Questions and Replies

Reply:

The response from Ekhurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality is narrated underneath:

The Municipality appointed consultants to investigate the bridges. They had submitted the report to the Municipality. The answers are based on the report and Municipal comments.

(a) Central Avenue

The bridge was not closed. Visual inspections by the relevant department of the municipality indicated that it appeared to be stable enough to allow traffic through it. This was confirmed by the appointed Consultants.

(b) Van Riebeeck Avenue

The bridge was not closed. Visual inspections by the relevant department of the municipality indicated that it appeared to be stable enough to allow traffic through it. This was confirmed by the appointed Consultants.

(c) 4th Avenue

The bridge was not closed. Visual inspections by the relevant department of the municipality indicated that it appeared to be stable enough to allow traffic through it. This was confirmed by the appointed Consultants.

(d) 1st Avenue in Edenvale

This was the only bridge that was closed as the visual inspection indicated damage to the deck overlay. It is a small bridge constructed with culverts, which is the reason for closing the bridge until it could be certified as stable/ safe by specialist consultant. However, the bridge was opened for traffic after getting certification from the consultant.

(i) The appointed consultant assessed the stability and safety of the mentioned bridges for any movement/ displacement that could have taken place. They checked the stability of the abutments, floor slabs, approach roads and discharge/ downstream apron slabs. They also checked the extent of the erosion of the embankments and any movement/ damage to the decks/ overlays.

(ii) The consultant’s finding confirmed that all the bridges were structurally stable. They recommended that the upstream and downstream embankments require extensive rehabilitation due to the erosion and/ or flood damage to the areas around the wing walls.

(iii) The estimated costs for the remedial measure or to rehabilitate the bridges are as bellow:

(a) Central Avenue bridge: R 63 000 000.00 (it may vary depending on which design option is acceptable to the Consultants and Department of Water and Sanitation)

(b) Van Riebeeck Avenue bridge : R 300 000.00

(c)4th Avenue bridge/canal: R 5 600 000.00

(d) 1st Avenue bridge: R 800 000.00

(iv) The process has already been started. In order to execute the remedial measures designed by Specialist Consultants, approval from GDARD and Department of Water and Sanitation is required. These approvals and authorization requests have been submitted and approval is awaited.

(aa) Yes it does. The process has already been started. The municipality is awaiting the approvals and authorization of the design requests have been submitted and approval is awaited form GDARD and Department of Water and Sanitation.

(bb) All the bridges have been declared stable and have been open for traffic for quite some time now.

Reply:

a) What number of overseas trips has she taken.

Trip to :	b) What are the details of the programme of each visit.	c) What was the cost of each overseas trip for the Minister.
Madrid, Spain (9 – 15 May 2017)	105TH UNWTO Executive Council Meeting	Total: R105 694,80
Chicago and Miami, USA (10-16 July 2017)	Rainbow PUSH Coalition and Citizenship Education Fund 46th Annual International Convention Program and SAT Meetings, Chicago SAT Trade Engagement, Miami	Total: R250 488,78
Kigali, Rwanda and Lilongwe, Malawi (27 August – 1 September 2017)	41st Annual World Tourism Conference, Kigali Takulandirani Malawi International Tourism Expo and Signing of Memorandum of Understanding, Lilongwe	Total: R59 649,29
Chengdu, China and Beijing and Tokyo, Japan (10-24 September 2017)	CAF, UNWTO Executive Council Meeting and UNWTO General Assembly, Chengdu Tourism Expo (Ministerial Roundtable) and SAT Trade Engagements, Beijing and Tokoyo	Total: R106 780,29
New York and Las Vegas, USA (8-14 October 2017)	SAT Engagements, New York IMEX America, Las Vegas	Total: R271 471,29
London, UK (4-8 November 2017)	World Travel Market, London	Total: R81 481,29
Gaborone, Botswana (15-17 November 2017)	Binational Commission Meeting (BNC)	Total: R6 645,29

Reply:

a) The Department of Basic Education (DBE) does not have resources in the voted funds to provide sanitary towels to female learners.

b) Provinces such as Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Free State and KwaZulu-Natal have implemented local initiatives to provide sanitary towels to female learners.

(i) (ii)The project is a provincial initiative that is led and funded by each of the provinces. The school lists and relevant details remain in the custody of the said Provincial Education Departments (PEDs) and the question may be referred to the said PEDs.

