Questions and Replies

Reply:

Yes. The Department has established seed certification schemes including community seed multiplication schemes to assist farmers in accessing good quality seeds. The Community-Based Seed Multiplication (CBSM) approaches have been established in Limpopo and are used by the Agricultural Research Council and the Limpopo Department of Agriculture and Land Reform to improve farmers’ access to quality seed. The CBSM model is planned to be rolled out to other provinces based on the need to improve seed availability. To date the following certification schemes have been established: Potato Seed Certification Scheme, South African National Seed Organisation, and Deciduous and Vine Certification Scheme.

Among other strategic interventions in ensuring sustainable seed production, the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) established seed banks in different provinces to preserve seeds.

Legislation plays a pivotal role in ensuring equitable access to good quality seeds and promoting the contribution of crop production to the development of all communities, society at large, and the national economy, to enhance income, food security, employment, and quality of life. The following are legislative initiatives aimed at improving or regulating various aspects of seed production to ensure a sustainable crop production sector:

• Plant Improvement Act, of 1976 (Act No. 53 of 1976). This Act aims to ensure the availability of high-quality propagating material to all users. This legislation has an economic impact by contributing to high productivity by ensuring the availability of propagation materials of high quality.

On the traditional way of farming, the Department has just announced that South Africa has acceded to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. One important feature of the Treaty is that it requires governments to take measures toward implementing Farmers' Rights which may include:

• The protection of traditional knowledge relevant to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture.
• The right to equitably participate in sharing benefits arising from the utilization of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture; and
• The right to participate in making decisions, at the national level, on matters related to the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture.
• The right of farmers to save, use, exchange and sell farm-saved seeds and propagating material.

Acceding to this Treaty will strengthen the Department’s program on conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources, particularly neglected and underutilised species such as cowpea, bambara, millets, okra, and sorghum. Under this program, farmers are supported through various initiatives including the establishment of Community Seed Banks, participation in traditional seed/food fairs where seed exchange is encouraged and accessing traditional seeds from the national genebank under circumstances caused by natural disasters such as floods. To date, three (3) Community Seed Banks have been established in Gumbu (Limpopo province), Sterkspruit (Eastern Cape province) and Jericho (North West province). Furthermore, in the next two (2) years, the Department will be implementing a project on Strengthening Community Seed Banks in South Africa in collaboration with Bioversity International. The project will focus on improving the infrastructure of the existing Community Seed Banks and the establishment of two (2) new Community Seed Banks, one (1) in KwaZulu-Natal province and one (1) in Northern Cape province.

Reply:

No. The Director-General of the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development did not attend the afore-mentioned meeting.

(a)(i),(ii),(ii) Falls away.

(b) Falls away.

Reply:

1. The Agricultural Research Council (ARC) drives the transfer of new and improved technologies through training and advisory services. Professional and Extension officer training is done to enhance capacities for production decision support, post-harvest management, and general skills enhancement, thus contributing to the competitiveness of the sector. The support from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) has facilitated the wider reach of the ARC training, hence the larger than-targeted achievement. Effectiveness is measured through follow-up assessments conducted by the ARC and partners over time, including independent studies.
2. Yes. Follow-up assessments are conducted to determine the impact and productivity improvements. A few cases indicating the impact of ARC training are listed below:

KAONAFATSO YA DIKGOMO (KYD)

ARC capacitates officials on the Kaonafatso Ya Dikgomo (KYD) regarding quality improvements in cattle, translating into economic returns and better performance as follows:

• Prior to the training, farmers supported through KYD were getting less than the actual market price when selling. The training assisted in achieving sale prices closer to or equal to the market price. The modus operandi is that ARC trains farmers and extension, hosts auction sales and coordinates the sale.
• In Vryheid, KwaZulu-Natal for example, the ARC facilitated farmers' entry at auctions, helping them to be more market-savvy and achieve higher prices. Increased market information and training improved outcomes over time. Farmers’ progress can be observed through participation in various auctions. The example below shows the impact of two (2) auctions.

 

• Furthermore, the calving rate of the trained farmers’ herd improved after the ARC’s intervention.
• An independent study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of the programme and farmers’ perception of the usefulness of the programme. It found that KYD’s provision of continuous after-care and advisory support to farmers, as requested by provincial departments, is appreciated by farmers. The study further found that the program provided farmers with the necessary skills to progress to a financially viable stage.

SWEET POTATO TRAINING AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

Food and Nutrition Security is a serious challenge in South Africa. The ARC develops new sweet potato cultivars and products geared and contributing towards the mitigation of food and nutrition security in South Africa. Through training in sweet potato production and agro-processing, there are subsistence farmers and producers who have benefited and were able to generate income from sweet potatoes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bHSxxi_WzU&t=153s

Training includes farmer participation in cultivar evaluation trials which take into consideration farmer’s needs when selecting best-performing varieties. This initiative allows farmers to identify their preferred varieties and subsequently improves the adoption of newly released sweet potato cultivars. As a result of these interventions.

• Sweet potato production is improving, with more farmers growing the crop commercially, and developing related products. This is supported by an increase in the number of vines requested by farmers annually.
• Sweet potato product development training capacitated participants and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) on how to produce nutrient-rich meals and snacks from orange-fleshed sweet potatoes. These products are now available to consumers and the market is growing.

POTATO ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

The ARC partnered with the Gauteng and North West Departments of Agriculture and Rural Development in Potato Enterprise Development to afford smallholder farmers the opportunity to contribute to the potato industry. Training includes theoretical, practical, and on-farm training. Functional literacy is enhanced through mentorship, monitoring, and evaluation for a 6-month period, equivalent to the potato production season. The two (2) provincial departments committed to supporting this training for five years per farmer cohort as the minimum period required for a producer to effectively produce the commodity.

Reply:

I do not use a DA email account for any of my departmental communication. I make use of [email protected] for correspondence.

Reply:

(1)(a),(b) Yes. The R130 million reported during the Cannabis Steering Committee was the allocation made to the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) to carry out research projects in support of the Cannabis Industry. The allocation is for 14 research work packages planned for five (5) years starting from the 2024/2025 financial year to the 2028/2029 financial year. The implementation of the commissioned research projects is underway, and the Department of Agriculture assigned officials to monitor the implementation. The commissioned research work packages are as follows:

• WP1: Identification of locally developed and imported Hemp varieties adapted to different production areas in South Africa–obtain varieties with potential for local production–continuously.
• WP2: Seed multiplication of SA Hemp 1 and 2, as well as other identified varieties, to increase the availability of locally adapted Hemp genetic resources–continuously.
• WP3: Maintaining Hemp germplasm as seed and in tissue culture–continuously.
• WP4: Establishing Hemp evaluation and demonstration trials at ARC farms and Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) selected demonstration sites per province to determine feasibility–continuously but will be expanded to farmer participatory research with identified selections from the second (2) year.
• WP5: Regular training of hemp inspectors to empower them to perform the inspections as prescribed in the regulations–as per changing local legislation.
• WP6: Training of permit holders during farmers' days at demonstration sites on cultivation practices of Hemp – continuously.
• WP7: Develop a database on molecular markers Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) that can be used to determine diversity, cultivar discrimination and purity–will be expanded consciously as new genetic resources become available.
• WP8: Research under controlled conditions to determine the effect of biotic, abiotic factors and cultivation practices on cannabinoid production with special reference to Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)–continuously as per industry requirements.
• WP9: Long read sequencing to analyse genetic diversity and population structure of Cannabis in South Africa–five (5) years depending on progress.
• WP10: Cannabis breeding for medicine, fibre, and other uses-continuously as per industry requirements.
• WP11: Socio-economic analysis (Statistical and Economic Analysis)–two (2) years
• WP12: Medicinal plant breeding to stimulate the growing traditional medicine industry–continuously as per industry requirements.
• WP13: Evaluation and purchasing of locally available mechanization equipment–continuously as per farmer and industry requirements.
• WP 14: Identification and management of nematodes of cannabis (Cannabis sativa L).

(2)(a)(i),(ii) The allocation was made to the ARC in terms of the signed Service Level Agreement in line with their mandate to execute research projects on behalf of the Department of Agriculture; therefore the demographic breakdown of the beneficiaries is not applicable.

(2)(b),(c) Falls away.

Reply:

1. No, the Department has not commissioned intergovernmental research to support and prepare farmers for the challenges posed by climate change including floods, droughts and fires that impact the farmers on whom the Republic of South Africa relies on food security. However, the Department has commissioned research through the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) on the impact of climate change on agricultural production (crops, livestock, etc) to, amongst others, develop policies, adaptation and mitigation strategies, sector plans and frameworks to enhance the resilience of farmers, food, and agricultural production systems (adaptation), reduce or minimise agricultural greenhouse gas emissions (mitigation), and safeguard national food security. The implementation of the abovementioned sector policies, plans, frameworks, strategies, and departmental programmes assist farmers when faced with challenges posed by the increasing climate variability and change including floods, droughts, and fires.
2. Given the government’s financial constraints, the focus is more on risk reduction for climate change and reducing the vulnerability of farming communities and groups such as farmers, women farmers, and youth to address the challenges posed by climate change. However, possible alternative funding sources to assist farmers in addressing the challenges posed by climate change include international funding mechanisms under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of which the Republic of South Africa is a signatory to the Paris Agreement (PA) such as the Global Environment Facility (GEF), Green Climate Fund (GCF), Adaptation Fund, Loss, and Damage Fund, etc. In addition, possible alternative funding sources can be accessed not only by government but also academic and research institutions as well as international government agencies.

Reply:

(1) I have never met with the Minister in The Presidency, Ms K P S Ntshavheni, regarding section 33 of the National Health Insurance Act, Act 20 of 2023, and the abolishment of private medical aids;

(2) Falls away

(3) (a) Falls away (b) Falls away

(4) Falls away NW440E

Reply:

THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE:

(a),(b),(c) Please refer to Annexure A and Annexure B

Reply:

Find reply here

Reply:

Find reply here

Reply:

1. Yes, the modes of transport used by the Minister of Agriculture for official duties are departmental-owned executive vehicles and air transport.

(2)(a) Yes, all the executive vehicles are fitted with blue lights and the appropriate signalling systems.

(i),(ii)(aa),(bb),(cc) Falls away.

(aaa) Section 58(3) of the National Road Traffic Act (NRTA) makes provision for the utilization of sirens and the appropriate lamp in vehicles by the person appointed under the South African Police Service Act in the execution of their duties. Section 58(3)(b) of the National Road Traffic Act (NRTA) read with Road Traffic Regulation 176 (c)(3)(b) of 2000. The VIP Protection Officers are appointed under the South African Police Act and execute their duties, which include but are not limited to the transportation of executives, with the official vehicles provided and fitted for the purpose.

(bbb) The Guide for Members of the Executive as approved by the President, which is the current policy document under which executive vehicles are procured, came into effect on 13 April 2022.

(2)(b) No alternative high-security transport measures are being utilized.

(i) None. (ii)(aa) The current vehicles used are a 2018 Audi Q7, 2019 Toyota Prado and 2020 BMW X5.

(ii)(bb) The executive fleet allocated to the Ministry consists of three (3) vehicles.

(ii)(cc) The combined purchase price of the three (3) vehicles is R2 806 906.30.

Reply:

(1)(a), (b) Table 1 reflects the contribution from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development. The Department is awaiting contributions from the provinces.

2. Funding for irrigation schemes has historically been insufficient and fragmented, limiting their effectiveness and long-term sustainability. Thus far, government efforts have primarily focused on limited rehabilitation of existing irrigation infrastructure. While this is essential, there has been minimal attention given to a more comprehensive and integrated approach to revitalization. Such an approach should encompass critical elements like capacity-building initiatives, management training for stakeholders, and institutional development to ensure sustainable and efficient operations.

