ATC140915: Report of the Select Committee on Co-Operative Governance and Traditional Affairs on Consideration of the notice of Intervention issued in terms of Section 139(1)(C) of the Constitution In Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality, North West Province – dated 15 September 2014
NCOP Economic and Business Development
REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS ON CONSIDERATION OF THE NOTICE
OF INTERVENTION ISSUED IN TERMS OF SECTION 139(1)(c) OF THE CONSTITUTION IN NGAKA
MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTH WEST PROVINCE DATED 15 SEPTEMBER 2014
The Select Committee on Co-operative Governance and
Traditional Affairs, having considered the directive of the National Council of
Provinces (NCOP), to consider and report on the notice of intervention issued
in terms of section 139(1)(c) of the Constitution in Ngaka Modiri Molema District
Municipality in
the North West Province,
reports as follows:
1.
Introduction and Background
1.1
On the 3
rd
September 2014, the MEC of the Department of Local Government and Human
Settlements tabled to the NCOP, a notice of intervention issued in terms of
section 139(1)(c) of the Constitution in Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality.
1.2
On the
4
th
September, the Chairperson of the NCOP referred in terms of Rule
101 of the Council, the notice of intervention to the Select Committee on
Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs for consideration and reporting.
1.3
The
Select Committee on Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs took a
decision during its Committee proceedings of the 5
th
September 2014,
to call the MEC for the Department of Local Government and Human Settlements to
appear before it on the 15
th
September 2014. The purpose of the
meeting was to brief Members on the procedural, substantive and constitutional
nature of the notice of intervention in the District Municipality.
1.4
On the
15
th
September 2014, the MEC appeared before the Committee and
briefed its Members on the intervention in the District Municipality.
2.
Briefing
on the Notice of Intervention in Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality
2.1
During the
briefing, the MECs presentation focused on the
purpose and background on Ngaka Modiri Molema District
Municipality; basis for invoking section 139(1)(c) in the District Municipality;
process followed by the Provincial Government;
status quo on the intervention and the process plan for the intervention.
3.
Background
3.1
The
District Municipality was one of the four category C municipalities (according
to the Municipal Structures Act) in the North West Province. The District was made
up of five local municipalities:
Mahikeng
,
Ditsobotla
,
Tswaing
,
Ramotshere
Moiloa
and
Ratlou
Local Municipalities. The District Municipality was an
executive type with forty-five councilors comprising of an Executive Mayor,
Mayoral Committee, Speaker and Council Committees. This was according to
section 84 of the Structures Act, which deals with the division of functions
and powers between district and local municipalities. Further, the District Municipality
is a Water Services Authority in the district and was also responsible for
disaster management and construction of municipal roads and storm water.
4.
Governance
4.1
The District
Municipality has been experiencing governance and administrative challenges,
since the beginning of the current term of local government. This has
adversely affected the delivery of services
through its constituent local municipalities
4.2
The Ngaka
Modiri Molema District IGR Forum was dysfunctional, and this has led to
a myriad of complaints from the local
municipalities about the poor relations between themselves and the District
. The non-functionality of the District IGR Forum has
weakened its regional planning
capabilities,
and the coordination
of the provision of water services in particular. There have been no ser
vice level agreements between the
District as water services authority and local municipalities and/or Botshelo
Water as water services provider
(in
terms of bulk water; distribution; operations and maintenance; provision of
free basic services).
4.3
The poor relations also relate to the perceived lack of involvement and
consultation with local municipalities on prioritisation, identification, and
implementation of projects.
Due
to the non-functionality of the IGR Forum, there was generally no coordination
and collaboration between the District and its family of locals to improve
service delivery. Efforts were made on numerous occasions by the Department to
resuscitate the IGR Forum, but attendance by the Districts administrative
leadership and local municipalities was poor.
5.
Administration
5.1
The
District council appointed a Municipal Manager and senior managers who did not
met
the competency requirements in terms of local government
regulations (despite being advised by the Department not to proceed with the
appointments). The Municipal Manager, at the time of his appointment, had no
experience in local government, save for the period he acted in the position
when seconded by the Provincial Government.
5.2
Equally, the
Chief Financial Officer who was
appointed,
also did
not have the relevant experience in the local sphere of government as a
financial management practitioner.
This contributed negatively had an effect on clean
administration, as the Municipality was being led by inexperienced senior
officials who also did not have the relevant skills to occupy the positions.
5.3
The
2010/11, 2011/12 and 2012/13 audit outcomes of the Auditor-General revealed a
chronic failure on the part of the District Municipality to address issues
raised in the management letter, that contributed to three consecutive years of
disclaimers. There were poor internal controls which compromises supply chain
management processes.
The District
Municipality has obtained disclaimer audit opinions for the past three
financial years. The Auditor-General has reported the irregular expenditure of
R339
,864,539.00
in the 2011/2012 and 2013 financial
years. The irregular expenditure related to the expenditure that has been incurred
without following proper procedures, and not adhering to regulations.
