ATC140711: Report of the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources on the Strategic Plan and Budget Vote 32 of the Department of Mineral Resources for the 2014/2015 Financial Year, dated 11 July 2014
Mineral Resources and Energy
Report
of the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources on the Strategic Plan and
Budget Vote 32 of the Department of Mineral Resources for the 2014/2015
Financial Year, dated 11 July 2014
The Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources, having considered the
Strategic Plan (2014/15) and Budget Vote 32: Mineral Resources, reports as
follows:
1.
Introduction
The aim of the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR)
is to promote and regulate the minerals and mining sector for transformation,
growth, development and ensure that all South Africans derive sustainable
benefits from the countrys mineral wealth.
The Strategic Plan of the Department of Mineral
Resources (the Department) and Budget Vote 32 and its entities were referred to
the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources (the Committee), for consideration
and report, on the 04 July 2014. The Committee received briefings from Mintek, the
Council for Geoscience, the South African Diamond and Precious Metals
Regulator, the State Diamond Trader and the Mine Health and Safety Council on
their annual performance plans and budgets allocations on the 02 July 2014. The
Department presented its Annual Performance Plan (APP) for 2014/15 on 08 and 09
July 2014.
2.
Overview
of the 2013/14 financial year
The
DMR had an appropriation of R1.4 billion available in 2013/14. This represented
a nominal increase of R218.3 million, or 18.6 per cent, compared to 2012/13.
The fourth quarter expenditure report shows that the DMR had spent 99.5
per cent of its available budget, R1.387-billion, between April 2013 and March
2014.
Transfers
and Subsidies account for R692.7 million of the available budget and of this
amount the Department has transferred R688.5million, or 99.4 per cent, mainly
to public corporations and private enterprises and departmental agencies and
accounts. This means the Department has an available budget of R701.1 million
for operational use. Of this, the Department has spent R698.7 million, or 99.7
per cent, the majority of which has been used on compensation of employees and
goods and services.
The 2013 Budgetary Review and Recommendation
Report (BRRR) prepared by the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources did not
highlight any major financial problems with budget allocations but drew
attention to numerous performance weaknesses within the Department, which needs
to be addressed in this financial year through proper monitoring and reporting
systems
In summary, 21 per cent of the total planned
performance targets that the DMR set for itself in the 2012/13 financial year
were not achieved during the year. Six of the sixteen specific recommendations
made by the Committee regarding performance issues in 2013 were repeated from
the previous year because they had not been successfully addressed. This therefore
further indicates that a proper quarterly monitoring and reporting system needs
to be developed so that performance can be tracked effectively within the
Department.
The
Auditor-General (AGSA) made findings with regards to non-compliance with the
principal law that regulates the mining sector, Mineral and Petroleum
Development Act 28 of 2002 (MPRDA) . The AGSA found that mining rights holders
did not submit prescribed monthly returns to the Director-General as required
by Section 28(2)(a) of the Mineral and Petroleum Development Act (MPRDA).
Mining rights holders did not submit audited financial statements and annual
reports to the Director-General as required by section 28(2)(b)(c) of the
MPRDA. Furthermore, compliance with the above sections of the Act was not
enforced as required by section 93 of the MPRDA.
The failure of the Department to ensure
compliance with clauses of the MPRDA relates directly to the ability of the
Department to monitor the transformation of the industry. Under section 28 of
the MPRDA, the DMR is expected to ensure that holders of mining rights and
permits submit reports required under the Mining Charter and the Social and
Labour Plan provisions of the Act and its related regulations. Holders are
expected to report to the DMR, inter alia, on how they are contributing to the
socio-economic development of the areas in which they are operating and on how
they are expanding opportunities for historically disadvantaged persons,
including women, in the mining sector. The Auditor General found that the
Department has failed to enforce compliance with the Act, as required by
Section 93. The Committee has raised the issue of capacity within the
Department to implement its mandate through mine inspectors and will be
monitoring the situation.
The DMR received a qualified audit opinion in
2012/13 because it did not have an adequate system to manage and value
receivables for departmental revenue. The outstanding balance relating to
prospecting fees and royalties as generated by the system in place was
incorrect.
The
Portfolio Committee motivated that the DMR should secure the advice and
assistance of the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) in
the Presidency for the evaluation of the Mining Charter after it reaches its
2014 performance milestone. As a result of the Department not being able to
adequately monitor and report on performance indicators, implementation of the
legislative and regulatory mandate, as reported by the ASGA, the Committee will
develop a monitoring and reporting framework to ensure that progress on the
issues raised by the AGSA can be tracked for interventions as required.
2.1
Policy Priorities for 2014/15
The DMRs priorities for 2014/15 are set out in the
2014/15 Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Plan, which was tabled in
Parliament 4 July 2014. At the highest level, the priority is to align the
activities of the Department with the National Development Plan (NDP).
