ATC130509: Report of the Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology on Budget Vote 34 and the Annual Performance Plan of the Department of Science and Technology for the 2013/14 Fiscal Year, dated 8 May 2013:
Science and Technology
Report of the Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology on Budget
Vote 34 and the Annual Performance Plan of the Department of Science and
Technology for the 2013/14 Fiscal Year, dated 8 May 2013:
The Portfolio Committee on Science
and Technology (the Committee), having considered and concluded its
deliberations on Budget Vote 34 and the Annual Performance Plan of the
Department of Science and Technology for the 2013/14 Fiscal Year, reports as
follows:
1. Introduction
On 13 March 2013,
the DirectorGeneral, Dr Phil
Mjwara
briefed the
Committee on the annual performance plan and budget of the Department of
Science and Technology (hereafter, the Department).
A number of briefings by the entities reporting to
the Department followed. These entities were the National Research Foundation,
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Human Sciences Research
Council, Technology Innovation Agency, South African National Space Agency,
The Departments presentation
provided an overview of the strategic context within which it operates;
detailing its strategic goals, key priorities and recent outputs. Furthermore,
the Department highlighted a selection of performance indicators and their
concomitant targets and summarised the budget allocation for each of its
programmes for the next three years, as well as the budget allocation for each
of its entities for the current financial year.
2. Strategic Overview
The work of the Department is mainly
guided by the White Paper on Science and Technology, which introduced the
concept of the National System of Innovation (NSI). The NSI concept is an
enabling framework for the development of science, technology and innovation at
national level. Key strategies such as the National Research and Development
Strategy (NRDS) and in particular, the Ten-Year Innovation Plan (TYIP) seek to
contribute to the transformation of the South African economy into a
knowledge-based economy.
The Department's policy framework is further informed
and aligned to broader government priorities and policies such as articulated
in the Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF), the New Growth Path (NGP) and
now the National Development Plan (NDP). The NDP considers science, technology
and innovation as key aspects of the South African developmental agenda.
Science and technology are crucial to equitable growth as advances in these
fields underpin the advances in the economy.
3. Strategic Goals
The Departments five strategic
goals over the medium term are to:
·
Develop the
innovation capacity of the NSI to contribute to socio-economic
development;
·
Enhance South
Africas capacity for generating knowledge to produce world class research
outputs and develop advanced findings into innovation products and processes;
·
Develop appropriate
science, technology and innovation (STI) human capital to meet the needs of
society;
·
Build a world-class
STI infrastructure to extend the frontiers of knowledge, train the next
generation of researchers and enable technology development and transfer as
well as knowledge interchange; and
·
Position
4. Key Interventions
The Department aims to, through its
Strategic Plan and 2013/14 Annual Performance Plan, address the following
challenges:
·
Achieve critical
mass in a small number of long-term, large-scale and high-impact priority areas
that have been identified over the past few years;
·
Ensure that
high-level human capital is developed and employed in long-term productive
research in
·
Introduce and
strengthen efforts that enhance
·
Improve the ability
of government investment to leverage private sector and international funding;
·
Build the
knowledge-generation and knowledge-exploitation capabilities in rural and
historically disadvantaged higher education institutions;
·
Provide and
maintain state of the art STI infrastructure;
·
Create a
coordinated and integrated NSI governance and robust monitoring and evaluation;
·
Develop and
strengthen regional and provincial innovation systems and capabilities to meet
community ad industry demands;
·
Use the cluster
system to facilitate alignment of the Departments programmes to the NGP, the
Industrial Policy Action Plan 2 (IPAP2) and the NDP;
·
Resource the system
by achieving and going beyond the 1% General Expenditure on Research and Development
(GERD) as a % of GDP; and
·
Strengthen
government-industry-higher education partnerships.
5. 2013/14 Budget Overview
The Department is allocated R6.2 billion for the
2013/14 financial year, which is 0.6% of the total appropriation for the
country (R1.1 trillion). The budget allocation has increased by 24.0% in
nominal terms compared to the 2012/13 budget allocation of R4.99 billion (see
table 1).
In real terms, i.e. accounting for inflation, the
Research, Development and Innovation Programme receives an increase of 34.8%,
the Human Capital and Knowledge Systems Programme receives an increase of 13.6%
and the Socio-Economic Partnerships Programme receives an increase of 11.6%.
