Questions and Replies
17 November 2017 - NW3277
Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) With reference to the Minister of Energy’s reply to question 2966 on 12 October 2017, (a) why does Eskom disagree with the creation of a national basket for maintenance that will require a percentage from municipality revenue as stipulated by her department, (b) what is the alternative plan from Eskom in this regard, (c) how does Eskom intend to deal with the maintenance backlog that the national basket for maintenance attempts to address, (d) what is the total cost of the backlog and (e) what percentage of the tariff increase requested by Eskom will be allocated to maintenance; (2)what is the current allocation of revenue that is allocated to Eskom for maintenance?
Reply:
(1)(a)
Eskom disagreed to being part of the national basket for the following reasons:
- Eskom does not require additional funding outside the tariff increases to do maintenance of its Distribution infrastructure
- Eskom has stated its ambition in its corporate plan to reduce its financial loans and government guarantees in the next five years
- Eskom believes that Distribution should be a self-funding business.
(1)(b)
Based on the reasons in (1)(a) Eskom does not require an alternative plan
(1)(c)
From an Eskom perspective, there is no maintenance (repairs and preventative) backlog. Eskom Distribution has a preventative work order compliance rate of 99%.
(1)(d)
Not applicable, as Eskom does not have a backlog.
The maintenance budget (repairs and preventative) for the next 5 years is R25 484m.
(1)(e)
Looking at the make-up of the Eskom’s revenue application, this cannot be specifically broken down as the percentage, due to the application structure being expressed as the c/kwh and driven by the specific cost base
(2)
The 2017/2018 MYPD 3 Determination for the revenue allocation is R205 215m. The allocation for the total maintenance at Eskom level is R14 813m, of which R7 407m is the allocation for Distribution licence maintenance.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mr. Mogokare Richard Seleke Ms. Lynne Brown, MP
Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises
Date: Date:
17 November 2017 - NW3299
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to him are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
1. Transport Entities CEO’s are appointed on a five (5) years fixed term contract. Some of the entities CFOs are appointed on a permanent basis and others on a five (5) years fixed term contract.
2. Department of Transport entities CEO’s and CFO’s employment status
|
Name of Entity |
Name of CEO |
Contract Expiry Date |
Name of CFO |
Contract Expiry Date |
|
|
1 |
SANRAL |
Mr Skhumbuzo Macozoma |
30 November 2021 |
Ms Inge Mulder |
Permanent |
|
2 |
PRASA |
Mr Lindikaya Zide |
Acting |
Ms Yvonne Page |
Acting |
|
3. |
ATNS |
Mr Thabani Mthiyane |
30 June 2018 |
Mr Mtome Moholola |
Acting |
|
4. |
SAMSA |
Mr Sobantu Tilayi |
Acting |
Mr Phumlani Myeni |
Permanent |
|
5. |
SACAA |
Ms Poppy Khoza |
30 Novemeber 2018 |
Mr Asruf Seedat |
30 November 2021 |
|
6 |
ACSA |
Mr Bongani Maseko |
30 May 2018 |
Mr Dirk Kunz (Acting) |
Acting |
|
7 |
Ports Regulator |
Mr Mahesh Fakir |
30 April 2019 |
Mr Thokozani Mhlongo |
31 October 2020 |
|
8 |
C-BRTA |
Mr Sipho Khumalo |
30 June 2021 |
Mr Nchaupe Maepa |
Acting |
|
9 |
Road Accident Fund |
Ms Lindelwa Jabavu |
Acting |
Mr Rodney Gounden |
31 August 2022 |
|
10 |
RSR |
Mr Nkululeko Poya |
31 October 2021 |
Mr Regardt Gouws |
Permanent |
|
11 |
RTMC |
Adv Makhosini Msibi |
31 December 2018 |
Ms Liana Moolman |
Permanent |
|
12 |
RTIA |
Mr Japh Chuwe |
30 September 2021 |
Ms Palesa Moalusi |
Contract 31 July 2018 |
17 November 2017 - NW3411
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
With reference to the Prasa signalling systems and maintenance work after the Elandsfontein train crash, (a) why has maintenance work on the signalling systems stopped in some areas in Gauteng, (b) what is being done to resume and complete this work in each area respectively and (c) what are the timelines and deadlines for each area in this regard?
Reply:
a) The maintenance of the signalling system has never stopped in some areas in Gauteng. It has intensified working hand in hand with the Rail Safety Regulator (RSR) with a dedicated joint team of inspectors from RSR and Metro-rail signalling technicians.
b) Refer to (a) above
c) Refer to (a) above
17 November 2017 - NW2411
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Finance
(a) What are the full details of each current liability of (i) the SA Airways (SAA) and (ii) each of its subsidiaries as at 31 July 2017 and (b)(i) what is the detailed breakdown of all amounts owed to the creditors by (aa) the SAA and (bb) each of its subsidiaries that were only paid in part as at 31 July 2017 and (ii) by what date will the partially-paid amounts be paid in full in each case?
Reply:
SAA is not in a position to make the details requested available, as they are confidential and involve third parties.
17 November 2017 - NW3547
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) How is the performance of the boards of entities that report to him measured, (b) what sanction takes place should the performance targets not be met, (c) how did each board of each entity that report to him perform against set targets and measurables in the past three financial years and (d) who monitors the performance of boards?
Reply:
a) At the beginning of the financial year each entiy is required to submit a Shareholders compact. The shareholders compact, documents the mandated key performance measures and indicators to be achieved by the entities as agreed by the Accounting Authority and Executive Authority. The Executive Authority monitors the extent to which the Board as a whole, achieves the objectives and specific performamce targets. Procedures have been established where all the Accounting Authorities in SOE’s reports to the Executive Authority on a quarterly basis for monitoring and evaluation purposes.
b) In instances where an entity has not met its performance targets, careful consideration must be given, taking into account the reasons provided by the entities for non-achievement. Where it is found that Board members are lacking in certain skills sets they will be recommended for skills training or equipping programmes relevant to requirements. Sanctions would only become applicable where an entity has deliberately and knowingly acted negligently with state funds or resources or where supply chain processes were overlooked. In such instances, investigations are undertaken, followed by disciplinary action(s) where applicable or necessary.
c) Boards’ performance for the past three (3) financial years has been satisfactory, with other entities performing exceptionally well.
d) Board performance is monitored by the Corporate Governance Section within the Department. In addition, Boards also undergo Board evaluations, these can be done by an independent company or alternatively Board members can evaluate each other. Board evaluations conducted by Board members evaluating each other are usually done on a confidential basis. During these evaluations Board members are required to evaluate not only the positives but the negatives of each Board member over the course of the financial period under review. The outcomes of these Board evaluation reports are submitted to the Shareholder on an annual basis.
17 November 2017 - NW2964
Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether a certain company (name and details furnished) entered into any contracts with (a) Eskom and/or (b) Transnet; if so, in each case, (i) what is the purpose of each specified contract, (ii) what is the value of each contract, (iii) on what date was it signed, (iv) who approved the contract, (v) what was the outcome of the contract and (vi) what is the length of the contract?
Reply:
(a)
ESKOM SOC LTD
No, Eskom does not have a contract with Oliver Wyman. However Eskom has four contracts with Marsh (Pty) Ltd, a sister company to Oliver Wyman.
(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi)
Not applicable
(b)
TRANSNET SOC LTD
|
(1)(b)(i) |
(1)(b)(ii) |
(1)(b)(iii) |
(1)(b)(iv) |
(1)(b)(v) |
(1)9b)(vi) |
|
What is the purpose of the said contract |
What is the value of the contract |
When was it signed? |
Who approved the contract? |
What was the outcome of the contract? |
What is the length of the contract? |
|
Development of a Zero Based Operating Plan |
$2 470 000 or R12 015 000 |
14 December 2007 |
CE: TFR at the time |
Successful implementation of a Zero Based Train Operating Plan |
28 weeks |
|
MultiRail Software agreement – annual licence fees |
$880 000 (R4 294 500) once off initial payment – thereafter annual licence fee of $112 000 (R537 402) pa increasing at CPI of New York City index – plus once off expenses of $50 000 (R239 697) |
1 July 2008 |
Chief Information Officer at the time |
Successful implementation of the MultiRail Software system |
Ongoing annual licence fee until the MultiRail software system is discontinued at TFR |
The member should note that as the Shareholder I receive this information in good faith from SOC’s and therefore submit them as such. Should the member have any information to the contrary it would be appreciated if such can be provided.
Remarks: Reply: Approved / Not Approved
Mr. Mogokare Richard Seleke Ms. Lynne Brown, MP
Director-General Minister of Public Enterprises
Date: Date:
17 November 2017 - NW3413
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)(a) What are the details of each tender issued or awarded by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him in the past three financial years, (b) what was the value of each tender, (c) who won the tender (d) the criteria were used to award the tenders and (e) what mechanisms exist to ensure that the companies that won the tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfil the requirements demanded by each tender?
Reply:
Department
|
PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
CONTRACT AMOUNT |
SUPPLIER |
|
(a)(i) |
(b) |
(c) |
|
To Develop, Establish, Manage the Scrapping Administration Agency (TSA). |
521 238 734.00 |
Taxi Scrapping Administration |
|
Advocate to draft legislation for the No-Fault Policy/Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) |
2 312 000.00 |
HJ De Waal |
|
Establishment of the Single Source Transport Economic Regulator through Developing Policy, Legislation and Implementation Plan |
13 036 668.00 |
DNA Economics |
|
Rural Accessibility/Multi Modal Deprivation Index Project |
1 509 702.00 |
VelaVke Consulting |
|
Provision of Legal Advisory for the Department of Transport's intervention in Limpopo |
3 200 000.00 |
Ntuli Noble |
|
Cleaning Services to the Department for a period of two (2) year |
4 121 985.68 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
|
Extend Scope of Cleaning Services to provide for additional floors allocated to DOT |
1 071 536.54 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
|
Extend Scope of Cleaning Services to provide for additional floors allocated to DOT |
684 438.18 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
|
Travel agent to provide Travel, Accommodation, Conferencing and ad-hoc Car Rental Services to the Department for a period of two (2) years |
Negotiated rates apply |
Travel with Flair |
|
Extension of Feasibility Study: Moloto Development Corridor |
1 034 666.00 |
SMEC |
|
Supply , Install and Maintain the Switchboard (PABX) and Telephone Management System for the Department of Transport's Head Office |
5 679 327.53 |
Bytes |
|
Formulation and Implementation of SA Road Infrastructure Policy |
4 908 125.48 |
ITS Engineering |
|
Marine Pollution Prevention & Response Vessel capability (Standby Tug) |
199 640 000.00 |
AMSOL |
|
Security Services at the Department |
4 384 093.34 |
Eldna Security Services |
|
Review Road based subsidized transport service |
2 843 844.00 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
|
Multi Modal Transport Planning and Coordination Draft Bill |
5 386 000.00 |
Modiba & Associates Inc |
|
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster A(Gauteng, North West & Limpopo) |
11 244 960.00 |
PH Bagale (previously Core JV) |
|
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster C(KZN & Mpumalanga) |
9 931 680.00 |
PH Bagale (previously Core JV) |
|
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster B(Northern Cape & Free State) |
22 019 199.35 |
Royal Haskoning DHV |
|
Up scaling of S'hamba Sonke Road Program: Cluster D(Eastern Cape & Western Cape) |
19 587 508.25 |
Royal Haskoning DHV |
|
Technical and Secretariat Services for the NTPF |
5 621 700.00 |
Delca Systems |
|
Travel Agent to provide Travel, Accommodation, Conferencing and ad-hoc Car Rental Services to the Department for a period of two (2) years |
|
WingsNaledi Corporate Trading (Pty) Ltd |
|
Development of Regional Corridor Development Strategy |
2 727 336.57 |
Arup |
|
Cleaning Services to the Department for a period of two (2) year |
7 658 230.46 |
Bontle ke Bontle |
|
PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
CONTRACT AMOUNT |
SUPPLIER |
|
(a)(i) |
(b) |
(c) |
|
RE-APPOINTMENT :Support to Regulating Committee on Fees and Charges by ACSA and ATNS - Cost Extension |
1 314 207.00 |
PWC |
|
Update of the National Freight Logistics Strategy |
2 272 704.00 |
Delca Systems |
|
Update of the National Freight Databank |
8 941 872.72 |
Aurecon SA (Pty) Ltd |
|
Finalize the Draft White Paper on NADP |
2 436 164.00 |
Kaiser International (Pty) Ltd |
|
Review White Paper on National Transport Policy of 1996 |
5 269 365.00 |
Genesis Analytics/Aurecon SA & Webber Wentzel Consortium |
|
Assist in Developing a Branch-line Strategy and Pilot Program |
6 108 123.00 |
Ernst & Young Advisory Services |
|
NATURAL CONTINUATION: Forensic Analysis of Putco Sandfontein Contract |
4 598 226.88 |
Transport and Economics Support Services (TESS) |
|
Internal Audit Services for DLCA |
1 784 546.00 |
PriceWaterhouseCoopers Inc (PWC) |
|
Shova Kalula: Supply 2700 bicycles and helmets, vests, pumps, locks etc. |
3 996 000.00 |
Abroo Style Trading CC |
|
Assist Internal Audit with Audit Report Audits |
948 157.70 |
SAB&T Chartered Accountant Inc t/a Nexia SAB&T |
|
Natural Continuation: NATMAP 2050 Review and Update |
3 538 560.00 |
Aurecon SA (Pty) Ltd |
|
CLOSED BID: Finalize the Draft White Paper on NCAP |
983 424.00 |
Kaiser International (Pty) Ltd |
|
Freight Transport Model |
4 071 557.88 |
Kijama Development |
|
Determining the criteria for certifying Auditors and training requirements. |
731 300.00 |
SAATCA |
|
EXPANSION: Review of the National Safety Regulator Act |
798 000.00 |
Mncedisi, Ndlovu & Sedumi |
|
Develop a Regional Transport Market Integration Strategy |
1 866 180.00 |
Letsema Consulting & Advisory Services (Pty) Ltd |
|
Supply of Stationary to the Department for 2 years |
|
|
|
Review of the Taxi Recap Programme |
1 784 744.10 |
AM Consulting Engineers |
|
Shova Kalula: Supply 3450 bicycles and helmets, vests, pumps, locks etc. |
5 517 114.00 |
Foziyus Trading |
|
Develop an Integrated Public Transport Network plan in OR Tambo Municipal District |
1 963 650.00 |
SMEC |
|
Rail Economic Regulator Panel |
|
Panel |
|
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 1.1.1 - DEVELOP A SCOPING REPORT FOR RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL |
110 500.00 |
LTS Consulting |
|
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 1.1.2 - DEVELOP AN INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARKING REPORT FOR INFRASTRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL |
637 060.40 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
|
PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
CONTRACT AMOUNT |
SUPPLIER |
|
(a)(i) |
(b) |
(c) |
|
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 3.1 -UNDERTAKE A REVIEW OF THE CURRENT LOCAL RAIL ENVIRONMENT ON THE LEVELS OF SERVICE |
643 846.41 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
|
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 3.2 - UNDERTAKE LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARKING IN THE RAIL ENVIRONMENT ON THE LEVELS OF SERVICE |
660 769.21 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
|
Rail Economic Regulator Panel: SUB PROG 8.1.2 - DEVELOP A STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN AND OUTPUT REPORT FOR RAIL AND ROAD MODAL OPTIMIZATION |
630 110.80 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
|
Develop the White Paper on National Rail Policy and the National Rail Bill |
10 600 000.00 |
Railway Corporate Strategy (RCS) |
|
Lifestyle Audits of DOT Officials |
|
Panel |
|
Skills Audit |
981 545.47 |
LTS Consulting |
|
Develop a National Railway Safety Strategy |
2 730 120.00 |
Gibb (PTY) Ltd |
|
Feasibility Study for the Tug Boat Building Project in Preparation of a PPP |
9 033 360.00 |
J Maynard SA |
|
Develop a Salvage Strategy |
782 952.00 |
AUK Marine & Mining |
|
Feasibility Study for the Small Harbour Development in Port St Johns |
1 389 875.00 |
Urban Econ Development Economists |
|
Providing of Cleaning Services, Indoor & Outdoor Plants and Pest Control Services for the Department for a period of two (2) years |
9 282 329.44 |
Pheta Trading Enterprise |
|
Marine Pollution Prevention & Response Vessel capability (Standby Tug) |
275 880 000.00 |
AMSOL |
|
Supply of Stationary to the Department for 2 years |
|
Panel |
|
Standardization, Integration & Uniformity (SIU) of Road Sector Asset Management |
13 007 819.53 |
Nexor 312 (Pty) Ltd |
|
Develop an Integrated Public Transport Network plan in Thabo Mofutsenyane Municipal District |
1 315 395.91 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
|
Develop an Integrated Public Transport Network plan in John Taolo Gaetsewe Municipal District |
1 330 248.28 |
Gibb (Pty) Ltd |
|
Road Tariff determination framework |
639 526.00 |
Genesis Analytics |
|
Development of the Harrismith Hub |
2 223 456.00 |
Delca Systems |
|
Development of the SAMSA Funding Model |
3 876 008.16 |
AUK Marine & Mining |
|
Security Services at the Department |
9 661 559.09 |
Maduna Protection & Cleaning Services |
|
Provide Training on Labelling, Packaging etc for Transport of Dangerous Goods |
830 957.40 |
Tshireletso Multi Skills & Training |
|
Shova Kalula: Supply bicycles and helmets, vests, pumps, locks etc |
9 967 248.00 |
Flybrothersa |
|
PARTICIPATION: Participate in SANRAL tender for Media buying for 6 months |
|
MediaMix360 |
|
PARTICIPATION: Participate in SANRAL tender for Events Management and related Services for 6 months |
|
Nitrogen |
(d) In all the above mentioned tenders awarded, bidders had to respond to set functionality criteria. The tender documents (Terms of Reference) for each tender specified the evaluation criteria for measuring functionality, as developed by a Bid Specification Committee and with cognisance to the following:
1. It should not be generic;
2. It should be determined separately for each tender;
3. It may not be so low that it jeopardise the quality of the required goods or services; and
4. It may not be so high that is unreasonable to achieve.
Functionality criteria differs from one tender to another, but can include:
- Company experience and track record;
2. Skills development;
3. Proposed methodology and approach.
The criteria will also state the points available for each criteria and, if any, each sub-criteria, as well as the minimum qualifying score needed to advance. Normally the threshold will be between 65% and 85% out of 100%;
All tenders that score the minimum qualifying score for functionality is evaluated further in terms of Price and B-BBEE in accordance with the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2016. (All the aforementioned tenders were evaluated before the implementation of the new Regulations on 1 April 2017).
