ATC140327: Portfolio Committee on Sport and Recreation Handover Report 2009-2014 11 March 2014
Sport, Arts and Culture
PORTFOLIO
COMMITTEE ON SPORT AND RECREATION
HANDOVER
REPORT 2009-2014
11 MARCH 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1.
Department and Entities falling within the Committees portfolio
1.1.1.
Sport and Recreation SA (SRSA)
1.2.
Functions of Portfolio Committees
1.3.
Method of work of the Committee
4. Committees focus areas during the 4
th
Parliament
4.1. Legacies of the 2010 FIFA World Cup
TM
4.1.3.
Football Development Programmes
4.2. Budgets of the Department and Entities
6. Administration of Portfolio Committee
8. Challenges dealt with by the Committee
9. Highlights of Sport in South Africa
Index
of tables and graphs
Table 1 Sport-specific
legislation
Table 2: Statistics of
committee activities
Table 3: 2010 FIFA World
Cup Expenditure
Table 4: Sport stadia
visited by the Organisation Committee Technical Team (OCTT)
Table 5: Budget allocation
of department and entities
Table 6: Regulations
presented
Table 8: Portfolio
Committees budget allocation
Graph 1: Portfolio
Committees spending pattern 2009/10 to 2013/14
2009-2014 Legacy Report
of the Portfolio Committee on Sport and Recreation
1. Introduction
1.1.
Department and Entities falling within the Committees portfolio
1.1.1.
Sport and Recreation SA (SRSA)
The mission of Sport and
Recreation South Africa (SRSA) is to transform the delivery of sport and
recreation by ensuring equitable access, development and excellence at all levels
of participation and to harness the socio-economic contributions that can
create a better life for all South Africans, thereby realising its vision of an
active and winning nation.
1.1.2. Constitutional mandate
The functionality of Sport and Recreation South Africa (SRSA) is
premised on the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, hereafter
referred to as the Constitution, which guarantees the right to social security
in section 27. The Constitution affirms the democratic values of human dignity,
equality and freedom. In line with these Constitutional imperatives, SRSA has
been assigned the powers and functions to develop and implement national
policies and programmes regarding sport and recreation.
1.1.3. Legislative mandate
The sports-specific Acts, Bills
and regulations listed below outline the key legislative responsibilities
placed specifically on SRSA:
Table
1
: Sports-specific legislation
Act
|
Narrative
|
South African
Institute for Drug-free Sport Act, Act 14 of 1997
|
To promote the
participation in sport free from the use of prohibited substances or methods
intended to artificially enhance performance, thereby rendering impermissible
doping practices which are contrary to the principles of fair play and
medical ethics, in the interest of the health and well-being of
sportspersons; and to provide for matters connected therewith.
Key
responsibility placed on SRSA as a result of this Act
: To ensure that sport in South Africa is practiced free from
the use of prohibited substances or methods intended to artificially enhance
performance.
|
National Sport
and Recreation Act, Act 110 of 1998
|
To provide for
the promotion and development of sport and recreation and the co-ordination
of the relationships between SRSA and the Sports Confederation, national
federations and other agencies; to provide for measures aimed at correcting
imbalances in sport and recreation; to provide for dispute resolution
mechanisms in sport and recreation; to empower the Minister to make regulations;
and to provide for matters connected therewith.
Key
responsibility placed on SRSA as a result of this Act
: To ensure that sport and recreation from a national
perspective are administered and governed in the best interests of all
participants and stakeholders in sport and recreation in SA.
SRSA is a
facilitator and regulator in terms of the
National
Sport and Recreation Act
(NSRA). The South African Sports Confederation
and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) is recognised as the national confederation
for the promotion of high-performance sport in South Africa and as such must
coordinate all activities relating to high-performance sport, team
preparation and the delivery of Team South Africa. The NSRA provides for the department
to enter into service-level agreements (SLAs) with sport and recreation
bodies to be able to oversee and monitor their implementation of policies in
the country. The department supports those responsible for the delivery of
sport with available resources. The department also oversees the
implementation of projects and evaluates results to ensure that it delivers
value for public funding and to provide feedback into policy development.
Following the adoption of
the NSRP, amendments to this Act need to be considered to tighten the powers
of the Minister, particularly regarding the speedy resolution of
disputes.
A draft Bill was produced
that encompasses the following amendments, amongst others: (1) The
recognition and incorporation of the provincial Sports Confederations as
advisory bodies to the Minister in sport development matters; (2) The
recognition of the academy system to enhance development; (3) The
establishment of the Arbitration Foundation to assist in the dispute
resolution strategy; and (4) Confirmation of the roles of SRSA, SASCOC and
national federations (NFs).
It is
estimated that the Bill will be approved by Cabinet in 2014 and promulgated
in 2015.
|
South African
Boxing Act, Act 11 of 2001
|
To provide for
a new structure for professional boxing in the Republic; to ensure the
effective and efficient administration of professional boxing in the
Republic; to recognise amateur boxing; to create synergy between professional
and amateur boxing; to establish a Boxing Commission known as Boxing South
Africa (BSA); to promote interaction between associations of boxers,
managers, promoters, trainers and officials and BSA; and to provide for
matters connected therewith.
Key responsibility placed on SRSA as a
result of this Act:
To
ensure that the safety of boxers and the relationships between boxers,
managers, promoters, trainers and officials and BSA are effectively and
efficiently administered and governed in the best interests of boxing and its
stakeholders as a whole.
|
Safety at
Sports and Recreational Events Act, Act 2 of 2010
|
To provide for
measures to safeguard the physical well-being and safety of persons and
property at sport, recreational, religious, cultural, exhibitional,
organisational or similar events held at stadiums, venues or along a route,
to provide for the accountability of event role-players, to provide for
certain prohibitions, to provide for the risk categorisation of events, to
provide for the establishment of measures to deal with the safety and
security at events, to provide for the accreditation of role players at
events, to provide for event ticketing, to provide for the control of access
of spectators and vehicles at events, to provide for the issuing of safety
certificates for planned or existing stadiums or venues, to provide for the
contents of safety certificates and amendment to safety certificates, to
provide for the appointment of inspectors and their powers of entry and
inspection, to provide for the deployment of security services, to provide
for spectator exclusion notices, to provide for prohibition notices, to
provide for the establishment of an Appeal Board and for appeals, to provide
for public liability insurance for events, to provide for payment of fees, to
provide for offences and penalties, and to provide for matters connected therewith.
