ATC121123: Report of the Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs Relating to the Oversight Visit dealing with certain aspects of the work of the Department of Environmental Affairs and the Department of Water Affairs in the Gauteng Province 24th — 27th July 2012, dated 7 November 2012
Water and Sanitation
REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
RELATING TO THE OVERSIGHT VISIT DEALING WITH CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE WORK OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS IN THE
GAUTENG PROVINCE 24
TH
27
TH
JULY 2012, DATED 7 NOVEMBER
2012
Background
The Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs (the
Committee) went on an oversight visit, from 23
rd
to 27
th
July 2012, to assess and review matters on which the Committee held public
hearings and briefings, and also open opportunities for further engagements
with the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA), and the Department of Water
Affairs (DWA), as well as their relevant entities, on various issues. The
oversight visit started at the Department of Environmental Affairs
Headquarters, in
Meetings with the Department of
Environmental Affairs and Department of Water Affairs
The Committee held briefing meetings with the officials of the two
departments, respectively, at the DEA head office, in
Much discussion went into the Departments policy framework that sets
out revised principles for water management and underpins the policy reform for
addressing equity and water democracy. The Committee suggested the need for DWA
to interact with the Committee on its policy processes, citing the substantive
contributions that parliamentary processes added to the Climate Change Green
Paper in 2011 and the subsequent White Paper in 2012. It was recommended that
the Departments national policy proposals would be enriched in a similar
manner, particularly as parliamentary public hearings aim to gather and hear
from South Africans of all walks of life. The Department should give the
Committee the space to engage relevant stakeholders on proposed changes to the
National Water Resource Strategy.
The second significant input was a joint presentation done by the
departments of Environmental Affairs and Water Affairs, on the progress that
the three departments had reportedly made on Integrated Permitting. The
Committee noted the good progress that the departments had reported to it, and
proposed the use of legislative approach or a political protocol that can be
adopted by Cabinet as suitable instruments for realising the institutional
arrangement necessary for Integrated Permitting. The Committee would like to
be notified of the modality for Integrated Permitting once it has been
completed and agreed upon for it to assess the viability of the applicable
approaches.
DWA also presented the overviews of the Regional Bulk Infrastructure
Programme and the Accelerated Community Infrastructure Programme, where the
Department identified progress, successes and challenges. The Committee
reiterated its unanimous view that an urgent review and amendment of the
present funding model for the financing of Water Infrastructure and Water
Services should be urgently undertaken and implemented.
Firstly, the present use of providing
municipalities with funding for Water Service and Water Infrastructure through
the equitable share, which creates no obligation to spend money on water
related matters, must be urgently changed, to establish a funding model, which
obliges spheres and organs of government to spend money allocated for water
related matters
only
on such
matters.
Secondly, the Committee
highlighted the need for a single centralised infrastructure planning process
that spans over all water infrastructural programmes. Therefore, there is a
need for water infrastructure projects, including these in municipalities, to
move to a centralized planning process and conditional granting funding model
as opposed to the equitable share funding model, with the National Treasury
playing a critical role in this regard. The Committee underscored the need for
allocation of more money for the water sector, but indicated that this should
not be under the current model of funding that allows municipalities to shift
funds allocated for water related matters to sectors they deem priority. In
addition, the Committee requested the Department to produce and submit a report
on the water hotspots (outside the 23 district municipalities) to which 58
per cent of the 2012/13 budget of DWA was allocated in order for the Committee
to conduct its parliamentary oversight processes.
The Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) made three presentations
in the afternoon of the same day. The first presentation outlined the new
structural alignment of the Department. This was followed by the presentation
on the outcome of the Rio+20 Conference and the green economy in the context of
poverty eradication, in terms of both growth and employment creation in some
renewable energy subsectors such as wind and solar, which have exponential
growth potential. The presentation featured the national policy landscape in
support of a green economy transition; the possible sources of funding for
low-carbon and green economy transition; and zeroed on
Visit to the
The Committee visited the Western
Witwatersrand
Basin, on 25
th
July
2012, to view the efforts being put into decant prevention and management,
ingress control and water quality management, following the presentation of a
progress report in Parliament on the acid mine drainage (AMD) situation in the
area. It was evident to the Committee that progress had been made in the three
preceding thematic areas, although much still remains to be done to effectively
deal with AMD in the
The Committee left for the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site
(COHWHS) that holds the secrets of the origins of species (according to
archaeological & paleontological studies) to view the alleged impacts of
AMD on the Cradle of Humankind. This visit occurred against the backdrop of
media reports that AMD would destroy the Cradle of Humankind by dissolving
fossils and by sinking caves. Scientists briefed the Committee by presenting
the findings of a recent study that was conducted by the Council for Scientific
and Industrial Research (CSIR) to assess the impact of AMD on the Cradle of
Humankind. The study revealed no impact of AMD on the groundwater quality and
hence no threat to the Cradle of Humankind, although the quality of surface
freshwater in certain surface streams appeared to have been compromised. The
dolomite rock in the area, which is known to pacify acidification, explains
this disparity. In fact, the CSIR study indicated that groundwater quality in
the area was worse in 1985 than at the time of the recent study. The Committee
was satisfied with the explanations provided by the scientists, noted and
encouraged their good work and went on a tour of the
world-famous
The Committee visited, on 26
th
July 2012, the 276-hectare
Eskoms Renewable Energy Initiatives
The Committee proceeded from the
The Committee visited Eskom to see the renewable energy initiatives that
Eskom implements at the
The Committee was scheduled to visit the Kendal Power Station, in
The Committee initially planned to visit the
The Committee unanimously adopted
the Report, on 7th November 2012.
The Committee accordingly recommends the adoption of this report to this
House.
Report to be considered.
[1]
Level 1: Start-up (no
departments frameworks for controls; Level 2: the Department has developed
proper frameworks for controls; Level 3: the Department has effective controls;
Level 4: the Department measures resource utilisation; Level 5: the Department
manages resources in a manner that produces effective results; and Level 6: the
Department optimises processes providing for continuous improvement and
learning.
[2]
Natural capital is the
land, air, water, living organisms and all formations of the Earth's biosphere
that provide us with ecosystem goods and services imperative for survival and
well-being. It is the basis for all human economic activity.
Documents
No related documents