ATC141024: Budgetary Review and Recommendation Report (BRRR) of the Portfolio Committee on Human Settlements, dated 21 October 2014
Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation
Budgetary Review and Recommendation Report (BRRR) of
the Portfolio Committee on Human Settlements, dated 21 October 2014
The Portfolio Committee on Human Settlements (the
Committee), having considered the performance and submission to National
Treasury for the medium term period of the Department of Human Settlements and
its entities, reports as follows:
1.
Introduction
In 2009, the President assented
to the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill. The Money
Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act (No. 9 of 2009) came into
effect on 16 April 2009. The Act aims to provide for a procedure to amend money
bills before Parliament. The Act enables Parliament to amend the budget and
other money bills. This includes the annual Division of Revenue Bill
[1]
,
the Annual Appropriation Bill and the Adjustments Appropriation Bill.
Cabinet adopted an outcomes-based
delivery approach in 2010 to achieve the predetermined objective to accelerate
services to the people. All spheres of government should work in a coordinated
fashion to effect twelve (12) measurable outcomes which assist to focus all
policy and programme implementation. These predetermined objectives, with
associated and defined targets, should be reached by 2014. Outcome 8 is focused
directly on the mandate of the Department of Human Settlements and is
responsible for the creation of sustainable human settlements and improved
quality of household life.
During the previous term of
government (2009-2014) the competency of sanitation fell under the mandate of
the Department of Human Settlements. This competency was transferred from the
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry to the Department of Human Settlements
as per the proclamation by President Zuma. With the new government administration
this function was further removed from the Department of Human Settlements and
placed under the newly established Department of Water and Sanitation. The
report will therefore, report on the sanitation function as it was under the
Department of Human Settlements during the year under review.
Outcome 8 further brings an
important policy shift away from the mere building of houses. The Department of
Human Settlements is now at the centre of establishing human settlements in
which the dignity of people is substantially improved by providing better
houses, improved sanitation, better access to schooling, health care, sports
and recreation, places of worship and arts and culture, as well as employment
opportunities.
The
Budgetary Review and Recommendation Report (BRRR) of the Portfolio Committee on
Human Settlements is based on information that it accessed through rigorous
engagement with the Department on its annual planning processes, and with
relevant stakeholders on legislation as indicated below:
-
Department of Human
Settlements strategic plan and performance target 2013/14;
-
Quarterly Reports of the
Department;
-
Department of Human
Settlements Annual Report 2013/14;
-
Report of the Auditor-General
to Parliament on the Financial Statements of Vote No. 31: National
Department of Human Settlements for the year ended 31 March 2014;
-
Financial and Fiscal
Commission Recommendations of 2013/14; and
-
Public
Service Commission of 2013/14.
The
Committee further engaged with the following entities that report to the
Minister of Human Settlements and who work with the national Department on
their annual report:
-
Housing Development Agency
(HDA);
-
National Urban Reconstruction
and Housing Agency (Nurcha);
-
National Home Builders
Registration Council (NHBRC);
-
National Housing Finance
Corporation (NHFC);
-
Rural Housing Loan Fund
(RHLF);
-
Social Housing Regulatory
Authority (SHRA);
-
Estate Agency Affairs Board
(EAAB); and
-
Community Schemes Ombud
Services (CSOS).
1.1 Highlights of the State of the Nation Address (SONA) 2013
The 2013 State of the Nation
Address highlighted the following key strategic objectives pertaining to the
Department of Human Settlements:
[2]
·
In his
State of the Nation Address 2013, President Jacob Zuma announced the progress
of the Finance Linked Individual Subsidy Programme (FLISP) since its inception
in 2011.
·
Housing
programme that is geared towards assisting mine workers living in mining areas.
·
Redressing
the past apartheid spatial settlements planning and the need to develop
National Integrated Urban Development Framework.
2.
Mandate of Committee
The Committees mandate is to
maintain an oversight responsibility that ensures a quality process of
scrutinising and overseeing governments action.
It is driven by the ideal of realising a
better quality of life for all people in South Africa.
It is also required to facilitate public
participation and oversees compliance with regulatory legislative frameworks
related to human settlements.
In brief, the Committee:
-
Considers
legislation referred to it;
-
Conducts
oversight of any organ(s) of the state and constitutional institution(s)
falling within its portfolio;
-
Facilitates
appointment of candidates to entities;
-
Considers
international agreements; and
-
Considers
budget of department and entities falling within its portfolio.
In doing its oversight, the
Committee consults and engages with relevant state and civil society organs on
matters related to human settlement and the urgent need to improve the quality
of household life.
It has a responsibility
to enhance and develop the capacity of its members to exercise effective
oversight over the Executive Authority on issues related to the human
settlements portfolio.
As mentioned above, the Committee
processes and passes legislation, and ratifies international protocols and
conventions related to human settlements. It participates in national and
international human settlements conferences. It consults with the National
Council of Provinces on human settlements legislation affecting the Provincial
Legislatures, and with other Committees within the National Assembly.
The Committee regularly engages in any
activities and programmes aimed at the development of human settlements and the
urgent need to improve the quality of household life of all South Africans.
3.
The Department of Human Settlements
The mandate of the Department of
Human Settlements is to determine, finance, promote, co-ordinate, communicate
and monitor the implementation of housing policy and the provision of
sustainable human settlements, as mandated by the comprehensive housing plan
promulgated in 2004 (Breaking New Ground). In 2009, a proclamation was made
that resulted into the reorientation of the then Department of Housing into the
Department of Human Settlements. This resulted in the expansion of the mandate
of the Department by the inclusion of the sanitation function under Human
Settlements. The Department also embarked on a turnaround strategy aimed at
organisational restructuring and a new structure came into being which also
resulted in the formation of the Project Management Unit (PMU). In aligning the
Departments plans with the Comprehensive Housing Plan, the strategic focus of
the Department over the Mid-Term Strategic Framework (five-year plan) includes
the following:
·
Stimulation
of the residential property market through the Finance Linked Individual
Subsidy Programme (FLISP) and Mortgage Default Insurance (MDI).
·
Spatial
restructuring and sustainable human settlements through Integrated Residential
Development Programme, Social Housing & Economic Amenities Programme,
Enhanced Peoples Housing Process, and Farm Residents Housing Assistance
Programme.
·
Development
of Social Housing and Community Residential Unit programme (CRU).
·
Upgrading
of informal settlements programme through the National Upgrading Support
Programme (NUSP) and emergency housing assistance programme.
·
Reforming
and restructuring of Human Settlements entities.
·
Job
creation which will be addressed through the Expanded Public Works Programme
(EPWP).
