Questions and Replies

Reply:

Despite the presence of various billboard structures at Gillooly’s Interchange, none of these where applied for with SANRAL nor approved by SANRAL. Please see detailed answers to questions below.

(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.

(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.

(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received by SANRAL with regard to the Gillooly’s.

(b)(i)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(b)(ii)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none approved by SANRAL.

(c)(i)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.

(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.

(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.

(c)(ii)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL

(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL

(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received, so none rejected by SANRAL.

Reply:

See attached.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Sarah Baartman District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Amathole District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

(a) (i) (ii) (iii) and (iv) Attached find the spreadsheet as an Annexure containing the names of young persons incubated through the Groen Sebenza Programme, including those employed by different organisations and those unemployed.

(b) Some chose to further their studies while others were self-employed at the end of the programme. However, as indicated previpusly, the ongoing Tracer Study will provide the status quo in this regard.

(c) Opportunities are shared with young people as and when they arise through various platforms.

---ooOoo---

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Lejweleputswa District Municipality in the financial year 2016/17 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Ugu District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for uMgungundlovu District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for uThukela District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Zululand District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for uMkhanyakude District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Cetshwayo District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for iLembe District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Frances Baard District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Cape Winelands District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Overberg District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

(a), (b) and (c) The Integrated School Health Programme (ISHP) is implemented by school health teams employed by the Department of Health (DoH) in provinces. The reach of the services and the package provided, is dependent on the availability and composition of these school health teams in each geographic area. The Department of Basic Education receives signed off collated data on the number of learners that have received services in the preceding quarter from the national Department of Health. The list of schools is not provided.

(d) and (e) The cost of the school health services as well as the number of employees are the responsibility of each respective Provincial Education Department. This information is not available at DBE.

Reply:

a) The number of persons trained over the past five years are:

Department	Entities
14 449	22 920

b) The purpose for the training can be summarised as follows:

Department

Entities

Personal development plan (PDP): the PDPs of employees are informed by the key result areas of the individuals’ performance agreements. The employee and supervisor identify performance gaps as well as appropriate training and development interventions to address those gaps. The purpose of these training and development intervention seek to enhance the employees’ skills and competencies. The training interventions range from managerial, administrative to technical/professional training.

Health and safety Inherent job requirements Personal development plan Employee career aspirations Succession planning within the organisation and to improve technical skills within the water sector Learnership / internship / apprenticeship/ graduate trainee programmes

c) The training costs vary depending on the selected course (i.e. career path), the level of qualification (i.e. unskilled, semi-skilled, specialist) and its duration. The average cost can be summarised as follows:

Department	Entities
R 5 603,36	R 12 163,49

d) The positions can be summarised as follows:

Department	Entities
The training for departmental employees represents officials from the lowest to the highest level in the department.	Graduate and experiential learning Learnerships Unskilled Semi-skilled Technical worker or junior management Professional / specialist / middle management Senior management Top management

e)  The reasons that each specified individual was not employed following training are:

Department	Entities
Not applicable since the training was for departmental employees.	For the non-permanent employees (e.g. learnerships, internships) that could not be absorbed within the various entities, the reasons include but are not limited to No available internal vacancies at the time of completing the training Budget constraints

 

 

Reply:

a) (i) In terms of Section 1(1)(x) of the National Water Act, 1998 (Act no. 36 of 1998) (NWA) the Minister owns the land on which a Government Waterwork is situated. The Minister owns, manages and controls 322 dams (Government Waterworks) country wide. The extent of the land is determined scientifically up to the dam boundary line of each dam which includes the full supply level, the 1:100 year flood line and a buffer line. All excess land must in terms of Government Immovable Asset Management Act (GIAMA) and the disposal policies of the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) and the National Department of Public Works (NDPW) fall back to the NDPW.

(ii) In terms of ownership the Minister has exclusive rights on the land mentioned as above. No other Custodian Departments have any right over the mentioned land because Government Waterworks are National Assets and the water source must be protected in terms of the NWA.

(iii) None, due to the fact that the Minister acquires the minimum land needed for a Government Waterwork.

(aa) Refer to (a)(1)

(bb) Refer to (a)(1)

b) Refer to Annexure A for information regarding entities reporting to the Department.

