Question NW2133 to the Minister of Transport

Share this page:

17 August 2018 - NW2133

Profile picture: De Freitas, Mr MS

De Freitas, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)With reference to (a) his department and (b) all the entities reporting to him, (i) what number of legal matters have been dealt with in each of the past three financial years and (ii) what are the details of the specified matters in each case; (2) With regard to the matters that were initiated by his department and/or entities reporting to him and another party, on what date was each matter launched and concluded in each instance; (3) (a) What number of matters are still outstanding, (b) what are the relevant details of the matters and (c) why are they still outstanding in each case; (4) What amount has been (a) budgeted in respect of each financial year and (b) spent on each matter in each financial year?

Reply:

REPLY : 1 (a) (i)

2015/2016 (11 matters)

2016/2017 (19 matters)

2017/2018 (12 matters)

1(a)(ii) Details of the specified matters in each case

 

MATTERS

DETAILS

15/16

16/17

17/18

DOT/Bowman/Ngidi and Morar

Proceedings to recover amounts paid to consultants without following procurement procedures

x

x

x

Tasima/ DOT, RTMC

Application by Tasima to enforce court orders, DOT and RTMC brought counter application to declare 2010 contract extension unlawful

x

x

x

Prodiba/DOT

Counter application by DOT to declare the 2010 contract extension unlawful

x

x

 

Central African Road Services / Minister of Transport and CBRTA

Review application to set aside the promulgations of the 2014 permit tariffs

 

x

x

Road Freight Association / Minister of Transport and CBRTA

Review application to set aside the promulgations of the 2014 permit tariffs

 

x

x

Marine Enquiry Kingfisher

Marine court of enquiry on the sinking of the Kingfisher boat in Port Elizabeth leading to loss of lives

x

x

 

DOT/Hlabisa

Charges related to over payment made on provincial road maintenance grant. A final written warning was given.

x

x

 

DOT/Vilana

Charges related to breach of supply chain processes, misuse of authority, and his decision on the appointment of the service provider related to the investor conference. He opted to resign.

x

x

 

DOT/Thwala

Disciplinary proceedings on the unlawful extension of the eNatis contract. Found guilty and has brought a review application to the labour court

x

x

x

MEC for Transport KZN/ Transport Appeal Tribunal

Challenge of the decisions of the Transport Appeal Tribunal to set aside the decisions of the Provincial Regulatory Entity

x

x

 

JV Ndorum/ Minister of Transport, Finance, Defence, Transport Eastern Cape

Summons by JV Ndorum for payment of extra works conducted at the Mthatha Airport

x

x

x

City of Cape Town / SANRAL & Minister of Transport

Review application by the City of Cape Town on the approval of tolling of the N1/2 Winelands toll routes

x

x

 

Levers Mabaso/DOT

Application to set aside the process followed in appointing the Chief Director : Legal Services

x

x

x

Marine Enquiry Witbank

Marine Court of enquiry on the sinking of a boat at the Witbank Dam that led to loss of lives

 

x

x

Popo Molefe / PRASA & Minister of Transport

Application to set aside the decision of the Minister to dismiss the Board of PRASA

 

x

x

Jinja Outdoor Advertising / SANRAL & DOT

Application to set aside the decision of SANRAL to remove a bill board over the N1 highway

 

x

x

#Unite Behind and Equal Education / Minister of Transport and PRASA

Application to set aside the decision of the Minister to appoint an interim Board of PRASA

 

x

x

Selepe / DOT

 

Application to set aside the decision of the Minister not to confirm the probation period of Mr Selepe

 

x

x

African Harvest/ Regulating Committee

Application to challenge the fixing of tariff permits

 

x

 

African Harvest / Minister of Transport and ACSA

Application to compel the Minister of Transport and ACSA to purchase the shares of the Minority shareholders in ACSA

     

 

2. The matter of DOT against Bowman, Ngidi and Morar inc was instituted on 15 March 2016 and it has not been concluded as yet, as the court process is still underway.

3. (a) Six (6) matters are still outstanding

Matter

(b) Details

(c) Status

DOT/Bowman, Ngidi and Morar

Proceedings to recover amounts paid to consultants without following procurement procedures

The matter is still progressing

DOT/Thwala

Disciplinary proceedings on the unlawful extension of the eNatis contract. Found guilty and has brought a review application to the labour court

Awaiting hearing date

Selepe/DOT

Application to set aside the decision of the Minister not to confirm the probation period of Mr Selepe

Preparation of answering affidavits

African Harvest/Minister of Transport and ACSA

Application to compel the Minister of Transport and ACSA to purchase the shares of the Minority shareholders in ACSA

The matter is still progressing

#Unite Behind and Equal Education/Minister of Transport and PRASA

Application to set aside the decision of the Minister to appoint an interim Board of PRASA

The matter is still progressing

JV Ndorum

Summons by JV Ndorum for payment of extra works conducted at the Mthatha Airport

The matter is still progressing

 

4. (a) The following amounts were budgeted for each financial year

2015/2016 (R9 364,000.00)

2016/2017 (R9 500,000.00)

2017/2018 (R8 986,000.00)

(b) Total spent on each matter

Matter

2015/2016

2016/2017

2017/2018

DOT/ Bowman, Ngidi and Morar

R82, 560.00

 

R81, 795.00

Tasima/ DOT, RTMC

R6, 694, 560.56

R8, 510, 948.47

R922, 637.46

Prodiba/DOT

R102, 600.00

R37, 620.00

 

Marine Enquiry Kingfisher

R2, 293, 858.79

R82 000.00

 

DOT/Hlabisa

R141, 900.00

R137, 500.00

 

DOT/Vilana

R297, 225.00

R337, 325.25

 

DOT/Thwala

R755, 410.10

R1, 743, 883.60

R348, 700.00

MEC for Transport KZN/ Transport Appeal Tribunal

R232, 862.83

R673, 356. 26

 

JV Ndorum/ DOT, Finance, Defence, Transport Eastern Cape

R139, 878.00

R137, 500.00

R107, 217.00

City of Cape Town / SANRAL & DOT

R837, 501.00

R517, 389.00

 

Levers Mabaso/DOT

R56, 943.00

 