 

Reply:

(i) & (ii) The information requested by the Honourable Member is available in the Department’s Annual Report.

 

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Departments responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

Once schools are fit for purpose, a practical completion certificate is awarded. Upon final completion, the asset is handed over to the relevant Provincial Department who then makes sure that there is a maintenance budget and maintenance plan for the school. All 184 schools have been issued with their practical completion certificates.

Reply:

a) What number of buildings and other structures have been built as part of the Royal Khalanga Lodge project in Limpopo	b) what is the total square meters, including upper floors, of each building and structure	c) have the specified buildings and structures been registered with the National Home Builders Registration Council
Entrance gate & guard house	33m²	The National Home Builders Registration Council (NHBRC) is an agency of the Department of Human Settlements which is responsible for the protection of housing consumers and to regulate the home building industry. Registration with the NHBRC is mainly intended for residential buildings as areas designated as business, industrial or otherwise are excluded from the NHBRC. The Khalanga Project was therefore not registered with the NHRBC as the buildings did not fall within the requirements for registration.
Chalets - standard type (x10)	320m²
Chalets - luxury type (x4)	490m²
Chalet - Presidential suite	50m²
4 Chalets ( 4 rooms each)	324m²
Hall -1000 seater	1123m²
Hall toilets	75m²
Toilet block - pool	44m²
Breakaway rooms (x2 buildings)	160m²
Entertainment area	107m²
Laundry	66 m²
Steel palisade fence (1.8m) high	2500m
Swimming Pools (4x3m2)	7m/3 and 6/4 (280 m²)
Deck	75m² with approximately 20m long staircase
Carports	13/36-468 m²
Retaining wall	2450 m²
Paving in the hall	3285 m²
Paving – access road	10131 m²
Bulk services Electrical supply	455m
Sewer reticulation	631m
Water reticulation including 6x 6000l tanks	631m

Reply:

The Free State Government has spent 91.57% of their Learner Transport Budget in the first two financial quarters. Information received from the Free State Department of Police, Roads and Transport indicate that the Executive Committee of the Free State Government has earmarked Learner Transport to receive provincially earmarked funds. The funds will be made available during the budget adjustments and services will proceed without interruptions. An additional R10m was already made available on the adjustments budget and the Department is busy assessing internal funds for reprioritisation.

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Departments responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

1. The law enforcement agencies in particular the Hawks are investigating the so called Gupta leaked emails, this has been widely reported, Minister will not be commenting on any matter arising or related to the alleged Gupta leaked emails in order not to interfere with the due processes of the law.

2. The Minister is required by law to respect due process of the law which inter alia include investigations by law enforcement agencies and therefore I will not interfere with such investigation by making comments.

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Departments responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

Honourable Member, in accordance with the established practise applicable to parliamentary questions contained in the document titled, “Guide to Parliamentary Questions in the National Assembly”, I will not be able to provide names of the service providers as requested. The document referred to prohibits Members of Parliament, including the Executive, from divulging names of persons, bodies when asking or responding to parliamentary questions. It specifically states the following:

“Questions are to be framed as concisely as possible. All unnecessary adjectives, references and quotations are omitted. Names of persons, bodies and, for example, newspapers are only used in questions if the facts surrounding the case have been proven. As the mere mention of such names could be construed as publicity for or against them, it should be clear that this practice is highly undesirable. If a question will be unintelligible without mentioning such names, the Departments concerned are notified of the name (-s) and this phrase is used: ".......a certain person (name furnished)”

In addition, to spend time sourcing information for the past five financial years will take time and it would not be prudent to spend resources on a project such as this one. The Honourable Member is, however, encouraged to provide me with specific areas of concern that she might have in respect of any service provider used by my Department and the entities reporting to me.

 

Reply:

The Ekurhuleni Metropolitan municipality through the Gauteng Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs provided the information:

The Emergency Management Services Department can confirm that the Executive Mayor, Member of Mayoral Committee (MMC) Community Safety, other political office bearers and the Gauteng Premier did visit the areas that were affected by floods in the City of Ekurhuleni. However, the department cannot confirm whether the Executive Mayor and other political office bearers specifically visited Edenvale. The Office of the Executive Mayor and / or Member of Mayoral Committee (MMC) Community Safety or the Chairperson of the Community Safety Portfolio is well placed to respond to the specific visit to Edenvale from Honourable E R Wilson from Democratic Alliance.