ANNEXURE A

(b) How much land does the entities reporting to him	(i) own	(ii) have exclusive rights to and/or	(iii) lease from the State to	(aa) use and/or	(bb) occupy
Amatola Water	6 Lancaster Road Vincent East London- R2 372 250.00 3 Lancaster Road Vincent East London- R1 332 220.17 Albany Coast- R1 705 213.00	Nahoon WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Laing WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Craighead Pumping Station (and related land and dwellings on site) Glenmore WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Peddie Regional WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Gubu Dam (and related land and dwellings on site) Wriggleswade Dam  (and related land and dwellings on site) Rooikrantz WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Binfield WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Debe Nek WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Masincedane WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Upper Mnyameni WTW (and related land and dwellings on site) Sandile WTW (and related land and dwellings on site	None	Public Works Port Elizabeth workshop – Harrower Road	Public Works Port Elizabeth workshop – Harrower Road
Bloem Water	44509.1479 Hectare	75338.89 hectare	There are no properties leased from the state	None	None
Lepelle Northern Water	2 hectares valued at R6.4 million situated in Polokwane area	2 hectares valued at R6.4 million situated in Polokwane area	There are no properties leased from the state	None	None
Magalies Water	24 properties, of which covers the area of 169 hectares, 15 of the properties own by Magalies Water are still registered with Department Public Works, and Magalies Water is in the process of transferring ownership.	Magalies Water has 226 servitudes endorsement in different properties, of which it covers 54 163M2 and 105 servitudes not registered, which covers the area of 307 hectares	There are no properties leased from the state	None	None
Mhlathuze Water	Portion 6 ERF 6724 Richards Bay Registration Division GU in the Richards Bay Transitional Local Council area, Province of KwaZulu-Natal on sub-divisional diagram S.G no. 2118/1997 in extent 2 5012 hectares; Sub 4 of Lot 8723 Richards Bay (Extension No. 28) situated in the Richards Bay Transitional Local Council Area, Administrative District of Natal, Province of KwaZulu-Natal, in extent Three comma Three Five Nought One ( 3, 3501) hectares; Portion 41 of Reserve 6 No.15 825 Registration Division GU Province of KwaZulu-Natal in extent 44,4332 ( Forty Four , Four Three Three Two) hectares; ERF 960 Eshowe ( Extension Number 9 Registration Division GU Province of KwaZulu-Natal in extent 1534( One Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Four) square metres; Portion of ERF 1413 Eshowe Registration Division GU Province of KwaZulu-Natal in extent 1441( One Thousand Four Hundred and Forty One) square metres; and Portion 1 of the farm Richards Bay No. 16990 GU situated in the Township of Richards Bay, Administrative District of KwaZulu- Natal in the extent 3 542(Three Thousand Five and Forty Two) square metres as indicated on SG Diagram 2009/1999.	Mhlathuze Water does not have land that it has exclusive right to use.	Mhlathuze Water does has have land that it is leasing from the State:	None	None
Overberg Water	No land is owned except the wastewater treatment works in three schemes and houses.	Servitude to access infrastructure in someone property such as the adjacent farm.	None	None	None
Rand Water	7778.798ha land owned	4072.006ha Servitudes	None	None	None
Sedibeng Water	R142,440,370.95 (Both Land and Buildings for Office and Plant Operations: Total value of all regions combined as at 31 March 2018. Land used for Offices, Purification Plants and Pump station area is 144.9H but government owned).	R1,088,122.85 (Servitudes where the pipeline is laid. Right to use the land-Estimated area is 5.17657 km²).	None	Refer to response in (b) (i) & (ii) above	Refer to response in (b) (i) & (ii) above
Umgeni Water	Properties own by Umgeni Water are 451	Umgeni Water has exclusive right over 473 properties	Umgeni Water is leasing no land from the State	None	None
Trans Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA)	Total freehold land owned: 1318.35 hectares	Land with exclusive rights: 675.39 hectares;	State Land: 1115.63 hectares	None	State Land: 1115.63 hectares
Water Research Commission (WRC)	Through its subsidiary ERF 706 Pty (Ltd) WRC is currently the registered owner of a property with a building situated in Gezina, Pretoria. This property together with the building was sold during the 2017/18 financial year and the transfer of ownership in the Deeds office is underway.	Yes, the WRC own the building and the land and at this stage has exclusive right of use until the transfer to the new owners occur and this should happen soon	The WRC does not lease land from the state	The WRC is currently leasing and using office space in 4 Daventry Street, Lynnwood Bridge, Pretoria as it has sold the property ERF706 in Gezina.	See response (aa) above

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for Harry Gwala District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

1. (a) The Northern Cape hosts part of the international Square Kilometre Array (SKA), which is an international radio telescope project undertaken in collaboration with other countries including the UK and Australia. Analogue television transmissions produce high levels of interference and as such they have to be switched off and replaced with digital television transmissions via satellite.

(b) To date, all qualifying households in the core towns within a Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have been connected to the digital platform. Subsequent to the installations of devices to all households’ in the core towns of the SKA; including Carnarvon, Vanwyksvlei, Brandvlei, Williston and Vorsburg; analogue transmission services have since been switched off. However, analogue transmission services could not be switched in other areas of the SKA due to households that do not qualify for government subsidised decoders.

2. (a) The major challenges relates to the lack of resources mainly funding.

(b) Majority of the areas in the Northern Cape are covered by Satellite network and currently, there is no stock to distribute to the qualifying registered households.

3.  A table below present the statistics as at 31 March 2018.

PROVINCES	ESTIMATED INDIGENTS HOUSEHOLDS	(a) TOTAL INSTALLATIONS	(b) BALANCE
Northern Cape	111,559	41,687	69,872
Free State	341,306	104,051	237,255
Limpopo	562,980	24,686	538,294
Mpumalanga	455,867	40,292	415,575
KwaZulu Natal	860,786	40,399	820,387
Eastern Cape	538,633	10,946	527,687
North West	382,692	37,319	345,373
Western Cape	508,888	0	508,888
Gauteng	1,237,289	0	1,237,289
TOTALS	5,000,000	299,380	4,700,620

4. The department has not met the target in terms of

(a) the migration of five million qualifying households to receive government subsidised decoders;

(b) the migration of the majority of unsubscribed citizen who rely on the retail market to acquire migration devices

5. The Department is a policy maker and does not implement programmes on the ground. The department will ensure collaboration with relevant stakeholders such as the SABC and the industry to advocate for content development to feed the channels to be made available by digital migration. In 2018/19 the Department will develop a South African Audio-Visual content strategy to support the digital migration.