Key responsibility placed on SRSA as a result of this Act
:
To
ensure that the safety and
security of all spectators and sports participants at events at stadiums or
other venues in SA are adequately nurtured, protected, administered and
governed.
|
1.2. Functions of Portfolio Committees
Portfolio
committees are mandated to:
·
Monitor the financial and
non-financial performance of government departments and their entities to
ensure that national objectives are met.;
·
Facilitate public
participation in Parliament relating to issues of oversight and legislation;
·
Consider legislation
referred to it;
·
Conduct oversight of any
organ of state and constitutional institution falling within its portfolio;
·
Facilitate appointment of
candidates to entities;
·
Consider international
agreements, and
·
Consider budget of
department and entities falling within its portfolio.
1.3. Method of work of the Committee
Committee
meetings, calling for briefings and papers, public hearings, oversight visits
and study tours.
1.4. Purpose of the report
This report
provides an overview of the activities the Committee undertook during the 4
th
Parliament, the outcome of key activities, as well as any challenges that
emerged during the period under review and issues that should be considered for
follow up during the 5
th
Parliament. It summarises the key issues
for follow-up and concludes with recommendations to strengthen operational and
procedural processes to enhance the Committees oversight and legislative roles
in future.
2. Statistics
The table
below provides an overview of the number of meetings held, legislation and
international agreements processed and the number of oversight trips and study
tours undertaken by the Committee, as well as any statutory appointments the Committee
made, during the term of the 4
th
Parliament:
Table
2
: Statistics of committee activities
Activity
|
2009/10
|
2010/11
|
2011/12
|
2012/13
|
2013/14
|
Total
|
Meetings
held
|
28
|
28
|
23
|
35
|
18
|
133
|
Legislation
processed
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Oversight
trips undertaken
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
6
|
Study
tours undertaken
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
International
agreements processed
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statutory
appointments made
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Interventions
considered
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Petitions
considered
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3. Reflection on Committees programme per year and on whether the
objectives of such programmes were achieved
The Committees strategic plan for the 4
th
Parliament was aimed at maintaining the strategic focus, adherence to the
mandate of the Committee and the enabling fundamentals of the Constitution. The
strategic plan was a five-year road map with the following objectives:
-
To
consider Bills and other matters falling within its portfolio as are
referred to it in terms of the constitution, legislation and rules;
-
To
monitor, investigate, enquire into and make recommendations concerning any
such executive organs of state, constitutional or other body, including
the legislative programme, rationalisation, restructuring, organisation,
structure, staff and policies of such organs;
-
To
exercise oversight over the Department of Sport and Recreation and its
entities;
-
To
consider the international agreements referred to it, and conduct
necessary international study tours to transplant effective sporting
models i.e. the School Sport Model;
-
To
ensure the successful hosting of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, not only for
South Africa, but the entire continent; which would include essential
visits to the SADC region;
-
To
consider the Budget Vote of the Department of Sport and Recreation;
-
To
consider the legislation before it;
-
To
facilitate public participation in its processes and encourage public
hearings, and
-
To
facilitate appointments to statutory bodies.
Only one Bill, the
Safety at Sport and Recreation Events Bill,
was referred to and
passed by the Committee. The Bill was passed by Parliament on 25 March 2010,
and assented to on 1 June 2010 (Act 2 of 2010).
Sport inclusion, development, governance
and leadership have been the agenda that the Committee has always prioritised
in all its engagements with the sport bodies. In the beginning of its term the Committee
had facilitated the establishment of the new Rugby franchise in the Eastern
Cape. The launch of the franchise took place in June 2009 and it had been
established to
enhance the
transformation agenda.
The country successfully hosted the 2010 FIFA World Cup with the
support of all citizens. This
left a tangible feeling of pride among all South Africans. At the
conclusion of the tournament South Africa was awarded 9 out of 10 by the FIFA
president for the way in which the country staged the event. According to FIFA
more than three million spectators attended the 64 matches of the tournament.
This was the third-highest aggregate attendance after the 1994 FIFA World Cup
in the United States, and the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany. This figure
excludes the millions of people who watched World Cup games at fan fests, fan
parks and public viewing areas across the country and in various cities around
the world. Government recorded that more than 1.4 million foreigners visited
the country during the tournament.
The Government had committed to investing in the preparations
needed to ensure that Africas first FIFA World Cup
TM
was a
resounding success. Government used this opportunity to speed up the delivery
of services and infrastructure.
The South African Government committed R30 billion to major
infrastructure investment programmes to enable the success of the tournament.
These programmes included the upgrading of facilities, stadiums and precincts,
the improvement of transport, communications, health and safety and security.
As of February 2008, the Governments contributions to the 24
World Cup projects were R28 billion (Euro 2,5 billion) and the largest
contributions were allocated to stadium and precinct development, transport,
broadcasting and telecommunications, event operations, event volunteer
training, port-of-entry infrastructure, immigration support and communications,
hosting, legacy and culture.
Budget allocation for 2010 World Cup projects
ITEM
|
COST
|
Stadiums and precinct
development
|
R9 841 million
|
Transport
|
R11 728 million
|
Broadcast and
telecommunications
|
R300 million
|
Event operations
|
R684 million
|
Event volunteer training
|
R25 million
|
Ports of entry infrastructure
|
R3 500 million
|
Immigration support
|
R630 million
|
Communications, hosting, legacy
and culture
|
R504 million
|
|
|
Table
3
:
2010 FIFA World Cup Expenditure
Other major tournaments include the successful hosting of the 2013
Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) and the recent 2014 Orange African Nations Championship
(CHAN). Despite the poor performance of the national team at these events, the
countrys ability to stage mega-events cannot be underestimated.
The successful staging of these events
has enhanced South Africas international profile enormously and affirmed its
potential.
The Committee intervened in the matter
relating to the controversy surrounding Ms Caster Semenya, who was subjected to
the gender verification tests, and expressed concern over the manner in which
the matter was handled by parties concerned. This is after she had won a gold
medal at the
2009 Athletics World
Championships in Berlin.
The Committee registered their dissatisfaction
with t
he International Association
of Athletics Federations (IAAF) for the manner in which the matter was handled,
stating that it was wrong for them to make the matter public, as this violated
their own protocols.
A new road map was developed in 2012 in order to
create a new environment for sport in South Africa. This culminated in the
development of the first ever National Sport and Recreation Plan (NSRP) aimed
at nurturing a vibrant sports system that will encourage the growth and
development of sport in the country.
