Questions & Replies: Question & Replies No 1801 to 1850

Share this page:
2008-11-28

Search this file by selecting Ctrl + F on your keyboard

[PMG note: Any gaps in the numbering are due to the replies not being provided yet]

QUESTION NO 1801

DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 17 OCTOBER 2008

(INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 31/2008)

Date reply submitted: 04 November 2008

Dr S M van Dyk (DA) to ask the Minister of Safety and Security:

(1) Whether a certain officer of the SA Police Service (SAPS) (details furnished), who investigated a certain murder case (details furnished), intimated that there were many leads; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details;

(2) whether (a)(i) two suspects were taken into custody and (ii) one of them admitted in detention, to an informer, that they had in fact committed the murder and (b) the case was handed over to another investigating officer (name furnished); if not, what is the position in each case; if so, (i) what are the relevant details in each case and (ii) why were the suspects released;

(3) whether the SAPS knows where the suspects are at present; if not, whether they can be traced once more; if so, what are the relevant details;

(4) whether the case was handed over to the Attorney‑General; if so, (a) when was it handed over and (b) what decision has the Attorney‑General taken; if not,

(5) whether the SAPS is further investigating this case; if not, why not; if so, (a) what progress has been made with the investigation so far and (b) what are the relevant details?

NW2596E

REPLY:

(1) No, the case docket was not investigated by Capt Marè. The case docket in question is Schweizer Reneke CAS 79/02/2007, a charge of murder. The deceased is Mr SP Rademeyer. Only the crime scene was investigated by Capt Jan Marè as he was the standby duty officer at the time of the incident. Forensic evidence was collected at the crime scene during the investigation. Footprints at the scene as well as sweets eaten by the suspects and food left at the scene were analysed for DNA.

(2) (a)(i) Yes.

(ii) Yes. Statements of witnesses to this effect were obtained and filed in the case docket.

(2) (b)(i) No, Inspector Alla Reyneke of the Schweizer Reneke Detective Services investigated the case docket from the beginning. Inspector Reyneke serves under the command of Capt Marè.

(ii) The suspects were released by the Prosecuotr because they were both minors and they were both well known and could be traced again after decision from the DPP's office was received.

(3) Yes, the whereabouts of one of the suspects is known and can be traced by the investigating officer. The second suspect hanged himself with a rope and is deceased.

(4) Yes.

(a) On 14 July 2008.

(b) The case docket is currently still at the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

(5) Not applicable.

QUESTION NO.: 1802

DATE OF PUBLICATION: 10 OCTOBER 2008

Dr S M van Dyk (DA) to ask the Minister for Public Enterprises:†

Whether Transnet, SA Airways and Eskom will continue to exist within her department; if not, what is the position in each case; if so, what are the relevant details in each case? NW2597E

REPLY

Yes, the abovementioned State Owned Enterprises will continue to exist and report to the Department.

QUESTION: NO 1804

(Internal Question Paper No – 2008)

1804. Mr T D Lee (DA ) to ask the Minister of Sport and Recreation:

(1) Whether his department is compiling a report about Team SA's performance at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games; if not, why not; if so, when will this report be completed;

(2) whether the report will be made public; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

NW2599E

REPLY:

(1) The Department is not in a position to compile a report on the performance of Team SA at the Beijing Olympic Games as my officials were not part of the team management and only played a support role in terms of the preparation of the team. My officials have, however, requested a report from the SA Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee on the team's performance which will be discussed in detail with SASCOC and with the relevant national federations if necessary before being submitted to myself.

Sport and Recreation SA has had an Evaluation workshop of the results of Team South Africa at the Beijing Olympics. The findings of the workshop of scientists, administrators and sports activists will be made available to all interested parties.

(2) My Department will also propose to SASCOC that the report be made public as the team is indeed a national asset and significant public funds supported the preparation and presentation of the team.

QUESTION NO. 1805


(Internal Question Paper No 30- 200B)


Mr. M M Swathe (DA) to ask the Minister for Provincial and Local Government:


In respect of each of the past three years up to the latest specified date for which information is available, what the total amount of money owed by each state department to the six metropolitan municipalities?


ANSWER


The information available with the department in respect of debt owed to the six metropolitan municipalities is not classified into categories such as government, business and residential customers.

As a result, the dplg have put a request to all the Six Metros to provide with debt break down as it relates to state departments. Full response will be provided upon consolidation of the different responses from the concerned metros.

QUESTION 1806

1806. Ms AM Dreyer (DA) to ask the Minister of Labour:

(1) Whether he has received the Public Service Sector Education and Training

Authority (PSETA) report (copy furnished); if not, why not; if so,

(2) whether he has taken any action in relation to the findings of this report; if so, (a)

what action and (b) against whom; if not, why not;

(3) whether he will take any action; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant

details? NW2601E

The Minister of Labour replied

(1) I have not received a copy of the PSETA Memorandum as furnished from your office and I want to thank you for bringing it to my attention.

As for the PSETA Annual Report for the 2007/08, the entity has not submitted their audited Financial Statements and Report to me as required in terms of the PFMA. I have formally raised my concern with the entity's Board in a letter dated 19 September 2008, regarding their failure to meet the said deadline and requesting an indication of the necessary steps in terms of Section 51 of the PFMA against any employee who may have led to the contravention of the provisions of this Act.

(2) I have not yet taken any action regarding matters raised in the report as we are still busy conducting our internal investigation and consulting with our legal advisors including DPSA on some aspects of the Memorandum.

(3) I will certainly act on the outcome of our internal investigation including the advice from my legal team.

QUESTION 1807

1807. Ms AM Dreyer (DA) to ask the Minister of Labour:

(1) Whether he has been informed of the tensions, grievances and poor working relations of the staff of the Risk Management Unit in the provincial office in Gauteng South; if so,

(2) whether any action has been taken to improve the situation; if not, why not; if so,

(a) what action and (b) what were the outcomes;

(3) whether salary differences between inspectors have been resolved; if not, (a) why not and (b) when will they be resolved; if so, what was the outcome of that process;

(4) whether the matter of contract staff at the office who are unhappy about their contract status has been resolved; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

(5) whether a decision was taken to close this office; if not, what is the (a) current status of the office and (b) plan for the office in the future; if so, what are the relevant details? NW2602E

Minister of Labour replied:

I have not been made aware of the tensions, grievances and poor working conditions of the staff in the said risk management unit.

QUESTION 1808

1808. Ms AM Dreyer (DA) to ask the Minister of Labour:

(1) Whether his department has (a) a skills development programme, (b) career pathing, (c) a policy on travel allowances and (d) a leave policy for inspectors; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case;

(2) Whether his department has a policy regarding the job evaluation of inspectors; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the relevant details and (b) what is the frequency of evaluations for every inspector?

NW2603E

REPLY *1808: The Minister of Labour replied:

It is essential to point out to the honourable member that the Department of Labour does not have a separate and specific set of policies applicable only to Inspectors but has policies dealing with all employees in general. Inspectors are part of the general population of employees in the Department that are affected by such policies and therefore there is no special arrangement for the treatment of inspectors.

The rest of the questions therefore fall away.

1(a).Yes the Department has a skills development programme for all employees employed in the DoL which offers the following skills development opportunities:

  • Bursaries
  • Skills programmes
  • Short courses
  • Learnerships
  • Conferences and seminars
  • Internships
  • Each employee has a Personal Development Plan (PDP) which forms the basis for the Department's workplace skills plan for the year and inspectors are covered under this programme.

    1(b) Career pathing is reflected on the job profiles for all employees and employees discuss their career aspirations with their supervisors for them to agree on skills development interventions aimed at addressing identified career aspirations. Such interventions are then captured on the employee's Personal Development Plan for implementation.

    1(c) Inspectors are covered under the Department's Travel and Subsistence Policy. This Policy is applicable to all DoL Employees and therefore, it was not necessary to develop a policy specifically applicable to the Inspectorate.

    1(d) Inspectors are covered under DoL's Leave Policy which caters for all employees in the DoL. There is therefore no specific policy applicable only to inspectors.

    2 (a) The Department has one Job Evaluation policy that is applicable to all jobs in the Department and there is no separate policy for inspectors.

    2 (b) All posts at SR 9 upwards are regarded as mandatory posts with regards to the need for job evaluation and are evaluated once every three years in line with Public Service Regulations,2001 IV/B3 mandate. Posts below SR 9 are evaluated only on request in cases where the job content changed or where there is uncertainty with regards to remuneration level.

    QUESTION NO: 1813

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: 31 October 2008

    QUESTION PAPER NO: 29

    DATE OF REPLY:

    Adv P S Swart (DA) to ask the Minister of Communications:

    Whether any disciplinary action was taken against officials in her department (a) in (i) 2005, (ii) 2006 and (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) how many instances of disciplinary action occurred, (ii) what was the rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken, (iii) what was the transgression and (iv) what disciplinary action was taken?

    NW2608E

    REPLY

    (a) Yes disciplinary actions were taken against officials in my Department in (i) 2005; in (ii) 2006; in (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008.

    (i) 22 instances of disciplinary action occurred from 2005 up to 30 September 2008.

    2005

    (ii) rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken

    (iii) transgression

    (iv) disciplinary action taken

    1. Deputy Director

    Misuse of state property

    Dismissed

    2. Registry Clerk

    Fraud/theft

    Dismissed

    3. Director

    Unauthorized disclosure of information

    Demotion

    4. Chief Director

    Poor performance

    Settlement

    5. Director

    Dereliction of duties

    Written warning

    6. Admin Officer

    Violent threat

    Written warning

    2006

    (ii) rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken

    (iii) transgression

    (iv) disciplinary action taken

    1. Chief Admin Officer

    Fraud

    Dismissed

    2. Admin Officer

    Fraud

    Dismissed

    3. Admin Officer

    Misuse of government transport

    Written warning and payment of costs

    4. Deputy Director

    Gross negligence in the performance of duties

    Demotion

    5. Assistant Director

    Fraud

    Dismissed

    2007

    (ii) rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken

    (iii) transgression

    (iv) disciplinary action taken

    1. Secretary

    Theft

    Final written warning and counseling

    2. Assistant Director

    Abuse of state property (pornography)

    Final written warning and one month suspension without pay

    3. Assistant Director

    Abuse of state property (pornography)

    Final written warning and one month suspension without pay

    4. Driver/messenger

    Abuse of state property (pornography)

    Final written warning and one month suspension without pay

    5. Admin Officer

    Abuse of state property (pornography)

    Final written warning and one month suspension without pay

    6. Admin Officer

    Abuse of state property (pornography)

    Final written warning and one month suspension without pay

    7. Deputy Director

    Unauthorized removal of property

    Final written warning

    8. Assistant Director

    Failure to declare personal interests

    Final written warning

    1 January 2008 to 30 September 2008

    (ii) rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken

    (iii) transgression

    (iv) disciplinary action taken

    1. Driver/Messenger

    Abuse of position to promote interest of a political party

    Withdrawn

    2. Deputy Director

    Failure to obey reasonable instructions

    Written warning

    QUESTION NUMBER 1815

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: 17 OCTOBER 2008

    Mr S J F Marais (DA) to ask the Minister of Finance:

    Whether any disciplinary action was taken against officials in the National Treasury (a) in (i) 2005, (ii) 2006 and (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) how many instances of disciplinary action occurred, (ii) what was the rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken, (iii) what was the transgression and (iv) what disciplinary action was taken? NW2610E

    REPLY:

    (a)(i) Yes

    (a)(ii) Yes

    (a)(iii) Yes

    (b) Yes

    (b)(i to iv) Please read detailed spreadsheet attached.

    DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS TAKEN BY NATIONAL TREASURY

    BETWEEN 2005 TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2008.

    (a) (i) 01 April 2005 to 31 March 2006

    Total number of cases: 14

    No. of cases

    Rank/position of each official

    Transgression

    Disciplinary action taken

    (b) (i)

    (b) (ii)

    (b) (iii)

    (b) (iv)

    1.

    Procurement Specialist

    Negligence

    Verbal warning issued.

    2.

    Senior budget Analyst

    Unauthorised use of GG vehicle.

    Verbal warning issued.

    3.

    Procurement specialist

    Inappropriate behaviour

    Written warning issued.

    4.

    Assistant Director

    Inciting other personnel in unprocedural and unlawful conduct.

    Written warning issued.

    5.

    Senior admin Specialist

    Insubordination

    Written warning issued.

    6.

    Senior Economist

    Unauthorised absence

    Written warning issued.

    7.

    Procurement Specialist

    Insubordination

    Written warning

    8.

    Unauthorized absence

    Written warning

    9.

    Deputy Director

    Negligence

    Written warning

    10.

    Deputy Director

    Conducting an unauthorised meeting.

    Written warning

    11.

    Assistant Director

    Insubordination

    Written warning

    12.

    Consistent failure to meet deadline.

    Written warning

    13.

    Assistant Director

    Non-adherence to official working hours within the Department.

    Written warning

    14.

    Assistant Director

    Poor performance

    Written warning issued

    (a) (ii) 01 April 2006 to 31 March 2007

    Total number of cases: 08

    No. of cases

    Rank/position of each official

    Transgression

    Disciplinary action taken

    (b) (i)

    (b) (ii)

    (b) (iii)

    (b) (iv)

    1.

    Director

    Alcohol abuse

    Referred for correctional counseling.

    2.

    Facilities

    Late coming

    Referred for correctional counseling.

    3.

    Director

    Negligence

    Written warning issued.

    4.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Written warning issued

    5.

    HR Practitioner

    Unauthorised usage of Departmental resources.

    Written warning issued.

    6.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning issued.

    7.

    Senior Budget Analyst

    Abuse of NT property

    Final Written issued

    8.

    Senior Systems Specialist

    Sexual Harassment

    Official Dismissed.


    (a) (iii) 01 April 2007 to 31 March 2008

    Total number of cases: 19

    No. of cases

    Rank/position of each official

    Transgression

    Disciplinary action taken

    (b) (i)

    (b) (ii)

    (b) (iii)

    (b) (iv)

    1.

    Senior Security Officer

    Absenteeism

    Written warning

    2.

    Senior Economist

    Negligence

    Written warning

    3.

    HR Specialist

    Negligence

    Written warning

    4.

    Senior Security Officer

    Gross insubordination

    Final written warning & one month suspension.

    5.

    Personal Assistant

    Unauthorised usage of telephone pin code.

    Final written warning

    6.

    Senior Security Officer

    Unauthorised usage of telephone pin code.

    Final written warning & one month suspension without pay.

    7.

    HR Specialist

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    8.

    Senior Budget Analyst

    Abuse of NT property & time

    Final written warning

    9.

    Director

    Unauthorised usage of NT resources

    Final written warning

    10.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    11.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    12.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    13.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    14.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    15.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    16.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Final written warning

    17.

    Director

    Incapacity

    Case withdrawn (Official deceased)

    18.

    HR Practitioner

    Negligence

    Case withdrawn

    19.

    Director

    Negligence, insubordination & absenteeism.

    Final Written Warning

    (b)

    (a) (iv) 01 April 2008 to September 2008

    Total number of cases: 4

    No. of cases

    Rank/position of each official

    Transgression

    Disciplinary action taken

    (b) (i)

    (b) (ii)

    (b) (iii)

    (b) (iv)

    1.

    Receptionist

    Wrongful usage of the NT property.

    Disciplinary hearing held matter yet to be finalised.

    2.

    Procurement Specialist

    Negligence.

    Final written warning.

    3.

    Senior Financial Admin Specialist

    Unauthorised usage of the telephone pin code.

    Disciplinary hearing held matter yet to be finalised.

    4.

    Director

    Poor performance, unauthorised absenteeism.

    Settlement reached during the disciplinary process.

    QUESTION NO: 1816

    PUBLISHED IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 31 OF 17 OCTOBER 2008

    Mr A J LEON (DA) to ask the Minister of Foreign Affairs:

    (1) Whether any disciplinary action was taken against officials in her department (a) in (i) 2005, (ii) 2006 and (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) how many instances of disciplinary action occurred, (ii) what was the rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken, (iii) what was the transgression and (iv) what disciplinary action was taken?

    REPLY:

    (1)(a) (i) Yes, in the 2005/2006 Financial Year, 27 disciplinary actions were taken against officials in the Department.

    (ii) Yes, in 2006/2007 Financial Year, 12 disciplinary actions were taken against officials in the Department.

    (iii) Yes, in April 2007 to December 2007, 18 disciplinary actions were taken against officials in the Department.

    (b) During the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008, 23 cases were handled as tabulated below:

    Number(i)

    Rank(ii)

    Nature of misconduct (iii)

    Disciplinary action taken (iv)

    1

    Director

    Four charges of insubordination, two charges of bringing the Department into disrepute, one charge of disrespectful conduct, one charge of making false accusation and misrepresentation and one charge of dishonest conduct.

    Final Written Warning and a recall to Head Office.

    2

    Assistant Director

    Absenteeism

    Retired

    3

    Director

    Failure to follow Treasury Regulations and misrepresentation.

    One month suspension without pay

    4

    Corporate Services Manager

    Failure to follow Departmental procedures in procuring goods, misrepresentation, and failure to follow instructions

    Dismissal

    5

    Senior Foreign Service Officer

    Absenteeism

    Final Written Warning coupled with counselling

    6

    Senior Foreign Service Officer(1st Political Secretary)

    Insolent behaviour and abusive language

    Final Written Warning and one month suspension without pay

    7

    Security Officer

    Alleged fighting

    Written Warning

    8

    Assistant Director

    Alleged domestic violence

    Written warning, grounded for 2 years at Head Office and counselling but appeal pending.

    9

    Assistant Director

    Absenteeism

    Final Written Warning

    10

    Driver

    Abuse of alcohol

    Warning

    11

    Director

    Allegations of insubordination, failure to follow Treasury Regulations and the including insubordination and failure to follow treasury regulations

    Found not guilty

    12

    Deputy Director

    Alleged poor performance

    Not charged for misconduct, but referred for incapacity.

    13

    Deputy Director

    Alleged Misrepresentation and negligence

    Case withdrawn

    14

    Cleaner

    Alleged theft

    Not charged for misconduct due to insufficient evidence

    15

    Cleaner

    Alleged theft

    Not charged for misconduct due to insufficient evidence

    16

    Driver

    Misuse of government petrol card

    Suspension without pay for one month, and repayment of the loss to Department

    17

    Assistant Director

    Failure to follow treasury regulations and other prescripts

    Found not guilty

    18

    Driver

    Absenteeism

    Found not guilty

    19

    SASO

    Absenteeism

    Case withdrawn

    20

    Security Officer

    Absenteeism

    Dismissal

    21

    Cleaner

    Assault

    Dismissal

    22

    Security Officer

    Absenteeism

    Dismissal

    23

    Senior Foreign Affairs Officer

    Alleged insolence or disrespectful conduct towards the supervisor

    Dismissed but appeal pending.

    QUESTION 1817

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: Friday, 17 October 2008

    INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 31 of 2008

    Mr C M Lowe (DA) to ask the Minister of Home Affairs:

    Whether any disciplinary action was taken against officials in her department (a) in
    (i) 2005, (ii) 2006 and (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to
    30 September 2008; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) how many instances of disciplinary action occurred, (ii) what was the rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken, (iii) what was the transgression and (iv) what disciplinary action was taken?

    NW2612E

    REPLY

    (a)(i) Yes.

    (a)(ii) Yes.

    (a)(iii) Yes

    (b)(i) A total of 594 instances of disciplinary action occurred in the period
    01 January 2008 to 30 September 2008.

    (b)(ii) Rank / position of each official – please note that the ranks / positions are stated together with the number of officials in that specific rank against which disciplinary action was taken. As per the table below:

    Rank / position

    Number of officials

    Senior Administrative Officers

    42

    Vetting Officer

    1

    Senior Administration Clerks

    113

    Senior Immigration Officers

    10

    Senior Provisioning Administrative Officer

    1

    Administration Clerks

    125

    Senior Legal Administrative Officer

    1

    Security Officers

    13

    Refugee Reception Officers

    8

    Quality Assuror

    1

    Provisioning Administrative Officers

    8

    Legal Administrative Officers

    2

    Information Technology Specialists

    2

    Immigration Officers

    149

    Interns

    3

    Grounds man

    1

    Foreign Mission Co-ordinator

    1

    Fingerprint Comparers

    35

    Drivers

    4

    Deputy Directors

    6

    Control Security Officers

    2

    Client Service Consultant

    1

    Cleaners

    11

    Chief Immigration Officers

    18

    Casual Workers

    4

    Assistant Directors

    12

    Administrative Officers

    7

    Senior Personnel Officer

    1

    Chief Administration Clerks

    4

    Chief Training Officer

    1

    Control Immigration Officers

    3

    Data Typist

    1

    National Youth Service Participant

    1

    Principle Communications Officer

    1

    Secretary

    1

    Total

    594*

    (b)(iii) The transgressions – as per the table below. Please note that the number of a specific instance/s is only stated:

    Transgression

    Number of officials

    Assault

    15

    Disrespect and abusive behaviour

    33

    Aiding and abetting and corruption

    209

    Theft

    10

    Fraud / false statements

    67

    Unauthorised absence / abscondment

    98

    Discrimination against fellow employees

    0

    Damage to / loss of State property

    8

    Unauthorised use of Government vehicles

    56

    Dereliction of duty

    94

    Absenteeism / abscondment

    45

    Total

    635*

    * More than one transgression by official in some cases, hence the difference in totals.

