Questions and Replies
12 April 2016 - NW676
De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport
(a) What (i) processes, (ii) mechanisms and (iii) procedures exist within (aa) her department and (bb) each entity reporting to her to ensure that outcomes achieved are aligned to the National Development Plan, (b) how is this being (i) monitored, (ii) measured and (iii) coordinated and (c) who are the champions for (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her respectively?
Reply:
Department
(a) (i) In July 2014, Cabinet adopted the 2014-2019 Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) to be used as a comprehensive five-year implementation plan for the NDP 2030 vision and the commitments of the governing party’s Election Manifesto. This is the process through which all plans of Government institutions across the three spheres of Government are aligned to the NDP.
(ii) The MTSF is translated into the Ministers’ Delivery Agreement with the President of the Republic of South Africa. The DoT Strategic Plan 2015 – 2020 and Annual Performance Plans are aligned with the Minister’s Delivery Agreement in order to ensure that all MTSF deliverables are budgeted for and fully implemented and monitored.
(iii) The DoT developed internal Planning, Monitoring and Reporting Guidelines, as an instrument that aims to provide minimum requirements for the achievement of deliverables as outlined in the APP of the Department. The Department initiates its planning process in May of each financial year through programme planning sessions, with the involvement of Entities and Provinces. These engagements inform deliberations of the DoT Executive Committee Lekgotla that is followed by the Department-wide Strategic Planning session. The Strategic Plan and APP are then consolidated, costed and tabled in Parliament in line with the National Treasury Framework.
(b) (i) On a quarterly basis, reporting templates are circulated to every programme to provide progress reports on all APP targets. Reports are consolidated, analysed against a prescribed criteria and interrogated against relevant supporting documents to ensure usefullness, consistency and reliability of information.
Each programme has a branch coordinator who is responsible for coordination of reporting for the entire programme. Branch coordinators provide dedicated support to their respective programmes and ensure that reporting complies with the prescripts. Once compiled, reports are quality assured by Programme Managers and submitted to the Chief Directorate: Strategic Planning & Cluster Coordination for consolidation and analysis. The report then gets interrogated at the DoT Executive Committee (EXCO), chaired by the Accounting Officer and the Strategic Management Committee (SMC) chaired by the Deputy Minister.
(ii) Reports are compiled against the DoT Annual Performance Plan and submitted on a quarterly basis and are guided by the sequence of quarterly targets as per the approved Annual Performance Plan and the approved Technical Indicator Descriptions. At all times, the reported information is supported by admissible evidence as predetermined in the Technical Indicator Description table.
(iii) Internal coordination commences with the engagements at programme level through interactions between the Chief Directorate: Strategic Planning & Cluster Coordination and respective branches. Upon consolidation of inputs, the final report is interrogated and validated by the DoT Executive Committee for reporting at the Strategic Management Committee. The Audit Committee and the Portfolio Committee on Transport receive the reports in line with their respective oversight obligations. The Report is also submitted to the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME). The Department also participates in the Outcomes Technical Implementation Delivery and Data Forums for effective Outcomes implementation. At the end of the financial year, the department compiles an Annual Report. All reports mentioned above are posted in the DoT website for public consumption.
(c) (i) The champion is the Accounting Officer, supported by Programme Managers.
Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)
(a) Airports Company South Africa SOC Ltd (ACSA) strategy process is guided by the Minister of Transport’s vision, predetermined objectives and goals which are underpinned by the National Development Plan.
(bb) In response, ACSA has aligned its strategic objectives, outcomes, outputs, focus areas and strategic initiatives to the NDP. In turn, ACSA’s Corporate Plan outlines the predetermined objectives, key performance indicators and associated targets. ACSA applies the balanced scorecard philosophy, which directs and ensures that key performance indicators cover the breadth and spectrum of its business, people, society and environment.
(b) (i) The performance monitoring process, within ACSA sits within the CEO’s Office – Strategic Planning Unit. The Group Manager: Strategic Planning is responsible for coordinating, measuring and monitoring the process.
(ii) The key performance indicators and performance narrative are tracked and monitored monthly by the Executive Committee, and quarterly reviewed by the Board Audit and Risk Sub-Committee and subsequently, at Board level.
(iii) Once approved, the quarterly report, as outlined in the PFMA, is submitted to the Department of Transport and Department of Treasury. Every quarter, after submitting the quarterly reports, the Department of Transport and ACSA meet to engage and discuss the company’s year to date (YTD) performance in relation to YTD Targets.
From an internal assurance perspective, the key performance indicators process, as it relates to performance against targets and the remedial action, are subject to a scheduled quarterly internal audit review and assurance process. The external auditor, currently the Auditor General, provides the external review and assurance of the SOC’s key performance indicators and annual performances.
(c) (ii) The Board of ACSA through the Chairman is the champion.
Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)
(a) ATNS is a schedule 2 state owned company incorporated in 1993 in terms of ATNS Company Act, Act 45 of 1993. Its mandate is to provide Air Traffic Management Solutions and associated services on behalf of the State in accordance with ICAO Standards, recommended practice as well as the South African Civil Aviation Regulations and Technical Standards.
(a) (i) and (iii) (bb) Processes and procedures
The development process of the three (3) year Corporate Plan is driven by the Departmental outcomes to demonstrate the entity’s contribution and support towards the national priorities as stipulated in the Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) and the National Development Plan (NDP).
(a) (ii) (bb) Mechanism
The quarterly performance report is intended to provide feedback on the targets set in the Performance Agreement. The quarterly report is in a form of financial and non-financial performance indicators. Reporting on both financial and non-financial performance is important in measuring the performance of entities. While financial information (expenditure and revenue) is critical for determining the costs and efficiencies of programmes/objectives/activities, non-financial information is equally important for assessing progress towards predetermined performance targets.
The DoT has identified the following seven (7) key performance areas to assess progress towards ATNS achieving its targets.
- Transport Safety and Security
- Infrastructure Development and High-Level Investment Plan for Transport
- The Fight Against Fraud and Corruption
- Environmental Protection
- Training to Contribute to Job Creation
- Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment
- Employment Equity
(b) (i) The performance report is monitored on a quarterly basis.
(b) (ii) The Key Performance Indicators are measured and evaluated in accordance with the National Treasury performance management framework. This report is compiled and submitted to the DoT in accordance to the National Treasury Guidelines on the preparation of Quarterly Reports for Public Entities and Constitutional Institutions. Treasury Regulations 29.1.3(b) and 29.1.6(a)-(j) require public entities to report on a quarterly basis to their Executive Authority.
(b) (iii) The report is coordinated through the DoT Civil Aviation Oversight directorate.
- (i) The DoT Civil Aviation Branch is the champion for the department
(ii) The office of the CEO and Strategic Optimisation departments are champions at ATNS.
South African Civil Authority (SACAA)
(a) (i) (ii) (iii)
(aa) N/A
(bb) The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) as a Schedule 3A entity submits a five year Strategy and an Annual Performance Plan to the Department of Transport in compliance with the PFMA. The development process of the Strategy and APP ensures the alignment of the SACAA Strategic Objectives to both the National Development Plan and the Department of Transport Objectives and this alignment is clearly demonstrated in the same documents.
(b) (i) (ii) (iii) On an annual basis the various draft versions of the Strategy and APP are submitted three times to the Board and DoT during August, November and January of each year for approval. The APP includes a five year delivery plan and an annual quarterly delivery plan which incorporates SMART targets and this is monitored by submitting quarterly progress reports to the Board and ultimately to the Minister of Transport indicating what was achieved and how the SACAA plans on recovering on areas where there is non-delivery. On a quarterly basis the performance against targets is audited by the Internal Audit department and at the end of the financial year by the Auditor General. A portfolio of evidence is kept to prove achievement. An account of the annual performance is also included in the Annual Report of the SACAA which is submitted to Parliament during August/September each year.
(c) (i) N/A (ii) the champions of the process is the Director of Civil Aviation and the Board of the SACAA.
Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)
Given the RSR’s legislative mandate – to oversee, promote, enforce and monitor railway safety – its strategic objectives and respective outcomes contribute to the NDP’s broader social and economic development objectives and principles; assurance is provided for the safe conveyance of commuters and freight via rail. Alignment with the NDP’s broader objectives is ensured as follows:
(a) (i) (iii) Processes and procedures:
The RSR has regular engagement sessions with the DoT’s Rail Branch throughout each financial year when formulating its medium-term strategic framework (MTSF) and Annual Performance Plans (APP). As the Shareholder Department constructive input into the formulation of its outcomes-based MTSF and ensures that the entity contributes to the country’s NDP principles and objectives. Processes and procedures for input into the MTSF are contained in the RSR’s Guide for Strategy Development, which is PFMA compliant.
(a) (ii) Mechanisms:
DoT representation in the development of the RSR’s MTSF and Board approval of the MTSF.
(b) (i) Monitoring:
The DoT and the RSR’s Board monitors alignment. Quarterly organisational performance reports are quality controlled by the Board’s Audit and Risk Committee and presented to the Board for adoption. These reports are then submitted to the DoT for performance tracking. Annual and MTSF performance scores are compiled and submitted to the DoT where the former is used to track progress and the latter is used to assess the achievement of the entity’s strategic outcomes.
(b) (ii) Measurements:
Quarterly and annual organisational performance scores are used as measuring instruments. In addition, the annual State of Safety report is used as a tool to gauge the safety of the country’s railways and rail operations.
(b) (iii) The process is coordinated by the RSR’s Office of the CEO in collaboration with the DoT’s Rail Branch and the RSR’s Board Secretariat (with respect to Board input and guidance).
(c) (ii) The RSR’s Office of the CEO (wrt strategic targets and objectives) and Research Unit (wrt the State of Safety Report) within the Office of the COO.
Ports Regulator of SA (PRSA)
(a) (bb) The PRSA uses (i) the process of incorporating the NDP into the organisation’s Annual Performance Plan (APP) and its Strategic Plan via the (ii) mechanism of the MTSF which distils the first 5 year deliverables of the NDP into action items, as well as the Minister’s Performance agreement which she has shared with entities.
The DoT uses the (iii) procedure of Quarterly reporting on performance against APP targets, fulfilling:
(b) (i) monitoring by the department, in particular the Maritime Branch
(ii) measurement as overall percentage progress on the NDP aligned APP
(iii) detailed feedback by the Department to the entity on delivery progress on APP, thus effecting coordination.
(c) (ii) CEO and CFO
South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)
- The Strategy and APP of the entity is aligned through an alignment matrix with the National Development Plan outcomes; the SONA 9 Point Plan and DoT Strategic objectives
- This is being monitored through quarterly management quality review actions; quarterly DoT oversight reporting documents to ensure APP alignment; annually through the Auditor General’s office to ensure the APP is delivering performance indicators and measures.
- The champion for SAMSA is the CEO Commander Tsietsi Mokhele.
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
(a) The process followed is as required by the PFMA in terms of the submission of the annual Corporate Plan of PRASA, a schedule 3B entity, with specific annual performance indicators and targets. The corporate plan with performance levels is presented to the Department and the Minister of Transport in February of each year. The performance levels agreed are incorporated into the Annual Shareholder Compact between the Board of PRASA and the Minister of Transport.
(b) As required by the PFMA and Treasury Regulations, PRASA reports to the Shareholder on a quarterly basis on the state of performance with reasons for variation and actions to improve performance.
(c) (ii) Chief Strategy Officer of PRASA: Mr Sipho Sithole
REPLY
(bb) Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRTA)
(a)(i)(ii)(iii) The Framework for Strategic and Annual Performance Plans guides the development of the medium term strategy and is set by the National Treasury. Therefore, (bb) the Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRTA) and), within the jurisdiction of its mandate when developing its five year Strategy (such as the 2015-2020 Strategy) has five (5) strategic outcome goals that are aligned to the National Development Plan.
(b) Monitoring is done through the use of quarterly performance reporting, which is submitted to the National Department of Transport. The submitted quarterly performance is (ii) measured against the set targets as per the approved Annual Performance Plan.
(c) Executive Managers, the CEO and the Board are the champions for the CBRTA
(bb) Road Accident Fund (RAF)
(a)(bb) To ensure that outcomes achieved by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) are aligned to the National Development Plan, the RAF’s
(i) processes, (ii) mechanisms and (iii) procedures are aligned to the Framework for Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans (the Framework) established by National Treasury to provide for: timeframes for the submission, tabling and reporting on Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans; clarification of the relationship between institutional plans, policy and budgets; details and definitions of key concepts and information to be reported on in specific sections of the Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans, placing the emphasis on performance information; and, templates that are used in drafting the Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans. Consequently, the strategic objectives and performance targets set out in the RAF’s Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans, are presented to the Department of Transport, and ties back to the National Development Plan,
(b) the outcomes achievement by the RAF in terms of its Annual Performance Plans are (i) monitored by the RAF’s Strategy, Risk and Compliance Department, Internal Audit Department and external auditors, and reported to the Board, the Department of Transport, the National Treasury and the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (ii) the outcomes are measured against the respective performance indicators set out in the approved RAF’s Annual Performance Plans, and (iii) the measurement of such outcomes are internally coordinated by the RAF’s Strategy, Risk and Compliance Department, and
(c)(ii) Executive Managers, the CEO and the Board are the champions for the RAF
(bb) Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC
- (i) The RTMC aligns its strategic planning cycle to the set National Treasury Guidelines and ensures that all applicable legislation and policies are taken into consideration during planning. Workshops are and review sessions are held to ensure alignment of RTMC strategic plans with the National Development Plan.
(ii) Standardised scorecards and performance reviews are used to as mechanisms and procedures to ensure that outcomes are aligned to the National Development Plan.
- (i) Monthly internal performance reviews and quarterly performance reports are used to monitor performance against set objectives.
(ii) Road Traffic Information is used to measure performance against set targets.
(iii) Quarterly reviews by the Management Committee and reports to the Board are used as coordinating mechanisms to ensure sustained alignment with the National Development Plan.
- (i) Executive Managers, the CEO and the Board are the champions for the RTMC
Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA);
(a)(ii) the Minister has instructed the Department to engage with the entities and identify the overlapping areas of their functional responsibilities with a view to strengthening the operations of all entities and the policy mandate of the department.
(b)(i) the department is required to provide a report on the status of the overlaps, as well as recommendations for the required interventions by the end of the second quarter of the 2016/17 financial year.
(b)(ii) the envisaged timelines for implementing the short-term interventions are the end of the 2016/17 financial year. For the long-term interventions and permanent solutions which would require the legislative amendments to the various Acts, the timelines are the 2017/18 financial year. The process is being coordinated through the office of the Deputy Director General: Roads, Transport
(c) (ii)the champion in the Road Traffic Infringement Agency is the Registrar/Chief Executive Officer.
South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL
(a) SANRAL’s Board and Management are conscious of the need to ensure the achievement of the vision of the NDP through its operations. The Board directs SANRAL strategy to enable this. SANRAL’s 6 Strategic Outcome Oriented Goals are directly aligned to 8 of the 14 MTSF outcomes, the main one being Outcome 6: An efficient, competitive and responsive economic infrastructure network. SANRAL’s mandate of the management of the national road network is encapsulated in this outcome.
