Annual Department Report
NCOP Education, Sciences and Creative Industries
21 February 2007
Meeting Summary
A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.
Meeting report
EDUCATION
AND RECREATION SELECT COMMITTEE
21 February 2007
ARTS & CULTURE DEPARTMENT
ANNUAL REPORT
Chairperson: Mr B Tolo (ANC, Mpumalanga)
Document handed out:
Briefing
on Department of Arts and Culture 2006 Annual Report
Department of Arts and Culture 2006 Annual Report [available at www.dac.gov.za]
SUMMARY
The Department presented its annual report. It set out the programmes and strategic framework. Government would
accelerate economic growth and expand equity by creating wealth amongst all
segments of the South African society including the youth women and the
disabled. There was a need to appraise how far the country had come in having a
non racial and sexist society, and to achieve true equality. Some of the
flagship projects were outlined, which included the promotion of African
languages and promotion of literature. National film and video foundation work
was given a large grant which had helped to put South Africa into the
international arena. The Department was hoping to create a new national
identity and foster cohesion and a sense of common purpose amongst the
different segments of the society. Some of the challenges faced included a
problem with the supply chain management, some policy and legislation
limitations, broader Government action and clusters, human capacity
limitations, monitoring and evaluating research, integrated planning in the
Department and budget reduction.
Members sought clarity on why it took a long time to get projects off the
ground. The state of the Timbuktu project in Gauteng
was enquired into. More light should be thrown on the Department’s plans to
achieve equity. Efforts to curtail substance abuse and monitor offensive
musical lyrics amongst musicians were areas of concern to the Committee. The
Heritage promotion project should be spread out to include the different
nations in the country. The Committee also recommended that a synergy be
created between the Department and the Provinces to promote South African
culture and values.
MINUTES
Annual Report Briefing by Department of Arts and Culture(DAC)
Professor I. Mosala, Director –General,
Department of Arts and Culture (DAC) presented the al report for the period 1
April 2005 to March 2006. He stated that the aim of the DAC was to develop and
preserve South African culture to ensure social cohesion and nation building. DAC’s activities were divided into the six programmes of administration, arts and culture in society,
national language services, cultural development and international
co-operation, heritage promotion and national archives. In order to promote
culture, the Department rendered assistance to public institutions.
Some of the highlights were outlined. One of the flagship efforts was the
promotion of African language. There was collaboration with some tertiary
institutions to develop indigenous languages by collecting and preserving
indigenous music and oral history.. Literature in
local African languages would be promoted. Bursaries were awarded to students
pursuing studies in African languages. The language project created new jobs (including
28% for the disabled).
The national film and video foundation was awarded R34, 720 million and this
has paid off by way of the tremendous success of South African films in the
international arena, culminating in the nomination of films like Tsotsi for the Oscars. The cultural development and
international co-operation with other countries had yielded dividends by way of
international recognition of South African films. It had also provided support
for emerging writers. The DAC hosted the African film summit and brought film
representation from all over the continent as a contribution to the New
Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) cultural industries programme.
There was support for the Provincial Growth Development Strategy (PGDS) and the
Integrated Development Plan (IDP). The Heritage day 2005 celebration was held
in the North West Province and included a speech by the President as well as
the promotion of several indigenous foods. Several geographical names have been
standardized within the year in review. The second annual Albert Luthuli memorial lecture was held at the university
of Kwazulu Natal.
The DAC had a number of problems within the period in review and these included
a problem with the supply chain management. Other challenges include policy and
legislation limitations, broader Government action and clusters, human capacity
limitations, monitoring and evaluating research, integrated planning in the
Department and budget reduction.
The Department would create a new national identity and foster cohesion and a
sense of common purpose amongst the different segments of the society.
Discussion
Mr M Thetjeng (DA, Limpopo Province) noted that there were many projects in
the Pretoria museum within the past year. He wanted to know the state of the
Timbuktu project.
Prof Mosala explained that the Timbuktu project was
run from the Presidency. The Department was represented in the project by the
Deputy Minister. Although the Office of the President was in charge, the DAC
was actively involved in it.
Mr Thetjeng commented that
the Department’s equity report as contained in its briefing was not impressive.
He asked what the Department was doing to achieve its employment equity plans.
Prof Mosala replied that the Department was at the
top when compared with other Departments in terms of compliance with
Government’s inclusive employment drive for all segments of the society. The
Cabinet had affirmed that the Department had exceeded the initial targets set
for a representative workforce. The DAC had done very well in employing women.