3.1
Departments strategic priorities and
measurable objectives
3.1.1
Strategic
Plans of the Department
The Departments strategic plan
recognises that the delivery responsibility shared between the national,
provincial, and local governments poses a challenge in the sense that, although
the national Department has an overarching responsibility around housing
matters, the implementation of policies lies at the different spheres of
government; thus making it impossible for the national Department to monitor
projects and allocate resource distribution. Notwithstanding these, the
Department of Human Settlements needs to enhance its own capacity and
capability in response to the comprehensive plan.
The political pronouncements by
the government and state on related development priorities in 2012 respectively
and the launch of National Development (NDP), which is to be used as a
blueprint for developmental state, and subsequent political statements
regarding the projected human settlements trajectory has emphasised the need to
move from the normal policy development approach towards developmental policy
in support of interventions that are needed to address the triple challenges of
poverty, inequality and unemployment in our country.
Many people still live in appalling
accommodation, without access to basic services in a proliferation of
marginalised informal settlements as a result of poor planning and socio and
geo-spatial dislocations of the apartheid legacy. These informal settlements
are located far from economic opportunities and are in many instances without
access to water, sanitation facilities, electricity and refuse removal. This
together with the shortage of land, the lack of affordable housing
opportunities and security of tenure was the motivation behind Outcome 8. The
Delivery Agreements for Outcome 8 focuses on the following outputs:
-
Output
1: Deprttment had planned to upgrade informal settlements:
-
Upgrading
of 400 000 households in informal settlements with access to secure tenure and
basic services;
-
Implementation
of the National Upgrading Support Programme for informal settlements;
-
Accreditation
of municipalities to perform the housing function.
Output
2:
Access to basic services:
-
Provision
of universal access to adequate sanitation by 2014.
Output
3: Efficient utilization of land for for human settlements development:
-
Release
of
6250 ha of land vested nationally or
provincially for human settlements development;
-
Increased
urban densities to 60 units/ha;
-
An
approved land use management framework.
Output
4:
Improved affordable property market:
-
Provision
of 80 000 well-located rental accommodation units by 2014;
-
Establishment
and implementation of a Mortgage Insurance Guarantee Scheme to deliver 600 000
housing finance opportunities by 2014;
-
Revised
Finance Linked Individual Subsidy Programme (FLISP) to be responsive to the
challenges in the affordable (Gap) market.
The intention for Outcome 8 is to
create sustainable human settlements and improved quality of household life. In
order for the Department to achieve its Outcome 8 mandate coupled with
challenges of the 2.2 million housing backlog, the Department has reconfigured
its functioning through a turnaround strategy approved by the Department of
Public Service and Administration and the National Treasury.
4.
Virements
after adjustment estimate
Rand thousand
|
Medium term estimates
|
|||
2013/14
|
2014/15
|
2015/16
Indicative
|
2016/17
Indicative
|
|
Administration
|
422,399
|
425 905
|
445 612
|
472 038
|
Human Settlements Policy,
Strategy
and Planning
|
84,055
|
89 396
|
94 299
|
100 332
|
Programme Delivery Support
|
226,922
|
298 475
|
307 715
|
325 404
|
Housing Development Finance
|
27,377,087
|
29 707 616
|
31 994 736
|
33 554 818
|
Total
|
28,110,463
|
30 521 392
|
32 842 362
|
34 452 592
|
Departmental programme and
allocatiom MTEF 2013/14
The annual report of the
Department of Human Settlements, analysed in conjunction with the Strategic
Plan, provides valuable information on the operational successes of the Department
in relation to its programmes. While the Annual Performance Plan provides
detailed outputs, performance indicators, strategic and medium-term targets, as
well as estimated performance indicators for a programme, the Annual Report
only provides a broad report on performance of the programme and its
sub-programmes. This makes it a bit of a challenge for one to provide a
detailed analysis per programme.
4.1
Programme 1:
Administration
Purpose: To provide leadership,
management and support functions of the Department.
Programme 1 (Administration)
has spent 74% of its allocated budget during the 2013/14 financial year. This
is 1% less than the expenditure during the 2012/13 financial year, which was
75%.
The Department has reported that the
Anti-Fraud and Corruption Strategy has not been approved and committed that the
strategy would be developed during the first quarter of the 2014/15 financial
year.
The National Project Integration
has not been fully developed. The reason cited by the Department was a lack of
capacity.
The delays in the recruitment
of staff has resulted in some of the targets being partially achieved.
4.2
Programme 2: Human Settlements
Policy, Strategy and Planning
Purpose: Manage the
development and compliance with settlements sector delivery frameworks and
oversee integrated human settlements strategic and planning services.
The policy on densification has
been in the pipeline for a while now. The Department has reported that it has
not yet been finalised. Two governance framework reports were scheduled to be
produced but only one report was produced during the period under review.
The development of the Human Settlements
Green Paper is a crucial one because it leads towards the review of the policy
on Human Settlements. It will be crucial for the Department to keep the Committee
abreast on the progress made so far in this regard.
A total of five additional
municipalities was scheduled for assessment for level 2 accreditation. Only one
municipality got assessed for level 2 accreditation, which is a concern.
4.3
Programme 3: Programme Delivery
Support
Purpose: To oversee and
support the execution of human settlements programmes and projects.
During the 2012/13 financial year
programme 3 spent 42% of its budget. The expenditure was reduced during the
2013/14 financial year, which is only 35%. This a significant reduction and is
a concern because programmes such as bucket eradication fall under this
programme.
The Rural Housing
Infrastructure Programme (RHIP) has previously not performed well. With such a
huge backlog in eradicating bucket toilets in the country, the Department should
provide information on how it is planning to deal with the issue of bucket
toilets.
It has been reported that three
out of four quarterly progress reports have been produced with regard to the RHIP.
The Department should provide information on
what led to the reduction in the expenditure instead of the expenditure
increasing.
4.4
Programme 4: Housing Development
Finance
Purpose: To manage and
support human services grant management services.
The Department was scheduled to
produce an impact assessment report on Human Settlements Programmes. The report
has not been produced. It would be critically important for the Department to
furnish the Committee with such a report mainly because a lot of programmes get
underway and Parliament does not get to know about their evaluation. The
evaluation report would help in assessing programmes on where improvements should
be made.
5.
