ATC240307: Report of the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education, Science and Innovation on Its Oversight Visit to the Eastern Cape, Dated 1 March 2024

Higher Education, Science and Innovation

Report of the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education, Science and Innovation on Its Oversight Visit to the Eastern Cape, Dated 1 March 2024

 

The Portfolio Committee on Higher Education, Science and Innovation (hereafter referred to as the Committee), having conducted an oversight visit to the Eastern Cape from 5 - 7 February 2024, reports as follows:

1. DELEGATION LIST

1.1 Members of the Committee

Ms NT Mkhatshwa: Chairperson (ANC), Ms JS Mananiso (ANC), Mr T Letsie (ANC), Ms D Sibiya (ANC), Mr BS Yabo (ANC), Ms C King (DA) and Ms K Khakhau (DA).

 

1.2 Parliamentary Support Staff

Mr A Kabingesi: Committee Secretary, Ms S Isaacs: Committee Secretary, Dr R Osborne-Mullins: Content Advisor, Ms M Modiba: Content Advisor, Dr A Arendse: Researcher, Mr J Majozi: Parliamentary Communications Officer (PCO,) and Mr T Bottoman: Committee Assistant.

 

1.3 Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET)

Dr M Socikwa: Deputy Director-General (DDG) University Education, Ms R Ngwenya: DDG Corporate Services, Ms N Gasa: DDG Planning, Policy & Strategy, Ms T Futshane: DDG CET,Mr T Msipha: Chief Director: Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Systems Planning and Institutional Support, Mr D Modiba: Deputy-Director TVET Curriculum Development and Support, Ms V Tshetlo: Chief Director Examinations, Mr M Ntuli: Branch Coordinator TVET, Ms F Sotenjwa: Director Student Support and Sector Engagement, Ms E Kodisang Director CET, Mr T Lehola: Deputy Director Student Support and Sector Engagement, Ms Sowane-Ngobeni: Acting Branch Coordinator, Ms T Ngwenya: Deputy Director Governance and Support, Mr S Radebe: Deputy Director Governance and Support, Ms K Kungwane: Deputy Director Financial Planning, Mr J Malesela: Branch Coordinator CET, and Mr D Mohlamme: Parliamentary Liaison Officer (PLO).

 

1.4 National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS)

Mr T Mukondeleli: Manager Universities, Ms S Tshiwula: Manager Office of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and Ms L Sishi: Senior Manager.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and the Rules of Parliament (Rules of the National Assembly) mandate that the Committee exercises oversight over the Executive to promote good governance and accountability. In line with this constitutional mandate, the Committee undertook an oversight visit to the Eastern Cape on 5 – 7 February 2024 as part of its annual visit to Post School Education and Training (PSET) institutions to assess their readiness to start the new academic year.

 

2. BACKGROUND

In 2022 and 2023, the Committee interacted with Walter Sisulu University (WSU), Buffalo City TVET College and the University of Fort Hare (UFH). Stemming from these engagements with these institutions, the Committee resolved that it would need to conduct physical oversight of these Eastern Cape PSET institutions given the concerning matters that were raised in the meetings, and the invitations that these institutions extended to the Committee. Furthermore, the Committee had not undertaken an oversight visit to the EC during the 6th administration, and this was always part of its planning.

 

The Committee also identified potential red flags that could disrupt the smooth commencement of the 2024 academic year through the engagement it had with PSET stakeholders during the end of 2023. Consequently, the Committee, as part of its first term programme of 2024, prioritised the oversight visit to PSET institutions to monitor and assess their state of preparation and readiness to welcome students into the new academic year. The institutions were requested to prepare presentations that focused on the following:

 

• State of readiness for the 2024 academic year.
• Progress report on the 2024 registration and enrolment process.
• Overview of the state of governance, administration, teaching and learning at the institution.
• Plans on funding new and returning students.

• Safety and security, including policies and measures put in place to curb incidents of gender-based violence and femicide (GBV&F).

• Overview of student academic performance from 2022 to date.
• Overview of student dropout and throughput rates, causes, and measures put in place to address them.

• Overview of student accommodation and infrastructure development projects.
• Overview of the institutions’ finances.
• Partnership with industries for work-integrated learning (WIL).
• Successes and challenges.

 

In addition to the above, the Committee invited institutions’ stakeholders such as the Council, Student Representative Council (SRC), Organised Labour and Institutional Forum to form part of the meetings and make their presentations on the:

 

• Overview of the state of affairs of the university/college from the students’ and workers’ perspectives.
• Readiness of the university/college for the 2024 academic year from the perspectives of students and workers.
• Challenges experienced by students and workers at the university/college.
• Recommendations to take the university/college forward.

 

3. SITE VISITS AND SUMMARY OF THE PRESENTATIONS

3.1 King Sabatha Dalindyebo TVET College

3.1.1 Onsite walkabout

3.1.1.1 Lecture Halls

The Committee began its site visit by inspecting the classrooms and other similar facilities of the college. The college was allocated R12 million for the maintenance and repairs of its infrastructure through the Capital Infrastructure Efficiency Grant (CIEG). The areas of maintenance for the college included renovations of existing classrooms, student accommodation, plumbing, painting, electrical works, and water and sewer reticulation.

 

The project for the repairs and renovation of the classrooms began in September 2023 and was nearing completion. Most of the classrooms were newly renovated, however, not complete and students had to rotate to other older classrooms for teaching and learning. The stormwater drainage system of the college needed repairs, and the areas outside the classrooms needed paving.

3.1.1.2 Rolihlahla Male Residence

The residence housed male students and was handed over to the college in 2019. Despite the residence being completed in 2019, it required repairs and renovations. The residence did not have a dining hall within its premises, and students had to walk a short distance to use a dining hall. The dining hall that students used was not in a good state. The stoves that the college procured for students were industrial stoves that were not conducive for students to cook their meals. Students complained that the stoves were burning their pots and food because they were designed for commercial purposes. There were six stoves for 232 students.

 

3.1.1.3 Albertina House Ladies Residence

The residence housed female students and it was in a better condition and state compared with the male residence. Access control to the residence was through a biometric access control system that uses the student’s physical traits such as their fingerprint. The use of this system is critical for the safety of students because fingerprint traits cannot be copied, thus improving the accuracy of identification. There is also a female security personnel at the main entrance of the residence to provide extra security for students. The safety record of the residence was good, as there were no incidents of gender-based violence reported to the college.

 

3.1.1.4 Electrical Workshop

The workshop provides practical training for the National Certificate Vocational NC(V) Electrical Engineering students. The workshop was fitted with basic electrical equipment for all practical training on domestic and industrial wiring, fittings, switchboard assembly, coil winding, and repair and maintenance of various electrical appliances. Each practical session accommodated 20 – 30 students at a time. The lecturer in charge of the workshop indicated that the delays in the procurement of equipment had a negative impact on the training of students. The college is planning to introduce a training programme on renewable energy.

 

1. Plumbing Workshop

The workshop provides practical training for students registered in the NC(V) Civil Engineering and Construction – Plumbing. The workshop is equipped with the necessary equipment to train students on different plumbing systems such as potable water, sanitary and stormwater systems. The workshop takes up to 15 students per session.

 

 

1. Carpentry Workshop

The workshop provides training for students registered in the Civil Engineering Programme – Carpentry and Roof Works. The carpentry students are also responsible for repairing desks and related furniture at the college as part of their practical learning and acquiring experience. Limited space to store equipment for carpentry was highlighted as the main concern.

 

1. Council and Management

Mr G Qotywa: Chairperson of the Council welcomed the Committee to the college and indicated that the Council was functional with its committees. He indicated that the college has been operating without a permanent Principal for the past five years, which has created instability at the college and the Council had been requesting DHET to expedite the appointment of a permanent Principal. He added that other management positions were vacant at the college, and recruitment processes had been slow.

