ATC121004: Report Of The Select Committee On Appropriations On The Progress Report On The Northern Cape Mental Health Hospital Project And North West Hospital Revitalisation Grant Projects In The 2012/13 Financial Year, Dated 19 September 2012
Standing Committee on Appropriations
REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS ON THE PROGRESS REPORT ON THE NORTHERN CAPE MENTAL HEALTH
HOSPITAL PROJECT AND NORTH WEST HOSPITAL REVITALISATION GRANT PROJECTS IN THE 2012/13
FINANCIAL YEAR, DATED 19 SEPTEMBER 2012
1.
Introduction
The
Select Committee on Appropriations (the Committee) convened hearings on the
progress that had been made on the
North
West Hospital Revitalisation Grant and Northern Cape Mental Health Hospital
project projects since the Committees oversight visits on 11 October 2011 and
24 January 2012, respectively.
The
Committee invited the Health and Public Works departments of the two provinces,
2. Terms of
reference
The hearings
emanated from the Committees oversight visits to the two provinces in the
2011/12 financial year. After the visits the Committee had compiled reports
with recommendations. As part of the new adopted Committee Strategic Plan, the
Committee had resolved to track the implementation and progress of its recommendations.
The hearings formed part of the
Committees ongoing interaction with provinces to monitor their spending
patterns on conditional grants allocated to them. A framework for each grant
sets out the purpose of the grant, measurable objectives, conditions,
allocation criteria, and past performance, among other things.
3.
Progress reports by
3.1
Northern Cape Departments of Health and Public Works on the
During Committee
meetings held on 19 and 20 October 2010, the Committee was told that the
initial projected cost of the Northern Cape Mental Health Hospital project had
been R290 million, but it had escalated to R740 million. This project had been started
in 2006 and should have been completed in 2008. According to the Northern Cape
Department of Health (NCDH), the project had been delayed due to slow delivery
by the contractor. The contractor had been replaced, but the project had
additional costs to the amount of R380 million, and it was making good
progress.
In the meeting
held on 8 August 2012, t
he NCDH explained that the first contractor, Vista
Park/JOH Arch Investments, had been awarded the contract by the Provincial
Tender Board in August 2005. The NCDH added that the late installation of bulk
earthworks had delayed the commencement of the project and it eventually commenced
in February 2006. This, coupled with bad weather, had led to the revision of the
completion date to 20 March 2008. The NCDH further explained that by 2007 slow
construction, poor workmanship and incomplete remedial work had been noted.
This had led to the contractor being 565 days behind schedule which resulted in
penalties totaling R11.3 million levied but not deducted. The NCDH reported
that Vista Park/JOH Arch Investments had failed to submit a revised
construction
programme
, and had instead submitted claims
for extension of time and costs. Furthermore, the NCDH reported that water
penetration, had caused the structures to deteriorate. Vista Park/JOH Arch
Investments had also experienced cash flow problems and the subcontractors had not
been paid on time. Overall there had been poor supervision of the workforce by
Vista Park/JOH Arch Investments.
The NCDH reported that in February
2008, the department had requested Vista Park/JOH Arch Investments to provide a
definitive plan to complete the project by 20 March 2008. In April 2008 Vista
Park/JOH Arch Investments had failed to complete the project or submit the
required completion plan. The provincial Department of Public Works reported
that the contractor had been informed he was in breach of contract. In February
2009 Vista Park/JOH Arch Investments had submitted a claim for extension of
time with costs, together with a new completion date - May 2010. The NCDH
reported that from March to December 2009 senior management had tried to find a
solution to the never-ending delays and when this had failed, the Northern Cape
Department of Public Works had terminated the contract at the end of 2009.
The NCDH reported that from January
2010 to October 2011 Vista Park/JOH Arch Investments had challenged this
decision through the courts. The NCDH added that the lengthy delay, with the
construction site still legally under Vista Park/JOH Arch Investments, had resulted
in significant deterioration of the structure due to bad weather, vandalism and
theft. In October 2011 Vista Park/JOH Arch Investments had been liquidated
before the court could make a final ruling. The NCDH reported that 2 per cent
(R5 million) of the contract value had been provided through
Investec
Bank for a period of 24 months and a 4 per cent
(R10.2 million) retention from the contract had been kept by the client after the
termination. The NCDH also reported that the increase of the original contract
amount had been due to significant variations in costs caused by averaging
methodology used to estimate costs at the outset. Design work had continued
while construction was underway and R420 million had been spent on the initial
part of this project.
The NCDH reported that in 2011 a new
contractor,
Inyatsi
Construction, had been appointed using Joint Building Contract Committee (JBCC)
contract. The site had been handed over on 21 December 2011. The contract had
been for 24 months with the completion date set as January 2014. The contract had
been valued at R400.57 million for the hospital, internal roads and guardhouse,
excluding professional fees. Moreover, the NCDH reported that due to suspicions
of latent defects, structural tests had been done in 2011 and reports
commissioned had estimated remedial work to be amounting to R6.78 million. In June
2012 sample drill courses had been conducted to determine the concrete strength
and two of three passed the tests. The NCDH further reported that in August
2012 further strength tests had been conducted on some surface beds and
concrete slabs, and preliminary findings had indicated significant variations
in strength. At the time of the meeting, the department was awaiting laboratory
reports on load tests conducted.
The NCDH reported that the
The NCDH reported that there was no
capital budget available for this project. The expenditure was being paid from the
budget of the De
Aar
Hospital Revitalisation Grant
project. Moreover, there was a significant and unexpected increase in the
capital cost of the electric sub-station from the
3.2 North West Department of Health and Public Works
On 11 October 2011, the Committee
had visited the
The progress
report submitted to the Committee on 8 August 2012 by the North West Department
of Health (NWDH) indicated that the allocated budget for the Hospital
Revitalisation Grant in the 2012/13 financial year was R423 million. At the
time of reporting only R123 million (29 per cent) had been spent. The NWDH
reported that its submission to the Committee during the October 2011 visit
that there was nothing to show on the
The North
West Department of Public Works reported on a case that was before the court
with regard to the
4.
Key Observations
During interaction with the
4.1 The cost of the
4.2 The
4.3 There has been little progress with the North West Hospital
Revitalisation
programme
as far as the
4.4
The officials of the North West Provincial Department
of Health had committed and signed on behalf of the Department that the
5.
Recommendations
Having considered the joint
presentations by the provincial departments of health and public works on
progress on Hospital Revitalisation Grant projects, the Select Committee on
Appropriations recommends as follows:
5.1
The National Department of Health should conduct
thorough investigations on the Northern Cape Mental Health Hospital Project.
5.2
The Northern Cape Department of Health should
refrain from contravening the Division of Revenue Act by spending conditional
grant funds meant for the De
Aar
Hospital Project on
the Northern Cape Mental Health Hospital Project.
5.3
The National Department of Health should conduct
an assessment of progress on the
three North West Hospital
Revitalisation projects -
5.4
The North West Department of Health should submit a
progress report on its investigations into the
Report to be considered.
Documents
No related documents