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) project receives an additional amount of R1.9
billion over the medium term for the construction of the
MeerKAT
Antennae. The Human Capital and Knowledge Systems Programme still
receives
the largest share of the Departments allocation,
namely, 40%.
Table 1.
The 2013/14 Budget of the Department of Science and
Technology
Programme
|
Budget
|
Nominal
|
Real
|
Nominal % change
|
Real % change
|
|||
R million
|
2012/13
|
2013/14
|
2014/15
|
2015/16
|
2012/13-2013/14
|
2012/13-2013/14
|
||
Administration
|
229.4
|
268.2
|
291.0
|
309.2
|
38.8
|
24.6
|
16.91%
|
10.71%
|
Research, Development &
Innovation
|
1 142.8
|
1 627.1
|
1 603.9
|
1 702.0
|
484.3
|
398.0
|
42.38%
|
34.83%
|
International Cooperation and
Resources
|
139.3
|
148.4
|
157.2
|
164.4
|
9.1
|
1.2
|
6.53%
|
0.88%
|
Human Capital & Knowledge
Systems
|
2 064.7
|
2 476.8
|
2 683.5
|
3 417.8
|
412.1
|
280.8
|
19.96%
|
13.60%
|
Socio-Economic Partnerships
|
1 423.4
|
1 677.6
|
1 864.7
|
2 050.9
|
254.2
|
165.2
|
17.86%
|
11.61%
|
TOTAL
|
4 999.6
|
6 198.1
|
6 600.3
|
7 644.3
|
1 198.5
|
869.8
|
23.97%
|
17.40%
|
Source: National Treasury (2013) - Vote 34 Science and
Technology and own calculations.
Over the medium term, the Department receives
additional funding of R3.1 billion, which will be spent as follows:
·
R1.1 billion for
the SKA project through the Research, Development and Innovation Programme;
·
R400 million for
human capital development;
·
R605 million for
the modernisation of research infrastructure;
·
R910 million from
the economic competitiveness and support package in aid of the National
Intellectual Property Management Office, technology stations and the industry
innovation partnership fund; and
·
R125 million for
improved conditions of service in the Department and its entities.
According to economic classification, the Department
will spend 7.3% (R454.1 million) on Current payments (Compensation of employees
and Goods and services), 92.6% (R5.74 billion) on Transfers and subsidies and
0.04% (R2.2 million) on Payments for capital assets. The allocation for
Transfers and subsidies further comprises R4.17 billion for the Departments
agencies and science councils, R1.03 billion for Public corporations and
private enterprises and R532.8 million for Non-profit institutions.
6. Programme Summary
Programme 1: Administration
The Administration Programme is
responsible for the overall management of the Department, and ensures that the
organisations, which receive funding, comply with good corporate governance
practices, and align their activities with the NSI. It is also responsible for
monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Science Councils.
This Programme comprises 4.3%
(R268.2 million) of the total budget.
Programme 2: Research, Development and Innovation
The Research, Development and
Innovation Programme facilitate knowledge generation and exploitation through
research and development in the key priority areas of space science,
bioeconomy
and energy. It promotes the expansion of
This Programme is allocated 26.3%
(R1.63 billion) of the total budget.
Programme 3: International Cooperation and Resources
The purpose of this programme is to
develop, promote and manage international relationships, opportunities and
science and technology agreements that both strengthen the NSI and enable the
exchange of knowledge, capacity and resources between
This Programme comprises 2.4%
(R148.4 million) of the total budget.
Programme 4: Human Capital and Knowledge Systems
This programme aims to provide
leadership to develop an innovative and competitive society with skilled human
capital, superior knowledge and research infrastructure.
This Programme comprises 40% (R2.5
billion) of the total budget.
Programme 5: Socio-Economic Partnerships
The
purpose of this programme is to enhance the growth and development priorities
of government through targeted science and technology interventions and
development of strategic partnerships with other government departments,
industry, research institutions and communities.
This
Programme comprises
27% (R1.7 billion) of the total
budget.
7. Public Entities
Council for
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
The Council for Scientific and Industrial Researchs mandate is to
foster industrial and scientific development in the national interest through
multidisciplinary research and technological innovation.
The Councils strategic goals over the medium term are to:
·
build a track record of demonstrable impact in research and
development through an established programme of relevant research and
development in research impact areas and flagship programmes;
·
build and transform human capital to ensure adequate
capacity, and contribute to the national skills base;
·
strengthen the science, engineering and technology base and
perform relevant research and development;
·
transfer technology and skilled human capital; and
·
enhance
financial
sustainability and ensure good corporate governance and corporate citizenship.