Reply:

According to the information received from Limpopo Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance, Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs:

1. Yes, the Local Labour Forum in the Modimolle - Mookgophong Local Municipality in Limpopo is currently functional.

2. Three Councillors, Trade unions (IMATU and SAMWU), Management (Municipal Manager, Manager: Corporate Services, Manager: Technical Services, Manager: Social Services, Area Manager: Vaalwater and Mookgophong: Legal, Human Resources and Labour Relations Officer.

3. (a) 16 October 2017 (postponed on 27 October 2017, 1 November 2017 and 28 November 2017.

(b) (i) New Limpopo Collective Agreement;

     (ii) Essential Service Agreement;

     (iii) Protective clothing;

     (iv) One job one salary;

     (v) Paid leave; and

     (vi) Progress report of job evaluation and placement.

 

Reply:

No

Reply:

(1)

Yes, there are municipalities which have made payment agreements (PA’s) with Eskom and have defaulted on those agreements in each of the past three financial years.

(1)(a)

Annexure A presents the municipalities which have made payment agreements with Eskom and have defaulted on those agreements at some point within each of the past three financial years.

(1)(b)

Eskom together with the intervention of national and provincial (Treasury and Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs) have engaged municipalities in order to agree on realistic payment plans.

(2)

Yes, from the specified municipalities in Table 1 above there are municipalities at risk of having their electricity supply cut off by Eskom. Planned interruptions dates for municipalities at risk of having their electricity supply cut off by Eskom are presented in Table 1 below.

Table 1:

Province	Municipality	Planned Interruption Date
Free State	Nketoana Mantsopa Tokologo Masilonyana Nala Dihlabeng Moqhaka	27-Sep-17 27-Sep-17 27-Sep-17 27-Sep-17 27-Sep-17 27-Sep-17 27-Sep-17
Limpopo	Thabazimbi	21-Sep-17
Northern Cape	Siyancuma Renosterberg Thembelihle1 Tsantsabane	18-Sep-17 18-Sep-17 18-Sep-17 18-Sep-17

Although Thembelihle municipality electricity supply will be interrupted, the municipality does not have a payment arrangement with Eskom.

Annexure A:

