of the TS4 notices are in the process of being reviewed by SABS/Administration, and

(iii) The proprietor is given 14 days to respond.

(e) Monitor and pend for response, follow up on responses.

(f) The KwaZulu-Natal Department of Transport

Limpopo:

(d) The province is having number of compliance inspections conducted as one of the indicators in the Annual Performance Plan.

(i) Each and every institution is monitored every six months.

(ii) Compliance reports are received from National Inspectorate, follow-ups are made on implementation of the recommendations.

(iii) Monthly reports are received from the Departmental Inspectors and reports are being made to the respective institutions.

(e)(f) The National Inspectorate of Vehicle Testing Stations makes regular follow ups to ensure that these dates are met.

Mpumalanga:

(d) (i) (ii) (iii) Once the testing station report has been received, TS4 is issued to the affected testing station and a response is expected within 14 days. The testing station is given 30 days to put corrective measures.

(e) A follow up inspection is conducted to confirm the corrective measures.

(f) The Senior Manager responsible for Transport Administration and Licensing in the province.

North West:

d) The Provincial monitoring unit conducts follow up inspections to ensure the implementation and monitoring of the recommendations as communicated with the stations.

(i) Stations are given 30 days to respond to the recommendations made by the SA Bureau of Standards.

(ii) Non-compliant stations at the time of the inspection, have implemented all recommendations and now operating effectively. Furthermore, the Provincial Inspectorate conducts unannounced inspections to independently confirm that short comings are addressed accordingly.

(iii.) The provincial deadline for the implementation of the recommendations are linked to the SA Bureau of Standards Inspectorate deadline of 30 days.

e) Provincial monitoring unit conducts regular announced and unannounced visits to the Vehicle Testing Stations to ensure strict adherence to the deadlines, and where slow implementation is experienced, immediate intervention is sought with relevant authorities.

f) The Provincial monitoring unit is mandated with the responsibility of ensuring that all recommendations and deadlines thereto are strictly adhered to by relevant stations.

Northern Cape:

(d) Follow up letters are submitted to the respective Testing Stations in line with the findings and recommendations of the South African Bureau of Standards where TS4/ TS5 notices were issued.

Follow up visits are conducted to determine whether corrective interventions were taken or not. In the case where no corrective actions are taken the Testing Stations are suspended from operation i.e., De Aar, Victoria West, Kathu, Prieska etc.

Regular follow up visits and hosting of information sessions to ensure a common understanding in respect of the interpretation and application of relevant policies governing the Vehicle Testing Station environment.

(i) Quarterly

(ii) Follow up visits are done on Quarterly basis to ensure implementation plans are adhere to.

(iii) Testing Stations are given 14 (fourteen) days to comply in terms of Regulation 136 of the National Road Traffic Act, (Act. 93 of 1996).

(e) Regular follow ups in writing, telephonically and meetings with Municipal Managers/ Testing Station Proprietors.

(f) The Provincial Monitoring Unit.

Western Cape:

(d) Findings raised in reports that are provided to the Department are formally brought to the attention of the VTSs and followed up until rectified:

(i) as soon as the report is received with feedback due to the Department within 21 days (ii) milestones and corrected finding

(iii) reported immediately for a response within 21 days,

(e) The Section Vehicle Regulation and Standards Unit and the Compliance Monitoring Unit do follow up inspections.

(f) The Section Vehicle Regulation and Standards Unit and the Compliance Monitoring Unit

Reply:

(1) Adv Bilikwana is not appointed to the Board of the Road Traffic Infringement Agency;

(2) There was no appointment made and thus no need for his name to be gazetted;

(a) there was no gazetting because he is not a member of the board. His official employment duties are that of a Company Secretary. In the RTIA’s correspondence therefore, his name is listed along with that of board members, expressly indicating that he is the Company/Board Secretary, in line with best practise

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) It was reported to the Department that no examiners of vehicles in the Western Cape were convicted of issuing fraudulent certificates of road worthiness in the 2016 / 17 financial year.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

(1) (a) In the current financial year the Department of Sport and Recreation SA (SRSA) will conduct a facility audit intended not only to quantify number of facilities available, their type and level of service they offer, but also to assess needs and shortfalls using various methods including municipal IDPs and the SRSA Facility Classification Framework, which provides guidelines in terms of type and category of facility, level of service it must offer and minimum distance/radius for accessibility. This, in line with the department’s annual performance plan, will ensure the prioritisation of building and maintenance of facilities in order to contribute to the objectives of National Sport and Recreation Plan and the National Development Plan.

