Questions and Replies
06 January 2021 - NW2636
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)(a) On what date will the annual reports, including the detailed financial statements, of (i) SA Airways, (ii) Denel, (iii) Transnet, (iv) Eskom and (v) Alexkor for the 2019-20 financial year be tabled in the National Assembly and (b) what are the reasons for the delay in publication of the annual reports; (2) whether any measures are being considered to speed up the auditing processes, the annual reports and financial statements of public enterprises in order to meet the statutory deadlines; if not, what is the reason for this lack of consideration; if so, on what date can full implementation of considered measures be expected?
Reply:
1(a)(i) SA Airways: The Minister wrote to the Speaker of Parliament and the Chairperson of National Council of Provinces on 23 November 2020, informing Parliament that SA Airways is under business rescue. The Auditor-General suspended the audit when the airline was placed in business rescue. The audit will be finalised once the airline recommences operations and the annual report and annual financial statements will thereafter be tabled.
(ii) Denel: The Minister wrote to the Speaker of Parliament and the Chairperson of National Council of Provinces on 30 November 2020. The Department wrote to Parliament as soon as Denel had confirmed to the Department that it was unable to finalize its audit challenges with its external auditors, the Auditor General of South Africa (AGSA), prior to 30 November 2020. Denel Board and Management are engaging with the AGSA to resolve certain audit ISSUES. It is anticipated that the annual financial statements and integrated report will be tabled in January 2020 or as soon as possible thereafter, once the above- mentioned issues are resolved.
(iii) Transnet’s 2020 Integrated Report and audited Annual Financial Statements were tabled by the Minister in Parliament on 09 November 2020. The Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises received a briefing from Transnet on 18 November 2020.
(iv) Eskom’s Integrated Report and audited Annual Financial Statements were tabled by the Minister on 12 November 2020. The Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises received a briefing from Eskom on 25 November 2020.
(v) Alexkor: The Minister wrote to the Speaker of Parliament and the Chairperson of National Council of Provinces on 30 November 2020, to inform Parliament that Alexkor would not be in a position to table its Annual Financial Statements, Integrated Report and Audit Report due to serious going concern and other audit concerns. The Department wrote to Parliament once it was able to confirm with Alexkor that it was unable to finalize its audit challenges with its external auditors and prepare its AGM documentation prior to 30 November 2020. It is anticipated that the annual financial statements and integrated report will be tabled in January 2020 or as soon as possible thereafter, once the above- mentioned concerns are resolved.
2 As indicated above Denel, Alexkor, and SAA would not be able to submit the 2020 Integrated Reports and audited annual financial statements to the Minister prior to 30 November 2020 for the reasons set out above. The reports will be tabled in Parliament as soon as the companies are able to submit these reports.
06 January 2021 - NW2530
Buthelezi, Ms P to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What are the relevant details of the (a) Demographic make-up, (b) Date of appointment, (c) Highest qualification obtained, (d) Age, (e) Gender and (f) Race of each executive leadership in each state-owned entity?
Reply:
Responses from the State-Owned Companies are attached as Annexure A
According to the information received from Alexkor
Name |
Designation |
Date of appointment |
Highest qualification obtained |
Age |
Gender |
Race |
Mr Lemogang Pitso |
Alexkor Chief Executive Officer |
01/12/2017 |
Master in Business Leadership |
49 |
Male |
Black |
Mr Deon Bowers |
PSJV Act General Mine Manager |
01/11/20 |
BSc Honors (Geological Science) |
47 |
Male |
Coloured |
Demographics |
Alexkor |
PSJV |
Male African |
104 |
557 |
Male European |
5 |
121 |
Male Asian |
2 |
|
Female African |
47 |
51 |
Female European |
3 |
11 |
Female Asian |
0 |
According to the information received from DENEL SOC LTD
Name of Executive |
Designation |
Date of appointment |
Highest qualification obtained |
Age |
Gender |
Race |
Mr. Talib Sadik |
Acting Group CEO |
17 August 2020 |
B.Com/DIP Accounting/CA(SA)/ AMP (Insead) |
55 |
Male |
Indian |
Ms. Carmen Le Grange |
Group CFO |
01 September 2019 |
B.Com/DIP Accounting/CA(SA) |
47 |
Female |
Coloured |
Mr. William Hlakoane |
Group COO |
01 July 2019 |
MBA, ND: Mech Engineering/B:Tech Mech Engineering |
48 |
Male |
Black |
Ms. Mercia Ngema |
Group HR & Transformation |
01 July 2019 |
MBA, Honours Degree in HR Management |
46 |
Female |
Black |
Mr. Sello Ntshihlele |
CEO: Denel Dynamics |
01 August 2019 |
MBA, M. Eng (Electrical and Electronic) |
56 |
Male |
Black |
Mr. Phaladi Petje |
CEO: PMP |
01 May 2013 |
BA(Hons) Economics PDM Business Admin Executive Development Programs |
55 |
Male |
Black |
Mr. Mxolisi Makhathini |
CEO: DLS/DVS |
01 August 2019 |
Bsc (Electronic Eng) |
47 |
Male |
Black |
Mr. Mike Kgobe |
CEO: Denel Aeronautics |
01 March 2010 |
Master Degree: Aeronautical Production & Maintenance |
52 |
Male |
Black |
According to the information received from ESKOM SOC LTD
NAME |
DESIGNATION |
DATE OF APPOINTMENT |
HIGHEST QUALIFICATIONS |
AGE |
GENDER |
RACE |
Mr Bala Monde ludovick |
Group executive (distribution) |
19970101 |
Master of Engineering Graduate Diploma in Engineering Industrial Engineering |
47 |
Male |
African |
Ms Burn Faith |
Chief information officer |
20200515 |
Bsc maths; BSC Hons Maths Master of Science Maths Masters of Business Leadership |
52 |
Female |
Coloured |
Mr Cassim Calib |
Chief financial officer |
20020211 |
Master of Business Leadership Bachelor of Commerce |
49 |
Male |
Coloured |
Mr De ruyter Andre marinus |
Group chief executive |
20200106 |
Master of Business Administration Bachelor of Civil Law |
52 |
Male |
White |
Mr Dukashe Phillip |
General manager- eskom rotek industries |
19940101 |
Bsc Degree: Engineering Post Grad Diploma: Engineering |
50 |
Male |
African |
Mr Etzinger Andrew |
General manager-risk and sustainability |
19891211 |
Bsc Maths; BSC Hons Mathematical Statistics; BSC Hons Operations Research; Executive programme London Business School |
52 |
Male |
White |
Mr Hewu Nqaba bartlett |
Group executive legal and compliance (contractor) |
20180326 |
Bachelor of Law |
45 |
Male |
African |
Mr Manjingolo Mlawuli |
Company secretary |
20200701 |
Ba law; LLB; Higher Diploma Company and Labour Law |
52 |
Male |
African |
Mr Mathebula Rhulani |
Group executive- generation (acting) |
20031001 |
National Diploma Analytical Chemistry Btech: Business Administration |
40 |
Male |
African |
Mr Mflathelwa Mziwoxolo |
General manager-strategy and planning |
20100301 |
Bachelor of Engineering (mechanical) |
35 |
Male |
African |
Mr Minyuku Nthato |
Group executive (government and regulatory affairs) |
20201015 |
Master of City Planning and Urban Design |
42 |
Female |
African |
Ms Nxumalo Bhekizitha johannes |
Group executive (group capital) |
20170501 |
Master of Business Administration National higher diploma (chemical engineering) |
52 |
Male |
African |
Mr Oberholzer Jan albert |
Chief operating officer |
20180706 |
Master of Business Leadership Bachelor of Engineering (electrical) |
62 |
Male |
White |
Ms Pule Elsie mamolatelo |
Group executive (human resources) |
20121201 |
Master of Science in Engineering Business Management Bachelor of Arts and Social Work |
53 |
Female |
African |
Mr Scheppers Segomoco Martin |
Group executive (transmission) |
19930809 |
Master of Business Administration Bachelor of Science in Engineering |
57 |
Male |
African |
Mr Sookrajh Bob |
General manager- audit and forensics (acting) |
19940401 |
B.Com Hons; Chartered Internal Auditor Post Graduate Advanced Diploma Taxation |
54 |
Male |
Asian |
Mr Tshitangano Solly |
Chief procurement officer |
20190101 |
B.Com Hons |
58 |
Male |
African |
Mr Tuku Vuyolwethu |
Group executive (transformation management office) |
20200701 |
Master of Business Administration Bachelor of Science in Engineering |
45 |
Male |
African |
According to the information received from TRANSNET SOC LTD
SURNAME AND NAME |
DESIGNATION |
DATE OF APPOINTMENT |
ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION |
GENDER |
AGE |
RACE |
Derby Portia |
Group Chief Executive |
2020/02/01 |
Master’s Degree |
Female |
50 |
African |
Kgomo Lucas Makoma (Brian) |
Chief Audit Executive |
2020/06/01 |
Certified Internal Auditor (CIA), Masters of Philosophy in Internal Audit, B.Com Accounting |
Male |
53 |
African |
Shaw Andrew |
Group Chief Strategy Officer |
2020/07/01 |
PhD (Transport Economics), MBA, BSc and MSc (Engineering) |
Male |
53 |
White |
Kani Yolisa |
Group Chief Business Development Officer |
2020/05/01 |
BSc Applied Science Honours in Transportation Engineering |
Female |
45 |
African |
Dlamini Nonkululeko |
Group Chief Financial Officer |
2020/05/01 |
CA (SA), Higher Diploma in Accounting (CTA) and a B-Comm degree |
Female |
46 |
African |
Coetzee Sandra Adv |
Group Chief Legal Counsel |
2020/05/01 |
Admitted Advocate, BLC, LLB and Senior Leadership Programme |
Female |
58 |
White |
Munyai Pandelani |
Chief Information Officer |
2020/04/01 |
Master of Business Leadership, Master of Electronic Engineering, a BSc Electrical Engineering, BSc Physics and Mathematics |
Male |
51 |
African |
Nemukula Vuledzani |
Group Chief Procurement Officer |
2020/04/01 |
BSc; MBA; Advanced Business Management Programme (AMP), Advanced Management Programme from INSEAD and Oxford Executive Leadership Programme (OELP) |
Male |
52 |
African |
Mzimela Sizakele |
Chief Executive: Transnet Freight Rail |
2020/04/01 |
BA Economics and Statistics, a Certificate in Management from Henley College and a Certificate of the Transnet Executive Development Programme from GIBS |
Female |
55 |
African |
Mills Ralph |
Chief Executive: Transnet Engineering |
2020/05/01 |
Bachelor’s degree in Military Science and an MBL. |
Male |
56 |
White |
Velile Dube |
Chief Executive: Transnet Port Terminals |
2009/11/01 |
BA in Communications and a BA (Hons) in English Literature, Program Leadership Certificate, certificate in Leadership from the Gordon Institute of Business (GIBS). |
Male |
59 |
African |
Michelle Phillips |
Chief Executive: Transnet Pipelines |
1999/11/16 |
Admitted Advocate of the High Court with a B Juris LLB, Executive Development leadership programmes, certificates for several International Terminal Operations Management Programmes from Antwerp, Rotterdam, Paris and Le Havre. |
Female |
49 |
Coloured |
Khayalethu Ngema |
Chief of People |
2017/07/01 |
BA in Law and Industrial Sociology, A Public and Development Management Diploma and a postgraduate diploma in Public Policy and Development , Certificate for a Senior Executive Program |
Male |
50 |
African |
Kapei Phahlamohlaka |
Chief Executive: Transnet Property |
2020/09/01 |
Bachelor of Arts (Hons) and Bachelor of Laws (LLB), Master of Business Administration (MBA) |
Male |
44 |
African |
Mninawe Silinga |
Chief Executive: Transnet National Ports Authority |
2020/09/01 |
BSc in Civil Engineering, Master of Engineering, MBA, AMP, Chartered Director [IoD-UK]. Fellow of the South African Academy of Engineering |
Male |
55 |
African |
According to the information received from SAFCOL
Name and Surname |
DESIGNATION |
(b) Date of Appointment |
(c) Highest Qualification |
(d) Age |
(e) Gender |
(f) Race |
Mr Tsepo Monaheng |
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) |
01/12/2017 |
|
57 |
Male |
African |
Mr John Maruma |
Acting Chief Financial Officer (ACFO) |
01/03/2020 |
|
37 |
Male |
African |
Mr Sibalo Dlamini |
Chief Operating Officer (COO) |
05/10/2020 |
|
54 |
Male |
African |
Mr Vishal Harichund Executive: |
Strategy and Commercial |
01/06/2020 |
|
42 |
Male |
African |
Mr Siyabonga Mpontshana |
Executive: Legal |
01/06/2018 |
|
44 |
Male |
African |
Ms Dimakatso Motseko |
Executive Human Capital |
02/01/2018 |
|
47 |
Female |
African |
Ms Christelle Marias |
Chief Risk Officer |
01/06/2020 |
|
49 |
Female |
White |
According to the information received from SAA
Position |
Date of Appointment |
Highest qualification |
Age |
Gender |
Race |
Chief Executive Officer (vacant) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Interim Chief Financial Officer |
15 October 2018 |
CA (SA) |
60 |
M |
C |
Chief Commercial Officer |
19 August 2019 |
MA TV Journalism |
53 |
M |
W |
Acting General Manager Operations |
01 July 2019 |
Post Graduate Diploma in Business Management |
52 |
M |
B |
Head of Loyalty/Voyager |
01 April 2014 |
US BSc. Business Administration, Private Pilot License, Commercial Pilot License |
50 |
F |
W |
Acting General Manager Cargo |
01 June 2018 |
B. Com Hons (Transport Economics), Masters in Business Administration, IATA Diploma in Air Cargo Transportation |
55 |
M |
B |
Acting General Manager Human Resources |
03 October 2019 |
B. Com |
52 |
M |
W |
Acting Chief Information Officer |
01 October 2019 |
Masters in Business Administration |
49 |
M |
W |
Acting Head Customer Services |
01 October 2019 |
Management Advanced Programme (MAP), Diploma in Public Relations |
47 |
F |
B |
Acting Chief Legal Officer |
01 May 2020 |
Bachelor of Laws |
40 |
M |
B |
Acting Chief Internal Auditor |
01 October 2019 |
B. Com Hons (Accounting) |
37 |
F |
B |
Company Secretary |
01 February 2009 |
BA. Hons. (Economics and Social Administration), CIS Diploma, Bachelor of Laws |
58 |
F |
B |
CEO |
Vacant |
|
|
|
|
Acting Chief Financial Officer |
01 October 2020 |
B. Com Hons. Accounting |
43 |
M |
B |
Acting HOD - Base Maintenance |
01 September 2019 |
NTC 4 Aircraft Technology |
48 |
M |
B |
Acting HOD- Marketing and Sales |
01 May 2018 |
Aircraft Avionics Technician (Olifantsfontein) |
44 |
M |
B |
Acting HOD- Workshops |
01 September 2019 |
National Technical Certificate Part 3 (N3) |
57 |
M |
W |
General Manager Engineering and Support Sevices |
01 December 2019 |
Masters Airworthiness & Aviation Safety |
49 |
M |
B |
General Manager Human Resources |
01 November 2019 |
Executive MBA |
49 |
M |
B |
General Manager Quality and Risk |
01 December 2019 |
M.Sc Business and Strategic Leadership |
45 |
M |
B |
HOD- Line Maintenance |
01 February 2012 |
Senior Management Development Programme NQF 8 |
44 |
M |
B |
HOD- Security |
01 December 2019 |
M. Tech Degree Policing |
57 |
M |
B |
HOD-Business Excellence |
04 November 2019 |
Masters Project Management |
37 |
M |
B |
Chief Executive Officer |
01 November 2013 |
B. Com |
52 |
M |
W |
Chief Financial Officer |
03 June 2019 |
B. Com Honours, CA (SA) |
37 |
M |
B |
Acting General Manager Commercial |
01 May 2018 |
Diploma in Hospitality Management |
34 |
F |
B |
General Manager Operations |
01 September 2019 |
Management Advanced Programme (MAP), National Diploma in Tourism Management |
43 |
M |
B |
General Manager Human Resources |
19 January 2015 |
Post Graduate Diploma in Human Resources |
43 |
F |
B |
Head of Quality, Safety and Environment |
01 July 2015 |
BSc. Human Ecology |
41 |
F |
B |
Head of Coastal |
01 September 2017 |
BSc. Hons. Dietetics, Management Development Programme |
47 |
F |
B |
27 November 2020 - NW2259
Steenhuisen, Mr JH to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What (a) Are the relevant details of the submissions made by his department to the Competition Commission regarding South32’s acquisition of 91,8% shares in SA Energy Coal by Seriti Resource Holdings and; (b) Is his department’s position on the deal that will result in nearly 72% of Eskom’s coal supply coming from only two companies?