 

Mr L Mswane: Acting Principal gave a brief background of the college and its seven campuses situated in Libode, Mthatha, Mapuzi, Mngazi, Ngcobo, Ntabozuko, and Zimbane. Concerning registration, he indicated that the college implemented a pre-registration system that enabled the college to better prepare for the registration period of January 2024. The college implemented online registration for new and returning students, and also accepted walk-ins. The number of students registered for the NC(V) programme was 2 282, Report 191 Engineering Studies 739 and 1 530 for Business Studies.

 

In relation to the challenges of the college, he indicated that the infrastructure of the college was not fit for purpose, student placement into workplaces posed a challenge, and there was insufficient student accommodation.

 

1. Student Representative Council

Mr S Ndwayi: President made the presentation. He indicated that the registration process at the college was delayed by a week due to financial procedures, however, the college made good progress thereafter in registering students as most registrations were done online. He added that teaching and learning was supposed to start on 22 January 2024, however, many students had not yet received their study materials.

 

Regarding the challenges experienced by students, he indicated that NSFAS funding contributed to most of the challenges faced by students at the college. There were many challenges related to NSFAS funding, such as funding of students in wrong cycles; the NSFAS system rejecting data sent by the college; Noracco, the direct payment service provider scamming and defrauding students of their allowances, and poor communication between the college and Noracco.

 

On recommendations to take the college forward, he noted that the college should undertake a thorough post-mortem after registration to avoid committing the same mistakes; delivery of stationery to students should be expedited; maximum utilization of the student portal is needed for students to access information related to their studies; monthly meetings between management and SRC should be convened; NSFAS must pay allowances on time and that the College provide more sports facilities for students on college campuses.

 

1. Organised Labour
   1. National Education and Health Allied Workers Union (NEHAWU)

Ms L Ndlwana: Chairperson presented on behalf of NEHAWU. She indicated that ever since the permanent Principal left in November 2021, the college has been managed by Acting Principals and this has brought instability to the college. Relations among staff were challenging as some employees resisted taking instructions from acting incumbents. In relation to the challenges of the college, she noted that most decisions taken were not implemented; the post-provisioning norm (PPN) was not progressing as expected and the college lost R22 million for recruitment.

 

1. National Professional Teachers Organisation of South Africa (NAPTOSA)

Mr J Ngcuthushe: Chairperson provided an overview of the registration process, which was mainly done online, and indicated that it helped the college expedite the process. In relation to teaching and learning-related challenges, he mentioned that late registration affected teaching and learning; there was poor internet access for students; there were no computer lab assistants 24-hour hours a day; the residences closed at 10h00 pm and there was no exam hall at Engcobo Campus. He recommended that unions must guard against unfair labour practices and should not interfere with management work.

 

 

1. Public Service Association (PSA)

Mr M Gilintaba: Chairperson alleged that the college management undermined his union and PSA was not able to be part of NEHAWU and NAPTOSA’s preparations for the meeting of the Committee. He reiterated the concerns raised by other unions regarding the negative impact of the absence of a permanent Principal to the college. He further raised concerns about the delays in filling outstanding vacancies at the college.

 

1. National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers (NUPSAW)

The representative from NUPSAW alleged that the college had managers and employees who held positions without the requisite qualifications. He added that the college did not have an employment equity plan, thus affecting employees’ progression in the workplace. Regarding policies, he indicated that deviation from policies was a norm in the college.

 

1. Walter Sisulu University
   1. Onsite walkabout
      1. Zamukulungisa Campus

The meeting of the Committee was hosted at the IT Hub in Zamukulungisa Campus, and the hub was funded by the Department through the Sibusiso Bengu Development Programme. The campus had other recently repaired and refurbished infrastructure development projects, such as the auditorium, lecture halls and student residences.

 

The Committee had an opportunity to inspect the newly refurbished auditorium, which was awaiting the installation of IT equipment to be ready for teaching and learning. The Committee also visited the Block K student residence, which was funded by the Department to the tune of R120 million. The residence mainly houses undergraduate students and offers a mixed range of single and double rooms. There are kitchens on each floor that are fitted with four electric stoves. The residence also offers a common living area where students can socialize in a conducive space.

 

1. Nelson Mandela Drive Campus

• Isilimela Residence

The residence is one of the university’s oldest, having been built when the university was established as a former University of Transkei in the late 70s. The residence was not in a good state, although the university continues to place students due to the high demand for student accommodation. During the visit of the Committee, there was loadshedding and the corridors and rooms were dark, a situation which has persisted for a long time, according to one of the students.

 

Students had not yet returned to the residence during the visit of the Committee; however, it did not look clean and ready to receive students for the 2024 academic year. The facilities such as bathrooms were also not in good condition, and according to the students, the residence did not meet the DHET minimum norms and standards for student accommodation.

 

1. Summary of the presentations
   1. Council and Management

Adv T Ngcukaitobi: Chairperson of the Council presented on behalf of the Council. He indicated that the Council was fully constituted and functional with experienced and suitably qualified members, some of whom were former alumni of the University. He added that the VC has done very well in terms of stabilizing the institution from a management point of view, and the process of filling vacant senior positions and Deans of academic departments has been recently completed.

 

Adv. Ngcukaitobi said the University adopted a rationalization and consolidation process aimed at improving the daily lived experiences of staff and students at the University, and the VC had spent more time within the University to create stability. The Council has requested the VC to undertake international visits with the view of exposing the University to the world and attracting foreign donor investment. He questioned government’s logic in reducing block grants that are allocated to universities as this had a knock-on effect on the operations of the institution.

 

In relation to the NSFAS, he indicated that the entity poses a major challenge to the stability of institutions as most complaints from students were related to NSFAS funding. He questioned the rationale for having service providers disburse funding and allowances on behalf of NSFAS as opposed to the institutions that are capable and competent to perform this function. He said that the direct payment system had various shortcomings and students complained about it. He called for NSFAS to revisit the decision to implement the direct payment system and called for it to be scrapped completely.

 

The management presentation could not be presented due to time constraints. Nonetheless, the presentation covered the academic readiness of the University for 2024 and the number of applications received. In terms of registration for 2024, there were 6 272 (84%) FTEN students who have registered against a target of 7 300, and overall, 20 134 (67%) students were registered against a target of 30 650.

 

In relation to academic performance, the overall success rate of the University for 2023 was 80%, which was a decline from 85% in 2022. Furthermore, there was a decline in the success rate per faculty for 2023.

 

1. Student Representative Council

Mr P Ngcambu: President made the presentation. He indicated that the University was undeniably anti-students, and that the University failed to meet the needs of students and their expectations in several aspects. He added that the quality of education offered by the University was subpar, with outdated teaching methods and a lack of investment in modern technology and resources. Overall, the University’s disregard for students’ satisfaction and well-being indicates a deep-rooted problem that urgently requires attention.

 

In relation to the readiness of the University for the 2024 academic year, he indicated that the University seemed not ready as there were countless outstanding issues affecting students. Such issues included insufficient student accommodation and those available were not conducive.

 

On registration, he alluded that there was resounding progress on the registration of students, as there were 19 000 students who were already registered with few challenges experienced. The President raised a concern about unfair academic exclusion of students based on the G7 rule. He also cautioned the University against admitting students when it did not have space for them.

 

1. Organised Labour

• NEHAWU

Mr M Ngcizelwa: Secretary made the presentation and indicated that stakeholder engagement in the University needs to be improved, including communication strategies with the University community. The implementation of the Joint Bargaining Forum decisions should be adhered to.

 

In relation to the challenges of the University, he indicated that management was overlooking the policies of the institution; there was the purging of workers; the decision-making process of the University was not transparent and there was a lack of meaningful consultation with workers; and there was a lack of staff development.

 

Regarding recommendations, he recommended that the University should re-evaluate its relationship with stakeholders to rebuild trust and foster a harmonious coexistence; NEHAWU reconciliation with management should be expedited and there is a need to promote diversity at all governance levels.