Human Settlements Conditional Grant
Expenditure
5.1
Human Settlements Development Grant (HSDG)
Provinces
|
DoRA
Allocation
2013/14
|
Additional /
Disaster relief
|
Reallocation/
(Stopped)
|
Total Available
|
Actual Transfer
|
Amount Received by
Province
|
Amount Spent by
Province
|
% Spent
|
R'000
|
R'000
|
R'000
|
R'000
|
R'000
|
R'000
|
R'000
|
||
Eastern Cape
|
2,523,803
|
-
|
-
|
2,523,803
|
2,523,803
|
2,523,803
|
2,523,803
|
100%
|
Free State
|
1,120,936
|
-
|
230,000
|
1,350,936
|
1,350,936
|
1,350,936
|
1,350,936
|
100%
|
Gauteng
|
4,108,399
|
-
|
-
|
4,108,399
|
4,108,399
|
4,108,399
|
4,095,445
|
100%
|
KwaZulu-Natal
|
3,235,428
|
40,156
|
57,000
|
3,332,584
|
3,332,584
|
3,332,584
|
3,333,979
|
100%
|
Limpopo
|
1,324,742
|
1,368
|
(644,000)
|
682,110
|
682,110
|
682,110
|
303,449
|
44%
|
Mpumalanga
|
1,124,332
|
1,764
|
-
|
1,126,096
|
1,126,096
|
1,126,096
|
1,014,826
|
90%
|
Northern Cape
|
395,724
|
-
|
207,900
|
603,624
|
603,624
|
603,624
|
577,450
|
96%
|
North West
|
1,224,537
|
-
|
117,000
|
1,256,637
|
1,256,637
|
1,256,637
|
1,341,523
|
107%
|
Western Cape
|
1,925,971
|
1,166
|
32,100
|
2,044,137
|
2,044,137
|
2,044,137
|
1,959,237
|
96%
|
Total
|
16,983,872
|
44,454
|
-
|
17,028,326
|
17,028,326
|
17,028,326
|
16,500,648
|
97%
|
Human
Settlements Development Grant (HSDG) Expenditure: 31 March 2014
5.1.1
Development Human Settlements Grants Schedule 5A (Direct Grant)
It should be noted that the competency to deliver houses is vested in
the provinces. Therefore, a schedule 5A grant is a direct grant that is
transferred directly to provinces for human settlements developments. An amount
of R17.9 billion has been allocated for the 2014/15 financial year. In the 2010/11
financial year the allocation of the Human Settlements Developments Grant was
R15.2 billion
[3]
.
This shows an increase over the period of four years. The intention of the
grant is to establish a stable and sustainable human settlements in which all
citizens have access to social and economic amnesties and enable an improved
quality of household life. The performance of the grant for the past four years
is as follows:
-
In 2010/11 the grant was allocated R15.2
billion, but only R14.6 billion or 96.3 per cent was spent.
-
In 2011/12 the grant was allocated R14.9
billion, but only R14.4 million or 97 per cent was spent.
-
In 2012/13 the grant was allocated R15.7
billion, but only R15.4 million or 97 per cent was spent.
-
In 2013/14 the grant was allocated R16.9
billion, and as at the end of the third quarter only R10.4 billion or 61.2
per cent was spent. Of note is that the grant was upwards adjusted through
the provincial roll over amount of R44.4 million which increased the
allocation to R17 billion
[4]
.
Based on the above trends analysis, it should be noted that since its
inception in 2010/11 the grant has never spent 100%. The maximum expenditure
has been around 97 per cent for each year.
According to the 2014/15 Division of Revenue Bill the formula that is
used to allocate this grant has been reviewed during 2013
[5]
. The
2014/15 allocation is based on a new formula to ensure closer alignment between
provincial allocations and the number of households with inadequate housing in
each province.
[6]
In addition, a total amount of R2.4 billion has been added over the Mid-term
Expenditure Framework (MTEF) to upgraded informal settlements around the mining
areas in six provinces where mining sector is predominant. According to
National Treasury the new formula will be phased in for two years from 2014/15
in order to allow provinces to adjust to their new allocations
[7]
.
5.1.2
Human Settlements Development Grants Schedule 6A (Indirect Grant)
In 2014/15, a new component of this grant was introduced as an indirect
grant or in kind grant allocation as opposed to the existing direct grant (schedule
5A) to eradicate the bucket system which the government has reprioritised. An
amount of R899 million has been allocated for the current financial year.
The intention is to eradicate the sanitation
backlog in the form of the bucket system. The grant will run for a two-year
period and is an indirect grant. This means that the Department will spend it
on behalf of the province to eradicate the bucket system. The indirect grant
will be focussed on improving sanitation in areas where housing projects did
not adequately provide for decent sanitation systems.
5.2
Rural
Household Infrastructure Grant (RHIG)
The grant was initiated as a schedule 7 grant in the 2010/11 financial
year
[8]
.
In 2013/14 the schedule of the grant was changed from schedule 7 to 5 with
effect from 2013. The Rural Household Infrastructure Grant (RHIG) is divided
into two components, there is schedule 5 B which is a direct grant to
municipalities and schedule 6 B which is an indirect grant or grant in kind
allocation to municipalities
[9]
.
The intention of the grant is to provide specific capital funding for
the eradication of rural sanitation backlogs and to target existing households
where bulk dependent services are not viable
[10]
.
Its primary purpose is to improve basic sanitation in rural areas. For the
indirect grant component an amount of R66 million has been allocated while only
R48 million has been allocated for the direct grant component for 2014/15
[11]
.
The performance of the past three financial years is as follows
[12]
:
-
In 2011/12 an amount of R258 million was
allocated for this grant, but only R77.8 million or 31 per cent was spent
at the end of that financial year.
-
In 2012/13 an amount of R340.6 million was
allocated for this grant, but only R135 million or 60 per cent was spent.
-
In 2013/14 an amount of R106.7 million was
allocated for this grant; the expenditure for the third quarter was not
available during the time of the analysis.
5.3
Urban Settlements Development Grant
(USDG)
Municipality
|
Allocated Funds National
|
Rollovers
|
Total Available
|
Transferred Funds
|
Spent by Municipality
|
Variance Spent vs Transferred
|
Variance Spent vs Total Available
|
Spent as % of Total Available
|
Unspent as % of Total Available
|
R'000
|
|||||||||
Buffalo City
|
613 305
|
176 875
|
790 180
|
613 305
|
789 503
|
677
|
100%
|
99.9%
|
0.1%
|
Nelson Mandela Bay
|
727 986
|
-
|
727 986
|
727 986
|
727 986
|
-
|
100%
|
100.0%
|
0.0%
|
Mangaung
|
596 719
|
129 450
|
726 169
|
596 719
|
651 137
|
75 032
|
100%
|
89.7%
|
10.3%
|
Ekurhuleni
|
1 584 912
|
69 509
|
1 654 421
|
1 584 912
|
1 444 715
|
209 706
|
100%
|
87.3%
|
12.7%
|
City of JHB
|
1 488 877
|
70 347
|
1 559 224
|
1 488 877
|
1 435 796
|
123 428
|
100%
|
92.1%
|
7.9%
|
City of Tshwane
|
1 290 611
|
-
|
1 290 611
|
1 290 611
|
1 245 781
|
44 830
|
100%
|
96.5%
|
3.5%
|
eThekwini
|
1 580 999
|
-
|
1 580 999
|
1 580 999
|
1 580 999
|
-
|
100%
|
100.0%
|
0%
|
City of Cape Town
|
1 193 497
|
66 276
|
1 259 773
|
1 193 497
|
973 226
|
286 547
|
100%
|
77.3%
|
22.7%
|
Total
|
9 076 906
|
512 457
|
9 589 363
|
9 076 906
|
8 849 143
|
740 220
|
100%
|
92.3%
|
7.7%
|
Urban Settlements Development Grant (USDG)
Expenditure as at 30 June 2014
The USDG was introduced in the 20011/12 financial year, parallel to the accreditation
(delegation of housing responsibilities) of metropolitan municipalities. The
aim of this grant as contained in the Division of Revenue Act is to assist
metropolitan municipalities to improve urban land production to the benefit of
the poor households by supplementing the revenue of the metros.