(b) Monitoring, Measurement and Coordination of Performance Information
SANRAL has identified 9 Strategic Objectives to achieve the Strategic Goals. Performance to achieve the strategic objectives is monitored, measured and reported in terms of SANRAL’s Performance Management Policy. The attainment of the strategic objectives is monitored through key performance indicators within every objective. The key performance indicators have targets which must be attained annually. This is documented in SANRAL’s Annual Performance Plan (APP), which is developed every year, approved by the Board and finally approved by the Minister of Transport.
Performance is reported quarterly in the case of the majority of key performance indicators. The remainder are reported semi-annually or annually, determined by the type of indicator. The performance report is submitted quarterly to the Minister, following approval by SANRAL’s Board. This is checked by the Public Entity Oversight division of the Roads Branch in the DoT and a report is provided to the Minister of Transport.
The final performance information at the end of each financial year is audited by the Auditor General (AG) and then published in the Annual Report. Interim reports may also be audited by internal audit or the AG.
(c) SANRAL: Company Secretary
12 April 2016 - NW579
Tarabella - Marchesi, Ms NI to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
What were the legal costs incurred by each (a) local, (b) district and (c) metropolitan municipality in the 2014-15 financial year?
Reply:
The question by the Honourable member should be directed to the National Treasury. The National Treasury manages the expenditure and the budgets of municipalities in line with the provisions in the Municipal Finance Management Act. Municipalities report budgetary matters in terms of s71 of the MFMA and are best placed to respond to matters relating to budget and expenditures of all municipalities.
12 April 2016 - NW347
Maynier, Mr D to ask the President of the Republic
(1)Whether he has offered the former Minister of Finance, Mr Nhlanhla Nene, another strategic position; if not, why not; if so, (a) when was the specified person offered the position and (b) what position was he offered; (2) whether he consulted the specified person about the specified strategic position prior to being removed from the finance portfolio; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether the specified person has accepted the specified strategic position; if not, why did he reject the specified strategic position; if so, when did he accept the specified strategic position?
Reply:
- I have publicly stated on several occasions that South Africa nominated Mr Nhlanhla Nene for the position of head of the African Regional Centre of the New Development Bank, also known as the BRICS Bank. Processes to make an appointment to that position are underway under the aegis of the New Development Bank in Shanghai, China.
- See the reply to question 1 above.
- See the reply to question 1 above.
12 April 2016 - NW500
Motau, Mr SC to ask the President of the Republic
What amount was spent in respect of each case on (a) appearance fees, (b) consulting fees and (c) any other related costs to procure the services of (i) certain legal representatives (names furnished) and (ii) any other legal (aa) representatives, (bb) advisors and (cc) consultants in the Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others and Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others case, heard on 9 February 2016, in the Constitutional Court?
Reply:
The matter was recently finalized by the Constitutional Court. The process that is followed in government regarding the payment of legal fees is as follows: Counsel would submit their bills to the State Attorney. The State Attorney is required to verify the bills and effect payment. Thereafter the Bills are submitted to the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development. The Department of Justice invoices the relevant Departments for a refund, in this case, the Presidency. The Presidency will only be able to ascertain the amount spent after the above process is concluded.
12 April 2016 - NW725
Carter, Ms D to ask the President of the Republic
(1)Whether he met or was planning to meet with representatives of the different race, language and cultural groups of our country within the next 90 days to address the rapidly deepening racial polarisation in South Africa in a collective and inclusive manner and, in preparation of such a meeting, share with them up-to-date and high-quality research to facilitate dialogues and to adopt measures that would expeditiously and thoroughly help (a) address racial tension, (b) accelerate race reconciliation and nation building, (c) promote the attainment of a common national identity and (d) allow the principle of Ubuntu to manifest everywhere in the South African society; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether he will make a statement on what the Government has been doing since 2009 to deal decisively with our country’s deteriorating race relations and the consequences thereof; if not, why not; if so, what are the details?
Reply:
1. I have not met with representatives of any specific race groups to discuss the resurgence of racism in our society. The matter has been discussed at various forums where I have met with various stakeholders, but I have not called a meeting of specific race groups to discuss the matter.
As you may be aware, I declared the Human Rights Month, March 2016, as the month to focus on fighting the scourge of racism. The campaigns and programmes that were undertaken during the month culminated in the Human Rights Day event at Moses Mabhida Stadium in Durban, which had a strong focus on uniting society against racism.
2. Promoting national unity and social cohesion is a constitutional imperative. We have used every avenue to promote the unity of our people and to advance social cohesion. We have done this through the statements we have made during important National Days, and through implementing the government’s programme of transforming our country into a truly non-sexist and non-racial society.
We urge leaders of all sectors to play their part in building a non-racial society.
12 April 2016 - NW346
Maynier, Mr D to ask the President of the Republic
(1) Whether he decided to remove the former Minister of Finance, Mr Nhlanhla Nene, from the finance portfolio on 9 December 2015; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, why was he removed; (2) whether he consulted any person (a) before the removal of Mr Nene and/or (b) after the removal of Mr Nene on 9 December 2015; if not, why not, in each case; if so, (i) what is the (aa) name and (bb) designation of each specified person consulted and (ii) why were the specified persons consulted; (3) whether the decision to remove Mr Nene had any implications for the state of the economy; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;
Reply:
1. It is a matter of public record that Mr Nhlanhla Nene was relieved from his duties as a Minister of Finance on 9 December 2015. It is the prerogative of a sitting President to appoint and change members of his/her Cabinet as he deems necessary. It is the same prerogative enshrined in the Constitution that I exercised on 9 December 2015.
2. Decisions to make changes to the Cabinet are made with the best intentions and for the public interest, including the economy.
12 April 2016 - NW765
Volmink, Mr HC to ask the Minister of Health
(1)What steps has he taken to protect the public from the health risks associated with the drought that is currently affecting the country; (2) does the Government health sector currently have sufficient (a) financial and (b) human resources to address the health risks associated with the drought; if not, what steps will he take to ensure that there are sufficient resources to deal with the health risks associated with the drought; if so, (3) has a specific (a) strategy and/or (b) operational plan been developed; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
1. Drought conditions may lead to numerous short and long term human health impacts, ranging from the risks of the spread of waterborne diseases due to compromised quantity and quality of drinking water and poor sanitation and hygiene, to hunger and malnutrition due to food unavailability and security issues.
With drought conditions, it is required that integrated solutions be employed to control the threat of drought on environmental and human health. Therefore a collaborated, intergovernmental response is required to protect the public from health risks associated with the drought. The Department of Health, however, continues to employ a holistic approach to health interventions by providing preventative, promotive and curative health care services to the public for protection on human health, including the mitigation of drought conditions on human health. These services include:
- Strengthening and maintaining disease surveillance, and maintain capacity to respond to communicable diseases;
- Monitoring and activating disease outbreaks and preparedness team where outbreaks are reported;
- Health-related water quality monitoring to detect changes in water quality in collaboration with municipality and water services authorities;
- Strengthening health promotion and public education on water conservation, hygiene and emergency treatment of water and the impacts of drought on human health;
- Monitoring of infectious diseases in young children, including diarrhoea and malnutrition through the District Health Information System;
- Provision of emergency medical services;
- Increased surveillance of imported goods, especially agricultural consignments in points of entry;
- Monitor nutrition of vulnerable populations; and
- Strengthening monitoring and surveillance of environmental conditions that may constitute health hazards or risks, as a result of the drought, dust conditions, sanitation, food control, etc.
2. (a) Yes, the health sector does receive financial resources from Government to provide health services to South Africans. This includes resources for disaster preparedness.
(b) The health sector continues to ensure that adequate and skilled human resources are available in the health sector in line with the National Development Plan (NDP) priorities.
3. To ensure health sector readiness to deal with climate change impacts, the Department has developed a climate change and health adaptation plan. The plan provides a broad framework for health sector action towards climate change impacts, such as drought, and effectively guide the management of climate change impacts on health through interventions and emergency response capacity.
The health sector, in implementing the plan, continues to engage and negotiate across sectors in the interest of public health. The aim is to ensure that human health is central to planning across all sectors to improve public health and reduce vulnerability to climate change.
END.
12 April 2016 - NW779
Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(1)Whether any funding was made available in each metropolitan municipality as sponsorship for (a) sports and/or (b) cultural events in the (i) 2014-15 financial year and (ii) since 1 July 2015; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (a) which metropolitan municipality, (b) for what purpose and (c) what was the amount involved; (2) whether the return on investment was measured in each specified case; if not, why not; if so, what was the return on investment in each specified case; (3) whether any (a) councillor and/or (b) municipal official and/or (c) any family member of any (i) councillor and/or (ii) municipal official benefitted in any way from the specified sponsorships; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (aa) what action has been taken in this regard, if any, and (bb) what are the further relevant details in this regard?
Reply:
The question by the Honourable member should be directed to the National Treasury. The National Treasury manages the expenditure and the budgets of municipalities in line with the provisions in the Municipal Finance Management Act. Municipalities report budgetary matters in terms of s71 of the MFMA and are best placed to respond to matters relating to budget and expenditures of all municipalities.
12 April 2016 - NW521
Khubisa, Mr NM to ask the Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services
In view of the recent protracted strike by post office employees around the country, (a) how many post offices were part of the strike and in which provinces and districts are the post offices located and (b) how many employees in the post office joined the strike; (2) What are the relevant details of the grievances complained of by the post office employees, inter alia, salaries and working conditions; (3) Whether the specified grievances have been finally resolved; if so, what is the nature of resolutions and or settlement reached?
Reply:
SAPO has advised me as follows:
There has been no recent strike at SAPO, the last strike was in 2014.
(1)(a) 851 Post Offices (including 13 mail centres) were closed across the country at the start of the strike. In the third and fourth week 634 post offices (including 14 mail centres) and 714 post offices (including 9 mail centres) were respectively closed. The closures were mostly in the Gauteng Province followed by Western Cape and Kwa-Zulu Natal. These were mainly in; Johannesburg, Pretoria, Cape Town and Durban. The closures in other provinces were sporadic in nature.
(b) A total of 4656 employees were reported to be on strike. However the level of intimidation and violence that was experienced during the strike led to more employees not being at their workstations during the strike due to fears of intimidation and violence.
(2) The details of the grievances included:
(i) Back pay for the 2014 salary increases
(ii) Casual employees requesting full time employment with full benefits
(iii) Permanent Part time employees (flexible labour contracts) requesting full time employment
(iv) Equal work for equal pay
(v) The 588 employees that were previously dismissed due to illegal strike but then re-employed in 2013 after agreements between SAPO and labour Unions demanded re-instatement of full benefits
(3) The Minister established the National Leadership Forum at SAPO in October 2014. This was used as a platform to re-establish the engagements between representatives of the organised labour and SAPO management with the Department attending as an observer. SAPO workforce forums were subsequently established and settlement agreements reached with labour representatives taking into account SAPO’s financial situation. These agreements included:
(i) Back pay for 2014/2015 salary increases
(ii) Conversion of casual and permanent part-time workers to permanent full time employees
(iii) Equal pay for work of equal value
(iv) 2015/2016 salary increases
Of the above agreements, the conversion of the temporary employees (casuals and flexible labour contracts) to permanent employees started in 2014 in a phased-in approach but was stopped due to financial constraints. Other settlements agreements were not honoured altogether due the entity’s continued constrained cash-flow position as the entity battled to recover financially post the strike action.
12 April 2016 - NW591
Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether, with reference to his reply to question 4259 on 21 December 2015; his department has received the outstanding information from the metropolitan municipalities; if not, why not; if so, when will the information be made available as requested?
Reply:
The requested information is yet to be received from the Metropolitan Municipalities. We are however, making efforts to follow-up on it and the Honourable Member will therefore be updated on progress.
12 April 2016 - NW902
Mbatha, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Higher Education and Training
(1)Has he earned any additional income from businesses, in particular businesses doing work for the Government, since his appointment as Minister; if so, (a) when, (b) how much did he earn, (c) from which businesses and (d) for what work; (2) whether his (a) spouse, (b) children and (c) close family earned income from businesses, in particular businesses doing work for the Government, through his appointment as Minister; if so, in respect of each case, (i) when, (ii) how much did each earn, (iii) from which businesses and (iv) for what work?
Reply:
(1) No
(a) - (d) Not applicable
(2) No
(a) - (c) Not applicable
COMPILER/CONTACT PERSONS:
EXT:
DIRECTOR – GENERAL
STATUS:
DATE:
QUESTION 902 APPROVED/NOT APPROVED/AMENDED
Dr BE NZIMANDE, MP
MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
STATUS:
DATE:
12 April 2016 - NW830
Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Police
Whether, with reference to his undertaking in his reply to question 3950 on 2 December 2015, he has provided to Parliament (a) the list of shortlisted candidates for the filling of the vacancy for the Head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation and (b) copies of their respective curricula vitae; if not, why not; if so, by when?
Reply:
Due to the court challenge relating to the appointment of the Head: DPCI which is currently before the High( Gauteng North).The list of shortlisted candidates and their curriculam vitae will be delivered to Parliament once that process is finalized.
12 April 2016 - NW355
Bhanga, Mr BM to ask the Minister of Basic Education
What was the (a) salary and (b) performance bonus of each public school principal in 2015?
Reply:
What was the (a) salary and (b) performance bonus of each public school principal in 2015?
(a) The table below shows a summary of Principal annual and monthly basic salary. The annual and monthly salaries are summarised by the level of a principal and the number of principals on each salary notch. This is a summary of the position as at December 2015.