R96, 444.00

Marine Enquiry Witbank

 

R3, 640, 159.14

 

African Harvest / Minister of Transport and ACSA

 

R445, 657.00

R2, 427, 744.00

Popo Molefe / PRASA & Minister of Transport

 

R98 000.00

R588, 282.00

Jinja Outdoor Advertising / SANRAL & DOT

 

R86 782.50

 

#Unite Behind & Equal Education / Minister of Transport & PRASA

     

Selepe / DOT

 

R157, 263.00)

 

R273, 703.00

African Harvest/ Regulating Committee

   

R485, 469.00

Central African Road Services / Minister of Transport and CBRTA

R235, 367.00

R349, 483.79)

 

Road Freight Association / Minister of Transport and CBRTA

R124, 254.00

R87, 425.98)

 

 

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

(1) (a) Not Applicable to ACSA

(b)(i) In the past three financial years ACSA has dealt with 36 (Thirty Six) litigation matters.

(ii) Please see attached spreadsheet.

Please note that the current members of the legal team have only been with ACSA for a period of 1 year 3 months at most. This report is therefore limited to the matters which they have dealt with and those where information has been readily available. There could therefore be litigation matters which are not included herein due to the fact that there is no information that is available on these matters.

(2) Please see annexed spreadsheet.

(3) Please see annexed spreadsheet.

(4) (a) The amounts budgeted in respect of each financial year are as follows: -

2015/ 2016- R9 000,000

2016/2017- R11 000,000

2017/2018- R21 000,000

(b) The amounts spent on legal expenses for the past three financial years are as follows:

2015/2016- R 22 147 833

2016/ 2017- R 30 106 855

2017/ 2018 - R 46 646 308

The legal expenses for the financial year 2017/ 2018 also include the expenses on the debt collection matters which the legal department has taken over from FinOps.

Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)

  1. (i) Seven.

(ii) (a) ATNS / Ndlovu : Urgent Application for dismissal /Interdict of Internal Disciplinary Process.

  1. ATNS / Ndlovu : Review Application to interdict the disciplinary hearing and appointment of the Chairperson of the Hearing,
  2. ATNS/Motsogi : Review Application of the CCMA Arbitration ruling in relation to ATA theft of assessment papers,
  3. ATNS/Ndlovu : to review the decision of the board to remove Mr. Ndlovu as the Board Director of ATNS,
  4. ATNS/T Mofuledu : Fraud.
  5. ATNS/ S Khan Recovery/ Breach of training Contract.

(2) (a) ATNS / Ndlovu : Urgent Application for dismissal /Interdict of Internal Disciplinary Process : 2018.

  1. ATNS / Ndlovu : Review Application to interdict the disciplinary hearing and appointment of the Chairperson of the Hearing : 2018.
  2. ATNS/Motsogi : Review Application of the CCMA Arbitration ruling in relation to ATA theft of assessment papers : 2018.
  3. ATNS/Ndlovu : to review the decision of the board to remove Mr. Ndlovu as the Board Director of ATNS : 2018.
  4. ATNS/T Mofuledu : Fraud : 2015.
  5. ATNS/ S Khan Recovery/ Breach of training Contract : 2015.

(3) (a) Seven

(b) (c) - ATNS / Ndlovu: Urgent Application for dismissal /Interdict of Internal Disciplinary Process: 2018 : The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing. The matter was postponed on 26 April 2018 to provide the Applicant (Mr. Ndlovu) to file his responding Affidavit. He argued that he was unable to respond to the Affidavit. The disciplinary hearing has been finalised which led to the employee being dismissed and the termination letter was handed to him on 25 May 2018.

  • ATNS / Ndlovu : Review Application to interdict the disciplinary hearing and appointment of the Chairperson of the Hearing : 2018 : The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing.Notice of Intention to Oppose has been filed.
  • ATNS/Motsogi : Review Application of the CCMA Arbitration ruling in relation to ATA theft of assessment papers : 2018 : The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing. Notice of intention to oppose has been filed.
  • ATNS/Ndlovu : to review the decision of the board to remove Mr. Ndlovu as the Board Director of ATNS : 2018 : The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing.
  • ATNS/T Mofuledu : Fraud : 2015 : There is a criminal and civil charge against the defendant. On 10 March 2017 the defendant cannot be found at the last known address as a result he cannot be served. The defendant will only be served upon his arrest.
  • ATNS/ S Khan Recovery/ Breach of training Contract : 2015 : Matters has been settled in Court in the amount of R85000.00.

(4)(a) Financial Year Actual Budget

2017/18 3 247 189 5 000 000

2016/17 3 932 315 8 637 289

2015/16 7 979 519 6 950 000

(b) ATNS / Ndlovu: R312 115.20.

ATNS/ NDLOVU: R154 477.97.

ATNS / MOTSOGI: Not Yet Invoiced.

ATNS/ MOFULEDU: R27300.00 and R44 118.00.

ATNS/ S KHAN: R103 466.80.

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

(1) (a) is not applicable. For questions (1) (b), (i) and (ii); (2); (3) (a), (b) and (c); (4) (a) and (b) please refer to ANNEXURE A: SACAA Response to National Assembly Question Number: 2133 by Mr M SF de Freitas (DA) on Legal Matters Instituted Against and by the SACAA.

Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)

  1. (i) Five legal matters have been dealt with by the RSR.

(ii) The details of the matters are as follow:

BMW vs RSR, 2015

The matter was a review application against the decision of the Board and RSR on the reduction of the permit validity period of the operators and lack of consultations with operators. The RSR defended the matter at the High Court and it was concluded in April 2017, with the order in favour of the RSR.

Sefora Kutumela vs RSR and Others, 2015

Review application by the applicant against an award of the CCMA confirming dismissal of the applicant by the RSR. Matter was lodged at the Labour Court. The matter appears to have been abandoned by the employee as it was never set down for review after the last court sitting in November 2015.

Gumede and others vs RSR, 2015

Litigation was initiated by the plaintiffs in a claim against the RSR for failure to vacate the premises rented in Bruma on time and effecting necessary reperations. The matter was settled out of court in April 2016.