This grant is in line with agreed 12 outcomes
by Cabinet within which to frame public service delivery priorities and targets.
Outcome 8 refers to sustainable human settlements and is aimed at achieving an
improved quality of household life. In this regard, four major outputs are
spelled out:
·
Accelerate housing delivery;
·
Improve access to basic services;
·
Improve property market;
·
More efficient land utilisation and release of state-owned
land.
The grant is allocated R10.2 billion for the 2014/15 financial year
[13]
.
The grant is targeting about 8 metropolitan areas (Buffalo City, Nelson
Mandela, Mangaung, Ekurhuleni, City of Johannesburg, City of Tshwane,
eThekwini, City of Cape Town).
The performance of the grant for the past three years is as follows
[14]
:
-
In 2011/12 the grant was allocated R6.2
billion, and 88 per cent was spent in that particular year.
-
In 2012/13 the allocation increased to R7.3
billion and only R6.8 billion or 93 per cent was spent in that particular
year.
-
In 2013/14 the allocation increased to R9
billion and the expenditure information was not available at the time when
the analysis was done.
Some of the challenges on the USDG raised during the
2013/14 Committee meeting
The Department of Human Settlements in the last engagement with the Standing
Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) in relation to the USDG cited the
following challenges
[15]
:
-
Lack of coordination and alignment which was
experienced by the Department within the metros which led to poor service
delivery;
-
Lack of capacity to carry out programme plans
in the metro municipalities;
-
Critical vacancies and consistent personnel in
some metros to manage the USDG grant;
-
Land acquisition challenges and limited land
in close proximity to the city centres;
-
Multi-year projects are budgeted for in one
financial year due to inadequate planning of projects;
-
There were very lengthy procurement processes
which was time consuming;
-
Legal challenges - certain tenders were being
contested in court, particularly for major projects;
-
There was a lack of management and governance
of informal settlements area.
5.4
Municipal Human Settlement Capacity Grant
This is a new indirect grant introduced by the 2014/15 Division of
Revenue Bill. The aim of the grant is to improve coordination of urban
programmes and establish clearer lines of accountability. The National
Development Plan recommends that responsibility for housing should shift to
municipal level, where human settlement planning takes place. In support of
this, government is developing planning and implementation capacity in
municipal government through the introduction of the new R300 million municipal
human settlements capacity grant for metropolitan municipalities from 2014/15.
The intention of the grant is to build capacity in municipalities to deliver
and subsidise the operational cost of administering the human settlement
programme.
Whilst the Division of Revenue Act (DORA) suggests that the housing
function should be assigned to municipalities, the Committee was proposing that
this must be linked to their capacity given the history of underspending by
some of the metropolitan municipalities.
6.
DEPARTMENTAL
EXPENDITURE VS. PERFORMANCE TARGETS 2013/14
Branch
|
Final Allocation
(Operational)
|
Expenditure
|
Variance
|
%
Spent
|
Planned
Targets
|
Achieved
Targets
|
Variance/ Targets
Not achieved
|
%
Achieved Targets
|
1: Administration
|
346 922 000
|
247 710 959
|
99 211 041
|
71%
|
25
|
24
|
1
|
96%
|
2: Human Settlements Delivery Frameworks
|
37 070 395
|
36 253 742
|
816 653
|
98%
|
24
|
13
|
11
|
54%
|
3: Human Settlements Strategy And Planning
|
55 645 605
|
42 156 537
|
13 489 068
|
76%
|
17
|
8
|
9
|
47%
|
4: Programme
Management Unit
|
192 945 056
|
79 867 291
|
113 077 765
|
41%
|
17
|
12
|
5
|
71%
|
5: Office Of The Chief Financial Officer
|
198 230 344
|
168 862 385
|
29 367 959
|
85%
|
30
|
29
|
1
|
97%
|
6: Office Of The Chief Operations Officer
|
52 629 600
|
41 959 659
|
10 669 941
|
80%
|
13
|
13
|
0
|
100%
|
Total
|
883 443 000
|
616 810 573
|
266 632 427
|
70%
|
126
|
99
|
27
|
79%
|
7.
Performance by human settlements
institutions
7.1
National Home Builders Registration
Council
The National Home Builders Registration Council was
established in 1998 in terms of the Housing Consumer Protection Measures Act,
1998 (Act No. 95 of 1998). The NHBRC is mandated to protect the housing
consumer and to regulate the home building environment by promoting innovative
home building technologies, setting homebuilding standards and improving the
capabilities of home builders.
Overview - summary of performance of NHBRC
Valuable Final Product (VFP)
|
Year- to-date Performance for 2012/2013
|
Year-to-Date Performance for 2013/2014
|
||||||
Performance
|
Target
|
Variance
|
% Variance
|
Performance
|
Target
|
Variance
|
% Variance
|
|
Registration of new Home Builders
|
2,935
|
3,332
|
-397
|
(12%)
|
3,175
|
2,974
|
201
|
7%
|
Renewal of registered Home Builders
|
11,558
|
11,431
|
127
|
1%
|
12,447
|
10,480
|
1,967
|
19%
|
Enrolment of homes
|
204,235
|
90,119
|
114,116
|
126%
|
168,319
|
250,394
|
82,063
|
(33%)
|
Late Enrolment of homes
|
1,906
|
1,696
|
173
|
12%
|
1,743
|
1,001
|
-742
|
(74)
|
Inspections of homes
|
336,046
|
553,740
|
-217,694
|
(65%)
|
451,324
|
370,677
|
80,647
|
22%
|
Training of homebuilders
|
2050
|
3500
|
-1450
|
(41%)
|
1,369
|
3,500
|
2,131
|
(61%)
|
Training of Youth
|
474
|
2,000
|
-1526
|
(76%)
|
934
|
2,000
|
-1.066
|
(53%)
|
The NHBRC received an unqalified audit report with
emphasis of matter regarding irregular expenditure, performance informatio and
Information technology.