Annual Basic Salary (R) |
Monthly Basic Salary (R ) |
Number of Principal per level (level is determined by size of the school) |
||||||
Principal P1 |
Principal P2 |
Principal P3 |
Principal P4 |
Principal P5 |
Principal S1 |
Grand Total |
||
123 000 |
10 250 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
162 516 |
13 543 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
164 157 |
13 680 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
169 113 |
14 093 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
170 814 |
14 235 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
179 532 |
14 961 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
188 673 |
15 723 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
190 569 |
15 881 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
194 400 |
16 200 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
196 335 |
16 361 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
198 297 |
16 525 |
2 |
2 |
|||||
200 478 |
16 707 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
202 476 |
16 873 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
206 547 |
17 212 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
208 620 |
17 385 |
2 |
2 |
|||||
212 811 |
17 734 |
4 |
4 |
|||||
214 929 |
17 911 |
2 |
2 |
|||||
217 074 |
18 090 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
219 258 |
18 272 |
4 |
4 |
|||||
221 445 |
18 454 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
223 674 |
18 640 |
3 |
3 |
|||||
228 165 |
19 014 |
5 |
5 |
|||||
230 445 |
19 204 |
3 |
3 |
|||||
232 752 |
19 396 |
4 |
4 |
|||||
235 077 |
19 590 |
3 |
3 |
|||||
237 420 |
19 785 |
5 |
5 |
|||||
239 790 |
19 983 |
4 |
4 |
|||||
242 169 |
20 181 |
6 |
6 |
|||||
244 617 |
20 385 |
8 |
8 |
|||||
247 062 |
20 589 |
3 |
3 |
|||||
249 528 |
20 794 |
2 |
2 |
|||||
252 012 |
21 001 |
2 |
2 |
|||||
254 541 |
21 212 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
257 082 |
21 424 |
8 |
8 |
|||||
259 650 |
21 638 |
4 |
4 |
|||||
262 254 |
21 855 |
8 |
8 |
|||||
264 885 |
22 074 |
4 |
4 |
|||||
267 531 |
22 294 |
108 |
4 |
112 |
||||
270 195 |
22 516 |
43 |
5 |
48 |
||||
272 904 |
22 742 |
87 |
5 |
92 |
||||
275 622 |
22 969 |
65 |
8 |
73 |
||||
278 397 |
23 200 |
53 |
5 |
58 |
||||
281 157 |
23 430 |
27 |
1 |
28 |
||||
283 986 |
23 666 |
20 |
1 |
21 |
||||
286 815 |
23 901 |
5 |
5 |
|||||
289 698 |
24 142 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
||||
292 581 |
24 382 |
36 |
1 |
37 |
||||
297 114 |
24 760 |
21 |
21 |
|||||
300 087 |
25 007 |
21 |
1 |
22 |
||||
303 105 |
25 259 |
37 |
1 |
38 |
||||
306 111 |
25 509 |
72 |
4 |
76 |
||||
309 189 |
25 766 |
113 |
2 |
115 |
||||
312 267 |
26 022 |
84 |
4 |
88 |
||||
315 396 |
26 283 |
72 |
3 |
75 |
||||
318 543 |
26 545 |
69 |
814 |
4 |
887 |
|||
321 723 |
26 810 |
71 |
405 |
4 |
480 |
|||
324 957 |
27 080 |
66 |
566 |
4 |
636 |
|||
328 203 |
27 350 |
50 |
397 |
1 |
448 |
|||
331 494 |
27 625 |
41 |
395 |
1 |
437 |
|||
334 809 |
27 901 |
19 |
235 |
1 |
255 |
|||
338 163 |
28 180 |
19 |
98 |
1 |
118 |
|||
341 538 |
28 462 |
9 |
76 |
85 |
||||
344 946 |
28 746 |
11 |
95 |
106 |
||||
348 384 |
29 032 |
12 |
69 |
81 |
||||
351 870 |
29 323 |
9 |
107 |
116 |
||||
355 410 |
29 618 |
6 |
95 |
101 |
||||
358 956 |
29 913 |
6 |
132 |
138 |
||||
359 655 |
29 971 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
362 547 |
30 212 |
5 |
291 |
296 |
||||
366 159 |
30 513 |
7 |
419 |
1 |
427 |
|||
369 810 |
30 818 |
9 |
390 |
399 |
||||
373 524 |
31 127 |
12 |
432 |
444 |
||||
377 259 |
31 438 |
10 |
409 |
1 |
420 |
|||
381 027 |
31 752 |
4 |
404 |
691 |
1099 |
|||
384 831 |
32 069 |
4 |
341 |
376 |
721 |
|||
388 683 |
32 390 |
6 |
288 |
538 |
832 |
|||
392 574 |
32 715 |
5 |
203 |
480 |
1 |
689 |
||
396 510 |
33 043 |
5 |
149 |
393 |
547 |
|||
400 464 |
33 372 |
4 |
194 |
332 |
530 |
|||
404 451 |
33 704 |
3 |
142 |
100 |
245 |
|||
408 528 |
34 044 |
7 |
111 |
47 |
165 |
|||
412 596 |
34 383 |
5 |
110 |
62 |
177 |
|||
416 721 |
34 727 |
5 |
131 |
59 |
195 |
|||
420 894 |
35 075 |
3 |
156 |
123 |
282 |
|||
427 413 |
35 618 |
50 |
59 |
109 |
||||
431 691 |
35 974 |
37 |
91 |
128 |
||||
435 993 |
36 333 |
52 |
194 |
246 |
||||
440 364 |
36 697 |
35 |
267 |
477 |
779 |
|||
444 753 |
37 063 |
64 |
391 |
315 |
1 |
771 |
||
449 205 |
37 434 |
21 |
353 |
326 |
700 |
|||
453 714 |
37 810 |
4 |
319 |
336 |
659 |
|||
458 223 |
38 185 |
1 |
7 |
335 |
244 |
587 |
||
462 819 |
38 568 |
6 |
371 |
182 |
559 |
|||
467 448 |
38 954 |
13 |
299 |
48 |
360 |
|||
472 128 |
39 344 |
1 |
10 |
238 |
22 |
1 |
272 |
|
476 835 |
39 736 |
7 |
187 |
29 |
223 |
|||
481 602 |
40 134 |
13 |
151 |
38 |
202 |
|||
486 432 |
40 536 |
13 |
110 |
53 |
176 |
|||
491 301 |
40 942 |
14 |
107 |
42 |
163 |
|||
496 206 |
41 351 |
6 |
87 |
62 |
155 |
|||
501 168 |
41 764 |
11 |
78 |
101 |
190 |
|||
506 178 |
42 182 |
12 |
49 |
115 |
176 |
|||
511 245 |
42 604 |
10 |
49 |
154 |
213 |
|||
516 348 |
43 029 |
8 |
42 |
181 |
231 |
|||
521 517 |
43 460 |
7 |
49 |
196 |
252 |
|||
523 788 |
43 649 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
526 743 |
43 895 |
10 |
79 |
231 |
320 |
|||
531 999 |
44 333 |
11 |
52 |
218 |
281 |
|||
537 324 |
44 777 |
2 |
26 |
231 |
1 |
260 |
||
542 688 |
45 224 |
4 |
191 |
65 |
260 |
|||
548 112 |
45 676 |
1 |
4 |
172 |
47 |
224 |
||
553 614 |
46 135 |
6 |
88 |
45 |
139 |
|||
559 134 |
46 595 |
1 |
5 |
53 |
58 |
117 |
||
564 738 |
47 062 |
1 |
2 |
19 |
40 |
62 |
||
570 378 |
47 532 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
45 |
58 |
||
576 078 |
48 007 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
9 |
21 |
||
581 838 |
48 487 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
18 |
||
587 646 |
48 971 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
2 |
20 |
||
593 541 |
49 462 |
3 |
11 |
2 |
16 |
|||
599 460 |
49 955 |
1 |
8 |
2 |
11 |
|||
605 460 |
50 455 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
||||
611 517 |
50 960 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
11 |
|||
617 637 |
51 470 |
11 |
12 |
23 |
||||
623 793 |
51 983 |
3 |
19 |
22 |
||||
630 033 |
52 503 |
3 |
28 |
31 |
||||
636 330 |
53 028 |
1 |
28 |
29 |
||||
642 702 |
53 559 |
2 |
26 |
28 |
||||
649 149 |
54 096 |
19 |
19 |
|||||
655 635 |
54 636 |
2 |
20 |
22 |
||||
662 178 |
55 182 |
1 |
18 |
19 |
||||
668 814 |
55 735 |
4 |
4 |
|||||
675 501 |
56 292 |
3 |
3 |
|||||
682 236 |
56 853 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
768 762 |
64 064 |
1 |
1 |
|||||
Grand Total |
1 354 |
8 086 |
7 226 |
4 216 |
501 |
170 |
21 553 |
Source: PERSAL
(b) The current performance management dispensation for school-based educators does not provide for a performance bonus.
12 April 2016 - NW716
Lekota, Mr M to ask the President of the Republic
(1)Whether, with reference to his address at the opening of the House of Traditional Leaders on 3 March 2016 wherein he stated that the very law that we have today regarding land restitution is lopsided against black persons, he has instructed his Executive to act immediately to rectify the specified law, informed by a new policy, so that both black persons and current land owners who are not black know exactly (a) how the Government intends to resolve the matter of land claims once and forever and (b) in what period of time; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant (i) details and (ii) time frames; (2) whether he will make a full statement on how the Government will radically increase the pace and the extent of land reform so that the aspirations of black persons are met and restitution is completed
Reply:
1. What I said when I addressed the National House of Traditional Leaders is that a vast number of black people in South Africa had already been dispossessed of their land when the Natives Land Act was passed in 1913. I then asked a question whether in view of this fact it made sense to have 1913 as the starting date for land restitution.
By posing the question mentioned above I was not saying the existing policy on land restitution in no longer operational. Should there be a need for a change of policy in this area, proper procedures of policy development will be followed, which will include consulting important stakeholders in the sector.
2. The pace of land reform has been very slow. One of the major contributors has been the matter of property valuations, which resulted to some landowners pricing the land under consideration for land redistribution very high. It is for this reason that we submitted to Parliament the Property Valuation Bill, which Parliament subsequently passed into law. One of the provisions of the Property Valuation Act is the establishment of the Office of the Valuer-General, which is tasked with the responsibility of valuating property that has been identified for expropriation and land reform purposes.
It is our belief that the establishment of this office will assist in accelerating the pace of land reform.
12 April 2016 - NW678
Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
How many persons were suspended with full pay in (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her, excluding the Passenger Rail Agency of SA, in the (aa) 2012-13, (bb) 2013-14 and (cc) 2014-15 financial years, (b) what amount was paid to each of the specified persons in each of the specified entities in each month in each of the specified financial years, (c) what were the reasons for (i) the suspensions, (ii) suspending the persons with full pay and (iii) the delays in resolving the suspensions in each case respectively and (d) what steps is she taking to resolve these suspensions?
Reply:
Department
a) How many persons have been suspended with full pay within (i) her department.
(aa) 2012/13 – None
(bb) 2013-14 – 1 X DDG for 10 months. The value for the duration is R983 851.49
(cc) 2014-15 financial years – Five (05) employees to the value of R1 015 228.91
- 2 Deputy Directors-General (3 Months and 15 days)
- 1 Director (3 months and 20 days)
- 1 Deputy Director (3 months and 20 days)
- 1 Assistant Director (4 months and 10 days)
(b) in each specified case, what (i) is the value of these payments for each month by her department
2013/2014 FINACIAL YEAR |
||
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES |
MONTH |
VALUE OF PAYMENTS |
One employee |
May 2013 |
R0 |
June |
R77 356.42 |
|
July |
R94 116.98 |
|
August |
R94 116.98 |
|
September |
R153 559.29 |
|
October |
R94 116.98 |
|
November |
R94 116.98 |
|
December |
R94 116.98 |
|
January 2014 |
R94 116.98 |
|
February |
R94 116.98 |
|
March |
R94 116.98 |
|
TOTAL |
R 983 851.49 |
|
2014/2015 FINACIAL YEAR |
||
Employee 1 |
April 2014 |
R138 386.61 |
TOTAL |
R138 386.61 |
|
Employee 2 |
July 2014 |
R118 521.91 |
August 2014 |
R124 311.78 |
|
September 2014 |
R53 130.51 |
|
TOTAL |
R295 964.20 |
|
Employee 3 |
October 2014 |
R27 974.57 |
November 2014 |
R70 907.76 |
|
December |
R70 907.76 |
|
January |
R70 907.76 |
|
February |
R23 312.74 |
|
TOTAL |
R264 010.00 |
|
Employee 4 |
October 2014 |
R16 478.74 |
November 2014 |
R41 769.04 |
|
December 2014 |
R41 769.04 |
|
January 2015 |
R41 769.04 |
|
February 2015 |
R13 732.29 |
|
Total |
R155 518.14 |
|
Employee 5 |
October 2014 |
R36 545.71 |
November 2014 |
R37 020.79 |
|
December 2014 |
R37 020.79 |
|
January 2015 |
R37 020.79 |
|
February 2015 |
R13 741.90 |
|
Total |
R161 349.96 |
|
Grand Total – 2014/15 |
R1 015 228.91 |
(c) what were the reasons for (i) these suspensions,
The officials committed serious allegations of misconduct that warranted precautionary suspension.
(ii) reasons for suspending the persons with full pay
Precautionary suspension is always with full pay in terms of Chapter 7, clause 2(b) of the Senior Management Service Handbook and clause 7.2 of the Disciplinary Code and Procedure (Resolution 1 of 2003).
(iii) the delay in resolving the suspension in each case respectively
The complexity of the investigations is the cause of the delay.
(d) what steps is she taking to resolve these suspensions?
All the above-mentioned cases were resolved.
Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)
(a)(ii) The Airports Company South Africa, placed employees under suspension with full pay pending investigation and possible disciplinary action during the financial years under review as follows:
(aa) 2012/13
During the period under review, nine (9) employees were placed under suspension with full pay for the average period of approximately three (3) months (92 days). The total value of the salaries paid to the nine (9) employees during the period under review for suspension with full pay amounted to R 286 889.90.
All cases were concluded, with outcomes reached within set timeframes of investigation, resolution and finalization of such matters.
(bb) 2013/14
During the financial year under review, nineteen (19) employees were placed on suspension with full pay for the average period of approximately three (3) months (95 days). The total amount of salaries paid to the nineteen (19) employees during the period of suspension under review amounted to R 880 462.11
All cases were concluded, with outcomes reached within set timeframes of investigation, resolution and finalization of such matters.
(cc) 2014/15
During the financial year under review, thirty four (34) employees were placed under suspension with full pay for the average period of below three (3) months (77 days). The total amount of salaries paid to the thirty four (34) employees during the period under review of suspension with full pay amounted to R 2 298 887.60
All cases were concluded, with outcomes reached within set timeframes for investigation, resolution and finalization of such matters.
(c)(i) and (ii) Reasons for suspension and disciplinary action during the requested review period
The reasons for suspensions to facilitate investigation and conclusion of matters during the period under review were many and varied as reflected in the list below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Conclusion of disciplinary action during the requested review period
All of the suspensions with full pay for the three (3) sets of financial years have been finalised and there were no delays in the investigation and finalisation of disciplinary processes. Outcomes of majority of the disciplinary processes mainly resulted in decisions of:
- Dismissal
- Acquittal and
- Final written warnings
(d) Solution for the reduction of suspensions with full pay
A benchmark has been set for resolution of suspensions with full pay within a period of three (3) months. Suspension of employees with full pay will be used as an action of last resort in deserving cases of serious financial and criminal misconduct. While some suspensions with full pay may be longer than others, the average period of three months (3) will be the guiding principle.
South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)
- (i) N/A (ii) the South African Civil Aviation Authority suspensions are listed below for (aa) there were none, for 2012/13, (bb) there were none for 2013/14, and (cc) for 2014/15 as per table below. (ii) (aa) (bb) (iii) and (iv) are stated in the table below.
Name Department |
No. of days suspended |
Reasons for suspension |
Payment value of suspension in rand per month |
Delay and Reasons |
Action taken to resolve the matters |
Accident and Incident Investigation Division |
90 days |
Serious misconduct relating to misrepresentation of qualifications |
R59,782.76 x3 months R179.348.28 |
No delay* |
An internal disciplinary process was undertaken and the employee was dismissed. |
Air Safety Operations Division |
90 days |
Serious Misconduct unethical conduct when doing inspection and audit. |
R70,654.22 x 3 months R211,962.66 |
No delay* |
An internal disciplinary process was undertaken and the employee was dismissed. |
Air Safety Operations Division |
90 days |
Serious misconduct relating to conflict of interest and contravention of Civil Aviation Act, section 98. |
R51,442.43 x 3 months R154,327.29 |
No delay* |
The employee resigned before the disciplinary hearing was held. |
Air Safety Operations Division |
14 days |
Serious misconduct relating to conviction on criminal case. |
N/A |
No delay* |
An internal disciplinary hearing was conducted and the charges against the employee were dismissed by the Chairperson of the hearing. |
Air Safety Operations Division |
120 days |
Serious misconduct relating misrepresentation of flying experience. |
R97,707.48 x 4 months R390,829.92 |
Under the control of external investigations. |
An internal disciplinary process was undertaken and the employee was dismissed. |
Air Safety Operations Division |
150 days |
Serious misconduct relating to misrepresentation of qualifications. |
R57,258.57 x 5 months R286,292.85 |
Some delay experienced during festive holidays. |
An internal disciplinary process was undertaken and the employee was dismissed. |
Total |
R1,222,761.00 |
Footnote: * means that the suspension was within the SACAA Disciplinary Management Policy.
Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)
Department |
Date Suspended |
Date Suspension Uplifted Termination |
Value of payment per month |
Total of payment whilst on suspension |
Reason for Suspension |
Reason for Delay in resolving matter |
What is being done to resolve |
Reason for suspension with full pay |
2012/2013 |
||||||||
ATNS |
25 September 2012 |
24 December 2012 |
R56 767.00 |
R163 307.00 |
KPMG Audit – Whistle blowing matter |
Matter was dealt with as expedient as possible taking the audit into consideration. |
Matter concluded |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
ATNS |
31 August 2012 |
14 September 2012 |
R20 833.33 |
R10 575.00 |
Gross Insubordination |
Non availability of internal qualified Chairman. |
Matter concluded. |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
ATNS |
25 September 2012 |
24 December 2012 |
R72 399.00 |
R211 618.00 |
KPMG Audit Whistle blowing matter |
Matter was dealt with as expedient as possible taking the audit into consideration. |
Matter concluded. |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
ATNS |
28 March 2013 |
1 August 2013 |
R153 333.00 |
R634 561.00 |
Gross Insubordination |
External legal team appointed based on seniority. |
Matter concluded. Employee dismissed. |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
2013/2014 |
||||||||
ATNS |
4 July 2013 |
5 September 2013 |
R128 808.00 |
R271 466.00 |
Gross dishonesty |
External legal team appointed due to seniority of employee. |
Matter concluded. |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
ATNS |
13 March 2014 |
25 July 2014 |
R80 424.00 |
R357 004.00 |
Gross Insubordination |
External legal team appointed due to the seniority of the employee. |
Matter concluded |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
2014/2015 |
||||||||
ATNS |
16 May 2014 |
31 October 2015 |
R111 435.00 |
R1 950 958.07 |
Whistle Blower on allegations of racism, discrimination, intimidation and victimisation of black employees. |
Extensive internal disciplinary hearing finalised. |
Matter Concluded. Employee resigned before finalization of disciplinary hearing. |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
ATNS |
16 May 2014 |
25 September 2015 |
R94 350.00 |
R1 557 411.00 |
Whistle Blower on allegations of racism, discrimination, intimidation and victimisation of black employees. |
Extensive internal disciplinary hearing finalized.
|
Matter Concluded. Employee dismissed. |
According to the Labour Relations Act, a suspension preceding a disciplinary hearing is a preventative suspension and must always be with full pay |
Ports Regulator of South Africa
The Ports Regulator has never suspended any of its employees since starting operations in 2007.
South African Maritime Safety Authority ( SAMSA)
- (ii)
Number of persons suspended |
Number of months person suspended |
Amount p/m |
Reasons for suspension |
Why Suspension with full pay? |
Reasons for delays in resolving the matter |
What are the Steps to resolve the matter? |
2012-13 |
||||||
1 |
3 months |
R69 141.49 |
Misconduct |
Precautionary suspension |
CCMA process took long |
Resolved |
2013-14 |
||||||
1 |
1 month |
R28 818.12 |
Misconduct |
Precautionary suspension |
Hearing process |
Resolved |
2014-15 |
||||||
1 |
3 months |
R70 616.58 |
Misconduct |
Precautionary suspension |
Investigation |
Matter referred to the Labour Court |
1 |
6 months |
R18 853.99 |
Misconduct |
Precautionary suspension |
Sick leave by staff member & initiator |
Matter resolved |
Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)
ii. (aa) No persons were suspended during the 2012-13 reporting period.
ii. (cc) 2014/15 FINANCIAL YEAR
NO. OF PERSONS |
REASONS FOR SUSPENSION |
PERIOD OF SUSPENSION |
MONEY PAID DURING SUSPENSION |
1 |
Gross dishonesty, Financial misconduct, Insubordination and Breach of Duty of Trust. |
Four months |
R388, 700,96 |
1 |
Misconduct |
One month |
R42, 316 |
TOTAL |
|||
2 |
R431,016.96 |
||
(bb) 2013/14 FINANCIAL YEAR |
|||
NO. OF PERSONS |
REASONS FOR SUSPENSION |
PERIOD OF SUSPENSION |
MONEY PAID DURING SUSPENSION |
1 |
Misconduct |
One month |
R81, 433,50 |
1 |
Misconduct |
Two months |
R46, 474,64 |
TOTAL |
|||
2 |
R127, 908,14 |
(b)(iv) All the suspensions were conducted in compliance with the RSR’s Disciplinary Policy, which makes allowances for suspensions with full pay.
Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRTA)
(a)(ii) The CBRTA in the (aa) 2012-13 (bb), 2013-14 (cc) 14-15 financial years (b) suspended a total of eight (8) persons as outlined in the schedule of suspensions table listed below. (b) The amount was paid to each of the specified persons in each month in each of the specified financial years, (c) the reasons for (i) the suspensions and (iii) the delays in resolving the suspensions in each case respectively are all provided in the table below.
Position |
(aa)(bb)(cc)Financial years |
Period |
(c)(i) (ii) Reason for suspension |
(c)(iii) Delay in resolving these matters |
(b) Monthly amount paid |
|
HR Generalist |
FY12/13 |
FY12/13 |
November 2012 - January 2013 Suspended for 65 days |
Alleged Misconduct. Recruitment process not followed for appointment of new hires. Verbal offers of employment extended before requisite approval. |
The matter was not delayed. The suspension was uplifted and an informal disciplinary hearing was conducted. |
R 36,744 |
Chief Road Transport Inspector |
FY12/13 |
FY13/14 |
February 2013 – April 2013 Suspended for 65 days |
Alleged misconduct. Making use of employer's resources for personal benefit. Leave without authorisation |
The matter was not delayed. Disciplinary hearing was conducted. |
R 38,133 |
Senior Manager Human Resources |
FY13/14 |
FY13/14 |
March 2013 – April 2013 Suspended for 43 days |
Alleged Misconduct. Unprofessional conduct, fraudulently changing performance score, failure to carry out responsibilities with recruitment of Road Transport Inspectors |
The matter was not delayed, the employee resigned pending disciplinary enquiry |
R 66,371 |
Position |
(aa)(bb)(cc)Financial years |
Period |
(c)(i) (ii) Reason for suspension |
(c)(iii) Delay in resolving these matters |
(b) Monthly amount paid |
|
Senior Manager Law Enforcement |
FY 13/14 |
FY 14 / 15 |
November 2013 – November 2014 Suspended for 260 days |
Alleged misconduct. Gross Insubordination, unruly behaviour, gross negligence |
Delays with investigations due to unavailability of witnesses due to work pressures as well as year-end closure. |
R 75,467 |
Executive Manager: Human Resources & Administration |
FY13/14 |
FY14/15 |
February 2014 - July 2014 Suspended for 108 days |
Allegations of misconduct - Gross dereliction of duty, gross insubordination, and gross negligence |
Matter delayed by changes to external investigators. Finally a settlement agreement was entered into |
R 110,933 |
Executive Manager: Facilitation & Industry Development |
FY14/15 |
FY14/15 |
May 2014 - November 2014 Suspended for 130 days |
Allegations of misconduct - Gross insolence and undermining authority of superior |
The matter was not delayed. After further investigations, the matter was partly heard. The employee requested a settlement agreement |
R 131,098.50 |
Position |
(aa)(bb)(cc)Financial years |
Period |
(c)(i) (ii) Reason for suspension |
(c)(iii) Delay in resolving these matters |
(b) Monthly amount paid |
|
Senior Data Administrator |
FY14/15 |
FY15/ 16 |
July 2014 – May 2015 Suspended for 216 days |
Allegations of misconduct - Frequent late-coming, Repeated absence without permission, Abscondment/desertion, Gross insubordination |
Suspension and hearing delayed on account of repeated failure by employee to respond to acknowledge receipt and/or to respond to disciplinary documentation, failure to attend the inquiry. |
R 31,951 |
Position |
(aa)(bb)(cc)Financial years |
Period |
Reason for suspension |
Delay in resolving these matters |
Monthly amount paid |
|
Senior Manager Information Technology |
FY14/15 |
FY15/ 16 |
October 2014 – July 2015 Suspended for 216 days |
Allegations of misconduct - Intended fraud. |
Investigations into the alleged misconduct were lengthy and required extended time. |
R 79,679 |
(d)Mitigation against future costs related to employee suspensions:
The C-BRTA developed and adopted Management Guidelines for Employee Suspensions (as attached) that line management will now use when considering suspensions. The overall effect is that to date employee suspensions have become minimal and where there is a need to isolate an employee from operations while investigations are underway, the employee is placed in other non-related roles to best derive equitable value for the salary earned.
Road Accident Fund (RAF)
- (ii) The Road Accident Fund (RAF), who employs over 2500 people, suspended with full pay (aa) 9 employees in 2012-13, (bb) 20 employees in 2013-14, and (cc) 10 employees in the 2014-15 financial years,
- the value of the matters for each month in each financial year are:
(aa) 2012-13 |
(bb) 2013-14 |
(cc) 2014-15 |
|
April |
R 76 000.00 |
R 160 000.00 |
R 420 000.00 |
May |
R 45 000.00 |
R 215 000.00 |
R 465 000.00 |
June |
R 85 000.00 |
R 255 000.00 |
R 420 000.00 |
July |
R 85 000.00 |
R 245 000.00 |
R 450 000.00 |
August |
R 75 000.00 |
R 225 000.00 |
R 420 000.00 |
September |
R 90 000.00 |
R 125 000.00 |
R 550 000.00 |
October |
R 55 000.00 |
R 100 000.00 |
R 550 000.00 |
November |
R 30 000.00 |
R 205 000.00 |
R 430 000.00 |
December |
R 58 000.00 |
R 175 000.00 |
R 320 000.00 |
January |
R 92 000.00 |
R 200 000.00 |
R 130 000.00 |
February |
R 70 000.00 |
R 300 000.00 |
R 130 000.00 |
March |
R 70 000.00 |
R 420 000.00 |
R 130 000.00 |
- (i) the reasons for the suspensions, which relate to anything from misconduct to fraud, are to manage the risk of the employee to interfering with witnesses and/or evidence; where the continued presence of the employee presents a threat to life or property; or where the employee’s presence will have a disruptive effect on other employees, (ii) the CCMA and Labour Court generally consider suspension without pay an unfair labour practice, therefore the RAF Disciplinary Policy provides for the suspension of an employee on full pay in the aforementioned instances, (iii) delays in resolving the matters may be experienced due to any one or more reasons, including ongoing investigations that must be completed; the employee getting sick; CCMA referrals for unfair labour practices; and, requests for legal representation and determination, which if granted, impacts on the time taken to conclude hearings, and
- in order to resolve future matters the RAF is amending its Disciplinary Policy to curb the maximum period for which an employee may be suspended on full pay and requiring the employee be charged no later than one month after the suspension.
Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC)
(ii) Road Traffic Management Corporation
(aa) 2012 - 2013 = five (5) employees
(bb) 2013 – 2014 = Five (5) Employees
(cc) 2014 – 2015 = One (1) Employees
- 2012-2013
Employee |
Monthly salary |
No. 1 |
R 18 421.39 |
No. 2 |
R 13 961.89 |
No. 3 |
R 10 815.07 |
No. 4 |
R 35 980.71 |
No.5 |
R 14 383.92 |
2013-2014
Employee |
Monthly salary |
No. 1 |
R 38 565.30 |
No. 2 |
R28 490.88 |
No. 3 |
R 35 256.08 |
No. 4 |
R 14 171.32 |
No.5 |
14 383.92 |
2014-2015
Employee |
Monthly salary |
No. 1 |
R 35 256.08 |
- (i) The reasons for the suspension were that the acts of misconduct were very serious and another reason was to conduct the investigation free from possible interference by the employees, in terms of paragraph 9.2 (i) & (ii) of the Disciplinary Code and Procedures of the Corporation
(ii) The suspension of this kind is with full pay in terms of paragraph 9.2 (b) of the Disciplinary Code and Procedures of the Corporation.
(iii) The delays were caused due to the investigation which took longer than we expected. Charges are informed by the Investigation report and therefore if finalization of the investigation delays, then the process of charging the employee/s delays.
(d). As soon as the employee is suspended, processes will be put in place to ensure that the investigation unfolds immediately without any delay. This will ensure that there are no unnecessary delays in the finalization of cases and suspensions.
Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA)
|
||
2012/13 |
2013/14 |
2014/15 |
None |
None |
1 |
- R 261 541.15 for the period September 2014 to February 2015
Gross salary per month:
September 2014- R39 401.44
October 2014- R39 401.44
November 2014- R39 401.44
December 2014- R39 401.44
January 2015- R64 533.97
February 2015- R39 401.44
- Reason for suspension
- Misconduct;
- The suspension was with full pay; and
- A lengthy disciplinary process was undertaken and the employee was given a final written warning
- The disciplinary hearing concluded the process.
South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)
None of the South African National Roads Agency (SOC) Ltd (SANRAL) staff members were suspended during the years under review
12 April 2016 - NW593
Mhlongo, Mr TW to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether, with reference to his reply to question 4092 on 8 December 2015, his department has received the outstanding information from the metropolitan municipalities; if not, why not; if so, when will the information be made available as requested?
Reply:
The requested information from Metropolitan Municipalities is yet to be received and the efforts are being made to follow up on them. The Honourable Member will therefore be updated on progress.
12 April 2016 - NW439
Malema, Mr J to ask the President of the Republic
(1)Whether he intends to redeploy the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs to the Ministry of Economic Development; if not, (2) whether he has found that the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs has the appropriate experience to deal with the crisis that exist in local government?
Reply:
- I appointed the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs in terms of section 91(2) of the Constitution of South Africa, 1996.
12 April 2016 - NW608
Carter, Ms D to ask the President of the Republic
Whether, in line with his undertaking during the State of the Nation Address on 11 February 2016 to create political and policy certainty, and in line with the statement by the Presidency on 29 February 2016, he will articulate his full and unstinted support for the Minister of Finance and the fiscal consolidation that the Minister is seeking to achieve; if not, why not in each case; if so, what unambiguous and full statement is he willing to make for investors, rating agencies and the business community?
Reply:
I appointed the Minister of Finance because I have confidence in his ability to execute his responsibilities. The fiscal consolidation programme he announced in the Budget Speech was developed collectively by the Cabinet and is fully supported by the Cabinet.
12 April 2016 - NW626
Gardee, Mr GA to ask the President of the Republic
Has the Minister of Finance made any recommendations of potential candidates for the position of Commissioner of the SA Revenue Service?
Reply:
DRAFT REPLY
There is a sitting Commissioner of SARS, so there is no need to look at potential candidates when there is no vacancy.