In
the February 2014 State of the Nation Address (SONA), the President described
the NDP as the countrys socio-economic blueprint and one of the landmark
achievements of the fourth administration. The President further highlighted
the importance of the mining industry within the economy and the responsibility
of the sector to ensure that the socio-economic conditions of the backbone of
the sector are conducive in our democracy. The key themes emerging from the
SONA included:
Ensuring
the implementation of the Framework Agreement for Sustainable Mining, which was
entered into by labour, business and government in 2013. The implementation of
the undertaking to provide basic services and adequate housing facilities and
to revitalize the mining towns in several provinces are also key priorities in
the sector. The exploration of shale gas to supplement the countrys energy
security is also a policy imperative and will be closely monitored by the
Committee. These issues are not clearly allocated within the budget and APP of
the Department and a proper expenditure plan needs to be presented to address
these government priorities.
The
NDP includes substantial commentary on the mining sector and lists the
following
proposals to grow
investment, outputs, exports and employment in the minerals cluster:
·
Address the major constraints impeding accelerated
growth and development of the mining sector in South Africa. The main
interventions include:
o
ensure certainty in respect of property rights;
o
ensure a predictable, competitive and stable mining
regulatory framework by passing amendments to the Minerals and Petroleum
Resource Development Act (2002) to;
o
secure, reliable electricity supply; and
o
secure, reliable rail services, potentially
enabling private participation.
·
Develop, deepen and enhance linkages with other
sections of the economy. This includes linkages with:
o
both manufacturers of inputs (capital goods and
consumables) and suppliers of mining-related services; and
o
downstream producers, especially for platinum-group
metals and chrome ore. In this regard, an export tax could be considered.
·
Provide focused research and development support to
enable improved extraction methods that lengthen mine life. This includes
o
better energy efficiency and less water intensity;
and
o
alternative uses of South Africa's extracted
minerals, especially platinum-group metals, titanium and others that have
potential for application in new energy systems and machinery.
·
Identify opportunities to increase regional
involvement and benefit in the whole minerals cluster. This could include
encouraging the establishment and development of alternative providers of
partially processed intermediate inputs in other countries in the region.
·
Ensure
active engagement on, and resolution to, issues raised through the Mining
Industry Growth and Development Task Team process (MIGDETT).
·
Improve
alignment of mining charter requirements to ensure effectiveness in local
communities.
These
issues all find mention within the expenditure plans outlined in the 2014
Budget for Vote 32: Mineral Resources, which also includes important issues of
mine health and safety, which are not specifically mentioned in the NDP as a
priority. A draft bill to amend the Mine Health and Safety Act, No. 29 of 1996,
as amended (MHSA) was published in November 2013.
2.2
Departmental Strategic and Annual Performance Plan
2014/15
2.2.1
Overview
by the Minister
The Minister of Mineral Resources, Adv N
Ramatlhodi gave a political overview on the strategic plan of the department. He
appreciated the opportunity given by the committee and was looking forward to
work together.
He indicated that Mineral
Resources plays a critical contributory role in ensuring that all South
Africans gain sustainable benefits from the countrys mineral wealth. The
Ministry and the department commits to building on the foundation of the past
20 years of a democratic government by decisively prioritising the challenges
facing the industry to ensure than an enabling investment environment in
the
minerals and petroleum sectors
continues to be supported.
Some of the
challenges relate to instability in the mining industry due to labour related
matters, which have recently been settled amongst stakeholders.
The firm foundation for a sustainable mining
industry requires a robust investment environment that continuously addresses
emerging impediments such as infrastructure limitations, skills shortages and
investments in exploration. He indicated that these constraints will be
addressed through policy and regulatory interventions such as the
infrastructure development programme of government, skills development
programmes and research and development programmes.
The Minister indicated that the DMR in
collaboration with other departments and institutions will continue to promote
mineral value addition (beneficiation) to strengthen the interface between
extractive industries and national socio-economic developmental objectives as
outlined in the NDP and contribute towards decent employment, inclusive growth
and industrilialisation of South Africa. As part of creating sustainable,
decent jobs, government will during the current administration expedite the
exploration of shale gas in a responsible manner. The potential of shale gas in
term of providing the country with a diverse energy mix and better security of
supply is immense and it also presents the realistic opportunity to assist the
country in achieving lower carbon emissions and ensure that the department
maintains competiveness in the global area.
The Minister indicated that in the quest to
drive radical socio economic transformation, monitoring and enforcement of
compliance with the Mining Charter, which will be reviewed during this
financial year, will be intensified. Set targets around improving housing and
living conditions in particular the conversion of single sex hostels into
family units by 2014 will remain non-negotiable.
The department will continue to promote mining
that takes into consideration the need to protect the environment. In this
regard the department will work with other organs of state in implementing
environmental regulations to mitigate negative environmental impacts, as well
as pursuing the continuous rehabilitation and closure of derelict and ownerless
mines in line with environmental best practice.