(e) As detailed in Section (d) each tender had specific evaluation criteria for measuring functionality, as developed by a Bid Specification Committee. During evaluation requirements such as capacity, capability and resources are then evaluated.
Additionally, once awarded, Project Managers conclude a Contract and Project Plan in which deliverables and time frames are detailed, against which the project is managed and performance measured.
RAF
|
(1)(a) The Road Accident Fund (RAF), in the past three financial years awarded the following tenders after inviting competitive bids, |
(b) the value of each specified tender was, |
(c) the tender was awarded to, |
(d) the criteria used to award the aforementioned tenders is the criteria prescribed (at the time) in the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, No. 5 of 2000, more specifically: assessment of mandatory requirements as contained in the tender document; assessment of technical requirements, and, or, functional requirements as contained in the tender document (where same were specified in the tender); price; and BEE status of the service provider, in accordance with the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system based on the value of the tender, |
(e) the following due diligence mechanisms exist to ensure that the service providers that were awarded tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfill the requirements demanded of them:
|
|
2014-15 FY |
||||
|
ICT End to End Performance Assessment |
R 688,788.00 |
Elimu Technology Solutions |
||
|
Supply, Installation and Configuration of Servers for SAP Migration (including high speed storage device and Citrix server capacity and SAP BI servers) |
R 19,513,276.68 |
Aptronics |
||
|
Branding and Promotional Materials (Panel) |
R 2,000,000.00 |
Creative Harvest, Mithethe Trading, Shereno Printers
|
||
|
Panel of Medical Experts |
R 50,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
A Wryly Birch, Adelaide Phasha, Adri Roos, Adroit Roos, Anneke Greeff, Annelies Cramer, Anton Schepers, Ashnie Maharaj, Ben Moodie, Bernard Oosthuizen, Bongone Ngwato, Catherine Rice, Christa du Toit, Dorietta Vermooten t/a Takkie, Dr. Annalie Pauw, Dr. Gavin Fredericks, Dr. I Malepfani, Dr. Maxwell Matjane, Dr. Mudau, Dr. P N Mafuya, Dr. Sincha LB Mdaka, Dr. V P Gqokoma, EJ Prinsloo, Elana Human, Energy Plus, Esme Noble, Etienne Joubert, Fitness 4 Work, Fryer and Cornelius, G O Read, Gail Vlok, Hanien Du Preez, Hlunga Consulting, Ilse du Plessis, Ithubalethu Health and Wellness, Janine Mare Schoeman, JPV Business Solutions, K Naidoo, Karen L Dinah Plaatjie, KCN Consulting, Khazimla Occupational Health and Wellness, Kim Kaverberg, Kimbali Holdings, Leazanne Toerien, Letta Consulting, Lisha Chetty, Magdalene Mills, Mamotshabo Magoele, Marina Bosman, Medexec, Megan Sparvins, Megan Townshend, Melloney Smit, Michelle Hough, Monique Kok, Motsepe Thandiwe, N Runqu Trading, Nevashnee Panchoo, Nicolene Kotze, Nonhlanhla Similane, Peter Whitehead, Re Intergrate, Rehana Paruk, Rejoice Talifhani Ntsieni, Remotlotlo Health, Rita du Plessis, Robert Macfarlaine, S De Freitas, Salomien Pretorius, Sekwari Management, Shaida Bobat, Sharon Truter, SIMI Healthcare, SL Naidoo, SOMA Initiative, Spear, Success Moagi, Sugreen Consulting, Susan Verhoef, T Van Zyl, TC Consulting, Thandeka Consulting, TMR Nape, TNL Consulting, Tsebo Ke Thebe, Vanaja Rama, Women’s Health and Wellness, Yandisa Ngoangashe, Ye Ye Ye Human Development |
||
|
Panel of Internal Auditors |
R 6,000,000.00 budgeted per annum
|
Sizwe Ntsaluba, KPMG, Indyebo, Ernst & Young, PWC, Deloitte |
||
|
Panel of Attorneys |
R 200 000 000.00 budgeted per annum |
AK Essack, Morgan Naidoo & Co, Alet Gerber Attorneys, AV Dawson, Bate Chubb & Dickson, Bowes Loon Connellan Incorporated, Borman Duma Zitha Attorneys, Dev Maharaj & Associates, Diale Attorneys, Diale Mogashoa Attorneys, Duduzile Hlebela Incorporated, Dwarika Naidoo & Co., Excellent Mthembu Attorneys Incorporated, Fourie Fismer Incorporated, Friedman Scheckter; Gcolotela & Peter Incorporated, Govindasamy Ndzingi & Govender Incorporated, Hammann-Moosa Incorporated, Harja Patel Incorporated, Harkoo Brijlal & Reddy Incorporated, Hughes-Madondo Incorporated, Ighsaan Sadien Attorneys, Iqbal Mohamed Attorneys, Joubert Galpin & Searle Incorporated, Karsans Incorporated, Kekana Hlatshwayo Radebe Incorporated, Ketse Nonkwelo Incorporated, L Mbajwa Incorporated, Ledwaba Attorneys, Lekhu Pilson Attorneys, Lindsay Keller Attorneys, Livingston Leandy Incorporated, Mabunda Incorporated, Mac Ndhlovu Incorporated, Maduba Attorneys, Maluleke Msimang & Associates, Maponya Incorporated, Maribana Makgoka Incorporated, Marivate Attorneys, Mastross Incorporated, Matabane Incorporated, Mathipane Tsebane Attorneys, Mathobo Rambau & Sigogo Incorporated, Mayat Nurick Langa Incorporated, Mayats Attorneys, MF Jassat Dhlamini Attorneys, Mgweshe Ngqeleni Incorporated, Mkhonto & Ngwenya Incorporated, Moche Attorneys, Mohlala Attorneys, Molefe Dlepu Incorporated, Moloto Stofile Incorporated, Morare Thobejane Incorporated, Mothle Jooma Sabdia Incorporated, Mnqandi Incorporated, MT Silinda & Associates, Naidoo Maharaj Incorporated, Ngubane & Partners Incorporated, Ningiza Horner Incorporated, Noko Maimela Incorporated, Nompumelelo Radebe Incorporated, Nongogo Nuku Incorporated, Nozuko Nkusani Incorporated, Poswa Incorporated Attorneys, Potelwa & Company, Pule Incorporated, Rachoene Incorporated Attorneys, Rahman Attorneys, Rambevha Morobane Attorneys, Regan Brown Attorneys, Rehana Khan Parker & Associates, Riley Incorporated, Robert Charles Attorneys, Sangham Incorporated, Saras Sagathevan Attorneys, S.C. Mdhluli Attorneys, Shereen Meersingh & Associates, Smith Tabata Attorneys, Tasneem Moosa Incorporated, Tau Phalane Incorporated, TJ Maodi Attorneys Incorporated, TM Chauke Incorporated (Nelspruit), Tomlinson Mnguni James Attorneys, Tsebane Molaba Incorporated, Twala Attorneys, Z Abdurahman Attorneys, Z & Z Ngogodo Incorporated, Zubeda K Seedat & Co. |
||
|
Panel of Funeral Parlours |
R 30,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Avbob, Doves, Sopema, Mabindisa, Two Mountains, Rand Funerals, Thabelo, Last Mile, Quma, Nomatye, Sokudela, Ncedisizwe, Ngoma, Ekuphumleni, Ulwazi, Shingas, Msizi, Zothani, Multi First Class, Mcosi, Lighthouse, Wyebank, Solomons |
||
|
E-Recruitment |
R 4,393,048.00 |
Epi-Use Africa |
||
|
Standby Generator for Block C Eco Glades (re-advertised) |
R 843,683.88 |
Electrical Excellent |
||
|
Dry Goods |
R 2,332,036.36 |
Schick Services, Tshiamo Trading Enterprise, DBZN Trading and Projects |
||
|
Offsite Storage (new process) |
R 7,819,509.95 |
Metrofile |
||
|
Audio Visual Maintenance |
R 3,444,998.14 |
Dimension Data |
||
|
Enterprise Project Portfolio Management (Re- advertised) |
R 2,944,392.00 |
Accutech |
||
|
Citrix Licensing |
R 2,316,480.00 |
EOH Mthombo |
||
|
Panel of DC Experts |
R 2, 400, 000.00 budgeted per annum
|
Matshekga Labour & Consultants, Maserumule Incorporated, Masipa Incorporated, Luvuyo Dzanibe Qina, Anisa Khan Attorneys & Converyancers |
||
|
Learning Management System (LMS) |
R 1, 847, 789.52 |
Bytes People Solutions |
||
|
Panel of Assessors |
R30,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Censeo/Santam Charman Mabuza t/a Efficient Tracers, Kaygee Investigators and Security Kutullo Investigation Services, SKW Matima, Stephen Black and Muthelo Investigators, Tshidiso Trading Enterprise, Tswelopele Business Services and Projects, Gladko Consulting, Ngangelive Trading and Projects, Qhubeka Forensic Services, Rheeder Nel Assosiates, Malesa and Associates, M.I. Abdulla SB, Buthelezi Stonier, A Meyiwa Roadmate Technologies t/a Lavela Assessors, Joint Shelf 1185 CC t/a Accident Specialist, Laurence Palmer Consultants, Crawford & Company, Inkomfe Trading Enterprise, Francois Balt, GD Engelbrecht t/a Independent Analysis, MVO Consultants, Inquisitor Investigations, Versitrade |
||
|
2015-16 FY |
||||
|
ICT Security Vulnerability Service |
R 6,792,264.00 |
Ernst & Young |
||
|
Insurance Brokerage Services |
R 12,791,580.00 |
Marsh |
||
|
Interface system between SAP and RAF Biometric system |
R 2,795,799.84 |
Epi Use Africa |
||
|
POPI |
R 1,800,000.00 |
Performanta |
||
|
Printing, Scanner and Photocopying |
R 19,513,276.68 |
Altronics |
||
|
SAP Support Services |
R 37,462,718.95 . |
Gijima Holdings |
||
|
Knowledge Lake Scanning Solution and Support |
R 735, 527.81 |
Intervate Solutions |
||
|
SMS Notification Facility |
R 500, 000.00 |
Vodacom |
||
|
Courier Services |
R 551, 622.22 |
Crossroads Distribution T/A SkyNet |
||
|
Vulnerability Management Services |
R 6, 567, 375. 00 |
Ernst & Young |
||
|
IT Support to HSC, satellite and small provincial offices |
R 6, 134, 549.58 |
EOH Mthombo |
||
|
2016-17 FY |
||||
|
Research Agency Partner |
R 3,046,086.88 |
Genex Insights (Pty) Ltd |
||
|
Panel of Recruitment Agencies |
R 3,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Morvest Professional Services, Phaki Personnel Management Services, Moshitoa Selections, Investong Human Capital, Toro Human Capital, Versatex Trading 505 (Pty) Ltd, Dalitso Consulting (Pty) Ltd, Ntirho Business Consulting |
||
|
Panel of Actuaries |
R 30,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
JW Jacobson Consulting, Independent Actuaries and Consultant, NBC Holdings, Rose Wood Technologies |
||
|
Statutory Actuary Services |
R 5,175,000.00 |
True South Actuaries and Consultants . |
||
|
Procurement of McAfee licenses |
R 1,742,135.63 |
Datacentrix (Pty) Ltd |
||
|
Cleaning Services: All Gauteng offices and Durban office |
R 12,450,610.08 |
Monabo Hygiene Services |
||
|
Development of the RABSA logo branding
|
R 6,212,190.60 |
FCB Africa (Pty) Ltd |
||
|
Back Scanning |
R 9,041,257.50 |
Metrofile (Pty) Ltd |
||
|
Panel of Recruitment Agencies |
R 3,000,000.00 budgeted per annum |
Pinpoint One Human Resource (Pty) Ltd, Human Communications (Pty) Ltd, EOH Abantu (Pty) Ltd |
||
|
Provision of Cleaning Services |
R 425,005.57 |
Enzani General Trade 828 |
||
|
Provision of Information Tracing Services |
R 3,000,000.00 |
Crosscheck Information Bureau (Pty) Ltd |
||
|
NAKISA Organisational Management Tool |
R 2,795,779.84 |
EPI-USE AFRICA |
RTIA
|
(1)(a) Details of tender |
(b) Value |
(c) Tender awarded to |
(d) Criteria used to award tender |
(e) Mechanism |
|
|
|
|
National Treasury has developed a system (PPPFA) called Functionality or Technical Criteria to enhance the system and to ensure that the companies with the best ability are evaluated according to the Regulations. This is a safety measure built into the system to keep the companies with limited ability but with the lowest price from winning a tender. A company’s ability to execute a competitive bid is measured through its ability to perform and deliver. This ability is measured in many different ways but most of the common areas are;
|
RTMC
Response for RTMC is provided in the attached spreadsheet.
C-BRTA
Response for C-BRTA is provided in the attached spreadsheet.
SANRAL
Response for SANRAL from (a) to (c) is provided in the attached spreadsheet.