12 April 2016 - NW449
Lekota, Mr M to ask the President of the Republic
(1)Whether, in view of the great necessity to have policy certainty in these dire economic times, he had canvassed various organisations (details furnished) to obtain their total and unreserved support for the (a) eight points he and the business leaders with whom he had been meeting in February 2016 had agreed to, (b) National Development Plan and (c) rapid elimination of convoluted bureaucracy impeding the functioning and expansion of small businesses; if not, why not; if so, what are the details of the agreements with each of the various organisations; (2) whether he will make a statement on his commitment to creating a business-friendly climate to prove that South Africa was indeed open for business?
Reply:
- The National Development Plan is supported by the vast majority of South Africans and many important stakeholders in our society. Government, working together with other societal sectors, is implementing the NDP through the Medium Term Strategic Framework. The meeting with the captains of industry in February 2016 reached a decision that the eight points you have alluded to in the question will be processed by a joint government-business task lead led by the Minister of Finance and the Chairperson of the board of Telkom, Mr Jabu Mabuza.
- I have said on many occasions that South Africa is open for business. This is the same message the South African delegation took to the World Economic Forum in Davos in January this year. Recently the Minister of Finance led a South African delegation of government, business and labour leaders on an international tour meeting with investors to communicate the message that South Africa is open for business and investment. I have also established an Inter- Ministerial Committee which I chair to look at ways in which investment can be attracted to our country and to remove obstacles to investments.
12 April 2016 - NW231
Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Basic Education
Has her department awarded any contracts to companies indirectly or directly owned by certain persons (names furnished) in the (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 and (c) 2014-15 financial years; if so, in each specified financial year, (i) how many times were such contracts awarded and (ii) for what amount?
Reply:
The Department did not award any contract to Atul, Ajay and Rajesh Gupta during the (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 and (c) 2014-15 financial years.
12 April 2016 - NW680
Hunsinger, Dr CH to ask the Minister of Transport
Whether the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa has undertaken any (a) research and/or (b) cost analysis into the use of the locomotive manufacturers that Transnet SOC Ltd uses for the acquisition of new locomotives; if not, why not; if so, (i) what (aa) research and/or (bb) cost analysis were undertaken in this regard, (ii) by whom and (iii) what were the outcomes in each case?
Reply:
(a)(b) PRASA has not undertaken any specific research or cost analysis into the use of locomotive manufacturers that Transnet uses in the acquisition of new locomotives. PRASA will only embark on such exercise when it is ready to procure additional locomotives for the long-distance rail service and this will be done through a market engagement process with the locomotive manufactures.
(i)(aa)(bb) See above.
(ii) See above.
(iii) See above.
12 April 2016 - NW729
Maynier, Mr D to ask the President of the Republic
(1)Whether any meeting took place where he (a) in line with his power to appoint Ministers and Deputy Ministers in accordance with section 91(3) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and/or (b) any (i) member, (ii) employee and/or (iii) close associate of the Gupta family allegedly offered the Deputy Minister of Finance, Mr Mcebisi H Jonas, (aa) the position of Minister of Finance and/or (bb) any financial inducements to accept the specified position offered; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, in each specified case, (aaa) what are the names of the persons whom the Deputy Minister met, (bbb) when and (ccc) where did each such meeting take place and (ddd) what are the relevant details of each specified meeting; (2) whether the Deputy Minister reported the (a) meeting(s) and/or (b) offer(s) of inducement; if so, in each specified case, (i) to whom and (ii) when was it reported;
Reply:
- I am unaware of such a meeting taking place except for the public statement that was recently made by the Deputy Minister of Finance.
11 April 2016 - NW757
Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration
(1)Whether all training offered to public servants takes place through the National School of Government (NSG); if not, why not; if so, what are the details of the training offered by the NSG that is indeed mandatory; (2) whether specific training has been identified as appropriate for each position or grade within the public service; if not, (a) who decides what training should be carried out, (b) according to what guidelines and (c) who is responsible for quality assurance of training that is selected and offered; if so, what are the relevant details of such training; (3) whether any competency tests or assessments are performed within the public service to measure the effectiveness of training; if not, (a) why not and (b) how is it determined that any particular training is effective or otherwise; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether (a) his department and (b) the Public Service Commission recommend training offered through the NSG as an appropriate mechanism to improve performance where performance weaknesses are identified; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
- Yes. Not all training offered to public servants takes place through the National School of Government. There is no regulation that mandates departments to send public servants to the National School of Governement to be trained.
Mandatory training programmes are the Compulsory Induction Programmes (CIP) for newly appointed public servants from salary levels 1 to 16 as per the Directives issued by the Minister for Public Service and Administration namely;
(a) Amendments to the Directive on the Implementation of the Compulsory Induction Programme (CIP) in the public service, April 2015
(b) Directive on Compulsory Capacity Development, Mandatory Training Days and Minimum entry requirements for Senior Management Services (SMS).
(i) CIP 1-12 focuses on newly appointed public servants on salary levels 1 to 12. This CIP 1-12 is divided into two programmes, namely CIP 1-5 and CIP 6-12 with dedicated focus on the unique requirements of knowledge, skills, values and competencies that is relevant and responsive at these salary levels respectively.
(ii) CIP 13-14 focuses on newly appointed public servants on salary levels 13 and 14, namely Directors and Chief Directors. These programmes focus on the unique requirements of knowledge, skills, values and competencies that are relevant and responsive at these salary levels.
(iii) CIP 15-16 or the Executive Inductive Induction Programme (EIP) focuses on newly appointed public servants on salary levels 15 and 16, namely Deputy-Director Generals and Director-Generals. This programme focuses on the unique requirements of knowledge, skills, values and competencies that are relevant and responsive at these salary levels.
2. Yes. All the training programmes are focused on a specific target group or salary level of public servants.
(a) The department that identified the training needs decides what training should be carried out.
(b) The guidelines that inform the training programmes are the Learning Provision Cycle and the Learning Programme Design Matrix. The Learning Provision Cycle provides the strategic framework for planning, design, development, approval, delivery and monitoring and evaluation of the training programmes. The Design Matrix provide the specific guidelines with regard to the specific/enabling outcomes, assessment criteria, learning statements, assessment activities, and related critical cross filed outcomes to ensure integration of learning.
(c) The National School of Government is responsible for the quality of training that is selected and offered. It does this using its Quality Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Systems. The Quality Management System involves the Quality Management System Policies with accompanying implementation toolkits. The Monitoring and Evaluation processes include the 100% monitoring of all NSG programmes, regular on-site visits and evaluation reports as well as application or learning studies focusing on selected National School of Government programmes.
3. (a) Every training programme has assessment requirements to ensure the effectiveness of training.
(b) Training is monitored and evaluated on a regular basis. The National School of Government conducts evaluations of the training programmes and the application of learning thereof in the workplace to establish (i) whether training is achieving its intended objectives and (ii) whether training is resulting in expected changes in the workplace; and if so, what these changes mean to the public.
4. (a) The National School of Government is continually analysing the Report on National Skills Development Strategy of South Africa from the Human Resource Development Council of South Africa, and also the Workplace Skills Plans of departments, in order to recommend training offered through the NSG as an appropriate mechanism to improve performance where performance weaknesses are identified;
(b) The Public Service Commission has released reports on the “State of the Public Service” as well as reports such as “ Assessing the effectiveness of training provided by PALAMA in improving skills and competencies of public service leadership with a view to inform curriculum development by the National School of Government, September 2014” . The recommendations provided in these AMPAT reports inform the training offered through the NSG as an appropriate mechanism to improve performance where performance weaknesses are identified.
11 April 2016 - NW720
Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether he has gone to (a) Ga-Rankuwa or (b) any other area where violent protests were taking place at present, in the period since his appointment to his new post, to (i) bring fed-up protesters and slack local government authorities together around a table to address long simmering community grievances quickly, effectively and efficiently and (ii) protect the image of South Africa in the face of a regular showing on TV screens around the world that South Africa was a violent and dangerous country with ordinary people being at odds with local government and angry at national government for not being responsive and caring; if not, why not; if so, what has he achieved through his direct involvement in resolving the long-simmering dispute at GaRankuwa or anywhere else where protests have recently been flaring up because of unresolved grievances?
Reply:
(a) No, the Minister has not visited Ga-Rankuwa.
(b) The Minister visited the Tlokwe Local Municipality, since his appointment.
(i)
The Minister has taken steps to address community grievances. These include:
• Ensuring that the department continues to implement the Back-to-Basics (B2B) programme that addresses challenges in the local government sphere
• Directing the department's provincial 828 coordinators to focus on areas where violent protests are taking place, to address community grievances;
(ii) The City of Tshwane is involved in addressing concerns raised by the residents of GaRankuwa.
The Back to Basics provincial teams have identified municipalities where violent protests are taking place and are working at resolving the challenges in these municipalities.
The teams report back to the Minister regularly.
11 April 2016 - NW798
Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Police
(1)(a) How many incidents of taxi violence-related shootings have been reported in each province from 1 January 2011 up to the latest specified date for which information is available, (b) how many of the investigations into the specified incidents have been solved, particularly where murder actually occurred, (c) (i) what are the reasons for the investigations that remain unsolved and (ii) what actions he undertook to ensure that the unsolved cases reach their full conclusion to fight what appears to be organised crime in the taxi industry; (2) whether he has put any mechanisms in place to combat taxi violence-related shooting incidents in the future; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
Province |
(1)(a) |
(1)(b) |
(1)(c)(i) |
(1)(c)(ii) |
(2) |
Mpumalanga |
38 |
37 |
One (1) investigation is still active (ongoing). |
|
|
Free State |
8 |
6 |
Four (4) warning statements are outstanding. One (1) docket is at the DPP for a decision. |
|
|
Eastern Cape |
2 |
1 |
One (1) investigation is still active (ongoing). The accused is deceased. Suspected that more perpetrators are involved. |
|
|
Northern Cape |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
North West |
6 |
5 |
One (1) investigation is still active (ongoing) because the suspect is still unknown. |
|
|
Province |
(1)(a) |
(1)(b) |
(1)(c)(i) |
(1)(c)(ii) |
(2) |
KwaZulu-Natal |
66 |
20 |
Forty six (46) investigations are still active (ongoing) because a break-through has not been made. |
|
|
Guateng |
153 |
38 |
One hundred and fifteen (115) investigations are still active (ongoing) because a break-through has not yet been made due to:
|
|
|
AXI VIOLENCE CONTINGENCY
Province |
(1)(a) |
(1)(b) |
(1)(c)(i) |
(1)(c)(ii) |
(2) |
Western Cape |
85 |
30 |
Fifty five (55) Investigations are still active (ongoing). |
|
|
Limpopo |
1 |
0 |
One (1) investigation is still active (ongoing). |
N/A |
|
11 April 2016 - NW305
Ross, Mr DC to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether each metropolitan municipality offers any support to neighbourhood watch initiatives; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case? (2) whether there were any disruptions of service or late removal of waste as a result of a failure by any municipality since 1 January 2015; if so, (a) what were the causes and (b) how has this been addressed?
Reply:
The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the Department. The Department thus made a request to Metropolitan Municipalities to provide the relevant information. Information was received from the following Metropolitan Municipalities:
BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY
The BCMM does not offer any support to neighbourhood watch initiatives other than the BCMM Law Enforcement Services and Traffic Services.
CITY OF TSHWANE
The functions of the Tshwane Metro Police include Crime Prevention, By-Laws and Road Policing. The Crime Prevention and Social Crime Prevention Units do assist neighbourhood watches as and when needed. Tshwane is divided into Regions and Regional Policing offices attend meetings at South African Police Stations whereby the community is assisted through the Community Police Forum Meetings.
MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY
Not applicable
NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (NMBMM)
Metro Police not yet established. The SAPS currently provides support to neighbourhood watch initiatives.
11 April 2016 - NW586
Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether, with reference to his reply to question 4236 on 21 December 2015, his department has received the outstanding information from the Tlokwe City Local Municipality; if not, why not; if so, when will the specified information be made available as requested?
Reply:
The following response is based on information received from legal services at Tlokwe Local Municipality:
(a)(i) Total amount spent on legal fees for 2013-14 financial year |
(b) Breakdown of the specified amounts (2013-14 financial year) |
(a)(ii) Total amount spent on legal fees for 2014-15 financial year |
(b) Breakdown of the specified amounts (2014-15 financial year) |
||
Month |
Amount |
Month |
Amount |
||
R 8 890 840.36 |
July |
R 402 187.14 |
R 4 237 194.63 |
July |
R 476 318.83 |
August |
R 591 972.78 |
August |
R 178 640.36 |
||
September |
R 637 242.16 |
September |
R 775 808.30 |
||
October |
R 874 365.14 |
October |
R 296 796.00 |
||
November |
R 390 942.12 |
November |
R 143 550.39 |
||
December |
R 1555 722.59 |
December |
R 258 000.00 |
||
January |
R 140 226.23 |
January |
R 731 770.23 |
||
February |
R 559 686.80 |
February |
R 371 386.63 |
||
March |
R 956 695.62 |
March |
R 381 521.70 |
||
April |
R 656 578.95 |
April |
R 23 689.34 |
||
May |
R 1 157 336.92 |
May |
R 525 803.29 |
||
June |
R 967 883.91 |
June |
R 100 909.56 |
11 April 2016 - NW702
Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) With reference to a certain publication that is based in Cape Town (name furnished), which was allocated R839 000,00 in 2011 and thereafter R490 000,00 in 2012, (a) how was the costing done for the specified funding in each case and (b) what is the printing cost for the magazine which sells at R24,95; (2) whether the specified magazine, which sells 8000 copies per month, is considered a successful project according to the Media Development and Diversity Agency’s funding criteria, given that the magazine is supported by local advertisements in almost a third of the magazine; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) (a) All project applicants submit their business plans and requested budgets. After engagement with MDDA Project Staff members through on site assessment, a needs analysis is conducted with the applicants, this entails interrogating each budget line item and a recommended budget is decided based on that need analysis. Below is the costing for 2011 and 2013 funding to Treasure Magazine:
2011
Item description |
Quantity |
Cost |
Printing |
10 000 copies @ R 70,100.00 (bi monthly, 64 pager, full colour) x 6 annually |
R 420, 600.00 |
Distribution |
10 000 @ R 3,000.00 (bi monthly, 64 pager full colour) x 6 annually |
R 18, 000.00 |
Software – in design |
@ R8,000.00 |
R 8,000.00 |
Public Relations & Promotions |
@ R 2,000.00 per month x 12 |
R 24,000.00 |
Email & internet connection |
@ R500.00 per month x 12 |
R 6,000.00 |
Website developer and hosting |
@ R 1,000.00 per month x 12 |
R 12,000.00 |
Photo & Illustration |
@ R 2,000.00 per issue x 6 |
R 12,000.00 |
Bank charges |
@ R 400.00 per month x 12 |
R 4,800.00 |
Stipends |
1 x Journalists @ R 5,500.00 per month x 12 |
R 66,000.00 |
1 x Layout & Graphic Designer @ R6,500.00 x 6 editions |
R 39,000.00 |
|
Publisher @ R 8,500.00 x 12 |
R 102,000.00 |
|
1 x Marketing and Sales Officer @ R 5,500.00 per month x 12 |
R 66,000.00 |
|
1 x sub-editor @ R 8,500.00 per edition x 6 |
R 51,000.00 |
|
Audit & Accounting fees |
Once off |
R 10,000.00 |
Total |
R 839,400.00 |
2013
Item Description |
Quantity |
Costs per month |
Total Costs |
Printing |
10 000 copies @ R72,400.00 (bi monthly) x 6 editions |
R 72,400.00 |
R 434,400.00 |
Distribution |
10 000 copies @ R 2,000.00 (bi monthly)x 6 editions |
R 2,000.00 |
R 12,000.00 |
Bank Charges |
12 months |
R 400.00 |
R4,800.00 |
Telecommunications |
12 months |
R2, 000.00 |
R24,000.00 |
Audit Fee |
Once off |
R 14,800.00 |
R 14,800.00 |
Total Budget |
R490,000.00 |
- (b) The printing costs are reflected on the costing above as quoted by Paarlcoldset printers in Cape Town
- The MDDA funding criteria is embedded in Section 3 of the MDDA Act of 2002. Treasure Magazine meets all the objects as stipulated in the Act and therefore a successful project established and managed by a black young woman. The MDDA measures the success of each supported project based on its sustainability which is driven by the publication’s ability to generate revenue through advertising and other promotion, sales and marketing activities. A magazine that sells 8000 copies can per month be deemed to be successful if it has managed to generate enough advertising that will enable it to continue printing, cover all its operational costs including staff retention.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
11 April 2016 - NW649
Mokause, Ms MO to ask the Minister of Human Settlements
(1)With reference to a certain person (name and details furnished) from Ventersdorp in Ward 6 who applied and was approved for a housing subsidy but had her building material taken away after it was delivered because her ID number was linked to two beneficiaries, what is the process of verification of ID numbers when a subsidy is linked to two beneficiaries; (2) is a certain councillor (name furnished) allowed to sell RDP housing subsidy material?