National Research
Foundation (NRF)
The National Research Foundations mandate is to promote and support
research in all fields of humanities, the social and natural sciences,
engineering and technology, and indigenous knowledge systems. The Foundation
provides research funding and research platforms through national facilities
and science awareness activities. The Foundations strategic goals over the
medium term are to:
·
promote both nationally and internationally competitive
research as the basis for a knowledge
economy;
·
grow a representative science and technology workforce in
·
provide cutting edge research, technology and innovation
platforms;
·
operate world class evaluation and funding systems; and
·
contribute
to a vibrant
national innovation system.
The mandate of the
The Academys strategic goals over the medium term are to:
·
recognise
scholarly
achievement and excellence in the application of scientific thinking for the
benefit of society;
·
mobilise members to contribute their expertise in the
service of society;
·
conduct systematic and evidence based studies on issues of
national importance and producing authoritative reports that have significant
impact on policy making;
·
promote the development of an indigenous system of South
African research publications, increasing their quality, visibility,
accessibility and impact;
·
publish science focused periodicals that will showcase the
best of Southern African research to a wide national and international
audience;
·
develop productive partnerships with national, regional and
international organisations with a view to building capacity in science and its
application within the national system of innovation;
·
create diversified sources of funding for sustainable
functioning and the growth of a national academy; and
·
communicate
effectively with
relevant stakeholders through various media and
fora
.
Africa Institute of
The mandate of the Africa Institute of South Africa is to focus on
political, socioeconomic, international and developmental issues in
contemporary
The Institutes strategic goals over the medium term are to:
·
promote knowledge and understanding of African affairs
through leading social scientists acting in concert and across all disciplines,
and through training and education on African affairs;
·
collect, process and disseminate information on African
affairs, give effective advice and facilitate appropriate action in relation to
the collective needs, opportunities and challenges of all South Africans; and
·
promote
awareness and
consciousness of
Human Sciences
Research Council (HSRC)
The Human Sciences Research Council was established in 1968 to
undertake, promote and coordinate research in the human and social sciences.
The Councils strategic goals over the medium term are to:
·
advance social sciences and humanities for public use by
initiating, undertaking and fostering basic and applied research in human and
social sciences, and geopolitical issues;
·
contribute to development and social progress in Africa by
conducting research and
analysing
and publishing data
that aims to address developmental challenges locally, regionally and globally;
·
contribute to the development of a skilled and capable
workforce in
·
preserve its library holdings through digitisation and
preserved data sets from data collected by its researchers and share this with
others for further analysis;
·
effect transformation at senior level to reflect race and
gender demographics; and
·
improve
and implement
effective and efficient systems of financial management and good corporate
governance.
South African
National Space Agency (SANSA)
The South African National Space Agency is broadly required to promote
the peaceful use of space, foster international cooperation in space related
activities, and facilitate the creation of an environment that is conducive to
space technology and industrial development.
The Agencys strategic goals over the medium term are to:
·
deliver world class and efficient services that yield social
and economic benefits;
·
conduct cutting edge research and development, and
innovation in space science, communications, navigation and space physics;
·
develop human capital in
astrosciences
;
·
contribute to a competitive national space industry and
astronautics;
·
support and promote the creation of an environment that is
conducive to industrial development in space technology;
·
advance scientific, engineering and technological
competencies and capabilities through human capital development outreach
programmes, and infrastructure development; and
·
strengthen
Technology Innovation
Agency (TIA)
The Technology Innovation Agency serves as the key institutional
intervention to bridge the innovation chasm between research and development
outcomes from higher education institutions, science councils, public entities,
private companies and world markets, thus intensifying the effect of
technological innovation in the economy. The Agencys overarching objective is
to enable and support technological innovation across different sectors of the
economy to achieve socioeconomic benefits through structured financial and
non-financial interventions, thereby, building linkages between innovation
products and world markets.
The Agencys strategic goals over the medium term are to:
·
stimulate the development and demonstration of technology
based services, processes and products;
·
support the
commercialisation
of
technology innovations;
·
develop an enabling environment for technology innovation in
·
develop an enabling internal environment to successfully
execute its strategy;
·
facilitate the development of innovation skills to support
technology innovation and commercialization; and
·
build
a culture of technology innovation.