The Minister further indicated that in
addressing the fragmented licensing process, the Departments of Mineral
Resources, Water Affairs and Environmental Affairs will during this
administration, implement modalities for integrating timeframes and processes
of environmental, water use and mining licenses. The process of environmental,
prospecting, mining and water use license authorisations will be processed in
parallel rather than sequentially and within stipulated timeframes. The
amendments to the National Environmental Management Act have been processed and
the integrated system will be implemented.
The members inquired about the changes that can
be expected in the Mineral and Petroleum Resource Development Amendment Bill as
the Minister has indicated in the media that it might be returned to Parliament
for further deliberations.
The Minister responded that the Bill is with
the President who will make a decision on whether to sign it or return it to
Parliament based on constitutional matters. An inter-ministerial committee has
been established to review the Bill and to consider, amongst other issues, the
oil and gas and beneficiation provisions of the Bill.
2.2.2
Financial Administration
The CFO, Ms R I Singo indicated that financial administration is a
sub-programme under Programme 1: Administration of the Departments Strategic
Plan.
The purpose of
this programme is to enable the Department of Mineral Resources to deliver on
its
mandate by
providing strategic management and
administrative support to the Ministry and the department
. The d
epartmental
expenditure increased from R853.845 million in 2009/10 to R1.174 billion in
2012/13. The budget for the 2013/14 financial year was R1.394 billion and is
expected to increase by an average annual growth rate of 6.7% to R1.66 billion
in 2016/17. The increase is attributed to increased funding for rehabilitation
of derelict and ownerless mines and the specialised technical skills required
for the implementation of the National Environmental Management Act.
The
CFO reported that the administration budget for 2013/14 was R310 million and
was expected to increase at an average growth of 1.5% to R314.5 million in
2016/17. The spending focus over the MTEF period is staff development
initiatives, including programmes to attract skills in the mining
inspectorate.
The department is working
together with Mining Qualifications Authority (MQA). It was further reported
that the department is focusing on the ICT services and recruitment expenses.
On
Programme 2: Promotion of Mine Safety and Health, the budget for 2013/14
financial is expected to increase at an average growth rate of 5.5 % to R188.9
million in 2016/17. The spending focus over the MTEF is to ensure compliance
with the Mine Health and Safety Act (1996) by conducting inspections, audits,
inquiries and investigation and to further enhance the capacity to conduct
inspections.
On
Programme 3: Mineral Regulation, the budget for 2013/14 financial year was R154
million and is expected to increase at an average growth rate of 9.2 % to 260
million in 2016/17. The spending focus over the MTEF period is to improve the
process of issuing mining right and permits and increase on compensation of
employees and related goods and services for the implementation of National
Environmental Management Act (1998).
On programme 4:
Mineral Policy and Promotion, the budget for 2013/14 was R724.2 million and is
expected to increase at an average growth of 8.3% to R900.6 million in 2016/17.
The spending focus over the MTEF period is to promote the mineral sector, to
strengthen the regulatory framework that governs both the mining and petroleum
sectors, and to assisting SMMEs to promote mineral development.
2.3
Budget Analysis
The mandate of the Department of Mineral Resources is to promote South
Africa to harness its mineral wealth for development. Its budget is
comparatively small, barely 0.2 per cent of the total appropriation by vote in
2014/15, but its role in wisely applying laws and fostering the contributions
of several state agencies is critical for the growth of the minerals and mining
sector.
Table 1: Budget allocations per prgramme over the
MTEF for Vote 32: Mineral Resources
Budget
|
Nominal Rand
change
|
|
Nominal % change
|
Real % change
|
||||
R million
|
2013/14
|
2014/15
|
2015/16
|
2016/17
|
2013/14-2014/15
|
|
2013/14-2014/15
|
|
Administration
|
282.3
|
284.2
|
296.8
|
314.5
|
1.9
|
|
0.67 per cent
|
-5.20 per cent
|
Promotion of Mine Safety and Health
|
163.7
|
168.0
|
177.7
|
188.9
|
4.3
|
|
2.63 per cent
|
-3.36 per cent
|
Mineral Regulation
|
211.9
|
231.4
|
245.2
|
260.0
|
19.5
|
|
9.20 per cent
|
2.83 per cent
|
Mineral Policy and Promotion
|
735.9
|
787.8
|
879.5
|
900.6
|
51.9
|
|
7.05 per cent
|
0.80 per cent
|
TOTAL
|
1 393.8
|
1 471.4
|
1 599.2
|
1 664.0
|
77.6
|
|
5.57 per cent
|
-0.60 per cent
|
Source:
(National Treasury) Vote 32: Mineral Resources 2014
The budget of the Department of Mineral Resources for the 2014/15
financial year is approximately R1.5-billion. This represents an increase of
R78-million over the previous year, but in real terms, when inflation is taken
into account, this represents a 0.60 percent decline in the value of the
resources available to the Department, compared with the previous year. Vote 32
is one of seventeen votes (out of a total of 38) where the 2014/15 medium term
expenditure estimate is not expected to keep pace with the 6.2 per cent
forecast rate of inflation. This is a concern for the Committee since the
Department has a commitment to implement the Mining Charter,
Framework Agreement
for Sustainable Mining, Social and Labour Plans,
Beneficiation
implementation framework policy, Revitalization of Mining Towns and derelict
and ownerless mines.