Province	2015_2016 Financial Year Municipal Payment arrangement list
	Valid PA's in 2015/16 Fin Year	Municipality	Honouring PA’s in 2015/16 Fin Year	Number of municipalities who did not honour their agreements
Eastern Cape	5	1. Maletswai (Now Walter Sisulu) 2. Nkonkobe (Now Raymond Mhlaba) 3. Nxuba (Now Raymond Mhlaba) 4. Makana 5. Gariep Municipality (Now Walter Sisulu)	0	5
Free State	8	1.  Dihlabeng 2.  Masilonyana 3. Mantsopa 4. Matjabeng 5. Nketoana 6. Maluti A Phofung 7. Metsimaholo Munic 8. Nala Local Munic	1	7
Gauteng	3	1.  Midvaal 2.  Randfontein 3. Westonaria	3	0
KZN	2	1. Abaqulusi 2. Ulundi	1	1
Limpopo	2	Thabazimbi Munic Mookgophong	0	2
Province	2015_2016 Financial Year Municipal Payment arrangement list
	Valid PA's in 2015/16 Fin Year	Municipality	Honouring PA’s in 2015/16 Fin Year	Number of municipalities who did not honour their agreements
Mpumalanga	10	1. Emalahleni 2. Msukaligwa 3.  Govan Mbeki 4.  Lekwa 5.  Emakhazeni 6. Mkhondo 7. Nkomazi 8. Thaba Chweu 9. Chief Albert Luthuli 10. Umjindi	1	9
North West	9	1. Ditsobotla 2. Kgetlengrivier 3. Lekwa-Teemane 4. Mamusa 5. Matlosana 6. Naledi 7. Tswaing 8. Maquassi Hills 9. Madibeng	2	7
Northern Cape	11	1. Kamiesberg 2. Khara Hais 3. Khai - Ma 4.  Nama Khoi 5.  Renosterberg 6.  Tsantsabane 7.  Magareng 8. Siyathemba 9. Siyancuma 10. Dikgatlong 11. Ubuntu	3	8
Western Cape	3	1. Oudtshoorn 2. Kannaland 3. Cederberg	2	1
Province	2016_2017 Financial Year Municipal Payment arrangement list
	Valid PA's in 2016/17 Fin Year	Municipality	Honouring PA’s in 2016/17 Fin Year	Number of municipalities who did not honour their agreements
Eastern Cape	4	1. Dr Beyers Naude (Former Ikwezi) 2. Makana 3. Raymond Mhlaba 4. Walter Sisulu (former Gariep and Maletswai)	1	3
Free State	8	1. Dihlabeng 2. Masilonyana 3. Mantsopa 4. Moqhaka 5. Nala 6. Nketoana 7. Phumelela 8. Tokologo	2	6
Gauteng	7	1. Midvaal 2. Randfontein 3. Lesedi 4. Mogale City 5. Emfuleni 6. Merafong 7. Westonaria	7	0
KZN	4	1. Mpofana 2. eDumbe 3. Ulundi 4. Abaqulusi	3	1
Limpopo	5	1. Musina 2.  Bela-Bela 3. Modimolle 4. Mookgophong 5. Thabazimbi	0	5
Mpumalanga	11	1.    Emalahleni 2.    Msukaligwa 3.    Thaba Chweu 4.    Govan Mbeki 5.    Lekwa 6.    Emakhazeni 7.    Mkhondo 8.    Albert Lithuli 9. Dipalaseng 10. Victor Khanye 11. City of Mbombela	1	10
North West	9	1. Ditsobotla 2. Kgetlengrivier 3. Lekwa-Teemane 4. Mamusa 5. Matlosana 6. Naledi 7. Ramotshere 8. Tswaing 9. Ventersdorp	4	5
Northern Cape	18	1.   Kai Garib (Keimoes) 2.  Kai Garib (Kenhardt) 3.  Kai Garib (Kakamas) 4.    Kamiesberg 5.    Khai - Ma 6.    Nama Khoi 7.    Kgatelopele 8.    Renosterberg 9.  Tsantsabane 10. Magareng 11. Ga-Segonyana 12. Phokwane/Hartswater 13. Emthanjeni 14. Gamagara 15. Siyathemba 16. Siyancuma 17. Dikgatlong 18. Ubuntu	2	16
Western Cape	2	1. Oudtshoorn 2. Kannaland	1	1
Province	2017_2018 Financial Year Municipal Payment arrangement list
	Valid PA's in 2017/18 Fin Year	Municipality	Honouring PA’s in 2017/18 Fin Year	Number of municipalities who did not honour their agreements
Eastern Cape	5	1. Dr Beyers Naude (Former Ikwezi) 2. KSD 3. Makana 4. Raymond Mhlaba 5. Walter Sisulu (former Gariep and Maletswai)	1	4
Free State	8	1. Dihlabeng 2. Masilonyana 3. Mantsopa 4. Moqhaka 5. Nala 6. Nketoana 7. Phumelela 8.. Tokologo	1	7
Gauteng	4	1. Emfuleni 2. Merafong 3. Mogale City 4. Randfontein	0	4
KZN	6	1. eDumbe 2. Mpofana 3. Newcastle 4. Phongolo 5. Ulundi 6. Zululand	4	2
Limpopo	4	1. Modimolle 2.. Mookgophong 3. Musina 4. Thabazimbi	0	4
Mpumalanga	10	1. Albert Lithuli 2. Dipaleseng 3. Emakhazeni 4. Emalahleni 5. Govan Mbeki 6. Lekwa 7. Mkhondo 8. Msukaligwa 9. Thaba Chweu 10. Victor Khanye	0	10
North West	9	1. Ditsobotla 2. Kgetlengrivier 3. Lekwa-Teemane 4. Mamusa 5. Matlosana 6. Naledi 7. Ramotshere 8. Tswaing 9. Ventersdorp	2	7
Northern Cape	14	1. Dikgatlong 2. Emthanjeni 3. Gamagara 4. Ga-Segonyana 5. Kai Garib 6. Kgatelopele 7. Magareng 8. Nama Khoi 9. Phokwane/Hartswater 10. Renosterberg 11. Siyancuma 12. Siyathemba 13. Tsantsabane 14. Ubuntu	4	10
Western Cape	2	1. Oudtshoorn 2. Kannaland	1	1

Reply:

a) Yes, I accompanied H.E President Jacob Zuma on a working visit to the Russian Federation.

b) No

Reply:

a) At the conclusion of the Audit there was a dispute between the Department and the Auditor- General on the amount of irregular expenditure. The Minister of Energy has since met with the Auditor-General and the matter in dispute has been resolved.

b) (i) The area of concern that had been identified by the Auditor- General was understatement of irregular expenditure.