 

• Academic Professional Staff Association of South Africa (APSA)

Mr T Mduzulwana: Chairperson made the presentation and indicated that the union supported the rationalization and consolidation (R&C) project from the beginning, and it raised its non-negotiable principles with the management that there should be no job losses. He added that the union has also noted a great improvement in the implementation of the R&C project.

 

In relation to recommendations, he called for the following: the intervention of the Committee to establish progressive relations between the DBE and DHET so that there can be alignment in the calendars between the two departments; finalization of the University statute; addition of two traditional leaders to Council and five years cooling off period for convocation executive.

 

1. Institutional Forum (IF)

Ms S Mbongo: Chairperson of the IF made the presentation. In relation to the state of affairs of the University, he indicated that the University experienced continuous challenges with student funding; there were delays with the review of the University statute; the Council outsourced its duties through over-reliance on legal opinions, and there was animosity and unhealthy relations between management and its stakeholders.

 

On the readiness of the University for 2024, Mr Mbongo alluded that the appointment of vacant positions of Deans and Heads of Departments (HODs) needs to be expedited and the completion of the HR placement process needs to be articulated.

 

In relation to the recommendations to take the University forward, he noted that there is an urgent need to fill senior management positions such as the DVC; the review of the statute process should be expedited; a clearly defined resolution and mediation process should be developed, and the Council term should be extended to five years.

 

1. Buffalo City TVET College, John Knox Bokwe Campus
   1. Onsite walkabout

The oversight visit of the Committee was hosted at the JKB Campus, which is situated in Mdantsane NU 1, and the campus offers a programme in the NC(V) School of Engineering. The site visit began at the Student Support Services and Bursary Office. The office plays a pivotal role in facilitating student support and development. Students are also provided with the necessary information on bursaries and other financial aid opportunities.

 

1. Workshop Practice

The workshop offers practical training for students in NC(V) Level 2 and introduces them to the work environment and its tools, equipment, workshop and work environment, safety regulations, policies and procedures related to health and safety, and industry standards. Students are also equipped with the necessary skills to utilize basic power tools for drilling, cutting, and even welding at Level 3. The workshop accommodates 30 students per session.

 

1. Automotive Repairs Workshop

The workshop offers practical training in motor mechanics to diagnose and correct the causes of faulty engines and other critical car components. Students are also trained in the assembly of engines, tyres, wheel balancing, and alignment. The workshop takes up to 35 students per session for NC(V) Levels 2 – 4. There were vehicles donated by Ford in the workshop that the college used to train students. Members of the Committee were seriously concerned about the state of the workshop as it was untidy and seemed neglected even though the 2024 academic year had commenced. The surroundings of the workshop did not promote a positive impression of a facility that is aimed at preparing artisans for the world of work. Compounding the situation was the delayed delivery of personal protective equipment (PPEs) to the college, which caused a delay in students’ ability to conduct their practical lessons.

 

1. Engineering Technology Workshop

The workshop offers practical training to students and a basic introduction to the engineering environment, and the use and maintenance of basic tools. Students are given different practical tasks based on the syllabus, and the interpretation of drawing forms a critical aspect of the programme. Students are also trained on the importance of housekeeping in a workshop environment and taking care of tools. Unlike the automotive workshop, the engineering technology workshop was in a good state and very clean. The lecturer in charge of the workshop informed the Committee that he came from industry and had acquired experience from travelling to different countries abroad to learn more about engineering.

 

1. Student protests

While the Committee was making its way to the meeting venue, there were students who had been protesting for two weeks due to the introduction of the NSFAS student accommodation pilot project. The college is among the institutions selected to be part of the pilot project. The NSFAS spends close to R17 billion on student accommodation per annum, consequently, it introduced a pilot project aimed at ensuring that the entity pays for student accommodation that is conducive to studying and prevents students from living in accommodation facilities that do not meet the DHET norms and standards for student housing.

 

Students protested over the inclusion of the college in the NSFAS student accommodation pilot project without consultation. They rejected the pilot project because they did not know what it contained or how it worked, and there were no full facts and transparency on how it would be implemented. The students were concerned that they would lose out on the R4,000 monthly allowances that were paid directly to them by NSFAS to pay for their accommodation.

 

The new system of NSFAS will pay the accommodation fee directly to the accommodation provider, and students will receive a monthly living allowance of R1,000 and a personal care allowance of R300. The students were also concerned that they had already returned to their previous accommodation, which was closer to the college, and had made agreements with their landlords. The pilot project would mean that they can only reside in accommodation accredited by NSFAS, and it would be difficult to find such accommodation in a township area that is closer to the college.

 

In resolving the situation, the Committee requested officials from DHET, NSFAS, and college management to consult each other and find a common solution to the grievances raised by students.

 

1. Summary of the presentations
   1. Management

Due to the student protest at the college and the time constraints that this imposed, the management did not make a presentation. On the state of readiness for the 2024 academic year, the presentation noted that the college management had put in place the necessary measures to ensure a good start to the 2024 academic year and that learning materials were procured and delivered to students. The college made use of online registration, which commenced from 9 – 14 January 2024, and the total planned FTENs for 2024 was 4 270 students.

 

In relation to teaching and learning, the presentation indicated that the college had a 2024 teaching and learning plan and an academic services operational plan; the analysis of student performance was done quarterly; lecturer development was implemented, and the 2024 assessment plan was in place.

 

The presentation noted that the college achieved an unqualified audit opinion for 2022 and that an action plan was in place to improve audit findings.

 

1. Student Representative Council

Due to the student protest at the college, the SRC was also not able to make its presentation. On the state of affairs of the college from the SRC, the presentation noted that the college did not meet the demand of the community regarding admission of students; there was phasing out of programmes without a clear plan of replacing them; the college operated without a substantive Principal for a long time and there was lack of transparency from the college to students.

 

In relation to readiness for 2024, the presentation noted that there was late payment of NSFAS allowances; private accommodation students did not have places to stay though classes had commenced, and the system used by the college for registration was always down.

 

On challenges faced by students, the presentation noted that there was the late issuance of certificates; outstanding NSFAS disbursements; college residences that are not in good condition; NSFAS accommodation pilot project which was implemented without meaningful consultation with students; and a lack of proper sports grounds.

 

Regarding the recommendations, the presentation noted that the college needs to outsource more residences for students; NSFAS must regularly evaluate residences where students are placed to ensure they are conducive; the college should explore opportunities to gain more bursaries for students; and the college must have programmes that are responsive to the local economic needs.

 

1. Organised Labour

Due to student protest at the college, the unions were also not able to make their presentations. In relation to the college’s state of affairs, the presentation noted the following: a lack of leadership resulted in instability in the college, leaving unbearable working conditions; lack of transparency between DHET officials and management; delays in the appointment of officials in critical posts; maladministration and mismanagement of funds in the college; lack of internal controls and systems; lack of governance structures; dysfunctional labour forum; NSFAS funding delays affected teaching and learning; and no graduation ceremonies.

 

Concerning challenges faced by workers, the presentation noted the following: non-sitting labour and other structural meetings; poor absorption of contract employees; exclusion of employees in strategic plans of the college; review of internal policies; and inadequate infrastructure.

 

In relation to recommendations, the presentation noted the following: the immediate appointment of the Principal and CFO; immediate appointment of the Council; resolving the appointment of dual Deputy Principal Registration; review of the CET Act; strengthening of internal controls; and that the NSFAS pilot project should be postponed.

 

1. University of Fort Hare, Alice Campus
   1. Onsite walkabout
      1. Freedom Square

The site visit began at the University’s large central open space, also known as Freedom Square, which comprises the Tambo and Sobukwe Ways. The significance of starting the visit at the Square was to inform members about the rich history of the 107 years old University. The historically significant Freedom Square is the centre-point of the University’s academic activities, and is surrounded by three prominent buildings, namely: Steward Hall, Livingstone Hall and Henderson Hall. The halls are very old and require maintenance, and the University has allocated funding for their repair and refurbishment.