An international study tour to Argentina
was undertaken by members of the Committee from 29 June to 8 July 2012
to learn from the National Sport Secretariat of
Argentina and associated institutions how to implement sport policy and
services related to development of sports at schools supported by the
government. The objectives of the study tour were as follows:
-
To interact with legislators dealing with
policy formulation relating to sport in the Congress of the Federal
Republic of Argentina;
-
To understand the challenges faced and the
methods used to implement sport policy and programmes at school level; and
-
To observe and study the parliamentary
proceedings and the value added to the delivery of school sport services
by the government and its agencies.
The
delegation learnt that Argentina
provided free
education, which included physical education. However the emphasis remained
mainly on mass participation and not competition in sporting activities. This
education model was based on instilling a good value system in children who participate
in sport. As a result members considered compulsory physical education to be
the best solution for South Africa, since it would contribute to athletic development,
transformation and social cohesion in our society through systematic sports
programmes.
The
Committee
conducted oversight visits
to sports facilities in Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng from 3 to 9
June 2012. The main purpose of the visits was to interact with stakeholders in
municipalities, to establish whether sports facilities were accessible and had
been upgraded in line with the commitments from the 2010
FIFA Legacy Trust, to assess
the facilities against the investment made and to hear of future development
plans. Part of the engagement included the monitoring of spending of Municipal
Infrastructure Grant funding, 15% of which was supposed to be ring-fenced for
the development of sports facilities.
The
Committee also conducted oversight in the Free State, North West, Western Cape,
Mpumalanga, Limpopo and the Northern Cape with regard to certain key strategic
areas of the National Sport and Recreation Plan around facilities and
programmes. In particular the Committee visited some of the 27 sports
facilities that have been built by that time as a result of the 2010 FIFA
Legacy Trust programme. TheCommittee also visited facilities that had been
built by or in partnership with the Sports Trust and LoveLife. These were
facilities that had been built in partnership with those organs within
communities. The Committee also visited municipal facilities, which were being
built through the Municipal Infrastructure Grant that National Treasury allocated
to municipalities for infrastructure development. The Committee reported
findings and made recommendations to the House.
In the past five years the Committee
has had engagements with SRSA to ascertain whether their budget was in line
with addressing national sport and recreation priorities and to approve it as
such. The Committee also advocated for more funding for sport, which in many
instances has been a challenge to secure due to the many competing national
priorities.
National sport federations and many
other sports bodies were invited on a weekly basis with the intention of
engaging them on their programmes. These were invited to annually present their
strategic plans and report on sport development, transformation and governance
and ensure accountability.
4. Committees
focus areas during the 4
th
Parliament
During this 4
th
Parliament the Committee had focused on the following aspects of its work:
-
2010
FIFA World Cup Tournament
-
Budget of the department and its entities
-
Performance of the department
-
Legislation
-
Oversight
-
Public
Hearings
-
Transformation
The report provides an outline of what
transpired with regard to each of these aspects in the past five years and includes
outstanding matters, current challenges and recommendations for future focus
areas.
4.1. Legacies of the 2010 FIFA World Cup
TM
South Africas hosting of the tournament was set to benefit the
country in a number of areas. The South African Government had already
committed to a major infrastructure investment programme, but the hosting of
the 2010 FIFA World Cup
TM
acted as a catalyst for many of the
current infrastructure projects. We can currently boast of a number of world
class stadiums that have been built and renovated as result of the 2010 FIFA
World Cup.
One of the worst legacies of sport under apartheid is the dearth
of football facilities in disadvantaged areas and the complete lack of
recognition and support by the apartheid government of the sport. The hosting
of the World Cup has left a lasting legacy for football in this country.
4.1.1. Infrastructure legacy
Ten stadiums across South
Africa were selected to serve as match venues in 9 host cities, where 32 teams
competed in group stages and knockout stages until two teams reached the
finals, which were held at the Soccer City Stadium on 11
th
July
2010. The selection of the match venues, the readiness of the stadiums on time
and their compliance to FIFA requirements were the most critical deliverables
by the host country. During the course of 2005 the Government set aside R241
million for planning the stadium construction programme and supporting
infrastructure in the host cities. Based on an initial estimate, the Government
set aside R8, 4 billion for the construction of stadiums, however, the amount
was adjusted to R13, 5 billion due to cost escalations. The host cities,
together with their respective provinces, also made financial contributions totalling
R2,1 billion towards the construction of stadiums and support infrastructure.
The
Organisation
Committee Technical Team (OCTT)
visited stadiums in Frankfurt, Munich and
Berlin as part of a study tour to learn of and understand the complexities of
particularly FIFA requirements for match venues.
Table
4
: Sport stadiums visited by the
Organisation Committee Technical Team (OCTT)
STADIUM
|
CITY
|
NEW / UPGRADED
|
SEATING CAPACITY
|
COST
|
WORKERS EMPLOYED
|
FNB/Soccer City
|
Johannesburg
|
New
|
91 500
|
R3,7b
|
58 300
|
Green point/
Cape Town
|
Cape Town
|
New
|
70 000
|
R4,5b
|
65 000
|
Nelson Mandela Bay
|
Port Elizabeth/
Nelson Mandela Bay
|
New
|
45 700
|
R1,85b
|
15 200
|
Moses Mabhida
|
Durban/Ethekwini
|
New
|
70 000
|
R3,1b
|
18 200
|
Mbombela
|
Nelspruit
|
New
|
46 000
|
R960m *)
|
7 0000
|
Peter Mokaba
|
Polokwane
|
New
|
45 000
|
R1,1b
|
6 800
|
Ellis Park
|
Johannesburg
|
Upgraded
|
62 500
|
R254m
|
2 700
|
Free State
|
Mangaung/
Bloemfontein
|
Upgraded
|
45 000
|
R253m *)
|
2 500
|
Loftus Versfeld
|
Pretoria/Tshwane
|
Upgraded
|
50 000
|
R115m
|
870
|
Royal Bafokeng
|
Rustenburg
|
Upgraded
|
45 000
|
R150m **)
|
450
|
4.1.2. Skills Transfer
Job creation and skills
development are the cornerstone legacies of the 2010 FIFA World Cup. A large
number of volunteers benefited through empowerment initiatives including
capacity building workshops, overseas exchange programmes and skills training.