    (b)(iv) The disciplinary action taken. Please note that only the number of actions taken is stated:

    · Dismissals: 196

    · Suspension without salary: 44

    · Demotions: 3

    · Written Warnings: 196

    · Cases withdrawn /

    found not guilty / not finalised: 196

    QUESTION NO. 1818

    (Internal Question Paper No 31- 2008)

    Mr. M M Swathe (DA) to ask the Minister for Provincial and Local Government:

    Whether any disciplinary action was taken against officials In his department (a) In (i) 2005, (Ii) 2006 and (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008, if not; what is the position in this regard: if so (i) how many instances of disciplinary action occurred, (ii) what was the rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken, (iii) what was the transgression and (Iv) what disciplinary action was taken:

    ANSWER

    (a) (i) Two officials were disciplined in 2005.

    1st official

    Rank: General Assistant Transgression: Alleged theft Disciplinary action taken: Dismissal

    2nd Official

    Rank: Chief Admin Clerk Transgression: Alleged theft Disciplinary action taken: Dismissal

    (ii) One official disciplined in 2006.

    Rank: Administrative Clerk

    Transgression: Alleged fraud

    Disciplinary action taken: The official resigned during the process of disciplinary enquiry.

    (iii) One official was disciplined in 2007.

    Rank: Administrative Assistant

    Transgression: Alleged fraud

    (b) (i) No disciplinary action was taken during the period 01 January up to 30 September 2008.

    QUESTION NO.: 1819

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: 17 OCTOBER 2008

    Dr S M van Dyk (DA) to ask the Minister for Public Enterprises:

    Whether any disciplinary action was taken against officials in her department (a) in (i) 2005, (ii) 2006 and (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) how many Instances of disciplinary action occurred, (ii) what was the rank/position of each Official against whom disciplinary action was taken, (iii) what was the transgression and (iv) what disciplinary action was taken?

    NW2614E

    REPLY

    The Information requested by the Honourable Member is contained in the table below:

    Description

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    (Up to 30 September)

    Any disciplinary Action?

    Yes

    None

    Yes

    Yes

    Instances of disciplinary action

    One

    None

    One

    One

    Rank of each official

    Deputy Director (DD) and Chief Director (CD)

    None

    Senior Administrative Officer

    Deputy Director

    Transgression

    Abuse of State assets

    None

    Abscondment

    1. Poor Performance

    2. Verbal Abuse and aggressive behaviour

    Description

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    (Up to 30 September)

    Disciplinary action taken

    None.

    The DD was later reinstated and the CD resigned.

    None

    Dismissal

    1. Written Warning

    2. Referred to SOMA Initiative for assessment and

    the Department is

    awaiting the report

    from SOMA.

    QUESTION NO 1821

    DATE REPLY SUBMITTED: MONDAY, 10 NOVEMBER 2008

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: FRIDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2008 (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 31 – 2008)

    Mr S B Farrow (DA) asked the Minister of Transport:

    Whether any disciplinary action was taken against officials in his department (a) in (i) 2005, (ii) 2006 and (iii) 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) how many instances of disciplinary action occurred, (ii) what was the rank/position of each official against whom disciplinary action was taken, (iii) what was the transgression and (iv) what disciplinary action was taken?

    NW2616E

    REPLY:

    1.1

    The Minister of Transport:

    (a) Disciplinary action taken against officials in the Department of Transport in:-

    (i) 2005 - Nine (9)

    (ii) 2006 - Three (3)

    (iii) 2007 - Five (5); and

    (b) during the period 01 January 2008 up to 30 September 2008:-

    (i) Five (5) cases finalized and one (1) pending.

    (ii)

    ü Director: Campaigns and Events Management

    ü Deputy Director: Campaigns and Events Management

    ü Deputy Director: Driving License Standards

    ü Assistant Director: Supply Chain Management

    ü Driver

    (iii)

    ü Director: Campaigns and Events Management – Insubordination.

    ü Deputy Director: Campaigns and Events Management – Improper and insolent behaviour.

    ü Deputy Director: Driving License Standards – Smoking in the office.

    ü Assistant Director: Supply Chain Management – Improper and insolent behaviour.

    ü Driver – Failure to comply with road traffic regulations.

    (iv)

    ü Director: Campaigns and Events Management – Written warning.

    ü Deputy Director: Campaigns and Events Management – Written warning.

    ü Deputy Director: Driving License Standards – Written warning.

    ü Assistant Director: Supply Chain Management – Written warning.

    ü Driver – Final written warning.

    QUESTION 1822

    (WRITTEN REPLY) FRIDAY, 24 October 2008

    MR J P I Blanche` (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS

    (a) How many positions had to be filled in each province as at the latest specified date for which information is available, (b) how many Cubans (i) had been recruited to fill these positions and (ii) (aa) qualified to be employed in and (bb) accepted these positions, (c) for how long will they be employed and (d)(i) how many people were part of the team who interviewed the applicants in Cuba, (ii) what are their names and (iii) what organizations, bodies and institutions did they represent? NW2617E

    REPLY:

    (a) Hundred and seven (107) Cuban Technical Advisors (CTA) were recruited for the purpose of addressing the current skills shortages and to advise and transfer knowledge and skills in the Construction industry and were deployed as follows;

  • 57 CTA deployed to Provinces
  • 34 CTA deployed to National Department of Public Works
  • 19 CTA deployed to Independent Trust Development
  • (b) (ii)