Reply:
a) The Department provided its views in terms of the potential impact that the merger between Seriti Resources Holdings and SA Energy Coal may likely have on the energy coal sector. Amongst others, these views included: (i) the potential impact the merger might have on security of coal supply, particularly on Eskom electricity generation requirements;(ii) the electricity pricing effects the merger might have on the economy given the current socio economic challenges the country is confronted with. |
b) Security of coal supply is of primary importance to ensure Eskom meets the demand for electricity. Eskom for the past three years embarked on coal procurement exercise to ensure that long term coal supply agreements are secured for the majority of the coal fired power stations. Ownership and access to the state’s mineral assets is effective through the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (MRPDA) and Mining Charter. The DMRE is the authority in terms of determining effective ownership of these assets. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) intervenes through the Competition Commission if there are likely effects of substantially lessening or prevention of competition in the sector. |
Eskom on Managing Risk
1. Eskom estimates that the Seriti supply share after the transaction would increase to approximately 28% from 17% based on FY2020 delivery volumes. It is estimated that the two largest suppliers will account for approximately 55% of Eskom’s coal supply based on FY2020 delivery volumes. However, this may vary slightly subject to changes in Eskom’s coal demand and the mines’ production profiles.
2. Approximately 28% of Eskom’s supply is supplied from the cost plus mines. Post the Seriti/South32 merger, this percentage will remain the same and is approximately half of the 55% of the post-merger supply. Under the cost plus arrangement, Eskom is responsible for the majority of the operating, capital and rehabilitation costs of these mines. The supply risk also resides with Eskom.
3. The remaining 27% of supply from the two largest suppliers (post-merger) would be from fixed price long term and medium term contracts. These are arm’s length contracts where, the mine is responsible for the capital and operational expenditure as well as all the associated mining risks. Should the supplier not deliver as per the contractual terms and conditions, there are contractual recourses including but not limited to the rectification of undersupply and penalties. Approximately 80% of the 27% mentioned above mainly relates to the coal supply to Medupi and Matimba Power Stations, which are supplied by Exxaro. There is an excess 16 Mton coal stockpile at Medupi which could cater for any short term coal supply risk at Medupi or Matimba.
20 November 2020 - NW2285
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)On what date did a certain senior Eskom official (name furnished) complete his Master of Business Administration degree; (2) Whether the degree was verified with the SA Qualification Authority; if not, why not; if so, what are the further relevant details?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
1. Mr André de Ruyter obtained his Master of Business Administration qualification on 17 September 1998.
2. The qualification was verified on behalf of Eskom, prior to Mr de Ruyter’s appointment, by Lexis Refcheck. Eskom did not request SAQA to evaluate or verify the qualification.
As part of all executive appointments in Eskom, a full verification by a reputable company has to be done to verify ID number, driver’s license and criminalrecords and ensure the candidate has obtained all the qualifications listed on their résumés.
SAQA evaluation/verification of overseas qualifications is not a specific requirement for the appointments of executives at Eskom. A SAQA verification by the qualification holder will be requested only when the foreign qualification is a minimum requirement.
It is also important to note that as of 16 September 2019, only qualification holders (QHs) may apply for the evaluation of their foreign qualifications.
The above requirement according to SAQA, is to ensure that QHs are the prima facie owners of their applications and the outcomes thereof, including the protection of their private details. For this reason, SAQA will only interact directly with QHs, and involve third parties only when they are the parents or legal guardians of the affected QHs.
Please note that the change in the SAQA approach took place before Mr de Ruyter’s appointment and verification of his qualification.
Government has total confidence in Mr de Ruyter who has already made a substantial difference in Eskom. We call on all stakeholders to support the efforts of the Board and management team in their efforts to restore good governance, operational effectiveness, financial stability and efficiently implement the Eskom Roadmap.
20 November 2020 - NW2509
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(a) What progress has been made with the Port St Johns Local Municipality (Turnkey) Electrification Project; (b) What total amount has been spent on the specified project to date and (c) By what date does he envisage the project will be completed?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
The Port St Johns Local Municipality (Turnkey) Electrification Project is a schedule 5B project that is managed by the municipality. The question should therefore be directed to the municipality.
20 November 2020 - NW2284
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What informed the use of Treasury Regulation 16A6.6 to appoint Rand Merchant Bank as transaction advisor to oversee the Strategic Equity Partner transaction of Air Chef by SAA?NW2858
Reply:
SAA did not use Treasury Regulation 16A6.6 to appoint Rand Merchant Bank (RMB) as a transaction advisor to oversee the Strategic Equity Partner transaction of Airchefs. SAA used normal open competitive procurement processes to appoint RMB as transaction advisor for Airchefs.
The Department however, used Treasury Regulation 16A6.6 to appoint RMB as a transaction advisor to oversee the Strategic Equity Partner (SEP) transaction for SAA. This was carried out in order to speed up the process of assessing the best SEP for SAA as part of the work of concluding the business rescue process given the fact that RMB was already underseeing this SEP transaction with Airchefs.
20 November 2020 - NW1933
Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) By what date is the R3,5 billion loan and/or equity bridge from the Development Bank of South Africa to South African Airways repayable; (2) whether the loan will be repaid under the business rescue process; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, who will be responsible for the repayment of the loan? NW2449E
Reply:
1. The loan from the Development Bank of Southern Africa to South African Airways (SAA) was paidON THE DIRECTION OF THE NATIONAL TREASURY,on 27 August 2020.
2. The loan was repaid from the 2020 Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) allocation for the period 2020/21 to 2022/23 financial year, for the purchase of equity in SAA.
20 November 2020 - NW2510
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether, with reference to the reply by the Deputy President to oral question 15 in the National Assembly on 22 October 2020, wherein he indicated that there will be no load shedding in the Republic over the next 18 months, although not guaranteed, he is in a position to confirm that indeed there will be no load shedding in the Republic; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
Eskom recognizes the negative impact that load shedding has on the lives of the people and the economy of South Africa. Eskom endeavours not to load shed and does so only as a last resort to ensure the security of the electricity network. However, Eskom’s generating fleet is ageing, at around 39 years on average, and it is both unreliable and unpredictable. As Eskom has often stated, until all the required reliability maintenance has been executed, all the new build units come on line and the DMRE emergency generation comes on line, the system remains constrained and the risk of load shedding remains high in the foreseeable future.
20 November 2020 - NW2517
Thembekwayo, Dr S to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(a)What are the reasons that Eskom has cut off the electricity for the community of Braamfisherville in Phase 3, Soweto, in Gauteng for the past six months and (b) By what date does he envisage the electricity will be restored in the specified community?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
1. Eskom has not cut off electricity supply for the Phase 3 customers in Braamfisherville. The transformers have failed as a result of overloading networks caused by meter bypasses and ghost vending, as well as the illegal operations by third parties. In order to avoid this phenomenon from repeatedly reoccurring, Eskom has decided to audit the meters, fine those who have illegally bypassed their meters or are purchasing ghost vouchers, and replace the damaged meters before replacing the transformers. This process has been resisted by customers and hence delayed the process of transformer replacement across Braamfisherville.
We have currently agreed with ward councilors and the Gauteng Province to defer the payment of fines where customers who cannot afford them will have to agree to a payment arrangement by signing the relevant forms.
It was only after the payment arrangement was agreed upon that customers agreed that we implement the process. This process has created a backlog of about 70 transformers that need to be replaced. We have drafted a schedule to replace these transformers and are progressing very well.
2. A number of transformers are offline in Phase 3 as a result of the reasons provided above. The replacement of transformers in Phase 3 is expected to be completed by 21 December 2020 subject to the customers signing the deferred payment agreements and material availability. Eskom will have to be provided with the meter or reference number in order to provide a more specific date.
20 November 2020 - NW2177
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)Regarding the maintenance of prepaid electricity meters under Eskom, what is the current status of reported faults of electricity meters in terms of reported issues and maintenance outstanding; (2) Under what circumstances will Eskom carry out calibration tests and/or maintenance on electricity meters to ensure that the equipment reflects the correct consumption and usage?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
1. As at 9 October 2020, 7 038 prepaid electricity meters faults were reported in October 2020. Of these, 3 698 prepaid electricity meters have been maintained and faults were resolved/closed.
The 3 340 prepaid electricity meter work orders that are still open are reported by zero-buying customers, that is the meters indicated that the customers are not consuming electricity. In these cases, Eskom first scheduled the fault for investigation, after which the following actions will follow:
Where a customer is found to have tampered with the supply or meter, a tamper fine will be issued, the meter will be maintained and then the customer’s supply restored.
Where a meter is found to be bypassed, a tamper fine will be issued. The meter will be maintained however then the customer’s supply will be restored once the tamper fine is paid or a deferred payment form is signed.
Where the customer is zero buying but no tamper is found, the prepaid electricity meter will be maintained and the work order closed.
(2) Prepayment meters are full electronic devices with no moving parts on the measurement circuit that require calibration during the lifespan of the meter. They are electronically calibrated during the manufacturing process using high-tech calibration equipment embedded in the production line.
The accuracy is regularly certified by the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS). All the calibration results of individual meters are loaded into the Eskom Customer Care and Billing System for future reference. The calibration is not expected to drift in anyway during the lifespan of meter.
In instances where a customer complains that a meter is inaccurate, Eskom uses SABS certified equipment to verify the accuracy of the meter. In the unlikely event that the meter is found to be inaccurate, the meter is replaced with a new one. The faulty meter is then sent to the supplier for full analysis and the supplier is expected to submit a comprehensive report to Eskom.
20 November 2020 - NW909
Marawu, Ms TL to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
With reference to the challenges that the SA Airways (SAA) is going through in relaunching itself, (details furnished), what steps will he take to ensure that: (a) the new SAA pilot structures reflect the economically active population; and (b) all the Black pilots are retained.
Reply:
According to the information received from SAA:
(a) The failure to transform the pilot corps at SAA is a symptom of the general failure of leadership at the airline to make pertinent decisions and ensure their implementation. The Regulating Agreement (RA) entered into in 1988’s primary objective was to preserve undeserved privileges accrued through unjust laws that preserved aviation careers to a small minority in this country.
These privileges came with unaffordable perks and salary framework which should have long been remedied. The airline (i.e. the Business Rescue Practitioners) on insistence of the Department is addressing the matter of RA as it cannot become part of the new SAA.
The following is the background to the RA:
1.1 The Regulating Agreement, (“The RA”) is an evergreen collective agreement entered into between South African Airways Pilots Association (SAAPA) and South African Airways (SOC) LTD (SAA) in 1988. The RA regulates the terms and conditions of employment of pilots and contains volumes of onerous provisions on SAA.
1.2. It is our view that the RA is unconstitutional and unlawful, and it is imperative that it be terminated.
1.3. The unconstitutionality and unlawfulness of the RA relates to the following:
1.3.1 First, the evergreen nature of the regulating agreement is in breach of section 23(4) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“the LRA”). Section 23(4) of the LRA does not contemplate or permit collective agreements which have no fixed term, no specific notice period and which may not be terminated on reasonable notice – in other words it does not contemplate or permit evergreen collective agreements.
1.3.2 The regulating agreement precludes and impedes SAA achieving meaningful and expeditious transformation which is in breach of the Constitution and the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998. In particular, in terms of the RA, the principle of seniority rigidly and directly affects and controls all elements of the manner in which pilots are employed and dealt with by SAA, including promotions, demotions, salaries and so on. Given the make-up of SAA’s pilot list, which comprises overwhelmingly of white males, this operates to the detriment of and discriminates unfairly against white women, black men, and especially black women.
1.3.3 The regulating agreement effectively removes core elements of decision-making from the board and management of SAA and precludes SAA from giving effect to its procurement obligations. This is in breach of the Constitution, the Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 and the Companies Act 71 of 2008. The effect of the Regulating Agreement is that SAA is precluded from reaching any agreement to wet-lease SAA aircraft without the consent of SAAPA. The RA has a “succession of ownership” provision which means that notwithstanding any changes in ownership of SAA, the RA will remain in full operation. Considering the fact that Government has taken a decision to find a strategic equity partner (SEP) for SAA, the RA in its current form, combined with succession clauses, will no doubt make SAA less attractive to potential partners.
The RA also subjects key SAA procurement decisions such as which hotels to contract with to the control of SAAPA in that SAAPA is entitled to select the short-list of three hotels from which SAA can choose and even within this short-list, SAA is required to take SAAPA’s preferences into account. It requires SAA to act in breach of Treasury instructions – such as requiring SAA to accommodate pilots and crew in four- or five-star hotels when the Treasury instruction requires that three-star hotels be used.
1.3.4 The negotiations at the LCF with the DPE. After more than two and a half months of engagements, no agreement on the restructure of SAA was concluded and no agreement was reached on the VSP offered by DPE. In fact, SAAPA are on record at different forums and in writing to SAA that they never agreed to the VSP and reserve their rights in that regard.
(B) In engagement with potential Strategic Equity Partners (SEPs), the Department has placed the transformation of pilot corps as an imperative to the partnership. This is to ensure that National developmental objectives in Aviation should still receive priority in the new SAA. An appropriate balance must be attained to correct historical discrimination, retention of key skills, and achieving the correct demographic and gender objectives. This is a non-negotiable set of objectives. It is important that all pilots cooperate in achieving these objectives.
20 November 2020 - NW2529
Buthelezi, Ms P to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What are the plans of schools and educational programmes under the Transnet Academy in (a) funding the activities in order to invest in the academy and give it the necessary technology, facilities and faculties required to function at an optimal level and (b) forming and improving strategic partnerships with technical and vocational, education and training colleges, universities and research institutions?
Reply:
According to the information received from Transnet:
a) The Transnet Academy has identified the requisite technology requirements, developed the strategy and agreed business requirements with the Transnet Information, Communication and Technology Management (ICTM). Budget provisions have been made by ICTM as part of the Transnet Capex funding requirements.
b) Transnet has concluded a Memorandum of Understanding with the TVET Directorate. This approach has an advantage of building capacity across the country on an integrated basis.
University partnerships form the bedrock of the Academy strategy and this includes previously disadvantaged Universities to be included in the partnering review.
The Transnet Head of Academy serves as a Board member on the South African International Maritime Institute (SAIMI) and Transnet plays a pivotal role in the SETA’s. To date, three Transnet Employees serve in the Rail, Freight Handling, and Maritime Chamber. As members’ their role is to advise as industry experts in skills development.
04 November 2020 - NW1986
Van Minnen, Ms BM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What (a) Total volume of coal that Eskom purchased at (i) Above average and (ii) Acceptable pricing since 2007 was found to be unsuitable and was therefore unused for power generation and (b) Is the name of each company that the unsuitable coal was purchased from in each year?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
(a)(i) and (ii) All coal at Eskom’s coal stockyards will be used for power generation.
The request to disclose the prices and names of associated suppliers is commercially sensitive. The utility is currently progressing coal supply negotiations with existing and potentially new coal suppliers. By disclosing the requested information to parliament and to the public, suppliers could potentially use this information to erode Eskom’s bargaining power.
(b) Not applicable.
04 November 2020 - NW2134
Van Minnen, Ms BM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)(a)What financial payments that were requested have been paid to Eskom since 1 January 2020, (b) On what exact dates were the payments made and (c) What amounts were paid; (2) What is the; (a) Total cost in each month of transporting diesel from Cape Town to the gas turbine power plants in the Republic over the past 12 months and (b) Cost per litre of diesel in each month for the past 12 months for the gas turbine power plants; (3) Whether the report of the Medupi Conveyor Belt accident has been completed; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (4) Whether he will furnish Mrs B M van Minnen with a copy of the report; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
(1)(a)(b)(c) Since the question regarding financial payments is not specific, Eskom assumes it refers to payments received in line with the Government Appropriations.
Since January 2020, Eskom received the amounts set out in Table 1 below, as part of the Appropriations and Special Appropriations Act of 2019.
Table 1: Payments received by Eskom in line with Government Appropriations
Financial Year |
(b) Date |
(c) Amount paid, R'm |
2020 |
03-Feb-20 |
4 000 |
2020 |
11-Feb-20 |
4 000 |
2020 |
28-Feb-20 |
5 000 |
2020 |
31-Mar-20 |
9 500 |
2021 |
29 May 20 |
1 000 |
2021 |
11 Aug 20 |
5 000 |
Total for the 2020 Calendar year |
28 500 |
(2)(a) The cost of transport is included in the diesel price. Transport of diesel to Ankerlig and Port Rex is via truck, while transport is via pipeline for Gourikwa and Acacia.