(b) The Department has conducted and concluded a facility count and verification process in 2016. The process included count of all facilities irrespective of their ownership and this was done through our facility count project team in all nine (9) provinces in collaboration with municipalities. The national total sum of facilities as counted is 5022, and provincial breakdown is as follows:

 

PROVINCE	FACILITIES
Eastern Cape	214
Free State	259
Gauteng	989
KwaZulu-Natal	1341
Limpopo	947
Mpumalanga	791
Northern Cape	102
North West	134
Western Cape	245
NATIONAL	5022

(c) Our 2016 facility count took this matter into consideration and make a shocking revelation that of all facilities counted, irrespective of their conditions, only 20% are accessible to people with disabilities, and this is another matter that justifies a need to strengthen the role of SRSA in planning and monitoring implementation of sports and recreation infrastructure projects in order to enforce Norms and Standards, and Sports and Recreation Amendment Act both of which emphasize a need to ensure that sports facilities are user friendly to people with disability.

(2) (a) Since 2016/17 the department has been involved with identification of sports infrastructure projects in all provinces in order to guide allocation of the R300 million for MIG. The NDP dictates that all settlement in the country must have access to sport and recreation facilities, and it is in that spirit that while resources are limited and prioritisation is inevitable, allocations will be made in all provinces.

(b) Since sports infrastructure projects are implement in a context of MIG, therefore, with exception of multi-year projects, completion dates of projects will coincide with the end municipal financial year, and this effectively informs time frames.

**************************************

Reply:

a) I have been informed that the total number of applications for cellphone data in terms of Section 19 of the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act, Act 70 of 2002 that were submitted in the period 1 January 2014 to 31 March 2017 is 866.

b) (i) Granted: 866

(ii) Declined: 0

Reply:

1. (a) and (b) The Chairperson of the Board of the Media Development and Development Agency (MDDA) has neither (a) acted on behalf of the CEO; nor (b) acted as the CEO of the MDDA in each of the past five financial years.

In the absence of the CEO between 1 March 2017 and 9 May 2017, the Board took a resolution, in the Board meeting of 01 March 2017, that the Chairperson of the Board is to assume the caretaker role over the existing management structure.

After the resignation of the CEO on the 28 February 2017, the Board requested the Minister of Communications via letter dated 2 March 2017 and at the bi-lateral meeting on 5 March 2017 for a secondment from the Department of Communications for an Acting CEO. After a further request to the newly appointed Minister of Communications, Mr Donald Liphoko was seconded to the MDDA as Acting CEO effective from 8 May 2017.

2. The position of CEO has been vacant since 28 February 2017.

3. (a) and (b) This is not applicable as, as stated above, the Chairperson of the Board was not acting as CEO of the MDDA. She therefore has only received compensation as Chairperson and not as CEO.

4. No, the position of the CEO will not be filled by end of Q1 of 2017/2018 as the MDDA currently does not have a quorating Board. The recruitment process has commenced which will be approved by a quorating Board.

Reply:

(a) Total amount spent on legal fees

(i)

(aa) 2014-2015 (R8,983.177.00)

(bb) 2015-2016 (R9,383.623.00)

(cc) 2016-2017 (R19,911,320.00)

(ii) Since 1 April 2017 (928,574.00)

(b)

(i) details

2014 2015

Tasima

City of Cape Town / Minister of Transport and SANRAL

DOT / Thwala

Prodiba

2015-2016

Tasima

Prodiba

Marine enquiry Kingfisher

City of Cape Town / Minister of Transport and SANRAL

DOT / Vilana

DOT / Thwala

MEC For Transport KZN / Transport Appeal Tribunal

JV Ndorum (Mthatha Airport)

2016-2017

Tasima

Prodiba

Marine enquiry Kingfisher

Marine enquiry Witbank

MEC for Transport KZN / Transport Appeal Tribunal

City of Cape Town / Minister of Transport and SANRAL

DOT / Thwala

DOT/ Vilana

JV Ndorum (Mthatha Airport)

African Harvest / Minister of Transport and ACSA

1 April 2017

Tasima

JV Ndorum ( Mthatha Airport)