    CUBAN PROFESSIONALS DEPLOYED NATIONALLY

    NO

    CUBAN PROFESSIONALS

    DISCIPLINE/FIELD

    EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE

    1

    Delvis Abad Rodriguez

    Architect

    2

    Jover Prieto Roddriguez

    Electrical Engineer

    3

    Eugenio Torres Sanchez

    Architect

    4

    Javier Amores Perez

    Architect

    5

    Rodolfo Jesus Frias Horta

    Civil Engineer

    6

    Raimundo Antonio Betancourt Herrera

    Mechanical Engineer

    NORTHEREN CAPE PROVINCE

    7

    Roberto Arevalo Valdez

    Civil Engineer

    8

    Jose L Munoz Hierrezuelo

    Civil Engineer

    9

    Enoelvis Jordan Perez

    Civil Engineer

    10

    Hector Lopez Punales

    Electrical Engineer

    11

    Orlando R Gonzalez Verdecia

    Mechanical Engineer

    12

    Virgen Maren Ramirez

    Architect

    13

    Aliuska Mayo Leyva

    Architect

    KWAZUL NATAL PROVINCE

    14

    Fernando Angel Garcia Rubio

    Architect

    15

    Olga Lidia Valenzuela Manzano

    Electrica Engineer

    16

    Xaviera Viciedo Rivero

    Architect

    17

    Albert Gonzalez Pizarro

    Civil engineer

    18

    Jover Prieto Rodriguez

    Electrica Engineer

    19

    Lourdes Margarita Felipe Sosa

    Civil engineer

    20

    Salome Humberto Forcada del Cerro

    Civil engineer

    21

    Yudel Garcia Fuoman

    Architect

    22

    Rudolfo Bienvenido Munoz Machado

    Architect

    23

    Jose Manuel Perez Hernandez

    Architect

    24

    Jorge Humberto Vidal Otero

    Civil engineer

    FREE STATE PROVINCE

    25

    Danis Lima Quesada

    Mechanical Engineer

    26

    Delia Maria Rodriguez Santos

    Electrical Engineer

    27

    Elaine Caridad Verdecia Lopez

    Civil Engineer

    28

    Elio Ricardo Mosqueda

    Civil Engineer

    29

    Frank Ernesto Garcia Rodriguez

    Architect

    30

    Eva Maria Chaviano Alvarez

    Civil Engineer

    31

    Andro Javier Arias Camps

    Architect

    32

    Yoslaine Sanchez Lavielle

    Civil Engineer

    33

    Rider Palmero Zaldivar

    Architect

    34

    Mario Ismael Marquinez Sam

    Civil Engineer

    35

    Mijail Rojas Rodriguez

    Mechanical Engineer

    36

    Zaide Zamora Destrades

    Civil Engineer

    37

    Juan Franciscko Verdecia Cutino

    Electrical Engineer

    38

    Juan Pablo Diaz Guzman

    Civil Engineer

    GAUTENG PROVINCE

    39

    Osmani Artidiello Rodriguez

    Civil Engineer

    40

    Antonio Giron Arista

    Civil Engineer

    41

    Maria E Romero Flores

    Civil Engineer

    42

    Albert Gonzalez Pizarro

    Civil Engineer

    43

    Rolando Ramos Alvarez

    Civil Engineer

    LIMPOPO PROVINCE

    44

    Alexis Ramon Rosales Coll

    Architect

    45

    Jorge Ferreiro Rizo

    Civil Aengineer

    46

    Joaquin Edilberto Fuentes

    Civil Aengineer

    47

    Humberto Varon Tamayo

    Civil Aengineer

    48

    Pedro Vicente Hernandez Maldonado

    Electrical Engineer

    NORTH WEST PROVINCE

    49

    Jose Alfredo Ibanez Mestre

    Architect

    50

    Ana Isabel Pardo Jiminez

    Civil Engineer

    51

    Lisbet Yaumara Leonard Alvarez

    Civil Engineer

    52

    Joan Javier Albo Alonso

    Architect

    53

    Lorenzo Garcia Cuellar

    Electrical Engineer

    54

    Rodolfo Alberto Cuevas Gandaria

    Architect

    NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

    55

    Humberto Rodriguez Iglesias

    Hidraulic Engineer

    56

    Lorenzo Aguila Ruiz

    Electronic Engineer

    57

    Jorge H Vidal Otero

    Mechanical Engineering

    58

    Eric Gil Mayedo

    Mechanical Engineering

    59

    Juan Gongora Mena

    Mechanical Engineering

    60

    RafaelLa FranguiFrancis

    Mechanical Engineering

    61

    Fransisco D Feuntes Cabanas

    Mechanical Engineering

    62

    Alexis Perez cardoso

    Architecture

    63

    NelidaEnca Quesada

    Architecture

    64

    Luis Rodriguez Carmora

    Architecture

    65

    Marcelo A Vitar Garcia

    Architecture

    66

    Tania DLA Mendoza

    Architecture

    67

    Rendol Armas Gonzales

    Architecture

    68

    Leoneris E Nunez Franco

    Architecture

    69

    Olegario Ismael Lami Izquierdo

    Architecture

    70

    Yosniel Hernandez

    Electrical Engineering

    71

    Leoner Chongo Carrero

    Electrical Engineering

    72

    Miguel Zayas Correa

    Electrical Engineering

    73

    Jorge Ponce Tamayo

    Civil Engineering

    74

    ReinaldoRodrigues Bolanos

    Civil Engineering

    75

    William Batista Cruz

    Civil Engineering

    76

    Mario Romero Torres

    Civil Engineering

    77

    Fransisco Chi Rodrigues

    Civil Engineering

    78

    Uber Lopez Isalgue

    Civil Engineering

    79

    Rene Segui Diaz

    Civil Engineering

    80

    Juan Leon Arencibia

    Civil Engineering

    81

    LuisGarciaVina

    Civil Engineering

    82

    Felix Zaldivar Martinez

    Civil Engineering

    83

    Jorge Alfonso Ordaz

    Hydraulics Engineering

    84

    Jorge Munoa Martinez

    Hydraulics Engineering

    85

    Bernito Crespo Hernandez

    Hydraulics Engineering

    86

    Luis Barreras Abella

    Geology

    87

    Dulce M Argudin Marquez

    Geology

    88

    RicardoZaldivar Serrano

    Geology

    IDT

    89

    Josepho N. Atherton Seivewrigth

    Architect

    90

    Adis Cutino Jimenez

    Architect

    91

    Grechetn Pedrianes Gongora

    Architect

    92

    Yeline Cantinero Ferrer

    Architect

    93

    Tania Hernandez Ferragut

    Architect

    94

    Rosa Hecheverria Martinez

    Civil Eng.

    95

    Ana Gilma Fuente Luzua

    Civil Eng.

    96

    rolando Reyes Reynosa

    Civil Eng.

    97

    Yaima Bulte Mora

    Civil Eng.

    98

    Yoan Borbon Tamayo

    Civil Eng.

    99

    Linnet Alvarez Mendoza

    Civil Eng.

    100

    Daniel L. Ibanez Cabrera

    Civil Eng.

    101

    Jose M. Pompa Toledano

    Civil Eng.

    102

    Francisco A. Suarez Palpmino

    Civil Eng.

    103

    Jose R. Cuesta Tapia

    Civil Eng.

    104

    Rolando Moreno Pena

    Civil Eng.

    105

    Noemi Fonseca Merino

    Mechanical Eng.

    106

    Francisco Webb James

    Mechanical Eng.

    107

    Katia Llanes Galvez

    Civil Eng.

    (c) According to the General requirements for fixed term contracts of employment as contained in the Agreement between the Government of Republic of South Africa and the Government of the Republic of Cuba, the Cuban Technical Advisors period of employment is as follows;

    A twelve-month (12) period of employment, which may be renewed at the discretion of Public Works and after consultation with UNECA as follows;

    (i) If the contract of employment is renewed, it shall be renewed for a period not exceeding twelve (12) months;

    (ii) After the lapse of the period of twelve (12) months contemplated in (i), the contract of employment may further be renewed for a period not exceeding twelve (12) months;

    (iii) The total contract period shall not exceed thirty six (36) months

    (d) (i)Eight (8) officials for the 1st interviews in August 2007

    Six (6) officials for the 2nd interviews in April 2008

    (ii) 1st delegation to conduct interviews in Cuba in August 2007

    Mr. Solomon Malebye – Chief Operating Officer (Dept. of Public Works)

    Mr. Sam Vukela – Deputy Director-General: Corporate Services (Dept. of Public Works)

    Mr. Bheki Zulu – Chief Executive Officer: (Council for the Built Environment)

    Mr. Roderick Arthur Harker – (Engineering Council of South Africa)

    Prof. Pragashen Nayagar – (Engineering Council of South Africa)

    Mr. Malcolm Ernest Campbell – (South African Council for the Architectural Profession)

    Prof. Raymond Nkando – (South African Council for the Quantity Surveying Profession)

    Ms Tebogo Phiri (nee Mazibuko) – (Director Special and Major Projects Dept. of Public Works)

    2nd delegation to conduct interviews in Cuba in April 2008

    Mr. Solomon Malebye – Chief Operating Officer (Dept. of Public Works)

    Mr. Percy Molefe – Chief Director: International Relations (Dept. of Public Works)

    Mrs. Thembi Hlatshwayo – Chief Director: Human Resources (Dept. of Public Works)

    Dr. Stanley Bhebhe – Executive Regional Operations (Independent Development Trust)

    Mr. Sheriff Molefe – Regional General Manager (Independent Development Trust)

    Mr. Niraj Naamdhew – Manager Systems Integration (Independent Development Trust)

    (iii) Department of Public Works

    Independent Development Trust

    Council for the Built Environment

    Engineering Council of South Africa

    South African Council for the Architectural Profession

    South African Council for the Quantity Surveying Profession

    QUESTION NO. 1825

    (Internal Question Paper No 31- 2008)


    Mr W P Doman (DA) to ask the Minister for Provincial and Local Government:

    (a) How many Thusong Centres have been established, (b) from which budget are these centres funded, (c) what is the average number of staff serving at each centre, (d) under whose jurisdiction are they operating and, (e) what is the purpose of these centre?

    ANSWER

    (a) The Department of Provincial and Local Government is not responsible for the establishment of Thusong Centres.

    (b), (c), (d) & (e) fall away.

    The member must redirect his question to the relevant authority.

    QUESTION NO.: 1826

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    Dr R Rabinowitz (IFP) to ask the Minister for Public Enterprises:

    (1) Whether the directors' valuation on future cash flow in Mango for the 2008-09 financial year is based on (a) the SA Airways (SAA) debiting all the inter-company costs for 2008 to investment in subsidiary or (b) these costs being charged to the Mango loan account; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (2) whether all of the said airline's costs went through its financial statements; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (3) whether the SAA (a) carried any of the losses or (b) will write off any of these losses as "goodwill" on its investment; if so, what are the relevant details in each case? NW2580

    REPLY

    (1)(a-b)The Directors valuation of Mango is based on a full cost-absorption basis with the operating entity (Mango) settling its expenditures out of its own generated cash-flows. With regards to expenditure incurred by Mango, it should be noted that the Company operates on an arm's-length basis from SAA and is responsible for negotiating its own service levels, pricing and payment terms with its suppliers and for the direct settlement with said suppliers of any associated costs. The only exception to the aforesaid is in the case of fuel purchase administration, in which case Mango is responsible for negotiating pricing and contracting with fuel suppliers, however, SAA, due to having the appropriate IT reconciliation systems, fulfills a payment administration and reconciliation function on behalf of Mango (a service SAA also provides to SA Express and Airlink).

    In the aforementioned case SAA levies an administration fee against Mango and Mango settles its own fuel charges based on the pricing it has negotiated independently from SAA. In instances where SAA provides a service to Mango (limited to the provision of technical maintenance services through SAA Technical and sub-leasing of aircraft), expenditure is invoiced to Mango and settled through a creditors account by means of actual money flows, as is the case with SAA's other third party clients.

    (2) Yes, all of Mango's cost have gone through the Mango Annual Financial Statements.

    (3)(a-b)SAA did not carry any of Mango's losses neither did SAA write-off any of Mango's losses as goodwill on investment.

    QUESTION NO. 1827

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO. 32)

    Dr R Rabinowitz (IFP) to ask the Minister of Health:

    (1) Whether the widely-advertised products claiming to enlarge penis size and improve erectile function will be controlled and regulated by the SA Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) to be established; if not, why not; if so, in what way;

    (2) whether the facilities where these products are produced will be licensed according to good manufacturing practice by the SAHPRA; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

    NW2581E

    REPLY:

    (1) The Medicines Act, the Medicine and Related Substances Act, 1965, (Act 101 of 1965) requires that all medicines be registered with the Medicines Control Council (MCC) for safety, quality and efficacy. The MCC also evaluates and registers medical devices that are incorporated with an active pharmaceutical ingredient which will have a pharmacological effect on men. At this stage the products referred to are not yet registered as the MCC has not made the call for registration.

    The proposed amendment to the Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965 makes provision for the registration and control of medical devices. In accordance with the proposed amendment to the act, the SA Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) by notice in the Government Gazette, with the approval of the Minister, will determine which medical devices shall be subjected to registration. This may well be that the devices the honourable member is referring to will be among those.

    The proposed amendment to the Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965 will be supported by enabling Regulations that will be published for a comment period as determined by the Minister. After all comment has been processed the amended Regulations will be enacted by the Minister on a date as determined. The Department of Health is currently in the process of drafting these Regulations.

    (2) In terms of the provisions of Section 22C of the proposed amendment to the Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965 all manufacturers of medical devices will be issued a Manufacture license provided that the company comply with the provisions of Good Manufacturing Practices as determined by the Authority. The Authority, once established, will need to prepare Guidelines for Good Manufacture Practices of Medical Devices and publish the same for a comment period prior to implementation. These guidelines will take into consideration National as well as International standards relating to the manufacture of Medical Devices.

    QUESTION NO.: 1828 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 10 OCTOBER 2008

    Dr R Rabinowitz (IFP) to ask the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development:

    (1) Whether (a) the role of district surgeons in evaluating rape cases and (b)(i) dedicated sexual offences courts and (ii) special children's courts have been effectively replaced; if so, (aa) by whom and (bb) with what in each case;

    (2) whether courts have an intermediary service for child rape victims; if not; in which courts do child rape victims appear together with the perpetrator; if so, what are the relevant details in each case in respect of each court concerned;

    (3) whether his department provide psychosocial support for rape victims; if not; why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (4) whether the redeployment of Child Protection Units has hampered National Prosecuting Authority service delivery; if so, how;

    (5) whether he will take any steps to amend and improve the laws governing child rape cases; if not; why not; if so, what steps? NW2582E

    (1) Whether (a) the role of district surgeons in evaluating rape cases and (b)(i) dedicated sexual offences courts and (ii) special children's courts have been effectively replaced; if so, (aa) by whom and (bb) with what in each case;

    As the Honourable Member should be aware, after being a Member of Parliament for so many years, the provision of district surgeons lies within the mandate of the Department of Heath. The Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 provides for the integrated approach to the implementation of the National Policy Framework (NPF) which will provide the much needed guidance on service levels expected of the different role players in managing sexual offences. The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DoJCD) has initiated the development of the NPF which includes operational policy guidelines and will propose measures intended to promote integrated, comprehensive and cross-departmental responses to sexual offences. This will be informed by coordinating the existing fragmented guidelines. Thus, there will be alignment and synergies created between the different departmental guidelines which exist in relation to services provided to victims of sexual offences.

