Questions and Replies

Reply:

(1)(a) The individual was appointed as a Non Executive Director (NED) to the Transnet Board of Directors on 14 December 2014, on a three year term, subject to annual review. By virtue of his appointment as NED, the said Person serves as member and Chairperson of the Board’s Acquisition and Disposal’s Committee and member of the Remuneration, Social and Ethics Committee. He is also Chairperson of the Transnet Second Defined Benefit Fund, the Transport Pension Fund and the Transnet sub-Fund of the Transport Pension Fund.

(b) The terms and conditions of the appointment are governed by the Companies Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI). The Board appointment process, includes sourcing of CVs from the DPE database preceded by the issuing of an advertisement to obtain nominations. At the time, the vetting process included verification of qualifications, disclosure of interests and credit checks. Persons are found to be suitable by virtue of their qualifications, expertise, skills and expertise.

(c) At the time, the vetting process included verification of qualifications, disclosure of interests and credit checks. No conflict was identified. Following approval by Cabinet, appointment by myself, and acceptance by the individual, Transnet’s internal policy of disclosure of interest at each meeting will apply. Should there be any conflict disclosed at any time in the tenure, the Director would need to observe fully and comply with the disclosure and recusal requirements of Transnet’s policies. It is important to note that the disclosure policies of a SOC must be in line with the PFMA 1999 and the Companies Act, 2008.

2. I am not aware of the personal relations of the Director with the name provided by the Member of Parliament. Once they are appointed on the Board, the Companies policies and procedures must be adhered to.

(3)(a-c) As stated above if a conflict is identified or disclosed after appointment the Company is responsible to manage through its applicable policies. Hence, no investigation was done by my Department as there was no cause for one.

4. Should there be any Director who has a conflict and has not properly disclosed, it is the Company who must report to me on the matter. Based on the report, as Executive Authority, I will take a decision on the matter.

 

Mogokare Richard Seleke Lynne Brown, MP

Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises

Date: Date:

Reply:

Question	EC	FS	GP	KZN	LP	MP	NC	NW	WC
a (i) Names of the schools that had not received top-up textbooks required for 2017 by the start of the academic year	168 schools See attached as Annexure A	None	None	None	Kgoboki Primary School and Reabilwe. Both schools had received CAPS textbooks orders from 2013-2016.	The province provides textbooks to new schools	None	None	None
a (ii) Names of the schools that have received only a portion of the top-up textbooks required for 2017 by the start of the academic year	473 schools received a portion of the Top-up textbooks. See attached as Annexure A	All schools received Top-up textbooks	79 schools received a portion of the Top-up textbooks. See attached as Annexure B	838 schools received a portion of the Top-up textbooks. See attached as Annexure C	All schools received Top-up textbooks	The province provides textbooks to new schools	116 schools received a portion of the Top-up textbooks See attached as Annexure D	363 schools received a portion of the Top-up textbooks. See attached as Annexure E	All schools received Top-up textbooks
Question	EC	FS	GP	KZN	LP	MP	NC	NW	WC
(b) Schools that still had not received their full allocation of top-up textbooks by 28 February 2017	4 934 schools had not received full allocation by 28/02/2017. See attached as Annexure A	All schools received Top-up textbooks	69 schools had not received their full allocation by 28/02/2017 See attached as Annexure B	All schools received their full allocation	All schools received their full allocation	The province only provided for new textbooks	116 schools had not received their full allocation by 28/02/2017. See attached as Annexure D	230 schools had not received their full allocation by 28/02/2017 See attached as Annexure E	All schools received their full allocation

Reply:

NO	WHERE- Name of School, District and Province	WHEN	NO OF LEARNERS	DAYS LOST
2013
3	NO SCHOOLS DAMAGED
2014
4	Tsoe Primary School, John Taolo Gaetsewe, Northern Cape	5-Jun-14	316	1
5	Ditshipeng Primary School, John Taolo Gaetsewe, Northern Cape	5-Jun-14	428	1
6	Keatlholela Primary School, John Taolo Gaetsewe, Northern Cape	5-Jun-14	183	1
2015
7	Atamelang Primary School, Dr. Ruth S Mompati, North West	30-Sep-15	284	1
8	Mpolosa Senior Primary School, Lusikisiki, Eastern Cape	8-Jun-15	65	1
2016
9	Joe Slovo High School, Metro East, Western Cape	05-07 September 2016	1171	2
10	Orlando Secondary School, Johannesburg West, Gauteng	13-May-16	680	7
11	Magudwini High School, Ndwedwe, KwaZulu-Natal	18-Apr-16	321	22
12	Mokhari Secondary School, Waterberg, Naboomspruit Circuit, Limpopo	10 March to 05 April 2016	624	25
13	Mvaba Secondary School, Pinetown, KwaZulu-Natal	25-May-16	2000	10
14	Phakane High School, John Taolo Gaetsewe, Northern Cape	12-Apr-16	533	1
15	Avhatondwi Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	534	31
16	Frank Mukhaswakule Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	373	31
17	Khwara Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	442	31
18	Kurulen Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	247	31
19	Luambo High School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	133	31
20	Lupedze Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	256	31
21	Maligana Wilson Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	696	31
22	Mariadze Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	480	31
23	Mashaa Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	182	31
24	Mashau Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	403	31
25	Masia Senior Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	92	31
26	Matshindevhe Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	275	31
27	Mavhina Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	318	31
28	Mphagane Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	421	31
29	Munwai Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	335	31
30	Nwaridi Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	456	31
31	Radzambo Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	184	31
32	Ramauba Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	326	31
33	Tshinavhe Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	391	31
34	Tshipakoni Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	395	31
35	Tshirunzanani Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	264	31
36	Tshivhade Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	394	31
37	Vhafamadi Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	867	31
38	Vhudzani Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	310	31
39	Thomas Ntshavheni Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	414	31
40	Muvimbi Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	435	31
41	Masakona Senior Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	449	31
42	Tshinange Secondary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	625	31
43	Mawela Primary School, Vhembe, Limpopo	May-16	384	31
2017
44	Kwanang Primary School, Bohlabela District, Mpumalanga	January 2017 to 28 March 2017	587	40
45	Bakutswe High School, Bohlabela, Mpumalanga	January 2017 to 28 March 2017	575	40
46	Lamulelani High School, Bohlabela, Mpumalanga	January 2017 to 28 March 2017	215	40
47	Rindzani Junior Secondary School, Bohlabela, Mpumalanga	January 2017 to 28 March 2017	572	40
48	Hillview Primary School, KwaZulu-Natal	8-May-17	500	1

Reply:

 

1. The current CFO at Umalusi was appointed on 1 May 2017. The position remained unfilled from 1 March 2016, 14 months.

2. The applicant did apply for the first round of interviews. The applicant was appointed at Umalusi as the Senior Manager: Finance and Supply Chain Management (SCM) as from 1 April 2016. The applicant was not found to be an unsuitable candidate. In fact, the applicant was the best candidate in the first round of interviews. However, she could not be appointed because of the Umalusi Recruitment and Selection Policy. The policy states that “internal applicants must have served at least (1) one year before applying for another internal position or vacancy”. The panel did not want to deviate from the policy to ensure a fair and transparent recruitment process.