There has been no structural change from the pattern of past budgets.
Half (50.5 per cent) goes to current payments, half (48.8 per cent) to
transfers (mainly to the Council for Geoscience and MINTEK), with a negligible
proportion going to capital expenditure. Of particular concern to the committee
is the decrease in allocation to the Council of Geosciences, since this is the
research arm of the Departments, specifically around coming up with innovative
interventions to address Acid Mine Drainage.
The compensation of employees makes up 32 per cent of the total budget,
with goods and services at 18 per cent and travel and subsistence at five per
cent.
The weighting of the programmes as a percentage of the
total vote allocation is indicated in Figure 1, below, for 2013/14 and 2014/15.
The percentage changes in the size of the slices are indicated next to each
programme name. These are all very small increments. For example,
Administration absorbed 20 per cent of the budget in 2013/14 and will account
for 19 per cent of the budget in 2014/5. This represents a decline of 0.94 per
cent. The graphic shows that there are no significant changes in the share
which each of the four programmes has in the total budget for the Department
and in real terms after factoring inflation there is actually a decrease in the
allocations. Only Programme 3: Mineral Regulation, indicates a 2.83% increase
in the budget allocation.
Figure
1
: Vote 32: Comparison of
the split of the Mineral Resources budget between Programmes
Source: (National Treasury) Vote 32: Mineral
Resources 2014
2.4
Programme
Analysis
The strategic plan of the Department outlines in detail the objectives,
measures, Medium Term Expenditure Framework targets and initiatives of the four
departmental programmes, namely;
·
Programme 1:
Administration;
·
Programme 2:
Promotion of Mine Safety and Health;
·
Programme 3: Mineral
Regulation; and
·
Programme 4: Mineral
Policy and Promotion.
2.4.1
Programme
1: Administration
The purpose of the Administration Programme is to provide strategic
support and management services to the Ministry and the Department.
Table
2: Budget allocations per sub-programme in Programme 1:
Administration
Sub-Programme
|
Budget
|
Nominal
Increase / Decrease in 2014/15
|
Nominal
Percent change in 2014/15
|
Real
Percent change in 2014/15
|
|
R
million
|
2013/14
|
2014/15
|
|||
Ministry
|
22.8
|
24.2
|
1.4
|
6.14
per cent
|
-0.06
per cent
|
Corporate
Services
|
120.1
|
106.5
|
-
13.6
|
-11.32
per cent
|
-16.50
per cent
|
Department
Management
|
19.7
|
19.5
|
-
0.2
|
-1.02
per cent
|
-6.79
per cent
|
Financial
Administration
|
79.3
|
92.3
|
13.0
|
16.39
per cent
|
9.60
per cent
|
Internal
Audit
|
13.5
|
13.2
|
-
0.3
|
-2.22
per cent
|
-7.93
per cent
|
Office
Accommodation
|
26.8
|
28.4
|
1.6
|
5.97
per cent
|
-0.22
per cent
|
TOTAL
|
282.2
|
284.2
|
2.0
|
0.7 per cent
|
-5.17 per cent
|
Source: (National Treasury) Vote 32: Mineral
Resources 2014
Overall, there is a 5 per cent real decrease in the
budget allocation for Administration. The net R2-million increase will not be
enough to make up for the eroding effects of inflation.
The differences in
the percentage increases between sub-programmes are minor and can be explained
by the need for quality IT services for the Department in the Financial
Administration sub-programme. Corporate services expenditure was increased
markedly in 2012/13 in order to attract and retain skilled workers, especially
in the mine inspection directorates and by adjustments in the staff complement
in other sub-programmes. Despite the 2014/15 fall in corporate services
expenditure, real expenditure is still above 2011/12 levels.
2.4.2
Programme
2: Mine Health and Safety
The purpose of the Mine Health and Safety programme is to safeguard the
health and safety of the mine workers and people affected by mining activities.