(2)(b) The cost of diesel per litre in each month over the past 12 months for the gas turbine power plants is as set out in Table 2 below. Eskom received an average discount of 35c/l over this period.
Table 2 Cost of diesel per litre in each month for the gas turbine power plants
Month |
Wholesale Price (R/l) |
Average Discount |
Nett Price (R/l) |
04-09-19 |
14.05 |
0.35 |
13.70 |
02-10-19 |
14.30 |
0.35 |
13.95 |
06-11-19 |
14.14 |
0.35 |
13.79 |
04-12-19 |
13.99 |
0.35 |
13.64 |
01-01-20 |
14.08 |
0.35 |
13.73 |
05-02-20 |
14.03 |
0.35 |
13.68 |
03-03-20 |
13.49 |
0.35 |
13.14 |
01-04-20 |
12.09 |
0.35 |
11.74 |
06-05-20 |
10.48 |
0.35 |
10.13 |
03-06-20 |
10.70 |
0.35 |
10.35 |
01-07-20 |
12.43 |
0.35 |
12.08 |
05-08-20 |
12.88 |
0.35 |
12.53 |
(3) The report of the Medupi conveyor belt accident has been completed.
(4) The report is a product of an internal investigation that was commissioned in accordance with Eskom’s established integrated risk management processes. The report is therefore an internal report for consumption by the relevant Eskom senior executives and cannot be made public. However, Eskom endeavours to provide a summary of key findings from the report once internal governance processes are finalised.
04 November 2020 - NW1890
Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What are the reasons that (a) he has not taken any action against a certain company (name furnished) amidst the allegations of corruption and money laundering and (b) the contract of the specified company was extended by Transnet; (2) Whether he has found that a certain person (name and details furnished) received a donation of R300 000 from the specified company through a foundation?
Reply:
According to the information received from Transnet:
(1)(a) According to MNS the allegations of bribery and kickbacks as published in the City Press were malicious and defamatory. As a result, MNS lodged a complaint against City Press with the Press Council.
The Press Council rejected the City Press allegations of bribery and kickbacks and directed City Press to publish an apology to MNS and to Mr Ndlovu for:
1.1.1 Unjustifiably reflecting in its reportage, both in the headlines and in the text of the article, that MNS had been implicated in kickbacks, alleged acts of corruption and bribery; and
1.1.2Unnecessarily tarnishing their reputation.
(1)(b) MNS was appointed onto Transnet’s legal panel through a fair, just and equitable procurement process during 2017. The panel was appointed for a period of 3 years.
(2) The allegations of Dr Molefe receiving R300 000 from MNS have been peddled since June 2019 and despite the facts being put on the table on numerous occasions, the allegations are repeated by the EFF.
MNS received a request from the Popo Molefe Foundation Charitable Trust to make a sponsorship/donation to the Charitable Trust to provide bursaries to previously disadvantaged students who cannot afford the costs of tertiary education. MNS was not the only recipient of this request. A number of companies and individuals were approached with a similar request. A copy of the request letter is attached hereto as Annexure “A”.
The Charitable Trust organized a Golf Day and Gala Dinner on 31 May 2019 as part of its fund raising programme. All potential donors/sponsors could contribute to advance the educational aspirations of previously disadvantaged students. In this regard MNS contributed an amount of R350 000 to the Charitable Trust, which entitled MNS and other sponsors/donors to inter alia be recognized and listed on the various branding platforms that the Charitable Trust employed. This included amongst others, being publicly mentioned at the Gala Dinner and listed on Charitable Trust’s website for the contribution made to the Charitable Trust in the 2019 fund raising programme.
There was no direct or indirect benefit to either Dr Molefe or any of his family members arising from the funds donated to the Charitable Trust. The sole beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust are disadvantaged students benefitting from the Charitable Trust through bursaries to pay for their tertiary fees. Save for the donation referred to above, MNS has not, either directly or indirectly advanced any donation/loan/payment to Dr Molefe or any of his associated entities.
04 November 2020 - NW982
Cachalia, Mr G K to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) With reference to the ongoing business rescue process at the SA Airways and following the statement he made to the Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises on 6 May 2020 (details furnished), (a) how is the Government planning to keep the airline running without any further financial support from the fiscus; (2) Whether he will furnish Mr G K Y Cachalia with a copy of the business rescue plan with proposals on the alternative transition process that he presented to the business rescue practitioners; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) (a) The Department and National Treasury have been tasked by Cabinet to consider alternative sources of funding for SAA to ensure that a restructured airline emerges from the Business Rescue process. Government will have to consider various sources of Funding including Strategic Equity Partnerships.
(2) Yes, a copy of the business rescue plan with proposals on the alternative transition process that he presented to the business rescue practitioners will be provided accordingly. (Kindly note the attached copy of the BR Plan for consideration).
04 November 2020 - NW1985
Van Minnen, Ms BM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What (a) total amount did Eskom pay for coal that was above the annual average price for coal purchases in each year since 2007, (b) is the name of each company that the coal was purchased from and (c) were the coal volumes purchased from each specified company?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
(a)(b) and (c)
The request to disclose the prices and names of associated suppliers is commercially sensitive. The utility is currently progressing coal supply negotiations with existing and potentially new coal suppliers. By disclosing the requested information to parliament and to the public, suppliers could potentially use this information to erode Eskom’s bargaining power.
04 November 2020 - NW2102
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What are the details of the (a) sources of the funds and (b) progress made to obtain the funding required for the implementation of the business rescue plan of the SA Airways (SAA) that was approved by the SAA creditors on 14 July 2020?
Reply:
a) Various sources of funding are being considered including the strategic equity partner, application for funding from Government through the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework process, approaching Development Financial Institutions and Commercial Banks.
b|) The process has reached an advanced stage, which we will be able to announce in due course. Due to the sensitive nature of these negotiations we are unable to pronounce at this stage.
04 November 2020 - NW2132
Van Minnen, Ms BM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What is the (a) Daily electrical megawatt savings achieved through load shedding (i) In each province and (ii) In each metro over the past 60 days of load shedding and (b) Total amount of accumulated man-hours which have been load shed (i) In each province and (ii) In each metro over the past 60 days? NW2695E
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
(a)(i) The estimated daily megawatts load shed in each Eskom operating unit (OU) is as set out in Annexure A.
Most of Eskom OUs are aligned to the provincial boundaries with the following exceptions:
- Gauteng OU also includes most North West province
- Limpopo OU includes the Rustenburg region of the North West province
- Western Cape OU includes the Kalahari region of the Northern Cape province
- Free State OU includes the Kimberley region of the Northern Cape province
(a)(ii) Daily megawatts load shed in each metro is to be sought from the metros.
(b) Eskom does not have a measurement of man-hours which have been load shed. On the assumption that the intention was to request information on the megawatt- hours (MWh) that have been load shed.
(b)(i) The estimated daily megawatt-hours load shed in each province is as set out in Annexure B.
(b)(ii) The estimated daily megawatt-hours load shed is to be sought from the metros.
Annexure A
Estimated megawatts load shed per Eskom Operating UnitPeriod: 1 July to 3 September 2020
|
10-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
N/A |
N/A |
203 |
133 |
198 |
210 |
138 |
0 |
Gauteng |
N/A |
N/A |
378 |
316 |
255 |
287 |
402 |
0 |
KwaZulu Natal |
N/A |
N/A |
134 |
126 |
125 |
208 |
140 |
0 |
Free State |
N/A |
N/A |
180 |
118 |
38 |
93 |
241 |
0 |
Limpopo |
N/A |
161 |
162 |
172 |
121 |
176 |
148 |
0 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
70 |
65 |
60 |
68 |
78 |
74 |
0 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
182 |
196 |
143 |
178 |
173 |
196 |
0 |
Total |
N/A |
412.29 |
1317 |
1069 |
982 |
1225 |
1338 |
0 |
|
11-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00 - 00:00 |
Western Cape |
152 |
110 |
210 |
109 |
206 |
138 |
188 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
314 |
339 |
429 |
343 |
354 |
346 |
488 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
127 |
116 |
168 |
103 |
123 |
153 |
147 |
N/A |
Free State |
122 |
210 |
86 |
175 |
68 |
149 |
191 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
N/A |
164 |
153 |
129 |
162 |
168 |
158 |
95 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
59 |
67 |
53 |
40 |
56 |
57 |
60 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
158 |
156 |
181 |
207 |
154 |
182 |
196 |
Total |
715 |
1156 |
1268 |
1093 |
1160 |
1163 |
1411 |
350 |
|
12-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00 - 20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
102 |
185 |
239 |
344 |
109 |
122 |
249 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
298 |
337 |
396 |
298 |
376 |
405 |
293 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
215 |
138 |
176 |
147 |
218 |
138 |
100 |
N/A |
Free State |
63 |
160 |
101 |
154 |
89 |
238 |
52 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
98 |
114 |
159 |
151 |
131 |
169 |
130 |
63 |
Eastern Cape |
56 |
72 |
74 |
64 |
37 |
55 |
67 |
30 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
182 |
147 |
181 |
189 |
158 |
156 |
181 |
Total |
832 |
1187 |
1291 |
1339 |
1149 |
1284 |
1047 |
274 |
|
13-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
131 |
118 |
162 |
134 |
90 |
110 |
175 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
274 |
347 |
349 |
353 |
350 |
332 |
324 |
327 |
KwaZulu Natal |
120 |
113 |
108 |
129 |
86 |
145 |
128 |
N/A |
Free State |
88 |
236 |
142 |
75 |
161 |
152 |
180 |
N/A |
|
13-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Limpopo |
N/A |
164 |
148 |
152 |
120 |
159 |
117 |
140 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
84 |
88 |
60 |
49 |
78 |
84 |
37 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
173 |
196 |
126 |
182 |
147 |
181 |
189 |
Total |
613 |
1235 |
1191 |
1028 |
1039 |
1122 |
1189 |
694 |
|
14-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
130 |
185 |
123 |
203 |
208 |
177 |
172 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
375 |
441 |
571 |
490 |
314 |
387 |
285 |
216 |
KwaZulu Natal |
107 |
128 |
112 |
121 |
144 |
142 |
165 |
N/A |
Free State |
151 |
205 |
140 |
56 |
100 |
260 |
147 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
N/A |
158 |
162 |
161 |
121 |
176 |
148 |
152 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
70 |
82 |
64 |
74 |
98 |
97 |
50 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
182 |
196 |
143 |
178 |
173 |
196 |
126 |
Total |
763 |
1368 |
1386 |
1237 |
1138 |
1413 |
1210 |
543 |
|
15-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
37 |
96 |
78 |
226 |
132 |
215 |
115 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
421 |
495 |
312 |
208 |
309 |
395 |
306 |
336 |
KwaZulu Natal |
41 |
66 |
54 |
134 |
158 |
206 |
152 |
N/A |
Free State |
117 |
36 |
40 |
50 |
161 |
225 |
120 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
N/A |
78 |
63 |
161 |
166 |
158 |
162 |
172 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
38 |
19 |
45 |
65 |
80 |
89 |
56 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
162 |
187 |
213 |
154 |
182 |
196 |
143 |
Total |
617 |
971 |
753 |
1037 |
1145 |
1460 |
1141 |
708 |
|
16-Jul-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
102 |
107 |
64 |
167 |
92 |
273 |
138 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
0 |
163 |
233 |
204 |
120 |
391 |
204 |
363 |
KwaZulu Natal |
93 |
97 |
62 |
144 |
106 |
212 |
N/A |
N/A |
Free State |
0 |
85 |
134 |
80 |
231 |
108 |
154 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
N/A |
78 |
64 |
141 |
158 |
153 |
71 |
N/A |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
42 |
43 |
37 |
52 |
78 |
62 |
N/A |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
147 |
181 |
189 |
158 |
156 |
181 |
N/A |
Total |
195 |
718 |
781 |
960 |
917 |
1369 |
809 |
363 |
|
13-Aug-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
165 |
160 |
189 |
140 |
92 |
222 |
143 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
287 |
289 |
327 |
335 |
351 |
361 |
459 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
126 |
110 |
110 |
138 |
83 |
102 |
112 |
N/A |
Free State |
77 |
223 |
136 |
105 |
149 |
141 |
175 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
122 |
176 |
148 |
143 |
114 |
159 |
151 |
141 |
Eastern Cape |
76 |
87 |
95 |
65 |
67 |
65 |
88 |
38 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
173 |
196 |
126 |
182 |
147 |
181 |
189 |
Total |
852 |
1217 |
1201 |
1052 |
1037 |
1197 |
1310 |
368 |
|
14-Aug-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00 - 00:00 |
Western Cape |
165 |
160 |
113 |
157 |
113 |
63 |
76 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
354 |
363 |
488 |
492 |
327 |
347 |
191 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
128 |
127 |
135 |
106 |
180 |
79 |
N/A |
N/A |
Free State |
124 |
185 |
103 |
37 |
83 |
150 |
7 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
173 |
158 |
162 |
158 |
122 |
83 |
89 |
N/A |
Eastern Cape |
76 |
87 |
95 |
65 |
67 |
65 |
88 |
38 |
Mpumalanga |
154 |
182 |
196 |
143 |
178 |
173 |
196 |
126 |
1174 |
1261 |
1291 |
1159 |
1070 |
960 |
646 |
164 |
|
18-Aug-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00 - 20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
136 |
204 |
132 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
402 |
477 |
312 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
166 |
169 |
139 |
N/A |
Free State |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
221 |
147 |
98 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
169 |
148 |
152 |
120 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
91 |
111 |
84 |
60 |
Mpumalanga |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
173 |
196 |
126 |
182 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
1358 |
1452 |
1042 |
362 |
|
19-Aug-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
189 |
66 |
158 |
93 |
187 |
133 |
164 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
306 |
383 |
374 |
355 |
494 |
571 |
309 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
111 |
79 |
119 |
112 |
141 |
157 |
178 |
N/A |
Free State |
81 |
169 |
70 |
142 |
192 |
148 |
54 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
N/A |
158 |
161 |
173 |
150 |
157 |
172 |
122 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
47 |
51 |
63 |
68 |
83 |
98 |
63 |
Mpumalanga |
156 |
181 |
207 |
154 |
182 |
196 |
143 |
178 |
843 |
1082 |
1139 |
1091 |
1413 |
1444 |
1119 |
362 |
|
20-Aug-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
163 |
195 |
192.4 |
101 |
228 |
149 |
249 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
405 |
305 |
396 |
421 |
224 |
138 |
300 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
97 |
89 |
130 |
96 |
152 |
115 |
151 |
N/A |
Free State |
115 |
173 |
116 |
211 |
106 |
175 |
77 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
N/A |
131 |
141 |
172 |
153 |
158 |
161 |
173 |
Eastern Cape |
N/A |
65 |
39 |
60 |
70 |
44 |
63 |
61 |
Mpumalanga |
147 |
181 |
189 |
164 |
156 |
181 |
207 |
154 |
Total |
927 |
1139 |
1204 |
1226 |
1088 |
959 |
1207 |
388 |
|
01-Sep-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
101 |
182.6 |
204 |
234 |
311 |
413 |
373 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
292 |
292 |
309 |
309 |
941 |
941 |
817 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
166 |
133 |
168 |
171 |
334 |
299 |
394 |
N/A |
Free State |
89 |
79 |
186 |
280 |
355 |
335 |
328 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
153 |
158 |
133 |
173 |
317 |
296 |
309 |
280 |
Eastern Cape |
66 |
44 |
30 |
67 |
112 |
132 |
122 |
114 |
Mpumalanga |
161.55 |
187 |
213 |
160 |
346 |
394 |
350 |
360 |
|
1028 |
1076 |
1241 |
1393 |
2716 |
2810 |
2693 |
754 |
|
02-Sep-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00 - 20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
101 |
183 |
204 |
234 |
311 |
413 |
373 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
292 |
292 |
309 |
309 |
941 |
941 |
817 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
166 |
133 |
168 |
171 |
334 |
299 |
394 |
N/A |
Free State |
89 |
79 |
186 |
280 |
355 |
335 |
328 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
153 |
158 |
133 |
173 |
317 |
296 |
309 |
280 |
Eastern Cape |
66 |
44 |
30 |
67 |
112 |
132 |
122 |
114 |
Mpumalanga |
162 |
187 |
213 |
160 |
346 |
394 |
350 |
360 |
Total |
1028 |
1076 |
1241 |
1393 |
2716 |
2810 |
2693 |
754 |
|
03-Sep-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:00-10:00 |
10:00-12:00 |
12:00-14:00 |
14:00-16:00 |
16:00-18:00 |
18:00-20:00 |
20:00-22:00 |
22:00-00:00 |
Western Cape |
332 |
355 |
389 |
203 |
359 |
458 |
351 |
N/A |
Gauteng |
864 |
981 |
871 |
857 |
607 |
724 |
688 |
N/A |
KwaZulu Natal |
293 |
266 |
344 |
326 |
254 |
256 |
271 |
N/A |
Free State |
302 |
287 |
262 |
343 |
328 |
271 |
292 |
N/A |
Limpopo |
290 |
248 |
269 |
283 |
297 |
253 |
283 |
283 |
Eastern Cape |
107 |
133 |
99 |
120 |
110 |
139 |
N/A |
N/A |
Mpumalanga |
346 |
394 |
350 |
360 |
347 |
394 |
350 |
354 |
Total |
2534 |
2664 |
2583 |
2491 |
2302 |
2495 |
2235 |
636 |
Annexure B
Estimated megawatt-hours per Eskom Operating UnitPeriod: 1 July to 3 September 2020
Date |
Western Cape |
Gauteng |
Kwazulu Natal |
Free State |
Limpopo |
Eastern Cape |
Mpumalanga |
TOTAL |
Stages |
Fri 10-Jul-2020 |
1764 |
3275 |
1466 |
1341 |
830 |
830 |
2134 |
11 639 |
Stage 2 |
Sat 11-Jul-2020 |
2226 |
5225 |
1875 |
2000 |
2058 |
783 |
2465 |
16 633 |
Stage 2 |
Sun 12-Jul-2020 |
2700 |
4805 |
2264 |
1714 |
2026 |
911 |
2388 |
16 808 |
Stage 2 |
Mon 13-Jul-2020 |
1840 |
5312 |
1658 |
2068 |
1998 |
959 |
2387 |
16 222 |
Stage 2 |
Tue 14-Jul-2020 |
2396 |
6158 |
1834 |
2118 |
2153 |
1069 |
2385 |
18 114 |
Stage 2 |
Wed 15-Jul-2020 |
1798 |
5564 |
1624 |
1499 |
1921 |
786 |
2471 |
15 663 |
Stage 1/2 |
Thu 16-Jul-2020 |
1886 |
3356 |
1427 |
1580 |
1327 |
626 |
2024 |
12 227 |
Stage 1/2 |
Thu 13-Aug-2020 |
2222 |
4818 |
1562 |
2014 |
2304 |
1161 |
2387 |
16 468 |
Stage 2 |
Fri 14-Aug-2020 |
1694 |
5128 |
1508 |
1377 |
1888 |
1161 |
2692 |
15 448 |
Stage 2 |
Tue 18-Aug-2020 |
944 |
2383 |
948 |
933 |
1176 |
691 |
2749 |
9 825 |
Stage 2 |
Wed 19-Aug-2020 |
1980 |
5585 |
1791 |
1712 |
2186 |
943 |
2790 |
16 988 |
Stage 2 |
Thu 20-Aug-2020 |
2555 |
4377 |
1657 |
1947 |
2178 |
804 |
2757 |
16 275 |
Stage 2 |
Tue 01-Sep-2020 |
1884 |
2962 |
1337 |
1180 |
1665 |
809 |
2066 |
11 903 |
Stage 2 |
Wed 02-Sep-2020 |
3636 |
7802 |
3330 |
3304 |
3637 |
1372 |
4344 |
27 425 |
Stage 2/4 |
Thu 03-Sep-2020 |
4894 |
11183 |
4020 |
4170 |
4408 |
1414 |
5791 |
35 880 |
Stage 4 |
Additional Information
An overview of the days were load shedding was implemented and the corresponding stages between 1 July to 3 September 2020 is as set out in the table below.