3. (a) The Senior Manager: Finance and SCM was appointed on level 13 notch 8 of the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) Senior Management Service (SMS) Salary scales. The annual amount as at 1 April 2016 was R997 476. The appointment was made at that level to equal the employee’s previous remuneration level as the employee was not being remunerated on DPSA levels with her previous employer.

(b) In terms of Umalusi policy “If an employee is required to act in a higher-grade position for an unbroken period of one (1) calendar month and/or 30 days, or longer, the employee qualifies to be remunerated at a sum equal to the entry level remuneration for that higher grade”. The Acting Chief Financial Officer was remunerated at salary level 14 notch 1 at R1 068 564 for the duration of the acting period.

(c) The Chief Financial Officer was appointed in May 2017 at salary level 14 notch 1, currently being remunerated at R1 068 564.

4. (a) Panel for CFO interview – 27 April 2016

Panel member name	Designation
Dr MS Rakometsi	CEO – Umalusi
Prof J Volmink	Chairperson – Umalusi Council
Mr M Albertyn	CFO – South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA)
Ms L Rossouw	Chairperson –Umalusi Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) / CFO – Department of Justice

(b) Panel for CFO interview – 24 March 2017

Panel member name	Designation
Dr MS Rakometsi	CEO – Umalusi
Ms L Rossouw	Chairperson of Umalusi ARC / CFO – Department of Justice
Mr NT Johnstone	Umalusi Council member / Member of Umalusi ARC
Ms N Madilonga	CFO – Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO) / Acting CEO
Mr T Mothusi	CFO – Council on Higher Education (CHE)

5. The new CFO was appointed at Umalusi as the Senior Manager: Finance and SCM from 1 April 2016. This was the first appointment of the employee at Umalusi.

Reply:

1. (a) and (b)

Yes, I am advised that there was correspondence between the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) and employees of the company whose name was furnished, as is required by the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (EIA), 2014. There has been, for example, comments on reports that have been submitted and formal letters such as an acknowledgement of the application and reports, as well as acceptance of the scoping report. DEA also had a pre-application meeting with the company whose name was furnished prior to submission of the application, which is customary practice.

It should be noted further that a certain person whose name was also furnished requested access to the same information, on behalf of AVDS Environmental Consultants, in terms of section 18(1) of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 (Act No. 2 of 2000) (PAIA), on 17 November 2016. He requested access to information relating to the environmental authorisation application for the proposed Spitskop West Wind Energy Facility, within the Blue Crane Route Local Municipality in the Eastern Cape Province. DEA granted access to the information on 12 December 2016. On 02 March 2017, a certain person whose name was also furnished submitted an appeal in terms of section 74 (1) of PAIA, on the basis that all the information to which access had been granted was not provided by DEA due to an oversight. The Ministers Appeal Decision upheld the appeal, and further access was granted to the following additional information, which was within the scope of the requested information:

• The letter to the Department from the company whose name was furnished dated 04 October 2016;
• The letter from, the company whose name was furnished titled “Pubic Participation Process” dated 06 October 2016;
• An email correspondence from the company whose name was furnished to the Department dated 11 and 06 October 2016 respectively;
• An email correspondence from the Department on 26 October 2016; and
• The letter to the Department from the company whose name was furnished dated 17 November 2016.

2. Anybody who would like to participate in an EIA process can formally register as an interested and/or affected party. This will enable the party to receive documentation, reports, notifications, etc. during the process. Once registered, the details of the party will be included in a register that will be used to communicate with interested and/or affected parties. This register and the comments and responses report forms part of the EIA documentation to be submitted to the competent authority. This means that all registered parties’ names will be included in reports and correspondence thereto. DEA’s responses and decisions sent to the environmental assessment practitioner (EAP) responsible for the EIA process is public documents and form part of the reports.

(a) (i) Yes, the Scoping Report submitted as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process refers to “AVDS Environmental Consultants”. The name is included in the list of landowners notified during the scoping process and AVDS Environmental Consultants registered as a stakeholder and provided comments. The environmental impact assessment practitioner’s (EAP’s) response to the comments included “AVDS Environmental Consultants”. This is all set-out in Volume 3 of the Scoping Report dated October 2016. It is a legal requirement to include, in these reports, the names of registered interested and affected parties and their comments, as well as the EAP’s response thereto. DEA received the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report (EIAr) but has not reviewed the report due to the lapsing of the application. It therefore cannot be confirmed if the report also refers to “AVDS Environmental Consultants”.

(ii) Yes, the Scoping Report submitted as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process refers to “the person whose name has also been furnished”. The name is included in the list of landowners notified during the scoping process, and “the person whose name has also been furnished” registered as a stakeholder and provided comments. The environmental impact assessment practitioner’s (EAP) response to the comments included “the person whose name has also been furnished”. This is included in Volume 3 of the Scoping Report dated October 2016.

As indicated above, it is a legal requirement to include, in the reports, the names of registered interested and affected parties and their comments, as well as the EAP’s response thereto. DEA received the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report (EIAr) but has not reviewed the report due to the lapsing of the application. The Department therefore cannot confirm if the report also refers to “the person whose name has also been furnished”. It should also be noted that the scoping report refers to “the person whose name has also been furnished” – AVDS Consulting.

(iii) Yes, the Scoping Report submitted as part of the EIA process refer to “the clients”. The names are included in the documentation, table of registered interested and affected parties, and comments received from AVDS as contained in Volume 3 of the Scoping Report dated October 2016. DEA received the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report (EIAr) but has not reviewed the report due to the lapsing of the application. It therefore cannot be confirmed if this report also refers to the clients.

(b) (i) No, there were no correspondence that excluded the environmental impact assessment practitioner’ (EAP). As indicated in the response to (1) above, it is a legal requirement that the competent authority respond to the EAP as required by the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014; for example, by means of sending comments on reports submitted and formal letters such as acknowledgement of the application and reports, and acceptance of the scoping report.

(ii) Yes, the environmental impact assessment practitioner (EAP) is responsible to inform and correspond with registered interested and affected parties and include these in the reports.

3. All documentation regarding the proposed Spitskop West Wind Energy Facility that is in the public domain can be provided upon receipt of the request. Access to other information, records and documents will have to follow the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 (Act No. 2 of 2000) (PAIA) process.

---ooOoo---

Reply:

1. (a) and (b)

The suspension of the Glenvista High School principal was as a result of the alleged financial mismanagement of the school funds. The principal was found guilty and sanctioned to three (3) months suspension without pay and subsequently returned to work after completing the three (3) months suspension. The allegation levelled against him was financial mismanagement.

2. (a) The allegation levelled against him was financial management.

(b) (i) Yes, an investigation was undertaken by KPMG.

(ii) Forensic Investigation processes were followed and was concluded within 60 days.

3. (a) The principal of the school and the Department were the only parties involved,

(b) and (c) The Department’s total cost was R 320 000.00 and the principal’s costs are unknown.

Reply:

In my reply to question 126 I indicated the following:

“The information provided by the North West Provincial Department of Human Settlements is as follows:

(a) The project commenced in June 2008.

(b) &(c) The progress made in respect of the project in Khudutlou Village is as follows:

• 3 Houses were completed
• 9 Units were at the roof level
• 11 Units were completed up to wall plate level
• 2 Slabs were completed

Due to poor workmanship, construction on the project has been put on hold and the North West Provincial Department of Human Settlements indicated that they are awaiting an engineering report with a view to considering cancellation of the contract.