Table
3: Budget allocations per sub-programme in Programme 2:
Promotion of Mine Safety and Health
Sub-programme
|
Budget
|
Nominal
Increase / Decrease in 2014/15
|
Nominal
Percent change in 2014/15
|
Real
Percent change in 2014/15
2013/14
|
|
R
million
|
2013/14
|
2014/15
|
|||
Governance
Policy and Oversight
|
49.8
|
50.2
|
0.4
|
0.80
per cent
|
-5.08
per cent
|
Mine
Health and Safety Regions
|
113.9
|
117.8
|
3.9
|
3.42
per cent
|
-2.61
per cent
|
TOTAL
|
163.7
|
168.0
|
4.3
|
2.6 per cent
|
-3.36 per cent
|
Source: (National Treasury) Vote 32: Mineral
Resources 2013
Overall,
there is a small, approximately 3 per cent, real decrease in the budget for the
promotion of mine safety and health. The differences in the percentage
increases between sub-programmes are minor. Eight thousand health and safety
inspections and 396 audits are to be commissioned in 2014/15, the same number
as in 2013/14. The
goals
of the programme are supported by an additional R70-million annual contribution
to the Mine Health and Safety Council (MHSC). This is used to fund research
projects whose outcomes can sustain and improve health and safety performance
in the mining industry in order to significantly reduce fatalities, injuries,
and occupational diseases.
It is
noteworthy that both Programme 2 and the MHSC anticipate holding expenditure on
mine health and safety below the expected rate of inflation in the period to
2016/17, while the performance indicators stay at the same levels.
This means that the DMR and the MHSC
anticipate productivity increases as they will be doing the same work with
reduced resources.
2.4.3
Programme
3: Mineral Regulation
The purpose of the Mineral
Regulation Programme is to regulate the minerals and mining sector to promote
economic development, employment and ensure transformation and environmental
compliance.
Table 4: Budget
allocations per sub-programme in Programme 3: Mineral Regulation
Sub-programmes
|
Budget
|
Nominal
Increase / Decrease in 2014/15
|
Nominal
Percent change in 2014/15
|
Real
Percent change in 2014/15
|
|
R
million
|
2013/14
|
2014/15
|
|||
Mineral
Regulation and Administration
|
144.5
|
154.5
|
10.0
|
6.92
per cent
|
0.68
per cent
|
Management
Mineral Regulation
|
22.6
|
29.0
|
6.4
|
28.32
per cent
|
20.83
per cent
|
South
African Diamond and Precious Metal Regulator
|
44.8
|
47.8
|
3.0
|
6.70
per cent
|
0.47
per cent
|
TOTAL
|
211.9
|
231.3
|
19.4
|
9.2
per cent
|
2.78
per cent
|
Source: (National Treasury) Vote 32: Mineral
Resources 2014
There
is a small approximately 3 per cent real increase in the budget allocation for
Mineral Regulation programme.
Expenditure in the Management Mineral Regulation sub-programme is
planned to increase well above the rate of inflation. This sub-programme
provides overall management of the programme. And expenditure is planned to
increase because of the new responsibilities transferred from the Department of
Environmental Affairs in 2013/14. There has been a major re-balancing of
functions (between budgets) which has introduced a discontinuity that make it
impossible to compare present trends with those of previous years.
There is no significant change in the budget for the South African
Diamond and Precious Metal Regulator sub-programme, where the 2013/14 increase
just accounts for the effects of inflation.
2.4.4
Programme
4: Mineral Policy and Promotion
The purpose of the Mineral Policy and Promotion programme is to develop
relevant mineral policies that promote South Africas mining and minerals
industries to attract investment.
Table 5: Budget
allocations per sub-programme in Programme 3: Mineral Regulation
Sub-programme
|
Budget
|
Nominal
Increase / Decrease in 2014/15
|
Nominal
Percent change in 2014/15
|
Real
Percent change in 2014/15
|
|
R
million
|
2013/14
|
2014/15
|
|||
Management
|
13.9
|
14.3
|
0.4
|
2.88
per cent
|
-3.13
per cent
|
Mineral
Policy
|
28.8
|
17.9
|
-
10.9
|
-37.85
per cent
|
-41.48
per cent
|
Mineral
Promotion
|
44.3
|
59.7
|
15.4
|
34.76
per cent
|
26.90
per cent
|
Assistance
to Mines
|
0.0
|
19.1
|
19.1
|
|
|
Council
for Geoscience
|
271.2
|
287.8
|
16.6
|
6.12
per cent
|
-0.07
per cent
|
Council
for Mineral Technology
|
341.5
|
338.5
|
-
3.0
|
-0.88
per cent
|
-6.67
per cent
|
Economic
Advisory Services
|
4.6
|
4.4
|
-
0.2
|
-4.35
per cent
|
-9.93
per cent
|
Mine
Environmental Management
|
31.7
|
46.0
|
14.3
|
45.11
per cent
|
36.64
per cent
|
TOTAL
|
735.9
|
787.8
|
51.9
|
7.1
per cent
|
0.80
per cent
|
Source: (National Treasury) Vote 32: Mineral
Resources 2014
The Mineral Policy and Promotion programme receives 54 per cent of the
budget allocation for Vote 32. This proportion is planned to increase over the
period of the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) as the major increase in
the budget for the Mine Environmental Management sub-programme, introduced in
2013/14, is carried into the future. While there is no real increase in the
budget for the programme in 2014/15, it does maintain the real level set in
2013/14, when the real increase was of the order of 20 per cent.