(ii) Steps to be taken to address the areas of concern include strengthening of internal controls.

(iii) As indicated in (ii) above mechanisms will be instituted to avoid the concerns identified again in 2017/18 financial statements as part of the remedial action plan. The Minister and the audit committee will oversee the administration on quarterly basis.

Reply:

The Question has been referred to all the Provincial Education Departments and the response will be provided as soon as it is received.

Reply:

I am always guided by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, when I appoint Ministers. Section 91 of the Constitution provides the prescripts by which I abide when appointing the members of Cabinet. 

Reply:

The following response was provided by the Chief Albert Luthuli Local Municipality:

(1) (a) (i)(ii)

The municipality budgets for the maintenance and repair of (i) roads and (ii) storm-water infrastructure covering all wards. It doesn’t budget ward-wise.

The municipality budgeted a total amount of R 9 000,00 thousand for the past five years from 2012-2013 to 2016-2017. The year-wise budget amounts are detailed below in thousand Rand:

Roads and storm-water maintenance budget for 2012-2017 period

2012/13 (000 )	2013/14 (000 )	2014/15 (000 )	2015/16 (000 )	2016/17 (000 )	TOTAL (000 )
1 100,00	2 400,00	1 900,00	1 400,00	2 200,00	9 000,00

(1) (b)(i)(ii)

According to the municipality, it spent a total amount of R 2 500,00 thousand for the past five years from 2012-2013 to 2016-2017. The year-wise expenditure amounts are detailed below in thousand Rand:

Expenditure for roads and storm-water during 2012-2017 period

2012/13 (000 )	2013/14 (000 )	2014/15 (000 )	2015/16 (000 )	2016/17 (000 )	TOTAL (000 )
450,00	600,00	550,00	600,00	300,00	2 500,00

(2) According to the municipality, it allocated a total budget of R 1 800,00 thousand for the 2017-2018 financial year for maintenance and repair of roads and storm-water.

Reply:

The information on the incidents mentioned has been requested from the Eastern Cape and the KwaZulu-Natal Departments of Education and will be provided as soon as it is received.

Reply:

It is acknowledged that under common law physical abuse is classified as a criminal offence. This means that the listing of an educator’s name on the Register depends on the gravity of the sanction imposed against the educator for an offence he/she committed against a child. If an educator has physically abused a child, which abuse resulted in the child receiving medical attention/treatment, such an educator will be charged with a criminal offence by the South African Police and if found guilty by the court of law and convicted, then that person’s name will automatically be listed in the Register. In that case, the employer cannot overrule the decision of the court of law and therefore will also find the educator guilty of the alleged offence and dismissal is the only sanction for such an offence. In that case where an educator was found guilty of physical abuse against a child and dismissed, such educator’s name submitted by the employer to the Department of Social Development for listing on the National Child Protection Register.

However, in a case where an educator was found guilty of physical abuse by the employer or SACE during the disciplinary hearing, and the sanction imposed was not dismissal, (depending on the severity of the abuse) that person’s name is not listed in the Register. E.g. in a case where an educator used an open hand on the child’s back leaving the child with no finger marks or any mark related to the abuse, the educator may be given a final written warning as a sanction.

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Departments responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

1. (a) No procurement and/or services were made to Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd by the Department of Energy

(i) Not applicable

(ii) No payments were made to Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd.

(b) (i) Other than the National Nuclear Regulator none of the other entities reporting to the Minister of Energy have procured any services from Travel With Flair

(ii) R 2, 027, 867.96

2. (a) Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd did not provide international travel for the Department of Energy.

(i) Not applicable

(ii) Not applicable

(iii) Not applicable

(b) (i) The revelation of such information would allow others to develop a profile of the operations of the National Nuclear Regulator which could impact on both safety and security.

Reply:

a) A legal firm had been appointed to conduct investigations. The investigations took longer than expected. The report presented had gaps due to the method used by the investigators. The Minister directed that the report must be able to meet the principles of natural justice i.e. Ald. at partem. The financial aspect conducted by KPMG had to be subjected to a reliance audit and this further caused more delays.

b) When the Minister was supposed to receive final report the service provider on the legal part declared a conflict of interest. The Minister has instructed CEF and SFF to expedite the investigations without further delays.

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Departments responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

Information on the question is the information included in the USB flash drive that was submitted to the Portfolio Committee on 17 February 2017 and to the questions office.