Reply:
(1) A verification search against the Housing Subsidy System (HSS) as at 13 March 2016, indicates that the person referred to by the Honourable Member does not appear as a subsidy applicant or as an approved beneficiary of a state housing subsidy on the HSS. The North West Provincial Department of Human Settlements has since confirmed this finding. This implies that a subsidy application for the ID number provided was not captured on HSS to date or a subsidy application was not completed by the person or household to access a government housing subsidy.
In terms of the verification of ID numbers when processing applications for housing subsidies, there are set Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that are followed before an application is captured on the system before being approved to benefit from a housing subsidy. A subsidy is linked to a household (applicant and / or spouse) and a specific site. The ID numbers (applicant/spouse/dependants) indicated on a subsidy application form is captured on HSS against a specific site number as contained in the deed of sale and specific project.
The captured application is then verified to ensure that the details on the application form have been captured correctly on HSS. The verified application is then submitted for searches via an automated process on the ID against other databases including the Population Register in the Dept. of Home Affairs, and the Deeds Register, in the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, as well as the Department Audit Database to ensure that the applicant did not previously benefit from a state housing subsidy.
The application is tagged for approval only if it passes all the aforementioned verification and search processes.
(2) In respect of the alleged selling of housing subsidy material by the named councillor, the Department of Human Settlements views such activity in a serious light, and will investigate and take appropriate steps based on the findings when the full and exact details, including documentary or other evidence relating to such activity are provided and obtained by the Department.
11 April 2016 - NW797
Cardo, Dr MJ to ask the Minister of Economic Development
What progress has been made in assessing the application that was submitted to the International Trade Administration Commission (ITAC) of South Africa in December 2015 for a grain tariff review?
Reply:
Maize:
Grain SA submitted an application for an increase in the dollar based reference price for maize in December 2015. ITAC engaged with stakeholders and solicited comments from 25 interested parties. ITAC staff is now evaluating the application. The preliminary submission will be submitted to the Commissioners of ITAC during the Commission meeting of May 2016 for consideration.
Wheat:
Wheat tariffs are determined by a variable tariff formula based on US dollars. At the request of producers, when the conditions were met for an upward tariff trigger, ITAC applied the formula and tariff increases were accordingly applied. This resulted in an increase of customs duties on wheat from 91.12c/kg to 122.43c/kg and wheaten flour from 136.68c/kg to 183.65c/kg.
However, in light of the drought, the current exchange rate and the impact on food prices, government has requested a review of the variable import duty formula to ensure that consumer needs are properly taken into account.
-END-
11 April 2016 - NW535
Lovemore, Ms AT to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration
With reference to his department’s Budget Vote speech on 13 May 2015, what are the full relevant details of the progress made to date with his department’s commitments to (a) address gaps in efficiency and effectiveness of measures through improving performance measurement instruments in the 2015-16 financial year, (b) strengthen both the (i) Head of Department evaluation system and (ii) performance management system for all employees to ensure service quantity outputs and service quality outcomes are met and that the Government gets value for money and (c)(i) justify the number of employees recruited to the senior management level and (ii) review the post provisioning norms in order to ensure optimal utilisation of employees and personnel spend?
Reply:
(a) The Department of Public Service and Administration has undertaken a systemic review and revision of the performance management and development systems (PMDS) applicable to all levels of staff. The focus of the exercise was to align organisational performance with employee performance whilst also bringing administrative efficiency to the processes. These revisions have been consulted extensively with national departments and provincial administrations as well as at various Public Service Consultative forums
(b) (i) Heads of Department (HODs) Evaluation system is at an advance stages of finalization for approval, with increased focus on departmental programme performance, performance against the Annual Performance Plan and the audit findings and opinions of the Auditor-General. The policy is in the final stages of consultation for concurrence with the Presidency and the Public Service Commission before being tabled at Cabinet for approval.
(ii) On a similar vein, the department has structured revised performance management and development systems for each of the other levels of the Senior Management Service (SMS), which will be communicated and implemented subject to the approval of the HOD PMDS.
In addition, as per Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC) Resolution 1 of 2012, the department has crafted revisions to the Employee Performance and Development System (EPMDS) for non-SMS staff. These revisions have been published in the Government Gazette: 3 August 2015, Notice 800 of 2015 as part of the Draft Public Service Regulations, 2015: Invitation for public comment. The department has received comments which are being processed for finalisation and submission for approval.
(c) (i) Since the powers to perform organisational review and redesign process are decentralized to departments. The competency of Executive Authorities regarding the internal organisation of departments is exercised within the Norms and Standards issued by the Minister for Public Service and Administration (MPSA). The MPSA gives effect to the organisational design Norms and Standards through the Public Service Act (PSA), 1994, the Public Service Regulations (PSR) (2001), Guidelines, Directives and Frameworks.
Furthermore, the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) for example, has recently conducted a study on the Minimum Norms and Standards for the provisioning of SMS posts for provincial administrations, which is calculated on citizen segmentation factors, geographic accessibility and spatial norms, reasonable minimum span of control and the complexity of the job role.
(ii) The Norms and Standards will also assist in determining an ideal split between how many SMS posts as a maximum should be located at a national level and how many SMS posts should be located at a provincial level. Furthermore, the MPSA has issued a Directive on the process to coordinate the grading of an entire occupational category or certain level within an occupation category that is utilised by more than one department. The aim of the Directive is to ensure consistence in the provision and grading of posts.
11 April 2016 - NW686
America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Communications
(a)What are the anticipated total costs of (i) producing and (ii) installing the 5 million subsidized Set-Top Boxes (STBs), (b) How much funding has been approved by the National Treasury in the Medium Term Expenditure Framework in this regard and (c) from which (i) departmental votes and/or (ii) other government sources will this be drawn?
Reply:
(a) The anticipated total costs of producing and installing the 5 million subsidized STBs, as appropriated, is R2.45 billion.
(b) Over the MTEF period the National Treasury has allocated R1.1 billion.
(c) The funds will be drawn from the Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services’ vote.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
11 April 2016 - NW590
Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether, with reference to the reply to question 4251 on 21 December 2015, he has received the outstanding information from the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality; if not, why not; if so, when will this information be made available?
Reply:
The following information was provided by the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality:
- (a) and (b) The Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality has indicated that it approached Rand Water regarding the installation of the telemetry system at all of its reservoirs. At present, the final draft of the service level agreement between the Municipality and Rand Water for the installation of the telemetry system at all of the Municipality’s reservoirs is with Rand Water for formalisation.
- (a) According to the Municipality, an amount of R8 million is available in the current financial year to commence with the work. The design of the system is complete. The data loggers are expected to take six months to install the system at all of the Municipality’s reservoirs. Further phases in the next financial year would include the completion of the integration of the Municipality and Rand Water control rooms as well as the installation of the telemetry to control the reservoir valves. (b) The Municipality has indicated that the first phase will take six months to complete.
11 April 2016 - NW315
Topham , Mr B to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
For each metropolitan municipality, how many commercial, industrial and residential building plan submissions were made in the: (a) 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years; (b) How many building plan submissions were approved by each specified municipality in the (a) 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years; (c) What is the response time to acknowledge receipt of building plans; (d) How long does it take to finalise building plan submissions?
Reply:
1. The following table represents commercial, industrial and residential building plan submissions per Metro in the 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years
Building Plans:2013-14 |
||||
Metro |
Commercial |
Industrial |
Residential |
Total |
City of Tshwane |
94 |
97 |
12 323 |
12 514 |
Ekurhuleni |
50 |
190 |
5062 |
5302 |
City of Johannesburg |
104 |
72 |
11977 |
12153 |
City of Cape Town |
330 |
7904 |
8234 |
|
Nelson Mandela Bay |
95 |
86 |
7734 |
7915 |
Buffalo City |
83 |
96 |
2461 |
2640 |
Mangaung |
45 |
17 |
2283 |
2345 |
eThekwini Municipality |
927 |
408 |
9618 |
10953 |
Building Plans:2014-15 |
||||
Metro |
Commercial |
Industrial |
Residential |
Total |
City of Tshwane |
128 |
87 |
12 883 |
13 098 |
Ekurhuleni |
33 |
241 |
5382 |
5656 |
City of Johannesburg |
41 |
79 |
12963 |
13083 |
City of Cape Town |
353 |
8985 |
9342 |
|
Nelson Mandela Bay |
87 |
94 |
9530 |
9711 |
Buffalo City |
84 |
86 |
2370 |
2540 |
Mangaung |
35 |
24 |
2069 |
2108 |
eThekwini Municipality |
1363 |
601 |
12740 |
14704 |
2. The following table represents building plans that were approved by each municipality in the (a) 2013-14 and (b) 2014-15 financial years
Municipality |
YEAR |
|
2013-14 |
2014-15 |
|
City of Tshwane |
10 654 |
9 554 |
Ekurhuleni |
4550 |
5272 |
City of Johannesburg |
11247 |
11934 |
City of Cape Town |
8407 |
9859 |
Nelson Mandela Bay |
2475 |
3724 |
Buffalo City |
2314 |
2207 |
Mangaung |
3083 |
2173 |
eThekwini Municipality |
5748 |
6044 |
3. The table below represents the time indicated by each metro on the response time to acknowledge receipt of building plans
Municipality |
Response time to acknowledge receipt of Building Plans |
City of Tshwane |
Application is acknowledged as soon as it is received and the necessary fees are paid. |
Ekurhuleni |
Upon submission and payment of necessary fees. |
City of Johannesburg |
Upon receipt and payment of necessary fees. |
City of Cape Town |
Application is acknowledged as soon as it is received and necessary fees are paid. |
Nelson Mandela Bay |
Upon submission the application is issued with an invoice. |
Buffalo City |
1 week |
Mangaung |
Immediately after submission and payment of the requisite building plan fees. |
eThekwini Municipality |
Immediately on submission and payment of the prescribed tariff where applicable. |
4. The information below represents response time each municipality takes to finalise building plan submissions.
Municipality |
Time taken to finalise Building Plan Submissions |
City of Tshwane |
Building Plans 500m² and less: 30 days Building Plans 501m² and more: 60 days |
Ekurhuleni |
|
City of Johannesburg |
As per the legislated time period, namely 30 days for building plans smaller that 500m² and 60 days for plans larger than 500m². |
City of Cape Town |
Building Plans 500m² and less: 30 days Building Plans 501m² and more: 60 days |
Nelson Mandela Bay |
Eight (8) days from date of submission if application has all necessary supporting documents |
Buffalo City |
22 days |
Mangaung |
The general norm is as per the legislated time period, namely 30 days for building plans smaller that 500m² and 60 days for plans larger than 500m². In most cases Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality complies. |
eThekwini Municipality |
In terms of timeframes expressed as a percentage the performance has been 98.1% (2013/14) and 99.9% (2014/15). |
11 April 2016 - NW628
Matshobeni, Ms A to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture
(1). What (a) has he found to be the cause of the state of decline in quality in our national archives and (b) is he doing to improve the situation which has been degenerating for the past six years with proper filing and recording of our history?
Reply:
1(a). The National Archives has been operating at the same level of professionalism and dedication since 1994. Additional functions have been added to the work of the National Archives. These new services/activities include the provision of access to information in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information (PAIA) Act, Act No 2 of 2000, the implementation of Oral History programmes, the provision of policies, the guidelines, procedures and management of Electronic Records Management and Digitisation programmes.
(b). The National Archives is charged with the responsibility of managing government records through its records management unit and having custody of all national records through the National Archives Repository. The filing plan of the National Archives is up to date and properly implemented.
Through Oral History Programmes and projects implemented by the National Archives in partnership with other stakeholders including the Oral History Association of South Africa (OHASA), the National Archives is systematically recording histories of different communities throughout the country. This is in line with section 3(d) of the National Archives and Records Service Act, Act 43 of 1996 as amended, which refers to the collection of non-public records with enduring value of national significance which cannot be more appropriately preserved by another institution with due regard to the need to document aspects of the nation's experience neglected by archives repositories in the past.
11 April 2016 - NW596
Sithole, Mr KP to ask the Minister of Human Settlements
(a) What amount has been budgeted by her department for the renovation of the Thokoza Hostel in Durban and (b) what are the relevant details of when the renovation (i) will start and (ii) is envisaged to be completed?
Reply:
The Thokoza Hostel is situated in the Gauteng Province and falls within the jurisdiction of the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality.
(a) The budget allocated for the 2015/16 financial year was R19 730 000.00. This was for the provision of temporary residential units, for accommodation of residents pending the redevelopment. The budget allocated for the 2016/17 financial year is R61 000 000.00, this funding is for the demolition of the existing buildings as well as for the installation of engineering services up to phase one of the development.
(b) The hostel comprises of forty-one (41) hostel blocks in a dormitory formation, which were deemed not suitable for human habitation and will be demolished and replaced by three storeys of Community Residential Units. These three storeys will yield two thousand, six hundred and twenty one (2621) units.
(i) & (ii) Tenders for demolition of the existing buildings and installation of services were advertised during March 2016. This project will consist of seven phases and will be implemented in a phased approach over a period of approximately eight (8) years subject to the availability of the required funding.
11 April 2016 - NW791
Redelinghuys, Mr MH to ask the Minister of Health
(1) How many ambulances are currently (a) operational and (b) not operational at the Odi District Hospital in Mabopane Gauteng; (2) whether there are any plans to acquire additional ambulances for use by the specified hospital; if not, why not; if so, (a) how many ambulances will be acquired and (b) what are the timeframes in this regard; (3) what are the average waiting times at the specified hospital for (a) trauma patients classified as (i) green, (ii) yellow and (iii) red, (b) out-patients referred from clinics waiting to see a doctor, and (c) out-patients for an appointment to see a doctor?