 

Reply:

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)
(i) Play Your Part programme: programme designed to promote active citizenship amongst South African’s a) Partnership with Sunday Times Generation Next which includes a conference and a media programme b) Play Your Part programme through activations, radio, online TV	National (Conference to be hosted in Gauteng)	12 million	R3 390 000
(ii) Constitutional awareness: designed to promote Constitutional awareness as part of Outcome 14 requirements. a) National Marketing campaign developed and executed on various media platforms (TV, radio and digital platforms) b) On the ground stakeholder engagements in Western Cape, Eastern Cape, Limpopo, Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal)	National	8 million	R4 690 000
(iii) Promotion of the Nation Brand on domestic and international platforms: promotion of the country and its positive attributes. a) Marketing campaign promoting the Nation Brand targeting traffic at Airports pre and during the BRICS Summit. b) Marketing campaign promoting the Nation Brand at Airports Telecommunication Union (ITU) Conference c) Media partnership support	Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and National (Media)	Estimated reach 15 million	(iii)R 2 500 000
(iv) Domestic and international Research Analysis: analysis on performance of the Nation Brand produced and communicated online and through various PR driven media platforms a) SA Inc project consultation on investor experience and Perceptions with business from the EU region. b) Research engagement with BRICS c) Pan-African Nation Brand University Dialogue.	Domestic and international	Estimated 5 000 000	iv) R3 500 000
(v) Stakeholder Programmes in collaboration with business, govt & civil society Nelson Mandela Centenary Investment Promotion Roundtables Road Safety Campaign Campus Dialogues Schools Outreach Thought Leadership Engagements	National	Estimated Reach 5 000 000	R6 500 000
(vi) International Reputation Management Campaign to promote country reputation	China, US, UK, Germany, Russia	Not applicable	R4 400 000
vii) International Stakeholder relations engagements and Global South Africans Programme (South Africans in the diaspora)	China, US, UK, Germany, Ghana	Not applicable	R3 300 000
viii) International & Domestic Media: CNN, BBC, CNBC Africa, EURONEWS, Local Radio, TV, Print and Online to support projects	North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Middle East, South Africa	Estimated reach 2 000 000 000	R15 000 000

Reply:

Key programmes on the rail infrastructure network is reflected in the table below. All of these projects are multi-year projects and dates indicated on current projects are as per contracts.

Plans/Programme	Region	d) Key Milestones	b &c) Projected Completion Date	e) Monitoring Mechanism
Re-Signalling Programme	KwaZulu/Natal (KZN)		25 Jun 2021	Project Progress meetings; Monthly report; APP; Quarterly Report DOT
		Phase 1: Pinetown line	20 Jul 2018
		Phase 2: New Rossborough Centralised Traffic Control Centre (CTC)	16 May 2019
		Phase 3A: Kwa Mashu to Temple	30 Nov 2018
		Phase 3B: Avoca to Springfield	27 May 2020
		Phase 4: Umlazi to Umbogintwini	23 Sep 2019
		Phase 5: Clairwood to Crossmoor	05 Jun 2020
		Phase 6: Berea to Congella	15 Oct 2020
		Phase 7: Durban station	11 May 2021
	Western Cape (WC)		30 Jun 2020	Project Progress Meeting ; Monthly report; APP Quarterly report to DOT
		Regional Monitoring and Train Control Centre (RM&TCC)	30 June 2018
		Phase 1.2: Wynberg – Simonstown, Crawford – Diep River	30 Apr 2018
		Phase 1.4: Koeberg – Maitland - Hazendal	31 May 2018
		Phase 1.3: Salt River - Kenilworth	31 Jul 2018
		Phase 3.1: Cape Town - Woodstock (South)	30 Sep 2018
		Phase 3.2: Cape Town - Woodstock (North)	31 Oct 2018
		Phase 2.3: Esplanade - Ysterplaat	31 Jan 2019
		Phase 1.1: Philippi - Kaptiensklip, Chris Hani	28 Feb 2020
		Phase 2.2: Woltemade – Parow	31 Mar 2020
		Phase 2.1: Langa - Nyanga, Bontheuwel – Sarepta	30 Apr 2020
		Phase 4.1: Tygerberg – Bellville	31 May 2020
		Phase 4.2: Kuils River - Strand, Eerste River - Muldersvlei	30 Jun 2020
	Gauteng		28 Feb 2021	Project Progress meetings; Monthly report; APP; Quarterly Report DOT
		Gauteng Nerve Centre (GNC)	Apr 2016 - Completed
		Phase 1: Midway – Residentia	31 Mar 2016 – Completed
		Phase 2: Kaalfontein – Leralla, Olifantsfontein – Irene	28 Nov 2016 – Completed
		Phase 3: Randfontein – Roodepoort	15 May 2017 – Completed
		Phase 4: Boksburg East – Springs, Daveyton – Alliance	15 Dec 2017 – Completed
		Phase 5: George Goch – Geldenhuys, Benrose – Kaserne West, Booysens – Crown	03 Apr 2018
		Phase 6: Rissik – Koedoespoort – Eerste Fabrieke	15 Dec 2019
		Phase 7: Jeppe – Johannesburg – Braamfontein	25 Sep 2018
		Phase 8: Centurion – Pretoria, Mitchell Street – Saulsville	07 Jan 2019
		Phase 9: Kempton Park – Knights	11 Mar 2019
		Phase 10: Langlaagte – Florida, Croesus	20 May 2019
		Phase 11: New Canada – Naledi, Orlando – Kliptown	14 Oct 2019
		Phase 12: Hercules – Belle Ombre, Capital Park East and West, Pretoria North – Mabopane, Rosslyn	23 Jun 2020
		Phase 13: De Wildt	06 Jul 2020
		Phase 14: Driehoek – Germiston, Angelo – Oosrand, Kutalo – Elsburg – Kwesine, India	01 Feb 2021
Blue Downs Rail Extension	Western Cape: Cape Town	Preliminary Design and EIA Detail Design Construction Operations Aim to commence Preliminary Design in 2018/19, thereafter timeframes can be confirmed with greater accuracy. Allow for 4-6 month procurement process for phases leading up to Operations	12 – 15 months 6 months – 30 months	Programme Management office Cape Town Intermodal Planning Committee
Depot Modernisation Wolmerton	Gauteng North	Phase 1 complete Phase 2 in testing & commissioning scheduled for completion by end March 2018 Phase 3 Consultants appointed Designs complete Contractor appointed All construction complete	February 2019 February 2020 November 2021 March 2026
Depot Modernisation Braamfontein	Gauteng South	Will be done in phases Phase 1 awaiting appointment of contractor by PRASA Board. 12 month design and construction period envisaged Phase 2 Consultants appointed Designs complete Contractor appointed All construction complete	June 2019 March 2020 December 2021 June 2024	Project Progress meetings; PRASA Tech Management Committee; Monthly report; APP; Quarterly Report DOT
Depot Modernisation Salt River	Western Cape	Will be done in Phases Phase 1 will be advertised by June 2018 and construction will be complete by June 2021 Phase 2 Consultants appointed Designs complete Contractor appointed All construction complete	December 2019 December 2020 December 2021 June 2025	PRASA Tech Management Committee; Monthly Report; APP Quarterly Report DOT
Depot Modernisation Durban Yard and Springfield	KZN	Consultants appointed Designs complete Contractor appointed All construction complete	January 2019 January 2020 November 2021 March 2026	PRASA Tech Management Committee; Monthly Report; APP Quarterly Report DOT