There was still room for improvement in employing the disabled, but the DAC was
at par with other Departments in this regard and was in no way lagging behind.
Mr Thetjeng enquired into
the position of the DAC in relation to the controversial song about the general
De La Ray.
Prof Mosala said that the Minister was the
spokesperson in respect of that issue and he had also done very well in
handling the matter. South Africans were free to express themselves in art form
and it was often difficult to determine people’s motives for their artistic
work. Undue monitoring therefore could stifle creativity. The DAC would if
necessary monitor the distortion of the national anthem.
Ms N Madlala-Magubane (ANC, Gauteng)
commended the Department’s effort in presenting a well thought out and
researched report. She asked whether children and the youth were being absorbed
in the employment equity, especially in the urban areas. She clarified that
there was no absorption of these mentioned groups into the workforce in the
rural areas.
Prof Mosala said that more could be done to employ
youths in the workforce.
A Committee Member asked what the Department was doing to control substance
abuse amongst performing artists in the country.
Mr Sydney Selepe, Deputy
Director General, DAC replied that substance abuse amongst artists was a long
standing issue. It was difficult for the Department to determine why artists
abused drugs. It could be as a result of frustration of not having adequate
control over their intellectual property. There was collaboration between the
Department and Hugh Masekela to tackle problems that
may affect artists. A creative union would be set up to ensure that artists had
more control over their intellectual property. The Department was poised to aid
all artists.
The Department was asked why the heritage promotion was concentrated in the
Zulu nation and not spread out to the other nations.
Mr Irwin Langeveld,
Director, DACexplained that the Heritage sites were
well spread throughout the Country and were not restricted to the Zulu nation.
There were a total of 9 heritage sites presently being developed and these were
located in Gauteng, Western Cape, Eastern Cape and KwaZulu Natal Provinces. There was no bias in favour of the Zulu nation.
Mr M Sulliman (ANC,
Northern Cape) asked if there was enough enlightenment drive to explain the
reasons for name changes of monuments or places to the wider public.
Mr Langeveld replied that
more could be done to enlighten the public on the need for any planned name
change to monuments and places. The Provinces could also help by throwing light
on name changes billed to take place in their domains.
The Chairperson commented that the process of name change for places and
monuments was rather slow. The rate of name change should be accelerated to
ensure that the Country had an African feel by the time it hosted the World Cup
in 2010. It was important that visitors felt they were in Africa.
Mr Sulliman asked why there
was much delay in completing the freedom park.
Prof Mosala explained that capital projects did not
always lend themselves to time frames preferred by the National Treasury. Many
factors could delay the pace of a project. Architects might be slow in
completing their part of the projects, thereby slowing down the whole process.
In such a situation the DAC would return to the Treasury and ask for a
roll-over. However when there were repeated requests for a roll-over, Treasury
might not grant that request. Therefore in a sense there was a clash of
processes and procedures.
Mr Sulliman asked whether
the Department worked closely with the Education Department to ensure that the
mother-tongue was taught in schools.
Prof Mosala replied in the affirmative.
Ms H Lamoela (DA, Western Cape) enquired as to the
efforts of the Department to ensure proper monitoring of its projects.
The question was not answered.
Ms Lamoela asked what criteria the DAC used in
allocating translators to the different languages.
Prof Mosala explained that this was demand driven;
the department assigned more translators to a language where there was
increased demand or need.
The Chairperson noted that not enough effort was made towards promoting
indigenous languages. Government should encourage publication of books in any
of the official languages. Language could be promoted by making use of some
modern electronic devices like the short message texts (SMS). Culture was lost
when languages are poorly promoted.
Prof Mosala agreed that there was a need to have a
contemporary angle to stories written in African languages, as this was an
effective way of drawing in the youth. African culture was often viewed as
stagnant or steeped in ancient history. There was need to draw on current
trends in African culture.
Ms Lamoela asked whether the Department involved the
provincial and local governments in its projects.
Prof Mosala replied that the Department would
intensify efforts to collaborate with the provincial and local governments. A programme to promote local languages had been achieved by
partnering with Universities located in the provinces.
The Chairperson asked why the Department did not plan ahead of time since this
would make it easier to spend funds within the stipulated time.
Prof Mosala explained that priorities changed over
time and therefore planning too far ahead of time might not be a solution. Some
projects might be shelved or new ones initiated within a set time. The DAC was
however seeking ways of dealing with the problem.
The meeting was adjourned.
Audio
No related
Documents
No related documents
Present
- We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting
Download as PDF
You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.
See detailed instructions for your browser here.