8. Committee
observations resulting from engagements with the Department and entities
·
The Committee
noted and welcomed the allocations made to the SKA project, the upgrade and
maintenance of research infrastructure and to the National Intellectual
Property Management Office (NIPMO). Some of these funding concerns were raised
in the Committees budget review and recommendations report in 2012.
·
The Committee questioned most of the
entities that made presentations around how their targets were set. Entities
such as the CSIR, HSRC and NRF assured the Committee that their objectives and
performance indicators had been set in line with the SMART (Specific,
Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-bound) principle. The Committee
wanted to ascertain whether these targets, especially in cases where they were
all met, could not be attributed to setting targets either too low or due to
limitations of the parliamentary grants and human capital to increase those
targets. The Committee undertook to explore further the aforementioned
submissions of
DSTs
entities.
·
The Committee acknowledged the important
work done by the Department and its entities and questioned whether it was
significantly communicated to the public and government departments. In some
instances, and this was raised with the CSIR, the Committee found that the
budget allocated for communication and outreach was insufficient. They urged
the Department and its entities to accelerate efforts in effectively
communicating their programmes and achievements to all South Africans.
·
The Committee noted that the Bio-economy Strategy
has taken long to be finalised. The completion of the Strategy is important in
guiding the research, development and investment priorities for the programmes
governed by this strategy. The Committee urged the Department to finalise the Strategy
without delay.
·
T
he
Committee noted that certain job category challenges existed and raised the
concern that the human resources targets for women and disabled persons were
not necessarily on the increase but decreasing and urged the Department and its
entities to work harder to achieve these targets.
·
Throughout the proceedings, the Committee sought clarity on the issue of Governments
involvement in Sunspace. The Committee further noted the minimal progress that
had been made since the 2009 Agreement around the African Resource Management
Constellation (ARMC).
·
The Committee
welcomed the recommendations by the Ministerial Review Committee on the
Science, Technology and Innovation Landscape as to how the NSI could be
strengthened going forward. The Committee plans to invite the Department to
update them, particularly on the outcomes of the Internal Working Committees
evaluation on these recommendations as well as on the public comments received
on the matter.
·
The Committee remained concerned about the
possible negative effects that hydraulic fracturing (
fracking
)
of the
·
The Committee views the contributory role
of the Department as crucial when it comes to education. Particular concerns
were raised with regard to inputs in curriculum development as part of a plan
to address the low levels of science, engineering, technology and innovation
students progressing through to postgraduate studies.
·
In light of the Departments programme alignment to the
objectives of the NDP, which foresee the number of first rate scientists
doubled by 2030, science intervention in education could not be limited to
financial support for students in the field.
·
Stringent synergies should be forged with both the
Departments of Higher Education and Training and Basic Education to ensure that
issues of concern regarding weaknesses in mathematics and science at school
level are discussed in order to produce the desired impact for the science,
technology and innovation agenda of the country.
·
Further attention by both the Department
and the Departments of Education should be devoted to addressing the low rates
of academic achievement in mathematics and science as well as assessing the
support and impact of the
Dinaledi
schools.
·
The Committee viewed intergovernmental collaborative
partnerships as instrumental in ensuring the work done by the Department and
its entities was used and implemented. Enhanced co-ordination is necessary at
Executive as well as Parliamentary level amongst the various portfolio and
select committees in instances where science and technology issues are
transversal.
·
In interacting with the public entities in the science
portfolio, Members expressed their general satisfaction with the entities
operations and plans. They acknowledged that the science councils and agencies
in this portfolio have an important role to play in facilitating the
development of cutting-edge science and technology capabilities in the country.
Recommendation:
The Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology, having considered and
concluded its deliberations on Budget Vote 34 and the Annual Performance Plan of
the Department of Science and Technology for the 2013/14 fiscal year,
recommends that
Budget Vote 34, be approved by
the House.
Report to be considered.
References:
Department of Science and Technology (2011)
Strategic Plan for the Fiscal Years
2011-2016.
Department of Science and Technology (2013),
Annual Performance Plan 2013-2014.
Department of Science and Technology (2013)
DST Strategic Plan,
Presentation
to the Portfolio Committee on 13 March 2013.
National Treasury (2013)
Estimates of National Expenditure Vote 34: Science and Technology
.
Portfolio Committee
on Science and Technology (2012)
Budget
Review and
Recommendation Report of the Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology,
dated April 2011.
Documents
No related documents