The most notable structural change in the budget for Vote 32 over the
past two years and in the MTEF period has been the increase in the proportion
of the Mineral Policy and Promotion programme budget that is allocated to Mine
Environmental Management. This increases from 1 per cent to 11 per cent between
2012/13 and 2016/17. The target for the number of derelict and ownerless mines
that are rehabilitated per year has been adjusted upwards in 2013/14 from a
previous target of 40 to 50. This figure will be maintained in the long term.
The R117-million expenditure on the Mine Environmental Management sub-programme
for 2016/17, is combined with research and implementation allocations to MINTEK
and the Council for Geoscience. The scale of the states liability for the
environmental harm from the mining sector is enormous. The Council for
Geoscience told the Portfolio Committee that at least six thousand old mines
are the responsibility of the State. The liability to the State has been
estimated at R40-billion. The DMR, working with MINTEK and the Council for
Geoscience, has a policy of prioritising rehabilitation work to deal with the
most severe problems for human safety first. However, at the present planned
rate of progress the historic environmental problems from mining will still
persist for many decades. This situation places a pressure on the DMR to ensure
that present environmental laws related to mining are properly monitored and
enforced so that the problems do not get still bigger.
The approximately 27 per cent real increase in the budget for Mineral
Promotion (following a 9 per cent real increase in 2013/14) speaks to taking
forward the implementation plans for the beneficiation strategy for the South
African minerals industry (which are scheduled for finalisation by March 2014).
In this regard, subsidies will be allocated to 221 small scale mining projects.
This is part of implementing the mining sector strategy towards a competitive
and transformed sector.
The
Council for Geoscience and MINTEK are two national science councils that are
funded through Vote 32. The transfer of funds to the Council for Geoscience
shows no real increase in 2014/15, but this follows a 13 percent real increase
in 2013/14. That higher resource level had therefore been maintained.
The transfer to MINTEK in 2014/15 is below
inflation, with a 7 percent real decrease with reference to the adjusted
appropriation for 2013/14. This was, however, 17 per cent above the initial
appropriation in the 2013/14 budget.
The
budget notes that transfers to the Council for Geoscience and MINTEK have each
been reduced by R20 million over the medium term to give effect to Cabinet
approved baseline reductions. Both entities will generate their own revenue to
ensure that service delivery is not compromised. The Committee is concerned
about the decrease in budget allocations to the Councils, specifically with
regards to the research and development that needs to be conducted on Acid Mine
Drainage and the amendments to the MPRDA.
The bulk of MINTEKs revenue
comes from the sale of products, services and
contracted research to the private sector. This pattern is changing, with
recent higher levels of state funding, so that commercial sales in 2014/15 will
account for 54 per cent of revenue (compared with 71 per cent in 2011/12).
Increased transfer payments to MINTEK up to 2016/17 will be used for
research in water treatment, the rehabilitation of derelict and ownerless
mines, the establishment of a precious gemstone facility in Northern Cape,
waste and scrap reprocessing, and the building of a pilot plant for rare earth
elements.
The
Council for Geoscience also earns income from commercial activities with the
private sector and international and foreign state entities. This will account
for 24 per cent of revenue in 2014/15.
The Council for Geoscience again plans small increases in the numbers of
mineral maps, map explanations and mineral related publications published per
year as well as the numbers of rural development projects finished the number
of regional and African development projects in progress and the number of completed
projects with external collaborators.
There is a significant anomaly in the budget commentary on the goals and
expenditure plans of the Council for Geoscience which is worth examining in
detail. The budget write-up on the Council for Geoscience states:
The
Geoscience Amendment Act (2010) extends the entitys functions to include the
provision of advisory services relating to geohazards and geo-environmental
pollution, and to be the custodian of all geoscience information related to the
South African mining industry. ... According to its implementation plan, the
council will need to recruit at least 56 researchers, professionals,
technicians and administrative personnel in order to assist in the amendments
of the Geoscience Act (1993) and to provide more stimulus to investment in the
mineral sector.
This
directly contradicts the Councils 2012/13 Annual Report which states that the
necessary funding could not be made available for the extension of the
Councils role to become the national advisory authority on geohazards (and for
other significant issues). The Geoscience Amendment Act, No 16 of 2010) has not
come into full operation. The Council has told the Portfolio Committee that it
would cost R19-million to meet the costs of the additional activities specified
in the Amendment Act and require the appointment of an additional 56 staff
members at least.
The
budget summary refers to an implementation plan which is not funded in the
budget and to legislative provisions that have not been brought into effect
because funding has not been available.
3.
Briefing by
Mintek on strategic plan and budget
Mr
Mngomezulu, CEO and President of Mintek outlined the strategic plan for
2014/15. Minteks core business is research and development of efficient mineral
processing technologies and value added products and services. Mintek upholds
good governance, and makes it a point that they comply with the requirements of
the Auditor General at the end of the financial year.