(d) (i) The cost of the project is R1 282 025 for 25 units.

(ii) The total projected cost is R 2 569 200.

Furthermore, and for the benefit of the Honourable member who has recently joined the Portfolio Committee on Human Settlements, I wish to reiterate what I said during the Policy Debate on the budget of my Department on 12 May 2015 in the NCOP. I indicated,

“We are no longer rectifying houses using our budget. Any house that has defaults is the responsibility of the National Home Builders Registration Council (NHBRC), which is responsible to identify the contractor and ensure that they rectify the shoddy work at their own cost. The money currently used on rectification can and will be used in building more houses”.

Accordingly, I have requested the MEC for Local Government and Human Settlements in North West to provide me with a full report on this matter with a view to ensure that contractor responsible returns on site to undertake remedial work or is blacklisted if found to be in breach of the contractual agreement”.

In respect of this follow up question, I wish to add that there were no other contractors involved in the housing project in Khudutlou Village and reiterate that an amount of R1 282 025 was paid to the contractor for 25 units delivered.

With regards to the request for name(s) of contractors involved in the housing project referred to in this question, I am constrained and prohibited by the document titled “Guide to Parliamentary Questions in the National Assembly” from providing the Honourable Member with the name of the contractor. The document referred to states that:

“Questions are to be framed as concisely as possible. All unnecessary adjectives, references and quotations are omitted. Names of persons, bodies and, for example, newspapers are only used in questions if the facts surrounding the case have been proven. As the mere mention of such names could be construed as publicity for or against them, it should be clear that this practice is highly undesirable. If a question will be unintelligible without mentioning such names, the Departments concerned are notified of the name (-s) and this phrase is used: ".......a certain person (name furnished)”

I encourage the Honourable Member to provide me with any information that will assist me to deal with any challenges regarding the housing project Khudutlou Village.

Reply:

The information has been requested from the nine (9) Provincial Education Departments and will be provided as soon as it is received.

Reply:

ALEXKOR SOC LIMITED

(a)	NIL
(b)	NIL
(c)	NIL
(d)	NIL
(e)	NIL
(f)	NIL

DENEL SOC LIMITED

(a)	NIL
(b)	NIL
(c)	NIL
(d)	NIL
(e)	NIL
(f)	NIL

SAFCOL SOC LIMITED

(a)	NIL
(b)	NIL
(c)	NIL
(d)	NIL
(e)	NIL
(f)	NIL

SA EXPRESS SOC LIMITED

(a)	NIL
(b)	NIL
(c)	NIL
(d)	NIL
(e)	NIL
(f)	NIL

TRANSNET SOC LIMITED

(a)	NIL
(b)	NIL
(c)	NIL
(d)	NIL
(e)	NIL
(f)	NIL ESKOM SOC LIMITED (a) NIL (b) NIL (c) NIL (d) NIL (e) NIL (f) NIL

Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved

Mr. Mogokare Richard Seleke Ms. Lynne Brown, MP

Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises

Date: Date:

Reply:

Presidential Protection Service (PPS)

(1)(a)(i) A total of 17 persons were protected by the South African Police Service (SAPS) Presidential Protection Service (PPS), in the 2016/2017 financial year.

(1)(a)(ii) Since 1 April 2017, a total of 17 persons were protected.

(1)(b)(ii)&(iii) Not applicable.

(1)(b)(i)(iv)(v)&(vi) The breakdown is provided in the table below:

Current President of South Africa
1	President JG Zuma
Current Deputy President of South Africa
2	Deputy President MC Ramaphosa
Former Presidents of South Africa
3	Former President FW De Klerk
4	Former President TM Mbeki
5	Former President KP Motlanthe
Former Deputy Presidents of South Africa
6	Former Deputy President P Mlambo-Ngcuka
7	Former Deputy President BM Mbete
Current First Ladies of South Africa
8	Spouse of President JG Zuma, GA Khumalo (Ma-Khumalo)
9	Spouse of President JG Zuma, N Ntuli (MaNtuli)
10	Spouse of President JG Zuma, TS Madiba
11	Spouse of President JG Zuma, GB Ngema (MaNgema)
12	Spouse of Deputy President MC Ramaphosa, Ms Motsepe
Former First Ladies of South Africa
13	Spouse of Former President TM Mbeki, Mrs Z Mbeki
14	Spouse of Former President KP Motlanthe, Ms Mtshali
15	Spouse of Former President Mandela, Mrs G Machel
Other persons afforded this service
16	Director General from Presidency, CL Lubisi
17	African Union Chairperson, Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma
Foreign Dignitaries
The total number of foreign dignitaries protected during the 2016/2017 financial year is 65, and the total number protected since 1 April 2017, until 10 May 2017, is seven.

Protection and Security Services (PSS)

(1)(a)(i) A total of 288 persons were protected by the South African Police Service (SAPS) Protection and Security Services (PSS), in the 2016/2017 financial year.

(1)(a)(ii) Since 1 April 2017, a total of 289 persons were protected.

(1)(b)(i) Not applicable;

(1)(b)(ii) 34;

(1)(b)(iii) 37;

(1)(b)(iv) Not applicable;

(1)(b)(v) 77; and

(1)(b)(vi) 141 (including Provincial VIPs).

(2)(a) The reasons for protection are based on the outcome of individual threat assessments.

(2)(b) The total cost of protection is part of the annual budget which is allocated to PPS and PSS.

Reply:

1. Yes.

(a) The reviews emanated from directives from the Public Protector to review contracts above R10m for the Public Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) which immediately extended to other State Owned Entities including Transnet;

(b) The National Treasury is still waiting for the requested documentation from Transnet and the Department of Public Enterprises respectively, in order to conclude the review;

(c) Submission of requested documents from Transnet and the Department of Public Enterprises will determine the timelines for the review; and

(d) The completion of the review is dependent on receipt of the documentation from Transnet and Department of Public Enterprises.

2.The report will be submitted to Standing Committee of Public Accounts which will make it public.

Reply:

1. South Africa National Parks (SANparks)

(a) Not applicable.

(b) (i) No

(ii) No request was received from the foundation.

(aa) Not applicable.

(bb) Not applicable.

(cc) Not applicable.

(dd) Not applicable.

(ee) Not applicable.

(ff) Not applicable.

2. iSimangaliso Wetland Park

(a) Not applicable.

(b) (i) No

(ii) No request was received from the foundation.

(aa) Not applicable.

(bb) Not applicable.

(cc) Not applicable.

(dd) Not applicable.

(ee) Not applicable.

(ff) Not applicable.

3. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI)

(a) Not applicable.

(b) (i) No

(ii) No request was received from the foundation.

(aa) Not applicable.

(bb) Not applicable.

(cc) Not applicable.

(dd) Not applicable.

(ee) Not applicable.

(ff) Not applicable.

4. South African Weather Service (SAWS)

(a) Not applicable.

(b) (i) No.

(ii) No request was received from the foundation.

(aa) Not applicable.

(bb) Not applicable.

(cc) Not applicable.

(dd) Not applicable.

(ee) Not applicable.

(ff) Not applicable.

---ooOoo---

Reply:

1. (a)(i),(ii) and (b) The Department of Basic Education (DBE) has never applied to obtain a copy of the National Register for Sex Offenders.