The Committee commended the entity for its improvement
from the qualified report to an unqalified audit report.
However, it was concerned about the same issue
that was raised by the recurrence of the emphasis of matter.
7.2
Estate
Agency Affairs Board
The Estate Agency Affairs Board was established in 1977
in terms of the Estate Agency Affairs Act (Act No.112 of 1976). The EAAB was
transferred from the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to the Department
of Human Settlements following a Cabinet decision to house all pieces of
legislations pertaining to housing under one department. During the financial
period under review, registrations increased by 6%. In the 2012/13 financial
year, a total of 55 232 registrations was recorded compared to the
52 304 of the 2011/12 financial year. The number of inspections performed
in the 2012/13 financial period increased dramatically. A total of 1 613
inspections were performed during the 2012/13 financial year, compared to 364
performed during 2011/12 financial year. The fidelity fund used to protect
consumers against unscrupulous estate agents is in a healthy financial
position. It has grown by almost 12% since the 2008/09 financial year. Its net
asset value is R575 million as at the end of 2012/13 financial year.
Operational overiview of EAAB
INSPECTIONS
STATISTICS
|
|||||||||
NON-COMPLIANCE:
INSPECTION CONTRAVENTIONS 2013/14
|
|
||||||||
|
Gauteng
|
Western Cape
|
Limpopo
|
Free State
|
Eastern Cape
|
KwaZulu Natal
|
Mpumalanga
|
Total
|
|
ESTATE AGENCIES
OPERATING ILLEGALLY
|
24
|
36
|
0
|
10
|
15
|
31
|
9
|
210
|
|
PRINCIPALS - NO
FIDELITY FUND CERTIFICATE
|
40
|
48
|
0
|
9
|
9
|
31
|
21
|
168
|
|
NON-PRINCIPALS AND
INTERNS - NO FIDELITY FUND CERTIFICATE
|
79
|
2
|
0
|
26
|
7
|
24
|
19
|
157
|
|
PRIMARY TRUST ACCOUNT
CONTRAVENTIONS
|
40
|
49
|
1
|
30
|
12
|
20
|
20
|
83
|
|
SECONDARY/INVESTMENT
ACCOUNT CONTRAVENTIONS
|
22
|
25
|
0
|
17
|
10
|
37
|
9
|
118
|
|
INTEREST EARNED ON
TRUST MONEY - NOT PROPERLY DEALT WITH
|
7
|
15
|
0
|
19
|
1
|
11
|
2
|
55
|
|
The entity reported that it had received an unqualified
audit opinion with no emphasis of matter.
This was a record for the five consecutive years.
There were legal and regulatory matters
related to
three
disqualified board members who had not vacated office.
They have since vacated office. It was repoted that
56% of the targets were not achieved
as they did not meet the SMART criteria.
The
Performance Information
System was not integrated with the Financial and Reporting Management Systems.
The Committee requested the entity to fast-track the
transformation of the entity.
7.3
National
Urban Reconstruction and Housing Agency (NURCHA)
The National Urban Reconstruction and Housing Agency
(NURCHA) has been mandated to provide bridging finance and development finance
for subsidy housing, infrastructure and community facilities and affordable housing.
NURCHA presented its 2013/14 business plan to the Committee.
The entity reported that it has achieved an unqalified
audit report.
The turnaround strategy
that was undertaken was successful. It was reported that there was a surplus
following
years of losses. There was
improvement in the collaboration with provincial and local government
stakeholders in the human settlements.
During the period under review on the affordable housing programme the
entity signed 14 contracts, and delivered 1 983 houses and sites.
The value of the loans disbursed was
R230 729 million and the value of projects was R873 072 million.
The number of completed houses was
1 619.
On the subsidy housing
lending programme there were 11 contracts signed, 4 428 houses and sites
and houses completed were 3 108.
The value of loan was R55, 482 million and the value of projects was
R349, 911 million.
The Committee was concerned about non-compliance with the
procurement policy as reported by the Auditor-General.
As a result, the entity was requested to
report on a quarterly basis on the findings of the Auditor-General.
7.4
Rural
Housing Loan Fund (RHLF)
The mandate of the Rural Housing Loan Fund was to
make loans available to low-income households in rural areas and to build or
improve their houses. These were households with an income of R9 800 and less.
It empowered rural dwellers by giving them access to housing finance from
sustainable retail lenders and government subsidies through the Individual
Rural Subsidy Voucher Programme. The Rural Housing Loan Fund (RHLF) noted that
it was stable and had had clean audits for its 12 years of operation. Its
mandate was to enable people in rural areas to access finance so that they
could incrementally improve their housing conditions. It covered communal land,
rural towns and small towns. RHLF received R99 million through fiscal
allocations.
A concern was raised that people in rural areas do
not have access to information about the RHLF and information is not
communicated in the language that could be understood by the people on the
ground.
There was a concern around the
connection between funds provided by RHLF and other entities within the Human
Settlements who checked quality, standards, training, and capacity building.
It was noted that in rural areas, there are
teachers and police who earn slightly higher than the R9800 and do not qualify
for RHLF.
7.5
Community
Schemes Ombud Services
The Community Schemes Ombud Services Act (Act No 9
of 2011) [CSOS Act] was promulgated on 11 June 2011 and provides for the
establishment of the Community Schemes Ombud Services (CSOS) as a public entity.
The CSOS has been classified as a Schedule 3A public entity in terms of the
Public Finance Management Act (Act No 1 of 1999) [PFMA].
The mandate of the CSOS and core functions of
the entity are as indicated below:
-
Develop
and provide a dispute resolution service in terms of the Act;
-
Provide
training for conciliators, adjudicators and other employees of the
Service.
-
Regulate,
monitor and control the quality of all sectional title schemes governance
documentation and such other scheme governance documentation as may be
determined by the Minister;
-
Take
custody of, preserve and provide access electronically or by other means
to sectional title schemes governance documentation and such other scheme governance
documents as may be determined by the Minister;
-
Manage
the Sectional Titles as provided by the Act.
The
entity reported that the Chief Ombud and the Chief Financial Officer had been
appointed.
The office was operational on
an ad hoc basis as regulations that regulates the entity still require to be
submitted to Parliament for approval.
The entity further reported that it would
approximately 22 staff complement.
The
entity was aiming to open three provincial offices by 31 March 2015.