This constrained funding has posed significant challenges, both in attempts to rejuvenate ageing irrigation schemes and in the initiation of new irrigation projects. To overcome these challenges, there is a pressing need to adopt a holistic and forward-looking strategy for irrigation schemes. This would include securing consistent, long-term funding, incorporating modern technologies for water efficiency, and fostering partnerships with local communities, private entities, and development organizations.

By addressing these gaps, irrigation schemes can better support agricultural productivity, especially given the climate change complexities, enhance food security, and contribute to broader rural development goals.

Table 1

Province	Scheme	1 (a) Allocation	1 (b) Activities (per financial year)
Eastern Cape	2021/2022
	Ncera Macadamia Phase 1	R 29 527 541,63	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	2022/23
	Ncera Macadamia Phase 2	R 5 546 611,11	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	2023/24
	Ncera Macadamia Phase 2	R 1 070 631,92	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	2024/2025
	Ncera Macadamia Phase 2	R 0.00	N/A
KwaZulu Natal	2021/22 – R 6 507 135,77
	Mooi River (phase 1 and 2)	R 0.00	N/A
	Kusa Kusa Irrigation Scheme	R 43 587.82	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Horseshoe / Mkhuphula / Nkunmathe	R 2 576 945.60	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Makhaphula irrigation	R 1 268 500.78	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Vukuzenzele Coop	R 704 962.62	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Tugela Ferry Irrigation / Block 6	R 968 445.90	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Nkungumathe Irrigation	R 693 686.74	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Nsuze Irrigation Scheme	R 251 006.31	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Ndumo Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	Driefontein Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
	2022/23 – R 2 427 711.61
	Mooi River (phase 1 and 2)	R 187 385.13	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Kusa Kusa Irrigation Scheme	R 29 412.24	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Horseshoe / Mkhuphula / Nkunmathe	R 0.00	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Makhaphula irrigation	R 534 787.23	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Vukuzenzele Coop	R 657 791.82	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Tugela Ferry Irrigation / Block 6	R 880 060.03	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Nkungumathe Irrigation	R 138 275.16	Construction of Irrigation scheme
	Nsuze Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
	Ndumo Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	Driefontein Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
	2023/24: R 34 448 857.90
	Mooi River (phase 1 and 2)	R 3 380 271.32	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Kusa Kusa Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
	Horseshoe/ Mkhuphula and Nkunmathe	R 0.00	N/A
	Makhaphula Irritation	R 0.00	N/A
	Vukuzenzele Coop	R 0.00	N/A
	Tugela Ferry Irrigation / Block 6	R 11 635 010.41	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Nkungumathe Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	Nsuze Irrigation Scheme	R 9 806 297.65	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Ndume Irrigation	R 9 627 278.52	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Construction of Driefontein Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	2024/25: R 24 176 636.00
	Mooi River (phase 1 and 2)	R 5 530 525.43	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Kusa Kusa Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
	Horseshoe/Mkhuphula/ Nkunmathe	R 0.00	N/A
	Makhaphula Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	Vukuzenzele Coop	R 56 507.45	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Tugela Ferry Irrigation / Block 6	R 10 102 888.86	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Nkungumathe Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	Nsuze Irrigation Scheme	R 826 372.98	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Ndumo Irrigation	R 450 991.04	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Driefontein Irrigation	R 7 209 350.42	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
Limpopo	2021/22: R 4 746 272.14
	Tshiombo Irrigation Scheme	R 4 387 766.25	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Tafelkop Irrigation Scheme	R 358 505.89	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	2022/23: R 12 826 973.88
	Tshiombo Irrigation Scheme	R 8 227 780.70	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Tafelkop Irrigation Scheme	R 4 599 193.18	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	2023/24: R 4 449 850.12
	Tshiombo Irrigation Scheme	R 1 587 657.63	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Tafelkop Irrigation Scheme	R 2 862 192.49	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	2024/25: R 870 125.99
	Tshiombo Irrigation Scheme	R 767 740.82	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	Tafelkop Irrigation Scheme	R 102 385.17	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
Mpumalanga	2021/2022: 5 363 595.08
	Newforest Irrigation Scheme	R 5 363 595.08	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	2022/2023: no allocation
	Newforest Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
	2023/2024: no allocation
	Newforest Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
	2024/2025:no allocation
	Newforest Irrigation Scheme	R 0.00	N/A
Western Cape	2021/2022: R 2 102 406.24
	Ebenhaeser Bulk Irrigation	R 2 102 406.24	Construction of Irrigation Scheme
	2022/2023
	Ebenhaeser Bulk Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	2023/2024:
	Ebenhaeser Bulk Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A
	2024/2025: no allocation
	Ebenhaeser Bulk Irrigation	R 0.00	N/A

Reply:

(1),(a) No investigation is being considered at this moment, as the Provincial Department of Agriculture (PDA) ascertains what led to the collapse of Mantusini Dairy project which mainly is the premature introduction of dairy cows when the infrastructure was not in place and the lack of business and commercial exposure of beneficiaries which led to the lack of access to operating capital.

(b) There are no records outlining how the private investor was introduced to the project.

(2)(a) The Department cannot confirm whether due diligence was conducted as the introduction of the private investor was facilitated at the provincial level, without direct involvement or oversight by the national Department.

(b) The absence of a formal written agreement between the community and the specified entity is noted with concern. The Department is engaging with relevant stakeholders to establish the circumstances under which this oversight occurred and will work to provide clarity and recommendations moving forward.

(3),(a)(b)The Department currently does not have records of the registration number or ownership details of the specified investor. This information will be sought from provincial authorities and the investor directly, as part of efforts to gather a comprehensive understanding of their involvement.

(4) The Department is committed to ensuring accountability and preventing similar failures in future projects. Measures to be implemented include:

• Strengthening due diligence processes for selecting and approving private investors or implementing partners.
• Enhancing monitoring and oversight mechanisms for government-funded agricultural initiatives to ensure compliance with project objectives and financial accountability.

Reply:

a) For the 2025/26 fiscal year, the Provincial Departments of Agriculture are in the preliminary phases of developing their business plans, which will outline their strategic priorities and budget allocations. These plans will determine the specific funding that can be directed toward irrigation scheme revitalization. It is only upon the finalization of this process that the exact allocations for this purpose will be available.

b) To effectively resolve the challenges faced by dysfunctional irrigation schemes, a forward-thinking, comprehensive approach is required. This includes designing a robust budget aimed at the rehabilitation, modernization, and sustainable management of these schemes.

For this revitalization effort to be successful, it must be supported by long-term adequate funding from the National Treasury. Once such a comprehensive plan is established and financial commitments are confirmed, I will be able to announce specific time frames and milestones for the implementation.

This approach will not only address the historical challenges but also pave the way for resilient and efficient irrigation systems, much needed given the climate challenges faced by the country.

Reply:

Yes, Taung Farmer Production Support Unit (FPSU) mainly focuses on crop production which target the farmers within the Vaalharts irrigation scheme. Tlaafa is a cooperative that focuses on livestock production which does not fall under the Taung Farmers production unit. The cooperative has an auction site which holds auctions on a bi-monthly basis. The Department has supported the farmers with payment of electricity.

list of farmers who benefitted	items bought and/or paid ESKOM PAYMENT	amount paid for each item		(d) paid on what date		Relevant details in each case
						If not, why not	If so,
Enid Tsholofelo Montwedi Hans Moloko Bongy Macuthwane Benjamin Mosweu Onalennna Moeti Alloucias Nkosi Cabiet Seruteng Brain Mojanaga Pontsho Kgosieng Mothusiemang Bogaleboile	Payment of the Proforma.	R58,000.00		February 2023		Falls away	Paid for electricity, the proforma and change from conventional to pre-paid metering.
	Installation of prepaid meter box.	R27,255.00		February 2023		Falls away
Total spent for support			R85,255.00

Reply:

a) CHINA:

South Africa (SA) recently concluded the following protocols and Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Republic of South Africa (RSA) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) during the period 2024/2025:

• Protocol on dairy products to be exported from SA to China.
• Protocol for greasy wool exports from SA to China.
• MoU on Foot and Mouth Disease.

It should also be noted that South Africa`s export protocol of avocados to China was signed by the former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) and General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China (GACC) on 22 August 2023 by the Ministers of the two countries. The 1^st consignment was exported in September 2024 to China.

INDIA:

SA concluded the following protocol between the RSA and India during the period 2024/2025:

• SA avocados obtained market access in April 2024 to India.

b) CHINA:

Currently, the following market access issues are under discussion:

• SA Stone Fruit (excluding cherries) exports to China.
• Pet food exports from SA to China.

INDIA:

Currently, the following market access issues are under discussion:

• SA litchis are currently under discussion between SA and India.
• SA blueberries exports to India: discussion will follow after litchis.

The next priority is litchi fruits from SA into India. Should an agreement be reached between India and South Africa, technical officials from India will visit SA from 16-20 December 2024.

 

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL

There is no formal cooperation agreement between RSA and the Federal Republic of Brazil; however, there is trade taking place between the two countries.

South Africa, as a member of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and the Federal Republic of Brazil a member of the Common Market of South, comprising Argentina, the Federal Republic of Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (MERCOSUR) trades through the MERCOSUR-SACU Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA).

South Africa’s top agricultural exports to the Federal Republic of Brazil (2023)

HS CODE	Products	Value (million R)
22	Beverages, spirits and vinegar	78
12	Oilseeds	43.7
4401	Raw hides and skins	19.8
08	Edible fruits and nuts	13.6
Total Exports	Agricultural	165.7

Trade Map: 2023

Reply:

(1)(a) The outcomes of producer support programs differ across various initiatives. Numerous evaluations have revealed a combination of success stories showcasing positive impacts, alongside areas where the results have been less effective.

An Evaluation of the Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme /CASP- https://evaluations.dpme.gov.za/evaluations/405)

(b) Producer support programmes such as Ilima Letsema and Presidential Employment Stimulus are instrumental in tackling food and nutrition security challenges. With many individuals relying on social safety nets, promoting household-level food production serves as an effective strategy to safeguard limited disposable incomes. Achieving increased food productivity at the household level, when realised, leads to significant positive outcomes.

(2)(a) The National Policy on Comprehensive Producer Development Support (NPCPDS) was approved by Cabinet on the 13 March 2024. The policy introduces funding limits specific to each producer category, along with requirements for producers to contribute their funding. To ensure clarity and fairness, detailed classification tools and criteria are being designed. These tools will undergo an extensive consultation process with relevant stakeholders before being issued for implementation.

(b) The NPCPDS is projected to begin its initial implementation phase on 1 April 2025. This phase will focus on laying the foundational framework and ensuring readiness for broader adoption. Full-scale implementation, which will encompass all intended components and reach the targeted beneficiaries at a national level, is expected to commence in the subsequent year. The phased approach aims to ensure a seamless transition, effective resource allocation, and maximized impact for all stakeholders involved.

Reply:

No compromises for 2020/2021 to 2023/2024. Please refer to the tables below.

Year	(a)Date	(b) Duration	(c)(i) Root cause
2024/2025	22 July 2024		Failed quality control test, sterility parameter was determined to be out of specification. Bacterial contamination in the filling area was established as the root cause.
	25 July 2024		Failed quality control test, the conductivity parameter was determined to be out of specification. The valve that controls water flow in the water plant was found to be in an incorrect position.
	6 August–9 September 2024		Failed quality control test, the conductivity parameter was determined to be out of specification. Contamination of the membranes that filter the water as part of the water purification procedures.
	24 September –10 October 2024		Failed quality control test, the sterility parameter was determined to be out of specification due to contamination from the environment in the diluent filling area.