 

Reply:

YES, with most of its services.

In line with the phasing-in approach as agreed with all stakeholders including the National Department of Health, the following services are now operational at the Nelson Mandela Children's Hospital:

Radiology - MRI scans, CT scans, X-rays and ultrasound services

Day Ward - Day admissions for MRI and CT scan patients

Anaesthesiology Unit - General Anaesthesia for Radiology patients

NICU - Admission of Neonatal ICU patients

PICU - Admission of Paediatric ICU patients

Dialysis - Peritoneal and Haemo dialysis

Cardiology - Cardiac Diagnostics and pre-surgical work up for cardiac

surgery patients

Pharmacy - medicines and medical supplies for out-patients and inpatients

The Neonatal, Maternal and Child Health department is currently commissioning theatres and surgical services, and recruiting staff for the units. The following surgical services will be available in 2018/19: Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Paediatric Neuro Surgery, Paediatric Cardiac Surgery and Paediatric General Surgery.

END.

Reply:

a) The planning for the Tsitsikamma restaurant precinct development has been completed following the fire in November 2016 and is ready to be subjected to a tender process. After the restaurant was destroyed by the fire, SANParks decided to upgrade the entire restaurant precinct to include all infrastructure.

The project scope includes the following:

• Restaurant that accommodates 250 seats
• Curio shop with offices and stores
• Information centre as first point of arrival for visitors
• Multi use Boat house
• General Amenities for visitors that includes play areas, picnic areas as well as beach showers and dressing areas
• Bulk Services (Electricity, water and sewer)

b) It is envisaged that the tender and contracting process will take six months from May 2018 to October 2018. Construction is scheduled to commence in January 2019 after the peak tourism season. The estimated construction period is 18 months due to the difficult site and visitor management requirements, with estimated completion in September 2020.

The clients are being serviced from provided marquee since 10th December 2016

---ooOoo---

Reply:

Despite the presence of various billboards on bridges owned by SANRAL in Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality, none of these where applied for with SANRAL nor approved by SANRAL. These billboards are illegal and should be removed, but SANRAL is prevented in doing so by the dispute resolution mechanisms provided for in Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act with Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (they illegally approved these billboards) and litigation relating to similar billboards with one of the transgressors. Please see detailed answers to questions below.

a) (i)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(a) (ii)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = 2 objections lodged by SANRAL

(bbb) 2015-2016 = 13 objections lodged by SANRAL

(ccc) 2016-2017 = 22 objections lodged by SANRAL

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = 12 objections lodged by SANRAL

(b) (i)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(bbb) 2015-2016 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(ccc) 2016-2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = No applications received by SANRAL, so none supported by SANRAL.

(b) (ii)

(aaa) 2014-2015 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)

(bbb) 2015-2016 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)

(ccc) 2016-2017 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)

(bb) since 1 April 2017 = Do not comply to section 48 and 50 of the SA National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act no. 7)

Reply:

(a) and (b) The Intergrated School Health Programme (ISHP) is implemented by school health teams employed by the Department of Health (DoH) in provinces. The reach of the services and the package provided, is dependent on the availability and composition of these school health teams in each geographic area. The Department of Basic Education receives signed off collated data on the number of learners that have received services in the preceding quarter from the national Department of Health. The list of schools is not provided.

Reply:

The ten leading causes for admission to a health care facility in Nkangala District Municipality in 2016/17 are:

• HIV and AIDS
• TB
• Lower respiratory infections
• Hypertensive heart diseases
• Ischaemic heart diseases
• Cerebrovascular diseases
• Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
• Diabetes
• Diarrheal diseases
• Road injuries

END.

Reply:

The ten leading causes for admission to a health care facility in Gert Sibande District Municipality in 2016/17 are:

• HIV and AIDS
• TB
• Lower respiratory infections
• Hypertensive heart diseases
• Cerebrovascular diseases
• Diabetes
• Diarrheal diseases
• Road injuries
• Meningitis/Encephalitis
• Nephritis/Nephrosis

END.

Reply:

As things stand, there are no plans to scrap the e-toll system. However there are ongoing discussions at National and Provincial governments. Once decision has been reached and finalised it will be communicated.