Reply:
(1) (a) and (b)
The number of ambulances indicated below serve Mabopane, Ga-rankuwa, Winterveldt and Soshanguve. These ambulances are stationed next to Odi Hospital and serve Odi and Dr George Mukhari Hospitals, all clinics, all Community Health Centres in the Northern Sub-district of Tshwane including house calls.
Type of Vehicles |
Number of Allocated Vehicles |
Number Operational |
Number Not Operational |
Ambulances |
13 |
8 |
5 at workshop |
Obstetrics Vehicle |
2 |
1 |
1 at workshop |
Response Vehicle |
2 |
2 |
0 |
Planned Patient Transport |
4 |
2 |
2 at workshop |
Rescue Vehicle |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Logistic Vehicle |
1 |
0 |
1 at workshop |
TOTAL |
23 |
14 |
9 |
(2) (a) Approval has been granted for 7 ambulances to be procured in the 2016/2017 financial year, i.e. 2 Obstetrics and 5 Ambulances. The new ambulances will replace ambulances identified for disposal and to add to the existing fleet.
(b) Ambulance procurement will be completed by the second quarter of 2016/2017.
(3) The average waiting time is as follows:
(a) (i) trauma - green - 57 minutes
(ii) trauma – yellow - 18 minutes
(iii) trauma - red - 13 minutes
(b) OPD referred from clinics - 65 minutes
(c) OPD follow up - 48 minutes
CHALLENGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF WAITING TIMES
- There is is a general population growth in the surrounding areas.
- Odi District Hospital serves both Gauteng and North West communities and the communities are growing.
- There are a growing number of self-referrals, hence the OPD overflows daily and this affects waiting time.
- There is no regional or tertiary hospital between Odi and DGMA hospital, hence referral to a higher level becomes a challenge and the hospital is required to manage the many patients it cannot refer.
- Patients are reluctant to use the nearby clinics and return to the hospital despite being referred to their respective clinic.
- Most patients with chronic conditions come to the hospital after hours to use the Emergency Centre instead of the OPD during the day; hence the higher patient load and impact on the Emergency Centre.
- Patients with chronic conditions who attend the Emergency Centre after hours complain about long waiting time because acutely ill or injured patients are given priority attention.
- Turnover of clinical and nursing staff is high as they are attracted to higher level hospitals or resign due to pension and this also impacts negatively on waiting time.
- Space in the Emergency Centres and OPD is limited due to infrastructural challenges. Consulting rooms are few so patients cannot be accommodated in comfort while waiting.
END.
11 April 2016 - NW860
Dlamini, Ms L to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)What incentives have Eskom and her department put in place to encourage legal use of electricity and discourage electricity theft beside the threats to criminalise illegal use; (2) what (a) amount is Eskom losing in revenue as a result of electricity theft (b) is the breakdown of the amount in each province?
Reply:
(1) There are no incentives provided to encourage the legal use of electricity. Eskom makes use of the Operation Khanyisa Campaign to inform and educate customers about how to better manage electricity usage.
(2)(a) We assume all non-technical energy loss to be attributed to theft. Non-technical losses in Eskom amounted to R4.7bn for 2014/15 FY.
(b) The amount stated in (2)(a) above represents the collective loss across all provinces. Eskom estimates non-technical losses at a national level, a breakdown per province therefore not available.
11 April 2016 - NW704
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) What are the legal costs to be paid by the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) after the High Court in Pretoria set aside ICASA`s approval of the transfers of Neotel`s operating and spectrum licenses to Vodacom; (2) whether any steps will be taken against the persons responsible for (a) meeting allegedly unlawfully with Vodacom and (b) taking alleged unlawful decisions with regard to the transfer of Neotel`s operating and spectrum licenses to Vodacom; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) The legal costs to be paid by ICASA are yet to be determined. The full extent of these costs will only be determined upon taxation by the Taxing Master of the High Court. In terms of the Court Order the taxed costs are to be borne jointly and severally by ICASA, Vodacom and Neotel.
(2) The court found that meetings conducted between ICASA and Vodacom, without the participation of all interested parties, were improper and unlawful in that they were impermissible in respect of a public process and that gave credence to the suspicion of bias. As a result the court concluded that ICASA’s decision is hereby reviewed and set it aside.
Kindly be informed that the Minister is currently in a process of obtaining the relevant information pertaining to the transfer of Neotel`s operating and spectrum licenses to Vodacom. Therefore, once ICASA submits all the information that the Minister requested, the Minister will be able to assess the matter and take the necessary and appropriate steps.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
11 April 2016 - NW592
Mhlongo, Mr TW to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs:
Whether, with reference to his department's reply to question 4097 on 8 December 2015, his department has received the outstanding information from the Tlokwe Local Municipality; if not, why not; if so, when will the information be made available as requested?
Reply:
The following information was provided by the Tlokwe Local Municipality:
Below is the response regarding the amounts spent by Tlokwe Local Municipality on print media, radio, television, online and outdoors during the 2014/15 financial year and since July 2015:
Amount spent and purpose on advertising by Tlokwe Local Municipality for 2014/15
(a) Print Media
(i) Local Community Newspapers
MEDIA |
PURPOSE |
COST |
Mooivaal Media |
The purpose of the advertisements was to inform the communities about public meetings relating to progress on |
11 959 |
lzindwe Marketing |
82 100 |
|
lzindwe Marketing |
service delivery and unexpected interruptions to services |
29 000 |
Total |
123 059 |
Please find here: (ii) National Magazines
11 April 2016 - NW863
Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Public Service and Administration
For each national department, what amount was spent on training for (a) Senior Management Service (SMS) members and (b) employees occupying grades lower than those qualifying for the SMS in the (i) 2012-13, (ii) 2013-14 and (iii) 2014-15 financial years?
Reply:
(a)(b)(i)(ii)(iii) refer to the table herewith below
DEPARTMENT |
(a) |
(b) |
||||
(i) |
(ii) |
(iii) |
(i) |
(ii) |
(iii) |
|
Department in the Presidency |
12 319 |
- |
9 864 |
416 387 |
243 905 |
641 178 |
Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries |
21 867 |
112 489 |
56 874 |
1 035 018 |
1 864 952 |
1 592 482 |
Department of Arts and Culture |
19 918 |
66 576 |
32 682 |
45 526 |
180 706 |
130 728 |
Department of Basic Education |
- |
5 386 |
- |
395 100 |
226 197 |
499 776 |
Department of Correctional Services |
447 405 |
350 644 |
- |
1 043 945 |
1 658 816 |
1 395 545 |
Department of Defence |
- |
17 313 |
- |
1 726 295 |
2 718 120 |
3 302 708 |
Department of Economic Development |
12 664 |
- |
5 528 |
4 221 |
44 325 |
33 165 |
Department of Education |
|
- |
|
|
71 288 |
|
Department of Energy |
26 798 |
73 596 |
25 839 |
348 375 |
220 788 |
723 484 |
Department of Environmental Affairs |
333 777 |
244 543 |
79 856 |
1 260 936 |
1 316 770 |
1 789 722 |
Department of Health |
108 908 |
- |
43 933 |
3 439 678 |
473 797 |
129 358 |
Department of Higher Education and Training |
147 422 |
222 309 |
35 945 |
833 500 |
236 652 |
854 689 |
Department of Home Affairs |
58 225 |
11 601 |
126 393 |
82 741 |
1 015 097 |
2 446 848 |
Department of Human Settlements |
4 921 |
221 348 |
152 192 |
118 109 |
154 944 |
488 283 |
Department of International Relations and Cooperation |
199 231 |
209 306 |
- |
1 535 737 |
753 501 |
505 964 |
Department of Labour |
296 264 |
435 061 |
192 976 |
1 915 858 |
1 489 388 |
3 315 866 |
Department of Military Veterans |
|
- |
|
77 430 |
||
Department of Mineral Resources |
131 485 |
49 367 |
253 312 |
884 538 |
1 596 215 |
1 447 496 |
Department of Planning Monitoring & Evaluation |
29 446 |
- |
- |
235 569 |
52 536 |
105 318 |
Department of Public Enterprises |
64 928 |
16 124 |
68 053 |
64 928 |
46 760 |
198 487 |
Department of Public Service and Administration |
124 567 |
138 871 |
69 007 |
1 575 078 |
1 666 447 |
2 180 617 |
Department of Public Works |
405 583 |
46 789 |
4 197 |
1 598 299 |
823 480 |
591 761 |
Department of Rural Development and Land Reform |
39 339 |
10 146 |
15 097 |
4 442 810 |
5 969 431 |
865 588 |
Department of Science and Technology |
325 724 |
10 113 |
- |
172 442 |
151 696 |
184 792 |
Department of Social Development |
62 085 |
8 467 |
13 904 |
418 255 |
378 179 |
389 325 |
Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services |
|
- |
85 716 |
|
15 375 |
179 225 |
Department of Tourism |
157 755 |
44 295 |
15 060 |
591 582 |
673 286 |
624 988 |
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) |
427 021 |
387 575 |
280 234 |
2 087 656 |
2 196 260 |
1 961 640 |
Department of Transport |
194 950 |
231 783 |
7 367 |
27 850 |
267 054 |
445 685 |
Department of Transport |
- |
|
8 312 |
|
||
Department of Water Affairs |
1 012 651 |
266 656 |
204 122 |
2 716 476 |
2 377 570 |
1 820 347 |
Department of Justice and Constitutional Development |
547 013 |
489 380 |
353 696 |
1 566 779 |
1 125 087 |
2 992 829 |
Government Communication and Information System |
35 893 |
- |
- |
35 893 |
243 378 |
725 679 |
Government Pensions Administration Agency |
- |
- |
5 383 |
359 534 |
336 112 |
231 488 |
Government Printing Works |
- |
- |
3 804 |
125 120 |
94 341 |
64 662 |
Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) |
54 886 |
40 246 |
73 253 |
192 101 |
234 770 |
109 879 |
National Parliament |
11 096 |
25 680 |
41 915 |
5 659 163 |
3 004 607 |
2 556 824 |
National Prosecuting Authority of SA |
- |
26 007 |
78 065 |
26 541 |
173 377 |
303 076 |
National School of Government |
136 754 |
23 051 |
69 698 |
383 794 |
748 103 |
543 064 |
National Treasury |
134 896 |
89 643 |
98 457 |
277 500 |
386 881 |
1 045 676 |
Public Service Commission |
10 188 |
- |
38 486 |
95 088 |
77 026 |
113 626 |
South African Police Service (SAPS) |
- |
- |
5 116 |
6 541 413 |
6 473 637 |
1 959 404 |
South African Police Service (SAPS) |
- |
- |
- |
37 000 |
132 000 |
8 991 |
South African Revenue Service (SARS) |
|
- |
- |
|
6 885 |
11 140 |
South African Social Security Agency |
- |
33 484 |
- |
25 225 |
1 131 756 |
1 178 350 |
Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) |
23 486 |
28 028 |
5 989 |
2 411 228 |
1 550 906 |
1 922 371 |
Grand Total |
5 619 464 |
3 935 878 |
2 552 014 |
46 761 599 |
44 602 403 |
42 689 554 |
11 April 2016 - NW847
Lorimer, Mr JR to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) With reference to the deal between Eskom and Optimum Colliery to supply coal to the Hendrina Power Station, (a) what grade of coal (i) was contracted for, (ii) was actually received by Eskom at the specified power station prior to the fine imposed against the specified colliery by the specified entity, and (iii) is currently being received by Eskom at the specified power station and (b) at what (i) price or (ii) prices;(2) why was the coal received from the specified colliery unsuitable for use by the specified power station prior to the imposition of the fine; (3) is the coal currently received from the specified colliery suitable for use by the specified power station; (4)did the use of unsuitable coal supplied by the specified colliery cause any damage to the specified power station; if so, (a) what damage was done, (b) what was the value of the damage caused to the specified power station and (c) has this damage been repaired; (5) is the poor quality coal still causing damage to the specified power station; if not, (a) was the grade of coal changed or (b) was the specified power station adapted to use a different grade of coal; if so, why is the specified power station still using this coal?
Reply:
(1)(a)(i) In terms of the Coal Supply Agreement, Optimum Coal Mine (Proprietary) Limited ("Optimum") was obliged to supply and deliver to the Hendrina power station coal which complies with, amongst others, the following quality specification:
- All coal must have an ash content which shall not exceed 28.8% in order to ensure that the calorific value of the coal is not less than 23.0MJ/kg (calculated on a moisture free basis);
- a monthly average size distribution of:
- not more than 55% of coal supplied will be smaller than 6mm;
- not more than 35% of coal supplied will be smaller than 2.38mm; and
- not more than 15% of coal supplied will be smaller than 0.81mm.
- The Second Addendum amended the quality parameters in respect of the Abrasiveness Index (pursuant to an arbitration with Optimum) to be <423 mgFe on a 7 day weighted rolling average basis.
(ii) The coal that was received by Eskom was within contractual specifications with regard to the Calorific Value but out of specification in respect of Abrasive Index and Sizing.
(iii) The coal currently being received by Eskom meets the contractual specifications with regard to the Calorific Value except for Abrasive Index.
(b) The price of coal paid by Eskom is R174.41/ton as at February 2016.
(2) The coal supplied by Optimum Coal prior to the imposition of the fine was outside the quality specification for Hendrina Power Station in terms of Abrasive Index and Sizing. For the 1 March 2012 to 31 May 2015, Optimum Coal, failed to supply and deliver to Eskom coal which meets the quality parameter as set out in the Coal Supply Agreement. The coal supplied and delivered to Eskom, amongst others, failed to comply with the sizing specification, in that 20% to 45% of the coal supplied and delivered to Eskom by Optimum on a monthly basis, during the period of supply was smaller than 0.81mm. Despite this failure by Optimum, Eskom has, without prejudice to its right in terms of clause 3.6 of the First Addendum, paid Optimum for such coal, without applying any adjustment or reduction to the payment, for Optimum's failure to comply with the quality parameters.
(3) The coal currently received by Hendrina Power Station is within the contractual specifications in respect of Calorific Value except for the Abrasive Index and the Sizing. Since Optimum is currently under business rescue, the parties have in terms of the interim agreement agreed to suspend the application of penalties until the business rescue process is finalised. Of critical importance to note is that Eskom has issued Summons against Optimum for failing to supply coal that meets the quality specification of the station. Optimum has since disputed the penalties. Once the business rescue process has been finalised, the legal proceedings will continue to run its course.
(4) High Abrasive Index causes high wear rate of the plant and sizing affects the material flow frequency causing hang-ups which results in load losses. The wear rate causes accelerated wear of parts. This negatively affects the energy output from the station thus the total energy capacity available for dispatch into the grid. In order to compensate Eskom for the capacity loss occasioned as a result of these quality parameters being out of specification, penalty provisions in terms of the contract apply.
(5) (a) Since Optimum is currently under business rescue, the parties have in terms of the interim agreement agreed to suspend the application of penalties until the business rescue process is finalized.
(b) No. Not applicable.