(c)(ii),(iii) List of vaccines compromised, and monetary value of loss.

Vaccine	(c)(ii) Number of Vaccine Packs Impacted	(c)(iii) Monetary Value of diluent	Explanatory Note
African Horse Sickness	1 054 -25 packs affected. 25 296 vials of 2.5 mL of diluent were destroyed.	R95 365.92	A compromised diluent does not affect the quality of a vaccine given that the diluent is produced separately from the vaccine. However, there could be delays in releasing the given vaccine to the market if the diluent that is supposed to accompany the said vaccine is compromised and requires destruction. There were delays in the release to the market of the African Horse Sickness vaccine due to compromised diluents that were scheduled to accompany this vaccine. The cost implications are related to the diluent that was destroyed due to lack of conformity to the pre-set specifications.
Rift Valley Fever Live	13 025 packs affected. 13 025 vials of 100 mL of diluent were destroyed.	R81 927.25	A compromised diluent does not affect the quality of a vaccine given that the diluent is produced separately from the vaccine. However, there were delays in releasing the vaccine to the market where the diluent which is supposed to accompany the said vaccine was compromised and requires destruction. There were delays in the release of the Rift Valley fever vaccine to the market due to compromised diluents that were scheduled to accompany this vaccine. The cost implications are related to the diluent that was destroyed due to a lack of conformity to the pre-set specifications.

Reply:

The former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) developed an extension programme to increase the capacity of Extension and Advisory Services (EAS) by recruiting unemployed agricultural graduates as extension practitioners at entry level as Assistant Agricultural Practitioners (AAPs). However, due to the unavailability of sustainable funding, the implementation of the programme was discontinued. Currently, the only limited funding available is the Extension Recovery Plan (ERP) which is a grant fund that aims to ensure:

• visibility and accountability;
• professionalism and improving image;
• recruitment of Extension Personnel; and
• reskilling and re-orientation and provision of ICT and other resources.

Engagements with the National Treasury are continuing to source sustainable funding for the programme. Once the funds are made available the programme will be implemented as planned with the Provincial Departments of Agriculture leading as the main employer of Extension Practitioners.

Reply:

1. The Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP) has no vaccines that are currently compromised, unusable or to be discarded due to water compromises.

2. A compromised diluent does not affect the quality of a vaccine given that the diluent is produced separately from the vaccine. However, there could be delays in releasing the given vaccine to the market if the diluent that is supposed to accompany the said vaccine is compromised and requires destruction. There were delays in the release to the market of the African Horse Sickness vaccine due to compromised diluents that were scheduled to accompany this vaccine. The cost implications are related to the diluent that was destroyed due to lack of conformity to the pre-set specifications.

Reply:

1. Mechanisation support is one of the relevant and critical support areas for producers; to this effect, the Department has incorporated it into the approved National Policy on Comprehensive Producer Development Support (NPCPDS). The NPCPDS was drafted to provide all forms of support including mechanisation support to farmers in accordance with producer categories as defined in the policy. The need to categorise producers was aimed at providing support according to the sizes of their operations and considered the fact that producers’ needs and challenges on mechanisation vary.
2. No. The Mechanisation Policy is incorporated into the NPCPDS because mechanisation is regarded as part of the holistic support provided to producers together with inputs.

Reply:

Find reply here

Reply:

THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE:

(1)(a) The draft Bill, developed by internal departmental officials, has been completed. However, it has been determined that additional expert input is needed in the areas of animal welfare, law, and legislative development. These specialized contributions can be most effectively sourced through an academic institution such as the University of Pretoria (UP).

(b) The revised target date for the completion of the first draft of the Bill is June 2025.

(2),(a)(b) No. The Socio-Economic Impact Assessment conducted in 2018 has expired. The Department is currently in the process of resubmitting an application. The new target date is March 2025.

(3)(a) The Department has engaged the University of Pretoria (UP) through an existing Memorandum of Understanding to continue the finalization of the draft.

(b) The consultation process has not yet been initiated.

Reply:

Annexure

Find reply here

 

Reply:

Find reply here

Reply:

Find reply here

Reply:

Please refer to the below responses.

(1),(i) Division and/or Directorates of his Department

(a) Impact on efficiency of operations	The signed Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with Agri-SETA has been in place for 3 years. Since the inception of this MoA over 4000 learners across the country have been exposed to career opportunities which exist within agriculture, land reform and rural development sectors through the joint career awareness summits.
(b) Cost implication	Four (4) Career Awareness summits are held per financial year. The Agri-SETA has committed a budget per summit for logistics for the events. The former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) has committed to pay for travel costs for learners for each summit. The amount payable is as per the department’s financial guidelines with reference to quotations.
(2) Proposed alternative	None

(1),(ii) Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP)

(a) Impact on efficiency of operations	The OBP has experienced a positive impact from the sector education and training authority through current research collaboration agreements with various universities across the country. The OBP hosts students pursuing postgraduate studies with the Universities of KwaZulu-Natal, Free State, North West, Pretoria, Johannesburg, and Tshwane University of Technology. The students and employees are based at the OBP, and their studies are in the field relevant to OBP as a business entity. While the university provides training and education, OBP gains new knowledge and technologies to improve its business efficiencies and vaccine product offerings
(b) Cost implication	There are currently no cost implications given that studies by postgraduate students hosted at OBP are paid for by the National Research Foundation or third parties.
(2) Proposed alternative	None

(1),(iii) National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)

(a) Impact on efficiency of operations	Efficiency of Operations   Skills Development: SETA initiatives enhance workforce skills, leading to improved operational efficiency at the NAMC. This includes training programs tailored to the agricultural sector, which helps in meeting industry standards. Streamlined Processes: SETA funding facilitates the development of more efficient processes through the introduction of best practices and innovative training methodologies. Compliance and Standards: By aligning with SETA requirements, NAMC ensures compliance with national training standards, which helps in maintaining quality and efficiency. Impact to the agricultural industry: Mohair Empowerment Trust: The Mohair Empowerment Trust took the opportunity to address Climate change and Smart farming practices after they received funding from Agri-SETA in partnership with the NAMC. This course was presented by the Herding Academy, hosted at Graaff-Reinet- PROFCON resort in September 2022. The course is designed for land managers to implement smart practices on farms. To equip the farmers with basic knowledge regarding regenerative land Management within their holistic decision-making framework. A total of 20 mohair farmers attended the course. National Wool Growers Association (NWGA): The beginner blade shearer training courses were presented to unemployed people in the rural areas of the Eastern Cape. They were trained in the communal shearing sheds where the NWGA organises communities to shear all their sheep in one communal shearing facility, and then market the wool through the formal auction system. There are 4 million woolled sheep in these areas that need shearing annually. The beginner machine shearing training courses are also presented in the communal shearing sheds, as well as at Agricultural Schools and Agricultural Colleges. Intermediate and advanced blade and machine shearer training is presented while experienced shearers are rendering a shearing service to the wool producers. The NWGA managed to train in total of 195 beginners and 105 advanced shearers who will be shearing sheep in the communal areas of Eastern Cape. This also assists in reducing the high unemployment rate in the communal areas.   South Africa Feedlot Association (SAFA): SAFA through collaborative funding with the NAMC and Agri-SETA managed to train a total of 20 red meat farmers for a period of three days. The training was focused on the marketing and distribution of red meat products, and climate-smart agricultural practices. The training has managed to equip farmers with an understanding of how to market and distribute their red meat products and provided knowledge on climate-smart farming since most red meat farmers in the country are affected by the changing climatic conditions, it is therefore important to understand mitigation strategies that will improve their productivity. Deciduous Fruit Development Chamber: The Deciduous Fruit Development Chamber (DFDC) Management Capacity Building Programme is designed to develop and enhance critical management skills that will enable beneficiaries to manage their farming operations effectively by identifying needs and challenges in time and making appropriate decisions that will impact positively on cost implications across the entire chain of operations of the farming business. The farmers received training on Business governance and financial management skills, Cultivar selection, and Pest control applications. The training was attended by nine (9) participants from Limpopo and Mpumalanga. After the training, the beneficiaries were able to apply the knowledge and information in key areas of their farming business operations, namely, general management and production-related decision-making, as well as financial planning. Furthermore, the beneficiaries also gained an understanding of the necessity of developing and maintaining relationships with key experts and service providers in the fields of financial management and bookkeeping services, governance and legalities, human resources and skills training services for both owners, managers, and general staff. An understanding of legislative compliance in relation to South African Revenue Services (SARS), the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) and the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Disease Act (COIDA) was identified as a key area of concern, whilst the importance of quality control in meeting export compliance standards such as Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP), /PPECB and Employment Tax incentive (ETI) was emphasized
(b) Cost implication	Impact: The approved funding was R3 million in March 2020, which can be adjusted conditional on the availability of funds at Agri-SETA. According to the projected costs, a total of R1.2 million has been budgeted for skills development on Climate-smart agriculture production practices, a further R1.1 million for marketing and distribution and a total of R700 000 on processing and entrepreneurship. Noteworthy is that the first trench (R1,5 million) of the funds has been transferred to the NAMC and allocated to industries that submitted their skills development plans on a rand-to-rand basis, the second trench can only be claimed with a submission of a detailed progress report. Funding Support: SETA provides financial assistance for training, reducing the direct costs borne by NAMC for employee development. Resource Allocation: With SETA support, NAMC can allocate resources more effectively, investing saved funds into other operational areas or strategic initiatives.
(2) Proposed alternative	Cost-Benefit Analysis of Training Programs: Regular assessments can help NAMC identify the most effective training investments and redirect funding to areas with higher returns on investment. Alternative Funding Sources: NAMC could explore partnerships with private entities or international organizations for additional funding to support training initiatives, thereby reducing reliance on SETA. Collaborative Training Programs: NAMC could partner with SETA to develop customized training modules that directly address operational challenges faced by the council. Technology Integration: Implementing digital platforms for training and development can enhance accessibility and engagement, making training more effective.

(1)(iv) Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB)

(a) Impact on efficiency of operations	In terms of efficiency of operations, the Agriculture Export Technologist program that is funded by the Agri-SETA ensures that the PPECB has a pool of graduates to employ in season, and through this programme more job opportunities are created for the youth. The other efficiency created by the Agri-SETA is ensuring that entities like the PPECB have competent employees through the training interventions they offer i.e. training of facilitators, assessors, and moderators.
(b) Cost implication	There is a need to top up the stipends provided for internship programs as what the Agri-SETA offers is not market related.
(2) Proposed alternative	Propose a review of stipends paid to interns and graduates. It will also benefit the entities if the length of internships is extended to about 24 months. The Agri-SETA also needs to consider funding Internships in fields like Information Technology (IT) seeing that we are moving towards the fourth industrial revolution. The Agri-SETA should encourage a more blended learning approach rather than classroom training aligned to digital transformation and the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4 IR).

 

(1)(v) South African Veterinary Council (SAVC)

(a) Impact onefficiency of operations	The SAVC has since 2017 received funding for different projects from the Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority (HWSETA). This funding has made a huge impact on the professions that we are regulating
(b) Cost implication	The SAVC has not yet received any funding from the Agricultural Sector Education and Training Authority (Agri-SETA). HWSETA PROJECTS FINANCIAL YEAR AMOUNT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Animal Auction Monitoring Training 2017-2018 R205,561.00 SAVC Animal Auction Monitoring Training 2018-2019 R837,087.00 SAVC Animal Euthanasia Training 2019-2020 R920,909.00 SAVC Mentorship project for Compulsory Community Service (CCS) Veterinarians 2018-2019 R1,000,825.00 South African Veterinary Association (SAVA) Mentorship project for CCS Veterinarians 2020-2021 R6,092,800.00 SAVA Mentorship Project for CCS Veterinarians 2021-2022 R7,970,400.00 SAVA and South African Association of Animal Health Technicians (SAAAHT) Needs Analysis -Stakeholder Research 2019-2020 / 2020-2021 R3,517,332.00 Marketing surveys and Statistical Analysis (MSSA)
(2) Proposed alternative	The SAVC has since applied for funding from the Agri-SETA to train Para-Veterinary Professionals in business management since there are new rules that are allowing them to open their facilities. We are still waiting for their response.