 

The Committee also visited the staff centre, which was torched during a student protest in 2017, and has been fully restored. The floor structure comprises a staff café with a VIP dining area. The Committee was informed that the University’s library was closed and under renovation. The library was built in 1970 and during that period it catered for 400 students, however, the University’s population has since expanded to 9 000 students on the main campus. An allocation of R94 million for the repairs and maintenance of the library has been allocated.

 

1. Administration / Registration Hall

The hall is equipped with staff from various units and departments within the University and provides important registration information to new undergraduates and returning students. The University uses online registration for new applicants and returning students, however, students who have challenges in applying online are also assisted at the facility. Students are provided with information related to their preferred programmes of study and other financial aid opportunities.

Students who have been blocked from registering are also assisted at the facility. There is a dedicated disability unit in the facility that provides specialised services for students with disabilities. There is an international affairs desk that provides assistance to foreign students.

 

1. Alice Student Village – Cluster 3 Residence

The Committee was informed that the Alice Student Village is one of South Africa’s largest student housing development projects comprising 17 buildings with 2 050 beds. The project was made possible through a partnership between the University, Department, Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA), and the European Union (EU). The construction of the project commended in 2012, and Phase 1 comprising five (5) blocks and 610 beds was completed in 2016. The Department contributed R137 million, while the University contributed R18 million for the first phase of the project.

 

The University experienced financial constraints while the project was underway, and it required an additional R419 million to complete Phase 2 of the project. The outstanding funding was made possible by R122 million in infrastructure funding from the Department, a R278 million loan from the DBSA, and the University’s contribution amounting to R19 million. Phase 2 of the project was completed in 2021.

 

The Cluster 3 Residence accommodates 165 male and female students and comprises three floors. The ground floor has space for students with disabilities, and there is no elevator in the building. The main problem with the building design is that the ablution facilities were designed using the hotel style, and there are no windows for ventilation to the toilet.

 

1. Science Infrastructure

The walkabout at the University to assess the state of infrastructure further included a visit to a Smart/Virtual Classroom and the SolarWatt Park, an outdoor research facility. Further included, was a brief presentation on the Enzyme and Microbial Technology Consortium and the Industrial Biocatalysis Hub, which was used to demonstrate the features of the Smart/Virtual Classroom.

 

The Smart/Virtual Classroom is a post-Covid19 innovation that offers not only remote teaching and learning, but it also enables students to interact with peers at many universities around the globe and provides access to experts in academia to share knowledge on matters to resolve local and national challenges. Its aim is to advance teaching and learning and to address some technological inadequacies in the surrounding communities.

 

The Industrial Biocatalysis Hub (IBH) is an initiative of the Technology Innovation Agency (TIA) and hosted by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). The funding by the Department of Science and Innovation (DSI) of the UFH Node (project) of the IBH spans from 2019 with the aim to provide technical process development support to enterprises in the biomanufacturing sector using biocatalysis technologies thus, advancing the circular economy. The presentation highlighted the production chain using the microbial enzymes from agricultural waste specifically the poultry industry, to develop high-end products, in this instance Keratinase, for hair and skin care, animal feed and food flavouring, all contributing to increased industrial productivity.

 

The project, in terms of human capital development, boasts six MSc graduates and three PhDs at advanced stages in the programme. Other outputs include 15 journal articles published in high-impact factor journals, six developed prototypes and several awards received at international conferences.

 

SolarWatt Park is a project of the Fort Hare Institute of Technology (FHIT) funded by the DSI through the South African National Energy Development Institute (SANEDI) under the auspices of the National Energy Research Programme (ERP) as one of two Photovoltaic Spokes. The focus of the FHIT is energy-related research, development and innovation. The research projects draw on masters, doctoral and post-doctoral students from varied academic disciplines, but relevant to the core focus.

 

At SolarWatt Park, the outdoor research facility, a range of standardized tests, innovative products and processes are tested. The energy yield, degradation and failure of several kW-range photovoltaic systems are being monitored in real time. A building integrated photovoltaic project (solar powered house) demonstrated that solar power can reduce the building costs by using it as part of the building materials. In addition, passive solar design features ensure that the building remains in the comfort zone (no need for electrical heating in winter or cooling in summer) by making use of the solar path throughout the year.

 

FHIT is currently developing hybrid photovoltaic thermal systems (PVT) using water to cool the solar modules. This water absorbs the heat and is used in domestic warm water systems. Thus, the PVT system has a dual purpose of heating water and cooling the solar modules. Challenges regarding projects funds and the location of the building for operations were noted by the Committee.

 

 

 

1. Summary of Presentations
   1. Council and Management

Prof L Ntsebeza: Chairperson of the Council welcomed the Committee to the University and reflected on the work of the Council since the beginning of the term.

 

The management presentation could not be presented due to time constraints; however, the presentation noted the following. On registration, 95% of registrations took place online, and there were backup generators to support venues during the registration process. The University registered 3 673 FTEN undergraduates against a target of 3 685.

 

In relation to campus readiness, the University initiated the Wamkelekile Fresher 2024 first-year orientation programme and students were also introduced to the Gender-Based Violence (GBV) Prevention Unit. The campus was officially opened on 12 February 2024. In terms of accommodation, the Alice Campus has 6 025 beds, which covers 65% of the student population and 3 539 beds in East London (EL) for 48% of students.

 

Concerning governance, the new Council was elected in June 2023, and there were three vacancies on the Council. On management, the executive management functioned well and has been meeting weekly since the end of 2019. In relation to student performance, the University produced 3 425 graduates in 2022 and had an overall pass rate of 80% in 2023 and a success rate of 85%.

 

1. Student Representative Council

Mr A Matinise: President made the presentation and indicated that the SRC had been actively involved in assisting students and even drafted concessions for registration that were presented to the management in preparation for the 2024 academic year. The SRC had requested that students owing R100 000 be allowed to register, however, management approved R30 000 as a concession for registration with debt. The President raised a concern regarding the online application auto-selection system, which rejected applicants without proper assessment.

 

In relation to infrastructure development, he indicated that the SRC proposed the following: the renovation of all lecture halls since they were old and had old equipment; the upgrading of teaching and learning facilities; integration of the online system across all departments; and renovation of the health care centre in EL.

 

With regard to the NSFAS private accommodation accreditation crisis, he indicated that the University was selected to be part of the NSFAS accommodation pilot project, however, there were no proper consultations with the SRC regarding the implementation of the project. Consequently, the SRC rejected the buildings that the NSFAS accredited as they were not conducive for students’ living and learning. They alleged that the University of Fort Hare students were mixed with community members and students from other universities in one building and their safety was of concern.

 

The President also raised issues related to the challenges with the accreditation of the Bachelor of Science in Speech and Language Therapy; lack of research supervisors; outstanding 2023 NSFAS allowances; wrongly defunded students; challenges with student debt and withholding of certificates owing to outstanding fees not paid by NSFAS; delays with the renovations of student residences and allocation of students thereof; and the need for increased security on and off campus.

 

1. Organised Labour: NEHAWU and National Tertiary Education Unions (NTEU)

Dr S Makeleni: Deputy Chairperson NEHAWU (EL Branch) led the joint NEHAWU and NTEU presentation. Regarding the state of affairs of the University, he indicated that the executive leadership was stable; policies were reviewed and approved; implementation of infrastructure projects was ongoing, and there was space for engagement with management through meetings with the VC.

 

Concerning the readiness of the University for the 2024 academic year, he indicated that the NSFAS challenges impact students’ registration; the library in Alice was not ready for use; the Alice Campus was not ready to welcome workers and students due to untidiness, and the teaching venues were not conducive for teaching and learning.