(d) SANRAL used the following criteria to award the tenders as follows:
1. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
|
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following criteria are eligible to submit tenders: (a) Registered as a Consulting Engineering Firm. (b) Meet the minimum requirements for the key persons as stated in the Scope of Works. (c) National Treasury Central Supplier Database Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered. (d) Criteria for preferential procurement Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4, and is ………….. (Note to compiler: Insert “an EME or a QSE”) Failure to satisfy the eligibility criteria is a breach of the Conditions of Tender and as such, results in instant disqualification. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.2 |
A two envelope procedure apply as follows: 1. The completed CD and electronically provided Booklet marked with the tenderer’s company name, the project number and description and marked “TECHNICAL PROPOSAL”. and The completed CD and electronically provided Booklet marked with the tenderer’s company name, the project number and description and marked “FINANCIAL PROPOSAL”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.3 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilising the following formula: A = (1 – (P – Pm) / Pm) Where: P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0 (zero). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.4 |
Up to 100 minus W1 tender evaluation points will be awarded to tenderers who submit responsive tenders and who are found to be eligible for the preference claimed. Points are based on a tenderer’s scorecard measured in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE, Act 53 of 2003) and the Regulations (2017) to the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000). Points awarded will be according to a tenderer’s B-BBEE status level of contributor and summarised in the table below:
Eligibility for preference points is subject to the following conditions:
|
2 CONSTRUCTION TENDERS
|
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following eligibility criteria are eligible to submit tenders as follows:
Registered with the CIDB, at close of tender, in a contractor grading designation equal to or higher than a contractor grading designation determined in accordance with the sum tendered, or a value determined in accordance with Regulation 25(1B) or 25(7A) of the Construction Industry Development Regulations, for a CE class of construction work. Tenderers whose CIDB registration expires within 21 days after close of tender, need to demonstrate that there is a reasonable chance of being registered in the appropriate grading designation, by submitting a copy of their application for CIDB registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who are not capable of being registered in the required contractor designation, within 21 days after close of tender, will not be considered. Note that in terms of the Construction Industry Development Board Act, 2000 (Act No. 38 of 2000) a registered contractor must apply for renewal of registration three months before the existing registration expires. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the sake of clarity and subject to satisfactory proof of a tenderer’s ability to perform the work specified at the tendered value, the Employer lists in the table below the margins it considers reasonable. However, in the event that the sum tendered exceeds the margins shown then such tender shall be deemed non-responsive. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joint Ventures are eligible to submit tenders provided that:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The tenders are required to be registered and listed on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database. Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4, and is an EME or a QSE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.2 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilising the following formula: A=(1-(P-Pm)/Pm) Where P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.3 |
The conditions stated in clauses 5.13(a) to ((f) of the Conditions of Tender as well as the following additional clauses 5.13(g) to (k) shall be applied as objective criteria in terms of section 2(1)(f) of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 and as compelling and justifiable reasons in terms of Conditions of Tender clause 5.11:
In addition to the requirements under paragraph (b) of the Conditions of Tender, in the event that a due diligence is performed as part of the tender evaluation, the due diligence report will be used to evaluate the tenderer’s ability to perform the contract as stated in paragraph (b). |
3 ROUTINE ROAD MANTENANCE: CONSULTING ENGINEERS TENDERS
|
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following criteria are eligible to submit tenders:
Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered.
Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4 and is ………….. an EME or a QSE. Failure to satisfy the eligibility criteria is a breach of the Conditions of Tender and as such, results in instant disqualification. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3.2 |
A two envelope procedure will apply as follows: 1. The completed CD and electronically provided Booklet marked with the tenderer’s company name, the project number and description and marked “TECHNICAL PROPOSAL”. and The electronically provided Booklet and completed CD marked “FINANCIAL PROPOSAL” |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3.3 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilizing the following formula: A = (1 - (P - Pm) / Pm) Where: P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration; and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer. In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0 (zero). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3.4 |
Up to 100 minus W1 tender evaluation points will be awarded to tenderers who submit responsive tenders and who are found to be eligible for the preference claimed. Points are based on a tenderer’s scorecard measured in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE, Act 53 of 2003) and the Regulations (2017) to the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000). Points awarded will be according to a tenderer’s B-BBEE status level of contributor and summarised in the table below:
Eligibility for preference points will be determined as follows:
|
4. ROUTINE ROAD MANTENANCE: CONSTRUCTION TENDERS
|
Tender Evaluation Criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.1 |
Only those tenderers who satisfy the following criteria are eligible to submit tenders: a) CIDB grading Registered with the CIDB, at close of tender in a contractor grading designation equal to or higher than a contractor grading designation determined in accordance with the sum tendered, or a value determined in accordance with Regulation 25 (1B) or 25 (7A) of the Construction Industry Development Regulations, for a CE class of construction work are eligible to have their tenders evaluated. Tenderers whose CIDB registration expires within 21 days after close of tender, need to demonstrate that there is a reasonable chance of being registered in the appropriate contractor grading designation, by submitting a copy of their application for CIDB registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who are not capable of being registered in the required contractor grading designation, within 21 days after close of tender, will not be considered. Note that in terms of the Construction Industry Development Board Act, 2000 (Act No 38 of 2000) a registered contractor must apply for renewal of registration three months before the existing registration expires.
Joint Ventures are eligible to submit tenders provided that:
b) National Treasury Central Supplier Database Tenderers who are not registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database at close of tender, shall submit a copy of their application of registration, with their tender submission. Tenders received from such tenderers who have not submitted proof of their registration within 21 days after the closing date for tender submissions, will not be considered. c) Criteria for preferential procurement Tenderers that have a B-BBEE contributor status level of 1, 2, 3 or 4, and is an EME or a QSE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.2 |
The Preference Points System: The value of W1 is:
The value of A will be calculated utilizing the following formula: A = (1 - (P - Pm) / Pm) Where: P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration; and Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer. In the event that the calculated value is negative, the allocated score shall be 0 (zero). |
5. NON-ENGINEERING EVALUATION TENDER CRITERIA
Each tender whether RFT or RFP will be evaluated as follows:
5.1 TENDER EVALUATION AND SELECTION
SANRAL will evaluate tenders and select the Service Provider on, inter alia, the following basis:
- The Service Provider plan to assist SANRAL to meet its goals for the provision of the required services;
- The ability of the Service Provider to meet the requirements of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act. Prospective Service Provider/s must submit their shareholding structure. Bidders are encouraged to ensure that their bids include a significant BBBEE component.
- The Service Provider’s relevant experience, qualifications and success in providing the goods and services outlined in this RFT/RFP;
- The Firm's financial proposal as outlined in the RFT/RFP including discounts, service charges, other charges and fees;
- The quality of the proposal, specifically, responsiveness to requirements and adequacy of information provided;
- The qualification and experience of the personnel/staff that will be delivering the services to SANRAL;
- The contractual terms which would govern the relationship between SANRAL and the Selected Service Provider;
- Any other factors relevant to the Service Provider's capacity and willingness to satisfy the SANRAL requirements.
5.2 Evaluation and Adjudication
The evaluation and adjudication of the Tenders will strictly be dealt with in terms of the PFMA, Treasury regulations and Supply Chain Management. An Evaluation Committee consisting of senior officials from the South African National Roads Agency SOC Limited and complying with the SANRAL’s Supply Chain Management Policy will evaluate the bid tenders. The panel will individually evaluate each of the tenders received against the criteria listed in this section. A recommendation from the Evaluation Committee will be forwarded to the Adjudication Committee of the SANRAL who in terms of SANRAL’s Supply Chain Management Policy will adjudicate and award the contract.
SANRAL reserves the right to request one or more tenderers, who have scored, according to SANRAL, the highest scores for their tenders, to enter into negotiations with SANRAL regarding the award.
5.3 Test for responsiveness
SANRAL shall determine, on opening and before detailed evaluation, whether each Tender received:
- meets the requirements of this Request for Tender;
- has been properly and fully completed and signed, and
- is responsive to the other requirements of the tender documents.
A responsive Tender is one that conforms to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Tender documents without material deviation or qualification. A material deviation or qualification is one which, in the SANRAL’s opinion, would:
- detrimentally affect the scope, quality, or performance of the works, services or supply identified in the Scope of Work;
- change the SANRAL’s or the Tenderer’s risks and responsibilities under the contract, or;
- affect the competitive position of other Tenderers presenting responsive tenders, if it were to be rectified.
SANRAL may reject a non-responsive Tender, and not allow it to be subsequently made responsive by correction or withdrawal of the non-conforming deviation or reservation, unless it can be subsequently rendered responsive by correction that does not prejudice the other Tenderers.
5.4 Weight Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation will follow the following sequence: - (wherein either two or single envelope may be applicable)
Phase One
- Determine the compliance through tender content;
- Determine compliance through the returnable schedules;
- Adjudication on functionality, scoring of each function; and
- Determine the score for each tenderer compared with the minimum score required;
Phase Two
- Price (pricing schedule); and
- BEE compliance.
5.4.1 The Preference Points System:
|
Points are based on a tenderer’s scorecard measured in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE, Act 53 of 2003) and the Regulations (2017) to the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000). Points awarded will be according to a tenderer’s B-BBEE status level of contributor and summarised in the table below:
Eligibility for preference points is subject to the following conditions:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The conditions stated in the Conditions of Tender shall be applied as objective criteria in terms of section 2(1)(f) of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 and as compelling and justifiable reasons in terms of Conditions of Tender:
In addition to the requirements under the Conditions of Tender, in the event that a due diligence is performed as part of the tender evaluation, the due diligence report will be used to evaluate the tenderer’s ability to perform the contract. |
(e) In addition to the requirements under the Conditions of Tender, in the event that a due diligence is performed as part of the tender evaluation, the due diligence report will be used to evaluate the tenderer’s ability to perform the contract.
Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)
- – c) Answer – please refer to the attached Annexure.
d) The ACSA organisation, as a schedule 2 has adopted the PFMA and PPPFA regulation as a means of executing its procurement administration. These regulatory prescripts are in place to ensure that the procurement process is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost effective.
Further the PPPPFA sets out the standards, including the evaluation process to be employed in the evaluation and the selection of the most suitable service provider whilst ensuring that the 5 pillars as set out in section 217A of the act are upheld. The evaluation criteria are defined by a team of subject matter experts.
e) The ACSA has employed a three-bid committee system. These independent committees are assembled to ensure that the procurement process in the evaluation, recommendation and the final award is fair, transparent, competitive, equitable and cost effective. The evaluation criteria by its nature are set to determine a match against the set requirements, thus ensuring that the award to make to a supplier has the capacity and capability to undertake the contract of a defined magnitude. This holistic capacity and capability assessment is not only focused on the technical aspects, it also has a strong focus on the financial strength, legal standing, and many other aspects that are deemed necessary on a tender by tender basis.
Further to the above, ACSA has a performance management system in place. This system ensures a continuous evaluation of the performance of the service provider through the life span of the contract.
Question (a), (b), (c).
Table 1 below illustrate details of tenders issued and awarded in the 2017/2018 financial year.
Table 2 below illustrate details of tenders issued and awarded in the 2016/2017 financial year.
Table 3 (a) below illustrate details and values of tenders issued and awarded in the 2015/2016 financial year:
Table 3 (b) below illustrate details and values of tenders issued and awarded in the 2015/2016 financial year:
Question (d) what criteria were used to award the tenders?
The ATNS SCM process provide suppliers with the opportunity to compete for business in an open and transparent manner within the confines of the law. The following evaluation stages are applied when selecting suppliers:
- Stage on
- e (1) is the evaluation of Preferential Procurement requirement to assess compliance to Transformation requirements as per the ATNS Supply Chain Management Policy. Bidders meeting the Preferential Procurement requirements will proceed to the second stage of evaluation.
- Stage two (2) is the evaluation of compliance to Technical Specification requirement. The technical evaluation scores are weighted at 100% as indicated in the tender instructions. Bidders meeting minimum qualifying set threshold for technical evaluation will proceed to third stage of evaluation.
- The final stage (3) of evaluation is evaluation in terms of the preference point system. All bidders meeting the minimum qualifying threshold will be evaluated applying the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system to adjudicate the bids. The preference point system ranks tenders on the basis of calculated scores for price and BBBEE contribution.
Question (e) what mechanisms exists to ensure that the companies that won the tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfil the requirements demanded by each tender?
ATNS, the Air Traffic and Navigation Services State Owned Company of South Africa, is a high technology organisation. ATNS encourages black company participation by a form of Joint venture agreement or consortium agreement between the OEM and South African Black Owned Companies. These are some of the requirements assessed to ensure that bidders have the capacity to deliver on the project.
Technical Resources requirements:
-
-
-
- Tenderers shall have successfully completed projects of a similar nature in at least the past 3 years and shall provide a list of such projects together with end user certificates substantiating the claims made by the Tenderer.
- Tenderers shall have dedicated resources with 5 or more years’ experience in the proposed technology. CVs of proposed resources shall be included.
- The Tenderer shall identify, describe and quantify the technical resources for design, manufacture, integration, installation and support of this project as follows:
- description of engineering organisation and resources, naming and quantifying disciplines and equipment;
- description and location of manufacturing facilities, naming products and quantifying production capacity and current demand;
- description of construction organisation, naming skills and equipment; and
- description of parts replacement and repair organisation and support facilities.
-
-
South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACCA)
|
Tender Details |
Value of contract in 2014/15 (a)(ii); & (b) |
Criteria for award of tender (d) |
Mechanisms deployed for the tender award |
|
|
Supplier/ Awarded to (c) |
Description (a)(i) |
2014/15 |
||
|
AE Soft (Pty) Ltd |
Laptop and Desktop |
R3,088,350.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
The Bid Specification Committee deploys a risk aversion strategy in the functionality during the approval of the specifications. The risk aversion include but not limited to methodology (how), experience (including references), and successes attained during the delivery, where possible site inspections (at service provider premises or were services are rendered) are also conducted. |
|
MTN |
Cell Phone Provider |
Usage based |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Kingdom Caterers |
Canteen & Catering Services |
R414,000.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
|
Betts Townsend |
Re-Advertisement. Project Manager for CAA Premises |
R720,000.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
|
Travel with Flair |
Travel Agency |
Booking based |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Empic & Synova JV |
Enterprise Business System (EBS) |
R94,091,131.20 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Metrofile (Pty) Ltd |
Document Imaging, Scanning and Retrieving Solution |
R3,927,072.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Continuity SA (Pty) Ltd |
Business Continuity Operational Disaster Site |
R5,796,848.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Business Enterprise @ University of Pretoria |
Organizational Structure Review |
R1,670,100.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Business Enterprise @ University of Pretoria |
National Aviation Transformation Strategy (NATS) |
R948,480.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Tender Details |
Value of contract in 2015/16 (a)(ii); & (b) |
Criteria for award of tender (d) |
Mechanisms deployed for the tender award |
|
|
Supplier/ Awarded to (c) |
Description (a)(i) |
2015/16 |
||
|
Vox Telecommunications |
Least Cost Routing |
R198,242.34 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
The Bid Specification Committee deploys a risk aversion strategy in the functionality during the approval of the specifications. The risk aversion include but not limited to methodology (how), experience (including references), and successes attained during the delivery, where possible site inspections (at service provider premises or were services are rendered) are also conducted. |
|
Superior Pilot Services |
Cadets Pilot Training |
R3,325,699.20 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Aerodata AG |
FIU Strategy |
R 1,795,319.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
ExecuJet |
Aircraft Maintenance, Hangarage, Office Acc and FOB services |
Service based |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd |
Security (Guarding) Services |
R8,531,320.68 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Docufile Records |
Off-Site Storage |
R503,195.65 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
|
Sisonke Printers & Signage (Pty) Ltd |
Aeronautical Information Publication |
R451,192.39 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
|
Business Enterprise @ University of Pretoria |
National Aviation Transformation Strategy (NATS) |
R948,480.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
Tender Details |
Value of contract in 2016/17 (a)(ii);& (b) |
Criteria for award of tender (d) |
Mechanisms deployed for the tender award |
|
|
Supplier/ Awarded to (c) |
Description (a)(i) |
2016/17 |
||
|
Superior Pilot Services |
Cadet Pilot Training Service Provider |
R11, 012, 810.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
The Bid Specification Committee deploys a risk aversion strategy in the functionality during the approval of the specifications. The risk aversion include but not limited to methodology (how), experience (including references), and successes attained during the delivery, where possible site inspections (at service provider premises or were services are rendered) are also conducted. |
|
Servest Group (Pty) Ltd |
Cleaning, Pest Control and Hygiene Services |
R1, 408, 824.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
ACSA Cape Town |
Cape Town Lease |
R6, 237, 619.12 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Introstat (Pty) Ltd |
IT Equipment |
R4, 165, 076.79 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Sizwe IT Group |
Core Network Switch Replacement |
R537, 465.19 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
|
Vox Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd |
Internet Solutions |
R17, 121, 910.46 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Microsoft |
Microsoft Licenses (Sole Supplier) |
R7, 461, 805.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Computer Security and Forensic Solutions (Pty) Ltd |
ICT Security |
R2, 034 444.00 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Deloitte & Touché |
Audits of Aviation Fuel Levies |
R938, 670.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
|
Capitol Caterers (Pty) Ltd |
SCM Canteen Services |
R1, 529, 481.15 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
NexisLexis (Pty) Ltd |
Provision and uploading of Act, Technical Standards and Regulations on CAA intranet and website |
R1, 374, 369.75 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
|
|
Sethewo (Pty) Ltd |
Maintenance and Support of Great Plains |
R919, 296.00 |
Open tender process. A 80/20 principle is applied |
|
|
Century Avionics |
Supply and Installations of Flight Data Recorder |
R1, 046, 795.06 |
Open tender process. A 90/10 principle is applied |
- ii Railway Safety Regulator
2014/15 Financial Year
|
No |
Services |
C |
B |
D |
|
HR Supports Services |
Work Dynamics |
R 1 584 600.00 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
|
|
Travelling Management Services |
Fly-Now |
Rate based |
||
|
Fleet Management Services |
Khula Fleet |
R14 857 278.15 |
||
|
Rail Infrastructure Risk Management Project |
Mzumbo Consulting |
R8 421 225.6 |
||
|
Development of 4 Rail Regulations |
Muthwa Law consulting& Bulumko Inc. |
R685 00.00 |
||
|
ENS Africa |
R480 000.00 |
|||
|
MPM Holdings |
R777 857.00 |
|||
|
MNC Incorporated |
R700 000.00 |
2015/16 Financial Year
|
No |
1 a |
1 b |
1 c |
1 d |
|
Development of regulations on occurrence management and board of inquiries in terms of Section 50 of the NRSR Act 16 of 2002 |
Ramphele Attorneys |
R719 000.00 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
|
|
Development of regulations on safety of person, including person with disabilities on board stationary or rolling stock, infrastructure or at station in terms of Section 30(d) of the NRSR Act no. 16 of 2002 as amended for the RSR |
MNS Attorneys |
R737 100,00 |
||
|
Development of Regulations on Construction Activities in terms of Section 31(e) of The National Railway Safety Regulator Act no. 16 of 2002 as Amended for the Railway Safety Regulator submission. |
MNS Attorneys |
R844 200.00 |
||
|
Provision of RSR Q Rail Management Quality System Project. |
Business Assessment Services |
R2 234 870.82 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
|
|
Maintain and support a managed wide area network infrastructure for a period of 36 months with an option to extend for a further 24 months. |
VOX Telecommunications |
R4 184 661.84 |
||
|
RSR application hosting for a period of 36 months. |
Telkom SA |
R5 049 011.69 |
||
|
Provision of tablets and 3G to RSR for a period of 24 months. |
Telkom SA |
R5 352 744.00 |
||
|
Appointment of a service provider for the development of High speed Rail Standard for the RSR. |
GIBB Engineering and Architecture |
R5 490 945.09 |
||
|
Provision of fully serviced accommodation for the regions. |
Full Facilities Management |
R195 912 468.00 |
2016/17 Financial Year
|
No |
1 a |
1 b |
1 c |
1 d |
|
To Conduct A Motorist And Pedestrian Level-Crossing Risk Behavior Study. |
MTO Safety |
R2 995 920.00 |
Predetermined functionality criteria 90/10 Evaluation Criteria |
E1 The Railway Safety Regulator has established a Project Management Office to assist project managers with the tracking of deliverables by the service provider to ascertain that projects are delivered on time, at the allocated cost, within the scope agreed to and assess the performance of the bidder.