    Furthermore, the National Prosecution Authority (NPA) has piloted the Thuthuzela Care Centres (TCCs) which are aimed at ensuring that there are available, appropriately trained personnel, including medical examiners to deal with all victims of rape (sexual offences). Further details on the TCCs are attached in Annexure A.

    aa) The issue of specialized courts was considered at length by the Department. From the information available at our disposal, concerns were raised about the manner in which cases involving sexual offences were dealt with in the dedicated courts and in the 'normal' courts. The Department noted that more resources were allocated to the dedicated courts than in the 'normal' courts. This raises serious concerns because of the differences in outcomes that were observed. It became clear that cases of victims of sexual offences were not receiving the same treatment in the courts. Those cases that were prosecuted in the dedicated courts were likely to result in a conviction than those prosecuted in the 'normal' courts. Whilst the high conviction rate of dedicated courts serves the administration of justice well, it is important that government ensures that all sexual offences result in a conviction. Therefore, government needs to put more effort in ensuring that all prosecutors and magistrates undergo specialized training on sexual offences. It is important that resources in all courts are allocated evenly so that other victims of crime of a sexual nature receive appropriate care and attention.

    bb) The DoJCD is also in the process of developing a policy discussion document with regard to mainstreaming/integration of sexual offences courts. This policy will be discussed and workshopped with relevant stakeholders.

    (2) Whether courts have an intermediary service for child rape victims; if not; in which courts do child rape victims appear together with the perpetrator; if so, what are the relevant details in each case in respect of each court concerned;

    Section 170A of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that where the court is of the opinion that a child witness under the age of 18 would be exposed to undue mental stress or suffering if he or she testifies in court, the court may appoint a competent person to act as an intermediary in order to enable the child witness to give evidence through the intermediary.

    There are approximately 203 intermediaries appointed countrywide by the DoJCD, the National Prosecution Authority (NPA), the Department of Social Development (DSD) and Non-Governmental Organisations.

    National audit of Intermediary in the Regions

    Province

    Number of Intermediaries

    Justice Contract Appointments

    Other (Social Development, Ad Hoc, NPA & NGO Appointments)

    Kwa- Zulu Natal

    17

    11

    6

    Limpopo

    10

    4

    6

    Northwest

    11

    5

    6

    Free State

    30

    15

    15

    Northern Cape

    14

    4

    10

    Gauteng

    25

    6

    19

    Eastern Cape

    44

    3

    39

    Western Cape

    27

    10

    17

    Mpumalanga

    25

    2

    23

    TOTAL

    203

    60

    141

    In order to avoid a situation where a child witness has to give evidence in the same court room with the alleged perpetrator, Closed Circuit Televisions (CCTVs) and One Way Mirrors are installed in the special sexual offences courts and dedicated courts. There are approximately 193 courts with CCTVs and 78 with one-way mirrors.

    (3) Whether his department provides psychosocial support for rape victims; if not; why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    The Department of Social Development is responsible for providing psychosocial support for rape victims and it is proposed that the Honourable Member approach that Department for further information.

    (4) Whether the redeployment of Child Protection Units has hampered National Prosecuting Authority service delivery; if so, how;

    The closing of the SAPS specialized units has not had a significant impact on the prosecution of sexual offences cases brought before the courts. As indicated in part (aa) above, sexual offences are prosecuted in a dedicated sexual offences court (referred to as a Sexual Offences Court) and in the Regional Courts. At all material times the prosecution, in either court, conducts a thorough prosecution based on the evidence provided. The conviction rate in the dedicated courts remains high because of the specialists skills of the prosecutors. They Department therefore supports the continued specialization by prosecutors and magistrates dealing with sexual offences. This will ensure that we maintain a good conviction rate at all times.

    (5) Whether he will take any steps to amend and improve the laws governing child rape cases; if not; why not; if so, what steps?

    The coming into effect of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 (the Act) on the 16th December 2007 is aimed at addressing, in a comprehensive manner, the rights of victims of sexual offences. The Act has provisions specifically aimed at protecting children and the mentally disabled.

    Section 42 of the Act provides for the establishment of the National Register of Sexual Offenders (NRSO). This requires the creation of a register with details of persons convicted of sexual offences or alleged to have committed sexual offences against a child or mentally disabled person. The Act further requires employers to obtain a certificate from the Registrar of the NRSO detailing whether or not; an employee who applies or is employed to work with children, has been convicted or alleged to have committed a sexual offence against a child or mentally disturbed child. This provision prevents children from exposure to sexual predators. A process has been initiated for the establishment of the National Register of Sexual Offenders (NRSO) in conjunction with the South African Police Service (SAPS).

    PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION NO 1828

    ANNEXURE A

    The Thuthuzela Care Centre (TCC) seeks to introduce a victim centered approach in a manner that allows for reporting of the crime and initial interventions in rape cases to be shifted away from police stations to a victim-friendly centre situated within a hospital. In this way, the victim is in a position to receive assistance from medical staff, investigating officers and counselors all in one place. The aim is for the TTC`s to be a "one-stop-centre" of rape care management, also providing for follow-up medical treatment, counseling and communication with the victim regarding the progress of the case.

    There are currently 10 TCC's located nationally, established to a large extent with donor funding.

    An evaluation study on the implementation of the TTC's revealed that the concept of survivors being comforted and supported is good in practice and ensures in a reduction in secondary victimization. The UN General Assembly has recognized the 'Thuthuzela model' of multidisciplinary care centers as a 'world best practice model' in the field of gender violence management response.

    Victim Assistant Officers, Site Coordinators and Case-flow Managers are attached to the centre with all role-players including NGO's readily available. The TCC model entails, that:

    a) A trained counselor/Victim Assistant offers initial containment and support to the child where-after the victim is examined by a specially trained medical doctor or forensic nurse. Both these medical practitioners should have received extensive training on inter alia, sexual assault examination, rape care management, post exposure prophylaxis and criminal trial exposure.

    b) After the examination the child is given an opportunity to bathe or shower and is then provided with clean clothing as well as refreshments and or meals.

    The TCC-approach has not been implemented in all areas where sexual offences cases against children are heard although the concept is being rolled out throughout the country.

    QUESTION 1830

    FOR WRITTEN REPLY

    Date of publication on internal question paper: 24 October 2008

    Internal question paper no: 32

    Mr I E Jenner (ID) to ask the Minister of Social Development:

    (1) Whether a national strategy has been drawn up for the implementation of the Children's Act, Act 38 of 2005, if not, when will it be done; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (2) Whether poor communities who require prevention and early intervention services have been identified in each province as required by the said Act; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (3) What is the current level of funding being given by Government to non-government organisations and Community Based Organisations working in the children's sector and what are the relevant details;

    (4) Whether Government will increase this level of funding; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW2622E

    REPLY:

    1. Yes, the Department is in the process of finalizing a national implementation plan to implement the Children's Act.

    The implementation plan focuses on the inter-sectoral collaboration efforts which bind all organs of state and civil society structures to form a partnership in implementing the Act. The implementation plan is still in a draft form and will be finalized in January 2009 after consultation with other national and provincial departments, as well as the national Non-Government Organisations (NGOs).

    The content of the implementation plan addresses the following:

    - Situational analysis.

    - Demand for services vs existing services.

    - Existing personnel.

    - Expenditure on services to children.

    - Priorities.

    The following priority areas were agreed upon nationally:

    - Services to children as wards of the state.

    - Services to children in need of care and protection.

    - Services to children in Early Childhood Development Programmes.

    - Management processes.

    - Human Resources.

    - Infra-structure.

    2. Yes, provinces identified the following poor communities that require prevention and early intervention services. These areas will be confirmed in the final draft of the implementation plans of the provinces:

    Mpumalanga

    Ehlanzeni district:

    Mbombela, Nkomazi, Bushbuckridge, Thaba Chweu and Umjindi.

    Gert Sibande district:

    Albert Luthuli, Dipaleseng, Govan Mbeki, Lekwa, Mkhondo, Msukaligwa and Pixley Ka Seme.

    Nkangala district:

    Delmas, Dr J.S. Moroka, Emakhazeni, Emalahleni, Steve Tshwete and Thembisile.

    North West

    Mafikeng extension 2, Rustenburg, Delareyville, Ganyesa, Setlagole, Christiana, Huhudi, Schweizer- Reneke, Taung, Moretele, Kgetleng, Stillfontein, Potchefstroom and Orkney.

    Municipalities in North West are as follows:

    Moretele, Kgetleng and Moses Kotane, Ditsobotla, Mafikeng, Ramotshere Moilwa, Ratlou, Tswaing, Kagisano, Taung, Matlosane, Maquasie Hills, Merafong, Potchefstroom and Ventersdorp.

    It should be noted that 75% of North West province is predominantly poor hence all the areas are included here.

    Gauteng

    Attridgeville, Boipatong, Bophelong, Daveyton, Duduza, Kagiso, Katlehong, Khutsong, Kwa-Thema, Mamelodi, Mohlakeng, Munsieville, Rantanda, Refilwe, Rethabiseng, Saulsville, Soshanguve, Soweto, Tembisa and Wattville.

    Free State

    Thabomufutsanyane and Xhariep.

    KwaZulu-Natal

    Ugu, Umkhanyakude, and Zululand.

    The following urban areas have been identified as poor communities:

    Inanda, Nuzuma and Kwamashu.

    Western Cape

    Bishop Lavis, Delft, Elsies River, Cedarberg, Matzikama, Beaufort West, Manenberg, Gugulethu, Nyanga, Hanover Park, Kannaland, Oudtshoorn, Khayelitsha, Kleinvlei, Phillippi, Mitchell's Plain, Muizenberg, Paarl, Theewaterskloof, Vredenburg and Witzenberg.

    Eastern Cape

    Nyandeni, Qaukeni, Ngqushwa, Mbhashe, Mnquma, Intsika yethu, Ngcobo, Elundini, Mzimvubu, Ntabankulu and Mbizana.

    Northern Cape

    Namaqua district:

    Poffader, Port Nolloth, Garies, Calvinia and Steinkops.

    Francis baard district:

    Fitchie,Greenpoint,Roodepan,Transiet Camp,Phuthanang,Plaatfontein,Club 2000, Donkerhoek, Jan Kempdorp, Hartswater, Pampierstad, Warrenton, Barley West, Longlands, GongGong, Griekstad, Koopmansfontein, Oliefontein, Douglas, Soutlake, Campbell and Smithdrift.

    Pixley kaseme district:

    De Aar, Colesburg and Carnavon.

    Kgalagadi district:

    Seobing village, Olifantshoek and Dithakgong.

    Limpopo

    Sekhukhune, Mopani and Vhembe.