Reply:

1. (a) The purpose of the R2.1 million is a once off gratuity paid in accordance with Proclamation by the President of the Republic of South Africa No. 50, 2008. It is in line with paragraph 3.3 once off gratuity for Members of Executive or Deputy Ministers who have served more than 5 years and whose term of office has ended.

(b) The former Minister had served more than 5 years and her term of office had ended from 31st March 2017.

(c) The details of the gratuity are as follows:

i) 4 months pensionable salary for every 5 years term amounting to R 1,847,408.96

ii) Pro-rata part of the 5 year period (last term) 1 May 2014 – 31 March 2017 amounting to R 269,413.81

(2) (a) There was a shift of R17 million from the National Solar Water Heater Project to personnel remuneration, travel, gratuity, events and relocation costs because of the savings under SWHP that could be utilised to defray excess expenditure in those items. The shift was done in line with Section 43(1) of the Public Finance Management Act, Act 1 of 1999.

(2) (b) The shift of R17 million has had a minimal impact on the project. The budget was largely allocated for installation of solar water heaters for the financial year 2017/18 which had not commenced by end of September 2017, as the department is currently busy with compliance requirements of governance. For the remaining months of the current financial year the achievable number of installations will not be impacted upon by the shift of funds.

(2) (c) The current targets for this project for the current year, is to increase the number of procured baseline systems in line with the budget allocation and train youth on the installation of solar water heaters at targeted municipalities. In terms of the achievement, the Department increased the number of procured baseline systems from 42 196 in 2016/17 to 87 206 in 2017/18.

Reply:

(1) (a) & (b) Yes

The Honourable Member did not specify the period for which the information is required.

(2) Furthermore, in accordance with the established practise applicable to parliamentary questions contained in the document titled, “Guide to Parliamentary Questions in the National Assembly”, I will not be able to provide names of persons as requested in the question. The document referred to prohibits Members of Parliament, including the Executive, from divulging names of persons, bodies when asking or responding to parliamentary questions. It specifically states the following:

“Questions are to be framed as concisely as possible. All unnecessary adjectives, references and quotations are omitted. Names of persons, bodies and, for example, newspapers are only used in questions if the facts surrounding the case have been proven. As the mere mention of such names could be construed as publicity for or against them, it should be clear that this practice is highly undesirable. If a question will be unintelligible without mentioning such names, the Departments concerned are notified of the name (-s) and this phrase is used: ".......a certain person (name furnished)”

Reply:

a) Yes, the Department had a contract with Mahlako-A-Phahla Investment.

(i) Services rendered were for transactional advisory to review the state of readiness for the Nuclear New Build Programme.

(ii) The initial contract was for three (3) months, i.e. 27 May to 26 August 2016 with further extension of four (4) months starting from 1 September to December 2016.

(iii) The department paid R20 174 423.82 for the initial contract and a further R67, 745, 337.77 for the extension of the contract.

(iv) (aa) The contract was approved by the Accounting Officer of the Department of Energy

(bb) Payment was approved by the responsible Programme Manager for Nuclear Energy.

Entity	(b)	(i) What services did the specified company provide	(ii) What was the duration of the contract,	(iii) What amount did the entity pay the specified company for the contract	(iv) Who approved the (aa) contract	(iv) Who approved (bb) payment?
NERSA	No	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
SANEDI	No	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
NRWDI	No	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
NNR	No	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
NECSA	Yes	Feasibility Study	27 May 2017 -30 March 2018	3,554,442.86	Senior Executive Manager: Pelindaba Enterprises	Senior Executive Manager: Pelindaba Enterprises
		Uxc Reports	27 May 2017 -30 March 2018	327,750.00
		Management Fees	27 May 2017 -30 March 2018	None
		Nuclear Fuel Feasibility Study	27 May 2017 -30 March 2018	12,398,629.74
		Project Management	27 May 2017 -30 March 2018	None
		Nuclear Fuel Feasibility Study	27 May 2017 -30 March 2018	387,366.41
CEF	Yes	To develop an acquisition strategy for renewable energy projects	2 months	None	The contract has not yet been signed but the procurement manager has issued a letter of intent	No payment has been done yet as the service provider has not started working

Reply:

There was no member of the specified family that was part of the official delegation that accompanied the President to the State Visit to Zambia.

Reply:

The matter raised by the Honourable Member can best be responded to by the National Treasury, as the competent authority.