More than 20 000 jobs were
created through the construction of the World Cup stadiums, and 4 000
South Africans who volunteered for the FIFA Confederations Cup now have
experience of volunteering for or working at a major football event. During the
2010 FIFA World Cup
TM
, 15 000 volunteers, the majority of them
South Africans, gained experience of working at a major event. 55% of the
organisations spend was through BEE companies and 26% through SMMEs. Extensive
skills programmes and coaching were offered countrywide. These include:
·
Organising Committee
- The Royal
Netherlands Football
Association
(KNVP) signed an agreement to train 2010 coaches over a
three-year period in collaboration with SAFA. They have already trained over
300 coaches around the country
·
Department of
Trade and Industry - Indirect skills transfers and ongoing interaction through
SEDA and other agencies.
·
Training in
hospitality, tour operators
and related
fields
-
Training
of fire fighters.
4.1.3. Football
Development Programmes
The hosting of the 2010 FIFA
World Cup had to provide a concrete initiative towards ending bad governance in
sport and creating a lasting legacy for sports development. To meet this
objective, the following were among the projects that were implemented:
·
Football Turfs
·
Football Turfs Container
-
2010 FIFA World Cup Legacy Trust
-
Stadiums, training grounds and base camps
·
Win in Africa with Africa
·
Football for Hope programme
·
Khayelitsha Football for Hope
·
Grassroots Football programme
·
South African Football Associations Post World Cup Development Strategy
·
Youth Development against Violence through Sport Programme
·
Projects in partnership with the National Lottery Board (NLB)
·
2010 FIFA World Cup TM Ticket Fund
4.2.
Budgets of the Department and Entities
Table
5
: Budget allocation of department and
entities
Entities
|
2009/2010
R
000
|
2010/2011
R
000
|
2011/2012
R
000
|
2012/2013
R
000
|
2013/14
R
000
|
SRSA
|
2 866 430
|
1 252 026
|
810 622
|
1 047 336
|
1 073 485
|
Boxing
SA
|
3 087
|
2 208
|
10 112
|
5 108
|
6 552
|
SAIDS
|
6 713
|
10 042
|
11 604
|
13 215
|
14 024
|
In conducting its constitutional mandate
of oversight with regard to Sport and Recreation South Africa (SRSA), the Portfolio
Committee on Sport and Recreation has seen the budget of the department
fluctuating over time. R2.8 billion was allocated in the 2009/10 financial year
to enable the department to prepare for the Confederations Cup and the 2010 FIFA
World Cup tournaments. This budget was reduced in the 2011/12 financial year to
cater for domestic programmes. The budget was increased in subsequent years to
allow the department to fund the AFCON 2013 and CHAN 2014 events.
The Committee approved the R8 million
increase of the budget of Boxing SA in the 2011/2012 financial year, in order
to revive the sport and assist boxing to revive its development plans. However,
the legal battles that Boxing SA went through caused delays in its development
programmes. The intervention by the Minister on the administrative side and the
ensuing court action had some positive results for Boxing SA. By the end of the
2012/13 financial year the federation had received an unqualified audit result
from the Auditor-General.
The
South African Institute for Drug-free Sport (SAIDS) has consistently been
receiving unqualified audit outcomes. This is a good governance image that the
Committee aims to achieve with all. The SAIDS budget has grown steadily from
R6.7m in the 2009/10 financial year to R14m in the 2013/14 financial year an
increase of 108%.
The increase
was primarily necessitated by the increase in cost of testing after switching
from urine testing to blood testing.
The Committee regards
the work that SAIDS does in rooting out anti-sporting behaviour through the use
of prohibited substances to be a serious matter.
Sport
participation and development has always been at the forefront of the
Committees oversight focus, particularly access to sport and recreation
opportunities for all South Africans. In the past five years the Committee has
seen a large number of sporting opportunities created by the department through
its different programmes. In the 2009/10 financial year close to 4.5 million
people were given the opportunity to take part in sport and recreation
activities, which was made possible by increased funding as a result of the
2010 FIFA World Cup. In the 2012/13 financial year the number declined to 1.277
million people who had been provided access to sport and recreation.
Through
constant engagement with SRSA the Committee was instrumental in ensuring that
all citizens, including children, were given access to sport and recreation and
that the school sport programme became a flagship programme of the department.
Through these engagements the Committee saw an improved version of the
programme by the end of 2012/13. The programme has the following three pillars:
Capacity building, top school leagues and Youth Olympics. It is still a work in
progress, especially in terms of cooperation and the implementation of the
memorandum of understanding with the Department of Basic Education. There are
16 priority codes within the school sport programme. The budget of the Mass
Participation Programme had grown from R452 million in the 2009/10 financial
year to R553 million in the 2013/14 financial year, indicating a 22% increase
of the budget of the department.
The
Committee started its work on the eve of the 2009 FIFA Confederations Cup. The
task of the Committee was to ensure that the local organising committee and all
stakeholders were delivering on their responsibilities. To enable the
successful hosting of this prestigious event the Committee had to
oversee that government departments sign the 17
guarantees with FIFA.
This would ensure that the
image of South Africa as the host of international mega-events would be
improved. The event served as precursor to the 2010 FIFA World Cup, thus
ensuring that
South Africa was
in a position to host a successful, memorable and world-class event.
In
2010 the Committee adopted the
Safety at
Sport and Recreation Events Bill
,
which
became the
Safety at Sport and Recreation
Events Act, Act 2 of 2010
. The purpose of the Act is, among other things, to
provide for measures to safeguard
the physical well-being and safety of persons and property at sports,
recreational, religious, cultural, exhibitional, organisational or similar
events held at stadiums, venues or along a route; to provide for the accountability
of event role-players; to provide for certain prohibitions; to provide for the
risk categorisation of events; to provide for the establishment of measures to
deal with safety and security at events.
Following the adoption of the National
Sport and Recreation Plan (NSRP) in May 2012, the Committee has been awaiting
the Bill that will see the amendment of the principal Act, the
National
Sport and Recreation Act, Act 110 of 1998
.
This amendment Bill has
not yet passed through the parliamentary process. The envisaged legislation will
empower the Minister to intervene with a view to resolve some of the disputes
within the sport fraternity, through the envisaged establishment of the
Arbitration Foundation.
Table
6
: Regulations
Safety at Sport and Recreational Events (SASREA) Regulations
|
Regulations have been drafted and consultations with
municipalities were completed in 2012.
It is envisaged that the regulations will be promulgated in 2014.
Key responsibility placed on SRSA as a result of these
regulations
:
To ensure that the safety and security of
all spectators and sports participants at events at stadiums or other venues
in SA are adequately nurtured, protected, administered and governed.