E2 The office of the CFO through scm is also responsible for supplier performance and monitoring.
E3 Another mechanism is the Internal Audit function that audits these matters on a quarterly basis.
E4 Further, the RSR established a Compliance Unit in order for completeness and compliance to be verified before payments are made to suppliers.
E5 Predetermined functionality criteria applied to ensure that the companies that won the tenders have the capacity, capability and resources to fulfil the requirements
Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)
|
Year |
Tender Description |
Appointed Supplier |
BBBEE level |
Amount |
|
2012/13 |
Procuremnt of Internal Audit Services |
Deloitte |
2 |
R 906 000.00 |
|
2013/14 |
Procurement of IT Hardware |
Intergr8 |
4 |
R 111 116.84 |
|
Procurement of Human Resources Management |
PWC |
2 |
R 1 246 986.00 |
|
|
Procurement of Offsite Data Storage |
Metrofile |
5 |
R 50 400.00 |
|
|
Procurement of Financial Consulting Services |
KPMG |
3 |
R 277 824.00 |
|
|
Procurement of Multi-function Printer |
Green Dot |
3 |
R 91 147.56 |
|
|
2014/15 |
Procument of IT Management Services |
Teksys Computers |
4 |
R 194 119.20 |
|
2015/16 |
Procerment of Internal Audit Services |
A2A Kopano Incorporated |
1 |
R 824 686.50 |
|
2016/17 |
Procurement of IT Hardware |
IT Master |
2 |
R 389 994.51 |
|
Procurement of Multi - Function Printer |
Olivetti Direct Office Technologies |
3 |
R 132 924.00 |
|
|
Procurement of Valuation of Assets Services |
Meridian Economics |
4 |
R 1 915 086.00 |
(d) The bid for each contract specified the minimum requirements that must be met for each tender, also the bid had a minimum score of functionality that must be met before the bidder can be evaluated on price.
(e) The terms of reference for the bid specified that the bidder must demonstrate their ability to deliver the service required, this is also monitored during the contract period.
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
See attached Annexure
- Refer to the spreadsheet attached.
(d) Each tender was advertised in the newspapers and i-tender
- They were evaluated through Bid Evaluation Committees and adjudicated through Bid Adjudication Committees.
- Depending on the thresholds and is as follows:
- R 25 million and below approved by the Divisional and Subsidiary CEO’s
- R 50 Million and Below approved by the Group CFO and Group CEO
- R 50 Million and above approved by the of the Board.
- Once approved PRASA enter into negotiations with the approved service provider.
(e) On construction related works construction guarantees and Bid Bonds (from the Financial institutions) are required;
- Depending on the nature of requirements (Goods, Services and works) PRASA has incorporated probity services on the tenders that are more than R 10 million;
- All service providers that have passed the technical thresholds are subjected to security screening;
- Company experience and the CV’s of the Resources proposed form part of the mandatory requirements;
- All previous projects that have been completed will require referral letter from the clients;
- The industry certification /professional bodies IDB/IATA/ASATA/PR.Eng/SAICA/ESCA) also form part of the evaluation criteria;
- Latest Annual Financial Statements to the liquidity ratios; and
- During the project period the Supplier Assessment and Evaluation form are sent to End-user and the Service Provider to ensure that all requirement are met.
South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)
|
2014/2015 FINANCIAL PERIOD |
||||
|
Supplier Name |
Description |
80/20 or 90/10 |
Value |
SLA or Contract |
|
SIZWENTSALUBAGOBODO |
Internal Audit Services |
90/10 |
R 2 456 928.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
FARANANI |
SOFTWARE LICENCE FEE |
90/10 |
R 3 115 672.43 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
INTERNET SOLUTIONS |
IT SYSTEM |
90/10 |
R 12 186 107.36 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
7 |
MAINTENANCE OF SECURITY SYSTEM (CAMERAS) |
80/20 |
R 1 582 534,77 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
NASHUA MOBILE |
CELLPHONE VOICE & DATA SERVICE |
90/10 |
R 2 908 777.27 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
PMB CHANGE A LIFE |
CSI PROJECT (DUZI CANOEING PROJECT) |
90/10 |
R 1 000 000.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
BLAUPAU MANAGEMENT CONSULTINGCC |
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR MARITIME SECTOR |
90/10 |
R 1 950 000.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
CSIR |
RESEARCH SERVICE |
Inter-governmental procurement |
R 1 670 328.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
COMPUTER INITIATIVES T/A VOX |
GP UPGRADE |
90/10 |
R 1 642 985.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
2015/2016 FINANCIAL PERIOD |
||||
|
Supplier Name |
Description |
80/20 or 90/10 |
Value |
SLA or Contract |
|
MTN |
CELLPHONE VOICE & DATA SERVICE |
90/10 |
R 4 184 525,13 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
VODACOM |
CELLPHONE VOICE & DATA SERVICE |
NT Transversal Contract |
R 9 706 305,09 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
FARANANI |
SLA MAINTENANCE FEE - GO LIVE |
90/10 |
R 1 838 232.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
2016/2017 FINANCIAL PERIOD |
||||
|
Supplier Name |
Description |
80/20 or 90/10 |
Value |
SLA or Contract |
|
BYTES TECHNOLOGY GROUP SA (PTY) LTD |
PHOTOCOPIER MACHINE LEASE |
NT Transversal Contract |
R 724 230,72 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
PLAZA AQUAD |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 1 719 780.60 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
RICKETT SALES (PTY) LTD |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 4 916 879.68 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
RICKETT SALES (PTY) LTD |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 4 770 517.20 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
GROWTHPOINT |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 6 250 169.16 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
TRANSNET NATIONAL PORTS AUTHORITY |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 7 812 711.45 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
INTERPARK (SOUTH AFRICA) (PTY) LTD |
PARKING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 1 354 320.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
JHI REAL ESTATE (19 TH FLOOR) |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 27 621 270.60 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
JHI REAL ESTATE ((18 TH FLOOR) |
RENTAL OFFICE BUILDING |
Negotiated Lease Agreement/ Deviation Approved by NT |
R 14 484 130.60 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
INDWE RISK MANAGEMENT |
INSURANCE FOR SAMSA DIRECTORS |
90/10 |
R 1 729 065.10 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
|
SIKELA XABISA |
INTERNAL AUDIT |
90/10 |
R 3 094 789.00 |
Signed SLA and contract monitoring & reporting |
17 November 2017 - NW3437
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Transport
(1)How many officials and/or employees in his department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years; (2) are any of the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with the Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?
Reply:
1. 2014/2015 – 7 employees (work outside employment in the Public Service)
2015/2016 – 4 employees (work outside employment in the Public Service)
2016/2017 – 8 employees (work outside employment in the Public Service)
2.
a) None
b) Not applicable
c) Not applicable
17 November 2017 - NW3514
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)What (a) total amount did his/her department spend on air travel between Gauteng and Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the 2014-15 financial year and (b) is the total number of trips that were undertaken; (2) What is the total amount that his/her department spent on (a) accommodation and (b) car rental in Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the specified financial year?
Reply:
(1) Government officials are expected to travel between Gauteng and the Western Cape to carry out official duties, including Ministerial and Departmental support to the Executive who carry out Parliamentary duties according to the Parliamentary Programme.
(2) Costs incurred by Government Officials are readily made available in Annual Reports which are tabled in Parliament annually.
---ooOoo---
16 November 2017 - NW3316
Rawula, Mr T to ask the Minister of Labour
(1) Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
1. Minister of Labour to respond:
As the Department of Labour we have two CEO’s, two Commissioners and two Executive Directors.
|
Entity |
(a) Chief Executive Officers, Commissioner’s and Executive Directors. |
(b) Chief Financial Officer employment status |
|
COMPENSATION FUND |
Permanent (Commissioner) |
Permanent |
|
UIF |
Permanent (Commissioner) |
Permanent |
|
NEDLAC |
Fixed term contract (Executive Director) |
Permanent |
|
PRODUCTIVITY SA |
Fixed term contract (CEO) |
Permanent |
|
SEE* |
Fixed term contract (CEO) |
Permanent |
|
CCMA |
Fixed term contract (Executive Director) |
Permanent |
- *SEE is not listed as a public entity, operates as a trading entity within the Department of Labour2.
2. Minister of Labour to respond:
|
Entity |
(a) Names of each Officer |
(b)(i) When was Officer employed? |
(b)(ii) When will each Officer’s contract end? |
|
COMPENSATION FUND |
Mr. Vuyo Mafata(Commissioner) Mr. Abraham J Modiba(CFO) |
01 April 2016 16 September 2013 |
Permanent Permanent |
|
UIF |
Mr. Teboho Maruping(Commissioner) Ms Fezeka Puzi(CFO) |
01 December 2016 01 April 2016 |
Permanent Permanent |
|
NEDLAC |
Mr Madoda P Vilakazi(EX Director) Mr Mfanufikile Daza(CFO) |
01 April 2016 15 December 2014 |
31 March 2021 Permanent |
|
PRODUCTIVITY SA |
Mr Mothunye Mothiba(CEO) Dr Sibusiso Sabela(CFO) |
01 April 2016 01 August 2017 |
31 March 2020 Permanent |
|
SEE* |
Mr. Silumko Nondwangu(CEO) Mr. Spheni Ngcongo(CFO) |
31 August 2017 15 December 2015 |
31 August 2018 Permanent |
|
CCMA |
Mr. Cameron Morajane(Director) Ms Phetsile Magagula(CFO) |
01 April 2016 03 April 2017 |
31 March 2021 Permanent |
- * SEE is not listed as a public entity, operates as a trading entity within the Department of Labour
16 November 2017 - NW3524
Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Social Development
What measures are in place at each place of safety to ensure that the boys and girls are kept separate at night time?
Reply:
In relation to placement of children in Temporary Safe Care formerly known as Places of Safety, it is standard practise to separate boys and girls in terms of gender and age. Child and youth care workers are supervising children on a 24 hour basis, 7 days a week. In terms of the national norms and standards for temporary safe care, programmes must promote the safety, security, dignity and well-being of children
16 November 2017 - NW3335
Mhlongo, Mr P to ask the Minister of Labour
(a) What is the total number of persons who are employed in call centres as call centre agents in each (i) province and (ii) city and (b) what is the name of the company in each province and city where the agents are employed?
Reply:
(a) The Department of Labour does not use call centre agents services
(i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
(b) none
16 November 2017 - NW3526
Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Social Development
(a) How often is roll-call supposed to be done at places of safety for children and (b) who is responsible for ensuring that the roll-call takes place?
Reply:
a) Attendance registers are completed in the morning and at night on a daily basis at Temporary Safe Care formerly called Places of Safety.
b) The centre manager and child and youth care supervisors are responsible for ensuring that the child and youth care workers complete the attendance registers.
16 November 2017 - NW3326
Sonti, Ms NP to ask the Minister of Social Development
(1)Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
1. (a) The Chief Executive Officer of the NDA, Mrs Thamo Mzobe, is employed on a fixed term contract.
(b) The Chief Financial Officer of the NDA, Ms Cheryl Yeni, is employed permanently, effective from 03 October 2017.
2. (a) Mrs Thamo Mzobe. (Chief Executive Officer)
(b) (i) The Chief Executive Officer was employed on 01 November 2016.
(ii) Her contract will expire on 31 October 2019.
16 November 2017 - NW3587
Matsepe, Mr CD to ask the Minister of Social Development
(a) What is the total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her for more than (aa) 30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days and (b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?
Reply:
SASSA
(a) (aa) 3 invoices
(bb) 2 invoices
(cc) 5 invoices
(dd) There are no invoices outstanding for 120 days
(b)
|
Supplier Name |
Invoice date |
Invoices over 30 days |
Invoices over 60 days |
Invoices over 90 days |
|
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
17-Mar-17 |
|
|
R 31 795.37 |
|
SITA |
31-Mar-17 |
|
|
R 409 539.57 |
|
SHAMROCK AIR CLOSE CORPORATION |
28-Sep-16 |
|
|
R 1 117.20 |
|
LEXIS NEXIS |
28-Jun-17 |
|
|
R 3 420 |
|
MTN |
25-Jul-17 |
|
|
R 14 214.33 |
|
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
8-Aug-17 |
|
R 41 226.96 |
|
|
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
18-Aug-17 |
|
R 503.00 |
|
|
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
17-Jul-17 |
R 381 344.25 |
|
|
|
LYCEUM COLLEGE |
19-Sep-17 |
R 26 250 |
|
|
|
AZ TRADING CORPORATION |
14-Jun-17 |
R 4 698.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
R 412 292.85 |
R 41 729.96 |
R 460 086.47 |
NDA
a) ii) The NDA has a total number for Supplier invoices that remain unpaid as follows:
aa) 0 to 30 Days
- 1 Supplier, with a total amount outstanding of R7 200.00
bb) 31 to 60 days
- 2 Suppliers, with a total amount outstanding of R139 828.00
cc) 61 to 90 days
- 1 Supplier, with a total amount outstanding of R1 197.00
dd) 91 days and over
- 4 Suppliers, with a total amount outstanding of R40 320.00
16 November 2017 - NW3409
Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Social Development
(1)What procedure must be followed by staff who work at places of safety if a child at the institution goes missing; (2) what are the consequences for staff members who do not follow the relevant procedure?
Reply:
(1) The procedure to be followed by staff who work at Temporary Safe Care formerly called Places of Safety if a child at the institution goes missing, is that they must immediately report the matter to the nearest police station for the case to be investigated. The DSD managers at the district level, Head of the Department and case manager must be informed. The case manager must inform the parent(s) and the children’s court.