    Prevention and early intervention services rendered in poor communities include the following:

    · Preventing the neglect, exploitation, abuse or inadequate supervision of children and preventing other failures in the family environment to meet children's needs.

    · Preventing the recurrence of problems in the family environment that may harm children or adversely affect their development.

    · Avoiding the removal of a child from the family environment.

    · Assisting and empowering families to obtain services such as social assistance.

    · Supporting and assisting families with a chronically ill or terminally ill family member.

    · Early childhood development.

    · Support to orphans and child headed households.

    3. The current level of funding being given by Government to Non-Government Organizations and Community Based Organisations working in the children's sector is as follows:

    The national department is funding eighteen (18) national bodies to the amount of R8 574 000 for the financial year 2008/09.

    The funding by provincial departments differs from province to province. Provinces are funding NGOs who deliver social work intervention and statutory services to children and their families. The NGO's applications for funding are costed in terms of a set of criteria based on provincial priorities, information from their business plans and audited statements.

    The level of funding can be estimated at approximately 65% of the NGOs budget and provision is made for annual increases.

    4. Yes, Government intends to increase the level of funding to service providers.

    The report on the Costing of the Children's Act has indicated that services to children are underfunded; as a result provincial departments have been requested to increase their funding to NGO's. This has already been effected in the allocation of funding to NGO's managing Child and Youth Care Centres and Early Childhood Development sites.

    In addition, government is currently implementing the Policy on Financial Awards to fund service providers. The aim of the Policy is to provide guidance on funding of service providers and to transfer the payments to them.

    The intention of the Department is to review current policies that govern the partnership between government and civil society organizations to facilitate optimal service delivery. Currently the Department is also developing norms and standards for welfare services, to make it possible for the sector to improve its understanding of the nature of resources that are required to deliver services. It is expected that having norms and standards will revolutionalize the funding of welfare services in this country and this could bring an end to the chronic underfunding of NGOs.

    QUESTION NUMBER 1831

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: 24 OCTOBER 2008 MR L W GREYLING (ID) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF FINANCE:

    (1) How much tax revenue is currently derived from alcohol sales;

    (2) whether this revenue will be directed towards alcohol rehabilitation programmes; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? N2623E

    REPLY:

    (1) Specific excise tax revenue derived from alcohol sales:

    2007/08

    2008/09

    R millions

    Actual Audited outcome

    Estimate as at 2008 MTBPS

    Actual to end Sep 2008 (six months)

    Beer

    5 142

    5 640

    2 433

    Sorghum beer

    35

    40

    19

    Wine

    1 254

    1 365

    516

    Spirits

    2 364

    2 630

    1 111

    TOTAL

    8 795

    9 675

    4 079

    (2) There is no direct or explicit earmarking of excise tax revenue. The above-mentioned revenue flows to government's National Revenue Fund, from where it is allocated to general government expenditure programmes. As such, alcohol excise tax revenue, together with other general government revenue, indirectly forms part of meritorious expenditure programmes aimed at addressing the health and social impact of alcohol abuse. Allocations for such interventions are on the budgets of the Departments of Health and Social Development.

    QUESTION NO 1832

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 32/2008)

    Date reply submitted: 12 December 2008

    Mr M H Hoosen (ID) to ask the Minister of Safety and Security:

    (1) Whether the Government is considering the adoption of an action plan for implementing the recommendations emanating from the report of the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (2) (a) what training programmes are there for the police in ensuring that they conform to a human rights culture and (b) what measures will he take to combat violence currently exhibited by police officials?

    NW2624E

    REPLY:

    (1) The recommendations from the Report on the Study of the Violent Nature of Crime in South Africa will be presented to the JCPS Cluster Ministers for discussion and will serve as part of the Cluster's Plan of Action on approval by Cabinet.

    (2)(a) Since 1994, human rights have been comprehensively covered in the Basic Police Training course. In each review of the Basic Training Learning Programme since 1994, human rights were specifically provided for in various modules.

    A dedicated programme, Human Rights and Policing, is presented to SAPS members. The content of the programme has recently been reviewed and the new revised version is currently being implemented.

    Human rights are incorporated in Module 5 of the Station Management Learning Programme, which is a compulsory course for all Station Commissioners.


    Human rights are addressed as a cross-cutting topic in all operational courses dealing with victims, complainants, suspects, colleagues, arrested persons, use of force, etc.

    Specific human rights are also addressed in various other courses presented to SAPS members, eg the Victim Empowerment Course, Youth and Children at Risk Learning Programme and the Domestic Violence Course.

    (2)(b) The following measures will be taken to combat unwarranted violence displayed by police officials:

    - Constant formal, informal and in-service training at all levels of the organization to instill a culture of human rights among all police officials

    - Proper command and control, especially at operational level, to ensure that instructions and regulations are carried out

    - Strict, consistent and decisive disciplinary action in cases where laws and rules are transgressed

    - Immediate criminal prosecution when warranted.

    QUESTION NO 1833

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 32/2008)

    Date reply submitted: 20 November 2008

    Mr M H Hoosen (ID) to ask the Minister of Safety and Security:

    How many crimes were committed in the past 12 months up to the latest specified date for which information is available, where firearms (a) were used, (b) were brandished or (c) formed part of the crime?

    NW2625E

    REPLY:

    1 January to 31 December 2007.

    (a) 87 614

    (b) 14 592

    (c) 102 206. (Total of the figures for (a) and (b) above added together.)

    QUESTION NO 1835


    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 32)

    Mr M M Swathe (DA) to ask the Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry:

    Whether the (a) Bushbuckridge and (b) Ikangala Water Boards have been disestablished; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

    NW2627E

    ---00O00---

    REPLY:

    (a) Bushbuckridge Water Board

    The Department has recently undertaken a study to investigate the future role of water boards and other water institutions like Catchment Management Agencies (CMA's) under a project called Institutional Re-alignment Project. The aim of this investigation is to restructure and rationalize the number of water institutions for the department to play more effective oversight role. Restructuring these institutions must also improve efficiency in service delivery and more importantly affordability of water to the customers. The Bushbuckridge water board's future role is also being investigated in the above context. Regarding the future of the Bushbuckridge Water Board will be guided by outcome of this study.

    (b) Inkangala Water Board

    The Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry took a decision to disestablish Inkangala Water Board due to major problems it was experiencing in its operations. The final disestablishment anticipated for completion by 30 November 2008. The Water Boards assets will be taken over by the Director-General until the new regional entity is in place to take them over.

    QUESTION NO 1836

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 32)

    Mr M M Swathe (DA) to ask the Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry:

    (1) Whether there are any plans in place in respect of the Inkangala Water Board staff whose term expired in December 2007; if not, why not; if so, what plans;

    (2) whether any of these staff members have been seconded to municipalities; if so, (a) to which municipalities and (b) to what positions;

    (3) whether there are any plans in place to pay the moneys owed to auditing companies and for the rental of offices; if not, why not; if so, (a) who will pay the outstanding debt and (b) when;

    (4) what will happen to the water board's assets?

    NW2628E

    ---00O00---

    REPLY:

    (1) Yes; a plan is in place to transfer Inkangala Water Board staff to Department's Bronkhorstspruit office with effect from 1 December 2008. The staff is still working in Inkangala Water Board and salaries are paid.

    (2) None have been seconded to Municipalities.

    (a) Four staff members have been absorbed within the Department's Mpumalanga Regional office structure and establishment.

    (b) Maintaining their original positions as stated below:

    No

    Names

    Positions

    1.

    Ms R P Mthimunye

    Accountant

    2.

    Ms C S Sibiya

    Executive Secretary

    3.

    Ms N M Kgosana

    Administration Clerk/ Receptionist

    4.

    Ms R M Xaba

    Cleaner

    (3) Yes; settlement costs for termination of contracts have been discussed with all the creditors and total cost of R1 294 973, 44 will have to be paid. The remaining assets of the board have been gazetted.

    a) Thereafter, the Department's Director-General will settle all outstanding debts and take over the ownership of assets; and

    b) Our target date is 30 November 2008.

    (4) The Water Boards assets will be taken over by the Director-General until further decisions are made with regard to water management entities.

    Question 1837 (Written Reply) Friday, 24 October 2008

    Mr LK JOUBERT (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS

    How many new job opportunities were created through the Expanded Public Works Programme in each of the past five years up to the latest specified date for which information is available? NW2629E

    REPLY

    Number of Work opportunities created through EPWP from April 2004 – June 2008.

    Sector

    5-yr Targets

    Job Opportunities created

    Infrastructure

    750 000

    685 694

    Economic

    12 000

    14 133

    Environment and culture

    200 000

    386 366

    Social

    150 000

    142 223

    Overall

    1 112 000

    1 228 416

    QUESTION NO 1838

    DATE REPLY SUBMITTED: TUESDAY, 02 DECEMBER 2008

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: FRIDAY, 24 OCTOBER 2008 (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 32 – 2008)

    Mr L K Joubert (DA) asked the Minister of Transport:

    For each of the past five years up to the latest specified date for which information is available, how much has been invested by (a) the Government and (b) state-owned enterprises for the improvement of (i) roads, (ii) railways and (iii) air transport?