The need to revise financial needs was also
raised by the entity.
It was
reported that during the year under review there were no audit conducted on
predetermined objectives as the entity received the money on the last day of
the financial year, namely 31 March 2014.
The strategic outcomes-oriented goals and strategic objectives were not
achieved due to non-operational activities.
7.6
Housing
Development Agency (HDA)
The
Housing Development Agency (HDA) is a national public development agency
established by an Act of Parliament (Housing Development Act 23 of 2008). The
HDA promotes sustainable communities by making well-located land and buildings
available for the development of housing and human settlements. As an organ of
state, the HDA is accountable through its Board to the Minister of Human
Settlements.
The HDA reported its highlights during the period under
review, including the
3 819 hectares of land was
released and acquired for human settlements.
A total of 16 properties was held by the Agency and 27 leases were in
place.
The Priority Housing Development Area
(PHDA) Policy was approved by the Board. The PHDA Regulations were adopted by
the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee.
It was further reported that 15 implementation protocols (IP) with provinces
and local authorities were in place with four new protocols signed with the
Mpumalanga Department of Human Settlements, Buffalo City Municipality, City of
Cape Town and City of Johannesburg.
The HDA received an unqualified audit report for the
year ended 31 March 2014.
Financial,
supply chain and risk management reporting, systems and procedures continued to
improve.
Specific focus was placed on the improvement of Human Resources
and Information Technology. The
performance management system remains in place and evaluations were conducted
twice annually
.
Communications and marketing activities continued to inform, position and
brand the HDA as a credible, professional and responsive organisation.
The Committee was concerned about transformation within
the entity as the structure did not reflect black personnel in managerial
posts.
7.7
National
Housing Finance Corporation (NHFC)
The NHFC is a state-owned development finance institution with
a principal mandate to broaden and deepen access to affordable housing finance
for the low and middle-income households. The NHFC is responsible for the
Mortgage Default Insurance Company (MDIC) that was set up to encourage banks to
lend to a wider sector, by providing them with guarantees that would take up a
portion of the risk, and, in particular, drop the down payment requirements to
5%. The FLISP programme which commenced in 2011 was linked to this.
It would provide down payment assistance to
qualifying households earning between R3 500 and R15 000 to purchase a property
not exceeding R300 000.
7.8
Social
Housing Regulatory Authority
The Social Housing Regulatory Authority (SHRA) was
established in terms of the Social Housing Act, (No. 16 of 2008).
Its mandate is to regulate the social housing
sector and invest in social housing projects.
The sector which SHRA regulates
include:
-
Social housing institutions (SHIs) which are non-profit
companies and act as landlords in terms of the Rental Housing Act;
-
A few SHIs are municipal-owned entities (MoEs); and
-
Housing cooperatives.
The entity reported that it had received unqualified
report with
predetermined objectives.
There
were no material findings raised on the usefulness and reliability of the
reported performance information.
Compliance with laws and regulations - t
here
were material findings with expenditure management regarding the prevention of irregular
expenditure and fruitless and wasteful expenditure which resulted in
non-compliance with section 51(1)(b)(ii) of the PFMA.
8.
Report
of the Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA)
The AGSA reported that the Department of Human
Settlements had received an
unqualified audit
opinion with significant emphasis of matter as indicated below
:
8.1
Material underspending of the vote
The
Department has materially underspent the budget on programme 2. The Department
spent R12 433 000 of its allocation of R 87 773 000 in respect of Programme
Implementation Facility. As a consequence, the Departments objectives of
supporting human settlements projects were not achieved.
The
Department spent R108 589 000 of its allocation of R133 649 000 on the implementation
of the Rural Household Infrastructure Grant. The Department was also allocated
an amount of R106 721 000 to be transferred to municipalities. However these
transfers were only made in March 2014 and a significant portion of these
grants were unspent as at 31 March 2014. As a consequence the Department may
not achieve its objectives of providing sanitation services to the rural
communities.
8.2
Predetermined
objectives
The AGSA
has reported on the usefulness and reliability of information reported on:
Programme
2: Human Settlements Policy, Research and Monitoring
Programme
3: Programme Delivery Support on pages and
Programme
4: Housing Development Finance on pages.
8.3
Changes
to objectives, indicators and targets not approved
The AGSA
further stated that Treasury Regulation 5.1.1 requires the executive authority
to approve the strategic and annual performance plan. Therefore, if this plan
is changed in the year due to significant policy or mandate changes, the
executive authority must also approve the updated plan. Material changes were
made to indicators and targets reported in the annual performance report
without these changes being approved. This was due to managements lack of
understanding of their approval requirements of Treasury Regulation 5.1.
8.4
Consistency of indicators and targets
Treasury
Regulation 5.2.4 requires the strategic plan to form the basis for the annual
report, therefore requiring consistency of objectives, indicators and targets
between planning and reporting documents. A total of 28% of the reported
indicators and 29% of reported targets were not consistent with those in the
approved annual performance plan. This was due to managements lack of
understanding of their reporting requirements during the strategic planning
phase.
8.5
Measurability of indicators targets
The Framework
fo Mananaging Programme Informaion (FMPPI) requires the following:
-
Performance targets must be specific in clearly
identifying the nature and required level of performance. A total of 26%
of the targets was not specific.
-
Performance targets must be measurable. We could
not measure the required performance for 26% of the targets. This was
because management did not adhere to the requirements of the FMPPI due to
a lack of proper systems and processes and technical indicator
descriptions.
8.6
Reliability of reported performance information
The
FMPPI requires auditees to have appropriate systems to collect, collate, verify
and store performance information to ensure valid, accurate and complete
reporting of actual achievements against planned objectives, indicators and
targets. Significantly important targets were not reliable when compared to the
source information or evidence provided. This was due to a lack of documented
standard operating procedures for the accurate recording of actual achievements
and technical indicator descriptions for the accurate measurement, recording
and monitoring of performance.
8.7
Programme
3: Programme delivery support
8.8
Measurability
of indicators and/or targets
The
FMPPI requires the following:
Performance
targets must be specific in clearly identifying the nature and required level
of performance. A total of 58% of the targets were not specific.
Performance
targets must be measurable. We could not measure the required performance for
58% of the targets. This was because management did not adhere to the requirements
of the FMPPI due to a lack of proper systems and processes and technical
indicator descriptions.
8.9
Human
resource management and compensation
Funded vacant posts were not filled within 12 months as required by Public
Service Regulation 1/VII/C.1A.2. A human resource plan was not in place as
required by Public Service Regulation 1/III/B.2(d).