(2) The case must be reported to the Provincial DSD Human Resource Management, (Labour Relations Unit) for an investigation if it has been determined that staff member/s did not follow the relevant procedures and the disciplinary processes must be followed.
16 November 2017 - NW3337
Mente-Nkuna, Ms NV to ask the Minister of Labour
Whether labour brokers are registered with the Government; if so, what number of (a) labour brokers are registered with the Government, (b) government departments nationally and provincially make use of labour brokers and (c) persons are currently employed by the Government through labour brokers?
Reply:
The term labour broker does not exist in our current legislation. What we have is Temporary Employment Services and or Private Employment Agencies (PEAs/TES) that are registered with the Department of Labour in terms of Section 24(1) of the Skills Development Act, 1998 as Amended as part of our transitional process.
(a) A total of 492 private employment agencies/temporary employment services were registered with the Department of Labour as at 30 September 2017.
(b) Currently we do not have data as that will only become possible once PEAs/TES regulations are finalized and gazetted. The Department
of Labour will as soon as the regulations are finalised, keep records
on who uses PEAs/TES and statistics of people employed, placed or assisted across all sectors by these agencies.
(c) Covered above.
16 November 2017 - NW3494
Steyn, Ms A to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
(a) What was the total cost of developing Operation Phakisa on Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development? (b) What is the total number of stakeholders who were involved in the development? (c) What is the (i) name and (ii) professional designation of each stakeholder?, and What is the current status of the specified project?
Reply:
a) What was the total cost of developing Operation Phakisa on Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development?
|
Expenses |
Paid |
|
1. Birchwood (venue & accommodation) |
R 7 786 000 |
|
2. Travel (for selected stakeholders such as farmers, union representatives and NGOs) to and from the 5 week Lab |
R 1 491 423 |
|
3. Pre and Post Lab facilitation: managing the content and programme of the Phakisa process |
R 29 483 533 |
|
4. Research in support of Lab discussions and outputs |
R 3 398 230 |
|
|
R 42 159 186 |
b) What is the total number of stakeholders who were involved in the development?
The participants were selected from various disciplines within the industry to ensure appropriate representation. The participants represented research institutions, public and private sector, as well as labour organizations. Each participant was selected based on their professional expertise, insights and overall value they could contribute towards the Lab. There were approximately 161 participants registered to attend the Lab; however, the Lab had an average overall attendance of 82% participants.
The table below summarizes the registered participants at the Lab.
|
Area of Business |
Number of participants |
|
Academia/ Research Institutions |
7 |
|
Institutional Body |
10 |
|
NGO/ CBO |
9 |
|
Private business and organized Business |
45 |
|
Organized Labour |
14 |
|
Public Sector (including Provincial Government) |
76 |
|
TOTAL |
161 |
c) What is the (i) name and (ii) professional designation of each stakeholder?
|
No. |
Title |
Name |
Surname |
Department |
Type of Institutions |
Job Title |
|
Mr |
Sifiso |
Dlamini |
CSIR MERAKA |
Academia / Research Institutions |
Researcher |
|
|
Mr |
Mario |
Marais |
CSIR |
Academia / Research Institutions |
Principal Researcher |
|
|
Ms |
Grace |
Oloo |
University of Venda |
Academia / Research Institutions |
Senior Lecturer |
|
|
Dr |
Sannah |
Mativandlela |
ARC |
Academia / Research Institutions |
Programme manager |
|
|
Dr |
Mduduzi |
Ngcobo |
ARC |
Academia / Research Institutions |
Research Team manager |
|
|
Dr |
Dr Rorisang |
Patoso |
ARC |
ACADEMIA / RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS |
RESEARCHER |
|
|
Mr |
Toi |
Tsilo |
ARC |
ACADEMIA / RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS |
RESEARCHER |
|
|
Mr |
Harry |
Moeng |
Land Bank |
Institutional Body |
Head: Distressed Farms |
|
|
Mr |
Phuti |
Moloto |
Credit (Land Bank) |
Institutional Body |
Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Seatla |
Nkosi |
Industrial Development Corporation |
Institutional Body |
Senior Specialist |
|
|
Mr |
Johann |
Marshall |
IDC of SA LTD |
Institutional Body |
Senior Specialist |
|
|
Prof |
Victor |
Mmbengwa |
National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC) |
Institutional Body |
Manager: Smallholder markert access |
|
|
Dr |
Abongile |
Balarane |
National Agricultural Marketing Council |
Institutional Body |
Grains specialist |
|
|
Ms |
Sinovuyo |
Matai |
PPECB |
Institutional Body |
General Manager: North Operations |
|
|
Mr |
Daniel |
Motiang |
Agricultural Research Council |
Institutional Body |
Manager |
|
|
Ms |
Zodwa |
Mobeng |
Onderstepoort Biological Product |
Institutional Body |
Comapany Secrectary |
|
|
Mr |
Thozamile |
Gwanya |
ECRDA |
Institutional Body |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Ms |
Mawetu |
Stirling |
CAMISSA |
NGO/CBO |
NATIONAL RESEARCHER |
|
|
Ms |
Palesa |
RAMAISA |
NARYSEC |
NGO/CBO |
Participant |
|
|
Mr |
Siyabonga |
Mbambo |
NYDA |
NGO/CBO |
Senior Manager Operations |
|
|
Mr |
Gino |
Govender |
Earthrise Trust |
NGO/CBO |
Trustee |
|
|
Mr |
Adriaan |
Markus |
RAAWU |
NGO/CBO |
Labour Organiser |
|
|
Mr |
Petrus |
Viljoen |
Agri Land Group (Pty) Ltd |
NGO/CBO |
Cheif Executive Officer |
|
|
Mr |
Ndivhuho Navillee |
Phungo |
YARD |
NGO/CBO |
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR |
|
|
Ms |
Clara |
Lukhele |
National Movement of Rural Women |
NGO/CBO |
Administrator/ Coordinator |
|
|
Ms |
Henriette |
Abrahams |
Sikhula Sonke |
NGO/CBO |
General Secretary |
|
|
Mr |
De Wet |
Boshoff |
AFMA (MFSC) |
Organised Business |
Executive Director |
|
|
Mr |
Dirk |
Kok |
AFMA/SACOTA |
Organised Business |
Manager: Operastional Services |
|
|
Mr |
Ishmael |
Tshiame |
GFADA |
Organised Business |
General Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Mawetu |
Sonkosi |
Nerpo |
Organised Business |
Project Coordinator |
|
|
Dr |
Gert |
Dry |
WRSA |
Organised Business |
Past President |
|
|
Dr |
Gerhard |
Neethling |
Red Meat Abattoir Association |
Organised Business |
General Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Anwhar |
Madhanpall |
South African Sugar Association |
Organised Business |
General Manager: Land Reform and Rural Development |
|
|
Mr |
Philip |
Bowes |
Vinpro (Wine Industry) |
Organised Business |
Transformation Manager |
|
|
Dr |
Konanani |
Liphadzi |
Fruit South Africa |
Organised Business |
CEO |
|
|
Dr |
Andre |
Jooste |
Potatoes South Africa |
Organised Business |
CEO |
|
|
Mr |
Rudolf |
Badenhorst |
Potatoes South Africa |
Organised Business |
Manager: Market Development |
|
|
Mr |
Kevin |
Maart |
Deciduous Fruit Development Chamber |
Organised Business |
General Manager |
|
|
Mr |
khethokuthula |
Nzimande |
South African Sugar Association |
Organised Business |
Operations Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Theo |
Boshoff |
Agri SA |
Organised Business |
Legal Officer |
|
|
Mr |
christo |
vd Rheede |
Agri SA |
Organised Business |
Deputy Executive Director |
|
|
Ms |
Thozama |
Gwente |
The South African Wine Industry Trust |
Organised Business |
Chairperson |
|
|
Mr |
William |
Fortuin |
The South African Wine Industry Trust |
Organised Business |
Trustee |
|
|
Mr |
Leon |
de Beer |
NWGA |
Organised Business |
CEO |
|
|
Mr |
Hamlet |
Hlomendlini |
Agri SA |
Organised Business |
Senior Economist |
|
|
Mr |
Jannie |
Hendricks |
BAWSI |
Organised Labour |
Member |
|
|
Mr |
kaviraj |
appadu |
ilo |
Organised Labour |
senior programme officer |
|
|
Mr |
Dhalmini |
Bhekithemba |
Ceppwawu |
Organised Labour |
National Co-ordinator |
|
|
Mr |
Mxolisi Patric |
Jama |
NAFU |
Organised Labour |
District Leader |
|
|
Ms |
Pumza |
Vitshima |
NAFU-EC |
Organised Labour |
NAFU-EC President |
|
|
Ms |
Thuliswa |
Ndzibongwana |
NAFU-EC |
Organised Labour |
EC-Youth-Co-ordinator |
|
|
Ms |
Chwayita |
Mboni |
NAFU-EC |
Organised Labour |
NAFU-EC Rural Women |
|
|
Ms |
Florence Nomzi |
Joel |
Nafu |
Organised Labour |
Rural Women |
|
|
Ms |
IDA |
JACOBS |
FAWU |
Organised Labour |
ORGANISER |
|
|
Ms |
Mahuhudi |
Masipa |
NAFUSA |
Organised Labour |
Dep SG and Head of Transformation |
|
|
Mr |
ABRAHAM PAUL |
DANIELS |
FAWU |
Organised Labour |
NATIONAL EDUCATOR |
|
|
Mr |
Manila. Elliot |
Malishe |
NAFUSA |
Organised Labour |
Secretary |
|
|
Ms |
Ntuthu |
Mbiko Motshegoa |
AFASA Women's Desk |
Organised Labour |
Womens's Desk |
|
|
Ms |
Brenda |
Tlhabane |
AFASA |
Organised Labour |
Women's Desk |
|
|
Mr |
Willem Abraham |
Olivier |
Tongaat Hulett Starch (Pty) Ltd |
Private Sector |
Maize Co-Ordinator, Purchasing |
|
|
Mr |
Teko |
Kole |
Afri-Grow |
Private Sector |
Operations Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Vusumzi |
Stok |
Afri-Grow |
Private Sector |
Operations |
|
|
Mr |
Charles |
Erasmus |
WIVCRT |
Private Sector |
Transformation Convenor |
|
|
Mr |
Gafieldien |
Benjamin |
AFRIWU |
Private Sector |
General Secretary |
|
|
Mr |
Elmo |
Abrahams |
E PARTNERS |
Private Sector |
Executive Member |
|
|
Mr |
Michael |
Mokhoro |
SALBA/Vinpro |
Private Sector |
Stakeholder Relations Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Landile |
Nkungwana |
sefa |
Private Sector |
Agricultural Relationship Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Egan |
Duminy |
LenQua Group |
Private Sector |
Executive Member |
|
|
Dr |
Riaan |
Du Preez |
Afrivet |
Private Sector |
Manager: Scientific Affairs |
|
|
Mr |
Moshe |
Molefe |
Afrigrow Agriholdings (Pty) LTD |
Private Sector |
Group CEO |
|
|
Dr |
Otto |
Mbangula |
Afrigrow Agriholdings (Pty) LTD |
Private Sector |
Executive Director: Livestock Production & Farmer Support |
|
|
Ms |
Mariette |
Kotze |
HORTGRO |
Private Sector |
Information Manager: Agricultural Economics |
|
|
Mr |
Lungani |
Hlongwa |
TigerBrands |
Private Sector |
Policy analyst |
|
|
Mr |
Piers |
Kenyon |
enteprisEvolution Technology Holdings |
Private Sector |
MD |
|
|
Mr |
George |
Mothoa |
SEFA |
Private Sector |
Agricultural Specialist |
|
|
Ms |
Maleshoane |
Mokhachane-Moeti |
Mokhachane CPA |
Private Sector |
Farm manager |
|
|
Ms |
Elizabeth |
Mhlongo |
SANParks |
Private Sector |
Senior GM: Socio- Economic Development |
|
|
Mr |
Jerry |
Seakhoaa |
FABRIC |
Private Sector |
Public Relations Officer |
|
|
Ms |
Jolene |
Samuels |
The Vineyard Academy |
Private Sector |
Marketing |
|
|
Mr |
Pitso |
Sekhoto |
Makolobane Farmers Enterprises |
Private Sector |
CEO |
|
|
Mr |
Louis H. W. |
Verhoef |
Agratech Trade |
Private Sector |
Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Moshakge |
Molokwane |
People and Packs |
Private Sector |
MANAGER |
|
|
Mr |
Humlet |
Hlomendlini |
AgriSA |
private sector |
Economist |
|
|
Mr |
Johan |
Pietersen |
Matuba Wines |
private sector |
Wine Maker |
|
|
Mr |
owen |
wilcox |
National Treasury |
Public Sector |
CHIEF DIRECTOR PUBLIC FINANCE |
|
|
Mr |
Dennis Nekhavhambe |
Nekhavhambe |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
ECONOMIST |
|
|
Mr |
M |
Selepe |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
DEPUTY DIRECTOR |
|
|
Ms |
Thandi |
Manzi |
Eastern Cape |
Public Sector |
EXTENSION OFFICER |
|
|
Mr |
Bongani |
Mbali |
CCMA |
Public Sector |
Commissioner |
|
|
Ms |
Mlalelwa |
Mabona |
DSD |
Public Sector |
ASD |
|
|
MS |
ZANELE |
BAMBO |
DSBD |
Public Sector |
DEPUTY DIRECTOR |
|
|
Mr |
JULY |
MOTSOENENG |
Department of Small Business Development |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Mr |
Walter |
Mokgobu |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
Agronomist |
|
|
Ms |
Nobuhlobo |
Mafu |
Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Mr |
NJANYANA JOHN |
RADEBE |
Rural Development and Land Reform |
Public Sector |
NARYSEC participant |
|
|
Ms |
Roberta |
Burgess |
Department of Agriculture, Land reform and Rural Development |
Public Sector |
Senior Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Risimati Samuel |
Khandlhela |
Traditional Affairs |
Public Sector |
Senior Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Patrick |
Tonyane |
Agriculture:NC |
Public Sector |
Manager |
|
|
Mr |
khulekani |
mtshali |
DARD |
Public Sector |
Agricultural Advisor |
|
|
Mr |
Gift |
Pasipavunda |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Chief Town and Regional Planner |
|
|
Mr |
THEBE |
MOTHUSI |
READ |
Public Sector |
DIRECTOR |
|
|
Mr |
Dumisani |
Nzama |
KZN Dept Of Agriculture& Rural Development |
Public Sector |
Production Scientist Grade B |
|
|
Ms |
dina elizabeth |
mosito |
agriculture and rural dev |
Public Sector |
production scientist |
|
|
Ms |
Rirhandzu Nomia |
mkhari |
Limpopo Department of Agriculture and rural development |
Public Sector |
Agricultural Scientist |
|
|
Dr |
Julian |
Jaftha |
Agriculture, forestry & fisheries |
Public Sector |
Chief Director: Plant Production & Health |
|
|
Mr |
Mapurunyane Krauzer |
Bapela |
Department of Rural Development and Land Reform |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
Deka |
Bothwell |
National Treasury |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
Thabane Mhlonipheni |
Mvelase |
KZN: Department of Agriculture |
Public Sector |
Senior Agric Advisor |
|
|
Mr |
Thabo |
Ramashala |
Agriculture,Forestry & Fisheries |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
Simphiwe |
Mhlontlo |
EC Dept of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform |
Public Sector |
Scientific Manager |
|
|
Ms |
Sibongile |
Hlekiso |
Cooperative Governance |
Public Sector |
Senior Manager:LED Support |
|
|
Mr |
Ayanda |
Ngqandu |
Rural Development and Land Reform |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
Mfundo |
Macanda |
EC Rural Development & Agrarian Reform |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
HILTON JOE |
TOOLO |
RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM |
Public Sector |
CHIEF DIRECTOR |
|
|
Ms |
Zwianzo |
Nemavhola |
Agriculture |
Public Sector |
Scientist Manager |
|
|
Dr |
Cebisa Luxolo |
Mnqeta |
DRDAR |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Ms |
Maria |
Mphahlele |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Mr |
Lukhanyo |
Nkombisa |
CGA-GDC |
Public Sector |
General Manager |
|
|
Mr |
LOMAS |
MAVULWANA |
GDARD |
Public Sector |
PRODUCTION SCIENTIST |
|
|
Mr |
WAKHENI |
MABUSELA |
GDARD |
Public Sector |
SAA |
|
|
Ms |
Elder Mtshiza |
Mtshiza |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
CD:CASP |
|
|
Mr |
TENDAMUDZIMU |
RASIKHANYA |
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION |
Public Sector |
DEPUTY DIRECTOR:POLICY DEVELOPEMNT AND IMPLEMENTATION |
|
|
Mr |
Vela |
Mngwengwe |
Rural Development and Land Reform |
Public Sector |
Chief Director |
|
|
Mr |
Makala Ngaka |
Ngaka |
Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Mr |
Abram |
Shiya |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
Assistant Director |
|
|
Ms |
Priscilla |
Namukasa |
Rural Development and Land Reform |
Public Sector |
Professional GISc. Practitioner |
|
|
Mr |
Petrus Louw |
Pienaar |
Western Cape Department of Agriculture |
Public Sector |
Senior Agricultural Economist |
|
|
Ms |
Nompumelelo |
Pakade |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Head of Special Projects and AdviseDMKC |
|
|
Ms |
Lesego |
Kok-Ngonyama |
FS-DARD |
Public Sector |
Scientist Production Gr A |
|
|
Ms |
Mavis |
Masemola |
FS-DARD |
Public Sector |
Agric Adviser |
|
|
Mr |
Pilot |
Nchabeleng |
FS-DARD |
Public Sector |
Senior Manager-Research |
|
|
Mr |
Joel |
Mamabolo |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
MASIPHULA |
MBONGWA |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
SPECIAL ADVISOR TO MINISTER |
|
|
Ms |
Santhurie |
Naidoo |
Dept of Rural Development and Land Reform |
Public Sector |
CHief Director |
|
|
Mr |
LULAMA |
ZANTSI |
RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM |
Public Sector |
CHIEF DIRECTOR |
|
|
Mr |
Bonga |
Msomi |
Agriculture |
Public Sector |
Chief Director |
|
|
Mr |
MALIBONGWE |
GCWABE |
RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM |
Public Sector |
LAND REFORM ADVISOR |
|
|
Ms |
Shaun |
Feldman |
Department of Labour |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Mr |
Richmond Ntuli |
Ntuli |
Labour |
Public Sector |
Director: Governance & Projects |
|
|
Mr |
wandisile |
kahlane |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Mr |
MOSES |
RANTHO |
NKANGALA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
Public Sector |
RURAL &AGRICULTURAL SPECIALIST |
|
|
Mr |
Leslie |
Nyagah |
Economic Development |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
Charl |
van Rooyen |
WCDoA |
Public Sector |
Pomologist |
|
|
Ms |
Kholofelo |
Thobejane |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Ms |
Parmella |
Makongwana |
dti |
Public Sector |
Assistant Director |
|
|
Mr |
Elvis |
Nakana |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director: Commodity Markets Analysis |
|
|
Mr |
Samfana |
Mahlangu |
Rural Development and Land Reform |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Mr |
William |
Mohapi |
waterberg DLRC |
Public Sector |
Pensioner |
|
|
Mr |
William |
Mohapi |
Waterberg DLRC |
Public Sector |
Pensioner |
|
|
Mr |
Dennies |
Nekhavhambe |
DAFF |
Public Sector |
Senior Agricultural Economist |
|
|
Mr |
Bonginkosi |
Zulu |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
CD |
|
|
Mr |
Gaoretelelwe |
Phutieagae |
Rural evnvironment and agricultural development |
Public Sector |
Deputy Direcotor |
|
|
Ms |
Aluwani |
Matsila |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
CD |
|
|
Ms |
Disego |
Malepu |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Business anlyst |
|
|
Ms |
imameleng |
Mothebe |
DTI |
Public Sector |
Director |
|
|
Ms |
Ngoanabokone |
Maleswene |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Ms |
Samukelisiwe |
Ngcobo |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Geomatic Manager |
|
|
Mr |
Solly |
Molepo |
DTI |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Ms |
Makhupu |
Selepe |
DRDLR |
Public Sector |
Deputy Director |
|
|
Dr |
Steven |
Cornelius |
OBP |
public sector |
CEO |
|
|
Prof |
Mandivamba |
Rukuni |
|
public sector |
Advisor |
d) What is the current status of the specified project?