Intengu Communications vs RSR, 2016

The complainant filed an arbitration complaint against the RSR claiming an amount of R505,030-27 for services rendered for the Women in Rail Conference which Intengu alleges they have performed. The RSR defended the matter at the arbitration proceedings and the complainant subsequently withdrew the dispute and the matter was settled between the parties in April 2018.

Transnet SOC Ltd vs RSR, 2016

Transnet lodged an urgent application against RSR following an unsuccessful permit application. The matter proceeded in court and the application by Transnet was dismissed.

  1. The RSR has not launched any legal matters against any party.
  1. All matters have been concluded. There is currently no active litigation against the RSR.
  1. The amount budgeted and spent for each financial year is as follow:
  1. Financial Year
  1. Amount budgeted
  1. Amount spent

2015/2016

R3,000,000-00

R699,767-50

2016/2017

R2,000,000-00

R1,105,089-00

2017/2018

R1,000,000-00

R717,143-00

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)

  1. (i) The number of legal matters that have been dealt with in each of the financial years are:
  • 2015/16 – 25 matters
  • 2016/17 – 40 matters
  • 2017/18 – 52 matters

(ii) The matters listed below are matters in respect of which the counter party mentioned has ommenced legal proceedings either in court or through alternative dispute resolution, for example, arbitration proceedings. Note that this list exludes items where PRASA initiated legal matters.

   

Year

(ii) Details of matters

15/16

16/17

17/18

Prodigy Business Services

Claiming for alleged failure to pay for services rendered.

 

X

X

Bagale Consulting

Claiming for alleged failure to pay for services rendered during 2010.

X

X

X

Labour disputes,

Including mass dismissal dispute by National Transport Movement.

X

X

X

Rail & Road Assessing Services

Application was launched for dismissal of action.

X

X

X

Lenkwane Cleaning Services

For alleged breach of contract.

X

X

X

Proconse Consulting Engineers

For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.

X

X

X

Various insurance claims

For personal injuries

X

X

X

Bombardier Africa Alliance -

Delay claims allegedly occasioned by a change request and a NUMSA strike.

X

X

X

Algee Medics and Fire

For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.

X

X

X

Tiro Projects -

Claim for alleged failure to pay for professional services rendered.

X

X

X

ME Mlungisi.

Alleged unlawful arrest

X

X

X

National Force Security

For alleged unlawful cancellation of security contract.

X

X

X

Transportation and Traffic Technology Africa

For alleged failure to pay for professional services rendered.

X

X

X

Madisha & Associates -

Claim for alleged breach of contract.

X

X

X

Baran Projects SA -

Claim for alleged failure to pay for goods sold and delivered.

X

X

X

Koor Dindar Moti Quantity Services -

Claim for alleged failure to pay for services rendered / work performed.

X

X

X

The New Age -

Claim for alleged failure to pay for goods sold and delivered.

X

X

X

Sbahle Safety consultants

For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.

X

X

X

Be My Guest Trading

For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.

X

X

X

Rasakanya Builders CC -

Claim for alleged failure to pay for cleaning services rendered.

X

X

X

Business Pledge -

Claim for alleged failure to pay in terms of an agreement.

X

X

X

Phumelela Fleet Operations (Pty) Ltd -

Claim for alleged failure to pay services rendered, viz Vehicle Management Tracking System.

X

X

X

Enterprise Technology Solutions (Pty) Ltd -

Declaratory order setting aside cancellation of rental and loan of certain equipment agreement.

X

X

X

Siyaya Rail Solutions -

Claim for alleged failure to pay for professional services rendered.

X

X

X

Daveglen 371 (Pty) Ltd t/a Security International -

Claim in respect of Statutory increases determined by the Security Industry.

X

X

 

Siyaya db Consulting Engineers -

Claim for alleged failure to pay for services rendered.

 

X

X

EE Meishwine vs Autopax,

Claiming for loss of support.

 

X

X

Madisha & Associates CC -

Alleged early termination of contract.

 

X

X

Raamba Engineering Enterprises CC and JRACCE (PTY) LTD -

Subcontractor work

 

X

X

DBI -

Change in scope and budget.

 

X

X

MMQS-MACE (PTY) LTD -

Claim for work done

 

X

 

OTIS (PTY) LTD

Variation on contract.

 

X

 

VISION AFRICA as part of MMQS-MACE (PTY) LTD -

Alleged work done.

 

X

X

Pro-Serve Consulting -

Alleged work done.

 

X

X

Kamo Architects -

Alleged services rendered

 

X

 

Kamo Construction -

Alleged services rendered

 

X

 

Siyangena

interest.

 

X

X

Lebepe Quantity Surveyors -

Alleged services rendered

 

X

X

Brouwers Property Development cc –

Penalties

 

X

 

David Underwood/Sharpline Graphics -

Claim for breach of contract

   

X

Mtiya Dynamics -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

Tshepo Nkwana -

Unlawful deduction from pension fund payout

   

X

DC Worst Composite (PTY) LTD vs Tecuvert & PRASA -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

DC Worst Composite (PTY) LTD vs Baraka Eng & PRASA -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

DC Worst Composite (PTY)LTD vs Ecoan Eng & PRASA -

Alleged services rendered

 

-

X

Sebenza Shipping and Forwarding -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

Fabor Engineering Products (PTY) LTD -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

Nkambule and Associates -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

Superway Constructions vs PRASA -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

Theeunissen J  vs PRASA & others

Claim for injuries/unlawful arrest

   

X

Phaahlana Mahlako Investments -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

Boyisa Trading Enterprise -

Alleged services rendered

   

X

  1. Matters initiated by PRASA

Matter

Date launched

Status

Swifambo Rail Leasing

June 2016

In progress

Swifambo Rail Leasing – Appeal by Swifambo

June 2017

In progress

Siyangena Technologies

December 2015

In progress

Siyangena Technologies

March 2018

In progress

Compass Insurance

July 2015

In progress

Eastern Cape : Department of Health

January 2011

In progress

National Department of Public Works

April 2011

In progress

Arbour Town

February 2011

In progress

F Gastin

September 2016

In progress

J Phungula

December 2015

In progress

D Mthimkhulu

November 2015

In progress

M Mngomezulu

December 2016

In progress

Mazwe Financial Services

April 2016

In progress

Independent Development Corporation (IDC)

November 2016

In progress

  1. (a)There are twelve (12) matters outstanding where PRASA have initiated legal action:

Matter

(b) Detail

(c) Status

Swifambo Rail Leasing

In July 2017, the Local Division of the Gauteng High court ruled in favour of PRASA to set aside an agreement in the amount of R3.5 billion with Swifambo Rail Leasing for the sale and purchase locomotives dated 25 March 2013. PRASA had paid Swifambo an amount of R2.6 billion.