 

Regarding the challenges, he added that the gap left by the Deputy VC IS renders the institution ineffective in some areas; there was uncertainty and anxiety as the University was embarking on an organogram review and redesign; and a lack of urgency in implementing the directives of the Council for Commission, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA); lack of notch progression for workers; ongoing and perpetual suspensions; and inadequate tools of trade.

 

With regard to recommendations, he indicated a need to strengthen executive management; improve intentional conversations between workers and management; capacitate managers with necessary skills; facilitate insourcing; and implement consequence management.

 

1. Institutional Forum

Dr E Rungani: Deputy Chairperson of the IF joined the meeting virtually from London because she was participating in an exchange programme. She indicated that there was evidence that the University has sound governance, strong management, and accountable leadership. She added that the institutional environment was no longer hostile, and management has managed to build trust with employees. All faculties had research niche areas that are functioning well.

 

In relation to the readiness of the university for the 2024 academic year, she noted that the University was ready to start the new academic year, however, some issues needed urgent attention such as alternative venues for buildings that were under renovation; inadequate backup systems to mitigate the impact of loadshedding; and the need for permanent solutions for the network challenges at Alice Campus. She added that the University needs to put more effort into continuously rebuilding its reputation.

 

1. Rhodes University
   1. Onsite walkabout

The Committee was informed that the University has 56 student residences and 428 buildings, and it is one of the few universities in the country that are not fenced. The rationale behind the open University model is to ensure that the institution is part of the community and that there is easier access for students and the public to reach the campuses. The site visit began at the University’s Blue Route, which is situated along Prince Alfred Street and St Peters Campus. This route is widely used by students to access the University, and it has additional security and guards patrolling it during the day and at night. The University has 500 cameras installed in various spaces of the campus for surveillance and security. There were 3 800 students in its residences out of the 9 000-student population.

 

1. College House

The College House is a male residence and is among the University’s oldest student residences. It was built in 1913 and is centrally located, and closer to the lecture rooms, library, and other recreational facilities of the University. The University has maintained the building’s integrity over the years because it is classified as a heritage building. The University spent R18 million on renovations of the residence so that it is in line with the DHET norms and standards for student accommodation.

 

The residence houses 47 male students and provides facilities for students with disabilities. The majority of students in the residence are FTEN undergraduate students and a few senior students who are residence assistants The residence provides conducive conditions for students to achieve academic excellence. The Committee observed that the residence was clean and well-maintained.

 

1. Dining Hall

The dining hall provides a convenient location for students to have quality, nutritionally balanced meals in a safe, hygienic, and hospitable environment. The University uses a computerized meal booking system (Rhodes University Student Support System / ROSS) that allows each student to choose the meals they want and can select the diet they prefer, including halaal food. Students are allowed to have three meals a day, and the menu is changed every two weeks. The Committee observed that the dining hall was clean and well-maintained.

 

1. Dingemans House

Dingemans House is a female student residence and is also among the oldest residences in the University. The SRC of the University indicated that Dingemans is the residence that has the most student complaints due to sewage spillages. The spillages were caused by ageing underground infrastructure belonging to the municipality, and deferred maintenance of this infrastructure has been a serious problem for the University. The University has contended with the reality of spending its funds to repair infrastructure belonging to the municipality more often.

 

1. Science Buildings

The Committee was further shown some of the ongoing legacy construction projects which were aimed at restoring, developing and beautifying the aging infrastructure. Of these projects are the renovation of the Chemistry-Pharmaceutical building, with approximately R200 million of equipment that has largely been funded by the DSI; and the construction of a new, state-of-the-art Institute for Nanotechnology Innovation (INI). The construction of the INI building cost R87 million and was funded by the DHET and the equipment for the INI was funded by the DSI totaling around R200 million. This INI building is the first of its kind on the African continent and will provide cutting-edge technology and fit-for-purpose research facilities, which will support the training of young nano-scientists and technologists, which is a priority for the DSI.

 

Laboratories for Biosciences and Lifesciences have also been refurbished and connected to generators to mitigate the adverse impact of load shedding.

 

1. Summary of the presentations
   1. Council and Management

Mr S Tredoux: Chairperson of the Finance and General-Purpose Committee of Council who joined the meeting virtually, conveyed the apology of Judge G H Bloem who could not join the meeting due to other commitments. He welcomed the Committee and gave a brief background of Rhodes University, which was celebrating 120 years of existence. He said the University was looking forward to the oversight visit of the Committee and hoped that it would assist the institution in moving to greater heights.

 

The University Management could not make their presentation owing to time constraints. Nonetheless, the presentation of the University provided an update regarding to the 2024 registration period. The University targeted to enroll 1 487 new students, and registrations commenced on 2 February 2024 and were ongoing. The University had dedicated staff who were involved in registration from 6 am – 6 pm, including weekends. Some challenges with registration included the late release of results, lack of communication, and an unstable system.

 

The total enrolment of students at the University stood at 8 348 students in 2023 with female students making up 65% of the student population, and 75% of students were undergraduates. The University had 56 residences with 13 dining halls, and approximately 3 500 students lived on campus.

 

In relation to teaching and learning, the University has six faculties: Humanities, Commerce, Science, Pharmacy, Education and Law. The mode of teaching and learning used by the University is face-to-face, and it also promotes blended learning. The University enjoyed a success rate, which is above 80% and among the best in the country.

 

1. Student Representative Council

Mr S Mnyande: President made the presentation. He noted that the University has a student population of 8 000 students and most students were funded by NSFAS. He added that students were concerned about the NSFAS direct payment system, and the service provider for the University was Coinvest. Some students were owed outstanding funding and allowances from November 2023, because of challenges with the direct payment system.

 

The President raised concerns about the impact of the NSFAS accommodation cap of R45 000 on students, as most of the student residences of the University were charging way beyond the cap. He noted that the cap would result in students incurring additional debt and that NSFAS-funded students would not be able to fund the shortfall in their accommodation costs. This would result in a situation where students would leave the University with an extra debt. The University has also increased its tuition and accommodation fees for 2024, and the Minister should allocate additional funding to the University.

 

The President welcomed the announcement by the Minister regarding the launch of the first phase of the Comprehensive Student Funding Model. This model provides loans to students who fall within the “missing middle” category. He added that the University would be admitting 1 400 new undergraduate students, and the SRC had embarked on a benchmarking exercise with other SRCs to learn and share best practices on how best to assist students with their grievances.

 

He concluded by assuring the Committee that the SRC enjoyed a good working relationship with management and is represented in the Council and other key decision-making committees of the University.

 

 

 

1. Organised Labour: NEHAWU and NTEU

The joint presentation of NEHAWU and NTEU was led by Ms D Bekker: Chairperson NTEU. She noted the financial risks facing the University and indicated that the institution had an unsustainable business model due to limited third-stream income and a decline in government subsidies. She added that the University was seeking to become a financial service provider as it did not have a tangible plan to recoup loans offered to students, and this sets students up for failure and for starting their working lives with large debts. Other financial risks of the institutions included: long delays in the payment of service providers and a costly and ineffective financial management system (Fincore), which is not fit for purpose.

 

In relation to staffing, she indicated that the University had an excellent, highly proficient staff complement, however, the staff motivation and morale were low. She added that the employment equity of the University remains a concern as lower grades were dominated by Black Africans with consistent failure to reach equity targets at other levels. Furthermore, there were long delays in recruitment and making appointments, and below-average remuneration despite the high cost of living.

 

She raised concerns about the poor municipal services provision as the University suffered from consistent water shortages and poor-quality water provision; very poor road infrastructure; broken telephone cables, and the movement of the High Court to Bisho, which is likely to result in many businesses shutting down.

 

In relation to the recommendations to take the University forward, she noted that the University needs to reconsider its business and financial sustainability; the expansion model of the University needs to be more agile and flexible; focus on core business of education; and prioritization of infrastructure maintenance.

