Questions and Replies
20 March 2018 - NW711
Tarabella - Marchesi, Ms NI to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Whether her department has a sexual harassment and assault policy in place; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will her department have such a policy in place; if so, (i) how are reports investigated and (ii) what are the details of the consequence management and sanctions stipulated by the policy; (2) (a) what is the total number of incidents of sexual harassment and assault that have been reported in her department (i) in each of the past three financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017, (b) what number of cases were (i) opened and concluded, (ii) withdrawn and (iii) remain open based on the incidents and (c) what sanctions were issued for each person who was found to have been guilty?
Reply:
1. Yes.
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable
(i) Labour Relations Practitioners are designated officials delegated to execute the investigation function to gather evidence upon receipt of complaints with additional support through outsourcing of Labour Law experts where deemed necessary.
(ii) The consequence management and sanctions are in line with the Public Service Policy and Procedures on Management of Sexual Harassment which provides a guideline on the list of sanction ranging from:
- Counselling,
- verbal warning,
- written warning,
- final written warning,
- suspension/fine,
- demotion (as an alternative to dismissal), and
- dismissal.
2. (a)
(i) One incident of sexual harassment and no incident on assault in 2014/15.
No incident of sexual harassment nor assault was reported in 2015/2016.
Two incidents of sexual harassment and one incident of assault in 2016/2017.
Two incidents of sexual harassment and one incident of assault in 2017/2018.
(ii) Six incidents have been reported since 01 April 2017.
Four incidents on sexual harassment and two incidents on assault.
(b)
(i) Seven cases were opened and six concluded.
(ii) No cases were withdrawn.
(iii) One case remains open pending approval of charges and disciplinary hearing.
(c) None found guilty.
---ooOoo---
05 March 2018 - NW317
Bara, Mr M R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What amount did (a) her department and (b) each entity reporting to her spend on the promotion or celebration of the Year of O R Tambo on the (i) Africa News Network 7 channel, (ii) SA Broadcasting Corporation (aa) television channels and (bb) radio stations, (iii) national commercial radio stations and (iv) community (aa) television and (bb) radio stations since 1 January 2017?
Reply:
(a) None yet.
(b) None yet.
(i) None yet.
(ii) None yet.
(aa) None yet.
(bb) None yet.
(iii) None yet.
(iv) None yet.
(aa) None yet.
(bb) None yet.
---ooOoo---
05 March 2018 - NW268
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether Sub 8 of the Heartsease Farm number 3291 in the Okhahlamba Local Municipality, in KwaZulu-Natal, where the construction of a petrol station is proposed, falls within the proposed United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization buffer zone surrounding the Okhahlamba World Heritage Site; if so, what steps has her Department taken to ensure that the proposed construction does not proceed; if not, what are the relevant details; and (2) whether her Department conducted any research and/or studies to determine the potential impact of the proposed construction on the tourism sector that is linked to the World Heritage Site; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of the outcomes?
Reply:
1. Yes, the anticipated development is within the proposed buffer zone of Maloti-Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site. The draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR) is still under review, and it is important to note that the decision on whether the development proceeds or not and under what conditions will be informed by the assessment that has been commissioned. Because the proposed development is in the vicinity of the World Heritage Site, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Practice Note on Environmental Impact Assessments and the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) Guidelines on Heritage Impact Assessment will be taken into consideration, as required by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
2. The Basic assessment process will ascertain, inter alia, any socio-economic and cultural considerations, including relevant studies and permissions to be sought in this regard, not excluding those relating to or relevant tourism and conservation of the world heritage property.
---ooOoo---
05 March 2018 - NW211
Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
In view of increasing incidents (details furnished) of violent and in some instances murderous attacks on visitors, who do hiking trails in particular, in the Table Mountain National Park, (a) what number of incidents, including the severity thereof in each case, have been recorded (i) in (aa) 2013, (bb) 2014, (cc) 2015, (dd) 2016 and (ee) 2017 and (ii) since 1 January 2018 and (b) what action has she taken or intends to take to put an end to these incidents?
Reply:
(a) The incidents recorded in Table Mountain National Park are mainly robberies and are as follows:
(i) (aa) 2013 (there were 11);
(bb) 2014 (there were 16);
(cc) 2015 (there were 19);
(dd) 2016 (there were 11); and
(ee) 2017 (there were 22)
(ii) There have been six and one fatal incident since 01 January 2018
(b) The following actions were taken .
Additional resources were deployed to the affected areas.
Various operational plans are being reviewed and considered, including:
- Joint operations with South African Police Services (SAPS);
- surveillance observation points to monitor the mountain;
- increased patrols in the area; and
- deployment of a South African National Parks dog unit.
Also media relations interventions are ongoing.
Strategic focus areas were identified for investigation, including:
-
- Planning and implementation of operations;
- permeability of the urban edge;
- establishment of a Joint Operations Centre;
- establishment of a rapid response team;
- technology options;
- ranger capablity to meet ever changing challenges; and
- proactive communications.
The South African National Parks held a Chief Executive Office (CEO) Security Cluster Meeting that was attended by:
- CEO: SANParks and the Park representatives;
- representative of the Provincial Police Commissioner of the Western Cape;
- representative of the SAPS Cluster;
- Head of Department for Community Safety representing the Member of Executive Council;
- Wilderness Search and Rescue;
- South African Navy; and
- the City of Cape Town did not send a representative.
The South African National Parks (SANParks) and SAPS continue to work together to implement operational plans and joint patrols in order to keep crime to a minimum and also to address safety concerns across the Park. On 13 February 2018, two suspects were arrested and charged with robbery in the Kalk Bay mountain hiking trail area. They appeared in the Muizenberg Magistrate’s Court and are still in custody.
---ooOoo---
27 December 2017 - NW3859
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
With reference to the four work streams of Operation Phakisa: Waste Economy, how will her department package (a) waste and (b) e-waste differently from the way it is currently packaged?
Reply:
(a) One of the work streams within Operation Phakisa was the Hazardous Waste. One initiative from this work stream related to ash waste. The officials have developed draft regulations for the exclusion of waste or portions of waste from the definition of waste. These proposed regulations will provide for the beneficiation of certain waste streams whilst not having to adhere to the relevant waste legislation (licence requirements). This is after a rigorous process has been followed to obtain the exclusion which includes various risk assessments and waste classification. The waste streams initially include boiler ash, metalurgical slag, biomass and gypsum. These regulations will be published for public comments in due course.
The following twenty (20) initiatives developed within the 4 work streams, aim to maximise diversion of waste from landfill sites and also increase South Africa’s competitiveness in the chemicals industry and create a positive enabling business environment for Small Medium Micro Enterprises to foster inclusive growth. These include amongst others:
Industrial work stream
Initiative 1 - Increase ash uptake for alternate building materials
Initiative 2 - Accelerate innovation and commercialize existing Research & Development (R&D)
Initiative 2a - Use ash as soil ameliorant; and
Initiative 2b - Use ash to treat acid mine drainage and backfill mines.
Initiative 3 - Export ash and ash products.
Initiative 4 - Zero sewage sludge to landfill.
Initiative 4a - Anaerobic Digester Biogas to Energy; and
Initiative 4b - Fluidised Bed Reactor Thermal Treatment.
Initiative 5 - Towards zero meat production waste to landfill by 2023.
Municipal Solid Waste work stream
Initiative 6 - Introduction of an e-waste levy to increase collection rate
Initiative 7 - Unlocking government Information Communication Technology legacy volumes
Initiative 8 - Achieving a minimum of 50% of households separating at source by 2023
Initiative 9 - Introduction of materials recovery facilities and pelletisation plants to increase plastic recycling rates
Initiative 10 - Produce building aggregates and construction inputs from rubble and glass.
Waste Minimisation and Product Design
Initiative 11 - Developing capacity through a specialised programme which upskills agri-stakeholders to minimize food loss
Initiative 12 - Consumer awareness campaign to use and consume ugly food
Initiative 13 - Compilation/update of packaging design guidelines
Initiative 14 - Formalising the packaging industry producer responsibility plans
Initiative 15 - Establish refuse-derived fuel plants across South Africa.
Chemicals work stream
Initiative 16 - Establish a refrigerant reclamation and reusable cylinder industry;
Initiative 17 - Ban import of harmful chemicals (e.g. leaded paint/paint pigments);
Initiative 18 - Collect and dispose of stockpiles of harmful substances
Initiative 18a Mercury; and
Initiative 18b Asbestos
Cross-cutting initiatives
Initiative 19 - Coordinate SMME development opportunities across initiatives
Initiative 20 - Roll out national awareness campaigns
Technical support, in the form of technical skills development, is integrated into initiatives’ 3 feet plans as relevant.
(b) Post Operation Phakisa Chemicals and Waste Economy, on 6 December 2017 I have published a final section 28 Notice calling on the Electrical and Electronic industry to develop an Industry Waste Management Plan and submit to me for approval. It is anticipated that this Notice will increase the collection and recycling rates of ewaste and result in the diversion of waste away from landfilling to reuse, recycling and recovery, e-waste is part of initiatives 6 and 7.
---ooOoo---
27 December 2017 - NW3569
Kopane, Ms SP to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) What is the total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by (i) her Department and (ii) each entity reporting to her for more than (aa) 30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days; and (b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?
Reply:
i) DEPARTMENT |
(aa) > 30 days |
(bb) >60 days |
(cc) > 90 days |
(dd) 120 days |
a) Total number of invoices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
b) Total amount |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
ii) SAWS |
(aa) > 30 days |
(bb) >60 days |
(cc) > 90 days |
(dd) 120 days |
a) Total number of invoices |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
b) Total amount |
R247 |
R500 |
R870 |
R171,526 |
Invoices >120 days
Two invoices totalling R171 526 are over 120 days and SAWS has requested credit notes from the service providers to write off the invoices or either the supplier should provide proof that work was performed. We are still awaiting response from the suppliers and the credit status will be updated in January 2018.
Invoices > 90 days
Only one invoice is outstanding over 90 days which amounts to R870 and is being queried with the supplier and SAWS is awaiting feedback. The status of this invoice will be updated in January 2018 upon receipt of the response from the supplier.
Invoices > 60 days
Only one invoice is outstanding over 60 days which amounts to R500 and is being queried with the supplier and SAWS is awaiting feedback. The status of this invoice will be updated in January 2018 upon receipt of the response from the supplier.
Invoices > 30 days
Only one invoice is outstanding over 30 days which amounts to R247 and is being queried with the supplier and SAWS is awaiting feedback. The status of this invoice will be updated in January 2018 upon receipt of the response from the supplier.
ii) SANPARKS |
(aa) > 30 days |
(bb) >60 days |
(cc) > 90 days |
(dd) 120 days |
a) Total number of invoices |
0 |
12 |
4 |
200 |
b) Total amount |
R0.00 |
R 245, 941 |
R 3, 908 |
R 333, 261 |
Invoices >120 days
The reported amounts on 120 days plus are due to disputes (168 invoices) with certain suppliers and legal processes are conducted. A number of invoices relate to e-toll charges (16) where the supplier cannot provide information for SANParks to enable payment. Other oustanding amounts (16) are due to incorrect banking details and correct information have not been received from the service provider yet.
Invoices >90 days
The 4 invoices for 90 days are due to 2 from e-toll and 2 where the correct banking details are awaited.
Invoices > 60 days
The 12 invoices for 60 days are due to 5 where correct banking details are awaited, 2 are for e-toll and the other 5 will be paid by with the next payment run.
ii) ISIMANGALISO |
(aa) > 30 days |
(bb) >60 days |
(cc) > 90 days |
(dd) 120 days |
a) Total number of invoices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
b) Total amount |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
ii) SANBI |
(aa) > 30 days |
(bb) >60 days |
(cc) > 90 days |
(dd) 120 days |
a) Total number of invoices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
b) Total amount |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
R0.00 |
The total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by SANBI within 30 days are 218 as at 07 November 2017. The total amount outstanding is R1 482 045.
---ooOoo---
11 December 2017 - NW4013
Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Which part of the Richtersveld coast line in the Northern Cape is considered to be the admiralty strip; (2) did the area of this strip change after the promulgation of the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act, 2008 (Act No. 24 of 2008); if so, what are the relevant details; and (3) whether the Richtersveld community owns the admiralty strip; if not, who owns the strip; if so, what are the geographical details of the admiralty strip?
Reply:
(1) The Admiralty Reserve forms part of the range of zones that describe the coast along with the seashore, coastal waters and coastal buffer zone. It is generally described as a strip of land between 150 to 200 feet (45m to 60m) wide, inland of the high water mark. The Richtersveld coastline in the Northern Cape has no admiralty strip reserved, registered or designated on an official plan deed of grant, tittle deed or other documents evidencing title or land-use right.
(2) The Richtersveld coastline in the Northern Cape has no admiralty strips reserved. The National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act, 2008 (Act No. 24 of 2008) does not intend changing any area or status of any strip that exists as admiralty reserve. The Act has a huge influence in how properties adjacent and in proximity of the coast are managed or supposed to be managed.
(3) All admiralty reserves are state land and falls under the custodianship of the National Department of Public Works.
---ooOoo---
11 December 2017 - NW3745
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Whether (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her procured services from a certain company (name furnished); if so, (i) what services were procured in each case and (ii) what is the total amount that was paid to the specified company in each case; (2) whether the specified company provided services related to international travel to (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her; if so, (i) what is the name of each person who travelled, (ii) what was the travel route and (iii) what is the total amount that was paid for each person?
Reply:
The services that my Department and its entities procure from any service provider, be it in the sphere of travel management and or accomodation, are services that are always awarded after a fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective bid process in line with Section 38 (1) (a) (iii) of the Public Finance Management Act. Such procurement processes are administered by the Department’s Bid Evaluation Committee in terms of the same Act.
All procurement procedures and processes are audited annually and the information pertaining to the audit opinion on these matters is reflected in the relevant annual reports which are readily available as public documents.