Reply:

1. I have been advised that the Judge was appointed as the Chairperson of the Interim Board of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) in October 2017 prior to her appointment by the then President of the Republic of South Africa as a Judge of the Gauteng Division of the High Court. Her appointment as a Judge was effective from 01 January 2018 but due to her position as the Chairperson of the Interim Board of PRASA, the Judge did not assume her position as a Judge of the Gauteng Division of the High Court. She requested the Judge President of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, to request me to approach the President with a request that her appointment date be deferred to 1 April 2018. Whilst she was the Chairperson of the Interim Board of PRASA, the Judge never sat nor carried any judicial functions. I have been informed that she has subsequently resigned as Chairperson of the Interim PRASA Board with effect from 16 March 2018.

2. It is not within my purview to determine whether a conduct of a Judge constitutes a breach of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The responsibility to determine whether a Judge has committed a breach of the Code of Judicial Conduct is vested upon the Judicial Conduct Committee established in terms of section 8 of the Judicial Service Commission Act, 1994 (Act no 9 of 1994) (JSC Act). Additionally, Article 2 of that Code of Judicial Conduct is clear as it provides that ‘any wilful or gross negligent breach of the Code is a ground upon which a complaint against a Judge may be lodged in terms of section 14(4)(b) of the JSC Act’. This simply means that if any determination has to be made about the conduct of the Judge, a complaint that complies with the provisions of section 14 of the JSC Act, must first be lodged with the Judicial Conduct Committee setting out the grounds upon which the complaint is based. There is currently no complaint lodged with the Judicial Conduct Committee about Judge’s conduct.

Reply:

(1) (a) (i) Construction contract award value is R487 279 565,59 excluding CPA and VAT.

(ii) The 30 month construction contract commenced on 16 March 2016 and was scheduled to be completed by 15 September 2018. The contractor is however currently behind schedule and now only forecasts to complete in November 2019, with associated applicable contractual penalties to be applied by SANRAL.

(b) The contractor is Basil Read Limited

(2) (a) A total of 30 households in Musina Nancefield Ext 4 are affected due to their houses been within the new road reserve.

(b) The affected households are provided with new houses in Musina Nancefield Ext 10.

(c) Ownership of the affected stands vests with Musina local municipality. SANRAL compensated the municipality for the affected stands as well as for the new stands identified by the municipality. SANRAL is in the process of constructing new houses to all applicable national standards on the new stands at SANRAL’s cost. Compensation values per affected property have been determined by independent Professional Valuers appointed by SANRAL through negotiations with households and the municipality. The affected households also agreed to R3000 per household compensation for relocation costs to be paid by SANRAL.

Reply:

a) Budgeting for provisioning of educators is done in terms of the normal government budgeting processes. On an annual basis, each Member of the Executive Council (MEC) for Education declares a basket of posts his/her respective Provincial Education Department, based on the available budget. Such posts are then distributed to schools using the post provisioning model. Therefore, vacancies that exist at any point are part of the declared post establishment and are funded and there is no additional amount of funding required to fill existing vacancies.

b) Requirements for funding for infrastructure is based on the Regulations Relating to Minimum Norms and Standards for Public School Infrastructure. As at the publication of the Norms and Standards, a shortfall of R 182 billion was estimated to address new schools and new spaces to be provided to bring all schools to optimum functionality. This includes provision of new education and curricular spaces, education support areas as well as administrative spaces. The sector is planning to conduct a condition assessment of all schools to determine the current backlog and calculate the resultant funding required.

 

QUESTION: NA 1010- I

COMPILER:

MS S GEYER (3740)

CD/TE

DATE:

MR ER MAFOKO

EXT: X 4317

DATE:

DR G WHITTLE

A/DDG: SECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT

DATE:

MS P TYOBEKA

ACTING DIRECTOR–GENERAL

DATE:

QUESTION NA 1010- I APPROVED/ NOT APPROVED/ AMENDED

MR ME SURTY, MP

DEPUTY MINISTER

DATE:

QUESTION: NA 1010- I APPROVED/ NOT APPROVED/ AMENDED

MRS AM MOTSHEKGA, MP

MINISTER

DATE:

Reply:

1. (a) What number of (i) case backlogs does the Competition Commission have and (ii) days has each case been backlogged for, (b) what was the average time line, in days, from receiving a complaint to resolving a case in (i) 2015, (ii) 2016 and (iii) 2017 and (c) how does the commission monitor the (i) settlement agreements reached and (ii) progress on each agreement

The Competition Commission advises that it has a total of 64 cases on backlog in cartel matters, with the periods of backlog differing by case, with the complexity of cases largely driving the period of the backlog.

The following table provides information on the average time taken for different cartel investigations as well as enforcement/other abuse of dominance and restrictive practices, for the past three years:

Category	Average no. of days to complete all cases
	2015/16	2016/17	2017/18
Cartels	1044 days	684 days	1061 days
Enforcement Other- abuse of dominance, restrictive practices	396 days	329 days	254 days

All settlement agreements concluded between the Competition Commission (“the Commission”) and respondent firms are presented to the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) for confirmation as consent orders of the Tribunal in terms of section 49D of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”). Once so confirmed by the Tribunal, a consent order may in terms of section 64 of the Act, be served, executed and enforced as if it were an order of the High Court.

Where a settlement agreement contains an on-going commitment or undertaking by a respondent firm to pay penalties or to perform remedial action, performance is monitored by the legal and economic teams of the Commission.

(2) Have any cases been referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for prosecution; if so, what are the details of the cases?

The Commission has referred certain cases to the relevant criminal investigation agency for criminal investigation. The Commissioner advises that further details of the cases cannot be disclosed at this stage because they are subject to ongoing criminal investigation.

-END-

Reply:

Attached is the latest detailed Burden of Disease profile for John TaoloGaetsewe District Municipality for the period 2010 to 2015 by age and gender.

END.

Reply:

(a) All clinics have administrative support.

(b) Not applicable.

END.