(ii) outcomes

Tasima - success

Prodiba – success

Marine enquiry kingfisher – completed

Marine enquiry Witbank – completed

DOT / Vilana - settled)

DOT / Thwala – success

MEC for Transport KZN / Transport Appeal Tribunal - success

City of Cape Town – not succesful

JV Ndorum (Mthatha Airport) – not finalized

African Harvest (not finalized)

(ii) costs of each case

Tasima (R13, 322, 170. 54)

Prodiba (R1, 792, 495.19)

Marine enquiry Kingfisher (R2, 582, 935.33)

Marine enquiry Witbank (R1, 722, 232.54)

DOT / Vilana (R1, 552, 420.00)

DOT / Thwala (R2, 550, 370.93)

MEC for Transport KZN / Transport Appeal Tribunal (R1, 306, 460.93)

City of Cape Town / Minister of Transport and SANRAL (R1, 087, 503.00)

JV Ndorum (Mthatha Airport) (R247, 095.00)

African Harvest (R809 172.00)

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

1. It was reported to the Department that no examiners of vehicles in KwaZulu-Natal who have been convicted of issuing fraudulent certificates of road worthiness during the 2016 / 17 financial year are still practicing.

1. See above (a)

1. See above (b)

Reply:

(a),(b)(i),(ii) No.

(aa),(bb),(cc),(dd),(ee),(ff) Falls away.

Reply:

(a)  Total amount spent by Government on rating agencies fees

South Africa has solicited the credit rating services of Moody’s Investors Services (Moody’s), S&P Global Ratings (S&P), Fitch Ratings (Fitch) and the Japanese’ Ratings and Investment Information, Inc. (R&I). In terms of the contractual agreements, the government has to pay fees to the rating agencies for the services rendered.

Since April 2008 to May 2017, a total amount of R 81 451 873.00 has been paid to the rating agencies. The table link below illustrates the total spent in rands made to all the four solicited credit rating agencies. S&P is the highest paid rating agency followed by Moody’s.

http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW1393Table-170605.pdf

(b) The detailed breakdown of such expenditure per rating agency:

(i) S&P:

S&P’s annual rating fees are based on:

• Annual surveillance;
• Rating of long term debt issuances;
• Ratings of short term debt issuances; and
• Ratings of the Commercial Paper and Medium Term Notes.

(ii) Moody’s:

Moody’s annual and quarterly rating fees are based on:

• Annual and quarterly credit surveillance;
• Ratings of all Non-US Medium Term Notes Programs;
• Ratings of all US Medium Term Notes;
• Ratings of all Global Medium Term Notes Programs;
• Ratings of all Commercial Paper/Short Term; and
• Ratings of all long term debt issuances and Medium Term Notes sales in all markets including local currency debt issuances.

(iii) Fitch

Fitch’s annual rating fees are based on:

• Annual surveillance;
• Ratings of debt issuance; and
• Expense reimbursement for reasonable travel and lodging expense incurred during the annual rating mission to the Republic of South Africa.

(iv) R&I

R&I’s annual rating fee is based on:

• On-going surveillance of the credit rating
• Foreign currency issuer rating;
• Domestic currency issuer rating; and
• Foreign currency short term rating.

Reply:

South Africa is implementing the International Health Regulations (2005) [IHR 2005] since its enactment on 15 June 2007. In February 2017, the National Department of Health completed a self IHR assessment using the Joint External Evaluation tool, with the participation of all relevant Government departments and key stakeholders. The National Department of Health officials assessed all the action packages, namely: prevention, detection, response, and IHR-related hazards as well as Points of Entry. The Department of Health is using the findings to develop an action plan aimed at further strengthening of South Africa's IHR capacity.

END.

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) The province of Mpumalanga has reported that there were no examiners that were convicted of issuing fraudulent certificates of road worthiness in the 2016 / 17 financial year.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

Response:

a) Yes

b) Yes

Response to (i), (ii), (aa), (aaa) (bbb) on table below.

PROGRAMME	ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE	OVG DETERMINED VALUE	DIFFERNCE
LAND REDISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT	R 116,866,011.00	R 98,264,000.00	R 18,602,011.00
STRENGTHENING OF RELATIVE RIGHTS	R 218,457,051.64	R 176,651,900.00	R 41,805,151.64
RESTITUTION	R 250,376,449.00	R 226,205,265.96	R 24,171,183.04
Total	R 585,699,511.64	R 501,121,165.96	R 84,578,345.68

Reply:

(a) The Department has not as yet received the legal fees from its legal team.