--ooOoo---
04 December 2017 - NW3860
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
With reference to the product design and waste minimisation plans of her Department which certain official’s (name and details furnished) claims will be carried out by raising awareness, (a) what other measures will be taken to reduce waste, and (b) how will awareness reduce waste?
Reply:
a) The following measures will be implemented to promote waste reduction:
- Developing capacity through a specialised programme which upskills agri-stakeholders to minimise food loss.
- Compilation and updating of packaging design guidelines with the Department of Trade and Industry, Industry Associations and SABS, and a voluntary grading scheme with marketing value for brand owners can improve the design of packaging and increase collaboration between brand owners and recycling companies.
- Formalising the packaging industry extended producer responsibility plans to enable and support the unification and alignment around packaging design guidelines and other packaging industry initiatives, a mechanism which formalises Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR).
- Implementation of packaging design guideline once it has been developed.
b) The awareness initiatives are additional measures to enhance waste minimisation and promote the recycling economy. These measures aim to create a joint platform for communicating messages to improve consumer behaviour and industry practice towards pro-recycling in the waste sector by focusing on specific areas, including:
- minimisation of food waste by eating ugly fruit;
- separation of waste at household-level (e.g. promote the incentives and/or Buy Back Centres, re-inforce the benefits of not contaminating paper waste with food waste, etc.); and
- safe disposal of waste (e.g. promote and create awareness on the e-Waste drop-off centres).
The awareness raising measures will increase consumer awareness and demand for recyclable products that are packaged in an environmentally friendly manner.
---ooOoo---
04 December 2017 - NW3862
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) How does her department plan to enforce the separate source initiative mentioned in the Operation Phakisa: Chemicals and Waste Economy and (b) what will happen to those who refuse/fail to comply?
Reply:
(a) The Department is putting Norms and Standards for waste separation at source in 2018/19. The administrative and criminal enforcement would be carried out by Environmental Management Inspectors as empowered by the National Environmental Management: Waste Act, Act No 59 of 2008. However, municipalities that have made separation of waste at source mandatory as part of their by-laws have enforcement powers that they can also exercise accordingly.
(b) The Department is bound by the Constitution to support those that fail to meet the Norms and
Standards however criminal enforcement can be considered as a last resort in keeping with
co-operative governance.
In terms of the co-operative governance approach, the Department will endevour to assist those to come into compliance. Enforcement will be considered as the last resort to ensure compliance with the Norms and Standards.
---ooOoo---
04 December 2017 - NW3861
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)With reference to Operation Phakisa and waste disposal, (a) will her Department introduce an e-waste levy to increase the collection rate, (b) what are the plans of her Department to deal with e-waste, and (c) will it be (i) local or (ii) exported; and (2) (a) how will the new proposed levy increase collection rates, and (b) how will it be different to the plastic bag levy?
Reply:
1. a) Yes. The participants representing the ewaste sector requested that waste charges be introduced to increase the collection rates of ewaste.
b) The Department will be implementing a policy mechanism provided for in Section 28 of the National Environmental Management Waste Act, Act No. 59 of 2008. This policy mechanism is the Indstry Waste Management Plans (IndWMP).
c) The implementation of IndWMP promotes local beneficiation of waste materail. This will require capital funding to support large infrastructure and technology investments. These will be funded through the waste charges implemented.
2. a) There is no legislation currently in place to compel the end user to dispose of the e-waste in line with the waste hierarchy. The implementation of the levy will enable Product Responsibility Organisations (PROs) to provide financial incentves to encourage the end users to take back any redundant equipment to a buy or taker-back centre or an accredited recycler. The IndWMPs will also contain targets for collection and recycling. The Producer will be legally required to achieve these targets, and there will be adequate public awareness programs as part of these plans as well.
b) The plastic bag levy is collected by the South African Revenue Service and transferred to the National Revenue Fund. The new Industry Waste Management Plan for Paper and Packaging will include measures to collect waste plastics in general, of which plastic bags are a part of. The Industry Waste Management Plan levy will be approved together with the approved plan for the collection of the various plastics, including plastic bags.
---ooOoo---
04 December 2017 - NW3858
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) What is the total number of waste pickers in the country, and (b) why is there such a vast difference in the figures presented by her and those presented by a certain person (name and details furnished) in this regard?
Reply:
a) The Department of Environmental Affairs’ study for the determination of the extent and role of waste picking in South Africa concluded that there are about 62 000 waste pickers in the country.
b) Non-government organisations, and other organisations operating in the informal sector, have suggested, in some forums, that this could be much higher. We are in the process of validating this information.
---ooOoo---
27 November 2017 - NW3514
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) How many official international trips did (i) she and (ii) the Deputy Minister undertake since 1 April 2015 and (b) what (i) was the (aa) purpose, (bb) outcome, (cc) duration and (dd) cost of each trip and (ii) role did she play in each case and (c) (i) which officials from her department accompanied her and (ii) what were the costs in respect of each official that accompanied her?
Reply:
(1) (a) The official international trips that I and the Deputy Minister undertake at any given period are always guided by the provisions of the Ministerial Handbook.
(b) The aspects that relate to the purpose, outcome and duration of each official international trip are considered by the President before he approves such official trips in line with the Ministerial Handbook.
(c) Costs incurred by the Executive and or the Government officials are readily made available in relevant annual reports which are tabled in Parliament .
---ooOoo---
27 November 2017 - NW3620
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether (a) her department and/or (b) any entity reporting to her own land; if so, in each case, (i) where is each plot of land located, (ii) what is the size of each specified plot and (iii) what is each plot currently being used for?
Reply:
(a) No
(i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
(iii) Not applicable
1. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI)
(b) Yes
(i) (Location) |
(ii) (Size) |
(iii) (Purpose) |
Nieuwoudtville, Northern Cape |
130.9921 hectares (Erf 412) |
Hantam National Botanical Garden / Conservation |
15.3936 hectares (Erf 428) |
||
1246.4943 hectares (Remainder of farm Buffelvley No. 628) |
||
246.0259 hectares (Remainder of portion 1 Buffelvley No. 628) |
||
825.2189 hectares (Portion 3 of the farm Groen Rivier No.660) |
||
298.0731 hectares (Portion 2 of teh farm Oorlogkloof No. 661) |
||
709.1186 hectares (Farm Zoo Voorby No.621) |
||
2904.8071 hectares (Remainder of farm Brakfontein No.627) |
||
0.8565 hectares (Portion 12 of the farm Klippe Rivier No.630) |
||
East London, Eastern Cape |
10.4758 hectares (Fram No.1505) |
Kwelera National Botanical Garden / Conservation |
Roodepoort, Gauteng |
8.5692 hectares (Portion 83 of the R/E of farm Roodekrans No.183IQ) |
Walter Sisulu National Botanical Garden / Conservation |
Betty’s Bay, Western Cape |
1.3607 hectares (Erf No. 5562) |
Harold Porter National Botanical Garden / Conservation |
2. South African Weather Service (SAWS)
(b) Yes
(i) (Location) |
(ii) (Size) |
(iii) (Purpose) |
Farm Garsfontein 374, Waterkloof Heights, Registration Division JR, Gauteng |
It is made up of portions 411, 412, 423 and 424 |
Currently not in use, plans to develop an office park for SAWS |
Erf 1997, on 8 Dr Clark Street, Bethlehem, Free State |
1\997 square metres |
utilised for accommodation by SAWS personnel working in Bethlehem Weather Office |
Erf 2064, on 19 Gordon Dreyer Street, Bethlehem, Free State |
1568 square metres |
Utilised for accommodation by SAWS personnel working in Bethlehem Weather Office |
3. iSimangaliso Wetland Park
(b) No
(i) Not applicable
(ii) Not applicable
(iii) Not applicable
4. South Africa National Parks (SANParks)
(b) Yes
(i) South African National Parks, Schedule 3A Public Entity who is the body responsible for managing 19 Parks consisting of nearly 4 million (3,929,380) hectares of land which is about 67% of the conservation areas of Southern Africa. Please see below detail of land owned (Table A).
Land owned by South African National Parks – (i), (ii) and (iii) (Table A)
(i) (Location) |
(ii) (Size) |
(iii) (Purpose) |
West Coast |
Erf 1493 Langebaan 852 Square Metres |
National Park |
Knysna |
Erf 2303 Knysna 1025 Square metres |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1884: Proteastraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1885: Proteastraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1886: Proteastraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1887: Proteastraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 827: Ged van Erf 2082 Uitsigstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 2047 Langebaan Malmesbury 377sq mt |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 2048 laangeban Malmesbury 294 Sq mt |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1693 Wilderness George 325 square mt |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 820: Ged van Erf 2082 Uirsigstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 821: Ged van Erf 2082 Uitsigstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 822: Ged van Erf 2082 Uitsigstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1565 Wilderness,George 325 square mt |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1888: Proteastraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1907: Suikerkantstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1908: Suikerkantstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1909: Suikerkantstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1910: Aalwynstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1912: Hoofstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1913: Hoofstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1914: Hoofstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1915: Hoofstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 158: Hoofstraat |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Marakeli: Ged 39 (Ged v Ged 1 v Marakele |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Morceaux: Restant van Plaas 207 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Blespaardspruit: Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Duikerspan: 136 KQ Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Duikerspan: 136 KQ Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Duikerspan: 136 KQ Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Diamant: Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Geelhoutbosch: Ged 4 van Plaas nr 269 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Geelhoutbosch: Ged 7 v Ged 1 Plaas nr269 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Marakeli: Gedeelte 1 van Plaas nr 437 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Duikerspan: Ged 9 van Ged 4 Plaas nr 136 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Zwarthoek: Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Buffelspoort: Plaas (Landmeetkoste) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Tygerkrans 270kq: Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kransberg: Plaas 593kq (tvl) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Klipdrift: Plaas |
National Park |
West Coast |
Yzerfontein: Nr 560 Plaas |
National Park |
Addo |
Plaas 36 |
National Park |
Addo |
Woodlands: Ged 6 van Plaas nr 45 |
National Park |
Addo |
Slagboom: Plaas 38/2&39/2 (Staatsgrond) |
National Park |
Addo |
Duncairn: Nr 109 Plaas (Alexandria) |
National Park |
Addo |
Plaas: NR 91 Ged 5 (Alexandria) |
National Park |
Addo |
Plaas Nr 91: Ged 6 (Alexandria) |
National Park |
Addo |
Mimosa: NR 89 Plaas (Alexandrie) |
National Park |
Addo |
Thornleigh: NR 85 Restant van plaas |
National Park |
Addo |
Unamore Nr 88: Plaas (alexandria) |
National Park |
Addo |
Eengevonden: 37/3 Plaas |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Geelhoutbosch: Ged 5 Ged 1 Plaas nr 269 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Zandfontein: Restant van Plaas nr 315 |
National Park |
Addo |
Buffelskuil: Restant van Plaas nr 84 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Waterval: Ged 1 van Plaas nr 497 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Hendrikskraal: Plaas |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Klipplaatsfontein: Rest Ged2 v1 Plaas210 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Klipplaatsfontein: Rest van Plaas nr 211 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Klipplaatsfontein: Ged 1 van Plaas nr211 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Klipplaatsfontein: Rest van Plaas nr 212 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Tweeloopfontein: 235kq 513 Hektaar |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Apiesrivierpoort: Ged 3 van Plaas nr 272 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Vygeboomfontein: Ged 3 van Plaas nr 239 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Geelhoutbosch: Rest van Ged 1 Plaas 269 |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 1911: Aalwynstraat |
National Park |
West Coast |
Massenberg: Restant van Plaas nr 298 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Blespaardspruit: 1/8 Ged 3 Plaas nr 275 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ged 3 van Plaas 274 |
National Park |
Musina |
Den Staat: Restant van PLaas nr 27 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Buffelspoort: Gedeelte 3 280 KQ (Opmeet) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Elandshoek: Gedeelte 4 263 KQKQ |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Omdraai: Ged 5 van Plaas nr 492 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ged 4 van Plaas nr 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ged 5 van Plaas nr 274 |
National Park |
Addo |
Woodlands: Restant van Plaas Nr 45 |
National Park |
Addo |
Strathsomers: Ged 357 van Ged 217 nr 42 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: Ged 4 274KQ |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: Ged 3 274KQ |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Blespaardspruit: Ged 3 275K |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: Ged 5 274KQ |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Blespaardspruit: 1/8 Ged 3 Plaas nr 275 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ded 3 Plaas nr 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ged 4 Plaas 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ged 5 Plaas nr 274 |
National Park |
Addo |
Vygeboomfontein: Ged3: Ged van Ged1 326 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Kookfontein: Plaas nr 393 |
National Park |
West Coast |
Langebaan Strandmeer: Waardasie Plase |
National Park |
Cradock |
Kaal Plaats: Ged 2 & 6 278 (Regs/koste) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Blespaardspruit: 1/8 Ged 3 Plaas nr 275 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ged 3 Plaas 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/12 Ged 4 Plaas 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: ,3 Ged 5 Plaas 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: ,62 Ged 1 van Plaas nr 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Blespaardspruit: 1/2 Ged 3 van Plaas 275 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Blespaardspruit: Ged 4 van Plaas 275 |
National Park |
Addo |
Grond: Regs/koste Addo konsolidasie |
National Park |
Addo |
Nieuwepost: Ged 3 4 4 van plaas 68 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Duikerspan: Restant van Plaas nr 136 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: Ged 9 van Plaas nr 274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: //3 Ged 3 van Plaas 274 |
National Park |
Potchestroom |
Town & Townlands: Potch 435 IQ Opm koste |
National Park |
Addo |
Weltevrede: Ged 1 van Plaas nr 67 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: Gedeelte 11 van Plaas nr 274 |
National Park |