These responsibilities are subject to
amendment until formal promulgation of the regulations.
|
The
Committee has conducted oversight visits in all provinces in June 2012, July
2013 and September 2013 with a view to:
a)
assessing
the use of the Municipal Infrastructure Grant allocated for the building of
Sport and Recreation facilities in municipalities;
b)
evaluating the standard and utilisation of
facilities that have been built as a result of the 2010 FIFA Legacy Project to
the SAFA regions for the purposes of increasing sport participation.
c)
exploring
the local and provincial sport and recreation plans aimed at creating access to
sport opportunities for rural communities.
d)
exploring
the efficiency with which public-private partnerships were creating sporting
opportunities for the rural communities by providing facilities and life skills
programmes.
During
these visits the Committee found that:
-
SAFA
was promoting social sport as well as high-performance sport.
-
The
Northern Cape provincial department seemed to be organised, however much wass
needed in terms of professionalism within the federations. Sport and
Recreation was well organised in Kakamas and Upington; however more still
needed to be done in Prieska, where there were no active, funded sport
programmes. The Legacy Fund organisation had done good job.
-
There
were no mass participation programmes for school children. Such programmes
have proved to reduce crime, teenage pregnancies, alcohol and substance
abuse and other social ills.
-
Conflicts
between sports councils and municipalities, and the limited functioning of
sport councils were not conducive to the nurturing and development of
sport participation in the region. The majority had been addressed in the
interest of the athletes.
-
The
facilities that were visited in the Northern Cape were generally in good
condition. Community sports grounds were graded where necessary. The sport
and recreation initiatives in the area were found to be promising and the Committee
hoped that the work would be sustained.
Following
these observations, the Committee recommended that the Minister of Sport and
Recreation:
·
Encourage all stakeholders
to work together when building sport and recreation facilities;
·
engage the Department of
Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA) and the SA Local
Government Association (SALGA) to mobilise municipalities to use the 15% of the
MIG allocated for sport facilities and infrastructure;
·
encourage provincial
departments to establish community structures to ensure that the Government
delivers on its mandate with regard to sport and recreation, and that funding
is made available for sport development programmes in municipalities;
·
encourage provincial
departments to ensure that sport and recreation facilities with access to all
communities are made available in all municipalities, and that such facilities
be maintained by trained staff;
·
encourage all stakeholders
to ensure that FIFA Legacy Trust facilities are handed over within agreed time
frames;
·
encourage provincial
departments to align their sport and recreation plans and programmes with the
National Sport and Recreation Plan, and to draw up provincial sport and
recreation plans;
·
encourage the provincial
departments to monitor the utilisation of the 15% Municipal Infrastructure
Grant and the Urban Settlement Development Grant meant for the building of
sport and recreation facilities;
·
encourage the other
provinces to learn from the Free State province with regard to the
implementation of sport and recreation programmes.
Table
7
: Public hearings
2009
|
18, 19, 24 August 2009, 10-11 September, 15 16 September 2009, 5 9
October, 29 30 October 2009
|
Safety at Sport and Recreational Events
Bill [B7-2009] in Moqhaka, Mangaung and George Local Municipalities and
Metropolitan Municipalities of Johannesburg, Ekurhuleni and Cape Town
To establish whether the constitutional
processes were followed in issuing notices of interventions and, to recommend
to the National Assembly on whether to approve or disapprove the Safety at
Sport and Recreational Events Bill [B7-2009] in terms of section 139(1)(b) of
the Constitution
|
2010
|
9 March 2010
|
Public hearings on the Budget Vote 19: Department
of Sport and Recreation, Report published 16 April 2010.
|
18 and 19 May 2010
|
Public hearings by Ad Hoc Joint Committee
on South Africas Readiness for the 2010 Fifa World Cup, Report published 1
June 2010
|
|
2011
|
15 Feb 2011
|
Hearings on SAIDS 2009/10 annual report
|
23 March 2011
|
Public Hearings on Budget Vote 20
|
|
29 March 2011, 24 and 31 May 2011, 16
August 2011
|
Public Hearings on the Petition by
concerned athletes regarding alleged misconduct relating officials of SASCOC
sitting on Distribution Agency of the National Lotteries Fund
|
|
2012
|
-
|
0
|
2013
|
-
|
0
|
2014
|
-
|
0
|
The Committee
held public hearings in August 2009 with regard to the
Safety
at Sports and Recreational Events
Bill
and invited the relevant stakeholders to deliver presentations. These
stakeholders ranged from SRSA,
the
Private Security Industry Regulating Authority (PSIRA), the Premier Soccer
League (PSL), 2010 FIFA Local Organising Committee (LOC), South African Rugby
Union (SARU), Disaster Management Institute of South Africa (DMISA), Boxing
South Africa (BSA), National Council Against Smoking (NCAS), South African
Council of Churches (SACC) and The Soul City Institute (SCI). Successful public
hearings on the Bill were held in KwaZulu-Natal, but the hearings in the
Eastern Cape were disappointing due to the poor attendance of the people.
The hearing in Port Elizabeth was cancelled and the hearing in East London was
poorly attended. Public hearings were also held in the Free State and Gauteng.
The Private Security Industry Regulating
Authority generally supported the Bill. It suggested that changes to the definition
of a steward, and asked that a representative from PSIRA should be included
in the Event Security Planning Committee.
The Premier Soccer League generally supported the
Bill, but claimed that there had not been consultation. The League submitted that
provisions of the Bill dealing with security concerns would be financially
impossible to meet, and that the upkeep of municipal stadiums to meet the
requirements of the Bill was not feasible.
The FIFA 2010 Local Organising Committee was not
opposed to the Bill in general, but was concerned that it was not necessary to
pass it prior to the 2010 World Cup, as all security measures for that event
were already catered for.
It
suggested that Parliament either delay the implementation of the Bill, or include
an exemption for the World Cup under Clause 2. 2. However, the department
indicated that the provisions around the 2010 event would not conflict with the
Bill, and that it was likely that the event could be exempted.
SARU expressed concerns over meeting the minimum
safety and security requirements of the Bill. An issue of contention for SARU
was the authority that the SA Police Service would enjoy over events, which
concern the Committee dismissed as largely unwarranted on SARUs part. In order
to address the concerns the Committee indicated that the requested workshop,
for educating the public about the Bill, would take place as soon as possible.
