Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Amendment Draft Bill [PMB -2017]Call for comments opened 14 July 2017 Share this page:
Submissions are now closed (since 09 August 2017)
In accordance with section 73(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 ("the Constitution"), notice is given that Mrs C Dudley MP intends to introduce the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Amendment Bill, 2017, a private member's bill, in Parliament.
An explanatory summary of the proposed content of the Bill is hereby published in accordance with Rule 276(l)(c) of the Rules of the National Assembly (9th edition).
The Draft Bill will provide for the following amendments:
- an amendment to the definition of "gestation period" in section 1 of the principal Act so that the gestation period of a woman is more accurately determined not only by calculating from the first day of her last menstrual period but also confirming this calculation via an ultrasound examination;
- the deletion in section 2 of the principal Act of certain circumstances under which a pregnancy may be terminated. The first amendment is to delete section 2(1)(b)(iv) from the principal Act which currently allows that a pregnancy may be terminated from the 13th up to and including the 20th week of the gestation period if a medical practitioner, after consultation with the pregnant woman, is of the opinion that the continued pregnancy would significantly affect the social or economic circumstances of the woman. It is not clear from the principal Act what expertise a medical practitioner has to make a decision on the social or economic effect of a pregnancy. This circumstance accordingly appears to be arbitrary and is so broad that it is vague. Up to 12 weeks of the gestation period of a pregnancy, this circumstance will automatically apply and is thus provided for. The second amendment is to delete section 2(1)(c)(iii) from the principal Act which currently allows that a pregnancy may be terminated after the 20th week of the gestation period if a medical practitioner, after consultation with another medical practitioner or a registered midwife, is of the opinion that the continued pregnancy would pose a risk of injury to the fetus. This circumstance is vague. It should be noted that provision is already made in the principal Act for termination of a pregnancy in the event that the fetus would suffer from a severe physical or mental abnormality or that the continued pregnancy would result in severe malformation of the fetus;
- the insertion of new paragraphs into section 3(1) of the principal Act which will ensure that facilities at which terminations of pregnancies take place give the pregnant woman access to ultrasound equipment and ultrasound examinations and also provides
- an amendment to section 4 of the principal Act which will provide that the State must promote the provision of mandatory (as opposed to non-mandatory) counselling;
- the addition of a new subsection to section 4 of the principal Act, which will stipulate the kind of information that must be made available to a pregnant woman during counselling to assist her in making an informed choice regarding the termination of her pregnancy and to assist her in giving informed consent prior to the termination of her pregnancy. Such information will include relevant information relating to the state of the development of the fetus, including electronic pictures, diagrams and photographs; information on the procedure of the termination and the extent of the associated risks involved in continuing the pregnancy as set against all the associated risks involved in terminating the pregnancy; information on available alternatives to the termination of the pregnancy;
- information on other support available to the pregnant woman such as referral to a social worker who can assist the pregnant woman to access relevant social grants, safe-housing and counselling, where necessary; and information on contraceptive measures;
- the addition of a further new subsection to section 4 of the principal Act which will provide that the counselling services must also be provided to either the natural guardian, spouse, legal guardian or curator personae, as the case may be, in the event that such person is the person giving consent for a termination of pregnancy on behalf of a severely mentally disabled or unconscious pregnant woman;
- the deletion of section 5(5)(b)(iii) from the principal Act which currently allows that two medical practitioners or a medical practitioner and a registered nurse or midwife may, after the 20th week of the gestation period of a pregnant woman who is severely mentally disabled or in a state of continuous unconsciousness, consent to the termination of a pregnancy if they are of the opinion that the continued pregnancy would pose a risk of injury to the fetus. This circumstance is vague and provision is already made in the principal Act for termination of a pregnancy in the event that the fetus would suffer from a severe physical or mental abnormality or that the continued pregnancy would result in severe malformation of the fetus; and
- the express repeal of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Amendment Act, 2004 (Act No. 38 of 2004), which was declared invalid in the constitutional court case, Doctors for Life International v Speaker of the National Assembly and others, 2006 (6) SA 416 CC, in that Parliament had failed to comply with its constitutional obligation to facilitate public involvement before passing Act 38 of 2004 and as a consequence, adopted it in a manner that was inconsistent with the Constitution. Following this judgment, the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Amendment Act, 2008 (Act No. 1 of 2008) was passed, which came into operation on 1 8 February 2008.
Comments can be emailed to the Speaker of the National Assembly at firstname.lastname@example.org and to email@example.com by no later than Wednesday, 9 August 2017.