(1),(iv) Agriculture Research Council (ARC)

(a) Impact on efficiency of operations	The operations of the ARC on quality assurance services provided by the Agri-SETA have shown a positive impact.
(b) Cost implication	None, covered by Agri-SETA.
(2) Proposed alternative	It is recommended that multiple channels of communication be used by the SETA, including publishing key developments on its website and other alerts to stakeholders to remind them of impending deadlines of significance, over and above roadshows. Additionally, information such as presentations and minutes of roadshows should be shared with stakeholders unable to attend roadshows. Direct contracting with the ARC rather than the various stakeholders or tripartite agreements can be considered.

Reply:

Please refer to the Table below:

Institution	Role of sector education and training authority
(a) Divisions and/or directorates of his department:	In May 2021, the former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with the Agriculture Sector Education and Training Authority (AgriSETA) to further the objectives of the National Development Strategy (NDS). At the centre of the signed MoA, which will run for seven years, is the commitment by both parties to maximize sharing of information, representation, financial arrangements and join interventions & ventures. As part of the agreement, AgriSETA and DALRRD have agreed to jointly conduct career awareness seminars across the country to improve and consolidate efforts to enhance access to information and ultimately increase learner’s awareness of opportunities that exist in the sector.
(b) Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP)	Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP) has in the past benefitted from the Chemical Industries Education and Training Authority (CHIETA) through funded internship and bursaries for postgraduate programs (2016/2017). Our most recent (2022/2023) applications for CHIETA funded interns have not been successful. OBP continues to apply for funded internships through CHIETA.
(c) National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)	AgriSETA creates and promotes opportunities for social, economic and employment growth for agri-enterprises through relevant, quality, and accessible education, training, and development in both primary and secondary agriculture, in conjunction with other stakeholders in agriculture. The AgriSETA has formed a partnership with the National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC) effective from 1 March 2020 to provide funding for skills development for black farmers. The specific skills to be developed are climate-smart agricultural practices, food marketing, processing, and distribution, both domestically and internationally. The NAMC and AgriSETA have entered a 3-year contract. The approved funding to the tune of R3 million is principally meant to uplift the producer skills. The latter amount maybe be adjusted depending on the demand and availability of funds at AgriSETA. In addition, the AgriSETA provides training programs and resources to enhance the capabilities of individuals and organizations, which aligns with NAMC’s goals of improving agricultural productivity. Furthermore, the AgriSETA offers funding for training initiatives, allowing NAMC to access financial support for capacity-building projects and programs aimed at improving agricultural marketing and practices, and bursaries to deserving individuals. This is through Learnerships and Internships. Through these services, AgriSETA supports NAMC in enhancing the skills and competencies of the agricultural workforce, ultimately contributing to the sector’s growth and sustainability.
(d) Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB)	AgriSETA is playing a pivotal role in skills development at the Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB). To ensure growth and development, funding of R1,2 million was approved for the Leadership Development Programme for the past 3 years. AgriSETA also provided bursaries for further development of employed learners and have funded the PPECB R246 000 for bursaries. The Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) is also partnering with the PPECB in youth development through the Agric Export Technologies Programme; not only are they co-funding this programme with the Department but they are also ensuring accreditation of the programme at National Qualification Framework (NQF) Level 5. With the current move to Quality Council for Trade and Occupation (QCTO) AgriSETA is providing funding and coaching to ensure that the Perishable Produce qualification is aligned with QCTO. AgriSETA is also funding the PPECB for internships and Learnerships. AgriSETA plays a pivotal role in the development of smallholder farmers through funding of the disabled smallholder farmers and funding some aspects of the South African Good Agricultural Practices (SAGAP).
(e) SA Veterinary Council (SAVC)	The functional sectors represented by the Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority (HWSETA) in South Africa include the health, social development, and veterinary sectors. Its mission is to create an integrated approach to the development and provision of appropriately skilled health and social development workers, to render quality services comparable to world-class standards. HWSETA has a broad mandate, but its key objectives are: to develop and implement the Sector Skills Plan; skills development planning, programmes and initiatives; monitor of education and training; identification of workplaces for practical work experience; to support and facilitate the development of the National Skills Development Strategy; disbursement of levies collected; to forge links with all stakeholders and relevant bodies; to account for the effective and efficient use of public monies in line with the provisions of the Public Finance Management Act; and the promotion of the employment of disabled persons. The South African Veterinary Council (SAVC) has, since 2017 received funding for different projects from the Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority (HWSETA). This funding has made a huge impact on the professions that we are regulating. The SAVC has not yet received any funding from the Agricultural Sector Education and Training Authority (AGRISETA). This is the list of the projects that were funded by the HWSETA: HWSETA PROJECTS FINANCIAL YEAR AMOUNT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Animal Auction Monitoring Training 2017-2018 R205,561.00 SAVC Animal Auction Monitoring Training 2018-2019 R837,087.00 SAVC Animal Euthanasia Training 2019-2020 R920,909.00 SAVC Mentorship project for Compulsory Community Service (CCS) Veterinarians 2018-2019 R1,000,825.00 South African Veterinary Association (SAVA) Mentorship project for Compulsory Community Service (CCS) Veterinarians 2020-2021 R6,092,800.00 South African Veterinary Association (SAVA) Mentorship Project for Compulsory Community Service (CCS) Veterinarians 2021-2022 R7,970,400.00 South African Veterinary Association (SAVA) and South African Association of Animal Health Technicians (SAAAHT) Needs Analysis -Stakeholder Research 2019-2020 / 2020-2021 R3,517,332.00 Marketing surveys and Statistical Analysis (MSSA)
(f) Agriculture Research Council (ARC)	The Agriculture Research Council’s (ARC) primary SETA is the Agriculture Sector Education and Training Authority (AgriSETA). AgriSETA has played and continues to play a pivotal role in the ARC landscape; we have been able to roll out the following programmes through the assistance of AgriSETA: Mandatory grants – through submission of the ARC’s Workplace Plan and Annual Training Report, the ARC continues to benefit from receiving grants aligned with the submission. Discretionary grants—the ARC has benefitted from numerous funding to train employed and unemployed learners for the qualifications needed to address its workforce challenges. These included Honours, Master's, Doctoral, and post-doctoral bursaries, internships, and graduate placements, which aim to give unemployed people access to experience as they build their future. Accreditation and Quality Assurance: The ARC received accreditation from the AgriSETA in 2010 and is qualified to offer numerous skills programmes, short learning programmes and five qualifications as a skills development provider in the agricultural sector. This accreditation has supported the ARC in ensuring our training programmes meet national standards and are industry-recognized. Networking Opportunities: we have collaborated with other member companies and shared best practices in training and development. The continued partnership with the AgriSETA is beneficial for the ARC, the agricultural landscape, and the community at large as we can transfer knowledge and technical skills to rural poor and urban communities in pursuance of our technology transfer mandate. This is done through the provision of training and capacity-building programmes provided by our accredited researchers to unlock economic opportunities for Smallholder Farmers in South Africa. Accredited training has become the main form demanded by the industry, and the AgriSETA assists the ARC in comply with the legislative requirement.

Reply:

Please refer to the table below:

(a) Level of efficiency of sector education and training authority in providing services:

Institution	Response
(i) Divisions and / or directorates of his department	The relationship with AgriSETA has been efficient due the fact that it is guided by the signed Memorandum of Agreement.
(ii) Onderstepoort Biological Products,	The Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP) has experienced high levels of efficiency regarding the sector education and training authority given that the universities always wanted to work with the OBP in terms of training postgraduate students.
(iii) National Agricultural Marketing Council	Skills Development and Training: The AgriSETA has been very instrumental in supporting skills development as part of the implementation of Pillar 3 of the Agriculture and Agro-processing Master Plan (AAMP). The skills development initiative outlines the specific measures to improve farmer and agri-preneurs skills in production, processing, marketing, and distribution of food in the country. The skills gap within the sector is very concerning especially amongst previously disadvantaged groups. This has limited inclusive growth in the sector over the years therefore making it difficult for smallholder farmers and agri-preneurs to succeed. Promoting skills development will allow smallholder farmers and agri-preneurs to have a competitive advantage, while enabling infrastructure, market access and financing solutions. Following the skill development initiative supported by AgriSETA for the AAMP, it is important that adequate resources are allocated to promote skills improvement of farmers in order realize the increased production and agro processing envisaged in the AAMP.
	Funding and Resource Allocation: The AgriSETA allocates funds for training and development, but the distribution can vary based on applications and priorities. For example, financial support for training initiatives, such as workshops on Agro processing, helps organizations like NAMC reduce training costs.
	Compliance and Quality Standards: The AgriSETA ensures that training meets national standards, which is crucial for maintaining quality in agricultural practices. Example: Training programs accredited by AgriSETA align with the National Qualifications Framework, ensuring participants receive recognized qualifications.
(iv) Perishable Products Export Control Board	The administration could be improved to ensure efficiency. Clear implementation guidelines are necessary.
(v) South African Veterinary Council (SAVC)	The South African Veterinary Council (SAVC) has since 2017 received funding for different projects from the Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority (HWSETA). This funding has made a positive impact on the professions that we are regulating.
(vi) Agricultural Research Council/ARC	The Agricultural Research Council (ARC) has found the efficiency of the AgriSETA to be acceptable. This is in responding to queries on accreditation of short learning programmes and skills programmes as well as registration of qualifying assessors and moderators. The response is always received within the agreed timelines. Engagement with the AgriSETA also resolved issues in paying the discretionary and mandatory grants to the ARC. Payments have been made to ARC, enabling training of the youth and unemployed learners to start. ARC is also engaging AgriSETA on clearer identification of scarce and critical skills for a “research and development” institution.