Reply:

(a) (i) the department does not own land

(ii) South African resources agency has ownership of the land listed below:

ITEM NO.	PRO PERTY NAME	LACATION	PROPERTY EXTENT	PROPERTY USE/INTENDED USE
EASTERN CAPE
1	The Lookout	Kirkwood District	3 947m2	Memorial and Grave site
2	Old Congregational Church	Cradock	1 753m2	Church used by the local community
3	Mooimeisiesfontein	Riebeeck East	69 156 m2	Main building leased; Repurposing concepts in process of being determined for socio-economic benefit for the community
4	Old Gaol	Grahams town	3 736 m2	SAHRA office; Portion of the property vacant for leasing
5	Old Residency	King Williams Town	10746 m2	Vacant property; Best use concepts in process of being determined for State use with Dept. of Public Works
6	Concentration Camp Garden of Remembrance	Aliwal North	5 312m²	Memorial and Cemetery
FREE STATE
7	Burger Monument	Edenburg	52 589m²	Memorial
KWAZULU NATAL
8	Old Fort	Durban	20 703m²	Public Open Space
9	Blarney Cottage	Richmond	2.4571ha	Vacant; Engagements in process with the Richmond Municipality to determine best use concepts for socio-economic benefits to the community
10	Birthplace of Louis Botha	Greytown	645m²	Memorial
11	Spioenkop Battlefield	Bergville	46.7127ha	Memorial
12	Elandslaagte Memorial	Klip River District	149m²	Memorial
13	Piet Retief Grave	Ulundi	4307m²	Grave site,memorial
LIMPOPO
14	Moordfift Monument	Mokopane	132m²	Memorial
15	Old English Fort	Polokwane	18323m²	Memorial
16	Verdun Ruins	Soutpansberg	3789m²	Archeological site
17	Mapochs Caves	Roossenekal	63.1100ha	Archeological site
MPUMALANGA
18	Krugerhof	Waterval Onder	440m²	Museum
NORTH WEST
19	Old Powder Magazine	Potchefstroom	70m²	Monument
20	Old Fort & Cemetery	Potchefstroom	3 735m²	Memorial, Cemetery
21	Site of Livingstone`s House	Marico District	343m²	Ruins, natural site
NORTHERN CAPE
22	Union Masonic	Kimberely	426m²	Use of building by local church
WESTERN CAPE
23	Granite lodge	Cape Town CBD	1505m²	SAHRA Head Office
24	Wouter Wessels Vault	Green point	331m²	Vault
25	Vlakenberg Manor	Observatory	1.1456ha	Leased for portion of a hotel and restaurant
26	Van Riebeeck`s Hedge	Bishopscourt	19 151m²	Museum; Repurposing of property for conference facilities
27	Het Posthuys Museum	Muizenberg	1 977m²	Museum; Repurposing of property for conference facilities
28	Welcome Cottage	Glencairn	2 885m²	Repurposing for best use concept in process; Engagement with DPW for potential State use
29	Hugo Family Vault	Simons Town	1 042m²	Vault
30	Dal Josafat Farm	Paarl	232.5850ha	Buildings are leased; Repurposing of property for socio-economic benefit; Engagement with DPW for the best use concept; Engagement with local municipality for the best use concepts
31	Onderdal School	Paarl	8 728m²	SAHRA site office; Repurposing of property in process with DPW.
32	Kleinbosch Cemetery	Paarl	1 065m²	Cemetery
33	Groenenberg School	Wellington	8 565m²	Vacant; Repurposing concepts for community benefit in process with DPW
34	Tulbagh Erf 56	Tulbagh	4 479m²	Community Vegetable garden
35	Tulbagh Erf 255	Tulbagh	4 746m²	Open Garden for Community use
36	Struisbaai Fisherman Cottages	Struisbaai	17 043m²	Repurposing of property into holiday cottages for leasing

The head office which housed the Department and the following entities National Film and Video Foundation (NFVF); national Heritage Council (NHC) and the Pansalb are leasing their buildings from the Private persons.

All other entities occupy government properties.

Reply:

(1)The Department does not have an approved sexual harassment and assault policy in place.

(a) A draft policy has been developed and submitted to the Departmental Bargaining Chamber (DBC) for consultation.

b) It is anticipated that the sexual harassment and assault policy will be approved in the 2018/19 financial year.

(i) Incidents of sexual harassment are reported through the normal grievance procedure.

(ii).The draft policy does not stipulate consequence management and sanctions. However, consequence and sanctions will be determined by the outcome of each case.

(2)

(a) (i) There were no cases of sexual harassment and assault reported in the past three years

(ii) There were no cases of sexual harassment and assault opened since 2017

(b) (i) N/A

(ii) N/A

(iii) N/A

(c) N/A

Reply:

The Department of Environmental Affairs size of the land occupied is 3.1 hectares (ha).

(b) 1. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI)

(i) 6 397ha (for use as national botanical gardens)

(ii) 991ha (for use as part of national botanical gardens) and 85ha (for use by the National Zoological Garden)

(iii) Not applicable

(aa) 1 390 ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens) and 200 ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens).

(bb) 1 390ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens) 1 390 ha and 200 ha (to use and occupy as part of South Africa’s national botanical gardens).

2. South African Weather Services (SAWS)

1. The South African Weather Service owns 59,29 hectares.
2. Not applicable
3. Not applicable

(aa) Not applicable.

(bb) Not applicable.

3. iSimangaliso Wetland Park

(i) Not applicable

(ii) 332 000ha, managed by iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority (appointed as a Management Authority in accordance with the proclamation in terms of the World Heritage Convention Act, 1999).

(iii) Not applicable

(aa) Not applicable.

(bb) Not applicable.