Date |
Load shedding Stage |
Date |
Load shedding Stage |
10-Jul-20 |
Stage 2 |
14-Aug-20 |
Stage 2 |
11-Jul-20 |
Stage 2 |
18-Aug-20 |
Stage 2 |
12-Jul-20 |
Stage 2 |
19-Aug-20 |
Stage 2 |
13-Jul-20 |
Stage 2 |
20-Aug-20 |
Stage 2 |
14-Jul-20 |
Stage 2 |
01-Sep-20 |
Stage 2 |
15-Jul-20 |
Stage 1 / 2 |
02-Sep-20 |
Stage 2 /4 |
16-Jul-20 |
Stage 1 / 2 |
03-Sep-20 |
Stage 4 |
13-Aug-20 |
Stage 2 |
04 November 2020 - NW2133
Van Minnen, Ms BM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What; (a) Is the current municipal debt outstanding to Eskom by each municipality and (b) Attempts have been made to collect the outstanding specified municipal debt to Eskom? NW2696E
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
a) The total debt owed by municipalities as at 31 July 2020 is R46.1 billion, of which R31 billion is overdue debt. The details of the age analysis of the total debt owed by each municipality to Eskom, as at 31 July 2020 are set out in Annexure A.
b) Eskom has implemented several interventions to collect the outstanding debt owed as set out in Table 1 below:
Table 1: Interventions by Eskom to collect outstanding debt
Interventions by Eskom |
|
Implemented concessions as agreed with SALGA |
|
Interventions by Eskom |
|
Focus on enhancing and enforcing current revenue management processes |
|
Partnering with government |
|
ANNEXURE A - PQ2133 |
||||||||||
REPORTING MONTH : 2020/07/31 |
||||||||||
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
16 - 30 days |
31 - 60 days |
61 - 90 days |
90 days+ |
Total |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
Total VAT |
(b)(ii) Total Interest |
||
EASTERN CAPE |
1 045 309 406 |
2 530 451 |
82 838 040 |
54 125 462 |
1 094 964 881 |
2 279 768 239 |
1 795 121 602 |
268 812 797 |
215 833 839 |
|
1 |
ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
-206 089 |
247 583 |
38 373 |
9 043 |
92 140 |
181 051 |
153 815 |
19 010 |
8 225 |
2 |
AMAHLATHI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 173 481 |
10 224 |
4 674 349 |
1 760 031 |
16 357 033 |
27 975 119 |
22 424 224 |
3 363 616 |
2 187 279 |
3 |
AMATHOLE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
1 274 342 |
1 087 143 |
1 210 463 |
981 709 |
1 092 622 |
5 646 278 |
4 836 768 |
727 414 |
82 097 |
4 |
BLUE CRANE ROUTE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
14 094 374 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 094 374 |
12 255 977 |
1 838 397 |
0 |
5 |
BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
237 804 629 |
0 |
36 963 |
1 |
0 |
237 841 592 |
206 746 921 |
31 094 356 |
315 |
6 |
CHRIS HANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
-723 145 |
101 341 |
4 198 860 |
221 205 |
432 114 |
4 230 375 |
3 786 403 |
389 371 |
54 601 |
7 |
DR BEYERS NAUDE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
12 712 692 |
69 099 |
8 824 386 |
7 206 803 |
85 385 606 |
114 198 585 |
87 592 369 |
13 119 997 |
13 486 219 |
8 |
ELUNDINI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
152 619 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
152 619 |
134 562 |
18 057 |
0 |
9 |
EMALAHLENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
2 019 976 |
0 |
5 877 |
0 |
0 |
2 025 852 |
1 756 485 |
263 473 |
5 895 |
10 |
ENGCOBO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0,05 |
0,01 |
0 |
11 |
ENOCH MGIJIMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
42 663 040 |
15 051 |
31 083 743 |
20 638 507 |
298 112 955 |
392 513 295 |
305 419 072 |
45 776 831 |
41 317 392 |
12 |
GREAT KEI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 562 521 |
0 |
484 587 |
10 368 |
3 802 232 |
5 859 708 |
4 665 931 |
699 858 |
493 919 |
13 |
INGQUZA HILL LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
250 676 |
34 647 |
257 909 |
0 |
0 |
543 232 |
469 595 |
70 439 |
3 198 |
14 |
INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
527 757 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
527 757 |
458 919 |
68 838 |
0 |
15 |
INXUBA YETHEMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
12 308 862 |
0 |
8 968 063 |
5 983 581 |
140 121 530 |
167 382 037 |
119 397 835 |
17 741 834 |
30 242 368 |
16 |
JOE GQABI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
11 361 |
134 482 |
109 492 |
1 496 472 |
0 |
1 751 808 |
1 500 303 |
225 045 |
26 459 |
17 |
KING SABATA DALINDYEBO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
101 419 957 |
31 501 |
424 314 |
1 441 991 |
112 009 461 |
215 327 225 |
180 089 083 |
27 617 009 |
7 621 133 |
18 |
KOUGA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
31 699 079 |
0 |
798 |
0 |
0 |
31 699 876 |
27 563 600 |
4 134 540 |
1 737 |
19 |
KOU-KAMMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
704 582 |
0 |
308 878 |
0 |
0 |
1 013 460 |
877 925 |
131 689 |
3 847 |
20 |
MAKANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
17 097 721 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 749 083 |
53 846 804 |
45 909 235 |
6 829 881 |
1 107 688 |
21 |
MATATIELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
6 988 990 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 988 990 |
6 077 383 |
911 607 |
0 |
22 |
MBASHE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 827 |
0 |
219 |
333 |
0 |
2 378 |
1 992 |
299 |
87 |
23 |
MBIZANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
93 301 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
93 302 |
80 413 |
12 067 |
822 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
16 - 30 days |
Current |
16 - 30 days |
Current |
16 - 30 days |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
Total VAT |
(b)(ii) Total Interest |
||
24 |
MHLONTLO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
199 361 |
45 970 |
34 821 |
0 |
0 |
280 152 |
242 800 |
36 420 |
932 |
25 |
MNQUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
NDLAMBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
7 573 353 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 573 353 |
6 518 988 |
1 054 365 |
0 |
27 |
NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
513 455 879 |
527 935 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
513 983 814 |
446 942 072 |
67 041 372 |
370 |
28 |
NGQUSHWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
NTHABANKULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
30 151 |
0 |
276 |
0 |
0 |
30 427 |
26 458 |
3 969 |
0 |
30 |
NYANDENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY FBE |
107 342 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
107 342 |
93 341 |
14 001 |
0 |
31 |
O R TAMBO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
-468 490 |
225 060 |
222 275 |
174 269 |
193 240 |
346 355 |
263 672 |
64 209 |
18 474 |
32 |
PORT ST JOHNS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
303 262 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
303 262 |
263 706 |
39 556 |
0 |
33 |
RAYMOND MHLABA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 715 887 |
0 |
7 687 542 |
4 832 117 |
166 402 968 |
188 638 514 |
122 480 855 |
17 928 459 |
48 229 201 |
34 |
SAKHISIZWE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 995 628 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 995 640 |
1 720 822 |
258 121 |
16 698 |
35 |
SENQU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 340 493 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 340 493 |
4 643 910 |
696 582 |
0 |
36 |
SUNDAYS RIVER VALLEY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
3 538 619 |
0 |
2 510 673 |
1 583 566 |
0 |
7 632 858 |
6 176 658 |
926 499 |
529 701 |
37 |
UMZIMVUBU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
44 043 |
403 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 446 |
38 649 |
5 797 |
0 |
38 |
WALTER SISULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
15 841 324 |
0 |
11 755 177 |
7 785 466 |
234 213 897 |
269 595 865 |
173 510 863 |
25 689 820 |
70 395 182 |
FREE STATE |
558 515 003 |
247 880 311 |
275 222 401 |
206 877 352 |
11 474 620 510 |
12 763 115 577 |
8 663 638 405 |
1 258 736 678 |
2 840 740 494 |
|
39 |
CENTLEC MUNICIPALITY |
3 430 414 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 430 414 |
2 971 169 |
445 675 |
13 570 |
40 |
DIHLABENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
26 792 920 |
0 |
18 576 125 |
13 342 424 |
347 465 405 |
406 176 873 |
296 860 680 |
43 919 008 |
65 397 185 |
41 |
KOPANONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 331 508 |
0 |
10 065 |
15 155 |
1 226 544 |
6 583 272 |
5 556 785 |
825 596 |
200 892 |
42 |
LETSEMENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
4 981 926 |
0 |
4 272 604 |
2 347 114 |
46 973 170 |
58 574 813 |
45 544 488 |
6 840 068 |
6 190 257 |
43 |
MAFUBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
13 032 629 |
0 |
12 416 681 |
15 357 066 |
98 532 534 |
139 338 910 |
101 708 119 |
14 920 993 |
22 709 798 |
44 |
MALUTI A PHOFUNG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
103 018 183 |
662 361 |
89 820 631 |
72 908 612 |
5 140 907 401 |
5 407 317 188 |
3 416 686 863 |
493 591 612 |
1 497 038 713 |
45 |
MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
4 952 986 |
247 171 599 |
12 040 567 |
0 |
13 886 892 |
278 052 045 |
241 698 211 |
36 254 997 |
98 836 |
46 |
MANTSOPA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
8 029 084 |
0 |
14 084 839 |
7 374 869 |
192 387 328 |
221 876 119 |
144 565 922 |
21 065 830 |
56 244 367 |
47 |
MASILONYANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
6 792 694 |
0 |
5 811 351 |
2 434 505 |
60 087 494 |
75 126 044 |
60 368 482 |
8 906 425 |
5 851 137 |
48 |
MATJHABENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
178 222 967 |
7 893 |
49 033 516 |
44 390 457 |
3 129 712 117 |
3 401 366 950 |
2 277 416 556 |
329 785 275 |
794 165 118 |
49 |
METSIMAHOLO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
44 243 387 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 500 000 |
57 743 387 |
49 953 693 |
7 493 054 |
296 640 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
16 - 30 days |
Current |
16 - 30 days |
Current |
16 - 30 days |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
Total VAT |
(b)(ii) Total Interest |
||
50 |
MOHOKARE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
67 803 |
0 |
66 300 |
65 412 |
192 350 |
391 865 |
334 842 |
50 226 |
6 796 |
51 |
MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
40 234 333 |
0 |
15 742 628 |
0 |
298 357 452 |
354 334 414 |
274 732 913 |
40 968 278 |
38 633 222 |
52 |
NALA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
25 440 184 |
0 |
2 973 884 |
17 704 568 |
346 273 371 |
392 392 006 |
298 390 489 |
43 565 352 |
50 436 165 |
53 |
NGWATHE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
37 416 763 |
0 |
31 989 813 |
18 228 528 |
1 221 468 050 |
1 309 103 154 |
986 444 975 |
142 542 453 |
180 115 726 |
54 |
NKETOANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
20 562 888 |
0 |
5 750 543 |
5 557 075 |
321 984 368 |
353 854 874 |
239 246 224 |
34 691 455 |
79 917 195 |
55 |
PHUMELELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
8 037 971 |
26 578 |
2 314 024 |
2 213 297 |
124 528 836 |
137 120 705 |
99 794 356 |
14 859 853 |
22 466 496 |
56 |
SETSOTO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
11 717 024 |
11 879 |
210 852 |
0 |
0 |
11 939 755 |
10 275 707 |
1 541 356 |
122 692 |
57 |
TOKOLOGO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 006 543 |
0 |
4 049 180 |
2 839 483 |
93 121 829 |
105 017 035 |
78 046 722 |
11 542 190 |
15 428 123 |
58 |
TSWELOPELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
11 202 797 |
0 |
6 058 799 |
2 098 788 |
24 015 370 |
43 375 754 |
33 041 210 |
4 926 979 |
5 407 565 |
GAUTENG |
6 262 789 360 |
707 633 991 |
259 734 441 |
182 966 557 |
2 405 224 960 |
9 818 349 309 |
7 967 389 189 |
1 194 170 609 |
656 789 511 |
|
59 |
CITY OF EKURHULENI METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
1 841 503 839 |
703 358 185 |
14 068 423 |
331 637 |
0 |
2 559 262 084 |
2 226 904 328 |
334 200 566 |
-1 842 810 |
60 |
CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
1 670 743 142 |
85 603 |
3 778 616 |
0 |
2 275 |
1 674 609 637 |
1 456 122 030 |
218 418 546 |
69 062 |
61 |
CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
1 508 561 807 |
724 170 |
384 906 |
0 |
0 |
1 509 670 884 |
1 312 835 323 |
196 828 012 |
7 548 |
62 |
EMFULENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
626 500 695 |
3 386 573 |
158 757 750 |
110 805 767 |
1 833 220 909 |
2 732 671 694 |
1 968 807 647 |
294 487 852 |
469 376 196 |
63 |
LESEDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
39 965 438 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 965 438 |
34 753 416 |
5 212 022 |
0 |
64 |
MERAFONG CITY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
106 995 000 |
79 460 |
30 161 686 |
26 536 973 |
363 916 132 |
527 689 250 |
382 220 081 |
57 162 147 |
88 307 021 |
65 |
MIDVAAL LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
43 316 862 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 316 862 |
37 666 837 |
5 650 026 |
0 |
66 |
MOGALE CITY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
226 714 381 |
0 |
168 198 |
0 |
0 |
226 882 579 |
170 075 997 |
25 511 623 |
31 294 960 |
67 |
RAND WEST CITY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
198 488 196 |
0 |
52 414 862 |
45 292 180 |
208 006 073 |
504 201 310 |
377 934 338 |
56 689 438 |
69 577 534 |
68 |
SEDIBENG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 570 |
79 570 |
69 192 |
10 379 |
0 |
KWAZULU NATAL |
2 640 303 110 |
5 626 740 |
38 055 628 |
32 493 098 |
482 404 486 |
3 198 883 061 |
2 686 612 419 |
403 032 475 |
109 238 166 |
|
69 |
ABAQULUSI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
52 536 257 |
12 584 |
0 |
0 |
17 281 243 |
69 830 084 |
56 131 678 |
8 421 628 |
5 276 778 |
70 |
ALFRED DUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
42 465 418 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
42 465 418 |
36 926 450 |
5 538 968 |
0 |
71 |
AMAJUBA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
365 343 |
0 |
243 797 |
16 239 |
41 156 |
666 535 |
577 233 |
86 800 |
2 502 |
72 |
BIG 5 HLABISA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
-2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-2 |
-2 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
CITY OF UMHLATHUZE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
135 633 196 |
1 230 235 |
153 317 |
148 200 |
0 |
137 164 948 |
119 267 789 |
17 893 124 |
4 036 |
74 |
DANNHAUSER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
16 - 30 days |
Current |
16 - 30 days |
Current |
16 - 30 days |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
Total VAT |
(b)(ii) Total Interest |
||
75 |
DR NKOSAZANA DLAMINI ZUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
18 415 |
0 |
2 545 |
0 |
0 |
20 960 |
18 208 |
2 731 |
21 |
76 |
EDUMBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 118 208 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 118 208 |
4 450 616 |
667 592 |
0 |
77 |
EMADLANGENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
2 020 573 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 020 573 |
1 757 020 |
263 553 |
0 |
78 |
ENDUMENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
18 996 139 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 996 139 |
16 519 983 |
2 476 156 |
0 |
79 |
ETHEKWINI METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
1 512 335 557 |
0 |
5 185 |
0 |
0 |
1 512 340 742 |
1 315 078 890 |
197 261 841 |
11 |
80 |
GREATER KOKSTAD LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
-1 633 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-1 633 |
-1 633 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
HARRY GWALA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
-584 999 |
161 024 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-423 975 |
-427 098 |
1 947 |
1 175 |
82 |
ILEMBE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
819 821 |
780 852 |
1 013 |
0 |
0 |
1 601 686 |
1 392 771 |
208 916 |
0 |
83 |
IMPENDLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
84 |
INKOSI LANGALIBALELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
51 163 261 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 207 105 |
76 370 366 |
59 246 542 |
8 886 539 |
8 237 286 |
85 |
JOZINI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
32 710 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 710 |
28 443 |
4 266 |
0 |
86 |
KING CETSHWAYO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
156 948 |
166 379 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
323 328 |
279 853 |
43 474 |
0 |
87 |
KWADUKUZA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
104 639 975 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
104 639 975 |
90 991 283 |
13 648 692 |
0 |
88 |
MANDENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
89 |
MAPHUMULO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 839 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 839 |
1 599 |
240 |
0 |
90 |
MKHAMBATHINI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