Operation Phakisa for Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development is at the 4th step of an 8 step process of the Operation Phakisa methodology.
The 4th step involves an Open Day which has the purpose of informing the public of the outcomes of the Lab, and nature of implementation agreement with key role players to be signed publicly on that day.
The application to host the Open Day was submitted to the Private Office of the President.
The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) and the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR) has since the completion of the Lab, appointed champions to lead the implementation of the twenty seven initiatives emanating from the Lab.
16 November 2017 - NW3300
Mulaudzi, Adv TE to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
(1) Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
1(a) Chief Executive Officers employment period:
SEFA
The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of SEFA, Mr Thakhani Makhuvha is employed by Industrial Development Corporation (IDC).
SEDA
The CEO of SEDA, Ms Mandisa Tshikwatamba is appointed on five year fixed contract.
1(b) Chief Financial Officers employment period:
SEFA
The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of SEFA, Ms Reshoketswe Ralebepa is appointed on a five (5) year fixed term contract period.
SEDA
The CFO of SEDA, Mr Norman Mazizi is employed on five year fixed contract.
(2) Details of contracts
|
(2)(a) Names of Officers |
Details of contract |
(2)(i)Starting date |
(2)(ii)Ending date |
|
Mr Thakhani Makhuvha |
Mr Makhuvha, employed by Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), was seconded to SEFA for a three-year (3) period. |
1 November 2012 |
31 October 2015 |
|
His secondment was further extended by three years. |
1 November 2015 |
31 October 2018 |
|
|
Ms Mandisa Tshikwatamba |
Appointed on a five year fixed contract. |
1 August 2016 |
31 July 2021 |
|
Ms Reshoketswe Ralebepa |
Appointed on a five year fixed contract. |
1 October 2015 |
30 September 2020 |
|
Mr Norman Mazizi |
Appointed on a five year fixed contract. |
1 March 2015 |
29 February 2020 |
16 November 2017 - NW3621
Ntlangwini, Ms EN to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry
Whether (a) his department and/or (b) any entity reporting to him own land; if so, in each case, (i) where is each plot of land located, (ii) what is the size of each specified plot and (iii) what is each plot currently being used for?
Reply:
Response from the Department
The department does not own any land.
Response from the Entities
|
Entity |
b |
b(i) |
b(ii) |
b(iii) |
|
Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) |
The CIPC does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
Companies Tribunal (CT) |
The CT does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
Export Credit Insurance Corporation (ECIC) |
The ECIC does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Consumer Commission (NCC) |
The NCC does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Consumer Tribunal (NCT) |
The NCT does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Credit Regulator (NCR) |
The NCR does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Empowerment Fund (NEF) |
The NEF does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Gambling Board (NGB) |
The NGB does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Lotteries Commission (NLC) |
The NLC does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Metrology Institute of South Africa (NMISA) |
The NMISA does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
|
National Regulator For Compulsory Specifications (NRCS) |
The NRCS does own land |
ERF 2901 Mount Road, in the area of the Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality, Division of Port Elizabeth, Province of the Eastern Cape |
1,6486 hectares |
The office building located on this land has been consumed by fire in 2016/17, but the NRCS is in a process to refurbish the building and use it as NRCS Regional Office in Port Elizabeth. |
|
South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) |
The SABS does own land |
1 Lategaan Street, Groenkloof, Pretoria, Gauteng 1 Apollo Road Olifantfontein 1665, Pretoria, Gauteng 20 Liesbeek Road, Rosebank, Western Cape 15 Garth Road Durban, Mayville, Kwazulu-Natal 1 Teichman Drive, Sunnyridge East London, Eastern Cape Farm 964, Cove Road, East London, Eastern Cape 8 Bunsen Road, Secunda, Mpumalanga 22 Henrywicht Drive, Saldanha, Western Cape |
220 907 sqm 113 927 sqm 4 121 sqm 24 272 sqm 82 672 sqm 961 670 sqm 1000 sqm 647 sqm |
Head office Electrical testing facility Regional office (Testing and Certification) Regional Office (Certification) Vehicle testing facility Leased Coal testing facility Vacant |
|
South African National Accreditation System (SANAS) |
The SANAS does not own land |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
16 November 2017 - NW3523
Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Social Development
How many (a) boys and (b) girls were resident at the Don Mattera Child and Youth Care Centre in Edenvale in each month from September 2016 to date?
Reply:
(a) The information below indicates the number of boys resident at Don Mattera Child and Youth Care Centre in each month from September 2016 to date:
|
Month |
Number of boys |
|
September 2016 |
35 |
|
October 2016 |
36 |
|
November 2016 |
38 |
|
December 2016 |
38 |
|
January 2017 |
37 |
|
February 2017 |
42 |
|
March 2017 |
42 |
|
April 2017 |
42 |
|
May 2017 |
37 |
|
June 2017 |
41 |
|
July 2017 |
39 |
|
August 2017 |
36 |
|
September 2017 |
27 |
|
October 2017 |
27 |
|
November 2017 |
27 |
(b) The information below indicates the number of girls resident at Don Mattera Child and Youth Care Centre in each month from September 2016 to date:
|
Month |
Number of girls |
|
September 2016 |
36 |
|
October 2016 |
36 |
|
November 2016 |
37 |
|
December 2016 |
37 |
|
January 2017 |
32 |
|
February 2017 |
35 |
|
March 2017 |
38 |
|
April 2017 |
36 |
|
May 2017 |
38 |
|
June 2017 |
39 |
|
July 2017 |
38 |
|
August 2017 |
39 |
|
September 2017 |
32 |
|
October 2017 |
34 |
|
November 2017 |
34 |
15 November 2017 - NW3190
Paulsen, Mr N M to ask the Minister of Science and Technology
(1) What are the details including the ranks of service providers and/or contractors from which (a) her department and (b) the entities reporting to her procured services in the past five years; (2) what (a) service was provided by each service provider and/or contractor and (b) amount was each service provider and/or contractor paid; (3) (a) how many of these service providers are black-owned entities, (b) what contract was each of the black owned service provider paid?"
Reply:
1. (a) Refer to Annexure A for the Department of Science and Technology (DST).
(b) Refer to Annexure B for entities.
2. (a) Refer to Annexure A, column H for the services provised, for the DST.
Refer to Annexure B for the entities.
(b) Refer to Annexure A, column F for the amount spent per service provider for DST.
Refer to Annexure B for entities.
3. (a) The following has reference:
|
Black Owned |
|
|
The DST |
759 |
|
Entities |
1453 |
(b) Refer to Annexure C, column H for the contracts awarded to black owned suppliers by the DST.
Refer to Annexure B for the entities.
(c) Refer to Annexure C, column G for amount paid to black owned suppliers for the DST.
Refer to Annexure B for entities.
15 November 2017 - NW3496
King, Ms C to ask the Minister of Science and Technology
(1)What is the total amount of her department's budget that was spent on research and development into cybersecurity measures in the 2016-17 financial year?
Reply:
(1) In 2016/17 there were 2 multi-year projects that were being funded and are in the cyber/information security space.
a) The development of a prototype for the Biometric Recognition of Minors. Its total budget over 2015/16 - 2017/18 is R 14 977 561, of which R 8 648 983 was for 2016/17. In its conceptualisation the project received endorsement from the South African Social Services Agency (SASSA), and is being implemented by the CSIR.
b) The implementation of the Network Emulating and Simulation Laboratory (NESL). Its total budget over 2014/15-2016/17 was R7 887 000. of which R1 049 500 was for 2016/17. The project was funded through the High-end Infrastructure grant. The NESL is a platform that aims to provide cybersecurity researchers with the ability to perform network bandwidth modelling, cybersecurity training, device security research and advanced analytics to study cyber risk and to deliver effective and practical security solutions. It is implemented by CSIR.
Therefore, the total investment for investment for 2016/17 is R9 698 483.
15 November 2017 - NW3365
Bozzoli, Prof B to ask the Minister of Science and Technology
(1) (a) What programmes of the National Research Foundation's (NRF's) budget will benefit from its decision to cut funding to over 2 000 rated researchers by 90% from 1 January 2018, (b) what amount will be saved, and (c) what precisely will the savings be used for; (2) were other areas of possible savings considered so as to reduce the shock effect of the 90% decrease; if not why not; if so, (a) what are the details, and (b) why were these areas not included in the NRF's savings plan, (3) has the NRF done a cost-benefit analysis of what will be lost as a result of the 90% decrease, in terms of (a) student education and (b) research outputs; if not, in each case, why not, if so, what were the findings in each case?
Reply:
1. The number of A and B rated researchers is 831 and not 2 000. The restructuring of the Incentive Funding for Rated Researchers (IFRR) instrument will benefit emerging and early career researchers as well as established researchers through the following instruments, viz., (i) Competitive programme for Rated Researchers (CPRR); (ii) Competitive Support for Unrated Researchers (CSUR); and (iii) Thuthuka.
Based on the current MTEF budget, it is estimated the approximately R30 million per annum will be re-directed and used to supplement the above funding instruments.
2. Yes, all areas of possible savings were considered in terms of the NRF's operational and financial sustainability plans. However, only the IFRR programme was deemed relevant in terms of the directive from the National Treasury that the NRF must implement measures to increase cost savings without compromising its core mandate of research support and advancement.
3. The IFRR programme was never intended to be a primary instrument of the allocating research grants and driving student education or research output. The R30 million released from restructuring the IFRR constitutes only 1.25% of the R2.4 billion annual allocations for researcher and postgraduate and student support. The released funds will be re-allocated for researcher and student support through other funding instruments.
15 November 2017 - NW3468
Paulsen, Mr N M to ask the Minister of Science and Technology
1. How many officials and /or employees in her department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years. 2. are any if the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?
Reply:
1. The Department granted permission to employees as follows:
- 2015-2016 = 01 employee
- 2016-2017 = 07 employees
- 2017-2018 = 09 employees
2. Only 1 employee was doing business with the government.
(a) Cleaning and vegetation with Eskom
(b) 2014-2016;
(c) R35 506,95 payable every second or third month. The employee has since resigned from company.
14 November 2017 - NW3384
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What is the total number of tons of ash that were produced by (a) Eskom and (b) Sasol (i) in the (aa) 2014-15, (bb) 2015-16 and (cc) 2016-17 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017?
Reply:
As reported by third parties, which we as Environmental Affairs are not required to keep record of, and therefore cannot verify these figures:
a) Eskom
(i) (aa) 2014-15: 34 410 Kilo Tons.
(bb) 2015-16: 32 586 Kilo Tons.
(cc) 2016-17: 32 612 Kilo Tons.
(ii) 01/04/17 – to date: 16 999 Kilo Tons.
b) Sasol
(i) (aa, bb and cc) and (ii)
The Sasolburg Operations (SO) and Secunda Synfuels Operations (SSO) ash figures are kept separate because of the operations being in different locations. We have also separated the coarse ash (predominantly gasification ash) from the fine ash (ash generated at the steam plants). Also, please note that Sasol’s financial year runs from July to June.
|
Ash in Tons |
FY15 (1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015) |
FY16 (1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016) |
FY17 (July 2016 to June 2017) |
1 April 2017 to 30 Sep 2017 (please note that Apr 2017 to June 2017 figures are included in FY17 data) |
|
Sasolburg Operations (SO) |
||||
|
Fine ash (boiler fine and bottom ash particles) |
598 215 |
573 927 |
590 731 |
262 748 |
|
Secunda Synfuels Operations (SSO) |
||||
|
Fine ash (boiler and gasification fine particles) |
4 324 772 |
4 037 215 |
3 843 959 |
1 847 788 |
|
Coarse ash (predominantly gasification ash) |
6 229 382 |
6 654 301 |
6 400 470 |
3 058 644 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Ash generated (all sources and types) |
11 152 369 |
11 265 443 |
10 835 160 |
5 169 180 |
---ooOoo---
14 November 2017 - NW2898
Hoosen, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?”