2. In terms of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, Act 32 of 2007, only employers offering services which allow for access to children such as schools and crèches must, before employing a person, establish from the Registrar of the Sex Offenders Register whether or not the potential employee’s name is on the National Register for Sex Offenders. Based on this statement, the employer of educators employed at the school level is the Head of the Provincial Education Department and it is therefore the responsibility of the Head of the Provincial Education Department to do so.

 (a) and (b) are not applicable to the DBE based on the above response.

Reply:

(a) A consolidated, uniform approach to e-government is being developed by the Department of Telecommunication and Postal Services (DTPS). It would be prudent to address the question based on an understanding that the following qualities form the basis for e-government services:

• Focusing on efficiency gains in service delivery processes;
• Making government services more accessible to communities; and
• Improving inter-departmental interaction to ensure a streamlined service to the community.

The following projects will serve, inter alia, to demonstrate that e-government services are tangible and form an integral part of almost each and every corporate system that is in use in the South African Police Service (SAPS).

The Network Upgrade Project is a multi-year, multi-million rand project to modernise the network infrastructure at all SAPS offices, focusing on police stations as the priority.

The modernised network results in faster computing time, thereby reducing the time the community members are required to spend in a Community Service Centre (CSC), while information is being captured on corporate systems.

The modernised network enables modernisation of systems such as the Investigation Case Docket Management System (ICDMS) and the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS).

With higher capacities, the systems can be enhanced to do more, work faster and to exchange and/or verify information, even between government departments, for example the verification of citizen data between SAPS and the Department of Home Affairs. This is an e-government service that benefits citizens indirectly.

Corporate Systems are being developed, enhanced and maintained, by the State Information Technology Agency (SITA), on a daily basis. These systems all support the SAPS in day-to-day operations, ranging from crime administration systems, crime intelligence systems and corporate support systems. All these systems aim to support the qualities as mentioned above.

Below is a list of e-government services being rendered, but not having been specified as e-government services. The list is not an exhaustive list, but provides examples of e-government services which are integral to the day-to-day operations of the Division: Technology Management Services (TMS).

• The ICDMS administrative and investigative modules will ultimately lead to a paperless process where the case docket will be sent between departments in electronic format. This e-government service will lead to faster processing times, which should contribute to quicker resolution of cases.

• The SAPS webpage (www.saps.gov.za) currently has an e-government service where a citizen can enquire online about the status of their application for a Clearance Certificate. This is automated and the processing time has improved, as SAPS members do not spend their time answering enquiries, but rather spend it on executing the processes related to the Clearance Certificates.
• The e-Vetting system that is being utilised by SAPS internally, shortened the processing time to issue security clearances to SAPS members by Crime Intelligence, as everything is done online and not via a 10-page document.

• The Enhanced Firearm Registration System (EFRS) also promotes e-government services between SAPS and manufacturers and dealers of firearms. This ensures that the integrity of firearm information is reliable, as information is exchanged electronically.

• The implementation of the Central Supplier Database (CSD) reduces corruption as it ensures that when orders are issued to suppliers, ghost or shell companies are not used fraudulently as the requirements to be registered on the CSD are stringent. This enables faster payment to suppliers subsequent to goods and services having been rendered and minimises long payment cycles from government.

• Inter-departmental integrations are being managed through the Integrated Justice System (IJS) Board, where information exchange (between departments) is promoted using the Service Integration Business Architecture (SiBUS). This is an inter-departmental service which should eliminate duplication and therefore make processes more efficient in all relevant departments.

Most projects undertaken aim to address the qualities stated above. It is therefore not possible to isolate a cost factor associated purely with e-government services. SAPS corporate systems are being updated and enhanced on a daily basis, based on user requirements, as well as inter-departmental interfacing requirements. These services are rendered through the Service Level Agreements (SLA’s) between SAPS and SITA. The value of the Managed Applications SLA with SITA for 2016/2017, was R366 million. This includes all SAPS corporate systems, maintenance and support, as well as licensing costs for third-party software being utilised by SAPS.

(b) The budgeted cost for the Managed Applications SLA with SITA for 2017/2018 is R417 000 000, subject to final agreement between SAPS and SITA.

 

Reply:

1. (a) The matter came to the SACE’s attention via a newspaper article on 23 January 2017.

2. Yes, the SACE investigated the matter on 7 March 2017.

 (a) The outcome of the investigation was that there was sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations that the principal had indeed assaulted the now deceased learner.

(b) The SACE served the principal with the charges to appear before a disciplinary hearing on 21 April 2017. The hearing was postponed at the request of the principal as he was appearing in an internal disciplinary hearing of the Department of Education.

(c) The hearing against the educator will take place on 23 May 2017.

Reply:

(a) DRUG BUST OPERATIONS (DPCI) – APRIL 2016 TILL MARCH 2017

HEAD OFFICE/ PROVINCE	NO OF OPERATION
SANEB Head Office	18
Western Cape	52
Gauteng	145
KwaZulu Natal	166
Eastern Cape	91
North West	102
Free State	30
Mpumalanga	49
Limpopo	13
Northern Cape	57
TOTAL	723

(b) Division: Visible Policing is reporting on the drug operations conducted during daily activities and planned special operations. The table below consists of drug operations during the financial year 2016/2017.

DRUG OPERATIONS: FINANCIAL YEAR 2016/17
OPERATIONS	EC	FS	GP	KZN	LIM	MP	NW	NC	WC	Prov Total
Drug Operations	1290	403	1490	1498	1628	2195	169	201	6193	15067
Drug Operations (Section 252(A))	16	32	219	22	56	35	1	17	652	1050
Total	1306	435	1709	1520	1684	2230	170	218	6845	16117
DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES	EC	FS	GP	KZN	LIM	MP	NW	NC	WC	Prov Total
Drug Operations	1710	482	5895	4529	1320	2964	264	73	3655	20892
Drug Operations (Section 252(A))	8	23	2447	97	32	66	1	0	434	3108
Total	1718	505	8342	4626	1352	3030	265	73	4089	24000
Grand Total	3024	940	10051	6146	3036	5260	435	291	10934	40117

(b) Border Policing conducted 3750 intelligence driven operations focusing on all priority crimes including drugs for the 2016/2017 financial year.

National Intervention Unit conducted 138 intelligence driven operations focusing on all priority crimes including drugs for the 2016/2017 financial year.

Reply:

The information has been requested from the nine (9) Provincial Education Departments and will be provided as soon as it is received.

Reply:

The Department has forwarded the question to the nine Provincial Education Departments and is awaiting the response. The response will be forwarded as soon as the Department receives it.

Reply:

(a) The department has, and will continue to apply the requirements of the National Environmental Management Act, Act 107 of 1998, as amended, as well as its subordinate legislation and will continue to ensure that it uses, among other things, a risk-averse and cautious approach in its assessments.

(b) DEA cannot “halt applications” and its Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) processes once an application is received in terms of the EIA Regulations. In other words, the processes prescribed in terms of the legislation would have to be followed to finalise the application. DEA is obliged to consider all factors, including the findings of the assessment/s conducted for the facility in order to make an informed decision on whether to grant or refuse the application. The Spitskop West Wind Energy Facility’s EIA has not been concluded yet and DEA is awaiting the submission of the environmental impact assessment report (EIAr) which contains comments received on the proposed project and the specialist studies which will indicate the impact and significance of the impacts on, inter alia, avifauna. I am advised that, DEA has on-going consultations with BirdlifeSA and others. Vulpro and BirdlifeSA also have the opportunity to register as interested and affected parties (I&APs) and participate and provide input in the EIA process. The Renewable Energy Development Zones (REDZ) have been Gazetted for comment. For any site-specific EIA application in the REDZ, an assessment will still be required in future to determine site-specific impacts. The EIA process has in this case, as has been mentioned, not been concluded yet and no decision has been made by DEA.