91 |
MPOFANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
7 921 418 |
0 |
5 957 353 |
3 952 182 |
168 480 033 |
186 310 986 |
137 797 506 |
20 384 739 |
28 128 740 |
92 |
MSINGA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
-3 304 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-3 304 |
-2 782 |
-522 |
0 |
93 |
MSUNDUZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
480 468 091 |
0 |
45 104 |
24 039 |
1 592 529 |
482 129 763 |
415 304 937 |
62 535 103 |
4 289 724 |
94 |
MTHONJANENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
2 547 629 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 571 696 |
6 119 325 |
5 203 446 |
781 578 |
134 301 |
95 |
MTUBATUBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
11 550 |
9 548 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 098 |
17 917 |
2 688 |
493 |
96 |
NDWEDWE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
97 |
NEWCASTLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
125 363 929 |
0 |
30 242 547 |
21 597 294 |
166 566 605 |
343 770 375 |
262 288 394 |
39 461 437 |
42 020 544 |
98 |
NKANDLA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
4 021 175 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 021 175 |
3 484 208 |
522 631 |
14 336 |
99 |
NONGOMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
25 992 |
0 |
26 194 |
0 |
0 |
52 186 |
45 379 |
6 807 |
0 |
100 |
NQUTHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
3 574 987 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 574 987 |
3 108 684 |
466 303 |
0 |
101 |
OKHAHLAMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 455 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 455 |
1 265 |
190 |
0 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
Total VAT |
(b)(ii) Total Interest |
||
102 |
RAY NKONYENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
14 348 518 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 348 518 |
12 476 972 |
1 871 546 |
0 |
103 |
RICHMOND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
104 |
UBUHLEBEZWE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
35 627 |
42 770 |
33 220 |
0 |
0 |
111 617 |
96 508 |
14 569 |
540 |
105 |
UGU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
305 961 |
1 673 529 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 979 491 |
1 721 959 |
257 037 |
494 |
106 |
ULUNDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
22 836 934 |
0 |
8 111 |
6 586 606 |
99 612 854 |
129 044 505 |
93 943 656 |
13 991 774 |
21 109 076 |
107 |
UMDONI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
-57 247 |
70 103 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 856 |
10 655 |
2 201 |
0 |
108 |
UMFOLOZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
99 443 |
19 360 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
118 803 |
103 307 |
15 496 |
0 |
109 |
UMGUNGUNDLOVU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
8 567 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 567 |
7 449 |
1 117 |
0 |
110 |
UMHLABUYALINGANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
-1 000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-1 000 |
-870 |
-130 |
0 |
111 |
UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNIC |
3 832 673 |
0 |
79 841 |
0 |
0 |
3 912 513 |
3 409 374 |
502 361 |
779 |
112 |
UMLALAZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
7 920 573 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 920 573 |
6 887 455 |
1 033 118 |
0 |
113 |
UMNGENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
20 381 396 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 381 396 |
17 722 952 |
2 658 443 |
0 |
114 |
UMSHWATHI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
-2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-2 |
-2 |
0 |
0 |
115 |
UMUZIWABANTU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
116 |
UMVOTI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
10 353 066 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 353 066 |
9 002 666 |
1 350 400 |
0 |
117 |
UMZIMKULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
118 |
UMZINYATHI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
897 411 |
221 356 |
710 537 |
148 451 |
51 264 |
2 029 019 |
1 758 677 |
267 133 |
3 209 |
119 |
UMZUMBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
171 762 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
171 762 |
148 285 |
22 243 |
1 234 |
120 |
UPHONGOLA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
3 736 084 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 736 084 |
3 248 768 |
487 315 |
0 |
121 |
UTHUKELA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
4 311 747 |
199 515 |
181 736 |
16 056 |
0 |
4 709 054 |
4 094 838 |
614 217 |
0 |
122 |
ZULULAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
1 471 651 |
1 039 484 |
365 126 |
4 032 |
0 |
2 880 292 |
2 491 189 |
376 216 |
12 887 |
LIMPOPO |
365 644 212 |
83 934 |
36 521 267 |
19 461 882 |
799 096 597 |
1 220 807 892 |
917 389 531 |
136 409 206 |
167 009 155 |
|
123 |
BA-PHALABORWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
10 296 929 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 296 929 |
8 953 852 |
1 343 078 |
0 |
124 |
BELA-BELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
12 529 223 |
0 |
16 264 129 |
6 505 124 |
534 614 |
35 833 091 |
22 204 295 |
3 349 128 |
10 279 668 |
125 |
BLOUBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 796 357 |
0 |
68 663 |
0 |
0 |
5 865 021 |
5 100 018 |
765 003 |
0 |
126 |
CAPRICORN DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
231 179 |
0 |
108 572 |
0 |
0 |
339 751 |
293 593 |
44 456 |
1 701 |
127 |
COLLINS CHABANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
442 394 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
442 394 |
344 466 |
97 928 |
0 |
128 |
ELIAS MOTSOALEDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
10 791 749 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 791 749 |
9 366 960 |
1 405 044 |
19 744 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
Total VAT |
(b)(ii) Total Interest |
||
129 |
EPHRAIM MOGALE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 984 035 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 984 035 |
5 203 508 |
780 526 |
0 |
130 |
FETAKGOMO - GREATER TUBATSE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
695 238 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
695 238 |
604 571 |
90 668 |
0 |
131 |
GREATER GIYANI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
94 137 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
94 137 |
81 859 |
12 279 |
0 |
132 |
GREATER LETABA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
2 276 535 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 276 535 |
1 979 595 |
296 939 |
0 |
133 |
GREATER TZANEEN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
62 478 617 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 478 617 |
54 097 570 |
8 114 634 |
266 412 |
134 |
LEPELLE NKUMPI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
333 195 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
333 195 |
289 735 |
43 460 |
0 |
135 |
LEPHALALE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
12 968 872 |
0 |
83 097 |
0 |
0 |
13 051 969 |
11 340 038 |
1 702 157 |
9 774 |
136 |
MAKHADO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
40 837 585 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 837 585 |
35 510 944 |
5 326 642 |
0 |
137 |
MAKHUDUTHAMAGA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
36 690 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 690 |
31 904 |
4 786 |
0 |
138 |
MARULENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
27 376 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 376 |
23 805 |
3 571 |
0 |
139 |
MODIMOLLE-MOOKGOPHONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
24 901 644 |
0 |
19 975 470 |
12 956 758 |
541 353 824 |
599 187 696 |
430 035 176 |
63 881 053 |
105 271 466 |
140 |
MOGALAKWENA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
28 617 694 |
68 719 |
21 335 |
0 |
0 |
28 707 749 |
24 643 089 |
3 696 463 |
368 196 |
141 |
MOLEMOLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
369 567 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
369 567 |
321 362 |
48 204 |
0 |
142 |
MOPANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
2 782 672 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 782 672 |
2 342 185 |
440 487 |
0 |
143 |
MUSINA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
14 281 246 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 547 185 |
76 828 431 |
52 507 211 |
7 863 053 |
16 458 168 |
145 |
POLOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
110 045 238 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
110 045 238 |
95 690 601 |
14 354 637 |
0 |
146 |
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
2 727 234 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 727 234 |
2 424 021 |
303 213 |
0 |
147 |
THABAZIMBI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 035 505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
194 660 974 |
203 696 479 |
147 869 991 |
21 522 136 |
34 304 352 |
148 |
THULAMELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
941 719 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
941 719 |
818 886 |
122 833 |
0 |
149 |
VHEMBE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
6 121 581 |
15 215 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 136 796 |
5 310 296 |
796 827 |
29 673 |
MPUMALANGA |
907 660 119 |
7 516 615 |
437 595 269 |
295 614 172 |
8 067 142 378 |
9 715 528 552 |
6 871 695 575 |
1 013 313 981 |
1 830 518 996 |
|
150 |
BUSHBUCKRIDGE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
8 592 270 |
9 556 |
41 218 |
47 295 |
2 795 848 |
11 486 187 |
9 591 898 |
1 438 956 |
455 332 |
151 |
CHIEF ALBERT LUTHULI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
11 152 692 |
0 |
12 654 701 |
44 644 |
3 064 943 |
26 916 980 |
18 370 903 |
2 755 567 |
5 790 510 |
152 |
CITY OF MBOMBELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
233 332 697 |
7 506 989 |
59 540 611 |
50 613 658 |
119 353 057 |
470 347 013 |
347 286 841 |
52 077 008 |
70 983 163 |
153 |
DIPALESENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
10 767 510 |
0 |
3 135 474 |
28 792 |
40 966 490 |
54 898 267 |
36 562 627 |
5 480 622 |
12 855 018 |
154 |
DR J S MOROKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
45 430 |
0 |
46 800 |
0 |
0 |
92 230 |
149 401 |
-58 126 |
955 |
155 |
DR PIXLEY KA ISAKA SEME LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
11 194 699 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 194 699 |
9 734 521 |
1 460 178 |
0 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
Total VAT |
(b)(ii) Total Interest |
||
156 |
EMAKHAZENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 110 334 |
0 |
7 624 258 |
4 727 831 |
14 106 323 |
35 568 745 |
19 644 348 |
2 945 752 |
12 978 645 |
157 |
EMALAHLENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
202 206 778 |
0 |
184 122 466 |
105 468 608 |
3 765 940 297 |
4 257 738 149 |
2 980 551 539 |
438 233 357 |
838 953 253 |
158 |
GOVAN MBEKI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
118 537 253 |
70 |
75 977 923 |
56 430 543 |
1 845 400 427 |
2 096 346 216 |
1 491 685 244 |
220 881 471 |
383 779 501 |
159 |
LEKWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
51 751 210 |
0 |
35 985 637 |
27 920 218 |
1 061 620 169 |
1 177 277 234 |
771 943 754 |
113 585 356 |
291 748 124 |
160 |
MKHONDO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
23 505 497 |
0 |
19 843 787 |
10 989 345 |
140 688 284 |
195 026 912 |
143 033 710 |
21 658 341 |
30 334 861 |
161 |
MSUKALIGWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
40 017 013 |
0 |
25 819 186 |
16 502 497 |
98 578 799 |
180 917 495 |
129 653 393 |
19 441 736 |
31 822 366 |
162 |
NKANGALA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
38 741 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 741 |
33 549 |
5 032 |
159 |
163 |
NKOMAZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
18 159 927 |
0 |
19 840 |
0 |
0 |
18 179 768 |
15 801 662 |
2 370 249 |
7 857 |
164 |
STEVE TSHWETE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
79 812 695 |
0 |
38 668 |
0 |
10 023 |
79 861 386 |
69 443 904 |
10 416 429 |
1 053 |
165 |
THABA CHWEU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
53 638 796 |
0 |
9 123 742 |
8 066 497 |
731 152 976 |
801 982 010 |
607 390 361 |
87 677 266 |
106 914 383 |
166 |
THEMBISILE HANI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
273 419 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
273 419 |
237 756 |
35 663 |
0 |
167 |
VICTOR KHANYE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
35 523 158 |
0 |
3 620 958 |
14 774 245 |
243 464 742 |
297 383 103 |
220 580 164 |
32 909 122 |
43 893 817 |
NORTH WEST |
841 754 173 |
2 233 012 |
257 373 301 |
114 059 427 |
1 616 955 797 |
2 832 375 711 |
2 045 584 616 |
303 446 819 |
483 344 276 |
|
168 |
CITY OF MATLOSANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
245 873 306 |
686 256 |
57 731 377 |
49 476 792 |
295 308 522 |
649 076 254 |
498 853 779 |
74 629 652 |
75 592 823 |
169 |
DITSOBOTLA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
19 888 630 |
9 034 |
15 811 342 |
10 967 219 |
580 419 857 |
627 096 083 |
403 251 980 |
58 948 453 |
164 895 650 |
170 |
DR RUTH SEGOMOTSI MOMPATI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
76 928 |
0 |
43 745 |
0 |
0 |
120 673 |
104 973 |
15 700 |
0 |
171 |
GREATER TAUNG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 736 478 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 736 478 |
1 510 345 |
226 133 |
0 |
172 |
JB MARKS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
127 779 494 |
0 |
22 790 470 |
0 |
0 |
150 569 964 |
130 832 609 |
19 624 891 |
112 464 |
173 |
KAGISANO-MOLOPO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
338 156 |
0 |
218 868 |
0 |
0 |
557 024 |
484 492 |
72 532 |
0 |
174 |
KGETLENGRIVIER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
8 221 795 |
22 347 |
3 127 140 |
2 967 531 |
128 124 786 |
142 463 600 |
102 472 991 |
15 057 349 |
24 933 259 |
175 |
LEKWA-TEEMANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
16 374 286 |
11 979 |
5 295 415 |
4 105 005 |
28 438 977 |
54 225 662 |
45 013 631 |
6 752 309 |
2 459 722 |
176 |
MADIBENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
61 889 822 |
112 129 |
46 638 872 |
27 191 585 |
49 111 665 |
184 944 072 |
146 411 142 |
21 880 992 |
16 651 938 |
177 |
MAHIKENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
434 909 |
46 888 |
82 618 |
99 498 |
4 887 425 |
5 551 338 |
4 299 862 |
616 684 |
634 793 |
179 |
MAMUSA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
5 765 300 |
230 076 |
4 542 741 |
2 651 415 |
84 228 354 |
97 417 888 |
64 355 570 |
9 487 426 |
23 574 891 |
180 |
MAQUASSI HILLS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
17 729 506 |
1 037 353 |
4 969 338 |
5 017 932 |
10 719 534 |
39 473 662 |
29 198 825 |
4 354 983 |
5 919 854 |
181 |
MORETELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
822 572 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
822 572 |
705 339 |
105 799 |
11 434 |
182 |
MOSES KOTANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
548 174 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
548 174 |
476 087 |
72 087 |
0 |
183 |
NALEDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
28 783 257 |
0 |
7 755 111 |
7 018 725 |
325 325 325 |
368 882 419 |
248 644 382 |
36 372 825 |
83 865 212 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
||
184 |
NGAKA MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
-295 536 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-295 536 |
-215 388 |
-80 148 |
0 |
185 |
RAMOTSHERE MOILOA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 014 105 |
76 950 |
6 463 760 |
4 232 882 |
45 036 315 |
64 824 013 |
49 482 277 |
7 418 730 |
7 923 006 |
186 |
RATLOU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
946 515 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
946 515 |
823 499 |
123 015 |
0 |
187 |
RUSTENBURG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
281 951 757 |
0 |
81 890 831 |
318 076 |
470 551 |
364 631 215 |
270 476 067 |
40 580 472 |
53 574 676 |
NORTHERN CAPE |
344 185 847 |
491 368 |
72 340 140 |
33 725 145 |
1 657 186 468 |
2 107 928 968 |
1 459 764 851 |
215 637 494 |
432 526 623 |
|
188 |
!KHEIS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
48 605 |
69 735 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
118 339 |
101 008 |
15 151 |
2 181 |
189 |
DAWID KRUIPER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
28 287 216 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 287 216 |
23 958 504 |
3 593 776 |
734 936 |
190 |
DIKGATLONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
4 921 723 |
0 |
11 199 072 |
2 405 857 |
114 259 861 |
132 786 514 |
89 544 028 |
13 103 909 |
30 138 577 |
191 |
EMTHANJENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
11 133 067 |
0 |
8 300 662 |
4 886 344 |
71 524 133 |
95 844 205 |
70 079 616 |
10 497 178 |
15 267 411 |
192 |
GAMAGARA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
40 057 404 |
0 |
10 154 304 |
10 199 |
229 882 298 |
280 104 206 |
204 883 347 |
30 542 311 |
44 678 547 |
193 |
GA-SEGONYANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
16 881 579 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 881 579 |
11 686 218 |
1 752 933 |
3 442 428 |
194 |
HANTAM LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
2 883 373 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 883 373 |
2 507 281 |
376 092 |
0 |
195 |
JOE MOROLONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 412 277 |
0 |
707 836 |
0 |
0 |
2 120 114 |
1 740 990 |
261 101 |
118 023 |
196 |
KAI !GARIB LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 161 264 |
0 |
6 550 145 |
4 832 837 |
318 372 016 |
338 916 262 |
233 828 207 |
34 086 755 |
71 001 300 |
197 |
KAMIESBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
823 637 |
353 168 |
1 213 979 |
997 020 |
19 450 858 |
22 838 661 |
17 337 681 |
2 589 369 |
2 911 612 |
198 |
KAREEBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
-270 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-270 |
-512 |
242 |
0 |
199 |
KAROO HOOGLAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
30 511 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 511 |
26 531 |
3 980 |
0 |
200 |
KGATELOPELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
3 289 068 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 289 068 |
2 211 400 |
331 710 |
745 958 |
201 |
KHAI-MA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 231 326 |
64 307 |
906 888 |
633 133 |
17 567 862 |
20 403 516 |
13 323 309 |
1 977 493 |
5 102 715 |
202 |
MAGARENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
2 931 296 |
0 |
2 357 735 |
1 645 332 |
58 243 830 |
65 178 194 |
42 469 756 |
6 244 447 |
16 463 991 |
203 |
NAMA KHOI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
10 417 488 |
0 |
8 818 618 |
6 424 048 |
110 568 882 |
136 229 036 |
90 015 279 |
13 537 080 |
32 676 677 |
204 |
PHOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
19 782 404 |
0 |
5 952 228 |
5 309 723 |
116 395 538 |
147 439 893 |
105 562 316 |
15 735 134 |
26 142 443 |
205 |
RENOSTERBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 477 358 |
0 |
1 185 868 |
989 069 |
88 517 636 |
92 169 930 |
55 603 383 |
8 014 615 |
28 551 933 |
206 |
RICHTERSVELD LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 962 553 |
4 158 |
1 434 466 |
1 146 780 |
8 269 265 |
12 817 222 |
9 932 841 |
1 489 888 |
1 394 493 |
207 |
SIYANCUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
12 218 530 |
0 |
3 488 128 |
0 |
150 826 726 |
166 533 384 |
104 722 521 |
15 334 349 |
46 476 514 |
208 |
SIYATHEMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
3 388 979 |
0 |
2 709 253 |
1 774 437 |
63 576 385 |
71 449 053 |
50 090 782 |
7 391 879 |
13 966 392 |
209 |
SOL PLAATJE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
145 089 302 |
0 |
9 043 |
7 744 |
0 |
145 106 089 |
120 503 185 |
18 075 478 |
6 527 427 |
210 |
THEMBELIHLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 990 003 |
0 |
1 654 177 |
1 227 199 |
77 900 543 |
82 771 921 |
49 523 127 |
7 197 184 |
26 051 609 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
||
211 |
TSANTSABANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
13 003 441 |
0 |
3 368 820 |
60 023 |
147 252 789 |
163 685 073 |
106 538 739 |
15 626 285 |
41 520 049 |
212 |
UBUNTU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
2 621 811 |
0 |
2 131 961 |
1 375 400 |
64 577 847 |
70 707 019 |
45 485 525 |
6 645 686 |
18 575 807 |
213 |
UMSOBOMVU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 141 904 |
0 |
196 956 |
0 |
0 |
9 338 860 |
8 089 790 |
1 213 469 |
35 601 |
WESTERN CAPE |
2 128 610 643 |
468 097 |
13 559 252 |
8 907 022 |
4 955 170 |
2 156 500 183 |
1 871 098 781 |
280 628 568 |
4 772 834 |
|
214 |
BEAUFORT WEST LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
16 618 073 |
2 |
1 350 357 |
0 |
0 |
17 968 433 |
15 290 788 |
2 293 692 |
383 953 |
215 |
BERGRIVIER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
13 025 659 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 025 659 |
11 326 660 |
1 698 999 |
0 |
216 |
BITOU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
14 779 187 |
367 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 779 554 |
12 851 778 |
1 927 776 |
0 |
217 |
BREEDE VALLEY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
46 785 107 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 785 107 |
40 682 700 |
6 102 407 |
0 |
218 |
CAPE AGULHAS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
12 318 050 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 318 050 |
10 711 347 |
1 606 702 |
0 |
219 |
CEDERBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
11 422 826 |
129 097 |
9 243 198 |
6 468 139 |
3 421 849 |
30 685 109 |
25 517 245 |
3 827 587 |
1 340 277 |
220 |
CITY OF CAPE TOWN METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY |
1 344 766 378 |
203 828 |
52 964 |
13 250 |
89 301 |
1 345 125 721 |
1 169 720 089 |
175 397 831 |
7 801 |
221 |
DRAKENSTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
209 005 120 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
209 005 120 |
181 253 161 |
27 210 855 |
541 104 |
222 |
EDEN DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
66 031 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 031 |
57 192 |
8 579 |
260 |
223 |
GEORGE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
71 141 484 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
71 141 484 |
61 862 160 |
9 279 324 |
0 |
224 |
HESSEQUA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
4 483 848 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 483 848 |
3 898 092 |
585 757 |
0 |
225 |
KANNALAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
4 738 693 |
0 |
2 901 594 |
2 425 633 |
1 444 020 |
11 509 940 |
8 530 103 |
1 279 516 |
1 700 321 |
226 |
KNYSNA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
27 494 603 |
15 |
1 431 |
0 |
0 |
27 496 048 |
23 908 113 |
3 586 217 |
1 718 |
227 |
LAINGSBURG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
469 439 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
469 439 |
407 232 |
60 963 |
1 244 |
228 |
LANGEBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
42 248 052 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
42 248 052 |
36 737 436 |
5 510 615 |
0 |
229 |
MATZIKAMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
14 285 691 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 285 691 |
11 833 676 |
1 775 051 |
676 964 |
230 |
MOSSEL BAY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
50 700 673 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 700 673 |
43 985 167 |
6 597 775 |
117 731 |
231 |
OUDTSHOORN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
23 009 623 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 009 623 |
20 008 367 |
3 001 255 |
0 |
232 |
OVERSTRAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
40 485 198 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 485 198 |
35 204 520 |
5 280 678 |
0 |
233 |
PRINS ALBERT LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
1 646 075 |
0 |
52 |
0 |
0 |
1 646 126 |
1 431 369 |
214 705 |
52 |
234 |
SALDANHA BAY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
40 339 866 |
96 939 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 436 804 |
35 161 624 |
5 274 246 |
935 |
235 |
STELLENBOSCH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
52 626 589 |
37 845 |
9 337 |
0 |
0 |
52 673 770 |
45 803 178 |
6 870 478 |
115 |
236 |
SWARTLAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
33 945 087 |
0 |
320 |
0 |
0 |
33 945 407 |
29 517 468 |
4 427 614 |
325 |
237 |
SWELLENDAM LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 975 014 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 975 014 |
8 673 880 |
1 301 134 |
0 |
Name of Municipality |
(a) Age |
Total debt is made up of |
||||||||
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
Current |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
(b)(i) Total Capital |
||
238 |
THEEWATERSKLOOF LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
9 787 132 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 787 132 |
8 510 552 |
1 276 579 |
0 |
239 |
WEST COAST DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY |
1 194 027 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 194 027 |
1 038 255 |
155 738 |
34 |
240 |
WITZENBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY |
31 253 122 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 253 124 |
27 176 630 |
4 076 494 |
0 |
21 September 2020 - NW1197
Cachalia, Mr G K to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) What are the relevant details of private shareholders who (a) have held shares in the SA Express Airways SOC Ltd (SA Express) since it was established and (b) currently hold shares; (2) What are the relevant details of shares traded during the life of SA Express, including the details of the (a) shares traded, (b) share sellers, (c) share purchasers and (d) amounts paid for shares? NW1502E
Reply:
- (a) In 2007, Transnet divested its interest in SA Express when the airline was established in terms of the SA Express Act (No. 34 of 2007), promulgated in December 2007, which provided for the transfer of SA Express shares and interests from Transnet to the state. The Act further granted the conversion of SA Express into a public company with share capital. In 2009, Government took 100% shareholding in SA Express.
The Company is a pre-existing company as contemplated in Item 2 of Schedule 5 of the Companies Act, (No 71 of 2008), as amended, and was incorporated in accordance with the Legal Succession to the South African Transport Services Act No. 9 of 1989 to and, in terms of its enabling legislation.
(b) There are no private shareholders who currently hold shares in SA Express. The company is also subject to the provisions of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999, (PFMA) as amended. The government is the sole shareholder of the shares in the company and the rights attached to those shares are exercised by the Minister of Public Enterprises.
- The Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI) provides that the company is authorised to issue 1000 (one thousand) Shares. The 2013 MOI provides that the shares in issue are 452 (four hundred and fifty two) ordinary shares, all of which are held by the shareholder, as represented by the Minister of Public Enterprises.
- shares traded where 102 shares
- share seller was Transnet
c). share purchaser was Government, represented by the Minister of Public Enterprises
d) amount paid was R140 million.
The company received a total of R1 549 000 000.00 during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 financial years. The company was required to provide the Minister with a commensurate request to increase the authorised and issued shares, accordingly. The process was not finalised and the provisional liquidator will only be able to address the matter, subject to prescribed requirements.
21 September 2020 - NW1746
Singh, Mr N to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) Whether his department and/or the entities reporting to him currently provide free basic electricity under programmes other than the Free Basic Electricity programme; if not, why not; if so, (a) to whom and (b) what are the relevant details; (2) whether the installation and maintenance of electricity prepaid meters would be (a) subsidised or (b) free under certain parameters; if not, why not; if so, (i) under what parameters and (ii) what are the relevant details; (3) whether his department and/or the entities reporting to him prescribe electricity tariffs and rates to municipalities in order to ensure that the most vulnerable and indigent communities receive free basic electricity; if not, why not; if so, (a) in what manner and (b) what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) No the Department of Public Enterprises and its entities do not provide free basic electricity under programmes other than the Free Basic Electricity (FBE) programme.
(1)(a) Not applicable (1)(b) Not applicable
(2)(a) Under the FBE programme, installation and maintenance of electricity prepaid meters is not subsidised.
(2)(a)(i) and (ii) Not applicable
(2)(b)(i) and (ii) The installation of electricity prepaid meters is free under the Government’s Integrated National Electrification Programme (INEP). INEP is funded by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy as per the Division of Revenue Act, 2013 (Act No.2 of 2013) schedule 6.
Eskom maintains prepaid electricity meters. Eskom has a maintenance budget for repairs and maintenance for its infrastructure and this is allocated from the tariff.
(3) Eskom does not prescribe electricity tariffs and rates to any of its customers but charge all its customers tariffs approved by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). The Electricity Regulation Act prohibits Eskom from charging its customers any other tariffs other than those approved by NERSA.
(3) (a) Not Applicable
(3) (b) Not Applicable
21 September 2020 - NW2080
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
With reference to his department’s appearance before the Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises on 19 August 2020, where the Director-General indicated that Rand Merchant Bank has been appointed as transaction advisors to ensure that the best option of securing funding is chosen, what (a) process was followed to appoint Rand Merchant Bank as the transaction advisors, (b) is the contract value of the specified agreement, (c) are the deliverables in the agreement and (d) are the timelines of the contract?
Reply:
(a) The Rand Merchant Bank had been appointed as transaction advisor to oversee the Strategic Equity Partner (SEP) transaction of Air Chefs by SAA, the Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) expanded the scope in line with procurement prescripts to include a similar scope on the SAA group, in line with Treasury Regulation 16A6.6.
(b)The contract value is capped at R12 million as retainer fee and R25 million as success fee for concluding a partnership for S
(c) The deliverables are;
i. Initial evaluation
ii. Due diligence and agreeing heads of agreement
iii. Final Due Diligence, definitive Transaction agreements, Transaction approvals and closing
(d) The timeline for the contract is 12 months. But the project may be concluded earlier due to the urgency of the matter, and the Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) has an option of exiting within 15 days, a month’s notice or by mutual agreement.
21 September 2020 - NW1889
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What are the reasons that (a) The grievance lodged by a certain person (name furnished) regarding the interdict of the appointment of Eskom Group Treasurer was ignored, (b) Eskom misled the chairperson of the grievance process by supplying an incorrect advert of the position and (c) A certain person (name furnished) was a member of the interview panel that appointed Eskom Treasurer when the specified person is not a member of the board or an employee of Eskom? NW2397E
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
(a) The Grievance was attended to in line with the Eskom HR Management priscipts and the outcome was provided to the aggrieved employee.
(b) The advert that had been provided initially was the copy of the working draft. The error was corrected when it was posted out. There were no material differences between the working draft and final version published.
Table 1: Comparison of pdf copy of the advert vs advert on the Eskom recruitment site
Advert on the pdf copy |
Advert on the Eskom recruitment portal |
Position: GM TREASURY Position Task Grade: EEE – GENERAL MANAGER Purpose: Ensure Eskom has necessary policies, strategies, processes and systems to optimize Eskom’s financial liquidity through providing an effective Treasury function. Business Unit: Office of the CE/Chairman Location: Megawatt Park Reference Number: 041120191 Closing Date: 07 November 2019 Line Manager: Jabu Mabuza |
Position : GM Treasury Task Grade : E-Band Area of Specialization: Ensure Eskom has necessary policies, strategies, processes and systems to optimize Eskom’s financial liquidity through providing an effective Treasury function. Department : Chief Financial Officer Business Unit : Office of the CFO Location : South Africa (Gauteng) Reference Number : 041120191 Closing Date : Monday, 11 November 2019 |
(c) The Eskom recruitment and selection process make provision for a subject matter expect to form part of an interview panel. Ms Ramos was brought in on this basis.