Kimberly |
Erf 31550: Gedeelte van Erf 3114 |
National Park |
Potchestroom |
Grond: Registrasie Nooitverwacht Potch. |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: Ged 10 van Ged 7 Plla nr 274 |
National Park |
Musina |
Welton: 1/3 Ged van Ged 3 van Plaas nr16 |
National Park |
Addo |
Weltevrede: Ged 6 van Plaas nr 67 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/3 Ged van Ged 3 Plaas nr274 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Alwynsgat: Gedeelte 1 van Plaas 187 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Coerney: Restant van Ged 1 Plaas nr 83 |
National Park |
Addo |
Coerney: Restant van Plaas nr 83 |
National Park |
Addo |
Buffelskuil: Gedeelte 1 van Plaas nr 84 |
National Park |
Addo |
Coerney: Gedeelte 7 van Plaas nr 83 |
National Park |
Addo |
Buffelskuil: Gedeelte 2 van Plaas nr 84 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/3 Ged van Ged 4 Plaas nr274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek: 1/3 Ged van Ged 5 Plaas nr274 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Geelhoutbosch: Ged 6 v Ged 1 Plaas nr269 |
National Park |
West Coast |
Massenberg: Restant van Plaas nr 297 |
National Park |
West Coast |
Massenberg: Restant van Plaas nr 299 |
National Park |
West Coast |
Oostewal: Gedeelte 3 van Plaa nr 292 |
National Park |
Addo |
Marion Baree: Plaas 120 (Uitenhage) |
National Park |
Addo |
Addo Heights: Gedeelte 1 van Plaas 209 |
National Park |
Addo |
Lot de Penhurst: Ged 2 van Plaas 123 |
National Park |
Addo |
Lismore: Restant van Plaas 208 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Spitze Kop: 213 Ged 7 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Zandfontein: Ged 3 van Zandfontein315KQ |
National Park |
Addo |
Wolwekop Nr 82 ged1 en ged3 |
National Park |
Addo |
Woodlands 45 Portion 4 Uitenhage Distrik |
National Park |
Addo |
Addo Heights: Gedeelte 6 Plaas 209 |
National Park |
Addo |
Addo Heights 209 portion 5 of farm |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Geelhoutbosch 269KQ 1/24aand van restant |
National Park |
Addo |
Addo Heights 209 Portion 4(Vertrou) |
National Park |
Addo |
Addo Heights 209 Remainder of farm |
National Park |
Addo |
Addo Heights 209 Remainder of port.2 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Diamant 228 KO Portion 19 of farm |
National Park |
Augrabies |
ZeekoeSteek: Portion 35 Rem.port.1+2 No9 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Keerom 341: Ged 15 van plaas Namaqualan |
National Park |
Springbok |
Kookfontein 466: Ded5 van pl Namaqualand |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Klipdrift 231KQ Portions 3,4,5 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Signal Hill: CT367/VT1796 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Lions Head: CLI148 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Hout Bay: HB3438/HB2848 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Silver Mine: CF919/8/CF920/2 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Dassenberg: CF940/6 |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Paalhuis No392: Beaufort West RD |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Rietfontein No205: Restant van plaas |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Drooge Hoek No92: Restant van plaas |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Drooge Hoek No92: Ged 3 van plaas |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
Slagt Kloof No203: Restant van plaas |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
De Hoek No204: Restant van plaas |
National Park |
Beaufort West |
De Hoek No204: Ged 1 van plaas |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Rhenosterkop No285: Por 6 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Soutbosch No 286: Por 4 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Zoudendaals Valley No 278: Por 1 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Brakfontein A no 283 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Blinkvley Vlakte No 1087 Calvinia Rd |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Biesjes Fontein Nr 1086 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Zeekoe Steek no 9 Portion 18((6467.535ha |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 1 of Klipdrift 231 KQ |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 21 of Diamant 228 KQ |
National Park |
Addo |
Fascadale 213: Remainder of farm |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 630: Remainder of farm |
National Park |
Addo |
Riet Poort No19: Por 2 of Por 1 |
National Park |
Addo |
Riet Poort No19: Remaining ext of farm |
National Park |
Addo |
Die Dorings No 21: Remaining ext of Farm |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 17 of Diamant 228 KQ |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Farm 287: Portion 2 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Farm 287: Portion 3 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Canariesfontein: Nr465 Gedeelte 8 |
National Park |
Addo |
Die Dorings 21: Portion 2 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 75: Remainder of farm Alexandria |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 76: Remainder of farm Alexandria |
National Park |
Addo |
Doorn Nek: Remainder of Por 2 |
National Park |
Addo |
The Farm Koms No 70 |
National Park |
Addo |
Dirks Kraal No 286: Rem of Farm |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Bergplaas 291: Remainder of farm |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 18 of Diamant 228 KQ |
National Park |
Addo |
Cypherfontein No 160 Portion 4 |
National Park |
Addo |
Cypherfontein No 160 Portion 9 |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Zoutefontein 210 |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Zoutefontein 210 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Pramberg Rivier 1092 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Potklys Berg Oos 1094 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Ingleside No 215:Remainder |
National Park |
Cradock |
Ingleside No 215: Portion 3 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 2 of Farm Modderfontein No338 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 5 of Farm Dirks Kraal No 286 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 3 of Farm Dirks Kraal No 286 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 10 of Farm Groothoek 278 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Aandele in restant van Geelhoutbosch 269 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Paapekuilfontein Nr 281: Por 58 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por2 Nieuw Jaars Kap 300(185.47.2ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Por7 Nieuw Jaars Kap 300(242.2463ha) |
National Park |
Cradock |
Portion 1 of Farm 595 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Farm 596 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 1 of Rietpoort 19 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Portion 6 of Soutbosch 286 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Farm 387 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Farm 385 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Gedeelte 4 van Plaas Garstlands Kloof384 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 2 of Lismore 208 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Remainder of Groot Hoek 267 |
National Park |
Cradock |
Gedeelte 6 van Stapelbergskraal 239 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 1781 Orangekloof (CPNP) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Portion 1 of Bergplaas No 291 Bredasdorp |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 2 of Vaalnek 232 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 3 of Vaalnek 232 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 1 of Ingleside 215 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 2 of Thornleigh 85 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Uintjes Bosch No7 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Portion 1 of Farm 342 Bredasdorp RD |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 5 of Coerney No 83 |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Lynnwood No 86 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 9 of farm Groothoek 278 KQ |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Remainder of Blouputs No 10(12075.22ha |
National Park |
Swellendam |
Erf 5338 Swellendam |
National Park |
Swellendam |
Erf 5339 Swellendam |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Pauls Hoek Nr. 5 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Waai Kop Nr. 6 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek Portion 2 274KQ |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Paapekuil Fontein Portion 57 nr281 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartbeestfontein Ptn 21 rem (267.4391ha |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartbeesfontein 281 KQ portion 15 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartbeesfontein 281 KQ portion 18 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Zandfontein 315 KQ Portion 8 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Paapekuil Fontein 281 Portion 10 |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Erf 426 Suiderstrand |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Erf 665, L'Agulhas |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Henderson 410 |
National Park |
Addo |
Rietrivier 230 Portion 3 |
National Park |
Addo |
Dwaas 232 Portion 6 |
National Park |
Addo |
Dwaas 232 Portion 10 |
National Park |
Addo |
Weltevrede 367 Portion 4 |
National Park |
Addo |
Weltevrede 67 Portion 7 |
National Park |
Addo |
Nieuwe Post 68 Portion 1 |
National Park |
Addo |
Kareehoek Portion 6 274 KQ |
National Park |
Addo |
Nieuwe Post 68;Remainder |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartebeesfontein 281 Portion 6 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm Nr 65 Portion 2 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Soubatters Fontein 467 porsion 10 (13ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Soubatters Fontein 467 por 5 (910.4274ha |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Remainder of Zandspruit 138KQ (791 ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Remainder of Kareehoek 274(.068988share) |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 10 of Vista 367 (780,3857ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Erf no 2 L'Agulhas with house |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Share of portion 1 of Kareehoek 274 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 9 of Weltevrede 67 (447 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Zoute Fontein 210 Portion 2 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Portion 2 of Nelshoop 12 (1774.36 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 6 of Ingleside 215 (402.23ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 1 of Die Dorings 21 (329 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 1 of Vaaldraai 296 (1702ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Oudekraal 327 (552 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 5 of Henderson 410 (110.72 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Farm 296 (3231ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 4 of Groene Leegte 164 (267. ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Manus Zyn Dam 1089 (4556 ha) |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Remainder of Daberas 8 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek 274:.150569 Share in Remainder |
National Park |
Springbok |
Soubatters Fontein 467 porsion 37 |
National Park |
Addo |
Sundays River Irrigation Board (51 prop) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 6 of Keerom341(2064 h) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 5 of Canariesfontein 465(963h) |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Portion 7 of Daberas 8(37h) |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 12946 Constantia |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 12 of Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Portion 1 of Stompiesfontein 1197 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 8884 Hout Bay |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 3 of Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 4 of farm Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 2 of Zandfontein 315 KQ |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 4 of Zandfontein 315 KQ |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 7 of Zandfontein 315 KQ |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 7of Dirks Kraal 286 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 349 fo Strathsomers Estate 42 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Remainder of Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Gedeelte 10 Plaas Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 11 of Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 13 of Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 14 Plaas Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 16 Plaas Keerom 341 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 2 of Rietrivier 230 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 7 of Rietrivier 230 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 3 of Farm 410(Somerset East) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Remain of Farm 287 Cape Agulhs |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Remain Portion 1 farm 287 Agulh |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Remainder of RhenosterKop 285 Ag |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Portion 1 ofFarm RhenosterKop 285 Ag |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 5113 Kommetjie |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Zuukloof 17 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 2 of Farm 52 (Rudvale) |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Portion 1 of Saamwerk 376 (967 ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Remainder of Kareehoek: ,64465undiv.shar |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 20 of Hartbeestfontein 281 KQ |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Por 9 of Hartbeestfontein 281 KQ( 47.9ha |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Por 31 of Groothoek 278 KQ(140.1h |
National Park |
Addo |
Remainder of Oliphants Plaat 214 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 28 of Vetmaak Vlakte 312 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 29 of Vetmaak Vlakte 312 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 1 of Kareehoek:,077882undiv.shar |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 12043 Fish Hoek 37 1890 Ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Klein Dirks Kraal No 287 (1387.3ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Salieleegte no 336 in Blue Crane Route |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 3(Commando Kl) of Olievenfontein 292 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 2 (Rietvley) of Olievenfontein 292 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 3(Christiana) of Volkers River 244 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 2(Hoekskraal) of Volkers River 244 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 5(Por of Por 2) of Boerslaagte |
National Park |
Addo |
Rem of Por 2 of Boerslaagte 245 |
National Park |
Addo |
Rem ext ofFarm no 383 in the Blue Crane |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm no 383 in the Blue Crane Route Munp |
National Park |
Addo |
Rem of por 1 of Wortel Kuil no 225 Ikwaz |
National Park |
Addo |
Rem of Erf 142 Waterford Ikwazi Munp |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 1(Rem extent) of Brakvlei 353 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 1 of Brakvlei 353 (1 half share ) |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 3 of Palmiet Fontein no 281 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 4 (Middelfo) of Palmiet Fontein 281 |
National Park |
Addo |
Rem extent of Volkers Rivier 244 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 2 of Palmietfontein no 281 |
National Park |
Addo |
Rem exte of Por 1 of Palmietfontein 281 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 1 of Boerslaagte no 245 |
National Park |
Addo |
Postion 6 of Palmietfontein no 281 |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 6(prt Por 3)of Bouwers Fontein 240 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Elandsberg 1088 (5276.1058 ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 7 of Doornfontein 464 (769.2 ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 9 of Doornfontein 464 (796.1 ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Portion 12 of Duikerspan 136 (2.763 )ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Farm no300 Bredasdorp (2007.4612) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Rem of Rietfontein 293 (260.23 ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Por 2(por of por 1) of Farm 312 (4.05ha) |
National Park |
Cape Town |
CP Provincial Land Transfer (892.42 ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Portion 3 of Doornfontein 464 (736.778h) |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 5(pretkop) of Palmietfontein no 281 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Por 51(Por of Por 32) of Zeekoe-Steek 9 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Por 1 of Stofbakkies no 417 (356.7788ha) |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Por 2 of Daberas No 8 (2121.3428 ha) |