Mintek
is looking at ways to reduce water and energy usage. With regard to finances,
Mintek is well funded, but in recent years an increasing amount of funding is
attached to particular projects and it is concerned that the baseline state
grant is set to decline over the MTEF period. The CEO mentioned that there will
be difficult times for the global mining sector in the two years ahead, even
when compared to 2008 recession. Mintek research is typically long term in
nature and it needs an adequate baseline grant in order to plan its research and
development activities optimally.
Members
applauded Mintek as a research company that the country can be proud of and as
an entity that contributes to its own funding by the commercial sale of
technology both in South Africa and internationally.
4.
Briefing by
Council for Geoscience on strategic plan and budget
Dr
Mathe, non Executive director at CGS introduced the team from the Council and
tendered an apology from the CEO who could not be present because he was
hospitalised. Dr Graham led the presentation by outlining the strategic
objectives. CGS is faced with declining contract revenue, inadequate statutory
funding and ageing infrastructure, but it is continuing with transformation,
refocusing and aligning the organisation to address South Africans developmental
challenges and planning for the implementation of the Geoscience Amendment Act
(Act No.16 of 2010).
The
number of interns has increased from seven in 2010 to 56 in 2014. The
geological field school was initiated in 2005 and is based in Limpopo. GCS is
in the process of acquiring accreditation from Mining Qualification Authority (MQA).
Dr
Graham indicated that the provisions of legislations that CGS cannot perform
its responsibility include its function in identifying geohazards such as on
dolomitic land and acting as an effective repository for geological and
technical information that is (or is due to be) lodged with the CGS by
companies.
Members
asked why large areas of the country had white shaded squares on the map,
indicating that no geological mapping had been done. They noted that this
omission includes many former homeland areas. The CGS said that the whole of SA
has geological maps but at a large scale. The mapping project is to produce
maps at a smaller scale which is of more use to prospectors. The pace at which
this more detailed mapping is undertaken depends on the budget that is
available, so it is a gradual process.
5.
Briefing by
South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator
The
CEO, Mr Levy Rapoo outlined the background to the establishment of the
Regulator.
He reported that the diamond
industry in South Africa was administered in terms of the Diamond Act, 1986
(Act No 56 of 1986, which established, South African Diamond Board (SADB) as
the authority to regulate the diamond industry. In July 2007, the SADPMR was
established
by section 3 (1) of the
Diamond Act, 2005 (At No 29 of 2005) which accounted to the Public Finance
Management Act, 1999 (Act No 1 of 1999) in terms of section 3 (2).
The CEO reported that the SADPMR is funded
by monies appropriated by Parliament.
The Regulator was established as a One-stop Shop for the issuing of
precious metals incense/permits and certificates.
The
strategic objectives of the regulator are to improve competitiveness,
sustainable development and job creation in the diamond and precious metals
industry, to transform the diamond and precious metals sector, to promote
equitable access to resources for local beneficiation, to enforce compliance
with the legislative requirements and to improve organisational capacity for
maximum execution for excellence.
The
SADPMR has a staff compliment of 120, of which the majority (80) are women. The
regulator required R79 million for all its functions but was allocated R47
million. The regulator is faced with challenges of inadequate budget
allocation, declining diamond and precious metals industries, complexities with
regards to the beneficiation of precious metals and inadequate access to rough
diamonds by beneficiators.
The
regulator has commenced with the implementation of the plan by engaging diamond
producers to avail rough diamonds for local beneficiators and has already
facilitated four tenders for polished diamond at the Diamond Exchange and
Export Centre (DECC).
6.
Briefing by
State Diamond Trader on strategic plan and budget
The
Board Chairperson congratulated the Chairperson and the members of the
committee on their election to Parliament. She handed over to the CEO, Ms F
Zikalala who took the committee through the presentation. The CEO also
congratulated the Chairperson and looked forward to a constructive relationship
with the committee.
The SDT
is eligible by law and proclamation to purchase up to 10 per cent of the run of
the mine output from all diamond producers in South Africa. It does not receive
any grant from the state, but funds its operations itself, with the aid of
working capital loaned by the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC).The CEO
mentioned that Jewish people are the mainstay of the diamond industry in South
Africa and internationally. In response to questions from members, she
explained that because of the nature of the industry, it has proved very
challenging to assist black South Africans to enter the sector and to be
successful over time.
Members
questioned whether the ten percent ceiling for the purchase of SA-mined
diamonds was sufficient. The SDT responded that this was a policy issue that
was set by the law.
7.
Briefing by
Mine Health and Safety Council
Mr D Msiza,
the Chairperson, outlined the mandate of the Council which is to advice the
Minister on all occupational health and safety issues in the mining industry
relating to legislation, research and promotion; review and develop legislation
for recommendation to the Minister; promote health and safety culture in the
mining industry; oversee research in relation to the health and safety in the
mining industry and liaise with other bodies concerned with health and safety
issues. He reported that the most recent annual mine fatality statistics
reflected the lowest figures ever. This achievement would inspire the industry
in its journey to zero harm.