(b) Challenges experienced with the AgriSETA

Institution	Response
(i) Divisions and/or directorates of his department	Adequate: there are no challenges experienced since the signing of Memorandum of Agreement in May 2021.
(ii) Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP)	The inherent challenges are availability of funds to pay for studentships. While OBP pays for research study costs, there are no readily available funds for this training, and the OBP must apply to third parties to fund studentships.
(iii) National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)	Administrative Burdens: Challenge: Complex application processes for funding and training programs can be time-consuming and resource intensive for NAMC. Due to lack of information submitted to the NAMC regarding costing, learner’s information, and service provider information, some of the skills development proposals were not in line with the AgriSETA requirements, including misalignment with the prioritized skills. This has resulted in only a few skills development proposals being recommended for approval. Example: Delays in processing applications can hinder timely training interventions, affecting operational efficiency.
	Funding Limitations: Challenge: While AgriSETA provides funding, the amount available may not fully meet the demands of all training programs required by NAMC. Example: If NAMC requires extensive training for new agricultural technologies, the funding may fall short, limiting the scope of training initiatives.
	Alignment with Industry Needs: Challenge: There may be a disconnect between SETA training programs and the specific needs of the agricultural sector. Example: NAMC might find that some training modules offered by AgriSETA do not directly address the current challenges faced by farmers, such as climate change adaptation.
	Monitoring and Evaluation: Challenge: Inadequate systems for tracking the effectiveness of training programs can make it difficult for NAMC to assess the impact of AgriSETA initiatives. As part of coordinating the development and implementation of the AAMP, the NAMC is facilitating the formalization of emerging commodity farmers’ associations in grains, livestock and horticulture products including their processed products. The emerging commodity farmers’ associations are created to improve skills and access to markets, enhance research and development and create enabling infrastructure in the areas where farmers operate. Example: Without robust evaluation mechanisms, NAMC may struggle to determine if the training leads to improved productivity or skills retention. It thus should be noted that while AgriSETA provides valuable support to NAMC through training and funding, challenges such as administrative burdens, funding limitations, misalignment with industry needs, and monitoring issues can impact overall efficiency. Addressing these challenges is crucial for maximizing the benefits of SETA services in the agricultural sector.
(iv) Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB)	The challenges with regard to the services of the AgriSETA relate to turnaround times for responses to funding requests. The implications of this are that at times we must abandon some of projects we have planned for. The other challenge is where AgriSETA does not adjust its requirements to the needs of the beneficiaries. AgriSETA funded our smallholder people with disabilities programme, but had the same administrative requirements applicable to able-bodied persons. This created frustration and delays in implementing the programme.
(v) South African Veterinary Council (SAVC)	The SAVC has not yet received any funding from the Agricultural Sector Education and Training Authority (AGRISETA).
(vi) Agricultural Research Council (ARC)	The ARC has experienced challenges with the process of transitioning from the old system of training, to the occupationally directed training by the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO). The following recommendations are made to improve efficiency: Enhanced information on the required steps to be followed by stakeholders to secure registration by the QCTO. More information on the role of the SETA for the transitioning process; deadlines and requirements of QCTO on this; and implication of missing these deadlines etc. Use of multiple communication channels. Stakeholders who could not attend the provincial roadshows missed out on information presented. SETA enters into agreements with stakeholders who in turn outsource the ARC for services. The management of the stakeholder contracts is challenging where stakeholders are not well versed in SETA programmes. ARC continues to engage with AgriSETA on these challenges.

Reply:

Weak commodity prices do have a debilitating effect on those countries whose economies are heavily reliant on commodity exports. South Africa, being one of those countries and being a small open economy, is from time to time exposed to these cyclical commodity price movements.

South Africa is a net exporter of several agricultural commodities such as citrus, table grapes, apples, pears, wool, mohair, and weak international prices for these commodities translate to lower incomes for exporters and reduced foreign exchange earnings for the country. If such events are prolonged, impacts may be felt in lost jobs and increased poverty in the country. This would further exacerbate the already dire situation of high unemployment and poverty in the country.

In attempting to deal with this and other issues, this government will continue to work with the industry to ensure that we increase the resilience of the sector to withstand the challenges brought about by the cyclical lows in international commodity prices and be ready to exploit the opportunities that will arise when the same commodity prices hit the peak of the cycle. This will be done through the value chain round tables that are driving the implementation of the Agriculture and Agro-processing Master Plan.

Reply:

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

WRITTEN REPLY

Yes. Since the Minister launched the Farmer Register in February 2022, the number of farmers registered on the system has grown from 95 501 to 140 054. The Department receives regular requests from farmers to register on the system. Stakeholders such as the National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC) are interested in accessing the database.

In March 2024, government approved the National Policy on Comprehensive Producer Development Support (NPCPDS). This policy is an extensive national framework for South Africa's agriculture sector which governs and regulates the interventions (support services) provided by government to various types of producers. This policy offers guidelines for stakeholders involved in producer assistance, encompassing the corporate sector, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), Development Partners (DPs), and other relevant institutions. The policy also regulates the registration of farmers on the central database for all categories of producers, and they are issued with a unique Producer Registration Number (PRN) which they use to access support (regulatory, financial, and non-finacial).

The Farmer Register is indeed used extensively through different operations and branches in the department.

• The Monitoring and Evaluation Sub-programme in the Department uses the Farmer Register to prove evidence-based existence of farmers supported, during the auditing process of non-financial reporting.
• Provinces can download the database of the Farmer Register to understand the performance on farmer registration in their area or indicate the number of farmers they supported and their location.
• Extension Officers/Agricultural Advisors continue to register farmers where there is a need, and the number of registered farmers is increasing.
• The Farmer Register has been instrumental in locating farmers when the Department was identifying farmers for PESI during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown.
• Branches of the Department use the Farmer Register for its operations e.g. Agricultural Production, Biosecurity and Natural Resources Management for tracking the origin of production of commodities in terms of SPS regulations- i.e. Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement as an international treaty that sets out the basic rules for food safety and animal and plant health standards, these and other reasons.
• Branches of the Department are given access to the Farmer Register to be able to view listed farmers per region, and municipality and further download and interact with the database.

Reply:

1. As part of the food systems transformation initiative that culminates from the Food Systems Summit held in 2021, South Africa in partnership with the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO) is coordinating the rollout of inclusive multi-sector, multi-stakeholder implementation of four food systems pathways. These are aimed at the realization of Sustainable Development Goals 1 (no poverty) and 2 (zero hunger). Coordination of evidence-based targeting of food and nutrition security interventions at household level within the food-insecure districts is now based on the results of the National Food and Nutrition Security Survey, which has provided a baseline of food and nutrition security at a sub-national level. The survey results are a combination of food and nutrition security indicators.

The Department of Agriculture implements farmer support and development programmes crafted to ensure that funding is provided to subsistence and smallholder producers in the form of infrastructure, production inputs, mechanization, training, extension support, and working capital. Furthermore, the Department ensures that market access support is also provided to beneficiaries.

The funding programmes are as follows:

• Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP) which is a Schedule 5 conditional grant;
• Ilima/ Letsema programme (a Schedule 5 conditional grant);
• Land Care Programme (a Schedule 5 conditional grant);
• AgriBEE Fund;
• Land Development Support grant for Land Reform beneficiaries;
• Blended Finance Scheme; and
• Agro-Energy Fund – for alternative energy solutions.

It is important to ensure that all producers are self-reliant irrespective of size, and sustainability must be a principle applied by all producers towards self-reliance and ensuring food security for all.

The role of the Department in marketing, as envisioned by the Integrated Agricultural Marketing Policy (IAMP), is to provide a range of agricultural marketing support services to enhance participation by all role players across the various agricultural value chains. The Department implements marketing support programmes that are aimed at enabling producers, particularly smallholder producers to gain access to markets and accelerate the commercialization program.

The above-mentioned support programmes include the provision of marketing information, marketing skills development programme, Good Agricultural Practices (SA-GAP) Certification Programme, and market linkages programme. The SA-GAP Certification programme is aimed at assuring potential buyers that the food produced by smallholder producers is safe for human consumption.

Regarding marketing information, the Department disseminates a wide range of market information to producers and other value chain players through the Marketing Information System (MIS), which is a web-based system that can be accessed on the internet and through cell phones. The information distributed through the system includes daily prices for agricultural products (fresh produce and grains) and weekly prices for meat, standards and grading information and contact information for various markets and market agents. This information is distributed to get producers to understand the prevailing market conditions, inform them about the existing alternative marketing channels and to bring to the fingertips of farmers into contact with information for various markets.

The marketing skills development programme is being implemented continuously to empower producers on how the markets operate (mechanics) and to provide them with exposure to different marketing channels. e.g. fresh produce farmers are capacitated on fresh produce marketing and are also given an opportunity to participate in the market exposure visit for them to meet with market management and agents. The goal is to empower producers with knowledge about markets and to allow them to meet with market managers and organize deals on their own with those markets.

2. The Department implements the Career Awareness Programme which is structured and focuses on the promotion of agriculture, land reform and rural development careers as livelihoods of choice particularly among school-going youth. The programme is implemented through periodic school visits, exhibitions, seminars, campus recruitment etc. to promote careers in the sector. Booklets, leaflets and videos on careers in the sectors are disseminated to the students.

(3) The Department implements the External Bursary Scheme through which deserving students are financially supported to study prioritised careers in the sector. The bursary covers tuition, accommodation, meals, books, and a monthly stipend. The Department further implements the Graduate Placement Programme through which unemployed agricultural graduates are placed in farms/enterprises over a 24-month period for entrepreneurial development to acquire practical hands-on experience to enhance their chances of employability and starting their own business enterprises.

Reply:

1. Yes, to realise the objectives of the National Policy on Food and Nutrition Security, the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) together with other relevant departments, developed the Food and Nutrition Security Plan (NFNSP) for 2018–2023. The Plan had six Strategic Objectives (SOs) and given the multidisciplinary and multistakeholder nature of Food and Nutrition Security (FNS), various government departments are leading in different SOs as follows:

• SO1-was designed to establish the Food Security Council. The DALRRD and the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) were the leading departments in this Strategic Objective (SO).
• SO2-aims to foster the participation of smallholder and subsistence farmers in the local food value chains through various producer support programmes. DALRRD is leading this SO.
• SO3-is to expand social safety nets to vulnerable individuals. This SO is led by the Department of Social Development (DSD) and the Department of Basic Education (DBE) which provide meals through the Community Development and Nutrition Centres (CNDCs) and the National School Nutrition Programme (NSNSP) respectively.
• SO4-is to scale up high-impact nutrition interventions targeting women, infants, and children. The Department of Health (DoH) is leading this SO.
• SO5-which influences people across the life cycle to make informed food and nutrition decisions through an integrated communications strategy. The DALRRD and DoH are leading this SO.
• SO6-is for the development of a monitoring and evaluation system for FNS including an integrated risk management system for monitoring FNS-related risks. Statistics SA and DALRRD are leading in this SO.
• SO7-is to cultivate entrepreneurial development. The Department of Small Business Development is leading in this SO.
• The Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) commissioned the evaluation for implementation and progress towards predefined targets of all SOs for the NFNSP (2018 – 2023). For comprehensive insights on the progress made, the DPME evaluation report is attached hereto as Annexure A.

(link to the report)

https://www.dpme.gov.za/keyfocusareas/evaluationsSite/Evaluation%20Reports/Genesis%20DPME%20NFNSP%20Full%20Evaluation%20Report%2002.11.2023.pdf).

(2),(a)(b) Refer to the DPME evaluation report hereto as attached.

(3) The recommendations from the DPME evaluation guided the South African government and Partners to commence the next iteration of the NFNSP, by revising the current Plan. A revised theory of change and improvements in the implementation modalities was recommended for better outcomes in reducing food insecurity and malnutrition.

a) The DALRRD is currently developing the NFNSP for (2024–2029), lessons learnt throughout the implementation of the previous Plan and detailed recommendations from the evaluation are taken into consideration in the revised theory of change and the new Plan.

b) The results of the NFNS Survey commissioned by the DALRRD and conducted by the Human Sciences Research Council are also used as an evidence-based planning instrument in designing the new plan that is being developed through a robust multi-stakeholder forum convened by the Department.

Reply:

(a),(b) The Department took note of the United Nations Special Rapporteur's recommendation on the aerial application of pesticides and an investigation on the impact of such technologies on human and environmental health will be undertaken. The investigations will focus on the best practices for aerial applications to manage pesticide spray drift. Other model factors including nozzle type, droplet size, wind speed, direction, and application height as well as the use of buffers to protect bystanders from exposures will form part of the investigation. The outcome of the investigation will inform the need for reviewing the existing applicable regulations. The investigation is ongoing and is scheduled to be concluded in the 2025/26 financial year.

The Department acknowledges that highly hazardous pesticides are an issue of concern and has taken steps by continuously reviewing its use, and where applicable banning or restricting them and promoting the safe use of alternative products/techniques. To that end, the Department is to phase out by 30 June 2025, 28 active ingredients that meet the criteria of carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity categories 1A and 1B of the Globally Harmonized Systems (GHS) of classification and labelling of chemicals and they are also listed on the Stockholm Convention and Montreal Protocol. In addition, the Department is banning pesticide products that contain chlorpyrifos and cartap hydrochloride as an active ingredient in November 2024 due to concerns about human health safety.