 

1. Institutional Forum

Mr E Knoesen: Chairperson of the IF made the presentation. He explained the role of the IF in the University which is mainly to provide advice to the Council on all matters, particularly those that relate to institutional transformation. Regarding the critical issues affecting the University, he indicated that the University had old buildings that required maintenance and refurbishment, and limited funding hampers the institution’s ability to expedite this process. The old underground infrastructure also poses a major challenge for the University. He was of the view that the University experienced difficulties in attracting and retaining staff from other provinces due to its location and the challenges with the quality of life in the town of Makhanda.

 

Mr Knoesen indicated that the University is lacking in terms of expanding its postgraduate offering, and the number of postgraduate students at the University was low, equaling 25% of the total student enrolment. He proposed that the residence business model of the University needs to be reviewed as it was unsustainable, considering that most of the residences were priced way beyond the NSFAS accommodation cap. The gap between the NSFAS accommodation cap and the residence costs amounts to R30 000 per annum, and the University should account on how it persists with its residence model. He added that student historic debt remains a challenge for the University, and students with debt must sign an acknowledgement of debt form to continue their studies. This results in students leaving the university with enormous debt upon completion of their studies.

 

1. Eastern Cape Community Education and Training College
   1. Summary of the presentation

Ms T Futshane: DDG CET informed the Committee that the CET colleges would benefit from the R1 billion that has been set aside for infrastructure development of the sector and R200 million committed by the National Skills Fund (NSF) for occupational skills and non-formal programmes in the sector. The funding would assist with the expansion of CET infrastructure for teaching and learning, thus reducing overreliance on basic education infrastructure.

 

Ms L Mpepho: The Chairperson of the EC CET college welcomed the Committee and indicated that the college had a fully constituted and functional Council with dedicated members. She noted that the Makanaskop CLC was among the centres that were previously donated by DPW to the DHET, and the college was in the process of renovating the facility.

 

Mr M Mdunyelwa: The Principal made the presentation. He indicated that the EC CET college comprised 30 main CLCs and 242 satellite centres and the central office was located in Mdantsane. The CLC centres were located across the eight district municipalities of the province. He added that the college received a clean audit opinion from 2019 to 2021.

 

In terms of management, the college had one Principal who was supported by three Deputy Principals and other support staff members. In terms of enrolments for the 2024 academic year, the college had a target of enrolling 39 523 students. The college was awarded funding by the National Skills Fund (NSF) for skills programmes for learners and staff capacity development to the value of R18 million. The skills programmes and capacity development will commence in April 2024.

 

In relation to partnerships with industries, the college enjoyed good relations with TVET colleges, Sector-Education and Training Authorities (SETAs) and the NSF, which continue to provide support where needed. The college has also been embarking on an advocacy and marketing campaign to attract more students to the sector. The challenges of the college included: insufficient funding to cover the financial needs of the college; understaffing of the central office; unresolved 37% payment in lieu of benefits and lack of adequate infrastructure.

 

1. Onsite walkabout
   1. Eastern Cape CET College, Makanaskop Community Learning Centre

The last site visit of the Committee was conducted at the Makanaskop CLC, which is situated 5 kilometres from the town of Makhanda. The facility was donated by the Department of Public Works (DPW) to the Department, and it used to be a Police Station. The Department received that building in a very bad state since it was vandalized and stripped of key electrical equipment and components.

 

The Department has made repairs and renovations to the building to provide a conducive environment for teaching and learning. At the time of the Committee’s visit, the ablution facilities were working, and the interior of the building was painted. The installation of electricity was still outstanding.

 

The Committee had an opportunity to listen to the experiences and grievances of the students. One learner who managed to express his experience at the centre was a 50-year-old male who was delighted to see members of Parliament visit the facility. He noted that the lecturers of the centre were dedicated to offering students a platform to improve their basic literacy and numeracy skills. The student indicated that he had achieved the General Education and Training Certificate (GETC) Level 4, which is equivalent to Grade 9, and was in the process of studying towards a National Senior Certificate.

 

The students at the centre requested that basic learning materials such as textbooks be made available by the Department so that they could complete their academic tasks. They even suggested the library booking system be utilized so that learners can borrow and return the textbooks. They also requested Wi-Fi and computers to assist them with their academic research. Some other requests included: financial assistance; laptops; stationery; and equipment for the skills programmes offered in the centre.

 

1. KEY FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS

The Committee having undertaken an oversight visit to the post-school education and training (PSET) institutions in the Eastern Cape, makes the following findings and observations and findings:

 

1. King Sabatha Dalindyebo TVET College
   1. With respect to readiness for the 2024 academic year, the college made good progress in registering new and returning students without major setbacks. The college implemented an online registration system that is more convenient and saves time. The college also accepted walk-ins and late registrations. The main challenge was the delayed delivery of learning materials and timetables to students.
   2. The Committee noted the maintenance and refurbishment work done at the lecture halls at the college’s Mthatha Campus, which were made possible through the CIEG from the Department and was the first since the college campus was established. The Committee was concerned about the inadequate maintenance of the newly built student residences and the unhygienic kitchens used by students to cook their meals.
   3. The college did not have recreational facilities at the Mthatha Campus, and this was highlighted as a major concern by the SRC. The Mthatha Campus is the biggest among all the seven campuses of the college, and yet there are no spaces for students to participate in sports and other wellness activities.
   4. The biggest threat to the stability of the college is the delayed appointment of a principal on a substantive basis. In the past five years, the college had five individuals in the acting principal role, and this was gravely concerning. The absence of a substantive principal has resulted in a situation in which Deputy Principals have been recycled to act in this critical vacant position. This has caused disagreements among staff as they have their preferred candidates and refuse to take instruction from other acting principals whom they do not favour. It was noted that interviews for a Principal position were held in March 2023, however, the appointment process was still not completed.
   5. The reported interference by some labour unions in the recruitment processes at the college and their alleged disputing of all recruitment processes have contributed to the delays in filling vacant positions were noted with concern.
   6. Concerns were noted regarding the seven out of eight TVET colleges in the Eastern Cape did not have substantive Principals. The Department committed that all the principal vacant positions in the Eastern Cape will be filled by the end of March 2024. They were awaiting the results of competency tests.
   7. The term of the College Council was coming to an end at the end of March 2024 and concerns were raised regarding the timeous appointment of the new Council.
   8. Notwithstanding the absence of a permanent Principal, the college also experienced delays in filling other senior management positions. Furthermore, the workers alleged that the college suffered a loss of R21 million from the post-provisioning norms (PPN) budget due to the non-implementation of the PPN policy. It was further alleged that the college had been taken to court by some employees of the college, which further delayed the recruitment processes.
   9. Concerns were raised concerning the exclusion from the PPN of the college’s agricultural and hostel staff in the organogram and the Department was silent about the issue.
   10. The progress made by the college in utilizing the infrastructure grant for repairs and renovations of classrooms and other facilities was welcomed by the Committee.
   11. The progress made by the college in improving its audit findings from 63 in 2018 to 5 in 2022 was commended by the Committee. The Committee further encouraged the college to aim for a clean audit and to ensure that good audit outcomes are commensurate with service delivery to the beneficiaries.
   12. The Committee commended the college for the well-kept workshops. However, it expressed its concern about the reported theft of electrical equipment from the workshops by some college students and implored management to take serious action against students who are responsible for stealing the college’s assets.
   13. The Committee was concerned that although the college had various workshops for different trades, none of the workshops were accredited by the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO), and there was no trade test centre in the college.
   14. The inability of the unions to submit a consolidated presentation to the Committee was noted as a concern, despite the unions representing workers from the same college. There were also glaring differences in how the unions viewed the college’s state of affairs.