 

The matter has been taken on appeal. Awaiting date from Supreme Court of Appeal

Siyangena Technologies

Review of award of the tender and/or contract to supply and install ISAMS .

In progress

Compass Insurance

Claims against an insurer of a contractor in respect of the non-performance of contractor that has since been liquidated.

In progress

Eastern Cape : Department of Health

Claim for alleged failure to pay for Professional Services

In progress

National Department of Public Works

Claim for alleged failure to pay for Professional Services

In progress

Arbour Town

Claim for alleged failure to pay for Professional Services

In progress

F Gastin

Claim for monies paid where no services were rendered and the contract was irregular

Awaiting hearing date

J Phungula

Claim for payments made to an employee who was employed on the basis of misrepresentation

Awaiting trial date

D Mthimkhulu

Claim for payments made to an employee who was employed on the basis of misrepresentation

Awaiting trial date

M Mngomezulu

Claim for salaries paid when employee was absent without leave of absence..

Awaiting trial date

Mazwe Financial Services

Claim of monies erroneously paid in respect of unpaid loans advanced to employees

Assessing detail of quantum of claim

Independent Development Corporation (IDC)

Refusal to pay gurantee to PRASA on a contractor that failed to remedy breach of provisions.

Process to complete legal matters take time

  1. The matters in legal do not have an allocated budget per individual case. Spending on each case also requires detailed analysis as legal representatives deal with more than one matter. PRASA also has a number of law firms that represent the entitiy.

Legal Fees PRASA

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

  1. Budget

R36,099 million

R35 million

R36 million

  1. Spend

R69,643 million

R49,424 million

R60,874 million

 

Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)

  1. (b) The Ports Regulator did not have any legal matters that were dealt with except for those under the Tribunal function which is one of its programmes.
  2. N/A
  3. N/A
  4. N/A

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

In 2016/2017 SAMSA had a litigious matter -Patrick Eric Deale t/a Deale Attorneys v SAMSA Case No. 4290/2017- the claim was in respect unpaid legal fees. The matter was settled in the amount R35 677.44.

SAMSA currently has one pending litigious matter. S Gool v SAMSA sued out the Regional Court for Regional Division of Western Cape Case No.616/2018. The claim is for amounts allegedly owed to Mr Gool for work he did in respect of feasibility study. The amount being claimed R 280 000.00. The matter is outstanding.

(b) The Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (C-BRTA)

  1. 2015/16 - 7 Matters

(i) 2016/17 - 7 matters

(i) 2017/18 - 10 matters

(ii) details of the specified matters in each case

Financial Year 2015/16

Commencement date

Title of the Matter

Fact of the Matter

14 September 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTA

review application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs

16 April 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Dermit O Brein // C-BRTA

Court Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.

10 September 2016

C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading and Projects (PTY) LTD

Recovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.

10 June 2015

Florence Lebyane// C-BRTA

Claim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.

25 June 2015

Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTA

Review and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.

16 January 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Muranga and Others// C-BRTA

Claim for breach of employment contract.

06 July 2015

RSA-Lesotho Cross–Border Route Corridor Committee//Minister of Transport and other

Declaring a directive invalid and setting it aside.

(ii) details of the specified matters in each case

Financial Year 2016/17

Commencement Date

Title of the Matter

Fact of the Matter

1 September 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Central African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTA

Review application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.

14 September 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTA

Review application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.

16 April 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Dermit O Brein // C-BRTA

Court Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.

10 September 2016

C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading and Projects (PTY) LTD

Recovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.

10 June 2015

(carried over from previous financial year)

Florence Lebyane// C-BRTA

Claim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.

25 June 2015

(carried over from previous financial year)

Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTA

Review and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.

16 January 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Muranga and Others// C-BRTA

Claim for breach of employment contract.

(ii) details of the specified matters in each case

Financial Year 2017/18

Commencement date

Title of the Matter

Fact of the Matter

8 April 2017

Jj Trauernicht // Cross Border Road Transport Agency-BRTA, Amos Lelope

The applicant in this matter was involved in an accident with an RTI officer. The applicant drove into the RTI office as he crossed the road.

14 September 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Central African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTA

Review application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.

16 April 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTA

Review application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.

16 April 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Dermit O Brein // C-BRTA

Court Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.

10 September 2016

(carried over from previous financial year)

C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading and Projects (PTY) LTD

Recovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.

10 June 2015

(carried over from previous financial year)

Florence Lebyane// C-BRTA

Claim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.

25 June 2015

(carried over from previous financial year)

Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTA

Review and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.

16 January 2014

(carried over from previous financial year)

Muranga and Others// C-BRTA

Claim for breach of employment contract.

5 April 2017

Reggie Williams and Other// C-BRTA

Illegality regarding the migration of the road transport inspectorate to RTMC.

6 November 2017

C-BRTA// National Cross Border Taxi Association and others

Urgent interdict to remove the protesting taxi association from at the Agencies premises and to prevent them from continuing or returning at a later date.

  1. The details of the matters initiated by the C-BRTA are in the table below :

Title of Matter

Launch Date

Date Concluded

C-BRTA//Shavana Ni Vukosi

10 September 2015

Pending

C-BRTA// National Cross Border Taxi Association and others

6 November 2017

6 November 2017

  1. (a) Seven (7) matters are outstanding.

(b) Title of the Matter

Fact of the Matter

(c) Reason outstanding

Jj Trauernicht // Cross Border Road Transport Agency-BRTA, Amos Lelope

The applicant in this matter was involved in an accident with an RTI officer. The applicant drove into the RTI office as he crossed the road.