11 April 2016 - NW304
Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(1) Whether each metropolitan municipality has a metropolitan police department; if not, why not; if so, (a) when was it established, (b) how many persons (i) in total and (ii) per category are currently part of the specified municipality’s police force and (c) how many operational (i) cars, (ii) motorbikes, (iii) bicycles and (iv) other vehicles are currently used by the metro police force in each case; (2) whether each metropolitan police department have specialised units tasked with dealing with drugs, gangs and any other safety needs; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (3) whether each metropolitan municipality measures the average response times of the metro police to accidents and complaints; if not, why not; if so, (a) how is this measured and (b) what is the current average response time in each case?
Reply:
The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available within the Department. The Department thus made a request to Metropolitan Municipalities to provide the relevant information. Information was received from the following Metropolitan Municipalities:
BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (BCMM)
1. The BCMM does not have a Metropolitan Police Department. BCMM is in the process of establishing a Metropolitan Police Department with its implementation date being scheduled for 2016/17.
2. Not applicable
3. Not applicable
CITY OF TSHWANE (CoT)
- (a) The Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD) was established on 04 April 2002. It functions independently from the South African Police, funded by and accountable to the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, as per the South African Police Service Act, 1995 and 1998, as amended (Act No. 68 of 1995 and Act No. 83 of 1998). The Act prescribes the functions of a Municipal Police Service per Section 64E, as follows:
Traffic policing, subject to any legislation relating to road traffic (Road Policing);
The policing of municipal by-laws and regulations which are the responsibility of the municipality in question;
The prevention of crime.
(b) The TMPD Staff Establishment is listed within the table below:
Designation |
ESTABLISHMENT |
||||||||||||||||
Approved Posts as per structure
|
Posts filled as per Migration and Placement process |
Vacancies |
Current warm bodies |
Proposed vacancies to be filled in 2015/16 |
Male |
Female |
Operational |
Admin |
Occupational level |
||||||||
A |
C |
I |
W |
A |
C |
I |
W |
||||||||||
Admin Officer |
289 |
167 |
122 |
143 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
65 |
8 |
2 |
39 |
0 |
143 |
5 |
|
Cashier |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
Chief of Police |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Chief Security Evaluator |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
Chief Security Officer (GR A): Internal Security |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
Commander |
36 |
21 |
15 |
21 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
0 |
2 |
|
Constable / Sergeant |
2601 |
1533 |
1068 |
1531 |
0 |
824 |
48 |
5 |
108 |
518 |
10 |
0 |
18 |
1531 |
0 |
5 |
|
Constable Gr III |
|
|
|
1875 |
|
1032 |
24 |
0 |
3 |
812 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1875 |
|
5 |
|
Deputy Chief of Police |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
Deputy Director |
15 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
9 |
2 |
|
Director |
13 |
11 |
2 |
11 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
|
Driver |
8 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
|
Driver Messenger |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
Examiner |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
Executive Commitments Tracking Specialist |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Executive Secretary |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
Executive Support Specialist |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Functional Head |
41 |
19 |
22 |
19 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
3 |
|
Functional Head/ Snr Superintendent |
8 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
|
General Worker |
22 |
14 |
8 |
14 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
6 |
|
Human Resource Officer |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
Inspector |
350 |
230 |
120 |
230 |
70 |
97 |
5 |
1 |
65 |
57 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
230 |
0 |
4 |
|
Law Enforcement officer |
80 |
73 |
7 |
73 |
0 |
42 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
0 |
5 |
|
Liaison Officer |
7 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
License Officer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
9 |
5 |
|
Librarian |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
|
Management / Strategic Support Officer |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
|
Messenger |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
|
Operator Radio Control |
40 |
18 |
22 |
18 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
0 |
5 |
|
Personal Assistant |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
Regional Director |
7 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
|
Secretary |
20 |
3 |
17 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
|
Security Evaluator |
8 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
|
Security Officer (GR C) |
120 |
1 |
119 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
|
Snr Admin Officer |
56 |
34 |
22 |
33 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
33 |
4 |
|
Snr Secretary |
5 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
|
Snr Security Evaluator |
4 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
|
Snr Security Officer (GR B) |
18 |
4 |
14 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
5 |
|
Snr Superintendent |
88 |
55 |
33 |
55 |
0 |
25 |
1 |
0 |
15 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
55 |
0 |
3 |
|
Strategic Support Specialist |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
Superintendent |
146 |
87 |
59 |
87 |
0 |
34 |
2 |
0 |
14 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
87 |
0 |
3 |
|
Supervisor (Worker) |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
Support Service Officer |
22 |
5 |
17 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
|
System Officer |
8 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
|
Technical Officer |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
|
Waiter |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
|
Warden |
52 |
27 |
25 |
27 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
5 |
|
Total |
4095 |
2354 |
1741 |
4212 |
75 |
2165 |
91 |
6 |
245 |
1575 |
27 |
2 |
100 |
3941 |
271 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4212 |
||||||
Sergeant |
866 |
|
429 |
17 |
4 |
83 |
317 |
3 |
0 |
13 |
|||||||
Constable |
665 |
|
395 |
31 |
1 |
25 |
201 |
7 |
0 |
5 |
|||||||
|
1531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) The Tshwane Metro Police Fleet vehicles are listed within the table below:
Type |
Total |
BUS |
11 |
CAR |
187 |
KOMBI |
72 |
LDV |
192 |
MOTORBIKE |
142 |
TRACTOR |
1 |
TRAILER |
47 |
TRUCK |
25 |
TOTAL |
677 |
2. The Tshwane Metro Police’s Special Project Team assists with drug enforcement, as per the initiative implemented by the Chief of Police since January 2015. The unit consists of seven (7) members and one Supervisor who has sixteen (16) years’ experience relevant to the enforcement of illegal substance abuse. Tshwane does not have a problem of gangs as such, but the department however works closely with the SAPS to deal with crime prevention in general.
3. (a) The current TMPD system (manually) assists with monitoring calls and call time intervals. The TMPD Nodal Point (331) dispatches complaints to the regions, after which the regions contact members via cell phones or radio to attend to complaints.
(b) Status quo on dispatch is 00:01:39 (1 Minute and 39 seconds from receipt of a call until dispatched to operational members).
MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY
Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality does not have a Metro Police Department.
NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (NMBM)
NMBM is currently busy with the planning and physical establishment process of a Metro Police Department.
11 April 2016 - NW524
Grootboom, Mr GA to ask the Minister of Arts and Culture
(1).With reference to his dissolution of the board of the Pan South African Language Board (PanSALB) in January 2016, (a) why did he appoint the National Heritage Council as the caretaker body of PanSALB and (b) on what basis was appointment made?
Reply:
1(a). I was wary of allowing the current CEO of PanSALB to act as both the Accounting Officer and Accounting Authority since he was fairly new to the job and could be overwhelmed with work. The Department is trying to avoid similar challenges that occurred in the past when the former caretaker CEO acted as the Accounting Authority
(b). The basis for the appointment was made in terms of section 49 (3) of the Public Finance Management Act, as the National Heritage Council is one of the public entities reporting to me as the Executive Authority. We proceeded because initially we received concurrence from National Treasury, but later the National Treasury withdrew the advice they gave me, immediately thereafter the National Heritage Council was withdrawn, I realised that PANSALB is a constitutional entity, and is not part of the entities listed by the PFMA, therefore it cannot be governed under those rules.
11 April 2016 - NW698
Bhanga, Mr BM to ask the Minister of Communications
What amount was (a) budgeted for and (b) spent by her department on Metro FM’s annual Metro FM Music Awards Show in the (i) 2012-13, (ii) 2013-14 and (iii) 2015-16 financial years (aa) in total and on (bb)(aaa) hiring the venue, (bbb) venue décor, (ccc) fees for master of ceremonies, (ddd) individuals who presented awards to winners, (eee) prize monies awarded to each award winner in each category, (fff) performers who performed at the awards, (ggg) catering and (hhh) alcohol in each specified financial year?
Reply:
The new Department of Communications was only established by President Jacob Zuma after the 2014 national and provincial general elections. The changes in the structure and administration of government were introduced in the 5th democratically-elected government thorough the introduction of the Proclamation to split the then Department into two Departments namely, Department of Communications (now the new Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services), and the New Department of Communications. The Presidential proclamation issued in December 2014, also re-organized the reporting structure of entities, which historically reported to one old Department while other entities including the public broadcaster, the SABC were transferred to the new Department.
Having given this background, it is therefore clear that the new Department of Communications has not allocated or spent any public money towards the hosting of the annual Metro FM Awards. In addition, the Annual Metro FM Awards takes place at no costs to the SABC. The annual awards are fully funded through sponsorships and partnerships.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
11 April 2016 - NW846
Lorimer, Mr JR to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)With reference to the deal between Eskom and Exxaro-owned Arnot Colliery to supply coal to the Arnot Power Station, (a) what grade of coal was (i) contracted for and (ii) actually received by Eskom, (b) at what price, and (c) why was the contract cancelled; (2)with reference to the current deal between Eskom and Optimum Colliery to supply coal to the specified power station, (a) what grade of coal (i) was contracted for and (ii) is actually being received by Eskom, (b) at what price and (c) why is it suitable for use by Arnot Power Station?
Reply:
(1)(a)(i)
- Calorific value (moisture free): 24,3 Mj/kg (base value) and between 23,3 and 25,4 Mj/kg
- Total moisture: 7,0 – 9,0% (range) and between 7,0 and 9,0%
- Ash content (moisture free): 23,0% (base value) and between 17,0 and 31,0%
- Volatile content (moisture free): 24,0% (base value) and between 21,0 and 29,0%
- Abrasiveness index: 375 mg Fe (base value) and between 325 and 425 mg Fe
(ii) The coal received by Eskom was within the contractual specifications range as per (i) above.
(b) The price of coal paid by Eskom at the expiry of the Agreement was R944.61/ton.
(c) The contract was not cancelled but expired on 31 December 2015.
(2)(a)(i) The coal contracted for Arnot Power Station is a better quality specification compared to the Arnot expired contract and is as follows:
Quality parameter |
Unit |
Quality Expected |
Quality Specifications |
Quality Rejection Limit |
Measurement basis |
Calorific Value |
MJ/kg |
24.0 |
≥22.5 |
<22.5 |
Air Dried |
Total Moisture |
% |
8 |
≤9.0 |
>9.0 |
As Received |
Inherent Moisture |
% |
4.1 |
|
As Received |
|
Ash |
% |
20.2 |
≤24.3 |
>24.3 |
Air Dried |
Abrasive Index (Eskom Mining House Method) |
mgFe/4kg |
<450 |
<450 |
>450 |
Air Dried |
Sulphur |
% |
1.19 |
≤1.19 |
>1.19 |
Air Dried |
Volatiles |
% |
21.7 |
≥19.5 |
<19.5 |
Air Dried |
AFT (Initial deformation) |
ºC |
1380 |
>1380 |
<1380 |
N / A |
Sizing: (cumulatve) % |
|
N / A |
|||
+60mm |
0 |
0 |
>0 |
||
+50mm -6.35mm |
5 50 |
5 50 |
>5 >50 |
||
-3.35mm |
30 |
30 |
>30 |
||
-1mm |
15 |
15 |
>15 |
(ii) The coal received by Eskom is within the contractual specifications as per (i) above.
(b) The contractual price is R470/ton to Arnot Power Station.
(c) The coal is suitable for Arnot Power Station as it meets the quality specification for the station.
11 April 2016 - NW740
Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Whether he and senior members of his department travelled to Isithebe in KwaZulu-Natal at an early stage to defuse the crisis which flared up there and which led over several days to (a) the burning and looting of many factories, (b) billions of rand of loss in production, (c) millions of rand of loss to workers who had no work to go to and (d) further loss of investor confidence; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what did he and his senior officials do to calm the situation and address the deep-seated grievances of the surrounding communities regarding service delivery failures and alleged nepotism; (2) whether his department has a policy to act proactively and decisively in respect of crisis situations at local government level before the protests get out of hand and the protesters resort to arson, vandalism and obstruction of traffic; if not, why not; if so, what are the (a) relevant details and (b) outcomes thereof? NW858E
Reply:
(1) In line with a cooperative governance approach, indeed the concerns in Isithebe area were attended to at an early stage through the intervention of provincial government leadership and by engaging with business, communities and other stakeholders in order to find solutions to the challenges. It was through these engagements it was established that interventions to the challenges needed a multi-sectoral approach. To this end, it was agreed that interventions should focus, amongst other, on the need to expedite service delivery. Mass prayers and community dialogue were facilitated to emphasize the need for constructive engagement, peaceful protests, respect for rights and properties of others as well as education on rights to recourse as well as poverty alleviation programmes.
To date, Lower Tugela Bulk Water Supply for the area was launched on 22 March 2016 as one of the service delivery responses which also present the people of Isithebe with jobs as well as skills development opportunities. A prayer meeting for peace and stability in Isithebe was held 31 March 2016. Other activities are planned to take place in the area.
(2) In 2014, government adopted the Local Government Back to Basics Strategy as a response to challenging situations at local government level. Recognising the need for inter-sphere collaboration, the strategy is implemented and monitored collaboratively, with the Department of Cooperative Governance taking the lead in the coordination of the following five pillars of the strategy:
(i) put people and their concerns first and ensure constant contact with communities through effective public participation platforms;
(ii) create conditions for decent living by consistently delivering municipal services of the right quality and standard;
(iii) demonstration of good governance and administration;
(iv) ensuring sound financial management and accounting; and
(v) building and maintaining sound institutional and administrative capabilities, administered and managed by dedicated and skilled personnel at all levels.
Since the strategy was implemented, the department’s monitoring of municipalities has shown signs of municipal performance improvement in the KZN Province. The Department also established Back to Basic teams clustered in Provinces to provide oversight and rapid response.
11 April 2016 - NW696
Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications
(1) Whether she was informed of the SA Broadcasting Corporation’s (SABC) decision to ban call-ins on its radio stations; if not, why not; if so, what is her department’s position on the SABC’s decision to ban call-ins on its radio stations; (2) whether the SABC Board was informed of the SABC’s decision to ban call-ins on its radio stations; if not, why not; if so, (a) when and (b) what are the further relevant details?
Reply:
There was no decision to ban call-ins on radio SABC’s stations. The SABC management did not prohibit talk shows hosts from having open lines discussions during programmes. Talk show hosts of religious or sport programmes are subject matter experts and will have open line discussions on relevant religious or sporting matters. At the same time, political discussions can only be dealt with during News and Current affairs programmes where presenters/hosts are skilled to deal with these matters. Therefore, the SABC strives to ensure that political discussions are dealt with on the correct platforms.
MR NN MUNZHELELE
DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE:
MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)
MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS
DATE
11 April 2016 - NW861
Chewane, Dr H to ask the Minister of Health
(1)Why is the clinic at Senekal, O R Tambo Section, in the eastern Free State Province not open despite being completed two years ago; (2) what is the cost of damage to the specified property due to vandalism and loss due to stolen equipment?
Reply:
- The clinic at Senekal, OR Tambo Section, in the Eastern Free State province, was not completed because the contractor failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, and as such was never handed over to the provincial department of health, and as such it could not be opened.
- The damage, due to the vandalism of the facility, is a responsibility the contractor because it was never handed over to the provincial department of health.
END.