Disaster Management Institute of South Africa
(DMISA) broadly supported the Bill, but raised concerns such as the need for
including safety officials on the Appeal Board, and the need for clearly outlining
the decision-making process in the Event Safety and Security Planning Committee
(ESSPC).
BSA supported the Bill and would ensure that it
met the provisions enshrined in it. The Committee asked about the standby
procedures for medical personnel during fights, and commended BSA's initiative
in taking out insurance policies for public liability and fighters, noting that
other sport organisations had not done so.
The National Council Against Smoking (NCAS) had
indicated that the limitation of smoking during public events was not anything
new, and that South Africa had been enforcing the Constitutional right to clean
air since 1998. It added that the policies should be easy to implement, since
the existing legislation was largely self-regulating, and people were used to
the idea. The Committee agreed with the NCAS and decided to incorporate its
suggestions into the Bill.
South African Council of Churches (SACC) largely
supported the Bill, and stressed that the culture of safety and security at
public events should be inculcated firmly. There was a need to educate everyone
about the Bill, particularly since it would cover religious and large community
gatherings.
The Bill would
incorporate issues of disability.
The Soul City Institute (SCI) had outlined the
results of their studies into alcohol abuse and its related problems, including
the risks of alcohol consumption at public events and to the public at large. They
motivated for stronger regulations concerning the selling and consumption of
alcohol at events, including proper labelling on alcoholic drinks. Some of the
issues would be incorporated into the regulations.
In post-apartheid South Africa sport has been used as an
essential element of the long-term project of transforming South Africa, building
a post-apartheid country and generating a post-apartheid identity that transcends
racial, class, gender and geographic divisions.
Transforming the racial identities of sport clubs
and federations has been a painfully slow process that the Committee has been
grappling with in the past five years
. The
Committee has consistently emphasised the importance and gravity of
transformation.
The
National Sport and Recreation Plan (NSRP) which was adopted in 2012 elevated
the issue of transformation as the key issue. The Transformation Charter, which
is at the centre of NSRP, is aimed at bringing about the establishment of a
competitive and demographically representative sport system guided by a value
set based on the following principles:
·
Redress
·
Equal opportunity
·
Fairness and just behaviour
·
Equitable resource
distribution
·
Empowerment and affirmation
As a
result of these resolutions the Minister of Sport and Recreation established
the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) to oversee this process and monitor the
progress made in it.
The aim of the EPG
is to implement, manage and monitor sports transformation through a
multi-dimensional Performance Scorecard which would be used to enable the
sports system to measure where it is in its transformation. The Transformation
Scorecard would also be used to determine whether the sports system was improving
on the targets set.
PC SPORT AND RECREATION
5-YEAR BUDGET
Table
8
: Portfolio Committees budget
allocation
|
2009/10
|
2010/11
|
2011/12
|
2012/13
|
2013/14
|
||||||||
Operating expenses in Rand
|
Budget available
|
Budget spent
|
Budget available
|
Budget spent
|
Budget available
|
Budget spent
|
Budget available
|
Budget spent
|
Budget available
|
Budget spent
|
|||
|
2009/10
|
2010/11
|
2011/12
|
2012/13
|
2013/14
|
||||||||
Entertainment
- Within SA NA MPs
|
|
|
|
|
20
000.00
|
0.00
|
10
000.00
|
0.00
|
20
000.00
|
1
645.50
|
|||
Accommodation
- Overnight In SA MPs
|
6 203
|
6 202
|
163 299
|
163 298
|
50
000.00
|
0.00
|
166
427.00
|
151
809.74
|
180
000.00
|
141
889.15
|
|||
Mileage
Claims - Within SA MPs
|
2 834
|
2 833
|
|
|
|
|
9
621.00
|
9
620.64
|
10
000.00
|
5
702.39
|
|||
Subsistence
Allowance - Within SA MPs
|
40 800
|
40 800
|
25 181
|
25 180
|
20
000.00
|
3
600.00
|
18
200.00
|
15
600.00
|
30
000.00
|
16
037.00
|
|||
Travel
- Airfares Within SA Staff
|
0
|
(1 425)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Travel
- Airfares Within SA MPs
|
341 476
|
341 477
|
(87 023)
|
(87 024)
|
50
000.00
|
28
552.00
|
178
906.00
|
160
914.56
|
120
000.00
|
73
615.60
|
|||
Vehicle
Hire - Within SA NA MPs
|
180 836
|
180 837
|
68 117
|
68 116
|
50
000.00
|
3
320.00
|
122
826.00
|
114
348.79
|
200
000.00
|
186
462.70
|
|||
Catering
- In-House
|
36 232
|
36 240
|
30 000
|
31 751
|
56
000.00
|
28
101.00
|
52
020.00
|
51
634.29
|
40
000.00
|
21
430.30
|
|||
Catering
Services - Outside Suppliers
|
7 970
|
7 970
|
12 596
|
12 595
|
20
000.00
|
4 971.61
|
7
000.00
|
4
637.00
|
80
000.00
|
26
950.00
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
TOTAL
|
R 616 361.00
|
R 614 924.00
|
R 212 170.00
|
R 213 916.00
|
R 266 000.00
|
R 68 544.61
|
R 565 000.00
|
R 508 565.02
|
R 680 000.00
|
R 473 732.64
|
|||
Graph
1
:
Portfolio Committees spending pattern 2009/10 to 2013/14
The Committees
spending of its allocated budget during the period under review is illustrated in
the graph above. In the 2009/10 financial year the Committee spent 99.7% of its
allocated budget and undertook a number of oversight visits to evaluate the
state of readiness of host cities for the 2010 FIFA World Cup. It was also
during this time that the Committee held public hearings in provinces. In the
2010/11 financial year the Committees budget allocation was reduced by 65.5%, to
R212 170, since the Committee included no oversight visits in its
programme for that financial year. The Committee spent 100% of its 2010/11
budget allocation. In the 2011/12 financial year the Committee only spent 25%
of its allocated budget. It was also during this period that the provincial and
national Sport Indabas were held.
The
Committees budget allocation was increased by 112% in the 2012/13 financial
year, from R266 000 to R565 000. In the 2012/13 financial year the
Committee undertook the study tour to Argentina and oversight visits to three
provinces. During this period the Committee managed to spend 90% of its
allocated budget. The budget was further increased by 20% in the 2013/14
financial year, from R565 000 to R680 000. By 11 March 2014 the
Committee had managed to spend 70% of its budget. The largest expenditure was
oversight visits to six provinces in the year under review.