Pending, dependent on court processes

Central African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTA

Review application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.

 

Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTA

Review application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.

 

Dermit O Brein // C-BRTA

Court Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.

 

C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading And Projects(PTY) LTD

Recovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.

 

Florence Lebyane// C-BRTA

Claim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.

 

Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTA

Review and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.

 
  1. (a) The following amounts were budgeted for in each of the financial years:
  • 2015/16 – R3,588,697
  • 2016/17 – R4,019,341
  • 2017/18 – R4,750,000
  1. Total spent on each matter is as per the table below:

No

Title of the Matter

2015/2016

(R)

2016/2017

(R)

2017/2018

(R)

1

Central African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTA

736,930

162,415

-

2

Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTA

623,554

42,806

315,385

3

Dermit O Brein // C-BRTA

-

-

-

4

C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading And Projects (PTY) LTD

-

-

-

5

Florence Lebyane// C-BRTA

21,913

34,754

64,845

6

Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTA

57,523

-

-

7

Jj Trauernicht // C-BRTA, Amos Lelope

-

-

167,922

8

RSA- Lesotho Cross –Border Route Corridor Committee//Minister of Transport and other

543,386

-

-

9

Muranga and Others// Cross Border Road Transport Agency

30,485

1,635

90,844

10

Reggie Williams and Other// Cross Border Road Transport Agency

-

-

-

11

C-BRTA// National Cross Border Taxi Association and others

-

-

36,385

  1. (b) The Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA)

(i) 5 Legal matters

(ii)

Details of the specified matter

Name of Litigation

Nature of Litigation

Fines for U & Another

Litigant seeking to review decisions taken by representation officers in terms of section 18 of the AARTO Act.

Edwards Matter

The Applicant in this matter requests the court to order the Agency and Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (joined as the second respondent in the matter) to issue him with his driving licence and licence disk in respect of various vehicles under the circumstances where the Applicant has been served with an enforcement order.

Howard Dambovsky v Department of Transport and others

Mr Dembovsky has lodged this application to, amongst others; contest the constitutionality of some of the provisions in the AARTO Act as well as its Regulations. He alleges that those identified provisions of the Act contravene in the main, the right to a fair trial as enshrined in the Constitution. This application also seeks to request cancellation of all infringement notices in an instance where infringers have elected to be tried in court but have still not been served with summonses for a period over 18 months, as prescribed by the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Mpanza Matter

Review application of the AARTO divisions.

CANCOM

Review application of the AARTO divisions.

(2) Matter launched

Name of Litigation

Launched

Concluded

Fines for U & Another

2013

2017

Edwards Matter

2017

2017

Howard Dambovsky v Department of Transport and others

2016

Abandoned

CANCOM

2014

2016

(3) (a) 1

(b) Constitutionality of AARTO

(c) Matter Is still at the pleading stage.

(4)

 
  1. Budgeted
  1. Spent

2015/16

R 5 mil

R 800k

2016/17

R 5 mil

R 3.5 mil

2017/18

R 5 mil

R 3 mil

(b) The Road Traffic Management Corporation

(i) 2015/16 – 6 Matters

(i) 2016/17 - 3 matters

(i) 2017/18 - 4 matters

FINANCIAL YEARS

  1. MATTERS/ DETAIL

(2) MATTERS INITIATED

2015/2016

2016/2017

2017/2018

WAYMARK INFOTECH (PTY) LTD vs RTMC

  • Waymark appointed to develop and install an Enterprise Recourse Planning System (ERP).
  • Waymark instituted legal action against the RTMC in 2010 for the outstanding Contract price,
  • The RTMC successfully defended the matter as the Court ordered absolution of the instance because Waymark failed to proof their case.
  • 23 May 2014 Waymark again instituted legal action against the RTMC.

TIJGER VALLEI (PTY) LTD & OTHERS vs RTMC

  • Tijger Vallei 1 (Pty) Ltd, Carslwald Gardens (Pty) Ltd, Jamwa Beleggings (Pty) Ltd, Awaiz @ 5th Avenue Investments CC and Clifton Dunes Investments 166 (Pty) Ltd, issued summons to recover purported outstanding lease amounts.
  • RTMC defended the matter
  • The complainants abandoned claim
  • Matter Closed

CIVAIR vs RTMC

  • CIVAIR issued summon against the RTMC for payment of helicopter services rendered during April 2013.
  • The RTMC defended the matter
  • Parties Settled the matter out of court
  • Matter Closed

INTERCAPE FERREIRA INTERLINER vs RTMC

  • Intercape Ferreira Interliner issued summons against the RTMC, claiming that it suffered damages as a result of the operations of the NTPU and statement made by the erstwhile Acting CEO
  • RTMC defended that matter and file its plea
  • Complainant abandoned matter
  • Matter Closed

TASIMA (PTY) LYD VS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND THE RTMC

  • Tasima brought an urgent application to uphold and enforce, the terms of various extant court orders on the basis of contempt.
  • RTMC and the Department opposed the application and brought counter application to contest the unlawful extension of the agreement in 2010

PJ BADENHORST VS RTMC

  • The complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.
  • RTMC opposed the action and filed its plea.
  • Complainant abandoned matter
  • Matter Closed

BLOEMFONTEIN SHOW VS RTMC

  • BloemfonteinShow organisers issued summons against the RTMC
  • Parties settled matter
  • Matter Closed

MAVUNGA vs RTMC

• The complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.

• RTMC opposed the action and filed its plea.