Reply:

In carrying out its mandate, the Department develops legislation, undertakes programs and projects, and in that process interacts with a plethora of stakeholders and industry players of varying nature. This for example may take a form of bilateral meetings, visits, conferences, etc. and therefore it is practically impossible to mention with specific engagements that the department, often represented by different officials at different levels, has undertaken.

Reply:

SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION (SALGA) AND SOUTH AFRICAN CITIES NETWORK (SACN)

a) Not applicable. In respect of Salga, positions are filled through elective conference linked to the Local Government Elections while the board members of the SACN are mandated by their respective municipalities to form part of the board based on municipal council resolutions of each municipality.

b) Not applicable. Positions are filled through elective conference linked to the Local Government Elections.

MUNICIPAL DEMARCATION BOARD

(a) (b) The applications for persons to be appointed as a member board are advertised in accordance with Section 8(1)(a) of the Municipal Demarcation Act, Act 27 of 1998.

COMMISSION FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF CULTURAL, RELIGIOUS AND LINGUISTIC COMMUNITIES (CLR COMMISSION)

(a) (b) The current Commissioners were appointed in March 2014 for a five-year period, expiring in March 2019.

Reply:

a) The total cost of the involvement of the SA Nuclear Energy Corporation ‘s mobile hot cell in the removal of high activity sealed radioactive sources from 87 teletherapy units in the Federative Republic of Brazil was R 35 663 397.17.

b) No funds were budgeted by NECSA for the Mobile Hot Cell operation as the operation was in Brazil and funded by the United States Department of Energy and the Government of Brazil.

Reply:

(a)

	Value	(aa) Listed assets	(bb) Unlisted Investment
		(aaa) Directly held	(bbb) Indirectly held	(aaa) Directly held	(bbb) Indirectly held
	R’000	R’000	R’000	R’000	R’000
a) Current assets		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Unauthorised expenditure	6 488	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cash and cash equivalents	863 651	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Other Financial Assets	-	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Prepayment and advances	497 761	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Receivables	61 867	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Loans	-	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aid Assistance prepayments	-	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aid assistance receivables	-	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
(b) Non-Current assets		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Investments	-	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Receivables	96 632	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Loans	-	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Other Financial Assets	-	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

(b) Public Entities detailed breakdown of and valuation for current and non-current assets and investments:

SACE

Assets: Less than months <	(aa) Listed assets	(bb) Unlisted Investment
	(aaa) Directly held	(bbb) Indirectly held	(aaa) Directly held	(bbb) Indirectly held
Assets/Investment	R’000	R’000	R’000	R’000
Buildings	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Motor vehicles	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Office equipment	84 602.99	N/A	N/A	N/A
IT equipment	72 870.90	N/A	N/A	N/A
Leasehold improvements	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Intangible assets	20 736.23	N/A	N/A	N/A
Current assets	47 208 088	N/A	N/A	N/A
Assets: 3-6 months
Buildings	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Motor vehicles	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Office equipment	276 926.90	N/A	N/A	N/A
IT equipment	51 688.33	N/A	N/A	N/A
Leasehold improvements	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Intangible assets	39 465.59	N/A	N/A	N/A
Current assets	24 210 996	N/A	N/A	N/A
Assets: 6-12 months
Buildings	61 110 936.74	N/A	N/A	N/A
Motor vehicles	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Office equipment	851 192.17	N/A	N/A	N/A
IT equipment	76 444.51	N/A	N/A	N/A
Leasehold improvements	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Intangible assets	270 527.15	N/A	N/A	N/A
Current assets	25 095 798	N/A	N/A	N/A
Assets: 1 year and older
Buildings	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
Motor vehicles	138 000	N/A	N/A	N/A
Office equipment	3 078 392	N/A	N/A	N/A
IT equipment	3 857 437	N/A	N/A	N/A
Leasehold improvements	1 409 972	N/A	N/A	N/A
Intangible assets	5 524 281	N/A	N/A	N/A
Current assets	98 072 547	N/A	N/A	N/A

UMALUSI

	Value	(aa) Listed assets	(bb) Unlisted Investment
		(aaa) Directly held	(bbb) Indirectly held	(aaa) Directly held	(bbb) Indirectly held
	R’000	R’000	R’000	R’000	R’000
b) Current assets		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cash and cash equivalents	1 504	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Short-term deposit	70 835	N/A	N/A	70 835
Receivables from exchange transactions	4 379	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
(b) Non-Current assets		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Property, plant and equipment	43 344	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Operating lease assets	17	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Comment

• The short term investment is available cash invested with the Corporation for Public Deposits (CPD). The CPD is governed by the Corporation for Public Deposits Act 46 of 1984. The CPD accepts all deposits from the public sector and invests the funds in short-term money-market instruments and special Treasury bills. All funds invested with the CPD, and the interest earned on these funds, are payable on demand.