National Park |
Musina |
Remainder of Hamilton 41MS(359.46ha) |
National Park |
Musina |
Por 2 of Hamilton 41MS(65.114ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
The Rem of Farm Brakvlei 353(433.7252ha |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Por 33 of Kommetje Estates 948(259.81ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 6(Ptn of Ptn3) of BouwersFontein 240 |
National Park |
Addo |
Erf 1650(p of 880) Colchester 7.9494ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Remain of Erf 881 Colchester 35.7614ha |
National Park |
Musina |
Portion 1 of Janberry 44(755.56 ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Ptn 5(ptn of 3) Buffelspoort 280(197ha) |
National Park |
Musina |
Ptn 3 of Samaria 28 (431.9859ha) |
National Park |
Musina |
Remainder of Samaria 28 (431.9859ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Port 9 (Rem ext) Dwaas 232 (262.6862ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Portion 0 of Boesak 1090 (3288.9187ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Portion 1 Rietfontein A299 (2048ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Portion 2 Rietfontein A299 (796ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Portion 3 Rietfontein A299 (1010ha) |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 1614 Simons Town (31.5377 ha) |
National Park |
Cradock |
Prt 1 of Farm 376 Dist Cradock(25.9087 h |
National Park |
Cradock |
Rem of Farm 373 Dist Cradock(1076.8245h |
National Park |
Cradock |
Por 0Farm 374 Dist Cradock(199.9874 ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Por 4 of farm 494 Kwoap(75.1079 ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Por 0 of farm 493 Votentoe (2084.2203 ha |
National Park |
Springbok |
Por 0 of farm 483 Graskom (1919.5172ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 7 of Strathsomers 42 (573.7851ha |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 0 of farm 1028 Gannaga (1400.4812ha |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 0 farm 1091 Roodewerf (4190.7013ha |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Rem farm 1027 Kleinfontein(3527.0681ha |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 1 farm 61AnnxKleinfontein(128.5869ha |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 1 farm 1030 Brandewynsbank(69.8502ha |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Rem Ex farm 274 Kareehoek (45.3ha |
National Park |
Springbok |
Por 2 farm 477 Taaibosch Duin(907.223ha |
National Park |
Springbok |
Por 1 farm 483 Graskom(855.6560ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 10 farm Groene Leegte 164(166.1770ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Rem Por 12 Groene Leegte 164(86.4977ha |
National Park |
Addo |
(Merrivale) Groene Leegte 164(41.7873ha |
National Park |
Addo |
(Merriton) Groene Leegte 164(83.8284ha |
National Park |
Graaff Reinet |
Erf 1920 Graaff-Reinet (54.3331ha) |
National Park |
Graaff Reinet |
Erf 3569 Graaff-Reinet (2230.0292ha) |
National Park |
Graaff Reinet |
Erf 3570 Graaff-Reinet (1586.1569ha) |
National Park |
Graaff Reinet |
Erf 3866 Graaff-Reinet (311.5285ha) |
National Park |
Graaff Reinet |
Erf 3908 Graaff-Reinet (2359.1783ha) |
National Park |
Graaff Reinet |
Rem of Erf 4311 Graaff-Reinet (7693.1067 |
National Park |
Graaff Reinet |
Erf 5289 Graaff-Reinet (221.9590ha) |
National Park |
Musina |
Portion of Balerno 18 (768.6940ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Rem of Rodeklipheuwel 470 (1419.4421ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Kareehoek 274ptn 0(rem ext) (603.9064 ha |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Groothoek 278 ptn 30 (26.6359 ha) |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Rooipad 15 prt 13 (1.8979 ha) |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Rooipad 15 prt 14 (25.5022 ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Roodelaagte 476 ptn 1 (782.4177) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Roodelaagte 476 ptn 2 (876.1023) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Roodelaagte 476 ptn 4 (1054.9534) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Farm 623 (2691.4319) |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Zeekoeisteek 9 Prt 56(1.1991ha) |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 9581(Por of Erf 1788) Hout Bay 4.463 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartebeesfontein 281 Prt 27 (8.4975 ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartebeesfontein 281 Prt 28 (8.4975 ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartebeesfontein 281 Prt 29 (34.5636ha) |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Hartebeesfontein 281 Prt 27 (49.5928 ha) |
National Park |
Springbok |
Rodeklipheuvel 470 (.09375 share)prt 2(2 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Rooipad 15 ptn 25(ptn of ptn 22) 39.4307 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Rooipad 15 ptn 24(ptn of ptn 20) 25.9198 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Rooipad 15 ptn 23(ptn of ptn 9) 706.0205 |
National Park |
Augrabies |
Rooipad 15 ptn 15(ptn of ptn 9) 40.5703 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
De Zyfer 1 ptn 0 (3259.9608ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Rooi Werf 2 ptn 0 (2522.8650ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Lange Kloof 60 ptn 0 (1563.0271ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Cypherfontein 160 prn 3 rem (213.9313ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Cypherfontein 160 prn 5 (213.9313ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Cypherfontein 160 prn 6 rem (156.4013ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Cypherfontein 160 prn 7 (327.7020ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Cypherfontein 160 prn 8 (171.3107ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Nieuw Jaars Kop 300 ptn 6 (171.4050ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Middel Drift 12 por 2 (771.5080 ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Oudebaas Kraal 13 por 1(1858.4070 ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Middeldrift 12,remainder(3499.502 ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Oudebaas Kraal 13, remainder (2364.9592) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Kleinfontein 59 Annex (278.833ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Klipfontein 55, por 1 (1821.844) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Kleinfontein 1027, por 1(176.845) |
National Park |
Swellendam |
Erf 4492 Por 0 Ren Ext (5782.00sqm) |
National Park |
Addo |
Strathsomers Est 42, erf 306 (4.5ha) |
National Park |
West Coast |
Strathmore No.42 remain of 289 1984714h |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Farm Ymasqua no 14(5619.98ha) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Farm Onderste Wagendrift no 15((4715.23) |
National Park |
Addo |
Port 9 farm Ingleside 215: 293 44404 ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Port 10 farm Ingleside 215:308 4044 ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Marion Baree 120 ptn 1 (993.7182 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Lismore 208 Rem of Ptn 1 (420.7628 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Milverton 121 Ptn 3 (417.0766ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Milverton 121 Ptn 4(ptn of ptn 2) (93.88 |
National Park |
Springbok |
Graskom 483 Ptn 2 (1914.5265 ha) |
National Park |
Kimberly |
Knoffelfontein 104 Rem (796.3877 ha) |
National Park |
Kimberly |
Knoffelfontein 104 Prt 1 (1696.3617) |
National Park |
Kimberly |
Knoffelfontein 104 Ptn 2 (904.1381 ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Farm Waterford 314 (4502.981ha) |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Paapekuilfontein 281 Ptn B of Rem of 15( |
National Park |
Agulhas |
Rietfointein 299 Portion 4 ( 287,602 ha) |
National Park |
Kimberly |
Farm Scholtzfointein north 137 portion 8 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 234 portion 1 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 234 portion 2 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 234 portion 0 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm Vaalnek 233 portion 1 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Farm Mieriesfointein no 1093 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Farm Platfontein no.11 |
National Park |
Cape Town |
Erf 1510 Hout Bay Cape town 60913 ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Midfor 327 |
National Park |
Addo |
Mainfor 328 |
National Park |
Addo |
Langvlakte 326 |
National Park |
Addo |
Alexandria coast west 318 |
National Park |
Addo |
Grootvlei 329 |
National Park |
Addo |
Boxwood 356 |
National Park |
Addo |
Request 325 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 270 |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm 272 |
National Park |
Addo |
Yellow woods 292 |
National Park |
Addo |
Alexandria coast west 308 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Farm 8 Driefointein (3371,9657 hectares) |
National Park |
Kimberly |
farm Valschfoitein No.105 (2805,4578 ha) |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 32 of Farm Addo Drift (193.0685) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Portion 1: farm driefoitein No.8 (1152) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
farm Musquitokolk no. 10 (3871,3081) |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 279 (portion of 216) Strathmore |
National Park |
Addo |
farm416 Bloukrans No.23 (505.0861 ha) |
National Park |
Kimberly |
Farm Kameel No 118: 1284,7980 hectares |
National Park |
Addo |
Farm Wellspark 37: 475,5201 hectares |
National Park |
Addo |
Por 5(1p of Por 2) of Volkers River 244 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion of farm416 Bloukrans No.23 |
National Park |
West Coast |
Bottelary: Gedeelte 4 (J.S. du Toit) |
National Park |
West Coast |
Bottelary: Gedeelte 4 (B.F.Cilliers) |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Grasberg Noord 1084 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Varsch Fontein 1085 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Potklys Berg Suid 1095 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Springbokfontein 1096 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Folmoesfontein 1097 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Springbok Vlakte 1098 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Luipers Kop 1099 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Luipers Kop Suid 1100 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 0 Hoender Hoek 3 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 0 Taai Bosch Kloof 63 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 0 Waterval 64 |
National Park |
Calvinia |
Por 1 Quaggasfontein 66 |
National Park |
Thabazimbi |
Stand: Zandfontein No. 315 Remainder of p |
National Park |
Addo |
NieuwJaars Kop no.300 Port 1:3064679 ha |
National Park |
Addo |
Rodeklipheuvel portions 2&3 21 872 554 ha |
National Park |
West Coast |
Erf 2046 Langebaan Malmesbury 337 sq mt |
National Park |
West Coast |
No. 62 Div of Sutherland 2194 8390 Ha |
National Park |
West Coast |
Paapekuil Fontein No.281 Hact 471 0926 |
National Park |
Kimberly |
Farm SchotzFontein Portion 2,3,5,9 and 10 |
National Park |
Addo |
Portion 12 of the Farm Wolve Kop no.82 |
National Park |
Addo |
Erf 1753 (Portion of ERF1739) Colchester |
National Park |
---ooOoo---
27 November 2017 - NW3451
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1) How many officials and/or employees in her department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years (2) are any of the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with the Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?
Reply:
1. 32 employees were granted permission to do business dealings in the past three financial years.
Occupation |
Branch |
Reason work Outside Departmentq |
Status of Approval |
EO |
CWM |
Tutor |
Approved 23/11/2015 |
DD |
COO |
Consulting:IT |
Approved 24/02/2014 |
AO |
CC&AQ |
Supply Goods |
Approved 22/01/2014 |
ASD |
COO |
Courier Services |
Approved 04/02/2013 |
DD |
OC |
Support |
Approved 08/08/2014 |
OHSO |
ADMIN |
Supply Equipments |
Approved 10/04/2015 |
PAO |
CFO |
Publishing |
Approved 05/06/2014 |
EO |
LACE |
Trainer |
Approved 08/05/2014 |
ASD |
ADMIN |
Music Production & Drama |
Approved 18/11/2014 |
AO |
OC |
Face Painting |
Approved 23/06/2015 |
GIS Technician |
EAS |
Merchandising |
Approved 13/08/2015 |
ASD |
COO |
Selling clothes |
Approved 22/06/2015 |
DD |
CFO |
Events management |
Approved 03/07/2015 |
CEO |
CWM |
Gym at home |
Approved 21/07/2015 |
DD |
IMSC |
Material Supply |
Approved 25/07/2014 |
DD |
LACE |
Project Management |
Approved 14/07/2014 |
SPAC |
CFO |
Investment |
Approved 02/07/2014 |
SAO |
CFO |
Trading Enterprise |
Approved 28/05/2014 |
Director |
LACE |
Tutor |
Approved 22/10/2015 |
Occupation |
Branch |
Reason work Outside Departmentq |
Status of Approval |
SAC |
ADMIN |
Transportation |
Approved 28/11/2013 |
CD |
CC&AQ |
Sales |
Approved 04/02/2015 |
ASD |
LACE |
Investment |
Approved 01/12/2016 |
ASD |
COO |
Sales and Marketing |
Approved 09/06/2015 |
SPP |
COO |
Selling Garments and motivational speaker |
Approved 06/05/2016 |
Director |
COO |
Sales |
Approved 31/05/2016 |
CEO |
LACE |
Sales and Marketing |
Approved 31/01/2017 |
DD |
EP |
Engineering |
Approved 14/11/2016 |
PAO |
ADMIN |
Education activities |
Approved 28/03/2017 |
PROJ ADMIN |
LACE |
Health Professionals |
Approved 20/02/2017 |
SHRP |
ADMIN |
Sales and Marketing |
Approved 28/03/2017 |
CEO |
LACE |
Consultancy work |
Approved 21/12/2016 |
EO |
CC&AQ |
Building Construction |
Approved 30/09/2016 |
2. No
(a) No
(b) No
(c) No
---ooOoo---
17 November 2017 - NW3514
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)What (a) total amount did his/her department spend on air travel between Gauteng and Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the 2014-15 financial year and (b) is the total number of trips that were undertaken; (2) What is the total amount that his/her department spent on (a) accommodation and (b) car rental in Cape Town for employees attending Parliament business in the specified financial year?
Reply:
(1) Government officials are expected to travel between Gauteng and the Western Cape to carry out official duties, including Ministerial and Departmental support to the Executive who carry out Parliamentary duties according to the Parliamentary Programme.
(2) Costs incurred by Government Officials are readily made available in Annual Reports which are tabled in Parliament annually.
---ooOoo---
14 November 2017 - NW3384
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What is the total number of tons of ash that were produced by (a) Eskom and (b) Sasol (i) in the (aa) 2014-15, (bb) 2015-16 and (cc) 2016-17 financial years and (ii) since 1 April 2017?
Reply:
As reported by third parties, which we as Environmental Affairs are not required to keep record of, and therefore cannot verify these figures:
a) Eskom
(i) (aa) 2014-15: 34 410 Kilo Tons.
(bb) 2015-16: 32 586 Kilo Tons.
(cc) 2016-17: 32 612 Kilo Tons.
(ii) 01/04/17 – to date: 16 999 Kilo Tons.
b) Sasol
(i) (aa, bb and cc) and (ii)
The Sasolburg Operations (SO) and Secunda Synfuels Operations (SSO) ash figures are kept separate because of the operations being in different locations. We have also separated the coarse ash (predominantly gasification ash) from the fine ash (ash generated at the steam plants). Also, please note that Sasol’s financial year runs from July to June.
Ash in Tons |
FY15 (1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015) |
FY16 (1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016) |
FY17 (July 2016 to June 2017) |
1 April 2017 to 30 Sep 2017 (please note that Apr 2017 to June 2017 figures are included in FY17 data) |
Sasolburg Operations (SO) |
||||
Fine ash (boiler fine and bottom ash particles) |
598 215 |
573 927 |
590 731 |
262 748 |
Secunda Synfuels Operations (SSO) |
||||
Fine ash (boiler and gasification fine particles) |
4 324 772 |
4 037 215 |
3 843 959 |
1 847 788 |
Coarse ash (predominantly gasification ash) |
6 229 382 |
6 654 301 |
6 400 470 |
3 058 644 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
Ash generated (all sources and types) |
11 152 369 |
11 265 443 |
10 835 160 |
5 169 180 |
---ooOoo---
13 November 2017 - NW3379
Mackay, Mr G to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) On which date did Eskom approach her department to conduct environmental impact assessments for Duynefontein as the preferred site to establish another nuclear power station as part of the Government’s new nuclear build programme, (b) what are the details of the grounds on which her department approved the specified site as the preferred site for a new nuclear power station and (c) why did her department approve the specified site as the preferred site for a new nuclear power station when the Government’s new nuclear build programme determinations and intergovernmental agreements relating to the programme have been declared unconstitutional and invalid by a court of law?