Reply:

1. (a) Compromised vaccines: please refer to Table 1 below.

b) Unusable vaccines: please refer to Table 2 below. The list is derived from the compromised list of products mentioned in Table 1 which were re-tested and failed to comply with set quality control standards.

c) Vaccines requiring disposal: the products mentioned in Table 2 required disposal/discarding in line with Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP) quality management systems. Cold chain breakage is a rare occurrence and does not occur on a monthly basis.

d) Yes, The cold chain breakages are reported and tracked through a specific Non-Conformance Report (NCR) process as per the NCR record numbers provided in the tables above.

TABLE 1
Year	2020/2021		2021/2022		2022/2023	2023/2024			2024/2025
Date of occurrence	16 September 2020		22 June 2021 and 04 October 2021		None	20 December 2023 and 15 January 2024			None
Non-conformance Report Number	(NCR) No: 20-051		(NCR) No: 21-028 and 21-067		N/A	(NCR) No: 23-095 and 23-096			N/A
compromised	Product Name	Batch No	Product Name	Batch No			Product Name	Batch No
	African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater Asiatic Redwater Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater	462 460 461 463 598 859 860 861 862 863 321 322 323 326 327 328 329 330	Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Asiatic Asiatic Asiatic Asiatic African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater	862 863 865 866 867 868 322 327 328 329 329 328 322 323 863 864 865 867 866 868 603 606 607 608 463 466 467 468	NO COLD ROOM FAILURES OCCURRED		Anaplasmosis African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater Asiatic Redwater Asiatic Redwater Asiatic Redwater Heartwater Heartwater Heartwater Asiatic Asiatic African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Heartwater Heartwater	888 480 481 482 483 468 475 476 477 478 620 621 623 337 338 339 619 622 475 476 477 478 479 879 887 339 340		NO COLD ROOM FAILURES OCCURRED

TABLE 2

Year	2020/2021		2021/2022	2022/2023		2023/2024		2024/2025
Date of occurrence	16 September 2020		22 June 2021 and 04 October 2021	None		20 December 2023 and 15 January 2024		None
Non-Conformance Report	(NCR) No: 20-051		(NCR) No: 21-028 and 21-067	N/A		(NCR) No: 23-095 and 23-096		N/A
Unusable vaccines	Product Name	Batch No	Product Name	Batch No			468 475 476 477 478 337 338 620 621 623 339 Product Name	Batch No
	Asiatic African Redwater	598 462	Heartwater Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Heartwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Heartwater	327 863 868 329 463 467 468 863 865 866 867 328	NO COLD ROOM FAILURES OCCURRED		African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater Heartwater Heartwater Asiatic Redwater Asiatic Redwater Asiatic Redwater Heartwater		NO COLD ROOM FAILURES OCCURRED

Reply:

Yes. In terms of the Animal Diseases Act, 1984 (Act No. 35 of 1984), control measures are prescribed for the controlled animal diseases tabled in the Act. These control measures are summarised in Table 2 of the Regulations of the Act.

Examples of some of the important controlled animal diseases regulated under the Act are Foot and Mouth Disease, Avian Influenza and African Swine Fever.

The Act empowers the National Director of Animal Health, in conjunction with the State Veterinarians employed by the nine Provincial Veterinary Authorities, to implement and enforce these contingency/control measures. The prescribed control measures are binding on the owner and / or manager of affected animals irrespective of whether a government official has visited the premises. In addition to the prescribed measures for specific controlled animal diseases, section 11 of the Act also holds the owner and / or manager of animals responsible for taking ‘all reasonable steps to prevent the infection of the animals with any animal disease, or parasite and the spreading thereof from the relevant land or animals, or which are necessary for the eradication of animal diseases and parasites on the land or in respect of the animals’

For certain controlled animal diseases, for example Foot and Mouth Disease and Avian Influenza, specific more detailed contingency protocols have been developed to guide the implementation of the prescribed control measures.

Standard contingency/control measures that are applied during disease outbreaks include the following:

• Infected animals are to be isolated (infected farm(s) placed under quarantine). For certain controlled animal diseases, the surrounding farms/area are also placed under quarantine.
• For disease outbreaks that cannot be controlled effectively by quarantine of individual premises or small areas, the Honourable Minister may declare a Disease Management Area for area-wide implementation of control measures.
• Movement of animals, persons, vehicles, animal feeds onto, off and in between infected farms are prohibited or strictly controlled. General biosecurity measures must be put in place by the owner/manager of the farm, including but not limited to access registers and limiting entry of visitors and vehicles, washing and disinfecting visitors’ and workers’ clothes on the premises, visitors, and workers to refrain from contact with other animals. Equipment amenable to disinfection and vehicles must be cleaned and disinfected with a registered disinfectant upon entry and exit of the infected property.
• All material that is deemed infectious must be disposed of in a safe manner on the premises under state supervision.
• For certain controlled animal diseases, infected animals are to be destroyed or slaughtered under the supervision of the responsible local State Veterinarian.
• For certain controlled animal diseases, infected and contact animals are to be vaccinated or treated with an effective remedy.
• Contact animals (including animals on neighbouring farms) are to be isolated and tested by an officer or authorised person for the presence/absence of disease.
• For certain controlled animal diseases more intensive clinical surveillance is conducted around a disease outbreak.
• Outbreaks of controlled animal diseases are reported to the World Organisation for Animal Health.
• South Africa’s neighbouring countries and trade partners are informed of certain important, and trade sensitive controlled animal disease outbreaks and regular press statements and updated disease reports are issued to inform industries and the general public.

Reply:

a) The changes in the marketing structure for fresh produce and the growing consumer demand for fresh produce that is safe and of good quality, means there is a need to focus on the implementation of good practices in fresh produce supply chains. The Department of Agriculture (DOA), in collaboration with the Provincial Departments of Agriculture and the Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB), offers certification on South African Good Agricultural Practices (SA GAP) for smallholder producers. The SA-GAP also plays an integral part in ensuring that marketing infrastructure facilities (in the form of pack-houses) conform to SA-GAP requirements. The SA-GAP plays a pivotal role in providing guiding principles for the proper washing, sorting, grading, treatment and packaging of fresh produce. Furthermore, both the department and PPECB in collaboration with the provinces focus on the design of fresh produce pack-houses that conform to SA-GAP guidelines. The SA-GAP standards for pack-house/cold storage specifications focus on the following:

• Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) – food processed/packaged is of safe and consistent quality.
• Location and structure – away from environmentally polluted and industrial areas.
• Drainage system – floor design must have slopes and there must be channels to ensure proper drainage/ the cleaning procedure must detail the removal of excess water.
• Sanitary facilities – must not open directly onto produce handling areas unless the door is self-closing. 
• Hand washing facilities – must be available at the entrances. Lights inside the pack house must be covered (for glass breakage control). Storage facility for cleaning chemicals must be well-lit and retain spillage.
• Openings including vents and drains - must be covered to prevent pests, birds etc.
• Pack line equipment/machinery surfaces (sizers, conveyors, drop boards, grading tables and wash tanks – Free from flaking plaster/paint and metal shards, to ensure clean-ability and avoid injury to the product.
• Cold storage – All lights in the cold storage facilities covered with protective covers and all other glass protected to prevent contamination in case of breakage. Cold rooms seal perfectly with no gaps and no visible damage. Plastic strip curtains are maintained in good condition, kept clean and mounted so that the tips are not touching the floor.
• Pesticide Stores – Pesticide stores must be dedicated to the storage of chemicals such as plant protection products, animal remedies, biocides, etc. All pesticide stores must be designed and constructed to facilitate control of access and to prevent unauthorized access e.g. by passers-by, customers, children etc. Pesticide stores can be adjacent to buildings, be attached to other buildings or comprise compartments within buildings but must either have separate entrances or separate exits to the open air.
• Temperature-Controlled Transportation – the use of refrigerated vehicles assists with maintaining the cold chain for temperature-sensitive produce, aligning with SA-GAP’s focus on reducing spoilage and maintaining freshness during transit.
• Reduce Transport Time – optimized routes and logistics plans reduce time from farm to market, supporting SA-GAP’s aim to deliver high-quality produce efficiently.
• Vehicle Hygiene – ensure that vehicles used for transporting produce are regularly cleaned and sanitized, as SA-GAP certification requires transportation that maintains hygiene and prevents cross-contamination.

b) Public and private partners can ensure that there are investments to support infrastructure, compliance to SA-GAP and training of farmers. Currently, the department is implementing the Blended Finance Programme in collaboration with development finance institutions and some commercial banks. The programme entails the provision of access to grants, and low-interest loans for farmers to invest in SA-GAP-compliant storage, transportation, and other infrastructure such as nets, to ensure excellent quality produce. There is a scope to incentivize upgrades by offering incentives for farmers and transport providers who make infrastructure upgrades specifically for SA-GAP certification such as temperature controls or pest-proofing.

c) nInfrastructure investment can reduce post-harvest losses, enhance product safety, and build trust with consumers and buyers. Supporting farmers in these areas also enables them to maintain certification and access better market opportunities, improving the overall competitiveness and sustainability of the agricultural sector. Reduction in post-harvest losses will further enhance supply-chain efficiencies through targeted investments in rural infrastructure, and post-harvest and agro-processing technologies, thus contributing to improved food availability and enhanced product quality.

Reply:

a) Terbufos is not banned to the extent that it is used in pest control during the production of economic crops in South Africa.

b) The use, sale, and distribution of terbufos is not prohibited when it is used by, or under the supervision of trained registered Pest Control Operators (PCOs). Any other use, sale or distribution of the chemical outside of restrictions specified in the applicable regulation is prohibited and criminally prosecutable. The Department forms part of the multi-government agencies investigating the use, distribution, and sale of terbufos and where necessary prosecutorial steps are being considered in collaboration with the South African Police Services against those involved.

c) Manufacturers and suppliers of terbufos are legally compelled to uphold and comply with the relevant regulation in the distribution and sale thereof.

Reply:

The National Department of Agriculture, through Provincial Departments of Agriculture (PDAs), provides Extension and Advisory Services (EAS) to various categories of farmers. Public extension practitioners primarily support subsistence and smallholder producers, while commercial producers typically rely on private extension practitioners organized through commodity groups.

• Short-Term Initiatives

The Department is currently developing the Online Producer Development Support System, which consists of four key modules:

• E-Voucher: For streamlined financial support and input access.
• Farmer Register: To maintain an updated database of producers.
• Online Extension Directory: A platform to connect farmers with extension services.
• Decision Support Services (DSS): Tools to facilitate evidence-based decision-making for farmers.

The Online Extension Directory and DSS modules, designed to implement e-extension services, are in advanced development stages and are expected to launch during the 2025/26 financial year. These modules aim to make EAS more efficient and accessible to farmers.

• Medium-Term Focus

To address capacity challenges, the Department, alongside PDAs, continues to recruit extension practitioners under the Extension Recovery Plan (ERP). The recruitment efforts contribute to addressing the immediate needs of smallholder and subsistence farmers.

• Long-Term Vision

The Department is actively engaging National Treasury to secure sustainable funding for the recruitment of additional extension practitioners, with the goal of achieving an optimal extension-to-producer ratio of 1:250 or less, counting the e-extension platform. Once funding is secured, the Department will collaborate with PDAs to employ more extension and assistant agricultural practitioners on a permanent basis to enhance capacity at the provincial level. The PDAs will oversee the recruitment and management of extension practitioners, as these professionals are employed and operate at the provincial level.