5.4
There were
reports that the supply chain management processes have been flouted by the
Municipal Manager and senior managers on key services, such as the provision of
water
tankering
services to water distressed
communities within the District. It was alleged that the contract was given to
one supplier, and that some senior officials in the District are connected to
the supplier. Communities receiving this service have complained about the
inconsistent supply of the water as well as the poor quality of the water. The Provincial
Government intends to probe into this matter and take appropriate action where
necessary, because the council was not taking action on the alleged financial
misconduct and irregular, wasteful and fruitless expenditure as raised by the
Auditor-General.
6.
Service Delivery
6.1
The
District Municipality was one of the two water stressed districts in the Province.
Much as there are water sources challenges in the District, the poor management
of water provision programmes by the District Municipality aggravates the
situation.
6.2
Firstly,
the District has failed to develop and maintain a good relationship with the
local municipalities as water services providers. There have been no service
level agreements to inform the roles and responsibilities of both parties in as
far as water provision was concerned. Local municipalities in the District have
been complaining about the Districts lack of consultation and involvement when
water and sanitation projects are initiated, planned and implemented.
6.3
Secondly,
the local municipalities have been providing the water service without any
agreement with the District and were not being reimbursed for costs incurred.
This has contributed to the financial constraints of the local municipalities
as they are unable to service their bulk water accounts with the Water Board (Botshelo
Water).
6.4
The total
estimated arrear balance of the municipalities within the district is in excess
of R200 million. The locals cannot afford to pay this amount and the District refuses
to pay, citing that the locals are the ones generating revenue from the sale of
water, which the local municipalities disputed. The Auditor-General has also
raised this matter consistently that the District, as the water services
authority, must make provision for the arrears because there were no
agreements.
6.5
This poor
relationship has resulted in the delivery of water services in the District being
highly compromised. Some communities in
Dinokana
,
Madibogo
and
Setlagole
villages
have not had water for years, while the District received equitable share
allocations and grants for water and sanitation.
6.6
The Ngaka
Modiri Molema is one of the districts that has experienced numerous service
delivery protests as a result of poor or non-delivery of water. Communities of
Ratlou
(
Madibogo
,
Setlagole
),
Ramotshere
Moilwa
(
Dinokana
,
Khunotshwana
) and
Ditsobotla
(
Itsoseng
,
Bodibe
) have protested
against the lack of water provision on their areas for years. These communities
have, on many occasions raised this with the relevant authorities but no long
lasting solutions have been made.
6.7
Recently,
the former Premier and some Members of EXCO had to address the community of
Itsoseng
, following the violent protests against poor
delivery of services and in particular, the lack of water.
The District, as the water service authority,
has done very little to intervene on this matter and the local municipalities
are the ones that have been negatively affected by this.
6.8
Thirdly,
the District has not been spending the grants allocated to them for water and
sanitation projects. For instance, The Department has through the Provincial
Treasury received an allocation of R 60 000 000.00 to assist in
eradicating water and sanitation backlogs and further to that, revitalize the
capital city of the Province (
Mahikeng
). The District
Municipality was allocated R47 000 000 in total from the Grant. The District
has not performed well in the spending of the grant, and has so far spent only
about R4 000 000. A total of R27 000 000 has been transferred to
the Municipality and the outstanding balance was R20 000 000.
6.9
The Department of Water Affairs has indicated that the
business practices are in a critical state, and urgent
municipal and provincial local government intervention was required. It was noted
that the interventions that have occurred in the past has not shown to have had
impact on the wastewater service delivery. The poor score was understated by a
severe lack of information, data and management systems that would constitute a
fair service performance. According to the Department of Water Affairs, the
District has not complied with the submission of a corrective action within the
30 days period as stipulated.
7.
Basis for Invoking the Intervention in Terms of Section 139(1)(c)
of the Constitution
7.1
Failure by
the District Municipality to provide quality services to the residents of the
Ngaka Modiri Molema District (in line with powers and functions). Failure to implement
programmes and projects relating to infrastructure programmes for water and
sanitation services.
7.2
Poor
administration of service delivery related programmes (poor infrastructure
spending, poor monitoring of projects and programmes). Poor integration and
coordination of infrastructure and other programmes with the local
municipalities as the water services authority (in terms of the
Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act).
7.3
Failure by
the council to act on the alleged maladministration, fraud and corruption. The
District Municipality also failed to provide support to the local
municipalities in terms of section 88 of the Municipal Structures Act
7.4
The District
Municipality failed to comply with applicable legislation and regulations
governing the local sphere of government (Municipal Systems Act, Municipal
Systems Amendment Act of 2011, Municipal Structures Act,
Municipal
Finance Management Act).
8.