4. South Africa National Parks (SANParks)

(i) South African National Parks owns 3 721 192 hectares of Land.

(ii) SANParks have exclusive rights to 4 026 040ha of Land for use as National Parks/Conservation Purposes.

(iii) SANParks leases approximately 304 848ha of land.

(aa) The hectares of land mentioned above are used as National Parks for Conservation Purposes.

(bb) Not applicable

---ooOoo---

Reply:

1. (a) (i) Execujet SA (Pty) Ltd

Fortune Air (Pty) Ltd

National Airways Corporation (Pty) Ltd

VOGN (Pty) Ltd

South African Airways

(ii) The SAAF procurement process of VVIP chartered aircraft does not allow for direct chartering from individuals, unless the approved tender processes were adhered to (including, but not restricted to approval from National Treasury).

(b) (i) See below-listed spreadsheet.

(ii) The cost to hire each aircraft:

(c) National Airways Corporation (Pty) Ltd: R17 409 603.65

Execujet SA (Pty) Ltd: R12 660 961.82

Fortune Air (Pty) Ltd: R 8 418 837.83

VOGN (Pty) Ltd: R 8 361 503.42

South African Airways: R 1 932 956.54

Reply:

The Economic Development Department, ITAC, Competition Commission and Competition Tribunal do not own land and currently rents office space. Attached as Annexure ‘A’ is information on land which IDC owns. The properties are part of the IDC’s overall portfolio.

 

-END-

Reply:

I have been informed by the SOUTH AFRICAN POST OFFICE (SAPO) as follows:

1. The South African Postbank Limited “Postbank” does not have a banking license but it has been exempted from the provisions of the Banks Act as a deposit-taking institution.

(a) Yes

(b) The timeframe to grant the banking license is determined by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) and there is no prescribed period in which to grant the license.

2. There are two layers to the banking license application process and the applications for both layers have already been submitted to the SARB.

(a) The first layer entailed the lodgement of the application with the SARB for authorisation to establish the bank as required in terms of section 12 of the Banks Act on 05 September 2013. The authorisation was granted to SAPO on 04 July 2016 wherein Postbank was given a maximum of 12 months (1 year) to comply with the set conditions before it could accordingly submit an application for the banking licence. The set conditions were duly met within the set timelines. The actual application to register Postbank as a bank was then lodged with the SARB on 26 June 2017 (ahead of 3 July 2017 deadline) in terms of section 16 of the Banks Act.

(b) Achievements to-date:

A critical milestone was achieved when SAPO was granted approval in terms of the Banks Act to establish a Bank and was given a maximum of 12 months to comply with the conditions and accordingly submit an application for the banking licence. The met conditions included:

(i) Minister’s determination of the split of Assets & Liabilities between SAPO and Postbank based on completion of independent audits.

(ii) Submission of the five-year financial forecasts for Postbank to the SARB.

(iii) Minister’s appointment of the initial Postbank Board: Initial Postbank Board appointed on 01 April 2017 following completion of:

• • Onerous bank regulatory assessments processes: Fit and proper assessments of the prospective board members conducted by both the independent auditors and the SARB;

• • • Concurrent Ministerial approval process (Telecommunications and Postal Services Minister and the Finance Minister); and

• • • Cabinet approval process.

(iv) The appointment of the initial Board enabled the incorporation of the Postbank Company with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) on 19 April 2017

SARB is busy adjudicating on the actual banking application. Parallel to adjudication process, the Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services, the National Treasury and SAPO have been working together to address some of key challenges. These involve:

• Agreeing on the optimal bank controlling company structure for Postbank.
• Alignment of the Banks Act with the Companies Act to enable state owned entities [Postbank and its bank controlling company (BCC)] to be registered as a bank and BCC respectively.

 

Approved/ not approved

Dr Siyabonga Cwele, MP

Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services

Date:

Reply:

(a) The NEF has not yet been incorporated as a subsidiary of the IDC. Technical work has been completed and includes an assessment of the regulatory and governance requirements to ensure that all applicable regulatory framework, including the PFMA, are complied with. Following completion of a review of legislative implications, the modalities of incorporation will then be considered by Cabinet.

(b) The R500 million has not been drawn as yet, as certain conditions precedent flowing from the review and approval are still to be met, namely National Treasury approval and formalization of processes by Cabinet.

-END-

Reply:

DAFF’S RESPONSE:

1. The destruction of the Indigenous Forest occurred when a contractor appointed by Amathole Forestry Company (AFC) was felling trees and the trees fell over and destroyed the indigenous forest. The Department took the matter up with AFC and instructed the company to rehabilitate the destroyed area. AFC is currently rehabilitating the area by replanting the indigenous trees that were destroyed back into the area and will inform the Department once the rehabilitation work is complete. The Department will then conduct a site visit to verify and confirm if the rehabilitation complies with norms and standards. The matter will only be reported to the Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) if AFC fails to rehabilitate the area according to acceptable norms and standards.

2. The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries will not revoke the lease agreement with the Amathole Forestry Company as the transgression does not constitute a material breach to the lease agreement. As mentioned above, AFC has already started implementing the corrective measure by rehabilitating the affected area.

Reply:

1. No, South Africa has not signed the petition with the Presidents of Uganda, Gabon and Botswana calling on the European Union to close its ivory market as South Africa’s Constitution allows for the sustainable utilisation of the country’s natural resources - ivory is one of these natural resources. South African National Parks and some of the provincial conservation authorities have stockpiles of ivory which have been legally obtained through natural deaths and/or hunting of problem elephants. If the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) approves the international sale of ivory (through the appropriate proposals), the government can then access much needed funds which would result from such sales to be ploughed back into conservation of our natural resources.