Reply:

1. Please refer to the table below.

Province	District	Total number of government veterinarians
Gauteng	City of Tshwane	13
	Rand West	4
	City of Johannesburg	13
	Vereeniging	0
		30
Mpumalanga	Ehlanzeni North	4
	Ehlanzeni South	5
	Gert Sibande	10
	Nkangala	5
	Head office	3
		27
Northwest	Bojanala	4
	Ngaka Modiri Molema	5
	Dr Kenneth Kaunda	3
	Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati	3
		15
Limpopo	Sekhukhune	3
	Capricorn	5
	Waterberg	4
	Mopani	4
	Vhembe	4
	Head office	6
		26
KwaZulu-Natal	uMkhanyakude	1
	King Cetshwayo	1
	Zululand	1
	uMzinyathi	1
	uThukela	0
	uMgungundlovu	3
	Harry Gwala	1
	uGu	1
	eThekwini	4
	iLembe	1
		15
Eastern Cape	Alfred Nzo	2
	Amathole	7
	Chris Hani	6
	Joe Gqabi	3
	OR Tambo	4
	Sarah Baartman	4
		26
Northern Cape	Francis Baard	2
	John Taolo Gaetsewe	2
	Pixley Ka Seme	1
	Namakwa	2
	ZF Mgcawu	1
		8
Free State	Xhariep	1
	Mangaung Metro	1
	Lejweleputswa	0
	Thabomofutsanyana	4
	Fezile Dabi	3
		9
Western Cape	City Of Cape Town	5
	City of Cape Town Drakenstein, Stellenbosch	3
	Overberg	2
	Winelands	1
	Garden Route	5
	Mossel Bay	3
	West Coast	2
	Central Karoo	1
	Head Office	10
		32
National Department (Head office)		25
		25
	Total	213

2. No government veterinarian that we know of has been found guilty of gross negligence. The employees of the Department are treated according to the statutes and may be subjected to disciplinary processes according to labour laws. Veterinary Professionals are also subjected to the Veterinary and Para Veterinary Professions Act. Should there be a need to charge veterinary professionals with gross negligence, the Veterinary Council will conduct investigations and charge accordingly.

Reply:

(1)

Year	No of Complaints Received regarding malpractice and negligence
1/4/2019 – 31/3/2020	84
1/4/2020 – 31/3/2021	91
1/4/2021 – 31/3/2022	72
1/4/2022 – 31/3/2023	55
1/4/2023 – 31/3/2024	62
Total	364

2. The SA Veterinary Council (SAVC) received the complaint on 20 March 2023. The complaint was duly investigated in terms of section 31 of the Veterinary and Para-Veterinary Professions Act 19 of 1982 including confronting the listed respondents with the allegations made against them. The respondents filed their answering affidavits in response to the allegations, and answering affidavits were presented to the complainant for them to file their final reply.

Upon conclusion of this process, which marked the conclusion of the preliminary investigations, the matter was presented to an Investigating Committee in terms of Rule 3(8) of the Rules Relating to Disciplinary Processes. The Investigating Committee was convened on 13 June 2023 to consider matters under investigation, including this specific case.

Upon consideration of the evidentiary material, which included affidavits, photographic evidence, and clinical records, among others, the Investigating Committee unanimously resolved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that there was no evidence of negligence/malpractice and/or unprofessional conduct by the cited veterinarians. The Investigating Committee was satisfied that the correct diagnosis had been made and that the correct course of treatment was followed.

The outcome of the Investigating Committee was communicated to Mr Isakov in the SAVC’s letter dated 4 July 2023, wherein the reasons for the committee’s findings were set out in detail. The complainant was dissatisfied with the outcome and subsequently filed a review application to the Council in terms of Rule 3(13) of the above-mentioned rules. The review application was considered by the Council at its sitting on 17 November 2023, where the Council, upon reviewing the evidentiary material, the decision and the reasoning of the Investigating Committee, found that the Investigating Committee had not erred in its decision and confirmed the decision of the Investigating Committee.

The outcome of the review application was communicated to the complainant in a letter dated 28 November 2023. It is based on this communication and the outcome of the review application that the complainant has sent correspondence detailing his dissatisfaction to several institutions, including the former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) and the Presidency, among others.

The complainant, having exhausted all internal remedies provided for in terms of the Veterinary and Para-Veterinary Professions Act No. 19 of 1982, was advised that he was entitled to approach the High Court of South Africa by way of review proceedings, should he wish to pursue the matter further. To no service of formal review proceedings has been received from the complainant.

(3)(a),(b),(c) Please refer to the tables below:

Year	No of Inquiries	No of guilty findings against professionals	Professionals found not Guilty
1/4/2019–31/3/2020	5	5	-
1/4/2020–31/3/2021	14	14	-
1/4/2021–31/3/2022	18	14	4
1/4/2022–31/3/2023	9	9	-
1/4/2023–31/3/2024	14	14	-
Total	60	56	4

Breakdown of sanctions
Reprimands or Caution [s33(1)(a)]	2
Fines [s33(1)(b)]	35
Suspensions (Immediate execution of penalty) [s33(1)(c)]	1
Suspensions (execution suspended) [s33(1)(c) read with s33(2)(b)]	17
Registration Withdrawals imposed [s33(1)(d)]	1
Total	56

Reply:

1. Yes, The Department of Agriculture (DoA) has initiatives such as the Value Chain Roundtables and Trade Working Groups where products are identified to access new markets. Requests for new market access are initiated by the industry to identify priority markets. Through platforms created such as presidential visits, ministerial visits, Binational Commissions, Joint Bilateral cooperations etc, market access is then requested with identified counties. It must also be noted that the government has an extensive footprint of foreign missions abroad

2. South Africa has already concluded market access protocols with the likes of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and is continuing to engage with Iran for further market access. The department intend to expand these to all BRICS countries with the aim of maximizing these benefits. The trade in plant and animals and its products amongst all existing BRIC countries will still be subjected to sanitary and phytosanitary measures as determined by the importing or exporting country. Membership of BRICS does however offer the opportunity to leverage engagement platforms amongst the countries to advance negotiations on sanitary and phytosanitary at a faster pace.

(3)

(a) The Department has the mandate to ensure sustainable and long-term national food security. In this regard, the Department has the objective to promote and enhance ecological and economically sustainable agricultural systems through improved land use production systems. This objective is based on a continuous evaluation of the natural agricultural resource’s capability, potential, state, and land use to improve decision-making pertaining to the management and use thereof. As such, the Department has submitted the Preservation and Development of Agricultural Land Bill (PDALB) for enactment. Through this Bill, the implementation of Agricultural Sector Plans will ensure that land with the capability to be used for sustainable production is identified, specifically through the delineation of the Protected Agricultural Areas (areas of high agricultural potential for cultivation and grazing). The Agricultural Sector Plan creates the platform and prioritizes the development of these areas, which will enhance production that will have inter alia effect of increased job creation for the sector.

b) The Department has also been providing support to farmers/producers through its current programmes, namely, the Ilima/Letsema, the Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programmes, the Land Development and Post Settlement Support and the Presidential Economic Stimulus. Apart from the optimisation of agricultural land use, the interventions contribute directly to self-employment and the creation of employment opportunities.

Reply:

a) Please refer to Table 1 below.

b) The average period of failures lasts 12 to 16 hours.

c) Extended power outages and equipment failure.

(d) The cost of each product loss is indicated on the list below:

National Assembly Question 1623 of 2024

Year	2020/2021		2021/2022		2022/2023	2023/2024		2024/2025
Date of Occurrence	16 September 2020		22 June 2021, and 04 October 2021		None.	Date of occurrence 20 December 2023, and 15 January 2024		None
Non-Conformance Report Number	No. 20-051		No. 21-028 and No. 21-067		N/A	No. 23-095 and No. 23-096		N/A
Product Loss in Rands	Product Name	Batch No	Product Name	Batch No		Product Name	Batch No
	Asiatic African Redwater	598 R193 314 462 R194 467	Heartwater Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Heartwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis   Anaplasmosis Heartwater	327 R170 577 863 R167 858 868 R179 997 329 R191 001 463 R182 893 467 R179 456 468 R177 738 863 R167 858 865 R180 883 866 R179 490     867 R178 984 328 R175 498	No cold room failures.	African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater African Redwater Heartwater Heartwater Asiatic Redwater Asiatic Redwater Asiatic Redwater     Heartwater	468 R177 736 475 R178 596 476 R179 456 477 R166 690 478 R171 968 337 R180 635 338 R186 601 620 R200 606 621 R199 505 623 R201 156         339 R176 385	No cold room failures.

Table 1:

Reply:

a) Market access was initially requested in 2009. A second market access request was provided to the General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China (GACC) in September 2015. In 2020 they started with Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) on South Africa’s Avocado produce.

The exchange of technical information between the former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) and GACC took place from 2020 until 2022. Details of the agreement under which the Republic of South Africa exports avocados to China are in the “Protocol of Phytosanitary Requirements for Export of Fresh Avocado Fruits from South Africa to The Peoples Republic of China”. Attached as Annexure A.

b)In 2022, the DALRRD and GACC reached an agreement on the list of quarantine pests. The Protocol was signed on 22 August 2023 by ministers of the two countries.

Reply:

South Africa can be self-sufficient in most agricultural products. However, South Africa does rely on imports for some significant agricultural products, including wheat. Approximately 40% to 50% of the country’s wheat requirement is imported. The concept of food self-sufficiency is generally taken to mean the extent to which a country can satisfy its food needs from its domestic production.

The Department of Agriculture (DOA) is implementing measures to empower and mainstream designated groups, including women, into the sector. The National Policy on Comprehensive Producer Support and Development (NPCPSD) aims to ensure that there is an increase in agricultural production and improved food security through the provision of support to all categories of farmers/producers. Some of the interventions that align with the policy directives are summarised as follows: -

 

Grants support for producers: DOA is implementing grants-based producer support programmes that are designed to ensure that funding is provided in the form of infrastructure, production inputs, mechanization, training, extension support, and working capital and ensures that market access support is also provided to beneficiaries. The funding programmes in the Department are:

• The Presidential Economic Stimulus
• The Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP) - (Schedule 5 conditional grant);
• The Ilima/ Letsema programme (Schedule 5 conditional grant);
• The Land Care Programme (Schedule 5 conditional grant); and
• The AgriBEE Fund.

Land Development and Post Settlement Support: Another critical programme for land reform beneficiaries is the Land Development Support (LDS) Programme which is implemented in partnerships with development partners (i.e., commodity organisations and financial institutions). This approach is within the framework of the sector master plan (AAMP) that advocates for public, and private partnerships for inclusive growth in agriculture and agro-processing.

• Blended Finance Scheme:
• The blended finance scheme (BFS) is a financing instrument also targeting land reform beneficiaries, amongst others, to broaden access to affordable finance and ensure a critical mass of black commercial producers owning and controlling the agricultural value chains. The blended finance is offered in partnership with the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), the Land Bank and ABSA.
• Good Agricultural Practices Certification Programme/SA-GAP:
• The above-mentioned support programmes include the provision of marketing information, the marketing skills development programme, Good Agricultural Practices Certification Programme (SA-GAP), and the market linkages programme. The SA-GAP certification programme is aimed at providing assurance to potential buyers that the food produced by smallholder producers is safe for human consumption.
• Marketing of commodities:
• The marketing of commodities, as envisioned by the Integrated Agricultural Marketing Policy (IAMP), is to provide a range of agricultural marketing support services to enhance participation by all role players across the various agricultural value chains. The Department implements various marketing support programmes that are aimed at enabling producers, particularly smallholder producers to gain access to markets and accelerate the commercialization program.
• Regarding marketing information, the Department disseminates a wide range of market information to producers and other value chain players through the Marketing Information System (MIS), which is a web-based system that can be accessed on the Internet and through Cell phones. The information distributed through the system includes daily prices for agricultural products (fresh produce and grains) and weekly prices for meat, standards and grading information and contact information for various markets and market agents. This information is distributed to get producers to understand the prevailing market conditions to inform them about the existing alternative marketing channels and to bring to the fingertips of farmers into contact with information for various markets.
• The marketing skills development programme is being implemented continuously to empower producers on how the markets operate (mechanics) and to provide them with exposure to different marketing channels. e.g., fresh produce farmers are capacitated on fresh produce marketing and are also allowed to participate in the market exposure visit for them to meet with market management and agents. The goal is to empower producers with knowledge about markets and to allow them to meet with market managers and organize deals (on their own) with those markets.
• DoA also administers the preferential market access programme and issues import and export quotas and permits to traders to enable them to import and export certain agricultural products at reduced rates of duty. This system gives preference to previously disadvantaged companies and/or traders.