(b) Not applicable

(i) The Department has not yet received any taxed costs from the Applicants.

(ii) PRASA did not join legal proceedings, thus there were no legal fees to be paid

Reply:

Yes.

Detailed answers to questions (a), (b) and (c) are as follows:

Province	(a) Number of patients accommodated	(b) Prison facilities	(c) For how long
Eastern Cape	14	St. Albans	8-22 months
	14	Grahamstown	6-19 months
	43	East London	1-22 months
	1	Wellington	1month
	13	King Williams Town	1-11 months
	11	Fort Beaufort	10-18 months
	3	Cradock	14-21 months
Sub-total	99
Mpumalanga	2	Witbank	84 months
	6	Nelspruit	12-36 months
	1	Middelburg	12 months
	6	Ermelo	1-48 months
Sub-total	15
Total	114

The waiting list of patients in prison facilities in Mpumalanga province is due to the lack of a specialised psychiatric hospital to render this service. Plans are underway to build a hospital, and currently patients are referred to Weskoppies Hospital in Gauteng Province, when a bed becomes available.

END.

Reply:

With regard to my reply to Question 406 on 27 March 2017, I wish to inform Honourable Member that since the beginning of May 2017, the 21 of the 26 patients mentioned in March have been moved to West End Psychiatric Hospital after completion of refurbishment of facilities there.

When they were still in correctional service facilities, on a waiting basis, they used to wait for an average of 4 years.

END.

Reply:

1. (a) (i) No.

(a) (ii) No.

(aa) Not Applicable

(bb) Not Applicable

(cc) Not Applicable

(dd) Not Applicable

(ee) Not Applicable

(ff) Not Applicable

Reply:

(1) Yes

(a) The law does not prohibit any person from serving on more than one Board of the entities reporting to the Minister of Communications.

(b) (i) Ms Khanyisile Kweyama

    (ii) Brand South Africa Board and the interim SABC Board.

    (iii) Serving a three-year term at Brand South Africa and six months at the SABC interim Board.      

    (iv) payment for services rendered were in line with the required prescript

(2) Yes.

Reply:

a) The Metrorail commuter service between Crossmoor (Chatsworth) and Durban was suspended from 22 February 2017 due to the general shortage of serviceable rolling stock experienced by the PRASA KZN Region. As at February 2017, only 32 train sets out of the required 57 train sets were in-service, due to major overhaul/upgrade and maintenance program requirements of the ageing fleet. PRASA was also losing 5 coaches on average per month due to vandalism. As a consequence the in-service fleet is under pressure and run more kilometres than usual, with less time to effect day to day maintenance, having an adverse effect on the performance of the fleet. The over extension and poor performance of the available fleet create serious risks in terms of commuter dissatisfaction and overcrowding.

In balancing the available in-service fleet with overall demand across the KZN region, the Chatsworth and Bluff services were suspended in order to make rolling stock available on higher demand corridors in areas where alternative bus services are not viable due to objections from the taxi industry.

b) A replacement bus service was provided by PRASA between Crossmoor and Merebank, making it possible for commuters to connect with trains travelling to and from the South Coast and Umlazi.

c) Although a partial recovery of the KZN Metrorail fleet availability towards the end of March allowed the train service between Durban and Crossmoor to be reinstated, limited spare trains sets still affects service capacity and performance, resulting in frequent cancellations. Buses are arranged on an ad-hoc basis to augment the train service as far as possible.

d) The train service between Durban and Crossmoor was officially reinstated on 30 March 2017. The train service between Durban/Umlazi and Wests (Bluff) remains suspended due to the ongoing shortage of rolling stock. PRASA is in a process of accelerating the return of additional rolling stock (train sets) to improve the fleet availability across all services in the KZN region.

Reply:

(a) (i) Total number of grievances handled during the period 01 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 is thirty two (32), and all thirty two (32) were concluded.