    NW2630E

    REPLY:

    The Minister of Transport:

    (a) Government

    2004/05

    R'000

    2005/06

    R'000

    2006/07

    R'000

    2007/08

    R'000

    2008/09

    R'000

    (i)

    Roads

    Local Government:

    Metro roads infrastructure

    1,626,169

    1,440,655

    1,571,748

    2,502,567

    2,890,456

    Metro roads maintenance

    1,004,415

    958,771

    929,524

    1,130,383

    1,303,726

    Secondary cities road infrastructure

    469,072

    534,386

    651,408

    962,303

    1,121,392

    Secondary cities road maintenance

    240,277

    260,554

    338,656

    363,703

    359,459

    Total Local Government

    3,339,933

    3,194,366

    3,491,336

    4,958,956

    5,675,033

    Provincial Government:

    Eastern Cape

    1,282,252

    1,352,575

    1,473,542

    1,606,268

    1,556,158

    Free State

    320,522

    331,655

    799,096

    748,151

    978,198

    Gauteng

    436,853

    550,201

    577,101

    1,022,791

    1,401,161

    KwaZulu-Natal

    1,235,766

    1,576,042

    1,782,736

    2,281,429

    2,866,788

    Limpopo

    952,449

    1,152,058

    1,138,906

    1,480,389

    1,425,371

    Mpumalanga

    597,811

    722,561

    687,234

    992,880

    1,013,166

    North West

    392,977

    599,680

    683,958

    669,838

    704,952

    Northern Cape

    185,902

    175,672

    235,063

    370,307

    417,922

    Western Cape

    662,693

    946,839

    1,266,027

    1,325,653

    1,353,506

    Total Provincial Government

    6,067,225

    7,407,283

    8,643,663

    10,497,706

    11,717,222

    (ii)

    Railways – since the 2004/05 up to the 2008/09 financial years, Government has invested as follows in the passenger rail sector:-

    R605,000

    R688,003

    R1,208,000

    R2,172,000

    R2,577,000

    (iii)

    Air Transport

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    (b) State-owned Enterprises

    The South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)

    Toll: Direct Spending on Roads

    (i)

    Roads

    2003/2004

    R'000

    2004/2005

    R'000

    2005/2006

    R'000

    2006/2007

    R'000

    2007/2008

    R'000

    Routine Maintenance

    188,077

    193,641

    202,952

    277,496

    321,726

    Periodic Maintenance

    71,061

    110,855

    104,057

    82,556

    16,635

    Special Maintenance

    -

    -

    29,845

    56,416

    2,473

    Opex

    259,138

    304,496

    336,854

    416,468

    340,834

    Strengthening

    108,473

    2,478

    4,245

    8,777

    98,381

    Improvements

    140,266

    42,188

    12,146

    65,712

    530,813

    New Facilities

    89,654

    11,769

    2,270

    110,581

    164,118

    Capex

    338,393

    56,435

    18,661

    185,070

    793,312

    The South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)

    Non-Toll: Direct Spending on Roads

    (i)

    Roads

    2003/2004

    R'000

    2004/2005

    R'000

    2005/2006

    R'000

    2006/2007

    R'000

    2007/2008

    R'000

    Routine Maintenance

    216,280

    392,085

    764,804

    693,988

    672,818

    Periodic Maintenance

    155,742

    151,122

    324,160

    503,228

    683,513

    Special Maintenance

    122,725

    110,669

    120,276

    151,024

    118,801

    Opex

    494,747

    653,876

    1,209,240

    1,348,240

    1,475,132

    Strengthening

    394,193

    222,750

    288,210

    503,336

    886,375

    Improvements

    77,548

    49,446

    98,651

    291,293

    570,631

    New Facilities

    79,963

    64,792

    49,543

    110,975

    132,851

    Capex

    551,704

    336,988

    436,404

    905,604

    1,589,857

    The South African Rail Commuter Corporation Limited (SARCC)

    (ii)

    Railways

    2003/2004

    R'000

    2004/2005

    R'000

    2005/2006

    R'000

    2006/2007

    R'000

    2007/2008

    R'000

    Opex

    1,678,840

    1,715,910

    1,619,466

    2,751,274

    2,259,119

    Capex

    665,000

    782,640

    980,247

    1,029,598

    1,696,078

    PTIS

    -

    -

    -

    179,000

    476,000

    The Airports Company South Africa Limited (ACSA)

    (iii)

    Air Transport

    2003/2004

    R'000

    2004/2005

    R'000

    2005/2006

    R'000

    20062007

    R'000

    20072008

    R'000

    Capex

    473,462

    491,783

    1,259,355

    1,642,259

    5,171,839

    The Air Traffic and Navigation Services Company Limited (ATNS)

    ATNS has since 2003 renewed, improved and extended the national infrastructure related aeronautical communication, navigation, surveillance and air traffic management systems and in so doing has met the demands placed on it by the air traffic movement growth experienced over the period and also achieved the operational objectives set at that time.

    The Capital investments associated with all infrastructure projects can be summarized as follows:-

    (iii)

    Air Transport

    2003/2004

    R'000

    2004/2005

    R'000

    2005/2006

    R'000

    2006/2007

    R'000

    2007/2008

    R'000

    Capex

    149,400,000

    105,433,887

    131,974,155

    218,657,566

    236,324,281

    QUESTION 1839

    1839. Mr L K Joubert (DA) to ask the Minister of Labour:

    Whether unemployment has been reduced since 2004 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if not, why not; if so, to what extent?

    REPLY: The Minister of Labour replied:

    According to the Labour Force Survey unemployment levels declined from 4 611 000 in March 2004 to 4 191 000 in March 2008, representing adecline of about 9.1% (i.e. 420 000. The official rate of unemployment has also been going down from 27.8% in March 2004 to 23.5% in March 2008.

    QUESTION NO.: 1840

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    Mr G R Morgan (DA) to ask the Minister for Public Enterprises:

    (a)(i) What is the expected total cost of the environmental impact assessment process for Nuclear 1 and (ii) what is the breakdown of the figure and (b)(i) what is the expected total cost of the environmental impact assessment process for the demonstration power plant of the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor and (ii) what is the breakdown of the figure?

    NW2632E

    REPLY

    (a)(i) The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Nuclear-1 project is expected to cost approximately R 18.0 million. The Scoping Phase of this EIA investigated five (5) different sites. The detailed Impact Assessment phase of this EIA is currently being undertaken on three (3) of the original 5 sites.

    (ii) Different activities are undertaken at different times during the full EIA process; for example the public participation takes place throughout the process, some of the specialist studies commence early in the process and continue into the detailed assessment phase, whereas other specialist studies are only performed in the second phase of the project. The final reconciliation of costs to each component of the full EIA process will thus only be possible once the EIA has been completed.

    (b)(i) The EIA for the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor(PBMR)project is expected to cost approximately R 6.5 million. The Scoping Phase of this EIA investigated four (4) different sites. The detailed Impact Assessment phase of this EIA was undertaken on the preferred site (Koeberg).

    (ii) The final reconciliation of costs to each component of the full EIA process will thus only be possible once the EIA has been completed.

    QUESTION NO 1842

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 24 OCTOBER 2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 32/2008)

    Date reply submitted: 12 December 2008

    Mr M Waters (DA) to ask the Minister of Safety and Security:

    (1) Whether the police service members of the Edenvale Police Station were called out to the Sizwe Hospital (a)(i) in 2005, (ii) in 2006 and (iii) in 2007 and (b) during the period 1 January 2008 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if so, (i) how many times in each year or period and (ii) what were the reasons for the call-out in each case;

    (2) whether the police members are provided with face masks and gloves when they are called out to the Sizwe Hospital; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (3) whether his department is obliged in terms of any Act or regulation to provide the police service members with face masks and gloves; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (4) why is the Sandringham Police Station not responsible for the Sizwe Hospital, given their close proximity and the fact that both the Sandringham Police Station and the Sizwe Hospital fall within the Johannesburg Metro area?

    NW2634E

    REPLY:

    (1) (a)(i) No

    (ii) No

    (iii) No

    (1) (b) No

    (i) Not applicable.

    (ii) Not applicable.

    (2) The police members at Edenvale SAPS do have access to face masks and gloves at their station.


    (3) In terms of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 85 of 1993, Sizwe Hospital will provide members with the above equipment if they are called out because they are not allowed to enter the hospital without this essential equipment.

    (4) Sandringham SAPS is not responsible for the Sizwe Hospital because of the demarcation of station boundaries.

    QUESTION 1844

    DATE OF PUBLICATION OF INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER 24/10/2008
    (INTERNAL QESTION PAPER 32-2008)

    Mrs D van der Walt (DA) to ask the Minister of Education:


    (1) In respect of each province, (a) how many public schools are there, (b) how many of these schools do not have (i) classrooms, (ii) toilets (iii) fences, (c) how many posts for (i) maths and (ii) science teachers are vacant, (d) how many such teachers are needed to meet the current demand, (e) how much has her department spent to produce such teachers in each of the past fours years up to the latest specified date for which information is available and (f) what is the current teacher/ pupil ratio in public schools in each province,
    (2) whether this figure improved in comparison to the same in 2004, if not, why not, if so, what are the relevant details? NW2636E

    REPLY

    1(a)

    Table 1: Number of public schools

    Provinces

    Schools

    Eastern Cape

    5,686

    Free State

    1,614

    Gauteng

    1,989

    KwaZulu-Natal

    5,783

    Limpopo

    4,023

    Mpumalanga

    1,873

    North West

    1,730

    Northern Cape

    602

    Western Cape

    1,451

    Total

    24,751

    Source: EMIS School Realities, 2008

    1 (b) (i)

    Table 2: Number of schools using facilities of other schools, as at 29 July 2008.






























    Source: NEIMS

    1 (b) (ii)

    Table 3: Operational schools without sanitation facilities, as at 29 July 2008

    Province

    Schools

    Eastern Cape

    527

    Free State

    55

    Gauteng

    6

    KwaZulu-Natal

    169

    Limpopo

    75

    Mpumalanga

    72

    North West

    73

    Northern Cape

    5

    Western Cape

    22

    Total

    1,004

    Source: NEIMS
    Note: These schools also include the platoon schools. These schools will be provided with sanitation either by provincial education departments or the DWAF programme.

    1 (b) (iii)

    Table 4: Operational schools without fencing or fencing in poor condition, as at 29 July 2008.

    Province

    Schools

    Eastern Cape

    1,132

    Free State

    146

    Gauteng

    64

    KwaZulu-Natal

    359

    Limpopo

    364

    Mpumalanga

    407

    North West

    125

    Northern Cape

    18

    Western Cape

    108

    Total

    2,723

    Source: NEIMS

    1 (c & d) I refer the Honourable Member to the answers I have already provided to questions NA 1560 (12 September 2008), NA 849 (30 May 2008), and NCOP 6 (26 February 2008).

    1 (e)

    Table 5: Funza Lushaka bursars and costs :

    Year

    Bursars

    Rands

    2007

    3,360

    110 528 265

    2008

    4,974

    164 466 668

    1(f)

    Table 6: Teacher/pupil ratio in public schools

    Province

    Learner-Educator Ratio (Teacher/Pupil Ratio)

    State-paid and SGB-paid educators

    State-paid educators

    Eastern Cape

    31.7

    33.5

    Free State

    28.9

    30.4

    Gauteng

    32.4

    36.4

    KwaZulu-Natal

    32.5

    34.5

    Limpopo

    31.2

    32.1

    Mpumalanga

    31.6

    33.0

    North West

    29.8

    31.4

    Northern Cape

    29.8

    31.7

    Western Cape

    30.0

    35.7

    National

    31.4

    33.7

    Source: EMIS School Realities 2008

    2.

    Table 7: Projects completed by provincial departments from 2005 to July 2008.

    Province

    Number of classrooms completed

    Schools provided with sanitation

    Schools provided with fences

    Eastern Cape

    412

    396

    101

    Free State

    132

    197

    6

    Gauteng

    199

    33

    24

    KwaZulu-Natal

    4,818

    1,158

    101

    Limpopo

    3,494

    1,672

    17

    Mpumalanga

    657

    1,178

    4

    North West

    975

    261

    124

    Northern Cape

    92

    20

    5

    Western Cape

    1,122

    65

    32

    Total

    11,901

    4,980

    414

    Source: NEIMS
    Note: Since 2007 DWAF has provided another 67 schools with sanitation. The EU donor programme has also funded 141 new classrooms, sanitation for 27 schools and fencing for 9 schools.