(c) It must be understood that the department is not required by law to “engage the local expertise of certain companies”, but rather its function is to ensure that the reports submitted by the experts commissioned by the Environmental Impact Assessment practitioner (EAP) meet legislated requirements.

---ooOoo---

Reply:

The Board and management undertook a two-day strategy planning session and identified the following 5 key strategic pillars to transform SAA into a financially sustainable aviation group:

• Liquidity;
• Balance Sheet Restructuring;
• Revenue enhancement;
• Cost optimization; and
• Strategy direction

Furthermore, Seabury was appointed to assist the airline with the review of the LTTS, particularly to determine its appropriateness for SAA. The results of this review will form the basis for a five (5) year fully funded Business Plan. Once the 5 year business plan has been finalised, management will be in a position to determine whether or not it will need financial assistance from the shareholder, the quantum and the timing thereof.

Reply:

(1) The person has resigned from the FPB.

(a) The person resigned on 8 April 2017 and is currently handing over and concluding projects relating to the Annual Report.

(b) The resignation was due to professional reasons.

(2) No.

(3) No. (a) She used to serve on the MDDA Board. (b) Yes. (c) payment for serves rendered are made in terms of the revenant prescript.

(4) Yes, the person has been shortlisted to serve on the Council of ICASA and recommended by the National Assembly.

Reply:

1. (a) Yes.

    (b) The Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of

Communication–related Information Act (RICA), 2002 (Act No. 70 of 2002) has been earmarked for revision and appropriate amendments. This is as a result of a number of requests for amendments that have been received from various quarters and also as a result of concerns regarding the implementation of the RICA which have been brought to the attention of the Department. These requests relate, among others, to the following:

1. the need to enhance governance, transparency and accountability mechanisms in order to oversee the interception of communications;
2. the need to give further consideration to the compulsory registration of SIM-cards and the regulation thereof; and
3. the broadening of RICA to cater for the combatting of cybercrime, making provision for other forms of electronic surveillance and regulating the use of remote access tools to investigate crime.

The Department is still in an investigative and initial drafting phase. A draft Bill is not yet available. Discussions with some of the law enforcement agencies regarding certain proposed amendments are under way. Public consultation will follow once the Department has processed the draft Bill through the required internal processes.

2. Yes. Section 15 of the RICA deals with the availability of other procedures for obtaining real-time or archived communication-related information. In terms of this section, the availability of the procedures in respect of the provision of real-time or archived communication-related information provided for in sections 17 and 19 of the RICA (applications to the interception judge for real-time communication-related and archived communication related-directions) does not preclude obtaining such information in respect of any person in accordance with a procedure prescribed in any other Act. However, in terms of section 15 of the RICA any real-time or archived communication-related information which is obtained in terms of such other Act may not be obtained on an ongoing basis.

In this regard, section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA), 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977) is relevant. Section 205 of the CPA deals with the power of a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, upon the request of a Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) or a public prosecutor authorized thereto by the DPP, to require the attendance before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, for examination by the DPP or the public prosecutor authorized thereto by the DPP, of any person who is likely to give material or relevant information as to any alleged offence, whether or not it is known by whom the offence was committed. If such person furnishes that information to the satisfaction of the DPP or the public prosecutor concerned prior to the date on which he or she is required to appear before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, he or she is under no further obligation to appear before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate.

The Department is aware of concerns relating to the application of section 205 of the CPA in order to obtain real-time or archived communication-related information. Since section 205 of the CPA can be used to obtain material and relevant information regarding any alleged offence and not only information relating to communication as provided for in the RICA, the Department will consider amendments to section 15 of the RICA together with the amendments referred to in question 1 above.

Reply:

1. Yes.

(a) The following positions are still vacant;

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

Strategy, Monitoring and Evaluation Director

Research and Capacity Building Manager

Project Director

Executive Secretary to CEO

Knowledge Management Co-ordinator

Assistant Company Secretary

Legal and Contracts Officer

Internal Audit Manager

Travel and Events Officer

HR Officer

Digital Media Co-ordinator

(b) Chief Executive Officer (CEO): A CEO was appointed for the Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA), commencing on 1 January 2017. He subsequently resigned from the Agency, with immediate effect, on 28 February 2017. Recruitment for a replacement CEO commenced immediately with a recruitment advertisement placed nationally with a closing date of 2 April 2017. The candidates have since been shortlisted.

Chief Financial Officer: This position was put on hold to enable the newly appointed acting CEO to be involved in the selection of the Executive Team.

Executive Secretary to the CEO: This position was put on hold to enable the newly appointed CEO to be involved in the selection of the Executive Secretary.

Strategy, Monitoring and Evaluation Director, Project Director: This position was put on hold to enable the newly appointed CEO to be involved in the selection of the Executive Team. On the resignation of the CEO on 28 February 2017, the Board of the MDDA decided not to delay recruitment of the executive positions any further.

Research and Capacity Building Manager; Knowledge Management Co-ordinator; Assistant Company Secretary; Legal and Contracts Officer, Internal Audit Manager, Travel and Events Officer, HR Officer, Digital Media Co-ordinator: These positions are new in the MDDA organogram which was approved by the Board in quarter four of the 2015/2016 financial year. The positions were to be funded through funding from two major funders who only committed this funding in quarter 3 of the 2016/17 financial year.

2. (a) Yes, all positions have been advertised.

(b) (i) and (ii) The positions for CEO, CFO, Legal and Contracts Officer, Assistant Company Secretary and Travel and Events Co-ordinator were advertised in the Sunday Times on 12 March 2017 and on the MDDA website.

The other positions were advertised on 10 April 2016 in the City Press and on the MDDA website.

3. (a) Two of the specified positions are occupied in an acting capacity namely; CEO and CFO.

(b) (i) None (ii) Only the executive positions listed above in (3) (a) are occupied in an acting position. These are recent vacancies.

Reply:

The Minister of Finance has not been informed of any adjustment to the powers and functions of any (a) Local or (b) District municipality in terms of section 85(9A)(b) of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, Act 117 of 1998, as amended, before December 2015. (i) not applicable (ii) not applicable (iii) not applicable

Reply:

1. According to information from PERSAL, as at 28 February 2017, there are 61 Deputy - Directors General (DDG) posts that are currently vacant across National Departments (Annexure 1).

(a) Information from PERSAL indicates that the median time these posts have been vacant for is 19 months.

(b) Details with regards to the reasons for each vacancy can be obtained from the respective departments.

2. Advertising, interviewing and filling of posts within departments remain the responsibility of each Executive Authority, therefore information in this regard can be obtained from the relevant departments.

3. (a) There are 168 DDGs currently employed across all National Departments (Annexure 2).

(b) Relevant details with regards to acting appointments can be obtained from relevant departments.

 (c) Relevant details with regards to any of the specified persons having applied for the position of deputy director-general in which they are acting can be obtained from the respective departments.