6. Administration
of Portfolio Committee
Minutes of the meetings:
The
turnaround time and quality of draft minutes was improved, thus enabling the
Committee to deal with issues that had been raised more efficiently. There is,
however, room for improvement in adopting minutes more frequently and following
up on matters that require further action.
MANCO Meetings:
MANCO
meetings have been held although not
as often as desired due to the ineffective coordination of members of the committee.
It is important that the management committee meet at least once a quarter in
order to prepare for the Committees quarterly programme or when necessary, to
accommodate emerging priorities.
Committee Meetings
: The
Committee worked well in the past five years and forming a quorum for Committee
meetings was never a challenge. Apologies that had been sent were sometimes
communicated late; after Committee meetings had commenced.
Committee Reports
: It
is worth noting that the Committee has improved on the turnaround time for
reporting in order to meet the set ten-day deadlines. There is a need for
members and staff to work closely together so that inputs to the reports can be
discussed and included well on time. Staff is expected to follow up on all
issues that are raised and to report back to the Committee.
Support Staff:
The
Committee has seen growth in its staff complement, especially during the 2013,
when the role of the content advisor was added to assist Members with content and
strategic issues of the Committee. In addition, a new committee secretary was
appointed following the resignation of the previous long-serving committee secretary.
Members briefings:
. Efficiency
and quality of meetings are enhanced by requesting input in the form of
briefings/briefs by the content advisor and researcher about the latest
developments within the sector prior to meetings.
Oversight visits
: The
Committee would improve efficiency and curb expenditure by requesting advance
visits by the researcher to areas it intends to visit. The logistical
arrangements during visits and the standard of accommodation are unique to each
area. Advance visits will assist the Committee to confirm logistical
arrangements in time. In cases where the Committee splits into more than one
group, the staff member accompanying each delegation is responsible for writing
a report within 10 days.
Implementation of the National Sport and Recreation Plan:
Monitoring and oversight of stakeholders
implementation of the NSRP and the alignment of their programmes with the
national plan will be a focus area in the Committees
strategic
plan and future
programmes. Implementation of the NSRP will enable all
stakeholders to pull in the same direction in ensuring that all structures are
aligned to the NSRP. The Committee should continue, through its work, to engage
federations to check the progress made in aligning to the plan.
Amendment of the
National
Sport and Recreation Act, Act 110 of 1998
, and repeal of
South African Boxing Act
, Act
11 of 2001
:
The amendment of the
National Sport and Recreation
Act
is intended to accommodate the
newly adopted Sport and Recreation Plan and empower the office of the Minister
to intervene when disputes within the federations necessitate such actions. It
is expected that this Bill will be presented to the Committee in 2014. The
South African Boxing Act, Act 11 of 2001
,
will
be repealed, and the SA Combat Sport Bill (2014) will accommodate Boxing SA.
Increased oversight
:
The role of the Committee in conducting oversight should be strengthened to
focus more on implementation, especially with the introduction of the NSRP. Whilst
the Committees oversight has been more focused on sport infrastructure, the
scope of the Committees mandate will require more oversight of the
implementation of legislation.
Physical Education:
The school sport policy was signed in 2011 to include
the subject of Physical Education within Life Orientation.
This would apply to all schools in the
Republic of South Africa governed by the
South African Schools Act, Act
84 of 1996.
The Department of Sport and
Recreation and the Department of Basic Education signed a Memorandum of
Understanding to clarify the roles and responsibilities with regard to the
implementation of Physical Education. Since then the pace of implementing this
MoU has been slow. The two departments would need to be encouraged to work more
closely together in order to accelerate the implementation of the agreement and
thus roll out a comprehensive Physical Education curriculum at schools.
A
case for building Sport and Recreation facilities
: There
is still outstanding work from 2010 FIFA Legacy Project, namely delivering the
outstanding twenty-five (25) legacy facilities. The Legacy Trust had promised
to build 52 facilities throughout the country. Sports Trust along with the
department should continue providing the necessary sport infrastructure in
rural areas. SRSA is in the process of completing a study of the number of
facilities and their location countrywide and grading them. This process should
be completed by 2015 so as to ascertain a database of all facilities in the
country. The National Lottery Board has been assisting with funding for
facilities through the application process by municipalities. The passing of
the
Lotteries Amendment Bill will allow for a
proactive approach, which will allow the National Lottery Board to intervene
with funding in municipalities that are struggling.
Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) and Urban Settlement
Development Grant (USDG) funds for Sport and Recreation:
The
Committee has thus far supported the departments approach of administering the
grant for sport infrastructure development. The current way of managing the
allocation of the municipal infrastructure grant, particularly the portion for
building of sport and recreation facilities, has not been effective due to the
challenges that municipalities have had in using it. There are attempts by the
department to bring a new approach that will ensure that the consolidated funds
are channelled for the intended purpose.
Improved governance by federations and entities:
There
are challenges evident within some federations which are consistent with a lack
of good corporate governance as prescribed in the
Companies Act, Act 71 of 2008
. The continuing internal battles
within Athletics SA, and the evasive manner in which SAFA continues to run its
affairs, have not done justice to sport. Such conduct denies athletes the
platform for growth and development in a sustained manner. It is evident that
those governing and participating at the top levels are struggling to get to
grips with the changing face of world sport.
The Committee has indicated that it was committed to good and
clean governance of sport - not just a particular sporting code, but all
sporting codes. We have championed good governance in all federations and sport
bodies. Good governance is a priority and a prerequisite for political support
and future funding.
Funding for Sport and Recreation development:
It
is widely acknowledged that sport
development needs to begin at grassroots level and that recreational sport -
both the active and spectator varieties - holds many social benefits.
Research shows that investment in
sport in developing countries is much lower than in developed countries, as
sport development is usually not a top priority in the national budgets or in
the education systems of most developing countries.
Whilst the budget for
Sport and Recreation South Africa is just above a billion rand, it is still far
too little compared to that of developing countries. Within the National
Development Plan (NDP) sport is amongst the areas that are said to be in need
of urgent attention, firstly within the South African education system, and
secondly as a means of advancing social cohesion.
8. Challenges
dealt with by the Committee
Governance:
The Cricket SA
debacle regarding bonuses paid to the directors led to the establishment of the
Ministerial Committee of Enquiry to conduct an investigation into the affairs
of Cricket South Africa (Nicholson Commission of Enquiry) which made
recommendations to change the governance structure of the sport and improve the
development of the game.