Please refer to Annexure A for additional information

[Annexure A (PQ1139)]

Import/export data between Russia/Ukraine and South Africa

South Africa is regarded as a net importer of wheat as local production is not sufficient to satisfy local consumption, resulting in a negative SSI (SSI<100). The average 10-year index value (2013 to 2022) of wheat is 55. The index value of wheat for 2023 is 58, which is slightly less (1,7%) than the index value of 2022 (59). Thus, local production is not sufficient to meet local consumption and imports are required.

 

Graph 1: Self-Sufficiency Index of Wheat, 2013 -2023

South Africa’s wheat deliveries for 2024: Q2 increased by 9.0% compared to the same period a year ago in 2023: Q2. Local demand for wheat increased by 17,8%, whilst imports increased by 14,0% in 2024: Q2 when compared to the previous quarter.

Graph 2: Wheat Deliveries, Imports, Exports and Local Demand

Graph 3: Wheat: RSA Imports for 2021/22 marketing season.

Graph 4: Wheat: RSA Imports for 2022/23 marketing season

Graph 5: Wheat: RSA Imports for 2023/24 marketing season

The pie charts above show the countries that South Africa trades with regarding the imports of wheat.

The war between Ukraine and Russia started in February 2022. South Africa has relatively weak agricultural import ties with both Russia and Ukraine. Russia is the 22^nd-largest agricultural products supplier to South Africa and Ukraine is the 84^th-largest. In value terms, agricultural imports from these two countries accounted for just 1,4% or R1,820 billion of South Africa’s total agricultural imports for 2023.

The major products both countries export to South Africa are wheat and sunflower oil. Over the past five marketing years (2019-2023), South Africa imported an average of 1,7 million tons of wheat per marketing year, roughly 40% of the annual wheat consumption needs. Of this, wheat imports from Russia and Ukraine averaged 17% and 1%, respectively. The significance of Russia in South Africa’s wheat imports basket may raise concerns about the near-term supplies. From this perspective, in the just-passed wheat marketing year of 2023/24 that ended in September 2024, South Africa has imported 1,9 million tons of wheat, of which Russia contributed 545 000 tons or 28% and Ukraine 0% (see graph 6). However, it is notable that the remaining balance for the year was sourced from various other countries such as Australia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, as is evident in Graph 5.

Graph 6: RSA Wheat: % imports from Russia and Ukraine

The Russia-Ukraine war has raised concerns about potential escalating food insecurity as the two countries are major exporters of grains, oilseeds, fertilizers, and crude oil products to international markets, further compounding this situation is the fact that Russia is the world’s top exporter of nitrogen fertilizers and second most important supplier of both potassium and phosphorus fertilizers. South Africa's domestic fertilizer production capacity is weak, in part, because of deteriorating capacity at SASOL and FOSKOR and the lack of some input minerals required to produce mixed fertilizers. As a result, South Africa imports about 80% of its annual fertilizer needs.

Since the start of the Ukraine and Russia war in February 2022, the industry started looking at other alternative sources of wheat imports such as Australia, Lithuania and Poland. This assisted in meeting the domestic needs of the country. The industry searches for suppliers of grains for the country globally for which there is a need and wheat is one of them. Guided by industry government will go ahead to provide the necessary permits.

The strategy is applied by allowing the industry to indicate the quantities needed and to search for countries where alternative sources can be located. The government then follows through with permits and necessary trade protocols to enable the buying of the crops. This is determined annually or seasonally taking into consideration the state of events in the globe and where the risks are.

Reply:

The responsible department in this regard is the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition – however, our response is as follows:

No, The matter of Botswana and Namibia blocking produce from South Africa is being addressed through both the technical and diplomatic channels. Two meetings have already been held with Botswana on 6 May and 6 December 2023, with a follow-up meeting being planned. The date of the next follow-up meeting has not yet been confirmed.

Multilateral meetings are being arranged between the Department of Agriculture (DoA), and relevant departments, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) to formulate a comprehensive South African response to this challenge. At a technical level, (DoA) is looking for methods to convince both Botswana and Namibians to change their stance.

Reply:

The Department is implementing measures to empower and mainstream designated groups, including women, in the sector. The National Policy on Comprehensive Producer Development Support (NPCPDS) which aims to regulate and guide the provision of support to the various categories of producers, stipulates and upholds conditions which enable all previously disadvantaged citizens and targeted groups (women, youth, people with disabilities, etc.) by ensuring that at least 50% of women, 40% of youth and 10% of persons with disabilities get supported.

On land access, the Ministry of Land Reform and Rural Development is implementing the Beneficiary Selection and Land Allocation Policy (BSLAP) which also regulates that at least 50% of the land must be allocated to women.

The Norms and Standards for the Inclusion of Designated Groups (NSDG) provide guidelines for setting measurable targets for departmental programmes to prioritize designated groups and to articulate precise targets. The NSDG advocates for departmental programmes to benefit at least 50% of women, 40% of youth and 10% of persons with disabilities and will be enforced through the Departmental Programmes Approval Committees.

From the three policies referenced above, the two departments will continue to coordinate activities to ensure that both land acquired and supported adhere to set targets.

Reply:

1. (a) The Department did not fail to return test samples within the prescribed 90-day period.

(b) (i),(ii),(iii) From 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2024:

• The Transboundary Animal Diseases (TAD) Diagnostic Laboratory is a South African National Accreditation System (SANAS)--accredited laboratory and tracks the turnaround time of testing for all submissions received by the laboratory. On average the results for submissions received for testing of samples collected from African buffalo are issued within 4 days of samples being received; no submission received by the TAD Diagnostic Laboratory exceeded the 90-day period.
• The Bacterial Serology Diagnostic Laboratory is a SANAS-accredited facility that monitors the turnaround time for all test submissions. Samples from African Buffalo typically receive results within 7 days. Between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2024, no submission took longer than 90 days to process.
• The Corridor Laboratory is a SANAS-accredited laboratory and the turnaround time is 10 days. We have included tests that went beyond the turnaround time for the period and indicated reasons for this. As may be seen this was mostly due to payment or information issues related to the client and not the laboratory. However, none of these exceeded 90 days.

(2)(a),(b),(c) The buffalo farm registration system is kept at the national level (former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development) and does not distinguish between land areas, farms, and reserves. Only the number of registered buffalo farms is captured.

The total number of registered buffalo farming units currently in Limpopo Province is 1658. The total number of registered buffalo farming units for the keeping of specific infection-free buffalo is 1577.

The number of specific infection-free buffalo farm units registered in Limpopo Province for the financial years 2021/2022 to 2024/2025 can be seen in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Number of new farms registered in Limpopo province for the keeping of buffalo.

Financial Year	Number of registrations
2021-2022	53
2022-2023	48
2023-2024	30
2024-2025	49
Total	180

(3)(a)(b) Surveys will include sampling by the veterinary authority according to a sampling plan designed beforehand and inspections will entail farm visits and inspection of animals for a specific reason which may result in actions such as sampling, treatment, and vaccination. The following should be noted while evaluating the information:

- Mpumalanga and Northern Cape have included all animal species, the information is not limited to buffaloes only.

- Mpumalanga province also provided information per district. See Table 3.

- Limpopo has provided information on buffalo farms only but indicated that they only have the capacity to conduct farm inspections when the farm is being registered as a farm for keeping buffalo and hardly ever during loading and offloading. No additional information was supplied.

(i),(ii),(iii) Please refer to Table 2 below:

Table 2: Number of Inspections and surveys on buffalo farms per province

Provinces	2021-22		2022-23		2023-24
	Inspection	Surveys	Inspection	Surveys	Inspection	Surveys
Eastern Cape	19	64	55	168	75	284
Free State	12	12	8	8	18	18
Gauteng	56	35	66	157	58	18
KwaZulu-Natal	24	1	22	10	26	16
Limpopo	No information received.
Mpumalanga	4807846	5095	4 473 827	7730	4 544 718	8771
Northern Cape	1231	496	2067	532	1390	512
North West	68	167	90	130	102	146
Western Cape	28	17	46	19	46	22

Information on surveillance per district was provided by Mpumalanga State Veterinary Services for all animal species as can be seen in Table 3 below.

Table 3: Surveillance conducted in all animal species in Mpumalanga per district.

District	2021/22	2022/23	2023/24
Ehlanzeni North	563	1197	1065
Ehlanzeni South	2776	2351	5438
Gert Sibande	711	1096	1292
Nkangala	1045	3086	976
Total	5 095	7 730	8 771

Information on inspections per district was provided by Mpumalanga State Veterinary Services for all animal species as can be seen in Table 3 below:

Table 4: Inspections conducted in all animal species in Mpumalanga per district.

District	2021/22	2022/23	2023/24
Ehlanzeni North	1890851	1539377	1575844
Ehlanzeni South	1708785	1714070	1648560
Gert Sibande	916903	868820	711833
Nkangala	291307	351560	608481
Total	4 807 846	4 473 827	4 544 718

Reply:

(1)(a),(b) The Department developed the National Policy on Comprehensive Producer Development Support there is no interdepartmental plan in place as yet, since the former Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) is still operating administratively as one Department.

(2) The Department is already participating through its partnerships with commodity organisations in initiatives similar to the ones referred to above. Further, provinces through their extension and advisory services organise events such as farmers’ information days whereby different agricultural role players are invited to participate.

The Department through its Sector Capacity and Development has a programme of adopting schools from poor communities and farm schools. These learners are then provided bursaries, and later, are enrolled into the DALRRD external bursary scheme for higher learning. A partnership with Stellenbosch University is used to expose girl children to oenology and viticulture. Unemployed youth graduates are placed at farms for experiential learning.

Reply:

(1)(a),(b) Veterinary movement permits issued for buffalo movements are always Red Cross permits.

(i),(ii),(iii) The number of Red Cross permits issued for buffalo movement per province is summarised in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Number of Red Cross permits for buffalo movement per province

Provinces	2021-2022	2022-23	2023-24
Eastern Cape	19	55	75
Free State	75	34	27
Gauteng	7	9	8
KwaZulu-Natal	01	2	18
Limpopo	No data	178	191
Mpumalanga	17	16	24
Northern Cape	45	23	20
North West	218	187	238
Western Cape	17	18	22

The Veterinary Service of Mpumalanga also provided information per district.

Table 2: Number of Red Cross permits issued in Mpumalanga for buffalo movement per district.

District	2021/22	2022/23	2023/24
Ehlanzeni North	5	4	15
Ehlanzeni South	6	1	3
Gert Sibande	2	7	2
Nkangala	4	4	4
Total	17	16	24

(2)(a),(b),(c) All provinces responded that there was full compliance with the 5 working days rule of issuing the movement permits.