• Litigation Ongoing

JPSA vs DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

  • JPSA bring application to contest AARTO Procedure
  • RTMC Opposed the application
  • Plaintiff Abandoned Application
  • Matter Closed

All 2016/2017 matters excluding matters marked ‘Closed’

REKWELE CHAUFEUR DRIVE (PTY(LTD) vs RTMC

  • Rekwele issued summons to claim purported outstanding costs for rental of vehicles by the RTMC.
  • RTMC defended the matter and filed a special plea.
  • Litigation Ongoing

NKWATSI and 5 Others vs RTMC

  • The complainants issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.
  • RTMC opposed the action
  • Litigation Ongoing

PUTCOMAFANI VS RTMC

  • Service provider issued summons against the RTMC for breach of contract – Repudiation.
  • The RTMC defended the matter
  • Litigation Ongoing

TASIMA (PTY) LYD VS RTMC

  • Application to enforce Section 197 of Labour Relations Act
  • RTMC opposed application
  • Litigation Ongoing

Pre- 2015/2016

MOHLALENG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTY (LTD)

  • RTMC instituted legal action against Mohlaleng for the outstanding deposit as well as for all expenses the RTMC incurred as a result of the RTMC relocating offices from Silver Lakes
  • Mohlaleng defended matter
  • Litigation Ongoing

2015 / 2016

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND THE RTMC vs TASIMA

  • Department and RTMC bring counter application to the declare 2010 extention of Tasima Agreement Unlawfull
  • 30 April 2015

RTMC vs TASIMA

  • RTMC bring urgent application agianst Tasima to enforce Constitutional Court order of 9 November 2016
  • March 2017
  • Litigation Ongoing

2017/2018

RTMC vs TELKOM

  • RTMC bring Urgent Application to order Telkom to seize service suspension
  • 18 October 2017

RTMC vs TELKOM

  • RTMC bring Urgent Application to order Telkom to seize service suspension
  • 25 October 2017

(3)

MATTERS OUTSTANDING

DETAILS

REASON / STATUS

WAYMARK INFOTECH (PTY) LTD vs RTMC

• Waymark appointed to develop and install an Enterprise Recourse Planning System (ERP).

• Waymark instituted legal action against the RTMC in 2010 for the outstanding Contract price,

• The RTMC successfully defended the matter as the Court ordered absolution of the instance because Waymark failed to proof their case.

• 23 May 2014 Waymark again instituted legal action against the RTMC.

  • RTMC appeal to CC (Counter Claim)
  • Awaiting directions from CC
  • Litigation on-going

MOHLALENG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTY (LTD)

• RTMC instituted legal action against Mohlaleng for the outstanding deposit as well as for all expenses the RTMC incurred as a result of the RTMC relocating offices from Silver Lakes

• Mohlaleng defended matter

  • Set down for Trail - 19 February 2019
  • Litigation on-going

MAVUNGA vs RTMC

  • The complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.
  • RTMC opposed the action and filed its plea.

• Litigation on-going

REKWELE CHAUFEUR DRIVE (PTY(LTD) vs RTMC

• Rekwele issued summons to claim purported outstanding costs for rental of vehicles by the RTMC.

• RTMC defended the matter and filed a special plea.

• Litigation on-going

NKWATSI and 5 Others vs RTMC

• The complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.

• RTMC opposed the action and filed its exception and plea.

• Litigation on-going

PUTCOMAFANI VS RTMC

• Service provider issued summons against the RTMC for breach of contract – Repudiation.

• The RTMC defended the matter

• Litigation on-going

RTMC vs TELKOM

• RTMC bring Urgent Application to order Telkom to seize service suspension

• Telkom appealed final order

• Litigation on-going

RTMC vs TASIMA

    • RTMC bring urgent application agianst Tasima to enforce Constitutional Court order of 9 November 2016
  • Tasima Appealed to SCA and CC
  • Matter in CC 8 March 2018

• Awaiting CC judgement

TASIMA vs RTMC

• Application to enforce Section 197 of Labour Relations Act

• RTMC opposed application

• RTMC appealed to Labour Appeals Court (LAC)

• Awaiting LAC date

• Litigation on-going

(4)

FINANCIAL YEAR

BUDGET

MATTER

EXPENDITURE

2015/2016

R5 000 000 adjusted to R14 200 000

  • Waymark Infotech (PTY) LTD vs RTMC
  • TASIMA (PTY) LTD VS Department Of Transport and RTMC

R 90,820.62

R13 988,280.40

2016/2017

R5 500 000

  • Waymark Infotech (Pty) Ltd Vs RTMC
  • Mohlaleng Investment Holdings Pty LTD
  • Tasima (Pty) Lyd Vs Department Of Transport And The Rtmc
      • RTMC VS TELKOM
      • JPSA vs DEPARTMENT
  • PJ Badenhorst VS RTMC
  • Mavunga vs RTMC

R1 918 052.28

R70 090.80

R8 203 642.56

R166 405.20

R18973.39

2017/2018

R 5 700 000

  • Waymark Infotech (PTY) LTD vs RTMC
  • Mohlaleng Investment Holdings Pty (LTD)
  • TASIMA (PTY) LYD VS Department Of Transport and RTMC
  • RTMC vs TASIMA
  • TASIMA (PTY) LYD VS RTMC
  • RTMC vs TELKOM x2
  • NKWATSI and 5 Others vs RTMC
  • Rekwele Chaufeur Drive (PTY(LTD) vs RTMC
  • PUTCOMAFANI VS RTMC

R230 566.34

R5908.62

R7 508 686.91

R74530.49

R37128

(1) (b) The Road Accident Fund (RAF) dealt with 233 Legal matters in past 3 Financial Years excluding litigation matters under the RAF Act, No. 56 of 1996)

(i) 2015/16 - 80 Matters (53 Legal Unit and 27 Employee Relations Unit)

(i) 2016/17 - 67 matters (48 Legal Unit and 19 Employee Relations Unit)

(i) 2017/18 - 86 matters (54 Legal Unit; 29 Employee Relations Unit and 3 Corporate Secretariat)

No.

(ii) details of the specified matters in each case

 

Legal Unit

 

2015-16

1

L Dreyer brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

2

C Mounton brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

3

M Mahlatsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

4

Mithethe Trading Enterprise instituted an action in respect of alleged breach of contract.

5

Empower Financial Services (Pty) Ltd instituted an action in respect of alleged breach of contract.

6

M Kubjana & Others brought a legislative challenge in respect of Regulation 3 to the Act.

7

Consolidated matters: M Lingenfenlder, S du Toit, S Renken, E Taljaard, P Uys, J Du Preez, L Fulscher, J Renken, M Van Der Merwe, E Retief, W Du Preez, S Gresch brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 18(1)(a)(i), 18(1)(b) and 18(2) of the Act.

