Question NW3219 to the Minister of Human Settlements

Share this page:

25 September 2015 - NW3219

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

(1)Whether her department has withheld or caused to be withheld any grants to (a) local, (b) district or (c) metropolitan municipalities (i) in the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) since 1 April 2015; if so, in respect of each specified case, (aa) what amount was withheld, (bb) what were the reasons for withholding the grant and (cc) in terms of which legislation and/or regulations was the grant withheld; (2) whether her department consulted with the National Treasury in respect of each specified case; if not, why not; if so, what was the National Treasury’s advice in this regard; (3) whether her department notified the affected municipalities properly of her department’s intentions; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

The Department of Human Settlements transfers the allocations for grants to nine Provinces and eight Metropolitan Municipalities. The Department does not transfer allocations for any grant to district municipalities as implied in the Honourable member’s question.

 

During the 2014/15 financial year, the department withheld the Municipal Human Settlements Capacity Grant (MHSCG) to six metropolitan municipalities until such time that Metropolitan Municipalities had demonstrated that they had spent this conditional grant for the purpose for which it was intended as envisaged in the relevant prescripts, in particular the Division of Revenue Act (DORA).

In actual fact Honourable member, the grant referred to in the question is not the only one giving my MECs and I sleepless nights. The misuse of the Urban Settlement Development Grant (USDG) is also worrisome. We need to review the grants framework to address serious anomalies. To illustrate my point, the USDG was introduced as a conditional grant to ensure the provision of bulk connector, link and internal services; well-located land and public amenities because we realised that these plagued the optimum performance of the human settlements sector. Metropolitan municipalities spend the USDG on other things such as roads, street lighting and social facilities when there are still bulk infrastructure constraints. This is frustrating to say the least.

The Honourable should be interested how this grant is used by the City of Cape Town allocated the USDG funds for 2014/15 financial year as indicated below:

Description

Allocated Budget

% Total Available Funds

Spent by Municipality

% Spent

Variance

% Unspent

R’00

R’00

R’00

Electricity

231 698

14.1

189 286

81.7

42 412

18.3

Solid Waste Management

50 000

3.0

50 000

100.0

 

0.0

Water and Sanitation

195923

11.9

182 885

93.3

13 038

6.7

City Parks

30 595

1.9

24 797

81.0

5 798

19.0

Sport, Recreation and Amenities

41 636

2.5

34 423

82.7

7 213

17.3

Library and Information Services

23 644

1.4

23 644

100.0

 

0.0

Assets Management and Maintenance (Transport)

262 765

16.0

195 118

74.3

67 647

25.7

City Health Sub Districts

7 467

0.5

7 391

99.0

76

1.0

HS Development & Delivery

120 608

7.3

97 695

81.0

22 913

19.0

HS Planning and National Housing Programmes Development

419 900

25.5

416 727

99.2

3 173

0.8

Public Housing and Customer Services

42 674

2.6

27 853

65.3

14 821

34.7

HS Urbanisation

92 332

5.6

79 003

85.6

13 329

14.4

Disaster Risk Management

5 500

0.3

5 492

99.9

8

0.1

Spatial Planning and Urban Design

1 230

0.1

1 230

100.0

 

0.0

Provincial Allocation

49 048

3.0

49 048

100.0

 

0.0

Project Pre-Planning

68 405

4.2

24 964

36.5

43 441

63.5

Human Settlements - Title Deeds

500

0.0

343

68.6

157

31.4

Project Managemnet

1 500

0.1

 

 

1 500

100.0

VAT

 

 

72 031

 

- 72 031

 

Total

1 645 425

100.0

1 481 930

90.1

235 526

14.3

 

In summary, the table indicates the following:

  • From the R1.6 billion total allocated budget, Human Settlements Planning is allocated a larger portion of R419.9 million or 25.5% whereas 99.2% of those funds were spent. The expenditure is attributable to land purchase amounting to R416.7 million.
  • The second highest allocation is on Assets Management and Maintenance at R262.8 million or 16% of the total allocated budget of which only 74.3% of those funds were spent.
  • At least four of the services spent 100% of their budget at year end i.e. Solid Waste Management, Library/Information Services, Spatial Planning/Urban Design and Provincial Allocations.

We are required intervene to ensure that we provide the much needed houses for our people. I will certainly not abdicate my responsibilities by not acting when funds are not spent in line with the DORA. Not a cent from the USDG should be used for amenities or stadium construction while housing infrastructure is lacking or in some cases is non-existent.

Source file