4. Which contracts of deputy director-general will expire in the following financial years (Annexure 3):

(a) 2017-18 = 11 contracts

(b) 2018-19 = 5 contracts

(c) 2019-20 = 3 contracts

NB: The majority of positions at Deputy Director –General level in the Public Service are filled on a permanent basis.

END

Reply:

1. Yes, there are properties that are let out to non-governmental tenants.

  (a) As at 31March 2017, there were 1175 surplus properties let to non-governmental tenants;

  (b) These properties are leased to non-governmental tenants such as churches, private individuals, companies, not for profit organisations, etc.

  (c) These properties are spread across the country in all provinces and various municipalities (refer to attached annexure A).

2. Lease agreements were signed with these tenants. However, there are instances where the lease agreements have since expired and are in the process of being renewed.

The department embarked on Operation Bring Back (OBB) specifically to ensure all properties of state are accounted for and utilised appropriately. The department has a team which is visiting all properties to ensure they are secured, and any illegal occupants engaged and that all leases are regularised. For vacant properties, and expired leases, the department advertised these properties to ensure that we achieve legal occupation speedily, not all the expired leases have been renewed, as this is an ongoing process.

The rental amounts vary for each property as per the attached annexure.

(a) Further details with respect to the leased properties are as per the attached annexure.

Reply:

1) Yes.

2)  No, the MDDA staff members were not required to put in extra hours to cover hours lost due to staff shortages to ensure that the entity’s mandate was fulfilled. However, it is understood that due to the vacancy rate, some staff members were required to take on extra duties during normal working hours.

3) Staff members were given a choice to take leave or to take cash in lieu of leave to assist in compensating for the extra workload due to the vacancies.

  (a) A total of 17 staff members opted to not take leave and to receive cash in lieu of leave.

  (b) The professional designations were Programme Managers, Project Officers and Administration staff.

4) No, the MDDA did not re-allocate the lost leave days.

(a) The lost leave days were not reallocated as the staff had been given the option for cash in lieu for the lost leave days.

(b) The affected staff were given cash in lieu for the lost leave days. All affected staff received the cash in lieu for the lost leave days in April 2017.

5) The latest organogram is attached herewith as Annexure A

 

Reply:

No	Organisation	(a) Amount Outstanding	(b) Period	(c) Reason and payment dates
(i)	SAMRO (SA Music Rights Organisation)	R14,546,580-00	April 2017	This is based on March 2017 revenue. Payment of SAMRO is scheduled for the 3rd Quarter of the 2017/18 F/Y.
(ii)	SAMPRA (SA Music Performance Rights Association) and IMPRA (Independent Music Performance Rights Association)	R52,751,160-73	March 2014	Both societies have not agreed on the percentage split of the amount based on the play history reports SABC has generated. Then a decision was made that both societies must submit their repertoires lists to SABC for final verification which SABC agreed on the due date of the end of May 2017. Both societies have submitted the repetoires list for the verification process which is still ongoing. Once all is completed and agreed upon by all parties the payment will be made to the societies.
(iii)	AIRCO (Association of Independent Record Companies)	R2,800,000-00	October 2016 -  April 2017	TV division is awaiting invoices from AIRCO for October 2016 – March 2017. Payments are scheduled from May 2017 onwards.
(iv)	RISA (Recording Industry of South Africa)	R2,400,000-00	January 2017 – April 2017	A payment of R19.8m was made at the end of December 2016. Payment is scheduled for the 3rd Quarter of the 2017/18 F/Y.
(v)	CAPASSO (Composers, Authors and Publishers Association)	R3,000,000-00	February 2017 – April 2017	February and March payments have been submitted for payment and are dependent on funds availability. Payment is scheduled for the 3rd Quarter of the 2017/18 F/Y.

Reply:

The Department of Public works manages accommodation requirements of national departments through the Property Management Trading Entity (PMTE). Included in this mandate is the provision of accommodation through state owned and leased properties, construction of new accommodation, major refurbishment of existing properties and management of municipal services.

State-owned accommodation charges are billed quarterly in advance in line with the devolution framework principles developed at the time of establishment of the PMTE. The process that is followed to recover monies relating to private leases, municipal services, Client Infrastructure spending (Capital allocation) and other recoverable infrastructure projects (referred to as PACE and CA) is as follows:

 

• PMTE pays lessors, contractors and municipalities on behalf of user departments;
• At the end of the month, the recoverable costs are consolidated per client;
• Invoices are then issued to clients in arrears;
• User departments have 30 days to settle debts in terms of the PFMA;
• However, in practice this gives rise to 60 days delay in matching the expense with the revenue.

As at the end of March 2017, R2, 854 billion was outstanding from national departments (Annexure: A) and R195 billion from other organs of state (Annexure: B).

In line with established inter-governmental cooperation principles, the PMTE has regular interactions with user departments for the recovery of outstanding debts and is assisted by the National Treasury where additional funding is required.

 

Reply:

1. The National Treasury did provide the former Minister of Communications or the Department of Communication with the report into investigation into the set-top box procurement process.

2. (a) There was no additional request made to PWC to conduct any further investigation as the Department of Communication has not requested the National Treasury to facilitate such an investigation.

(b) No further aspects of the process are being investigated, currently.

(c) The final report will be completed subject to completion of criminal proceedings by law enforcement agencies.

Reply:

E-government services are the services that Government render to the public online through the internet. In this regard, the Department of Home Affairs has developed an eHome Affairs Portal which enables citizens to apply for smart ID Cards and Passports online. The Portal was launched on 07 April 2016.

(a) FY2016/17 Expenditure

1. Development of the eHome Affairs Portal – R6 960 447.19
2. Post Release Enhancements of eHome Affairs – R2 846 908.79
3. Support and Maintenance of the eHome Affairs system – R887 494.97

It is to be noted that the development of the Portal includes upgrade to Live Capture system and revenue systems to enable EFT payments and integration to various core systems.

​(b) FY2017/18 Budget allocation for eHome Affairs Portal

1. Planned enhancement of eHome Affairs Portal – R2 500 000.00
2. Maintenance and Support of the System – R1 000 000.00
3. Hosting and Internet Connectivity for eHome Affairs (including hardware procurement) – R10 000 000.00

Reply:

(1) The National Treasury reviewed coal contracts to established if Eskom complied with the SCM norms and standards when appointing the service provider.

(2) Yes.

(a) (1) Falcon Research and Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd and

(2) Israel Monnapula Dikgwatlhe.

(b) Both were appointed to assist the National Treasury to review and analyse the quality of coal delivered to Eskom by Tegeta Exploration and Resources.