8

M Kubjana & Others brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

9

Consolidated matters: M Lingenfenlder, S du Toit, S Renken, E Taljaard, P Uys, J Du Preez, L Fulscher, J Renken, M Van Der Merwe, E Retief, W Du Preez, S Gresch brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections18(1)(a)(i), 18(1)(b) and 18(2) of the Act.

10

H Matidza instituted action claiming damages as per the judgement in his favour. The RAF appealed the judgement awarding punitive cost against the claims handler.

11

RAF instituted action to recover debt from MSMM Attorneys.

12

RAF instituted action to recover debt from TC Beea.

13

RAF instituted action to recover debt from Ke Yona Business Information Management Solutions.

14

C F Jeftha brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 19(g) and s 21 of the Act.

15

R & M Combrink brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

16

L Mlenga logded a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to file copies.

17

Towell & Groenewaldt Attorneys instituted action in relation to the RAF Supply Chain Management process.

18

C Degneer brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.

19

C Kgoale brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.

20

Mac Ndhlovu Attorneys instituted action in relation to the RAF supply chain management process

21

T & N Assessors instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

22

RAF instituted action against A Ramavhunga to recover debt.

23

RAF instituted action against Mashishi Attorneys to recover debt.

24

RAF instituted action against Meintjes Petzer Attorneys to recover debt.

25

L J Moeketsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

26

D De Jager, brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

27

J T Tshoba brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

28

Consolidated matters: MP Mangena,P T Motsena,A A Mbonana,H M Mahlangu,N J Mazibuko,J M Mashibini,F A Khuzwayo, M L Letsoalo, P M De Esclana, N Momberg, N Archary, G J Bothma, N Momberg (Snr), CJ Knight, M J Motloung, S Ngunyula, T J Masuku, R D Molefe, R Werner, A Swanepoel, E Fourie, M M Masenya, PN Majela, MM Madonsela, RE Fereira brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 & 5 to the Act.

29

N P Fakude and forty-six others brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a), and 21 of the Act.

30

Y Chotia brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

31

Z G Magayiana brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

32

J N Khoza obo A Chabangu brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.

33

M Katse brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1) and 17(4) (a)(c), and the regulations.

34

Zahwa

Entertainment instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

   
 

Legal Unit

 

2015-16

36

A R Fogwill

instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

37

King & Queen Tour instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

38

Mashishi & Meyers Assessor instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

39

Booyens Du Preez & Boshoff Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

40

Caveonet Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Becker & Mzimela Investigations instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

41

M T F Consultants (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

42

B Mbalu brought a labour dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

43

N Oliphant lodged a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to records.

44

R Devchander obo V instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

45

G O Simelane instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

46

J M Moyo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

47

M Gwebityala instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

48

M L Malebo v Searle Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

49

V Khumalo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

50

M D Faes instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

51

M V Netshipale instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

52

HB Molefe Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

53

Brian Hitchings, NO obo S R Mlangeni instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

 

2016/17 Financial Year

1

RAF instituted action to recover debt from MSMM Attorneys.

2

RAF instituted action to recover debt from TC Beea.

3

RAF instituted action to recover debt from Ke Yona Business Information Management Solutions.

4

C F Jeftha brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 19(g) and 21 of the Act.

5

L Mlenga logded a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to file copies.

6

Towell & Groenewaldt Attorneys instituted action in relation to the RAF Supply Chain Management process.

7

C Degneer brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.

8

C Kgoale brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.

9

J S Thokoane & twenty others instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

10

T & N Assessors instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

11

RAF instituted action against A Ramavhunga to recover debt.

12

RAF instituted action against Mashishi Attorneys to recover debt.

13

RAF instituted action against Mabunda Attorneys to recover debt.

14

RAF instituted action against Meintjes Petzer Attorneys to recover debt.

15

L J Moeketsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

16

D De Jager, brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

17

J T Tshoba brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

18

Consolidated matters: MP Mangena,P T Motsena,A A Mbonana,H M Mahlangu,N J Mazibuko,J M Mashibini,F A Khuzwayo, M L Letsoalo, P M De Esclana, N Momberg, N Archary, G J Bothma, N Momberg (Snr), C J Knight, M J Motloung, S Ngunyula, T J Masuku, R D Molefe, R Werner, A Swanepoel, E Fourie, M M Masenya, PN Majela, MM Madonsela, RE Fereira brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 & 5 to the Act

19

N P Fakude and forty-six others and Thokoane & twenty others brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.

20

Y Chotia brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

21

Z G Magayiana brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

22

G W De Waal brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

23

J N Khoza obo A Chabangu brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act

24

M Katse brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1) and 17(4) (a)(c), and the regulations.

28

Zahwa

Entertainment instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

26

W J Mkhonza & Associates

instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

27

A R Fogwill

instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

28

King & Queen Tour instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

29

Mashishi & Meyers Assessor instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

30

Booyens Du Preez & Boshoff Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

31

Caveonet Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Becker & Mzimela Investigations instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

32

M T F Consultants (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

33

B Mbalu brought a labour dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

34

N Oliphant lodged a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to records

35

R Devchander obo V instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

36

G O Simelane instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

37

J M Moyo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

38

M Gwebityala instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

39

M L Malebo v Searle Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

40

V Khumalo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

41

M D Faes instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

42

M V Netshipale instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

43

HB Molefe Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

44

Brian Hitchings, NO obo S R Mlangeni instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

 

2017/18 Financial Year

1

Bokwa Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

2

Mohlala Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

3

F Schutte Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

4

L E Lopedi Ford brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17, 17(A) and 26 of the Act.

5

F Galant brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17, 17(A) and 26 of the Act.

6

M Venter brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(4)(a), (c), (A) and (B) of the Act.

7

Salani Marketing & Projects instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

8

Adv. N Krige instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

9

AN Jamotte instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

10

Askew Grindlay Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

11

L Grundling instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

12

TR &S Pillay instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

13

K Malao Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

14

TB Nsibande instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

15

Van Zyl Le Roux Inc & Grimbeek Van Rooyen Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

16

N N Ndamse instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

17

Synko Projects (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

18

JN Chiliza instituted action challenging the principle of litis contestatio.