(2) The Department of Environmental Affairs has not taken any steps to close the legal ivory trade in South Africa as the legal trade in ivory is regulated under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004) and the Threatened or Protected Species (ToPS) Regulations. Retailers in South Africa who are selling ivory must be registered as traders under ToPS to sell ivory, and a buyer needs a permit to buy and to possess the ivory. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) recommends that Parties to the Convention close domestic ivory markets that are contributing to poaching or illegal trade. There is no evidence that the legal trade in ivory in South Africa is contributing to poaching and illegal trade and, accordingly, the legal ivory trade has not been closed.

---ooOoo---

Reply:

DAFF’S RESPONSE:

• Currently the land owned by Fort Cox is close to 843 ha, which is the balance of about 750 ha that were given to the community of Cwaru as settlement.

Overall land utilisation at fort Cox forms part of student training, with 41 ha of irrigable land and 60 ha of dry land together with 33 camps used for grazing of animals. However, it must be stated that there are people that have encroached on the North-West side of the land, which is related to fences not being in place, as expected.

• There is no land that has been leased nor sold to anyone for the period indicated. Thus no terms have ever been established, at all.

Reply:

DAFF’S RESPONSE:

• The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) is not aware of any massive excavation taking place on the leased land at Zingcuka Forest and therefore will institute an investigation to ascertain the facts. The Amathole Forestry Company (AFC) has a right to quarry on existing quarries on the leased and land for the purpose of constructing or maintaining the road network within the leased land. However, for new quarries, AFC has to submit an application and get an approval from DAFF.

• There is no permission that has been given to the Amathole Forest Company (AFC) to excavate new quarry site at Zingcuka Forests.

Reply:

I am not aware of any work undertaken by the Industrial Development Corporation in partnership with the Public Investment Corporation to assess the economic cost of public sector corruption. The question may be referring to work undertaken for the PICC (Presidential Infrastructure Coordinating Commission) by the IDC, on the potential economic cost of corruption, details of which were provided to the Honourable Member last year in response to Parliamentary Question 2843 published on 15 September 2017, and which is reproduced below for ease of reference.

“The information on the cost of corruption was based on an economic modeling exercise that sought to quantify the cost of the reduction in real capital spending that results from corruption and the impact on decreased spending in the SA economy on goods and services. While the full extent and thus real costs of corruption is unknown precisely because by its nature it is concealed, a calculation was done based on a scenario where corruption results in a 10% increase in costs; this increase was then modeled into the data-sets to obtain GDP and employment effects.

The purpose of the modeling exercise was to show that corruption is not a ‘victimless’ crime and that the opportunity costs of improperly and unlawfully diverting resources for private gain, comes at a significant cost to economic growth, job creation and service delivery. There is a compelling case for immediate and decisive action against corruption, based on the costs it imposes on the economy, on jobs and on the poor. The results of this modeling exercise were referred to in my speech at the 11th Annual Competition Law, Economics and Policy Conference on 31 August 2017 as well as at other public gatherings and were also shared with the Committees of the Economic Cluster, in Parliament, on 10 October 2017.

During my address to the 11th Annual Competition Law, Economics and Policy Conference on 31 August 2017, I noted the following:

Neither corruption in the public sector (with its private sector counterparties) nor collusion between large firms are victimless crimes. Corruption takes resources away from housing, jobs, social grants, education and health facilities. Collusion increases the costs of doing business, it stunts the dynamism and competitiveness that is needed and it has a negative impact on growth and jobs.

A World Bank study on competition in South Africa noted the following:

“In the case of four cartels in maize, wheat, poultry and pharmaceuticals – products which make up 15.6% of the consumption basket of the poorest 10 percent – conservative estimates indicate that around 200 000 people stood to be lifted above the poverty line by tackling cartel overcharges”.

We recently began doing work to quantify the cost of corruption in the public sector, based on just a 10% increase in the price of infrastructure projects as a result of corruption...Based on our modelling, it leads to at least R27bn foregone annually in GDP and the loss of 76 000 jobs that would otherwise have been created. So corruption is not only an ethical issue, it is also a profound issue of delivery, of growth, of services to the poor.

There are some troubling matters to address in looking at corruption and the collusion therewith by professional firms, from auditors to lawyers and others.

The culture of rampant acquisition is spreading so widely that the professional standards of integrity that is a hallmark of functioning institutions, are under enormous pressure. One of its outcomes is a fraying of the social compact that all societies need and unless we act with resolution, we will not build a society that achieves the vision of the constitution, indeed, we will betray it.

There are things we can do, practical things, while the wider battle to ensure integrity in the public and private sectors, is pursued.

One of the provisions in the Construction industry Settlement Agreement that I referred to earlier, is an Integrity Commitment that CEOs of the seven largest companies signed publicly and I want to briefly quote from it:

“ In my capacity as CEO of [name of company], I do hereby declare and affirm that:

1. I will conduct business, and will do everything in my power to ensure that the company and all of its associated companies (‘the Group’) conducts business in South Africa, in accordance with sound legal and ethical practice;
2. I will not be involved, and will do everything in my power to ensure that no one in the Group is involved, in any kind of bribery, corruption, collusion or unfair means of furthering our business interests;
3. I will do everything in my power to instil a culture of integrity, honesty and transparency in the Group consistent with this declaration
4. I will develop and actively promote codes of conduct imposing ethical and legal standards on all personnel in the Group that are aligned with international best practice for the construction industry and impose appropriate penalties on those who don’t comply; and
5. I will use my best efforts, and take firm steps, in line with and pursuant to my executive management authority, to expose, confront, eradicate and prevent collusion and corruption in the construction industry and in all the construction industry’s dealings with public entities, private sector institutions and with each other.”

-END-