Reply:
Eskom lodged an application for environmental authorisation on 1 May 2007, for the proposed construction and operation of a Nuclear Power Station in South Africa. The independent consultant appointed by Eskom as an Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) identified five sites as alternatives for the proposed development during the Scoping Phase of the Environmental Impact Assessment, namely Brazil and Schulpfontein (Northern Cape); Duynefontein (Western Cape); Bantamsklip (Western Cape) and Thyspunt (Eastern Cape). The Brazil and Schulpfontein sites were considered unsuitable for the proposed development and were eliminated from further assessment during the Scoping Phase. Bantamsklip was eliminated from further consideration in the Environmental Impact Assessment stage as there were shortcomings relating to transportation risks, urban planning and the level of detail provided in the assessment report on the transmission of power from the operational station was found to be inadequate when compared to the other two sites. The Thyspunt and Duynefontein sites were the only two sites that progressed to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) phase and were presented as viable sites for the proposed development. The Duynefontein site was eventually approved by the Department from the two sites that were presented as viable options. There were numerous specialist assessments undertaken by experts in their respective fields which culminated in extremely voluminous specialist assessment reports. Some of these reports were subjected to a peer review during the EIA process. In addition however, these reports were also subjected to an independent review process by a panel of experts outside of the Department - before the department made a final decision.
The Duynefontein site was selected given that there were generally less overall environmental impacts associated with this site relative to impacts associated with the development of a “greenfields” site, i.e. Thyspunt. The refinement of the Duynefontein footprint to a terrestrial area of approximately 265ha, immediately north of the Koeberg Nuclear Power Station and inland from the coast has materially reduced the footprint-related environmental impacts of the project. In addition, the Duynefontein site is adjacent to the existing Koeberg Nuclear Power Station, thereby allowing for a suite of logistical and operational synergies.
The Western Cape High Court judgement found the request made by government for proposals to be submitted for the procurement of 9.6 gigawatts of nuclear to be unlawful and uncostitutional. The ruling had no bearing the application for the Environmental Authorisation as it had nothing to do with procurement processes.The application for environmental authorsation was lodged in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, Act 108 of 1998 and the associated environmental impact assessment regulations. Therefore the selection of Dynefontein as a prefereed site through the Environmental Impact Assessment process does not violate the High Court ruling, as it is an unrelated process.
13 November 2017 - NW3000
Lotriet, Prof A to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What is the (a) total amount that was paid out in bonuses to employees in her Department and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that was paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2016/17 financial year; and (2) what is the (a) total estimated amount that will be paid out in bonuses to employees in her Department and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that will be paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2017/18 financial year?
Reply:
(1) (a) Due to the financial constraints and agreed to budget cuts the Department opted to pay incentives to performing staff, instead of generalised bonuses, as outlined in Part VIII, Section F1 of the Public Service Regulations which reads as follows:
“If the Departmental budget and the medium-term expenditure framework provide adequate funds, a head of department may establish a financial incentive scheme for the employees or any category of those employees.”
Consequently, an amount of R14, 493,635.57 was paid out in performance incentives to employees on salaries level 2-12 for the financial year.
(2) (a) An estimated total amount of R15 751 095 will be paid out in performance incentives to employees in the Department for the 2017/2018 financial year.
(b) The breakdown of the performance incentives to be paid out to each employee in each salary level for the 2017/18 financial year will be determined as outlined in Part VIII section F1 of the service Regulations, as outlined above.
---ooOoo---
13 November 2017 - NW2978
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)With regard to the sale of rhino horns by a certain person (name furnished) during the online auction sale held from 21-24 August 2017, what is the total number of (a) permits that were issued by her department, (b) rhino horns or part thereof that were sold; (2) were any rhino horns or part thereof sold to the international community members; if not, what measures will be implemented to ensure that rhino horns or part thereof never leave the borders of the country; if so, (a) why, (b) what are the names of the buyers and/or bidders?
Reply:
(1)
(a) 1 permit to sell 264 rhinoceros horns and 7 permits to buy rhinoceros horns
(b) No horns or parts thereof
(2)
(a) As indicated above, no horns or parts thereof were sold during the auction. The following measures are in place to prevent and detect illegal activities:
- Environmental Management Inspectors (EMIs) monitor compliance to the buying permits as well as the possession permits that will be applicable to the horns. Through the permitting system we are able to track the movement of the horns and conduct inspections on a regular basis to monitor that these are horns have remained in the country;
- We have improved the ability to track the movement of rhino horn through the implementation of a national database and systems relating to the marking of rhino horn and genetic profiling;
- The Department’s Environmental Management Inspectorate (EMI) works in collaboration with other government agencies such as the South African Police Service and SARS Customs at international airports and at border posts in order to combat the illegal import and export of wildlife products. Having enforcement officials at these ports has assisted in the detection of illegal goods and identification of possible offenders and continue to do so;
- The Department’s Environmental Management Inspectorate (EMI) has been raising awareness and training border officials on initiatives focused on the Illicit International cross border movement of endangered species. This enhances our efforts to build capacity to tackle the problem;
- In 2017 we also commenced with awareness raising sessions for the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) officials protecting the South African border line to ensure that they are aware of the illegal practices related to smuggling of wildlife and that they are able to react should they encounter smugglers;
- The Department works in close co-operation with enforcement officials from neighboring countries to ensure that they are aware of possible illegal trade and that they immediately inform the department in case of any seizures of illegally traded horn and supply us with the necessary information to enable enforcement agencies to investigate;
- Accordingly, we have improved our detection capability at ports of entry and exit by increasing awareness, human capacity, technology and skills which is evident in the increased number of confiscations, arrests and convictions related to wildlife trafficking.
- Regulations pertaining to certain restricted activities involving rhinoceros horn were developed under section 97 of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004) to ensure the strict regulation of the domestic trade in rhino horn. Under section 57(2) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No.10 of 2004) specific activities will be prohibit, i.e. the shaving and powdering of rhinoceros horn of Ceratotherium simum, Diceros bicornis bicornis, Diceros bicornis minor and Diceros bicornis michaeli.
(b) Not applicable
---ooOoo---
13 November 2017 - NW3173
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)What are the details including the ranks of service providers and/or contractors from which (a) her department and (b) the entities reporting to her procured services in the past five years; (2) what (a) service was provided by each service provider and/or contractor and (b) amount was each service provider and/or contractor paid; (3) (a) how many of these service providers are black-owned entities, (b) what contract was each of the black-owned service providers awarded and (c) how much was each black-owned service provider paid?
Reply:
(1)– (3) The Department’s database does not rank the service providers. However, the information relative to the bids awarded by the Department and its entities is published in the media from which they are advertised such as:
- Government Tender Bulletin
- E-tender portal (National Treasury)
- Departmental Website
The Member is also referred to the Annual Reports of both the Department and its entities of over the past five years as these would also have an indication of the procurements that the Auditor-General would have delivered his opinion on.
---ooOoo---
13 November 2017 - NW3512
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) Why has the biotrade permit number IEP 005 of Schibuna Aloe not been renewed yet despite all documentation being submitted at least five months ago and (b) by what date will the renewal of the specified permits be finalised so that the business can continue to export aloe juice and pay its 213 aloe tappers; (2) what (a) measures has the department put in place to ensure that existing biotrade permits are not reassigned to businesses or individuals that do not comply with all the necessary standards and (b) steps will she take to ensure that the unnecessarily long delays in renewal of permits are resolved more efficiently in the future?
Reply:
(a) Schibuna Aloe’s application was subjected to internal processes which involves the evaluation by the Bioprospecting Advisory Committee (BAC) comprised of internal and external stakeholders and ensuing consultations with the applicant. Upon receipt of the recommendations by the BAC, key fundamental gaps on fair and equitable sharing of benefits with communities were identified which needed further engagement with the applicant.
(b) The issuing of the permit will be finalised as soon as the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the fair and equitable sharing of benefits with communities. (Approval has been given, however, for the applicant to continue with the export of aloe juice in the interim, pending the completion of these processes)
2. (a) The Bioprospecting Access and Benefit Sharing (BABS) Amendment Regulations provide the criteria that must be taken into consideration before a biotrade permit can be issued and /or renewed.
(b) The department places high value on the role of bioprospecting and biotrade in facilitating fairness and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of biological resources. Recent interventions include but are not limited to institutional strengthening, regulatory amendments and enhancement of the assessment processes.
NW3939E
---ooOoo---
10 November 2017 - NW3200
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) What number of tenders have been awarded by the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency since 1 April 2014, (b) what were the specified tenders for, (c) what was the total monetary value of each tender, (d) what are the names of the companies that each tender was awarded to and (e) what is the nature of the relationship between each specified company and a certain person (name and details furnished)?
Reply:
This is a provincial competency that would require the question to be reffered, for response, to the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism as the Management Authority in charge of the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency.
---oOo---
09 November 2017 - NW3313
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Whether the (a) Chief Executive Officer and (b) Chief Financial Officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis; if not; and (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?
Reply:
1. South African National Parks (SANParks)
1. (a) No
(b) No
2. (a) Chief Executive Officer: Mr Fundisile Mketeni
Chief Financial Officer: Vacant.
(b) (i) Chief Executive Officer: 1 December 2014
Chief Financial Officer: Vacant
(ii) Chief Executive Officer: 30 November 2019
Chief Financial Officer: Vacant
2. iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority
1. (a) No
(b) No
2. (a) Interim Chief Executive Officer – Dr Anis Karodia
Chief Financial Officer – Ms Abeeda Kadir
(b) (i) Interim Chief Executive Officer – 1 September 2017
Chief Financial Officer – 1 May 2015
(ii) Interim Chief Executive Officer – 31 March 2018
Chief Financial Officer – 30 April 2020
3. South African Weather Services (SAWS)
1. (a) No
(b) No
2. (a) Chief Executive Officer – Mr Jerry Lengoasa.
Chief Financial Officer – Vacant.
(b) (i) Chief Executive Officer employed – 08 May 2017
Chief Financial Officer – Vacant.
(ii) Chief Executive Officer Contract ends – 31 March 2022
Chief Financial Officer – Vacant.
4. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI)
1. (a) No
(b) Chief Financial Officer at SANBI is employed – on a permanent basis.
2. (a) Chief Executive Officer – Dr Moshibudi Rampedi
Chief Financial Officer – Ms Lerato Sithole
(b) (i) Employed on 01 September 2017
(ii) Employment contract ends on 31 August 2022
---ooOoo---
09 November 2017 - NW3292
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether, with reference to the advertised position of senior manager in Protected Area Expansion which was advertised by the Eastern Cape Tourism Agency in August 2017 and in respect of which interviews were held in September 2017, a suitable candidate was appointed; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the details of scores on the original score sheet of the interview panel, (b) what was the recommendation of the panel regarding who should be appointed and (c) was the recommended candidate appointed?
Reply:
This is a provincial competency that would require the question to be reffered for respond by the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism as the Management Authority in charge of the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency.
---ooOoo---
09 November 2017 - NW3385
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Whether any cell phones and/or other communication devices were confiscated by rangers from alleged poachers in each national park since 01 January 2017; if so, (a) what number of communication devices were confiscated in each specified park and (b) what are the details of the processes followed after confiscation; (2) whether the specified devices were handed over to the South African Police Service (SAPS); if so, have the devices been used as evidence in investigations?
Reply:
(1) Yes, ninety three (93) cellular phones were confiscated during arrests, by Rangers, of suspected poachers in the Kruger National Park.
(2) Yes, all cellular phones recovered from South African National Parks (SANParks) anti-poaching operations/ arrests are handed over to the SAPS for further investigation. The intention is for all cellular phone evidence to be used in investigation processes. The SAPS is in a better position to give an account on whether the devices have been used as evidence in investigations.
---ooOoo---
06 November 2017 - NW3201
Ketabahle, Ms V to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether, with reference to the announcement late in 2016 and early in 2017 that the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency would implement a game transformation policy, the specified policy has been implemented; if so, (a)(i) what number of persons have benefited from the game transformation policy and (ii) what is the (aa) name and (bb) contact details of each specified person and (b) what is the relationship between the specified beneficiaries and a certain person (name and details furnished)?
Reply:
This is a provincial competency that would require the question to be reffered, for response, to the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism as the Management Authority in charge of the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency.
---oOo---
06 November 2017 - NW3273
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Whether the North West Parks Board has entered into agreements with any private company to co-manage the Molopo Nature Reserve; if so, what (a) is the name of each private company, (b) are the details of the owners of each specified company, (c) are the reasons for entering into a co-management agreement in each case and (d) are the terms of each contract, including the contract dates; (2) whether the process was put to tender; if so, (a) how many companies, individuals or entities applied, (b) what criteria had to be fulfilled and (c) what time period did the tender stipulate?
Reply:
This is a provincial competency that would require the question to be reffered, for response, to the North West Department of Rural, Environmental and Agricultural Development as the Management Authority in charge of the North West Parks Board.
---oOo---
06 November 2017 - NW3204
Mente, Ms NV to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) What is the monetary value of the infrastructural development project at the Cape Morgan Nature Reserve, (b) who are the contractors appointed for the project and (c) what is the relationship of the specified contractors with a certain official (name and details furnished)?
Reply:
This is a provincial competency that would require the question to be reffered, for response, to the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning as the Management Authority in charge of the Cape Morgan Narure Reserve.
---oOo---
06 November 2017 - NW3203
Mente, Ms NV to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What (a) is the name of the new security company appointed by the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency (ECPTA), (b) was the original decision of the bid committee regarding the appointment of the security company, (c) (i) was the bid price presented to the bid committee by the company and (ii) is the monetary value of the final contract that ECPTA entered into with the company and (d) is the relationship between the owners of the security company and a certain official (name and details furnished)?
Reply:
This is a provincial competency that would require the question to be reffered, for response, to the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism as the Management Authority in charge of the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency.
---oOo---
06 November 2017 - NW3202
Paulsen, Mr N M to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) Who owns the building that currently houses the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency in East London in the Eastern Cape, (b) what is the amount of the lease contract, (c) why was the specified company chosen, (d)(i) which other companies were involved in the bid to lease offices to the specified agency and (ii) what amount were they going to bill the agency for the use of their offices and (e) what is the relationship between the owner of the specified building and a certain person (name and details furnished)?
Reply:
This is a provincial competency that would require the question to be reffered, for response, to the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism as the Management Authority in charge of the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency.