19

Mac Ndhlovu Attorneys instituted a further action in relation to the RAF supply chain management process.

20

J S Thokoane & twenty others instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

21

T & N Assessors instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

22

RAF instituted action against A Ramavhunga to recover debt.

23

RAF V Mashishi Attorneys recovery of debt.

24

RAF instituted action against Mabunda Attorneys to recover debt.

25

L J Moeketsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

26

D De Jager, brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

27

J T Tshoba brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.

 

Consolidated matters: M L Letsoalo, N Momberg, T J Masuku, M M Masenya brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 & 5 to the Act

28

N P Fakude and forty-six others and Thokoane & twenty others brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.

29

Y Chotia brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

30

Z G Magayiana brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

31

G W De Waal brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.

32

J N Khoza obo A Chabangu brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.

33

M Katse brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1) and 17(4) (a)(c), and the regulations.

34

Zahwa

Entertainment instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

35

W J Mkhonza & Associates

instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

36

A R Fogwill

instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

37

King & Queen Tour instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

38

Mashishi & Meyers Assessor instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

39

Booyens Du Preez & Boshoff Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

40

Caveonet Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Becker & Mzimela Investigations instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

41

M T F Consultants (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

42

B Mbalu brought a labour dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

43

N Oliphant lodged a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to records

44

R Devchander obo V instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

45

G O Simelane instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.

46

J M Moyo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

47

M Gwebityala instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

48

M L Malebo v Searle Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

49

V Khumalo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

50

M D Faes instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

51

M V Netshipale instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

52

HB Molefe Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

53

Brian Hitchings, NO obo S R Mlangeni instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.

 

Corporate Secretariat

 

2017/18 Financial Year

1

Dr. T Kommal initiated a governance dispute in respect of governance.

2

Dr. T Kommal initiated a governance dispute in respect of governance.

3

Dr. T Kommal initiated a governance dispute in respect of governance.

 

Employee Relation Unit

 

2015/16 Financial Year

1

C. Maswanganye instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of demotion.

2

Z. Nduneni instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.

3

L. Mashilo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.

4

SATAWU on behalf of Mahlotja and three others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion

5

SATAWU on behalf of five others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.

6

SATAWU obo Noxolo Ntongolo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

7

R. Johnson instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

8

D. Chelopo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

9

D. Golele instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

10

M. Moseneke instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

11

SATAWU obo of S. Munsammy instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

12

L. Pillay instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

13

P. Motswiri instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of suspension.

14

D. Lekganyane instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

15

T. Mafanya instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

16

L. Myataza instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

17

P. Kgosiyadira instituted an unfair labour practise dispute in respect of benefits.

18

B. Mbalu instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of misconduct and incompatibility.

19

G Mahlangu instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

20

K. Maitisa instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of dismissal on misconduct and dishonesty.

21

W. Mokubyane

instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of Task Grading.

22

D. Mokolobate

instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of review of CCMA award.

23

P. Mathebula & B. Mankwane

instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of review of CCMA award.

24

Moseneke and other

instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of review of CCMA award on condonation.

25

 
 

2016/17 Financial Year

1

P Hlungwani instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of demotion.

2

D Maluleke instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of demotion.

3

SATAWU obo Ngwenyama and four others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.

4

SATAWU obo Sabasa, Johanna and eight others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.

5

M. Jozana instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of equal pay for equal work of value.

6

T Mazibuko instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.

7

A. Lenders instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal

8

M Sibanyoni instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

9

R Mapumulo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

10

SATAWU obo Mfanafuthi Dlamini instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

11

D. Creighton instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

12

T Magoro instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

13

T Magoro instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

14

S Gona instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

15

SATAWU on behalf of Mahlomotja and three others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

16

Xolisa Mgqamqo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

17

P. Ramdial instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action short of dismissal.

18

SATAWU obo L. Matodzi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.

19

L. Peter instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

20

G. Qobeka instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

21

L. Peter instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

 

2017/18 Financial Year

1

A Mhlauli instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

2

SATAWU obo members instituted an unfair labour practice in respect of disciplinary action short of dismissal.

3

NUMSA obo members instituted a dispute in relation to a collective agreement.

4

NUMSA obo members instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.

5

J. Matimela instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.

6

N. Ntambi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

7

L. Gxanashe instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

8

M. Mphupu instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

9

L. Moima instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

10

Z. Dangwana instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

11

A. Motsamai instituted an unfair labour practice in respect of disciplinary action demotion.

12

M. Seku instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.

13

B. Mkhwanazi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

14

SATAWU obo Sebenzile Mlaza instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

15

R. Mokgoko instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.

16

P Ngwasheng instituted an unfair labour practice in respect of disciplinary action.

17

NUMSA instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of dispute of mutual interest.

18

M. Mushi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of deduction.

19

Kalaivani Pillay instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of dispute of mutual interest.

20

SATAWU obo Farisan Nzumbululo instituted an

unfair labour practise in respect of disciplinary action.

21

SATAWU obo G Songezo instituted an unfair labour practise dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

22

SATAWU obo Nonjongo instituted an arbitration unfair dismissal.

23

NUMSA obo Gcanabana

instituted an unfair labour practise dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

24

L Majela brought instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action.

25

M Mabelebele instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

L Pretorius instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action.

26

 

27

L Boihang instituted an

unfair labour practise dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

28

Z Abrahams instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.

29

SATAWU obo Rathipa and nine others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action.

30

L. Matodzi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.

SANRAL

Questions 1-3

Please refer to Annexure A attached to this letter. All matters which are highlighted in grey in the annexure, relates to both the High (referred to as Pilot 2 matters) and Magistrate (referred to as Pilot 1 matters) Court actions which Sanral has instituted for e-toll debt.

Question 4

Financial Years

Actual Budget

Actual Spent

2015/2016

R 5 135 400.00

R 27 584 699.53

2016/2017

R 25 362 588.00

R 22 729 860.24

2017/2018

R 23 743 988.00

R 26 430 688.81