Question NW2584 to the Minister of Higher Education, Science and Innovation

Reply:

The Independent Assessor Reports over the years have highlighted a number of factors that contribute to governance failures. These range from the inability of councils, and in some cases the chairperson and deputy chairperson in particular, to provide strategic leadership and direction resulting in the abdication of its responsibilities to the Management; role confusion and contestation; fraught relationships between Council and Management; the phenomenon of the inability of council members nominated by internal/external constituencies to distinguish between the interests of the constituencies and the interests of the institution; the misunderstanding of the principle of cooperative governance; unacceptable and counter-productive conduct by some council members; non-adherence to good-governance practices, institutional rules and procedures.

Some of the systemic interventions that are being considered besides those provided for by the Higher Education Act, 101 of 1997 as amended include:

• The Resuscitatation of the role of the University Council Chair Forum (UCCF-SA)
• A sectorially-coordinated capacity building initiatives for induction of members. There is a council capacity development programme developed by the Department in partnership with UCCF-SA on offering induction and continuous development of members. This programme was envisaged to include two streams, the Basic and Advanced level. The basic training designed for new members of council, would explore the roles and responsibilities of Councils, the legislative and policy framework, as well as the distinctive context of academic institutions. The advanced training level designed for council members who have already attended the basic training or serving a second term, would explore various themes, namely institutional autonomy vs. accountability; council relationship with other governance structures and management; chairing of university councils; governance and management performance and evaluation; financial management and reporting etc. It may be important to make these compulsory for serving or potential members of councils.
• Development of a code of Good Governance for HEIs and a Governance Oversight Framework consisting of modern, transparent, and accountable governance arrangements.

• Ensuring that each member of Council is a paid member if the IODSA and any deregistered members be assumed not a member in good standing.
• Regular Ethics workshops and assessments to gauge the ethical standing of the member.