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Department responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

The Department is not responsible for the operation of a project post-handover and therefore is not involved in the marketing initiatives post-handover. This question will need to be referred to the Project Owning Entity who is the Valoyi Traditional Authority Trust.

 

Reply:

(1) The complaint was investigated by the South African Council of Educators (SACE) on 7 September 2017. The investigator, after conclusion of the case, recommended that no charges be levelled against the accused educator and furnished his reasons for the findings (Case 135/2017-GP).

(2) The educator in question was charged by SACE with 53 counts of applying corporal punishment on the learner. She has been placed on medication by her doctor, Dr Lugongolo for 6 months with effect from 08 August. This means that she may be fit for work in February 2018 and all that is known is that she has a mental condition. We tried contacting the school to ascertain her status, but the only number available keeps ringing unanswered and the landline number is no longer in service according to Telkom. The school is Prince Dokodoko High School (Case 119/2016-KZN).

(3) Without having to repeat the full reading of the charges, the Principal of Mphaphuli Secondary School was charged with three (3) charges:

• The first one was for refusing to cooperate with a SACE investigator;
• The second one was for refusing to grant the investigator access to the educators in the school; and
• The third one was for refusing to grant the investigator access to the learners or complainants in the school.

The hearing was scheduled to take place on 10 November 2017, but was postponed as his representative was engaged in arbitration on the day in question. The hearing will proceed in February 2018 (Case 133/2017-LP).

(4) The disciplinary hearing was finalised on 20 November 2017 and the presiding officer promised to furnish his report by 09 December 2017 (Case number 476/2016-MP).

(5) We have been informed by the school that the matter was postponed in court until January 2018. The accused will appear again in 2018.

Reply:

a) (i)(ii)(iii)

The Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs does not own any land

b) (i)(ii)(iii)

The Department is still awaiting a response from entities reporting to me.

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Departments responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

1. a) NERSA did not reverse any decision related to Eskom‘s coal contracts and costs. The decision taken by NERSA was that Eskom‘s information relating to coal contracts and cost not be published as it contained commercially sensitive information. Eskom has submitted all requested information to NERSA.

b) NERSA did not reverse any decision. (Limiting information only to the personnel of the Regulator is standard practice with all commercially sensitive information).

2. a) No decision was reversed by NERSA.

b) No decision was reversed by NERSA

Reply:

The Department utilises many service providers over the a wide range of service areas. The number of service providers utilised by the Department over the past five years is average. In accordance with the kind of services the Department renders.

UNQUOTE.

Reply:

a) The matter was asked during the meeting of the Portfolio committee on Energy on the 22 November 2017.

b) The Minister reaffirms the same answer provided to the committee.

Reply:

The information requested by the Honourable Member is not readily available in the Department. The Department has however, engaged the Provincial Departments responsible for Local Government to request the relevant information from municipality. The information will be submitted to the Honourable Member as soon as it is received.

Reply:

(1)(a)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb) The South African Police Service (SAPS), does not erect or repair security border fences or static observation posts. This is the responsibility of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF).

2. Border crossing observation posts are monitored and manned by members of the SANDF.

Reply:

Such information relating to service providers and/or contractors of the State Security Agency (SSA) forms part of the broader operational framework of the SSA and therefore remains classified and privileged. Information about service providers and/or contractors is a matter that falls in the ambit of national security and therefore excluded from public disclosure. It should however be observed that the SSA is held accountable on such matters by the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence (JSCI).

Reply:

This question requires consultation with various role players, including all station commanders. It is, therefore, requested that extension is granted to reply to this question. An extension period of five working days is requested, to gather and consolidate the correct information.

 

 

Reply:

1. The alleged employment of the relatives of Lieutenant General Richard Mdluli, in the South African Police Service (SAPS), is the subject of both criminal and internal disciplinary proceedings and as such, the matter is sub judice.

2. The alleged employment of the relatives of Lieutenant General Richard Mdluli, in the SAPS, is the subject of both criminal and internal disciplinary proceedings and as such, the matter is sub judice.