 

Nature of grievance	Number	Status
Unfair PMDS process	2 (two)	Finalised
Unfair recruitment and selection process	3 (three)	Finalised
Verbal abuse and intimidation	2 (two)	Finalised
Failure by the department to assist officials serving abroad with medical aids	1 (one)	Finalised
Disapproval of resignation	1 (one)	Finalised
Unilateral decision by the CFO to discontinue education allowance	6 (six)	Finalised
Failure by the department to upgrade the officials’ qualifications from FAA to MAC	4 (four)	Finalised
Harrasment and victimization	1 (one)	Finalised
Disapproval to undergo surgery abroad	1 (one)	Finalised
Exclusion from management meetings	1 (one)	Finalised
Disapproval of an application to attend MAC bridging course	1 (one)	Finalised
Disapproval of transfer back to South Africa	1 (one)	Finalised
Failure to upgrade post to high level	4 (four)	Finalised
Disapproval to attend a course	1 (one)	Finalised
False accusations	2 (two)	Finalised
Non payment of COLA	1 (one)	Finalised

(ii) Twelve (12) misconduct cases were handled and finalised during the period 01 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. See the table in paragraph (C)

(b) Twelve (12) grievances were from officials stationed abroad while twenty (20) were from officials at DIRCO Head Office

(bb) One (1) misconduct case was for the official stationed abroad and the remaining eleven (11) were for officials at DIRCO Head Office

(c) The nature of sanctions that were meted out in each misconduct case are as follows:

Nature of Misconduct	Sanction
Plagiarism	Not Guilty
Fraud	Dismissal
Insubordination	Not Guilty
Breach of Security	Final Written Warning plus recovery of COLA Allowance
Failure to disclose conflict of interest	One month Suspension without pay plus final written warning
Direlection of duty	Written Warning
Contravention of the procurement policy	Written warning
Gross negligence and dishonesty	Final written warning
Fraud	Final written warning plus one month suspension without pay
Misrepresentation and fraud	Dismissal
Irregular processes of the DBAC	Final written warning plus counselling
Absenteeism	Written warning

(d) All the cases have been finalised

(e) See the answer in (d)

Unquote.

Reply:

a) The Department is in the process of analysing the comments received from the public, once done the Department will also consult sister departments for comments and submit to Cabinet for processing. The updated Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and the Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) will then be submitted to Parliament for processing.

b) i) The next step is to analyse the public inputs, make adjustment to assumptions used where necessary, rerun the base case, run scenarios and come up with a balanced scenario (draft IRP) before policy adjustment. We anticipate having the plans to Cabinet by the fourth quarter of 2017/18 financial year.

c) Once Cabinet has processed the updated IRP &IEP,..

d) i) Once Cabinet approves the IRP it will be submitted to Parliament for processing

    ii) See response to question (c)

(e) (i) See response to question (a)

    (ii) See response to question (c)

 

Reply:

(1) The South African Government, through the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO), employs country nationals, third country nationals and/or South African nationals at the various Diplomatic and Consular Missions abroad, as support staff to the South African diplomats stationed in these missions abroad. Such employees are referred to as Locally Recruited Personnel (LRP).

(2) (a) 2049 LRP

(b)(i) The LRP are employed in the following positions:

• Cleaner
• Domestic Worker
• Gardener
• Watchman/Security
• Chauffeur
• Messager/Driver
• Receptionist
• Registry Clerk
• Accountant/Assistant Accounts Clerk
• Consular Clerk
• Maintenance Officer
• Secretary
• Administrative Clerk/Officer
• Information Clerk
• Translator
• Trade and Information Assistant
• Marketing Officer

(ii) (aa) Each post has minimum requirements in terms of qualifications.

(bb) Post requirements and skills are determined by the level of the post

(3) (a) Yes

(b) As part of recruitment and selection, all applicants are required to submit a police clearance certificate from the local authorities of the host country.

Reply:

1. South Africa continues to support MONUSCO (United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo) through a deployment of uniformed and other personnel in a multi-dimensional peacekeeping which involves the military, police and the civilian components. MONUSCO’s strategic priorities are to protect civilians, stemming out of violence against women and children perpetuated by armed groups. The current mandate of MONUSCO will expire on 31 March 2017. The UN will provide guidance in terms of the extension of the mandate based on a situational analysis on the ground, particularly in the Eastern DRC and the political developments as the country prepares for the elections by end of 2017.

 

UNQUOTE

Reply:

The Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) did not procure any services from and/or made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

The National School of Government (NSG) has neither procured any services nor made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

(b) (i) No – The Centre for Public Service Innovation (CPSI) has not procured nor had any need to procure any services from the Decolonisation Foundation.