 

1. Walter Sisulu University
   1. The University has made good progress in the registration of new and returning students for the 2024 academic year without major disruptions. Eighty-four per cent of first-time entering students were registered.
   2. Delays in the release of Grade 12 examination results impact the smooth commencement of the academic year.
   3. The University has made significant progress in terms of rebuilding the academic programme since its last engagement with the Committee in May 2022. During the last engagement with the Committee, the University questioned the accreditation status of five programmes, however, this has been resolved.
   4. The University has experienced a decline in the overall success rates (85% in 2022 – 80% in 2023), and this was noted as a concern.
   5. The University has benefited from the Sibusiso Bengu Development Grant and other grants provided by the Department, and this was evident during the Committee’s site visit to the Zamukulingisa Campus, which has newly completed infrastructure projects. The Committee welcomed the renovations of various residences and teaching and learning facilities at the University and the efforts to modernize the old lecture halls, which also provided ease of access to students with disabilities. Notwithstanding progress in maintenance and renovations, the Committee was gravely concerned about some of the old residences which were not in good living and learning conditions.
   6. The high vacancy rate and inadequate retention strategy were noted as calls for concern, given that the institution has reportedly lost six members of the executive management.
   7. The reported block grants cut was noted as a concern and a call was made to ensure a funding formula that will balance the injustices of the past.
   8. The commitment from the Council to improve stakeholder relations within the university and to hold management accountable for its performance was welcomed by the Committee. The Council further committed to ensuring that management provides conditions for academically deserving students not to be financially excluded.

 

1. Buffalo City TVET College
   1. The Committee’s last engagement with the college was in November 2022, and the college did not have a permanent Principal at the time, and there was animosity between staff, management, and the Council. The situation was so bad that the Committee had requested the Minister to institute an investigation into the college’s affairs. During the oversight visit of the Committee, the college still did not have a permanent Principal, and it also operated without a Council (term expired in November 2023), which is a governance structure meant to exercise oversight over management. The absence of the Council and a substantive Principal has resulted in a leadership vacuum in the college and has created instability.
   2. The Committee was extremely concerned with the conditions of some of the college’s workshops as they seemed neglected and there was a lack of accountability to hold those responsible for such.
   3. A notable improvement was observed in the unity among the labour unions of the college, who managed to submit their collective presentations to the Committee despite sharing different ideologies. The Committee also observed improved relations between management and unions.
   4. The delays in the procurement of personal protective equipment (PPE) for lecturers and students to commence with practicals noted were with concern. The Committee was gravely concerned that students were losing tuition time while waiting for PPE. The state of some of the workshops was not conducive to learning as it was also used as a storage facility. The challenges at the college pointed to a lack of decisive leadership and implementation of consequence management against those who fail to do their work. Compounding the situation were student protests due to the NSFAS’s outstanding payment of allowances and the introduction of the private accommodation pilot project. Students refused to attend lectures until their demands were met, and there appeared to be a lack of urgency from the college management to speedily resolve the situation, and the Committee had to intervene and instruct the Department, NSFAS, and college management to find solutions so that teaching and learning could not be further disrupted.
   5. Poor communication from the college management, including the SRC, was attributed as the main reason for students protesting for almost two weeks.
   6. Notwithstanding that the college did not have a permanent Principal, there are many other senior management vacancies in the college, such as the Deputy Principal (DP) Finance, Campus Manager East London Campus and others. The absence of the college’s CFO in particular was noted as a serious concern.
   7. The Committee was seriously concerned with the allegations of corruption in the allocation of student accommodation at the East London campus.
   8. The poor communication between NSFAS and the college regarding the roll-out of the pilot project was noted as a concern. Furthermore, the 2024 academic year has started, and students have already returned to their previous accommodation and made agreements with their landlords, while the college has been selected to be part of the pilot project. Poor planning from the NSFAS side was noted as a serious concern as the roll-out of the pilot project could have been properly communicated to the college in the prior year.

 

1. University of Fort Hare
   1. The University had its last engagement with the Committee in August 2023, and there were many concerns related to the safety and security of staff, animosity between management and stakeholders, allegations of illegal awarding of qualifications, and related matters. The Committee observed that there was an improvement in the relationship between management and labour, and there was still an opportunity to improve the relations between the SRC and management. The management assured the Committee that it has a special protection programme in place to improve the security of staff, and one of the senior officials responsible for investigations was arrested for murder and has been refused bail.
   2. In terms of registration for the 2024 academic year, the University has made good progress in registering new and returning students. Ninety-five per cent of registrations were conducted online. The University is awaiting an updated list of students approved by NSFAS funding in the 2024 academic year to finalise registration.
   3. It is commendable that 65% of the students at Alice Campus resided in the university-owned accommodation on campus. The Committee also commended the idea of a student village within a rural university so that students can have a conducive environment to focus on their academic programmes.
   4. The Committee expressed its concern about the four-year Bachelor of Science (BSc) Speech-Language Pathology programme, which was introduced in 2018. However, the first cohort of students who were due to graduate after completing the programme could not, since the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) identified shortcomings with the programme.
   5. The clean audit achieved by the University in 2021 was commended; however, the Committee expressed concern about the delays in the finalization of the 2022 audit report due to the outstanding NSFAS close-out report.
   6. The appointment of a Director and Investigating Officer for the GBV Unit was welcomed by the Committee. The University also has a sexual harassment and GBV policy.
   7. The Committee commended the University for its partnership with DHET in constructing the Alice multi-million-rand water infrastructure project. The project was funded by DHET to the tune of R130 million for constructing the water treatment works and upgrading of the wastewater treatment works. The University previously complained about inconsistent water supply from its local municipality, and the project would assist the University and surrounding communities with reliable water supply.

 

1. Rhodes University
   1. The University implements a fully online registration process for its students, which is convenient and enables the University to expedite the placement of students in different programmes. It also made resounding progress in registering FTEN students (target 1 487 – registered 1 457). The slow pace in registrations was experienced with postgraduate students (target 2 562 – registered 1 098).
   2. The Committee commended the University’s residence system, which provides students with a safe and secure living environment to enable academic progression. The university residences were well-kept and in good condition, and students were encouraged to keep their spaces tidy. The University is also among the leading institutions that utilise infrastructure grants from DHET.
   3. The University’s open campus model was commended by the Committee, including its commitment to embrace the local community as part of the campus.
   4. The Committee noted the University’s concern that the NSFAS accommodation cap would lead to a shortfall for many students funded by NSFAS and that they would exit the University with debts. Some of the University’s residences cost up to R80 000 per annum, and NSFAS-funded students would not be able to cover the shortfall in their accommodation costs.
   5. The committee was concerned with the old and poorly maintained sanitation infrastructure of the Makana Local Municipality, which is unable to provide a reliable water supply to the University. Consequently, the University had to be proactive in dealing with challenges related to sewage spills and water shortages, which are the responsibility of the local municipality.
   6. The allegations that the University is taking longer to pay service providers due to the newly introduced financial system were noted as a concern.

 

1. Eastern Cape CET College
   1. The clean audit achieved by the Eastern Cape CET college was welcomed, including the door-to-door campaign to inform community members about the college’s programmes.
   2. The low student-to-lecture ratio (1:8) at the Makanskop CLC was noted as a serious concern given the high number of unemployed youth and adults with no skills.
   3. The Committee was concerned that 90% of the budget allocated for the CET programme is for compensation of employees, and this leaves very little budget for operations and maintenance of facilities.
   4. The partnerships the college has established, including the repurposing of unutilised public buildings (the former police station) into a Community Learning Centre were commended.

 

1. National Student Financial Aid Scheme
   1. The students and organized labour at all the institutions visited by the committee expressed concern about the NSFAS direct payment system and noted that allowances were not disbursed on time, resulting in students having to make other means to sustain themselves.
   2. The Committee expressed its concern in relation to the inadequate communication by NSFAS to institutions regarding the implementation of the private accommodation pilot project. At BC TVET college, management and the SRC appeared confused about the implementation of the project and were not able to give confidence to students about the details of the project, hence, students resorted to protests.
   3. The Committee noted concerns about the accreditation process of privately owned accommodation by the service providers appointed by NSFAS. It was noted that whilst the accommodation providers were expected to pay R200 for the accreditation of each bed, there was no guarantee that they would be allocated students, and this process has been very slow despite the huge demand for student accommodation.
   4. The reported allegations that NSFAS accrediting agents were accrediting properties that were not conducive to living and learning for the University of Fort Hare students at the East London Campus were concerning. It was reported that the University of Fort Hare students were mixed with community members and students from other universities in one building, which raised safety concerns. The Committee further noted the threat by the SRC to embark on protest if NSFAS failed to address their accommodation concerns.
   5. The committee expressed its concern regarding the delays in the payment of funding and allowances owed to students since 2023. Consequently, some students could not register for the 2024 academic year due to pending funding status.

