Question NW3505 to the Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development

Share this page:

20 December 2023 - NW3505

Profile picture: Cebekhulu, Inkosi RN

Cebekhulu, Inkosi RN to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development

Whether her department has details of the total number of successful young commercial farmers who have attained funding through her department in the (a) 2019-20, (b) 2020-21, (c) 2021-22 and (d) 2022-23 financial years; if not, why not; if so, (i) what are the figures in each municipality, (ii) which sectors of agriculture have seen the most investment and (iii) what was the total expenditure?

Reply:

(a),(b),(c),(d) Yes. This response covers young commercial farmers who have received funding from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) through Conditional Grants (Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme “CASP” and Ilima/Letsema) that are transferred to Provincial Departments of Agriculture who implement agricultural projects. The young farmers reported herein are beneficiaries (owners or shareholders) of projects that were implemented in the respective financial years reported below.

(i) The number of youth farmers supported per province in the respective financial years as follows: Tables 1 and 2 depicts figures for CASP and Ilima/Letsema respectively, while Table 3 provides information for the Jobs Fund.

Table 1: CASP – Number of youth supported per financial year:

CASP

  1. 2019/20
  1. 2020/21
  1. 2021/22
  1. 2022/23

Eastern Cape

195

257

131

278

Free State

235

610

300

155

Gauteng

67

21

231

1 575

KwaZulu Natal

188

442

484

503

Limpopo

79

77

26

26

Mpumalanga

190

61

115

94

Northern Cape

29

3

39

5

North West

128

128

41

51

Western Cape

251

131

95

3

Total No

1 363

1 731

1 462

2 690

Males/Female

717 / 646

911 / 820

840 / 622

1 189 / 1 501

Source: CASP Annual Reports from Provincial Departments of Agriculture.

Table 2: Ilima/Letsema- Number of youth Supported per financial year

Ilima/Letsema

  1. 2019/20
  1. 2020/21
  1. 2021/22
  1. 2022/23

Eastern Cape

5 059

410

3 894

5 672

Free State

13 331

5 789

222

0

Gauteng

83

18

2 000

55

KwaZulu Natal

603

607

1 241

1 235

Limpopo

461

474

2 070

1 253

Mpumalanga

403

191

1 408

395

Northern Cape

26

10

22

0

North West

62

19

0

21

Western Cape

232

36

0

432

Total No.

20 260

7 554

10 857

9 063

Males/Female

8 885 / 11 375

3 804 / 3 750

4 136 / 6 721

3 893 / 5 170

Source: Ilima/Letsema Annual Reports from Provincial Departments of Agriculture.

Table 3: Jobs Fund – Number of youth supported per financial year:

Year

2019-20

2020-21

2021-22

2022-23

(i) what are the figures in each municipality?

   

Dr. Ruth Segomotsi Mompathi District

- 1 livestock farmer (34 years)

- Allocated Amount = R 1 021 600

Bojanala District (North West)

- 2 young citrus farmers (28 & 32 years)

- Allocated Amount = R 10 815 965

Chris Hani District (Eastern Cape)

- 1 livestock farmer (32 years)

- Allocated Amount = R 4 013 514

(ii) which sectors of agriculture have seen the most investment?

Horticulture and livestock production received the most investment. Funding went towards both primary production and agro-processing.

(iii) What was the total expenditure?

 

R 15 851 079.00

Total Project Budget

 

R 38 437 823.25

% Expenditure on Young Commercial Farmers

 

41 %

(ii) In terms of CASP (Ilima/Letsema), the support focused on grain production followed by livestock, vegetable, and fruit while horticulture and livestock production received the most investment with regards the Jobs Fund intervention.

(iii) Conditional Grants and Jobs Fund Expenditure reported:

Financial Year

CASP Budget spent

R’000

Ilima/Letsema Budget Spent

R’000

Jobs Fund Budget Spent

2019/20

1 537 000

510 000

-

2020/21

1 041 000

415 000

-

2021/22

1 228 875

546 574

1 021 600

2022/23

1 478 007

593 818

10 815 965

4 013 514

Total spent

5 284 882

2 065 392

15 851 079

Note! The total expenditure against the budget transferred to the province was reported, not expenditure against gender or vulnerability groups.

Source file