The AGSA also reported on the entities as indicated below:
The Estate Agency Affairs Board (EAAB) had a number of weaknesses in the performing
environment, including:
·
Lack of periodic review of the annual
performance plan;
·
Lack of alignment between the annual
performance plan and the annual budget;
·
Lack of integration between the financial
and performance information systems; and
·
Lack of review of performance information
reports.
Material non-compliance with Treasury Regulations, the Public Finance
Management Act and the Estate Agency Affairs Board Act were also identified in
the year under review.
The Social Housing Regulatory Authority (SHRA) did not take effective
steps to prevent irregular expenditure, as required by section 51(1)(b)(ii) of
the Public Finance Management Act.
In relation to the National Urban Reconstruction & Housing Agency
(NURCHA), the following procurement issues relating to non compliance were
identified in the 2013/14 financial year:
·
Invitations for competitive bidding were not
always advertised for a required minimum period of 21 days, as required by
Treasury Regulations.
·
Requests for proposals did not stipulate the
minimum points to be awarded for functionality and the weight allocated to each
functionality/criteria as required by National Treasury Instruction Notes.
·
Deviations for not advertising in the
national tender bulletin and national newspapers were not supported by justifiable
reasons, as required by Treasury Regulations.
9.
Report
of the Financial and Fiscal Commission (FFC)
The FFC reported that the Departments overall performance had been good
over the last four (4) years at an average spending over 98% of allocated funds.
Some targets set for 2013/14 have been
achieved.
However, of concern was Programme
3 where under-spending was 36% in 2012/13 and increased to 55% in 2013/14.
The FFC indicated that it was
difficult to fully assess whether targets were
met in some instances as targets are not clearly determined where the Department
has under-performed, and reasons were not always provided.
Some of the reasons for under-performance in
2013/14 were similar to 2012/13.
The FFC recommended that:
-
Municipalities, especially metros, should invest in
forward-looking processes and systems that will enable such municipalities
to accurately understand and disaggregate the housing demand.
-
Metros should focus on planning for rental flats and
creating new (or transform existing) neighbourhoods in intermediate
suburbs, which have lower densities than the inner city.
-
Governments housing subsidy should prioritise the most
vulnerable groups, which include poor female-headed households with
children below the age of 20 years and households with adults who are
permanently out of the labour market.
10.
Report
of the Public Service Commission
The PSC gave a report on the annual performance of the
Department of Human Settlements. The Department received an unqualified audit
opinion with findings. The PSC outlined the findings by the Auditor-General as
follows:
Financial management of the Department was as indicated
below:
·
The Department received invoices amounting to R22,4
million for office accommodation. The offices were not occupied.
·
The Department has materially underspent on the RHIG.
·
Only 14% of the budget was spent in respect of the Programme
Implementation Facility, and consequently the objectives of supporting human
settlements projects were not achieved.
·
81% of the budget was spent on the implementation of
the Rural Household Infrastructure Grant.
·
R106 721 allocated for municipalities was only
transferred in March 2014.
As a result a
significant portion of the grant was unspent as at 31 March 2014.
Expenditure vs performance
The PSC reported that:
·
The spending of the Department was within the generally
accepted margin of 2% set by National Treasury.
·
Although almost the entire budget was spent over the
past four years, the achievement of predetermined outputs remained fairly low
(67% on average).
·
Major reasons for underspending were delays in the
filling of vacant posts, delays in migration from Novell to Microsoft, funds
for Special Investigating Unit SIU were not fully utilised and delays in the
implementation of the National Upgrading Support Programme which takes up to
30% of Programme 3s budget.
·
With regard to reporting on performance information in 2013/14,
the Auditor-General found that material changes were made to indicators and
targets reported in the annual performance report without these changes being
approved, 28% of the reported indicators and targets were not consistent with
those the approved annual performance plan, the required performance for 26% of
the targets could not be measured and 58% of the targets were not specific as
prescribed by the National Treasury Framework for managing programme
performance information.
The PSC reported that the Department had maintained its
audit record of unqualified audits over the past two years. Effective spending
of the Rural Household Infrastructure Grant remained a challenge. Spending
trends as at August 2014 point to inadequate financial management and a need to
put mitigating strategies in place to ensure spending in line with
predetermined objectives and targets. Similar to the previous financial year,
the Auditor-General made findings in respect of the usefulness and reliability
of performance information reflected in the Annual Report. In addition, not all
required information in respect of Human Resources was reported. There is
therefore a need for the Department to improve accountability.
The PSC has noted achievements in respect of access to
sanitation and electricity. The Department would have to put measures in place
to eliminate the backlogs reported.
There was a concern regarding the maintenance
of professional ethics in the Department. There has been no improvement in the
Departments ability to deal with cases reported to the NACH and no Financial
Disclosure Forms were submitted to the PSC by the due date. The latter impacts
negatively on the EAs ability to monitor and deal with potential and actual
conflicts of interest. Although the MPAT results shows improvements in some
areas of compliance, areas around the submission of Financial Disclosure Forms,
having a human resource plan in place, the filling vacancies and employment
equity requires immediate attention. It is of concern that since the last
report to the Portfolio Committee there had been no improvements in these
areas.
The Committee was concerned about the low level of
responding to allegations of corruption.
The Committee was also concerned about the drastic drop of disclosures
by Senior Managers Services.
11.
Department of Human Settlements contributions to key
government priorities
11.1
Provision of quality education
The Department reported that the Fledgling Scholarship Programme
benefited 347 beneficiaries since inception.
Annual investment by the Department was at R9 million per annum.
The Bachelor of Human Settlements Development
Degree (BHSD) was offered via the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
(NMMU).
The Chair for Human Settlements
Development and Management was hosted by the NMMU to develop the body of
knowledge in the sector.
The said degree
was approved by the Cabinet and the Chair.
The Committee proposed that the Department should assist students who were
willing to study engineering courses.
This
would assist the Department to close the gap of the shortage of rare skills.
11.2
Job creation
For the period under review, the Department had created
jobs in the construction sector. The Department further reported that it had
delivered 48 193 serviced cites and 105 936 houses during 2013/14.
This translated into 53 278 job opportunities
(28 502 direct jobs and 4 349 indirect and 20 427 induced).
11.3
Fight
against crime
The establishment of the Directorate of Fraud and Corruption
with the mandate to investigate analyse and assess patterns on fraud and
corruption was welcomed.
It was
important to note that, the statistics below were a reflection of work done
with an added advantage to stop criminals.
In 2013/14 the following were recorded and reported by the Public
Service Commission:
-
Cases reported in September
2013 were 268 and in September 2014 were 187 and feedback was 4% and 6%
respectively.
-
Cases closed in September
2013 was 1% and in September 2014 were 2%.
-
Outstanding cases were 265 in
September 2013 and in September 2014 were 184.
12.