---oOo---
31 October 2017 - NW2689
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) What number of illegal incursions by foreign fishing vessels into South Africa’s 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone occurred in the past five years, (b) in each case, (i) what is the name of the vessel, (ii) from what state do they originate, (iii) what actions were taken against such vessels and (iv) what penalties were imposed and (b) what are the full relevant details of the current state of readiness of the country to prevent and police such incursions should they occur in the future?
Reply:
a) A total number of fourteen (14) foreign fishing vessels entered into South Africa’s 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone illegally during the past five years.
b) (i) and (ii)
1. Bahari Nusantara number 83, China;
2. Bahari Nusantara number 19, China;
3. Bahari Nusantara number 5, China;
4. Bahari Nusantara number 26, China;
5. Bintang Samudra number 11, China;
6. Samudra Gilontas number 231, China;
7. Mahkota Abadi number 15; China;
8. Naham number 4, Oman;
9. Samudera Pasific number 8, China;
10. Berkat Menjala number 23, China;
11. Lu Huang Yuan Yu, number 186, China;
12. Fu Yuan Yu number 7880, China;
13. Fu Yang Yu number 7881, China;
14. Run Da number 617, China.
(iii)
Vessels numbered 1 to 14 above were charged in terms of the Marine Living resources Act (No. 18 of 1998), forfeited to the State and sold on auction for the benefit of the State. The cases against vessels 1 to 7 remain open as the suspects are foreign nationals and could not be located. Vessels 9 and 10 escaped from lawful custody in Cape Town Harbour and INTERPOL International Notices were issued in respect of these vessels.
(iv)
The Lu Huang Yuan Yu, number 186, was fined R75 000;
The Fu Yuan Yu number 7880 was fined R250 000;
The Fu Yang Yu number 7881 was fined R250 000;
The Run Da number 617 was fined R200 000.
b) The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), which has the principal mandate to monitor and undertake enforcement in relation to foreign fishing vessels, is supported in the execution of this function by the work of Initiative 5 of Operation Phakisa - the enhanced and coordinated compliance and enforcement programme which addresses illegal activities taking place within the South African Economic Exclusive Zone and coastal environment. The ongoing operations undertaken by Initiative 5 in line with the National Instruction issued by the National Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (NATJOINTS) involve a coordinated interdepartmental approach to ensure compliance monitoring and enforcement within South Africa’s Economic Exclusive Zone, coastal waters and maritime ports of entry.
In addition to operating its Fisheries Protection Vessels (FPVs), the DAFF has been piloting a Maritime Intelligence capability that is designed to give early warning signals of Foreign Fishing Vessel entering the SA EEZ without the required/necessary permit/s and in contravention of the Marine Living Resources Act. The reports from this system are linked to the Cape Town Port of Control Centre (PECC). Work is also underway through Initiative 6 of Phakisa, the National Ocean and Coastal Information System and Extending Earth Observation Capacity, to provide an integrated maritime domain awareness system for our ocean space and coastal environment, which will integrate information from these early warning systems into a single government system to enable the effective deployment and mobilisation of the relevant capability to apprehend suspected perpetrators.
---ooOoo---
31 October 2017 - NW3040
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether she will advise which specific departmental and/or government authority is ultimately responsible and accountable for overseeing and verifying that only 800 lion bone skeletons are being exported each year; if not, why not; if so (a) where does such verification take place, (b) what does the process entail, (c) how many lion bones in kilograms have been shipped since 01 January 2017 and (d) if the quota has already been reached, how many kilograms of lion bone over-quota have been shipped?
Reply:
The Department and/or government authority responsible and accountable for overseeing and verifying that the lion bone skeletons exported each year does not exceed the set quota is the Department of Environmental Affairs. Prorvincial authorities discharge their specific functions associated with permit issuing for exporters.
(a) The verification is conducted throughout the value chain process starting from the details required from the applicant, the pre-permit inspection by the provincial authorities, and finally at the port of exit where the permits are endorsed by the Environmental Management Inspectors.
(b) The process is as follows:
- The quota is managed at a national level (applications are lodged with provincial nature conservation authorities and then submitted by Provincial authorities to the Department for quota allocation);
- The quota is restricted to trade in full skeletons only, with or without the head
- Upon receipt of an application, the officials at the Province conduct the initial inspection to confirm the existence of the skeletons in question;
- Once confirmed, the Province evaluates the application and determine whether the relevant permit can be issued;
- Skeletons have to be packed separately;
- If confirmed, the Province requests for a quota from the Department;
- The Department manages the quota and the distribution of tags and DNA collection kits;
- After allocating the quota, the skeletons are inspected for a second time where they are then weighed, tagged and a DNA sample is taken for forensic analysis;
- The quota numbers are indicated on all permits;
- During export, at the port of exit, the consignment is inspected again where the quantity is verified against the details on the permit and random DNA samples are collected for analysis; and
- When all the particulars are correct, the Environmental Management Inspector endorses the permit for export.
(c) The total number of endorsed permits at OR Tambo since January 2017 is 208 skeletons and 113 lion bones. These bones and skeletons are exported for various purposes, including but not limited to, trophy hunting, personal, education and commercial activities. The weighing at the port of exit was not a legal requirement during the first semester of 2017, but this requirement will now apply to future shipments. It must be noted that, weighing of the skeletons happens in the provinces and the weight appears on the addendum of the issued permits. Copies of the addenda are kept by the Provincial authorities and can be requested.
(d) The total quota of 800 skeletons, with or without the skull, for 2017 has been allocated to various applicants in the Provinces for export. The quota as per allocation has been reached for the year. No export of lion bone over-quota is allowed.
---ooOoo---
31 October 2017 - NW3039
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether she will provide copies of all lion bone export permits issued in the Eastern Cape, North West, Limpopo, Free State, Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Northern Cape provinces since 01 January 2015; (2) with reference to each permit issued, what are the (a) full names of the permit holder, (b) business names of the permit holder, (c) consignee and consignor addresses, (d) permit numbers, (e) names of issuing authority and (f) quantities and kilograms of lion bone permitted
Reply:
(1) (a) The Environmental Management Inspectors from the national Department of Environmental Affairs commenced with inspections at O R Tambo with effect from 1st April 2015. The Department is in possession of copies of all permits that were endorsed during the verification of consignments at the airport from the 1st April 2015 to October 2017. The copies of all permits referred to above are available in hard copy and are kept at O R Tambo International Airport. The Department is not in possession of copies of permits for the period 1st January 2015 to 31st March 2015.
Copies of permits endorsed between 1st January 2015 to 31st March 2015 are held by the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development because verification and endorsement of permits was previously carried out by the provincial officials who were deployed at OR Tambo.
2. The details required in respect of: (a) the full names of the permit holder, (b) business names of the permit holder, (c) consignee and consignor addresses, permit numbers, (e) names of issuing authorities are available in hard copies of the permits.
(f) Information regarding quantities of lion bones is contained in the Department’s data base and can be made available. Information regarding kilograms was not recorded in the database. Only quantities of bone are recorded in the database.
---ooOoo---
31 October 2017 - NW3109
Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)Whether any licences have been issued to the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality for the discharge of sewage into the ocean; if so, in each case, (a) when was each licence issued and (b) what is the expiry date of each licence; (2) has any sewage been (a) released into the ocean after the expiry date of the relevant licence and/or (b) discharged into the ocean without a license; if not, what are the further details in this regard; (3) have there been any unintended discharges of sewage into the ocean by the specified municipality in the past 18 months; if so, in each case, (a) when did the discharge occur and (b) what was the cause of the discharge; (4) What steps have been taken to mitigate the impact of the intended and unintended discharge of sewage into the ocean by the specified municipality?
Reply:
(1) The National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act, 2008 (Act 24 of 2008) (ICM Act) came into force in 2009. Subsequently, the Municipality is required to apply for a Coastal Waters Discharge Permit (CWDP) for East Bank WWTW’s in accordance with the ICM Act irrespective of the current status of the Water Use Licence Authorisation (WULA) obtained from the Department of Water and Sanitation. Currently, the Municipality adheres to the conditions stipulated under the WULA until such time the CWDP is issued by the Department of Environmental Affairs in terms of the ICMA. Furthermore, the Buffalo City Municipality has currently submitted an application for a CWDP for Hood point Waste Water Treatment works.
(2) The Municipality is currently discharging as per the Water Use Licence Authorisation (WULA) requirements.
(3) No unintended discharges have been raised for the Department’s attention or noting, the Municipality adheres to the WUL conditions for the discharge of effluent in to the coastal waters.
(4) No unintended discharges have been raised for the DEA’s attention or noting. However, the Department has issued a compliance notice to the Municipality on 24 July 2017 to apply for a CWDP in order for the effluent impacts to be managed under ICM. The Department is currently reviewing the water quality standards for the natural marine environment and will dictate standards for compliance in each permits. Should the Department of Environmental Affairs require higher levels of treatment for the effluent in order to meet the (natural) receiving environment water quality standards, the permit holder will be instructed to implement land-based management options (such as higher levels of treatment, on site dilution, dosing, filtration, etc. The Buffalo City Municipality is currently undertaking Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the extension of existing Hood Point pipeline from the surf zone to the deep-sea as part of improvement plan for coastal water quality.
---ooOoo---
30 October 2017 - NW3152
Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
With reference to the fracking activity which is taking place in Matatiele, why has her department approved the environmental impact assessment when the surrounding communities opposed the specified activity on the grounds of pollution (details furnished) and (b) whether the principle of public participation has been applied to give the surrounding communities a chance to voice their opinions and input and assist the executive in making the decision?
Reply:
(a) The Department of Environmental Affairs did not approve the environmental impact assessment in this instance, as it is not the Competent Authority for this type of activity/ies under the current regulatory regime. If the application was lodged under the 2014 Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, the application may have been processed and approved by the Department of Mineral Resources, in which case the Department of Environmental Affairs would become the appeal authority.
(b) Given that the Department of Environmental Affairs was not the issuing authority in this instance, it cannot comment on “whether the principle of public participation has been applied to give the surrounding communities a chance to voice their opinions and input and assist the executive in making the decision”. However, the surrounding communities may appeal a decision granted by the Competent Authority to the Minister of Environmental Affairs if they are dissatisfied with
(i) the decision that was “approved”, alternatively, (ii) the lack of, or dissatisfaction with, the public participation process.
---ooOoo---
30 October 2017 - NW2977
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)With regard to the court’s dismissal of the application of a certain family (name furnished) to compel a certain bank (name furnished) not to close its accounts by the end of September, what steps does she intend to put in place to ensure that the rehabilitation funds of mines owned by and/or linked to the specified family do not leave the country; (2) whether she intends to approach the courts to ensure that the rehabilitation funds are frozen to deal with environmental degradation caused by mines owned by and/or linked to the specified family; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) With regard to the question 1 which asks what steps the Minister will take to ensure that funds identified for the rehabilitation of mines do not leave the country, the Minister draws attention to the following legislative requirements:
The National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998) requires the following in respect of financial provision:
Section 24P“(5)
(a) The requirement to maintain and retain the financial provision contemplated in this section remains in force notwithstanding the issuing of a closure certificate by the Minister responsible for mineral resources in terms of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 to the holder or owner concerned. “
Further, the competency for these matters has been identified as the Minister of Mineral Resources in the following circumstances:
Section 24C(2A):
“The Minister responsible for mineral resources must be identified as the competent authority in terms of subsection (1) where the listed or specified activity is directly related to-
(a) prospecting or exploration of a mineral or petroleum resource; or
(b) extraction and primary processing of a mineral or petroleum resource.”
Therefore, noting the provisions of the Act, it is the responsibility of the Minister of Mineral Resources to ensure that the legal requirements are implemented.
(2) With respect to question 2 regarding the intention of the Minister to approach the courts to ensure rehabilitation funds remain to deal with remediating degradation caused by mining, please note that section 24C(2A) of the Act, identifies the Minister of Mineral Resources has having the competency with respect to mining, including the provisions surrounding financial provision for rehabilitation of impacts associated with prospecting, exploration, mining and production.
---ooOoo---
11 October 2017 - NW2727
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What number of (a)(i) poachers and (ii) illegal immigrants were arrested by the (aa) SA National Defence Force and (bb) SA Police Service members deployed in the Kruger National Park (aaa) in each of the past seven financial years and (bbb) since 1 April 2017 and (b) the specified arrests resulted in successful prosecutions in each case?
Reply:
(a)(i) From 2011 to the end of 2016, 935 poachers have been arrested in the Kruger National Park. The numbers are as follows:
2011 = 82
2012 = 73
2013 = 123
2014 = 174
2015 = 202
2016 = 281
From 1 January to 30 September 2017, 206 poachers have been arrested in the Kruger National Park.
(a)((ii)(aa) The number of illegal immigrants arrested is linked to the line function of the South African National Defence Force and South African Police Services and the question should thus be directed to those respective Ministers.
(a)(ii)(bb) For specific information on the number of arrests by the South African Police Service outside of the Kruger National Park, but related to poaching in the Kruger National Park over the seven year period, this information has to be sourced from the the Minister of Police.
(b) For specified arrests resulting in successful prosecutions, this question should be directed to the Minister of Police and the National Prosecuting Agency, respectively.
---ooOoo---
10 October 2017 - NW2688
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(a) What is the total number of (i) registered breeders of tigers, (ii) tigers in captivity and (iii) tigers that have been hunted in South Africa since 1 January 2017 and (b) what is the breakdown of the numbers for each province?
Reply:
a)
(i) Tigers are alien in South Africa and are kept for among others zoological and breeding purposes. Tigers are not regulated in terms National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004) or Threatened & Protected Species Regulations(TOPS). The national Department of Environmental Affairs , therefore, does not keep statistics on numbers of registered breeders, tigers in captivity, and hunting in South Africa as it is done with the key indigenous big mammals (Rhino, Elephants) as well as other big cats (Lions and Leopards). Provincial Authorities may have statistics on a number of registered captive facilities and hunting as such may be regulated through respective provincial legislation.
