Community Based Public Works Programme: briefing by Department
Public Works and Infrastructure
25 September 2002
Meeting Summary
A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.
Meeting report
PUBLIC WORKS PORTOLIO
COMMITTEE
25 September 2002
COMMUNITY BASED PUBLIC WORKS
PROGRAMME: BRIEFING BY DEPARTMENT
Chairperson: Inkosi M W Hlengwa (IFP)
Documents Handed Out:
Presentation by the Department of Public Works (document will be available
here shortly; please email [email protected]
for a copy)
SUMMARY
The Department of Public Works briefed the Committee about the community
based public works programme. The programme seeks to create community based
projects with a strong focus on the rural areas. The funding of these
programmes is channelled through district municipalities which then administer
these funds. Challenges encountered with the programme include the issue of
sustainability due to lack of capacity within the municipalities.
MINUTES
Mr Bongani More: Chief
Director for the Community Based Public Works Programme (CBPWP) conducted the
presentation. He noted that the presentation would, amongst other things, focus
on the special projects that are there in the communities. He pointed out that
about 70% of the programme is based on the cluster priorities which need
thorough operation whereas the other 30% is for easy implementation projects like
the erection of school fences, and so forth.
Since 1999, the Department has created more than 2100 community project assets.
In the same period, about 80 000 employment opportunities were created. Another
achievement for the Department is that they have managed to consolidate the
Integrated Rural Development Strategy in conjunction with the Department of
Provincial and Local Government.
In terms of capacity, they have managed to empower local government in project
management issues and they have generally been involved in various issues of
community training. A problem encountered has been the area of sustainability
mainly because of the lack of capacity in the various district municipalities.
The reality is usually that, as soon as a project ends, a district municipality
finds it increasingly difficult to sustain it on its own. In the Eastern Cape,
they are operating in six areas with R 69 million spent. In Kwazulu-Natal, they
are operating in eleven areas and spent R 69,5 million. In Limpopo, they are
operating in 63 municipalities where they have spent R62 million. Over and
above this, there is about R13 million which is for special projects and is
managed by the Independent Development Trust.
The progress so far is that almost all of these projects are either complete or
they are reaching the final completion stage. He pointed out that despite such
progress, there are some challenges which they face. For instance, it has
emerged that there is a whole debate around the issue of IDP (Integrated Development
Projects). The issue of duplication of documents (business plans) for different
areas has been highlighted and they are working together with the DPLG to solve
this problem. They have also tried to call a mid-term review so as to reflect
on the progress that has been made so far with the district municipalities.
Here, they will look at issues such as whether, in comparison with the spent
money, what has been accomplished and what still needs to be done. They will
also look at what can be done with the available money. One of the problems
highlighted is the lack of technical skills and services like engineering,
especially in the case of small rural municipalities.
He informed the Committee that, as such, the Department has embarked on a
programme to meet the district municipalities halfway through a funding
programme to make these technical skills available for the inspection of the
various projects at their various life stages.
Discussion
Mr Chikane (ANC) asked if the DPW has, in addition to the CBPWP done
anything to create jobs as per the request of the state president in his
opening of parliament speech?
On the job creation issue, Mr More pointed out that a document is being
developed in the social cluster component at cabinet level to take an
integrated approach to job creation. He also pointed out that the President's
state of the nation address made reference to the issue of public works
programmes which go beyond the scope of the Community Based Public Works
Programme to larger projects, such as the construction of hospitals.
Mr Schippers (NNP) asked why the funds are transferred directly to the district
municipality and not through the provinces. Regarding the channelling of funds,
he pointed out that the provinces had until recently been responsible for the
handling of funds. This system was changed whereby the funds are now being
directly transferred to different municipalities. He added that even though the
provinces are not happy with this, the Ddepartment's approach is to give provinces
a monitoring role.
Mr Moonsamy (ANC) asked if councillors have the capacity to use the money
appropriately. Secondly, if the money goes to one general account, how do these
people allocate these funds amicably?
Mr More pointed out that the Department is indeed worried that this might not
be the case, but they also have to act according to instructions from the
treasury. The allocation of funds largely depends on what is of utmost priority
to the particular municipality, what the Department would like to see happening
is some form of monitoring mechanism over these funds.
The Chair asked about the issue of IDP's, specifically regarding the
implementation and understanding of these programmes from the various
stakeholders like the municipalities for example. Is there any plan that the
DPW has to fill this gap and bring these people to an understanding and create
a smoother working environment?
Mr More pointed out that yes, they have been trying to approach the various
district municipalities and see how their IDP's are progressing. For instance
they went to Oakwood municipality and proposed these kinds of issues to them.
He added that generally, the Department has noted that some municipalities are
good in these issues and their engagement as a Department will depend more on
the capacity of a particular municipality in this regard.
The meeting was adjourned.
Audio
No related
Documents
No related documents
Present
- We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting
Download as PDF
You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.
See detailed instructions for your browser here.