Reply:
a) Department of Small Business and Development (DSBD)
|
Details |
(a) Breakdown |
(b) Valuation |
|||||
|
Item |
Name /Type |
Specification (Current / non-current) |
(0-3 months) |
(3-6 months) |
(6-12 months) |
(Beyond 12 months) |
|
|
(aa) LISTED ASSETS |
(aa) Listed assets in reference to (aaa) directly |
Not applicable |
|||||
|
(aa) Listed assets in reference to (bbb) indirectly |
Not applicable |
||||||
|
(bb) UNLISTED INVESTMENTS |
(bb) Unlisted investments in reference to (aaa) directly |
Not applicable |
|||||
|
(bb) Unlisted investments in reference to (bbb) directly |
Not applicable |
b) (i) Entity: Small Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA)
|
Details |
(a) Breakdown |
(b) Valuation |
||||||
|
Item |
Name /Type |
Specification (Current / non-current) |
Breakdown (0-3 months) |
Breakdown (3-6 months) |
Breakdown (6-12 months) |
Breakdown (Beyond 12 months) |
||
|
(aa) LISTED ASSETS |
(aa) Listed assets in reference to (aaa) directly |
Not applicable |
||||||
|
(aa) Listed assets in reference to (bbb) indirectly |
Not applicable |
|||||||
|
(bb) UNLISTED INVESTMENTS |
(bb) Unlisted investments in reference to (aaa) directly |
ABSA Call Account |
Current |
R 66 092 057 |
R 66 092 057 |
|||
|
(bb) Unlisted investments in reference to (bbb) directly |
Not applicable |
c) (ii) Entity: Small Enterprise Finance Agency (SEFA)
|
Details |
(a) |
(b) |
||||||
|
Item |
Name /Type |
Specification (Current / non-current) |
Breakdown (0-3 months) |
Breakdown (3-6 months) |
Breakdown (6-12 months) |
Breakdown (Beyond 12 months) |
Valuation |
|
|
(aa) LISTED ASSETS |
(aa) Listed assets in reference to (aaa) directly |
Not applicable. |
||||||
|
(aa) Listed assets in reference to (bbb) indirectly |
Not applicable |
|||||||
|
(bb) UNLISTED INVESTMENTS |
(bb) Unlisted investments in reference to (aaa) directly |
Associates |
Non-current |
R 128 622 368 |
R 128 622 368 |
|||
|
Investments |
R 36 964 865 |
R 31 964 865 |
||||||
|
Joint Operations |
R 29 000 000 |
R 29 000 000 |
||||||
|
Joint Ventures |
R 194 213 072 |
R 163 872 781 |
||||||
|
Subsidiaries |
R 129 201 028 |
R 106 189 103 |
||||||
|
Loans and advances |
Loans and advances |
Non-current |
R 1 197 449 987 |
R 616 201 761 |
||||
|
Rental debtors |
Current |
R 73 087 645 |
R 17 790 380 |
|||||
|
Investment properties |
Loans and advances |
Non-current |
R 190 444 353 |
R 190 444 353 |
14 November 2017 - NW3466
Mokoena, Mr L to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
(1)How many officials and/or employees in his department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years; (2) are any of the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with the Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?
Reply:
(1). The Department does not grant employees permission “to have businesses and or to do business dealings”, however, it grants permission to employees who request to perform other remunerated work outside their employment in line with the requirements of Section 30 of the Public Service Act 1994, as Amended by Act 30 of 2007. In the past three financial years, nine (9) employees were granted permission to perform remunerative work outside their employment in the Department.
(2) The Department does not have information of any employee who in the past three financial years had business dealings with the Government.
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
14 November 2017 - NW3408
Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Whether, with regard to the court report from the Gauteng liquor board (details furnished), the shebeen will be closed; if not, on what basis can the board ignore the court judgment; if so, by which date;
Reply:
The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development is not responsible for enforcing civil court judgements. The Ekurhuleni Metro Municipality successfully applied for an order against the respondent and inquiries need to be made to the Ekurhuleni Metro Municipality as to why they are not enforcing it.
14 November 2017 - NW3639
Mente-Nkuna, Ms NV to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry
With reference to his reply to question 3174 on 30 October 2017, what are the (a) relevant details and (b) black economic empowerment status level of service providers and/or contractors from which (i) his department and (ii) the entities reporting to him procured services in the past five years?
Reply:
Due to the detailed information requested for the department and its entities per order issued during the past 5 years it will unfortunately not be possible to provide a meaningful response within the limited time frame allowed in responding to Parliamentary questions.
The information requested is not readily available and supporting documents will have to be requested from archives filed off site.
Further to that it should also be noted that the BEE status level as requested per supplier will not cover the 5 year period and that the department previously recorded and reported on the HDI status of suppliers. The software system that was used at that stage is no longer in existence as it has been discontinued with the implementation of the Central Supplier Database hosted at National Treasury.
Based on the above it is proposed that the department be allowed more time to gather information and that a response be submitted directly to the member.
14 November 2017 - NW3423
Figlan, Mr AM to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What are the processes, procedures and mechanisms with regard to the issuing of small-scale and ad hoc work required to be done by the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa, (b) how is the work issued, (c) how are suppliers identified and decided upon, (d) what amount has been spent in this regard in each month in the past three financial years and (e) what was the nature of the work in each case?
Reply:
a) All small-scale work is procured through quotation process for both CAPEX and OPEX. SME’s and suppliers registered on the database are invited to submit quotations for goods or services required. During 2014 financial year up to July 2016, PRASA supplier database was used to source quotations for small-scale and ad-hoc works such as unplanned maintenance. Since July 2016, the Central Supplier Database managed by National Treasury is used to source quotations for all small –scale works.
b) Invites are sent to suppliers registered on the Central Supplier Database to renders services or provide goods for OPEX and CAPEX. The supplier information is obtained from the Central Supplier Database.
c) On rotational basis, suppliers are selected from the Central Supplier Database and invited to quote for services or goods required by the business.
d) Refer to Annexure A.
e) The nature of work relates to repairs and maintenance, office stationer, cleaning services and property relates services. Refer to Annexure A
14 November 2017 - NW3515
Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
With reference to the Minister of Finance’s Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement delivered in the National Assembly on 25 October 2017, where mention was made of a fund for start-up businesses, (a) by which date will the specified fund be operational, (b) what amount will be injected into the fund, (c) where will the money come from, (d) who will manage the fund, (e) will it have any connection to the Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Fund established by the Chief Executive Officer Initiative, (f) will it operate as a separate Development Finance Institution and (g) what will its financial mandate be in terms of (i) return on investment and (ii) profitability?
Reply:
a) The Fund will be operational during 2018/19 financial year but the planned disbursement of the funding will be the beginning of 2019/2020 financial year.
b) An allocation of R1 Billion has been communicated to the Department of Small Business Development.
c) The money will come from the national fiscus.
d) The Department of Small Business Development together with National Treasury and Department of Science and Technology are working with the Government Technical Advisory Centre (GTAC) to develop the architecture of the Fund where issues around the management of the Fund will be considered.
e) The SA SME Fund established by the CEO Initiative is targeting high growth businesses whereas our research on the ecosystem shows that there is a lack of funding of enterprises that are at an ideation and early start-up phase which will be the target of the Fund. The Department together with its agencies are engaging with SA SME Fund to identify areas of collaboration on other matters which include sharing research, mentorship and training of enterprises on financial management.
f) The work that is being undertaken through GTAC will assist government to decide on how the fund will operate but the government is conscious of the economic environment and would not look at setting up a completely new structure that will add to operational costs.
g) The financial mandate of the fund will be informed by the exercise that is being conducted through GTAC, but government is looking at having this fund as a soft loan which will provide affordable finance to small businesses and the emphasis will be more on ensuring that the Fund is sustainable rather than profit maximisation.
14 November 2017 - NW3640
Mente-Nkuna, Ms NV to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry
With reference to his reply to question 3174 on 30 October 2017, what (a) service was provided by each service provider and/or contractor and (b) amount was each service provider and/or contractor paid for services procured by his department or entities reporting to him in the past five years?
Reply:
Due to the detailed information requested for the department and its entities per order issued during the past 5 years it will unfortunately not be possible to provide a meaningful response within the limited time frame allowed in responding to Parliamentary questions.
The information requested is not readily available and supporting documents will have to be requested from archives filed off site.
Further to that it should also be noted that the BEE status level as requested per supplier will not cover the 5 year period and that the department previously recorded and reported on the HDI status of suppliers. The software system that was used at that stage is no longer in existence as it has been discontinued with the implementation of the Central Supplier Database hosted at National Treasury.
Based on the above it is proposed that the department be allowed more time to gather information and that a response be submitted directly to the member.
14 November 2017 - NW3641
Mente-Nkuna, Ms NV to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry
With reference to his reply to question 3174 on 30 October 2017, of the service providers and contractors from which his department or entities reporting to his department procured services in the past five years (a) how many of these service providers are black-owned entities, (b) what contract was each of the black-owned service providers awarded and (c) what amount was each black-owned service provider paid?
Reply:
Due to the detailed information requested for the department and its entities per order issued during the past 5 years it will unfortunately not be possible to provide a meaningful response within the limited time frame allowed in responding to Parliamentary questions.
The information requested is not readily available and supporting documents will have to be requested from archives filed off site.
Further to that it should also be noted that the BEE status level as requested per supplier will not cover the 5 year period and that the department previously recorded and reported on the HDI status of suppliers. The software system that was used at that stage is no longer in existence as it has been discontinued with the implementation of the Central Supplier Database hosted at National Treasury.
Based on the above it is proposed that the department be allowed more time to gather information and that a response be submitted directly to the member.
14 November 2017 - NW3396
Brauteseth, Mr TJ to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources
Whether his department is aware of any salary scales used by the mining sector when it classifies paygrades; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the details of the (a) salary band for each category and (b) number of persons employed as (i) permanent employees and (ii) outsourced contractors in the (aa) platinum group metals and (bb) gold sectors in each of the specified salary scales for each financial year since 1 April 2006?
Reply:
The salary band are regulated by the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and all other related labour legislations all of which are under the administration of the Department of Labour.
Approved/Not Approved
Mr MJ Zwane, MP
Minister of Mineral Resources
Date Submitted:-……………/………………/2017
14 November 2017 - NW3282
Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Small Business Development
With reference to her reply to question 2398 on 6 October 2017, regarding the appointment of members of the National Small Business Advisory Council and her reply to question 2569 on 6 October 2017, in which she states that nominations for these advertised positions closed on 3 September 2015, (a) why has she not made the appointments for a period of more than two years and (b) by which date does she expect to make the specified appointments?”
Reply:
(a) The process of appointing members had its complications which amongst other things included delays in verifying criminal records, qualifications of some of the nominated members as they were out of the country for long periods. There was also a process undertaken to broaden the composition of candidates to include those with background and experience in Cooperatives Development.
(b) The final list of nominations has been concluded and it is expected that the appointments shall be made in the last quarter of 2017/18 including induction of members. The new members shall be inaugurated to the Advisory Council on the 1 April 2018.
13 November 2017 - NW2422
Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether, with reference to the reply to question 2467 on 28 July 2015, the MEC responsible for Local Government in Gauteng commissioned an investigation into the matter; if not, (a) why not and (b) what action does he intend to take in this regard; if so, (i) what are the findings of the specified investigation and (ii) on what date was the report submitted to him; (2) Whether he will provide Mr D Bergman with a full copy of the specified report?
Reply:
The below response is based on a report submitted to the Department of Cooperative Governance (“Department”) by the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs in the Gauteng Province.
1. No, the MEC responsible for Local Government in the Gauteng Province did not commission an investigation into the matter.
a) The matter was referred to the Ekurhuleni City Metropolitan Municipality for investigation.
The matter was resolved through a disciplinary process and the individual in question was dismissed.
(b) As the MEC abides by the decision of the municipality in this regard, no further action is necessary from the part of the MEC.
(i) Not applicable.
(ii) Not applicable.
2. Not applicable.
13 November 2017 - NW2421
Bergman, Mr D to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether, with reference to the reply to question 4251 on 21 December 2015, the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality has provided the requested information; if not, by what date will they provide the requested information; if so, what are the relevant details of the information?
Reply:
1. According to the answer provided to PQ 4251 on 21 December 2015, there is no information that was requested from Ekurhuleni over and above the information provided in the reply. For ease of reference, we hereby attach the 21 December 2015 reply.
13 November 2017 - NW3371
Mackenzie, Mr C to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
Does the South African Post Office (SAPO) conduct any business with (a) JMAT Business Advisory Services and /or (b) any other companies associated with any of the specified persons; if not, in each case, what is the position; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
I have been informed by SAPO as follows:
a) The South African Post Office does not conduct any business with JMAT Business Advisory Services.
b) There is no entity linked with Mr Molefe Mathibe that is or was doing business with the South African Post Office.
c) A company associated with one of the former executives, Mr Janras Kotsi is Intimate Date, whose contract has long expired in 2014 and Mr Kotsi only became a director in 2016, two years after leaving SAPO. The details of the contract entailed the following:
- Cleaning of data in respect of addresses on a monthly basis
- Data capturing
- Maintenance of the postal delivery database
13 November 2017 - NW2777
Groenewald, Mr HB to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(1)(a) What plan is in place to increase the water flow capacity of bridges along the entire Eastleigh spruit situated within the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality area in order to reduce the risk of another flood, (b) what will the cost be to increase the water flow capacity of all the bridges, (c) what amount will each sphere of Government contribute and (d) when will the increase (2) (a) what resources does the Bedfordview regional disaster management depot have and (b) what resources should the specified depot have by law; (3) Whether the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Council disaster plan was followed in respect of the Edenvale flooding; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the reasons that the disaster management department took over six hours to respond to the disaster in Edenvale and (b) what additional support did the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Council give the local depots of the (i) roads department and (ii) water department?
Reply:
The Ekurhuleni Metropolitan municipality through the Gauteng Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs provided the information:
(1)(a)The plan is to do the following:
- Upgrade the spruit into a rectangular reinforced concrete lined canal with energy dissipators between Francoise Road and Van Riebeeck Avenue (2300m) to accommodate 1:50 year flood event.
- Stabilise the slopes of the spruit using Gabions between Van Riebeeck and 1st Avenue (450m).
- Increase all culvert capacities to accommodate at least 1:50 year flood event.
- Construct an attenuation pond that will be used as a dry retention structure to attenuate the difference between 1:50 and 1:100-year flood event.
- Construct an impermeable clay bund/berm covered with reinforced grass adjacent to some properties.
(b) The approximately cost for the Upgrades is R 400 million.
Attenuation Facility - R 100 million (300 000 cubic meters of water)
10 x Bridges - R 100 million
Channelizing of the Spruit - R 120 million
Road Upgrades - R 80 million
(c) There are no discussions amongst the spheres of government on contributions.
(d) The City of Ekurhuleni has submitted an application to the National Department of Water and Sanitation for a water use license. The City of Ekurhuleni has implemented 2 phases of the project thus far. The approximate time required to upgrade the Spruit at current budget allocations will be more than 10 years but will obviously remain dependent on the availability of budget.
(2) (a) The Environmental Impact Assessment, River Assessment Study, Hydrology and Hydraulic Study, detailed assessment report of the flood damages, Geotechnical Investigation, Digital Terrain Model (DTM) Survey, Water Use Application, Environmental Management Plan, Stormwater Management Plan.
(b) Various Consulting Engineers appointed by the City of Ekurhuleni.
(c) The Eastleigh Spruit will require attenuation facilities, bridge upgrades and channelising of the existing system to prevent flood damages in the future.
13 November 2017 - NW3252
Jooste, Ms K to ask the Minister of Social Development
(a) On what date will the North Gauteng High Court ruling lapse which allows the SA Social Security Agency to continue paying foster care grants and (b) what is the total number of foster care grants that will be affected when the specified ruling lapses?
Reply:
a) The North Gauteng High Court order will cease to have force or effect On 31 December 2017.
b) The total number of foster care grants that will be affected is estimated at about 34 000. However the actual number remaining will depend on progress made in extending the foster placement orders by 31 December 2017.
13 November 2017 - NW2755
Dreyer, Ms AM to ask the Minister of Public Works
Is he aware of any (a) transfers due but not paid over to provinces from his department and/or (b) money from his department transferred to provinces but not paid to municipalities for services, rates and taxes yet; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
a) All transfers have been made in line with the payment schedule as approved by National Treasury. The Department is only responsible for the EPWP Incentive Grant for Provinces.
b) The devolution of the property rates fund grant to provinces as the allocated funding for property rates was phased into the equitable share in 2013/14. This therefore means that the Department does not make transfers to provinces for property rates and service charges as it is part of their equitable share.