 

1. Department of Higher Education and Training
   1. The Committee expressed its concern regarding the delays in the appointment of Principals at TVET colleges in the Eastern Cape. It emerged that seven out of the eight colleges in the province did not have substantive Principals. The absence of substantive Principals impacts the stability of the college and contributes to delays in the implementation of the PPN policy.
   2. The Committee was concerned about the Department’s inadequate oversight of the colleges in the province. The Committee heard that even the Regional Manager of the province was suspended.
   3. The BC TVET college has been operating without a Council since November 2023, after its term had expired. The Committee was concerned about the absence of an oversight body and implored the DHET to ensure that the appointment of the new Council was expedited.
   4. The delays by the Department in issuing the NSFAS Bursary Guidelines each year were noted as a concern.
   5. The allocation of the Capital Infrastructure and Efficiency Grant (CIEG) to enable institutions to address the backlog in maintenance and build new student residences, teaching and learning, and research facilities was commended.

1. SUMMARY

The objective of the oversight visit to the PSET institutions in the Eastern Cape was to monitor and assess the state of readiness of these institutions for the 2024 academic year. The Committee was also fulfilling its resolution of having physical visits to the EC, which was taken during engagements with some institutions in 2022/23. The Committee also identified potential red flags in 2023 that could have contributed to instability during the 2024 registration period, and it was important to conduct oversight visits to the institutions.

Regarding the 2024 registration and enrolment process, there has been a significant improvement in the number of students who were registered at universities and TVET colleges during the visit of the Committee. Unlike previous years, most of the institutions conduct a fully online registration process, which is convenient and expedites the registration of students. The institutions did not report major disruptions to their registration process, despite some delays with the registration of NSFAS students due to delays in the finalization of their funding status.

In relation to the readiness to commence with the 2024 academic year, most institutions have put the necessary measures in place to welcome back the students for the new academic year. The main challenges that have the potential to delay or disrupt the smooth commencement of the 2024 academic year are related to NSFAS. Some of the key challenges concerning NSFAS included: outstanding payment of funding and allowances to students since 2023; delays in the finalization of funding decisions for 2024, thus impacting NSFAS-funded students from registering; NSFAS accommodation pilot project, the students at BC TVET college refused to be part of this project and embarked on a protest; accommodation cap, which has resulted in students incurring extra debt; delays in the delivery of learning materials in TVET colleges and related matters.

 

Regarding governance and administration, there has been an overall improvement in governance and management at the universities that met the Committee. The Councils were functional, and even their chairpersons were present in the meetings, except at Rhodes University, where the Chairperson tendered an apology. In relation to the TVET sector, the KSD TVET college was functional with qualified members, however, the BC TVET college did not have a Council since its term expired in November 2023. The process of the appointment of the new Council is underway. It was concerning to the Committee that the TVET colleges of the EC did not have permanent Principals for a prolonged period, and this created instability at the colleges.

 

In relation to the CET college, underfunding remains a major concern for the sector, and it needs more resources and marketing for the public to be aware of its programmes. The infrastructure and facilities at the CLC visited by the Committee were not in a good state, and funding limitations impacted the ability of the Department to undertake major renovations and repairs to CLCs infrastructure. There is hope that the R1 billion allocated for infrastructure development will improve the situation in the sector.

1. RECOMMENDATIONS

The Committee has undertaken an oversight visit to PSET institutions in the Eastern Cape and makes the following recommendations:

1. KSD TVET College
   1. The Department should ensure that the process of appointing a permanent Principal at the college is expedited to ensure stability. Furthermore, the filling of other senior management vacancies should be expedited.
   2. The management of the college should develop a stakeholder engagement platform where students and staff grievances can be discussed and resolved.
   3. The college should explore the possibility of forging a partnership with the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture to address the shortage of sporting facilities on its campuses.
   4. The college should consider increasing security measures at its workshops to mitigate the theft of its equipment by students. Furthermore, consequence management should be implemented against students who are caught stealing the college’s assets. Furthermore, the College management should ensure that civic education is taught to all college students.
   5. The college management and hostel staff should ensure that students take responsibility for taking care of the infrastructure.

 

1. WSU
   1. The Council should expedite the process of reviewing its statute. Furthermore, the proposal for the inclusion of traditional leaders within the Council should be explored given the rural setting of the University.
   2. The University management should expedite the process of refurbishing the Chuma and Isilimela student residences as they are not conducive for students to live there.
   3. The University working in collaboration with HPCSA should ensure that the process of accrediting the Master of Medicine (M Med) programme is expedited.
   4. The University should work towards increasing students’ pass and succession rates given the decline in most faculties in 2023.

 

1. BC TVET College
   1. The Department should expedite the appointment of a permanent principal at the college, including the new council.
   2. The TVET branch officials of the Department working in collaboration with the officials from the Accommodation Unit of NSFAS should work closely with the management of the college to ensure that the details concerning the implementation of the NSFAS accommodation pilot project are explained to students.
   3. The college management should provide NSFAS with the necessary data required for disbursing outstanding allowances to students.
   4. Management should put systems in place to expedite the process of procuring outstanding PPEs for students.
   5. Management should ensure that the college workshops are well maintained and that there is standardisation for their housekeeping.

 

1. University of Fort Hare
   1. The University should take the necessary steps to ensure that the accreditation of the BSc Language Speech Pathology programme is expedited.
   2. Management should improve its relations with the SRC so that students ‘grievances can be speedily addressed.
   3. The University should share best practices gained through the partnership with DHET for the construction of the water infrastructure projects with other universities that have similar challenges of unreliable water supply from the municipality.

 

1. Rhodes University
   1. The University needs to revisit its student accommodation model, taking into consideration the NSFAS accommodation cap.
   2. The University should consider partnering with DHET and request funding for the construction of the University-owned water treatment works to resolve the challenge of water supply shortages from the municipality.
   3. The University should invest more resources for an improved intake of postgraduate students as the numbers were low.
   4. The University should ensure that its internal financial systems are fixed so that service providers can be paid on time.
   5. The University should convene a stakeholder forum to address the grievances raised by students and staff.

 

1. DHET
   1. The Department should prioritise the process of filling all outstanding vacancies at TVET colleges, including the appointment of the new Councils.
   2. An investigation report into the state of affairs at BC TVET College should be submitted to the Committee.
   3. The Department should consider the basic demands of CET college students regarding providing learning materials such as textbooks and stationery.
   4. The Department should improve its oversight role over the TVET colleges of Eastern Cape in particular.
   5. The Department working with TVET colleges should ensure the resolution of PPN-related challenges and ensure that its implementation is finalised.
   6. The Department should embark on advocacy campaigns aimed at spreading information about the programme offered at CET colleges throughout the country.
   7. The Department should conduct a forensic investigation into the NSFAS accommodation pilot project, including a possible review thereof.

 

1. NSFAS
   1. The entity should expedite the process of finalising the payment of outstanding funding and allowances due to students for the 2023 academic year.
   2. The entity should deploy personnel across the institutions that have been selected to be part of the NSFAS accommodation pilot project so that they can assist the management and students in the smooth implementation of the project.

 

 

1. The entity should expedite the training programmes meant to equip stakeholders involved in the NSFAS processes at all institutions.

 

Report to be considered.