    Table 8: The teacher/pupil ratio in public schools in each province in 2005

    Province

    Learner Educator Ratio (Teacher/Pupil Ratio)

    State-Paid and SGB

    -Paid Educators

    State-Paid Educators

    Eastern Cape

    33.0

    34.8

    Free State

    29.4

    30.6

    Gauteng

    31.6

    36.7

    KwaZulu-Natal

    34.3

    36.7

    Limpopo

    34.1

    34.7

    Mpumalanga

    33.5

    35.4

    North West

    31.1

    32.4

    Northern Cape

    31.9

    34.2

    Western Cape

    31.5

    37.2

    National

    32.8

    35.2

    Source: EMIS School Realities 2005.
    Note: In 2005 the teacher/learner ratio in public schools was 35.2, while the current teacher/learner ratio in public schools is 33.7. This translates into 15,582 additional educators. There were 362,478 state-paid educators in public schools in 2005, while in 2008 there are 378,060 state-paid educators.

    QUESTION 1846

    DATE OF PUBLICATION OF INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER 24/10/2008

    (INTERNAL QESTION PAPER 32-2008)

    Mr GR Morgan (DA) to ask the Minister of Education:

    (1) Whether her department is investigating the incident that occurred on 17 September 2008 at Xolobeni Junior Secondary School where members of the SA Police Service are alleged to have administered corporal punishment to learners; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details,

    (2) whether the principal of the school will be removed if he/she is found to have been complicit in the incident; if not, why not; if so, what are relevant details;

    (3) whether her department will offer counselling services to the affected learners, if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (4) whether she will visit the school to assure learners that the matter is being dealt with and it will not recur; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW2638E

    REPLY:

    (1) The Eastern Cape Education Department's preliminary report indicates that there are differences of fact and opinion in the statements made by the members of SAPS and the principal of the school. SAPS members say they searched for dangerous weapons and in the process forced those who resisted against the wall. The principal says the learners were beaten because they were violent and did not take instructions from him. The provincial authorities are conducting further investigations.

    (2) The principal will be removed if he is found to be in contravention of the relevant legislation governing educators and schools.

    (3) The Department will offer counselling services if there is a need to do so. However, a circuit manager visited the school on 24 October 2008 where she had an open session with the learners. There were no indications of traumatized learners unless they were absent from school on that day.

    (4) I have delegated officials to visit the school.

    QUESTION NO 1847

    DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 21 NOVEMBER 2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 32/2008)

    Date reply submitted: 12 December 2008

    Mr G R Morgan (DA) to ask the Minister of Safety and Security:

    (1) Whether the Independent Complaints Directorate are investigating the incident that occurred on 17 September 2008 at a certain school (name furnished) where members of the SA Police Service (SAPS) are alleged to have administered corporal punishment to learners; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (2) Whether action will be taken against any SAPS members who have been found to have administered corporal punishment to the learners; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (3) Whether action will be taken against the station commissioner under whom the above SAPS members serve; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (4) Whether he will publicly condemn the actions of the SAPS members; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

    NW2639E

    REPLY

    (1) The ICD conducted investigations into the alleged assault of pupils on 17 September 2008 at Xholobeni Junior Secondary School. The investigation confirmed that the principal summoned the help of the police stationed at Mpisi Police Station after the pupils were allegedly unruly and had howled at him when he banned the charging of mobile phones using the school's solar powered energy. It is alleged that three members of the aforesaid station proceeded to the school where they conducted a search on the pupils. The search yielded mobile phones and chargers. It is further alleged that the three members ordered the pupils to line along the wall with their hands high against the wall. It was during this time that corporal punishment was allegedly administered.

    (2) The ICD has made recommendations to the Senior Public Prosecutor to take action against members involved on charges of assault and at the same time made recommendations to SAPS management for disciplinary action against the said members.

    (3) Nothing implicates the involvement of the station commissioner in the alleged incident.

    (4) The investigation on the matter has not yet been concluded

    QUESTION 1849

    DATE OF PUBLICATION OF INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER 24/10/2008

    (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER 32-2008)

    Ms M Smuts (DA) to ask the Minister of Education:

    (i) In respect of each province (a) what is the total number of (i) public schools as defined in the South African Schools Act, Act 84 of 1996 and (ii) Further education and training institutions as defined in the Further Education and Training Act, Act 98 of 1998 and (b) how many (i) public schools and (ii) FET institutions have computer laboratories or facilities for learners, (aa) with (bb) without internet connection,

    (2) Whether any schools are making use of the facilities or assistance of Sentech (Pty) Ltd or the Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa (USAASA); if not, why not; if so, which school in each province?

    (3) Whether she has taken any steps to (??) electronic communications by these schools and institutions; if not, why not; if so, what steps? NW2641E

    REPLY:

    (1)

    Table 1: Schools with computer laboratories and internet connections

    Public Schools

    FET Colleges

    Total Number

    24 751

    50

    Institutions with computer laboratories or facilities for Teaching and Learning

    3 366

    50

    Institutions with Internet Connections

    1 768

    50

    (There is a mix of campuses/college that have internet, and data is not available for those that do not)

    (2) Only 3 schools in South Africa currently receive services from Sentech (Pty). Mpumalanga has procured the services of Sentech (VSAT) to connect all secondary and combined schools (525) in the province. No implementation has yet taken place. In 2007/8 the Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa (USAASA) provided 241 computer laboratories/cyberlabs in schools. The majority of these schools are in under-serviced areas. USAASA is currently installing 20 computer laboratories/cyberlabs as part of the APEX 3 Project (FOSAD ISAD Dinaledi Connectivity Project).

    (3) We communicate with schools, teachers and learners both through the post and digitally. In particular, we make use of the Thutong portal (www.thutong.org.za) to communicate with schools, teachers and learners on various topics, for example, matric examinations.

    Additional information

    Table 1: Data on provincial distribution of ICT facilities

    Province

    Total number of Schools

    Number of schools with computer rooms 1

    Number of schools with Internet connectivity2

    Number of schools with electronic communication abilities3

    EC

    5686

    275

    72

    784

    FS

    1614

    290

    199

    219

    GT

    1989

    668

    374

    1601

    KZN

    5783

    583

    239

    247

    LP

    4023

    237

    24

    171

    MP

    1873

    119

    31

    952

    NC

    1730

    286

    92

    200

    NW

    602

    265

    17

    600

    WC

    1451

    643

    720

    720

    Total

    24751

    3366

    1768

    5494

    1 EMIS 2008 Annual survey of schools

    2 ICT in Education Audit conducted by SITA 2007/8

    3 Provincial Departments of Education, as supplied to National for 2007/8

    Table 2: SENTECH in Schools

    Province

    Total number of Schools

    Number of schools that are making use of SENTECH services4

    Notes

    EC

    5686

    1

    NEPAD e-School from the ORACLE Consortium

    FS

    1614

    1

    NEPAD e-School from the ORACLE Consortium

    GT

    1989

    0

    Gauteng OnLine (GOL) schools were serviced through a 3-year contract with Sentech. The contract was not renewed. GOL's connectivity has subsequently been placed in a bigger Gauteng network by GSSC that made use of iBurst.

    KZN

    5783

    1

    A project school installed by the DOC as part of their Cyberlab project

    LP

    4023

    0

    MP

    1873

    525

    Mpumalanga has procured the services of SENTECH VSAT to connect all secondary and combined schools in the province. No implementation has yet taken place.

    NC

    1730

    0

    NW

    602

    0

    WC

    1451

    0

    Total

    24751

    3 (+525)

    4 Information provided by ICT Provincial Representatives on the ICT Inter-Provincial Working Group

    Table 3: USAASA in schools

    Province

    Total number of Schools

    Number of schools that have facilities provided by USAASA5

    EC

    5686

    41

    FS

    1614

    20

    GT

    1989

    2

    KZN

    5783

    43

    LP

    4023

    36

    MP

    1873

    37

    NC

    1730

    23

    NW

    602

    29

    WC

    1451

    10

    Total

    24751

    241

    5 Information provided by USAASA

    QUESTION NO: 1850

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: 31 October 2008

    QUESTION PAPER NO: 29

    DATE OF REPLY: 3 December 2008

    Ms M Smuts (DA) to ask the Minister of Communications:

    How many (a) public schools, (b) further education and training institutions and (c) independent schools and institutions as defined in section 88 of the Electronic Communications Act, Act 36 of 2005, have (i) applied for, (ii) been offered and (iii) received subsidies from the Universal Service and Access Fund?

    NW2642E

    REPLY:

    I have been advised by USAASA as follows:-

    Herewith a list of the number of Public Schools, per Province, with Computer Labs and Internet Connectivity which is being subsidised by USAASA through the Universal Service and Access Fund:

    Province

    Computer Labs

    With Internet

    Without Internet

    Limpopo

    36

    16

    20

    Mpumalanga

    36

    10

    26

    Gauteng

    2

    2

    0

    North West

    29

    3

    26

    Free State

    17

    5

    12

    Kwazulu-Natal

    40

    16

    24

    Eastern Cape

    42

    23

    19

    Western Cape

    8

    6

    2

    Northern Cape

    23

    8

    15

    TOTAL

    233

    89

    144

    Herewith a list of the number of Further Education and Training Institutions (FETs), per Province, that do have Internet Connectivity which is being subsidised by USAASA through the Universal Service and Access Fund in partnership with DoC and ISSET SETA. These institutions already have computer labs, which were not subsidised through the Universal Service and Access Fund:

    Province

    Internet Connectivity

    Limpopo

    2

    Mpumalanga

    2

    Gauteng

    2

    North West

    2

    Free State

    2

    Kwazulu-Natal

    2

    Eastern Cape

    2

    Western Cape

    2

    Northern Cape

    2

    TOTAL

    18

    In the 2007/08 financial year, USAASA signed agreements with three (3) operators (WBS, MTN and Cell C) to pay for connectivity at schools through the e-Rate system.

    WBS indicated that they have connected forty (40) schools, of which USAASA has paid for seven (12) [7 in Gauteng and 5 in North West].

    MTN and Cell C have not indicated to USAASA the number of schools they have connected. MTN however did indicate plans to connect fifty (50) schools in the current financial year.

    USAASA currently has ten (10) requests for computer labs from schools. These are going through internal processes. As part of the Dinaledi Programme, USAASA will deploy twenty (20) new computer labs, concentrated in the province of North West.