Athletics
SA finds itself at loggerheads with members and has resorted to courts to fight
their battles. This is not the way the Committee would like to see issues resolved
within sport. The Committee had always tried to encourage parties to have
discussions and for its members to put the plight of the athletes before their
own interests.
Match-fixing:
This
matter will not be pursued any more as the President of the Republic has indicated
that the international governing body of football, FIFA, is conducting a
broader investigation. South Africa will be also be investigated by FIFA on
this matter.
Maladministration:
Athletics
SA
was plagued by the Caster Semenya
saga and maladministration of the sport, which led to the expulsion of the president
and director. The sport continues to be plagued by yet another leadership
squabble and currently has an interim leadership. The Committee will continue
to encourage the concerned stakeholders to continue to work together to find a
solution.
Sport and recreation facilities:
Redressing
the legacies of apartheid will require a concerted effort of government and
private sector in building facilities in rural areas to offer sport and
recreation opportunities to all citizens. During oversight visits these
concerns were raised and the Committee continued to engage the relevant
stakeholders to assist in the delivery of sport and recreation infrastructure
in rural areas.
Transformation
:
The slow pace of transformation in sport and recreation seems to be a stumbling
block in identifying talent and nurturing athletes to compete at higher levels
of sport. All national players of rugby
seem
to be chosen from 22 schools that are traditionally rugby playing schools.
Cricket
governance at national
provincial and club levels is still dominated by white people and they have
acknowledged it. The Committee should monitor the manner in which this is
addressed.
Funding of Federations
: Whilst
the department annually allocates funds to all affiliated federations, there
are still challenges of funding from some of the main sources of funding in
sport. There is an uneven funding mechanism by broadcasters with regard to
broadcasting between small and big federations. The problem is also clear
between broadcasting and funding of male-dominated and female sporting codes.
Netball, as the female sporting code with the largest number of female
participants in the country, is still facing a problem of funding.
Outstanding reports
:
The Committee has yet to receive the reports on AFCON 2013 and the recent CHAN
2014 from the local organising committees (LOCs). Government allocated R160m
for the hosting of AFCON 2013 and R120m for the hosting of CHAN 2014. It will
be important that the local organising committees come and present the reports
on these tournaments.
Oversight visits
: Unexpected
changes in the Parliamentary programme or the Committees programme can
necessitate changes to the Committees oversight programme. Such late changes
to the oversight programme make it difficult to reschedule meetings and to
coordinate properly with the provincial representatives. Logistical
arrangements for road travel, flights and accommodation are also affected. Such
challenges were experienced during the visit to the Northern Cape Province.
9. Highlights
of Sport in South Africa
9.1.
The 4
th
session of Parliament began on the eve of the 2009 FIFA
Confederations Cup which the country successfully hosted. The Members had an
opportunity to go on oversight to check the state of readiness of the host
cities and raise concerns where there were delays and problems.
9.2.
The performance of TEAM SA at the 2012 London Olympic Games, where we won 6
medals, has been by far the best performance by South Africa at the Olympic
Games.
9.3.
The adoption of the National Sport and Recreation Plan in May 2012 was a
milestone. The plan provides a pathway for creating an integrated sport system
in the country.
9.4.
The successful hosting of the AFCON 2013 and CHAN 2014 tournaments indicated
the confidence that the continent has in our countrys ability to host such
events.
9.5.
Through the assistance of the Portfolio Committee, Southern Kings Rugby Club
managed to establish a franchise that will participate in Rugby Super 15. There
is still a long way to go due to the ongoing challenges in the South Western
Districts (SWD)
9.6.
The establishment of the Eminent Persons Group to help with the monitoring of transformation
in sport, using the Transformation Scorecard, was a step to continue redressing
the legacy of apartheid in sport.
9.7.
The Committee noted that the departments initiative of allocating an
additional R10m to the federation of the year has gone a long way in assisting
small federations to establish sustainable programmes and leagues. Tennis SA
was a recipient in 2012. Netball SA, the 2013 recipient, is in a process of
establishing a Netball Premier league.
9.8.
There are 27 artificial pitches that have been built throughout the country as
a result of the legacy of the 2010 FIFA World Cup Legacy Trust. There are still
25 more to be built.
9.9.
Netball SA won the 2013 African Netball Championship in June after beating
Malawi 54-52 on their home soil. South African athletes have also won first
place in international rowing, swimming, under 19 cricket and under 20 rugby
competitions.
10.1.
Administration
:
The Committee should ensure that there are regular briefings with staff
regarding the programme and content-related issues in order to improve interaction
with stakeholders.
10.2. Implementation of NRSP
:
The Committee should ensure that it strengthens its oversight over the
implementation of the National Sport and Recreation Plan and follows up on the
outstanding matters.
10.3. Implementation of the Physical Education Curriculum
:
The Committee should strengthen coordination with the Portfolio Committee of
Basic Education in order to ensure the speedy implementation of physical education
in schools.
10.4. Transformation
:
The Committee should follow up with the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) regarding
their report on transformation in sport and set clear targets that should be
adhered to with regard to transformation in sports by all federations.
10.5. Outstanding reports
:
The Committee should invite the LOCs of AFCON 2013 and CHAN 2014 as a matter of
urgency to provide briefs and complete reports of the tournaments.
10.6. Funding and sport facilities
:
The Committee should continue to lobby for more funding for sport development
and building of sports facilities. It should also monitor closely the use of
lottery funds allocated for the building of sport and recreation facilities in
line with the National Sport and Recreation Plan.
10.7. Appointment of candidates to entities
:
The Committee should facilitate the appointment of candidates to entities.
The Committee
has made an effort to address key issues in sport in the past five years. The
legacies of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, when it comes to infrastructure
development, has had the notable achievement of creating access to sport and
recreation opportunities. Such successes have to be safeguarded and built upon.
There
is still more to be achieved achieve, especially when it comes to
transformation and provision of access to sport and recreation activities to
all citizens. At the heart of creating an enabling environment in sport is the
building of sport and recreation facilities. On the other hand, there is a
critical element of governance in federations which seems to be weak. At the
same time there are signs of lack of leadership in sport federations. It will
be important for the new Committee to take these issues forward.
The
work of the Committee should be enhanced by strengthening oversight with regard
to the implementation of the legislation. Until such time as the legislation is
translated into proper action, the transformation and development goals will
not be delivered within the desired time frame. The Committee, therefore, is duty-bound
to ensure that all stakeholders responsible for sport and recreation implement
the resolutions as contained in the Transformation Charter in order to fast-track
this process.
Documents
No related documents