Committee findings
Having considered the Annual Report presented by the
Department of Human Settlements, the Committee presents its findings on areas
of success and those that need special attention to improve the Departments performance.
There had been a significant improvement in the overall
performance of the Department. However, a more concerted effort to focus on key
areas indicated in the report was required.
By addressing these critical areas, the
department would be in a better position to yield improved results on its
performance.
·
The Committee appreciated the fact that the Department
and its entities received unqualified audit outcomes, however stressed the need
to improve in responding to opinions from the Office of the
Auditor-General.
·
Funds provided for the Special Investigating Unit (SIU)
were not fully utilised.
The contractual
agreements that the SIU had with the Department of Human Settlements included,
amongst others, carrying out high-level investigations on fraud, corruption and
maladministration. The SIU, after having completed its contractual duties, had
to invoice the Department of Human Settlements for the payments to be effected.
It came to the Committees attention
that the invoices took longer to be received and to process. This posed a
challenge to the Departments budget expenditure because the SIU funds were not
spent within the specific financial year.
·
The Committee noticed that most of the human
settlements entities were tasked to assist in and support the eradication of
bucket system in various provinces. Quarterly reports on the progress in this
regard would be highly appreciated.
·
There was a huge backlog in the registration and
issuing of title deeds, particularly those that were meant for state-subsidised
houses. The lack of a dedicated policy within the department, to determine
standards and norms on processing, registration and issuing of title deeds, are
viewed as one of the limitations to providing security of tenure.
However, the Committee was aware that the
Minister had tasked the Estate Agency Affairs Board to prioritise the issuing
of title deeds for pre-1994 stock.
·
As stated in a number of annual reports of the Department,
there were recurring challenges with the services that the State Information
Technology Agency (SITA) had to deliver. These affected the implementation of
the Departments information technology systems. A case in point is the Housing
Subsidy System (HSS) that was developed to regulate all beneficiary lists in
the nine provinces. The Committee appreciated the undertaking by the Minister to
sign a service level agreement with SITA.
·
Only 14% of the budget was spent in respect of
programme implementation facility, and consequently the objectives of
supporting human settlements projects were not achieved.
·
Although the Department introduced a revised policy on
the implementation of the Finance Linked Individual Subsidy Programme (FLISP),
progress remained slow.
It was
attributed to the fact that there was a number of individual recipients under
the programme that had negative credit records. This situation prejudiced a
large number of people who ought to benefit from FLISP. Slow progress on the
finalization of the Mortgage Default Insurance (MDI) caused delays in the
implementation of the programme and further compromised the intended purpose.
·
It was a cause for concern that the process of winding
up Thubelisha,
Servcon and the National
Housing Fund had taken too long to be concluded.
·
The Committee noted that funds provided for the leasing
of additional office accommodation have not been
fully utilised.
·
The Department was not filling most of its critical
posts due to a lack of people with technocal skills such as engeneers. The
Auditor-General also stated that competition was very high in the market and
made it extremely difficult for the Department to acquire suitable people
unless it could adjust its budget.
·
The delay in the implementation of the National
Upgrading Support Programme was a concern.
·
The invisibility of the human settlements entities on
the ground was a concern.
The Committee
advised the Department to assist the entities in marketing their work espcially
in rural areas because its where they are need most.
·
The annual report in most cases reflected that the
expenditure was higher than the houses delivered. This was also noted by the
AGSA and the FFC.
Both AGSA and FFC
stated that the incomplete houses in the audited financial year were not
included, hence the number of built units were alaways below expenditure.
13.
Recommendations
The Committee recommends that the Minister of Human Settlements
should ensure that the Department:
·
Consider and develop action plans and a monitoring tool
to address all issues raised by the chapter nine institutions, including such
reports from the Office of the AG, the PSC, and the FFC on all governance and
budget-related issues raised and report to Parliament on a quarterly basis.
·
Ensure that SIU invoices received are processed
timesouly to prevent underspending in the relevant programme.
·
Review the national housing code to determine norms and
standards that will ensure that whenever a house is handed over to the
respective beneficiary, a title deed is simultaneously handed to that
beneficiary.
·
Create a reporting mechanism on work-in-progress in
every financial year to qualify spending.
·
Ensure that the NHBRC quality assure subsidy houses
before they are handed over to beneficiries.
·
Ensure that the information technology system is
implemented seeing that the service level agreement had been signed.
This would assist in the development of the
Housing Subsidy System (HSS) and regulation of beneficiary list management.
·
Consider completing incomplete houses and handing them
over to beneficiaries.
·
Ensures that entities report quarterly on the emphasis
of matter, irregular expenditure and
Information
Technology (IT) issues raised by the Auditor-General.
·
Develop measures to assess the capacity of
municipalities prior to the awarding of accreditation.
·
Fast-track the development of a policy that would
specifically address the matter of backyard dwellers as there was no standard
way of dealing with this important matter.
·
Ensure that the Housing Development Agency (HDA) assists
municipalities with land acquisition and the land audit.
·
Consider extending the Urban Settlement Development
Grant allocations to those District Municipalities that were accredited and that
were no longer receiving the Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) funding.
·
Fast-track the amendment of the Housing Act that would
result in the closure of the National Housing Fund.
·
Fast-track the closure of the business of Servcon and
Thubelisha.
This would assist the
Department to unpack the issue of Thubelisha contractors as there was a lot of
subcontracting regarding to payment.
·
Ensure that all upgraded informal settlements should be
provided with a place to play (recreational facility).
·
Fast-track the rolling-out of the Financed Linked
Subsidy
Programme
to benefiting beneficiaries. This should be conducted
through vigorous marketing via all sorts of media.
Conclusion
It was evident from the Departments performance that
there is a significant improvement in service delivery. However, there were
still challenges that need to be attended to if the Department is to realise
its full potential. The provision of proper sanitation (eradication of bucket
system) to restore the dignity of the communities remains a cause for concern.
Appreciation
The Committee appreciates the support of the members of
the Committee, the Parliamentary support staff, the Ministry, the Director-General
and the team, human settlements entities and chapter nine institutions for
their collective commitment and time devoted to the work of the Committee.
Report to be considered.
[1] Note that this is the case even though the Constitution does not refer to the bill as a money bill.
[2]
Zuma (2013).
[3]
National
Treasury (2010)
[4]
Ibid,2013
[5]
National
Treasury (2014)
[6]
Ibid, 2014
[7]
Ibid
[8]
National
Treasury (2013)
[9]
Ibid,2014
[10]
Ibid
[11]
Ibid
[12] Ibid
[13]
National
Treasury (2014)
[14]
Ibid
[15]
Department
of Human Settlement (2012)
Documents
No related documents