(c) The total cost for Falcon Research and Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd

R 184 500.00,

The following is the breakdown of the cost for Falcon

Analysis of test coal results ...………………………………………………. R 13 500-00

Analysis of the Environmental Analysis report …………………………… R 4 500-00

Analysis of the technical aspects of the coal supply agreement ………. R 9 000-00

Analysis of the technical aspects in the draft report ……………………… R 18 000-00

Analysis of technical aspects in the minutes of the meetings …………… R 9 000-00

Extended reviews of documents………………………………………………. R103 500-00

Compilation of a technical report …………………………………………… R 27 000-00

TOTAL………………………………………………………………………….. R184 500.00

The following is the breakdown for Israel Monnapula Dikgwatlhe

Analysis of test coal results ...………………………………………………. R 24 800-00

Analysis of the Environmental Analysis report …………………………… R 18 600-00

Analysis of the technical aspects of the coal supply agreement ………. R 18600.00

Analysis of the technical aspects in the draft report ……………………… R 18 600-00

Analysis of technical aspects in the minutes of the meetings …………… R 9 920-00

Request additional data analysis………………………………. R12 400-00

Compilation of a technical report …………………………………………… R 49 600-00

Comparison of the quality of coal expected……………………………….. R5 425.00

Clear comparison of what was delivered………………………………….. R4 650.00

Clear comparison of results for Sibonisiwe and SABS in compliance of

Brakfontein mine with requirements for mining coal R4 030.00

NT findings with the response from Eskom………………………………. R5 425.00

TOTAL………………………………………………………………………… R178 250.00

(3) whether any draft and/or final report(s) on the review has/have been produced; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date is a report expected; if so, (i) what is the title of each report and (ii) on what date was the report completed;

Response: A final draft report was sent to Eskom on 05 April 2017.

(4) whether the final report on the review will be made public; if not, why not; if so, by what date is it expected?

Response: Yes, as soon as the report is finalised.

Reply:

(1) Yes

(a) The law does not prohibit any person from serving on more than one Board of the entities reporting to the Minister of Communications.

(b) (i) Ms Khanyisile Kweyama

    (ii) Brand South Africa Board and the interim SABC Board.

    (iii) Serving a three-year term at Brand South Africa and six months at the SABC interim Board.      

    (iv) payment for services rendered were in line with the required prescript

(2) Yes.

Reply:

Auditing process in relation to the total amount spent, amongst others, refer to in this parliamentary question is still under away, once the auditing process and all other process has been completed, the amount spent, will be submitted to Parliament as part of the Annual Reports, which will be tabled in Parliament.

Reply:

1. a) The National Department of Public Works is the custodian of the Jonkershoek Forest Reserve Farm 352 and the unregistered portion 4 also known as “Op-die-Bult Jonkershoek”

(b) The National Department of Public Works is currently negotiating with the Stellenbosch Municipality to assume responsibility for the human settlement of former forest workers by means of the disposal of the property to that municipality.

(2) No, currently there are no funds available for the maintenance of the general infrastructure and houses of the settlement, hence negotiations with the
Stellenbosch Municipality to assume responsibility for the settlement.

(3) (a) 18 formal structures have been confirmed at Op-die-Bult, with 123 households recorded in the broader Jonkerhoek Mixed Use Precinct. These
figures are from the time when the property was returned to Department by the South African Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL) acting on behalf of
the then Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

(b) (i) No funds have been spent on the infrastructure

(b) (ii) No funds have been spent on the houses

(4) (a) The Department is currently negotiating with the Stellenbosch municipalityto take over the properties together with their inhabitants as it is best-placed to provide appropriate standards of human settlement

(b) Yes, it is envisaged that the Department will hand over the properties to the Stellenbosch Municipality for management of the human settlement according to prescribed standards.

(5) The National Department of Public Works aims to transfer the land to the Stellenbosch Municipality. Other relevant Departments e.g. Department of
Human Settlements, COGTA, Department of Rural Development etc. will then be drawn in as an intergovernmental team to assist with housing and
infrastructure in formalising the settlement in terms of their core function.

Reply:

1. Yes, Erf 81 situated in Tamboerskloof, Cape Town, Western Cape falls under the care of National Public Works Department.

2. The property is being considered for transfer to the Department of Defence, which has requested that this property – as well as all other Endowment properties – be returned to the Department of Defence for their own use. The property is an Endowment property owned by Department of Defence and is under the custodianship of National Department of Public Works.

3. The property is intended to be used by the Department of Defence for their own needs.

Reply:

1. (a) (i) and (ii)

The suspension of Hill High School principal was as a result of the alleged financial mismanagement of the school funds. The principal was found guilty and sanctioned to suspension without pay and subsequently returned to work after completing the suspension.

(b) The allegation levelled against him was financial mismanagement of the school funds.

2. (a) Yes, an investigation was undertaken by the Gauteng Department of Education. (b) and (c) An internal investigation was conducted and concluded within 60 days.

3. (a) The principal of the school and the Department were the only parties involved.

(b) and (c) The matter was investigated internally and therefore no costs were incurred by the Department.

Reply:

(1-2) The role of Prof. Chris Malikane is to advise Minister of Finance. The eight pages discussion documents, is not government position but was for his academic purposes.

(3) The government is doing all it can to improve the economic prospects of the country by ensuring that a conducive environment is created for public and private sector to invest in the economy and eventually create jobs.

(4) As government, we are clear and consistent in terms of Economic Policy and how to address current challenges. A lot of work is being done at the level of both local and abroad to avoid any further downgrade. We are working towards improving our current grading.

Reply:

MINISTRY

PUBLIC WORKS

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224

Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592

www.publicworks.gov.za

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

(ORAL)

1. We requested information from Mr Edward Nkuna in Head Office, we are awaiting his feedback.
2. See below:

Item No	Project Name	WCS numbers	Status	2015/16	2016/17	2017/18
1	Bryntirion No. 19	053319	Completed	R 158 301.19	R 2 107 035.90	R 0.00
2	331 Olivier, Brooklyn	053347	Completed		R 1 835 818.72
3	375 Lawley	053574	Completed		R 1 319 303.55
4	321 Rigel	054033 & 048576	Completed	R 2 398 350.77	R 89 124.35	R 0.00
5	313 Edward, Waterkloof	054031	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 597 583.51	R 0.00
6	273 Eridunus, Waterkloof	053575	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 828 604.88	R 0.00
7	286 Albertus, Waterkloof	053584	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 784 102.34	R 0.00
8	13, 1st Avenue Houghton*	050773 & 054581	Completed	R 3 133 499.05	R 333 263.99	R 0.00
9	21A Killarney Road, Sandhurst	052038	Completed	R 197 826.19	R 2 501 531.73	R 0.00
10	79 Bogey	052425	Completed	R 920 961.98	R 1 200 680.99	R 0.00
11	205 Sterlitzia Street	054730	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 658 529.98	R 0.00
			TOTAL	R 6 808 939.18	R 20 255 579.94

Reply:

a) The Department of Home Affairs is not in a position to respond to the question as the Department does not know which company / companies the person referred to is associated with or working for. The person referred to is and was not employed by the Department.

b) No.

Reply:

(a) The increase in the remuneration of the CEO of Umalusi from 2013-14 to 2014-15 financial years was not as a result of a long service award as previously reported. The spur of the moment response given in the meeting of the Portfolio Committee on 3 May 2017 was informed by the fact that such an award was given to the CEO in recognition of his 30 years’ service in the public service albeit a year earlier. The decision for the long service award was guided by the long service policies of the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and Umalusi.