(ii) the question has been answered in paragraph (a)(i) above;
(iii) the question has been answered in paragraph (a)(i) above;
(b) The question has been answered in paragraph (a)(i) above.
---ooOoo---
10 October 2017 - NW2881
Dreyer, Ms AM to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?
Reply:
(i) DEA (Data as at 20 September 2017)
Details |
Current |
Non-Current |
Total |
||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
CASH & CASH EQIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
R 689 984 295.42 |
CONSOLIDATED BANK ACC |
689 753 092.94 |
|
|
|
R 689 753 092.94 |
PETTY CASH |
222 000.00 |
|
|
|
R 222 000.00 |
CASH WITH LOCAL BANK:ABSA |
9 202.48 |
|
|
|
R 9 202.48 |
PREPAYMENTS & ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
R 1 232 468.12 |
T&S ADVANCE DOM:CA |
1 004 468.12 |
|
|
|
R 1 004 468.12 |
ADV:DOM:PRIVATE ENT:ADV ACC |
|
|
|
200 000.00 |
R 200 000.00 |
T&S STANDING ADV DOM:CA |
|
|
|
28 000.00 |
R 28 000.00 |
RECEIVABLES |
|
|
|
|
R 49 919 005.98 |
RECOVERABLE EXPENDITURE |
|
|
|
|
R 36 484 032.33 |
CLAIMS RECOVERABLE |
881 253.15 |
7 697 328.80 |
6 033 073.30 |
17 758 392.90 |
R 32 370 048.15 |
DAMAGE VEHICLES |
265 628.67 |
8 776.58 |
|
3 796 804.23 |
R 4 071 209.48 |
SAL:REVERSAL CONTROL:CA |
|
3 966.97 |
38 807.73 |
|
R 42 774.70 |
STAFF DEBT |
|
|
|
|
R 13 434 973.65 |
DEBT ACC |
428 612.21 |
23 457.28 |
6 000.00 |
12 960 140.98 |
R 13 418 210.47 |
SAL:TAX |
|
16 763.18 |
|
|
R 16 763.18 |
AID ASSISTANCE RECEIVABLE |
27 940 947.70 |
|
|
|
R 27 940 947.70 |
TOTAL |
720 505 205.27 |
7 750 292.81 |
6 077 881.03 |
34 743 338.11 |
R 769 076 717.22 |
-ooOoo---
(ii) PUBLIC ENTITIES
SANBI
DIRECTLY HELD |
|||||||
Details |
Current Assets and Investments |
Total |
|||||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
||
CASH & CASH EQIVALENTS |
353 120 319 |
- |
- |
- |
R 353 120 319,00 |
||
INVENTORY |
794 169 |
- |
- |
- |
R 794 169,00 |
||
RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS |
1 301 643 |
1 453 060 |
- |
- |
R 2 754 703,00 |
||
OTHER: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
a OPERATING LEASE ASSET |
- |
751 487 |
- |
- |
R 751 487,00 |
||
b DEFINED BENEFIT SURPLUS |
3 977 296 |
3 900 000 |
4 184 672 |
- |
R 12 061 968,00 |
||
c |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
a |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||
b |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||
c |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
6 073 108 |
6 104 547 |
4 184 672 |
- |
R 369 482 646 |
||
INDIRECTLY HELD |
|||||||
Details |
Current Assets and Investments |
Total |
|||||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
||
CASH & CASH EQIVALENTS |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
||
INVENTORY |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
||
RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
||
OTHER: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
||
a |
|
|
|
|
|
||
b |
|
|
|
|
|
||
c |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INVESTMENTS: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
||
a |
|
|
|
|
|
||
b |
|
|
|
|
|
||
c |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
||
iSIMANGALISO
DIRECTLY HELD CURRENT ASSETS AND SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS |
|||||
Details |
Current Assets and Investments |
Total |
|||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
INVENTORY |
- |
- |
284 005,07 |
|
R 284 005,07 |
CASH & CASH EQIVALENTS |
223 531 064,98 |
|
|
|
R 223 531 064,98 |
RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Receivables |
1 557 240,43 |
151 428,48 |
33 730,17 |
458 293,00 |
R 2 200 692,08 |
Prepayments |
2 565,00 |
|
|
|
R 2 565,00 |
Debtors control other |
43 143,00 |
|
|
158 070,00 |
R 201 213,00 |
TOTAL |
225 134 013,41 |
151 428,48 |
317 735,24 |
616 363,00 |
226 219 540,13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNLISTED INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
R - |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
|
R - |
DIRECTLY HELD NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|||||
Details |
Total |
||||
|
|
||||
PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
|
||||
Buildings and Infrastructure |
R 440 994 780,23 |
||||
Vehicles and mechanical equipment |
R 1 581 088,39 |
||||
Aircraft |
R - |
||||
Furniture and office equipment |
R 689 471,29 |
||||
Assets under construction |
R 112 652 285,27 |
||||
|
|
||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
|
||||
Software |
R 57 591,89 |
||||
|
R - |
||||
TOTAL |
R 555 975 217,07 |
||||
SANPARKS
DIRECTLY HELD CURRENT ASSETS AND SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS |
|||||||
Details |
Current Assets and Investments |
Total |
|||||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
||
INVENTORY |
- |
- |
34 871 221,47 |
|
R 34 871 221,47 |
||
CASH & CASH EQIVALENTS |
989 511 531,34 |
42 743 030,87 |
|
|
R 1 032 254 562,21 |
||
RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trade Receivables |
15 709 336,40 |
15 616 750,83 |
220 601,00 |
|
R 31 546 688,23 |
||
Prepayments |
2 679 332,34 |
|
|
|
R 2 679 332,34 |
||
Debtors control other |
218 465 235,14 |
|
|
|
R 218 465 235,14 |
||
Provision for bad debts |
|
(8 373 437,92) |
|
|
R -8 373 437,92 |
||
Receivables from non-exchange transactions: EPWP |
17 541 422,73 |
|
|
|
R 17 541 422,73 |
||
Receivables from non-exchange transactions: Special Projects |
81 183 127,96 |
|
|
|
R 81 183 127,96 |
||
TOTAL |
1 325 089 985,91 |
49 986 343,78 |
35 091 822,47 |
- |
R 1 410 168 152,16 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
① |
UNLISTED INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNB |
57 288 419,77 |
|
|
|
R 57 288 419,77 |
||
Investec |
150 264 908,46 |
|
|
|
R 150 264 908,46 |
||
Absa |
102 865 157,57 |
|
|
|
R 102 865 157,57 |
||
STD Bank |
13 385 578,36 |
|
|
|
R 13 385 578,36 |
||
TOTAL |
323 804 064,16 |
- |
- |
- |
R 323 804 064,16 |
||
DIRECTLY HELD NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|||||||
Details |
Current Assets and Investments |
Total |
|||||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
||
PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Buildings and Infrastructure |
|
|
|
1 309 674 191,03 |
R 1 309 674 191,03 |
||
Vehicles and mechanical equipment |
|
|
|
228 986 304,92 |
R 228 986 304,92 |
||
Aircraft |
|
|
|
62 908 108,97 |
R 62 908 108,97 |
||
Furniture and office equipment |
|
|
|
66 513 048,56 |
R 66 513 048,56 |
||
Assets under construction |
|
|
|
115 562 711,97 |
R 115 562 711,97 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Software |
|
|
|
23 702 140,46 |
R 23 702 140,46 |
||
Rights-Acquisition |
|
|
|
20 200 000,00 |
R 20 200 000,00 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
R - |
||
HERITAGE ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
R - |
||
Conservation Land |
|
|
|
540 168 666,67 |
R 540 168 666,67 |
||
Other Heritage Assets |
|
|
|
552 224,69 |
R 552 224,69 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
R - |
||
② |
Non-current receivables from exchange transactions |
|
|
|
210 114 279,00 |
R 210 114 279,00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
2 578 381 676,28 |
R 2 578 381 676,28 |
||
Legend: |
|||||||
South African National Parks (SANParks) holds unlisted assets and investments directly for a period as listed above; SANParks does not hold any listed assets and investments directly or indirectly. |
|||||||
① |
The short term unlisted investments are in the form of notice accounts. |
||||||
② |
This receivable relates to the right to receive concession assets at the date of transfer, as per the agreements in place with the concessionaires. |
||||||
SAWS
DIRECTLY HELD |
|||||
Details |
Current Assets and Investments |
Total |
|||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
CASH & CASH EQIVALENTS |
|
|
78 526 172,00 |
|
R 78 526 172,00 |
INVENTORY |
|
|
3 341 671,00 |
|
R 3 341 671,00 |
RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS |
|
|
39 419 036,00 |
|
R 39 419 036,00 |
OTHER: |
|
|
- |
|
R - |
INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
R - |
fixed deposit (cash investment) |
20 000 000,00 |
|
|
|
R 20 000 000,00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
20 000 000,00 |
- |
121 286 879,00 |
- |
R 141 286 879,00 |
INDIRECTLY HELD |
|||||
Details |
Current Assets and Investments |
Total |
|||
|
0-3 months |
3-6 months |
6-12 months |
12months+ |
|
CASH & CASH EQIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
INVENTORY |
|
|
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER: |
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
b |
|
||||
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
R - |
06 October 2017 - NW2726
Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether she (a) received, (b) considered, (c) approved and/or (d) rejected any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?
Reply:
(a) No, I did not receive any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
(b) No, I did not consider any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
(c) No, I did not approve any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
(d) No, I did not reject any (i) applications, (ii) requests and/or (iii) proposals to withdraw the national parks declaration of any portion(s) of the West Coast National Park.
---ooOoo---
19 September 2017 - NW2564
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What are the full details of (a) the exact scientific rationale that informed the South African National Biodiversity Institute’s decision, justification and recommendation for the quota of 800 lion bone export per annum and (b) the steps that her department has put in place to ensure that the quota does not in fact exacerbate the tiger and lion poaching in South Africa?
Reply:
(a)
1. African lion (Panthera leo) is included on Appendix II to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). In 2016 at the 17th Conference of the Parties to CITES, the Parties adopted an annotation to this listing in relation to the growing international trade in lion bones:
“A zero annual export quota is established for specimens of bones, bone pieces, bone products, claws, skeletons, skulls and teeth removed from the wild and traded for commercial purposes. Annual export quotas for trade in bones, bone pieces, bone products, claws, skeletons, skulls and teeth for commercial purposes, derived from captive breeding operations in South Africa, will be established and communicated annually to the CITES Secretariat”.
2. The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), in its role as the scientific co-ordinator of South Africa’s CITES Scientific Authority was requested to advise the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) on the setting of this quota. The problem statement was formulated as the following question: “What is the current annual sustainable supply of lion bone from captive breeding operations?”
3. In setting the quota, the following issues were considered:
a) The need to avoid the creation of a monopoly in the supply of lion bones to Asia;
b) the need to incentivise compliance with the quota and avoid stimulating illegal trade;
c) the need to anticipate any unintended consequences;
d) possible confounding effects of the United States of America’s (USA) January 2016 listing of Panthera leo as threatened on the Endangered Species Act;
e) the fact that South Africa has a healthy wild lion population of approximately 3 500 individuals which is currently experiencing no major threats and persists alongside a large captive population of approximately 7 000 individuals in around 260 lion breeding/captive facilities in South Africa. Within this context, illegal use and/or trade in wild lion in South Africa is considered small to negligible based on available information;
f) the existing trade in lion bone between South Africa and eastern and south-eastern Asia which emerged in 2008 and has since shown an increasing trend. The supply of Felidae bones and skeletons from the Southern African Development Community region is sourced mostly from captive produced lions from South Africa as a by-product of the lion trophy hunting industry; and
g) submissions from a public consultation process managed by the Department of Environmental Affairs in which various parties argued for a zero quota whereas representatives of captive lion facilities argued that far greater numbers could be sustainably harvested and this would reduce demand for bones from wild lion. Despite claims of positive or negative impacts associated with trade, there is considerable uncertainty about the outcomes of either approach or very little objective evidence to guide decision making. Outcomes of past prohibitions or forced limitations in the supply of wildlife products to Asian markets is the subject of considerable debate both nationally and internationally, as demonstrated in three case studies below:
(i) The increased poaching of rhinos in South Africa and potential links to the domestic moratorium on the trade in rhino horn;
(ii) the increased poaching of elephants in Africa which some commentators have ascribed to the one off sales of ivory permitted by CITES whereas others have ascribed to perceived future scarcity of ivory because of the 2007 CITES moratorium on ivory sales; and
(iii) the switch to the utilisation of and trade in lion bones and bones of other felids subsequent to the 2007 CITES Decision to phase out tiger farms.
The uncertainty regarding the impact (on wild lion) of a trade ban for lion bone derived from captive bred animals partly informed the annotation adopted at the 17th Conference of the Parties (CoP17) to CITES. It should also be noted that the annotation formed part of a broader set of Decisions (17.241 – 17.245) that focused on lion conservation in general and the need to obtain additional information on legal and illegal trade and the effects of international trade on lion population trends.
4. In advising the Department of Environmental Affairs on the current annual sustainable supply of lion bone from captive breeding operations in South Africa, it was recognised that there is at present insufficient data to determine sustainable production of lions in all lion breeding facilities throughout South Africa. The export records for captive produced lion trophies were therefore interrogated on the assumption that lion breeding operations would have been managed wisely in order to ensure the sustainable production of adult trophy lions.
5. In 2016, SANBI collaborated with the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) to undertake an analysis of CITES trade in the SADC countries between 2005 and 2014. In relation to the export of Panthera leo trophies from SADC, the following was established and formed the basis for the recommended quota of 800 skeletons per year:
- On average 1 080 lion trophies were exported from SADC every year; and
- of these, 80% were direct exports from South Africa (864 individuals per year) and were comprised of predominantly captive produced lion trophies (less than 10 wild lion were hunted per year over this time period).