The
CEO, Mr T Dube reported that the Council intends to have a stakeholder summit
in November 2014 on the health and safety issues in mining.
8.
Briefing by the
Auditor-Generals office
Mr. J van Schalkwyk,
Corporate Executive: Audit at the Auditor-General of South Africa stated to the
Committee that the DMR and its entities showed a better performance than the
norm. More discipline is needed by the Department in dealing with revenue from
royalties and prospecting and in legislative compliance but the Department has
set a good base from which to improve. The qualified audit opinion that the
Department received in 2012/13 was the result of a single area of difficulty.
There is a good relationship between the Auditor-General and the Department. Mr
van Schalkwyk stated that the DMR and its entities have shown significant
progress over time and that the portfolio was close to being totally clean from
an audit point of view. He described the DMR as a well governed, well
functioning department.
Members stated that a
clean audit is a must and expressed appreciation for the role of the
Auditor-General in guiding the committee in its oversight over the Department
and its entities.
9.
Observations
The Committee, following
its deliberations, noted the following concerns:
·
The Committee appreciated the attendance of
the Minister. The Committee felt that in the future, certain expenditure
patterns need to be discussed with the entities, particularly relating to the
efficiency of government support for research across the mining sector.
·
The Committee noted that the DMR had become
compliant wit
h
the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA), Act 2 of 2000, which sets standards
for transparency and accountability that enables citizens to access records
from government and business.
·
The
Committee welcomed efforts geared at streamlining licensing processes in
respect of mining and the environment and the partnerships with the Departments
of Environmental Affairs and Water and Sanitation. This will allow the
licensing process to be finalised in parallel rather than sequentially. These
improvements are catered for in the amendments to the MPRDA which were processed
by Parliament during 2013/14.
·
Members noted that because of inadequate
funding, there are provisions of the legislation which the CGS is unable to perform.
·
There
is a challenge in that the number of inspectors (including health inspectors)
is inadequate. This means that the department is only able to inspect a limited
sample of mines, and not all mines.
The DG indicated to the committee that there is only
1 inspector per region (province) who is dedicated to assisting mines to
develop and comply with the Social and Labour Plans which specify
responsibilities related to socio-economic development in the areas where mines
are located.
The matter has be brought
to the attention of the Minister and it
has been escalated to the Treasury and the Public Service Commission
with a motivation for more funding to recruit the experienced and
qualified
inspectors needed for these
roles..
·
The
Social Labour Plans (SLP) are often not effectively aligned with the Integrated
Development Plans (IDPs) of local municipalities. There was a concern whether the
DMR involves the departments of human settlement, water and sanitation and environment
affairs in the process of compiling and monitoring the SLPs.
·
There
is no clear allocation on how money will be utilized for assessing the
effectiveness of the Mining Charter as it reaches its 10 year implementation
point in December 2014.
The committee questioned whether the
department adequately prioritizes the need to improve the living conditions of
mine workers. Action is needed now, not only after December 2014, where the
past pattern is simply to extend deadlines.
10.
Recommendations
The Committee recommends as follows:
-
As
most entities are conducting research, the committee recommends that
research should be centralised, or at least centrally co-ordinated, so
that full value may be gained from government financial support for
research to strengthen the mining sector. The establishment of a Centre for
Excellence to deal with the entire research work should be considered.
-
The National Treasury should increase the budget of the department
so that more inspectors (in particular health and safety inspectors) be
employed to ensure effective and efficient compliance with the mining
legislation and regulations of the sector.
-
The process being undertaken by the inter-ministerial task team on
Social Labour Plans (SLPs) should be speedily driven to ensure the maximum
participation by all role players.
-
Compliance conditions for licenses should be an audit requirement
even by private companies.
-
The department should strengthen the systems that must assist the
process on compliance which include amongst other things harsher measures
in relation to revoking of licences.
-
Urgent attention should be given to the ability of the Council for
Geoscience to fund both the requirements of the 2010 Geoscience Amendment
Act and the additional responsibilities that may be given to the Council
if/when the MPRDA Amendment Bill is signed into law.
·
A platform should be
created whereby critical issues are discussed, for an example a stakeholder
discussion forum that includes Salga in how mining companies can best link SLPs
and IDPs to effectively serve our communities in mining areas.
·
The mechanisms being
used by the Department to monitor compliance with the Mining Charter are not
sufficient. The process of monitoring must begin as soon as possible, not only
after the deadline expires in December 2014.
11.
Conclusion
Having considered the Annual Performance Plan and
Budget Vote of the Department of Mineral Resources, the Committee adopts the
report.
Report
to be considered.
Documents
No related documents