The table below outlines the remuneration components of the total package reported in the annual reports of the abovementioned financial years:

	Remuneration component	13/14	14/15	%
		R'000	R'000	increase
1	Basic remuneration	1 618	1 729	6.9%
2	Pension contribution	149	160	7.1%
3	Medical contributions	–	12	100.0%
4	Cost to company package	1,767	1,901	7.6%
5	Bonus & Performance payment	99	114	14.9%
6	Leave pay-out	–	220	100.0%
7	Long service award	–	–	–
8	Total package	1 867	2 235	19.7%

In the 2013-14 to 2014-15 financial years the leave pay-out was the remuneration component that led to the high increase. In 2014 the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee of Council (REMCO) noted that 12 employees had accumulated more than 50 leave days. In May 2014, REMCO recommended to Council to pay out a maximum of 30 days to employees. The recommendation was subsequently approved by Council in June 2014 and the pay-out was actioned in July 2014. Ultimately, only 7 employees were reimbursed, and one of them was the CEO.

(i) The long service award was given to the CEO in January 2013 i.e. the 2012/13 financial year, as stipulated in the policies of the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and Umalusi.

(ii) The amount of the award was R15 000. The employee also encashed 30 days’ annual leave as per the Umalusi policy. The total amount of leave paid out was R188 270.

(iii) The CEO is employed at salary level 16 of the DPSA levels.

(iv) The table below summarises the employment history of Dr Rakometsi from 1 January 1983 to date.

Years	Position held	Institution	Date appointed	Date resigned / promoted
Total to date: 34 years 5 months
8 years 5 months	Chief Executive Officer	Umalusi, Pretoria	Jan 2009	To date
3 years 4 months	Superintendent General (Head of Department)	Free State Department of Education, Bloemfontein	Sep 2005	Dec 2008
4 years 5 months	Chief Director: Curriculum and Professional Development and Support	Free State Department of Education, Bloemfontein	Apr 2001	Aug 2005
2 years 3 months	Director: Education Institute	Free State Department of Education, Bloemfontein	Jan 1999	Mar 2001
3 years	Chief Education Specialist (Deputy Director Professional) - Examinations	Department of Education, Arts and Culture, Sport and Recreation, Mmabatho North-West Province	Jan 1996	Dec 1998
3 years	Deputy Chief Education Specialist (History)	Free State Department of Education and Culture, Welkom	Jan 1993	Dec 1995
3 years	Head of Department Professional Subjects and Student Affairs	Tshiya College of Education, Qwa Qwa	Jan 1990	Dec 1992
1 year	Senior Lecturer (Student Affairs)	Tshiya College of Education, Qwa Qwa	Jan 1989	Dec 1989
1 year 7 months	Lecturer	Tshiya College of Education, Qwa Qwa	Apr 1987	Dec 1988
3 year 3 months	Teacher	Thokoana-Makaota Senior Secondary School, Qwa Qwa	Jan 1984	Mar 1987
1 year	Teacher	Rearabetswe Senior Secondary School, Odendaalrsrus	Jan 1983	Dec 1983

(v) A submission regarding the long service award for the CEO is recommended internally, but ultimately submitted to the Chairperson of Council for approval.

All remuneration aspects of the CEO as the Accounting Officer are recommended to Council as the Accounting Authority and only paid out with Council’s approval. The cost to company is paid in line with the rates as determined by DPSA. To this end, Council is requested annually to approve all annual cost of living adjustments.

Bonus and performance payments are made on an annual basis in line with the performance management and development policy. The award ranges from 2% to 8% of cost to company, limited by the 1.5% of the total remuneration budget. The scores are moderated by members of the Executive Committee of Council (EXCO) and signed off by the Chairperson of Council.

(vi) Legislation informing the long service award is the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and Umalusi policies.

Reply:

The information required is being collected from various Divisions and stake holders which in turn must still be collated and verified so as to provide an accurate information. Therefore a consolidate response will be provided soon.

Reply:

The question was forwarded to the Department and the entities who responded as follows:

(a) Department of Home Affairs

The Department has not procured any services from or made any payments to an entity called the Decolonisation Foundation as there has been no need to do so.

(b) Government Printing Works

Government Printing Works has not procured any services from or made any payments to an entity called the Decolonisation Foundation.

(b) Electoral Commission

The Electoral Commission has not procured any services from or made any payments to an entity called the Decolonisation Foundation, and none are expected to be procured.

Reply:

1. The Minister has written to the identified person to provide the Department of Basic Education (DBE) with evidence in this regard. However, the DBE has been made aware of isolated cases (not a norm) involving some teachers. From the advent of democracy in South Africa, the DBE has built the curriculum on the same values and principles on which the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa are based. The National Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement articulates the democratic values, aims and principles, social justice and fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. The implementation of the National Curriculum and Policy Statement makes it difficult for teachers to stray from the content, pedagogy, dogma and values anchoring the curriculum itself. Where teachers were found to have strayed from the implementation of the curriculum in its true content and spirit, the Department has acted and meted out applicable sanctions.

2. There would be no need to defend the integrity of school system on this matter as the Department is not inundated with reports of such cases. The DBE will, however, bring it to the attention of Provincial Education Departments to make teachers aware of consequences of not adhering to the stipulations of the National Curriculum and Assessment Statement and the democratic values enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa.

Reply:

a) None of the classrooms have currently been repaired. 10 Schools have been identified for repairs in the 2017/18 financial year.

b) R177 million was made available during November-December 2016. This has been utilised to fund 10 Vuwani/ Malamulela protest damaged schools, and contractors have been appointed. However, due to the intermittent unrest that have been going on in the area, no progress has been registered. The service provider will proceed with the work as soon as the situation is back to normal.

c) Currently security officials have been deployed to the schools affected and fencing has been included into the scope of work that is to be done at the schools.

Reply:

Yes, the official has been suspended.

a) The official was suspended on 17 March 2017.

b) The official is facing various charges of alleged misconduct, details of which are still confidential pending finalisation of the disciplinary processes. The suspension was to enable the Board to conduct an investigation on allegations of misconduct.

c) Mr Mmberegeni Dzebu.

d) The Council requested the then Minister of Communications to second an official to act as the CEO. Mr Dzebu was found to be a suitable person.

Reply:

1. I have received a detailed briefing from the Department on proposed options and/ or interventions that could be considered for current Zimbabwe Special Permit (ZSP) holders beyond the expiry date of 31 December 2017. I am currently considering such proposals, and also consulting with my Cabinet peers. I will be ready to make an announcement during August 2017.

2. Relevant details will be contained in the announcement envisaged above.

Reply:

(1)(a) 1 130 designated marriage officers

(1)(b) 421 marriage officers are exempted to perform Civil Union Marriages whereby they objected on the grounds of conscience, religion or belief.

(2) This is not a Ministerial prerogative but a provision of the law in terms of section 6 of the Civil Union Act, 2006 (Act No. 17 of 2006) – A marriage officer, other than a marriage officer referred to in section 5, may in writing inform the Minister that he or she objects on the ground of conscience, religion and belief to solemnising a civil union between persons of the same sex, whereupon that marriage officer shall not be compelled to solemnise such civil union. The Act is clear in that marriage officers will not be compelled to solemnise such civil unions.

Reply:

The Eastern Cape Department of Roads and Public Works has read the judgement and instructed the State Attorney to appeal components of the judgement. In terms of the process, the Department filed an Application for leave to appeal the judgement. The matter was heard on the 19th May 2017 in the Grahamstown High Court, which reserved its judgement. The Department is therefore still awaiting the judgement of the Court.

Reply:

(a)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(cc)(dd)(ee)(ff)

The Department and the Entities reporting to the Minister did not procure any services from and/or made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.