6. The recommended quota accords well with a study conducted by WildCRU (Oxford University, UK) and TRAFFIC (July 2015) which estimated that the skeleton resource base from trophy hunting was up to 833 skeletons per year over the period 2008 to 2010. Information provided by DEA indicated that 651 lion skeletons and 69 sets of bones were legally exported from South Africa between October 2015 and September 2016 which is consistent with the numbers estimated by UNEP-WCMC and the WildCRU/TRAFFIC report.
7. The rationale for setting the lion bone export quota was discussed at the 13th meeting of the South African Scientific Authority held in February 2017. Based on the issues outlined in section 3 (above) the Scientific Authority reasoned that the correct approach would be to establish a quota based on the best estimates of current supply and to immediately initiate studies to address some of the uncertainties so that future quotas can be informed by better evidence. As a result, the recommended quota of 800 skeletons was approved for submission to me and SANBI was requested to initiate the required studies as budget permitted (see under Part (b) below).
(b)
1. It should be noted that there are no wild tigers in South Africa and lion poaching in South Africa has been and is currently negligible. There has been some recent reports of captive lions being killed for traditional purposes (medicine or for bones in divination sets).
2. The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) has initiated a three-year collaborative project with the University of the Witwatersrand, Oxford University and the University of Kent entitled “Analysing and monitoring the lion bone trade in South Africa”.
The aims of the project are to:
a) increase our understanding of the captive lion breeding industry and the lion bone trade in South Africa;
b) investigate how the trade in captive produced lion bone under a quota system affects wild lion populations; and
c) strengthen the evidence base for the annual review of the quota in order to ensure it is sustainable and not detrimental to wild populations.
3. This project will form the basis of an adaptive management approach towards the lion bone export quota. Should poaching of wild lion occur as a direct result of the trade in captive produced lion skeletons, the quota will be adjusted accordingly.
4. A system involving random testing of DNA samples collected from lion skeletons at ports of exits has been devised to ensure skeletons originate from captive breeding operations and also to verify that no tiger skeletons are being exported.
---ooOoo---
12 September 2017 - NW2438
Cebekhulu, Inkosi RN to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
Whether, with reference to the oceanic tidal pools established along the country’s coastline, in particular those under the direct control and maintenance of SANPARKS, research studies have been conducted into alternative means to clean the tidal pools, other than draining, lime-washing and the addition of chemicals as this method is known to be highly destructive to the existing fragile marine eco-systems found in and around the tidal pools which are safe havens for many marine breeding species; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
No, the South African National Parks (SANParks) has not conducted any research into alternative means to clean tidal pools because no negative impacts have been observed yet in the way the two tidal pools are being cleaned. The City of Cape Town is responsible for cleaning most of the tidal pools on the False Bay coast line and it has its own cleaning and mitigation regime. There are only two tidal pools at the Cape Point that SANParks is responsible for.
---ooOoo---
12 September 2017 - NW2581
Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to her?
Reply:
(a) Boards
South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI): 24 August 2017
South African National Parks (SANParks): 01 September 2017.
iSimangaliso Wetlands Park Authority (iSimangaliso): Not Applicable
South African Weather Service (SAWS): Not Applicable
Councils
Not Applicable
(b) Boards
SANBI: 26 September 2017
SANParks: 03 October 2017
iSimangaliso: Not Applicable.
SAWS: Not Applicable
Councils
Not Applicable
---ooOoo---
12 September 2017 - NW2387
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)With reference to recent media reports (details furnished) relating to the arrest and detention of a certain person at the Kruger National Park (KNP) (name and details furnished) who has been linked to a rhino poaching syndicate, (a) what is the current status of the specified person’s employment at the KNP, (b) what position(s) has the specified person held at the KNP and (c) which access gates was the specified person assigned to; (2) has the specified person been linked to any incidents or cases of rhino poaching or any other type of poaching; if so, what are the relevant details in this regard; (3) has the specified person been formally charged; if so, on what grounds; if not, why not; (4) is the specified person still living at the KNP; if so, why?
Reply:
1. (a) The employee is currently suspended from work pending an investigation related to the theft and unauthorised possession of the South African National Parks’ (SANParks) property;
(b) The employee held the position of Security Supervisor since 1999; and
(c) The employee was assigned to both Phabeni and Numbi Gates.
2. The investigation is still on-going but has not as yet established or confirmed whether the employee is linked to any involvement in rhino poaching or any other type of poaching activity.
3. The employee has been formally charged according to SANParks’ Disciplinary Code on matters related to theft of SANParks’ property. He has also been formally charged by the South African Police Service for being in possession of ammunition and suspected stolen property. He is currently out on bail pending his criminal case.
He was found in possession of the following items:
(a) SANPARKS property consisting of
- operational uniforms (greens) and accessories, shirts, trousers, bush jackets, boots, stable belts, caps, jerseys and socks.
- SA Police Services uniforms, trousers, shirts, caps, stable belt, boots along with a blue strobe light;
- 240 rolls of toilet paper, an aluminium ladder, a black dustbin and a 48kg gas bottle;
(b) Unlicensed ammunition belonging to an unknown owner consisting of
- fifteen x 9mm parabellum rounds, 2 x 9mm sort rounds, one 9.25 mm round, thirty four 5.56 mm rounds, a R5 magazine and a 9mm magazine.
(4) The employee is currently suspended from work and is residing outside the park until his internal disciplinary hearing is held
---ooOoo---
12 September 2017 - NW2343
Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)(a) How many permits have been signed off for local rhino horn trading and (b) to whom have they been awarded; (2) is there a quota for the number of permits to be issued; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) do the permit holders have a limitation on how many tonnes of horn they can trade in a year; if not, why not; if so, what is the total amount?
Reply:
(1) (a) and ((b)
The Department has issued a permit for the selling of rhino horn, ordinary permit number: O28640 was issued for 264 horns. Seven (7) permits were issued authorising the buying of rhino horn (Ordinary permit numbers: O29851; O29852; O29854; O29855; O29856; O29859; O29860).
(2) No. This is due to the nature of any domestic trade where no limits have been placed. It should be remembered that rhino horn trade is governed by CITES which is only about international trade and not domestic.
Furthermore Section 57(1) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004)(NEMBA) provide that a person may not carry out a restricted activity involving a specimen of a listed threatened or protected species without a permit issued in terms of Chapter 7 of NEMBA. The NEMBA and the Threatened or Protected Species Regulations, 2007 does not provide a quota for the number of permit that could be issued. However, in terms of 92A (1)(b) of NEMBA an issuing authority may refuse a permit if the applicant has been convicted of an offence in terms of NEMBA. Furthermore, Section 88(2)(e) of NEMBA provide that the issuing authority may defer a decision to issue a permit if the applicant is under investigation for the contravention or failure to comply with any provision of NEMBA.
(3) No
Section 57(1) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004)(NEMBA) provide that a person may not carry out a restricted activity involving a specimen of a listed threatened or protected species without a permit issued in terms of Chapter 7 of NEMBA. NEMBA and the Threatened or Protected Species Regulations, 2007 does not provide a limitation on the number of horns to be traded with however, in terms of 92A (1)(b) of NEMBA an issuing authority may refuse a permit if the applicant has been convicted of an offence in terms of NEMBA. Section 88(2)(e) of NEMBA provides that the issuing authority may defer a decision to issue a permit if the applicant is under investigation for the contravention or failure to comply with any provision of NEMBA. In terms of Section 88(2)(b) of NEMBA, the Issuing Authority may require the applicant to comply with conditions as it may impose.
The permit authorising the sale of rhino horn was issued with conditions, including the following:
- The permit holder can only sell rhino horn to a person who has a permit issued in terms of NEMBA authorising such buying;
- The international trade remains banned;
- The permit holder must provide the Department of Environmental Affairs with a register of bidders prior to the auction;
- The permit holder (seller or buyer of possession) must inform the registered bidders that they must apply for a permit to buy in terms of NEMBA;
- If it is an ordinary auction and if it is online, DEA must have access to the process.
- After the auction, the permit holder must provide a list of successful bidders to the Department of Environmental Affairs;
- The permit holder, the permit seller and the possession holder must grant an official of the Department of Environmental Affairs access to the website for an online auction.
The permit authorising the domestic sale of rhino horn was issued with conditions, including the following:
- The buyer’s permit authorises the person to buy only the rhino horn authorised to be sold through ordinary permit number: O28640 through the auction taking place from 23 – 25 August 2017;
- The permit does not authorise the possession or transport of rhinoceros horn;
- The permit does not authorise the export or re-export of rhino horn;
- Until the actual transfer has happened legally after the sale, the seller will require another permit.
---ooOoo---
12 September 2017 - NW2291
Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What steps is her department taking towards the decommissioning of Eskom’s oldest plants which are due for decommissioning in the next three years?
Reply:
Eskom’s plans to decommission some of its power stations first came to the Department’s attention during its applications for postponement of compliance timeframes with minimum emission standards (MES). In its applications for postponement, Eskom indicated the life-span of each of the power stations, and this information was factored in the postponement decisions. Since the life-span of the power stations was factored in the postponement decisions, the Department expects Eskom to live up to these commitments. In the event that non-compliances take place, the Department will address them following the current procedures of compliance monitoring and enforcement.
Although the Minister responsible for Environmental Affairs and/or her Department may not take any particular steps towards the decommissioning of Eskom’s oldest plants which are due for decommissioning in the next three years; it should be noted that such decommissioning would have benefits for air quality management and climate change. This is in the sense that there would be reduction of Eskom’s contribution to air pollution upon decommissioning of some plants as it would be with any other source that is discontinued.
---ooOoo---
31 August 2017 - NW2386
Purdon, Mr RK to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
(1)With reference to her media release on 24 July 2017 (details furnished), wherein it is stated that 15 out of 35 rhinos that were translocated were poached, (a) where were the 35 rhinos translocated from and (b) which facility were they translocated to; (2) have there been any successful arrests regarding this specific incident; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) what steps have been taken by her department to protect the remaining 20 rhinos in the affected facility; (4) what is the size, translated in quantity in tonnes, of the rhino horn stockpile currently held by (a) her department and/or (b) other government agencies?
Reply:
(1) (a) The rhinos were translocated from the Kruger National Park; and
(b) were translocated to Langgeluk Beleggings property in Kroonstad which comprises several farms across the Kroonstad district.
(2) The 20 rhinos are in private ownership and management.
(3) Private rhino owners authorised to possess rhinos are responsible for the security of their rhinos. Government supports such rhino owners, either upon request or through the overall national and provincial programs like the Intergrated Strategic Management Approach.
(4) (a) and (b)
The size and the whereabouts of the stockpile cannot be disclosed for security reasons.
---ooOoo---
30 August 2017 - NW2363
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
In respect of the biodiversity compliance workshop that her department hosted with muti traders and traditional leaders in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal on 8 June 2017, what (a) were the outcomes of the workshop and (b) steps are being taken by her department to prevent the continuing trade in critical and endangered species at the Durban and other muti markets in operation around the country?
Reply:
(a) The compliance promotion and awareness workshop held on 08 June 2017 produced positive outcomes in relation to the implementation of the department’s environmental legislation. The workshop provided:
i) the competent authorities (national Department of Environmental Affairs, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife and Ethekwini Municipality) with an opportunity to present to the traditional healers, muti traders and muti collectors all applicable environmental legislation and to promote awareness of all legal requirements that have to be complied with when they carry out their business;
ii) the traditional healers and muti traders and muti collectors with an opportunity to provide an insight into their understanding of the various legal requirements that they have to comply with;
iii) the traditional healers, muti traders and muti collectors with an opportunity to provide proof of their willingness to comply with environmental legislation and the steps or initiatives undertaken to ensure that they operate within the ambit of the law; and
iv) the traditional healers, muti traders and muti collectors also had an opportunity to highlight the challenges and frustration they encounter in respect of the permit application process and the delay in issuing permits by some of the authorities. They also requested authorities to consider reviewing the duration of the permit with a view to increasing the validity period from one year to two or three years.
The highlight of the workshop was the announcement by Mr Zihlahlazemithi Cele (a traditional healer from the area of uMlazi, who has cultivated more than 500 indigenous plants species with medicinal value) that he no longer harvests from the wild. The department is accordingly encouraging all traditional healers to be like Mr Cele and establish their own muti-gardens.
(b) The department is working with all relevant stakeholders in the province, namely, the South African Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), the provincial environmental authorities, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, the eThekwini Municipality and the leadership of traditional healers to ensure that there is increasing compliance with environmental legislation. The department is working closely with Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife which is a permitting authority in the province to ensure that permits are issued as speedily as possible. These initiatives are aimed at preventing the trade in critical and endangered species at the various muti markets in operation around the country and is the first phase of an ongoing compliance drive being pioneered in this economic and medicinal sector.
---ooOoo---
30 August 2017 - NW2288
Paulsen, Mr N M to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs
What efforts are being made to uncover, track and expeditiously bring to justice the main operators of the rhino horn organised trade syndicates within South Africa’s borders and those profiting most from it?
Reply:
Significant efforts continue to be made to investigate and disrupt those syndicates responsible for rhino poaching and the trafficking of rhino horn. Due to the organised nature of these crimes the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations (“the Hawks”) takes a lead role supported by other units within the South Africa Police Service, the South African Revenue Service, the Financial Intelligence Centre, the National Prosecuting Authority as well as SANParks, the provincial conservations authorities and the Department of Environmental Affairs. This integrated approach is realising success at higher levels within the syndicates (and not only those individuals responsible for poaching).
During 2016 this integrated approach resulted in the dismantling of levels 3 to 4 rhino horn trafficking activities as follows:
Arrests @ levels 3 and 4: 19
Total Rhino horns seized: 165
While in the first six months of 2017 the following activities related to levels 3 and 4 within these rhino trafficking syndicates:
Arrests @ levels 3 and 4: 12 suspects
Estimated Rhino horn weight: 138.46 kilogram
The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation has confirmed that they currently have two (2) projects under investigation; six (6) major investigations and 4 wildlife trafficking syndicates on the court roll. Senior State Advocates from the National Prosecuting Authority have been assigned to support the investigations and lead these prosecutions.
---ooOoo---