None of the candidates of the candidates interviewed expressed discomfort or objected to discomfort with the composition of the interview panel.
09 September 2020 - NW1887
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What are the reasons that a certain person (name furnished) was appointed as the Chairperson of the Eskom Pension Fund when a letter of appointment for the same position was already drafted and sent to another person (name furnished)?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
The term of the Eskom Pension and Provident Fund (EPPF) Board, ofwhich Ms Mantuka Maisela was the Chairperson, expired on 31 May 2020. However, because the governance process was not in place on 31 May 2020 and Eskom did not want to be the cause of a non-constituted Board, which had been a finding of the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) against the EPPF previously, Ms Maisela and the other two trustees were appointed to avoid such an occurrence.
The appointment letters were drafted to appoint them for a full term because the rules of the Fund did not provide for temporary appointments, but for replacements, where Eskom had the right to replace an employer board member at any time on reasonable grounds.
In a letter dated 29 May 2020, Ms Maisela was informed that her appointment was subject to the finalisation of the governance process and that it was to be read in conjunction with rule 3.5(1) of the EPPF rules, which provides that an employer board member could be replaced by Eskom at any time on reasonable grounds.
Eskom followed an appointment process for the EPPF Chairperson position with the assistance of an executive search company. Shortlisted candidates were interviewed by an Eskom panel that consisted of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Senior Manager Human Resources, and Recruitment Manager, and all internal governance processes were adhered to. Ms Maisela was not part of the process because she was not shortlisted.
In its decision not to extend Ms Maisela’s appointment, Eskom also considered the fact that Ms Maisela had acted in various roles on the EPPF Board since 2004, which made a total of 16 years, for 12 of which she had been appointed by Eskom. This tenure considerably exceeded the recommended period for a non-executive director in terms of governance processes.
Eskom took the above into consideration and decided that it would not be in the interest of good governance for the EPPF and Eskom to reappoint Ms Maisela as the Chairperson of the EPPF Board.
The CFO recommended the successful candidate’s name to the Group Chief Executive (GCE), and the GCE, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board, recommended the appointment to the People and Governance Committee (P&G), a subcommittee of the Board, for approval. The P&G approved the submitted name and recommended approval of the appointment by the Minister. It must be noted that this is merely a formality as the Minister is not involved in the process identifying new members of the Board. There were delays in soliciting the P&G approval due to the lockdown. The P&G recommendation reached the Minister on 15 May 2020.The Minister approved the recommended candidate on 9 June 2020. Eskom appointed the Chairperson with effect from 1 July 2020, and the name was submitted to the EPPF Board for final approval.
The EPPF Board approved the appointment of Ms Caroline Henry on 15 July 2020, and therefore, Eskom did not have authority to extend Ms Maisela’s appointment beyond 30 June 2020.
It should be noted that Ms Maisela was not the only trustee who was replaced in terms of rule 3.5(1) of the EPPF rules on 30 June 2020, as she was replaced along with two other trustees.
09 September 2020 - NW1891
Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether the Chief Executive Officer of Transnet intends to sell the assets of Transnet to the private sector; if not, what is the position in this regard, if so, (a) which assets will be sold, (b) what process is followed to decide which assets should be sold and (c) what are the reasons that Transnet is selling its assets?
Reply:
According to the information received from Transnet
No, Transnet is not planning to sell assets to the private sector. However, it is in the process of considering how its asset base is best positioned to deliver on the requirements of the business. We are however looking for opportunities to partner with the private sector. This is in order to promote economic transformation and to mobilise private sector capital for important projects.
(a) Not applicable
(b) Not applicable
(c) Not applicable
09 September 2020 - NW1892
Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)What qualifications do certain persons (names furnished) hold; (2) whether the qualifications of the specified persons were verified; if not, why not; if so, which institutions were used to verify their qualifications?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
(a) and (b)
The table below captures the details requested for each person.
Title |
Initials and surname |
Designation |
Qualification |
Verification by |
|
Mr |
A M |
de Ruyter |
Group Chief Executive |
|
Lexis RefCheck |
Mr |
C |
Cassim |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Internal recruitment department - 2006 |
Title |
Initials and surname |
Designation |
Qualification |
Verification by |
|
Mr |
J A |
Oberholzer |
Chief Operating Officer |
|
Internal recruitment department |
Mr |
N |
Harris |
Senior Manager: Information Management |
|
Internal recruitment department. Previously employed by Eskom since 1982 |
Mr |
R |
Vaughan |
General Manager: Treasury |
|
LexisNexis Risk Management |
09 September 2020 - NW1204
Van Minnen, Ms BM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)(a) At what stage are the negotiations with the unions regarding the unbundling of Eskom into three separate subsidiaries, and (b) which unions are involved in the process?(2) How will (a) the outstanding debt of Eskom be accrued to each of the three potential subsidiaries, and (b) Eskom debit to creditors be secured prior to the unbundling process?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom:
(1)(a) In terms of the Collective Agreement, Eskom engages with organised labour at various
participative structures. National structures include - Strategic Forum, Central Consultative Forum and Central Bargaining Forum. There are also Group Structures and Business Unit Level. The purpose of these structures is for Eskom to engage (share information, consult and bargain) with organised labour on matters that have direct impact on the employee’s conditions of employment in line with legal prescripts.
Post the publication of the Eskom Roadmap in October 2019, Eskom has had two formal consultative meetings with the leadership of NUM, NUMSA and Solidarity where Eskom shared the Strategic Turnaround Plan and Operating Model, the latter detailing the divisionalisation plans in support of the Eskom Roadmap. The table below lists engagements that have taken place as well as those planned.
Eskom is also party to the NEDLAC process where only NUM is in attendance as prescribed by the NEDLAC regulations.
Consultative Forum |
Dates of past meetings |
Discussions |
Organised labour representation |
Planned meetings |
Strategic Forum (SF) |
26 May 2020 |
Eskom shared the Eskom Strategic Turnaround Plan and Operating Model. |
NUM/NUMSA/Solidarity leadership. The engagements are targeted at Secretary General level. |
26 November 2020 |
21 July 2020 |
A follow up meeting to engage further on issues tabled at the meeting. |
|||
Central Consultative Forum (CCF) |
- |
The Eskom Turnaround Plan as shared at the Strategic form meetings of 26 May and 21 July. |
NUM/NUMSA/Solidarity The engagements are targeted at local leadership. |
The CCF meeting is scheduled to take place on 22 September 2020. With another meeting scheduled for 3 December 2020. |
NEDLAC |
15 October 2019 4 December 2019 11 February 2020 |
The Roadmap for Eskom in a reformed electricity supply industry 2019 |
As per NEDLAC’s prescribed regulations. |
Dates and agenda is set by NEDLAC. |
(1)(b)The recognised trade unions at Eskom are National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa
(NUMSA), National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) and Solidarity.
(2)(a)In line with the divisionalisation decision, proforma financial statements: income statement
and balance sheet, etc. have been formulated for each of the units to enable proper performance monitoring by the established divisional boards. However, the decision on the group debt remains an outstanding matter and a solution will be finalised before the debt is allocated to each division and prior to attainment of the legal separation.
(2)(b) The decision on a long term solution will include engaging and reaching agreement with
the creditors, after taking into account the regulatory methodology and the profitability of the proposed subsidiaries. It would be premature at this stage to provide a definitive decision on this matter, as the work has not been concluded.
27 August 2020 - NW1572
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What numbers of persons have been appointed at Eskom on the basis of (a) race, (b) position, (c) qualification, (d) salary level, (e) experience and (f) gender since the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer at Eskom, Mr André de Ruyter?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom:
As at 13 July 2020, Eskom appointed 139 employeessince the appointment of the Group Chief Executive, Mr André de Ruyter.
The breakdown is as follows:
- 25 external appointments, of which 18 were T-Systems employees who were transferred into Eskom in accordance to Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995. Only 7 were true external recruits.
- 114 were appointed on Fixed Term Contracts.
Annexure A provides details, according to (a) race, (b) position, (c) qualification, (d) salary level, (e) experience and (f) gender.
21 August 2020 - NW1681
Brink, Mr C to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What: (a) are the details of the current age analysis of the total debt owed by each municipality to Eskom and (b) amount of the debt is made up of (i) principal debt, (ii) interest and (iii) penalties ineach case?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
a) The total debt owed by municipalities as at June 2020 is R43.9 billion, of which R30.9 billion is overdue debt. The details of the age analysis of the total debt owed by each municipality to Eskom, as at June 2020 are set out in Annexure A.
b) (i) and (ii) The total debt of R43.9 billion, is made up of the capital amounts of R32.4 billion, interest of R6.7 billion and VAT of R4.8 billion. The makeup of total debt in terms of capital and interest for each municipality, as at June 2020 is set out in Annexure A.
c) (iii) The total Notified Maximum Demand (NMD) exceedance charge for June 2020 is R46.9 million and R104 million for the financial year to date. This is a penalty for NMD exceedance raised in terms of the NMD Rules approved by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) to discourage future exceedances and is included in the capital amount. The NMD exceedance charge, for each municipality as at June 2020 is set out in Annexure B.
21 August 2020 - NW522
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether all of the SA Airways Group Companies including (a) SA Airways SOC (Limited), (b) Mango Airlines SOC (Limited), (c) Air Chefs SOC (Limited), (d) SAA Technical SOC (Limited) and (e) SA Airways City Centre SOC (Limited), but not exclusively, are under business rescue; if not, why not?
Reply:
The only company in business rescue is South African Airways SOC Limited (SAA).
SA Airways City Centre SOC (Limited) has been placed in voluntary liquidation before the business rescue proceedings.
None of the other companies in the group are in business rescue as the boards have not placed the companies under voluntary business rescue, nor has any other process in terms of the Companies Act been given effect to.
21 August 2020 - NW1544
Zungula, Mr V to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)Whether he will disclose the recipient(s) of the R5 billion allegedly paid to an Eskom service provider by mistake; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) What steps has he taken to: (a) Bring those persons responsible for the reckless conduct to book and (b) Retrieve the R5 billion?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
1. The R5.5 billion is the total value of Eskom’s claim against Tegeta Resources and Exploration, which is in business rescue.
Relevant details are as follows:
Tegeta is a company owned by Oakbay which is a Gupta related company. Tegeta owns the Optimum coal mine.
The Business rescue proceedings of the Optimum coal mine commenced in February 2018 when the Optimum Board of Directors resolved to place the company under voluntary business rescue and proceeded to file a notice of commencement of business rescue proceedings with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission on 19 February 2018. The Optimum coal mine had been supplying coal to Hendrina Power Station.
Eskom has submitted a claim of approximately R5.5 billion against Optimum in these proceedings, composed of undelivered coal and poor quality of delivered coal:
A. pre - commencement (of business rescue) September 2016 to January, 2018 = R1,1 billion ( 1,1 million tons)
B. post – commencement (of business rescue process) February, 2018 to December, 2018
= R4.4 billion (3.8 million tons of Coal)
At a meeting of creditors convened on 10 December 2019, the quantum of Eskom’s claim was challenged and it was resolved to refer Eskom’s claim for determination by an independent expert. Creditors contended that Eskom’s claim is inflated and as such Eskom should not have been afforded voting rights on the contingent and disputed part of its claim in Optimum. Eskom’s disputed claim was determined by way of an expedited arbitration presided over by retired judge Fritz Brand, jointly appointed by the creditors.
At the arbitration hearing held in March 2020, the majority of creditors (excluding Oakbay – also a creditor in Optimum), Eskom and the BRPs reached an agreement regarding the quantum of Eskom’s claims. Eskom’s claim, both pre- and-post-business rescue, was determined to be the sum of R1 276 031 278.48 (one billion two hundred and seventy six million thirty one thousand two hundred and seventy eight rand and forty eight cents). Eskom’s voting share was determined at 24% to be exercised by Eskom in any manner it wishes to do.
Current Status of BR proceedings:
During the arbitration hearing in March it was also agreed that the revised business rescue plan would be published on or before the 2 April 2020. It was further agreed that the meeting of creditors, to vote on the preferred offer and adopt the business rescue plan, would be convened on or about 20 April 2020. The BRPs did not publish the plan in April due to the 2 remaining bidders, namely Lurco and IZM, failing to secure funding to acquire the mine.
In light of the above, in May 2020 the BRPs invited other prospective bidders to submit proposals to acquire the mine. Bids were submitted mid-June 2020 and the BRPs are currently reviewing the offers received from the 3 bidders. Eskom currently awaits the outcome of the review. Preferred bidders will be incorporated in the revised BR plan to be published in due course.
Towards the end of June 2020, the BRPs also received an alternative proposal to rescue the mine. The alternative offer was submitted by Centaur Ventures Ltd, one of the largest creditors of Optimum. According to the BRPs, the alternative plan, if supported by the BRPs and creditors, will also be incorporated in the revised business rescue plan and be triggered in the event that the preferred bidders fail to secure sufficient funding to acquire the assets. Eskom has not yet been furnished with the alternative proposal for consideration.
The BRPs have not committed to a specific date for publication of the revised business rescue plan. In the event that the revised plan is published end July, 2020 then the meeting of creditors for purposes of voting and adopting the plan would have to be convened early August i.e. within 10 days of the date of publication of the plan.
2. (a) Not applicable.
(b) As explained in (1) above, Eskom submitted a claim in the business rescue proceedings which are still underway.
24 July 2020 - NW1154
Wessels, Mr W to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)Whether his department purchased any goods and/or services below the amount of R500 000 connected to the Covid-19 pandemic; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (a) is the name of each company from which the specified goods and/or services were purchased, (b) is the amount of each transaction and (c) was the service and/or product that each company rendered;
Reply:
Goods and services were procured in relation to Covid-19 pandemic and the information is indicated in the table below.
(a) Name of the budiness |
(b) Amount |
(c) Service/ Product |
Biologica Pharmaceuticals |
R26 650.00 |
Mask surgical |
Tripple N Medical |
R2 044.00 |
Mask surgical |
Ekhaya Investments |
R11 500.00 |
Mask cloth |
Evergreen Latex |
R2 517.20 |
Gloves surgical and examination natural rubber |
Lechoba Medicals |
R15 187.50 |
Hand Sanitizers |
Promed Technologies |
R2 700.00 |
Disinfectant surface |
Promed Technologies |
R3 600.00 |
Temperature scanners |
Multisurge |
R4 600.00 |
Temperature scanners |
Recreative Creativity |
R27 950.00 |
Dispenser wipes |
Oks iInvestment 2009 |
R89 700.00 |
Fumigation/ Building sanitization |
Bizmak Trading |
R17 000.00 |
Hand sanitizer dispensers |
R39 000.00 |
Hand spray sanitizer |
|
R6 000.00 |
Face shield |
(2) Whether there was any deviation from the standard supply chain management procedures in the specified transactions; if so, (a) why and (b) what are the relevant details in each case;
Answer:
There was no deviation from the standard supply chain management procedures.
(3) What were the reasons that the goods and/or services were purchased from the specified companies;
Answer:
Businesses awarded through request for quotations met the specifications and their prices were the cheapest as compared to other competitors.
08 June 2020 - NW126
Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)What total amount have certain persons (names furnished) been paid since their appointment as business rescue practitioners for the SA Airways (SAA); (2) whether the specified business rescue practitioners benefited from the Development Bank of Southern Africa equity bridge loan facility to SAA; if so, (a) what amount did they get paid for that specified intervention and (b) how are they paid?
Reply:
The following information was provided by the Business Rescue Practitioners of the South African Airways Response:
1. The business rescue practitioners have been paid in accordance with the hours worked and set down rate for business rescue practitioners. The amounts paid to Matuson & Associates and Adamantem as at 26 May 2020 are as follows:
Matuson and Associates – R22 208, 689
Adamantem (Pty) Ltd – R14 002,112
(2) The business rescue practitoners did not benefit from the intervention relating to the DBSA bridge facility, other than payment in the normal course of the business rescue process done based on hours spent on the transaction and set down rate for that practitioner.