Process Followed by the Provincial
Government
8.1
The Department has had numerous engagements with the District since 2012
to date, at both administrative and political levels. The engagements were
aimed at both identifying the challenges faced by the District and providing
solutions and support towards addressing them. The previous MECs for Local government
have also engaged the council of the District, highlighting the areas that
required attention, including the water challenges and the support to the local
municipalities.
8.2
Both administrations of the Department of Local government and the
Provincial
Treasury,
have continuous meetings and
workshops with the District Municipality, where the officials have raised
certain concerns with recommendations to the District. The District has
absented themselves from most meetings called by the Department, and in cases
they do attend, management tended to send junior officials.
8.3
The Provincial EXCO then, after
receiving reports on the poor state of affairs in the District, resolved on the
2
nd
July 2014 to invoke section 139(1
)(
b)
intervention in the Municipality.
The District
subsequently objected to the manner in which the process was followed by the Provincial
EXCO. In the spirit of cooperative governance, the Provincial EXCO then
resolved to withdraw the intervention on that basis.
8.4
The Department then afforded the District an opportunity to respond to
the issues that are of concern to the Provincial Government (the District declined
to meet with the MEC, citing short notice). A session with the District was
then eventually held on the 21
st
August 2014, where the District presented
a lengthy report denying and disputing all concerns raised, even by the Auditor-General
and the Department of Water Affairs, in a very defensive manner. The responses
of the District were also reactive in nature.
8.5
The Provincial Government therefore, resolved to dissolve the District
Council on the basis that there was no political will and ownership of the
myriad of problems in the District and the fact that the communities of the
entire District continued to suffer from poor and lack of service delivery. The
Provincial EXCO resolved on the 3
rd
September 2014, to dissolve the District
Council in terms of section 139(1)(c) of the Constitution.
9.
Status
Quo for Intervention
9.1
The District received the notice of the Provincial EXCO resolution to
dissolve the council on the 3
rd
September 2014. The District has
responded to the letter by the MEC, citing dissatisfaction about the decision
of the Provincial EXCO to dissolve the council. The letter also demanded that
the Provincial EXCO decision be reversed by the 10
th
September 2014
or face legal action.
10.
Process
Plan for the Intervention
10.1
The Provincial Government has resolved to put in place an intervention
plan that will resolve the service delivery crisis in the District in the
short, medium to long-term. The plan seeks to establish a Rapid Response Team
which will promptly respond to the critical service delivery problems, with
special focus on water and sanitation services.
10.2
The Team will also proactively attend to potential service delivery
hotspots and crises, by engaging with the communities and all key role-players.
A Joint Operation Centre was being established to attend to the water and
sanitation crisis in the District, but will also service all other municipalities
in the Province.
10.3
The Provincial Government was gravely concerned over the municipal councils
inability as
well as neglect/refusal or
failure to demonstrate how they have intervened in the administrative failures
and/or shortcomings of the administrative arm of the District Municipality,
this in the form of the exercise of its oversight responsibility/
ies
.
10.4
The Provincial Government was committed to resolving the service
delivery crisis in the Ngaka Modiri Molema, in an effective and sustainable
manner. The support of the NCOP was requested to empower and enable the Provincial
Government to address the long standing problems of poor governance and
administration within the Ngaka Modiri Molema District.
11.
Committee Observations
11.1
Dissolution
is the final step in a process of intervention consisting of more than one
attempt to resolve the problem that may exist in a municipality. It should be
remembered that in this District there was an intervention invoked in 2009 in
terms of section 139(1
)(
b), and was subsequently
extended. Dissolution is clearly designed as a corrective measure to ensure
that appropriate steps are taken that would resolve the problems that may be
experienced in a particular municipality. The existence of special circumstances
is a prerequisite to the exercise of the power to dissolve a municipal council.
11.2
In its recommendation decision to the NCOP
on Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality, the Committee took into account
all relevant factors, including those challenges that were prevalent during the
first intervention and decided that the seriousness, extent and cause of the
Municipalitys failure to fulfil the obligation, taken together, constitute
exceptional circumstances warranting dissolution of the Municipal Council and
the appointment of an administrator to ensure fulfilment of the obligation.
12.
Committee
Recommendations
12.1
The
Select Committee on Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs recommends
as follows:
12.1.1 The NCOP approves the
intervention in Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality, as issued by the
North West Provincial Executive Council in terms of section 139(1)(c) of the
Constitution.
12.1.2 Before the newly elected
Municipal Council is declared elected, the Administrator should identify the
capacity and skills of the Municipality in relation to the executive obligation
the Municipality failed to fulfil, and assist the Municipality in acquiring the
necessary capacity and skills.
12.1.3
The North West MEC for Local Government and Human
Settlements, should table progress reports to the NCOP and the relevant
Provincial Legislature on the status of
by-elections to be held at
Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality, as well as progress reports
on the work of the Administrator.
Report to be considered.
Documents
No related documents