(ii) No – The CPSI has not made any payments nor had any need to make payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

(aa) Not applicable

(bb) Not applicable

(cc) Not applicable

(dd) Not applicable

(ff) Not applicable

End

Reply:

Paragraph 1.2.4 of Chapter 5 of the Ministerial Handbook relates to the purchase of motor vehicles for Members. There are proposals to amend this provision as part of the review of the Ministerial Handbook.

(a) It is expected that the review of the Ministerial Handbook will be completed once the Joint Cabinet Committee has considered the content and approved a revised Ministerial Handbook.

(b)The details of the revised Ministerial Handbook will be made available as soon as it is approved by the Cabinet.

End

Reply:

(a) Yes -Government is involved in a continuum of actions securing the release of Mr Stephen McGowan, involving support from any of the Government Departments when needed. Actions were taken since March 2016, including, but not limited to, considering every viable option to ensure his release. Government continued to liaise with other Governments and agencies who may contribute to effect the release of Mr McGowan. Disclosing any details of actions taken at this stage will not serve a proper purpose but the House should know that Government did not leave any stone unturned to secure the release of Mr McGowan and will continue to assign resources and sincere efforts to ensure his return to South Africa..

(b)The exact location of Mr Stephen McGowan is not known, because it is a known trend of the captors to move their captives with regular intervals, ensuring their safety and security. Different groups are publicly known to capture tourists in Mali and, although more information about the group may be sourced, providing more information on the group is not in the interest of the matter being dealt with.

(c)Government is working with many other Governments and agencies in an effort to effect the release of Mr Stephen McGowan. Providing details on each of these organisations at this stage may compromise his safety.

UNQUOTE

Reply:

An LRP Charter does not apply to our regulatory context , since all LRP administrative matters are regulated through domestic legislation applicable to the respective countries of accreditation. Therefore, DIRCO does not have such a charter.

a) Not applicable

b) Not applicable

Reply:

1.The person referred to, is said by the member that he is a suspended person from Crime Intelligence.

2. Crime Intelligence does not have its mandate on the Minister of State Security.

3. Labour Relations Act and Basic Conditions Employment Act defines every Employment Relations of everyone in the Employment of the State.

Reply:

The State Security Agency (SSA) has no company called Decolonisation Foundation in its data base.

Reply:

The State Security Agency (SSA) has no Bell Pottinger in its data base of companies.

Reply:

(a) The Department of Energy and (b) its entities reporting to it has never; (i) procured; (ii) nor made any payments to the Decolonisation foundation.

(bb) Not applicable

(cc) Not applicable

(dd) Not applicable

(ee) Not applicable

(ff) Not applicable

Reply:

1. (a) The information that the Honourable Member is seeking is currently going through an audit process in order to ensure its accuracy. However, we will gladly provide such information in the 2016/17 Annual report which will be tabled in Parliament in August 2017 as prescribed in the PFMA.

(2) (a) The total budget for Supported Enterprises is R141 million and

(b) Marketing-advertising budgets is R4.4 million

Reply:

the dti has facilitated numerous investments since 2012 and we are not aware of any of these companies divesting since then.

The General Motors decision is due to a commercial decision by its Head-Quarters in terms of its future global operations. Such divestment may also based on restructuring of the companies, mergers & acquisitions and general restrictive global market conditions.

Invest SA, offers as part of its services investor facilitation and aftercare and we are paying particular attention on the retention and maintenance of investment in the country. We have engaged with the steel sector, companies such as AMSA, Highveld, SC Smelters and well as companies in the renewables sector.

Reply:

(1) (a) The detailed breakdown of the 2014/15 and 2015/16 information can be gleaned in the Productivity South Africa’s Audited Financial statements and/or the Annual Reports that were tabled in Parliament in the periods in question.

(b) (i), (ii) & (iii) Detailed breakdown for 2016/17 is currently being audited and as such it will be premature and improper to provide such information at this stage. However the information will be provided in the Productivity South Africa/s Audited Financial Statements and/or in the 2016/17 Annual Report as prescribed.

(2) The projected budget for Productivity SA for 2017/18 Financial Year is in the region of R177 million.

(3) The staff complement of Productivity South Africa for the 2016/17 financial year is currently being audited and as such it will be premature to provide such information at this stage. However, the detailed information in this regard will be tabled in Parliament in August 2017 as prescribed.

Reply:

(a)(b) Not applicable.

________________________

Approved by the Minister on

Date………………………..