08 June 2020 - NW85
Schreiber, Dr LA to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What is the total number of (a) persons who are currently employed at each state-owned entity and/or public enterprise and (b) what number of the specified employees at state-owned entities or enterprises are appointed at (i) senior and (ii) middle management levels (2) What is the average remuneration package of employees appointed at (a) senior management and (b) middle management levels at state-owned entities or enterprises; (3) What is the current total amount spent on salaries for senior and middle management managers at state-owned entities or enterprises? NW91E
Reply:
According to the information received from Alexkor
(1)(a)
The number of employees are currently employed at ALEXKOR is 205 as at end of December 2019.
Level |
Number of employees |
|
(1)(b)(i) |
Senior Management |
12 |
(1)(b)(ii) |
Middle Management |
9 |
(2)
Level |
Average remuneration |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R3 323 538,75 |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R1 411 488,89 |
(3)
Level |
Amount Salary Spent |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R15 617 673,20 |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R4 873 830,00 |
According to the information received from Denel:
(1)(a) As at February 2020 the total workforce of Denel is 3426.
Level |
Number of employees |
|
(1)(b)(i) |
Senior Management |
45 |
(1)(b)(ii) |
Middle Management |
700 |
(2)
Level |
Average remuneration |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R2,653,454m |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R958,088m |
(3)
Level |
Amount Salary Spent |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R76,771,451m |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R684,391,669m |
REPLY:
According to the information received from Eskom
(1)(a)
The number of employees are currently employed at Eskom is 45353 as at end of December 2019.
Level |
Number of employees |
|
(1)(b)(i) |
Senior Management |
372 |
(1)(b)(ii) |
Middle Management |
6734 |
(2)
Level |
Average remuneration |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R1 846 032 |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R1 144 138 |
(3)
Level |
Amount Salary Spent |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R686 723 910 |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R7 616 533 256 |
According to the information received from SAFCOL
(1)(a)
The number of employees are currently employed at Safcol is 1479 as at end of December 2019.
Level |
Number of employees |
|
(1)(b)(i) |
Senior Management |
7 |
(1)(b)(ii) |
Middle Management |
82 |
(2)
Level |
Average remuneration |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R 131 726/ 1580 712 p/a |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R 80 977/ 971 724 p/a |
(3)
Level |
Amount Salary Spent |
|
(a) |
Senior Management Middle Management |
R 7 643 211/ 91 718 532/pa |
(b) |
According to the information received from SAX
(1)(a)
The number of employees are currently employed at SAX is 671 as at end of December 2019.
Level |
Number of employees |
|
(1)(b)(i) |
Senior Management |
81 |
(1)(b)(ii) |
Middle Management |
43 |
(2)
Level |
Average remuneration |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R1 093 485 per annum |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R598 330 per annum |
(3)
Level |
Amount Salary Spent |
|
(a) |
Senior Management Middle Management |
R16 828 815.00. |
(b) |
According to the information received from Transnet:
(1)(a)
The number of employees are currently employed at Transnet is 58051 as at end of December 2019.
Level |
Number of employees |
|
(1)(b)(i) |
Senior Management |
1041 |
(1)(b)(ii) |
Middle Management |
5296 |
(2)
Level |
Average remuneration |
|
(a) |
Senior Management |
R 1 522 753 |
(b) |
Middle Management |
R 758 755 |
(3)
Level |
Amount Salary Spent |
|
(a) |
Senior Management Middle Management |
R5.6 billion p/a |
(b) |
Response from SAA is still outstanding and will be submitted as soon as the information becomes available.
08 June 2020 - NW524
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What are the details of (a) all government guarantees (i) issued to the SA Airways (SAA) and (ii) utilised by SAA and (iii) for what purpose have they been utilised, (b) all SAA loan debt liabilities including the (i) name of each lender, (ii) amount owed to each lender, (iii) interest rates charged by each lender and (iv) repayment date of each loan, (c) all current liabilities including the (i) name of creditor, (ii) amount owed to each creditor and (iii) due date for payment to each creditor and (d) all non-current liabilities excluding loan debt as at 29 February 2020?
Reply:
The following information was provided by the Business Rescue Practitioners of South African Airways: see the link
https://pmg.org.za/files/RNW524-SAA.docx
08 June 2020 - NW917
Wessels, Mr W to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)Whether his department awarded any tenders connected to the Covid-19 pandemic; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (a) are the names of the businesses to whom these tenders were awarded, (b) are the amounts of each tender awarded and (c) was the service and/or product to be supplied by each business;
Reply:
In accordance with procurement regulations, requests for quotations were sourced in relation to Covid-19 pandemic and the information is indicated in the table below.
(a) Name of the budiness |
(b) Amount |
(c) Service/ Product |
Biologica Pharmaceuticals |
R26 650.00 |
Mask surgical |
Tripple N Medical |
R2 044.00 |
Mask surgical |
Ekhaya Investments |
R11 500.00 |
Mask cloth |
Evergreen Latex |
R2 517.20 |
Gloves surgical and examination natural rubber |
Lechoba Medicals |
R15 187.50 |
Hand Sanitizers |
Promed Technologies |
R2 700.00 |
Disinfectant surface |
Promed Technologies |
R3 600.00 |
Temperature scanners |
Multisurge |
R4 600.00 |
Temperature scanners |
Recreative Creativity |
R27 950.00 |
Dispenser wipes |
Oks iInvestment 2009 |
R89 700.00 |
Fumigation/ Building sanitization |
Bizmak Trading |
R17 000.00 |
Hand sanitizer dispensers |
R39 000.00 |
Hand spray sanitizer |
|
R6 000.00 |
Face shield |
(2) Whether there was any deviation from the standard supply chain management procedures in the awarding of the tenders; if so, (a) why and (b) what are the relevant details in each case;
Answer:
There was no deviation from the standard supply chain management procedures.
(3) What was the reason for which each specified business was awarded the specified tender;
Answer:
No tender was awarded in connection with Covid-19 pandemic. However, businesses awarded through request for quotations met the specifications and their prices were the cheapest from other competitors.
08 June 2020 - NW878
Brink, Mr C to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)Whether his department will offer any form of Covid-19 financial or other relief to small businesses; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether the Covid-19 financial or other relief will only be allocated to qualifying small businesses according to the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, Act 53 of 2003, as amended; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) on what statutory grounds and/or provisions does he or his department rely to allocate Covid-19 financial or other relief only to small businesses according to the specified Act and (b) what form of Covid-19 financial or other relief, if any, will be made available to other small businesses?
Reply:
The government has put in place a support package for small businesses.
The Department of Small Business Development will provide the details of the support available. The support, is available from various departments, for example: Agriculture and Tourism
08 June 2020 - NW557
Clarke, Ms M to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) What amount in funding did Transnet allocate to the Esselen Park Sport School of Excellence in Tembisa for the current academic year; (2) Whether the funding for the current financial year has been released to the specified school; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) (a) what are the relevant details of the funding that Transnet intends to allocate to the school over the 2020-22 medium-term expenditure framework and (b) does the specified funding cover the cost of running the school; (4) What number of (a) staff members are employed at the school and (b) professional football players has the school turned out to date?
Reply:
According to the information received from Transnet:
1. For the Financial year 2020/2021 the SAFA Transnet Football School of Excellence has been allocated an amount of R 21 m.
2. The funds for the School of Excellence have been released for this financial year as per Transnet cost centre 1004036.
(3)(a) The budget for the 2020 – 2022 Medium Term Framework is estimated at
R44m, based on a 10% budget increase for the Financial year 2021/2022.
(3)(b) The allocated funding covers the running costs of the School including salaries for the 28 staff members employed by the School.
(4)(a) The School has 28 staff members made up of:
Eight academic staff;
One Head Coach and Five Coaches; and
Fourteen support staff.
(4)(b) The school has produced over 100 professional players. A list of players who
graduated from the School of Excellence is attached.
08 June 2020 - NW5
Groenewald, Dr PJ to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1)What amount of diesel, indicated in (a) Litres and (b) Rand value, has Eskom used (i) In the (aa) 2014-15, (bb) 2015-16, (cc) 2016-17, (dd) 2017-18 and (ee) 2018-19 financial years and (ii) Since 1 April 2019; (2) For what purposes was the diesel used in each specified financial year; (3) Whether he will make a statement on the matter?
Reply:
According to the information received from Eskom
1. The table below provides the Eskom OCGT diesel usage.
Financial Year |
Rand value, R'm[1] |
Megalitres |
1 April 2019 up to Jan 2020 |
3 268 |
318.6 |
2018-19 |
3 768 |
384.5 |
2017-18 |
320 |
37.8 |
2016-17 |
340 |
10 |
2015-16 |
8 690 |
1 247.8 |
2014-15 |
9 546 |
1 178.6 |
2. At Eskom diesel is used as fuel to open cycle gas turbines (OCGTs) and fleet.
3. As the power stations perform better and energy availability factor (EAF) improves to a higher level, the use of diesel must reach zero level.
08 June 2020 - NW374
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What (a) number of contracts have been cancelled since the SA Airways was placed under business rescue, (b) is the name of each company whose contract was cancelled and (c) was the (i) value and (ii) term of each contract?
Reply:
The following information is provided by the Business Rescue Practitioners of the SAA: see the link
https://pmg.org.za/files/1/RNW374-200608.docx
08 June 2020 - NW375
Maotwe, Ms OMC to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether the SA Airways (a) advertised and (b) awarded tender(s) for catering in all its aircraft since 1 January 2014; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) on what date was each tender (i) advertised and (ii) awarded, (b) what is the name of each company that was awarded a tender and (c) what is the monetary value of each tender
Reply:
The following information was provided by the Business Rescue Practitioners of South African Airways:
SAA advertised and awarded catering tenders from 01 January 2014 to July 2019. The links below include contracts that cover SAA’s global operations (Local, Regional and International):
08 June 2020 - NW234
Van Minnen, Ms BM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) In view of his confirmation to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts on 19 February 2020 that each state-owned entity (SOE) must be evaluated for viability, (a) by what date will the process of evaluating the 131 SOEs commence, (b) who will be carrying out the evaluation and (c) what will be the criteria for such evaluations; (2) (a) what does his department intend to achieve with the evaluations and (b) how will the evaluations be connected to the financial viability of the SOEs; (3) how does he intend to deal with SOEs that are found not to be adding value and/orthat are not financially viable?
Reply:
(1)
Government as a whole is concerned about the number of state-owned enterprises and entities, and their respective governance operational and financial status. A process of review has been discussed and the relevant departments are establishing which entities can be merged, closed or retained. This will be an on-going process with regular reports to government.
Once the Presidential SOC Council begins its work, further measures and initiatives will be put in place.
(2)
As above:
In addition, Boards as the accounting authority in terms of the PFMA, will also be responsible for ensuring operational performance and financial viability of entities.
(3)
Government, in consultation with the relevant Departments, will determine the response to financial and other issues. The example of restructuring of Eskom as a result of the governance, operational and financial challenges arising from corruption and state capture.
Government initiated a process to change the business model, restructure the generation, transmission and distribution components with a view to better transparency, and focus on operational performance and financial efficacy.
The repositioning of state owned entities will continue to receive intense focus – particularly, ensure that dependence on the fiscus is stopped.
09 March 2020 - CW39
Nhanha, Mr M to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether he will provide an update on the post-settlement model between his department and the land claimants that was arranged by the SA Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL) on a matter that has been going on for more than five years without any success; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
1. Government has decided that settlement of forestry land claim could be informed by the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR) Agrarian Transformation System (Wagon Wheel) which emphasises significant community’s participation in enterprises operating on their land. In this regard, the communities will be prioritised in terms of:
- Guaranteeing that there is community participation in the planning process and subsequent phases.
- Equity participation in the enterprises operating on their land. This would include rights to have input into appointing non-executive and executive directors and senior management.
- Preference for community based enterprises in the subcontracting for goods and services, enterprise and supplier development, and prioritising of the community in corporate social investment spend.
- Recognition of Tribal Authorities, where they exist as competent oversight authorities over the assets acquired by the communities through the land claim settlement process.
- The land post transfer to community should continue to be used for the prime activities that had been on the land. In the case of forestry, approval by Minister should be obtained before the land use can be changed.
2. The forestry land claims have received a priority within government, with the Mkhwanazi land transfer in the Northern KZN effected on 14 October 2018. The next three parallel land claims are Mbonambi, Dukuduku and Nyalazi which are scheduled to be settled and transferred as per DRDLR’s plans.
09 March 2020 - CW26
Visser, Ms C to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
1. When last did his department use a white hat hacker to identify possible security gaps in their information technology system and cyber security threats; 2. Whether he will (a) employ such a hacker or (b) request the relevant Sector Education and Training Authorities to employ it; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The Department is constantly reviewing its IT security. Where weaknesses have been identified, they were corrected. To further strengthen its IT security, a process has been started to have a permanent capacity in the unit.
07 January 2020 - NW1558
Hinana, Mr N to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) With reference to his reply to question 241 on 19 August 2019, (a) what category of infrastructure are the pylons in (i) Kempton Park and (ii) Edenvale and (b) how often should these be inspected; (2) whether any pylons, during the last inspection in the above areas, were found to be (a) unstable and/or (b) decaying due to rust; if so, what number (i) was identified and (ii) has been repaired to date? NW2883E
Reply:
The parliamentary question has been forwarded to the entities and the Ministry of Public Enterprises awaits their urgent response. Further information will be conveyed to Parliament as soon as the response is received.
07 January 2020 - NW1700
Graham, Ms SJ to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
What is the nature of the agreement between Transnet and Dr Beyers Naudé Local Municipality in the Eastern Cape pertaining to the borehole that services Wolwefontein in respect of (a) maintenance, (b) fuel supply for the pump, (c) water provision to the community and (d) future transfer of the borehole to the auspices of the specified municipality?
Reply:
This response is according to information received from Transnet:
In response to the above questions, there is no agreement between Transnet and Dr Beyers Naudé Local Municipality pertaining to the borehole that supplies water to the community of Wolwefontein in the Eastern Cape.
(a)&(b) The borehole is the property of Transnet and is operated and maintained by service providers appointed by Transnet. Part of the maintenance includes the supply of fuel for the pump. The borehole has been out of service from August 2019 and a service provider was appointed to effect repairs, however, the service provider has been experiencing challenges to restore the water supply for the community of Wolwefontein.
(c) Currently, water is being supplied to the community with a tanker service to provide immediate relief.
(d) A new borehole will be drilled, preferably in front of the police station. The exact location will depend on the water table survey. Water can be restored within six (6) weeks after completion of the drilling of the borehole, considering that quality of water needs to be treated, together with other works that may be required. Until such time that the new borehole is functional, the tanker service will continue to supply water to the community of Wolwefontein.
Lastly, Transnet has no objection to the borehole being transferred to the Dr Beyers Naudé Local Municipality. It must be noted that high level meetings were held in 2013 and 2014, between Transnet and the Dr Beyers Naudé Local Municipality to transfer the ownership of the borehole to the municipality, but no agreement was reached.
07 January 2020 - NW1200
Lees, Mr RA to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
(1) What are the details of the process currently used to remove ash from unit one at the Medupi power station in terms of the (a) daily operational hours of vacuum trucks, (b) number of operational days per week of each vacuum truck, (c) process followed to award the contract/s for the ash removal, (d) number of vacuum trucks being used, (e) number of round trips being undertaken by each vacuum truck every 24 hours and (f) daily cost of each vacuum truck; (2) what are the details of the additional costs resulting from the use of vacuum trucks to remove the ash including (a) dust suppression, (b) road cleaning, (c) road repairs and (d) staff expenses such as for traffic control? NW2410E
Reply:
The parliamentary question has been forward to the entity and the Ministry of Public Enterprises awaits their urgent response. Further information will be conveyed to Parliament as soon as the response is received.
07 January 2020 - NW1354
Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
With reference to the reply to question 1269 on 16 July 2018, (a) what is the amount of the proceeds held in declared dividends, (b) in which bank account and account number are the dividends held and (c) who controls each bank account?
Reply:
The parliamentary question has been forward to the entities and the Ministry of Public Enterprises awaits their urgent response. Further information will be conveyed to Parliament as soon as the response is received.
07 January 2020 - NW1709
Dlamini, Mr MM to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises
Whether the Eskom generation entity will be 100% state-owned; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
Accordingly to the information received from Energy Team
The Eskom Generation entity will remain 100% state owned under Eskom Holdings consisting mainly of the current power plant base, which will be separated into a number of feasible smaller generation units.
Consideration for the creation of multiple generation companies (GENCOs) within Eskom Generation is currently under examination with the aim of introducing inter-company competition and drive efficiencies in generation. Each power station will have its own Power Purchase Agreement with predefined, fixed and guaranteed tariffs for energy with the Transmission Entity.