13 November 2017 - NW3284
Chance, Mr R to ask the Minister of Public Works
(1) With reference to the amended Construction Industry Development Regulations that was published for public comment in the Government Gazette No 38822 on 29 May 2015, what (a) is the current status of the proposed prompt payment regulations and (b) were the main points raised by the public through the consultation period; (2) by what date does he expect that the amended regulations will be enforced?
Reply:
1. (a) The draft Regulations on Prompt Payment and adjudication for the construction industry which were published for comment by the Minister of Public Works in Government Gazette 38822 of 29 May 2015 have been withdrawn. The Regulations were published in terms of Section 33 of the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Act, 2000 (Act no 38 of 2000). The much anticipated regulations were aimed at introducing automatic interest on late payment as well as statutory mechanisms to ensure progressive payment to contractors for work done.
In following due legal processes, the Minister submitted the draft Regulations to the Office of the Chief State Law Advisor to test its Constitutional validity and whether the draft Regulations were not ultra vires (meaning whether the Regulations did not go beyond the scope of the empowering provisions of the CIDB Act).
(b) The comments received highlighted the need for greater alignment of the adjudication provisions with the existing legislative framework for the administration of contracts, as well as the powers of the Minister in terms of the CIDB Act. Specifically, key comments received include (i) there are potential challenges that would arise if main contractors are expected to pay a sub-contractor within 30-days. Where verification of work is required, this may result in bad quality work being delivered, and as such, main contractors may be reluctant to sub-contract. This scenario may lead to price escalations
as a strategy to minimize the risk to main contractors. It would give a wrong impression to service providers that the payment is due to them irrespective of quality of work; (ii) payment of invoice within 30-days of submission will be impossible to implement by the public sector versus the current practice of within 30-days of issuing progress payment certificates after invoice have been verified; (iii) since the Regulations were proposing payment by main contractors to sub-contractors, it is argued that the conditions of contracts between the main and sub-contractors should take precedence.
2. The Minister received the legal opinion from the Office of the Chief State Law Advisor (the legal opinion) which emphasised that the Regulations were ultra vires and if challenged would not pass the Constitutional validity threshold. In essence, the legal opinion advised that the prompt payment and compulsory adjudication provisions of the draft regulations were substantive in nature and could not be categorised as any other matter for the better execution of the Act or in relation to any power granted or function or duty imposed by the Act (see section 33 (1) of the Act). The Chief State law advisor applied a restrictive approach for interpreting wide empowering provisions in respect of the making of the regulations and concluded that the draft regulations:
- extended the scope or general operation of the enactment;
- supported attempts to widen the purposes of the Act;
- provided for substantive matters relating to the law of contract as opposed to administrative measures to implement the substantive matters provided in the Act; and
- could not be categorised as authorising the provision of subsidiary means of carrying into effect what is enacted in the statute itself and covered what is incidental to the execution of its specific provisions.
13 November 2017 - NW3173
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)What are the details including the ranks of service providers and/or contractors from which (a) her department and (b) the entities reporting to her procured services in the past five years; (2) what (a) service was provided by each service provider and/or contractor and (b) amount was each service provider and/or contractor paid; (3) (a) how many of these service providers are black-owned entities, (b) what contract was each of the black-owned service providers awarded and (c) how much was each black-owned service provider paid?
Reply:
(1)– (3) The Department’s database does not rank the service providers. However, the information relative to the bids awarded by the Department and its entities is published in the media from which they are advertised such as:
- Government Tender Bulletin
- E-tender portal (National Treasury)
- Departmental Website
The Member is also referred to the Annual Reports of both the Department and its entities of over the past five years as these would also have an indication of the procurements that the Auditor-General would have delivered his opinion on.
---ooOoo---
13 November 2017 - NW2877
Cassim, Mr Y to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by (i) his department and (ii) each entity reporting to him according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?
Reply:
(a)(b)(i)(aa)(aaa)(bb)(aaa)
The financial statements of the Department of Cooperative Governance is prepared in terms of the modified cash basis of accounting principles applicable to National Government Departments and do not provide for valuation of current and non-current assets. As prescribed, the Department has no investments.
The Entities
MUNICIPAL DEMARCATION BOARD
(a)(b)(ii)(aa)(bbb)
|
VALUATION OF NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
||||
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
||||
|
Cost |
Accumulated Depreciation |
Carrying Value |
||
|
Furniture and Fittings |
2 098 693.04 |
1 211 552.92 |
887 140.12 |
|
|
Office Equipment |
983 938.70 |
854 870.86 |
129 067.84 |
|
|
Computer Equipment |
2 637 746.27 |
1 304 066.99 |
1 333 679.28 |
|
|
Vehicles |
656 315.37 |
353 030.95 |
303 284.42 |
|
|
Lease hold improvements |
2 503 940.03 |
1 543 861.01 |
960 079.02 |
|
|
8 880 633.41 |
5 267 382.73 |
3 613 250.68 |
||
|
Computer Software |
Cost |
Accumulated Depreciation |
Carrying Value |
|
|
1 896 172.43 |
1 056 177.56 |
839 994.87 |
||
|
1 896 172.43 |
1 056 177.56 |
839 994.87 |
||
|
Warranties |
|
|
18 546.08 |
|
|
Total Value of Non-Current assets as at 31 August 2017 |
4 471 791.63 |
|||
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
||||
|
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS |
||||
|
Finance-Petty Cash Control |
1 908.10 |
|||
|
Finance-Bank ABSA/01 Main |
57 464.20 |
|||
|
Finance-Bank ABSA/04 Call Account |
8 223 039.61 |
* |
||
|
Total Cash & Cash Equivalents |
8 282 411.91 |
|||
|
Inventory Account |
|
|
194 781.99 |
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS AS AT 31 AUGUST 2017 |
8 477 193.90 |
|||
|
TOTAL VALUE OF ASSETS AS AT 31 AUGUST 2017 |
12 948 985.53 |
|||
|
* The positive cash balance is held in a current account and the entire balance is available on call. |
(a)(b)(ii)(bbb)(bb)(bbb)
The MDB does not have unlisted investments.
SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION
See the link: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW2877-SALGA.pdf
SOUTH AFRICAN CITIES NETWORK
(a)(b)(ii)(aa)(bbb)
The valuation for current and non-current assets.
|
Current assets |
0-3 Months |
3-6 Months |
6-12 Months |
12 Months |
|
Equipment |
169,551 |
169,551 |
169,551 |
508,652 |
|
Non-current assets |
||||
|
Trade and other receivables |
4,875 |
4,875 |
4,875 |
14,625 |
|
Accrued income |
2,542,043 |
2,542,043 |
2,542,043 |
7,626,129 |
|
Cash and cash equivalent |
2,054,708 |
2,054,708 |
2,054,708.23 |
6,164,125 |
(a)(b)(ii)(bbb)(bb)(bbb)
The SACN does not have unlisted investments.
13 November 2017 - NW3265
Wilson, Ms ER to ask the Minister of Social Development
(1)With reference to her replies to questions 2018 and 2019 on 9 October 2017, in which she gives a breakdown of the number of Mikondzo events that were held in each province, as well as the associated costs and the management of the specified events by certain companies (names furnished), why do the Mikondzo events in her reply to question 2019 not correspond with the Mikondzo events for which the specified companies have been paid; (2) (a) were the Mikondzo events that were managed by the companies separate from the events laid out in her reply to question 2019 and (b) from which (i) budgeted line item and (ii) programme was the budget for the companies reflected?
Reply:
1. The difference is as a result of Mikondzo events which were held in the beginning of the financial year, before the companies were accredited. The response to Parliamentary Question 2018 indicated all the amounts paid to the accredited companies, from the date of their accreditation in June 2016 and also included one event which was held on 12 May 2017, which is in fact in the 2017/18 financial year.
The response to parliamentary question 2019 is not complete, and the amounts indicated are not accurate. I apologise for the inaccurate information submitted.
2. The Mikondzo events managed by the accredited companies were not separate to those indicated in the reply to question 2019. However, as indicated, the response to parliamentary question 2019 was not complete.
The amounts paid to the accredited companies were funded from the retained surplus within SASSA, and therefore did not reflect on the budget.
13 November 2017 - NW2978
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)With regard to the sale of rhino horns by a certain person (name furnished) during the online auction sale held from 21-24 August 2017, what is the total number of (a) permits that were issued by her department, (b) rhino horns or part thereof that were sold; (2) were any rhino horns or part thereof sold to the international community members; if not, what measures will be implemented to ensure that rhino horns or part thereof never leave the borders of the country; if so, (a) why, (b) what are the names of the buyers and/or bidders?
Reply:
(1)
(a) 1 permit to sell 264 rhinoceros horns and 7 permits to buy rhinoceros horns
(b) No horns or parts thereof
(2)
(a) As indicated above, no horns or parts thereof were sold during the auction. The following measures are in place to prevent and detect illegal activities:
- Environmental Management Inspectors (EMIs) monitor compliance to the buying permits as well as the possession permits that will be applicable to the horns. Through the permitting system we are able to track the movement of the horns and conduct inspections on a regular basis to monitor that these are horns have remained in the country;
- We have improved the ability to track the movement of rhino horn through the implementation of a national database and systems relating to the marking of rhino horn and genetic profiling;
- The Department’s Environmental Management Inspectorate (EMI) works in collaboration with other government agencies such as the South African Police Service and SARS Customs at international airports and at border posts in order to combat the illegal import and export of wildlife products. Having enforcement officials at these ports has assisted in the detection of illegal goods and identification of possible offenders and continue to do so;
- The Department’s Environmental Management Inspectorate (EMI) has been raising awareness and training border officials on initiatives focused on the Illicit International cross border movement of endangered species. This enhances our efforts to build capacity to tackle the problem;
- In 2017 we also commenced with awareness raising sessions for the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) officials protecting the South African border line to ensure that they are aware of the illegal practices related to smuggling of wildlife and that they are able to react should they encounter smugglers;
- The Department works in close co-operation with enforcement officials from neighboring countries to ensure that they are aware of possible illegal trade and that they immediately inform the department in case of any seizures of illegally traded horn and supply us with the necessary information to enable enforcement agencies to investigate;
- Accordingly, we have improved our detection capability at ports of entry and exit by increasing awareness, human capacity, technology and skills which is evident in the increased number of confiscations, arrests and convictions related to wildlife trafficking.
- Regulations pertaining to certain restricted activities involving rhinoceros horn were developed under section 97 of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004) to ensure the strict regulation of the domestic trade in rhino horn. Under section 57(2) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No.10 of 2004) specific activities will be prohibit, i.e. the shaving and powdering of rhinoceros horn of Ceratotherium simum, Diceros bicornis bicornis, Diceros bicornis minor and Diceros bicornis michaeli.
(b) Not applicable
---ooOoo---
13 November 2017 - NW3298
Mbatha, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Economic Development
Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to him are employed on a permanent basis; if not, 2. Whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
Competition Tribunal :
- The Tribunal Chairperson (CEO equivalent), Mr Norman Manoim, is employed on a 5 year contract which will end on 31 August 2019.
- The Chief Operating Officer (CFO equivalent), Ms Janeen de Klerk, is employed on a permanent contract, since 1 September 2013.
Competition Commission:
- The Commissioner- Mr Tembinkosi Bonakele, is employed on a 5 year fixed term contract for the period 20 April 2014 to 20 April 2019.
- The CFO – Mr Molatlhegi Kgauwe, is employed on a 3 year fixed term contract for the period 14 March 2016 to 14 March 2019.
ITAC:
- The Chief Commissioner (CEO equivalent), Mr Siyabulela Tsengiwe is employed on a three-year contract, which will end on 31 December 2017.
- The Chief Financial Officer position is filled on an acting basis by Ms Lebogang Bogatsu whilst a suitable candidate is being recruited.
IDC:
- The CEO, Mr Geoffrey Qhena and CFO, Ms Nonkululeko Dlamini of the IDC are both appointed on five (5) year fixed term contracts as follows:
- Chief Executive Officer appointed with effect from 1 March 2015 until 28 February 2020.
- Chief Financial Officer appointed with effect from 1 September 2015 until 31 August 2020.
-END-
13 November 2017 - NW2436
Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(1)What number of senior traditional leaders is currently recognised by Government as senior traditional leaders; (2) what amount each senior traditional leader has received in remuneration since 2012; (3) (a) what (i) movable and (ii) immovable benefits did each senior traditional leader receive in each specified year and (b) what did the costs amount to in each case; (4) whether he will make a statement about the matter?
Reply:
The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the Department, but has been sought from the Provinces. The information will be provided to the Honourable Member as soon as it becomes available.
13 November 2017 - NW2661
Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional affairs
(1)Whether any of the municipalities that were dissolved and/or amalgamated after 3 August 2016 purchased any (a) vehicles and/or (b) civil construction equipment, also referred to as yellow machines, in the 2015-16 financial year; if so, in each case, (i) which type of vehicles and/or equipment was approved by each relevant municipal council, (ii) what number of quotations were received from various suppliers, (iii) on which dates were the specified suppliers approached by each municipal council and (iv) who approached the specified suppliers; (2) Whether he will furnish Mr K J Mileham with copies of each municipal council’s resolution in this regard; if not, why not; if so, by what date; (3) What are the full relevant details of the (a) current location of each of these vehicles and/or equipment, (b) current mileage on each vehicle and/or piece of equipment and (c) asset registers that each vehicle and/or piece of equipment is recorded on?
Reply:
By way of background, the redetermination of boundaries by the Municipal Demarcation Board during 2013 and 2015 resulted in a decrease of 21 local municipalities from 278 to 257 municipalities (districts, locals and metros). These major determinations were either as a result of amalgamations or the splitting of municipalities and subsequent incorporation into neighbouring municipalities. As a result of the above, there were 26 municipalities whose boundaries were changed post the 3 August 2016 local government elections.
In preparing a response for the Honourable Member, the Departments of Cooperative Governance engaged the 26 affected municipalities through provincial departments responsible for local government.
It must be noted that even those municipalities that indicated that they had made purchases, did not supply all information as requested. The status of responses as provided to the Department is as follows:
|
No |
Name of Municipality |
1(a) Vehicles |
1(b) Yellow Machines |
1(b)(i) Type of Vehicle |
1(b)(i)(ii) Number of Quotations Received |
1(b)(i)(iii) Date when Council was approached |
1(b)(iv) Who approached Suppliers |
|
(i) |
Rand West City Local Municipality |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
|
(ii) |
The Big 5 Hlabisa Local Municipality City of Mbombela. |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
|
(iii) |
Not Applicable |
|
Not Applicable |
Information not supplied |
Information not supplied |
Information not supplied |
|
|
(iv) |
Inkosi Langalibalele Local Municipality |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
|
(v) |
Alfred Duma Local Municipality |
Toyota Fortuner. |
Information not supplied |
Information not supplied |
Information not supplied |
Information not supplied |
Information not supplied |
|
(vi) |
Raymond Mhlaba Local Municipality |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
|
vii) ( |
Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality |
Refer to attached Annexure A. |
Refer to attached Annexure A. |
Refer to attached Annexure A. |
Refer to attached Annexure A. |
Refer to attached Annexure A. |
Refer to attached Annexure A. |
|
(viii) |
Dr Beyers Naude Local Municipality |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
The following Municipalities did not submit any response:
|
NO. |
NAME OF MUNICIPALITY |
|
Umdoni Local Municipality |
|
|
Ray Nkonyeni Local Municipality |
|
|
Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma Local Municipality |
|
|
Mthonjaneni Local Municipality |
|
|
Umhlathuze Local Municipality |
|
|
City Of Mbombela Local Municipality |
|
|
Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality |
|
|
Ventersdorp/Tlokwe Local Municipality |
|
|
Dawid Kruiper Local Municipality |
|
|
Thulamela Local Municipality |
|
|
Makhado Local Municipality |
|
|
Musina Local Municipality |
|
|
Blouberg Local Municipality |
|
|
Molemolle Local Municipality |
|
|
Polokwane Local Municipality |
|
|
Fetakgomo/Greater Tubatse Local Municipality |
|
|
Modimolle/Mookgopong Local Municipality |
|
|
Lim 345 Local Municipality |
|
|
Walter Sisulu Local Municipality |
2. Yes
This information is not available at present. Copies of this information will be furnished to the Honourable Member as soon as all the information is received from each of these municipalities.
3. This information is not available at present since not all municipalities submitted the required information. A more comprehensive response in this regard will be furnished to the Honourable Member as soon as all the information is received from each of this municipalities.